首頁VW Caravelle
搜尋歷史
熱門搜尋
經銷商登入 / 註冊
Many people have such experiences.
Strolling through the mall with the whole family, circling the underground garage three times without finding a parking spot; driving skills are slightly lacking, only able to stare helplessly in front of a mechanical parking lot; or encountering a narrow parking spot at a dead-end road when it is windy or rainy, struggling for a long time but unable to park.
In the past, car brands categorized their products into levels. To thoroughly solve the difficulty of parking, you had to spend at least over 200,000 to buy a high-end electric vehicle with cross-floor memory parking, while the basic models around 100,000 only had the most superficial intelligent experience.
Now this unwritten rule has been broken.
Chery Fengyun T7 officially starts pre-sale.
The new car has three configurations, covering a price range from 109,900 to 129,900, with 600 kilometers of range across the entire series. At first glance, this configuration seems to only pass in many new energy models, but what truly makes the Fengyun T7 seem "out of place" among 100,000-level pure electric SUVs is that it has put a dedicated function long monopolized by high-end electric cars, cross-floor memory parking, into the product list of 100,000-level family cars.
Let's look at the intelligent configuration again.
Fengyun T7 is equipped with the Falcon 500 driver assistance system, the whole vehicle is equipped with 22 high-precision sensors, including 3 millimeter-wave radars, 7 high-performance cameras and 12 ultrasonic radars, see far, see clearly, measure accurately. In the automotive industry, it is considered to have broken the price barrier first.
Cross-floor memory parking is undoubtedly Fengyun T7's biggest selling point. There is no floor limit, supporting up to two kilometers of memory parking. Coupled with over 300 all-scenario automatic parking functions, dead-end road parking, irregular parking spots, and one-touch track reverse are all supported.
This means ordinary families do not need to spend double the budget to own the experience of automatic cross-floor travel in mall underground garages and automatic parking in narrow spots. New drivers don't need to panic in front of narrow parking spots, and experienced drivers can cope calmly when encountering irregular parking spots.
What the industry calls "parking freedom" has also been implemented on 100,000-level family SUVs.
If it is just downgrading a high-end configuration, that is called spec stacking.
But Fengyun T7 is far more than parking freedom. Its difference lies in that it is a global car with reverse input. The overseas version is called Lepas L6. Pre-sales have started in South Africa, and Thailand launched in July. Next, Indonesia, EU, Australia/New Zealand, and the UK will follow in succession.
Accepting global market testing first, then launching domestically, this process is not common among local car companies because there are not many car companies that can do it. But behind Fengyun T7 happens to be Chery, ranking first in exports of Chinese brand passenger cars for 23 consecutive years, with an accumulation of global users breaking 20 million.
Admittedly Fengyun T7, anchored global standards from the beginning of R&D, developed according to the 2026 version E-NCAP five-star safety standards. 81 exclusive durability cars are undergoing road tests simultaneously. The whole vehicle cumulative testing mileage exceeds 6 million kilometers, covering -40 degrees to 55 degrees whole environment, adapting to 95% of global road types.
Body safety is also unquestionable.
80% high-strength steel, 18.84% hot-formed steel, 9 airbags. However, for a car to simultaneously meet regulations, climate conditions, road conditions characteristics, and user habits of so many countries and regions such as Europe, Australia/New Zealand, Middle East, Southeast Asia, Latin America, the R&D cycle is destined not to be short. In this industry rhythm where delivery happens upon launch and iteration happens upon delivery, Fengyun T7 used two years for planning and three years for R&D. Chery seems anti-trend, but slow manufacturing builds good cars.
It is exactly this five-year slowness that makes this car perform differently in many dimensions. The entire series is standardly equipped with a 65.05kWh Rhino battery, CLTC range 600 kilometers, actually running over 670 kilometers; without distinction of high or low configuration; no need to pay extra for a large battery pack; Fengyun T7 directly treated this heart disease of 100,000-level pure electric SUV users.
But the most interesting thing is Chery's two bottom-line guarantees on rights.
