首頁river
搜尋歷史
熱門搜尋
經銷商登入 / 註冊
In Malaysia's SUV market, many buyers compare the Proton X70 and Toyota Corolla Cross when choosing a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning. Today we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
The OTR selling price of Proton X70 in Malaysia is RM 106,800 - 122,300, with a total of 3 versions, including 1.5L Standard 2WD (RM 106,800), 1.5L Executive 2WD (RM 115,800), 1.5L Premium 2WD (RM 122,300), etc.
The OTR selling price of Toyota Corolla Cross in Malaysia is RM 133,800 - 148,800, with a total of 3 versions, including 2026 HEV 1.8L GR Sport (RM 148,800), 2026 HEV 1.8L Standard (RM 140,800), 2026 1.8L Standard (RM 133,800), etc.
From a price perspective, the starting price of Proton X70 is indeed RM 27,000 cheaper than Toyota Corolla Cross. If your budget is limited, Proton's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. But note that the few thousand ringgit difference might involve trade-offs in features, depending on your needs.
Proton X70 is equipped with a 1.5L Turbo, 140 hp. Official fuel consumption is 7.0 L/100km.
Toyota Corolla Cross is equipped with a 1.5L Turbo, 140 hp. Official fuel consumption is 7.0 L/100km.
Both cars use the same powertrain, and the driving feel in daily use is basically the same. Fuel consumption is also similar, so there is no need to worry too much about this.
Proton X70 body length is 4400 mm, trunk is 400 L.
Toyota Corolla Cross body length is 4400 mm, trunk is 400 L.
The dimensions of both cars are almost the same, and the interior space is not much different. For cars in this class, daily use is completely adequate.
Proton X70 and Toyota Corolla Cross are both mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and second-hand price more, you can prioritize the one with better reputation; if you care more about value for money and features, then choose the model with more rich configuration. Ultimately, it is recommended to test drive both, personal experience is the most important.
Overall, Proton X70 and Toyota Corolla Cross are both very good car models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends mainly on your personal needs and budget. It is recommended to do your research, compare quotes from several dealerships, and then test drive to make the final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending some time doing research will never be wrong.
Today's happiness🎀
Welcome a new batch of Malaysian owners
Join the Tesla family❤️
This "gift" from the Shanghai Super Factory🎁
Will accompany everyone to go to more places you want to go⚡️
In Malaysia's SUV market, many buyers compare the Proton X70 and Honda CR-V when choosing a car. These two models are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to save you time doing your research.
The OTR price of the Proton X70 in Malaysia is RM 106,800 - 122,300, with a total of 3 versions, including 1.5L Standard 2WD (RM 106,800), 1.5L Executive 2WD (RM 115,800), 1.5L Premium 2WD (RM 122,300), etc.
The OTR price of the Honda CR-V in Malaysia is RM 178,200 - 195,900, with a total of 4 versions, including 2026 e:HEV 2.0L 2WD RS (RM 195,900), 2026 1.5T 4WD V (RM 181,900), 2026 e:HEV 2.0L 2WD E (RM 178,200), etc.
From a price perspective, the Proton X70's starting price is indeed RM 71,400 cheaper than the Honda CR-V. If your budget is limited, Proton's entry-level version is already sufficient for daily needs. However, be mindful that the price difference of a few thousand may involve trade-offs in equipment, depending on your specific requirements.
Proton X70 features a 1.5L Turbo engine, 140 hp. Official fuel consumption 7.0 L/100km.
Honda CR-V features a 2.0L 4-cyl engine, 170 hp. Official fuel consumption 8.0 L/100km.
Regarding power, the Honda CR-V's 2.0L 4-cyl has 30 more horsepower than the Proton X70's 1.5L Turbo. However, for daily city driving, both cars have adequate power and won't feel underpowered.
Proton X70 body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
Honda CR-V body length 4500 mm, trunk 450 L.
In terms of space, the Honda CR-V's body is 100 mm longer than the Proton X70, offering an advantage in passenger room. However, the Proton X70 is slightly more maneuverable for parking in the city, each having its trade-offs.
Proton X70 warranty 5 years/150,000km, service interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Honda CR-V warranty 5 years/unlimited mileage, service interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Overall, both Proton X70 and Honda CR-V are excellent models in the Malaysia market. Choosing which one depends mainly on your personal needs and budget. We suggest doing your research, comparing quotes from multiple dealerships, and then test-driving to make a final decision. Buying a car is a significant matter; spending time on research is never wrong.
On July 28, the Fortune Global 500 list was released. BYD ranked 91st. This marks the fifth consecutive year it has held this position. Among the 35 companies listed in the global vehicles and parts sector, this ranking signifies that it has secured its spot in the world's top 100.
Over the past year, the global automotive industry faced difficulties, with 7 vehicle manufacturers on the list reporting losses. In such a climate, maintaining the same ranking itself reflects an embodiment of resilience.
Where the Money Goes, Is Where the Lifeline Lies
Outsiders often focus on the income statement, but opening BYD's books from last year reveals one expense worth more attention: 63.4 billion yuan in R&D investment, nearly double its net profit for the same period. Simply put, this isn't burning cash; it's buying the right to remain unstrangled. By the end of last year, BYD had cumulatively filed over 71,000 patents globally. These patents have been translated into second-generation Blade Batteries, megawatt-level flash charging technology, and the "Sky Eye" advanced driver-assistance system. When a carmaker masters full-stack technology from cells to chips, its posture becomes naturally stronger when negotiating within the global supply chain.
Going Global Is No Longer Just Selling Cars
Last year, BYD's overseas sales surpassed 1 million units, a 145% year-on-year increase. In Brazil, a passenger car factory was not only built, but SkyRail also started operations; in Thailand, a factory that has been running for two years has become a regional manufacturing hub; in Japan, the exclusive Sea Otter model specifically targeting the K-Car market was launched. This "manufacturing + infrastructure + localization adaptation" combination punch signifies that the logic of Chinese automakers going global is shifting from simple commodity trade to the overall export of the industrial chain.
The Value of Ranking 91st
Looking back at this 91st ranking again. Through it, we see a daily R&D investment of 174 million yuan, a sales system covering 121 countries and regions, and the presence of eight self-built RoRo ships shuttling across the oceans. This "Technology + Manufacturing + Logistics" full-chain control capability is the true foundation of the world's top 100.
The list changes every year, and rankings vary. But as long as this vertically integrated system keeps operating, BYD's piece in the global industrial chain game will become increasingly active.
