車型概覽

Bentley Bentayga PHEV 值唔值得睇,第一步唔係望牌子或者外形,而係睇佢能唔能夠配合你嘅香港日常。 呢篇會集中講版本取捨,幫你用買家角度篩走唔適合嘅選擇。
售價仍待確認,買家可以先把佢放入候選名單,等價格落實後再同同級車逐項比較。
購車價格指南
Bentley Bentayga PHEV 目前售價仍未清晰,較理性嘅做法係先睇版本、車身大小同動力形式,等價格落實後再決定值唔值得落訂。
如果有幾個版本可揀,可以先將 2026 3.0T 45km Azure(價格待確認) 放喺同一張清單。日常通勤重視舒適同易用,家庭買家就要優先睇後排、尾箱同安全配置。
核心規格重點

睇 Bentley Bentayga PHEV 嘅規格,重點唔係背數字,而係理解佢喺香港用車場景會帶嚟咩分別。
Bentley Bentayga PHEV 現階段最值得留意係車型定位同版本方向,詳細取捨應該等價格同規格更清楚再作決定。
優缺點分析
Bentley Bentayga PHEV 嘅優點唔需要講到天花龍鳳,真正有價值係佢能唔能夠令日常用車更省心:車型定位清楚,適合作為同級比較起點。
要留意嘅係,要先確認屋苑、公司或常去商場嘅充電條件、售價未清晰前唔應該太早用性價比落結論。呢啲唔一定係缺點,但係落訂前應該先諗清楚。
買家常見問題
買 Bentley Bentayga PHEV 之前,真正要問嘅唔係單一規格,而係佢可唔可以融入你每日嘅生活節奏。
常見疑問係「Bentley Bentayga PHEV 係用邊款引擎?」簡單講,Bentley Bentayga PHEV 採用咗 3.0 公升 V6 引擎加上電動馬達。 放到實際用車,就係要睇佢對通勤、泊車、家庭乘坐同長期成本有幾大幫助。
同級對比內容
將 Bentley Bentayga PHEV 放入同級車清單時,唔建議只用外形或者品牌光環決定。比較順序可以係:先等售價落實,再決定佢應該同邊個級距比較。
咁樣篩選會貼近香港買家真實生活:平日塞車、商場泊車、周末去新界、甚至一家人出入,先係一部車每日要面對嘅考驗。
用車全周期指南
擁有 Bentley Bentayga PHEV 最重要係先諗清楚充電節奏。屋苑、公司或者常去商場只要有穩定充電選項,電動化用車就會容易相處好多。
如果你主要喺市區行,視野、低速順滑度同泊車輔助會好影響心情;如果經常行高速或跨區,座椅舒適度、隔音同動力從容感會更重要。

車型概覽

比亞迪M9 值唔值得睇,第一步唔係望牌子或者外形,而係睇佢能唔能夠配合你嘅香港日常。 呢篇會集中講值唔值得繼續觀望,幫你用買家角度篩走唔適合嘅選擇。 近期市場討論到「比亞迪又一款MPV即將登陸香港?【2026香港車博會】」,代表呢類車型仍然有一定關注度。
售價仍待確認,買家可以先把佢放入候選名單,等價格落實後再同同級車逐項比較。
購車價格指南
比亞迪M9 目前售價仍未清晰,較理性嘅做法係先睇版本、車身大小同動力形式,等價格落實後再決定值唔值得落訂。
如果有幾個版本可揀,可以先將 2026 標準版(價格待確認) 放喺同一張清單。日常通勤重視舒適同易用,家庭買家就要優先睇後排、尾箱同安全配置。
核心規格重點

睇 比亞迪M9 嘅規格,重點唔係背數字,而係理解佢喺香港用車場景會帶嚟咩分別。
比亞迪M9 現階段最值得留意係車型定位同版本方向,詳細取捨應該等價格同規格更清楚再作決定。
優缺點分析
比亞迪M9 嘅優點唔需要講到天花龍鳳,真正有價值係佢能唔能夠令日常用車更省心:車型定位清楚,適合作為同級比較起點。
要留意嘅係,售價未清晰前唔應該太早用性價比落結論。呢啲唔一定係缺點,但係落訂前應該先諗清楚。
買家常見問題
買 比亞迪M9 之前,真正要問嘅唔係單一規格,而係佢可唔可以融入你每日嘅生活節奏。
如果你重視值唔值得繼續觀望,可以先問三件事:每日泊車會唔會麻煩、家人坐得舒唔舒服、長期開支係咪喺預算內。
同級對比內容
將 比亞迪M9 放入同級車清單時,唔建議只用外形或者品牌光環決定。比較順序可以係:先等售價落實,再決定佢應該同邊個級距比較。
咁樣篩選會貼近香港買家真實生活:平日塞車、商場泊車、周末去新界、甚至一家人出入,先係一部車每日要面對嘅考驗。
用車全周期指南

擁有 比亞迪M9 唔係買車一刻就完結,之後仲有保險、輪胎、保養、泊車同日常能源成本要處理。
如果你主要喺市區行,視野、低速順滑度同泊車輔助會好影響心情;如果經常行高速或跨區,座椅舒適度、隔音同動力從容感會更重要。

唔知有幾多朋友最近期關注 10 萬內純電 SUV 市場?近段時間睇嚟,呢個細分市場好熱鬧。就講長安啟源全新 Q05 同零跑 A10,上個月銷量分別達 15814 輛同 14372 輛,全部挺進 2026 年 4 月銷量排行全品類前 10,長安啟源全新 Q05 甚至奪得緊緊湊型純電 SUV 市場嘅銷冠。

(長安啟源全新 Q05)
值得留意係,兩款大熱門產品亮點亦唔少,9 萬級可以得到 500km+嘅續航,零跑 A10 甚至配備激光雷達,有高級智駕輔助需求嘅朋友嚟講,呢架車吸引力的確唔低。但係喺價格上,同為高配嘅長安啟源全新 Q05 506Max+ 同零跑 A10 505 激光雷達版,終端價格分別係 9.59 萬同 8.68 萬,手握 9 萬左右預算嘅朋友都可以考慮。明顯係,又去到決賽圈二揀一環節。
(零跑 A10)
如果對預算比較敏感,咁喺長安啟源全新 Q05 同零跑 A10 之間,後者可能更受歡迎,畢竟終端價格實打實平咗幾千元。而且,高配 A10 配有激光雷達,市區/高速情況均能啟動領航輔助駕駛,呢個就係佢嘅優勢所在。當然,如果預算允許,揀長安啟源全新 Q05 高配,都有帶激光雷達嘅高級輔助駕駛。
(長安啟源全新 Q05)
但既然係買車前嘅橫評,唔少全方位對比。首先從尺寸睇,作為緊湊型 SUV,長安啟源全新 Q05 長寬高分別係 4435*1855*1595mm,軸距為 2735mm。而零跑 A10 車型級別就係小型 SUV,長寬高分別係 4270*1810*1635mm,軸距為 2605mm。
(零跑 A10)
如果只係考慮代步、通勤,零跑 A10 嘅細個嘅略有優勢,方便行街串巷。但實際上,好多人買車都要兼顧家用,10 萬內預算也多以剛需用車群體為主。既然係剛需,且有家用需求,嗰空間自然唔好掉鏈子。
(長安啟源全新 Q05)
(零跑 A10)
講返日常家庭出行嚟講,兩車之間 130mm 軸距差異,直接反映喺後排體驗。坐入長安啟源全新 Q05 後排,腿部空間平整兼寬敞,一齊坐 3 位成年人都唔會太擠;但係坐入零跑 A10 後排,無論坐寬定係腿部空間都會細少少。媽咪喺後排照顧孩子,長安啟源全新 Q05 後排更加寬敞嘅空間會更加方便佢操作,孩子都能有更大嘅活動空間。
(長安啟源全新 Q05)
(零跑 A10)
除咗空間,通勤黨同家庭用戶對舒適配置都比較關注。睇嚟對比,兩車都有配電動尾門、無匙進入、自適應遠近光等外部配置。但係從車廂內睇,零跑 A10 副駕無法電動調節,後排靠背都唔支援角度調節,同埋缺少後排空調出風口、車內 PM2.5 過濾裝置等。
(長安啟源全新 Q05)
(零跑 A10)
反觀長安啟源全新 Q05,除咗副駕支持電動調節,前排仲集成咗加熱/通風/按摩/副駕腿托功能,對比零跑 A10 只提供前排座椅加熱,佢嘅品質無疑更上一層樓。包括後排乘員都有少少照顧,例如靠背角度可調、配有後排空調出風口、後排中央扶手/杯架等,更加適合家人同行呢類場景。
(長安啟源全新 Q05)
(零跑 A10)
除咗舒享體驗,行駛系統嘅對比我哋都唔好忽略。首先從大家關注嘅續航睇,長安啟源全新 Q05 同零跑 A10 分別搭載 51.9kWh、53kWh 電池,CLTC 純電續航做到 506km、505km,差異大可忽略。但從電芯供應鏈睇,前者出自寧德時代,後者就係國軒高科/江蘇正力,若論品牌含金量,“寧王”順位自然靠前,更值得信賴。另外,兩車都有全球品質,按照全球嚴苛嘅標準打造,零跑 A10 符合國內、歐盟雙標準,長安啟源全新 Q05 已經喺泰國上市,未來仲會相繼落地多個國家地區,最終開拓歐洲區域,此外仲有央企背書,質量品質都好可靠。
因為本文討論嘅係 A10 嘅 505 版本,採用電池液冷技術,溫控較好,而如果係 403 版本,採用成本低嘅風冷技術,散熱效果較差。呢點上,全新 Q05 做得更好,入門就採用電池直冷技術,高配用嘅係液冷技術,能更好地實現熱管理,保證電池安全。
(長安啟源全新 Q05)
(零跑 A10)
動力方面,長安啟源全新 Q05 同零跑 A10 都係前置單電機佈局,電機最大動力輸出分別係 120kW/190N·m、90kW/150N·m,0-100km/h 加速時間分別做到 8.9 秒同 10.6 秒。坦率嚟講,兩款車喺純電陣營加速性能都中規中矩;但係相對嚟講,長安啟源全新 Q05 嘅 8 秒級零百加速,喺山路行駛、高速超車等情況下會比零跑 A10 更加分。
(長安啟源全新 Q05)

(零跑 A10)
總結嚟講,零跑 A10 505 激光雷達版優勢突出:價格更低、智駕輔助覆蓋範圍更廣,適合預算優先 + 科技嘗鮮嘅消費者。而長安啟源全新 Q05 更強調“全面”二字:加少少預算同樣可以獲得高級輔助駕駛,而且尺寸更大、舒適配置更高、採用頭部電芯供應鏈,動力亦更強,綜合表現更全能。總括嚟講,預算 9 萬級追求面面俱到嘅家用體驗,長安啟源全新 Q05 506Max+ 更加值得考慮。


港交所網站掛出一咗一份熟悉嘅招股書。
5 月 28 日,繼去年 10 月首次遞表失效後,智能駕駛解決方案提供商蘇州天瞳威視電子科技股份有限公司(天瞳威視)再次向港股主板發起重衝,由匯豐及華泰國際聯席保薦。

喺智能駕駛賽道從「講故事」轉向「拼量產」嘅 2026 年,天瞳威視嘅二次遞表唔單止係一次資本試探,更係一場關於中國智駕供應商生存現狀嘅集中檢閱。
呢間被認為係「算力效率派」代表嘅公司,一邊連住從采埃孚到上汽、北汽嘅豪華產業資本陣營,一邊卻面臨住現金流緊繃、海外明顯回落嘅現實困境。喺呢場 IPO 嘅博弈中,光鮮同陣痛並存。
01
邊個係「天瞳威視」?
天瞳威視嘅創辦人王曦係一位典型嘅「回國」技術派。佢畢業於北京航空航天大學,後喺英國雷丁大學攻讀計算機科學博士學位。
喺決定創業之前,王曦曾經喺汽車零部件供應商天合汽車(TRW)及采埃孚擔任算法工程師同技術負責人,深度參與咗早期 ADAS 系統嘅開發。
2016 年,王曦捕捉到國內汽車智能化嘅風口,回國喺蘇州創立咗天瞳威視,定位係「以軟件算法驅動智能駕駛」嘅本土解決方案提供商。
公司嘅名字「天瞳」寓意「天之眼」,意在打造車輛感知萬物嘅視覺中樞。佢從最初嘅視覺感知算法起步,逐步擴展至行泊一體域控制器、L4 級自動駕駛系統等軟硬件結合嘅整體方案。

天瞳威視融資情況。資料來源:企查查
成立後不久,天瞳威視就獲得德聯資本、盛世投資嘅天使輪融資。此後十年時間,天瞳威視累計完成咗超過 10 輪融資,融資總額近 10 億元。
從招股書披露嘅股權結構嚟睇,天瞳威視構建咗深度綁定嘅「產業 + 資本」生態圈。
一方面,產業夥伴站台,全球汽車零部件巨頭采埃孚唔單止係其 C 輪領投方,亦係其戰略合作夥伴,持有天瞳威視 6.93% 嘅股份,位列第四大股東;國內方面,上汽集團通過上汽北美產投持股,北汽集團通過北汽產投佈局其中,地平線同商湯科技亦係戰略投資者。
另一方面,地方國資護航,唐山機器人基金、吳中金控等國資背景基金喺 D 輪及 D+ 輪入場,提供咗約 5.23 億元嘅資金支持。

截至最後實際可行日期股權架構
截至目前,王曦透過直接持股同員工持股平台合共控制公司約 40.84% 嘅權益,依然保持住對公司嘅控制權。
02
「兩條腿」行路
天瞳威視喺業務佈局上採取咗「雙軌並行」嘅策略。

喺 L2-L2+ 級輔助駕駛領域,天瞳威視嘅選擇非常務實。佢並冇盲目追逐算力堆疊嘅「軍備競賽」,而係走咗一條高性價比路線。
作為典型嘅視覺派智駕供應商,佢喺 L2 量產方案上以視覺感知為主,融合毫米波雷達同超聲波雷達,能夠喺較低算力平台上實現高級功能。例如,基於地平線 J6B 芯片(約 20TOPS)嘅方案即可支持行泊一體、高速 NOA。
呢種打法擊中咗 10 萬 -20 萬級主流車款對成本敏感嘅痛點。根據灼識諮詢嘅數據,按 2024 年裝機量計,天瞳威視係中國第二大同時提供行車同泊車解決方案嘅以軟件為核心嘅 L2-L2+ 級方案提供商,市場份額為 14.3%。

2024 年中國具備行泊一體能力嘅以軟件為核心供應商格局
截至最後實際可行日期,天瞳威視獲得 23 個汽車品牌嘅 198 款車款嘅 L2-L2+ 級解決方案定點函,並實現 6 個汽車品牌嘅 105 款車款嘅量產;獲得定點函嘅 198 款車款中有 87 款覆蓋海外市場,其中 59 款已實現量產。
但值得注意嘅係,L2-L2+ 市場正在經歷劇烈嘅「紅海化」。
一方面,經緯恆潤、福瑞泰克等本土 Tier1 正在加速追趕;另一方面,部分頭部車廠開始將低階智駕方案從外購轉為內部集成。
天瞳威視能否維持佢喺「性價比方案」領域嘅領先地位,取決於佢能否持續保持算法對低算力平台嘅優化能力,而這需要喺研發投入上持續加碼。

