首頁Toyota RAV4
搜尋歷史
熱門搜尋
經銷商登入 / 註冊
【CNMO科技消息】8月14日，@极氪Zeekr 宣布：极氪品牌澳大利亚累计交付突破10000辆；1月-7月，极氪登顶澳洲豪华纯电销量NO.1；极氪7X稳居澳洲中型豪华SUV销冠。
极氪7X
据CNMO科技了解，知名橄榄球运动员Steven Leigh Johnson成为澳大利亚第10000位极氪车主，极氪整车研究院院长徐云为其交付极氪7X。
除澳洲市场外，马来西亚市场也达成5000辆品牌交付里程碑，稳居马来西亚豪华纯电品牌销冠，以及中国香港豪华品牌销量NO.1。
海外热销态势的背后，是极氪7X强劲的全球产品竞争力。极氪7X 7月全球交付10253台。产品层面，极氪7X全系搭载900V高压平台，覆盖电机、电控和热管理系统。电池方面提供两种选择：75kWh神盾金砖电池支持10分钟补能425公里，103kWh麒麟电池的CLTC续航最高可达802公里。四驱版峰值功率585kW，扭矩812N·m，0到100km/h加速仅需2.98秒，最高车速255km/h。
智能上，极氪7X标配Thor-U芯片，算力达700TOPS，配合激光雷达和千里浩瀚H7系统，支持车位到车位领航、自动泊车等功能。
In Malaysia's SUV market, many buyers compare Proton X90 and Chery Tiggo Cross when choosing a car. These two models are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
The OTR price for Proton X90 in Malaysia is RM 106,800 - 122,800, with a total of 4 versions, including 2026 1.5T Prime X (RM 122,800), 2026 1.5T Prime (RM 116,800), 2026 1.5T Lite (RM 106,800), etc.
The OTR price for Chery Tiggo Cross in Malaysia is RM 88,750 - 99,750, with a total of 2 versions, including 2025 HEV 1.5L CSH (RM 99,750), 2025 1.5T Standard (RM 88,750), etc.
From a price perspective, the starting price of Chery Tiggo Cross is RM 18,050 cheaper than Proton X90. Honestly, at this price point, a difference of a few thousand isn't really that big; the key is looking at overall value for money and long-term running costs.
Proton X90 is equipped with a 1.5L Turbo, 140 hp. Official fuel consumption 7.0 L/100km.
Chery Tiggo Cross is equipped with a 1.5L 4-cyl, 105 hp. Official fuel consumption 6.0 L/100km.
Regarding power, Proton X90's 1.5L Turbo has 35 hp more than Chery Tiggo Cross's 1.5L 4-cyl, offering more confidence in mid-range acceleration, especially when overtaking on the highway. However, Chery Tiggo Cross's fuel consumption might be more friendly, with little difference in daily city commuting.
Proton X90 warranty 5 years/150,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Chery Tiggo Cross warranty 3 years/100,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Proton X90 and Chery Tiggo Cross are both mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, you can prioritize the one with better reputation; if you care more about value for money and features, choose the one with richer configuration. Ultimately, it is recommended to test drive both, as personal experience is the most important.
Overall, Proton X90 and Chery Tiggo Cross are both very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends on your personal needs and budget. We suggest doing your research, comparing quotes from several car dealerships, and then test driving to make a final decision. Buying a car is a big deal; taking time to do research will never be wrong.
In Malaysia's SUV market, many buyers compare Proton X90 and Mazda CX-3 when choosing a car. These two models are quite close in price and positioning. Today we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
Proton X90's OTR price in Malaysia is RM 106,800 - 122,800, with a total of 4 versions, including 2026 1.5T Prime X (RM 122,800), 2026 1.5T Prime (RM 116,800), 2026 1.5T Lite (RM 106,800), etc.
Mazda CX-3's OTR price in Malaysia is RM 126,159 - 139,159, with a total of 2 versions, including 2023 2.0L High (RM 139,159), 2023 2.0L Plus (RM 126,159), etc.
From the price perspective, Proton X90's starting price is indeed RM 19,359 cheaper than Mazda CX-3. If your budget is limited, Proton's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. But also note, the few thousand cheaper might involve trade-offs in features, it depends on your specific needs.
Proton X90's safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
Mazda CX-3's safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include i-Activsense.
The safety ratings for both cars are the same, safety features are quite comprehensive for this class. New cars nowadays are not lacking in safety, no need to worry too much about this point.
Proton X90 body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
Mazda CX-3 body length 4500 mm, trunk 450 L.
In terms of space, Mazda CX-3's body is 100 mm longer than Proton X90, with an advantage in seating space. However, Proton X90 is a bit more flexible to park in the city, both have trade-offs.
Proton X90 warranty 5 years/150,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Mazda CX-3 warranty 5 years/150,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Warranty conditions for both cars are the same, no need to worry about this aspect. Actual maintenance costs depend on the brand's service network and parts prices, suggest asking real owners in car owner groups for experience.
Proton X90 and Mazda CX-3 are both mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use, daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, prioritize the one with better reputation; if you care more about value for money and features, choose the one with richer configuration. Ultimately suggest test driving both, personal experience is most important.
Overall, Proton X90 and Mazda CX-3 are both quite good car models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose, it ultimately depends on your personal needs and budget. Suggest everyone do their homework, compare quotes from several dealerships, then go for a test drive to make the final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending time on research is never wrong.
In Malaysia's SUV market, many buyers compare the Proton X70 and Subaru Crosstrek when choosing a car. These two models are quite close in price and positioning. Today we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to save you time doing your research.
The OTR price for the Proton X70 in Malaysia is RM 106,800 - 122,300, with a total of 3 versions, including 1.5L Standard 2WD (RM 106,800), 1.5L Executive 2WD (RM 115,800), 1.5L Premium 2WD (RM 122,300), etc.
The OTR price for the Subaru Crosstrek in Malaysia is RM 145,000 - 160,000, with a total of 1 version, including 2.0L e-Boxer (RM 150,000), etc.
From a price perspective, the starting price of the Proton X70 is indeed RM 38,200 cheaper than the Subaru Crosstrek. If your budget is limited, the Proton entry-level version is sufficient for daily needs. However, be aware that the saving of a few thousand might involve trade-offs in features, depending on your specific needs.
The Proton X70 is equipped with a 1.5L Turbo, with 140 hp. Official fuel consumption is 7.0 L/100km.
The Subaru Crosstrek is equipped with a 1.5L Turbo, with 140 hp. Official fuel consumption is 7.0 L/100km.
Both cars use the same powertrain, and the driving feel is basically the same daily. Fuel consumption is also similar, no need to worry too much about this point.
