喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嗰陣都會拿 Proton X50 同 Chery Tiggo 9 嚟做比較。呢兩款車喺價位同定位上都幾接近，今日我哋就從多個方面做一次詳細嘅比較，幫你省返做功課嘅時間。

價錢同版本

Proton X50 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 89,800 - 113,300，一共有 4 個版本，包括 1.5T Executive（RM 89,800）、1.5T Premium（RM 101,800）、1.5T Flagship（RM 113,300）等。

Chery Tiggo 9 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 166,800 - 179,800，一共有 1 個版本，包括 2026 2.0T Standard（RM 179,750）等。

從價錢嚟睇，Proton X50 嘅起步價的確比 Chery Tiggo 9 平咗 RM 77,000。如果你預算有限，Proton 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需求。但亦都要注意，平嘅嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備上面會有取捨，具體要看你嘅需求。

動力同油耗

Proton X50 搭載 1.5L 4-cyl，馬力 105 hp。官方油耗 6.0 L/100km。

Chery Tiggo 9 搭載 2.0L 4-cyl，馬力 170 hp。官方油耗 8.0 L/100km。

動力方面，Chery Tiggo 9 嘅 2.0L 4-cyl 比 Proton X50 嘅 1.5L 4-cyl 多咗 65 匹馬力。不過日常喺市區開，兩款車嘅動力都夠用，唔會覺得唔夠力。

安全配備

Proton X50 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA)。

Chery Tiggo 9 嘅安全評級係 TBD，主動安全系統包括 Basic。

安全配備方面，兩款車都攞到唔錯嘅評級。不過 Proton X50 嘅 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA) 同 Chery Tiggo 9 嘅 Basic 喺功能上面有啲差異，如果你比較看重主動安全嘅話，可以仔細比較吓兩者嘅功能列表。

保養同維修

Proton X50 保用 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。

Chery Tiggo 9 保用 3 年/100,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。

適合邊種人

Proton X50 同 Chery Tiggo 9 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更看重品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰一款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，那就選配置更豐富嗰款。最終都係建議兩款都去試駕，親身體驗先係最重要嘅。

總結

總而言之，Proton X50 同 Chery Tiggo 9 都係馬來西亞市場好唔錯嘅車型。選擇邊一輛，關鍵都係要看你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花啲時間做功課絕對唔會錯。

"Competition in the automotive industry is like a marathon, and it is a marathon without an end."

When the industry falls into a volume race of "trading price for volume", more and more automakers realize that simply pursuing sales volume makes it difficult to achieve sustainable development. Against this background, Changan launched a product matrix optimization and actively performed "subtraction" on its product line. In the first half of this year, the brand contracted the entry-level versions of Lumin below 50,000 yuan, bidding farewell to the low-price volume route; meanwhile, it sorted out the fuel vehicle product sequence and gradually contracted models with weaker profit performance.

Tan Benhong mentioned at the communication meeting that only the adjustment of the Lumin model formed a sales gap of about 70,000 units in the first half of the year. Looking at the overall picture, Changan Automobile's cumulative sales volume in the first half of 2026 was 1.1189 million units, a decrease of nearly 240,000 units compared to the same period last year.

In January to May 2026, the profit margin of the domestic automotive industry fell to 3.4%, and the industry entered an era of thin profits. The sales gap brought by the simplification of the product line is the reality that Changan needs to face to promote structural optimization. What is the deeper consideration behind this series of adjustments? Where will this "decluttering" at the product end take Changan?

From "Producing Many Models to Gain Advantage" to "Emphasizing Both Volume and Profit"

This "slimming movement" was not a temporary whim. In April this year, Changan officially released the "1445" global strategy. The most closely watched planning item is: In the next five years, the product spectrum will be streamlined from 63 models to 36 models, a compression rate as high as 43%. At the same time, Changan clearly stated the need to concentrate resources to build a global flagship product "one model with annual sales of 500,000 units and five models with annual sales of 300,000 units". This is a strategic transformation promoted from top to bottom, the purpose of which is to bid farewell to the car sea tactic of "producing many models to gain an advantage" in the past.

Lumin is exactly a very representative model in this product structure adjustment. This model once had a considerable volume, contributing about 200,000 sales for the full year last year. But the problem lies in the limited profit space for versions priced below 50,000 yuan.

Tan Benhong said straight out at the communication meeting: "For Lumin below 50,000 yuan, we actively adjusted. In the first half of this year, this one product was 70,000 units. We cut off some products with less profitability. Of course, you can have scale, but this kind of scale, we are constantly reviewing it now, such products we should not do."

In fact, the weakening demand for Lumin also has objective factors of the general industry environment. The track of micro pure electric vehicles is shrinking continuously. According to data from the China Association of Automobile Distributors, the wholesale sales of micro pure electric vehicles in June decreased by 50% year-on-year, falling to 8% in the pure electric market share; in the first five months of this year, the cumulative sales of A00-class micro sedans were 192,000 units, a significant drop of 64% year-on-year, and the market share shrank from 6% to 2.7%. In such a market environment, it is difficult to form long-term value by continuing to operate low-revenue models.

Changan's "subtraction" is not only reflected at the product level but also implemented in internal assessment mechanisms. Tan Benhong revealed that the company has established a "operational co-investment" mechanism internally: If a product cannot achieve profitability, even if sales targets are met, personnel participating in the project co-investment also need to bear corresponding losses. "Balancing volume and profit is a very critical point." This mechanism ensures from the system that "pursuing sales with profits" is not an empty talk.

Tan Benhong clearly stated at the communication meeting: "Changan has now discarded the 'Producing Many Models to Gain Advantage' strategy, and more pursues high-quality development." "Simply pursuing quantity, trying to roll others to death through scale, this method is used cautiously in Changan."

What does 70,000 sales volumes get you?

Actively giving up 70,000 sales volume is not an easy decision for any automaker, and Changan has indeed borne the cost brought by the adjustment.

In the first half of this year, Changan's sales volume decreased by nearly 240,000 units year-on-year, corresponding to a total revenue decrease of about 14.551 billion yuan. Based on the net profit attributable to shareholders of 740 million to 970 million yuan in the first half of the year and total sales of 1.1189 million units, a simple calculation shows that Changan's net profit attributable to shareholders per vehicle is only about 66 to 86 yuan, which is obviously lagging behind the industry mainstream level. The huge gap highlights the urgency of Changan promoting product "slimming".

However, while actively shrinking the scale of low-gross margin models, Changan is also cultivating new sales pillars. The one mainly playing the role of substitution is Changan Qiyuan Q05. The performance of this compact SUV is very bright - sales reached 19,350 units in May, further climbed to 23,523 units in June, and cumulative sales in the first half of the year exceeded 76,000 units, continuing to stand at the forefront in the compact SUV track where Changan has a significant advantage in fuel vehicle ownership.

Changan Automobile Executive Vice President Yang Dayong revealed at the communication meeting that Lumin contributed about 200,000 sales for the full year last year, but this part of sales is actively shrinking this year, "replaced by Qiyuan Q05". Under the retreat and advance, Changan has started the preliminary "gearing change" of main sales products.

It is also worth mentioning that the overseas market has become an important growth highlight. Changan's overseas sales reached 454,700 units in the first half of the year, an increase of 51.87% year-on-year. The proportion of overseas sales in total deliveries has risen to about 33.6%. Tan Benhong stated that Changan is systematically promoting overseas organization, talent, base and capacity layout. "Globalization is Changan's core growth pole in the next 3 to 5 years." According to the "1445" strategic planning, the overseas sales proportion needs to reach 35% to 40% by 2030. Doing "subtraction" domestically and "addition" overseas, this is Changan's "two-front battle" idea.

The rapid growth of the overseas market has provided Changan with valuable buffer space. When the domestic market is in the stage of product structure adjustment and scale faces pressure, the incremental increase in the overseas market makes up for part of the shortfall in the domestic market. With the Thailand production base landing and putting into production, and the European market steadily expanding, overseas business will also continue to contribute relatively higher gross margin income.

Of course, the challenges on the transformation path are still considerable. Avatr, the high-end brand, delivered only 27,619 units in the first half of the year, a year-on-year decline of more than 50%; Changan's new energy penetration rate in the first half of the year was about 38.1%, lower than the industry average level. The 1.4 million new energy target set at the beginning of the year was only completed at about 32.5% in the first half. Tan Benhong also frankly stated that Changan is currently in the "second stage of mobilization and structural adjustment critical cycle", and cannot simply use half-year sales and profit data to judge the overall development trend.

For Changan, the most realistic development path right now is to stabilize the mainstream market basic board composed of Qiyuan and Deepal, and at the same time accelerate the product iteration and brand building of Avatr. Whether high-end brands can form a stable profit support will largely determine whether Changan's transformation goal of "volume and profit both gains" can be fulfilled.

