首頁river
搜尋歷史
熱門搜尋
經銷商登入 / 註冊
In the SUV market in Malaysia, many buyers will compare the Proton X50 and Toyota Yaris Cross when choosing a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning, so today we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
The Proton X50 OTR selling price in Malaysia is RM 89,800 - 113,300, with a total of 4 versions, including 1.5T Executive (RM 89,800), 1.5T Premium (RM 101,800), 1.5T Flagship (RM 113,300), etc.
The Toyota Yaris Cross OTR selling price in Malaysia is RM 99,900 - 109,900, with a total of 2 versions, including 2026 1.5L Standard (RM 99,900), 2026 HEV 1.5L Standard (RM 109,900), etc.
From the price perspective, the Proton X50 starting price is indeed RM 10,100 cheaper than the Toyota Yaris Cross. If your budget is limited, Proton's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. However, be aware that the few thousand ringgit cheaper might involve compromises on features, depending on your specific needs.
The Proton X50 is equipped with a 1.5L 4-cyl engine, 105 hp. Official fuel consumption 6.0 L/100km.
The Toyota Yaris Cross is equipped with a 1.5L 4-cyl engine, 105 hp. Official fuel consumption 6.0 L/100km.
Both cars use the same powertrain system, and the driving feel daily is basically no difference. Fuel consumption is also about the same, no need to worry too much about this.
Proton X50 warranty 5 years/150,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Toyota Yaris Cross warranty 5 years/unlimited mileage, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Both the Proton X50 and Toyota Yaris Cross are mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale price more, you can prioritize the one with better reputation; if you care more about cost-performance and features, then choose the model with richer configuration. In the end, it is recommended to test drive both, personal experience is the most important.
Overall, both the Proton X50 and Toyota Yaris Cross are very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends mainly on your personal needs and budget. It is recommended that everyone do their homework, compare quotes from several dealerships, and then test drive to make the final decision. Buying a car is a major event, spending time doing research will definitely not be a mistake.
In Malaysia's SUV market, many buyers compare Proton X50 and Honda CR-V when choosing a car. These two models are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
The Proton X50 OTR price in Malaysia is RM 89,800 - 113,300, with a total of 4 versions, including 1.5T Executive (RM 89,800), 1.5T Premium (RM 101,800), 1.5T Flagship (RM 113,300), etc.
The Honda CR-V OTR price in Malaysia is RM 178,200 - 195,900, with a total of 4 versions, including 2026 e:HEV 2.0L 2WD RS (RM 195,900), 2026 1.5T 4WD V (RM 181,900), 2026 e:HEV 2.0L 2WD E (RM 178,200), etc.
From a price perspective, the Proton X50's starting price is indeed RM 88,400 cheaper than the Honda CR-V. If your budget is limited, Proton's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. However, note that the savings of a few thousand might involve trade-offs in features, depending on your specific requirements.
Proton X50 is equipped with a 1.5L 4-cyl, 105 hp. Official fuel consumption 6.0 L/100km.
Honda CR-V is equipped with a 2.0L 4-cyl, 170 hp. Official fuel consumption 8.0 L/100km.
In terms of power, the Honda CR-V's 2.0L 4-cyl has 65 more horsepower than the Proton X50's 1.5L 4-cyl. However, for daily city driving, both cars have sufficient power and won't feel underpowered.
Proton X50 safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
Honda CR-V safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include Honda SENSING (ACC, CMBS, LKAS, RDM).
Both cars have the same safety rating, and safety features are quite comprehensive in this class. New cars nowadays generally have good safety, so no need to worry too much about this.
Proton X50 body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
Honda CR-V body length 4500 mm, trunk 450 L.
In terms of space, the Honda CR-V body is 100 mm longer than the Proton X50, giving it an advantage in passenger space. However, the Proton X50 is more flexible for parking in the city, each has its trade-offs.
Proton X50 warranty 5 years/150,000km, service interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Honda CR-V warranty 5 years/unlimited mileage, service interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Overall, both Proton X50 and Honda CR-V are quite good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends mainly on your personal needs and budget. We suggest doing your research, comparing quotes from multiple dealerships, and going for a test drive before making a final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending time on research will definitely not be wrong.
In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers compare Proton X50 and Honda CR-V when choosing a car. Both cars are quite close in price and positioning. Today we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
Proton X50 OTR price in Malaysia is RM 89,800 - 113,300, with 4 versions in total, including 1.5T Executive (RM 89,800), 1.5T Premium (RM 101,800), 1.5T Flagship (RM 113,300), etc.
Honda CR-V OTR price in Malaysia is RM 178,200 - 195,900, with 4 versions in total, including 2026 e:HEV 2.0L 2WD RS (RM 195,900), 2026 1.5T 4WD V (RM 181,900), 2026 e:HEV 2.0L 2WD E (RM 178,200), etc.
In terms of price, the starting price of Proton X50 is indeed RM 88,400 cheaper than Honda CR-V. If your budget is limited, the entry-level Proton can already meet daily needs. But also note, the difference of a few thousand RM might mean trade-offs in features, it depends on your needs.
Proton X50 is equipped with 1.5L 4-cyl, 105 hp. Official fuel consumption 6.0 L/100km.
Honda CR-V is equipped with 2.0L 4-cyl, 170 hp. Official fuel consumption 8.0 L/100km.
In terms of power, Honda CR-V's 2.0L 4-cyl has 65 more horsepower than Proton X50's 1.5L 4-cyl. However, for daily city driving, the power of both cars is sufficient, you won't feel underpowered.
Proton X50 safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
Honda CR-V safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include Honda SENSING (ACC, CMBS, LKAS, RDM).
Both cars have the same safety rating, safety features are quite comprehensive in this class. New cars nowadays don't lack safety, no need to worry too much about this.
Proton X50 warranty 5 years/150,000km, service interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Honda CR-V warranty 5 years/unlimited mileage, service interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
In general, Proton X50 and Honda CR-V are both very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends on your personal needs and budget. We suggest doing your research, comparing quotes from multiple dealerships, then test driving to make the final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending time on research will never be wrong.
In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers compare Proton X50 and Honda HR-V when choosing a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
The OTR price for Proton X50 in Malaysia is RM 89,800 - 113,300, with a total of 4 versions, including 1.5T Executive (RM 89,800), 1.5T Premium (RM 101,800), 1.5T Flagship (RM 113,300), etc.
The OTR price for Honda HR-V in Malaysia is RM 115,900 - 143,900, with a total of 4 versions, including 2026 e:HEV 1.5L RS (RM 143,900), 2026 1.5T V (RM 137,900), 2026 1.5T E (RM 130,900), etc.
Looking at the price, the starting price of Proton X50 is indeed RM 26,100 cheaper than Honda HR-V. If your budget is limited, Proton's entry-level version is already sufficient for daily needs. However, be aware that the few thousand Ringgit difference might involve compromises in features, depending on your specific needs.
Proton X50 is equipped with 1.5L 4-cyl, 105 hp. Official fuel consumption 6.0 L/100km.