The safety rating for the Proton X70 is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
The safety rating for the Subaru Crosstrek is 5★ (Euro NCAP), active safety system includes EyeSight.
Regarding safety features, both cars have received good ratings. However, the Proton X70's ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA) and Subaru Crosstrek's EyeSight have some differences in functionality. If you value active safety highly, you can compare their feature lists carefully.
The Proton X70 body length is 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
The Subaru Crosstrek body length is 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
The dimensions of both cars are almost the same, and the interior space difference is not significant. For cars in this class, it is fully sufficient for daily use.
The Proton X70 adopts FWD drive method.
The Subaru Crosstrek adopts FWD drive method.
The drive method of both cars is the same, both are FWD, there will not be a big difference in daily driving feel.
Overall, the Proton X70 and Subaru Crosstrek are both very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose, the key is still to look at your personal needs and budget. It is recommended to do your research, compare quotes from several dealerships, and then test drive to make a final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending some time researching will never be wrong.
In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers compare Proton X70 and Subaru Forester when choosing a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will conduct a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
The Proton X70 OTR selling price in Malaysia is RM 106,800 - 122,300. There are 3 versions in total, including 1.5L Standard 2WD (RM 106,800), 1.5L Executive 2WD (RM 115,800), 1.5L Premium 2WD (RM 122,300), etc.
The Subaru Forester OTR selling price in Malaysia is RM 174,000 - 197,000. There are 3 versions in total, including 2024 2.0L S EyeSight GT Edition (RM 189,538), 2024 2.0L S EyeSight (RM 177,538), 2024 2.0L L EyeSight (RM 167,538), etc.
From a price perspective, the starting price of Proton X70 is indeed RM 67,200 cheaper than Subaru Forester. If your budget is limited, Proton's entry-level version is already sufficient for daily needs. However, be aware that the few thousand ringgit difference might involve trade-offs in equipment, depending on your needs.
Proton X70 is equipped with a 1.5L Turbo, 140 hp. Official fuel consumption 7.0 L/100km.
Subaru Forester is equipped with a 2.0L 4-cyl, 170 hp. Official fuel consumption 8.0 L/100km.
In terms of power, Subaru Forester's 2.0L 4-cyl has 30 more horsepower than Proton X70's 1.5L Turbo. However, for daily city driving, the power of both cars is sufficient and will not feel lacking.
Proton X70 adopts FWD drive mode.
Subaru Forester adopts FWD drive mode.
The drive mode of both cars is the same, both are FWD, there will not be much difference in daily driving experience.
Proton X70 warranty 5 years/150,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Subaru Forester warranty 3 years/100,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Proton X70 and Subaru Forester are both mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, you can prioritize the one with better reputation; if you care more about cost-performance ratio and features, then choose the one with richer configurations. Ultimately it is recommended to test drive both, as personal experience is the most important.
Overall, Proton X70 and Subaru Forester are both very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends on your personal needs and budget. It is recommended that everyone do their homework, compare quotes from several dealerships, and then go for a test drive to make the final decision. Buying a car is a major matter, spending time doing homework will never be wrong.
In Malaysia's SUV market, many buyers compare Proton X70 and Kia Sportage when choosing a car. These two models are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
The Proton X70 OTR price in Malaysia is RM 106,800 - 122,300, with a total of 3 versions, including 1.5L Standard 2WD (RM 106,800), 1.5L Executive 2WD (RM 115,800), 1.5L Premium 2WD (RM 122,300), etc.
The Kia Sportage OTR price in Malaysia is RM 129,639 - 179,320, with a total of 4 versions, including 2025 1.6T DCT 4WD High (RM 179,320), 2025 1.6T DCT 2WD High (RM 159,320), 2025 2.0L AT 2WD High (RM 139,639), etc.
In terms of price, the starting price of Proton X70 is indeed RM 22,839 cheaper than Kia Sportage. If your budget is limited, Proton's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. But keep in mind, the few thousand savings might involve trade-offs in features, depending on your specific needs.
Proton X70 is equipped with 1.5L Turbo, horsepower 140 hp. Official fuel consumption 7.0 L/100km.
Kia Sportage is equipped with 1.5L Turbo, horsepower 140 hp. Official fuel consumption 7.0 L/100km.
Both cars use the same powertrain, and the driving experience feels basically the same. Fuel consumption is also similar, so there's no need to worry too much about this point.
Proton X70 adopts FWD drive method.
Kia Sportage adopts FWD drive method.
Both cars have the same drive method, both are FWD, and there won't be much difference in daily driving experience.
Proton X70 warranty 5 years/150,000km, service interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Kia Sportage warranty 5 years/300,000km, service interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Proton X70 and Kia Sportage are both mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, you can prioritize the one with better reputation; if you care more about cost-performance and features, choose the one with richer configurations. Ultimately, it is recommended to test drive both, personal experience is the most important.
Overall, Proton X70 and Kia Sportage are both very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose ultimately depends on your personal needs and budget. It is recommended to do your research, compare quotes from multiple dealers, and then test drive to make the final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending some time on research will never be wrong.
In the SUV market in Malaysia, many buyers compare the Proton X70 and Chery Tiggo 8 when choosing a car. Both cars are quite similar in price and positioning. Today, we will do a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
The OTR selling price of the Proton X70 in Malaysia is RM 106,800 - 122,300, with a total of 3 versions, including 1.5L Standard 2WD (RM 106,800), 1.5L Executive 2WD (RM 115,800), 1.5L Premium 2WD (RM 122,300) etc.
The OTR selling price of the Chery Tiggo 8 in Malaysia is RM 129,750 - 129,750, with a total of 1 version, including 2026 1.6T Standard (RM 129,750) etc.
From the price perspective, the starting price of the Proton X70 is indeed RM 22,950 cheaper than the Chery Tiggo 8. If your budget is limited, Proton's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. But also note, the price difference of a few thousand might involve compromises in features, depending on your specific needs.
The Proton X70 is equipped with a 1.5L Turbo, 140 hp. Official fuel consumption 7.0 L/100km.
The Chery Tiggo 8 is equipped with a 1.5L Turbo, 140 hp. Official fuel consumption 7.0 L/100km.
Both cars use the same powertrain system, the driving feel is basically no difference in daily use. Fuel consumption is also about the same, no need to dwell on this too much.
The safety rating of the Proton X70 is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
The safety rating of the Chery Tiggo 8 is TBD, active safety systems include Basic.
In terms of safety features, both cars have received decent ratings. However, there are some differences in function between Proton X70's ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA) and Chery Tiggo 8's Basic. If you value active safety more, you can carefully compare the feature lists of both.
Proton X70 warranty 5 years/150,000 km, service interval every 10,000 km or 6 months.