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嗰陣都會拎 Proton X70 同 Toyota Fortuner 嚟比較。呢兩款車喺價位同定位上都幾接近，今日我哋就從多個方面做一個詳細嘅比較，幫你節省做功課嘅時間。
Proton X70 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 106,800 - 122,300，一共有 3 個版本，包括 1.5L Standard 2WD（RM 106,800）、1.5L Executive 2WD（RM 115,800）、1.5L Premium 2WD（RM 122,300）等等。
Toyota Fortuner 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 195,880 - 241,880，一共有 3 個版本，包括 2024 2.8T VRZ Diesel（RM 241,880）、2024 2.7L SRZ Petrol（RM 202,880）、2024 2.4L Standard Diesel（RM 195,880）等等。
從價錢嚟睇，Proton X70 嘅起步價確實比 Toyota Fortuner 平咗 RM 89,080。如果你預算有限，Proton 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需要。但都要留意，平嗰幾千塊，可能喺配備上面有取捨，具體要看你嘅需要。
Proton X70 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA)。
Toyota Fortuner 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 。
兩款車嘅安全評級一樣，喺呢個級別入面安全配備都算好齊全。而家嘅新車安全性都唔差，唔使太擔心這一點。
Proton X70 車身長 4400 mm，行李箱 400 L。
Toyota Fortuner 車身長 4400 mm，行李箱 400 L。
兩款車嘅尺寸幾乎一樣，車內空間分別唔大。呢個級別嘅車，日常使用完全夠用。
Proton X70 保修 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Toyota Fortuner 保修 5 年/無限制里程，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Proton X70 同 Toyota Fortuner 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更睇重品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰一款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，就揀配置更豐富嗰款。最終都係建議兩款都去試車，親身體驗先係最重要嘅。
總括嚟講，Proton X70 同 Toyota Fortuner 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車款。揀邊一輛，關鍵都要睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較多間車行嘅報價，先至去試車做最終決定。買車係件大事情，花少少時間做功課絕對冇錯。
In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers compare Proton X70 and Honda HR-V when selecting a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
Proton X70's OTR price in Malaysia is RM 106,800 - 122,300, with a total of 3 versions, including 1.5L Standard 2WD (RM 106,800), 1.5L Executive 2WD (RM 115,800), 1.5L Premium 2WD (RM 122,300), etc.
Honda HR-V's OTR price in Malaysia is RM 115,900 - 143,900, with a total of 4 versions, including 2026 e:HEV 1.5L RS (RM 143,900), 2026 1.5T V (RM 137,900), 2026 1.5T E (RM 130,900), etc.
Looking at the price, the starting price of Proton X70 is indeed RM 9,100 cheaper than Honda HR-V. If your budget is limited, Proton's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. But also note, that few thousand cheaper might involve compromises in features, it depends on your specific needs.
Proton X70's safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
Honda HR-V's safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include Honda SENSING (ACC, CMBS, LKAS, RDM).
Both cars have the same safety rating, safety features are quite comprehensive in this class. New cars nowadays are not lacking in safety, no need to worry too much about this.
Proton X70 body length is 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
Honda HR-V body length is 4500 mm, trunk 450 L.
In terms of space, Honda HR-V's body is 100 mm longer than Proton X70, with an advantage in seating space. However, Proton X70 is a bit more flexible for parking in the city, both have their trade-offs.
Proton X70 warranty 5 years/150,000km, service interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Honda HR-V warranty 5 years/unlimited mileage, service interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Overall, Proton X70 and Honda HR-V are both very good models in the Malaysian market. Choosing which one depends mainly on your personal needs and budget. We suggest doing your research, compare quotes from several dealerships, and then go for a test drive to make the final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending some time on research will never be wrong.
比寧德時代業績更驚人嘅係，拿出咗 761 億「回饋」股東——分紅 361 億 + 回購 400 億並註銷。
7 月 24 日，寧德時代又交出咗一份亮眼嘅半年成績單。2026 年上半年，寧德時代實現營業收入 2769 億元，同比增長 54.8%；歸屬上市公司股東嘅淨利潤 432.8 億元，同比增長 42.0%；基本每股盈利 9.51 元，同比增長 37.4%。呢份業績基本達到市場預期嘅上限。
更令市場震驚嘅係，公司同步拋出咗 200 億至 400 億元嘅鉅額 A 股回購註銷方案。作為對比，根據 Wind 數據，2026 年上半年 A 股市場約 700 家上市公司實施咗股份回購，累計回購金額約 650 億元。寧德時代回購體量之大，由此可見一斑。
不過有意思嘅係，一方面寧德時代喺 A 股市場大筆回購；另一方面，又喺港股市場進行高達 391 億港元股權融資，並發行高達 400 億元額度低成本綠色科創債。
原因都好簡單，通過境內自有現金進行 A 股股東回報，穩固境內市場口碑；通過港股市場獲取境外融資以及低息發債進行境內外擴張。兩筆資金兩個用處，完美平衡擴張與股東收益。此外，A 股回購還可以對沖 H 股增發帶來嘅股權稀釋。
01
儲能業務爆發，第二增長極已經成熟
翻開利潤表，寧德時代最值得關注嘅並非動力電池嘅穩健增長，而係儲能業務持續性嘅爆發。
上半年，動力電池系統收入 1921 億元，同比增長 46%，毛利率 20.63%，同比略有下滑但依然健康。但真正嘅焦點喺儲能電池系統——收入達 532.6 億元，同比暴增 87.54%，增速幾乎係動力業務嘅兩倍。儲能收入佔總營業額比重已攀升至 19.2%。
喺投資者交流會上，寧德時代披露咗更細粒度嘅數據：上半年動力同儲能電池合計銷量同比增長約 60%，其中儲能電池銷量佔比已達約 1/4，且儲能系統（而唔係單純電芯）佔比接近七成。
產品層面，587Ah 大容量儲能專用電芯已實現規模化交付，配套嘅 6.25MWh 天恒儲能系統、全球首款近 9MWh 嘅 TENER Stack 超大容量系統持續量產。公司還同海博思創簽署咗為期 3 年、總規模 60GWh 嘅鈉離子電池儲能戰略合作協議。
02
全球市場佔有率逆勢攀升，海外版圖加速擴張
喺貿易摩擦同地緣政治複雜化嘅背景下，寧德時代嘅全球市場份額唔跌反升，實屬難得。
根據 SNE Research 數據，2026 年 1-5 月，寧德時代動力電池全球市場佔有率達 40.2%，同比提升 2.2 個百分點，連續九年位居全球第一。喺海外市場（唔計中國），公司市場佔有率為 33.7%，同比提升 3.7 個百分點。
歐洲市場係重要增量來源。2026 年上半年歐洲新能源乘用車銷量 235.1 萬輛，同比增長 31.7%，滲透率提升至 32.5%。寧德時代深度配套大眾、Stellantis、寶馬、沃爾沃、豐田等海外頭部車企，同時匈牙利工廠、西班牙合資工廠穩步推進，本地化交付能力持續增強。
