喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揸車嘅時候都會拿 Proton X70 同 Mazda CX-5 嚟比較。呢兩款車喺價同定位上都幾接近，今日我哋就由多個方面做一次詳細對比，幫你節省做功課嘅時間。

價錢同版本

Proton X70 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 106,800 - 122,300，合共 3 個版本，包括 1.5L Standard 2WD（RM 106,800）、1.5L Executive 2WD（RM 115,800）、1.5L Premium 2WD（RM 122,300）等。

Mazda CX-5 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 135,469 - 166,760，合共 3 個版本，包括 2025 2.0L AT 35th Anniversary（RM 316,154）、2025 2.0L AT（RM 296,154）、2025 2.0L MT（RM 294,154）等。

由價錢睇落，Proton X70 嘅起步價真係比 Mazda CX-5 平咗 RM 28,669。如果你預算有限，Proton 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需要。但都要留意，平嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備上要有取舍，具體要睇你嘅需要。

安全配備

Proton X70 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA)。

Mazda CX-5 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 。

兩款車嘅安全評級一樣，喺呢個級距入面安全配備都算俾得幾齊全。而家嘅新車安全性唔差，唔使太擔心呢點。

配置同科技

Proton X70 採用 FWD 驅動方式。

Mazda CX-5 採用 FWD 驅動方式。

兩款車嘅驅動方式一樣，都係 FWD，日常駕駛感受唔會有太大分別。

適合邊種人

Proton X70 同 Mazda CX-5 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭用、日常通勤。如果你更睇重品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑好嗰一款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，嗰就揀配置更豐富嗰款。最後始終建議兩款都去試駕，親身感受先至係最重要。

總結

總體嚟講，Proton X70 同 Mazda CX-5 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一部，關鍵都要睇你嘅個人需要同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，先去試駕先做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。

喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拿 Proton X70 定 Mazda CX-30 嚟做比較。呢兩款車喺價位同定位上都好接近，今日我哋就從多個方面做一個詳細嘅比較，幫你節省做功課嘅時間。

價格同版本

Proton X70 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 106,800 - 122,300，一共有 3 個版本，包括 1.5L Standard 2WD（RM 106,800）、1.5L Executive 2WD（RM 115,800）、1.5L Premium 2WD（RM 122,300） 等。

Mazda CX-30 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 122,409 - 146,409，一共有 4 個版本，包括 2025 2.0L High+ Premium（RM 146,409）、2025 2.0L High+（RM 138,409）、2025 2.0L High（RM 130,409） 等。

從價格嚟睇，Proton X70 嘅起步價確實比 Mazda CX-30 平咗 RM 15,609。如果你預算有限，Proton 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需求。但要小心，平嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備上會有取舍，具體要看你嘅需求。

安全配備

Proton X70 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA)。

Mazda CX-30 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 i-Activsense。

兩款車嘅安全評級一樣，喺呢個級數入面安全配備都算給得好齊全。而家嘅新車安全性都唔差，唔使太擔心呢一點。

配備同科技

Proton X70 採用 FWD 驅動方式。

Mazda CX-30 採用 FWD 驅動方式。

兩款車嘅驅動方式一樣，都係 FWD，日常駕駛感受唔會有太大分別。

保養同維護

Proton X70 保用 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。

Mazda CX-30 保用 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。

兩款車嘅保用條件一樣，呢方面唔使糾結。實際保養成本仲要看品牌嘅服務網絡同零件價格，建議去車友群問問真實車主嘅經驗。

總結

總體嚟講，Proton X70 同 Mazda CX-30 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一台，關鍵始終係要看你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕先做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。

喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嗰陣都會拿寶騰 X70 同本田 CR-V 來做比較。呢兩款車喺價位同定位上都幾接近，今日我哋就由多個方面做一個詳細嘅比較，幫你省返做功課嘅時間。

價錢同版本

寶騰 X70 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 106,800 - 122,300，一共有 3 個版本，包括 1.5L Standard 2WD（RM 106,800）、1.5L Executive 2WD（RM 115,800）、1.5L Premium 2WD（RM 122,300） 等。

本田 CR-V 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 178,200 - 195,900，一共有 4 個版本，包括 2026 e:HEV 2.0L 2WD RS（RM 195,900）、2026 1.5T 4WD V（RM 181,900）、2026 e:HEV 2.0L 2WD E（RM 178,200） 等。

從價錢睇落，寶騰 X70 嘅起步價確實比本田 CR-V 平咗 RM 71,400。如果你預算有限，寶騰嘅入門版已經可以满足日常需求。但都要注意，平嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備上面會有取舍，具體要睇你嘅需求。

安全配備

寶騰 X70 嘅安全評級係 5 星 (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA)。

本田 CR-V 嘅安全評級係 5 星 (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括本田 SENSING (ACC, CMBS, LKAS, RDM)。

兩款車嘅安全評級一樣，喺呢個級別裡面安全配備都算給得好齊全。而家嘅新車安全性都不差，唔使太擔心呢一點。

空間同舒適度

寶騰 X70 車身長 4400 mm，車尾箱 400 L。

本田 CR-V 車身長 4500 mm，車尾箱 450 L。

空間方面，本田 CR-V 嘅車身比寶騰 X70 長咗 100 mm，乘坐空間更有優勢。不過寶騰 X70 喺城市入面泊車會靈活啲，各有取舍。

保養同維修

寶騰 X70 保養 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。

本田 CR-V 保養 5 年/無限制里程，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。

總結

總體嚟講，寶騰 X70 同本田 CR-V 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車款。揀邊部車，關鍵都要睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多睇幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕先做最終決定。買車係件大事，花點時間做功課絕對唔會錯。

In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers compare Proton X50 and Subaru Forester when choosing a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.

Price and Versions

The OTR price of Proton X50 in Malaysia is RM 89,800 - 113,300, with a total of 4 versions, including 1.5T Executive (RM 89,800), 1.5T Premium (RM 101,800), 1.5T Flagship (RM 113,300), etc.

The OTR price of Subaru Forester in Malaysia is RM 174,000 - 197,000, with a total of 3 versions, including 2024 2.0L S EyeSight GT Edition (RM 189,538), 2024 2.0L S EyeSight (RM 177,538), 2024 2.0L L EyeSight (RM 167,538), etc.

From a pricing perspective, the starting price of Proton X50 is indeed RM 84,200 lower than Subaru Forester. If your budget is limited, Proton's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. However, be aware that the savings of a few thousand could involve trade-offs in features, depending on your specific requirements.

Safety Features

The safety rating of Proton X50 is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).

The safety rating of Subaru Forester is 5★ (Euro NCAP), active safety systems include EyeSight.

In terms of safety features, both cars have received good ratings. However, Proton X50's ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA) and Subaru Forester's EyeSight have some differences in functionality. If you value active safety highly, you can compare the feature lists of both carefully.