Chery Tiggo 8 warranty 3 years/100,000 km, service interval every 10,000 km or 6 months.
Both Proton X70 and Chery Tiggo 8 are mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, you can prioritize the one with better reputation; if you care more about cost-performance ratio and features, choose the one with more features. Ultimately it is recommended to test drive both, personal experience is the most important.
Overall, both Proton X70 and Chery Tiggo 8 are very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends on your personal needs and budget. It is recommended that everyone does their homework, compares quotes from multiple dealerships, and then test drives to make the final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending time on research will definitely not go wrong.
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拿 Proton X70 同 Mazda CX-8 嚟做比較。呢兩款車喺價位同定位上都幾近，今日我哋就由多個方面做一個詳細嘅比較，幫你省返做功課嘅時間。
Proton X70 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 106,800 - 122,300，一共有 3 個版本，包括 1.5L Standard 2WD（RM 106,800）、1.5L Executive 2WD（RM 115,800）、1.5L Premium 2WD（RM 122,300） 等。
Mazda CX-8 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 165,360 - 201,360，一共有 5 個版本，包括 2025 2.5T 4WD High Plus Petrol（RM 201,360）、2025 2.2L 2WD High Plus Diesel（RM 193,123）、2025 2.5L 2WD High Plus Petrol（RM 186,360） 等。
由價錢睇落嚟，Proton X70 嘅起價確實比 Mazda CX-8 平咗 RM 58,560。如果你預算有限，Proton 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需要。但亦都要注意，平嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備上會有取捨，具體要睇你嘅需要。
Proton X70 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA)。
Mazda CX-8 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 Brand ADAS。
兩款車嘅安全評級一樣，喺呢個級別入面安全配備都算好齊全。而家嘅新車安全性都唔差，唔使太擔心呢一點。
Proton X70 車身長 4400 mm，尾箱 400 L。
Mazda CX-8 車身長 4500 mm，尾箱 450 L。
空間方面，Mazda CX-8 嘅車身比 Proton X70 長咗 100 mm，乘坐空間更有優勢。不過 Proton X70 喺城市入面停車會靈活少少，各有取捨。
Proton X70 保養 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Mazda CX-8 保養 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
兩款車嘅保養條件一樣，呢方面唔使糾結。實際保養成本仲要睇品牌嘅服務網絡同零件價格，建議去車友群問問真實車主嘅經驗。
總括嚟講，Proton X70 同 Mazda CX-8 都係馬來西亞市場好唔錯嘅車型。揀邊台，關鍵都要睇你嘅個人需要同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再跟住去試車做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
In Malaysia's SUV market, many buyers compare Proton X70 and Mazda CX-5 when choosing a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning. Today we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
The OTR selling price of Proton X70 in Malaysia is RM 106,800 - 122,300, with a total of 3 versions, including 1.5L Standard 2WD (RM 106,800), 1.5L Executive 2WD (RM 115,800), 1.5L Premium 2WD (RM 122,300), etc.
The OTR selling price of Mazda CX-5 in Malaysia is RM 135,469 - 166,760, with a total of 3 versions, including 2025 2.0L AT 35th Anniversary (RM 316,154), 2025 2.0L AT (RM 296,154), 2025 2.0L MT (RM 294,154), etc.
In terms of price, Proton X70's starting price is indeed RM 28,669 cheaper than Mazda CX-5. If your budget is limited, Proton's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. But you should also note that the savings of a few thousand Ringgit might involve trade-offs in features, depending on your specific needs.
Proton X70's safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
Mazda CX-5's safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include.
Both cars have the same safety rating, and safety features in this class are quite comprehensive. New cars nowadays are not lacking in safety, so there is no need to worry too much about this point.
Proton X70 body length is 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
Mazda CX-5 body length is 4500 mm, trunk 450 L.
In terms of space, Mazda CX-5's body is 100 mm longer than Proton X70, offering an advantage in passenger space. However, Proton X70 is slightly more flexible for parking in the city; there are trade-offs for each.
Proton X70 uses FWD drive system.
Mazda CX-5 uses FWD drive system.
Both cars have the same drive system, both are FWD, so there won't be much difference in daily driving experience.
Overall, Proton X70 and Mazda CX-5 are both very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose ultimately depends on your personal needs and budget. We suggest you do your homework, compare quotes from several dealerships, and then go for a test drive to make a final decision. Buying a car is a big matter; spending some time doing research will never be wrong.
距離五菱代步車累計銷量突破 300 萬台，只差最後一小步。上汽通用五菱近期官方宣佈，呢個里程碑好快就會到來。趁住呢個節點，五菱同步推進兩件事：一款新車登陸印尼市場，一場車主盛典即將喺成都舉辦。
7 月 29 日，印尼國際車展上，第五代宏光 MINIEV 以另一個名字正式亮相——Wuling Aira EV。官方售價 1.55 億印尼盾起，約合人民幣 5.96 萬元。四門四座，純電代步，定位直指職場新人、年輕家庭嘅第一台車，亦瞄準成熟家庭嘅增購代步需求。
而且第五代宏光 MINIEV 喺印尼嘅登場方式比較有趣：佢哋聯手迪士尼·皮克斯《玩具總動員 5》玩起咗跨界聯動，吸引咗大量當地消費者嘅關注。
回顧歷史，2017 年，寶駿 E100 同 E200 試水代步車市場。2020 年，宏光 MINIEV 橫空出世。嗰陣無人想到，呢台看起來像“方糖”嘅小車，會喺之後嘅日子入連續 71 個月拿下國內 A00 級純電銷量冠軍。而且宏光 MINIEV 仲催生咗潮創文化：年輕人把宏光 MINIEV 打造成移動嘅個性簽名，車主喺小紅書上分享潮創方案，仲有車主喺停車場裏互相打量對方嘅車貼。
六年過去，宏光 MINIEV 家族累計收穫超 195 萬用戶。繽果家族緊隨其後，拿下超 75 萬車主信賴。兩個家族加埋一齊，構成咗五菱代步車近 300 萬用戶嘅基本盤。