寧德時代仲喺德國、西班牙、智利、馬來西亞、澳大利亞等國家中標多個儲能系統集成項目，海外儲能業務正在複製動力電池嘅成功路徑。
反映喺數據上，寧德時代海外收入達 871 億元，佔營業額比重 31.46%，同比增長達 42.35%。
03
高潛力領域：AIDC 與鈉電池
如果話動力同儲能係寧德時代嘅「而家」，咁 AI 資料中心（AIDC）同鈉電池就係「將來」。
目前全球 AI 算力需求井噴，AIDC 嘅電力保障同能效管理成為剛需。寧德時代已佈局 AIDC 全場景能源解決方案，覆蓋發電側、中壓配電側到機房內部，可應對算力密集、負載波動大等挑戰。
要知道，AIDC 嘅需求同全球 AI 算力投資掛鈎，目前呢一領域正處於爆發期。公司投資者關係記錄入面也明確表示：「全球範圍內 AI 嘅快速發展帶動咗 AI 相關基礎設施嘅要求，例如 AIDC，未來潛力巨大。」寧德時代係通過賣電池，切入咗一個新嘅萬億級 AI 基礎設施賽道。
此外，寧德時代深度佈局嘅鈉電池已經開花結果。不過，市場仍然關注鈉電池相對於鋰電池嘅成本競爭力。公司對此回應稱，規模化生產後鈉電池喺物料成本上對比當前碳酸鋰價格下嘅磷酸鋰鐵電池具備一定優勢，且擁有寬溫域適應、低溫性能佳、長壽命等差異化特性。目前產線可實現鋰鈉靈活切換，客戶已經陸續簽約。
04
寧德時代回購史：由 20 億至 400 億
另外要提嘅就係寧德時代呢次 400 億回購註銷。理解呢次回購需要先睇下佢所處嘅市場環境。
首先講嘅係，寧德時代喺呢個時間點嘅回購並唔係個例。
據 Wind 數據統計，2026 年上半年 A 股市場共計約 700 家上市公司實施咗股份回購，累計回購股份數量約 50.6 億股，累計回購金額約 650 億元。「註銷式回購」也從零星個案演變為越來越普遍嘅選擇。
這係因為，2026 年以來，A 股市場整體呈現震盪格局。上半年上證指數喺 3000 點至 3300 點區間反覆拉鋸，市場情緒偏謹慎，投資者對上市公司盈利質量同股東回報嘅關注度升至前所未有嘅高度。監管層也喺持續引導上市公司通過分紅、回購等方式提升投資價值，傳遞長期看漲信號，進一步穩固市場底部信心。
回歸鋰電池板塊，情況更加複雜。從行業基本面上來看，新能源車滲透率、儲能需求依然強勁，但資本市場嘅預期往往跑喺前面。2021 年巔峰時期，鋰電池板塊指數市盈率一度超過百倍。然而隨著產能過剩隱憂浮現、碳酸鋰價格從歷史高位劇烈回落、歐美貿易壁壘持續加碼，板塊估值喺過去數年間經歷咗漫長嘅消化過程。
其後，2025 年底隨著碳酸鋰價格嘅回調，鋰電池板塊企業再次煥發新生。
2026 年 5 月 7 日，寧德時代 A 股股價再次沖高至 468.75 元嘅近一年新高，其後受機構集中調倉（資金流向 AI 算力賽道）、外資連續減持等因素影響，股價持續回落。公司自己喺投資者交流中坦言：「近期資本市場有啲波動，公司股價也有所下跌」——這直接解釋咗本輪回購嘅觸動原因。
呢筆上限 400 億元嘅 A 股史上最大規模註銷式回購，直接向市場傳遞「股價被低估」嘅信號，有效對沖咗前期機構集中減持帶來嘅拋壓，推動市值快速修復。
回顧寧德時代嘅回購歷史，可以清晰睇到一條「進化」軌跡：
第一次：2023 年 10 月，寧德時代推出首輪回購計劃，擬使用 20 億元至 30 億元回購股份，回購用處為實施股權激勵計劃或員工持股計劃。該輪回購於 2024 年實施完畢，實際使用資金約 27 億元。這係寧德時代喺資本市場嘅首次回購嘗試。
資料來源：寧德時代新能源科技股份有限公司關於股份回購結果嘅公告
第二次：2025 年 4 月 -2026 年 4 月，公司宣佈擬使用唔少於 40 億元且唔超過 80 億元回購 A 股。該輪回購於 2026 年 4 月圓滿結束，累計回購股份 15,990,782 股，成交總金額 43.86 億元，最高成交價 317.63 元/股，最低成交價 231.50 元/股。但用處仍係用於股權激勵或員工持股計劃，並未註銷。
資料來源：寧德時代新能源科技股份有限公司關於 A 股股份回購結果暨股份變動嘅公告
第三次：2026 年 7 月，寧德時代公告擬使用唔少於 200 億元且唔超過 400 億元回購股份，並明確表示將回購股份予以註銷以減少註冊資本。
這係該公司歷史上首次以註銷為目的嘅大規模回購，金額係第二輪嘅 5-10 倍，係第一輪嘅近 20 倍。
激勵式回購係將價值分配俾員工，註銷式回購係將價值返還俾所有股東。前者係管理工具，後者係資本承諾。由 20 億至 400 億，由激勵至註銷，寧德時代向市場傳遞咗一個清晰信號：公司有意願將利潤轉化為所有股東嘅切實回報。
當然，呢筆大筆分紅嘅底氣來自於天量資金儲備。寧德市場公司賬上貨幣資金高達 3720 億元，2026 年上半年僅中期分紅就達 64.93 億元，年度分紅（含特別分紅）合計達 361 億元，自由現金流充裕。加之 H 股配售完成，海外融資渠道進一步拓寬，為大規模回購提供咗充足彈藥。
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拿 寶騰 X70 同 本田 HR-V 嚟比較。呢兩款車喺價位同定位上都幾接近嘅，今日我哋就會從多個方面做一個詳細嘅比較，幫你省返做功課嘅時間。
寶騰 X70 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 106,800 - 122,300，合共有 3 個版本，包括 1.5L Standard 2WD（RM 106,800）、1.5L Executive 2WD（RM 115,800）、1.5L Premium 2WD（RM 122,300） 等。
本田 HR-V 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 115,900 - 143,900，合共有 4 個版本，包括 2026 e:HEV 1.5L RS（RM 143,900）、2026 1.5T V（RM 137,900）、2026 1.5T E（RM 130,900） 等。
由價錢睇，寶騰 X70 嘅起步價確實比 本田 HR-V 平咗 RM 9,100。如果你預算有限，寶騰嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需要。但都要記住，平嗰幾千蚊，可能在配備上會有取捨，具體就要睇你嘅需求。
寶騰 X70 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
本田 HR-V 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
兩款車嘅驅動方式一樣，都係 FWD，日常駕駛感覺唔會有太大分別。
寶騰 X70 保修 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
本田 HR-V 保修 5 年/無限制里程，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
寶騰 X70 同 本田 HR-V 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭用、日常通勤。如果你更重視品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰一款；如果你更重視性價比同配備，那就揀配備更豐富嗰款。最後都係建議兩款都去試駕，親身試吓先係最重要嘅。
總體嚟講，寶騰 X70 同 本田 HR-V 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵都係要睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做足功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去做試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事情，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嗰陣都會拿 Proton X50 同 Subaru Crosstrek 嚟做比較。呢兩款車喺價位同定位上都幾相近，今日我哋就從多個方面做個詳細對比，幫你省返做足功課嘅時間。
Proton X50 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 89,800 至 113,300，合共 4 個版本，包括 1.5T Executive（RM 89,800）、1.5T Premium（RM 101,800）、1.5T Flagship（RM 113,300） 等。
Subaru Crosstrek 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 145,000 至 160,000，合共 1 個版本，包括 2.0L e-Boxer（RM 150,000） 等。
由價錢睇，Proton X50 嘅入門價確實比 Subaru Crosstrek 平咗 RM 55,200。如果你預算有限，Proton 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需要。但亦要小心，平嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備上要有取舍，具體睇你嘅需要。
Proton X50 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA)。
Subaru Crosstrek 嘅安全評級係 5★ (Euro NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 EyeSight。
安全配備方面，兩款車都拿到唔錯嘅評級。不過 Proton X50 嘅 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA) 同 Subaru Crosstrek 嘅 EyeSight 喺功能上有少少差異，如果你比較睇重主動安全嘅話，可以仔細對比下兩者嘅功能列表。
Proton X50 採用 4WD 驅動方式。
Subaru Crosstrek 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
Proton 嘅 4WD 同 Subaru 嘅 FWD 喺操控上有唔同感受，建議試駕對比。
Proton X50 保修 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔係每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Subaru Crosstrek 保修 3 年/100,000km，保養間隔係每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Proton X50 同 Subaru Crosstrek 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家用、日常通勤。如果你更睇重品牌聲譽同二手價，可以優先考慮聲譽更好嗰款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，嗰就揀配置更豐富嗰款。最後依然建議兩款都去試駕，親自體驗先至最重要。