Space and Comfort

The Proton X50 body length is 4400 mm, trunk space 400 L.

The Subaru Forester body length is 4400 mm, trunk space 400 L.

The dimensions of both cars are almost the same, interior space difference is not significant. For cars at this level, daily use is perfectly adequate.

Maintenance and Care

Proton X50 warranty 5 years/150,000km, maintenance interval 10,000km or 6 months.

Subaru Forester warranty 3 years/100,000km, maintenance interval 10,000km or 6 months.

Who is it Suitable For

Proton X50 and Subaru Forester are both mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, consider prioritizing the one with better reputation; if you care more about cost-effectiveness and features, choose the model with a richer specification list. Ultimately, it is recommended to test drive both models, as experiencing them in person is the most important.

Conclusion

Overall, Proton X50 and Subaru Forester are both very good models in the Malaysian market. Choosing which one depends on your personal needs and budget. It is recommended to do your homework, compare quotes from several dealerships, and then test drive to make the final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending some time on research is never wrong.

In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers compare Proton X50 and Mitsubishi Xforce when choosing a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning. Today we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.

Price and Versions

Proton X50 OTR price in Malaysia is RM 89,800 - 113,300, with a total of 4 versions, including 1.5T Executive (RM 89,800), 1.5T Premium (RM 101,800), 1.5T Flagship (RM 113,300), etc.

Mitsubishi Xforce OTR price in Malaysia is RM 109,930 - 119,930, with a total of 2 versions, including 2026 1.5L Ultimate (RM 119,930), 2026 1.5L Urban (RM 109,930), etc.

In terms of price, Proton X50 starting price is indeed RM 20,130 cheaper than Mitsubishi Xforce. If your budget is limited, Proton's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. But be aware, the difference of a few thousand might involve trade-offs in specifications, depending on your specific needs.

Power and Fuel Consumption

Proton X50 is equipped with 1.5L 4-cyl, 105 hp. Official fuel consumption 6.0 L/100km.

Mitsubishi Xforce is equipped with 1.5L Turbo, 140 hp. Official fuel consumption 7.0 L/100km.

Power wise, Mitsubishi Xforce 1.5L Turbo has 35 more horsepower than Proton X50 1.5L 4-cyl. However, for daily city driving, power of both cars is sufficient, won't feel lacking.

Safety Features

Proton X50 safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).

Mitsubishi Xforce safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include MI-PILOT.

Both cars have same safety rating, in this class safety features are quite comprehensive. New cars safety nowadays is not poor, no need to worry too much about this.

Configuration and Technology

Proton X50 adopts 4WD drive mode.

Mitsubishi Xforce adopts FWD drive mode.

Proton 4WD and Mitsubishi FWD will have different feelings in handling, test drive comparison is recommended.

Summary

Overall, Proton X50 and Mitsubishi Xforce are both very good models in Malaysia market. Which one to choose, key depends on your personal needs and budget. We suggest doing research, compare quotes from multiple dealerships, then go for test drive for final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending time doing research will definitely not be wrong.

喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多人揀車嗰陣都會拎 Proton X50 同 GWM Haval H6 嚟做比較。呢兩款車喺價錢同定位上都幾接近，今日我哋就從多個方面做個詳細對比，幫你省返做功課嘅時間。

價錢同版本

Proton X50 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 89,800 - 113,300，合共有 4 個版本，包括 1.5T Executive（RM 89,800）、1.5T Premium（RM 101,800）、1.5T Flagship（RM 113,300）等。

GWM Haval H6 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 139,750 - 139,750，合共有 2 個版本，包括 1.5L Turbo Standard（RM 140,000）、1.5L Turbo Premium（RM 155,000）等。

從價錢睇落，Proton X50 嘅起步價確實比 GWM Haval H6 平咗 RM 49,950。如果你預算有限，Proton 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需求。但都要注意，平嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備上會有取舍，具體要睇你嘅需求。

動力同油耗

Proton X50 搭載 1.5L 4-cyl，馬力 105 hp。官方油耗 6.0 L/100km。

GWM Haval H6 搭載 Hybrid，馬力 170 hp。官方油耗 4.5 L/100km。

動力方面，GWM Haval H6 嘅 Hybrid 比 Proton X50 嘅 1.5L 4-cyl 多咗 65 匹馬力。不過平日喺市區開，兩款車嘅動力都夠用，唔會覺得唔夠力。

安全配備

Proton X50 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA)。

GWM Haval H6 嘅安全評級係 TBD，主動安全系統包括 Basic。

安全配備方面，兩款車都拿到唔錯嘅評級。不過 Proton X50 嘅 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA) 同 GWM Haval H6 嘅 Basic 喺功能上有些分別，如果你比較睇重主動安全嘅話，可以仔細對比下兩者嘅功能列表。

保養同維護

Proton X50 保修 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。

GWM Haval H6 保修 7 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。

總結

總體嚟講，Proton X50 同 GWM Haval H6 都係馬來西亞市場好唔錯嘅車款。揀邊輛，關鍵始終要睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做足功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最後決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。

喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嗰陣都會拿 Proton X50 同 Chery Tiggo 9 嚟做比較。呢兩款車喺價位同定位上都幾接近，今日我哋就從多個方面做一次詳細嘅比較，幫你省返做功課嘅時間。

價錢同版本

Proton X50 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 89,800 - 113,300，一共有 4 個版本，包括 1.5T Executive（RM 89,800）、1.5T Premium（RM 101,800）、1.5T Flagship（RM 113,300）等。

Chery Tiggo 9 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 166,800 - 179,800，一共有 1 個版本，包括 2026 2.0T Standard（RM 179,750）等。

從價錢嚟睇，Proton X50 嘅起步價的確比 Chery Tiggo 9 平咗 RM 77,000。如果你預算有限，Proton 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需求。但亦都要注意，平嘅嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備上面會有取捨，具體要看你嘅需求。

動力同油耗

Proton X50 搭載 1.5L 4-cyl，馬力 105 hp。官方油耗 6.0 L/100km。

Chery Tiggo 9 搭載 2.0L 4-cyl，馬力 170 hp。官方油耗 8.0 L/100km。

動力方面，Chery Tiggo 9 嘅 2.0L 4-cyl 比 Proton X50 嘅 1.5L 4-cyl 多咗 65 匹馬力。不過日常喺市區開，兩款車嘅動力都夠用，唔會覺得唔夠力。

安全配備

Proton X50 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA)。

Chery Tiggo 9 嘅安全評級係 TBD，主動安全系統包括 Basic。

安全配備方面，兩款車都攞到唔錯嘅評級。不過 Proton X50 嘅 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA) 同 Chery Tiggo 9 嘅 Basic 喺功能上面有啲差異，如果你比較看重主動安全嘅話，可以仔細比較吓兩者嘅功能列表。

保養同維修

Proton X50 保用 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。

Chery Tiggo 9 保用 3 年/100,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。

適合邊種人

Proton X50 同 Chery Tiggo 9 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更看重品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰一款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，那就選配置更豐富嗰款。最終都係建議兩款都去試駕，親身體驗先係最重要嘅。

總結

總而言之，Proton X50 同 Chery Tiggo 9 都係馬來西亞市場好唔錯嘅車型。選擇邊一輛，關鍵都係要看你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花啲時間做功課絕對唔會錯。

"Competition in the automotive industry is like a marathon, and it is a marathon without an end."

