首頁blogger
搜尋歷史
熱門搜尋
經銷商登入 / 註冊
In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers compare Proton X50 and Chery Tiggo 8 Pro when choosing a car. These two models are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
The OTR price of Proton X50 in Malaysia is RM 89,800 - 113,300, with a total of 4 versions, including 1.5T Executive (RM 89,800), 1.5T Premium (RM 101,800), 1.5T Flagship (RM 113,300), etc.
The OTR price of Chery Tiggo 8 Pro in Malaysia is RM 159,750 - 159,750, with a total of 2 versions, including 1.6L Turbo Standard (RM 130,000), 1.6L Turbo Premium (RM 145,000), etc.
From a price perspective, the starting price of Proton X50 is indeed RM 69,950 cheaper than Chery Tiggo 8 Pro. If your budget is limited, the entry-level version of Proton is already sufficient for daily needs. But be aware, the few thousand Ringgit difference might involve compromises in features, it depends on your specific needs.
Proton X50 is equipped with a 1.5L 4-cyl engine, 105 hp. Official fuel consumption 6.0 L/100km.
Chery Tiggo 8 Pro is equipped with a 2.0L 4-cyl engine, 170 hp. Official fuel consumption 8.0 L/100km.
In terms of power, Chery Tiggo 8 Pro's 2.0L 4-cyl has 65 hp more than Proton X50's 1.5L 4-cyl. However, for daily city driving, the power of both cars is sufficient and won't feel underpowered.
Proton X50 warranty 5 years/150,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Chery Tiggo 8 Pro warranty 3 years/100,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Both Proton X50 and Chery Tiggo 8 Pro are mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, prioritize the one with better reputation; if you care more about cost-performance ratio and features, choose the one with richer configuration. Ultimately, it is recommended to test drive both, as personal experience is the most important.
Overall, both Proton X50 and Chery Tiggo 8 Pro are quite good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends on your personal needs and budget. It is recommended to do your research, compare quotes from multiple car dealers, and then test drive to make the final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending time on research will definitely not go wrong.
In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers compare Proton X50 and Chery Tiggo 8 when choosing a car. These two models are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time doing homework.
The OTR price for Proton X50 in Malaysia is RM 89,800 - 113,300, with a total of 4 versions, including 1.5T Executive (RM 89,800), 1.5T Premium (RM 101,800), 1.5T Flagship (RM 113,300), etc.
The OTR price for Chery Tiggo 8 in Malaysia is RM 129,750 - 129,750, with a total of 1 version, including 2026 1.6T Standard (RM 129,750), etc.
In terms of price, the starting price of Proton X50 is indeed RM 39,950 cheaper than Chery Tiggo 8. If your budget is limited, the Proton entry version already meets daily needs. However, note that saving a few thousand ringgit may involve compromises in features, depending on your specific needs.
The safety rating for Proton X50 is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), with active safety systems including ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
The safety rating for Chery Tiggo 8 is TBD, with active safety systems including Basic.
Regarding safety features, both cars have received decent ratings. However, there are some differences in functionality between the Proton X50's ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA) and Chery Tiggo 8's Basic. If you prioritize active safety, you can compare their feature lists in detail.
Proton X50 body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
Chery Tiggo 8 body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
The dimensions of both cars are almost identical, with little difference in interior space. For cars in this class, daily use is more than sufficient.
Proton X50 warranty 5 years/150,000km, service interval 10,000km or 6 months.
Chery Tiggo 8 warranty 3 years/100,000km, service interval 10,000km or 6 months.
Both Proton X50 and Chery Tiggo 8 are mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, prioritize the one with better reputation; if you care more about cost-performance and features, choose the one with richer configuration. Ultimately, it is recommended to test drive both, as firsthand experience is the most important.
Overall, both Proton X50 and Chery Tiggo 8 are very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends mainly on your personal needs and budget. We suggest doing your research, comparing quotes from multiple dealerships, and then test driving to make a final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending time doing research will never be wrong.
In the Malaysia SUV market, many buyers compare Proton X50 and Chery Tiggo 8 when choosing a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
The OTR price for Proton X50 in Malaysia is RM 89,800 - 113,300, totaling 4 versions, including 1.5T Executive (RM 89,800), 1.5T Premium (RM 101,800), 1.5T Flagship (RM 113,300), etc.
The OTR price for Chery Tiggo 8 in Malaysia is RM 129,750 - 129,750, totaling 1 version, including 2026 1.6T Standard (RM 129,750), etc.
From a price perspective, the starting price of Proton X50 is indeed RM 39,950 cheaper than Chery Tiggo 8. If your budget is limited, Proton's entry-level version is already sufficient for daily needs. However, also note that the few thousand cheaper might involve trade-offs in features, it depends on your specific requirements.
The safety rating of Proton X50 is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
The safety rating of Chery Tiggo 8 is TBD, active safety systems include Basic.
Regarding safety features, both cars received good ratings. However, there are some differences in functionality between Proton X50's ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA) and Chery Tiggo 8's Basic. If you value active safety, you can compare the feature lists of both in detail.
Proton X50 body length is 4400 mm, trunk is 400 L.
Chery Tiggo 8 body length is 4400 mm, trunk is 400 L.
The dimensions of both cars are almost the same, and the interior space is not much different. For cars in this class, daily use is perfectly sufficient.
Proton X50 warranty 5 years/150,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Chery Tiggo 8 warranty 3 years/100,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Overall, Proton X50 and Chery Tiggo 8 are both excellent models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends mainly on your personal needs and budget. We suggest doing your homework, comparing quotes from several dealerships, and test driving before making a final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending some time doing research will never be wrong.
In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers tend to compare Proton X50 and Chery Tiggo Cross when choosing a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
Proton X50 OTR price in Malaysia is RM 89,800 - 113,300, with a total of 4 versions, including 1.5T Executive (RM 89,800), 1.5T Premium (RM 101,800), 1.5T Flagship (RM 113,300), etc.
Chery Tiggo Cross OTR price in Malaysia is RM 88,750 - 99,750, with a total of 2 versions, including 2025 HEV 1.5L CSH (RM 99,750), 2025 1.5T Standard (RM 88,750), etc.
From the price perspective, Chery Tiggo Cross's starting price is RM 1,050 cheaper than Proton X50. Honestly, in this price range, a difference of a few thousand is not that big; the key is to look at overall value for money and long-term usage costs.
Proton X50 is equipped with a 1.5L 4-cyl, 105 hp. Official fuel consumption 6.0 L/100km.
Chery Tiggo Cross is equipped with a 1.5L 4-cyl, 105 hp. Official fuel consumption 6.0 L/100km.
Both cars use the same powertrain system, the driving experience is basically the same in daily use. Fuel consumption is also about the same, no need to worry too much about this.
Proton X50 safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
Chery Tiggo Cross safety rating is TBD, active safety systems include Basic.
Regarding safety features, both cars have received good ratings. However, the ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA) of Proton X50 and the Basic of Chery Tiggo Cross have some differences in functionality. If you value active safety, you can compare their feature lists carefully.
Proton X50 body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
Chery Tiggo Cross body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
The dimensions of both cars are almost the same, interior space difference is not big. For cars of this level, daily use is completely sufficient.
Proton X50 adopts 4WD drive method.
Chery Tiggo Cross adopts FWD drive method.
Proton's 4WD and Chery's FWD will have different handling experiences, test drive comparison is recommended.
Overall, Proton X50 and Chery Tiggo Cross are both very good car models in the Malaysian market. Choosing which one depends mainly on your personal needs and budget. We recommend doing your research, comparing quotes from several dealerships, and then test driving to make a final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending time doing research will never be wrong.
In the first half of 2026, the commercial vehicle market overall showed weak growth, with significant segmentation in tracks. The total commercial vehicle market cumulative year-over-year growth was only 8.28%, while head enterprises such as Foton, Sinotruk, Dongfeng, and FAW had growth rates of less than 20%. Multiple enterprises maintained single-digit growth or even saw sales declines. The industry average increased slightly in the first half, light truck sales declined slightly, and light van growth was sluggish. Industry growth was basically supported by pickups and exports, with car manufacturers generally falling into intense battles in the existing market.
Forming a stark contrast to the industry's flat trend, SAIC Commercial Vehicles followed a completely independent upward curve: June sales growth reached 52.79%, about 4.9 times the industry average, making it the only head manufacturer to cross the 50% growth threshold; cumulative sales growth for the first half was 28.37%, about 3.4 times the industry average level. Currently, the brand has achieved comprehensive breakthroughs in five major segments: light vans, light trucks, pickups, new energy, and overseas exports. Relying on self-developed technology, a full-category matrix, systematic overseas expansion, and ecosystem-based user operations, it has carved out a high-quality transformation path that is actionable and replicable, becoming a benchmark for industry transformation.
