首頁Porsche 911 964
搜尋歷史
熱門搜尋
經銷商登入 / 註冊
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家在揀車嘅時候都會拿 Proton X50 同 MG MG HS 做比較。呢兩部車喺價位同定位上都幾接近，而家我哋就由多個方面做一個詳細嘅比較，幫住你節省做功課嘅時間。
Proton X50 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 89,800 - 113,300，一共有 4 個版本，包括 1.5T Executive（RM 89,800）、1.5T Premium（RM 101,800）、1.5T Flagship（RM 113,300） 等。
MG MG HS 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 130,450 - 146,450，一共有 2 個版本，包括 1.5L Standard（RM 105,000）、1.5L Executive（RM 115,000） 等。
由價錢睇嚟，Proton X50 嘅起價真係比 MG MG HS 平咗 RM 40,650。如果你預算有限，Proton 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需要。不過都要留意，嗰幾千蚊嘅差價，喺配備度會有取舍，具體睇你嘅需要。
Proton X50 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA)。
MG MG HS 嘅安全評級係 TBD，主動安全系統包括 Basic。
安全配備方面，兩部車都拿到唔錯嘅評級。不過 Proton X50 嘅 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA) 同 MG MG HS 嘅 Basic 喺功能上有啲差異，如果你比較重視主動安全嘅話，可以仔細對比下兩者嘅功能列表。
Proton X50 車身長 4400 mm，行李箱 400 L。
MG MG HS 車身長 4400 mm，行李箱 400 L。
兩部車嘅尺寸幾乎一樣，車內空間分別唔大。呢個級別嘅車，日常使用完全夠用。
Proton X50 採用 4WD 驅動方式。
MG MG HS 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
Proton 嘅 4WD 同 MG 嘅 FWD 喺操控上會有唔同感覺，建議試駕對比。
總括嚟講，Proton X50 同 MG MG HS 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一部，關鍵仲係要睇你嘅個人需要同預算。建議大家做足功課，多比較間車行嘅報價，先再試駕做最後決定。買車係一件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對無問題。
喺马来西亚嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拿 Proton X50 同 Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV 來做比較。這兩款車喺價位同定位上都幾接近，今日我哋就從多個方面做一個詳細嘅對比，幫你慳返做功課嘅時間。
Proton X50 喺马来西亚嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 89,800 - 113,300，一總共有 4 個版本，包括 1.5T Executive（RM 89,800）、1.5T Premium（RM 101,800）、1.5T Flagship（RM 113,300） 等。
Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV 喺马来西亚嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 129,750 - 129,750，一總共有 2 個版本，包括 2025 1.5T 90km CSH（RM 129,750）、Tiggo 7 PHEV 支援邊種充電方法？可以用家居電源插座充電嗎？（RM 117,478） 等。
從價錢來看，Proton X50 嘅起步價真係比 Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV 平咗 RM 39,950。如果你預算有限，Proton 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需求。但都要小心，平嘅嗰幾千蚊，可能會喺配備上有所取捨，具體要睇你嘅需求。
Proton X50 裝載 1.5L 4-cyl，馬力 105 hp。官方油耗 6.0 L/100km。
Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV 裝載 Hybrid，馬力 170 hp。官方油耗 4.5 L/100km。
動力方面，Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV 嘅 Hybrid 比 Proton X50 嘅 1.5L 4-cyl 多咗 65 匹馬力。不過日常喺市區開，兩款車嘅動力都夠用，唔會覺得唔夠力。
Proton X50 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA)。
Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV 嘅安全評級係 TBD，主動安全系統包括 Basic。
安全配備方面，兩款車都拿到唔錯嘅評級。不過 Proton X50 嘅 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA) 同 Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV 嘅 Basic 喺功能上有少少差異，如果你比較睇重主動安全嘅話，可以詳細對比下兩者嘅功能列表。
Proton X50 採用 4WD 驅動方式。
Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
Proton 嘅 4WD 同 Chery 嘅 FWD 喺操控上會有唔同感受，建議試駕對比。
總體嚟講，Proton X50 同 Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV 都係马来西亚市場好唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵都要睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較間幾間車行嘅報價，先去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對無得錯。
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拿 Proton X50 同 Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV 嚟做比較。呢兩款車喺價位同定位上都好接近，今日我哋就從多個方面做一個詳細嘅對比，幫你節省做功課嘅時間。
Proton X50 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 89,800 - 113,300，一共有 4 個版本，包括 1.5T Executive（RM 89,800）、1.5T Premium（RM 101,800）、1.5T Flagship（RM 113,300） 等。
Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 159,750 - 159,750，一共有 2 個版本，包括 1.6L Turbo Standard（RM 130,000）、1.6L Turbo Premium（RM 145,000） 等。
從價錢嚟睇，Proton X50 嘅起步價確實比 Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV 便宜咗 RM 69,950。如果你預算有限，Proton 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需要。不過亦要注意，便宜嗰幾千塊，可能喺配備上會有取捨，具體要睇你嘅需要。
Proton X50 搭載 1.5L 4-cyl，馬力 105 hp。官方油耗 6.0 L/100km。
Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV 搭載 Hybrid，馬力 170 hp。官方油耗 4.5 L/100km。
動力方面，Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV 嘅 Hybrid 比 Proton X50 嘅 1.5L 4-cyl 多咗 65 匹馬力。不過日常喺市區開，兩款車嘅動力都夠用，唔會覺得唔夠力。
Proton X50 車身長 4400 mm，行李箱 400 L。
Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV 車身長 4400 mm，行李箱 400 L。
兩款車嘅尺寸幾乎一樣，車內空間差異唔大。呢個級別嘅車，日常使用完全夠用。
Proton X50 採用 4WD 驅動方式。
Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
Proton 嘅 4WD 同 Chery 嘅 FWD 喺操控上會有唔同感受，建議試駕對比。
Proton X50 保修 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV 保修 3 年/100,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
總括嚟講，Proton X50 同 Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV 都係馬來西亞市場好唔錯嘅車型。揀邊架，關鍵係要睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花費少許時間做功課絕對無錯。
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拿 Proton X50 同 Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV 嚟做比較。這兩款車喺價位同定位上都幾接近，今日我哋就從多個方面做一個詳細嘅比較，幫你省咗做功課嘅時間。
Proton X50 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 89,800 - 113,300，總共有 4 個版本，包括 1.5T Executive（RM 89,800）、1.5T Premium（RM 101,800）、1.5T Flagship（RM 113,300） 等。
Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 159,750 - 159,750，總共有 2 個版本，包括 1.6L Turbo Standard（RM 130,000）、1.6L Turbo Premium（RM 145,000） 等。
由價錢嚟睇，Proton X50 嘅起步價確實比 Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV 平咗 RM 69,950。如果你預算有限，Proton 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需求。但要留意，平嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備上要有取舍，具體就要睇你嘅需求。
Proton X50 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA)。
Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV 嘅安全評級係 TBD，主動安全系統包括 Basic。
安全配備方面，兩款車都拿到唔錯嘅評級。不過 Proton X50 嘅 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA) 同 Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV 嘅 Basic 喺功能上有些差異，如果你比較看重主動安全嘅話，可以仔細比較下兩者嘅功能列表。
Proton X50 車身長 4400 mm，尾箱 400 L。
Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV 車身長 4400 mm，尾箱 400 L。
兩款車嘅尺寸幾乎一樣，車廂空間差別唔大。呢個級別嘅車，日常使用完全夠用。
Proton X50 保修 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV 保修 3 年/100,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
總體嚟講，Proton X50 同 Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊部，關鍵都要睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
Once the China Passenger Car Association released the pure electric retail ranking for the first half of 2026, the industry finally saw the true temperature of the market. The top ten seats underwent a complete shake-up, with long-standing top models collectively diving. Seagull, Qin PLUS, and other former top hits fell out of the head lineup, replaced by all-new products concentrated on the market in the past year. Many people say the pure electric market is not doing well, but looking closely at the data reveals that what is not doing well are old products, low price points, and stock models without technology. Truly new products that hit users' core needs are still surging against the trend.
No.1 Geely Star Wish
Geely Star Wish, which took the pure electric sales crown for the first half of the year, has mixed feelings. The result of 194,000 units looks impressive, but actually decreased slightly by 5.3% year-on-year. Against the background of the overall contraction of the entry-level pure electric market, holding onto this volume is already considered a win. This 60,000-level A0-class small car has ranked at the top for 16 consecutive months, the core being that it solves the pain points of commuter cars to the extreme. Rear-drive architecture, independent suspension, CATL cells, and fast-charge configurations are fully loaded on all models. Using superior specifications, it beats competitors at the same price point. Cumulative sales exceeded 800,000 units in less than two years.
Conversely, the 50,000 to 100,000 market is continuing to shrink. Leapmotor and other competitors have entered with lower prices and higher configurations. Plus, car profits are thin as razor blades. Star Wish's domestic market share has basically hit the ceiling. The next incremental growth can only be supported by overseas markets.
No.2 Tesla Model Y
Tesla Model Y, ranked second, sold 172,500 units in the first half of the year, with a slight increase of 0.6% year-on-year. It barely held onto its basic market position amid the blockade of domestic models. As the industry benchmark for the 250,000 to 300,000 pure electric SUV market, Model Y's core competitiveness has never been interior configurations, but mature powertrain systems, a supercharging network spread across the country, and Tesla's brand premium. Many family users choose it for peace of mind and value retention.
However, with new products from Li Auto, Xiaomi, and AITO taking turns siphoning users, Model Y's growth has long entered stagnation. The latest news is that the high-performance version of this car has completed MIIT declaration. It will likely maintain sales with facelifts and price adjustments in the second half of the year, but it is highly probable that its overall market share will continue to be eroded.
No.3 Li Auto i6
Li Auto i6 reached third place with 120,400 units, the brightest dark horse in the first half of the year, and marked that Li Auto's pure electric transformation is fully completed.