When the industry falls into a volume race of "trading price for volume", more and more automakers realize that simply pursuing sales volume makes it difficult to achieve sustainable development. Against this background, Changan launched a product matrix optimization and actively performed "subtraction" on its product line. In the first half of this year, the brand contracted the entry-level versions of Lumin below 50,000 yuan, bidding farewell to the low-price volume route; meanwhile, it sorted out the fuel vehicle product sequence and gradually contracted models with weaker profit performance.

Tan Benhong mentioned at the communication meeting that only the adjustment of the Lumin model formed a sales gap of about 70,000 units in the first half of the year. Looking at the overall picture, Changan Automobile's cumulative sales volume in the first half of 2026 was 1.1189 million units, a decrease of nearly 240,000 units compared to the same period last year.

In January to May 2026, the profit margin of the domestic automotive industry fell to 3.4%, and the industry entered an era of thin profits. The sales gap brought by the simplification of the product line is the reality that Changan needs to face to promote structural optimization. What is the deeper consideration behind this series of adjustments? Where will this "decluttering" at the product end take Changan?

From "Producing Many Models to Gain Advantage" to "Emphasizing Both Volume and Profit"

This "slimming movement" was not a temporary whim. In April this year, Changan officially released the "1445" global strategy. The most closely watched planning item is: In the next five years, the product spectrum will be streamlined from 63 models to 36 models, a compression rate as high as 43%. At the same time, Changan clearly stated the need to concentrate resources to build a global flagship product "one model with annual sales of 500,000 units and five models with annual sales of 300,000 units". This is a strategic transformation promoted from top to bottom, the purpose of which is to bid farewell to the car sea tactic of "producing many models to gain an advantage" in the past.

Lumin is exactly a very representative model in this product structure adjustment. This model once had a considerable volume, contributing about 200,000 sales for the full year last year. But the problem lies in the limited profit space for versions priced below 50,000 yuan.

Tan Benhong said straight out at the communication meeting: "For Lumin below 50,000 yuan, we actively adjusted. In the first half of this year, this one product was 70,000 units. We cut off some products with less profitability. Of course, you can have scale, but this kind of scale, we are constantly reviewing it now, such products we should not do."

In fact, the weakening demand for Lumin also has objective factors of the general industry environment. The track of micro pure electric vehicles is shrinking continuously. According to data from the China Association of Automobile Distributors, the wholesale sales of micro pure electric vehicles in June decreased by 50% year-on-year, falling to 8% in the pure electric market share; in the first five months of this year, the cumulative sales of A00-class micro sedans were 192,000 units, a significant drop of 64% year-on-year, and the market share shrank from 6% to 2.7%. In such a market environment, it is difficult to form long-term value by continuing to operate low-revenue models.

Changan's "subtraction" is not only reflected at the product level but also implemented in internal assessment mechanisms. Tan Benhong revealed that the company has established a "operational co-investment" mechanism internally: If a product cannot achieve profitability, even if sales targets are met, personnel participating in the project co-investment also need to bear corresponding losses. "Balancing volume and profit is a very critical point." This mechanism ensures from the system that "pursuing sales with profits" is not an empty talk.

Tan Benhong clearly stated at the communication meeting: "Changan has now discarded the 'Producing Many Models to Gain Advantage' strategy, and more pursues high-quality development." "Simply pursuing quantity, trying to roll others to death through scale, this method is used cautiously in Changan."

What does 70,000 sales volumes get you?

Actively giving up 70,000 sales volume is not an easy decision for any automaker, and Changan has indeed borne the cost brought by the adjustment.

In the first half of this year, Changan's sales volume decreased by nearly 240,000 units year-on-year, corresponding to a total revenue decrease of about 14.551 billion yuan. Based on the net profit attributable to shareholders of 740 million to 970 million yuan in the first half of the year and total sales of 1.1189 million units, a simple calculation shows that Changan's net profit attributable to shareholders per vehicle is only about 66 to 86 yuan, which is obviously lagging behind the industry mainstream level. The huge gap highlights the urgency of Changan promoting product "slimming".

However, while actively shrinking the scale of low-gross margin models, Changan is also cultivating new sales pillars. The one mainly playing the role of substitution is Changan Qiyuan Q05. The performance of this compact SUV is very bright - sales reached 19,350 units in May, further climbed to 23,523 units in June, and cumulative sales in the first half of the year exceeded 76,000 units, continuing to stand at the forefront in the compact SUV track where Changan has a significant advantage in fuel vehicle ownership.

Changan Automobile Executive Vice President Yang Dayong revealed at the communication meeting that Lumin contributed about 200,000 sales for the full year last year, but this part of sales is actively shrinking this year, "replaced by Qiyuan Q05". Under the retreat and advance, Changan has started the preliminary "gearing change" of main sales products.

It is also worth mentioning that the overseas market has become an important growth highlight. Changan's overseas sales reached 454,700 units in the first half of the year, an increase of 51.87% year-on-year. The proportion of overseas sales in total deliveries has risen to about 33.6%. Tan Benhong stated that Changan is systematically promoting overseas organization, talent, base and capacity layout. "Globalization is Changan's core growth pole in the next 3 to 5 years." According to the "1445" strategic planning, the overseas sales proportion needs to reach 35% to 40% by 2030. Doing "subtraction" domestically and "addition" overseas, this is Changan's "two-front battle" idea.

The rapid growth of the overseas market has provided Changan with valuable buffer space. When the domestic market is in the stage of product structure adjustment and scale faces pressure, the incremental increase in the overseas market makes up for part of the shortfall in the domestic market. With the Thailand production base landing and putting into production, and the European market steadily expanding, overseas business will also continue to contribute relatively higher gross margin income.

Of course, the challenges on the transformation path are still considerable. Avatr, the high-end brand, delivered only 27,619 units in the first half of the year, a year-on-year decline of more than 50%; Changan's new energy penetration rate in the first half of the year was about 38.1%, lower than the industry average level. The 1.4 million new energy target set at the beginning of the year was only completed at about 32.5% in the first half. Tan Benhong also frankly stated that Changan is currently in the "second stage of mobilization and structural adjustment critical cycle", and cannot simply use half-year sales and profit data to judge the overall development trend.