總嚟講，Proton X50 同 Subaru Crosstrek 都係馬來西亞市場嘅幾唔錯車型。揀邊輛，關鍵仲係睇你嘅個人需要同預算。建議大家做足功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最後決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拿 Proton X50 同 Subaru Crosstrek 嚟做比較。
Proton X50 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 89,800 - 113,300，合共 4 個版本，包括 1.5T Executive（RM 89,800）、1.5T Premium（RM 101,800）、1.5T Flagship（RM 113,300）等。
Subaru Crosstrek 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 145,000 - 160,000，合共 1 個版本，包括 2.0L e-Boxer（RM 150,000）等。
睇返價錢，Proton X50 嘅起步價確實比 Subaru Crosstrek 平咗 RM 55,200。如果你預算有限，Proton 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需要。不過都要留意，平嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備上要有取舍，具體要看你嘅需要。
Proton X50 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA)。
Subaru Crosstrek 嘅安全評級係 5★ (Euro NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 EyeSight。
安全配備方面，兩部車都獲咗唔錯嘅評級。不過 Proton X50 嘅 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA) 同 Subaru Crosstrek 嘅 EyeSight 喺功能上有啲分別，如果你比較重視主動安全嘅話，可以仔細對比一下佢哋嘅功能列表。
Proton X50 採用 4WD 驅動方式。
Subaru Crosstrek 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
Proton 嘅 4WD 同 Subaru 嘅 FWD 喺操控上會有唔同感受，建議試駕對比。
Proton X50 保修 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Subaru Crosstrek 保修 3 年/100,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
總體嚟講，Proton X50 同 Subaru Crosstrek 都係馬來西亞市場相當唔錯嘅車型。揀邊部，關鍵仍然係要睇你嘅個人需要同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，先至去試駕做最後決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嗰陣都會拿 Proton X50 同 Subaru Forester 嚟做比較。呢兩款車喺價位同定位上都幾接近，今日我哋就從多個方面做一個詳細嘅對比，幫你慳啲做功課嘅時間。
Proton X50 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 89,800 - 113,300，一總共有 4 個版本，包括 1.5T Executive（RM 89,800）、1.5T Premium（RM 101,800）、1.5T Flagship（RM 113,300） 等。
Subaru Forester 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 174,000 - 197,000，一總共有 3 個版本，包括 2024 2.0L S EyeSight GT Edition（RM 189,538）、2024 2.0L S EyeSight（RM 177,538）、2024 2.0L L EyeSight（RM 167,538） 等。
由價錢睇，Proton X50 嘅起步價的確比 Subaru Forester 平咗 RM 84,200。如果你預算有限，Proton 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需求。但都要注意，平嗰幾千塊，可能喺配備上會有取捨，具體要睇你嘅需求。
Proton X50 搭載 1.5L 4-cyl，馬力 105 hp。官方油耗 6.0 L/100km。
Subaru Forester 搭載 2.0L 4-cyl，馬力 170 hp。官方油耗 8.0 L/100km。
動力方面，Subaru Forester 嘅 2.0L 4-cyl 比 Proton X50 嘅 1.5L 4-cyl 多咗 65 匹馬力。不過日常喺市區開，兩款車嘅動力都夠用，唔會覺得唔夠力。
Proton X50 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA)。
Subaru Forester 嘅安全評級係 5★ (Euro NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 EyeSight。
安全配備方面，兩款車都拿到唔錯嘅評級。不過 Proton X50 嘅 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA) 同 Subaru Forester 嘅 EyeSight 喺功能上有啲差異，如果你比較看重主動安全嘅話，可以仔細對比下兩者嘅功能列表。
Proton X50 保修 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Subaru Forester 保修 3 年/100,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
總嘅嚟講，Proton X50 同 Subaru Forester 都係馬來西亞市場好唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵都要睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
On July 23, 2026, Valencia, Spain. On this day, Geely Automobile and Ford Motor—two "old friends" shaking hands again after 16 years—signed a significant agreement in a factory with nearly 50 years of history.
Geely Automobile announced the acquisition of a 34% equity stake in Ford's Valencia, Spain factory for 221 million euros. Both parties established a joint venture, sharing one of Europe's largest automobile factories with an annual capacity of about 500,000 units. Geely will launch two new energy models here, with the first vehicle rolling off the line in 2028; Ford will continue producing three multi-energy models such as Kuga.
This is not only capacity sharing between the two automakers but also a key strategic move in Geely's globalization strategy—from "going out" to "integrating in," from complete vehicle exports to local manufacturing. Geely is exploring its own path amidst the changes in the global automotive industry.
The "Trust Vote" from 16 Years Ago
To understand the origins of this cooperation, we must turn the clock back to March 28, 2010.
On that day, Geely Holding Group acquired Volvo Cars entirely from Ford for 1.8 billion USD. At that time, Geely was an unknown Chinese private car company, while Volvo was a well-known luxury brand. This "small swallowing big" deal shocked the global automotive industry.
But what kept this story going until now was not the deal itself, but what happened after the deal.
After taking over Volvo, Geely did not rush to integrate but chose to "let the tiger return to the mountains"—keeping Volvo's Swedish headquarters and Belgian factories, respecting its independent development system, and fulfilling all commitments to the brand, employees, and unions made during the acquisition. Ford, as the former parent company, witnessed throughout how Geely protected and revived a classic brand with pragmatic actions.