This 250,000-level family pure electric SUV completely continues Li Auto's product logic oriented towards family users. It does not compete on paper data like 0-100 km/h acceleration, but makes 800V high-voltage platforms, dual-chamber air suspension, and advanced intelligent driving standard configurations. It maximizes space, comfort, and energy replenishment efficiency, precisely hitting the pain points of urban family users.
Since its launch, this car has had monthly sales exceeding 20,000 for four consecutive months, directly accounting for 62% of Li Auto's total sales, siphoning its own extended-range L series. However, the 200,000 to 300,000 pure electric SUV market is the most competitive track this year. New products are flocking to the market in the second half of the year. It is not easy for the i6 to maintain current sales levels. Later, it will depend on new products like the i8 to take over.
No.4 Xiaomi YU7
Xiaomi YU7, as a popular model, sold 104,600 units in the first half of the year, ranked fourth. As a brand-new car launched only half a year ago, this result has exceeded industry expectations. This mid-size SUV focusing on sports and family, relying on Xiaomi's ecosystem traffic, reached a peak of nearly 38,000 units in the first month after launch, directly breaking the market pattern at the same price level.
However, the subsequent trend can be described as opening high and closing low. After the heat subsided, sales declined month by month until June, relying on the launch of the standard version and employee internal purchase discounts to return to the ten-thousand club. Ultimately, the 200,000-level pure electric SUV track is too competitive. Tesla Model Y is above, and cost-effective brands like Leapmotor are below. YU7's product strength has not pulled an absolute gap. Next, Xiaomi's focus will shift to its extended-range series. YU7 will likely maintain steady sales, making it difficult to replicate the explosion in the early stages after launch.
No.5 BYD Yuan UP
BYD Yuan UP sold 82,700 units in pure retail sales in the first half of the year, increasing by 14.7% year-on-year, making it BYD's new backbone in the entry-level pure electric market. It gained volume because it took over from Yuan PLUS. The old Yuan PLUS saw a cliff-like drop in sales. Yuan UP used lower pricing, newer designs, and BYD's mature powertrain system to quickly fill the market gap for pure electric SUVs under 100,000.
Plus, BYD's service network spread across the country and the reputation of Blade Batteries have extremely strong attraction for mass market users. However, there is bad news: Leapmotor A10 has overtaken Yuan UP in retail volume for two consecutive months. It is advancing step by step with a cost-effective strategy of larger space and higher configurations. In the second half of the year, it will be quite difficult for Yuan UP to continue climbing. It will likely hold its current market share and maintain stable output through capacity ramp-up.
No.6 Xiaomi SU7
Xiaomi SU7 sold 80,500 units in the first half of the year, dropping 48.3% year-on-year, with the ranking falling to sixth. The main reason is that the replacement gap dragged it down. At the beginning of the year, the old SU7 was discontinued to pave the way for the new model. Two months of delivery vacuum directly lowered the total for the first half of the year. After the new generation model was launched in March, it quickly returned to a monthly sales level of 20,000+, remaining the benchmark for 200,000-level pure electric sedans.
As Xiaomi's founding work, SU7 thoroughly opened up the capacity of the niche sports car market, even siphoning users from BMW 3 Series and Tesla Model 3. However, the sports car market itself has a low ceiling. Plus, with more and more competitors, SU7's sales have basically hit the upper limit. Next, it will be more about stabilizing output as the brand's basic market. The stage of explosive growth has passed.
No.7 NIO ES8
NIO ES8 accumulated 78,600 units in retail sales for the first half of the year, ranking seventh, being the absolute sales king in the high-end market above 400,000. The fully new ES8 can fight, the core is hitting the pure electric replacement demand of high-end family users. The swapping system solves energy replenishment anxiety. Luxury and service experience crush same-price BBA fuel cars. Users accounting for more than 97% are exchange/purchase users, of which 60% come from BBA owners.
Less than a year after launch, the new ES8 cumulative delivery broke 120,000 units, ranking the large SUV sales champion for six consecutive months, hard撑着 (proping up) the market capacity of the high-end pure electric market. Next, its own lower-positioned ES9 has already siphoned many users after launch. The 6-seater version has just started reservations. Plus, the high-end market itself has limited capacity. ES8's main goal for the second half of the year is to hold onto the basic market of the high-end market.
No.8 Wuling Hongguang MINI
Once the national god car Hongguang MINI EV sold only 72,800 units in the first half of the year, dropping 57.4% year-on-year, falling directly from the top spot to eighth. It is known as the most tragic fall among old models.
The loss of speed of Hongguang MINI is not caused by a single reason. On one hand, the A00-class microcar market is contracting overall. Adjustment of purchase tax policy has significantly shrunk the cost-performance advantage of low-price cars. On the other hand, user consumption upgrades are obvious. Adding 20,000 can buy a small car with larger space, higher configuration, and longer range. Many users who watched MINI EV finally bought Bingo, Star Wish. Wuling itself is clear about the problem. The fifth-generation model changed to a four-door structure, added fast charging and safety configurations, but it still could not stop the downward trend.
No.9 Changan Qiyuan Q05
Changan Qiyuan Q05 sold 71,600 units in the first half of the year, breaking into ninth, a true comeback dark horse.
This car had little presence last year. After price reduction and configuration increase in April this year, it took off directly. It pulled the entry-level range to 506km, even downgraded laser radar to the 80,000 level. Using a "technology equity" strategy, it precisely hit the pain points of home users. It sat firmly as the pure electric compact SUV sales champion for three consecutive months. Changan's capacity also kept up with the rhythm. After the Nanchang factory was put into production, bottlenecks were gradually relieved. The overseas market also bloomed synchronously. Thailand launched in half a month, and orders broke 3,000. After capacity is fully released in the second half of the year, Qiyuan Q05 sales still have rising space. It is expected to冲击 (attack/strive for) the first echelon of entry-level pure electric.
No.10 MG4
Ranked tenth, MG4 sold 70,800 units in pure retail sales in the first half of the year, purely relying on overseas market endorsement. This 100,000-level pure electric hatchback has been selling well in Europe for several years. It has ranked as the China-brand European sales champion for 11 consecutive years. Overseas sales share far exceeds domestic.
In the domestic market, MG4 began to gain volume gradually after its refresh last year. Rear-drive architecture and five-link independent suspension chassis quality are unique at the same price level. The MG4X version launched this year even downgraded semi-solid-state batteries. The technology普惠 (universal benefit) strategy was very effective. Domestic monthly sales have exceeded 10,000 for 9 consecutive months. However, hatchbacks themselves are a niche market in China. MG's brand voice is far less than mainstream autonomous brands. There will be no big breakthroughs domestically. Next, its incremental growth will still come from overseas. Maintaining steady state domestically is sufficient. It is a model that relies on the global market to amortize costs.
Summary
After reading the top ten ranking, you can see that the pure electric market has long passed the barbaric growth period where any car can be sold by just building it. The logic now is very clear. The low-end market is continuously shrinking. Consumption upgrading is the big trend. Old products that do not iterate quickly will be eliminated quickly. New products that truly hit user needs, have proper configurations, and reasonable prices can still break through against the trend even in an environment where the overall market is declining. Competition in the second half of the year will only be more intense. More new products will be concentrated on the market. The price war will continue. Looking at the ranking by the end of the year, the rankings may have to change one more time.
In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers compare Proton X50 and Mazda CX-30 when choosing a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning. Today we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
The OTR price for Proton X50 in Malaysia is RM 89,800 - 113,300, with a total of 4 versions, including 1.5T Executive (RM 89,800), 1.5T Premium (RM 101,800), 1.5T Flagship (RM 113,300), etc.
The OTR price for Mazda CX-30 in Malaysia is RM 122,409 - 146,409, with a total of 4 versions, including 2025 2.0L High+ Premium (RM 146,409), 2025 2.0L High+ (RM 138,409), 2025 2.0L High (RM 130,409), etc.
From the price perspective, the starting price of Proton X50 is indeed RM 32,609 cheaper than Mazda CX-30. If your budget is limited, Proton's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. But also note, the savings of a few thousand ringgit might involve trade-offs in specifications, depending on your specific needs.
The safety rating for Proton X50 is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), with active safety systems including ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
The safety rating for Mazda CX-30 is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), with active safety systems including i-Activsense.
Both cars have the same safety rating, and safety features are quite comprehensive in this class. New cars nowadays generally have good safety, so no need to worry too much about this.
Proton X50 body length is 4400 mm, boot 400 L.
Mazda CX-30 body length is 4500 mm, boot 450 L.
In terms of space, the body of Mazda CX-30 is 100 mm longer than Proton X50, giving it an advantage in passenger space. However, parking Proton X50 in the city is a bit more flexible; each has its trade-offs.
Proton X50 warranty 5 years/150,000 km, maintenance interval every 10,000 km or 6 months.
Mazda CX-30 warranty 5 years/150,000 km, maintenance interval every 10,000 km or 6 months.
Both cars have the same warranty conditions, so no need to agonize over this aspect. Actual maintenance costs depend on the brand's service network and parts prices. It is suggested to ask real owners in car communities for their experience.
Proton X50 and Mazda CX-30 are both mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, you can prioritize the one with better reputation. If you care more about value for money and features, then choose the one with richer configuration. In the end, it is recommended to test drive both, as personal experience is the most important.
Overall, both Proton X50 and Mazda CX-30 are very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends mainly on your personal needs and budget. We suggest doing your research, comparing quotes from several dealerships, and then test driving to make the final decision. Buying a car is a significant matter, spending some time doing research will definitely not go wrong.