For Changan, the most realistic development path right now is to stabilize the mainstream market basic board composed of Qiyuan and Deepal, and at the same time accelerate the product iteration and brand building of Avatr. Whether high-end brands can form a stable profit support will largely determine whether Changan's transformation goal of "volume and profit both gains" can be fulfilled.

Bidding Farewell to "Scale Worship"

Changan's choice is not an individual case, the entire Chinese automotive industry is experiencing a round of profound adjustment.

In January to May 2026, the overall profit margin of the automotive manufacturing industry was only 3.4%, lower than the industry average of 6.1%; the profit margin of vehicle manufacturing was even only 1.5%. Based on this calculation, for a new car priced at 100,000 yuan, the profit in the vehicle manufacturing link is only about 1,500 yuan. JAC Motors, GAC Group, Seres, BAIC BluePark and other automakers announced losses in the first half of the year, and Changan, Great Wall and other leading enterprises' profits also showed obvious declines. The model of relying on "trading price for volume" to seize the market is increasingly difficult to continue.

Looking back at five or six years ago, the profit margin of the automotive industry was long in the range of 6% to 8%, at that time, "scale trading for profit" was a growth method that many car companies were effective. In just a few years, the industry profit margin was almost halved, "price wars" were continuous, vehicle profit dropped from several thousand yuan to hundreds of yuan, and many models fell into loss. Changan's active contraction at this node, rather than being a kind of courage, is more like a kind of sobriety.

Looking at the macro environment, the 2026 Government Work Report explicitly proposed to "deeply rectify involutionary competition", and a series of policies guiding the benign development of the industry continued to land. Changan's strategic choice of actively contracting low-gross margin models also formed a kind of tacit understanding with the policy-driven industry high-quality development orientation.

Tan Benhong compared the current industry environment to "marathon running on the plateau" - blindly accelerating and aggressive expansion will only continue to overdraw enterprise strength. "If we do not reform ourselves and cling to the past, we will definitely not be able to move forward."

In the past few years, many car companies have expanded scale as the core goal, relying on low-priced models to rush volume, trying to amortize costs through scale. But with raw material costs rising and market competition continuing to intensify, continuously releasing models without profitability will only continue to consume enterprise resources. Changan promoting product structure optimization is also a microcosm of domestic car companies shifting from pursuing scale expansion to pursuing operating quality.

Of course, whether "slimming" can successfully "strengthen" after that still needs time to test. Low-end model supply contraction, mid-to-high-end brands have not yet formed a stable performance pillar; new energy penetration rate still has room for improvement, and overseas market profit contribution also needs to be continuously cultivated. Changan's transformation path has just begun.

But one point is very clear: When the industry profit margin falls below 4%, there are not many car companies that can survive by "low price and high volume". Changan chooses to use 70,000 sales volume to exchange for a chance to start anew. Whether this "transformation account" is worth it or not is difficult to conclude in the short term.

In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers compare the Proton X50 and Chery Tiggo 7 Pro when choosing a car. The pricing and positioning of these two models are quite close. Today, we will conduct a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time doing research.

Price and Versions

The Proton X50 OTR price in Malaysia is RM 89,800 - 113,300, with a total of 4 versions, including 1.5T Executive (RM 89,800), 1.5T Premium (RM 101,800), 1.5T Flagship (RM 113,300), etc.

The Chery Tiggo 7 Pro OTR price in Malaysia is RM 123,750 - 123,750, with a total of 2 versions, including 1.6L Turbo Standard (RM 125,000), 1.6L Turbo Premium (RM 140,000), etc.

From a price perspective, the Proton X50 starting price is indeed RM 33,950 cheaper than the Chery Tiggo 7 Pro. If your budget is limited, the Proton entry-level version can already meet daily needs. However, keep in mind that the few thousand cheaper might involve trade-offs in features, depending on your specific requirements.

Power and Fuel Consumption

The Proton X50 is equipped with a 1.5L 4-cylinder, with 105 hp. Official fuel consumption is 6.0 L/100km.

The Chery Tiggo 7 Pro is equipped with a 1.5L Turbo, with 140 hp. Official fuel consumption is 7.0 L/100km.

In terms of power, the Chery Tiggo 7 Pro's 1.5L Turbo has 35 more horsepower than the Proton X50's 1.5L 4-cylinder. However, for daily city driving, the power of both cars is sufficient, and you won't feel it lacks power.

Safety Features

The Proton X50 safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).

The Chery Tiggo 7 Pro safety rating is TBD, active safety systems include Basic.

Regarding safety features, both cars have received good ratings. However, the ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA) on the Proton X50 and the Basic system on the Chery Tiggo 7 Pro have some differences in functionality. If you value active safety, you can compare the feature lists of both carefully.

Maintenance and Service

Proton X50 warranty is 5 years/150,000km, service interval every 10,000km or 6 months.

Chery Tiggo 7 Pro warranty is 3 years/100,000km, service interval every 10,000km or 6 months.

Conclusion

Overall, both the Proton X50 and Chery Tiggo 7 Pro are very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose mainly depends on your personal needs and budget. We recommend doing your homework, comparing quotes from several dealerships, and test driving before making a final decision. Buying a car is a big deal, and taking time to do research will never be wrong.

7 月 20 日，喺長江外貿第一大港——太倉港，一艘滿載上千台國產汽車嘅滾裝船鳴笛起航，駛向海外。

呢類場景，上半年喺呢度上演咗 192 次，平均每週 7 艘滾裝船離港出海，平均每分鐘出口 2.5 輛汽車。太倉海關數據顯示，2026 年 1-6 月，太倉口岸有近 65 萬台汽車出口至全球 166 個國家同地區，創歷史新高，相當於中國每出口約 8 輛車，就有 1 輛從太倉港出發。

太倉港嘅繁忙只係一個縮影。中國汽車工業協會數據顯示，上半年整車出口量達 509.6 萬輛，同比增長 65.3%，半年度出口量首次突破 500 萬輛大關。6 月單月出口 103.7 萬輛，同比增長 75.1%，首次突破百萬輛。海關總署數據顯示，上半年汽車出口額達 918 億美元，同比增長 54%。

但與此同時，國內汽車累計銷量卻同比大幅下滑 21.1% 至 992.1 萬輛，換算落嚟，平均每日比去年要少賣 1.2 萬輛。

一冷一熱之間，中國汽車產業已經站咗喺一個前所未有嘅十字路口。

銷量失速：半年 600 款新車，每日少賣一萬輛

上半年國內銷量跌去兩成，燃油車市場首當其衝，上半年傳統燃料乘用車國內銷量 369.4 萬輛，同比減少 173.2 萬輛，下降 31.9%；6 月單月傳統燃料乘用車國內銷量同比近乎「腰斬」，下降 49.9%。