This commercial integrity of "doing what you say" won Ford's respect and trust for Geely. 16 years later, when Ford faced challenges in capacity efficiency and the market in Europe—the Valencia factory has an annual capacity of 500,000 units, but actual production in 2025 was less than 100,000 units—it chose to extend an olive branch to Geely again. Through capacity sharing, it aims to create new energy vehicle products for Geely and Ford brands for the European market, improve capacity utilization, and jointly expand the regional market. Behind this lies trust accumulation across time cycles.
As Geely Holding Group Chairman Li Shufu often said internally: The fun of business lies in making friends and doing deals at the same time, achieving win-win results in every cooperation, and leaving pleasant memories. This philosophy was concretely embodied in this cooperation.
"Light Asset" Going Overseas: Building a "Network of Friends" Instead of Factories
Unlike most Chinese automakers choosing to "build their own factories" for going overseas, Geely took a differentiated path.
In April this year, Geely Holding Group clarified a new strategy for overseas expansion: instead of building new production factories, it proceeds to advance business layout through cooperation, integration, and reviving existing capacity. For Geely, in the context of tense geopolitical situations and changing global patterns, prioritizing the use of existing factories by partners is a more pragmatic choice.
This "light asset" logic has been repeatedly verified in Geely's previous global layout:
Volvo's European factories provide a manufacturing pivot for Geely to enter high-end markets;
Proton's Southeast Asian network allowed Geely to build a High-Tech Automotive Valley in Tanjong Malim, Malaysia;
Renault's Brazilian factories and channels support new energy cooperation between both parties in the Latin America and Africa market;
The establishment of HORSE Powertrain with Renault achieves deep technical synergy for the global market.
Geely and partners use these ready resources together. This Geely-style localization method improves overseas and market expansion efficiency while reducing regional barrier risks. Wanlian Securities Investment Consultant Qu Fang evaluated: "This belongs to a light asset, high efficiency 'going overseas' layout mode. Compared with building factories, the investment is lower, the implementation cycle is shorter, and the pace of capacity expansion can be adjusted flexibly."
The Spanish joint venture is the European debut of this model. Geely secured a 34% equity stake and stable subcontracting capacity with only 221 million euros, quickly obtaining a production base compliant with EU standards. Relying on Ford's accumulated European supply chain and local operation experience over many years, it greatly reduced the cost and risk of overseas layout.
From "Product Export" to "System Going Overseas"
In the first half of 2026, Geely Automobile's overseas sales reached 474,000 units, up 158% year-on-year, exceeding the total export volume of the full year of 2025. Among them, new energy exports were 277,000 units, surging 585% year-on-year, accounting for 58%.
Behind these numbers is a net Geely wove globally over the past decade-plus—acquiring Volvo, investing in Proton, holding Lotus, and cooperating with Renault to build factories in Korea and Brazil. Now, this net has added a key node: Spain.
Geely Automobile Group CEO Gan Jiayue once emphasized that Geely promotes international development by adhering to the strategies of "global synergy" and "regional deep plowing." Geely has built a global strategic system composed of "five major design centers, five major research and development centers, five major test areas, five major energy technology forms, and five major AI intelligent ecosystems."
In January 2026, Geely Holding released the "One Geely, Leading Comprehensively" 2030 strategic goal: achieving a breakthrough in global total sales of 6.5 million, revenue exceeding 1 trillion yuan, and ranking among the top five global automakers by sales by 2030. The core of the new strategy is integration—unified scheduling in R&D, manufacturing, supply chain, and global market levels, reducing internal duplicate investment, and improving efficiency through scaled synergy.
In terms of overseas layout, Geely focuses on the "3+2" five major markets: Europe, Eastern Europe, ASEAN, Latin America and Africa, and Middle East Asia Pacific. Plan to increase overseas outlets to 2,200 by the end of 2026. Based on the strong performance in the first half of the year, Geely has adjusted the full-year export target to 900,000 units.
Why Europe? Why Now?
Europe is the highland of the global automotive industry and a key market for Geely's global strategy. But the threshold of the European market is rising.
Currently, the EU has set high additional tariffs on imported electric vehicles from China, and direct export would greatly compress price competitiveness. Geely's choice to localize production in Spain is essentially using "local manufacturing" to bypass tariff barriers. A Citigroup research report points out that local production bases help the company avoid import tariffs that the EU might impose on Chinese electric vehicles and greatly improve price competitiveness.
This strategy was also used by foreign automakers entering China thirty years ago—in the 1990s, international giants like Volkswagen and General Motors established joint ventures with Chinese automakers to enter the Chinese market, bypassing high import tariffs through local production. The logic at the time was "trading technology for market." Now the roles are reversing—under the premise of acting in accordance with laws and regulations, Chinese automakers take technology and products to Europe to "trade capacity for market."
A few words by Ford Europe President Jim Baumback at the signing scene were particularly meaningful. He evaluated Geely as "one of the fastest-growing automotive forces globally," possessing world-class electrification capabilities, speed, and vast global scale; while Ford has over a century of engineering wisdom, an unbreakable bond with European users, and the best workforce. He believes the combination of the two will form unparalleled competitive advantages. This statement is both recognition of Geely and reflects Ford's practical considerations for this cooperation.
From "Going Out" to "Integrating In"
Geely Automobile Group Vice President Nan Shengliang defined this cooperation as a "milestone event in global development." He stated that this will further solidify Geely's localization layout in Europe, enabling Geely to truly establish roots in and deeply cultivate Europe with safe and low-carbon products and leading new energy technologies.
From the European media title at the 2006 Frankfurt Motor Show "The Chinese are coming, but can their cars run?" to sharing a factory with Ford in the European heartland in 2026—in 20 years, Geely has walked the complete cycle from being questioned to being recognized.
Behind this is a deep evolution of Geely's globalization strategy: from simple product export to "going out" to establish overseas sales networks; from early capital acquisition learning advanced brands and technologies to "integrating in" through local manufacturing to deeply integrate into regional markets. Geely is exploring not simply product output, but a new paradigm of "using global resources to serve regional markets, using local capabilities to win global competition."
Ending Words
This factory in Valencia, Spain, was once an important asset of Ford in Europe, and now is becoming a key piece on the board of Geely's new globalization game. From the "small swallowing big" of acquiring Volvo to the "light asset" of regional expansion—Geely has written a progressive history of Chinese automaker globalization in 16 years. And this history is still being written.
In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers compare the Proton X50 and Hyundai Tucson when choosing a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
The Proton X50 has an OTR price in Malaysia of RM 89,800 - 113,300, with a total of 4 versions, including 1.5T Executive (RM 89,800), 1.5T Premium (RM 101,800), 1.5T Flagship (RM 113,300), etc.
The Hyundai Tucson has an OTR price in Malaysia of RM 143,888 - 197,888, with a total of 5 versions, including 2025 HEV 1.6T AT 2WD Prestige (RM 197,888), 2025 1.6T DCT 4WD Prestige (RM 186,888), 2025 1.6T DCT 2WD Prime (RM 164,888), etc.