出口爆咗，屋企漏咗。
半年銷量180.85 萬輛！放喺任何一家中國車企身上都足以傲視群雄。
但對於而家嘅比亞迪而言，呢份成績單背後唔係凱歌，而係一絲焦慮。
正正所有中國上市車企一樣，海外高歌猛進，國內寒風凜冽；技術屢獲突破，利潤流血唔止。
當「一家獨大」嘅格局被打破，呢家技術見長嘅新能源汽車巨頭，點樣力挽狂瀾？
01
從銷量嘅絕對數字睇，比亞迪 6 月單月 40.35 萬輛嘅銷量，令佢成為當月唯一突破 40 萬輛嘅車企，喺中國自主品牌陣營中，依然穩坐頭把交椅。
今年上半年，比亞迪更加憑藉 180.85 萬輛嘅銷量，繼續拿下自主品牌冠軍；但呢個「冠軍」嘅成色略有褪色。比亞迪以 23.68 萬輛嘅明顯差距，輸俾上海汽車集團，痛失中國上市車企銷冠寶座。
更關鍵嘅係，被上海汽車集團反超呢個訊號，遠比數字本身更值得警惕。佢意味著比亞迪唔再擁有「碾壓式」嘅競爭壁壘，部分對手已經搵到破解之道。
唔單止，仲有追趕者嘅腳步正在不斷逼近。吉利、奇瑞上半年銷量分別達 142.3 萬輛同 127.51 萬輛，且均保持正增長。曾經被比亞迪甩開到連尾燈都睇唔到嘅對手，而家已經出現喺佢後視鏡入面，越嚟越近。
唔可以唔重視嘅係，人哋追嘅時候，比亞迪卻只係減慢下跌嘅幅度。
喺《汽車 K 線》統計喺冊嘅 18 家中國車企中，比亞迪 15.72% 嘅同比跌幅，只係好過中國一汽、長安汽車同小鵬集團。
02
今年開始，比亞迪一家獨大嘅格局被打破，取而代之嘅係「群雄逐鹿」嘅新常態。
更令人憂慮嘅係國內市場。今年上半年，比亞迪嘅國內銷量為 101.91 萬輛，同比減少 39%。
王傳福曾喺去年 12 月股東大會上表示，「技術領先度下降、行業同質化」。呢幾個字，道盡咗比亞迪喺國內市場嘅被動處境。
正如王傳福所講，譬如吉利、奇瑞，乃至上海汽車集團，喺產品層面不斷推出對標比亞迪嘅競品，無論係純電定插混，令比亞迪嘅先發優勢幾乎喪失殆盡。
不過，需要釐清嘅係，呢 39% 嘅下滑，唔完全係「失血」。2025 年同期係國內新能源滲透率爆發式增長嘅超高基數，而比亞迪亦喺主動進行結構性調整，壓縮低利潤嘅網約車同低價訂單，將產能向高端車款同海外市場傾斜。
因此，比亞迪喺國內市場嘅被動處境，亦有部分主動收縮嘅成分。
然而，呢種被動正從「銷量」傳導至「利潤」。
03
4 月 28 日，比亞迪披露 2026 年一季報：營業收入 1502.25 億元，同比下降 11.82%；歸母淨利潤 40.85 億元，同比暴跌 55.38%；扣非淨利潤 41.48 億元，同比下降 49.24%。
利潤腰斬嘅背後，匯兌損失亦係致命嘅「黑天鵝」。一季度公司財務費用高達 21 億元，而去年同期為 19.08 億元嘅匯兌收益。一嚟一轉，僅匯兌因素就吞噬咗約 40 億元嘅剪刀差。
比亞迪喺全球化進程中持有大量美元敞口，美元走弱令呢家技術見長嘅車企喺金融戰場上付出慘痛代價。
40 億元係咩概念？比亞迪 2025 全年淨利潤約 300 億元，一個季度就蒸發咗相當於全年超 13% 嘅利潤。
當然，美元走弱亦降低咗部分原材料（如鋰礦、晶片）嘅進口成本，但呢點紅利遠唔足以對沖匯兌對利潤表嘅直接衝擊。
與此同時，營收同利潤嘅下滑，亦同國內價格戰及銷量走低直接相關。
咁，佢嘅增長動力從點嚟？
04
答案同幾乎所有中國上市車企一樣，仍然指向海外。
今年上半年，比亞迪海外累計銷量 78.94 萬輛，同比猛增 67.92%；6 月單月出口 17.49 萬輛，同比暴增 95%，創历史新高。
與此同時，海外銷量喺總銷量中嘅佔比已突破 43%，全年 150 萬輛嘅海外目標完成率已達 52.62%。
《汽車 K 線》認為，喺整體銷量下滑嘅背景下，海外市場嘅強勁增長幾乎係資本市場對上市車企信心嘅唯一支撐。
從泰國、烏茲別克克工廠投產，到巴西基地首車下線，再到匈牙利工廠確認第四季度啟動組裝，比亞迪正在完成從產品出海到產業出海嘅質變。
交銀國際更加直言「海外市場仍係比亞迪最確定嘅成長來源之一」。
然而，有一個無法迴避嘅問題，比亞迪海外半年 78.94 萬輛嘅增量，減咗國內同比減少嘅約 67 萬輛，淨增量只有約 12 萬輛。
海外市場確實喺狂奔，但更多係喺補國內銷量下跌嘅窟窿，這就是比亞迪而家最真實嘅處境。
何況海外高增長嘅背後亦暗藏隱憂。馬來西亞新例令當地工廠停滯，歐洲關稅壁壘仍喺，一季度巨額嘅匯兌損失恰恰暴露咗比亞迪喺全球化佈局中嘅風險管理短板。
呢啲問題提醒我哋，海外係解藥定新病灶？答案取決於比亞迪能否喺兩個戰場上同時贏。
不過，即使海外存在眾多唔確定性，比亞迪手中仲有另一張牌——技術。
05
3 月，比亞迪正式發布第二代刀片電池同閃充技術，常溫下從 10% 充至 70% 只需 5 分鐘，從 10% 充至 97% 只需 9 分鐘。這無疑係 2026 年新能源汽車領域最具衝擊力嘅技術突破之一。
隨著新電池同閃充技術發布，比亞迪嘅訂單隨住爆發式增長。大湯 EV 上市當日累計訂單突破 15 萬輛。
問題亦隨住浮現：產能唔跟得上。
王傳福喺股東大會上坦言：「今年比亞迪嘅銷量將取決於電池嘅產量」。
目前，第二代刀片電池產能正以每月 2 萬～3 萬套嘅增量爬升，但遠水難解近渴，熱門車款交付需等待數月，大量訂單面臨喺等待中流失嘅風險。
技術領先卻敗俾產能爬坡，這係一種幸福嘅煩惱，即使係比亞迪，喺供應鏈管理同量產節奏把控上亦難免陷入暫時嘅僵局，而技術發布同產能釋放之間嘅時間差，則令先發優勢打咗折扣。
面對銷量、利潤、產能三重壓力，比亞迪嘅選擇係，與其被動挨打，不如主動變革。
06
6 月中旬以來，比亞迪啟動咗成立以來最大規模嘅整車業務組織變革。
王朝、海洋、騰勢、方程豹四大品牌全面推行獨立運營，實行獨立核算、自負盈虧嘅市場化機制。各品牌調用集團產線、電池、核心技術等共享資源，均按內部定價機制單獨結算。
與此同時，集團工程院一拆為五，成立五大品牌專屬研究院。呢樣與而家行業大整合重組，抱團取暖截然不同。
呢套組合拳嘅核心邏輯只有一個——打破「大鍋飯」。過去，集團統一兜底嘅模式令各品牌缺乏利潤意識，產品同質化嚴重，內部資源爭奪激烈；而家，賺咗歸團隊，蝕咗自己攬。
不過，喺銷量下滑、利潤腰斬嘅節骨眼上搞內部分家，必然會經歷陣痛，各品牌獨立核算意味著協同效率暫時下降，若內部協同成本喺短期內大幅上升，比亞迪可能將面臨大企業病嘅陣痛期。
研究院一拆為五，如果協調唔好，底盤、智駕等通用平台可能出現重複造輪子嘅風險。
呢場變革嘅效果唔會立竿見影，但方向係明確嘅，告別粗放增長，回歸經營本質。
07
比亞迪銷量數據披露後，多家機構發布咗研報，整體看法偏樂觀，普遍認可海外銷量超預期係最大亮點，看好閃充技術 + 第二代刀片電池構築差異化壁壘；同時認為公司已逐步走出基本面低點，內銷逐月修復。
其中，東方證券維持「買入」評級，認為整體銷量同環比改善，海外銷量創新高；華創證券則給予「強推」評級，上調全年出口預期至超 180 萬輛。
不過，亦有唔同嘅聲音。里昂將全年銷量預測由 490 萬輛下調至 460 萬輛，目標價由 130 港元下調至 120 港元，以反映銷售低於預期及國內復甦放緩。不過里昂仲係給予比亞迪「高度確信跑贏大市」評級。
呢種分歧本質上反映咗市場對比亞迪「國內能否止跌」嘅判斷差異，海外再強，如果國內繼續失血，整體增長嘅天花板依然清晰。
AutosKline 觀點：
從野蠻生長到存量搏殺，比亞迪喺海外搵到增量，喺技術上築起咗壁壘，喺組織上揮刀向內，呢啲動作說明，王傳福嘅團隊對問題心知肚明。
但戰略嘅清醒唔等於戰術嘅順利，匯率風險管理嘅短板，40 億利潤灰飛煙滅；產能爬坡節奏失控，手握訂單卻交唔出車；深陷價格戰泥潭，品牌溢價能力被持續稀釋……
王傳福講，「最壞時刻已過」，但呢唔等於「好時刻就嚟到」。
從觸底到反彈，中間隔住產能爬坡嘅漫長路、國內價格戰嘅持續消耗，以及匯兌風險嘅週期性威脅。
上汽、吉利、奇瑞……唔會俾比亞迪留低喘息嘅時間。下半年嘅競爭只會更殘酷。
文字為【汽車 K 線】原創，內容參考素材源自上市公司公告同行業公開資訊（相關公司同機構應有義務對真实性负责）；部分圖片來源網絡，版權皆歸原作者。
本號文章，未經授權，唔可以轉載，違者必究。同時，文章內容唔構成對任何人嘅投資建議！股市風險大，投資需謹慎！
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拿 Perodua Aruz 同 Chery Tiggo Cross 嚟做比較。呢兩款車喺價位同定位上都幾接近，今日我哋就從多方面嚟做一個詳細嘅比較，幫你省返做功課嘅時間。
Perodua Aruz 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 72,900 - 77,900，一共有 2 個版本，包括 1.5L X（RM 72,900）、1.5L AV（RM 77,900） 等。
Chery Tiggo Cross 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 88,750 - 99,750，一共有 2 個版本，包括 2025 HEV 1.5L CSH（RM 99,750）、2025 1.5T Standard（RM 88,750） 等。
從價錢嚟睇，Perodua Aruz 嘅入門價確實比 Chery Tiggo Cross 平咗 RM 15,850。如果你預算有限，Perodua 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需要。但亦都要注意，平嘅那幾千塊，可能會喺配備上有取舍，具體要睇你嘅需要。
Perodua Aruz 配備 1.5L 4-cyl，馬力 105 hp。官方油耗 6.0 L/100km。
Chery Tiggo Cross 配備 1.5L 4-cyl，馬力 105 hp。官方油耗 6.0 L/100km。
兩款車用嘅係同一套動力系統，日常開起嚟嘅感覺基本冇分別。油耗方面亦都差唔多，唔使太糾結呢一點。
Perodua Aruz 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括。
Chery Tiggo Cross 嘅安全評級係 TBD，主動安全系統包括 Basic。
Perodua Aruz 車身長 4400 mm，尾箱 400 L。
Chery Tiggo Cross 車身長 4400 mm，尾箱 400 L。
兩款車嘅尺寸幾乎一樣，車內空間分別唔大。呢個級別嘅車，日常使用完全夠用。
Perodua Aruz 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