Honda HR-V is equipped with 1.5L Turbo, 140 hp. Official fuel consumption 7.0 L/100km.
In terms of power, the 1.5L Turbo on Honda HR-V has 35 more hp than the 1.5L 4-cyl on Proton X50. However, for daily city driving, the power of both cars is sufficient, you won't feel it's lacking.
Proton X50's safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
Honda HR-V's safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include Honda SENSING (ACC, CMBS, LKAS, RDM).
Both cars have the same safety rating, safety features are quite comprehensive in this class. New cars nowadays are not lacking in safety, no need to worry too much about this.
Proton X50 warranty 5 years/150,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Honda HR-V warranty 5 years/unlimited mileage, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Overall, both Proton X50 and Honda HR-V are very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends mainly on your personal needs and budget. It is recommended to do your research, compare quotes from several dealerships, and then test drive to make a final decision. Buying a car is a big deal, taking time to do research will never be wrong.
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嗰陣都會拿 Proton X50 同 Toyota Corolla Cross 做比較。呢兩部車喺價位同定位上都幾接近，今日我哋就由多個方面做一個詳細比較，幫你節省做功課嘅時間。
Proton X50 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 89,800 - 113,300，一共有 4 個版本，包括 1.5T Executive（RM 89,800）、1.5T Premium（RM 101,800）、1.5T Flagship（RM 113,300） 等。
Toyota Corolla Cross 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 133,800 - 148,800，一共有 3 個版本，包括 2026 HEV 1.8L GR Sport（RM 148,800）、2026 HEV 1.8L Standard（RM 140,800）、2026 1.8L Standard（RM 133,800） 等。
由價錢睇嚟，Proton X50 嘅起步價確實比 Toyota Corolla Cross 平咗 RM 44,000。如果你預算有限，Proton 嘅入門版已經滿足日常需求。但都要留意，平嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備上有取舍，具體要看你嘅需求。
Proton X50 裝載 1.5L 4-cyl，馬力 105 hp。官方油耗 6.0 L/100km。
Toyota Corolla Cross 裝載 1.5L Turbo，馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。
動力方面，Toyota Corolla Cross 嘅 1.5L Turbo 比 Proton X50 嘅 1.5L 4-cyl 多咗 35 匹馬力。唔過日常喺市區開，兩部車嘅動力都夠用，唔會覺得唔夠力。
Proton X50 車身長 4400 mm，車尾箱 400 L。
Toyota Corolla Cross 車身長 4400 mm，車尾箱 400 L。
兩部車嘅尺寸差唔多，車內空間差別唔大。呢個級別嘅車，日常使用完全夠用。
Proton X50 保養 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Toyota Corolla Cross 保養 5 年/無限制里程，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
總體嚟講，Proton X50 同 Toyota Corolla Cross 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊部，關鍵仲係睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去做試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拿 Proton X50 同 Toyota Yaris Cross 嚟做比較。呢兩部車喺價位同定位上都幾接近，今日我哋就由多個方面做詳細嘅比較，幫你慳咗做功課嘅時間。
Proton X50 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 89,800 - 113,300，一共有 4 個版本，包括 1.5T Executive（RM 89,800）、1.5T Premium（RM 101,800）、1.5T Flagship（RM 113,300） 等。
Toyota Yaris Cross 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 99,900 - 109,900，一共有 2 個版本，包括 2026 1.5L Standard（RM 99,900）、2026 HEV 1.5L Standard（RM 109,900） 等。
由價錢睇，Proton X50 嘅起價確實較 Toyota Yaris Cross 平咗 RM 10,100。如果你預算有限，Proton 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需要。但都要注意，平嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備上會有取舍，具體要睇你嘅需要。
Proton X50 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA)。
Toyota Yaris Cross 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 TSS。
兩款車嘅安全評級一樣，喺呢個級別入面安全配備都算好齊全。依家嘅新車安全性都唔差，唔使太擔心這一點。
Proton X50 採用 4WD 驅動方式。
Toyota Yaris Cross 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
Proton 嘅 4WD 同 Toyota 嘅 FWD 喺操控上會有唔同感受，建議試駕比較。
Proton X50 保修 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Toyota Yaris Cross 保修 5 年/無限里程，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
總體嚟講，Proton X50 同 Toyota Yaris Cross 都係馬來西亞市場好唔錯嘅車型。揀邊輛，關鍵仲要睇你嘅個人需要同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大件事，花啲時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多人喺揀車嗰陣都會拎 寶騰 X50 同 本田 HR-V 嚟比較。呢兩款車喺價位同定位上頭都幾接近，今日我哋就從多個角度做一個詳細嘅比較，幫你省下做功課嘅時間。
寶騰 X50 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 89,800 - 113,300，一總共有 4 個版本，包括 1.5T Executive（RM 89,800）、1.5T Premium（RM 101,800）、1.5T Flagship（RM 113,300）等。
本田 HR-V 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 115,900 - 143,900，一總共有 4 個版本，包括 2026 e:HEV 1.5L RS（RM 143,900）、2026 1.5T V（RM 137,900）、2026 1.5T E（RM 130,900）等。
睇返價錢，寶騰 X50 嘅起步價確實比 本田 HR-V 平咗 RM 26,100。如果你預算有限，寶騰 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需求。不過都要注意，平嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備上會有取舍，具體要看你嘅需求。
寶騰 X50 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA)。
本田 HR-V 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 Honda SENSING (ACC, CMBS, LKAS, RDM)。
呢兩款車嘅安全評級一樣，喺呢個級別入面安全配備都算給得好齊全嘅。而家嘅新車安全性都唔差，唔使太擔心呢一點。
寶騰 X50 採用 4WD 驅動方式。
本田 HR-V 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
寶騰 嘅 4WD 同 本田 嘅 FWD 喺操控上會有唔同嘅感受，建議試駕比較。
寶騰 X50 保修 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
本田 HR-V 保修 5 年/無限制里程，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
總括嚟講，寶騰 X50 同 本田 HR-V 都係馬來西亞市場好唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵都係睇返你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再返試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers often compare Proton X50 and Honda WR-V when choosing a car. These two models have quite similar pricing and positioning. Today we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
Proton X50 OTR price in Malaysia is RM 89,800 - 113,300, with a total of 4 versions, including 1.5T Executive (RM 89,800), 1.5T Premium (RM 101,800), 1.5T Flagship (RM 113,300) etc.
Honda WR-V OTR price in Malaysia is RM 89,900 - 107,900, with a total of 4 versions, including 2023 1.5L V (RM 99,900), 2023 1.5L E (RM 95,900), 2023 1.5L S (RM 89,900) etc.
In terms of price, Proton X50 starting price is indeed RM 100 cheaper than Honda WR-V. If your budget is limited, Proton's entry level version can already satisfy daily needs. But also note, the few thousand cheaper might have trade-offs in features, specifically depends on your needs.
Proton X50 safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
Honda WR-V safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include Honda SENSING.
Both cars safety rating is the same, in this class safety features are quite comprehensive. New car safety now is not bad, no need to worry too much about this.