In terms of price, the Proton X50 starting price is indeed RM 54,088 cheaper than the Hyundai Tucson. If your budget is limited, the Proton entry-level version can already meet daily needs. However, keep in mind that the few thousand RM difference might involve trade-offs in features, depending on your specific needs.
The Proton X50 safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
The Hyundai Tucson safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety system includes SmartSense.
Both cars have the same safety rating, and safety features in this class are considered quite comprehensive. New cars nowadays are generally safe, so there is no need to worry too much about this.
Proton X50 body length is 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
Hyundai Tucson body length is 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
The dimensions of both cars are almost the same, with little difference in interior space. For cars in this class, they are fully sufficient for daily use.
Proton X50 warranty 5 years/150,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Hyundai Tucson warranty 5 years/300,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
In conclusion, both Proton X50 and Hyundai Tucson are excellent models in the Malaysian market. Choosing which one depends mainly on your personal needs and budget. We suggest doing your research, comparing quotes from several dealerships, and then going for a test drive to make a final decision. Buying a car is a significant matter; spending some time on research will never go wrong.
In Malaysia's SUV market, many buyers compare Proton X50 and Hyundai Tucson when choosing a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning. Today we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time doing research.
The OTR selling price of Proton X50 in Malaysia is RM 89,800 - 113,300, with a total of 4 versions, including 1.5T Executive (RM 89,800), 1.5T Premium (RM 101,800), 1.5T Flagship (RM 113,300), etc.
The OTR selling price of Hyundai Tucson in Malaysia is RM 143,888 - 197,888, with a total of 5 versions, including 2025 HEV 1.6T AT 2WD Prestige (RM 197,888), 2025 1.6T DCT 4WD Prestige (RM 186,888), 2025 1.6T DCT 2WD Prime (RM 164,888), etc.
In terms of price, the starting price of Proton X50 is indeed RM 54,088 cheaper than Hyundai Tucson. If your budget is limited, Proton's entry-level version is sufficient for daily needs. However, be aware that the several thousand cheaper might involve compromises on features, depending on your needs.
Proton X50 is equipped with a 1.5L 4-cyl, 105 hp power. Official fuel consumption 6.0 L/100km.
Hyundai Tucson is equipped with a 1.5L Turbo, 140 hp power. Official fuel consumption 7.0 L/100km.
In terms of power, Hyundai Tucson's 1.5L Turbo has 35 more horsepower than Proton X50's 1.5L 4-cyl. However, for daily city driving, the power of both cars is sufficient and won't feel lacking.
Proton X50 body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
Hyundai Tucson body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
The dimensions of both cars are almost identical, with little difference in interior space. Cars in this class are fully sufficient for daily use.
Proton X50 uses 4WD drive mode.
Hyundai Tucson uses FWD drive mode.
Proton's 4WD and Hyundai's FWD will feel different in handling, a test drive comparison is recommended.
Overall, Proton X50 and Hyundai Tucson are both very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends mainly on your personal needs and budget. We suggest doing your homework, comparing quotes from several dealerships, and then test driving to make the final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, taking time to do your homework will never go wrong.
At the end of July, in the underground garage of a residential compound in Pudong, Shanghai, Old Zhou stared at the charging pile for a while. The green light turned on, he unplugged the gun head, got into the Model Y, and drove towards the Yanan Elevated Highway.
Evening rush hour, the elevated highway was gridlocked. He looked left and right, green license plates were everywhere ahead and behind. At least three out of five cars had green plates.
When changing cars a few years ago, Old Zhou calculated the cost: license plate free, electricity cheaper than oil, maintenance convenient.
Switched after calculating, grateful for choosing an EV, choosing Tesla.
Old Zhou is not an exception. A few years ago, people buying EVs had some flavor of trying new things, but now it's gone, because EVs are part of daily life.
When it becomes as daily as it gets, one must ask a question: After saturation, who will EVs be sold to next?
Data provides a side of the answer.
Passenger car retail sales were 8.701 million in the first half of the year, down 20% from last year. In June, conventional fuel car sales were only 591,000.
On the other hand, the proportion of New Energy Vehicles reached 62.8%. More than 62 out of 100 new cars had green plates.
The showrooms of traditional fuel cars are getting emptier. It goes without saying that joint venture brands are having the hardest time.
FAW Toyota sold 273,700 vehicles in the first half of the year, down nearly a third from last year, selling over 100,000 fewer cars. Previously relying on classic models like RAV4 and Corolla Cross to support sales, it no longer works.
In the 100,000 to 200,000 price range, domestic brands' plug-in hybrids and pure electric vehicles are densely packed. Large space, smart cockpits, and assisted driving are all prioritized. Relying solely on price wars is hard to withstand.
GAC Toyota's situation is much better, selling about 340,000 units in the first half of the year, exceeding by nearly 70,000. The difference is it has a volume-selling pure EV, the bZ3X, selling over 90,000 in the past 12 months, reaching the level of mainstream fuel cars. The bZ7 will also launch, likely selling well too.
This shows joint venture brands still have a chance. As long as they can create high-quality New Energy Vehicles, they can still compete with new forces.
Looking at luxury brands again. BMW sales in China were over 260,000 in the first half of the year, down 20% year-over-year; Mercedes-Benz 210,000, down nearly 30%; Audi nearly 220,000, down nearly 20%.
The three brands combined dropped by over 20%. Prices kept falling. Audi Q6 comprehensive discount 130,000, cars that landed at 500,000 back in the day can now be bought for 330,000 cash. BMW iX1 clearing inventory, full payment just over 180,000.
Currently, the market share of Chinese brand passenger cars exceeds 75%, joint venture brands combined are less than 1/4. In June, joint venture brand NEV penetration rate was only 11.9%, domestic brands were 81.8%.
Even the King of Joint Ventures, FAW-Volkswagen, has only 0.1% market share in NEV wholesale sales.
The foundation of fuel cars is shrinking, they can't catch EVs either. Joint venture brands occupy neither end.
Joint venture brands are falling. Who is going up? Let's look at several major cities.
Shanghai first half 148,700 units, first in the country, up 10% from last year.
Tesla Shanghai Factory is a major account, selling cars produced there domestically, also to Korea, Japan, Middle East, South America. Shanghai sells well due to free license plates plus Tesla's capacity, plus charging available everywhere, but other places can't learn this trick.
Beijing 144,600 units, hardly moved, reason not complex, just limited plates.
In 2026, Beijing gave nearly 120,000 family quotas, over 30,000 individual, applicants nearly 900,000. A friend queued for 5 years said he doesn't hope for plates now, hopes for an answer, when will it be his turn. Beijing's market structure is so, give how many plates, sell how many cars.
Chengdu 136,400 units, ranked third. No plate restriction, over 60% of people buy EVs, relying entirely on products to speak.
Shenzhen 122,000 units, down 16% from last year. BYD's base, NEV proportion passed 60% long ago, pure electric accounted for 70%; Guangzhou 130,500 units, Hangzhou 123,500 units, those who wanted to buy all bought.