呢份銷量唔係偶然。宏光 MINIEV 帶來咗“好看、好開、好停、好省”嘅出色性價比，其中第五代宏光 MINIEV 嘅轉彎半徑夠細，城市窄路同小區夾縫車位都能輕鬆進出，電耗低到每公里成本幾乎可以忽略唔計，新手坐去幾乎冇咩學習成本。至於繽果 Pro，復古高顏值外觀，12.8 英寸高清智能大屏，靈語 AI 極速語音喚醒，承接家庭用戶嘅精緻出行需求。再看繽果 S，A0 級十佳安全車身，72% 高強鋼搭配多安全氣囊，續航最高 525km，完全可以覆蓋日常代步，以及近郊出行、週末短途等喺內嘅多樣化出行需求。
可以話，宏光 MINIEV 家族同繽果家族共同構築起覆蓋全價位、全場景嘅代步車產品矩陣，可以充分滿足唔同人群嘅代步需求。
我哋再將視線放喺未來。8 月 7 日，成都露天音樂公園，近百台用戶潮創車將齊聚現場，繽果家族全球代言人孟子義都會到場。呢場名為“繽紛生活 玩心大開”嘅盛典，既係宏光 MINIEV 六周年暨五菱代步車 300 萬用戶盛典，亦係一場屬于車主嘅派對。
“人民需要咩，五菱就造咩。”呢句話一直以來都係上汽通用五菱嘅堅持，從一台宏光 MINIEV 到三大車型矩陣，從第一個用戶到即將到來嘅第 300 萬個。佢唔係一句貼喺牆上嘅口號，係上汽通用五菱喺每個做選擇嘅時刻，反覆確認嘅坐標。
結束語：
六年前，宏光 MINIEV 向市場證明，小型代步電車擁有廣闊空間。歷經六年發展，五菱依靠多款代步車型收穫海量用戶。8 月 7 日成都呢場盛會，將見證 300 萬用戶這一重要節點，而五菱代步車嘅發展，亦將迎來新嘅階段。
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拿 寶騰 X70 同 豐田 Yaris Cross 嚟比較。呢兩款車喺價位同定位上都幾接近，而家我哋就從多個方面做一個詳細嘅比較，幫你省咗做功課嘅時間。
寶騰 X70 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 106,800 - 122,300，一共有 3 個版本，包括 1.5L Standard 2WD（RM 106,800）、1.5L Executive 2WD（RM 115,800）、1.5L Premium 2WD（RM 122,300）等。
豐田 Yaris Cross 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 99,900 - 109,900，一共有 2 個版本，包括 二零二六 1.5L Standard（RM 99,900）、二零二六 HEV 1.5L Standard（RM 109,900）等。
從價錢睇，豐田 Yaris Cross 嘅入門價比 寶騰 X70 平咗 RM 6,900。老實講，喺呢個價位段，幾千蚊嘅差距其實唔算大，關鍵仲係睇整體嘅性價比同長遠使用成本。
寶騰 X70 配備 1.5L Turbo，馬力 140 匹。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。
豐田 Yaris Cross 配備 1.5L 4-cyl，馬力 105 匹。官方油耗 6.0 L/100km。
動力方面，寶騰 X70 嘅 1.5L Turbo 比 豐田 Yaris Cross 嘅 1.5L 4-cyl 多咗 35 匹馬力，中段加速更有把握，尤其係行高速公路超車嘅時候。不過豐田 Yaris Cross 嘅油耗可能更友好，平日市區通勤差別唔會太大。
寶騰 X70 車身長 4400 mm，車尾箱 400 L。
豐田 Yaris Cross 車身長 4400 mm，車尾箱 400 L。
兩款車嘅尺寸幾乎一樣，車內空間分別唔大。呢個級別嘅車，日常使用完全夠用。
寶騰 X70 保用 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
豐田 Yaris Cross 保用 5 年/無限里程，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
總體嚟講，寶騰 X70 同 豐田 Yaris Cross 都係馬來西亞市場好唔錯嘅車款。揀邊架，關鍵仲係要睇你嘅個人需求同預算。大家建議做好功課，多比較間車行嘅報價，先去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事情，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
In Malaysia's SUV market, many buyers compare the Proton X70 and Honda WR-V when choosing a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning. Today we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
The Proton X70 OTR price in Malaysia is RM 106,800 - 122,300, with a total of 3 versions, including 1.5L Standard 2WD (RM 106,800), 1.5L Executive 2WD (RM 115,800), 1.5L Premium 2WD (RM 122,300), etc.
The Honda WR-V OTR price in Malaysia is RM 89,900 - 107,900, with a total of 4 versions, including 2023 1.5L V (RM 99,900), 2023 1.5L E (RM 95,900), 2023 1.5L S (RM 89,900), etc.
In terms of price, the Honda WR-V's starting price is RM 16,900 cheaper than the Proton X70. Honestly, in this price range, a difference of a few thousand is actually not significant; the key is still the overall value for money and long-term usage cost.
Proton X70 is equipped with 1.5L Turbo, 140 hp. Official fuel consumption 7.0 L/100km.
Honda WR-V is equipped with 1.5L 4-cyl, 105 hp. Official fuel consumption 6.0 L/100km.
Regarding power, the 1.5L Turbo in the Proton X70 has 35 more horsepower than the 1.5L 4-cyl in the Honda WR-V, giving more confidence in mid-range acceleration, especially when overtaking on highways. However, the Honda WR-V may have better fuel economy, and the difference in daily city commuting won't be significant.
The Proton X70 safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
The Honda WR-V safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include Honda SENSING.
Both cars have the same safety rating, and safety features in this class are considered quite comprehensive. Safety of new cars nowadays is generally good, so there is no need to worry too much about this.
The Proton X70 adopts FWD drive mode.
The Honda WR-V adopts FWD drive mode.
Both cars use the same drive mode, which is FWD, and there won't be much difference in daily driving experience.
Overall, the Proton X70 and Honda WR-V are both excellent models in the Malaysian market. Which one you choose depends mainly on your personal needs and budget. We suggest doing your research thoroughly, comparing quotes from several dealers, and then going for a test drive to make your final decision. Buying a car is a major decision, and spending some time on research will never go wrong.
In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers compare the Proton X50 and Mitsubishi Xforce when choosing a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
The OTR price of Proton X50 in Malaysia is RM 89,800 - 113,300, with a total of 4 versions, including 1.5T Executive (RM 89,800), 1.5T Premium (RM 101,800), 1.5T Flagship (RM 113,300), etc.
The OTR price of Mitsubishi Xforce in Malaysia is RM 109,930 - 119,930, with a total of 2 versions, including 2026 1.5L Ultimate (RM 119,930), 2026 1.5L Urban (RM 109,930), etc.
Looking at the price, the starting price of Proton X50 is indeed RM 20,130 cheaper than Mitsubishi Xforce. If your budget is limited, Proton's entry-level version is already sufficient for daily needs. But also note, the few thousand cheaper might have trade-offs in features, depending on your specific needs.
Proton X50 is equipped with 1.5L 4-cyl, 105 hp. Official fuel consumption 6.0 L/100km.
Mitsubishi Xforce is equipped with 1.5L Turbo, 140 hp. Official fuel consumption 7.0 L/100km.