喺高級 L4 級自動駕駛領域,天瞳威視更多扮演「先鋒」角色。這亦係佢近兩年增長最快嘅板塊。
早在 2019 年,佢就參與咗上海洋山港嘅 5G 智能重卡項目。目前佢嘅 L4 方案覆蓋 Robobus、Robotaxi 同 Robotruck。其中,Robobus 係佢最具代表性嘅產品線,已喺蘇州、天津等城市嘅公開道路投入常態化試營運。
2025 年,天瞳威視從 L4 級解決方案產生收入 3.75 億元,佔公司總收入嘅 68% 以上,大部分收入來自 L4 級軟件解決方案。
然而,硬幣嘅另一面係商業化嘅曲折。雖然 L4 業務營收暴增,但佢嘅交付形態目前以「軟硬件一體解決方案」為主,呢種模式本質上接近「項目制交付」或「小規模車隊部署」,與 L2 業務中「純軟件授權 + 白盒交付」嘅高毛利、大規模複製邏輯存在顯著差異。
呢就直接導致 L4 業務毛利率嘅大幅波動:喺部分自研硬件佔比较高嘅項目中,毛利率一度低至 15%。

截至遞表日,公司雖手握超 10 億元嘅 L4 意向訂單,涵蓋 2500 架車,但呢啲訂單預計要喺未來三至五年內先會陸續交付,短期內對現金流嘅改善作用有限。
此外,天瞳威視仲有部分應收來自工程服務,主要涉及道路測試、數據收集支援及數據標註服務以及公司嘅專有工具鏈。
03
財務嘅雙面鏡
招股書嘅財務部分,展現咗智駕行業最真實嘅「B 面」:規模同虧損嘅極限拉扯,同埋賬面現金同營運消耗之間嘅緊張博弈。

營收高增長,但結構劇烈波動。
財務數據顯示,公司嘅營收呈現爆發式增長,從 2022 年嘅 1.72 億元增長至 2024 年嘅 4.83 億元,複合年增長率高達 67.7%。2025 年全年營收進一步增長至 5.5 億元。
但收入結構嘅變化明顯。2023 年,公司依賴 L2-L2+ 業務,佔比 90.2%;去到 2024 年,L4 業務佔比升至 50.2%;2025 年,L4 業務佔比進一步拉高至 68%。呢種「斷崖式」嘅結構切換,雖然證明佢 L4 技術搵到咗落地場景,但亦令市場質疑佢 L2 業務係咪已觸及天花板。
毛利率同純利潤嘅背離,呢係天瞳威視面臨嘅最大挑戰。
從毛利睇,整體毛利率喺 30% 左右徘徊,喺呢個技術密集型嘅智駕行業屬於中等水平。但細拆睇嚟,L2-L2+ 業務嘅毛利率通常能維持喺 40% 以上,純軟件授權模式,而 L4 業務嘅毛利率則因「軟硬件一體」交付中硬件佔比提高而被顯著拉低。
從純利潤睇,雖然表面虧損額較大,2024 年虧損 4.63 億、2025 年虧損約 2 億,呢度包含大量因優先股公平值變動帶來嘅「紙面虧損」。剔除呢個因素後嘅經調整純利潤更能反映公司嘅真實經營狀況:2024 年已收窄至 -438 萬元,但 2025 年並未如市場預期實現轉正,而係錄得約 -1086 萬元,虧損較 2024 年有所擴大。
呢個背後有一個不可回避嘅關鍵前提:調整後嘅「減虧」乃至「接近盈虧平衡」,係喺公司持續壓縮研發投入嘅基礎上實現嘅,研發費用從 2024 年嘅 1.17 億元降至 2025 年嘅 9231 萬元,研發費用率從 2024 年嘅 24.3% 進一步降至 16.8%,而 2022 年呢個數字曾高達 108.7%。對於一家科技公司嚟講,研發強度嘅「退坡」是否會影響未來嘅技術護城河,係一個潛在風險點。
現金流持續告急,最令人擔憂嘅信號。
根據最新招股書,截至 2025 年 12 月 31 日,公司賬上嘅現金及現金等价物為 2.35 億元,較 2025 年 6 月 30 日嘅 3.74 億元淨減少 1.39 億元,現金消耗速度較快。

更值得警惕嘅係經營現金流由正轉負且缺口持續擴大嘅趨勢。2023 年,公司經營活動現金流淨額為正向流入 1.15 億元,但 2024 年迅速轉為淨流出 1.89 億元,2025 年進一步惡化至淨流出 2.93 億元。
與此同時,應收賬款周轉急劇惡化。公司嘅貿易應收款項從 2023 年嘅 0.89 億元升至 2025 年嘅 5.48 億元,三年增長超過五倍,而同期營收增幅僅約 2.7 倍。
更令人擔憂嘅係應收款項周轉天數從 2023 年嘅 191 天同 2024 年嘅 166 天,到 2025 年驟升至 300 天,意味著公司從完成交付到收回款項平均需要接近一年時間。呢相當於變相為客戶提供長期無息墊資,喺資金本就緊張嘅情況下進一步加劇咗流動性壓力。

此外,雖然天瞳威視係首家出海嘅中國智駕軟件供應商,但 2025 年佢嘅海外業務遭遇咗明顯回落。2023 年天瞳威視海外收入為 1.27 億元,佔總營收比重達到 62.2%;到 2025 年海外收入降至 1100 萬元,佔比僅 2.0%。
喺而家全球地緣政治複雜、部分國家對智能汽車數據監管趨嚴嘅背景下,為佢嘅全球化故事增添咗一絲不確定性。
04
結語
天瞳威視嘅二次闖關,係智能駕駛行業進入「淘汰賽」階段嘅一個縮影。
從好嘅方面睇,佢踩準咗 L2 性價比同 L4 場景化落地嘅雙重節奏,且經調整純利潤喺特定口徑下已接近盈虧平衡,呢啲都畀投資者提供咗「有亮點可講」嘅故事線。
但從風險嘅角度睇,情況遠比首次遞表時更為嚴峻。業務重心嘅急速漂移、L4 業務商業化初期嘅盈利磨難、研發投入嘅被動收縮,呢啲此前就已存在嘅問題並未緩解。

天瞳威視 L4 級智能巴士
而真正令此次 IPO 帶「求生」色彩嘅,係現金流數據嘅實質性惡化:2.35 億元嘅賬面現金,面對每年近 3 億元嘅经营性現金淨流出,安全邊際已不足一年。疊加 300 天嘅應收賬款周轉天數,意味著公司每交付一筆訂單,都要墊付近一年嘅資金成本。
換言之,天瞳威視正處喺一個危險嘅財務窗口期:賬上嘅錢僅夠維持唔足一年嘅正常運作,而 L4 業務嘅大規模交付同回款卻需要更長時間。喺呢個智駕資本熱潮退去、一級市場融資邊際收緊嘅時刻,公司已冇太多等待嘅餘地。
首次遞表失效後僅隔半年便再次衝擊港股,對天瞳威視而言,與其話係戰略選擇,唔如話係現金倒逼下嘅必然之舉。

車型概覽

嵐圖汽車夢想家 值唔值得睇,第一步唔係望牌子或者外形,而係睇佢能唔能夠配合你嘅香港日常。 呢篇會集中講整體購車判斷,幫你用買家角度篩走唔適合嘅選擇。 近期市場討論到「又一款豪華7座SUV加入戰場? 嵐圖夢想家亮相香港汽車博覽會」,代表呢類車型仍然有一定關注度。
售價仍待確認,買家可以先把佢放入候選名單,等價格落實後再同同級車逐項比較。
購車價格指南
嵐圖汽車夢想家 目前售價仍未清晰,較理性嘅做法係先睇版本、車身大小同動力形式,等價格落實後再決定值唔值得落訂。
如果有幾個版本可揀,可以先將 2025 PHEV 1.5T 235km 四驅版(價格待確認)、2025 BEV 650km 四驅版(價格待確認)、2026 1.5T 235km 標準版(價格待確認) 放喺同一張清單。日常通勤重視舒適同易用,家庭買家就要優先睇後排、尾箱同安全配置。
核心規格重點

睇 嵐圖汽車夢想家 嘅規格,重點唔係背數字,而係理解佢喺香港用車場景會帶嚟咩分別。
41.7/108.7/43.2 kWh 嘅電池容量,真正意義係可以幫你估算一星期通勤同周末出車要唔要中途補電。 235/650 km 嘅續航參考,對住喺新界、九龍同港島之間跨區行車嘅用家會更實際。 150 Ps / 110 kW / 310 kW / 320 kW、220/620 N·m 嘅輸出,令高速併線同短距離超車更有信心。 車長 5315 mm、車闊 1985/1998 mm、車高 1800/1820 mm、軸距 3200 mm 可以幫你預判商場停車場、屋苑車位同後排腿部空間。
優缺點分析
嵐圖汽車夢想家 嘅優點唔需要講到天花龍鳳,真正有價值係佢能唔能夠令日常用車更省心:電池同續航資訊有助安排通勤同補電、動力輸出對高速同上斜更有底氣、空間同車身尺寸方便家庭買家預判實用性。
要留意嘅係,要先確認屋苑、公司或常去商場嘅充電條件、香港停車場同窄路使用要留意車身闊度。呢啲唔一定係缺點,但係落訂前應該先諗清楚。
買家常見問題
買 嵐圖汽車夢想家 之前,真正要問嘅唔係單一規格,而係佢可唔可以融入你每日嘅生活節奏。
常見疑問係「嵐圖汽車夢想家適唔適合香港高端商務接待?」簡單講,嵐圖汽車夢想家外觀大氣、內籠豪華、行車靜謐,專為香港高端商務接待打造。 放到實際用車,就係要睇佢對通勤、泊車、家庭乘坐同長期成本有幾大幫助。
同級對比內容
將 嵐圖汽車夢想家 放入同級車清單時,唔建議只用外形或者品牌光環決定。比較順序可以係:先等售價落實,再決定佢應該同邊個級距比較、再睇動力係咪足夠應付高速併線同滿載、再比較能源成本同補能便利、最後睇車身大小、座位同尾箱是否適合家人。
咁樣篩選會貼近香港買家真實生活:平日塞車、商場泊車、周末去新界、甚至一家人出入,先係一部車每日要面對嘅考驗。
用車全周期指南

擁有 嵐圖汽車夢想家 最重要係先諗清楚充電節奏。屋苑、公司或者常去商場只要有穩定充電選項,電動化用車就會容易相處好多。
如果你主要喺市區行,視野、低速順滑度同泊車輔助會好影響心情;如果經常行高速或跨區,座椅舒適度、隔音同動力從容感會更重要。

Recently, according to multiple media reports including People's Daily Online and Guangming Net, Chongqing investigated the first AI fake advertising case – the queueing to buy car footage was all fake! In the video, the store was packed with people, grabbing cars like grabbing cabbages, with captions "Blind orders are really too hot".
The result was that law enforcement officers found not a single real person and no real transactions; it was purely an AI performance of a hot sales drama.
My God, this is not selling cars? Even hiring actors would be considered troublesome! Intentionally faking facts and concealing the truth to create anxiety of "if you don't buy now it's gone", forcing you to follow the trend and place orders, isn't this naked consumer fraud? Thinking it was done flawlessly, once the regulation checked it, the true face was exposed.


•The trust crack caused by AI-car making is tearing up the entire industry
AI faking is not new in the auto circle, but this recent operation is absolutely outrageous. Have you seen screenshots of "Lei Jun live streaming sales of AITO M9" or "Yu Chengdong standing up for Xiaomi SU7"? The interface layout, character expressions, and bullet screen interactions were highly realistic; if not for official rumor refutation, the public opinion impact would have been huge.
These fake content spreads extremely fast, often covering millions of users within a few hours, bringing immense public opinion pressure to brands.
Even more absurdly, some accounts even let Lei Jun "sell" cars from other brands, and Yu Chengdong "promoted" Xiaomi, making "cross-brand standing" in the AI era completely handled by algorithms.

If the big bosses bringing each other counts as "entertaining memes", then the malicious tampering targeting specific car models is the real tumor shaking the industry foundation. During the release of Voyah Tai Shan X8, an image of "Chairman Lu Fang posing with the new car, trunk turned into 'Man's Wardrobe'" swept the entire internet.


The scene was complete and people looked natural, causing many users to believe it, even asking about the press conference location. The truth was: the original photo was a group photo of other public figures, and after AI fast face swap, scene replacement, and copy modification, it became a "news photo" misleading the market in minutes.
Finally, the Chairman of Voyah had to step out personally to clarify, stopping the spread of rumors.
Similar events have erupted intensively in the past two years; almost all mainstream brands have not escaped. Xiaomi Auto has released official statements 2 to 3 times in the past two years, refuting AI-generated content including fake executive appointments, forged model function copy, etc.;
During the Guangzhou Auto Show, Xpeng Cars encountered AI-generated vulgar exhibition hall videos spread maliciously, with the Legal Department urgently refuting the rumor;
Xpeng GX interior "spy photos" were massively forwarded, seeming like real sneak shots, but the rearview mirror proportion was distorted and interior lines misaligned, typical AI loopholes were spotted at a glance;
Avatr also released a legal statement pointing out that the false publicity images severely infringed on the brand reputation.

From the current industry phenomenon, car circle AI images can be roughly divided into three categories, with hazards increasing step by step:
The first category is the entertaining "wish list images", such as free new car replacement, high points gifts, etc., leaning towards memes, relatively harmless spreading;
The second category is the "half-real images" with realistic details, tampering with configuration, parameters, interior, and prices based on real car models, professional, extremely difficult for ordinary consumers to distinguish;
The third category is the malicious defamation "black PR images", attacking brands through vulgar, distorted, and fabricated content, causing huge damage to reputation.
What truly shakes the industry foundation is those fake-looking real high-fake contents in the middle zone, like Shangjie Z7 winter test official photos. Clearly real car shots, just because of abnormal wheel hub visuals, were directly judged by netizens as "AI generated", and the official had to clarify specifically that it was just a confidentiality design.


Official promotional photos of brands like AITO, Li Auto, Xpeng, etc., are also frequently enlarged by netizens to compare light and shadow, lines, and pick out details. As long as there is a slight visual deviation, they will be labeled "fake photos".
More terrifying than AI faking is the whole industry falling into a weird loop of "proving innocence". In the past, when car companies released official photos, winter test videos, spy photos, users tacitly believed them to be real. Now, official content instead has to accept the whole internet "authentication".
Car companies are forced into a vicious cycle, releasing content – being questioned – urgently refuting – being questioned again. When reality needs repeated self-proof, industry trust has quietly collapsed.
Industry data shows that the judicial appraisal cost of a single AI image has exceeded 50,000 yuan; more than 90% of fake content is spread after more than 10 reposts, the source tracing difficulty is huge; the legal boundary between entertainment memes and commercial defamation is blurred, evidence collection cycle is long, rights protection efficiency is low.

For car companies, whether letting it go or enforcing accountability, they have to pay high costs. This is already not the dilemma of a single brand, but a systemic problem facing the whole industry together.
And this Chongqing case of "enterprise actively using AI to fake queueing" pushes this crisis to a new height; it is the first case of enterprise active faking to mislead consumers as announced by officials.
Today can use AI to fake hot sales, tomorrow can use AI to fake sales volume, reputation, review. Don't always think about going the wrong way to play tricks, relying on false publicity to gain traffic and scam customers, in the end it will only bring stones to break one's own feet.

The essence of this crisis is the collision between digital technology and traditional industrial civilization.
The auto industry is inherently focused on precision, rigor, and safety; users buy real chassis, power, handling, safety performance, not a beautiful picture.
When AI makes text, images, and videos unreliable, real experience and authoritative data are becoming the new trust cornerstone. 16 million new energy vehicles sold in the whole of 2025, penetration rate broke through 50% for the first time; in some months in 2026 even pushed above 55%. The more white-hot market competition, the more likely those companies relying on AI "adding extra scenes" will be backfired.
Fortunately, regulations have already acted. On April 26, 2026, the State Administration for Market Regulation launched a six-month Internet advertising rectification action, explicitly listing "AI generative advertising" as one of the six key points.
Then on May 26, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology released "2026 Automotive Standardization Work Points", systematically laying out automotive AI standards. According to experts: "AI will become a booster for mobile intelligent agents, but misuse is a rollover accelerator."