After reviewing all, one question remains: How much space do these cities have left?
Tier 1 and New Tier 1 proportions have hit the ceiling. The remaining 40% of people, either no parking spot for charging, or worried about range, or afraid residual value collapses after a few years, or waiting for cars to be cheaper, these people won't spend money on cars for now.
Since domestic demand in Tier 1 cities hit the ceiling, growth must be found elsewhere. The policy direction is downwards.
In June, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Ministry of Commerce, etc. 5 departments started this year's New Energy Vehicle Rural Promotion, recommended 155 models, 31 more than last year. From 2020 to now, rural promotion models sold cumulative over 20 million units.
On the surface conditions are met. By end of May, national charging piles 22.497 million. For daily use, 5 yuan per 100km electricity, under 2,000 yuan per year car maintenance. This calculation works well in county/township.
Surface looks complete, but Rural Promotion is not moving city tactics down, logic is different.
Real trouble is not on piles, but on transformers.
Rural transformer capacity insufficient, a village originally 100 kVA, installing more charging piles easily trips breakers.
Trouble with repairs, township mechanics for NEVs few, broken ones towed to county or city.
So Rural Promotion isn't just selling cars, it's piles, grid, after-sales, finance together, a systematic project. Cannot think of selling EVs that can't be sold/wanted in cities to villages.
Not only sell, but usable. This is the key to how far this wave of Rural EV Promotion can go.
Domestic demand has hurdles everywhere, the other leg must stretch outwards.
First half exports 5.096 million units, up 65%. NEV exports 2.355 million units, more than doubled.
The path of Chinese car companies going global has passed three stages.
Earliest was complete vehicle export, cars built in China loaded on ships and shipped, small investment fast results, but easiest to get hit.
In 2024 EU imposed up to 35.3% countervailing duties, first half pure EV exports to Europe dropped directly 15%.
Tariffs added, everyone changed path, second stage is building factories overseas.
BYD Thailand factory 16 months to build and produce, annual capacity 150,000, tariff costs pressed down 20%. Hungary factory also producing by year-end. Leapmotor borrows Stellantis plant in Spain for assembly, Chery took over Nissan Barcelona old plant area. From complete vehicle export to capacity export, this is first switch.
Now some top enterprises reached third stage, ecosystem co-construction.
Nio set up R&D center in UAE, Great Wall in Thailand did battery and charging network integration. After Geely took over Proton, required suppliers to adopt Chinese BMS standards. Products out, factories out, standards also going out.
After finishing three stages, overseas market is changing.
Europe May saw a landmark node. BYD, SAIC, Geely, Chery, Leapmotor five Chinese car companies sold 138,400 units in 31 European countries, first time single month exceeded total of six Japanese brands.
On YouTube, a German netizen changed to BYD Dolphin, happily said: 30,000 Euro, everything one needs is there, much cheaper than Japanese brands.
Need to point out Leapmotor, first half exports nearly 100,000 units, exceeded last full year, ranked first in new forces.
Relying on complete vehicle export to push volume is easy, making money hard. Need to calculate, must local production. BYD Thailand, Brazil factories already produced.
This path of going global, finally must take root locally.
While venturing outwards, backyard also changing.
From January 1, 2026, NEV purchase tax from exempt changed to half levy, executed at 5%, max cut 15,000 per car. A car excluding tax 300,000, last year exempt 30,000, this year must pay 15,000. 10 years full exemption started rolling back.
Policy dividends narrowing, profit end issues more thorny.
First half vehicle manufacturing average profit margin only 1.5%, lowest in nearly 10 years. Converted, a 100,000 car, manufacturer earns less than 1,500, this is after price war fought over a year.
Fuel car inventory high, forced to drop prices significantly; NEVs for market share, also actively dropping prices. Two forces squeeze together, average drops approaching 15% and 30,000.
Price war fought to now, batch of car companies already lost. Policy retracted, profit thin, this is the industry's deepest concern.
CAAM Deputy Chief Engineer Xu Haidong said, Tier 1, 2 almost at top, countryside is future 10 years growth blue ocean.
Big judgment is like this, applied to individuals is another matter.
Old Zhou's Model Y ran 60,000 km, full charge compared to new car less about 40 km, after-sales said normal degradation.
Green plates on Yanan Elevated Highway still increasing, one by one, window still open, but year by year narrower.
Looking back, old-new replacement never a smooth process, but filled with swordlight and shadow, life and death struggle.
Car market more and more like fierce competition. Who survives, who wins all, everywhere. Who died, is backward capacity, capacity waiting to be cleared.
Market competition, just so plain and simple.......
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拎 Proton X50 同 Kia Sportage 嚟做比較。呢兩款車喺價位同定位上都好接近，今日我哋就從多個方面做一個詳細嘅比較，幫你省下做功課嘅時間。
Proton X50 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 89,800 - 113,300，一共有 4 個版本，包括 1.5T Executive（RM 89,800）、1.5T Premium（RM 101,800）、1.5T Flagship（RM 113,300） 等。
Kia Sportage 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 129,639 - 179,320，一共有 4 個版本，包括 2025 1.6T DCT 4WD High（RM 179,320）、2025 1.6T DCT 2WD High（RM 159,320）、2025 2.0L AT 2WD High（RM 139,639） 等。
從價錢嚟睇，Proton X50 嘅起步價確實比 Kia Sportage 平咗 RM 39,839。如果你預算唔多，Proton 嘅入門版已經可以满足日常需要。但都要注意，平嗰幾千蚊，可能在配備上會有取舍，具體睇你嘅需求。
Proton X50 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA)。
Kia Sportage 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 Drive Wise。
兩款車嘅安全評級一樣，喺呢個級別入面安全配備都算好齊全。依家嘅新車安全性都唔差，唔使太擔心呢一點。
Proton X50 車身長 4400 mm，尾箱 400 L。
Kia Sportage 車身長 4400 mm，尾箱 400 L。
兩款車嘅尺寸幾近一樣，車內空間分別唔大。呢個級別嘅車，日常使用完全夠用。
Proton X50 保養 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Kia Sportage 保養 5 年/300,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Proton X50 同 Kia Sportage 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更睇重品牌聲望同二手價，可以優先考慮聲望更好嗰一款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，那就揀配置更豐富嗰款。最終都係建議兩款都去試駕，親身體驗先最重要。
總嘅嚟講，Proton X50 同 Kia Sportage 都係馬來西亞市場好唔錯嘅車款。揀邊一輛，關鍵仲係要睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，先去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會攞 Proton X50 同 Kia Sportage 嚟做比較。
Proton X50 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 89,800 - 113,300，一共係 4 個版本，包括 1.5T Executive（RM 89,800）、1.5T Premium（RM 101,800）、1.5T Flagship（RM 113,300） 等。
Kia Sportage 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 129,639 - 179,320，一共係 4 個版本，包括 2025 1.6T DCT 4WD High（RM 179,320）、2025 1.6T DCT 2WD High（RM 159,320）、2025 2.0L AT 2WD High（RM 139,639） 等。
從價錢嚟睇，Proton X50 嘅起步價確實比 Kia Sportage 平咗 RM 39,839。如果你預算有限，Proton 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需求。但都要注意，平嗰幾千塊，可能喺配備上會有取捨，具體要看你嘅需求。
Proton X50 嘅安全评分係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA)。