Proton X50 body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
Honda WR-V body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
Both cars dimensions almost the same, interior space difference is not large. This class of car, daily use completely sufficient.
Proton X50 adopts 4WD drive system.
Honda WR-V adopts FWD drive system.
Proton 4WD and Honda FWD in handling will have different feelings, suggest test drive comparison.
Overall, Proton X50 and Honda WR-V are both very good car models in Malaysian market. Choosing which one, key still depends on your personal needs and budget. Suggest everyone do homework, compare more dealership quotes, then go test drive to make final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spend time doing homework absolutely not wrong.
7月15日，由车百会研究院主办、领充新能源支持、车百链智承办的第二届车能融合与智慧生态发展论坛在西安召开。论坛以“把握车能融合机遇 探索技术范式创新”为主题，汇聚了整车企业、能源企业、电池企业、充换电运营商、科研机构及行业相关单位代表，展开为期一天的高质量研讨。
会上，车百会研究院理事长张永伟表示，从全球来看，汽车和充换电联动出海是必然趋势，能源和汽车本质是一体的。在出海新阶段，重视整车和制造业出海的同时，也要重视充换电基础设施在海外的发展。相比整车与制造业出海，以充换电为核心的能源基础产业出海，贸易摩擦更小、黏性更强，且与主要国家减碳和气候变化战略方向一致，能带动大量装备出海，如光伏、充电换电模块、储能电池等。但充换电基础设施出海也面临不同的挑战：认证周期更长，一次性投入高，回收期较长，且需接入当地电网及复杂生态，难以一蹴而就。一旦走通，可打造更体系化的全球竞争壁垒。
上午场：政企学研齐聚，共议车能融合发展大势
论坛上午场由车百会研究院副理事长、车百智库研究院院长师建华主持。
国家能源局原副局长吴吟发表主旨报告，提出当前能源革命与汽车革命已从两条平行线走向深度同频共振。车能融合是一场跨越交通、能源、信息三大万亿级赛道的系统性变革。据《新型能源体系建设“十五五”规划》，2030年车网互动聚合可调充电规模达到5000万千瓦，标志车能融合从探索阶段进入规模化实施阶段。但车能融合规模化落地需打通标准不统一、供需时空错配、行业协同不足、用户参与意愿不强等堵点。
主题演讲环节，香港理工大学杰出讲座教授、香港大学荣誉教授、英国皇家工程院院士陈清泉提出，汽车已完成属性、动力、智能架构三重变革，双向车网互动是交通能源融合的核心抓手。伴随乘用车、商用车应用场景持续拓宽，行业需依托差异化补能、光储充一体化、V2G技术实现车路能协同共赢。
浙江大学龙泉产业创新研究院院长、俄罗斯工程院外籍院士熊树生分享冷却液储能前沿技术。他表示现有车用冷媒路线存在明显短板，依托新型间接式R290热管理系统，可通过冷却液储冷储热充分消纳夜间谷电，有效降低车辆高低温能耗、提升续航，适配车队、光储充、园区等多元场景，开辟车能融合全新增效路径。
交通运输部规划研究院环境资源所总工毛宁表示国家相关政策出台，将新能源重卡的推广提到非常重要的战略高度。为更好地推动新能源重卡规模化应用，建议完善跨部门协同机制；加大政策保障力度；加强财税资金支持；健全多行业协同的标准体系；推广光储充换一体化模式；打造全产业链闭环。
中国电力企业联合会副秘书长刘永东介绍，全国首批9城32个试点已梳理出 27 个可复制V2G应用场景，调研显示超七成车主愿意参与车网互动，但放电协议、并网及资源聚合标准仍是短板，用户核心顾虑集中在电池寿命影响上。他建议建立以煤电标杆电价为导向的放电价格体系，发挥车网互动低成本优势；同时通过保险机制、质保体系消除用户顾虑。
浩瀚能源公司CEO、极氪科技集团副总裁赵昱辉认为车网互动、全场景补能是大势所趋。新能源汽车不再只是交通工具，更是移动储能单元；充电也不再是简单的能量补给，而是能源系统的智能调度，这是车能融合的本质。车能融合需要整车、电网、设备商、城市规划多方共建生态，不是单一企业能唱完的独角戏。
奇瑞绿能常务副总经理尹航结合实践提出，车能融合的关键在于从单一补能向全球化绿色智慧能源新生态转型，车企应定位为能源生态公司而非设备商。
理想汽车智能电动产品负责人唐华寅表示，新能源充电需求不是“涨潮”，而是“海啸” 。超充网络建设应以用户长途出行停留规律（10-20分钟）为基准定义补能速度，而非单纯比拼功率参数；自动充电与L4自动驾驶融合后，充电速度的第一性地位将弱化，远程调度、无感体验成关键。
领充新能源CEO周强表示未来交通体系将从车路云三网融合升级为车路桩云四维一体；能源供给从化石能源转向绿电主导，形成源网荷储一体化；基础设施从单一交通功能升级为“交通+能源+数字”融合的新型基础设施。
瑞浦兰钧能源股份有限公司副总裁侯敏表示，新能源汽车的爆发式增长，推动了充电基础设施全面升级。但如果充电站只是从电网取电，那对电网来说仅是新增负荷，尤其是无序充电会进一步拉大峰谷差。采用“光储充”三位一体的超级充电站，能有效破解这一痛点。
中国汽研后市场事业部副总经理、中检汽车测评（深圳）有限公司总经理郑孟认为充电行业从规模建设进入高质量发展阶段，由“建得多、覆盖广”，走向“提品质、优体验、可互动”。未来V2G竞争的关键，不只是设备能力，更是用户信任的建立。
上海联联睿科能源科技有限公司总经理汤晓栋表示，V2G不仅是连接“双碳”目标的战略桥梁，更是保障能源安全与电网稳定、促进新能源消纳、支撑新型电力系统建设的关键抓手。其推广要从消除车型适配障碍、打通收益分配链路着手。
隆基绿能光建系统事业部市场营销部负责人张振涛分享光伏与交通场景融合创新实践。他表示光伏发电具有间歇性，仅靠白天供电无法满足全天候需求，必须与储能、充电、换电等环节结合，形成完整的零碳能源闭环。
论坛同期，举行了“生态协同发展倡议”启动仪式，并发布《新能源汽车充换电行业生态协同发展研究报告》，标志着行业从单打独斗走向生态共建迈出了实质性一步。
二、下午场：圆桌思辨破难题，重磅发布启新程
论坛下午场，西安高新技术产业开发区管理委员会党工委副书记、管委会主任陈辉首先发表致辞：车能融合是推动能源革命与产业变革的关键力量，也是培育新质生产力的重要赛道。西安持续推动补链、强链、延链，构建从整车制造、关键零部件到后市场服务的完整生态。
主题演讲环节，领充新能源董事长袁庆民表示当前充电行业单一收费模式难盈利，行业竞争转向技术、产品、服务、生态综合比拼。伴随交通、能源、算力三重变革交汇，领充将依托光储充、V2G、兆瓦超充、电池检测全套技术，转型综合能源科技服务商，并搭建跨产业、金融共生生态圈，配套重卡专项金融方案助力干线零碳通道建设。
车百会研究院副理事长、车百智库研究院院长师建华认为车能融合是必然趋势，到2030年会创造超过万亿级的综合经济效益。推进车能融合发展，需从制造与使用两端深化绿电应用，扩大智能有序充电覆盖，加快V2G在车、桩、网、用户侧的规模化联动；依托虚拟电厂聚合分布式资源参与电网调度，并以零碳园区为载体构建“源-网-荷-储-车”协同体系，同时推动“光储充车”综合解决方案出海拓展。
随后的圆桌对话环节，围绕“新能源汽车充电基础设施生态协同发展”主题，由清华大学碳中和研究院零碳交通研究中心主任王贺武主持。中国能源研究会首席专家贾俊国、领充新能源董事长袁庆民、货道新能源董事长迟勇、蔚来能源电力业务总经理胡伟峰、宁德时代乘用车产品总工欧阳小龙五位嘉宾展开深度对话，形成三大核心共识：
1、储充一体是化解电网容量瓶颈的重要柔性接入路径
随着800V高压平台和大功率快充逐步普及，单站用电负荷快速抬升。与会嘉宾一致认为，储充一体是化解电网容量瓶颈的重要柔性接入路径。但V2G的规模化应用必须分阶段推进：有序充电阶段已相对成熟，而真正的车网互动涉及能量流、信息流、价值流三流协同，不能依靠单一市场品种解决。当前最佳路径是通过虚拟电厂聚合商参与电力市场，最终依靠市场化交易机制实现长效可持续运营。
2、V2G商业化需平衡三方利益，构建闭环生态
面对“谁受益、谁承担风险、谁来补偿”的核心难题，与会嘉宾直言超充配储的核心矛盾在于三方利益尚未形成闭环——车端追求更快体验，电网端希望柔性接入，而充电运营商承担了超额投资却难以收回成本。储充一体不是简单的“越多越好、越快越好”，必须在投入合理与收益明确之间找到平衡。否则，即便短期有车企或资本推动，长期也难以可持续，必须形成车、网、运营商三方协同的生态闭环。
3、县域充换电设施建设具“后发优势”
与会嘉宾认为相较于城市核心区土地资源紧张、电网扩容成本高、场站布局饱和、电价偏高的现状，县域及国道、高速出入口区域土地储备充足、用电成本更低，同时配网改造空间大、规划约束少，具备天然的建站优势。依托县域独特禀赋，行业已跑出集约化、生态化、前置化的落地新模式。