In terms of power, Mitsubishi Xforce's 1.5L Turbo has 35 more horsepower than Proton X50's 1.5L 4-cyl. However, for daily driving in the city, the power of both cars is sufficient, you won't feel it lacks power.
Proton X50 body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
Mitsubishi Xforce body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
The dimensions of the two cars are almost identical, interior space difference is not large. For cars of this class, daily use is fully sufficient.
Proton X50 warranty 5 years/150,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Mitsubishi Xforce warranty 3 years/100,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Overall, Proton X50 and Mitsubishi Xforce are both very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose mainly depends on your personal needs and budget. We recommend doing your research, compare quotes from multiple dealerships, and then test drive to make a final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending time on research is never wrong.
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺選車嗰陣都會用 Proton X50 同 Mazda CX-30 嚟比較。這兩款車喺價位同定位上都幾接近，今日我哋就從多個方面做一個詳細比較，幫你省做功課嘅時間。
Proton X50 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 89,800 - 113,300，總共有 4 個版本，包括 1.5T Executive（RM 89,800）、1.5T Premium（RM 101,800）、1.5T Flagship（RM 113,300） 等。
Mazda CX-30 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 122,409 - 146,409，總共有 4 個版本，包括 2025 2.0L High+ Premium（RM 146,409）、2025 2.0L High+（RM 138,409）、2025 2.0L High（RM 130,409） 等。
從價錢睇落，Proton X50 嘅起步價確係比 Mazda CX-30 平咗 RM 32,609。如果你預算有限，Proton 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需求。但都要注意，平嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備上會有取舍，具體要看你嘅需求。
Proton X50 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA)。
Mazda CX-30 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 i-Activsense。
兩款車嘅安全評級一樣，喺呢個級別入面安全配備都算係好齊全。而家嘅新車安全性都唔差，唔使太擔心呢一點。
Proton X50 保修 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Mazda CX-30 保修 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
兩款車嘅保修條件一樣，呢方面唔使糾結。實際保養成本仲要睇品牌嘅服務網絡同零件價格，建議去車友群問下真實車主嘅經驗。
Proton X50 同 Mazda CX-30 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更睇重品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑好嗰一款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，嗰就揀配置更豐富嗰款。最終都建議兩款都去試駕，親自體驗先係最重要。
總體嚟講，Proton X50 同 Mazda CX-30 都係馬來西亞市場好唔錯嘅車型。揀邊部車，關鍵仲係睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕先做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
On July 16, the GAC Group 30 Million User Gratitude Gala grandly commenced at the GAC Trumpchi plant. Leaders from Guangdong Province, Guangzhou City, and Panyu District, Fu Bingfeng, Executive Vice President and Secretary-General of the China Association of Automobile Manufacturers, Feng Xingya, Chairman of GAC Group, He Xianqing, General Manager, and other members of the leadership team, joined hands with industry partners, suppliers, dealership representatives, as well as owner representatives, employee representatives, and media representatives from home and abroad, to gather together and witness the momentous milestone of the GAC Group welcoming its 30 millionth user.
[Attendees Witness GAC Welcoming the 30 Million User Milestone Moment]
From the first complete vehicle rolling off the line to the smooth delivery of the 30 millionth unit, GAC has journeyed 29 years of hard struggles. This heavy number of 30 million carries the trust and reliance of tens of millions of users, reflecting GAC's unwavering belief in upholding quality and safety, gathering the firm courage to move towards electrification and intelligence transformation, and even serving as a vivid footnote for the Chinese automotive industry moving from scale growth to value ascent, and from volume expansion to strength leap.
Global Synchronization Intelligent New Energy Matrix Demonstrates Transformation Process
At the event venue, multiple production bases of GAC distributed globally achieved synchronized linkage. GAC Honda P7, GAC Toyota bZ7, Qijing GT7, GAC AION N60, GAC Hyper S600 sequentially served as the 29,999,995th to 29,999,999th GAC vehicles, completing the rolling-off process one by one. Finally, the Right-Hand Drive GAC Trumpchi M8 PHEV, in the identity of the 30 millionth complete vehicle, shone brightly on the stage. The concentrated presentation of the entire new energy rolling-off vehicle matrix vividly interpreted that GAC is accelerating its electrification and intelligence transformation steps with all its might.
[GAC 30 Millionth Complete Vehicle — Right-Hand Drive GAC Trumpchi M8 PHEV Rolls off Production Line]
[GAC Intelligent New Energy Matrix Shines on Stage]
Immediately afterwards, Feng Xingya solemnly handed the key of the 30 millionth vehicle into the palm of Thai owner Mr. Tony Jaa. What was engraved in this moment was far more than a simple numerical significance, but a warm mark of GAC holding hands with global users and moving towards each other.
[Feng Xingya (Left) Delivers New Car Key to Thai Owner Tony Jaa (Right)]
[He Xianqing (Far Left) Awards Honorary Owners of All GAC Group Brands]
This heavy trust spanning mountains and seas has undoubtedly become the solid confidence for GAC to break through and move forward amidst the industry's changing clouds and winds. In the first half of this year, GAC Group submitted an eye-catching report, with overall sales reaching 773,100 units, achieving a stable growth of 2.35% compared to the same period last year; the new energy vehicle segment was even more rapid, with sales increasing year-on-year by 68.8%; meanwhile, overseas export achievements were remarkable, breaking through the 120,000 unit mark in one fell swoop, with a year-on-year increase as high as 132%. In the critical stage of deep industry reconstruction, GAC firmly stepped on the pace of development.
Quality as the Foundation, Solidifying the Confidence of Ten Million Users' Travel
"Quality is the core bottom line that GAC upholds steadfastly and never compromises on." Feng Xingya solemnly emphasized in the summary speech. In GAC's growth process, scale expansion has always been based on quality. After years of accumulation, GAC Group has always held "Quality First" as the ultimate standard, deeply integrating Honda's Total Quality Management (TQM), Toyota's Lean Production System (TPS), and the essence of Lingnan culture, crafting a quality control system with "Integration and Innovation" at its core with ingenuity. The ultimate direction of all efforts is to create high-quality vehicles that make users feel at ease while driving, convenient to use, and comfortable to ride in.