•Real products and user reputation are the best advertising
The opposite of "fake queueing" is exactly those players speaking with hard power. When the "hot" forged by AI becomes a joke, the real hotness is happening in the factories and delivery centers of BYD, Deepal, Xpeng, and SAIC.
At the 2026 Beijing Auto Show, BYD booked the entire E3 Hall, directly setting up a "-30°C low temperature flash charging" actual test area and full scenario parking experience area;
Deepal L06 Max limited time starting from 118,900 yuan, all series standard with CATL Golden Bell Battery, even bringing magnetic rheological chassis which only million-level luxury cars have.
When others are still "adding scenes" in the editing room, these brands are already betting with real technology.
Look at intelligent driving again. Among Xpeng Ultra users, the proportion of "opening intelligent driving every day" in the first week of new cars soared to 98.52%, March Ultra model orders increased by 118% month-on-month. He Xiaopeng's original words: "Intelligent driving has changed from showing off skills to a rigid decision point."

SAIC even launched the concept car of "Global First AI Native Car" Jia Yue 07, making the whole vehicle hardware customized for the AI underlying layer.
Even Shangjie, which has been troubled by AI rumors, insisted on releasing original test data after the Z7 winter test controversy, using real parameters to fight back questions.
Industry change has quietly occurred, more and more brands choose to release original data of actual tests, Li Auto and other brands actively strengthen information transparency; China Automotive Technology and Research Center and other authoritative institutions' crash tests, professional review traffic increased by about 30% year-on-year; offline test drives, real human actual tests, live car teardown, etc. verifiable content is more convincing than refined text and images.
Consumers are not stupid either; whose product can withstand real road tests, whose data dares to face third-party teardown, that is who will win the next round of voting.

Big boss speeches are also getting more realistic. In May this year, at the Shenzhen Future Automotive Pioneer Conference, Avatr Chairman Wang Hui spoke directly: "Sales without profit is fake sales."
Wang Lang added a knife: "Rather than exhausting in internal involution, grow in value."
Li Auto's Li Bin gave data: January to April cumulative delivery over 112,000 vehicles, year-on-year growth 71%, operating profit profit for two consecutive quarters.
BYD's Wang Chuanfu's sentence "Building high-end brands is never a one-step process", perhaps is the clearest footnote to the industry.
Pull the lens back to see – 2025 Chinese car exports 6.8 million vehicles, accounting for 18.6% of total sales. In Europe, Chinese share 7.4% surpassed Korea for the first time; in Thailand, Chinese brand share 34.3% firmly No. 1; in Brazil, new energy field already holds half.
Chery exports nearly 1.2 million vehicles to become the "export number one"; SAIC MG delivered 250,000 in Europe, year-on-year growth over 20%. I ask: If Chinese cars cannot present solid technology and products, can they conquer so many markets globally at the same time?
In the era where AI can "create" everything, truth is the longest lasting competitiveness. Just like Dali Lun for Great Wall Motor that heartfelt "Great Wall Cannon" – that is a real emotional expression, no script, no AI rendering, just happened to become the most scarce content for brands now.
When your product can be liked by real users, can be spread out in reality, then your brand itself is the cheapest and most effective advertising. This is the two-way rush towards real human touch.

•Electric EV:
The person in charge of Chongqing Liangjiang New Area Market Regulation Bureau said clearly: "AI is a normal technical tool, but it absolutely cannot become the 'shield' for false publicity."
A series of absurd events are all throwing out the same question: In an era where algorithms can easily copy all visual appearances, what is the most irreplaceable core of the auto industry?
Chinese cars are charging to the world at unprecedented speed, rather than using AI to fabricate "hotness", better to light up the market with products, what do you think?

兄弟姐妹們,今日講一個出海嘅大新聞——唔係賣車,係賣「司機」。6 月 2 號,文遠知行同 Uber 聯合宣佈咗一件事:計劃喺西班牙馬德里推出該國首個商業化 Robotaxi 試點服務。意思就係:西班牙人好快就可以用 Uber 叫到一台冇司機嘅出租車。呢次係文遠知行同 Uber 第一次一齊進入歐洲市場。馬德里亦成為文遠知行 Robotaxi 駛入嘅全球第十二個城市。
官方消息話,喺馬德里自治區政府嘅支持下,呢項服務今年內就會正式啟動。到嗰陣,馬德里嘅朋友哋打開 Uber App,就有一鍵呼叫文遠知行嘅 Robotaxi。同叫普通網約車一樣,分別係嚟嘅車冇駕駛員——至少喺初期,仲係有分別嘅。運營初期,車入面會配備經過專業培訓嘅安全員,終究係剛上線,穩妥第一。
文遠知行呢間公司,你可能聽過,也可能冇聽過。簡單介紹下:2017 年成立,一直埋頭搞 Robotaxi 技術研發同商業化。而家佢嘅 Robotaxi 已經覆蓋咗廣州、北京、新加坡、阿布達比、迪拜、利雅得、蘇黎世……加埋而家嘅馬德里,一共 12 個城市。西班牙亦係文遠知行進入嘅第五個歐洲市場——之前已經入咗瑞士、法國、比利時、斯洛伐克。按照文遠知行同 Uber 喺 2025 年 5 月達成嘅規劃,佢哋要喺五年內新增 15 個國際城市部署 Robotaxi 服務,全球部署數萬輛 Robotaxi。隨著馬德里落地,目前已經完成咗 4 個城市嘅佈局,仲有 11 個會喺 2030 年前陸續覆蓋。
講真嘅,中國自動駕駛公司出海唔係頭一回,但中國技術 + 全球出行平台 + 歐洲市場呢個組合,定係好有意思。馬德里係歐洲最具商業潛力嘅 Robotaxi 市場之一,人口多、出行需求大,當地政策都好友善。喺呢個市場站穩腳根,對文遠知行嚟講係個唔小嘅里程碑。對 Uber 嚟講,引進 Robotaxi 都係為咗降低成本——終究司機唔使發人工。對馬德里市民嚟講,以後打車可能更平。

Have you ever seen the roads in India?
I've seen them online.
The scene is usually like this: a sedan blocked behind a cow, motorcycles running wild nearby, even milk tea vendors nearby, so "clean and hygienic".

However, in a place where many feel physically uncomfortable after watching, Toyota, Suzuki, Honda and other Japanese car companies decided to bet on India.
According to the Indian "Brand Quality Foundation" website, the three car companies will invest nearly $11 billion to build factories, increase capacity, and develop exports in India.
Some netizens commented: Did the three Japanese car companies have too much money?
In fact, they didn't have endless money to spend, nor were they bewildered by Indian curry. These Japanese car executives are much clearer than us.
Current Japanese car revenue and market share are declining. Raw material costs are soaring. Looking at the world map, finding a market that can accommodate capacity, expand share, and has gentle competition is not easy.
So, it wasn't that Japanese car companies chose India, but because they had no choice.
The Pain of Japanese Car Companies
Past Japanese cars were truly the envy of others.
Ask old drivers who drove Japanese cars over ten years ago, talking about Japanese cars, almost no one doesn't give a thumbs up, cheap price, fuel saving, durable...
Even many Japanese cars needed to be bought at a markup, but who would think this iron fortress would be beaten out of sight in a few short years.
With the wave of new energy vehicles coming, electrification and intelligence became the goal for many domestic car companies to "leapfrog". Relying on China's strong new energy vehicle industry chain advantages and car companies' own persistence on R&D and technology, Chinese independent brands quickly achieved "leapfrogging".
Domestic cars once criticized are now becoming more and more common on the roads, even surpassing joint ventures in share.
According to CPCA data, in April 2026, the share of independent brands reached as high as 62.5%, far exceeding Japan's 13.1%.

You need to know, the Chinese car market is the largest car market in the world. Losing speed in the Chinese market is like losing a huge piece of cake.
Meanwhile, the main theme of the Chinese market in recent years is still price wars. Racing on configuration, price, and service has become a normal state, which also had a huge impact on Japanese cars' profits.
Apart from China, Japanese cars are also not doing well in the US.
On January 20, 2025, Trump swore in as the 47th US President, starting a series of chaotic operations, including imposing additional car tariffs in the name of national security, causing the tariff rate for imported Japanese cars to reach as high as 27.5% at one point. Although it decreased later, it was still far higher than the initial tax rate.
This operation directly led to a tariff loss of over 2 trillion yen for seven Japanese car companies in fiscal year 2025.
Looking at Japan itself, it is actually not easy either.
Middle East geopolitical conflicts blocked shipping in the Strait of Hormuz, transportation costs and raw material costs soared, Japanese car companies also had to suffer in silence.

Executives looking at the reports, their backs went cold, only to find a new growth curve.
So, Japanese car companies didn't fall in love with India, there was nowhere else to go.
Deep Thought on Choosing India
So, what magic does India have, to make Japanese car companies invest heavily?
The first advantage is big. In 2025, the Indian car market achieved 5.517 million new car sales, up 6% year-on-year, breaking the historical record, ranking as the third largest car market in the world, exceeding Japan for four consecutive years, second only to China and the United States.
The value of this doesn't need me to say much. India achieved this result mainly because India has been promoting tax reduction policies to promote consumption, which led to a significant increase in domestic consumption willingness.
The second advantage is close, meaning it is close to places where Japanese cars sell well, such as Africa.
So, India for Japanese car companies is more like a convenience store built in the center of a crossroad. You don't need to ship cars to eight countries separately, just build well at this stop in India, then unload ship by ship, and you can save a lot of costs.

The Nikkei also believes that India is expected to become its global car supply center.
The third advantage is stability. You know, Japanese cars' advantage is fuel cars, after all, the three major components of engines, gearboxes, and chassis, they have played for many years, technology accumulation is number one in the world.
But the Chinese car market has fully promoted electrification and intelligence development, leading to Japanese cars' advantage becoming weaker and weaker, impossible to play out. But India is different, it has the characteristics of few charging piles and slow electrification process. Indian old people buying cars still look for cheap, fuel saving, easy to fix, and these three points are exactly Japanese cars' old trade.
Especially Suzuki, always been India's car market evergreen, almost always sitting on the best-selling model throne, reputation of being worry-free, better than any advertisement.
So, Japanese car companies' vigorous layout of the Indian market is obviously carefully considered.
But, is the Indian market really that easy to mix?
The Hard-to-Bite Indian Market
Of course, India is not perfect like a hot commodity, its disadvantages are as obvious as its advantages, and every one is enough for Japanese car companies to face a hard time.
First talk about electrification. Yes, right now India has few charging piles and electric cars don't sell well, it is indeed a shelter for Japanese fuel cars. But you have to think, how long can this "shelter" avoid?
India previously shouted the slogan of 30% of new cars being electric vehicles by 2030. Although it sounds like bragging, but can't help but they really give subsidies, really build charging stations.
Imagine, what if one day India suddenly wakes up, starts vigorously promoting electrification, doing infrastructure, charging piles popping out like mushrooms after rain, then Japanese cars will be dumbfounded?
Isn't this a version of the Thai market?
Back then Japanese cars in Thailand won easily. The entire Southeast Asian market was called Japanese cars' backyard. Result Thailand took the lead in promoting electrification. Chinese electric vehicles came in, directly became a hot commodity. Look at Japanese cars again, share in Thailand falling down rapidly.

If India accelerates electrification, history will likely repeat, and this time, Japanese cars don't even have a place to flee, how to prevent will become the first problem for Japanese car companies.
Next talk about policy. India's policy is like a pot of curry, you never know if you will eat chicken or potato next time.
This magical country, today low tariff encourages building factories, tomorrow may fine you a huge amount. What's more annoying is mandatory joint venture. Foreign car companies want to sell cars in India, have to find local partners to partner up. When your factory is built, supply chain is done, India directly backstabs you. At that time whether adding money or withdrawing capital, what you get is heartache.
So you see, this market like India is like a mango that looks very sweet, bite the first mouth it's okay, chew two more mouths hit the hard core.
Japanese cars now is calculating, while the core hasn't bit the tooth, hurry up to nibble a few more mouths, but the core will bite sooner or later, just don't know which day.
Epilogue
Japanese cars this trip to India, not go for tourism, is go to make a living.
Chinese and Southeast Asian dining tables are more crowded, production and transportation costs have risen. Looking around the world, only this pot in India is still steaming, even if what is boiling inside is curry-flavored stones, have to bite hard and chew down.
Japanese car companies want to expand market, India wants to pull economy, solve employment, both sides have their own thoughts.
As for the ending is Japanese cars in India regain their glory, or like past competitors shamefully walk away, then is not known.
But no matter how, this play just started, we slowly watch is okay.
Anyway India's story, never bored.

Folks, today let's talk about big news on going global—not selling cars, but selling "drivers". On June 2, WeRide and Uber jointly announced a plan: to launch the country's first commercial Robotaxi pilot service in Madrid, Spain. In other words: Spanish residents will soon be able to hail a driverless taxi via Uber. This is the first time WeRide and Uber are partnering to enter the European market. Madrid also becomes the 12th city globally where WeRide's Robotaxi arrives.
According to official news, with the support of the Madrid regional government, this service will officially launch within this year. At that time, friends in Madrid can open the Uber App and call WeRide's Robotaxi with one click. It's just like calling an ordinary ride-hailing service, the difference is the arriving car has no driver—at least initially, there is still a difference. In the initial operation phase, a professionally trained safety monitor will be on board, as it's just launched, safety comes first.
This company, WeRide, you might have heard of it, or you might not. A brief introduction: Established in 2017, it has been dedicated to Robotaxi technology R&D and commercialization. Currently, its Robotaxis cover Guangzhou, Beijing, Singapore, Abu Dhabi, Dubai, Riyadh, Zurich... plus Madrid now, totaling 12 cities. Spain is also the 5th European market WeRide has entered—previously entered Switzerland, France, Belgium, Slovakia. According to the plan agreed by WeRide and Uber in May 2025, they plan to deploy Robotaxi services in 15 new international cities within five years, deploying tens of thousands of Robotaxis globally. With the Madrid launch, the deployment in 4 cities has been completed, and 11 more will be covered successively before 2030.
To be honest, it's not the first time Chinese autonomous driving companies are going global, but the combination of Chinese technology + global mobility platform + European market is quite interesting. Madrid is one of the European Robotaxi markets with the most commercial potential, with a large population, high travel demand, and friendly local policies. Being able to take root in this market is a significant milestone for WeRide. For Uber, introducing Robotaxis is also a way to reduce costs—after all, drivers don't need salaries. For Madrid residents, hailing a taxi might be cheaper in the future.