Battery power safety bottom line, first-time non-operating owner, thermal runaway caused by battery reasons, compensate with a new car of the same model; Assistant driving bottom line, first-time non-operating owner within one year of buying a car, parking or intelligent pilot scenarios, accidents caused by intelligent driving system reasons, compensate up to 5 million yuan.
Daring to make such a promise shows confidence in their own technology.
Back to the original question, what exactly are 100,000-level pure electric SUV users paying for?
Range, space, safety, intelligence... In the past, these needs were split across models of different price levels. To achieve all-dimension balance, you have to keep adding money to upgrade. Fengyun T7 is very pure. Cross-floor memory parking that should belong to high-end models, 600-kilometer long range that should be added for selection, 8775 chip and nine airbags that should be exclusive to high configuration are all packed into the 100,000-level price range.
This is no longer a simple price war.
Instead, Chery uses product power verified by the global market to tell the domestic home pure electric car market what exactly is a good product and what is worth buying.
8 月 12 日，奇瑞風雲 T7 正式開啟預售，預售價 9.98 萬 -13.98 萬元。在純電緊湊型 SUV 市場早已是"神仙打架"嘅當下，這台以"慢功造好車，久等了"為主題嘅車型，用"全系 600km 續航不分高低配"嘅激進策略，向零跑 B10、比亞迪元 PLUS、豐田鉑智 3X 等同級竞品發起了正面挑戰。那麼，奇瑞風雲 T7 如此預售價到底香唔香？未來正式上市價格還會下探嗎？
核心亮點：全球品質 + 續航平權 + 智能滿配
風雲 T7 嘅產品力，可以用"三個全系標配"來概括。首先係全系續航平權——搭載 65.05kWh 犀牛電池，CLTC 續航 600km，實測續航可達 667km，反向虛標。30%-80% 快充僅 22 分鐘，一杯咖啡補能 300km。在同級車型普遍採用"低配短續航、高配長續航"策略嘅當下，風雲 T7"一碗水端平"嘅做法，直接消解咗用戶嘅續航焦慮。
其次係全球品質背書。風雲 T7 並非國內開發再簡單改款出海，而係同步面向全球 210 個國家和地區開發嘅全球車型。同源車型 Lepas L6 已在南非、泰國上市，經海外市場真實檢驗後回歸國內。新車歷經 2 年策劃、3 年研發，按 2026 版 E-NCAP 五星安全標準打造，投入 81 台耐久車、累計測試超 600 萬公里，覆蓋 -40℃至 55℃全域環境。
第三係智能配置。風雲 T7 搭載同級首發嘅 4nm 艙駕一體 8775 芯片，72TOPS NPU 算力，系統響應低至 80ms。15.6 英寸 2.5K 大屏、靈犀智艙 2.0×豆包大模型、獵鷹 500 智駕（22 顆傳感器）、200+ 全場景自動泊車、高速領航輔助等配置一應俱全。
安全層面同樣硬核：80% 高強度鋼 +18.84% 熱成型鋼、九橫五縱籠式車身、同級最多 9 安全氣囊（含 48L 雙腔遠端氣囊）、犀牛電池 6D 鎖子甲 31 層防護，IP68 防水達國標 96 倍。
同級優勢：續航不分级，安全不縮水
相較於零跑 B10、比亞迪元 PLUS、豐田鉑智 3X 等同級竞品，風雲 T7 嘅優勢十分鮮明。首先係"續航平權"策略——9.98 萬入門版即可享受 600km 續航，而元 PLUS 入門版續航僅 430km，零跑 B10 低配續航也低於 600km。對於預算 10 萬左右嘅家庭用戶而言，無需加價就能獲得長續航，這係極具吸引力嘅賣點。