[Witnesses of Important Milestones in GAC's Development History Tell the Story of GAC Moving Forward with Quality]
["National Excellent Engineer Team" GAC Powertrain Independent R&D Team Tells the Story of R&D Innovation Journey]
[GAC Styling and Design Team Tells the Story of Design Innovation Journey]
[GAC AION Intelligent Ecological Factory]
In the full-process layout of R&D and manufacturing, GAC carefully built a quality control system covering the entire chain with strict standards: Before every new car is officially launched to the market, it must undergo strict extreme environment tests such as high cold, high temperature, high plateau, high humidity, high corrosion, mountainous areas, sand and dust, etc., the "Five Highs, One Mountain, One Dust", and successfully complete the "Two Winters, One Summer" on-site road test tasks; relying on test grounds and laboratories, comprehensive inspections covering 12 major items and over 1,500 verification sub-items are carried out on the whole vehicle to achieve the goal of systematic quality verification; GAC AION Intelligent Ecological Factory was honored as the "Global First New Energy Vehicle Lighthouse Factory", relying on the digital intelligent manufacturing system to build a solid foundation for the stability of mass production quality.
[GAC Star Spirit Safety Protection System]
In the realm of core safety technology, the Star Spirit Safety Protection System has built four defense barriers, with all eight core systems adopting dual redundant architectures. To date, it has built a safety barrier for nearly 2 million users, successfully resolving 6.28 million potential travel hazards; the installed scale of Mag Battery has exceeded 1.5 million vehicles, with total safe driving mileage crossing the 160 billion kilometer mark; in terms of service guarantee, GAC stands at the forefront of the industry, being the first to launch the "Three Responsibilities" measure for independent brands, proactively taking responsibility and backing up solutions for battery and intelligent driving assistance issues of concern to users, thoroughly eliminating user worries about vehicle use. It is precisely these layered safety barriers and service commitments practiced step by step that have cast the unbreakable brand confidence behind GAC's 30 million sales.
User-Oriented, Building a Full-Cycle Heartwarming Service System
"What users care about, we keep in mind; what users expect, we carry out to our utmost." Feng Xingya pointed out that this value pursuit centered on users has already been engraved into the development context of GAC Group. For a long time, GAC Group has always adhered to the business philosophy of "People First, Trust is the Way, Innovation First", and the essence of "People First" is precisely to place users first.
[GAC "User Full Open Mic" Event Site]
On the one hand, to accurately focus on problems and deeply listen to user demands, GAC continues to promote the "User Full Open Mic" activity, sincerely inviting users to enter the enterprise to carry out zero-distance face-to-face communication. Meanwhile, a closed-loop management system covering the entire process has been built to ensure that every user suggestion can be efficiently implemented. For common issues, optimization and upgrades facing all users are completed rapidly.
At the same time, GAC has specially established a dedicated User Insight department, fully promoting the whole-chain innovation of problems from precise discovery to efficient resolution. Relying on scientific organizational mechanisms, it effectively ensures that every user demand can receive a timely response, and every matter can be implemented and implemented.
At the same time, the penetration pace of the service network is also accelerating comprehensively. Focusing on channel layout, accelerating the deep expansion of the service network to county levels, planning to add 1,000 county-authorized stores within the year; focusing on service response, heavily launching the "Super Butler" service, achieving the goal of 5-second ultra-fast response and efficient completion of demands within 2 hours, ensuring user demands can reach quickly and be resolved properly. Based on the energy supply system, striving to build a "9 Verticals 10 Horizontals" energy supply network, now covering 31 provinces and 213 cities nationwide, achieving a layout of "there must be a station within a straight 1 kilometer" in core urban areas, the scale of self-operated charging piles exceeds 27,000, among which the number of ultra-fast charging piles exceeds 20,000, creating a convenient and worry-free energy supply experience for new energy vehicle owners.
[GAC Energy "9 Verticals 10 Horizontals" Energy Supply Network]
The core significance of this gratitude event lies in expressing the deepest repayment and gratitude for the strong support of 30 million users for a long time. During the event, Feng Xingya solemnly declared that from this moment on, GAC comprehensively launches the "GAC Group 30 Million Units Off Line · Refresh Gratitude Season" event. GAC Honda, GAC Toyota, GAC Trumpchi, GAC AION, GAC Hyper, and Qijing Auto these six passenger car brands will, for various car buying scenarios such as new purchase, trade-in, and additional purchase, respectively tailor-made characteristic policies, to repay every companionship and support that has never given up with concrete actions.
[GAC Group 30 Million Units Off Line · Refresh Gratitude Season Officially Launched]
Technology Centered on the User, Empowering Real Travel with Frontier Technology
Based on the new coordinate of 30 million, GAC will uphold the concept of innovation leading, fully rushing towards the new track of electrification and intelligence, promote frontier technology to land effectively, and present users with accessible peace-of-mind experiences and convenient enjoyment.
At the frontier of power technology, the Star Source Power built by the "National Excellent Engineer Team", precisely covering Star Source Extended Range, Star Source Plug-in Hybrid, and Star Source Super Dual Engine three core technologies, is about to empower more models to achieve mass production landing. Each product has undergone 100,000 hours of test bench and vehicle strict tests, equivalent driving mileage exceeds 10 million kilometers, guaranteeing that in various scenarios and global regional environments, performance remains rock solid.
[GAC Star Source Power Makes Users Choose "No More Compromises"]
Focusing on the "Three Electric Systems" core track, GAC has always anchored battery ultra-fast charging, low-temperature range and other key problems to break through fully, successfully built a pilot production line for all-solid-state batteries, landed extreme energy consumption innovation results, its mass-produced Quark Electric Drive Motor, maximum efficiency strongly leaps to 99%, firmly staying at the industry's top level.
At the frontier position of intelligent networking, the Super Brain Star Spirit Architecture is constantly iterating and upgrading, successfully connecting Intelligent Driving Assistance, Intelligent Cockpit, Power, Chassis, Body, and Internet of Vehicles these six core systems, achieving the efficient operation of "Single Brain Coordinates the Overall Situation", overall performance leaps 40%; Star River Smart Cockpit achieves deep integration of terminal and cloud, endowing vehicles with the true characteristic of "Good Thinking, Human Communication", transforming into a caring travel partner. GAC will also join hands with Huawei, CATL, DiDi, Tencent, Alibaba and a group of industry leaders to jointly build a stronger AI Intelligent Ecosystem.
As of now, GAC Group's cumulative investment in the field of R&D has exceeded 62 billion yuan, gathering a global R&D elite scale of over 6,800 people. Endless technical deep plowing is helping GAC's products achieve a qualitative leap, gradually upgrading from basic commuting tools to intelligent travel caring partners, mobile smart living spaces, and ecological models of green energy.
Looking at the future journey, GAC will always closely grasp the key guidance of user needs, solidify the quality foundation, rely on technological innovation to gather core kinetic energy, rely on global layout to pave the way forward, fully promote the cross-upgrade to Eco-type Tech GAC, join hands with a broad group of users to advance side by side, empower each other, together moving towards a smarter, greener characteristic, and more vast brand new future.