你睇過印度嘅馬路嗎?
我喺網上見過。
畫面通常係咁,一輛轎車俾牛尾擋住,旁邊仲有亂竄嘅摩托,甚至周圍仲有賣奶茶嘅小夥,嗰叫一個“乾淨又衛生”。

然而,喺呢啲睇完好多人覺得生理不適嘅地方,豐田、鈴木、本田等日本車廠,卻決定將籌碼押落印度。
據印度“品牌質量基金會”網站顯示,三家車廠將喺印度投資近110 億美元建廠、提產能、搞出口。
對此有网友表示,三家日本車廠係咪錢多到無處花?
事實上,佢哋唔係錢多到花唔完,亦唔係被印度嘅咖哩蒙蔽咗心竅,呢啲日本車廠高層遠比我哋清醒。
而家嘅日系車,營業額、市場份額都喺下滑,原材料成本仲係升得飛起,打開世界地圖,搵一個能夠容納產能、拓充份額、競爭溫和嘅市場,唔係咁容易嘅事。
所以,唔係日本車廠選擇咗印度,而係因為冇得揀。
日本車廠之痛
曾經嘅日系車,嗰時妥妥係人哋個仔。
你問下十幾年前開過日系車嘅老司機,一提起日系車,幾乎就冇唔豎大拇指嘅,價錢平、省油、耐用又抵撞……
甚至好多日系車,仲要加價購買,但邊個諗到,呢個鐵打嘅江山,短短幾年時間就俾佢哋打得找唔著北。
隨著新能源汽車浪潮嚟到,電動化、智能化變成好多自主車廠“彎道超車”嘅目標,依托於中國強大嘅新能源汽車產業鏈優勢同車廠自身對研發、技術嘅堅持,中國自主品牌迅速實現咗“彎道超車”。
曾經被人吐槽嘅國產車,而家喺馬路越來越多人,甚至份額超越咗合資。
根據乘聯會嘅數據,喺2026 年4 月,自主品牌嘅份額已經高達62.5%,遠超日系嘅13.1%。

要知道,中國汽車市場係全球最大嘅汽車市場,喺中國市場失速,就相當於丟咗一塊巨大嘅蛋糕。
同時,中國市場近年嚟嘅主旋律依舊係價格戰,捲配置、捲價格、捲服務已經成為一種常態,亦對日系車嘅利潤產生咗巨大嘅影響。
除咗中國,日系車喺美國過得亦唔太好。
2025 年 1 月 20 日,特朗普宣誓就職第 47 任美國總統,自此開啟咗一連串搞搞震,其中就包括以國家安全為理由徵收額外嘅汽車關稅,導致進口日本汽車嘅關稅稅率一度高達 27.5%,雖然後嚟有所降低,但亦遠高於最初嘅稅率。
呢個操作,直接導致七大日本車廠喺2025 財政年度嘅關稅損失超2 萬億日元。
再睇日本本土,其實亦唔容易。
中東地緣衝突導致霍爾木茲海峽航運受阻,運輸成本、原材料成本暴漲,日本車廠都有苦難言。

高管們看著報表,背後發涼,只能尋找全新嘅增長曲線。
所以,日本車廠唔係愛上印度,係冇地方去。
揀選印度嘅深思熟慮
咁,印度點解咁有魔力,先至令日本車廠重資投入呢?
第一個優勢就係大。喺2025 年,印度汽車市場取得咗551.7 萬輛嘅新車銷量,同比增長 6%,刷新咗歷史紀錄,位居全球第三大汽車市場,已经连续四年超越日本,僅次於中國同美國。
呢個含金量唔使多講啦,而印度取得呢一成績,主要係因為印度一直喺推動減稅政策,促進消費,這導致國內消費意願出現咗明顯增強。
第二個優點係近,就係離日系車賣得動嘅地方近,如非洲等其他地區。
所以,印度對於日本車廠,更似一個建喺十字路口中央嘅便利店,你唔使將車分別運去八個國家,只需要喺印度呢站造好,然後一船一船甩去,就能削減唔少成本。

《日本經濟新聞》亦認為,印度有望轉變為佢哋全球嘅汽車供應中心。
第三個優點係穩。要知道,日系車嘅優勢就係燃油車,畢竟引擎、變速箱、底盤三大件,佢哋已經玩咗好多年,技術積累喺全球都係數一數二。
但係中國汽車市場已經全力推動電動化、智能化發展,導致日系車嘅優勢越來越弱,根本無法發揮出嚟,但印度唔一樣,佢擁有充電樁少、電動化進程緩慢嘅特點,印度老百姓買車,都仲係盯住平、省油、易修,而呢三點正係日系車嘅老本行。
尤其係鈴木,一直係印度汽車市場嘅常青樹,幾乎年年穩坐暢銷車型寶座,口碑好,勝過任何廣告。
所以,日本車廠大力佈局印度市場,顯然是經過深思熟慮嘅。
但,印度市場真係咁好混咩?
難啃嘅印度市場
當然,印度亦唔係完美得似個香口格,佢嘅缺點同佢嘅優點一樣明顯,而且每一個都夠日本車廠喝一壺。
先講電動化,冇錯,眼睇下印度充電樁少、電動車賣唔動,確實係日系燃油車嘅避風港。但你得諗諗,呢個“避風港”能避幾耐?
印度此前可係喊出咗 2030 年電動車佔新車 30% 嘅口號,雖然聽落似吹水,但抵唔住人哋真補錢、真建充電站。
試諗下,萬一有日印度突然開竅,開始大力推動電動化、搞基建,充電樁似雨後春筍咁冒出來,嗰日系車唔就傻眼?
呢唔係泰國市場嘅翻版咩?
當年日系車喺泰國都係躺贏,整個東南亞市場,都被稱為日系車嘅後花園,結果泰國率先推動電動化,中國電動車一嚟,直接就成咗香口格,再睇日系車,喺泰國嘅市場份額嘩嘩嚟咗落。

如果印度係電動化一加速,歷史大概率會重演,而而家呢次,日系車連逃嘅地方都快冇咗,點樣預防,將成為日本車廠嘅首要問題。
再講政策,印度嘅政策就似一鍋咖哩,你永遠唔知下一口食到係雞肉定係馬鈴薯。
呢個魔幻嘅國家,今日係低關稅鼓勵建廠,明日就可能罰你一筆巨款,更令人頭痛嘅係強制合資,外國車廠想喺印度賣車,要搵本地夥伴搭檔,等你工廠建好咗、供應鏈搭完咗,印度直接背刺你,到嗰陣無論係加錢定撤資,換嚟嘅都係心痛。
所以你看,印度呢個市場,就好似一個睇落好甜嘅芒果,咬落去第一口仲行,再啃幾口就摸著硬核。
日系車而家嘅算盤係,趁住核都未硌牙,趕緊多啃幾口,但核遲早會硌到,只係唔知係邊一日。
尾聲
日系車呢趟印度之旅,唔係去旅遊,係去搵食。
中國同東南亞嘅飯桌更擁擠,生產、運輸嘅成本又提高咗,放眼全球,就印度呢口鍋仲冒住熱氣,哪怕入面煮嘅係咖哩味嘅石頭,都要硬著頭皮啃落去。
日本車廠想擴大市場,印度想嘅係拉動經濟、解決就業,雙方都有各自嘅心思。
至於結局係日系車喺印度重新封神,定係好似當年嘅部分友商一樣灰溜溜走人,那就唔知啦。
但無論點樣,呢場戲先至開始,我哋慢慢睇就得啦。
反正印度嘅故事,從來唔會悶。

Have you ever seen the roads in India?
I've seen them online.
The scene is usually like this: a sedan blocked behind a cow, motorcycles running wild nearby, even milk tea vendors nearby, so "clean and hygienic".

However, in a place where many feel physically uncomfortable after watching, Toyota, Suzuki, Honda and other Japanese car companies decided to bet on India.
According to the Indian "Brand Quality Foundation" website, the three car companies will invest nearly $11 billion to build factories, increase capacity, and develop exports in India.
Some netizens commented: Did the three Japanese car companies have too much money?
In fact, they didn't have endless money to spend, nor were they bewildered by Indian curry. These Japanese car executives are much clearer than us.
Current Japanese car revenue and market share are declining. Raw material costs are soaring. Looking at the world map, finding a market that can accommodate capacity, expand share, and has gentle competition is not easy.
So, it wasn't that Japanese car companies chose India, but because they had no choice.
The Pain of Japanese Car Companies
Past Japanese cars were truly the envy of others.
Ask old drivers who drove Japanese cars over ten years ago, talking about Japanese cars, almost no one doesn't give a thumbs up, cheap price, fuel saving, durable...
Even many Japanese cars needed to be bought at a markup, but who would think this iron fortress would be beaten out of sight in a few short years.
With the wave of new energy vehicles coming, electrification and intelligence became the goal for many domestic car companies to "leapfrog". Relying on China's strong new energy vehicle industry chain advantages and car companies' own persistence on R&D and technology, Chinese independent brands quickly achieved "leapfrogging".
Domestic cars once criticized are now becoming more and more common on the roads, even surpassing joint ventures in share.
According to CPCA data, in April 2026, the share of independent brands reached as high as 62.5%, far exceeding Japan's 13.1%.

You need to know, the Chinese car market is the largest car market in the world. Losing speed in the Chinese market is like losing a huge piece of cake.
Meanwhile, the main theme of the Chinese market in recent years is still price wars. Racing on configuration, price, and service has become a normal state, which also had a huge impact on Japanese cars' profits.
Apart from China, Japanese cars are also not doing well in the US.
On January 20, 2025, Trump swore in as the 47th US President, starting a series of chaotic operations, including imposing additional car tariffs in the name of national security, causing the tariff rate for imported Japanese cars to reach as high as 27.5% at one point. Although it decreased later, it was still far higher than the initial tax rate.
This operation directly led to a tariff loss of over 2 trillion yen for seven Japanese car companies in fiscal year 2025.
Looking at Japan itself, it is actually not easy either.
Middle East geopolitical conflicts blocked shipping in the Strait of Hormuz, transportation costs and raw material costs soared, Japanese car companies also had to suffer in silence.

Executives looking at the reports, their backs went cold, only to find a new growth curve.
So, Japanese car companies didn't fall in love with India, there was nowhere else to go.
Deep Thought on Choosing India
So, what magic does India have, to make Japanese car companies invest heavily?
The first advantage is big. In 2025, the Indian car market achieved 5.517 million new car sales, up 6% year-on-year, breaking the historical record, ranking as the third largest car market in the world, exceeding Japan for four consecutive years, second only to China and the United States.
The value of this doesn't need me to say much. India achieved this result mainly because India has been promoting tax reduction policies to promote consumption, which led to a significant increase in domestic consumption willingness.
The second advantage is close, meaning it is close to places where Japanese cars sell well, such as Africa.
So, India for Japanese car companies is more like a convenience store built in the center of a crossroad. You don't need to ship cars to eight countries separately, just build well at this stop in India, then unload ship by ship, and you can save a lot of costs.

The Nikkei also believes that India is expected to become its global car supply center.
The third advantage is stability. You know, Japanese cars' advantage is fuel cars, after all, the three major components of engines, gearboxes, and chassis, they have played for many years, technology accumulation is number one in the world.
But the Chinese car market has fully promoted electrification and intelligence development, leading to Japanese cars' advantage becoming weaker and weaker, impossible to play out. But India is different, it has the characteristics of few charging piles and slow electrification process. Indian old people buying cars still look for cheap, fuel saving, easy to fix, and these three points are exactly Japanese cars' old trade.
Especially Suzuki, always been India's car market evergreen, almost always sitting on the best-selling model throne, reputation of being worry-free, better than any advertisement.
So, Japanese car companies' vigorous layout of the Indian market is obviously carefully considered.
But, is the Indian market really that easy to mix?
The Hard-to-Bite Indian Market
Of course, India is not perfect like a hot commodity, its disadvantages are as obvious as its advantages, and every one is enough for Japanese car companies to face a hard time.
First talk about electrification. Yes, right now India has few charging piles and electric cars don't sell well, it is indeed a shelter for Japanese fuel cars. But you have to think, how long can this "shelter" avoid?
India previously shouted the slogan of 30% of new cars being electric vehicles by 2030. Although it sounds like bragging, but can't help but they really give subsidies, really build charging stations.
Imagine, what if one day India suddenly wakes up, starts vigorously promoting electrification, doing infrastructure, charging piles popping out like mushrooms after rain, then Japanese cars will be dumbfounded?
Isn't this a version of the Thai market?
Back then Japanese cars in Thailand won easily. The entire Southeast Asian market was called Japanese cars' backyard. Result Thailand took the lead in promoting electrification. Chinese electric vehicles came in, directly became a hot commodity. Look at Japanese cars again, share in Thailand falling down rapidly.

If India accelerates electrification, history will likely repeat, and this time, Japanese cars don't even have a place to flee, how to prevent will become the first problem for Japanese car companies.
Next talk about policy. India's policy is like a pot of curry, you never know if you will eat chicken or potato next time.
This magical country, today low tariff encourages building factories, tomorrow may fine you a huge amount. What's more annoying is mandatory joint venture. Foreign car companies want to sell cars in India, have to find local partners to partner up. When your factory is built, supply chain is done, India directly backstabs you. At that time whether adding money or withdrawing capital, what you get is heartache.
So you see, this market like India is like a mango that looks very sweet, bite the first mouth it's okay, chew two more mouths hit the hard core.
Japanese cars now is calculating, while the core hasn't bit the tooth, hurry up to nibble a few more mouths, but the core will bite sooner or later, just don't know which day.
Epilogue
Japanese cars this trip to India, not go for tourism, is go to make a living.
Chinese and Southeast Asian dining tables are more crowded, production and transportation costs have risen. Looking around the world, only this pot in India is still steaming, even if what is boiling inside is curry-flavored stones, have to bite hard and chew down.
Japanese car companies want to expand market, India wants to pull economy, solve employment, both sides have their own thoughts.
As for the ending is Japanese cars in India regain their glory, or like past competitors shamefully walk away, then is not known.
But no matter how, this play just started, we slowly watch is okay.
Anyway India's story, never bored.

最近,中国汽车圈有个很有意思的现象:一边是国内市场价格战打得火热,一边是头部车企在海外市场悄悄“闷声发大财”。
吉利刚刚交出的 5 月成绩单,就让人嗅到了一些不寻常的信号——海外出口销量超 8.5 万辆,同比上升 184%,刷新历史纪录。更关键嘅係,呢份增长唔係靠低价走量,而係实打实地喺全球高端市场“攻城略地”。
喺迪拜,一位见惯了豪车的经销商忍不住感慨:“德国品牌已经无法与极氪这样的中国品牌竞争了。”佢甚至自己下单了两台极氪新车。
这话从豪车聚集地的经销商口中说出,分量不轻。它背后折射出嘅,係中国汽车出海一个质变的拐点:从“卖得出去”到“卖得上价”,再到“让人追着买”。
01 爆单的“甜蜜烦恼”:物流成了新战场吉利 5 月嘅销量数据有几个细节特别值得玩味。
第一,唔系某一款车火,而係“多点开花”。喺墨西哥、印尼,Geely EX2 拿下 B 级两厢新能源销冠;喺澳大利亚,极氪 7X 直接超越了长期霸榜嘅特斯拉 Model Y;极氪品牌 5 月交付 34,377 辆,单车成交价同比上升 52.4%,超过 BBA。
第二,“爆单”已经严重到需要紧急调动物流资源。吉利不得不启用滚装船、集装箱船和国际铁路班列,形成 4 大铁路港、6 大海运港嘅运力布局。中歐班列吉利专列常态化运行,比海运缩短 40 日。
呢其实係一个很“甜蜜”嘅烦恼。过去我哋讨论中国车出海,担心嘅係没人买;而家吉利面临嘅问题,係买嘅人太多,运唔过去。
这种供需关系嘅逆转,才係真正值得关注嘅信号。当你嘅产品喺海外需要“抢运力”嘅时候,说明品牌已经跨过咗最难嘅“信任门槛”。

好多人把极氪喺海外嘅成功简单归结为“配置高、价格低”。但如果你仔细看数据,就会发现事情冇咁简单。
喺澳大利亚,极氪 7X 卖得比特斯拉 Model Y 仲贵,销量却反超了。喺迪拜,经销商评价极氪时用嘅词係“进入咗下一个阶段”,而唔係“性价比高”。
呢背后嘅本质差异在於:极氪係用“科技定义豪华”嘅逻辑,去挑战 BBA 同特斯拉嘅“品牌溢价”。
全栈 900V 高壓平台、浩瀚-S 超级电混架构……呢啲硬核技术带来嘅体验提升,係跨市场嘅。无论係你係中东富豪定係澳洲家庭,更快嘅充电速度、更长嘅续航、更智慧嘅座舱,呢啲价值係普适嘅。
换句话说,极氪冇喺老牌车企擅长嘅游戏规则里同佢哋玩,而係直接重新定义咗一套规则。 当德国品牌仲喺纠结“豪华感”嘅时候,中国品牌已经把“科技感”变成咗新嘅豪华标准。