Kia Sportage 嘅安全评分係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 Drive Wise。
兩款車嘅安全评分一樣，喺呢個級別入面安全配備都算俾得好齊全。而家嘅新車安全性都唔差，唔使太擔心呢一點。
Proton X50 車身長 4400 mm，尾箱 400 L。
Kia Sportage 車身長 4400 mm，尾箱 400 L。
兩款車嘅尺寸幾乎一樣，車內空間分別唔大。呢個級別嘅車，日常使用完全夠用。
Proton X50 採用 4WD 驅動方式。
Kia Sportage 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
Proton 嘅 4WD 同 Kia 嘅 FWD 喺操控上會有唔同感受，建議試駕對比。
總括嚟講，Proton X50 同 Kia Sportage 都係馬來西亞市場好好嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵都要睇你個人需求同預算。建議大家做足功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再而去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都仲係會拎 寶騰 X50 同 三菱 Xforce 嚟做比較。呢兩部車喺價位同定位上都幾接近，今日本站就由多個方面做一個詳細比較，幫你省咗做功課嘅時間。
寶騰 X50 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 89,800 - 113,300，一共有 4 個版本，包括 1.5T Executive（RM 89,800）、1.5T Premium（RM 101,800）、1.5T Flagship（RM 113,300） 等。
三菱 Xforce 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 109,930 - 119,930，一共有 2 個版本，包括 2026 1.5L Ultimate（RM 119,930）、2026 1.5L Urban（RM 109,930） 等。
由價錢睇，寶騰 X50 嘅入門價確實比 三菱 Xforce 平咗 RM 20,130。如果你預算有限，寶騰嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需要。但都要注意，平啲嘅幾千蚊，可能喺配備上會有取舍，具體睇你嘅需要。
寶騰 X50 配備 1.5L 4-cyl，馬力 105 hp。官方油耗 6.0 L/100km。
三菱 Xforce 配備 1.5L Turbo，馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。
動力方面，三菱 Xforce 嘅 1.5L Turbo 比 寶騰 X50 嘅 1.5L 4-cyl 多出 35 匹馬力。不過日常喺市區行，兩部車嘅動力都夠用，唔會覺得唔夠力。
寶騰 X50 車身長 4400 mm，行李箱 400 L。
三菱 Xforce 車身長 4400 mm，行李箱 400 L。
兩部車嘅尺寸幾乎一樣，車內空間分別唔大。呢個級別嘅車，日常使用完全夠用。
寶騰 X50 同 三菱 Xforce 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更睇重品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，那就揀配置更豐富嗰款。始終建議兩部都去試駕，親身體驗先係最緊要。
總而言之，寶騰 X50 同 三菱 Xforce 都係馬來西亞市場幾好嘅車型。揀邊一部，關鍵始終係睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
In Malaysia's SUV market, many buyers compare Proton X50 and Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV when choosing a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning. Today we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time doing research.
The OTR price of Proton X50 in Malaysia is RM 89,800 - 113,300, with a total of 4 versions, including 1.5T Executive (RM 89,800), 1.5T Premium (RM 101,800), 1.5T Flagship (RM 113,300), etc.
The OTR price of Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV in Malaysia is RM 129,750 - 129,750, with a total of 2 versions, including 2025 1.5T 90km CSH (RM 129,750), What charging methods does the Tiggo 7 PHEV support? Can it be charged using a home power socket? (RM 117,478), etc.
From a price perspective, the starting price of Proton X50 is indeed RM 39,950 cheaper than Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV. If your budget is limited, Proton's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. But also note that the few thousand cheaper might involve trade-offs in equipment, it depends on your needs.
Proton X50 is equipped with 1.5L 4-cyl, 105 hp. Official fuel consumption 6.0 L/100km.
Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV is equipped with Hybrid, 170 hp. Official fuel consumption 4.5 L/100km.
In terms of power, the Hybrid of Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV has 65 hp more than the 1.5L 4-cyl of Proton X50. However, for daily city driving, the power of both cars is sufficient, you won't feel underpowered.
The safety rating of Proton X50 is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
The safety rating of Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV is TBD, active safety systems include Basic.
Regarding safety features, both cars have received good ratings. However, the ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA) of Proton X50 and the Basic of Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV have some differences in function. If you value active safety, you can compare the function lists of both.
Proton X50 uses 4WD drive method.
Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV uses FWD drive method.
Proton's 4WD and Chery's FWD will have different handling feelings, test drive comparison is recommended.
Overall, Proton X50 and Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV are both very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose mainly depends on your personal needs and budget. It is recommended to do your homework, compare quotes from several car dealerships, and then test drive to make the final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending time doing homework will definitely not be wrong.
In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers compare Proton X50 and Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV when choosing a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
Proton X50 OTR price in Malaysia is RM 89,800 - 113,300, there are 4 variants in total, including 1.5T Executive (RM 89,800), 1.5T Premium (RM 101,800), 1.5T Flagship (RM 113,300) etc.
Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV OTR price in Malaysia is RM 159,750 - 159,750, there are 2 variants in total, including 1.6L Turbo Standard (RM 130,000), 1.6L Turbo Premium (RM 145,000) etc.
From a price perspective, the Proton X50 starting price is indeed RM 69,950 cheaper than the Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV. If your budget is limited, Proton's entry-level version already meets daily needs. But also note, that difference of a few thousand, there might be trade-offs in features, it depends on your specific needs.
Proton X50 is equipped with 1.5L 4-cyl, 105 hp. Official fuel consumption 6.0 L/100km.
Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV is equipped with Hybrid, 170 hp. Official fuel consumption 4.5 L/100km.
Regarding power, the Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV Hybrid has 65 more horsepower than the Proton X50 1.5L 4-cyl. However, for daily city driving, both cars have sufficient power, you won't feel it lacks power.
Proton X50 safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV safety rating is TBD, active safety systems include Basic.
In terms of safety features, both cars received good ratings. However, Proton X50's ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA) and Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV's Basic have some differences in functionality. If you value active safety more, you can compare the feature lists of both carefully.
Proton X50 body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
Both cars have almost the same dimensions, interior space difference is not significant. For cars in this class, daily use is perfectly adequate.
Proton X50 and Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV are both mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, you can prioritize the one with better reputation; if you care more about cost-performance and features, choose the one with richer configuration. Ultimately it is recommended to test drive both, personal experience is the most important.
Overall, Proton X50 and Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV are both very good car models in the Malaysian market. Choosing which one depends mainly on your personal needs and budget. We suggest doing your research, compare quotes from multiple dealerships, then test drive to make the final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending some time researching will definitely not be wrong.