Bidding Farewell to "Scale Worship"

Changan's choice is not an individual case, the entire Chinese automotive industry is experiencing a round of profound adjustment.

In January to May 2026, the overall profit margin of the automotive manufacturing industry was only 3.4%, lower than the industry average of 6.1%; the profit margin of vehicle manufacturing was even only 1.5%. Based on this calculation, for a new car priced at 100,000 yuan, the profit in the vehicle manufacturing link is only about 1,500 yuan. JAC Motors, GAC Group, Seres, BAIC BluePark and other automakers announced losses in the first half of the year, and Changan, Great Wall and other leading enterprises' profits also showed obvious declines. The model of relying on "trading price for volume" to seize the market is increasingly difficult to continue.

Looking back at five or six years ago, the profit margin of the automotive industry was long in the range of 6% to 8%, at that time, "scale trading for profit" was a growth method that many car companies were effective. In just a few years, the industry profit margin was almost halved, "price wars" were continuous, vehicle profit dropped from several thousand yuan to hundreds of yuan, and many models fell into loss. Changan's active contraction at this node, rather than being a kind of courage, is more like a kind of sobriety.

Looking at the macro environment, the 2026 Government Work Report explicitly proposed to "deeply rectify involutionary competition", and a series of policies guiding the benign development of the industry continued to land. Changan's strategic choice of actively contracting low-gross margin models also formed a kind of tacit understanding with the policy-driven industry high-quality development orientation.

Tan Benhong compared the current industry environment to "marathon running on the plateau" - blindly accelerating and aggressive expansion will only continue to overdraw enterprise strength. "If we do not reform ourselves and cling to the past, we will definitely not be able to move forward."

In the past few years, many car companies have expanded scale as the core goal, relying on low-priced models to rush volume, trying to amortize costs through scale. But with raw material costs rising and market competition continuing to intensify, continuously releasing models without profitability will only continue to consume enterprise resources. Changan promoting product structure optimization is also a microcosm of domestic car companies shifting from pursuing scale expansion to pursuing operating quality.

Of course, whether "slimming" can successfully "strengthen" after that still needs time to test. Low-end model supply contraction, mid-to-high-end brands have not yet formed a stable performance pillar; new energy penetration rate still has room for improvement, and overseas market profit contribution also needs to be continuously cultivated. Changan's transformation path has just begun.

But one point is very clear: When the industry profit margin falls below 4%, there are not many car companies that can survive by "low price and high volume". Changan chooses to use 70,000 sales volume to exchange for a chance to start anew. Whether this "transformation account" is worth it or not is difficult to conclude in the short term.

In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers compare the Proton X50 and Chery Tiggo 7 Pro when choosing a car. The pricing and positioning of these two models are quite close. Today, we will conduct a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time doing research.

Price and Versions

The Proton X50 OTR price in Malaysia is RM 89,800 - 113,300, with a total of 4 versions, including 1.5T Executive (RM 89,800), 1.5T Premium (RM 101,800), 1.5T Flagship (RM 113,300), etc.

The Chery Tiggo 7 Pro OTR price in Malaysia is RM 123,750 - 123,750, with a total of 2 versions, including 1.6L Turbo Standard (RM 125,000), 1.6L Turbo Premium (RM 140,000), etc.

From a price perspective, the Proton X50 starting price is indeed RM 33,950 cheaper than the Chery Tiggo 7 Pro. If your budget is limited, the Proton entry-level version can already meet daily needs. However, keep in mind that the few thousand cheaper might involve trade-offs in features, depending on your specific requirements.

Power and Fuel Consumption

The Proton X50 is equipped with a 1.5L 4-cylinder, with 105 hp. Official fuel consumption is 6.0 L/100km.

The Chery Tiggo 7 Pro is equipped with a 1.5L Turbo, with 140 hp. Official fuel consumption is 7.0 L/100km.

In terms of power, the Chery Tiggo 7 Pro's 1.5L Turbo has 35 more horsepower than the Proton X50's 1.5L 4-cylinder. However, for daily city driving, the power of both cars is sufficient, and you won't feel it lacks power.

Safety Features

The Proton X50 safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).

The Chery Tiggo 7 Pro safety rating is TBD, active safety systems include Basic.

Regarding safety features, both cars have received good ratings. However, the ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA) on the Proton X50 and the Basic system on the Chery Tiggo 7 Pro have some differences in functionality. If you value active safety, you can compare the feature lists of both carefully.

Maintenance and Service

Proton X50 warranty is 5 years/150,000km, service interval every 10,000km or 6 months.

Chery Tiggo 7 Pro warranty is 3 years/100,000km, service interval every 10,000km or 6 months.

Conclusion

Overall, both the Proton X50 and Chery Tiggo 7 Pro are very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose mainly depends on your personal needs and budget. We recommend doing your homework, comparing quotes from several dealerships, and test driving before making a final decision. Buying a car is a big deal, and taking time to do research will never be wrong.

7 月 20 日，喺長江外貿第一大港——太倉港，一艘滿載上千台國產汽車嘅滾裝船鳴笛起航，駛向海外。

呢類場景，上半年喺呢度上演咗 192 次，平均每週 7 艘滾裝船離港出海，平均每分鐘出口 2.5 輛汽車。太倉海關數據顯示，2026 年 1-6 月，太倉口岸有近 65 萬台汽車出口至全球 166 個國家同地區，創歷史新高，相當於中國每出口約 8 輛車，就有 1 輛從太倉港出發。

太倉港嘅繁忙只係一個縮影。中國汽車工業協會數據顯示，上半年整車出口量達 509.6 萬輛，同比增長 65.3%，半年度出口量首次突破 500 萬輛大關。6 月單月出口 103.7 萬輛，同比增長 75.1%，首次突破百萬輛。海關總署數據顯示，上半年汽車出口額達 918 億美元，同比增長 54%。

但與此同時，國內汽車累計銷量卻同比大幅下滑 21.1% 至 992.1 萬輛，換算落嚟，平均每日比去年要少賣 1.2 萬輛。

一冷一熱之間，中國汽車產業已經站咗喺一個前所未有嘅十字路口。

銷量失速：半年 600 款新車，每日少賣一萬輛

上半年國內銷量跌去兩成，燃油車市場首當其衝，上半年傳統燃料乘用車國內銷量 369.4 萬輛，同比減少 173.2 萬輛，下降 31.9%；6 月單月傳統燃料乘用車國內銷量同比近乎「腰斬」，下降 49.9%。

比銷量下滑更令人警惕嘅係利潤嘅崩塌。價格戰打到第四年，企業利潤亦已被壓縮至極限。中汽協數據顯示，上半年整車製造環節平均利潤率跌至 1.5%，為近十年最低。按此折算，一輛 20 萬元嘅新車，整車廠商嘅淨利潤只有 3000 元。甚至有部分廠商已經倒掛，陷入咗賣一輛虧一輛嘅窘境。

需求端嘅寒意凜凜，同供給端嘅熱浪形成咗劇烈反差。據相關行業數據統計，上半年國內累計上市新車約 630 款，平均每日超過 3 款。比亞迪執行副總裁何志奇 7 月 14 日喺社交平台直言「徹底瘋狂」。佢晒出內部統計圖表顯示，1 至 5 月中國市場累計推出 542 款新車。

一款車動輒 10 億以上嘅投資、2 年以上嘅開發週期，上市後熱度卻維持唔到 3 個月。新車型生命週期從「按年計」壓縮到「按月計」，合資同自主、新勢力同傳統巨頭喺每一個細分市場短兵相接。

供需倒掛之下，上市車企嘅半年報集體亮起紅燈。年初至今，A 股汽車整車板塊累計跌幅 27.87%，半年蒸發近 9000 億元；港股新能源汽車板塊累計下跌 23.78%；2026 年上半年，16 家主流車企嘅銷量目標完成率冇一個超過 50%。

7 月 15 日，中汽協聯合 18 家主流車企發佈國內首套整車成本測算規則標準，試圖為無序競爭劃出一道底線。但「唔迭代就出局」嘅集體焦慮仍在蔓延，冇企業敢於率先踩下煞車，因為率先減速嘅一方，大概率要率先承受銷量加速下滑嘅陣痛。

可以話，中國汽車市場嘅競爭，已經從「增量時代嘅排位賽」全面轉入「存量時代嘅淘汰賽」。

銷量狂飆：500 萬輛之後，全球市場「溫差」明顯

同國內市場嘅寒意形成鮮明對比，海外市場正以烈火烹油之勢狂飆突進。

咨詢公司艾睿铂預測，2026 年中國汽車出口量將增至近 1000 萬輛，較 2025 年嘅 710 萬輛大幅提升，這將係人類歷史上單一國家汽車年度出口嘅最高紀錄。其中，新能源汽車成為出口增長嘅最大引擎，僅今年上半年，新能源汽車出口就達到 235.5 萬輛，同比增長 1.2 倍，意味著每出口兩輛中國汽車，就有一輛係新能源車。