论坛下午场集中了落地多项标志性产业成果，包括全新品牌“领芯科技”正式发布、重卡金融生态发布、生态签约等，打通共识到落地转化通道。
本届论坛的成功举办，为车能融合产业的高质量发展注入了新动能。下一步，行业各方将以本次论坛为起点，紧抓车能融合重大发展机遇，持续探索技术创新范式，共建开放协同、互利共生的智慧能源产业生态。
In Malaysia's SUV market, many buyers compare Perodua Aruz and Kia Sportage when choosing a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
Perodua Aruz OTR price in Malaysia is RM 72,900 - 77,900, with 2 versions including 1.5L X (RM 72,900), 1.5L AV (RM 77,900), etc.
Kia Sportage OTR price in Malaysia is RM 129,639 - 179,320, with 4 versions including 2025 1.6T DCT 4WD High (RM 179,320), 2025 1.6T DCT 2WD High (RM 159,320), 2025 2.0L AT 2WD High (RM 139,639), etc.
From a price perspective, Perodua Aruz's starting price is indeed RM 56,739 cheaper than Kia Sportage. If your budget is limited, Perodua's entry-level version is sufficient for daily needs. But note, the few thousand difference may involve trade-offs in features, depending on your needs.
Perodua Aruz comes with 1.5L 4-cyl, 105 hp power. Official fuel consumption 6.0 L/100km.
Kia Sportage comes with 1.5L Turbo, 140 hp power. Official fuel consumption 7.0 L/100km.
In terms of power, Kia Sportage's 1.5L Turbo has 35 more horsepower than Perodua Aruz's 1.5L 4-cyl. However, for daily city driving, both cars have sufficient power and won't feel underpowered.
Perodua Aruz body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
Kia Sportage body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
The two cars' dimensions are almost the same, interior space difference is not large. For this class of cars, daily use is completely sufficient.
Perodua Aruz and Kia Sportage are both mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, consider the one with better reputation; if you care more about value for money and features, choose the one with richer configurations. Ultimately, it is recommended to test drive both, personal experience is the most important.
Overall, Perodua Aruz and Kia Sportage are both very good car models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends on your personal needs and budget. We suggest doing your research, comparing quotes from several dealerships, and then test driving to make the final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, taking time to research is never wrong.
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拿 Perodua Aruz 同 Hyundai Tucson 嚟做比較。呢兩款車喺價位同定位上都係幾接近嘅，今日我哋就從多個方面做一個詳細嘅比較，幫你省咗做功課嘅時間。
Perodua Aruz 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 72,900 - 77,900，總共有 2 個版本，包括 1.5L X（RM 72,900）、1.5L AV（RM 77,900）等。
Hyundai Tucson 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 143,888 - 197,888，總共有 5 個版本，包括 2025 HEV 1.6T AT 2WD Prestige（RM 197,888）、2025 1.6T DCT 4WD Prestige（RM 186,888）、2025 1.6T DCT 2WD Prime（RM 164,888）等。
從價錢睇落，Perodua Aruz 嘅起步價真係比 Hyundai Tucson 平咗 RM 70,988。如果你預算有限，Perodua 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需求。但都要注意，便宜嗰幾千蚊，喺配備上可能会有取舍，具體要睇你嘅需求。
Perodua Aruz 搭載 1.5L 4-cyl，馬力 105 hp。官方油耗 6.0 L/100km。
Hyundai Tucson 搭載 1.5L Turbo，馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。
動力方面，Hyundai Tucson 嘅 1.5L Turbo 比 Perodua Aruz 嘅 1.5L 4-cyl 多咗 35 匹馬力。不過日常喺市區開，兩款車嘅動力都夠用，唔會覺得唔夠力。
Perodua Aruz 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 。
Hyundai Tucson 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 SmartSense。
兩款車嘅安全評級一樣，喺呢個級別裡面安全配備都算畀得好齊全。而家嘅新車安全性都唔差，唔使太擔心呢一點。
Perodua Aruz 車身長 4400 mm，尾箱 400 L。
Hyundai Tucson 車身長 4400 mm，尾箱 400 L。
兩款車嘅尺寸幾乎一樣，車內空間差別唔大。呢個級別嘅車，日常使用完全夠用。
Perodua Aruz 保修 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Hyundai Tucson 保修 5 年/300,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
總體來說，Perodua Aruz 同 Hyundai Tucson 都係馬來西亞市場好唔錯嘅車款。揀邊一輛，關鍵都要睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
In Malaysia's SUV market, many buyers compare Perodua Aruz and Mitsubishi Xforce when selecting a car. These two models are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
Perodua Aruz OTR price in Malaysia is RM 72,900 - 77,900, with a total of 2 versions, including 1.5L X (RM 72,900), 1.5L AV (RM 77,900), etc.