Chery Tiggo Cross 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
兩款車嘅驅動方式一樣，都係 FWD，日常駕駛感覺唔會有太大分別。
總括嚟講，Perodua Aruz 同 Chery Tiggo Cross 都係馬來西亞市場好唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵仲要睇你嘅個人需要同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試車做最終決定。買車係件大事，花啲時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
头图来源 | 零跑官方
作者 | 文露
编辑 | 苏鹏
没有预售、没有预热期，零跑D99在6月的最后一周直接宣布上市。
这种"不等人"的节奏，倒是符合零跑一贯的效率哲学，但也透露出一个信号：旗舰MPV这个赛道，零跑不想再观望了。
D99是零跑D系列的第二款车型，也是品牌首款MPV。定价方面也依然是零跑式的定价哲学，24.98万-31.98万。并辅以极致的"堆料"路线：29㎡全粒面半苯胺真皮、车规级森野氧舱、双高通8797芯片、VLA大模型智驾、全系标配四驱与双腔空气悬架。
从纸面看，这些配置放在30万级确实超出预期。
智能化是D99的另一张牌。搭载VLA大模型、28个感知硬件、覆盖全场景领航，官方声称能实现"地库到车位全程无人介入"。
随着D99的发布，零跑也补上MPV缺口，完成A、B、C、D四大系列从6万到30万的全产品序列的覆盖。
零跑式“MPV哲学”MPV设计的初衷是让更多人舒适，满足多人家庭乘车需求，空间设计上，零跑D99拥有91.3%得房率，车内可用长度3663毫米，确保每一排乘客实现“坐得开、伸得开、动得开”。
考虑到上下车进出的便利性，零跑D99在多处细节进行优化。二排迎宾系统电动侧滑门开门宽度720毫米、高度892毫米，配合迎宾脚步照明灯，提升上车仪式感与便捷性。二排超长上车拉手（成人拉上段、儿童拉下段，带电动开关门按键）、372毫米迎宾台阶、1385毫米车内高度、283毫米通道宽度，保障上下车优雅省力，儿童可轻松站立行动。
车内180毫米超宽中央通道，满员时成年人也可轻松进出；第三排配备可开启MAX巨幕天窗，解决传统MPV第三排压抑感，同时确保结构、防水、密封、防夹等安全细节。
座舱体验方面，零跑D99前排中控台基本延续零跑D19的设计风格，大尺寸中控屏、液晶仪表和HUD头显。
零跑D99内饰提供云雾灰、丹雅棕、霁雨灰、曜境黑四款低饱和度配色，采用29㎡全粒面半苯胺头层真皮，舱内座椅支持5种成床模式（临时休息、儿童空间、露营大床、商务休息等）。二排配备零重力旋转航空座椅，支持124度调节，配备环抱式加热、通风、按摩、腰托、腿托、脚托。三排座椅舒适体验不减分，配备加热、侧窗遮阳帘等，同时还解决了三排视野压抑、采光差的痛点，放倒后容量扩展至2890L，可做隐藏式下沉折叠。
空间灵活性上，二三排座椅通过不同角度调节，随时切换户外休闲、商务办公等场景。三排座椅翻转后可直接坐于车尾，兼顾遮阳挡雨，适配钓鱼等户外场景；二排座椅90度旋转，打开车内与车外边界，适合露营、看海等休闲场景；二排座椅180度旋转后，配合34.3英寸中央桌板（可隐藏收纳），使车内空间进入移动会客厅模式，实现面对面交流，支持儿童写作业、商务办公等场景。此外，二三排联动可展成近2.5米大床，适配露营过夜、午休补觉、亲子休憩等。
零跑D99全球首发车规级森野氧舱，支持8L/min制氧流量，弥散式+鼻吸式双模式，缓解长途驾驶疲劳与高原反应，同时配备43处储物空间、11.4L全电动车规级冷暖冰箱、智能香氛系统、23扬2304W杜比全景声音响系统、1600万色环舱氛围灯、衣帽间等，从听觉、嗅觉、体感打造全方位舒适座舱体验。
座舱采用双层环绕式设计，搭配行业首创3.9米“团圆”环形氛围灯、360°旋转阅读灯、11块5mm厚夹层隔音玻璃、130+项声学材料与米其林静音轮胎，整体氛围雅致而静谧。
来源：零跑官方
外观方面，零跑D99车身提供辰境蓝、光电白、液态银、天幕灰、金属黑五款配色，前脸采用“寰宇之境”设计，侧面采用纯平侧窗设计，有效降低风噪与风阻、提升视野，同时配备19英寸米其林轮毂、百万像素DLP投影大灯、尾部智慧交互灯，保证科技感和仪式感的同时，又不失实用性。
驾控操作方面，零跑D99全系标配四驱，底盘全系标配前双叉臂、后五连杆独立悬架，搭配双腔闭式空气悬架与可变阻尼减振器，悬架调节行程达95mm，兼顾多场景复杂路况通过性。
LMC2.0底盘控制系统可实现主动预瞄、实时扫描前方路面、提前调节悬架阻尼、过滤坑洼与减速带冲击、高速预稳定、湿滑路面防打滑等功能，高速双轮爆胎、斜坡驻车等极限场景下也能快速修正车身姿态，抑制转向不足、打滑，保障应急安全，同时智能防晕车功能通过多域融合控制，降低乘员晕车风险。
制动与操控方面，零跑D99搭载MKC2线控制动系统与前四活塞固定卡钳，配合米其林浩悦5E轮胎，100-0km/h制动距离仅37.5米，实现6.1米转弯半径，庞大车身也能灵活掉头。
智能化方面，零跑D99首发搭载双高通8797芯片，4nm制程工艺，总算力达1280TOPS。座舱内搭载端侧全模态AI大模型，五屏三维空间交互构建全场景数字视界：10.25英寸液晶仪表、17.3英寸中控屏、50英寸AR-HUD、6英寸后排控制屏、21.4英寸3K后排娱乐屏支持90°-110°电动调节。
LeapmotorOS交互系统支持六音区独立语音、13种方言混说、主驾免唤醒控车，车内不同位置乘客可同时下达指令互不干扰。此外还具备语音点咖啡、停车缴费、语音无感支付等多元功能。
辅助驾驶层面，零跑D99全系标配辅助驾驶提示小蓝灯，采用VLA大模型，配备激光雷达等28个高精感知硬件，覆盖44项主动行车功能，覆盖停车场巡航、闸机通行、城市道路、高速领航、目的地泊车等全场景领航辅助功能，可提前识别旁车异常减速、盲区汇入、夜间窄路、施工障碍等，复杂路况下主动调整车速并精准保持车距。
此外，零跑D99还支持120米循迹倒车、全姿态自动泊车、手机遥控泊车、跨层记忆泊车等功能，大幅降低驾驶负担。
辅助驾驶，VLA世界模型，自主从地库驶出到终点车位泊车，全程几乎无需人为介入，它不仅能精准保持车距、平稳加减速，无论是借道避让同侧停靠车辆，还是无车道线乡村道路的稳定轨迹，都处理得游刃有余。
在安全性方面，系统会自主判断各种风险，比如非机动车道混行路段自动减速，以突发加塞时的从容应对，相关车辆逼近时智能避让，都体现出对于出行安全的周全考量。
续航方面，零跑D99提供增程、纯电种动力，增程版搭载80.3kWh磷酸铁锂电池，CLTC纯电续航高达480km，CTC电池底盘一体化技术配合800V高压快充平台，30%-80%充电仅需约15分钟。纯电版搭载全球首发宁德时代分子级融合超混电芯，电池容量115kWh，CLTC纯电续航700km，采用全栈1000V高压架构，峰值快充功率超460kW，充电15分钟补能超350km。
作为一辆旗舰MPV，安全是必不可少的纬度。
被动安全方面，零跑D99车身采用钢铝合金环笼式车身设计，占比达81%，车身扭转刚度达 46682N・m/deg，配备11个安全气囊，从A柱到D柱拥有2.9米的贯穿式侧气帘，前排拥有中置气囊，看齐九系旗舰，全车12处防夹设计应对超20种场景。
主动安全方面，零跑D99标配主动AEB紧急制动系统，适配城市拥堵与高速场景，AI自适应驾驶模式可基于路况在500毫秒内切换动力模式。电池拥有十层防护体系，最高耐温超1300℃，热失控后72小时不起火不爆炸，AIBMS自适应电池管理系统可提前30天预判电池风险。
从6万到30万，零跑的棋盘落满棋子今年4月，旗舰SUV车型 D19正式上市。彼时零跑已经凭借C系列、B系列在10-20万元主流市场站稳了脚跟，月销稳定在8万数据。
A系列负责10万元以内的基盘，B系列和C系列深耕10-20万元走量区间，这是零跑的销量支柱，也是利润来源。但在D系列出现之前，零跑缺少一款能往上探的序列，让品牌价格带从“6万起”一路延伸到“30万级”的产品矩阵。
D19打开了SUV的天花板，D99则补上了MPV的缺口。至此，零跑完成了从轿车、SUV到MPV的全品类覆盖，A、B、C、D四大系列价格带横跨6万至30万元，构建起一个从入门到高端的完整矩阵。
今年5月的一季度业绩电话会上，零跑透露正在规划第二品牌，定位30万元以上高端新能源市场，最快年底或明年亮相。
零跑的产品节奏也相当密集：3月A10上市，4月D19登场，6月中旬C系列中期改款，下半年到明年第二品牌接棒——老车型的年款、中改、换代也会穿插其中，维持现款车型的竞争力。
“旗舰SUV和MPV具备高端属性，D19和D99为后续更高端的第二品牌铺平认知道路。”有业内人士告诉未来汽车Daily。
铺平认知道路的前提是走量。在零跑D99发布之前，高端新能源MPV市场存在稳定而高频的需求。
来源：零跑官方
数据是最好的佐证：2025年国内MPV销量前三——腾势D9卖出92988辆，广汽丰田赛那92214辆，岚图梦想家80248辆。三款车均在30-50万元价格带的热销产品中，有两款都是新能源MPV。
MPV的消费场景决定了它天然具备高溢价潜力。家庭多孩出行的空间刚需，商务接待的体面要求，让用户对舒适性、智能化配置、座舱豪华感的支付意愿远高于轿车和SUV。
更重要的是，这个细分市场的智能化和电动化转型远未完成。当轿车和SUV领域已进入配置内卷的“血海”，MPV仍存在向下惠普的市场空间。
这正是零跑擅长的战场。
零跑能在新势力销量榜上登顶，靠的是全域自研带来的成本控制能力。
数据是最直观的：除制造人员外，零跑研发人员占比仍达80%，核心零部件自研率超60%，三电系统自制率超80%。和依赖外部采购的对手相比，零跑在底盘整合、智能座舱、动力系统等环节拥有“同等配置、成本更低”的优势。
D99搭载的双高通8797舱驾一体芯片、端侧AI大模型、底盘系统等核心配置，都和D19同平台共享。基于D平台的底层复用，两款旗舰车型的研发成本被大幅摊薄，让D99得以在30万级价格带上实现百万级配置。
低成本反哺技术迭代，技术迭代进一步压低成本——这是零跑从T03时代就开始验证的良性循环。
比走量更重要的，是挣得好对一家月销稳定在8万辆以上的车企来说，比“卖得多”更迫切的，是“挣得好”。
一季度财报里的数字很诚实。营收108.2亿元，同比增长8%，但毛利率从14.9%滑落至9.4%。销量在涨，营收在涨，钱却没多赚——原因并不复杂：售价更低的B系列车型在结构中的占比升高，拉低了整体均价。