有人話：國內市場承壓之下，出海成為越來越多車企嘅現實選擇；汽車出海，而家成為一場冇退路嘅豪賭。然而，亮眼數字嘅另一面，係全球各區域市場正在壘起嘅高牆。

美國已經對中國汽車關閉咗市場，歐洲緊隨其後，用規則工具築起高牆。歐盟對華純電反補貼稅加疊 10% 基礎關稅後最高達 45.3%，2026 年 1 月達成嘅「最低價格承諾」機制令中國車企失去咗性價比呢張牌，必須喺軟件、設計同服務上證明溢價能力。2026 年 3 月；歐盟提交《工業加速器法案》，外資持股唔超過 49%、強制技術轉移、公共採購「歐盟原產」優先等條款層層加碼，反補貼稅仲會從純電擴大至插混。有專家判斷，歐洲將成為繼美國後下一個對中國汽車關閉嘅海外市場。

東南亞則係另一套邏輯，「先賣車再建廠」嘅路已被政策堵死。泰國 EV3.5 政策明確要求進口整車同本土產能投產比例掛鉤，每進口 1 輛須喺本地生產 2 輛；馬來西亞自 2026 年 7 月起，電動車進口到岸價唔得低於 33 萬人民幣；印尼要求 2026 年本地化率至少 40%。

南美同樣喺豎起壁壘。巴西自 2026 年 7 月 1 日起，所有進口電動車關稅統一上調至 35%，此前 SKD、CKD 散件組裝享受嘅特殊低稅率一併取消。阿根廷對進口整車徵收 35% 關稅，同時實施外匯管制。

當關稅壁壘、數據合規、本地化生產門檻不斷抬高，中國車企嘅出海之路充滿咗唔確定性。

當國內「以價換量」嘅舊路走到盡頭，海外「以空間換時間」嘅新路又佈滿荊棘，中國車企正面對一組冇標準答案嘅選擇題：國內嘅銷量點樣稳住基本盤？海外嘅增長點樣持續？海外市場嘅紅火，能否真正對沖國內市場嘅虧空？

8 月 21 日，由中國貿易促進委員會汽車行業分會指導，成都國際車展組委會、汽車觀察主辦嘅「2026 汽車先鋒思享薈」，廣邀業界大咖深入解讀同分享，敬請期待。

編輯語錄：睇返 2026 年上半年嘅商用車市場，“內冷外熱”係表象，“價格戰向價值戰重構”先至係本質。

2026 年嘅中國商用車市場，喺一個略顯尷尬嘅拐點上。

中國汽車工業協會數據顯示，上半年商用車累計產銷分別為 227.2 萬輛同 229.7 萬輛，同比增長 8.2% 同 8.3%——市場係回暖，但回暖得好慢。與之相伴嘅係價格戰嘅硝煙愈濃：單車利潤被不斷壓縮，新能源轉型又需要持續燒錢投入研發同產線，車企一邊要降本求生，一邊要砸錢轉型，“活下去、守份額”成為頭部陣營普遍嘅生存狀態。

就喺一片“唱衰”聲中，上汽商用車跑咗出讓人側目嘅獨立曲線：1-6 月銷量同比增長 28.37%，約為行業均值嘅 3.4 倍，係頭部陣營中唯一同時實現“規模做大 + 增速斷層領跑”雙重優勢嘅企業。其中，上汽大通作為板塊核心力量，上半年累計銷售 13.8 萬輛，商用車增速達 35.36%，係行業前十陣營中唯一增速超過 35% 嘅企業。

輕客守住基本盤，新能源同出海打開第二增長曲線

商用車行業嘅存量博弈，本質上係一場“基本盤保衛戰”。誰嘅基本盤穩，誰嘅轉型就有底氣。

上汽商用車嘅底氣，首先來自輕客。

上半年，大通輕客累計銷售 6.1 萬輛，包攬單月與累計銷量“雙冠王”，單一品牌市佔率突破 27%，領先行業第二名 7200 輛、第三名超萬輛。6 月大通輕客單月銷量 13902 輛，同比增長 62%；其中大拿系列 6 月熱銷 7207 輛，同比暴漲 218%，成為新能源輕客賽道嘅現象級爆款。

但真正讓上汽商用車與同行拉開代差嘅，係新能源與出海嘅雙引擎驅動。

新能源端，上汽商用車上半年新能源銷量同比增長 69%，國內新能源滲透率達 47%，遠超行業 30.4% 嘅整體水平。躍進新能源輕卡上半年銷售 12971 輛，同比增長 65%；大拿超級增程輕客 CLTC 綜合續航達 1260 公里，百公里能耗低至 2.65L——這組數據直接擊穿咗商用用戶最敏感嘅“續航焦慮”同“運營成本”兩根神經。

出海端，上半年上汽商用車累計出口 6.5 萬輛，同比增長 33%。喺希臘，大通份額較去歲同期翻四倍；喺新加坡，連續三月市佔率登頂；喺東南亞，接連斬獲新能源輕客大訂單；並成為首個入駐 DHL 德國郵政投遞車隊嘅中國商用車品牌。

上汽商用車執行管理會主席、上汽大通總經理楊懷景喺 2026 上汽大通幹部大會上嘅一段話，恰好解釋咗呢套打法嘅底層邏輯：“產品係企業發展嘅核心根基，更係二次創業實現價值突圍嘅關鍵抓手。行業嘅價格競爭最終將回歸商品價值本身，TCO 全生命週期成本更優、TVO 全生命週期價值更高嘅產品將更受市場青睞。”

從“賣車”到“經營用戶”，體系化能力構建護城河

如果話輕客、新能源、出海係上汽商用車上半年嘅“三張報表”，那麼支撐呢三張報表嘅，係一套從技術自研到全球本土化嘅體系化能力。

技術上，上汽商用車冇走業界普遍“外購三電”嘅捷徑，而是依托鴻圖 2.0 超級商用電動架構、星棧皮卡平台等自研核心平台，搭建起純電、插混、氫燃料、超級增程嘅全能源技術路線。2026 年落地嘅星湃超級 mini 增程技術、同寧德時代共研嘅天行電池技術，分別解決咗續航、能耗、安全三大行業痛點。這種“把核心技術攥喺自己手裡”嘅策略，讓上汽商用車喺新能源轉型中唔被供应商卡脖子。

全球化上，上汽商用車已經完成從“產品出海”到“體系化出海”嘅迭代。目前，其產品覆蓋全球百餘個國家同地區，喺核心市場搭建咗本土化銷售、服務、改裝全鏈條體系。楊懷景喺北京車展上面對 100 多個國家嘅 200 余家海外經銷商時明確表示：“我哋唔僅僅跟隨市場嘅腳步，更要同各位攜手，共同定義全球出行嘅未來。” 喺另一場戰略發布會上，佢更加直白地闡述咗“唔打價格戰”嘅全球策略：“上汽商用車班子里，唔少人係商用車領域嘅新兵，也有老将，新兵同老將，才能更好地協同高效破界。我哋唔會放棄任何一個板塊，握指成拳，五個手指齊全握緊打出嚟先最有勁。”

生態上，上汽商用車搭建咗全球改裝生態聯盟、8S 全場景用戶體驗中心，業界首創皮卡“7 天免費試用”模式，把傳統嘅“賣車關係”升級為“創富夥伴關係”。

睇返 2026 年上半年嘅商用車市場，“內冷外熱”係表象，“價格戰向價值戰重構”先至係本質。中汽協預測 2026 年全年商用車銷量將達 450 萬輛，同比僅小幅增長 4.7%——這意味著存量博弈將成為新常態，靠水漲船高普漲嘅日子一去唔返。

喺呢個新常態下，上汽商用車用 28.37% 嘅增速、約為行業 3.4 倍嘅增長曲線證明咗一件事：存量市場唔係冇機會，而係機會只畀畀嗰啲提前完成動能轉換嘅企業。

喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好買家喺揀車嗰陣都會拿 波德亞 亞魯斯 同 豐田 科羅拉 Cross 嚟做比較。呢兩部車喺價錢同定位上都幾接近嘅，而家我哋就由多個方面做個詳細比較，幫你節省做功課嘅時間。

價錢同版本

波德亞 亞魯斯 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 72,900 - 77,900，合共 2 個版本，包括 1.5L X（RM 72,900）、1.5L AV（RM 77,900） 等。

豐田 科羅拉 Cross 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 133,800 - 148,800，合共 3 個版本，包括 2026 HEV 1.8L GR Sport（RM 148,800）、2026 HEV 1.8L Standard（RM 140,800）、2026 1.8L Standard（RM 133,800） 等。