其次係全球驗證帶來嘅品質信任。在"速成造車"成為行業常態嘅當下，風雲 T7 的 600 萬公里耐久測試和全球多地域極限驗證（巴西高減速坎、墨西哥鵝卵石路、德國高速大曲率彎道等），構建起咗"可靠耐用"的品牌認知。9 安全氣囊、2026 版 E-NCAP 五星標準等安全配置全系標配，打破咗"低價=減配"嘅行業潛規則。
價格預測：正式售價或維持，權益可能加碼
關於 8 月正式上市後價格是否會低於預售價，車軲轆認為大機率維持 9.98 萬 -13.98 萬元區間，但通過增加上市權益變相讓利。參考奇瑞一貫嘅定價策略，預售價往往與正式售價基本持平，主要差異體現在置換補貼、金融政策、充電權益等方面。若市場競爭加劇，不排除入門版限時權益價下探至 9.58 萬甚至更低嘅可能，但大幅減價嘅可能性唔大——畢竟 600km 續航同全球驗證嘅成本底線擺喺度。
風雲 T7 預售價 9.98 萬起嘅定價極具衝擊力，喺 10 萬級純電 SUV 市場幾乎搵唔到"全系 600km+ 全球五星安全 +4nm 芯片"嘅竞品；奇瑞連續 23 年出口第一、2000 萬全球用戶嘅口碑背書，為品質信任提供咗基礎；"續航不分高低配"嘅策略精準擊中咗家庭用戶嘅痛點。
寫於最後
綜合來看，預計風雲 T7 正式上市後月銷有望暢銷，若產能同渠道發力，銷量突破並爆款並非唔可能。風雲 T7 嘅預售，標誌住 10 萬級純電 SUV 市場進入咗"續航平權"時代。9.98 萬元嘅價格、600km 嘅續航、全球驗證嘅品質，呢組"唔可能三 角"被奇瑞用長期主義造車理念打破咗。在"快"成為行業主旋律嘅當下，風雲 T7 選擇"慢落嚟"打磨產品，呢份堅持本身，就係對中國家庭用戶最真誠嘅致敬。
7月乘联会数据出炉，中国车市“国内承压、海外猛涨”的剧情再度上演。当月，国内乘用车零售150.6万辆，同比下降18%；其中，新能源车零售97万辆，同比微降2%，渗透率提升至64.4%。
视线转向海外，却是完全相反的滚烫行情：7月中国汽车出口达109.2万辆，同比大涨57%，并且已连续两个月出口突破100万辆；截至7月，2026年累计出口已达640万辆。按当前增速推演，全年出口销量冲击1000万辆，已从行业预判变成了清晰可触的现实。
这也意味着，中国将会成为世界上第一个年出口1000万辆汽车的国家，这一数字相当于全球最大汽车制造商丰田的年度总销量，为日本汽车年度出口总量的2.5倍。
宏观数字的涨跌固然直观，但7月车市两起标志性事件，或许为观察当下中国汽车产业提供了更具体的切口。其一，在重重设防的欧洲市场，五家主流中国车企销量已经连续两个月超过六家主流日系车企，中国汽车开始真正与全球传统强手正面交锋；其二，零跑汽车全球交付突破10万辆，海外销量快速增长，“技术输出+全球渠道”的反向合资模式，展现出新的增长潜力。
超越日系
出海下半场，要争夺全球份额
2026年5-6月，欧洲31国的销量榜单上，出现了一个颇具标志性的变化。
5月，比亚迪、上汽、吉利、奇瑞、零跑五家中国车企合计销售13.84万辆，同比增长65%；同期丰田、日产、铃木、马自达、本田、三菱六家日系车企合计销售13.04万辆，同比下滑3%。到了6月，中国车企阵营销量进一步攀升至17.16万辆，实现连续两个月对日系品牌的超越。
在欧洲“超越日系”，意义非同一般。
欧洲是全球汽车工业的发源地，日系品牌在这里深耕数十年，依靠可靠性、经济性和精细化的渠道运营，打下了极其稳固的基本盘，是公认的“全球化标杆”。中国车企能在这样的市场中，与日系车企正面交锋并实现反超，意味着中国车企正在加速进入全球主流竞争行列。
中国车企背后最突出的优势，是更快的新能源产品响应能力。中国市场的高强度竞争和完整的产业链，让车企能够更快地把新技术转化为新产品。与此同时，这些优秀的产品和体验，也在重塑海外消费者的认知，让中国汽车从相对陌生的选项，变成了消费者的主动选择。
全新MG4就是一个典型代表。这款在国内红海中厮杀出来的产品，转身以MG4 Urban之名登陆英国、澳大利亚、巴西等市场，首发便跻身多地纯电紧凑车型第一梯队。比亚迪的海外攻势同样迅猛，从面向欧洲市场的插混SUV，到针对日本开发的K-Car，多款车型在发布后迅速成为海外汽车媒体和社交平台的热门话题。
从被看见、被讨论，到被认可、被购买，这种认知层面的转变，意味着中国汽车出海的评判标准正在提高。过去，我们关注“进入了多少个国家、出口了多少辆车”，而今天，更应该关心的是：中国品牌能否进入海外消费者的购车清单，能否与欧洲、日韩品牌正面竞争。
中国汽车出海的下半场，已经不只是寻找海外增量，而是开始争取全球汽车市场的既有份额。
反向合资
跳出存量博弈的新途径
在国内大盘收缩的背景下，总有企业能找到新的增长路径。
7月份，零跑汽车全球交付突破10万辆、同比大增102%。翻倍增长的背后，不只是零跑低调深耕国内市场，更离不开“技术输出+全球渠道”的反向合资新模式。
2023年，零跑与斯特兰蒂斯建立合作关系，到2026年，合作成果迎来丰收。反映到销量结构上，是零跑海外销量占比的快速提升。7月零跑海外销量超1.7万辆，占总销量接近两成，成为新的增长支点。
零跑与Stellantis的合资模式与传统模式完全相反：零跑输出核心技术与产品，Stellantis拿出海外渠道、品牌运营经验等，共同开拓全球主流市场。这种“中方出技术、外方出渠道”的模式，颠覆了延续数十年的合资格局。