Data Source: CAAM
Leading All Tracks in Segmentation, Breaking Out from the Existing Market
Light Van Track
Light vans are the fundamental base of SAIC's light commercial vehicles and also its most dominant segment in the industry. Against the backdrop of industry growth of only 5.4% in the first half, Maxus light vans overall market share stabilized above 27%, making it the head brand with the largest share and largest increase in the light van industry. Cumulative sales reached 61,144 units in the first half, leading Changan by over 7,200 units and JMC by over 10,000 units, with the leading advantage continuing to amplify. Maxus light vans maintained a significant lead in June, with hot sales of 13,902 units in the month, surging 62% year-over-year; among them, the Dahon series sold hotly with 7,207 units in June, soaring 218% year-over-year, continuing to lead the new energy light van track.
Relying on the synergy of the Maxus and Iveco dual brands, SAIC Commercial Vehicles light vans achieved comprehensive first place in domestic insurance registration, exports, and total sales data. Unlike competitors relying on single fuel vehicle models to move volume, SAIC Commercial Vehicles light vans simultaneously deployed pure electric, super extended range, and other routes, accommodating both urban short-distance distribution and cross-city long-distance transport. Domestic city distribution demand combined with overseas logistics orders provides dual support, offering stronger adaptability and resistance to pressure in the market.
Light Truck Track
In the first half of this year, the light truck industry sales growth was weak. Most brands' electrification remained in the stage of simply adding batteries to fuel chassis, known as "fuel-to-electric conversion," but SAIC Maxus Forland defied the trend to achieve a significant sales increase. It carved out a differentiated route, using a native electric light truck architecture to adapt to electric drive, battery swapping, and extended range from the chassis stage. Native electric drive chassis completely solves the range and load-bearing shortcomings of modified models, greatly enhancing product competitiveness.
In June, Forland light vans sold hotly with 5,258 units, up 54% year-over-year; cumulative sales from January to June reached 23,864 units, with a year-over-year growth rate of 48%. Among them, new energy vehicles totaled 12,971 units, up 65% year-over-year. Electrification penetration rate and growth magnitude significantly lead peers, achieving dual optimization of sales volume and product structure during the industry downturn.
Pickup Track
The highlights of the pickup track lie in premiumization and model innovation. In the first half of 2026, cumulative domestic pickup sales were 343,000 units, up 9.4% year-over-year. This belongs to the few stable growth tracks in the industry, but the overall growth rate is flat.
As the brand with the number one high-end pickup exports in China, Maxus pickup growth resilience far exceeds the industry average. Maxus pickups ranked first in total exports in May, and in June, sold hotly with 7,871 units, a 83% surge year-over-year! What also holds industry-transforming significance is its marketing reform: the industry's first 7-day free trial model, breaking the limitations of traditional short-term test drives at the store, handing over real operational scenarios such as heavy load, long-distance, and off-road to users for experience. In the past, the pickup industry highly depended on dealer promotion, with high user decision costs. This new model centered on user experience is reconstructing the conversion logic of the pickup market.
Self-Developed New Energy Technology, Building a Moat
The leading advantage in new energy transformation is SAIC Commercial Vehicles' core moat. From January to June, the overall penetration rate of domestic new energy commercial vehicles was 30.4%. SAIC Commercial Vehicles' five major brands' overall penetration rate in the first half reached 47%, and in June, it was as high as 60%, leading the industry by nearly 17 percentage points; new energy sales volume in the first half surged 69% year-over-year, with June's single-month new energy growth at 80%, and electrification transformation progress leads the entire industry by a significant margin. Among them, Sunwin buses were the first to achieve 100% new energy across the entire series; Forland light trucks' new energy sales accounted for more than half in the first half; Maxus monthly domestic new energy penetration rate broke through 50% multiple times.
Unlike the industry's common model of outsourcing three-electric systems, SAIC Commercial Vehicles relies on self-developed bases such as Hongtu 2.0 electric architecture and StarStack pickup platforms, combined with deep co-research with CATL and Huawei, to build a complete independent technical system. For example, the Maxus Dahon super extended range light van has a CLTC comprehensive range of 1260km, solving range anxiety for pure electric models while greatly reducing long-distance fuel costs, becoming one of the optimal solutions for commercial new energy; equipped with CATL's Tianxing batteries featuring 7,000 times ultra-long cycle life, and an 8-year/600,000km ultra-long warranty, forming obvious advantages in product reliability and actual usage value.
Global Expansion Model Upgrade, Opening New Growth Space
The overseas market was the largest source of incremental volume for commercial vehicles in the first half of 2026. From January to June, domestic commercial vehicle cumulative exports were 664,000 units, up 32.5% year-over-year. SAIC Commercial Vehicles' overseas sales reached a new high in June, with single-month exports of 14,071 units, surging 70% year-over-year. Cumulative overseas sales from January to June were 65,183 units, up 33% year-over-year, outperforming the market average again, with products covering over 100 countries and regions worldwide.
Overseas benchmark orders continued to land in the first half: Kuala Lumpur Auto Show won a large order for 300 new energy light vans in Malaysia, creating the record for the largest single new energy light van order in local history; G50 PHEV went on sale in the Philippines in April and sold hotly immediately, with orders breaking 1,000 units within two months of launch; DHL Group cumulatively bulk purchased 2,500 pure electric light vans, with Maxus being the first Chinese car brand to enter the DHL German Postal delivery fleet; new pickup intention orders in Australia and Chile exceeded 800 units, with Venezuela and Chile consecutively securing bulk mining area pickup orders, with vehicle sales in many Southeast Asian countries continuing to rise.
SAIC Commercial Vehicles abandoned the industry's low-price volume overseas expansion model, shifting to an integrated output of technology, service, and ecology. Relying on product strength and localization support, it deepened its presence in the overseas market and continuously widened long-term growth space. This systematic overseas expansion strategy also provides an actionable reference path for high-end overseas expansion of domestic commercial vehicle brands.
Conclusion
The market performance in the first half is sufficient to show that the commercial vehicle industry has bid farewell to the era of rapid expansion based on dividends. Single hit products or single tracks are hard to support long-term development. Only by building a mature, complete system of technology, products, services, and global expansion can one maintain rhythm and breakthrough steadily amidst market volatility. The simultaneous rise in multiple tracks by SAIC Commercial Vehicles in the first half proves that its overall growth far exceeding the industry average is not accidental, but the result of continuous deep digging and steady iteration in multiple fields.
Shifting from purely scale expansion to high-quality value growth, SAIC Commercial Vehicles has carved out a pragmatic and feasible transformation path. Not only has it solidified the foundation for long-term development for itself, but it has also provided a new reference direction for the industrial upgrade and global development of Chinese commercial vehicle brands.