5月的最新数据印证了这一点。零跑单月交付超8万台，C系列贡献超过四成，依旧是绝对主力。C系列能走量，但品牌往上走，需要新的支点。
零跑副总裁李腾飞在一季度电话会上给出了预期：二季度毛利率有望回升至12%到13%。随着产能爬坡加速，规模效应的齿轮开始转动，成本正在被摊薄。
C10、C11、C16的改款版本已经就位，D19和D99两款高端车型也将加入战局——二季度的盈利账本，或许会比市场预期的好看一些。
来源：零跑官方
中国汽车工业协会和乘联会的数据勾勒出另一幅图景：2025年国内SUV累计零售1187.8万辆，轿车1080.9万辆，而MPV仅有105.8万辆。从体量上看，MPV确实算不上主流市场。
但体量不等于价值。
家庭结构的变化正在重塑用车需求，MPV的边界也从纯粹的商务接待向家用、定制化综合场景延展。年轻化、智能化的新需求涌入，车企们嗅到了机会。2025年，岚图梦想家、理想MEGA、小鹏X9、魏牌高山等新品扎堆入局，价格带从15万延伸到80万元。
华创证券6月发布的研报点指出：25万-60万元高端MPV兼顾家用与商务需求，利润贡献能力显著；40万-60万元区间则具备一定豪华属性，容量虽小，单车利润可观。
岚图梦想家是一个值得对标的案例。避开SUV的惨烈厮杀，这款车精准卡位商务接待与家庭出行的交叉地带。2025年销量超8万辆，占总销量一半以上，单车均价突破40万元，助力岚图实现年收入348.6亿元，毛利率升至20.9%。
当然，这条路并不平坦。
今年一季度，MPV市场零售21.2万辆，同比下滑8.6%。市场在波动，新车发布的节奏却没有慢下来。仅华为鸿蒙智行合作的车型，今年就有智界V9、尊界MPV、享界MPV三款在售或即将上市。
新能源车市的下半场是智能化的较量，MPV赛道的变数只会更多。下半年会不会有黑马精准切入、迅速占领用户心智，谁也无法预判。对零跑D99来说，此时入场，仍有足够的空间腾挪。
更大的棋盘在海外。
零跑高管在6月的采访中透露，站在150万台销量的里程碑上，下一个十年的方向是全球化——产品和管理的全面输出。6月18日，超跑Lafa5在香港上市，加上刚刚发布的D99，零跑正在以更完整的品类矩阵走向世界。
D99的全球化想象力或许比国内更大。目前零跑海外用户已超15万，覆盖全球40个国家和地区，渠道网点超2000家，其中海外近1000家——欧洲占近90%，亚太超60家，南美超40家。一台定价合理、配置丰富的新能源MPV，在这些市场面对的竞争压力，远小于国内。
朱江明在3月曾表示：“2026年，我们（零跑）会全面爆发。”
D99是这场爆发的序章。这款车没有开启预售，直接选择上市——零跑显然不想再等了。
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拿 Perodua Aruz 同 Mazda CX-30 嚟做比較。這兩款車喺價位同埋定位上都幾接近，今日我哋就從多個方面做一次詳細嘅對比，幫你省咗做功課嘅時間。
Perodua Aruz 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 72,900 - 77,900，一共有 2 個版本，包括 1.5L X（RM 72,900）、1.5L AV（RM 77,900） 等。
Mazda CX-30 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 122,409 - 146,409，一共有 4 個版本，包括 2025 2.0L High+ Premium（RM 146,409）、2025 2.0L High+（RM 138,409）、2025 2.0L High（RM 130,409） 等。
由價錢睇嚟，Perodua Aruz 嘅起步價確實比 Mazda CX-30 平咗 RM 49,509。如果你預算有限，Perodua 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需求。但亦都要注意，平嗰啲幾千蚊，可能喺配備上會有取舍，具體要看你嘅需求。
Perodua Aruz 配備 1.5L 4-cyl，馬力 105 hp。官方油耗 6.0 L/100km。
Mazda CX-30 配備 1.5L Turbo，馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。
動力方面，Mazda CX-30 嘅 1.5L Turbo 比 Perodua Aruz 嘅 1.5L 4-cyl 多咗 35 匹馬力。不過日常喺市區開，兩款車嘅動力都夠用，唔會覺得唔夠力。
Perodua Aruz 車身長 4400 mm，後備箱 400 L。
Mazda CX-30 車身長 4500 mm，後備箱 450 L。
空間方面，Mazda CX-30 嘅車身比 Perodua Aruz 長咗 100 mm，乘坐空間更有優勢。不過 Perodua Aruz 喺城市入面停車會靈活啲，各有取舍。
Perodua Aruz 保修 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Mazda CX-30 保修 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
兩款車嘅保修條件一樣，呢方面唔使糾結。實際保養成本仲要睇品牌嘅服務網絡同零件價格，建議去車友群問問真實車主嘅經驗。
總體嚟講，Perodua Aruz 同 Mazda CX-30 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車款。揀邊一輛，關鍵都係睇你嘅個人需求同埋預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，先至去試車做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
In Malaysia's SUV market, many buyers compare Perodua Aruz and Proton X70 when choosing a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning, so today we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save research time.
Perodua Aruz OTR price in Malaysia is RM 72,900 - 77,900, with a total of 2 versions, including 1.5L X (RM 72,900), 1.5L AV (RM 77,900), etc.
Proton X70 OTR price in Malaysia is RM 106,800 - 122,300, with a total of 3 versions, including 1.5L Standard 2WD (RM 106,800), 1.5L Executive 2WD (RM 115,800), 1.5L Premium 2WD (RM 122,300), etc.
In terms of price, Perodua Aruz starting price is indeed RM 33,900 cheaper than Proton X70. If your budget is limited, Perodua's entry version can already meet daily needs. But also note, the few thousand cheaper might involve trade-offs on features, it depends on your specific needs.
Perodua Aruz is equipped with 1.5L 4-cyl, 105 hp power. Official fuel consumption 6.0 L/100km.
Proton X70 is equipped with 1.5L Turbo, 140 hp power. Official fuel consumption 7.0 L/100km.
Regarding power, Proton X70's 1.5L Turbo has 35 more horsepower than Perodua Aruz's 1.5L 4-cyl. However, for daily city driving, power for both cars is sufficient, will not feel underpowered.
Perodua Aruz body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
Proton X70 body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
Dimensions of both cars are almost the same, interior space difference is not significant. Cars of this class, daily use is completely sufficient.
Perodua Aruz warranty 5 years/150,000km, service interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Proton X70 warranty 5 years/150,000km, service interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Warranty conditions for both cars are the same, no need to worry about this. Actual maintenance cost depends on brand's service network and parts prices, recommend asking real owners in car owner groups for experience.