比銷量下滑更令人警惕嘅係利潤嘅崩塌。價格戰打到第四年，企業利潤亦已被壓縮至極限。中汽協數據顯示，上半年整車製造環節平均利潤率跌至 1.5%，為近十年最低。按此折算，一輛 20 萬元嘅新車，整車廠商嘅淨利潤只有 3000 元。甚至有部分廠商已經倒掛，陷入咗賣一輛虧一輛嘅窘境。

需求端嘅寒意凜凜，同供給端嘅熱浪形成咗劇烈反差。據相關行業數據統計，上半年國內累計上市新車約 630 款，平均每日超過 3 款。比亞迪執行副總裁何志奇 7 月 14 日喺社交平台直言「徹底瘋狂」。佢晒出內部統計圖表顯示，1 至 5 月中國市場累計推出 542 款新車。

一款車動輒 10 億以上嘅投資、2 年以上嘅開發週期，上市後熱度卻維持唔到 3 個月。新車型生命週期從「按年計」壓縮到「按月計」，合資同自主、新勢力同傳統巨頭喺每一個細分市場短兵相接。

供需倒掛之下，上市車企嘅半年報集體亮起紅燈。年初至今，A 股汽車整車板塊累計跌幅 27.87%，半年蒸發近 9000 億元；港股新能源汽車板塊累計下跌 23.78%；2026 年上半年，16 家主流車企嘅銷量目標完成率冇一個超過 50%。

7 月 15 日，中汽協聯合 18 家主流車企發佈國內首套整車成本測算規則標準，試圖為無序競爭劃出一道底線。但「唔迭代就出局」嘅集體焦慮仍在蔓延，冇企業敢於率先踩下煞車，因為率先減速嘅一方，大概率要率先承受銷量加速下滑嘅陣痛。

可以話，中國汽車市場嘅競爭，已經從「增量時代嘅排位賽」全面轉入「存量時代嘅淘汰賽」。

銷量狂飆：500 萬輛之後，全球市場「溫差」明顯

同國內市場嘅寒意形成鮮明對比，海外市場正以烈火烹油之勢狂飆突進。

咨詢公司艾睿铂預測，2026 年中國汽車出口量將增至近 1000 萬輛，較 2025 年嘅 710 萬輛大幅提升，這將係人類歷史上單一國家汽車年度出口嘅最高紀錄。其中，新能源汽車成為出口增長嘅最大引擎，僅今年上半年，新能源汽車出口就達到 235.5 萬輛，同比增長 1.2 倍，意味著每出口兩輛中國汽車，就有一輛係新能源車。

有人話：國內市場承壓之下，出海成為越來越多車企嘅現實選擇；汽車出海，而家成為一場冇退路嘅豪賭。然而，亮眼數字嘅另一面，係全球各區域市場正在壘起嘅高牆。

美國已經對中國汽車關閉咗市場，歐洲緊隨其後，用規則工具築起高牆。歐盟對華純電反補貼稅加疊 10% 基礎關稅後最高達 45.3%，2026 年 1 月達成嘅「最低價格承諾」機制令中國車企失去咗性價比呢張牌，必須喺軟件、設計同服務上證明溢價能力。2026 年 3 月；歐盟提交《工業加速器法案》，外資持股唔超過 49%、強制技術轉移、公共採購「歐盟原產」優先等條款層層加碼，反補貼稅仲會從純電擴大至插混。有專家判斷，歐洲將成為繼美國後下一個對中國汽車關閉嘅海外市場。

東南亞則係另一套邏輯，「先賣車再建廠」嘅路已被政策堵死。泰國 EV3.5 政策明確要求進口整車同本土產能投產比例掛鉤，每進口 1 輛須喺本地生產 2 輛；馬來西亞自 2026 年 7 月起，電動車進口到岸價唔得低於 33 萬人民幣；印尼要求 2026 年本地化率至少 40%。

南美同樣喺豎起壁壘。巴西自 2026 年 7 月 1 日起，所有進口電動車關稅統一上調至 35%，此前 SKD、CKD 散件組裝享受嘅特殊低稅率一併取消。阿根廷對進口整車徵收 35% 關稅，同時實施外匯管制。

當關稅壁壘、數據合規、本地化生產門檻不斷抬高，中國車企嘅出海之路充滿咗唔確定性。

當國內「以價換量」嘅舊路走到盡頭，海外「以空間換時間」嘅新路又佈滿荊棘，中國車企正面對一組冇標準答案嘅選擇題：國內嘅銷量點樣稳住基本盤？海外嘅增長點樣持續？海外市場嘅紅火，能否真正對沖國內市場嘅虧空？

8 月 21 日，由中國貿易促進委員會汽車行業分會指導，成都國際車展組委會、汽車觀察主辦嘅「2026 汽車先鋒思享薈」，廣邀業界大咖深入解讀同分享，敬請期待。

編輯語錄：睇返 2026 年上半年嘅商用車市場，“內冷外熱”係表象，“價格戰向價值戰重構”先至係本質。

2026 年嘅中國商用車市場，喺一個略顯尷尬嘅拐點上。

中國汽車工業協會數據顯示，上半年商用車累計產銷分別為 227.2 萬輛同 229.7 萬輛，同比增長 8.2% 同 8.3%——市場係回暖，但回暖得好慢。與之相伴嘅係價格戰嘅硝煙愈濃：單車利潤被不斷壓縮，新能源轉型又需要持續燒錢投入研發同產線，車企一邊要降本求生，一邊要砸錢轉型，“活下去、守份額”成為頭部陣營普遍嘅生存狀態。

就喺一片“唱衰”聲中，上汽商用車跑咗出讓人側目嘅獨立曲線：1-6 月銷量同比增長 28.37%，約為行業均值嘅 3.4 倍，係頭部陣營中唯一同時實現“規模做大 + 增速斷層領跑”雙重優勢嘅企業。其中，上汽大通作為板塊核心力量，上半年累計銷售 13.8 萬輛，商用車增速達 35.36%，係行業前十陣營中唯一增速超過 35% 嘅企業。

輕客守住基本盤，新能源同出海打開第二增長曲線

商用車行業嘅存量博弈，本質上係一場“基本盤保衛戰”。誰嘅基本盤穩，誰嘅轉型就有底氣。

上汽商用車嘅底氣，首先來自輕客。

上半年，大通輕客累計銷售 6.1 萬輛，包攬單月與累計銷量“雙冠王”，單一品牌市佔率突破 27%，領先行業第二名 7200 輛、第三名超萬輛。6 月大通輕客單月銷量 13902 輛，同比增長 62%；其中大拿系列 6 月熱銷 7207 輛，同比暴漲 218%，成為新能源輕客賽道嘅現象級爆款。