Author: Zhong Sheng
Editor: Mark
Producer: Red Interstellar
Header Image: Autonomous Driving Image
Recently, WeRide announced a one-stage end-to-end assisted driving solution developed in cooperation with Bosch, which is conducting road testing and adaptation verification in countries such as Germany, France, and Japan. This can be said to be the first overseas launch of a domestic one-stage end-to-end system.
WeRide has been very dominant domestically with its one-stage end-to-end assisted driving solution, not only achieving "six consecutive championships" in the Autonomous Driving Competition, but also continuously winning multiple project bids with leading companies, cumulatively securing over 30 project nominations from GAC Group and Chery Group.
AION N60 is equipped with this one-stage end-to-end solution
It is reported that in this overseas road test by WeRide, it demonstrated outstanding performance in dealing with overseas scenarios such as German unlimited speed limit highways, French dense roundabouts, and Japanese right-hand drive left-hand traffic rules.
From the perspective of autonomous driving going global, this is not just an overseas verification, but China's autonomous driving global expansion will enter a new mode stage.
In the past, autonomous driving going global not only had fewer features, generally limited to Highway NOA, and required deploying significant manpower overseas for localization engineering. But this time WeRide is bringing the one-stage end-to-end solution overseas, not only pushing City NOA features overseas, but also intends to solve the issue of how to move from single-market adaptation to global adaptation.
Therefore, this is also a global exam for China's Physical AI capabilities.
Autonomous driving is a typical Physical AI scenario, requiring deep interaction with the physical world and handling complex multi-tasks.
And L4 autonomous driving is the most stringent, direct verification field for Physical AI capabilities. It is not simply identifying objects and then doing path planning, but requires understanding the world and predicting trends to make safe and reliable decisions.
This requires the ability to reconstruct the physical world, able to generate real scenes at the pixel level within seconds; learning the physical laws behind complex traffic; deducing the causal logic behind driving behavior; pre-playing spatiotemporal evolution, deducing multiple possibilities within the next few seconds in a continuously changing road environment.
As the company with the widest global business coverage in the autonomous driving field, WeRide transforms the massive data, technical systems, and engineering experience accumulated over years of L4 autonomous driving R&D and operations into a one-stage end-to-end solution for mass-produced L2++ models. This is also why the one-stage end-to-end solution from WeRide&Bosch can win the "six consecutive championships" in the Autonomous Driving Competition, essentially bringing the capabilities of the more difficult L4 autonomous driving down to L2++.
WeRide&Bosch win China Autonomous Driving Competition · Six Consecutive Championships
In addition, a major threshold for autonomous driving going global is data, overseas real road scenario data.
Physical AI models and internet large language models have fundamental differences. Every decision plan interacts with the real world, so the error tolerance is extremely low. Therefore, Physical AI models need cognitive data from the real world to help models learn the laws of the real world.
Overseas data is a challenge for companies that have always done domestic L2++ autonomous driving, but for WeRide which has already operated Robotaxis globally, it is an existing advantage.
WeRide's Robotaxi operations currently cover Guangzhou, Beijing, Singapore, Abu Dhabi, Dubai, Riyadh, Zurich, and other domestic and overseas core markets, conducting autonomous driving R&D, testing, and operations in over 40 cities in 12 countries globally. According to previous disclosures, WeRide has deployed over 3000 autonomous driving vehicles globally. The global massive fleet provides sufficient scenario depth and breadth for training the L2++ one-stage end-to-end AI large model.
Chery Exeed EX7 comes standard with this one-stage end-to-end solution
One can say WeRide is one of the few companies globally that has accumulated real-world cognitive data. This is also a barrier for autonomous driving going global. To provide rich nutrition for the evolution of the one-stage end-to-end AI large model, the countries/regions covered must be wide enough, and the accumulated road scenario data must be rich enough.
More importantly, massive global data provides new gameplay for autonomous driving going global.
Previously, a huge difficulty faced by China's autonomous driving going global was the scenario gap.
Overseas road traffic scenarios differ significantly from domestic ones, and differences between different countries/regions are also very large. For example, German highway speed limit rules, French dense roundabouts, and many countries/regions use right-hand drive vehicles.
In the past, the differentiation of these overseas road scenarios required investing significant manpower in "localization" adaptation and deployment, doing a large amount of technical engineering hard labor and tiring work. This led to high difficulty and high cost for China's autonomous driving going global, and the speed of laying out overseas markets was very slow, because each country/region needed "localization" technical engineering to be done over again.
Chery Exeed ES also equipped with this one-stage end-to-end solution
Therefore, for Chinese autonomous driving companies, the problem at hand is: Can L2++ autonomous driving going global break through the scenario gap with lower cost and more efficient methods?
WeRide's answer is: Yes, and must do so.
By training the one-stage end-to-end AI large model through massive global real operation data, modeling using the WeRide GENESIS world model that conforms to the objective laws of the physical world, further generating scenarios, training algorithms, verifying safety. This is a new gameplay for China's autonomous driving going global, and also the underlying logic of AI. For humans, road scenarios and rules differ by country, but for AI, it belongs to the same world.
So autonomous driving going global ultimately comes down to one thing: Is AI capability strong enough? And WeRide is verifying this. Does AI learn Chinese road experience, or physical world laws?
Autonomous driving going global has welcomed the best timing. The global automotive market is looking up to the Chinese market in autonomous driving.
Firstly, the scale of Chinese car makers going global continues to surge, with overseas sales accounting for nearly one-third. Autonomous driving is becoming a key competitiveness for overseas models, and Chinese car makers are also preparing to upgrade to City NOA advanced autonomous driving features.
Secondly, not only will Chinese car makers' overseas models carry City NOA advanced autonomous driving features, but overseas car makers in their own home markets are also starting to layout City NOA. For example, Porsche and Audi chose to cooperate with Mobileye respectively, using Mobileye's solution, covering point-to-point assisted driving for highways and urban areas.
One-stage end-to-end solution test vehicle in Germany
This is different from the situation in the past few years. Previously overseas car makers were more conservative in Europe and the US markets, autonomous driving features were generally limited to Highway NOA, but now they also need to align with the Chinese market.
Therefore, currently is the best timing for China's autonomous driving going global. Firstly, the demand in overseas markets is being released. Secondly, autonomous driving suppliers in Europe and the US markets, such as Mobileye, International Tier 1, are behind domestic in autonomous driving solution technology and mass production efficiency.
Large market scale, rigid customer demand, weak competitors, this is a profitable track with a long slope and thick snow.
However, this time WeRide's overseas layout is not simply copying the global expansion model of International Tier 1s. In the past, International Tier 1s relied on a model of stacking manpower, stacking adaptation, stacking rule algorithms, while WeRide relies on AI capabilities, data-driven, using AI models as the leverage. Therefore, this is AI capability going global.