由價錢嚟睇，波德亞 亞魯斯嘅起跳價真係比 豐田 科羅拉 Cross 平咗 RM 60,900。如果你預算有限，波德亞嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需要。但都要注意，平嗰幾千塊，可能喺配備上有取捨，具體要睇你嘅需求。

空間同舒適度

波德亞 亞魯斯 車身長 4400 mm，行李箱 400 L。

豐田 科羅拉 Cross 車身長 4400 mm，行李箱 400 L。

兩部車嘅尺寸幾乎一樣，車內空間分別唔大。呢個級別嘅車，日常使用完全夠用。

配備同科技

波德亞 亞魯斯 採用 FWD 驅動方式。

豐田 科羅拉 Cross 採用 FWD 驅動方式。

兩部車嘅驅動方式一樣，都係 FWD，日常駕駛感受唔會有太大分別。

適合邊種人

波德亞 亞魯斯 同 豐田 科羅拉 Cross 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更重視品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，嗰就揀配置更豐富嗰款。最終都好建議兩部都去試駕，親身體驗先係最重要。

總結

總體嚟講，波德亞 亞魯斯 同 豐田 科羅拉 Cross 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵仲係要睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。

In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers compare Perodua Aruz and Honda HR-V when choosing a car. The pricing and positioning of these two models are quite similar. Today we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to save you the time of research.

Price and Variants

The OTR price of Perodua Aruz in Malaysia is RM 72,900 - 77,900, with a total of 2 variants, including 1.5L X (RM 72,900), 1.5L AV (RM 77,900), etc.

The OTR price of Honda HR-V in Malaysia is RM 115,900 - 143,900, with a total of 4 variants, including 2026 e:HEV 1.5L RS (RM 143,900), 2026 1.5T V (RM 137,900), 2026 1.5T E (RM 130,900), etc.

From a pricing perspective, the starting price of Perodua Aruz is indeed RM 43,000 cheaper than Honda HR-V. If your budget is limited, Perodua's entry-level model can already meet daily needs. However, keep in mind that the money saved might involve trade-offs in features, depending on your specific requirements.

Safety Features

Perodua Aruz safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include.

Honda HR-V safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include Honda SENSING (ACC, CMBS, LKAS, RDM).

Both cars have the same safety rating, and safety features in this segment are quite comprehensive. New cars nowadays generally have good safety standards, so no need to worry too much about this.

Space and Comfort

Perodua Aruz body length is 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.

Honda HR-V body length is 4500 mm, trunk 450 L.

Regarding space, Honda HR-V is 100 mm longer than Perodua Aruz, offering more seating space advantage. However, Perodua Aruz is slightly more flexible for parking in the city, each has its trade-offs.

Maintenance and Service

Perodua Aruz warranty is 5 years/150,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.

Honda HR-V warranty is 5 years/unlimited mileage, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.

Who is it suitable for?

Perodua Aruz and Honda HR-V are both mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, you can prioritize the one with better reputation; if you care more about cost-performance ratio and features, choose the one with richer configuration. Ultimately, it is recommended to test drive both models, as personal experience is the most important.

Conclusion

Overall, Perodua Aruz and Honda HR-V are both very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends primarily on your personal needs and budget. It is suggested to do your research, compare quotes from several car dealerships, and then test drive to make the final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending time on research will definitely not be wrong.

In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers compare Perodua Ativa and Proton X90 when choosing a car.

Price and Versions

Perodua Ativa's OTR price in Malaysia is RM 62,500 - 73,400, with a total of 3 versions, including 1.0L Turbo X (RM 62,500), 1.0L Turbo H (RM 67,300), 1.0L Turbo AV (RM 73,400), etc.

Proton X90's OTR price in Malaysia is RM 106,800 - 122,800, with a total of 4 versions, including 2026 1.5T Prime X (RM 122,800), 2026 1.5T Prime (RM 116,800), 2026 1.5T Lite (RM 106,800), etc.

From a price perspective, Perodua Ativa's starting price is indeed cheaper than Proton X90 by RM 44,300. If your budget is limited, Perodua's entry version can already meet daily needs. However, also note that the difference of a few thousand Ringgit might involve trade-offs in features, specifically depending on your needs.

Power and Fuel Consumption

Perodua Ativa features a 1.5L 4-cylinder, with 105 hp. Official fuel consumption is 6.0 L/100km.

Proton X90 features a 1.5L Turbo, with 140 hp. Official fuel consumption is 7.0 L/100km.

In terms of power, Proton X90's 1.5L Turbo has 35 more horsepower than Perodua Ativa's 1.5L 4-cyl. However, for daily city driving, both cars have sufficient power, you won't feel like they lack power.

Safety Features

Perodua Ativa safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include ASA 3.0 + ACC + LDA + LKA + BSM + RCTA.

Proton X90 safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).

Both cars have the same safety rating, the safety features are quite comprehensive for this segment. New cars nowadays are generally safe, no need to worry too much about this.

Features and Technology

Perodua Ativa adopts FWD drivetrain.

Proton X90 adopts FWD drivetrain.

Both cars have the same drivetrain, both are FWD, daily driving experience will not differ significantly.

Who is it suitable for?

Perodua Ativa and Proton X90 are both mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale price more, you can prioritize the one with better reputation; if you care more about cost-performance and features, then choose the one with richer configuration. Ultimately it is recommended to test drive both, as personal experience is the most important.

Conclusion

In general, Perodua Ativa and Proton X90 are both very good models in the Malaysian market. Choosing which one depends mainly on your personal needs and budget. We suggest doing your research, compare quotes from several dealers, and then test drive to make the final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending some time researching is never a mistake.

喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拎 Proton X70 同 Subaru Crosstrek 黎比較。呢兩部車喺價錢同定位上都幾接近，今日我哋就從多個方面做一個詳細嘅比較，幫你節省做功課嘅時間。

價錢同版本

Proton X70 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 106,800 - 122,300，一共有 3 個版本，包括 1.5L Standard 2WD（RM 106,800）、1.5L Executive 2WD（RM 115,800）、1.5L Premium 2WD（RM 122,300） 等。

Subaru Crosstrek 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 145,000 - 160,000，一共有 1 個版本，包括 2.0L e-Boxer（RM 150,000） 等。

由價錢睇，Proton X70 嘅起步價確實比 Subaru Crosstrek 平咗 RM 38,200。如果你預算有限，Proton 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需求。但都要注意，平嗰幾千塊，可能喺配備上有取舍，具體要睇你嘅需求。

動力同油耗

Proton X70 搭載 1.5L Turbo，馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。

Subaru Crosstrek 搭載 1.5L Turbo，馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。

兩款車用嘅係同一套動力系統，日常開起嚟嘅感受基本冇分別。油耗方面也差唔多，唔使太糾結這一點。

安全配備

Proton X70 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA)。

Subaru Crosstrek 嘅安全評級係 5★ (Euro NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 EyeSight。

安全配備方面，兩款車都拿到唔錯嘅評級。不過 Proton X70 嘅 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA) 同 Subaru Crosstrek 嘅 EyeSight 喺功能上有啲差異，如果你比較重視主動安全嘅話，可以仔細對比一下兩者嘅功能清單。

空間同舒適度

Proton X70 車身長 4400 mm，車尾箱 400 L。

Subaru Crosstrek 車身長 4400 mm，車尾箱 400 L。

兩款車嘅尺寸幾乎一樣，車內空間差別唔大。呢個級別嘅車，日常使用完全夠用。

配備同科技

Proton X70 採用 FWD 驅動方式。

Subaru Crosstrek 採用 FWD 驅動方式。

兩款車嘅驅動方式一樣，都係 FWD，日常駕駛感受唔會有太大區別。

總結

總體嚟講，Proton X70 同 Subaru Crosstrek 都係馬來西亞市場好唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一部，關鍵仲係要睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做足功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係一件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。

喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會揾 Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV 同 Volkswagen Tiguan 嚟做比較。這兩款車喺價位同定位上都幾接近，今日我哋就從多個方面做一個詳細嘅比較，幫你節省做功課嘅時間。

價錢同版本

Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 159,750 - 159,750，一共有 2 個版本，包括 1.6L Turbo Standard（RM 130,000）、1.6L Turbo Premium（RM 145,000）等。

Volkswagen Tiguan 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 206,540 - 260,024，一共有 2 個版本，包括 2025 Allspace 2.0T R-Line（RM 260,024）、2025 Allspace 1.4T Elegance（RM 206,540）等。

由價錢嚟睇，Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV 嘅起跳價確實比 Volkswagen Tiguan 平咗 RM 46,790。如果你預算有限，Chery 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需要。但都要留意，平嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備上會有取舍，具體就要睇你嘅需要。