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嗰陣都會拿 寶騰 X50 同 奇瑞 Tiggo 8 做比較。這兩款車喺價位同定位上都好接近，今日我哋就從多個方面做一個詳細嘅比較，幫你節省咗做功課嘅時間。
寶騰 X50 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 89,800 - 113,300，一共有 4 個版本，包括 1.5T Executive（RM 89,800）、1.5T Premium（RM 101,800）、1.5T Flagship（RM 113,300） 等。
奇瑞 Tiggo 8 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 129,750 - 129,750，一共有 1 個版本，包括 2026 1.6T Standard（RM 129,750） 等。
從價錢來看，寶騰 X50 嘅起步價確實比 奇瑞 Tiggo 8 平咗 RM 39,950。如果你預算有限，寶騰嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需求。但要留意，便宜嘅嗰幾千塊，可能喺配備上會有取舍，具體要看你嘅需求。
寶騰 X50 搭載 1.5L 4-cyl，馬力 105 hp。官方油耗 6.0 L/100km。
奇瑞 Tiggo 8 搭載 1.5L Turbo，馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。
動力方面，奇瑞 Tiggo 8 嘅 1.5L Turbo 比 寶騰 X50 嘅 1.5L 4-cyl 多咗 35 匹馬力。不過日常喺市區開，兩款車嘅動力都夠用，唔會覺得唔夠力。
寶騰 X50 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA)。
奇瑞 Tiggo 8 嘅安全評級係 TBD，主動安全系統包括 Basic。
安全配備方面，兩款車都拿到唔錯嘅評級。不過 寶騰 X50 嘅 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA) 同 奇瑞 Tiggo 8 嘅 Basic 喺功能上有些分別，如果你比較看重主動安全嘅話，可以仔細比較一下兩者嘅功能列表。
寶騰 X50 採用 4WD 驅動方式。
奇瑞 Tiggo 8 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
寶騰嘅 4WD 同 奇瑞嘅 FWD 喺操控上會有唔同感受，建議試駕比較。
總體嚟講，寶騰 X50 同 奇瑞 Tiggo 8 都係馬來西亞市場幾好嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵始終係要看你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
編輯語錄：睇返 2026 年上半年嘅商用車市場，“內冷外熱”係表象，“價格戰向價值戰重構”先至係本質。
2026 年嘅中國商用車市場，喺一個略顯尷尬嘅拐點上。
中國汽車工業協會數據顯示，上半年商用車累計產銷分別為 227.2 萬輛同 229.7 萬輛，同比增長 8.2% 同 8.3%——市場係回暖，但回暖得好慢。與之相伴嘅係價格戰嘅硝煙愈濃：單車利潤被不斷壓縮，新能源轉型又需要持續燒錢投入研發同產線，車企一邊要降本求生，一邊要砸錢轉型，“活下去、守份額”成為頭部陣營普遍嘅生存狀態。
就喺一片“唱衰”聲中，上汽商用車跑咗出讓人側目嘅獨立曲線：1-6 月銷量同比增長 28.37%，約為行業均值嘅 3.4 倍，係頭部陣營中唯一同時實現“規模做大 + 增速斷層領跑”雙重優勢嘅企業。其中，上汽大通作為板塊核心力量，上半年累計銷售 13.8 萬輛，商用車增速達 35.36%，係行業前十陣營中唯一增速超過 35% 嘅企業。
輕客守住基本盤，新能源同出海打開第二增長曲線
商用車行業嘅存量博弈，本質上係一場“基本盤保衛戰”。誰嘅基本盤穩，誰嘅轉型就有底氣。
上汽商用車嘅底氣，首先來自輕客。
上半年，大通輕客累計銷售 6.1 萬輛，包攬單月與累計銷量“雙冠王”，單一品牌市佔率突破 27%，領先行業第二名 7200 輛、第三名超萬輛。6 月大通輕客單月銷量 13902 輛，同比增長 62%；其中大拿系列 6 月熱銷 7207 輛，同比暴漲 218%，成為新能源輕客賽道嘅現象級爆款。
但真正讓上汽商用車與同行拉開代差嘅，係新能源與出海嘅雙引擎驅動。
新能源端，上汽商用車上半年新能源銷量同比增長 69%，國內新能源滲透率達 47%，遠超行業 30.4% 嘅整體水平。躍進新能源輕卡上半年銷售 12971 輛，同比增長 65%；大拿超級增程輕客 CLTC 綜合續航達 1260 公里，百公里能耗低至 2.65L——這組數據直接擊穿咗商用用戶最敏感嘅“續航焦慮”同“運營成本”兩根神經。
出海端，上半年上汽商用車累計出口 6.5 萬輛，同比增長 33%。喺希臘，大通份額較去歲同期翻四倍；喺新加坡，連續三月市佔率登頂；喺東南亞，接連斬獲新能源輕客大訂單；並成為首個入駐 DHL 德國郵政投遞車隊嘅中國商用車品牌。
上汽商用車執行管理會主席、上汽大通總經理楊懷景喺 2026 上汽大通幹部大會上嘅一段話，恰好解釋咗呢套打法嘅底層邏輯：“產品係企業發展嘅核心根基，更係二次創業實現價值突圍嘅關鍵抓手。行業嘅價格競爭最終將回歸商品價值本身，TCO 全生命週期成本更優、TVO 全生命週期價值更高嘅產品將更受市場青睞。”
從“賣車”到“經營用戶”，體系化能力構建護城河
如果話輕客、新能源、出海係上汽商用車上半年嘅“三張報表”，那麼支撐呢三張報表嘅，係一套從技術自研到全球本土化嘅體系化能力。
技術上，上汽商用車冇走業界普遍“外購三電”嘅捷徑，而是依托鴻圖 2.0 超級商用電動架構、星棧皮卡平台等自研核心平台，搭建起純電、插混、氫燃料、超級增程嘅全能源技術路線。2026 年落地嘅星湃超級 mini 增程技術、同寧德時代共研嘅天行電池技術，分別解決咗續航、能耗、安全三大行業痛點。這種“把核心技術攥喺自己手裡”嘅策略，讓上汽商用車喺新能源轉型中唔被供应商卡脖子。
全球化上，上汽商用車已經完成從“產品出海”到“體系化出海”嘅迭代。目前，其產品覆蓋全球百餘個國家同地區，喺核心市場搭建咗本土化銷售、服務、改裝全鏈條體系。楊懷景喺北京車展上面對 100 多個國家嘅 200 余家海外經銷商時明確表示：“我哋唔僅僅跟隨市場嘅腳步，更要同各位攜手，共同定義全球出行嘅未來。” 喺另一場戰略發布會上，佢更加直白地闡述咗“唔打價格戰”嘅全球策略：“上汽商用車班子里，唔少人係商用車領域嘅新兵，也有老将，新兵同老將，才能更好地協同高效破界。我哋唔會放棄任何一個板塊，握指成拳，五個手指齊全握緊打出嚟先最有勁。”
生態上，上汽商用車搭建咗全球改裝生態聯盟、8S 全場景用戶體驗中心，業界首創皮卡“7 天免費試用”模式，把傳統嘅“賣車關係”升級為“創富夥伴關係”。
睇返 2026 年上半年嘅商用車市場，“內冷外熱”係表象，“價格戰向價值戰重構”先至係本質。中汽協預測 2026 年全年商用車銷量將達 450 萬輛，同比僅小幅增長 4.7%——這意味著存量博弈將成為新常態，靠水漲船高普漲嘅日子一去唔返。
喺呢個新常態下，上汽商用車用 28.37% 嘅增速、約為行業 3.4 倍嘅增長曲線證明咗一件事：存量市場唔係冇機會，而係機會只畀畀嗰啲提前完成動能轉換嘅企業。
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拎 Proton X50 同 Chery Tiggo 7 Pro 嚟做比較。呢兩款車喺價位同定位上都幾接近，今日我哋就由多個方面做一個詳細嘅對比，幫你慳返做功課嘅時間。
Proton X50 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 89,800 - 113,300，一共有 4 個版本，包括 1.5T Executive（RM 89,800）、1.5T Premium（RM 101,800）、1.5T Flagship（RM 113,300） 等。
Chery Tiggo 7 Pro 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 123,750 - 123,750，一共有 2 個版本，包括 1.6L Turbo Standard（RM 125,000）、1.6L Turbo Premium（RM 140,000） 等。
由價錢睇，Proton X50 嘅起步價確實比 Chery Tiggo 7 Pro 平咗 RM 33,950。如果你預算有限，Proton 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需要。但都要注意，平嗰幾千塊，可能喺配備上會有取捨，具體要睇你嘅需要。
Proton X50 搭載 1.5L 4-cyl，馬力 105 hp。官方油耗 6.0 L/100km。
Chery Tiggo 7 Pro 搭載 1.5L Turbo，馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。
動力方面，Chery Tiggo 7 Pro 嘅 1.5L Turbo 比 Proton X50 嘅 1.5L 4-cyl 多咗 35 匹馬力。不過日常喺市區開，兩款車嘅動力都夠用，唔會覺得唔夠力。
Proton X50 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA)。
Chery Tiggo 7 Pro 嘅安全評級係 TBD，主動安全系統包括 Basic。
安全配備方面，兩款車都拿到唔錯嘅評級。不過 Proton X50 嘅 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA) 同 Chery Tiggo 7 Pro 嘅 Basic 喺功能上有啲差異，如果你比較看重主動安全嘅話，可以仔細對比一下兩者嘅功能列表。
Proton X50 保修 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Chery Tiggo 7 Pro 保修 3 年/100,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
總括嚟講，Proton X50 同 Chery Tiggo 7 Pro 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵仲要睇你嘅個人需要同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最後決定。買車係件大事，花啲時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嗰陣都會拿 寶騰 X50 同 奇瑞瑞虎 7 Pro 嚟比較。呢兩款車喺價位同定位上都好接近，今日我哋就由多個方面嚟做詳細對比，幫你省咗做功課嘅時間。
寶騰 X50 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 89,800 - 113,300，一共有 4 個版本，包括 1.5T Executive（RM 89,800）、1.5T Premium（RM 101,800）、1.5T Flagship（RM 113,300） 等。
奇瑞瑞虎 7 Pro 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 123,750 - 123,750，一共有 2 個版本，包括 1.6L Turbo Standard（RM 125,000）、1.6L Turbo Premium（RM 140,000） 等。
從價錢嚟睇，寶騰 X50 嘅起步價的確比 奇瑞瑞虎 7 Pro 平咗 RM 33,950。如果你預算有限，寶騰嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需求。但都要注意，平嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備上面會有取舍，具體要睇你嘅需求。
寶騰 X50 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA)。
奇瑞瑞虎 7 Pro 嘅安全評級係 TBD，主動安全系統包括 Basic。
安全配備方面，兩款車都拿到唔錯嘅評級。不過 寶騰 X50 嘅 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA) 同 奇瑞瑞虎 7 Pro 嘅 Basic 喺功能上有些差異，如果你比較看重主動安全嘅話，可以仔細對比下兩者嘅功能列表。
寶騰 X50 車身長 4400 mm，行李廂 400 L。
奇瑞瑞虎 7 Pro 車身長 4400 mm，行李廂 400 L。
兩款車嘅尺寸幾乎一樣，車內空間差別唔大。呢個級別嘅車，日常使用完全夠用。
寶騰 X50 同 奇瑞瑞虎 7 Pro 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更看重品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰一款；如果你更介意性價比同配備，就揀配置更豐富嗰款。最終都係建議兩款都去試駕，親身體驗先係最重要嘅。
總體嚟講，寶騰 X50 同 奇瑞瑞虎 7 Pro 都係馬來西亞市場好唔錯嘅車型。揀邊輛，關鍵都要睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較間車行嘅報價，先去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嗰陣都會拿 寶騰 X50 同 奇瑞 Tiggo 7 Pro 嚟做比較。呢兩部車喺價錢同定位上都幾接近，而家我哋就由多個方面做詳細對比，幫大家省咗做功課嘅時間。
寶騰 X50 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 89,800 - 113,300，合共 4 個版本，包括 1.5T Executive（RM 89,800）、1.5T Premium（RM 101,800）、1.5T Flagship（RM 113,300） 等等。
奇瑞 Tiggo 7 Pro 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 123,750 - 123,750，合共 2 個版本，包括 1.6L Turbo Standard（RM 125,000）、1.6L Turbo Premium（RM 140,000） 等等。
睇返價錢，寶騰 X50 嘅起價確實比 奇瑞 Tiggo 7 Pro 平咗 RM 33,950。如果你預算有限，寶騰嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需要。但都要注意，平嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備上有取捨，就要睇返你需要咩。
寶騰 X50 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA)。
奇瑞 Tiggo 7 Pro 嘅安全評級係 TBD，主動安全系統包括 Basic。
安全配備方面，兩部車都拿到唔錯嘅評級。不過 寶騰 X50 嘅 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA) 同 奇瑞 Tiggo 7 Pro 嘅 Basic 喺功能上有分別，如果你比較重視主動安全嘅話，可以仔細對比下兩者嘅功能列表。
寶騰 X50 採用 4WD 驅動方式。
奇瑞 Tiggo 7 Pro 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
寶騰嘅 4WD 同 奇瑞嘅 FWD 喺操控上會有唔同感覺，建議試駕比較。
寶騰 X50 保修 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