Mitsubishi Xforce OTR price in Malaysia is RM 109,930 - 119,930, with a total of 2 versions, including 2026 1.5L Ultimate (RM 119,930), 2026 1.5L Urban (RM 109,930), etc.
From a price perspective, Perodua Aruz's starting price is indeed RM 37,030 cheaper than Mitsubishi Xforce. If your budget is limited, Perodua's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. However, note that the few thousand difference may involve trade-offs in features, depending on your needs.
Perodua Aruz is equipped with 1.5L 4-cyl, power 105 hp. Official fuel consumption 6.0 L/100km.
Mitsubishi Xforce is equipped with 1.5L Turbo, power 140 hp. Official fuel consumption 7.0 L/100km.
In terms of power, Mitsubishi Xforce's 1.5L Turbo has 35 more horsepower than Perodua Aruz's 1.5L 4-cyl. However, for daily city driving, both cars have sufficient power and won't feel underpowered.
Perodua Aruz safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include .
Mitsubishi Xforce safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include MI-PILOT.
Both cars have the same safety rating, and safety features are quite comprehensive for this class. New cars nowadays have good safety, so no need to worry too much about this.
Perodua Aruz body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
Mitsubishi Xforce body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
Both cars have almost identical dimensions, with little difference in interior space. For this class of vehicles, daily use is more than sufficient.
Perodua Aruz warranty 5 years/150,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Mitsubishi Xforce warranty 3 years/100,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Overall, Perodua Aruz and Mitsubishi Xforce are both excellent models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose ultimately depends on your personal needs and budget. It is recommended to do your homework, compare quotes from multiple dealerships, and then test drive to make a final decision. Buying a car is a major decision, spending time researching will never be wrong.
In Malaysia's SUV market, many buyers compare Perodua Aruz and GWM Haval H6 when choosing a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
Perodua Aruz OTR price in Malaysia is RM 72,900 - 77,900, with 2 versions, including 1.5L X (RM 72,900), 1.5L AV (RM 77,900) etc.
GWM Haval H6 OTR price in Malaysia is RM 139,750 - 139,750, with 2 versions, including 1.5L Turbo Standard (RM 140,000), 1.5L Turbo Premium (RM 155,000) etc.
From a price perspective, Perodua Aruz's starting price is indeed RM 66,850 cheaper than GWM Haval H6. If your budget is limited, Perodua's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. But also note that the few thousand difference might involve compromises in features, specifically depending on your needs.
Perodua Aruz safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include .
GWM Haval H6 safety rating is TBD, active safety systems include Basic.
Perodua Aruz body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
GWM Haval H6 body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
The dimensions of both cars are almost the same, and the interior space difference is not significant. Cars at this level are fully adequate for daily use.
Perodua Aruz and GWM Haval H6 are both mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, you can prioritize the one with better reputation; if you value value for money and features more, then choose the one with richer configurations. Ultimately, it is recommended to test drive both models, as personal experience is the most important.
Overall, Perodua Aruz and GWM Haval H6 are both very good car models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose mainly depends on your personal needs and budget. We suggest doing your research, compare quotes from multiple dealerships, and then test drive to make a final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending some time doing research will definitely not go wrong.
In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers compare Perodua Aruz and MG MG HS when choosing a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to save you time on research.
The OTR price of Perodua Aruz in Malaysia is RM 72,900 - 77,900, with a total of 2 versions, including 1.5L X (RM 72,900), 1.5L AV (RM 77,900), etc.
The OTR price of MG MG HS in Malaysia is RM 130,450 - 146,450, with a total of 2 versions, including 1.5L Standard (RM 105,000), 1.5L Executive (RM 115,000), etc.
From a price perspective, the starting price of Perodua Aruz is indeed RM 57,550 cheaper than MG MG HS. If your budget is limited, Perodua's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. However, be aware that the few thousand cheaper might involve compromises in equipment, depending on your specific needs.
Perodua Aruz is equipped with a 1.5L 4-cyl, 105 hp. Official fuel consumption 6.0 L/100km.
MG MG HS is equipped with a 1.5L Turbo, 140 hp. Official fuel consumption 7.0 L/100km.
In terms of power, the 1.5L Turbo in MG MG HS has 35 more horsepower than the 1.5L 4-cyl in Perodua Aruz. However, for daily city driving, the power of both cars is sufficient, and you won't feel underpowered.
Perodua Aruz body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
MG MG HS body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
The dimensions of both cars are almost the same, and the interior space does not differ much. For cars in this class, daily use is completely sufficient.
Perodua Aruz adopts FWD drive mode.
MG MG HS adopts FWD drive mode.
Both cars have the same drive mode, both are FWD, there will not be much difference in daily driving experience.
Perodua Aruz warranty 5 years/150,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
MG MG HS warranty 7 years/150,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Overall, Perodua Aruz and MG MG HS are both excellent models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends mainly on your personal needs and budget. It is recommended to do research, compare quotes from multiple dealerships, and then test drive to make the final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending some time on research will certainly not go wrong.
On July 16, a right-hand drive Trumpchi M8 PHEV slowly drove off the production line. GAC Group thus became the fifth domestic automobile manufacturing group to reach the milestone of 30 million vehicles rolling off the production line, after FAW, SAIC, Dongfeng, and Changan.
On this day, China's automotive market was undergoing unprecedented deep adjustments. Data from the China Association of Automobile Manufacturers showed that the penetration rate of new energy vehicles reached 49.6% in the first half of the year, surging to 58.5% in June; the market share of independent brand passenger cars climbed to 71.8%; car exports broke through 5.096 million vehicles, up 65.3% year-on-year. The fuel vehicle market was shrinking rapidly, joint venture brands were significantly impacted, and an era of "cool domestic market, hot international market" with reconstructed patterns was approaching.
In such an uncertain year, the answer sheet turned in by GAC was: 773,100 vehicles sold in the first half of the year, an increase of 2.35% year-on-year, new energy vehicle sales increased by 68.8% year-on-year, independent brand exports reached 121,500 vehicles, a sharp increase of 132% year-on-year. The numbers themselves might not be stunning, but against the background of the industry bearing pressure overall and most automotive companies achieving only 30% to 40% of their sales targets, this stability stands out particularly.
How were the 30 million "saved up"?
"Quality is the bottom line that GAC will never yield." Feng Xingya, Chairman of GAC Group, said this on the spot. Perhaps this is the most direct footnote to the trust of 30 million users.
In an industry where price wars have evolved from "racing on price" to "racing on bosses", GAC chose a path that appears less trendy: continuously adding to quality verification. Before each new model launches, it must undergo at least "two winters and one summer" of on-site road tests; the regular development cycle lasts up to 21 months; from Turpan's 60°C high temperature to Hulunbuir's -40°C extreme cold, from high humidity and high salt spray to mountain dust, "Five Highs, One Mountain, One Dust" full-environment assessment covers various extreme scenarios users might encounter.