Overall, Perodua Aruz and Proton X70 are both quite good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends on your personal needs and budget. It is recommended to do research, compare quotes from several dealerships, and go for a test drive to make the final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending time on research will definitely not be wrong.
In the past two years of the Chinese auto market, price wars, technology wars, and global expansion wars have advanced intertwined. In the first half of 2026, as these variables accelerate simultaneously, the complexity and intensity of market competition have also been pushed to a new historical height. Looking back at the first half of 2026, the Chinese auto market was full of magical colors. The density of new car launches and the intensity of upgrades have once again refreshed external cognition.
Under such a competitive rhythm, hit products are becoming fewer. Products that can maintain continuous global hot sales, keep monthly sales exceeding 10,000, and maintain high heat and word-of-mouth are extremely rare.
Deepal S05 is one of this "very small number" camp.
According to the latest June global sales data released by Deepal S05, the June global sales achieved 18,369 units, a year-on-year increase of 78.86%.
Not only that, Deepal S05 also won the sales champion of 120,000-180,000 RMB-level compact SUVs for 4 consecutive months from March to June this year. Its global hot sales map has already covered 73 countries and regions worldwide, and the global cumulative sales have broken through 240,000 units.
Just looking at the data, this series of numbers is enough to explain the market's recognition of Deepal S05. You should know that currently, the vast majority of products generally face the "Valley of Death" effect. The hot sales cycle of a new car is extremely short, while Deepal S05 has achieved monthly sales exceeding 10,000, continuous topping, and fully blooming results domestically and globally.
If numbers are just the result, then what is truly worth questioning is clearly what Deepal S05 got right behind this set of hot sales data?
In our opinion, there are three key passwords for hot sales behind this. The first is the satisfaction of rigid demand in product power.
In the compact new energy SUV sub-market, although market choices are rich, with layout from independent to joint ventures, the product power involution around configurations, prices, materials, etc., is arguably fierce, but Deepal S05 did not blindly pile materials nor obsess on showing off skills. Instead, it anchored the highest frequency, most real vehicle usage scenarios for users, spending every bit of cost on the "edge" users can perceive.
In terms of range, compared to the mainstream 500 km level of most products in the same price range, Deepal S05's pure electric range can reach up to 620 km. For complex climates, Deepal S05 is also equipped with the world-first Micro-core High-Frequency Pulse Heating Technology and Heat Pump Air Conditioning System, which can effectively solve the problem of range attenuation in low temperatures.
In terms of recharging, Deepal S05 directly standardizes 3C supercharging technology across the entire series, requiring only 15 minutes to complete SOC 30%-80% energy replenishment. In terms of safety, Deepal S05 also equips the entire series with CATL + Golden Bell Battery technology. Safety certifications far exceed new national standards, building the most basic trust foundation for users with unseen hard power.
In terms of space, relying on the 2880mm class-leaping wheelbase and CTV body-battery integration technology, seating space close to a mid-size SUV was achieved within the size of a compact SUV. Plus the storage combination of a 159L front trunk and a 492L trunk, Deepal S05 has written the two words "practical" into every detail.
Not greedy for many, not seeking complete, aiming for rigid demand, achieving the best in class in the scenarios users use most frequently. This is exactly the product philosophy of Deepal S05 standing out in configuration involution.
The second is Deepal Automobile's forward-looking global vision and agile global layout speed.
In the new energy compact SUV sub-market, the vast majority of Chinese brands still focus their focus on the stock game in the domestic market, and overseas strategies often stay in the "long-term planning" stage. But Deepal S05, based on a globally unified manufacturing and quality control system, quickly advanced into 73 countries and regions worldwide in just over a year.
From Southeast Asia to Middle East and Africa, from Central and South America to European core markets. The pace of steps, the extent of coverage, is almost impossible to find a second sample in the same class of models.
Beyond speed, depth is also worth paying attention to. In the overseas market, Deepal S05 also won multiple authoritative recognitions such as the German iF Design Award, Thailand Annual Best Rear-Wheel Drive Compact Electric SUV, Chile Autocosmos 2026 Best Recommended Model, FIPA Americas Automotive Journalists Association Annual Hybrid Model Award.
These authoritative awards from different regions and different evaluation systems all point to one conclusion: Deepal S05's product strength can stand up to the most rigorous scrutiny globally. According to planning, Deepal S05 will enter 150+ countries and regions worldwide in the future. The continuous expansion of the global map means that the Deepal S05 phenomenon of monthly sales exceeding 10,000 and continuous hot sales will be the norm.
The third is the dissemination at the cultural level and the satisfaction of emotional value.
Current market competition is no longer just a simple battle of product power, especially when the rise of the main young consumer army, the satisfaction of emotional value has also become an important part of each car company's competition soft power. For this form of competition, Deepal S05 also had insight early on.
In May this year, Deepal Automobile officially signed to become the global official partner of the Portugal National Team. At the Lisbon announcement site, Deepal Automobile delivered Deepal S05 to the team and simultaneously launched a 1,000 km Europe long-term test.
With sports spirit as the emotional link, under the hot promotion of the World Cup, Deepal S05 not only won more market exposure but also further solidified the global consumer market's image cognition of its "global flagship product". This will also form key empowerment for its upcoming global journey.
In summary, product competitiveness lays the foundation, global map expands increment, product emotional value reversely empowers hard power. Three layers advance, linked rings. This itself is a complete hot sales closed loop. And this closed loop, undoubtedly, will also usher in continuous self-reinforcement and expansion as Deepal S05 enters more countries and regions, the global user base continues to expand, and product power continues to evolve.
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嗰陣都會將 Mazda CX-60 同 BMW X1 比吓。呢兩款車喺價位同定位上都幾接近，今日我哋就從多方面做詳細嘅對比，幫你節省做功課嘅時間。
Mazda CX-60 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 200,510 - 252,873，共有 2 個版本，包括 2026 3.3T 4WD High Plus（RM 252,873）、2025 2.5L 2WD High（RM 200,510） 等。
BMW X1 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 252,800 - 252,800，共有 2 個版本，包括 sDrive18i（RM 220,000）、sDrive20i（RM 250,000） 等。
從價錢睇嚟，Mazda CX-60 嘅起步價的確比 BMW X1 平咗 RM 52,290。如果你預算有限，Mazda 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需要。但都要留意，平嗰幾千塊，喺配備上可能會有所取捨，具體要睇你嘅需要。
Mazda CX-60 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
BMW X1 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
兩款車嘅驅動方式一樣，都係 FWD，日常駕駛感受唔會有太大分別。
Mazda CX-60 保修 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
BMW X1 保修 5 年/無限里程，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Mazda CX-60 同 BMW X1 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更重視品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，嗰就揀配置更豐富嗰款。最後都建議兩款都去試駕，親身體驗先係最重要。
總而言之，Mazda CX-60 同 BMW X1 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵都係要睇你嘅個人需要同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕先做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嗰陣都會拎 Chery Tiggo 9 同 GWM Haval H6 嚟做比較。呢兩款車喺價位同定位上都幾接近，今日我哋就從多個方面做一個詳細嘅比較，幫你省咗做功課嘅時間。
Chery Tiggo 9 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 166,800 - 179,800，總共有 1 個版本，包括 2026 2.0T Standard（RM 179,750）等。