呢次吉利海外爆单,仲有一个容易被忽略嘅细节——它唔係靠单一品牌单打独斗,而係“一个吉利”体系下嘅多品牌协同。
吉利、领克、极氪保持各自调性,但共享研发、渠道、物流同售后体系。这意味著咩?意味著吉利喺海外唔係喺“试水”,而係喺“扎根”。
比如售后,吉利构建咗“中心库—区域仓—末端网点”三级服务体系,推出超长质保,仲建立咗 VOC 用户之声系统,全球统一响应。呢已经唔係“卖车”嘅思维,而係“用户运营”嘅思维。
再比如物流,提前布局自有滚装船、常态化中歐班列专列……呢啲基础设施嘅投入,睇落係成本,但面对而家 8.5 万辆嘅月出口量,呢啲前瞻布局成咗最硬嘅竞争壁垒。
真正嘅全球化,唔係把国内嘅车运到国外卖掉,而係喺当地建立完整嘅服务能力同品牌认知。 呢一点,吉利已经行喺好多中国车企嘅前面。

过去我哋总话“中国係汽车大国,唔係汽车强国”,因为真正嘅强国,一定係喺全球市场拥有定价权同品牌话语权嘅。
从吉利 5 月嘅海外表现来睇,呢个转折点可能比我哋想象中来得更快。当一款中国品牌嘅汽车能喺迪拜被经销商主动“求购”,能喺澳大利亚正面击败特斯拉,能喺墨西哥、巴西创下历史销量新高——呢已经唔係一个企业嘅胜利,而係整个中国汽车工业嘅里程碑。
当然,挑战仲喺后面。欧美市场嘅关税壁垒、本土品牌嘅激烈反扑、文化差异带来嘅用户习惯磨合……呢啲都係吉利乃至所有中国车企必须跨过嘅坎。
但至少有一点已经明确:中国汽车出海嘅“高端局”,唔再係愿景,而係正进行时。

BYD officially released the May 2026 production and sales flash report, with new energy vehicles from all brands reaching a monthly sales volume of 383,453 vehicles, a slight increase of 0.26% year-on-year, achieving year-on-year positive growth in monthly sales after ten months; among them, passenger car deliveries reached 376,990 units, surging 19.4% month-on-month, wiping out the pain of previous model iterations, presenting a new pattern where the domestic base is stable, overseas sales are soaring, and high-end brands are scaling up across the board. Amidst the market environment of intensified competition in the domestic new energy sector, Tesla FSD entering China, and an intense launch of independent new products, it has forged a unique structural growth path.

The Dynasty and Ocean main brands combined sold 330,215 vehicles in May, accounting for over 80% of the group's total sales, remaining the stabilizer for BYD's sales volume. The full series had 8 models exceeding 20,000 units in monthly sales, covering products from 50,000 entry-level commuter to 200,000 home SUV.

Inside the Dynasty Network, the Yuan family sold 56,691 units, and the Song family 51,370 units. Both crossed the 50,000 threshold, becoming two major sales pillars for the brand, catering to home commuter and urban-rural travel needs; the Qin family followed closely with a stable performance of 28,360 units. The Han and Tang series maintained a volume in the six-thousand range, deeply cultivating the mid-to-large home sedan and SUV niche markets; the brand new model Xia is in the market cultivation phase, delivering 1,810 units monthly, with potential for steady volume growth as channels expand.
The Ocean Network's growth momentum is even more rapid, with 5 models entering the 20,000 club across the series: Sealion 42,615 units, Seal 34,117 units, Seagull 39,919 units, Dolphin 22,260 units, and Song PLUS 27,755 units. Among them, Seagull remains the best-selling entry-level commuter model thanks to its affordable pricing of 60,000-80,000. Sealion, as a new volume model, stands firm at the 40,000 level upon launch, filling the mid-size SUV product gap in the Ocean Network and perfecting the Ocean product tier layout. From commuter small cars to compact SUVs, the two main brands rely on DM-i hybrid and pure electric dual-line technologies to牢牢锁住 the mainstream home market share within 150,000 domestically.
Fang Cheng Bao Year-on-Year Surges 139.7%, Brand Upward Positioning Takes EffectThe high-end matrix of Denza, Fang Cheng Bao, and Yangwang sold a combined 46,489 vehicles in May, officially breaking away from the niche positioning to become a new pivot for BYD's brand premium and profit growth, breaking the industry curse of difficulty in high-end breakthrough for domestic brands.

The off-road brand Fang Cheng Bao sold 30,186 units monthly, surging 139.7% year-on-year, creating a new high in monthly sales since the brand launched. Its Titanium 7 model sold 18,280 units monthly, while Leopard 5 and Leopard 8 output remained stable, continuously squeezing the survival space for joint venture and imported models in the 250,000-400,000 hardcore off-road niche market.

Denza delivered 16,303 units in May, with the MPV benchmark D9 selling 6,721 units, and the Z9 series close to 6,000 units. MPV and mid-to-large sedan dual-line efforts helped them stand firm in the luxury new energy track; the million-level ultra-luxury brand Yangwang continued its steady climb, delivering 286 units that month, a year-on-year increase of 105.8%, completing market verification of the domestic brand ceiling product and forming a full price range product layout from 100,000+ home, 300,000-400,000 off-road, 500,000 luxury MPV to million-level flagship.

In May, BYD's overseas sales of passenger cars and pickup trucks reached 160,177 units, surging 80.7% year-on-year. Exports accounted for over 42% of the full series total sales, setting a new historical high for brand export and becoming the core driving force to stabilize May overall sales and achieve year-on-year positive growth.
Southeast Asia, Europe, and Latin America became the main incremental markets. Seagull, Song PLUS, and Yuan series continued to top new energy best-seller lists in multiple countries; the SHARK pickup truck exceeded 4,000 units in monthly exports for two consecutive months. Relying on the completion of localization production in Thailand, Brazil, Hungary, and Uzbekistan with four overseas vehicle factories, localized production continues to land, avoiding tariffs while rapidly penetrating terminal channels. Against the background of stock market competition in the domestic auto industry and normalized price wars, the rapidly expanding overseas market effectively counteracts sales volatility brought by domestic model iterations, officially upgrading from a supplementary market to BYD's core growth engine. As of now, BYD's global cumulative new energy vehicle sales have exceeded 16.5 million units, with the globalization map continuously broadening.
Intelligent Driving Empowers Product Iteration, H2 New Products Prepare to Surge VolumeMay marked a key node in BYD's intelligent driving landing, with the God's Eye intelligent driving system becoming a core bonus point for models: the number of vehicles with advanced intelligent driving across all brands exceeded 3.15 million, with daily road test data exceeding 200 million kilometers; that month, BYD implemented City Pilot and Smart Parking dual safety backup services, becoming the world's first auto manufacturer to achieve dual intelligent driving backups. Three days after policy implementation, the activation rate of models equipped with the God's Eye system in cities surged 50%. Intelligent driving experience upgrades directly drove in-store order conversion, solidifying product competitiveness for subsequent models to continue volume sales, and facing the intelligent driving market shock brought by FSD entering China.
From data details, BYD's cumulative sales from January to May 2026 were 1,405,039 units, down 20.32% year-on-year. The core reason is that the full series of main models were concentratedly iterated, and the capacity ramp-up of the 2nd Gen Fast Charge Blade Battery was restricted. The new Flash Charge Battery upgraded fast charging and low-temperature performance. Full series iteration models prioritized installing new batteries, but production line retrofitting dragged down capacity release. Order backlogs on popular models and delayed deliveries compressed the May delivery volume to a certain extent.
As the end of the second quarter approaches and the 2nd Gen Blade Battery capacity continues to release, coupled with new models such as Denza N8L, Fang Cheng Bao Titanium 7 Pure Electric Version, Sealion 05, and Xia L landing the market, the industry generally predicts that BYD's full brand sales in June are expected to exceed 400,000 vehicles. Relying on the four-dimension development logic of low-end volume locking share, high-end raising profit, overseas pushing volume, and intelligence improving product power, amidst the intensified new energy elimination round in the domestic market, BYD's full category layout advantage continues to amplify, securing its status as the domestic new energy leader, accelerating steadily towards global top auto manufacturers.

你睇過印度嘅馬路嗎?
我喺網上見過。
畫面通常係咁,一輛轎車俾牛尾擋住,旁邊仲有亂竄嘅摩托,甚至周圍仲有賣奶茶嘅小夥,嗰叫一個“乾淨又衛生”。

然而,喺呢啲睇完好多人覺得生理不適嘅地方,豐田、鈴木、本田等日本車廠,卻決定將籌碼押落印度。
據印度“品牌質量基金會”網站顯示,三家車廠將喺印度投資近110 億美元建廠、提產能、搞出口。
對此有网友表示,三家日本車廠係咪錢多到無處花?
事實上,佢哋唔係錢多到花唔完,亦唔係被印度嘅咖哩蒙蔽咗心竅,呢啲日本車廠高層遠比我哋清醒。
而家嘅日系車,營業額、市場份額都喺下滑,原材料成本仲係升得飛起,打開世界地圖,搵一個能夠容納產能、拓充份額、競爭溫和嘅市場,唔係咁容易嘅事。
所以,唔係日本車廠選擇咗印度,而係因為冇得揀。
日本車廠之痛
曾經嘅日系車,嗰時妥妥係人哋個仔。
你問下十幾年前開過日系車嘅老司機,一提起日系車,幾乎就冇唔豎大拇指嘅,價錢平、省油、耐用又抵撞……
甚至好多日系車,仲要加價購買,但邊個諗到,呢個鐵打嘅江山,短短幾年時間就俾佢哋打得找唔著北。
隨著新能源汽車浪潮嚟到,電動化、智能化變成好多自主車廠“彎道超車”嘅目標,依托於中國強大嘅新能源汽車產業鏈優勢同車廠自身對研發、技術嘅堅持,中國自主品牌迅速實現咗“彎道超車”。
曾經被人吐槽嘅國產車,而家喺馬路越來越多人,甚至份額超越咗合資。
根據乘聯會嘅數據,喺2026 年4 月,自主品牌嘅份額已經高達62.5%,遠超日系嘅13.1%。

要知道,中國汽車市場係全球最大嘅汽車市場,喺中國市場失速,就相當於丟咗一塊巨大嘅蛋糕。
同時,中國市場近年嚟嘅主旋律依舊係價格戰,捲配置、捲價格、捲服務已經成為一種常態,亦對日系車嘅利潤產生咗巨大嘅影響。
除咗中國,日系車喺美國過得亦唔太好。
2025 年 1 月 20 日,特朗普宣誓就職第 47 任美國總統,自此開啟咗一連串搞搞震,其中就包括以國家安全為理由徵收額外嘅汽車關稅,導致進口日本汽車嘅關稅稅率一度高達 27.5%,雖然後嚟有所降低,但亦遠高於最初嘅稅率。
呢個操作,直接導致七大日本車廠喺2025 財政年度嘅關稅損失超2 萬億日元。
再睇日本本土,其實亦唔容易。
中東地緣衝突導致霍爾木茲海峽航運受阻,運輸成本、原材料成本暴漲,日本車廠都有苦難言。

高管們看著報表,背後發涼,只能尋找全新嘅增長曲線。
所以,日本車廠唔係愛上印度,係冇地方去。
揀選印度嘅深思熟慮
咁,印度點解咁有魔力,先至令日本車廠重資投入呢?
第一個優勢就係大。喺2025 年,印度汽車市場取得咗551.7 萬輛嘅新車銷量,同比增長 6%,刷新咗歷史紀錄,位居全球第三大汽車市場,已经连续四年超越日本,僅次於中國同美國。
呢個含金量唔使多講啦,而印度取得呢一成績,主要係因為印度一直喺推動減稅政策,促進消費,這導致國內消費意願出現咗明顯增強。
第二個優點係近,就係離日系車賣得動嘅地方近,如非洲等其他地區。
所以,印度對於日本車廠,更似一個建喺十字路口中央嘅便利店,你唔使將車分別運去八個國家,只需要喺印度呢站造好,然後一船一船甩去,就能削減唔少成本。

《日本經濟新聞》亦認為,印度有望轉變為佢哋全球嘅汽車供應中心。
第三個優點係穩。要知道,日系車嘅優勢就係燃油車,畢竟引擎、變速箱、底盤三大件,佢哋已經玩咗好多年,技術積累喺全球都係數一數二。
但係中國汽車市場已經全力推動電動化、智能化發展,導致日系車嘅優勢越來越弱,根本無法發揮出嚟,但印度唔一樣,佢擁有充電樁少、電動化進程緩慢嘅特點,印度老百姓買車,都仲係盯住平、省油、易修,而呢三點正係日系車嘅老本行。
尤其係鈴木,一直係印度汽車市場嘅常青樹,幾乎年年穩坐暢銷車型寶座,口碑好,勝過任何廣告。
所以,日本車廠大力佈局印度市場,顯然是經過深思熟慮嘅。
但,印度市場真係咁好混咩?
難啃嘅印度市場
當然,印度亦唔係完美得似個香口格,佢嘅缺點同佢嘅優點一樣明顯,而且每一個都夠日本車廠喝一壺。
先講電動化,冇錯,眼睇下印度充電樁少、電動車賣唔動,確實係日系燃油車嘅避風港。但你得諗諗,呢個“避風港”能避幾耐?
印度此前可係喊出咗 2030 年電動車佔新車 30% 嘅口號,雖然聽落似吹水,但抵唔住人哋真補錢、真建充電站。
試諗下,萬一有日印度突然開竅,開始大力推動電動化、搞基建,充電樁似雨後春筍咁冒出來,嗰日系車唔就傻眼?
呢唔係泰國市場嘅翻版咩?
當年日系車喺泰國都係躺贏,整個東南亞市場,都被稱為日系車嘅後花園,結果泰國率先推動電動化,中國電動車一嚟,直接就成咗香口格,再睇日系車,喺泰國嘅市場份額嘩嘩嚟咗落。

如果印度係電動化一加速,歷史大概率會重演,而而家呢次,日系車連逃嘅地方都快冇咗,點樣預防,將成為日本車廠嘅首要問題。
再講政策,印度嘅政策就似一鍋咖哩,你永遠唔知下一口食到係雞肉定係馬鈴薯。
呢個魔幻嘅國家,今日係低關稅鼓勵建廠,明日就可能罰你一筆巨款,更令人頭痛嘅係強制合資,外國車廠想喺印度賣車,要搵本地夥伴搭檔,等你工廠建好咗、供應鏈搭完咗,印度直接背刺你,到嗰陣無論係加錢定撤資,換嚟嘅都係心痛。
所以你看,印度呢個市場,就好似一個睇落好甜嘅芒果,咬落去第一口仲行,再啃幾口就摸著硬核。
日系車而家嘅算盤係,趁住核都未硌牙,趕緊多啃幾口,但核遲早會硌到,只係唔知係邊一日。
尾聲
日系車呢趟印度之旅,唔係去旅遊,係去搵食。
中國同東南亞嘅飯桌更擁擠,生產、運輸嘅成本又提高咗,放眼全球,就印度呢口鍋仲冒住熱氣,哪怕入面煮嘅係咖哩味嘅石頭,都要硬著頭皮啃落去。
日本車廠想擴大市場,印度想嘅係拉動經濟、解決就業,雙方都有各自嘅心思。
至於結局係日系車喺印度重新封神,定係好似當年嘅部分友商一樣灰溜溜走人,那就唔知啦。
但無論點樣,呢場戲先至開始,我哋慢慢睇就得啦。
反正印度嘅故事,從來唔會悶。