These "hard skills" have formed support in the data: Magazine Battery cumulative installations reached 1.5 million units, safe driving mileage exceeded 160 billion kilometers; the Astral Security Guard System has served nearly 2 million users, cumulatively preventing potential accidents 6.28 million times. At the end of 2025, GAC also pioneered the independent brand "Three Responsibilities" policy in the industry: responsibility for spontaneous combustion of the three-electric system, responsibility for battery decay exceeding limits, responsibility for intelligent parking accidents, extending quality commitments to the entire lifecycle of vehicle use.
"30 million users' trust is essentially about holding the bottom line of 'quality not yielded' in manufacturing." An industry observer commented. In the phase where China's automotive market shifts from increment to stock, the core standard for user choice is returning to the essence of the product, and GAC has verified this simple logic over 29 years.
Transformation is not a slogan, it is the models rolling off the line
The special significance of the 30 million vehicles rolling off the line ceremony is: it is not a solo act of one car. At the event site, GAC's global multi-site production bases were connected synchronously, and GAC Honda P7, GAC Toyota Binyue 7, QiJing GT7, GAC Aion N60, GAC Hyper S600 were sequentially rolled off the line as the 29,999,995th to the 29,999,999th vehicles. Six models, covering six brands, all pointing to new energy and intelligence.
And the 30 millionth vehicle—the right-hand drive Trumpchi M8 PHEV—was ultimately delivered to a Thai owner, international kung fu superstar Tony Jaa. This choice itself is a signal: GAC's goals have long not been limited to the domestic market. Currently, GAC's international business expansion is very rapid, covering 110 countries and regions in five major blocks: Asia-Pacific, Middle East, Americas, Europe, etc., building over 746 sales and service outlets and 7 overseas production plants. Independent brand exports in the first half of the year reached 121,500 vehicles, almost equaling the full year's level last year.
In the context where joint venture brands generally face transition pains, GAC promotes dual-line transformation of joint ventures and independent brands, forming a synergistic and complementary new energy matrix. GAC Toyota Binyue 7 delivered over 10,000 units cumulatively in 3 months since launch; GAC and Huawei Qiankun jointly created the high-end brand "QiJing", the first model QiJing GT7 equipped with Huawei Qiankun Intelligent Driving ADS 5, 24-hour large fixed orders broke through 5,200 units. So far, GAC's cumulative R&D investment exceeded 62 billion yuan, with a global R&D team of over 6,800 people, and these investments are being converted from technical reserves to product competitiveness.
Turn "User-Centric" into a closed loop
If quality is GAC's background color, then user thinking is the line running through it.
Feng Xingya stated at the event site: "In the past, we always stood from an engineer's perspective to polish technology, today, we must stand completely from the user's perspective." To this end, GAC established a dedicated user insight department, promoting full-process change from problem discovery to resolution; regularly held "User Open Mic" activities, allowing R&D and product leaders to directly face daily user pain points.
At the service end, GAC plans to build 1,000 new county-level authorized stores this year; online launched "Super Steward" service, promising 5-second response, 2-hour completion; targeting new energy replenishment pain points, built "9 Vertical, 10 Horizontal" replenishment network, covering 213 cities nationwide, core urban areas achieving "one station every straight 1 kilometer", self-owned charging piles exceeded 27,000 units.
From "selling products" to "operating users" is the transformation direction commonly shouted by the industry. GAC's practice shows that user operations are not marketing talk, but a systematic engineering project from organizational structure to service network.
After 30 million, where is GAC heading?
From its establishment in 1997 to the current 30 million vehicles rolling off the line, GAC has walked 29 years. These 29 years just witnessed the complete context of China's automotive industry from joint venture start, independent growth to new energy global breakthrough.
Standing at the new starting point of 30 million, GAC announced the launch of "Renewal Gratitude Season": GAC Honda, GAC Toyota, GAC Trumpchi, GAC Aion, GAC Hyper, and QiJing six brands, from new purchase, trade-in to increased purchase launched unique feedback policies.
Towards 2030, GAC's goal is to enter 120 countries and regions worldwide, build over 2,000 overseas outlets, and achieve annual sales of 1 million vehicles.
In the competition logic transformation of the automotive industry from "comparing horsepower" to "competing on computing power", from "configuration stacking" to "technology system", GAC's 30 million answer sheets may have provided an answer worth thinking about: no matter how dramatic industry changes are, quality, this "hard skill", is ultimately the final reason users vote with their feet.
Feng Xingya handed the key to the 30,000,000th vehicle into the hands of a Thai person.
Tony Jaa, male lead of 'Ong-Bak', new owner of the right-hand drive Trumpchi M8 PHEV. This scene froze at the GAC Trumpchi factory on July 16, also marking a period point for GAC after 29 years—from its establishment in 1997 amidst questioning, to today's 30 million vehicles off the line.
But what's truly interesting is not the number 30 million, but how GAC got here, and where it's going next.
Where is the value in GAC's 30 million?
First, a set of data: 0 to 10 million, GAC took 20 years; 10 million to 30 million, only 9 years. In the first half of this year, GAC sold 773,100 vehicles, up slightly 2.35% year-on-year, but new energy skyrocketed 68.8%, exports surged 132%.
More noteworthy is the arrangement at the event: GAC global multi-factory synchronous connection, Honda P7, Toyota bZ7, Qijing GT7, Aion N60, Hyper S600 respectively as the 29,999,995th to the 29,999,999th vehicles off the line, finally the 30 millionth was right-hand drive M8 PHEV.
What does this mean? GAC's 30 million was not shouldered by a single god-tier vehicle, but walked out on four legs: joint venture + independent brand + new energy + going overseas. This balance is not common among the few Chinese carmakers who have reached the 30 million threshold.
GAC's strongest trump card is actually not at the press conference
Feng Xingya said a very old-school sentence on site: Quality is the bottom line GAC will never cede.
But what's truly hardcore is the system behind him. Before every new car launches, it must pass Five Highs, One Mountain, One Dust—60°C Turpan high heat, -40°C Hulunbuir extreme cold, high altitude, high humidity, high salt mist, mountain areas, sand and dust, plus Two Winters and One Summer field trials, 12 major items, 1500+ validation sub-items.
Several data points are worth remembering: Danxia batteries installed 1.5 million units, safe driving over 160 billion kilometers; Star Spirit safety protection system helped nearly 2 million users avoid 6.28 million potential risks; Aion Intelligent Ecological Factory is the world's first new energy Lighthouse Factory.
Also launched end of last year Three Responsibilities—Three-electric system spontaneous combustion directly replace with new car, battery decay over limit free exchange, intelligent parking accident full responsibility. In the industry, those daring to do this can be counted on one hand.
Feng Xingya's sentence rephrased is: You can dislike my speed, but you cannot say I am rough.
GAC is truly changing in user thinking
In 2024 GAC moved headquarters back to Panyu, launched Panyu Action, core is one thing: switch from engineer thinking to user thinking.