GWM Haval H6 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 139,750 - 139,750，總共有 2 個版本，包括 1.5L Turbo Standard（RM 140,000）、1.5L Turbo Premium（RM 155,000）等。
由價錢睇，GWM Haval H6 嘅起步價比 Chery Tiggo 9 平咗 RM 27,050。實講，喺呢個價位段，幾千蚊嘅差距其實唔算大，關鍵仲係睇整體嘅性價比同長期使用成本。
Chery Tiggo 9 配備 2.0L 4-cyl，馬力 170 hp。官方油耗 8.0 L/100km。
GWM Haval H6 配備 Hybrid，馬力 170 hp。官方油耗 4.5 L/100km。
動力方面，GWM Haval H6 嘅 Hybrid 比 Chery Tiggo 9 嘅 2.0L 4-cyl 多咗 0 匹馬力。不過日常喺市區開，兩款車嘅動力都夠用，唔會覺得唔夠力。
Chery Tiggo 9 嘅安全評級係 TBD，主動安全系統包括 Basic。
GWM Haval H6 嘅安全評級係 TBD，主動安全系統包括 Basic。
兩款車嘅安全評級一樣，喺呢個級別入面安全配備都算俾得好齊全。而家嘅新車安全性都唔差，唔使太擔心呢一點。
Chery Tiggo 9 車身長 4400 mm，行李箱 400 L。
GWM Haval H6 車身長 4400 mm，行李箱 400 L。
兩款車嘅尺寸幾乎一樣，車內空間分別唔大。呢個級別嘅車，日常使用完全夠用。
Chery Tiggo 9 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
GWM Haval H6 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
兩款車嘅驅動方式一樣，都係 FWD，日常駕駛感受唔會有太大分別。
總體嚟講，Chery Tiggo 9 同 GWM Haval H6 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊輛，關鍵仲係要睇你個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對無錯。
喺馬來西亞嘅皮卡市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拎 Mazda BT-50 同 Mitsubishi Triton 嚟比較。這兩款車喺價錢同定位上都幾接近，今日我哋就從多個方面做個詳細比較，幫你省下做功課嘅時間。
Mazda BT-50 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 140,418 - 140,418，一共有 1 個版本，包括 2025 3.0T High Plus（RM 140,418） 等。
Mitsubishi Triton 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 101,930 - 169,930，一共有 7 個版本，包括 2026 Double Cab 2.4T AT Athlete Championship（RM 169,930）、2026 Double Cab 2.4T AT Premium Championship（RM 155,930）、2025 Double Cab 2.4T AT Athlete（RM 159,930） 等。
從價錢嚟睇，Mitsubishi Triton 嘅起步價比 Mazda BT-50 平咗 RM 38,488。老實講，喺呢個價位段，幾千塊嘅差距其實唔算大，關鍵仲要睇整體嘅性價比同長期使用成本。
Mazda BT-50 搭載 2.5L Diesel，馬力 187 hp。官方油耗 8.5 L/100km。
Mitsubishi Triton 搭載 2.5L Diesel，馬力 187 hp。官方油耗 8.5 L/100km。
兩款車用緊同一套動力系統，日常開落嚟嘅感受基本冇咩分別。油耗方面都差唔多，唔使太糾結呢一點。
Mazda BT-50 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 Brand ADAS。
Mitsubishi Triton 嘅安全評級係 TBD，主動安全系統包括 Basic。
安全配備方面，兩款車都拿到唔錯嘅評級。不過 Mazda BT-50 嘅 Brand ADAS 同 Mitsubishi Triton 嘅 Basic 喺功能上有少少分別，如果你比較睇重主動安全嘅話，可以仔細對比一下兩者嘅功能列表。
Mazda BT-50 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
Mitsubishi Triton 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
兩款車嘅驅動方式一樣，都係 FWD，日常駕駛感受唔會有太大分別。
Mazda BT-50 同 Mitsubishi Triton 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更睇重品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰一款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，就揀配備更豐富嗰款。最終都係建議兩款都去試駕，親身體驗先係最重要。
總體嚟講，Mazda BT-50 同 Mitsubishi Triton 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊部車，關鍵仲要睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕先做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
喺馬來西亞嘅汽車市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拿富豪 XC60 PHEV 同保時捷 Macan 嚟做比較。今日我哋從多個方面做一個詳細嘅比較，幫你省下做功課嘅時間。
富豪 XC60 PHEV 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 362,888 - 362,888，一共冇 2 個版本，包咗 2025 2.0T 89km Ultra（RM 362,888）、富豪 XC60 PHEV 具備哪些安全配備？（RM 296,610） 等。
保時捷 Macan 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 469,000 - 469,000，一共 4 個版本，包咗 2025 55 quattro S line（RM 467,285）、2025 50 quattro Advanced（RM 361,135）、PMT 1874, Lorong IKS BukitTengah 14000 武吉美占（RM 296,610） 等。
從價錢嚟睇，富豪 XC60 PHEV 嘅起步價確實比保時捷 Macan 便宜咗 RM 106,112。如果你預算有限，富豪嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需求。但都要注意，便宜嗰幾千蚊，喺配備上可能會做取舍，具體睇你嘅需求。
富豪 XC60 PHEV 搭載 Hybrid，馬力 170 hp。官方油耗 4.5 L/100km。
保時捷 Macan 搭載 3.0L Turbo，馬力 350 hp。官方油耗 12.0 L/100km。
動力方面，保時捷 Macan 嘅 3.0L Turbo 比富豪 XC60 PHEV 嘅 Hybrid 多咗 180 匹馬力。不過日常喺市區開嘅話，兩款車嘅動力都夠用，唔會覺得唔夠力。
富豪 XC60 PHEV 保修 5 年/無限里程，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
保時捷 Macan 保修 3 年/100,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
富豪 XC60 PHEV 同保時捷 Macan 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更睇重品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰一款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，嗰就揀配置更豐富嗰款。最終都係建議兩款都去試駕，親身體驗先至係最重要嘅。
總嘅嚟講，富豪 XC60 PHEV 同保時捷 Macan 都係馬來西亞市場好唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵都係要睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
喺馬來西亞嘅汽車市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拿 Mazda CX-5 同 BMW X1 嚟做比較。今日我哋由多個方面做一個詳細嘅比較，幫你省下做功課嘅時間。
Mazda CX-5 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 135,469 - 166,760，一共有 3 個版本，包括 2025 2.0L AT 35th Anniversary（RM 316,154）、2025 2.0L AT（RM 296,154）、2025 2.0L MT（RM 294,154）等。
BMW X1 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 252,800 - 252,800，一共有 2 個版本，包括 sDrive18i（RM 220,000）、sDrive20i（RM 250,000）等。
從價錢嚟睇，Mazda CX-5 嘅起步價確實比 BMW X1 平咗 RM 117,331。如果你預算有限，Mazda 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需求。但都記住，平嗰啲幾千蚊，可能喺配備上面會有取捨，具體要睇你嘅需求。
Mazda CX-5 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括。
BMW X1 嘅安全評級係 5★ (Euro NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 Premium ADAS。
Mazda CX-5 車身長 4500 mm，行李箱 450 L。
BMW X1 車身長 4400 mm，行李箱 400 L。
空間方面，Mazda CX-5 嘅車身比 BMW X1 長咗 100 mm，車內乘坐空間會稍微寬鬆啲，尤其係後座腿部空間。如果你經常載家人或者需要放嬰兒車，大一點嘅車身確實更實用。
Mazda CX-5 保修 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
BMW X1 保修 5 年/無限里程，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
總體嚟講，Mazda CX-5 同 BMW X1 都係馬來西亞市場好唔錯嘅車型。揀邊輛，關鍵都係要睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
車型概覽
東風小康E5 Plus 值唔值得睇，第一步唔係望牌子或者外形，而係睇佢能唔能夠配合你嘅香港日常。 呢篇會集中講家庭乘坐、行李同舒適度，幫你用買家角度篩走唔適合嘅選擇。 近期市場討論到「大空間+230km純電續航 DFSK發佈插電混能SUV E5 PLUS」，代表呢類車型仍然有一定關注度。
售價仍待確認，買家可以先把佢放入候選名單，等價格落實後再同同級車逐項比較。
購車價格指南
東風小康E5 Plus 目前售價仍未清晰，較理性嘅做法係先睇版本、車身大小同動力形式，等價格落實後再決定值唔值得落訂。
如果有幾個版本可揀，可以先將 2026 PHEV 1.5L 135km 標準版 5座（價格待確認）、2026 PHEV 1.5L 135km 標準版 6座（價格待確認）、2026 PHEV 1.5L 135km 標準版 7座（價格待確認）、2026 PHEV 1.5L 135km 智能版 5座（價格待確認） 放喺同一張清單。日常通勤重視舒適同易用，家庭買家就要優先睇後排、尾箱同安全配置。
核心規格重點
睇 東風小康E5 Plus 嘅規格，重點唔係背數字，而係理解佢喺香港用車場景會帶嚟咩分別。
25.3 kWh 嘅電池容量，真正意義係可以幫你估算一星期通勤同周末出車要唔要中途補電。 92 Ps / 68 kW / 160 kW、130/280 N·m 嘅輸出，令高速併線同短距離超車更有信心。 車長 4760 mm、車闊 1865 mm、車高 1710 mm、軸距 2785 mm 可以幫你預判商場停車場、屋苑車位同後排腿部空間。 電子無級變速(E-CVT)、前置前駆 會影響起步順滑度、濕地穩定感同長途巡航性格。
優缺點分析
東風小康E5 Plus 嘅優點唔需要講到天花龍鳳，真正有價值係佢能唔能夠令日常用車更省心：電池同續航資訊有助安排通勤同補電、動力輸出對高速同上斜更有底氣、空間同車身尺寸方便家庭買家預判實用性。
要留意嘅係，要先確認屋苑、公司或常去商場嘅充電條件、香港停車場同窄路使用要留意車身闊度。呢啲唔一定係缺點，但係落訂前應該先諗清楚。
買家常見問題
買 東風小康E5 Plus 之前，真正要問嘅唔係單一規格，而係佢可唔可以融入你每日嘅生活節奏。
常見疑問係「賽力斯 Seres E5 Plus 係一款咩定位嘅 SUV？」簡單講，賽力斯 Seres E5 Plus 係一款大空間嘅智能家用純電動 SUV。 放到實際用車，就係要睇佢對通勤、泊車、家庭乘坐同長期成本有幾大幫助。
同級對比內容
將 東風小康E5 Plus 放入同級車清單時，唔建議只用外形或者品牌光環決定。比較順序可以係：先等售價落實，再決定佢應該同邊個級距比較、再睇動力係咪足夠應付高速併線同滿載、再比較能源成本同補能便利、最後睇車身大小、座位同尾箱是否適合家人。
咁樣篩選會貼近香港買家真實生活：平日塞車、商場泊車、周末去新界、甚至一家人出入，先係一部車每日要面對嘅考驗。
用車全周期指南
擁有 東風小康E5 Plus 最重要係先諗清楚充電節奏。屋苑、公司或者常去商場只要有穩定充電選項，電動化用車就會容易相處好多。
如果你主要喺市區行，視野、低速順滑度同泊車輔助會好影響心情；如果經常行高速或跨區，座椅舒適度、隔音同動力從容感會更重要。
車型概覽
本田Jazz 值唔值得睇，第一步唔係望牌子或者外形，而係睇佢能唔能夠配合你嘅香港日常。 呢篇會集中講香港停車場同窄路使用，幫你用買家角度篩走唔適合嘅選擇。
零售價 HK$ 116,356 - 150,473、完稅價 HK$ 169,880 - 219,880 令預算位置更清楚，買家可以先估算月供、保險、泊車同日常開支。
購車價格指南
本田Jazz 嘅購車預算可以先由 零售價 HK$ 116,356 - 150,473、完稅價 HK$ 169,880 - 219,880 開始計。香港買車唔只係睇車價，月供、保險、牌費、泊車同能源成本都會影響每月壓力。
如果有幾個版本可揀，可以先將 2023 1.5L Crosstar（HK$ 169,880）、2023 e:HEV 1.5L RS（HK$ 219,880） 放喺同一張清單。日常通勤重視舒適同易用，家庭買家就要優先睇後排、尾箱同安全配置。
核心規格重點
睇 本田Jazz 嘅規格，重點唔係背數字，而係理解佢喺香港用車場景會帶嚟咩分別。
121 Ps / 89 kW / 106 Ps / 78 kW、145/127/253 N·m 嘅輸出，令高速併線同短距離超車更有信心。 車長 4095/4090 mm、車闊 1725/1695 mm、車高 1565/1535 mm 可以幫你預判商場停車場、屋苑車位同後排腿部空間。 無級變速(CVT) / 電子無級變速(E-CVT)、前置前駆 會影響起步順滑度、濕地穩定感同長途巡航性格。
優缺點分析
本田Jazz 嘅優點唔需要講到天花龍鳳，真正有價值係佢能唔能夠令日常用車更省心：預算位置清楚，方便同同級車直接比較、日常能源成本有基本參考、動力輸出對高速同上斜更有底氣。
要留意嘅係，要先確認屋苑、公司或常去商場嘅充電條件、香港停車場同窄路使用要留意車身闊度。呢啲唔一定係缺點，但係落訂前應該先諗清楚。
買家常見問題
買 本田Jazz 之前，真正要問嘅唔係單一規格，而係佢可唔可以融入你每日嘅生活節奏。
常見疑問係「Honda Jazz 嘅車身尺碼係幾多？泊車難唔難？」簡單講，Jazz e:HEV RS 車身長 4,090 mm、闊 1,695 mm、高 1,535 mm，Jazz Crosstar 車身長 4,095 mm、高 1,565 mm。兩個型號嘅轉向半徑都係 4.9 米，係同級入面最短之一，喺香港狹窄街道同停車場泊車非常靈活。 放到實際用車，就係要睇佢對通勤、泊車、家庭乘坐同長期成本有幾大幫助。
同級對比內容
將 本田Jazz 放入同級車清單時，唔建議只用外形或者品牌光環決定。比較順序可以係：先用 零售價 HK$ 116,356 - 150,473、完稅價 HK$ 169,880 - 219,880 鎖定預算圈、再睇動力係咪足夠應付高速併線同滿載、再比較能源成本同補能便利、最後睇車身大小、座位同尾箱是否適合家人。
咁樣篩選會貼近香港買家真實生活：平日塞車、商場泊車、周末去新界、甚至一家人出入，先係一部車每日要面對嘅考驗。
用車全周期指南
擁有 本田Jazz 最重要係先諗清楚充電節奏。屋苑、公司或者常去商場只要有穩定充電選項，電動化用車就會容易相處好多。
如果你主要喺市區行，視野、低速順滑度同泊車輔助會好影響心情；如果經常行高速或跨區，座椅舒適度、隔音同動力從容感會更重要。