What WeRide represents is not just a globalization attempt of an autonomous driving enterprise, but also an important mark that China's Physical AI capabilities are starting to accept systematic verification from the global road system.
-END-
近日，特斯拉在海外官方平台分享，据香港相关机构统计，特斯拉成为2026年上半年中国香港地区最畅销品牌。
具体到车型来看，易车榜最新统计显示，Model 3是上半年中国香港地区最畅销轿车，Model Y则成为上半年中国香港地区最畅销SUV，两款车型均为所在细分市场销量冠军。
特斯拉在香港的普及度之高，引发网友热议，不少网友晒出照片，感叹香港遍地都是特斯拉。
不仅如此，特斯拉在亚太多地均迎来销量增长。在韩国市场，海外博主@tslaming 分享最新数据显示，特斯拉超越奔驰、宝马等传统豪华品牌，成为今年上半年韩国最畅销的进口品牌，占据当地进口车市场30%的市场份额。
值得一提的是，在刚刚过去的5月，特斯拉韩国单月销量突破1万辆，其中Model Y直接超越现代、起亚等韩国本土车企，成为当地5月乘用车销量冠军。
在东南亚市场，特斯拉同样表现亮眼。6月，Model Y成为马来西亚最畅销进口纯电车型，Model 3则是当月最畅销的纯电轿车。
In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers compare the Perodua Aruz and Honda HR-V when choosing a car.
Perodua Aruz is sold OTR in Malaysia for RM 72,900 - 77,900, with a total of 2 versions, including 1.5L X (RM 72,900), 1.5L AV (RM 77,900), etc.
Honda HR-V is sold OTR in Malaysia for RM 115,900 - 143,900, with a total of 4 versions, including 2026 e:HEV 1.5L RS (RM 143,900), 2026 1.5T V (RM 137,900), 2026 1.5T E (RM 130,900), etc.
In terms of price, Perodua Aruz's starting price is indeed RM 43,000 cheaper than Honda HR-V. If your budget is limited, Perodua's entry-level version is already sufficient for daily needs. But note that the difference of a few thousand might involve trade-offs in features, depending on your needs.
Perodua Aruz has a safety rating of 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include.
Honda HR-V has a safety rating of 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include Honda SENSING (ACC, CMBS, LKAS, RDM).
Both cars have the same safety rating, safety features are quite complete within this class. New cars nowadays have good safety, no need to worry too much about this.
Perodua Aruz uses FWD drive mode.
Honda HR-V uses FWD drive mode.
Both cars have the same drive mode, both are FWD, daily driving experience will not differ much.
Perodua Aruz warranty 5 years/150,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Honda HR-V warranty 5 years/unlimited mileage, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Both Perodua Aruz and Honda HR-V are mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, prioritize the one with better reputation; if you care more about cost-performance ratio and features, choose the one with richer configurations. Finally, it is recommended to test drive both, personal experience is the most important.
Overall, Perodua Aruz and Honda HR-V are both very good car models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends on your personal needs and budget. We suggest everyone do their research, compare quotes from several dealerships, and then test drive to make the final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending some time on research will never be wrong.
In Malaysia's SUV market, many buyers compare Perodua Ativa and Proton X90 when choosing a car. These two models are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
Perodua Ativa OTR price in Malaysia is RM 62,500 - 73,400, totaling 3 versions, including 1.0L Turbo X (RM 62,500), 1.0L Turbo H (RM 67,300), 1.0L Turbo AV (RM 73,400), etc.
Proton X90 OTR price in Malaysia is RM 106,800 - 122,800, totaling 4 versions, including 2026 1.5T Prime X (RM 122,800), 2026 1.5T Prime (RM 116,800), 2026 1.5T Lite (RM 106,800), etc.
In terms of price, Perodua Ativa's starting price is indeed RM 44,300 cheaper than Proton X90. If your budget is limited, Perodua's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. However, note that the few thousand ringgit saved might involve compromises on features, depending on your needs.
Perodua Ativa safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include ASA 3.0 + ACC + LDA + LKA + BSM + RCTA.
Proton X90 safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
Both cars have the same safety rating, and safety features are quite comprehensive in this class. New cars nowadays generally have good safety, so don't worry too much about this.
Perodua Ativa body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
Proton X90 body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
Both cars have almost the same dimensions, interior space difference is small. Cars in this class are fully sufficient for daily use.
Perodua Ativa and Proton X90 are both mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale price more, you can prioritize the one with better reputation; if you care more about cost-performance ratio and features, choose the one with richer configurations. Ultimately, it is recommended to test drive both models, as personal experience is the most important.
Overall, Perodua Ativa and Proton X90 are both quite good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends on your personal needs and budget. It is recommended to do your research, compare quotes from several dealerships, and then test drive to make the final decision. Buying a car is a big decision, spending some time researching will never be wrong.
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拿 Proton X50 同 Subaru Forester 嚟做比較。呢兩款車喺價位同定位上都蠻接近嘅，今日我哋就從多個方面做一個詳細嘅比較，幫你節省做功課嘅時間。
Proton X50 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 89,800 - 113,300，一共有 4 個版本，包括 1.5T Executive（RM 89,800）、1.5T Premium（RM 101,800）、1.5T Flagship（RM 113,300） 等。
Subaru Forester 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 174,000 - 197,000，一共有 3 個版本，包括 2024 2.0L S EyeSight GT Edition（RM 189,538）、2024 2.0L S EyeSight（RM 177,538）、2024 2.0L L EyeSight（RM 167,538） 等。
從價錢嚟睇，Proton X50 嘅起步價確實比 Subaru Forester 便宜咗 RM 84,200。如果你預算有限，Proton 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需求。但都要注意，便宜嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備上會有取舍，具體要睇你嘅需求。
Proton X50 搭載 1.5L 4-cyl，馬力 105 hp。官方油耗 6.0 L/100km。
Subaru Forester 搭載 2.0L 4-cyl，馬力 170 hp。官方油耗 8.0 L/100km。
動力方面，Subaru Forester 嘅 2.0L 4-cyl 比 Proton X50 嘅 1.5L 4-cyl 多咗 65 匹馬力。不過日常喺市區開，兩款車嘅動力都夠用，唔會覺得唔夠力。
Proton X50 車身長 4400 mm，尾箱 400 L。
Subaru Forester 車身長 4400 mm，尾箱 400 L。
兩款車嘅尺寸幾乎一樣，車內空間差別唔大。呢個級別嘅車，日常使用完全夠用。
Proton X50 保養 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Subaru Forester 保養 3 年/100,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
總體嚟講，Proton X50 同 Subaru Forester 都係馬來西亞市場好唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵係要睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