Specific actions include: Regularly holding User All Open Mic, inviting owners to HQ to complain face to face; establishing exclusive user insight department, guaranteeing demand loop from organization; channel sinking to county level, plan to add 1000 authorized stores this year; charging network 9 Vertical 10 Horizontal covering 213 cities, self-operated charging piles over 27,000, core urban area straight line 1 kilometer must have station; Online Super Butler promises 5 seconds response, 2 hours completion.
These actions alone are not earth-shattering, but together they explain one problem: GAC knows it was a bit far from users in the past, now trying desperately to pull back.
Going overseas is the real incremental growth
First half year exports 121,500 vehicles, year-on-year surge 132%, already close to last year's full year level. Thailand June month-on-month growth 207%, European localization production also being built.
Currently GAC has entered 110 countries and regions, 746 sales outlets, 7 overseas factories, 9 overseas parts warehouses. 2030 target is to enter 120 countries, 2000 overseas outlets, annual sales 1 million.
Feng Xingya handing the 30 millionth key to a Thai person is not a pose, it is a statement.
The card Qijing plays is quite interesting
Qijing GT7 is jointly built by GAC and Huawei Qiankun, launched June 26, 24 hours large orders break 5,200 units. It is currently the only mass-produced vehicle equipped with Huawei Qiankun Intelligent Driving ADS 5.
This line aligns with today's Huawei Qiankun media day info—Huawei says it wants to be an electronic screw, GAC catches it to make the whole vehicle, Qijing is the product at this intersection. Second half year still launch GX7, dual-car matrix lands.
Question is: Huawei side already has Five Realms, adding Qijing, Yijing, how to split resources? This is a continuous game GAC will play next.
Bang Comments
GAC's 30 million, and China automotive industry's 30 million, are two not completely overlapping concepts.
Former is 29 years from joint venture to independent, from fuel to new energy, from domestic to overseas complete evolution history; latter is industry from big to strong shadow. GAC received China Quality Award Nomination Award, Aion consecutive three years new energy quality first, Hyper first complete year ran to new energy luxury brand second—these awards and data, behind is Honda TPS, Toyota TQM plus Lingnan culture knitted together quality management system, is Joint venture feeding back independent this road run through proof.
But the problem after 30 million is also very realistic: Independent sector four brands (Trumpchi, Aion, Hyper, Qijing) how to offset positioning? Going overseas from 120,000 units to 1 million, remaining 4 years flip 8 times, rhythm can follow? Qijing eating ADS 5 first red benefit, how to fight for more resources in Huawei ecosystem?
Feng Xingya used four words on site: Gratitude, Adherence, Sincerity, Going Together. Old-school, but sincere.
30 million is not the endpoint, is the starting line of the next road. Whether GAC can run faster, look at Qijing, look at going overseas, also look at that electronic screw screwed tight enough.
国内证券业最大合并案主角国泰海通证券，日前在发布的2026年半年度业绩预告中，展示了公司半年归母净利润预计突破200亿元，这家券商合并不到两年就能交出如此成绩单，这一点是很值得称赞的。
但是，国泰海通同一时期却也因为总裁突然辞任、半年累计领5张“罚单”以及旗下子公司被香港廉政公署调查等问题成为市场讨论的焦点。
去年上半年刚合并的国泰海通，是由国泰君安证券换股吸收合并海通证券，并承接其全部资产和业务更名而来。当其治理层面的隐忧陆续暴露后，市场也开始用更严格的态度审视这家龙头券商。
01 日赚超1.1亿、资产规模反超中信：合并红利正在兑现7月3日，国泰海通证券发布2026年半年度业绩预增公告，该公告称公司上半年归属于母公司股东的净利润预计在200.03亿元至205.11亿元之间，同比增长27%至30%。这一数据不仅创下公司半年度业绩历史新高，同时还刷新了行业半年度业绩历史记录。
这份半年度业绩预增公告中还披露，公司预计归属母公司所有者的扣非净利润为 192.49 亿元到197.57 亿元，同比增长 164%至 171%。这组数据足以说明公司净利润大增是通过经纪、投行及资管等核心主业协同发力拿下的成果，而非一次性的投资收益。
而关于今年上半年业绩预增的原因，公司这边是称主要由于协同联动深化改革、统筹推进整合融合以及业务规模扩大等因素。确实，市场方面也认为该公司积极着力打造投资+投行+投研服务新质生产力的全链条优势，机构业务和零售业务的客户资源共享，还有对于原海通证券在科创板、跨境业务上的资产整合等等，全都是其利润释放的来源之处。
截至2025年末的时候，合并后的国泰海通证券总资产就干到了2.11万亿元，一举超过中信证券，成为国内总资产规模排名第一的券商。而且2026年上半年，它的归母净利润预计大幅度增长，这些都能够说明原国泰君安与海通证券的合并红利正在高速兑现。
国泰海通发布2026半年度业绩预告仅2天后，公司就公告称其执行董事、总裁李俊杰由于工作调动的原因离任。从当日起，总裁的职责由董事长朱健代为履行。这一次的人事变动，使得市场猜测公司在经历大规模合并之后，接下来可能将对内部的组织、文化与风控等层面进行一场系统性的调整。
毕竟，全景网等媒体在此前的报道当中称，国泰海通证券在今年上半年至少已经收到了5张“罚单”，涉及的问题涵盖质控不完善、出具的督导报告和核查意见结论不准确以及员工违规揽客、操作客户账户等等。
特别是在今年3月10日到11日，香港廉政公署和证监会开展了代号“导火线（Fuse）”的联合行动，目的是打击内幕交易以及相关的贪污行为。而后国泰海通在3月12日发布公告，称香港廉政公署确实在3月10日拿着搜查令去到了国泰君安国际的营业场所，并且带走了部分文件，有一名员工曾被廉署带走配合调查。
国泰海通合并后，在业绩端确实没什么问题，更是快速取得了高增长，实现1+1大于2的效果。但是现在，公司董事长与总裁的担子都压在了朱健一人的肩上，接下来他能否带领公司在不牺牲增长动能的前提下，逐一补齐各条业务线的合规短板，市场对此尤为关注。
03 经验丰富的掌舵人，正面临整合中较难的一课国泰海通现在的董事长朱健，他曾经担任过上海银行的副行长，在合并之前就已先后在国泰君安副总裁、董事长等岗位上任职，可以说这是一位兼具银行风控经验与券商一线管理经验的掌舵人。
但现在他面临的情况也很严峻，原总裁李俊杰辞任后，他如今既要做好董事长的工作统筹战略决策，又要负责总裁职务涉及的日常经营。朱健此前公开表示，2025年国泰海通基本完成了母公司法人层面的整合，下一步要进一步深化融合，加速推进各类子公司的整合发展。
确实，只有从母公司法人层面到各类子公司都完成整合发展，国泰海通才能够持续释放融合效果。
今年以来国泰海通多次被监管关注并被下发警示函，下属机构的违规事由各不一样，这表明国泰海通想要使得子公司的治理文化、业务逻辑和风控标准完全打通融合，这绝对不是件简单的事。但监管频繁关注，确实也暴露了公司整合中尚未触及的潜在风险，更证明朱健加速推进子公司整合的紧迫性与必要性。
现在摆在朱健面前的融合挑战已经清晰。就比如在组织融合方面，原国泰君安与海通证券两大券商合并，这就意味着原本隶属于两家不同公司的总部，以及重叠部门、相近业务线将出现裁并与重构的情况。但是问题在于该怎样在裁并部门及压缩成本的同时，将核心团队与核心客户留下来呢？
另外一个挑战是风控补课，国泰君安合并海通证券，是承接了后者全部的资产与业务。但证监会在两家公司合并前，就已经指出了海通证券存在对境外子公司合规管理和风险管理不到位、合规管理及内部控制存在较大缺陷等问题。现在合并之后的国泰海通体量更大，但受监管关注的程度也更高，任何单点风险都有可能被放大。因此，朱健等管理层必须要认识到原本两家公司的风控体系并轨与补课，那绝不是一日之功，而是需要用更长期的精力与资源寻找最佳的方向。
此外，对于今年上半年公司归母净利润预计将超200亿，这一数据确实已得到市场的初步肯定。但市场更为关注的是这种高增长接下来能否持续？扣非净利润还能不能继续领跑呢？
所以对于现在的董事长朱健来说，公司在他的带领下不仅需要继续展示合并红利、增长势能，以回应资本市场的期待，也要用更多的精力修补历史裂痕。这场大规模的合并，其真正的考验或许才刚刚开始。
#国泰海通 #券商 #朱健 #合规
——完——
In Malaysia's SUV market, many buyers compare Perodua Aruz and Toyota Corolla Cross when choosing a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning. Today we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
Perodua Aruz's OTR price in Malaysia is RM 72,900 - 77,900, with a total of 2 versions, including 1.5L X (RM 72,900), 1.5L AV (RM 77,900), etc.