零跑能够成为这种模式的先行者，靠的是国内市场练出来的体系能力。平台化研发、零部件通用和供应链协同，让它能够不断摊薄成本、加快产品迭代，当这些优势走向海外，就转化成了更有竞争力的产品和价格。
更值得关注的是，这并不是零跑的孤例。就连过去以“引进来”为主的传统合资车企，如今也开始主动把中国市场变成立足全球的研发、生产和出口基地。
今年以来，上汽大众将途观L Pro、帕萨特Pro出口至乌兹别克斯坦，本土研发的ID. ERA 9X也将登陆越南市场；上汽通用计划从今年10月起，将中国团队主导研发的别克至境E7出口韩国；广汽丰田生产的铂智3X已实现对香港的出口；日产更是直接将中国定位为“全球创新和出口基地”，明确N7车型将从中国出口拉美与东盟。
如果把视线拉到全球维度就会发现，国内市场的承压必然残酷，但也锻造了中国车企的竞争力，并以不同方式向全球市场外溢。一边，是中国品牌直接进入欧洲、日本等成熟市场，与全球强手争夺用户；另一边，是越来越多合资车企借助中国技术参与全球竞争。
两条路径指向的是同一个变化：中国汽车产业的增长战场，早已不再局限于本土市场。一场关乎全球产业格局的重构，才刚刚拉开序幕。
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嗰陣都會拿 Proton X90 同 Mazda CX-8 嚟做比較。呢兩款車喺售價同定位上都幾接近，今日我哋就從多個方面做一個詳細嘅比較，幫你省返做功課嘅時間。
Proton X90 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 106,800 - 122,800，合共有 4 個版本，包括 2026 1.5T Prime X（RM 122,800）、2026 1.5T Prime（RM 116,800）、2026 1.5T Lite（RM 106,800）等。
Mazda CX-8 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 165,360 - 201,360，合共有 5 個版本，包括 2025 2.5T 4WD High Plus Petrol（RM 201,360）、2025 2.2L 2WD High Plus Diesel（RM 193,123）、2025 2.5L 2WD High Plus Petrol（RM 186,360）等。
從價錢睇落，Proton X90 嘅起價確係比 Mazda CX-8 平咗 RM 58,560。如果你預算有限，Proton 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需要。但都要留意，平嘅那幾千塊，可能在配備上會有取舍，具體要看你嘅需要。
Proton X90 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA)。
Mazda CX-8 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 Brand ADAS。
兩款車嘅安全評級一樣，喺呢個級別入面安全配備都算好齊全。依家嘅新車安全性都唔差，唔使太擔心呢一點。
Proton X90 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
Mazda CX-8 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
兩款車嘅驅動方式一樣，都係 FWD，日常駕駛感受唔會有太大分別。
Proton X90 保養 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Mazda CX-8 保養 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
兩款車嘅保養條件一樣，呢方面唔使糾結。實際保養成本仲要看品牌嘅服務網絡同零件價格，建議去車友群問問真實車主嘅經驗。
Proton X90 同 Mazda CX-8 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更重視品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰一款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，那就揀配置更豐富嗰款。最終都係建議兩款都去試駕，親身體驗先係最重要。
總體嚟講，Proton X90 同 Mazda CX-8 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵仲係要看你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
In Malaysia's SUV market, many buyers compare Proton X90 and Mazda CX-3 when choosing a car. Both cars are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save research time.