5 月 29 日至 6 月 7 日,2026(第三十屆)粵港澳大灣區車展開幕。比亞迪囊括 1 號館,打造專屬品牌展覽館。比亞迪商用車首次以全矩陣、全品類陣容同台展出,全方位展示全場景新能源交通生態佈局。
作為全球新能源商用車引領者,比亞迪商用車依托集團三電核心技術與全產業鏈優勢,建成成熟產品體系,本次展出車款涵蓋新能源客車、新能源卡車兩大核心品類,以硬核技術、可靠產品、優質服務樹立商用綠色出行標竿。

卡車領域,比亞迪攜純電動輕卡 T5、轎卡 T4、牽引車 Q3、灑水車 T18 等核心車款亮相,產品線覆蓋 3.5 噸至 31 噸,適配不同場景需求。其中,轎卡 T4 採用低阻力、輕量化設計,實現百公里耗電 18.5kWh(CLTC 工況),兼顧小卡實用性與轎車舒適性,重新定義純電轎卡。該車自國內上市後市場反應熱烈,目前已成功進入日本、墨西哥、新加坡等海外市場。4.5 噸級輕卡 T5 提供純電和混合動力兩種選擇,可匹配倉柵、冷藏、廂貨等不同上裝,與 T4 作為輕商領域核心車款,適配快遞、商超、冷鏈等物流場景。

純電動牽引車 Q3 配備多檔電量版本,適用於工業園區、港口及中短途物流運輸,全面覆蓋場內作業、短途配送、專項運輸等各類使用場景。純電動灑水車 T18,搭載大容量電池,最大爬坡坡度超 30%,輕鬆適配各類路況。同系列環衛車,十年三次護航國家盛典,憑藉新能源技術及品質的至高認可,向世界展現中國新能源科技的硬實力與綠色擔當。

作為全球公交電動化的引領者,比亞迪純電動客車產品涵蓋 6 米至 27 米。在現場,純電動客車 B12(歐洲版)、C11 兩大主力車款亮相。其中,全新客車 C11 基於 e-BUS 平台 3.0 打造,搭載刀片電池、CTC 電池底盤一體化、客車雲輦 A、全域 1000V 高壓架構等核心技術,在安全、高效、智能方面實現全面升級,為道路客運領域打造高品質出行新選擇。

截至目前,比亞迪商用車全球累銷超 20.3 萬輛,足跡遍及 6 大洲、70 多個國家和地區,是首個進入歐美日韩發達市場中國汽車品牌。未來,比亞迪商用車將持續發揮乘商協同優勢,以技術創新驅動全球商用車電動化發展,助力構建綠色低碳交通體系。


BYD officially released the May 2026 production and sales flash report, with new energy vehicles from all brands reaching a monthly sales volume of 383,453 vehicles, a slight increase of 0.26% year-on-year, achieving year-on-year positive growth in monthly sales after ten months; among them, passenger car deliveries reached 376,990 units, surging 19.4% month-on-month, wiping out the pain of previous model iterations, presenting a new pattern where the domestic base is stable, overseas sales are soaring, and high-end brands are scaling up across the board. Amidst the market environment of intensified competition in the domestic new energy sector, Tesla FSD entering China, and an intense launch of independent new products, it has forged a unique structural growth path.

The Dynasty and Ocean main brands combined sold 330,215 vehicles in May, accounting for over 80% of the group's total sales, remaining the stabilizer for BYD's sales volume. The full series had 8 models exceeding 20,000 units in monthly sales, covering products from 50,000 entry-level commuter to 200,000 home SUV.

Inside the Dynasty Network, the Yuan family sold 56,691 units, and the Song family 51,370 units. Both crossed the 50,000 threshold, becoming two major sales pillars for the brand, catering to home commuter and urban-rural travel needs; the Qin family followed closely with a stable performance of 28,360 units. The Han and Tang series maintained a volume in the six-thousand range, deeply cultivating the mid-to-large home sedan and SUV niche markets; the brand new model Xia is in the market cultivation phase, delivering 1,810 units monthly, with potential for steady volume growth as channels expand.
The Ocean Network's growth momentum is even more rapid, with 5 models entering the 20,000 club across the series: Sealion 42,615 units, Seal 34,117 units, Seagull 39,919 units, Dolphin 22,260 units, and Song PLUS 27,755 units. Among them, Seagull remains the best-selling entry-level commuter model thanks to its affordable pricing of 60,000-80,000. Sealion, as a new volume model, stands firm at the 40,000 level upon launch, filling the mid-size SUV product gap in the Ocean Network and perfecting the Ocean product tier layout. From commuter small cars to compact SUVs, the two main brands rely on DM-i hybrid and pure electric dual-line technologies to牢牢锁住 the mainstream home market share within 150,000 domestically.
Fang Cheng Bao Year-on-Year Surges 139.7%, Brand Upward Positioning Takes EffectThe high-end matrix of Denza, Fang Cheng Bao, and Yangwang sold a combined 46,489 vehicles in May, officially breaking away from the niche positioning to become a new pivot for BYD's brand premium and profit growth, breaking the industry curse of difficulty in high-end breakthrough for domestic brands.

The off-road brand Fang Cheng Bao sold 30,186 units monthly, surging 139.7% year-on-year, creating a new high in monthly sales since the brand launched. Its Titanium 7 model sold 18,280 units monthly, while Leopard 5 and Leopard 8 output remained stable, continuously squeezing the survival space for joint venture and imported models in the 250,000-400,000 hardcore off-road niche market.

Denza delivered 16,303 units in May, with the MPV benchmark D9 selling 6,721 units, and the Z9 series close to 6,000 units. MPV and mid-to-large sedan dual-line efforts helped them stand firm in the luxury new energy track; the million-level ultra-luxury brand Yangwang continued its steady climb, delivering 286 units that month, a year-on-year increase of 105.8%, completing market verification of the domestic brand ceiling product and forming a full price range product layout from 100,000+ home, 300,000-400,000 off-road, 500,000 luxury MPV to million-level flagship.

In May, BYD's overseas sales of passenger cars and pickup trucks reached 160,177 units, surging 80.7% year-on-year. Exports accounted for over 42% of the full series total sales, setting a new historical high for brand export and becoming the core driving force to stabilize May overall sales and achieve year-on-year positive growth.
Southeast Asia, Europe, and Latin America became the main incremental markets. Seagull, Song PLUS, and Yuan series continued to top new energy best-seller lists in multiple countries; the SHARK pickup truck exceeded 4,000 units in monthly exports for two consecutive months. Relying on the completion of localization production in Thailand, Brazil, Hungary, and Uzbekistan with four overseas vehicle factories, localized production continues to land, avoiding tariffs while rapidly penetrating terminal channels. Against the background of stock market competition in the domestic auto industry and normalized price wars, the rapidly expanding overseas market effectively counteracts sales volatility brought by domestic model iterations, officially upgrading from a supplementary market to BYD's core growth engine. As of now, BYD's global cumulative new energy vehicle sales have exceeded 16.5 million units, with the globalization map continuously broadening.
Intelligent Driving Empowers Product Iteration, H2 New Products Prepare to Surge VolumeMay marked a key node in BYD's intelligent driving landing, with the God's Eye intelligent driving system becoming a core bonus point for models: the number of vehicles with advanced intelligent driving across all brands exceeded 3.15 million, with daily road test data exceeding 200 million kilometers; that month, BYD implemented City Pilot and Smart Parking dual safety backup services, becoming the world's first auto manufacturer to achieve dual intelligent driving backups. Three days after policy implementation, the activation rate of models equipped with the God's Eye system in cities surged 50%. Intelligent driving experience upgrades directly drove in-store order conversion, solidifying product competitiveness for subsequent models to continue volume sales, and facing the intelligent driving market shock brought by FSD entering China.
From data details, BYD's cumulative sales from January to May 2026 were 1,405,039 units, down 20.32% year-on-year. The core reason is that the full series of main models were concentratedly iterated, and the capacity ramp-up of the 2nd Gen Fast Charge Blade Battery was restricted. The new Flash Charge Battery upgraded fast charging and low-temperature performance. Full series iteration models prioritized installing new batteries, but production line retrofitting dragged down capacity release. Order backlogs on popular models and delayed deliveries compressed the May delivery volume to a certain extent.
As the end of the second quarter approaches and the 2nd Gen Blade Battery capacity continues to release, coupled with new models such as Denza N8L, Fang Cheng Bao Titanium 7 Pure Electric Version, Sealion 05, and Xia L landing the market, the industry generally predicts that BYD's full brand sales in June are expected to exceed 400,000 vehicles. Relying on the four-dimension development logic of low-end volume locking share, high-end raising profit, overseas pushing volume, and intelligence improving product power, amidst the intensified new energy elimination round in the domestic market, BYD's full category layout advantage continues to amplify, securing its status as the domestic new energy leader, accelerating steadily towards global top auto manufacturers.

May 28, 2026, the World Living Room of the North Bund in Shanghai. In the live broadcast lens of Dragon TV, there were no lengthy speeches by leaders, but rather a "Global Relay Delivery" spanning across Asia and Europe, connecting multiple cities globally.
SAIC Group welcomed its first 100 millionth global user, officially becoming the first automotive group in the history of China's automotive industry to accumulate production and sales exceeding 100 million vehicles.

15 brands, counting down from the 99,999,996th vehicle to the 100,000,012th vehicle, 18 models were delivered synchronously in Shanghai, Liuzhou, Anting, London, Jakarta, and Singapore.
This is not only a milestone for an enterprise, but also a vivid footnote to China's automotive industry developing from scratch and from weak to strong.
In May 2014, SAIC actively implemented the instruction that "developing new energy vehicles is the only path for China to move from a large automotive country to a strong automotive country" and fully transitioned to new energy.
Twelve years later, SAIC completed the transition from "leading the way" with early transformation to "thousands of horses galloping" with brands, technology, ecosystem, and global reach blossoming, all through this 100 million delivery.
If you tear off all those hollow PR words and focus on the diverse owner profiles at the car delivery ceremony, some even spanning extreme geographical regions, you will find that the true smart-electric mass production capability and systemic power of a big factory lie precisely in these votes by different circles using their feet.
True International Natives
True internationalization has never been about holding a temporary press conference overseas or inviting a few Chinese media outlets, but about your product truly integrating into the lives of ordinary overseas people. Among the military merit medals of SAIC's 100 million deliveries, cumulative overseas deliveries have exceeded 7 million units.
At the delivery site in London, intern doctor Natalia picked up an MG4 EV. For her, this is not just an urban commuter pure electric small car. Her growth path has always had MG company, and her grandfather drove a classic British convertible MGB back then.

MG represents a new chapter in the global expansion of Chinese automakers. This brand, once born in the UK and possessing a century of history, after being wholly owned by SAIC Group, has multiple years consecutively topped European sales among Chinese brands.

At the same time, in Jakarta, the core winger of the Indonesian National Men's Football Team, the "genius boy" Eg who studied in Europe for five years, chose Wuling's 7-seater SUV Eksion produced locally in Indonesia, perfectly adapting to Indonesian local spatial and comfort needs, as the travel partner for himself and his family.

Behind this global multi-time-zone, multi-city relay delivery is SAIC's deployment of over 100 parts bases, 3 R&D centers, and 4 overseas manufacturing centers overseas. Even to avoid being strangled by international logistics capacity, SAIC also formed a self-operated RoRo fleet with a scale of 41 ships covering routes globally.
This "Age of Discovery" throughput of "Glocal" local globalization allows overseas car buyers, when purchasing, not to buy a distant imported symbol, but a reliable product supported by a local R&D layout and a local systemic ecosystem.
Efficiency Tool for Wealth Creators.
Those focusing on new forces of car making in middle-class private cars will find it hard to understand why SAIC's delivery list would simultaneously include a large number of commercial light trucks, logistics vehicles, and buses.
In Singapore, DHL (Dunhuang) Senior Vice President Herbert picked up a batch of MAXUS eDeliver 5 pure electric light trucks to cope with high-density, high-frequency urban last-mile delivery and cross-border parcel transfer;

In Taiyuan, Shanxi, Henglongsheng Industrial and Trade General Manager Zhang Yanbin purchased 56 Hongyan new energy heavy trucks again, working frequently in the most severe and labor-demanding mixing stations and urban infrastructure projects;

In Yangzhou, Jiangsu, Top Land Senior Vice President Yuan Guo batch-delivered nearly 10,000 Feifeng Dana T1 pure electric light trucks;

In Henan, Zhonglian Tourist Automobile General Manager Wang Xiaobing purchased Iveco Joy Star EV in one breath, used to run the high-density mountain road custom shuttle route from Luoyang to Laojun Mountain.

When the car circle is flocking to compete in TVs, refrigerators, and big sofas, these strivers walking on the front lines of infrastructure, culture, tourism, and logistics care most about availability rate, quality bottom line, and energy consumption cost. MAXUS light trucks can reduce cost per kilometer to as low as 5 cents under the city distribution model; Hongyan new energy can withstand extreme working conditions in mountainous slope operation environments.
This is the counter-cyclical structural advantage possessed only by big factories with "Full Scenario, Full Category Coverage". The essence of systemic power is that it can not only build the IM LS9 Hyper to fly close to the ground for the elite class at the 300,000 yuan level luxury electric car, but also build the smart electric tool car running in the urban logistics backbone network to help ordinary people efficiently create wealth.
Without a doubt, such a three-dimensional product matrix cannot be bought for even a lot of money by single-track lane players.
Reject High-Price Monopoly
Frontier smart-electric technology should not just be exclusive high-price toys for the rich.
In this delivery, the most touching story comes from Pang Fuqiang, a post-80s village party secretary in Lantian, Shaanxi. He personally pays every day to provide door-to-door meal delivery service costing 2 yuan per meal for 74 left-behind elderly people in the mountains. Because the delivery routes are scattered and road conditions are dispersed, the tricycle he drove before had small loading capacity and no safety guarantee.
In this activity, he was gifted a Wuling Rongguang Pure Electric Version. The 4.3 cubic meter large space, Shenyan Battery Commercial Version, and collision zero spontaneous combustion safety record became his helper to protect mountain elderly more quickly and safely.

And in Dahua Yao Autonomous County, Hechi, Guangxi, charity blogger Liu Jia drove back and forth through towering mountains for five consecutive years rain or shine to give haircuts and companionship to left-behind children. The Buick ZhiJing E7 he picked up, equipped with eye-protection ceiling lights and zero formaldehyde cabins, became the "full score cabin" for the children in the mountains.
Why can ordinary people and grassroots strivers enjoy the most cutting-edge and reliable technology?
The answer is still the scale effect and technology mass production brought by the system.
Because SAIC owns a full technology route, full price range product layout, it can use the integration capability of the supply chain to smash the Qualcomm 8155 chip and Doubao Deep Thinking Large Model into the 60,000 yuan national family sedan Roewe i6;

Turn Huawei Qiankun Intelligent Driving Pro and HarmonyOS Cockpit into standard configuration across the line for the 150,000 yuan Wuling Huajing S, directly breaking the strong binding between high-level intelligence and high price.
Quickly realize mass production of top technology in the laboratory, downgrade, turn into a delivery car in the mountains, turn into a smart vehicle not lagging in a tens-of-thousands yuan fuel car, let technology empowerment, this is the unique, cutting-edge underlying hard power of car company big factories.
99,999,999th Car Owner
The 99,999,999th vehicle delivered by SAIC Group globally is the SAIC Volkswagen ID. ERA 9X.
This delivery also welcomed the 6,999th car owner of ID. ERA 9X. As the World Cup is about to start, the first Chinese player to fight in the Bundesliga, Yang Chen, became the 6,999th owner of ID. ERA 9X, jointly witnessing SAIC Group's cumulative production and sales entering the "100 Million Level Era".
Deeply integrating "German heritage + Chinese wisdom", ID. ERA 9X broke 10,000 locked orders within 1 hour of launch, and retail delivery reached 2,326 units just 5 days after launch, and in April it forcefully ranked in the top 3 of extended-range large high-end SUVs.