但真正讓上汽商用車與同行拉開代差嘅，係新能源與出海嘅雙引擎驅動。

新能源端，上汽商用車上半年新能源銷量同比增長 69%，國內新能源滲透率達 47%，遠超行業 30.4% 嘅整體水平。躍進新能源輕卡上半年銷售 12971 輛，同比增長 65%；大拿超級增程輕客 CLTC 綜合續航達 1260 公里，百公里能耗低至 2.65L——這組數據直接擊穿咗商用用戶最敏感嘅“續航焦慮”同“運營成本”兩根神經。

出海端，上半年上汽商用車累計出口 6.5 萬輛，同比增長 33%。喺希臘，大通份額較去歲同期翻四倍；喺新加坡，連續三月市佔率登頂；喺東南亞，接連斬獲新能源輕客大訂單；並成為首個入駐 DHL 德國郵政投遞車隊嘅中國商用車品牌。

上汽商用車執行管理會主席、上汽大通總經理楊懷景喺 2026 上汽大通幹部大會上嘅一段話，恰好解釋咗呢套打法嘅底層邏輯：“產品係企業發展嘅核心根基，更係二次創業實現價值突圍嘅關鍵抓手。行業嘅價格競爭最終將回歸商品價值本身，TCO 全生命週期成本更優、TVO 全生命週期價值更高嘅產品將更受市場青睞。”

從“賣車”到“經營用戶”，體系化能力構建護城河

如果話輕客、新能源、出海係上汽商用車上半年嘅“三張報表”，那麼支撐呢三張報表嘅，係一套從技術自研到全球本土化嘅體系化能力。

技術上，上汽商用車冇走業界普遍“外購三電”嘅捷徑，而是依托鴻圖 2.0 超級商用電動架構、星棧皮卡平台等自研核心平台，搭建起純電、插混、氫燃料、超級增程嘅全能源技術路線。2026 年落地嘅星湃超級 mini 增程技術、同寧德時代共研嘅天行電池技術，分別解決咗續航、能耗、安全三大行業痛點。這種“把核心技術攥喺自己手裡”嘅策略，讓上汽商用車喺新能源轉型中唔被供应商卡脖子。

全球化上，上汽商用車已經完成從“產品出海”到“體系化出海”嘅迭代。目前，其產品覆蓋全球百餘個國家同地區，喺核心市場搭建咗本土化銷售、服務、改裝全鏈條體系。楊懷景喺北京車展上面對 100 多個國家嘅 200 余家海外經銷商時明確表示：“我哋唔僅僅跟隨市場嘅腳步，更要同各位攜手，共同定義全球出行嘅未來。” 喺另一場戰略發布會上，佢更加直白地闡述咗“唔打價格戰”嘅全球策略：“上汽商用車班子里，唔少人係商用車領域嘅新兵，也有老将，新兵同老將，才能更好地協同高效破界。我哋唔會放棄任何一個板塊，握指成拳，五個手指齊全握緊打出嚟先最有勁。”

生態上，上汽商用車搭建咗全球改裝生態聯盟、8S 全場景用戶體驗中心，業界首創皮卡“7 天免費試用”模式，把傳統嘅“賣車關係”升級為“創富夥伴關係”。

睇返 2026 年上半年嘅商用車市場，“內冷外熱”係表象，“價格戰向價值戰重構”先至係本質。中汽協預測 2026 年全年商用車銷量將達 450 萬輛，同比僅小幅增長 4.7%——這意味著存量博弈將成為新常態，靠水漲船高普漲嘅日子一去唔返。

喺呢個新常態下，上汽商用車用 28.37% 嘅增速、約為行業 3.4 倍嘅增長曲線證明咗一件事：存量市場唔係冇機會，而係機會只畀畀嗰啲提前完成動能轉換嘅企業。

喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好買家喺揀車嗰陣都會拿 波德亞 亞魯斯 同 豐田 科羅拉 Cross 嚟做比較。呢兩部車喺價錢同定位上都幾接近嘅，而家我哋就由多個方面做個詳細比較，幫你節省做功課嘅時間。

價錢同版本

波德亞 亞魯斯 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 72,900 - 77,900，合共 2 個版本，包括 1.5L X（RM 72,900）、1.5L AV（RM 77,900） 等。

豐田 科羅拉 Cross 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 133,800 - 148,800，合共 3 個版本，包括 2026 HEV 1.8L GR Sport（RM 148,800）、2026 HEV 1.8L Standard（RM 140,800）、2026 1.8L Standard（RM 133,800） 等。

由價錢嚟睇，波德亞 亞魯斯嘅起跳價真係比 豐田 科羅拉 Cross 平咗 RM 60,900。如果你預算有限，波德亞嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需要。但都要注意，平嗰幾千塊，可能喺配備上有取捨，具體要睇你嘅需求。

空間同舒適度

波德亞 亞魯斯 車身長 4400 mm，行李箱 400 L。

豐田 科羅拉 Cross 車身長 4400 mm，行李箱 400 L。

兩部車嘅尺寸幾乎一樣，車內空間分別唔大。呢個級別嘅車，日常使用完全夠用。

配備同科技

波德亞 亞魯斯 採用 FWD 驅動方式。

豐田 科羅拉 Cross 採用 FWD 驅動方式。

兩部車嘅驅動方式一樣，都係 FWD，日常駕駛感受唔會有太大分別。

適合邊種人

波德亞 亞魯斯 同 豐田 科羅拉 Cross 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更重視品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，嗰就揀配置更豐富嗰款。最終都好建議兩部都去試駕，親身體驗先係最重要。

總結

總體嚟講，波德亞 亞魯斯 同 豐田 科羅拉 Cross 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵仲係要睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。

In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers compare Perodua Aruz and Honda HR-V when choosing a car. The pricing and positioning of these two models are quite similar. Today we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to save you the time of research.

Price and Variants

The OTR price of Perodua Aruz in Malaysia is RM 72,900 - 77,900, with a total of 2 variants, including 1.5L X (RM 72,900), 1.5L AV (RM 77,900), etc.

The OTR price of Honda HR-V in Malaysia is RM 115,900 - 143,900, with a total of 4 variants, including 2026 e:HEV 1.5L RS (RM 143,900), 2026 1.5T V (RM 137,900), 2026 1.5T E (RM 130,900), etc.

From a pricing perspective, the starting price of Perodua Aruz is indeed RM 43,000 cheaper than Honda HR-V. If your budget is limited, Perodua's entry-level model can already meet daily needs. However, keep in mind that the money saved might involve trade-offs in features, depending on your specific requirements.

Safety Features

Perodua Aruz safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include.

Honda HR-V safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include Honda SENSING (ACC, CMBS, LKAS, RDM).

Both cars have the same safety rating, and safety features in this segment are quite comprehensive. New cars nowadays generally have good safety standards, so no need to worry too much about this.

Space and Comfort

Perodua Aruz body length is 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.

Honda HR-V body length is 4500 mm, trunk 450 L.