Proton X90 OTR price in Malaysia is RM 106,800 - 122,800, totaling 4 versions, including 2026 1.5T Prime X (RM 122,800), 2026 1.5T Prime (RM 116,800), 2026 1.5T Lite (RM 106,800), etc.
Mazda CX-3 OTR price in Malaysia is RM 126,159 - 139,159, totaling 2 versions, including 2023 2.0L High (RM 139,159), 2023 2.0L Plus (RM 126,159), etc.
From a price perspective, the starting price of Proton X90 is indeed RM 19,359 cheaper than Mazda CX-3. If your budget is limited, Proton's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. But keep in mind, the thousands saved might involve trade-offs in features, depending on your specific needs.
Proton X90 equipped with 1.5L Turbo, 140 hp. Official fuel consumption 7.0 L/100km.
Mazda CX-3 equipped with 1.5L Turbo, 140 hp. Official fuel consumption 7.0 L/100km.
Both cars use the same powertrain, the driving experience is basically the same. Fuel consumption is also similar, no need to worry too much about this point.
Proton X90 safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
Mazda CX-3 safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include i-Activsense.
Both cars have the same safety rating, safety features are quite comprehensive within this class. New cars nowadays generally have good safety, no need to worry too much about this point.
Proton X90 body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
Mazda CX-3 body length 4500 mm, trunk 450 L.
In terms of space, Mazda CX-3 body is 100 mm longer than Proton X90, offering better seating space. However, Proton X90 is more flexible for parking in the city, each has its trade-offs.
Proton X90 warranty 5 years/150,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Mazda CX-3 warranty 5 years/150,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Both cars have the same warranty conditions, no need to worry about this. Actual maintenance costs depend on the brand's service network and part prices, suggest asking real owners in car owner groups for experience.
Overall, Proton X90 and Mazda CX-3 are both quite good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends mainly on your personal needs and budget. It is suggested to do your research, compare quotes from multiple dealerships, and test drive before making a final decision. Buying a car is a big deal, spending some time on research will never be wrong.