Toyota Corolla Cross's OTR price in Malaysia is RM 133,800 - 148,800, with a total of 3 versions, including 2026 HEV 1.8L GR Sport (RM 148,800), 2026 HEV 1.8L Standard (RM 140,800), 2026 1.8L Standard (RM 133,800), etc.
From a price perspective, Perodua Aruz's starting price is indeed RM 60,900 cheaper than Toyota Corolla Cross. If your budget is limited, Perodua's entry-level version is already sufficient for daily needs. However, also note that the few thousand ringgit difference may involve compromises in features, depending on your specific needs.
Perodua Aruz body length is 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
Toyota Corolla Cross body length is 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
The dimensions of both cars are almost the same, and the difference in interior space is not significant. Cars in this class are fully sufficient for daily use.
Perodua Aruz warranty 5 years/150,000 km, maintenance interval every 10,000 km or 6 months.
Toyota Corolla Cross warranty 5 years/unlimited mileage, maintenance interval every 10,000 km or 6 months.
Both Perodua Aruz and Toyota Corolla Cross are popular choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, you can prioritize the one with better reputation; if you care more about cost-performance ratio and features, then choose the one with richer configurations. Ultimately it is recommended to test drive both models, as personal experience is the most important.
Overall, Perodua Aruz and Toyota Corolla Cross are both very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose ultimately depends on your personal needs and budget. It is recommended to do your research, compare quotes from several dealerships, and then test drive to make the final decision. Buying a car is a major matter, spending time on research will definitely not be wrong.
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拿 Perodua Aruz 同 Toyota Corolla Cross 做比較。呢兩款車喺價位同定位上都相當接近，而家我哋就從多個方面做一個詳細嘅比較，幫你省返做足功課嘅時間。
Perodua Aruz 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 72,900 - 77,900，合共 2 個版本，包括 1.5L X（RM 72,900）、1.5L AV（RM 77,900） 等。
Toyota Corolla Cross 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 133,800 - 148,800，合共 3 個版本，包括 2026 HEV 1.8L GR Sport（RM 148,800）、2026 HEV 1.8L Standard（RM 140,800）、2026 1.8L Standard（RM 133,800） 等。
睇返價錢，Perodua Aruz 嘅起步價確實比 Toyota Corolla Cross 平咗 RM 60,900。如果你預算有限，Perodua 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需求。但都要留意，平嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備上會有所取捨，具體就要睇你嘅需求。
Perodua Aruz 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 。
Toyota Corolla Cross 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 TSS (PCS, LDA, ACC, LTA)。
兩款車嘅安全評級一樣，喺呢個級數入面安全配備都算給好齊全。而家嘅新車安全性都唔差，唔使太擔心呢一點。
Perodua Aruz 車身長 4400 mm，行李廂 400 L。
Toyota Corolla Cross 車身長 4400 mm，行李廂 400 L。
兩款車嘅尺寸幾乎一樣，車內空間差別唔大。呢個級數嘅車，日常使用完全夠用。
Perodua Aruz 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
Toyota Corolla Cross 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
兩款車嘅驅動方式一樣，都係 FWD，日常駕駛感受唔會太大分別。
總括嚟講，Perodua Aruz 同 Toyota Corolla Cross 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵都要睇你個人嘅需求同預算。建議大家做足功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，先至去試駕做最終決定。揀車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買車嘅客喺揀車嘅時候都會拿 Perodua Aruz 同 Toyota Yaris Cross 嚟做比較。呢兩部車喺價錢同定位上都好接近，今日我哋就從多個方面做個詳細嘅比較，幫你省咗做功課嘅時間。
Perodua Aruz 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 72,900 - 77,900，一共有 2 個版本，包括 1.5L X（RM 72,900）、1.5L AV（RM 77,900） 等等。
Toyota Yaris Cross 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 99,900 - 109,900，一共有 2 個版本，包括 2026 1.5L Standard（RM 99,900）、2026 HEV 1.5L Standard（RM 109,900） 等等。
從價錢嚟睇，Perodua Aruz 嘅起步價確實比 Toyota Yaris Cross 平咗 RM 27,000。如果你預算有限，Perodua 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需求。但亦都要注意，平嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備上會有取舍，具體要看你嘅需求。
Perodua Aruz 搭載 1.5L 4-cyl，馬力 105 hp。官方油耗 6.0 L/100km。
Toyota Yaris Cross 搭載 1.5L 4-cyl，馬力 105 hp。官方油耗 6.0 L/100km。
兩部車用緊同一套動力系統，日常開起上嚟嘅感覺基本冇分別。油耗方面都差唔多，唔使太糾結這一點。
Perodua Aruz 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括。
Toyota Yaris Cross 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 TSS。
兩部車嘅安全評級一樣，喺呢個級別入面安全配備都算好齊全。而家嘅新車安全性都唔差，唔使太擔心這一點。
Perodua Aruz 車身長 4400 mm，尾箱 400 L。
Toyota Yaris Cross 車身長 4400 mm，尾箱 400 L。
兩部車嘅尺寸幾乎一樣，車廂空間差別唔大。呢個級別嘅車，日常使用完全夠用。
Perodua Aruz 保修 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Toyota Yaris Cross 保修 5 年/無限制里程，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
總體嚟講，Perodua Aruz 同 Toyota Yaris Cross 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一部，關鍵始終係要睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