Regarding space, Honda HR-V is 100 mm longer than Perodua Aruz, offering more seating space advantage. However, Perodua Aruz is slightly more flexible for parking in the city, each has its trade-offs.

Maintenance and Service

Perodua Aruz warranty is 5 years/150,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.

Honda HR-V warranty is 5 years/unlimited mileage, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.

Who is it suitable for?

Perodua Aruz and Honda HR-V are both mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, you can prioritize the one with better reputation; if you care more about cost-performance ratio and features, choose the one with richer configuration. Ultimately, it is recommended to test drive both models, as personal experience is the most important.

Conclusion

Overall, Perodua Aruz and Honda HR-V are both very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends primarily on your personal needs and budget. It is suggested to do your research, compare quotes from several car dealerships, and then test drive to make the final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending time on research will definitely not be wrong.

In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers compare Perodua Ativa and Proton X90 when choosing a car.

Price and Versions

Perodua Ativa's OTR price in Malaysia is RM 62,500 - 73,400, with a total of 3 versions, including 1.0L Turbo X (RM 62,500), 1.0L Turbo H (RM 67,300), 1.0L Turbo AV (RM 73,400), etc.

Proton X90's OTR price in Malaysia is RM 106,800 - 122,800, with a total of 4 versions, including 2026 1.5T Prime X (RM 122,800), 2026 1.5T Prime (RM 116,800), 2026 1.5T Lite (RM 106,800), etc.

From a price perspective, Perodua Ativa's starting price is indeed cheaper than Proton X90 by RM 44,300. If your budget is limited, Perodua's entry version can already meet daily needs. However, also note that the difference of a few thousand Ringgit might involve trade-offs in features, specifically depending on your needs.

Power and Fuel Consumption

Perodua Ativa features a 1.5L 4-cylinder, with 105 hp. Official fuel consumption is 6.0 L/100km.

Proton X90 features a 1.5L Turbo, with 140 hp. Official fuel consumption is 7.0 L/100km.

In terms of power, Proton X90's 1.5L Turbo has 35 more horsepower than Perodua Ativa's 1.5L 4-cyl. However, for daily city driving, both cars have sufficient power, you won't feel like they lack power.

Safety Features

Perodua Ativa safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include ASA 3.0 + ACC + LDA + LKA + BSM + RCTA.

Proton X90 safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).

Both cars have the same safety rating, the safety features are quite comprehensive for this segment. New cars nowadays are generally safe, no need to worry too much about this.

Features and Technology

Perodua Ativa adopts FWD drivetrain.

Proton X90 adopts FWD drivetrain.

Both cars have the same drivetrain, both are FWD, daily driving experience will not differ significantly.

Who is it suitable for?

Perodua Ativa and Proton X90 are both mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale price more, you can prioritize the one with better reputation; if you care more about cost-performance and features, then choose the one with richer configuration. Ultimately it is recommended to test drive both, as personal experience is the most important.

Conclusion

In general, Perodua Ativa and Proton X90 are both very good models in the Malaysian market. Choosing which one depends mainly on your personal needs and budget. We suggest doing your research, compare quotes from several dealers, and then test drive to make the final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending some time researching is never a mistake.

喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拎 Proton X70 同 Subaru Crosstrek 黎比較。呢兩部車喺價錢同定位上都幾接近，今日我哋就從多個方面做一個詳細嘅比較，幫你節省做功課嘅時間。

價錢同版本

Proton X70 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 106,800 - 122,300，一共有 3 個版本，包括 1.5L Standard 2WD（RM 106,800）、1.5L Executive 2WD（RM 115,800）、1.5L Premium 2WD（RM 122,300） 等。

Subaru Crosstrek 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 145,000 - 160,000，一共有 1 個版本，包括 2.0L e-Boxer（RM 150,000） 等。

由價錢睇，Proton X70 嘅起步價確實比 Subaru Crosstrek 平咗 RM 38,200。如果你預算有限，Proton 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需求。但都要注意，平嗰幾千塊，可能喺配備上有取舍，具體要睇你嘅需求。

動力同油耗

Proton X70 搭載 1.5L Turbo，馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。

Subaru Crosstrek 搭載 1.5L Turbo，馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。

兩款車用嘅係同一套動力系統，日常開起嚟嘅感受基本冇分別。油耗方面也差唔多，唔使太糾結這一點。

安全配備

Proton X70 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA)。

Subaru Crosstrek 嘅安全評級係 5★ (Euro NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 EyeSight。

安全配備方面，兩款車都拿到唔錯嘅評級。不過 Proton X70 嘅 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA) 同 Subaru Crosstrek 嘅 EyeSight 喺功能上有啲差異，如果你比較重視主動安全嘅話，可以仔細對比一下兩者嘅功能清單。

空間同舒適度

Proton X70 車身長 4400 mm，車尾箱 400 L。

Subaru Crosstrek 車身長 4400 mm，車尾箱 400 L。

兩款車嘅尺寸幾乎一樣，車內空間差別唔大。呢個級別嘅車，日常使用完全夠用。

配備同科技

Proton X70 採用 FWD 驅動方式。

Subaru Crosstrek 採用 FWD 驅動方式。

兩款車嘅驅動方式一樣，都係 FWD，日常駕駛感受唔會有太大區別。

總結

總體嚟講，Proton X70 同 Subaru Crosstrek 都係馬來西亞市場好唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一部，關鍵仲係要睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做足功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係一件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。

喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會揾 Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV 同 Volkswagen Tiguan 嚟做比較。這兩款車喺價位同定位上都幾接近，今日我哋就從多個方面做一個詳細嘅比較，幫你節省做功課嘅時間。

價錢同版本

Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 159,750 - 159,750，一共有 2 個版本，包括 1.6L Turbo Standard（RM 130,000）、1.6L Turbo Premium（RM 145,000）等。

Volkswagen Tiguan 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 206,540 - 260,024，一共有 2 個版本，包括 2025 Allspace 2.0T R-Line（RM 260,024）、2025 Allspace 1.4T Elegance（RM 206,540）等。

由價錢嚟睇，Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV 嘅起跳價確實比 Volkswagen Tiguan 平咗 RM 46,790。如果你預算有限，Chery 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需要。但都要留意，平嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備上會有取舍，具體就要睇你嘅需要。

動力同油耗

Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV 搭載 Hybrid，馬力 170 hp。官方油耗 4.5 L/100km。

Volkswagen Tiguan 搭載 2.0L 4-cyl，馬力 170 hp。官方油耗 8.0 L/100km。

動力方面，Volkswagen Tiguan 嘅 2.0L 4-cyl 比 Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV 嘅 Hybrid 多咗 0 匹馬力。不過日常喺市區開，兩款車嘅動力都夠用，唔會覺得唔夠力。

安全配備

Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV 嘅安全評級係 TBD，主動安全系統包括 Basic。