奇瑞 Tiggo 7 Pro 保修 3 年/100,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
總體嚟講，寶騰 X50 同 奇瑞 Tiggo 7 Pro 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一部，關鍵都要睇返你個人需要同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，先至去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對無錯。
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拿 Proton X50 同 Chery Tiggo Cross 嚟做比較。呢兩款車喺價位同定位上都幾接近，今日我哋就從多個方面做一個詳細嘅比較，幫你節省做功課嘅時間。
Proton X50 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 89,800 - 113,300，一共有 4 個版本，包括 1.5T Executive（RM 89,800）、1.5T Premium（RM 101,800）、1.5T Flagship（RM 113,300）等。
Chery Tiggo Cross 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 88,750 - 99,750，一共有 2 個版本，包括 2025 HEV 1.5L CSH（RM 99,750）、2025 1.5T Standard（RM 88,750）等。
從價錢嚟睇，Chery Tiggo Cross 嘅起步價比 Proton X50 平咗 RM 1,050。老實講，喺呢個價位段，幾千塊嘅差距其實唔算大，關鍵仲係睇整體嘅性價比同長期使用成本。
Proton X50 搭載 1.5L 4-cyl，馬力 105 hp。官方油耗 6.0 L/100km。
Chery Tiggo Cross 搭載 1.5L 4-cyl，馬力 105 hp。官方油耗 6.0 L/100km。
兩款車用緊同一套動力系統，日常開起嚟嘅感覺基本上冇咩分別。油耗方面都差唔多，唔使太糾結這一點。
Proton X50 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA)。
Chery Tiggo Cross 嘅安全評級係 TBD，主動安全系統包括 Basic。
安全配備方面，兩款車都揾到唔錯嘅評級。不過 Proton X50 嘅 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA) 同 Chery Tiggo Cross 嘅 Basic 喺功能上有些差異，如果你比較看重主動安全嘅話，可以仔細比較下兩者嘅功能列表。
Proton X50 車身長 4400 mm，後尾箱 400 L。
Chery Tiggo Cross 車身長 4400 mm，後尾箱 400 L。
兩款車嘅尺寸幾乎一樣，車內空間差別唔大。呢個級別嘅車，日常使用完全夠用。
Proton X50 保修 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Chery Tiggo Cross 保修 3 年/100,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
總體嚟講，Proton X50 同 Chery Tiggo Cross 都係馬來西亞市場好唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一部，關鍵仲係睇你嘅個人需求同預算。我哋建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
In Malaysia's SUV market, many buyers compare Proton X50 and Mazda CX-5 when choosing a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
The OTR price for Proton X50 in Malaysia is RM 89,800 - 113,300, with a total of 4 versions, including 1.5T Executive (RM 89,800), 1.5T Premium (RM 101,800), 1.5T Flagship (RM 113,300), etc.
The OTR price for Mazda CX-5 in Malaysia is RM 135,469 - 166,760, with a total of 3 versions, including 2025 2.0L AT 35th Anniversary (RM 316,154), 2025 2.0L AT (RM 296,154), 2025 2.0L MT (RM 294,154), etc.
In terms of price, the Proton X50's starting price is indeed RM 45,669 cheaper than the Mazda CX-5. If your budget is limited, Proton's entry-level version is sufficient for daily needs. However, keep in mind that saving that few thousand might involve trade-offs in features, depending on your specific needs.
Proton X50 is equipped with 1.5L 4-cyl, 105 hp. Official fuel consumption 6.0 L/100km.
Mazda CX-5 is equipped with 1.5L Turbo, 140 hp. Official fuel consumption 7.0 L/100km.
In terms of power, the 1.5L Turbo of Mazda CX-5 has 35 more horsepower than the 1.5L 4-cyl of Proton X50. However, for daily city driving, the power of both cars is sufficient, you won't feel it lacks power.
Proton X50 safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
Mazda CX-5 safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include.
Both cars share the same safety rating, and safety features are quite comprehensive in this segment. New car safety is generally good, so there is no need to worry too much about this.
Proton X50 body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
Mazda CX-5 body length 4500 mm, trunk 450 L.
In terms of space, the Mazda CX-5 body is 100 mm longer than Proton X50, offering more passenger space advantage. However, Proton X50 is a bit more flexible for parking in the city, each has trade-offs.
Proton X50 adopts 4WD drive mode.
Mazda CX-5 adopts FWD drive mode.
Proton's 4WD and Mazda's FWD will feel different in handling, test drive comparison recommended.
Overall, Proton X50 and Mazda CX-5 are both very good models in the Malaysia market. Which one to choose depends mainly on your personal needs and budget. It is recommended to do your homework, compare quotes from several dealerships, and then test drive to make the final decision. Buying a car is a big deal, taking time to do research is never wrong.
This article originates from AutoR Interviews, author Jia Hongbing
"The return of the all-new QQ, we are not simply competing with opponents to make this market more competitive. We hope to give users a new choice, to have a warmer companionship with QQ."
"Many A0 class small cars in the industry are making 'trade-offs', but users actually don't want to make trade-offs; they want it all. We use platformization and scale to bring down costs without reducing user experience."
"The Chinese market is just a part of the all-new QQ. Since its birth, it has been built as a global car according to global standards."
—— Chery QQ Owner Zhang Hongyu
Interview with Chery QQ Brand Owner Zhang Hongyu: How Does QQ Return?
Produced by: AutoR
Host: Jia Hongbing
Guest: Zhang Hongyu
Chery Automobile's senior 'veteran', possessing deep accumulation in the automotive industry for over 20 years. He personally experienced and witnessed the history of the first generation of Chery QQ sweeping the nation and becoming a national divine car; now, he shoulders the main burden again, serving as the all-new Chery QQ brand owner.
He takes the lead in the operations of the product sequence for the all-new QQ. Relying on the 'Grand Middle Platform' system of big Chery, he promotes the full chain from brand definition, product development, manufacturing to terminal delivery, committed to opening a new chapter for the QQ brand in the electrification and intelligence era facing the global market through intelligent pure electric native platforms and 'tech with warmth'.
AutoR interviews Chery Automobile QQ Brand Owner Zhang Hongyu: How Does QQ Return?
01.
All-new QQ operates independently within the Chery system
AutoR: You have a new Title here, I am quite interested, why call it 'QQ Owner'?
Zhang Hongyu:QQ returns, refreshed, actually at this time point, domestic brands are not just Chery, everyone is thinking about brand issues.
Chery already has Fengyun, Jetour has Shanshui, Jetour high-end Zhongheng, Chery's high-end also has Exeed.
If QQ returns again as a brand brand, it seems quite a lot.
Of course QQ should also be a brand with a lot of feelings, the first generation of QQ everyone still likes it very much!
So for the first product of the all-new QQ return, we still want to use hardcore product power to respond to everyone's expectations.
Why call it Owner? It is back to what I just said, that we don't want to come back and use a new brand organizational structure to do it, we still want to borrow the ability of the big system.
I as the product person in charge, later our team said, then you just call Owner!
This naturally came out, in fact it is still pushing forward according to the idea of operating as an independent brand.
From brand to product definition, to product development to manufacturing to delivery to the whole terminal delivery, experience channel operation management, in fact it still runs according to a set of organizational structure.