Now, just one month after launch, cumulative delivery exceeded 7,000 vehicles, further confirming its user recognition and product competitiveness in the high-end extended-range market. This achievement stems from SAIC Volkswagen's 42 years of deep cultivation in the Chinese market, and is more the fusion empowerment of the "In China, For China" strategy and "Global Wisdom + Chinese Speed".
This milestone delivery is both an important node for SAIC Group to move towards 100 million global cumulative production and sales, and a solid mark of SAIC Volkswagen's deep cultivation in the new energy track.
"100 Million Units" Is Not a Solo Act
"100 Million Units" has never been a solo act for SAIC alone, but the result of these 100 million car owners with vastly different identities, located in different time zones, voting with their feet on their respective life tracks.
Cao Xudong, CEO of a top intelligent driving enterprise, picking up the IM LS9 Hyper in Shanghai, stepping on the gas pedal in London streets by British intern doctor Natalia, the passenger car driver picking up waves of tourists at Luoyang scenic spots, and village party secretary Pang Fuqiang driving an electric car in the mountains of Lantian, Shaanxi to deliver meals for left-behind elderly...

They have different professions, skin colors, and budgets, but what they experience in intelligence, quality, and peace of mind at the moment they buy the car keys, shares at the bottom level, is the same huge, cutting-edge, and omnipresent smart electric big factory mass production system.
100 million vehicles is not the end point, but the starting line for this big factory smart electric mass production beast to accelerate transformation into a user-centric high-tech company. The system story of Chinese intelligence, in this global relay delivery season, has just turned a new chapter.

Have you ever seen the roads in India?
I've seen them online.
The scene is usually like this: a sedan blocked behind a cow, motorcycles running wild nearby, even milk tea vendors nearby, so "clean and hygienic".

However, in a place where many feel physically uncomfortable after watching, Toyota, Suzuki, Honda and other Japanese car companies decided to bet on India.
According to the Indian "Brand Quality Foundation" website, the three car companies will invest nearly $11 billion to build factories, increase capacity, and develop exports in India.
Some netizens commented: Did the three Japanese car companies have too much money?
In fact, they didn't have endless money to spend, nor were they bewildered by Indian curry. These Japanese car executives are much clearer than us.
Current Japanese car revenue and market share are declining. Raw material costs are soaring. Looking at the world map, finding a market that can accommodate capacity, expand share, and has gentle competition is not easy.
So, it wasn't that Japanese car companies chose India, but because they had no choice.
The Pain of Japanese Car Companies
Past Japanese cars were truly the envy of others.
Ask old drivers who drove Japanese cars over ten years ago, talking about Japanese cars, almost no one doesn't give a thumbs up, cheap price, fuel saving, durable...
Even many Japanese cars needed to be bought at a markup, but who would think this iron fortress would be beaten out of sight in a few short years.
With the wave of new energy vehicles coming, electrification and intelligence became the goal for many domestic car companies to "leapfrog". Relying on China's strong new energy vehicle industry chain advantages and car companies' own persistence on R&D and technology, Chinese independent brands quickly achieved "leapfrogging".
Domestic cars once criticized are now becoming more and more common on the roads, even surpassing joint ventures in share.
According to CPCA data, in April 2026, the share of independent brands reached as high as 62.5%, far exceeding Japan's 13.1%.

You need to know, the Chinese car market is the largest car market in the world. Losing speed in the Chinese market is like losing a huge piece of cake.
Meanwhile, the main theme of the Chinese market in recent years is still price wars. Racing on configuration, price, and service has become a normal state, which also had a huge impact on Japanese cars' profits.
Apart from China, Japanese cars are also not doing well in the US.
On January 20, 2025, Trump swore in as the 47th US President, starting a series of chaotic operations, including imposing additional car tariffs in the name of national security, causing the tariff rate for imported Japanese cars to reach as high as 27.5% at one point. Although it decreased later, it was still far higher than the initial tax rate.
This operation directly led to a tariff loss of over 2 trillion yen for seven Japanese car companies in fiscal year 2025.
Looking at Japan itself, it is actually not easy either.
Middle East geopolitical conflicts blocked shipping in the Strait of Hormuz, transportation costs and raw material costs soared, Japanese car companies also had to suffer in silence.

Executives looking at the reports, their backs went cold, only to find a new growth curve.
So, Japanese car companies didn't fall in love with India, there was nowhere else to go.
Deep Thought on Choosing India
So, what magic does India have, to make Japanese car companies invest heavily?
The first advantage is big. In 2025, the Indian car market achieved 5.517 million new car sales, up 6% year-on-year, breaking the historical record, ranking as the third largest car market in the world, exceeding Japan for four consecutive years, second only to China and the United States.
The value of this doesn't need me to say much. India achieved this result mainly because India has been promoting tax reduction policies to promote consumption, which led to a significant increase in domestic consumption willingness.
The second advantage is close, meaning it is close to places where Japanese cars sell well, such as Africa.
So, India for Japanese car companies is more like a convenience store built in the center of a crossroad. You don't need to ship cars to eight countries separately, just build well at this stop in India, then unload ship by ship, and you can save a lot of costs.

The Nikkei also believes that India is expected to become its global car supply center.
The third advantage is stability. You know, Japanese cars' advantage is fuel cars, after all, the three major components of engines, gearboxes, and chassis, they have played for many years, technology accumulation is number one in the world.
But the Chinese car market has fully promoted electrification and intelligence development, leading to Japanese cars' advantage becoming weaker and weaker, impossible to play out. But India is different, it has the characteristics of few charging piles and slow electrification process. Indian old people buying cars still look for cheap, fuel saving, easy to fix, and these three points are exactly Japanese cars' old trade.
Especially Suzuki, always been India's car market evergreen, almost always sitting on the best-selling model throne, reputation of being worry-free, better than any advertisement.
So, Japanese car companies' vigorous layout of the Indian market is obviously carefully considered.
But, is the Indian market really that easy to mix?
The Hard-to-Bite Indian Market
Of course, India is not perfect like a hot commodity, its disadvantages are as obvious as its advantages, and every one is enough for Japanese car companies to face a hard time.
First talk about electrification. Yes, right now India has few charging piles and electric cars don't sell well, it is indeed a shelter for Japanese fuel cars. But you have to think, how long can this "shelter" avoid?
India previously shouted the slogan of 30% of new cars being electric vehicles by 2030. Although it sounds like bragging, but can't help but they really give subsidies, really build charging stations.
Imagine, what if one day India suddenly wakes up, starts vigorously promoting electrification, doing infrastructure, charging piles popping out like mushrooms after rain, then Japanese cars will be dumbfounded?
Isn't this a version of the Thai market?
Back then Japanese cars in Thailand won easily. The entire Southeast Asian market was called Japanese cars' backyard. Result Thailand took the lead in promoting electrification. Chinese electric vehicles came in, directly became a hot commodity. Look at Japanese cars again, share in Thailand falling down rapidly.

If India accelerates electrification, history will likely repeat, and this time, Japanese cars don't even have a place to flee, how to prevent will become the first problem for Japanese car companies.
Next talk about policy. India's policy is like a pot of curry, you never know if you will eat chicken or potato next time.
This magical country, today low tariff encourages building factories, tomorrow may fine you a huge amount. What's more annoying is mandatory joint venture. Foreign car companies want to sell cars in India, have to find local partners to partner up. When your factory is built, supply chain is done, India directly backstabs you. At that time whether adding money or withdrawing capital, what you get is heartache.
So you see, this market like India is like a mango that looks very sweet, bite the first mouth it's okay, chew two more mouths hit the hard core.
Japanese cars now is calculating, while the core hasn't bit the tooth, hurry up to nibble a few more mouths, but the core will bite sooner or later, just don't know which day.
Epilogue
Japanese cars this trip to India, not go for tourism, is go to make a living.
Chinese and Southeast Asian dining tables are more crowded, production and transportation costs have risen. Looking around the world, only this pot in India is still steaming, even if what is boiling inside is curry-flavored stones, have to bite hard and chew down.
Japanese car companies want to expand market, India wants to pull economy, solve employment, both sides have their own thoughts.
As for the ending is Japanese cars in India regain their glory, or like past competitors shamefully walk away, then is not known.
But no matter how, this play just started, we slowly watch is okay.
Anyway India's story, never bored.


港交所網站掛出一咗一份熟悉嘅招股書。
5 月 28 日,繼去年 10 月首次遞表失效後,智能駕駛解決方案提供商蘇州天瞳威視電子科技股份有限公司(天瞳威視)再次向港股主板發起重衝,由匯豐及華泰國際聯席保薦。

喺智能駕駛賽道從「講故事」轉向「拼量產」嘅 2026 年,天瞳威視嘅二次遞表唔單止係一次資本試探,更係一場關於中國智駕供應商生存現狀嘅集中檢閱。
呢間被認為係「算力效率派」代表嘅公司,一邊連住從采埃孚到上汽、北汽嘅豪華產業資本陣營,一邊卻面臨住現金流緊繃、海外明顯回落嘅現實困境。喺呢場 IPO 嘅博弈中,光鮮同陣痛並存。
01
邊個係「天瞳威視」?
天瞳威視嘅創辦人王曦係一位典型嘅「回國」技術派。佢畢業於北京航空航天大學,後喺英國雷丁大學攻讀計算機科學博士學位。
喺決定創業之前,王曦曾經喺汽車零部件供應商天合汽車(TRW)及采埃孚擔任算法工程師同技術負責人,深度參與咗早期 ADAS 系統嘅開發。
2016 年,王曦捕捉到國內汽車智能化嘅風口,回國喺蘇州創立咗天瞳威視,定位係「以軟件算法驅動智能駕駛」嘅本土解決方案提供商。
公司嘅名字「天瞳」寓意「天之眼」,意在打造車輛感知萬物嘅視覺中樞。佢從最初嘅視覺感知算法起步,逐步擴展至行泊一體域控制器、L4 級自動駕駛系統等軟硬件結合嘅整體方案。

天瞳威視融資情況。資料來源:企查查
成立後不久,天瞳威視就獲得德聯資本、盛世投資嘅天使輪融資。此後十年時間,天瞳威視累計完成咗超過 10 輪融資,融資總額近 10 億元。
從招股書披露嘅股權結構嚟睇,天瞳威視構建咗深度綁定嘅「產業 + 資本」生態圈。
一方面,產業夥伴站台,全球汽車零部件巨頭采埃孚唔單止係其 C 輪領投方,亦係其戰略合作夥伴,持有天瞳威視 6.93% 嘅股份,位列第四大股東;國內方面,上汽集團通過上汽北美產投持股,北汽集團通過北汽產投佈局其中,地平線同商湯科技亦係戰略投資者。
另一方面,地方國資護航,唐山機器人基金、吳中金控等國資背景基金喺 D 輪及 D+ 輪入場,提供咗約 5.23 億元嘅資金支持。

截至最後實際可行日期股權架構
截至目前,王曦透過直接持股同員工持股平台合共控制公司約 40.84% 嘅權益,依然保持住對公司嘅控制權。
02
「兩條腿」行路
天瞳威視喺業務佈局上採取咗「雙軌並行」嘅策略。

喺 L2-L2+ 級輔助駕駛領域,天瞳威視嘅選擇非常務實。佢並冇盲目追逐算力堆疊嘅「軍備競賽」,而係走咗一條高性價比路線。
作為典型嘅視覺派智駕供應商,佢喺 L2 量產方案上以視覺感知為主,融合毫米波雷達同超聲波雷達,能夠喺較低算力平台上實現高級功能。例如,基於地平線 J6B 芯片(約 20TOPS)嘅方案即可支持行泊一體、高速 NOA。
呢種打法擊中咗 10 萬 -20 萬級主流車款對成本敏感嘅痛點。根據灼識諮詢嘅數據,按 2024 年裝機量計,天瞳威視係中國第二大同時提供行車同泊車解決方案嘅以軟件為核心嘅 L2-L2+ 級方案提供商,市場份額為 14.3%。

2024 年中國具備行泊一體能力嘅以軟件為核心供應商格局
截至最後實際可行日期,天瞳威視獲得 23 個汽車品牌嘅 198 款車款嘅 L2-L2+ 級解決方案定點函,並實現 6 個汽車品牌嘅 105 款車款嘅量產;獲得定點函嘅 198 款車款中有 87 款覆蓋海外市場,其中 59 款已實現量產。
但值得注意嘅係,L2-L2+ 市場正在經歷劇烈嘅「紅海化」。
一方面,經緯恆潤、福瑞泰克等本土 Tier1 正在加速追趕;另一方面,部分頭部車廠開始將低階智駕方案從外購轉為內部集成。
天瞳威視能否維持佢喺「性價比方案」領域嘅領先地位,取決於佢能否持續保持算法對低算力平台嘅優化能力,而這需要喺研發投入上持續加碼。

喺高級 L4 級自動駕駛領域,天瞳威視更多扮演「先鋒」角色。這亦係佢近兩年增長最快嘅板塊。
早在 2019 年,佢就參與咗上海洋山港嘅 5G 智能重卡項目。目前佢嘅 L4 方案覆蓋 Robobus、Robotaxi 同 Robotruck。其中,Robobus 係佢最具代表性嘅產品線,已喺蘇州、天津等城市嘅公開道路投入常態化試營運。
2025 年,天瞳威視從 L4 級解決方案產生收入 3.75 億元,佔公司總收入嘅 68% 以上,大部分收入來自 L4 級軟件解決方案。
然而,硬幣嘅另一面係商業化嘅曲折。雖然 L4 業務營收暴增,但佢嘅交付形態目前以「軟硬件一體解決方案」為主,呢種模式本質上接近「項目制交付」或「小規模車隊部署」,與 L2 業務中「純軟件授權 + 白盒交付」嘅高毛利、大規模複製邏輯存在顯著差異。
呢就直接導致 L4 業務毛利率嘅大幅波動:喺部分自研硬件佔比较高嘅項目中,毛利率一度低至 15%。

截至遞表日,公司雖手握超 10 億元嘅 L4 意向訂單,涵蓋 2500 架車,但呢啲訂單預計要喺未來三至五年內先會陸續交付,短期內對現金流嘅改善作用有限。
此外,天瞳威視仲有部分應收來自工程服務,主要涉及道路測試、數據收集支援及數據標註服務以及公司嘅專有工具鏈。
03
財務嘅雙面鏡
招股書嘅財務部分,展現咗智駕行業最真實嘅「B 面」:規模同虧損嘅極限拉扯,同埋賬面現金同營運消耗之間嘅緊張博弈。