In May, China's automotive market overall presented a gentle recovery trend, with domestic brands still being the sales backbone of the market. Recently, BYD, Geely, Chery, Changan, and Great Wall, the top 5 domestic automakers, successively released their monthly performance reports. From the data, these five companies show a general characteristic of "stable total growth, divergence between domestic and international markets, and accelerated new energy penetration". Overseas exports and new energy vehicles have become the most core growth engines; export business has evolved from a "bonus item" to the "core foundation" for some companies. BYD's "dominant leader" status is further consolidated, Chery achieved high growth via exports, Geely's new energy penetration rate broke 56%, Changan focused steadily on balanced development, while Great Wall appeared slightly under pressure during structural transformation.
BYD: Export Hits New High Becomes Biggest HighlightIn May, BYD stood firmly at the top of domestic brands with a monthly sales volume of 383,500 vehicles, maintaining positive growth both year-on-year and month-over-month under a large base. Its two main brands, Dynasty and Ocean, sold a combined 330,200 vehicles, contributing 86.1% of total sales; Fangchengbao's monthly sales broke 30,000 units to reach 30,200, a year-on-year increase of 139.7%, setting a new high for the year; Denza sold 16,300 vehicles, and Yangwang delivered 286 vehicles. From a model perspective, BYD had eight models in May with monthly sales exceeding 20,000 vehicles. The Song Family and Yuan Family both broke 50,000 units, selling 51,370 and 56,691 vehicles respectively. The Sea Lion Family followed closely with 42,615 vehicles, and Seagull sales were also close to 40,000 vehicles.
BYD's biggest highlight in May was exports. Overseas new energy vehicle sales reached 160,600 units, an 80.4% year-on-year increase, accounting for about 42%. The sharp expansion of export scale effectively countered the phased weakness in domestic demand. Cumulative exports from January to May exceeded 620,000 vehicles. High export growth mainly benefited from continued ramping up of overseas factory capacity, improved ocean shipping capacity, and accelerated channel network expansion. In the domestic market, BYD promoted Megawatt Super Charging and intelligent strategies simultaneously—Megawatt charging achieved about 90% charge in 9 minutes; 20,000 super charging stations are planned to be built by 2026; all series models are available with Sky Eye B intelligent driving solutions and city navigation safety fallback plans, accelerating the popularization of high-level intelligent driving. As Gen 2 Blade Battery capacity gradually releases, the company's orders are expected to continue rising.
Chery: Sales Growth Leads the Top 5Chery Group's total sales volume in May was 247,800 vehicles, a significant year-on-year increase of 20.5%, ranking first in growth speed among the top 5. Exports remained its most core growth engine—May exports reached 181,900 vehicles, an 80.5% year-on-year increase, accounting for 73.4% of total sales that month, continuously breaking the single-month export record for Chinese brands for three months. In terms of new energy, Chery New Energy sold 100,300 vehicles, a 58.8% year-on-year increase. April and May consecutively saw monthly new energy sales breaking 100,000 vehicles.
The strong performance in exports benefited from Chery's long-term deep cultivation of overseas channel advantages and localized operation capabilities. While overseas orders continued to rise, high export growth formed a sharp contrast with domestic sales—Chery's domestic sales in May were only 60,000 vehicles, accounting for one-quarter of total sales. From cumulative data, Chery Group accumulated 1.101 million sales from January to May, but against the annual goal of 3.2 million vehicles, monthly averages need to reach about 420,000 vehicles later, and pressure remains significant.
Geely: New Energy Penetration Rate Breaks 56%Geely Auto's total sales volume in May was 237,600 vehicles, a 1% year-on-year increase, achieving month-over-month double growth for three consecutive months. In terms of structure, Geely's "New Four Transformations" transformation showed significant results: new energy vehicle sales reached 133,400 units, accounting for 56% of total sales, with new energy share exceeding 50% for four consecutive months.
From sub-brands, performance was significantly divergent. Zeekr brand sales in May reached 34,400 vehicles, a 82% year-on-year increase; Zeekr 9 Series and 8 Series models combined sales approached 50% of total sales, showing bright performance in the high-end market; Galaxy brand sales were 81,700 vehicles; Geely brand sales were 182,500 vehicles, among which China Star Series sales reached 100,800 vehicles; Lynk & Co brand sales were 20,700 vehicles, with new energy vehicle sales share rising to 71%.
In terms of exports, Geely's overseas vehicle exports in May reached 85,100 vehicles, a explosive 184% year-on-year increase, setting a brand single-month export record high. Among exported products, new energy vehicles reached 40,800 units, accounting for nearly half; hybrid and pure electric products have successively landed in Southeast Asia, Middle East, Latin America, and other markets, highlighting the results of global strategy implementation.
Changan: Multi-brand Matrix Balanced EffortChangan Auto's delivery volume in May was 209,100 vehicles, among which new energy deliveries were 92,400 vehicles, a 5.8% year-on-year increase, with new energy share about 44%. In terms of exports, overseas deliveries reached 70,700 vehicles, a 38% year-on-year increase, becoming another major growth highlight for Changan in May.
In the sub-brand matrix, Changan Qiyuan delivered 34,500 vehicles in May; All-New Q05 delivered 15,800 units, with orders breaking 3,000 units within three days of listing in Thailand; Deepal sales in May were 33,200 vehicles, a 30% year-on-year increase; January to May overseas cumulative sales were 28,700 vehicles, a significant 167% year-on-year increase; Avatr delivered 7,336 vehicles in May; Changan Auto (Gravity) delivered nearly 49,000 vehicles in May.
Changan Auto's balanced layout was fully reflected in May: the fuel car base remained stable, new energy brands Deepal and Qiyuan accelerated volume growth, high-end brand Avatr continued to break through in technical cooperation, and overseas markets simultaneously achieved breakthrough growth. The pattern of five brands working together, driven by both new energy and exports, is initially taking shape.
Great Wall: Overseas Sales Growth Year-on-Year 46.75%Great Wall Motor's sales in May were 100,400 vehicles, slightly down compared to last May's 102,200 vehicles, making it the only company among the top 5 to show a year-on-year negative growth. From sub-brands, Haval brand sales in May were 55,500 vehicles, remaining Great Wall's most important sales pillar; Tank brand sales were 17,100 vehicles; both Haval and Tank brand sales showed year-on-year declines; Wey brand sold 8,119 vehicles, a 31.78% year-on-year increase, achieving growth against the trend; Ora brand performance was most stunning, with sales of 6,018 vehicles, a significant 206.88% year-on-year increase. In terms of new energy, Great Wall sold 30,400 new energy vehicles in May, with new energy vehicle transformation gradually accelerating.
The overseas market became Great Wall's biggest highlight in May, with overseas sales growing 46.75% year-on-year. Against the background of pressure on the domestic market, strong growth in overseas business effectively made up for the decline in the domestic market. Great Wall Motor's current core contradiction lies in: Haval and Tank, the two traditional main-selling brands, face weak growth, while Wey and Ora brands, although growing notably, have relatively small volume and are not yet enough to support overall growth. How to complete the "relay" between old and new brands is the key issue Great Wall must solve subsequently.
Final ThoughtsFrom May data, the growth pattern of the top 5 domestic brands has clearly diverged, but there are three common trends worth noting: First, exports have become a key engine for domestic brands to seek stability and growth. Second, new energy transformation is still accelerating, but paths differ among enterprises. Third, technological innovation continues to deepen brand moats. Looking ahead to the second half of the year, competition in the automotive industry will continue to upgrade around these three trends. Although everyone has a common direction, these three trends are all competing for the entire enterprise's industrial chain strength, and the strong will remain strong, which has almost become an inevitable outcome.