動力同油耗

Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV 搭載 Hybrid，馬力 170 hp。官方油耗 4.5 L/100km。

Volkswagen Tiguan 搭載 2.0L 4-cyl，馬力 170 hp。官方油耗 8.0 L/100km。

動力方面，Volkswagen Tiguan 嘅 2.0L 4-cyl 比 Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV 嘅 Hybrid 多咗 0 匹馬力。不過日常喺市區開，兩款車嘅動力都夠用，唔會覺得唔夠力。

安全配備

Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV 嘅安全評級係 TBD，主動安全系統包括 Basic。

Volkswagen Tiguan 嘅安全評級係 5★ (Euro NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 IQ.Drive。

安全配備方面，兩款車都拿到唔錯嘅評級。不過 Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV 嘅 Basic 同 Volkswagen Tiguan 嘅 IQ.Drive 喺功能上有啲差異，如果你比較睇重主動安全嘅話，可以仔細對比下兩者嘅功能列表。

空間同舒適度

Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV 車身長 4400 mm，行李廂 400 L。

Volkswagen Tiguan 車身長 4400 mm，行李廂 400 L。

兩款車嘅尺寸幾乎一樣，車內空間差別唔大。呢個級別嘅車，日常使用完全夠用。

配備同科技

Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV 採用 FWD 驅動方式。

Volkswagen Tiguan 採用 FWD 驅動方式。

兩款車嘅驅動方式一樣，都係 FWD，日常駕駛感受唔會有太大分別。

總結

總體嚟講，Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV 同 Volkswagen Tiguan 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊架，關鍵都係睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去做試駕先做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。

喺馬來西亞嘅轎車市場，好多人喺揀車嗰陣都拎 Honda Civic 同 Toyota Corolla 嚟做比較。這兩款車喺價位同定位上都幾接近，而家我哋就从多個方面做一个詳細對比，幫你省咗做功課嘅時間。

價錢同版本

Honda Civic 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 133,900 - 167,900，一共有 5 個版本，包括 2025 e:HEV 2.0L RS（RM 167,900）、2025 1.5T RS（RM 149,900）、2025 1.5T V（RM 144,900） 等。

Toyota Corolla 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 144,800 - 149,800，一共有 2 個版本，包括 2026 1.8L GR Sport（RM 149,800）、2026 1.8L G（RM 144,800） 等。

從價錢嚟睇，Honda Civic 嘅起步價確實比 Toyota Corolla 平咗 RM 10,900。如果你預算有限，Honda 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需求。但都要留意，平嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備上會有取捨，具體要看你嘅需求。

動力同油耗

Honda Civic 搭載 1.5L Turbo，馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。

Toyota Corolla 搭載 1.5L Turbo，馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。

兩款車用嘅係同一套動力系統，日常開起嚟嘅感受基本冇分別。油耗方面都差唔多，唔使太糾結這一點。

空間同舒適度

Honda Civic 車身長 4450 mm，車尾箱 470 L。

Toyota Corolla 車身長 4400 mm，車尾箱 400 L。

空間方面，Honda Civic 嘅車身比 Toyota Corolla 長咗 50 mm，車內乘坐空間會稍微寬鬆啲，尤其係後座腿部空間。如果你經常載家人或者需要放嬰兒車，大少少嘅車身確實更實用。

適合咩人

Honda Civic 同 Toyota Corolla 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更睇重品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰一款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，就揀配置更豐富嗰款。最終都係建議兩款都去試駕，親身體驗先最重要。

總結

總嘅嚟講，Honda Civic 同 Toyota Corolla 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵都要睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。

喺馬來西亞嘅汽車市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拿寶騰 X90 同 奇瑞 Tiggo Cross 嚟做比較。今日我哋由多個方面嚟做一個詳細嘅對比，幫你省返做功課嘅時間。

價錢同版本

寶騰 X90 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 106,800 - 122,800，一總有 4 個版本，包括 2026 1.5T Prime X（RM 122,800）、2026 1.5T Prime（RM 116,800）、2026 1.5T Lite（RM 106,800） 等。

奇瑞 Tiggo Cross 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 88,750 - 99,750，一總有 2 個版本，包括 2025 HEV 1.5L CSH（RM 99,750）、2025 1.5T Standard（RM 88,750） 等。

從價錢嚟睇，奇瑞 Tiggo Cross 嘅起步價比寶騰 X90 平咗 RM 18,050。講真，喺呢個價碼段，幾千蚊嘅差別其實唔算大，重點始終係睇整體嘅性價比同長期使用成本。

安全配備

寶騰 X90 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA)。

奇瑞 Tiggo Cross 嘅安全評級係 TBD，主動安全系統包括 Basic。

安全配備方面，兩款車都拿到唔錯嘅評級。不過寶騰 X90 嘅 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA) 同 奇瑞 Tiggo Cross 嘅 Basic 喺功能上有啲分別，如果你比較重視主動安全嘅話，可以仔細對比一下兩者嘅功能清單。

空間同舒適度

寶騰 X90 車身長 4400 mm，行李箱 400 L。

奇瑞 Tiggo Cross 車身長 4400 mm，行李箱 400 L。

兩款車嘅尺寸差唔多，車內空間分別唔大。呢個級別嘅車，日常使用絕對夠用。

保養同維修

寶騰 X90 保固 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。

奇瑞 Tiggo Cross 保固 3 年/100,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。

總結

總括嚟講，寶騰 X90 同 奇瑞 Tiggo Cross 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵始終係睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，先試駕先做最終決定。買車係一件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。

喺馬來西亞嘅汽車市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拿 Mazda CX-3 同 Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV 做比較。今日我哋從多個方面做一個詳細嘅比較，幫您節省做功課嘅時間。

價錢同版本

Mazda CX-3 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 126,159 - 139,159，一共有 2 個版本，包括 2023 2.0L High（RM 139,159）、2023 2.0L Plus（RM 126,159） 等。

Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 159,750 - 159,750，一共有 2 個版本，包括 1.6L Turbo Standard（RM 130,000）、1.6L Turbo Premium（RM 145,000） 等。

就價錢嚟睇，Mazda CX-3 嘅入門價確實比 Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV 平咗 RM 33,591。如果你預算有限，Mazda 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需要。但亦都要留意，平嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備上會有取捨，具體要睇你嘅需要。

動力同油耗

Mazda CX-3 搭載 1.5L Turbo，馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。

Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV 搭載 Hybrid，馬力 170 hp。官方油耗 4.5 L/100km。

動力方面，Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV 嘅 Hybrid 比 Mazda CX-3 嘅 1.5L Turbo 多出 30 匹馬力。不過日常喺市區開嘅話，兩款車嘅動力都夠用，唔會覺得唔夠力。

空間同舒適度

Mazda CX-3 車身長 4500 mm，尾箱 450 L。

Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV 車身長 4400 mm，尾箱 400 L。

空間方面，Mazda CX-3 嘅車身比 Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV 長咗 100 mm，車內乘坐空間會稍微闊綽少少，尤其係後座腿部空間。如果你經常載家人或者需要放嬰兒車，大少少嘅車身確實更實用。

保養同維護

Mazda CX-3 保養保修 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。

Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV 保養保修 3 年/100,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。

總結

總括嚟講，Mazda CX-3 同 Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV 都係馬來西亞市場好好唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵仲要睇你嘅個人需要同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，先去試駕先做最後決定。買車係大件事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。

車型概覽

比亞迪秦 值唔值得睇，第一步唔係望牌子或者外形，而係睇佢能唔能夠配合你嘅香港日常。 呢篇會集中講家庭乘坐、行李同舒適度，幫你用買家角度篩走唔適合嘅選擇。

售價仍待確認，買家可以先把佢放入候選名單，等價格落實後再同同級車逐項比較。

購車價格指南

比亞迪秦 目前售價仍未清晰，較理性嘅做法係先睇版本、車身大小同動力形式，等價格落實後再決定值唔值得落訂。

如果有幾個版本可揀，可以先將 2024 PHEV 1.5L 120km 前驅版（價格待確認）、2024 PHEV 1.5L 55km 前驅版（價格待確認）、2024 BEV 420km 前驅版（價格待確認）、2024 BEV 510km 前驅版（價格待確認） 放喺同一張清單。日常通勤重視舒適同易用，家庭買家就要優先睇後排、尾箱同安全配置。

核心規格重點

睇 比亞迪秦 嘅規格，重點唔係背數字，而係理解佢喺香港用車場景會帶嚟咩分別。

18.32/8.32/48/57.6 kWh 嘅電池容量，真正意義係可以幫你估算一星期通勤同周末出車要唔要中途補電。 420/510/55/120 km 嘅續航參考，對住喺新界、九龍同港島之間跨區行車嘅用家會更實際。 11.6/11.9 kWh/100km 嘅耗電表現，會影響你去快充站或者屋苑充電位嘅頻率。 110 Ps / 81 kW / 145 kW / 132 kW、135/325/316/180 N·m 嘅輸出，令高速併線同短距離超車更有信心。