Overall I lead this team, in charge of everyone pushing this thing, so everyone gave me a name Owner.
AutoR: How many people are in your team now?
Zhang Hongyu: It is the wholeQQ from brand to marketing to terminal channels, to product definition development, this is actually QQ team exclusive, we this team total about 1,000 people.
AutoR: Over 1,000 people?
Zhang Hongyu:Over 1,000 people. Then the whole backend also has us do product engineering development specially, do engineering development verification, do manufacturing delivery, do quality control management, these are actually Chery whole 'Grand Middle Platform' give us do support, equivalent to we make requirements, we set targets, they have to give us delivery, to reach my requirements.
Then this is 'Big Chery' system team help us do support, we exclusive team now already about 1,000 people.
AutoR: You are also an old Chery person, here for more than 20 years.
Zhang Hongyu: Yes.
AutoR: Actually the first generation QQ was also nearly 20 years ago, exactly you witnessed the first generation QQ to now second generation QQ resurrection. When the first generation, you originally in Chery what position?
Zhang Hongyu: Cannot mention position, now also cannot mention any position.
Do Chery, everyone still very happy.
We hope regardless of do QQ or do Chery other brand cars, must do it well, let users like.
First generation QQ why there so big sales, actually essence is still that car from modeling above say, is grow on everyone's aesthetics point.
That car in that era, its color very bright, color many, let users have many choices.
At the same time its product power also very capable, in that time small cars achieved large space, chassis also very solid, its power also very strong.
Many users actually drive QQ that small car still open to Lhasa up, Lhasa certain degree represent do car, your hardcore mechanical performance still very solid.
Users many spontaneously set up car owner association, we also set up QQ primary school, actually is users through QQ this platform, many people become very good friends, some also borrow this platform do their career make very well.
QQ second time return, I personally think also is everyone's voice, users very look forward.
Today we again come do all-new QQ, more confident, because today electrification, intelligence, Chery technology foundation strength stronger.
So we more confident do QQ every car can achieve user interaction experience sense, driving experience sense should can do better.
So we not simple come do a compete with opponent car, or let user choose very hard car, we hope it can achieve like past QQ same, it very classic, it very different, it very lively, it can reflect young people that kind exploration, free.
Put this spirit can return to new QQ, we want do such thing.
So we all-new QQ, actually company still spent heavy money create a new platform, call intelligent pure electric platform.
It can in electronic architecture, chassis platform these aspects just can very well realize, we future regardless whether in space, in driving, in intelligence, in OTA above, it can do infinite stretch.
We not simple go compete with opponent, let this market more competitive, we hope let users have a new choice, can with QQ do more warm companionship.
We internal team say we must use more temperature technology, give users bring best, extreme experience.
All-new QQ3 everyone can see four get users point call high appearance, large layout, strong body, more understand you.
We talk large layout is space not only big, not only more is easy to use, more is you maybe use more use want, so we for this why like put front trunk, we want do many kind open way, actually we think each kind open way it may certain in scene under let your experience sense pull full, let you very convenient.
I once with our team say, I say we do a voice interaction, you think ah, I say mom drive car go pick her own baby, then in school gate, this baby use he like wake word open front trunk, put his schoolbag in.
I say that instant open and auto close that instant, this kid absolutely in his classmate face, he is full sense of pride, this certain degree reflect this car technology, but more reflect it has temperature technology, it understand you.
So we hope do such QQ, this is Chery confidence, technology strength.
QQ second time return time, we think we can achieve call 'King Return, One Step到位'.
02.
All-new QQ focuses on A0 class small cars
AutoR: Chery so many brands, QQ in Chery new brand group, it status a what position?
Zhang Hongyu: We now should call product sequence, just belong Chery brand below product sequence, focus do this kind call A0 class level small cars.
This kind car we hope for a kind call have passion, explore, can enjoy in it also willing to share (people provide), just hope put our brand build have this slogan spirit a product sequence.
So our product you will see it very suitable do DIY, it very lively.
At the same time its inside technology factors many, just this kind intelligence.
And this kind intelligence thing still can constantly OTA, it this chassis solid, let you can go farther place.
These are we QQ next do product, we want grasp technology route.
For example our space and driving, we just use all-new intelligent pure electric platform go create.
We next car wheelbase may can achieve 2 meters 8 above, this platform will make our internal space, regardless height, main line above this length and width, it all will very comfortable.
AutoR: China many brands also all do A0 class small cars, and all are pure electric, just our this native pure electric platform have what advantage no?
Zhang Hongyu: This platform because is new consider ah! It from start design time, is with user demand as origin go consider, at the same time consider do multi model have extendibility, so in chassis platform above, first achieve rear drive layout.
Rear drive layout benefit lies in put front space give let out, it has front trunk.
This kind small cars past all are oil cars, oil cars sure front drive, because engine all in front ah, engine gearbox in front you then less space utilization, very convenient electric front trunk it just unable achieve.
This must rely on platform layout, another, I just said chassis layout above, we in steering, braking above all consider future extend models.
So this kind platformization, universal design, future small cars cost also favorable, it not let users do configuration trade-off, actually use we this kind platformization, universalization put scale do up, cover multiple markets.
So my cost can hit down, but user experience I not reduce, his demand not reduce.
For example its computing power must enough, it can support from domain control to central integration, so it can constantly OTA.
It not a piecemeal, makeshift car, now industry small cars, I not say complaint our friends not good, everyone actually all for users do very hard, also do all very excellent, but overall say I think many directions still in trade-off.
Because you trade-off after, he will inconvenient, or his experience just not so good.
For example some want range do very high very long, but he for this more pile cost after, other place maybe do interior do pull weak a bit, plastic sense stronger, or material use maybe it smell just not how good, even he sometimes in body chassis safety on he maybe do some sacrifice, in turn he some maybe is chassis driving comfort above maybe he also sacrifice, for example he use torsion beam, then you think he use torsion beam that this bump, pass shock absorber strip it sure uncomfortable ah!
We consider small cars time, we second row often consider elderly want with family together, weekend time go out elderly sit back, itself elderly he just endure not fiddle, you this small car again bump, that sure not like sit ah.
This not our original intention, these are we consider do QQ time, we how use platform put it create well.
03.
Born Global, China is just one of QQ's markets
AutoR: We know Chery export very powerful, QQ is a face global market model, you on its global sales how view?
Zhang Hongyu: Now domestic brands all go export, call domestic brand strengthen, make strong, do long-term, inevitable experience this process.
Especially this one two year, should domestic brand export do all very excellent.
Chery because always do overseas market, always do global layout, Chery do time is longest, from performance look also not bad, continuous many years all domestic brand export first.
QQ from start all consider global layout, right steering like Thailand, Indonesia, Malaysia these markets, still left steering markets, we all are do global layout.
So this car from start platform design time, in development verification time, we all according to local law, regulation and user demand.
So I in launch release meeting once say, we QQ3 actually experienced various exams, global big exam, practice a body skill.
So you in China market buy QQ3, actually it is fit global car standard.
This year 5 month, I just go to some right steering markets, like Malaysia, Indonesia, to 9 month I will go Europe like UK, Aus New these markets, about next year beginning just direct global pave. China just is me this QQ one market.
AutoR: Then on its sales have what expectation?
Zhang Hongyu: Sales ah naturally bigger better.
Currently look, domestic market demand should very lively, last year year, this Geely one car Xingyuan just sell 460,000 units, and single month sales several months just passed 50,000, and it now overseas export also very good; include BYD many small cars, like Seagull, Dolphin, these cars export also very good.
Buy electric car, its experience sense better than oil car very much, economic performance also very good, use maintenance cost also low, then consumer is understand, so I believe choice people will more more.
AutoR: This small car this year actually some new technology configurations, for example like 80,000 yuan install LiDAR, some want run world model, but we feel this QQ3 actually not above go compete. In intelligence driving aspects we how layout?
Zhang Hongyu: We this car also configure Falcon500, on Highway NOA above is not have problem.
On Sharing Edition above all up automatic parking, just parking assist. This small cars parking assist, we think user should be use high frequency scene, because many moms she on parking mind actually still have anxiety, include young people just get driving license, so we in Sharing Edition two configurations up, automatic parking all have.
Because QQ in this platform also plan new others models, we also will with this intelligence driving ability continuous enhance, cost continuous dip, finally also must put it perfect match to QQ above go, but this must look intelligence driving experience maturity and it can give consumer pricing, because small cars overall sale price should not high, so must overall put it match well.
I think in intelligence driving above, especially domestic brands, in chip, computing power, large model above, this development in multiple models above application more and more mature, I believe more and more excellent.
AutoR: Is future QQ this product line how arrange? For example have QQ5, still a car is right?
Zhang Hongyu: Later we will with industry will gradually release these information, overallQQ dream still very big, global layout, we also aim for more consumers can choose QQ, as mission to go develop, so later models have bigger point, also more personality point, all go launch.
AutoR: If take five years as one time node, you hope five years after, QQ can achieve a what vision can satisfy your effort?