營收高增長,但結構劇烈波動。
財務數據顯示,公司嘅營收呈現爆發式增長,從 2022 年嘅 1.72 億元增長至 2024 年嘅 4.83 億元,複合年增長率高達 67.7%。2025 年全年營收進一步增長至 5.5 億元。
但收入結構嘅變化明顯。2023 年,公司依賴 L2-L2+ 業務,佔比 90.2%;去到 2024 年,L4 業務佔比升至 50.2%;2025 年,L4 業務佔比進一步拉高至 68%。呢種「斷崖式」嘅結構切換,雖然證明佢 L4 技術搵到咗落地場景,但亦令市場質疑佢 L2 業務係咪已觸及天花板。
毛利率同純利潤嘅背離,呢係天瞳威視面臨嘅最大挑戰。
從毛利睇,整體毛利率喺 30% 左右徘徊,喺呢個技術密集型嘅智駕行業屬於中等水平。但細拆睇嚟,L2-L2+ 業務嘅毛利率通常能維持喺 40% 以上,純軟件授權模式,而 L4 業務嘅毛利率則因「軟硬件一體」交付中硬件佔比提高而被顯著拉低。
從純利潤睇,雖然表面虧損額較大,2024 年虧損 4.63 億、2025 年虧損約 2 億,呢度包含大量因優先股公平值變動帶來嘅「紙面虧損」。剔除呢個因素後嘅經調整純利潤更能反映公司嘅真實經營狀況:2024 年已收窄至 -438 萬元,但 2025 年並未如市場預期實現轉正,而係錄得約 -1086 萬元,虧損較 2024 年有所擴大。
呢個背後有一個不可回避嘅關鍵前提:調整後嘅「減虧」乃至「接近盈虧平衡」,係喺公司持續壓縮研發投入嘅基礎上實現嘅,研發費用從 2024 年嘅 1.17 億元降至 2025 年嘅 9231 萬元,研發費用率從 2024 年嘅 24.3% 進一步降至 16.8%,而 2022 年呢個數字曾高達 108.7%。對於一家科技公司嚟講,研發強度嘅「退坡」是否會影響未來嘅技術護城河,係一個潛在風險點。
現金流持續告急,最令人擔憂嘅信號。
根據最新招股書,截至 2025 年 12 月 31 日,公司賬上嘅現金及現金等价物為 2.35 億元,較 2025 年 6 月 30 日嘅 3.74 億元淨減少 1.39 億元,現金消耗速度較快。

更值得警惕嘅係經營現金流由正轉負且缺口持續擴大嘅趨勢。2023 年,公司經營活動現金流淨額為正向流入 1.15 億元,但 2024 年迅速轉為淨流出 1.89 億元,2025 年進一步惡化至淨流出 2.93 億元。
與此同時,應收賬款周轉急劇惡化。公司嘅貿易應收款項從 2023 年嘅 0.89 億元升至 2025 年嘅 5.48 億元,三年增長超過五倍,而同期營收增幅僅約 2.7 倍。
更令人擔憂嘅係應收款項周轉天數從 2023 年嘅 191 天同 2024 年嘅 166 天,到 2025 年驟升至 300 天,意味著公司從完成交付到收回款項平均需要接近一年時間。呢相當於變相為客戶提供長期無息墊資,喺資金本就緊張嘅情況下進一步加劇咗流動性壓力。

此外,雖然天瞳威視係首家出海嘅中國智駕軟件供應商,但 2025 年佢嘅海外業務遭遇咗明顯回落。2023 年天瞳威視海外收入為 1.27 億元,佔總營收比重達到 62.2%;到 2025 年海外收入降至 1100 萬元,佔比僅 2.0%。
喺而家全球地緣政治複雜、部分國家對智能汽車數據監管趨嚴嘅背景下,為佢嘅全球化故事增添咗一絲不確定性。
04
結語
天瞳威視嘅二次闖關,係智能駕駛行業進入「淘汰賽」階段嘅一個縮影。
從好嘅方面睇,佢踩準咗 L2 性價比同 L4 場景化落地嘅雙重節奏,且經調整純利潤喺特定口徑下已接近盈虧平衡,呢啲都畀投資者提供咗「有亮點可講」嘅故事線。
但從風險嘅角度睇,情況遠比首次遞表時更為嚴峻。業務重心嘅急速漂移、L4 業務商業化初期嘅盈利磨難、研發投入嘅被動收縮,呢啲此前就已存在嘅問題並未緩解。

天瞳威視 L4 級智能巴士
而真正令此次 IPO 帶「求生」色彩嘅,係現金流數據嘅實質性惡化:2.35 億元嘅賬面現金,面對每年近 3 億元嘅经营性現金淨流出,安全邊際已不足一年。疊加 300 天嘅應收賬款周轉天數,意味著公司每交付一筆訂單,都要墊付近一年嘅資金成本。
換言之,天瞳威視正處喺一個危險嘅財務窗口期:賬上嘅錢僅夠維持唔足一年嘅正常運作,而 L4 業務嘅大規模交付同回款卻需要更長時間。喺呢個智駕資本熱潮退去、一級市場融資邊際收緊嘅時刻,公司已冇太多等待嘅餘地。
首次遞表失效後僅隔半年便再次衝擊港股,對天瞳威視而言,與其話係戰略選擇,唔如話係現金倒逼下嘅必然之舉。


港交所網站掛出一咗一份熟悉嘅招股書。
5 月 28 日,繼去年 10 月首次遞表失效後,智能駕駛解決方案提供商蘇州天瞳威視電子科技股份有限公司(天瞳威視)再次向港股主板發起重衝,由匯豐及華泰國際聯席保薦。

喺智能駕駛賽道從「講故事」轉向「拼量產」嘅 2026 年,天瞳威視嘅二次遞表唔單止係一次資本試探,更係一場關於中國智駕供應商生存現狀嘅集中檢閱。
呢間被認為係「算力效率派」代表嘅公司,一邊連住從采埃孚到上汽、北汽嘅豪華產業資本陣營,一邊卻面臨住現金流緊繃、海外明顯回落嘅現實困境。喺呢場 IPO 嘅博弈中,光鮮同陣痛並存。
01
邊個係「天瞳威視」?
天瞳威視嘅創辦人王曦係一位典型嘅「回國」技術派。佢畢業於北京航空航天大學,後喺英國雷丁大學攻讀計算機科學博士學位。
喺決定創業之前,王曦曾經喺汽車零部件供應商天合汽車(TRW)及采埃孚擔任算法工程師同技術負責人,深度參與咗早期 ADAS 系統嘅開發。
2016 年,王曦捕捉到國內汽車智能化嘅風口,回國喺蘇州創立咗天瞳威視,定位係「以軟件算法驅動智能駕駛」嘅本土解決方案提供商。
公司嘅名字「天瞳」寓意「天之眼」,意在打造車輛感知萬物嘅視覺中樞。佢從最初嘅視覺感知算法起步,逐步擴展至行泊一體域控制器、L4 級自動駕駛系統等軟硬件結合嘅整體方案。

天瞳威視融資情況。資料來源:企查查
成立後不久,天瞳威視就獲得德聯資本、盛世投資嘅天使輪融資。此後十年時間,天瞳威視累計完成咗超過 10 輪融資,融資總額近 10 億元。
從招股書披露嘅股權結構嚟睇,天瞳威視構建咗深度綁定嘅「產業 + 資本」生態圈。
一方面,產業夥伴站台,全球汽車零部件巨頭采埃孚唔單止係其 C 輪領投方,亦係其戰略合作夥伴,持有天瞳威視 6.93% 嘅股份,位列第四大股東;國內方面,上汽集團通過上汽北美產投持股,北汽集團通過北汽產投佈局其中,地平線同商湯科技亦係戰略投資者。
另一方面,地方國資護航,唐山機器人基金、吳中金控等國資背景基金喺 D 輪及 D+ 輪入場,提供咗約 5.23 億元嘅資金支持。

截至最後實際可行日期股權架構
截至目前,王曦透過直接持股同員工持股平台合共控制公司約 40.84% 嘅權益,依然保持住對公司嘅控制權。
02
「兩條腿」行路
天瞳威視喺業務佈局上採取咗「雙軌並行」嘅策略。

喺 L2-L2+ 級輔助駕駛領域,天瞳威視嘅選擇非常務實。佢並冇盲目追逐算力堆疊嘅「軍備競賽」,而係走咗一條高性價比路線。
作為典型嘅視覺派智駕供應商,佢喺 L2 量產方案上以視覺感知為主,融合毫米波雷達同超聲波雷達,能夠喺較低算力平台上實現高級功能。例如,基於地平線 J6B 芯片(約 20TOPS)嘅方案即可支持行泊一體、高速 NOA。
呢種打法擊中咗 10 萬 -20 萬級主流車款對成本敏感嘅痛點。根據灼識諮詢嘅數據,按 2024 年裝機量計,天瞳威視係中國第二大同時提供行車同泊車解決方案嘅以軟件為核心嘅 L2-L2+ 級方案提供商,市場份額為 14.3%。

2024 年中國具備行泊一體能力嘅以軟件為核心供應商格局
截至最後實際可行日期,天瞳威視獲得 23 個汽車品牌嘅 198 款車款嘅 L2-L2+ 級解決方案定點函,並實現 6 個汽車品牌嘅 105 款車款嘅量產;獲得定點函嘅 198 款車款中有 87 款覆蓋海外市場,其中 59 款已實現量產。
但值得注意嘅係,L2-L2+ 市場正在經歷劇烈嘅「紅海化」。
一方面,經緯恆潤、福瑞泰克等本土 Tier1 正在加速追趕;另一方面,部分頭部車廠開始將低階智駕方案從外購轉為內部集成。
天瞳威視能否維持佢喺「性價比方案」領域嘅領先地位,取決於佢能否持續保持算法對低算力平台嘅優化能力,而這需要喺研發投入上持續加碼。

喺高級 L4 級自動駕駛領域,天瞳威視更多扮演「先鋒」角色。這亦係佢近兩年增長最快嘅板塊。
早在 2019 年,佢就參與咗上海洋山港嘅 5G 智能重卡項目。目前佢嘅 L4 方案覆蓋 Robobus、Robotaxi 同 Robotruck。其中,Robobus 係佢最具代表性嘅產品線,已喺蘇州、天津等城市嘅公開道路投入常態化試營運。
2025 年,天瞳威視從 L4 級解決方案產生收入 3.75 億元,佔公司總收入嘅 68% 以上,大部分收入來自 L4 級軟件解決方案。
然而,硬幣嘅另一面係商業化嘅曲折。雖然 L4 業務營收暴增,但佢嘅交付形態目前以「軟硬件一體解決方案」為主,呢種模式本質上接近「項目制交付」或「小規模車隊部署」,與 L2 業務中「純軟件授權 + 白盒交付」嘅高毛利、大規模複製邏輯存在顯著差異。
呢就直接導致 L4 業務毛利率嘅大幅波動:喺部分自研硬件佔比较高嘅項目中,毛利率一度低至 15%。

截至遞表日,公司雖手握超 10 億元嘅 L4 意向訂單,涵蓋 2500 架車,但呢啲訂單預計要喺未來三至五年內先會陸續交付,短期內對現金流嘅改善作用有限。
此外,天瞳威視仲有部分應收來自工程服務,主要涉及道路測試、數據收集支援及數據標註服務以及公司嘅專有工具鏈。
03
財務嘅雙面鏡
招股書嘅財務部分,展現咗智駕行業最真實嘅「B 面」:規模同虧損嘅極限拉扯,同埋賬面現金同營運消耗之間嘅緊張博弈。

營收高增長,但結構劇烈波動。
財務數據顯示,公司嘅營收呈現爆發式增長,從 2022 年嘅 1.72 億元增長至 2024 年嘅 4.83 億元,複合年增長率高達 67.7%。2025 年全年營收進一步增長至 5.5 億元。
但收入結構嘅變化明顯。2023 年,公司依賴 L2-L2+ 業務,佔比 90.2%;去到 2024 年,L4 業務佔比升至 50.2%;2025 年,L4 業務佔比進一步拉高至 68%。呢種「斷崖式」嘅結構切換,雖然證明佢 L4 技術搵到咗落地場景,但亦令市場質疑佢 L2 業務係咪已觸及天花板。
毛利率同純利潤嘅背離,呢係天瞳威視面臨嘅最大挑戰。
從毛利睇,整體毛利率喺 30% 左右徘徊,喺呢個技術密集型嘅智駕行業屬於中等水平。但細拆睇嚟,L2-L2+ 業務嘅毛利率通常能維持喺 40% 以上,純軟件授權模式,而 L4 業務嘅毛利率則因「軟硬件一體」交付中硬件佔比提高而被顯著拉低。
從純利潤睇,雖然表面虧損額較大,2024 年虧損 4.63 億、2025 年虧損約 2 億,呢度包含大量因優先股公平值變動帶來嘅「紙面虧損」。剔除呢個因素後嘅經調整純利潤更能反映公司嘅真實經營狀況:2024 年已收窄至 -438 萬元,但 2025 年並未如市場預期實現轉正,而係錄得約 -1086 萬元,虧損較 2024 年有所擴大。
呢個背後有一個不可回避嘅關鍵前提:調整後嘅「減虧」乃至「接近盈虧平衡」,係喺公司持續壓縮研發投入嘅基礎上實現嘅,研發費用從 2024 年嘅 1.17 億元降至 2025 年嘅 9231 萬元,研發費用率從 2024 年嘅 24.3% 進一步降至 16.8%,而 2022 年呢個數字曾高達 108.7%。對於一家科技公司嚟講,研發強度嘅「退坡」是否會影響未來嘅技術護城河,係一個潛在風險點。
現金流持續告急,最令人擔憂嘅信號。
根據最新招股書,截至 2025 年 12 月 31 日,公司賬上嘅現金及現金等价物為 2.35 億元,較 2025 年 6 月 30 日嘅 3.74 億元淨減少 1.39 億元,現金消耗速度較快。

更值得警惕嘅係經營現金流由正轉負且缺口持續擴大嘅趨勢。2023 年,公司經營活動現金流淨額為正向流入 1.15 億元,但 2024 年迅速轉為淨流出 1.89 億元,2025 年進一步惡化至淨流出 2.93 億元。
與此同時,應收賬款周轉急劇惡化。公司嘅貿易應收款項從 2023 年嘅 0.89 億元升至 2025 年嘅 5.48 億元,三年增長超過五倍,而同期營收增幅僅約 2.7 倍。
更令人擔憂嘅係應收款項周轉天數從 2023 年嘅 191 天同 2024 年嘅 166 天,到 2025 年驟升至 300 天,意味著公司從完成交付到收回款項平均需要接近一年時間。呢相當於變相為客戶提供長期無息墊資,喺資金本就緊張嘅情況下進一步加劇咗流動性壓力。

此外,雖然天瞳威視係首家出海嘅中國智駕軟件供應商,但 2025 年佢嘅海外業務遭遇咗明顯回落。2023 年天瞳威視海外收入為 1.27 億元,佔總營收比重達到 62.2%;到 2025 年海外收入降至 1100 萬元,佔比僅 2.0%。
喺而家全球地緣政治複雜、部分國家對智能汽車數據監管趨嚴嘅背景下,為佢嘅全球化故事增添咗一絲不確定性。
04
結語
天瞳威視嘅二次闖關,係智能駕駛行業進入「淘汰賽」階段嘅一個縮影。
從好嘅方面睇,佢踩準咗 L2 性價比同 L4 場景化落地嘅雙重節奏,且經調整純利潤喺特定口徑下已接近盈虧平衡,呢啲都畀投資者提供咗「有亮點可講」嘅故事線。
但從風險嘅角度睇,情況遠比首次遞表時更為嚴峻。業務重心嘅急速漂移、L4 業務商業化初期嘅盈利磨難、研發投入嘅被動收縮,呢啲此前就已存在嘅問題並未緩解。

天瞳威視 L4 級智能巴士
而真正令此次 IPO 帶「求生」色彩嘅,係現金流數據嘅實質性惡化:2.35 億元嘅賬面現金,面對每年近 3 億元嘅经营性現金淨流出,安全邊際已不足一年。疊加 300 天嘅應收賬款周轉天數,意味著公司每交付一筆訂單,都要墊付近一年嘅資金成本。
換言之,天瞳威視正處喺一個危險嘅財務窗口期:賬上嘅錢僅夠維持唔足一年嘅正常運作,而 L4 業務嘅大規模交付同回款卻需要更長時間。喺呢個智駕資本熱潮退去、一級市場融資邊際收緊嘅時刻,公司已冇太多等待嘅餘地。
首次遞表失效後僅隔半年便再次衝擊港股,對天瞳威視而言,與其話係戰略選擇,唔如話係現金倒逼下嘅必然之舉。