優缺點分析

比亞迪秦 嘅優點唔需要講到天花龍鳳，真正有價值係佢能唔能夠令日常用車更省心：日常能源成本有基本參考、電池同續航資訊有助安排通勤同補電、動力輸出對高速同上斜更有底氣。

要留意嘅係，要先確認屋苑、公司或常去商場嘅充電條件、香港停車場同窄路使用要留意車身闊度。呢啲唔一定係缺點，但係落訂前應該先諗清楚。

買家常見問題

買 比亞迪秦 之前，真正要問嘅唔係單一規格，而係佢可唔可以融入你每日嘅生活節奏。

常見疑問係「比亞迪 BYD Qin Plus 座椅舒服嗎？」簡單講，比亞迪 BYD Qin Plus 採用咗一體式運動座椅，包裹性好。 放到實際用車，就係要睇佢對通勤、泊車、家庭乘坐同長期成本有幾大幫助。

同級對比內容

將 比亞迪秦 放入同級車清單時，唔建議只用外形或者品牌光環決定。比較順序可以係：先等售價落實，再決定佢應該同邊個級距比較、再睇動力係咪足夠應付高速併線同滿載、再比較能源成本同補能便利、最後睇車身大小、座位同尾箱是否適合家人。

咁樣篩選會貼近香港買家真實生活：平日塞車、商場泊車、周末去新界、甚至一家人出入，先係一部車每日要面對嘅考驗。

用車全周期指南

擁有 比亞迪秦 最重要係先諗清楚充電節奏。屋苑、公司或者常去商場只要有穩定充電選項，電動化用車就會容易相處好多。

如果你主要喺市區行，視野、低速順滑度同泊車輔助會好影響心情；如果經常行高速或跨區，座椅舒適度、隔音同動力從容感會更重要。

車型概覽

平治EQS SUV 值唔值得睇，第一步唔係望牌子或者外形，而係睇佢能唔能夠配合你嘅香港日常。 呢篇會集中講每日相處是否輕鬆，幫你用買家角度篩走唔適合嘅選擇。

HK$ 1,302,586 令預算位置更清楚，買家可以先估算月供、保險、泊車同日常開支。

購車價格指南

平治EQS SUV 嘅購車預算可以先由 HK$ 1,302,586 開始計。香港買車唔只係睇車價，月供、保險、牌費、泊車同能源成本都會影響每月壓力。

如果有幾個版本可揀，可以先將 2025 450 4MATIC 5 Seats（價格待確認）、2025 580 4MATIC 5 Seats（價格待確認）、2025 680 4MATIC 5 Seats（HK$ 1,302,586）、2025 680 4MATIC 4 Seats（價格待確認） 放喺同一張清單。日常通勤重視舒適同易用，家庭買家就要優先睇後排、尾箱同安全配置。

核心規格重點

睇 平治EQS SUV 嘅規格，重點唔係背數字，而係理解佢喺香港用車場景會帶嚟咩分別。

平治EQS SUV 現階段最值得留意係車型定位同版本方向，詳細取捨應該等價格同規格更清楚再作決定。

優缺點分析

平治EQS SUV 嘅優點唔需要講到天花龍鳳，真正有價值係佢能唔能夠令日常用車更省心：預算位置清楚，方便同同級車直接比較。

要留意嘅係，最終取捨會落喺版本配置、保險同長期保養成本。呢啲唔一定係缺點，但係落訂前應該先諗清楚。

買家常見問題

買 平治EQS SUV 之前，真正要問嘅唔係單一規格，而係佢可唔可以融入你每日嘅生活節奏。

常見疑問係「平治 Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV 喺香港賣幾錢？」簡單講，平治 Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV 喺香港售價大約由港幣 $1,380,000 起。 放到實際用車，就係要睇佢對通勤、泊車、家庭乘坐同長期成本有幾大幫助。

同級對比內容

將 平治EQS SUV 放入同級車清單時，唔建議只用外形或者品牌光環決定。比較順序可以係：先用 HK$ 1,302,586 鎖定預算圈。

咁樣篩選會貼近香港買家真實生活：平日塞車、商場泊車、周末去新界、甚至一家人出入，先係一部車每日要面對嘅考驗。

用車全周期指南

擁有 平治EQS SUV 唔係買車一刻就完結，之後仲有保險、輪胎、保養、泊車同日常能源成本要處理。

如果你主要喺市區行，視野、低速順滑度同泊車輔助會好影響心情；如果經常行高速或跨區，座椅舒適度、隔音同動力從容感會更重要。

車型概覽

榮威RX8 值唔值得睇，第一步唔係望牌子或者外形，而係睇佢能唔能夠配合你嘅香港日常。 呢篇會集中講整體購車判斷，幫你用買家角度篩走唔適合嘅選擇。

售價仍待確認，買家可以先把佢放入候選名單，等價格落實後再同同級車逐項比較。

購車價格指南

榮威RX8 目前售價仍未清晰，較理性嘅做法係先睇版本、車身大小同動力形式，等價格落實後再決定值唔值得落訂。

如果有幾個版本可揀，可以先將 2019 2.0T 兩驅版（價格待確認）、2019 2.0T 四驅版（價格待確認） 放喺同一張清單。日常通勤重視舒適同易用，家庭買家就要優先睇後排、尾箱同安全配置。

核心規格重點

睇 榮威RX8 嘅規格，重點唔係背數字，而係理解佢喺香港用車場景會帶嚟咩分別。

渦輪增壓、4 個 汽缸、1995 mL 排量 嘅動力底子，重點係市區跟車夠唔夠順、高速巡航會唔會吃力。 222 Ps / 163 kW、360 N·m 嘅輸出，對滿載、上斜同超車都比單睇馬力數字更有意思。 車長 4923 mm、車闊 1930 mm、車高 1840 mm、軸距 2850 mm 可以幫你預判商場停車場、屋苑車位同後排腿部空間。 手自一體(AT)、前置後駆 / 前置四駆 會影響起步順滑度、濕地穩定感同長途巡航性格。

優缺點分析

榮威RX8 嘅優點唔需要講到天花龍鳳，真正有價值係佢能唔能夠令日常用車更省心：動力輸出對高速同上斜更有底氣、空間同車身尺寸方便家庭買家預判實用性。

要留意嘅係，香港停車場同窄路使用要留意車身闊度、售價未清晰前唔應該太早用性價比落結論。呢啲唔一定係缺點，但係落訂前應該先諗清楚。

買家常見問題

買 榮威RX8 之前，真正要問嘅唔係單一規格，而係佢可唔可以融入你每日嘅生活節奏。

常見疑問係「榮威 RX8 適唔適合香港多成員家庭使用？」簡單講，榮威 RX8 空間大、舒適度高、通過性強，適合香港多成員家庭使用。 放到實際用車，就係要睇佢對通勤、泊車、家庭乘坐同長期成本有幾大幫助。

同級對比內容

將 榮威RX8 放入同級車清單時，唔建議只用外形或者品牌光環決定。比較順序可以係：先等售價落實，再決定佢應該同邊個級距比較、再睇動力係咪足夠應付高速併線同滿載、最後睇車身大小、座位同尾箱是否適合家人。

咁樣篩選會貼近香港買家真實生活：平日塞車、商場泊車、周末去新界、甚至一家人出入，先係一部車每日要面對嘅考驗。

用車全周期指南

擁有 榮威RX8 唔係買車一刻就完結，之後仲有保險、輪胎、保養、泊車同日常能源成本要處理。

如果你主要喺市區行，視野、低速順滑度同泊車輔助會好影響心情；如果經常行高速或跨區，座椅舒適度、隔音同動力從容感會更重要。

車型概覽

奧迪A6 e-tron 值唔值得睇，第一步唔係望牌子或者外形，而係睇佢能唔能夠配合你嘅香港日常。 呢篇會集中講續航、電池同補電安排，幫你用買家角度篩走唔適合嘅選擇。

售價仍待確認，買家可以先把佢放入候選名單，等價格落實後再同同級車逐項比較。

購車價格指南

奧迪A6 e-tron 目前售價仍未清晰，較理性嘅做法係先睇版本、車身大小同動力形式，等價格落實後再決定值唔值得落訂。

如果有幾個版本可揀，可以先將 2025 Avant S Line（價格待確認）、2025 Sportback S Line（價格待確認） 放喺同一張清單。日常通勤重視舒適同易用，家庭買家就要優先睇後排、尾箱同安全配置。