Zhang Hongyu: I think right now we first step go well, first step go well, everything possible.
Of course is company include shareholder, expect maybe all very big ah!
QQ overall because we global layout, according now industry this kind A0 class car currently development trend look, I think we achieve a bigger target should have challenge, but should we have confidence.
"Interviewing Pioneering Figures, Recording Human Mobility Transformation." AutoR Interviews is AutoR Network's in-depth interview column launched for AI and future mobility field, planned and hosted by AutoR Network founder, editor-in-chief Jia Hongbing.
AutoR Interviews ID:DeepAutoR
Cooperation or news tips contact email: zhubian@autor.com.cn
Contact person WeChat: buyuziya
從萬千甄選到千萬信賴，每一份選擇，都係品牌成長嘅最好見證。7 月 16 日，廣汽集團 3000 萬用戶感恩盛典於廣汽傳祺工廠隆重舉行。政企領導、行業大咖、產業鏈合作夥伴、海內外車主、媒體及員工代表齊聚現場，共同見證廣汽發展史上極具分量嘅 3000 萬整車交付里程碑，解鎖中國汽車品牌高質量發展嘅全新篇章。
【與會嘉賓見證廣汽迎嚟 3000 萬用戶里程碑時刻】
歷經 29 年砥礪深耕，廣汽從首台整車下線，到累計 3000 萬輛整車交付，數字嘅跨越不僅係規模嘅突破，更係千萬用戶口碑嘅沉澱。呢個里程碑，既係廣汽堅守品質初心、加速智能新能源轉型嘅實力佐證，更係中國汽車工業從規模擴張邁向價值躍昇嘅生動縮影。
本次盛典以全域聯動嘅形式，展現廣汽強勁嘅轉型活力與全球實力。活動現場，廣汽全球多座生產基地雲端聯動，廣汽本田 P7、廣汽豐田鉑智 7、啟境 GT7、廣汽埃安 N60、廣汽昊鉑 S600 等多款新能源車型依次下線，完整呈現廣汽全覆盖、多元化嘅智能新能源產品矩陣。
【廣汽智能新能源矩陣閃亮登場】
萬眾矚目嘅第 3000 萬輛整車——右舵版廣汽傳祺 M8 PHEV 正式亮相下線，彰顯廣汽深耕全球化市場嘅堅定佈局。廣汽集團董事長馮興亞將新車鑰匙交付泰國車主 Tony Jaa，呢場跨越山海嘅雙向奔赴，生動詮釋咗廣汽品牌立足中國、走向世界嘅硬核實力與溫度。
【廣汽第 3000 萬輛整車——右舵版廣汽傳祺 M8 PHEV 駛下生產線】
【馮興亞（左）為泰國車主 Tony Jaa（右）交付新車鑰匙】
扎實嘅產品佈局，助推銷量穩步攀升。數據顯示，今年上半年廣汽集團累計銷量 77.31 萬輛，同比增長 2.35%；新能源車型銷量同比暴漲 68.8%，轉型成效凸顯。海外市場更係迎來爆發式增長，出口量突破 12 萬輛，同比增幅高達 132%，喺行業深度調整期跑出咗穩健向上嘅增長曲線。
「品質係廣汽永遠唔會讓渡嘅底線。」深耕行業近三十載，廣汽始終堅守「質量第一」核心理念，融合本田全面質量管理、豐田精益生產模式，結合本土市場特點打造專屬融合創新質量管理體系，讓品質貫穿研發、生產、交付全流程。
【廣汽發展歷程重要節點見證者講述廣汽與品質同行嘅故事】
【「國家卓越工程師團隊」廣汽動力總成自主研發團隊講述研發創新歷程】
【廣汽造型設計團隊講述設計創新歷程】
嚴苛嘅品控標準，係品質嘅核心保障。廣汽全系新車均需歷經「五高一山一塵」極端環境測試，完成「兩冬一夏」全場景實地路試，通過整車 12 大項、1500 多項嚴苛驗證，全方位適配複雜路況與多元出行場景。依托全球首個新能源汽車燈塔工廠——廣汽埃安智能生態工廠，以數碼化、智能化生產體系，實現量產車型品質穩定可控。
【廣汽埃安智能生態工廠】
喺安全技術領域，廣汽構築全方位守護壁壘。自研星靈安全守護體系覆蓋智能底盤、主被動安全、電池安全、智能駕駛四大維度，八大關鍵系統採納雙冗餘設計，累計已規避 628 萬次潛在出行風險，守護近 200 萬用戶出行安全。王牌彈匣電池累計裝車 150 萬台，安全行駛里程超 1600 億公里。同時，行業首創自主品牌「三擔責」政策，針對電池、智能駕駛輔助用戶痛點主動兜底，徹底打消用戶用車顧慮。
【廣汽星靈安全守護體系】
始終以用戶為中心，係廣汽持續領跑嘅核心密碼。秉持「人為本、信為道、創為先」嘅企業理念，廣汽將用戶需求融入品牌發展基因，搭建起全週期、全場景、閉環式用戶服務體系。
【廣汽「用戶全開麥」活動現場】
為傾聽真實用戶心聲，廣汽常態化開展「用戶全開麥」活動，直面用戶訴求、吸納用戶建議，透過專屬用戶洞察部門，實現用戶問題件件有回應、事事有着落。服務渠道持續下沉，年內計劃新增 1000 家縣域授權門店，打通基層服務壁壘；依托「超級管家」服務體系，實現 5 秒快速響應、2 小時訴求辦結，大幅提升服務效率。
補能生態持續完善，廣汽打造「9 縱 10 橫」全國補能網絡，覆蓋全國 31 個省份 213 座城市，擁有超 2.7 萬根充電樁、2 萬餘根超充樁，實現核心城區「直線 1 公里必有站」，為新能源用戶帶來便捷高效嘅補能體驗。
【廣汽能源「9 縱 10 橫」補能網絡】
為感恩 3000 萬用戶嘅一路陪伴，廣汽正式啟動「3000 萬輛下線·煥新感恩季」，旗下廣汽本田、廣汽豐田、廣汽傳祺、廣汽埃安、廣汽昊鉑、啟境汽車六大品牌，同步推出新購、置換、增購專屬福利政策，以滿滿誠意回饋千萬用戶信賴。
【廣汽集團 3000 萬輛下線·煥新感恩季正式啟動】
3000 萬係里程碑，更係全新起點。立足全新發展階段，廣汽以科技創新為核心驅動，持續深耕動力、三電、智能聯網核心技術，加速向生態型科技企業轉型。
動力領域，廣汽星源動力系統覆蓋增程、插混、超級雙擎三大技術路線，歷經 10 萬小時台架測試、超 1000 萬公里整車驗證，全場景性能穩定強悍，為用戶帶來高效、省心嘅出行體驗。三電領域持續攻堅行業痛點，建成全固態電池中試產線，自研夸克電驅電機效率突破 99%，達到行業頂尖水平。
【廣汽星源動力讓用戶選擇「不再湊合」】
智能領域，星靈架構全面迭代，打通駕駛、座艙、動力、底盤等六大核心系統，整車綜合性能提升 40%；星河智艙實現端雲一體，打造人性化、智能化移動出行空間。同時，廣汽攜手華為、寧德時代、騰訊、阿里等行業頭部企業，共建 AI 智能出行生態，持續解鎖未來出行新可能。
深耕技術研發，築牢創新底氣。目前廣汽累計研發投入超 620 億圓，組建超 6800 人嘅全球研發團隊，持續以硬核科技賦能產品升級、體驗升級。未來，廣汽將堅守品質初心、深耕用戶價值、堅持科技創新、加速全球佈局，以穩健姿態開拓智能、綠色、全球化新賽道，同千萬用戶並肩同行，奔赴下一個全新征程。
In the new energy market arena, a brand once universally questioned is now playing a surprisingly good hand.
In July 2026, Deepal Automobiles delivered an impressive semi-annual performance report: January–June global cumulative sales reached 164,000 units, a year-on-year increase of 14.6%. Among them, June single-month sales were 33,600 units, exceeding 30,000 units for four consecutive months. Overseas market first-half cumulative exports were 35,800 units, a year-on-year increase of 141%.
However, just a few months ago, Deepal was far from this scene.
Q1 2026, Deepal sales year-on-year declined by over 17%, January deliveries dropped month-on-month, February didn't even directly publish total series sales. Full-year 2025 sales settled at 333,100 units, although the adjusted target was completed, but built on the basis of the annual target actively being downward-adjusted from an initial 500,000 units to 360,000 units — this is the third consecutive year Deepal failed to complete the originally set annual target.
More troublesome than sales is the profit dilemma: By end of October 2025, Deepal cumulative loss was as high as 13.53 billion RMB, asset-liability ratio reached 114.3%, and it has been insolvent for consecutive years. At that time, Deepal was regarded by outsiders as one of the brands most likely to fail in new energy "fierce competition".
However, from being viewed negatively to consecutive monthly sales exceeding 30,000, what did Deepal rely on to complete this "comeback"?