Volkswagen Tiguan 嘅安全評級係 5★ (Euro NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 IQ.Drive。

安全配備方面，兩款車都拿到唔錯嘅評級。不過 Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV 嘅 Basic 同 Volkswagen Tiguan 嘅 IQ.Drive 喺功能上有啲差異，如果你比較睇重主動安全嘅話，可以仔細對比下兩者嘅功能列表。

空間同舒適度

Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV 車身長 4400 mm，行李廂 400 L。

Volkswagen Tiguan 車身長 4400 mm，行李廂 400 L。

兩款車嘅尺寸幾乎一樣，車內空間差別唔大。呢個級別嘅車，日常使用完全夠用。

配備同科技

Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV 採用 FWD 驅動方式。

Volkswagen Tiguan 採用 FWD 驅動方式。

兩款車嘅驅動方式一樣，都係 FWD，日常駕駛感受唔會有太大分別。

總結

總體嚟講，Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV 同 Volkswagen Tiguan 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊架，關鍵都係睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去做試駕先做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。

喺馬來西亞嘅轎車市場，好多人喺揀車嗰陣都拎 Honda Civic 同 Toyota Corolla 嚟做比較。這兩款車喺價位同定位上都幾接近，而家我哋就从多個方面做一个詳細對比，幫你省咗做功課嘅時間。

價錢同版本

Honda Civic 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 133,900 - 167,900，一共有 5 個版本，包括 2025 e:HEV 2.0L RS（RM 167,900）、2025 1.5T RS（RM 149,900）、2025 1.5T V（RM 144,900） 等。

Toyota Corolla 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 144,800 - 149,800，一共有 2 個版本，包括 2026 1.8L GR Sport（RM 149,800）、2026 1.8L G（RM 144,800） 等。

從價錢嚟睇，Honda Civic 嘅起步價確實比 Toyota Corolla 平咗 RM 10,900。如果你預算有限，Honda 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需求。但都要留意，平嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備上會有取捨，具體要看你嘅需求。

動力同油耗

Honda Civic 搭載 1.5L Turbo，馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。

Toyota Corolla 搭載 1.5L Turbo，馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。

兩款車用嘅係同一套動力系統，日常開起嚟嘅感受基本冇分別。油耗方面都差唔多，唔使太糾結這一點。

空間同舒適度

Honda Civic 車身長 4450 mm，車尾箱 470 L。

Toyota Corolla 車身長 4400 mm，車尾箱 400 L。

空間方面，Honda Civic 嘅車身比 Toyota Corolla 長咗 50 mm，車內乘坐空間會稍微寬鬆啲，尤其係後座腿部空間。如果你經常載家人或者需要放嬰兒車，大少少嘅車身確實更實用。

適合咩人

Honda Civic 同 Toyota Corolla 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更睇重品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰一款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，就揀配置更豐富嗰款。最終都係建議兩款都去試駕，親身體驗先最重要。

總結

總嘅嚟講，Honda Civic 同 Toyota Corolla 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵都要睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。

喺馬來西亞嘅汽車市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拿寶騰 X90 同 奇瑞 Tiggo Cross 嚟做比較。今日我哋由多個方面嚟做一個詳細嘅對比，幫你省返做功課嘅時間。

價錢同版本

寶騰 X90 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 106,800 - 122,800，一總有 4 個版本，包括 2026 1.5T Prime X（RM 122,800）、2026 1.5T Prime（RM 116,800）、2026 1.5T Lite（RM 106,800） 等。

奇瑞 Tiggo Cross 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 88,750 - 99,750，一總有 2 個版本，包括 2025 HEV 1.5L CSH（RM 99,750）、2025 1.5T Standard（RM 88,750） 等。

從價錢嚟睇，奇瑞 Tiggo Cross 嘅起步價比寶騰 X90 平咗 RM 18,050。講真，喺呢個價碼段，幾千蚊嘅差別其實唔算大，重點始終係睇整體嘅性價比同長期使用成本。

安全配備

寶騰 X90 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA)。

奇瑞 Tiggo Cross 嘅安全評級係 TBD，主動安全系統包括 Basic。

安全配備方面，兩款車都拿到唔錯嘅評級。不過寶騰 X90 嘅 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA) 同 奇瑞 Tiggo Cross 嘅 Basic 喺功能上有啲分別，如果你比較重視主動安全嘅話，可以仔細對比一下兩者嘅功能清單。

空間同舒適度

寶騰 X90 車身長 4400 mm，行李箱 400 L。

奇瑞 Tiggo Cross 車身長 4400 mm，行李箱 400 L。

兩款車嘅尺寸差唔多，車內空間分別唔大。呢個級別嘅車，日常使用絕對夠用。

保養同維修

寶騰 X90 保固 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。

奇瑞 Tiggo Cross 保固 3 年/100,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。

總結

總括嚟講，寶騰 X90 同 奇瑞 Tiggo Cross 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵始終係睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，先試駕先做最終決定。買車係一件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。

喺馬來西亞嘅汽車市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拿 Mazda CX-3 同 Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV 做比較。今日我哋從多個方面做一個詳細嘅比較，幫您節省做功課嘅時間。

價錢同版本

Mazda CX-3 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 126,159 - 139,159，一共有 2 個版本，包括 2023 2.0L High（RM 139,159）、2023 2.0L Plus（RM 126,159） 等。

Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 159,750 - 159,750，一共有 2 個版本，包括 1.6L Turbo Standard（RM 130,000）、1.6L Turbo Premium（RM 145,000） 等。

就價錢嚟睇，Mazda CX-3 嘅入門價確實比 Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV 平咗 RM 33,591。如果你預算有限，Mazda 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需要。但亦都要留意，平嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備上會有取捨，具體要睇你嘅需要。

動力同油耗

Mazda CX-3 搭載 1.5L Turbo，馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。

Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV 搭載 Hybrid，馬力 170 hp。官方油耗 4.5 L/100km。

動力方面，Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV 嘅 Hybrid 比 Mazda CX-3 嘅 1.5L Turbo 多出 30 匹馬力。不過日常喺市區開嘅話，兩款車嘅動力都夠用，唔會覺得唔夠力。

空間同舒適度

Mazda CX-3 車身長 4500 mm，尾箱 450 L。

Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV 車身長 4400 mm，尾箱 400 L。

空間方面，Mazda CX-3 嘅車身比 Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV 長咗 100 mm，車內乘坐空間會稍微闊綽少少，尤其係後座腿部空間。如果你經常載家人或者需要放嬰兒車，大少少嘅車身確實更實用。

保養同維護

Mazda CX-3 保養保修 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。

Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV 保養保修 3 年/100,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。

總結

總括嚟講，Mazda CX-3 同 Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV 都係馬來西亞市場好好唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵仲要睇你嘅個人需要同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，先去試駕先做最後決定。買車係大件事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。