核心規格重點

睇 奧迪A6 e-tron 嘅規格，重點唔係背數字，而係理解佢喺香港用車場景會帶嚟咩分別。

奧迪A6 e-tron 現階段最值得留意係車型定位同版本方向，詳細取捨應該等價格同規格更清楚再作決定。

優缺點分析

奧迪A6 e-tron 嘅優點唔需要講到天花龍鳳，真正有價值係佢能唔能夠令日常用車更省心：車型定位清楚，適合作為同級比較起點。

要留意嘅係，要先確認屋苑、公司或常去商場嘅充電條件、售價未清晰前唔應該太早用性價比落結論。呢啲唔一定係缺點，但係落訂前應該先諗清楚。

買家常見問題

買 奧迪A6 e-tron 之前，真正要問嘅唔係單一規格，而係佢可唔可以融入你每日嘅生活節奏。

常見疑問係「Audi A6 e-tron 採用咗邊個純電平台，對香港用家有咩好處？」簡單講，Audi A6 e-tron 採用咗全新嘅 PPE (Premium Platform Electric) 豪華純電平台，特點係配備 800V 高電壓架構。對香港用家嚟講，最明顯嘅好處係支援高達 270 kW 嘅直流快充，最快只需大約 21 分鐘就可以將電量由 10% 充到 80%，非常適合行程緊湊嘅本地車主。 放到實際用車，就係要睇佢對通勤、泊車、家庭乘坐同長期成本有幾大幫助。

同級對比內容

將 奧迪A6 e-tron 放入同級車清單時，唔建議只用外形或者品牌光環決定。比較順序可以係：先等售價落實，再決定佢應該同邊個級距比較。

咁樣篩選會貼近香港買家真實生活：平日塞車、商場泊車、周末去新界、甚至一家人出入，先係一部車每日要面對嘅考驗。

用車全周期指南

擁有 奧迪A6 e-tron 最重要係先諗清楚充電節奏。屋苑、公司或者常去商場只要有穩定充電選項，電動化用車就會容易相處好多。

如果你主要喺市區行，視野、低速順滑度同泊車輔助會好影響心情；如果經常行高速或跨區，座椅舒適度、隔音同動力從容感會更重要。

車型概覽

平治GLB系列 值唔值得睇，第一步唔係望牌子或者外形，而係睇佢能唔能夠配合你嘅香港日常。 呢篇會集中講香港停車場同窄路使用，幫你用買家角度篩走唔適合嘅選擇。

零售價 HK$ 333,023 - 346,977、完稅價 HK$ 569,000 - 599,000 令預算位置更清楚，買家可以先估算月供、保險、泊車同日常開支。

購車價格指南

平治GLB系列 嘅購車預算可以先由 零售價 HK$ 333,023 - 346,977、完稅價 HK$ 569,000 - 599,000 開始計。香港買車唔只係睇車價，月供、保險、牌費、泊車同能源成本都會影響每月壓力。

如果有幾個版本可揀，可以先將 2026 GLB 220 AMG Line（HK$ 599,000）、2026 GLB 220（HK$ 569,000）、2025 GLB 250 4MATIC Facelift（HK$ 549,000） 放喺同一張清單。日常通勤重視舒適同易用，家庭買家就要優先睇後排、尾箱同安全配置。

核心規格重點

睇 平治GLB系列 嘅規格，重點唔係背數字，而係理解佢喺香港用車場景會帶嚟咩分別。

190 Ps / 140 kW / 22 kW、300 N·m 嘅輸出，令高速併線同短距離超車更有信心。 車長 4732 mm、車闊 2029 mm、車高 1681 mm 可以幫你預判商場停車場、屋苑車位同後排腿部空間。 濕式雙離合(DCT)、前置前駆 會影響起步順滑度、濕地穩定感同長途巡航性格。

優缺點分析

平治GLB系列 嘅優點唔需要講到天花龍鳳，真正有價值係佢能唔能夠令日常用車更省心：預算位置清楚，方便同同級車直接比較、動力輸出對高速同上斜更有底氣、空間同車身尺寸方便家庭買家預判實用性。

要留意嘅係，要先確認屋苑、公司或常去商場嘅充電條件、香港停車場同窄路使用要留意車身闊度。呢啲唔一定係缺點，但係落訂前應該先諗清楚。

買家常見問題

買 平治GLB系列 之前，真正要問嘅唔係單一規格，而係佢可唔可以融入你每日嘅生活節奏。

常見疑問係「平治 Mercedes-Benz GLB 系列 喺香港賣幾錢？」簡單講，目前 平治 Mercedes-Benz GLB 系列 喺香港售價由港幣 $470,000 起。 放到實際用車，就係要睇佢對通勤、泊車、家庭乘坐同長期成本有幾大幫助。

同級對比內容

將 平治GLB系列 放入同級車清單時，唔建議只用外形或者品牌光環決定。比較順序可以係：先用 零售價 HK$ 333,023 - 346,977、完稅價 HK$ 569,000 - 599,000 鎖定預算圈、再睇動力係咪足夠應付高速併線同滿載、最後睇車身大小、座位同尾箱是否適合家人。

咁樣篩選會貼近香港買家真實生活：平日塞車、商場泊車、周末去新界、甚至一家人出入，先係一部車每日要面對嘅考驗。

用車全周期指南

擁有 平治GLB系列 最重要係先諗清楚充電節奏。屋苑、公司或者常去商場只要有穩定充電選項，電動化用車就會容易相處好多。

如果你主要喺市區行，視野、低速順滑度同泊車輔助會好影響心情；如果經常行高速或跨區，座椅舒適度、隔音同動力從容感會更重要。

BYD officially released the May 2026 production and sales flash report, with new energy vehicles from all brands reaching a monthly sales volume of 383,453 vehicles, a slight increase of 0.26% year-on-year, achieving year-on-year positive growth in monthly sales after ten months; among them, passenger car deliveries reached 376,990 units, surging 19.4% month-on-month, wiping out the pain of previous model iterations, presenting a new pattern where the domestic base is stable, overseas sales are soaring, and high-end brands are scaling up across the board. Amidst the market environment of intensified competition in the domestic new energy sector, Tesla FSD entering China, and an intense launch of independent new products, it has forged a unique structural growth path.

The Dynasty and Ocean main brands combined sold 330,215 vehicles in May, accounting for over 80% of the group's total sales, remaining the stabilizer for BYD's sales volume. The full series had 8 models exceeding 20,000 units in monthly sales, covering products from 50,000 entry-level commuter to 200,000 home SUV.

Inside the Dynasty Network, the Yuan family sold 56,691 units, and the Song family 51,370 units. Both crossed the 50,000 threshold, becoming two major sales pillars for the brand, catering to home commuter and urban-rural travel needs; the Qin family followed closely with a stable performance of 28,360 units. The Han and Tang series maintained a volume in the six-thousand range, deeply cultivating the mid-to-large home sedan and SUV niche markets; the brand new model Xia is in the market cultivation phase, delivering 1,810 units monthly, with potential for steady volume growth as channels expand.

The Ocean Network's growth momentum is even more rapid, with 5 models entering the 20,000 club across the series: Sealion 42,615 units, Seal 34,117 units, Seagull 39,919 units, Dolphin 22,260 units, and Song PLUS 27,755 units. Among them, Seagull remains the best-selling entry-level commuter model thanks to its affordable pricing of 60,000-80,000. Sealion, as a new volume model, stands firm at the 40,000 level upon launch, filling the mid-size SUV product gap in the Ocean Network and perfecting the Ocean product tier layout. From commuter small cars to compact SUVs, the two main brands rely on DM-i hybrid and pure electric dual-line technologies to牢牢锁住 the mainstream home market share within 150,000 domestically.

The high-end matrix of Denza, Fang Cheng Bao, and Yangwang sold a combined 46,489 vehicles in May, officially breaking away from the niche positioning to become a new pivot for BYD's brand premium and profit growth, breaking the industry curse of difficulty in high-end breakthrough for domestic brands.

The off-road brand Fang Cheng Bao sold 30,186 units monthly, surging 139.7% year-on-year, creating a new high in monthly sales since the brand launched. Its Titanium 7 model sold 18,280 units monthly, while Leopard 5 and Leopard 8 output remained stable, continuously squeezing the survival space for joint venture and imported models in the 250,000-400,000 hardcore off-road niche market.

Denza delivered 16,303 units in May, with the MPV benchmark D9 selling 6,721 units, and the Z9 series close to 6,000 units. MPV and mid-to-large sedan dual-line efforts helped them stand firm in the luxury new energy track; the million-level ultra-luxury brand Yangwang continued its steady climb, delivering 286 units that month, a year-on-year increase of 105.8%, completing market verification of the domestic brand ceiling product and forming a full price range product layout from 100,000+ home, 300,000-400,000 off-road, 500,000 luxury MPV to million-level flagship.