The most direct answer is hidden in the product structure. Deepal S05, L06, S07 three main models constitute a stable "sales triangle", rather than relying on a single blockbuster. Deepal S05 is the absolute "sales leader" — June global sales 18,400 units, year-on-year growth 78.86%, cumulative sales already over 240,000 units. Deepal L06 staged a "V-shaped turnaround", from a January low of only 1,656 units, to June climbing to 7,977 units, exceeding 5,000 units for four consecutive months, winning the 130,000–200,000 RMB new energy medium-sized car quarterly sales champion. Deepal S07 remained steady, June sales 6,994 units.
But the formation of product structure is just the appearance. What truly supports this matrix to run is the clear logic Deepal has on technology inclusiveness, its official summary being, "Not competing on price, competing on technology, bringing high-tech to a more suitable price interval." Such as L06's magnetorheological suspension and LiDAR, S05's 3C super charging and full series standard L2+ intelligent driving, S07's Huawei Qiankun intelligent driving solution. These technologies taken alone are not fresh, but concentrated on 150,000 RMB tier models, almost impossible to find a second at the same price level.
It is worth mentioning, behind this is not relying on "loss-making" to hold up, but a verified supply chain logic: Deepal uses scale to exchange for cost, uses cost to exchange for configuration, uses configuration to exchange for sales — then sales feedback scale, forming a positive cycle.
Additionally, the explosion in overseas markets provides another growth logic. Domestic new energy market growth rate has dropped to single digits, stock characteristics are becoming more obvious, which means every incremental unit must come from competitor shares. Based on this, Deepal extends the battlefield outward, its first half overseas sales 35,800 units, year-on-year growth 141%, business covers over 100 countries and regions, Thailand factory and five KD workshops have been put into operation. Overseas is not only a sales supplement, but also a kind of risk hedging: When domestic price wars fight to the extreme, the overseas market gross margin space and brand premium ability provide Deepal with larger maneuvering room.
But under the halo of sales numbers, some deeper questions are equally unavoidable.
First is profit. By end of October 2025, Deepal cumulative loss 13.53 billion RMB, asset-liability ratio 114.3% — the situation of selling one losing one although is narrowing, but the distance from real self-sustaining is still there. Standing at 30,000 units for four consecutive months just touched the "threshold" of break-even, crossing this threshold requires continuous stable scale output, rather than several months of volume push.
Second is the moat. Deepal current competitive advantage is using supply chain integration to put high-end configuration down to 150,000 RMB tier, its essence is a kind of "efficiency advantage", rather than "technology generation gap". Efficiency advantage can be imitated, chased, even surpassed. When competitors also put LiDAR, magnetorheological suspension to this price level, what is Deepal's next differentiation weapon?
Additionally, there is overseas market uncertainty. 35,800 units half-year export is only a beginning. Overseas growth depends on local capacity, channel network, and brand cognition continuous investment, any link's delay may change the growth curve's slope. At the same time, overseas market policy risk, local opponent counterattack, brand cognition long accumulation, are variables Deepal must face.
Six months ago, Deepal was still questioned whether it could survive; six months later, it gave the answer with 164,000 units performance. But this answer is just phased. Profit realization, thickness of technology barrier, overseas expansion variables — these three exam questions, Deepal has not finally submitted answers yet.
And this, is exactly the core exam question of the new energy industry's second half: First half, competed on whether can make the car out, sell out; second half, competes on whether can sustain profit, whether can build brand, whether can stand firm on global market. Now, Deepal's first half report is not bad, and the second half's curtain, has just been pulled open.
Global electrification is reconstructing the automotive industry division of labor system. The dividend of the single complete vehicle export model is gradually fading. Full-value-chain localized operational capability has become the core watershed for Chinese automakers participating in global market competition. Southeast Asia, relying on free trade agreement networks, mature automotive supporting foundations, and new energy policy support, has become the core battlefield for new energy vehicle capacity deployment for independent brands. As the core hub of the ASEAN automotive industry, Thailand continuously attracts domestic top automakers to establish manufacturing bases. Industrial cooperation has progressed from simple product trading to deep binding stages of supply chain co-construction, technology localization, and talent localization. The 2026 China-Thailand Sichuan Economic and Trade Investment Forum landed. Changan Automobile, as the only Chinese automaker invited to operate in Thailand, completed a high-level meeting with the Prime Minister of Thailand. Its three-year industrial landing results in Thailand and medium-to-long-term capacity R&D planning clearly show the underlying logic of the current top independent brand's globalization strategy, and also provide a typical sample for the industry to observe the outbound transformation of Chinese automakers.
Localized Capacity Forms a Closed Loop, Complete Industrial Landing Reshapes Regional Supply System
Since entering the Thai market in 2023, Changan Automobile has continuously promoted full-chain localized investment. With an investment of 9 billion Thai Baht, it built the Rayong overseas new energy complete vehicle factory, completing the complete loop of local supply for production and cross-border export. This changed the market pattern where Southeast Asian new energy complete vehicles relied on imports. As of now, the brand's cumulative sales of complete vehicles in Thailand have exceeded 41,000 units. 13 new energy models have been launched, covering local mainstream niche markets. 2 local mass-produced models have achieved export supply targeting 18 countries. Thailand has officially become the manufacturing hub for Changan to radiate the global right-hand drive market.
At the level of industrial synergy, the brand collaborates with over 40 local parts enterprises operating simultaneously, and simultaneously introduces 10 domestic core supporting enterprises to build factories in Thailand, making up for the shortcomings of Thailand's new energy three-electric systems supporting facilities, and promoting the transformation of the local traditional fuel vehicle industry chain towards electrification. Operational data intuitively reflects the value of industrial symbiosis, with cumulative tax contributions exceeding 1.6 billion Thai Baht, absorbing over 1,900 local jobs, and the talent localization rate is close to 90%. From an industry perspective, this model breaks out of the superficial layout of simply building factories for production. By driving the landing of upstream supporting industries, it helps the host country improve its new energy industry foundation, while reducing cross-border supply chain costs for automakers, forming a balanced mode of mutual empowerment between automakers and local industries, distinct from the lightweight layout of many overseas brands that only perform complete vehicle assembly.
Medium-to-Long Term Planning Anchors Regional Leader, R&D, Capacity, and Talent Three-Dimensional Investment Deeply Binds Industry
The medium-to-long term development plan released by the talks clearly conveys Changan's strategic orientation to deeply cultivate Southeast Asia rather than seeking short-term arbitrage. Goals in four dimensions—market, capacity, R&D, and talent—are implemented simultaneously to build a sustainable localized operation system. On the market side, it is planned to exceed 70,000 annual sales in Thailand by 2030, aiming for the second position among Chinese brands and the fourth position in the industry locally, continuously squeezing the market space for traditional foreign fuel vehicles and Japanese/Korean new energy brands. On the capacity side, the Rayong Factory Phase II expansion demonstration will be launched in 2028. Relying on the existing mature factory area, a larger manufacturing scale will be released to match the growing new energy consumption demand in ASEAN.
Localization of R&D and supply chain has become a core focus. The enterprise plans to land a Thailand regional R&D center, simultaneously setting a target for local parts procurement rate to exceed 60% by 2028, achieving technology adaptation to local road conditions and climate needs, and reducing overseas technology adaptation costs. In terms of talent, the plan is to expand the local employee scale to 3,000 by 2030, maintaining the proportion of local personnel in technical and management positions above 90%, building an autonomous and controllable local operation team. Analyzed from an industry perspective, this plan breaks the traditional mode where overseas automakers are dominated by expatriate operations. It reduces cross-border management costs through long-term talent cultivation. At the same time, it adapts to regional markets through local R&D, which is a characteristic feature of the improved maturity of independent brands' globalization.
Government-Enterprise Two-Way Synergy Builds Development Foundation, Southeast Asia Becomes Core Pivot of Chinese Automakers' Global Strategy
At the Thai government level, Changan is clearly regarded as the core partner for the country's new energy industry upgrade, committing to continuously improve the industrial infrastructure, logistics supporting, and talent cultivation systems, and issuing special policies to support enterprises in completing medium-to-long term market goals. The local government clearly recognizes the shortcomings of the local new energy industry. Relying on the complete three-electric manufacturing system of Chinese-owned automakers, it quickly makes up for the shortcomings of electrification transformation, and uses foreign production capacity to enhance the global export competitiveness of its own automotive industry.
The Changan Southeast Asia Division shared industry judgments at the economic and trade forum. Currently, Chinese new energy brands have mastered the dominant position in the Thai electric vehicle market. The export advantages brought by multiple free trade agreements fully cover the global right-hand drive market, which is the core logic for the brand to firmly root locally. From the perspective of top-level corporate strategy, the Thailand layout is the key landing carrier for Changan's 1445 Global Strategy and the Inclusive Plan 2.0. The brand has officially completed the transformation from export trade to an integrated system of manufacturing investment and service operation. Relying on the global collaborative R&D system of 6 countries and 10 locations, 24,000 cross-border R&D personnel continuously output core new energy technologies. Superimposed on the nearly 3 million units of production and sales volume globally in 2025, the overseas market has become the brand's second growth curve. The Thailand base is exactly the benchmark carrier for the landing of this globalization system.