In May, BYD's overseas sales of passenger cars and pickup trucks reached 160,177 units, surging 80.7% year-on-year. Exports accounted for over 42% of the full series total sales, setting a new historical high for brand export and becoming the core driving force to stabilize May overall sales and achieve year-on-year positive growth.

Southeast Asia, Europe, and Latin America became the main incremental markets. Seagull, Song PLUS, and Yuan series continued to top new energy best-seller lists in multiple countries; the SHARK pickup truck exceeded 4,000 units in monthly exports for two consecutive months. Relying on the completion of localization production in Thailand, Brazil, Hungary, and Uzbekistan with four overseas vehicle factories, localized production continues to land, avoiding tariffs while rapidly penetrating terminal channels. Against the background of stock market competition in the domestic auto industry and normalized price wars, the rapidly expanding overseas market effectively counteracts sales volatility brought by domestic model iterations, officially upgrading from a supplementary market to BYD's core growth engine. As of now, BYD's global cumulative new energy vehicle sales have exceeded 16.5 million units, with the globalization map continuously broadening.

May marked a key node in BYD's intelligent driving landing, with the God's Eye intelligent driving system becoming a core bonus point for models: the number of vehicles with advanced intelligent driving across all brands exceeded 3.15 million, with daily road test data exceeding 200 million kilometers; that month, BYD implemented City Pilot and Smart Parking dual safety backup services, becoming the world's first auto manufacturer to achieve dual intelligent driving backups. Three days after policy implementation, the activation rate of models equipped with the God's Eye system in cities surged 50%. Intelligent driving experience upgrades directly drove in-store order conversion, solidifying product competitiveness for subsequent models to continue volume sales, and facing the intelligent driving market shock brought by FSD entering China.

From data details, BYD's cumulative sales from January to May 2026 were 1,405,039 units, down 20.32% year-on-year. The core reason is that the full series of main models were concentratedly iterated, and the capacity ramp-up of the 2nd Gen Fast Charge Blade Battery was restricted. The new Flash Charge Battery upgraded fast charging and low-temperature performance. Full series iteration models prioritized installing new batteries, but production line retrofitting dragged down capacity release. Order backlogs on popular models and delayed deliveries compressed the May delivery volume to a certain extent.

As the end of the second quarter approaches and the 2nd Gen Blade Battery capacity continues to release, coupled with new models such as Denza N8L, Fang Cheng Bao Titanium 7 Pure Electric Version, Sealion 05, and Xia L landing the market, the industry generally predicts that BYD's full brand sales in June are expected to exceed 400,000 vehicles. Relying on the four-dimension development logic of low-end volume locking share, high-end raising profit, overseas pushing volume, and intelligence improving product power, amidst the intensified new energy elimination round in the domestic market, BYD's full category layout advantage continues to amplify, securing its status as the domestic new energy leader, accelerating steadily towards global top auto manufacturers.

即將到來二零二六北美世界杯，中國足球卻喺遙遠嘅歐洲賽場迎來高光時刻，奪得冠軍嘅係中國「男孩足球」足球小將 2014（U12）隊。

北京時間 6 月 2 日，意大利 SIGISMONDI 國際青少年杯落下帷幕，董路率領嘅中國足球小將 2014（U12）隊伍歷經七場鏖戰，喺點球大戰中 5 比 4 擊敗英超勁旅愛華頓青訓梯隊，以七戰全勝、進 21 球僅失 2 球嘅統治級表現捧起冠軍獎盃，成為該賽事創辦以來首支登頂嘅亞洲球隊，讓五星紅旗喺歐洲 U12"小世界杯"賽場高高飄揚。

本屆賽事匯聚全球 48 支頂尖青訓隊伍，愛華頓、佛羅倫薩、哥本哈根、布拉加等多家歐洲老牌俱樂部梯隊悉數參賽，賽事含金量十足。小組賽中，中國小將勢如破竹，先後 2 比 0 輕取意大利 TTT、5 比 0 橫掃丹麥哥本哈根、7 比 0 大勝 GGR，三戰零失球狂入 14 球，以小組頭名強勢晉級淘汰賽。

進入淘汰賽後，球隊繼續穩紮穩打，展現出同年齡唔符嘅成熟與堅韌。

八分之一決賽 3 比 1 力克意甲佛羅倫薩梯隊，四分之一決賽 1 比 0 絕殺葡超布拉加，半決賽再度 2 比 0 雙殺哥本哈根，六戰只失 1 球，強勢闖入決賽。決賽迎來巔峰對決，常規時間愛華頓率先破門，正當所有人以為勝利天平開始傾斜時，中國小將喺 6 分鐘內快速扳平比數，將比賽拖入殘酷嘅點球大戰。

最終戰勝愛華頓 U12 梯隊，以七戰全勝斬獲賽事冠軍，用亮眼戰績印證民間青訓嘅成長潛力。

關於中國足球小將 2014 隊

中國足球小將 2014 隊，係由一批二零一四年出生（而家 12 歲）嘅小球員組成，英文別稱 Chinese Football Boy 2014，係董路喺二零一七年牵头創立嘅民間青訓少年足球隊。

同各地體校、足球協會梯隊揀選模式唔同，足球小將 2014 隊球隊隊員全部面向全國公開海選招募，揀選唔限戶籍、地域，全國各地應齡孩童均可報名參加試訓。

球員入選球隊無須繳納培訓費，俱樂部亦唔會簽訂限制球員發展嘅綁紮式長期合約，最大限度保留孩子自主選擇權。

喺日常培養模式上，球隊採用分散就學、階段性集中嘅特色模式。小球員平日里留喺各自戶籍地正常上學，日常基礎訓練依托本地場地與教練完成；全隊每隔三至四個月組織一次集中集訓，集訓結束後集中奔赴國內外各項賽事，堅持以賽代練嘅培養思路。

比亞迪立大功

中國足球小將奪冠背後，係一家新能源汽車品牌默默支持，用綠色出行為夢想護航。

球隊運營資金唔靠財政撥款，主要依托賽事直播平台收益分成同企業商業贊助支撐，比亞迪作為核心合作贊助商，長期支持保障隊伍外出參賽、集訓開支。

自二零二五年正式贊助中國足球小將以來，比亞迪用實實在在嘅行動支持民間青訓，足球小將們每次出國踢比賽，除咗常规出行用車全由比亞迪搞定，比亞迪仲四處對接意甲等同海外優質足球資源，幫孩子開闊眼界，累積國際比賽經驗。

就喺本月，比亞迪又將護航另一批中國足球小將出發前往巴西同墨西哥，繼續佢哋嘅留洋之旅。這種"做實事"嘅態度，正係比亞迪一向嘅行事風格。

足球同汽車，看似毫無關係嘅兩個領域，卻有住驚人嘅相似之處——都需要技術積累同長期堅持、長期投入，都冇捷徑可走。

比亞迪對足球嘅支持，同搞研發一樣，都係長遠佈局，絕非短期玩玩，投資嘅係中國足球嘅未來。

而家，比亞迪已成為全球最大嘅電動汽車製造商，產品已經進入全球 119 個國家同地區，海外經銷商網絡突破 2000 間，歐洲市場實現大眾同高端雙線佈局。

二零二六年五月新能源汽車出口 160,644 輛，佔當月總銷量 383,453 輛嘅 41.9%，同比增長 80.7%，創下單月出口歷史新高。1-5 月比亞迪海外累計銷量達 614,470 輛，同時喺泰國、巴西、匈牙利等同國建立生產基地，二零二六年出口目標由 130 萬輛上調至 150 萬輛。

喺海外生產基地方面，比亞迪已形成四大核心製造基地：

①泰國羅勇工廠（二零二四年七月投產，年產能 15 萬輛）主打右舵車型輻射東盟，本地化率達 70%，員工本地化超 90%；

②巴西卡馬薩里工廠（二零二五年七月投產）佔地 400 萬㎡，初期產能 15 萬輛，二零二六年尾將擴至 30 萬輛，成為拉美最大電動車製造中心；

③匈牙利塞格德工廠（二零二六年一季投產）作為歐洲總部，年產能 15 萬輛，可規避歐盟 38.1% 反補貼關稅，交付週期由 45 日縮至 15 日；烏茲別克斯坦工廠一期產能 5 萬輛，三期規劃達 30 萬輛，覆蓋中亞同東歐市場。

喺物流體系上，比亞迪組建自營滾裝船隊，已投入 8 艘大型滾裝船（含 3 艘 9200 車位全球最大車型），年運力破 100 萬台，已經擺脫對第三方物流嘅依賴，大幅降低海運成本（約減少 50%）同提升交付效率。

隨著二零二六北美世界杯嘅臨近，中國足球小將嘅奪冠讓我哋睇到希望嘅火種，而比亞迪嘅鼎力支持，正為呢顆火種添柴加薪，讓佢有朝一日能燎原成勢，照亮中國足球嘅未來之路。