Placing it from a macro industry perspective, the Southeast Asian market competition has already moved beyond simple price competition of product prices. Whether it can drive host country industry chain upgrades, build local R&D and talent systems, and achieve long-term stable industry investment determines the brand's regional long-term competitiveness. A large number of overseas foreign automakers only layout assembly factories, lacking upstream supporting industries and local R&D investment. In the long run, they will find it difficult to adapt to the regional electrification rapid iteration demand. The complete industry chain advantage of Chinese independent brands forms a differentiated competitive barrier here.
Conclusion: Industrial Symbiosis Reshapes New Paradigm of Independent Brand Global Competition
Changan Automobile's deep localization layout in Thailand represents a fundamental iteration of the outbound logic of Chinese automakers, thoroughly saying goodbye to the superficial trade model of single complete vehicle exports, and walking out an industrial symbiosis path with multi-dimensional synergy of manufacturing, supporting, R&D, and talent. Relying on the dividends of China-Thailand economic and trade cooperation, Changan uses the Rayong new energy base to open up export channels for the ASEAN and even global right-hand drive markets. It not only helps Thailand make up for the shortcomings of the new energy industry chain and drives local employment and tax growth, but also relies on the host country's industrial policy and location advantages to solidify its own Asia-Pacific regional hub positioning. Against the backdrop of global automotive electrification reconstructing the division of labor, this long-term operation idea that deeply binds to the local, balancing enterprise development and host country industry upgrade, builds a differentiated barrier distinct from the lightweight assembly model of traditional overseas automakers. It provides a mature industry model for the systematic global layout of domestic independent brands and continuously promotes the advancement of China's automotive industry from product output to full industry chain global operation.
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拿 Proton X50 同 Mazda CX-8 嚟做比較。這兩款車喺價位同定位上都幾近，今日我哋就從多個方面做一個詳細嘅比較，幫你節省咗做功課嘅時間。
Proton X50 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 89,800 - 113,300，一共有 4 個版本，包括 1.5T Executive（RM 89,800）、1.5T Premium（RM 101,800）、1.5T Flagship（RM 113,300） 等等。
Mazda CX-8 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 165,360 - 201,360，一共有 5 個版本，包括 2025 2.5T 4WD High Plus Petrol（RM 201,360）、2025 2.2L 2WD High Plus Diesel（RM 193,123）、2025 2.5L 2WD High Plus Petrol（RM 186,360） 等等。
由價錢來看，Proton X50 嘅起步價確實比 Mazda CX-8 平咗 RM 75,560。如果你預算有限，Proton 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需求。但都要注意，便宜嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備上有取捨，具體要睇你嘅需求。
Proton X50 採用 4WD 驅動方式。
Mazda CX-8 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
Proton 嘅 4WD 同 Mazda 嘅 FWD 喺操控上會有唔同感受，建議試駕比較。
Proton X50 保養 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Mazda CX-8 保養 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
兩款車嘅保養條件一樣，呢方面唔使煩惱。實際保養成本仲要睇品牌嘅服務網絡同零件價錢，建議去車友群問問真實車主嘅經驗。
Proton X50 同 Mazda CX-8 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更看重品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰一款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，就揀配置更豐富嗰款。最終都係建議兩款都去試駕，親身體驗先係最重要。
總嚟講，Proton X50 同 Mazda CX-8 都係馬來西亞市場幾不錯嘅車型。揀邊一部，關鍵都要睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，先去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花點時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嗰陣都會拎 Proton X50 同 Mazda CX-3 拎嚟比較。呢兩款車喺價位同定位上都幾接近嘅，今日我哋就從多個方面做一次詳細嘅比較，幫你省咗做功課嘅時間。
Proton X50 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 89,800 - 113,300，合共 4 個版本，包括 1.5T Executive（RM 89,800）、1.5T Premium（RM 101,800）、1.5T Flagship（RM 113,300）等。
Mazda CX-3 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 126,159 - 139,159，合共 2 個版本，包括 2023 2.0L High（RM 139,159）、2023 2.0L Plus（RM 126,159）等。
睇返價錢，Proton X50 嘅起步價確實比 Mazda CX-3 平咗 RM 36,359。如果你預算有限，Proton 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需要。但都要留意，平嗰幾千蚊，喺配備上可能會有取捨，具體就要睇你嘅需要。
Proton X50 車身長 4400 mm，後尾箱 400 L。
Mazda CX-3 車身長 4500 mm，後尾箱 450 L。
空間方面，Mazda CX-3 嘅車身比 Proton X50 長咗 100 mm，坐位空間更有優勢。不過 Proton X50 喺城內泊車會靈活啲，各有取捨。
Proton X50 採用 4WD 驅動方式。
Mazda CX-3 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
Proton 嘅 4WD 同 Mazda 嘅 FWD 喺操控上會有唔同感覺，建議試駕比較。
Proton X50 同 Mazda CX-3 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更重視品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰一款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，那就揀配備更豐富嗰款。最後始終建議兩款都去試駕，親身試下先至係最重要。
總括嚟講，Proton X50 同 Mazda CX-3 都係馬來西亞市場幾不錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵都係要睇你嘅個人需要同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers compare the Proton X50 and Toyota Yaris Cross when choosing a car. These two models are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
The OTR price of Proton X50 in Malaysia is RM 89,800 - 113,300, with a total of 4 versions, including 1.5T Executive (RM 89,800), 1.5T Premium (RM 101,800), 1.5T Flagship (RM 113,300), etc.
The OTR price of Toyota Yaris Cross in Malaysia is RM 99,900 - 109,900, with a total of 2 versions, including 2026 1.5L Standard (RM 99,900), 2026 HEV 1.5L Standard (RM 109,900), etc.
Looking at the price, the starting price of the Proton X50 is indeed RM 10,100 cheaper than the Toyota Yaris Cross. If your budget is limited, Proton's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. However, also note that the price difference of a few thousand might involve trade-offs in features, depending on your specific needs.
Proton X50 body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
Toyota Yaris Cross body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
The dimensions of the two cars are almost the same, and the interior space difference is not significant. For cars at this level, daily use is more than enough.
Proton X50 warranty 5 years/150,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Toyota Yaris Cross warranty 5 years/unlimited mileage, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Proton X50 and Toyota Yaris Cross are both mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, you can prioritize the one with better reputation; if you care more about cost-performance ratio and features, choose the one with richer configuration. Finally, it is recommended to test drive both, as personal experience is the most important.
Overall, Proton X50 and Toyota Yaris Cross are both very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose mainly depends on your personal needs and budget. It is recommended to do your homework, compare quotes from several dealerships, and then test drive to make the final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending some time doing research will never be wrong.
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嗰陣都會揾 Proton X50 同 Toyota Corolla Cross 比較。兩款車喺價位同定位上都好接近，今日我哋就從多個方面做個詳細比較，幫你節省做功課嘅時間。
Proton X50 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 89,800 - 113,300，一共有 4 個型號，包括 1.5T Executive（RM 89,800）、1.5T Premium（RM 101,800）、1.5T Flagship（RM 113,300） 等。
Toyota Corolla Cross 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 133,800 - 148,800，一共有 3 個型號，包括 2026 HEV 1.8L GR Sport（RM 148,800）、2026 HEV 1.8L Standard（RM 140,800）、2026 1.8L Standard（RM 133,800） 等。
從價格睇落，Proton X50 嘅起價確實比 Toyota Corolla Cross 平咗 RM 44,000。如果你預算有限，Proton 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需求。但都要注意，平嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備上要有取舍，具體要睇你嘅需求。
Proton X50 搭載 1.5L 4-cyl，馬力 105 hp。官方油耗 6.0 L/100km。
Toyota Corolla Cross 搭載 1.5L Turbo，馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。
动力方面，Toyota Corolla Cross 嘅 1.5L Turbo 比 Proton X50 嘅 1.5L 4-cyl 多咗 35 匹馬力。不過日常喺市區開，兩款車嘅動力都夠用，唔會覺得唔夠力。
Proton X50 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA)。
Toyota Corolla Cross 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 TSS (PCS, LDA, ACC, LTA)。
兩款車嘅安全評級一樣，喺呢個級別入面安全配備都算好齊全。而家嘅新車安全性都唔差，唔使太擔心呢一點。
Proton X50 採用 4WD 驅動方式。
Toyota Corolla Cross 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
Proton 嘅 4WD 同 Toyota 嘅 FWD 喺操控上會有唔同感覺，建議試車比較。
Proton X50 同 Toyota Corolla Cross 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更睇重品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，就揀配置更豐富嗰款。最終都係建議兩款都去試車，親身體驗先係最重要。
總體嚟講，Proton X50 同 Toyota Corolla Cross 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊部，關鍵都係要睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，先至去試車做最終決定。買車係件大事，花啲時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