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嗰陣都會拿 Proton X90 同 Honda WR-V 做比較。呢兩款車喺價位同定位上都好接近，今日我哋就從多個方面做一個詳細比較，幫你省做功課嘅時間。
Proton X90 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 106,800 - 122,800，一共有 4 個版本，包括 2026 1.5T Prime X（RM 122,800）、2026 1.5T Prime（RM 116,800）、2026 1.5T Lite（RM 106,800） 等。
Honda WR-V 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 89,900 - 107,900，一共有 4 個版本，包括 2023 1.5L V（RM 99,900）、2023 1.5L E（RM 95,900）、2023 1.5L S（RM 89,900） 等。
從價錢嚟睇，Honda WR-V 嘅起價比 Proton X90 平咗 RM 16,900。講實情，喺呢個價位段，幾千蚊嘅差距其實唔算大，關鍵仲係睇整體嘅性價比同長期使用成本。
Proton X90 搭載 1.5L Turbo，馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。
Honda WR-V 搭載 1.5L 4-cyl，馬力 105 hp。官方油耗 6.0 L/100km。
動力方面，Proton X90 嘅 1.5L Turbo 比 Honda WR-V 嘅 1.5L 4-cyl 多咗 35 匹馬力，中段加速更有信心，尤其係跑高速公路超車嗰陣。不過 Honda WR-V 嘅油耗可能更抵，日常市區通勤差別唔會太大。
Proton X90 車身長 4400 mm，尾箱 400 L。
Honda WR-V 車身長 4400 mm，尾箱 400 L。
兩款車嘅尺寸幾乎一樣，車內空間差別唔大。呢個級別嘅車，日常使用完全夠用。
Proton X90 保養 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Honda WR-V 保養 5 年/無限里程，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
總嘅嚟講，Proton X90 同 Honda WR-V 都係馬來西亞市場好唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵仲係要睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做足功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。揸車係件大事，費點時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拿 Proton X70 同 MG MG HS 嚟做比較。呢兩部車喺價碼同定位上都幾相近，而家我哋就從多個方面做一個詳細嘅比較，幫你省返做功課嘅時間。
Proton X70 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 106,800 - 122,300，一共有 3 個版本，包括 1.5L Standard 2WD（RM 106,800）、1.5L Executive 2WD（RM 115,800）、1.5L Premium 2WD（RM 122,300） 等。
MG MG HS 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 130,450 - 146,450，一共有 2 個版本，包括 1.5L Standard（RM 105,000）、1.5L Executive（RM 115,000） 等。
由價錢睇，Proton X70 嘅起售價的確比 MG MG HS 平咗 RM 23,650。如果你預算唔多，Proton 嘅入門版已經足以滿足日常需要。不過都要留意，平嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備上有得有失，具體要看你嘅需要。
Proton X70 裝載 1.5L Turbo，馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。
MG MG HS 裝載 1.5L Turbo，馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。
兩部車用同一套動力系統，日常開起嚟嘅感覺基本冇分別。油耗方面都差唔多，唔使太糾結這一點。
Proton X70 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA)。
MG MG HS 嘅安全評級係 TBD，主動安全系統包括 Basic。
安全配備方面，兩部車都拿到唔錯嘅評級。不過 Proton X70 嘅 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA) 同 MG MG HS 嘅 Basic 喺功能上有啲差異，如果你比較重視主動安全嘅話，可以仔細比較下兩者嘅功能列表。
Proton X70 車身長 4400 mm，尾箱 400 L。
MG MG HS 車身長 4400 mm，尾箱 400 L。
兩部車嘅尺寸差唔多，車內空間差別唔大。呢個級別嘅車，日常使用完全夠用。
Proton X70 同 MG MG HS 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭用、日常上落。如果你更重視品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰一款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，那就揀配置更豐富嗰款。最終都係建議兩部都去試駕，親自體驗先係最重要。
總體嚟講，Proton X70 同 MG MG HS 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊輛車，關鍵都係要看你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
【2026 年 7 月 31 日】上汽通用五菱宣佈五菱代步車用戶將突破 300 萬，並將於 8 月 7 日舉行「繽紛生活 玩心大開」宏光 MINIEV 六週年暨五菱代步車 300 萬用戶盛典！屆時，繽果家族全球代言人孟子義也將親臨現場，與五菱代步車 300 萬用戶共同打造一場屬於用戶嘅盛典派對。此外，第五代宏光 MINIEV 近期喺印尼正式上市，標誌住「人民嘅代步車」正喺加速邁向全球，為全球用戶帶來簡單代步嘅出行享受！
三百萬信賴，冠軍實力鑄就盛典意義
自 2017 年起，上汽通用五菱通過推出寶駿 E100、E200、宏光 MINIEV、繽果家族等車型，持續深耕代步車市場，五菱代步車銷量將突破 300 萬台！其中，作為「人民嘅代步車」，宏光 MINIEV 家族憑藉「靚、好開、好停、抵用」嘅產品實力累計收穫超 195 萬位用戶青睞，並已連續 71 個月獲得國內 A00 級純電銷量冠軍，穩居全球微型新能源汽車累計銷量第一。繽果家族同樣以高靚值繽紛座駕之姿，收穫超 75 萬車主信賴，為用戶帶來繽紛多彩嘅出行體驗。代步車家族雙星閃耀，合力構築起無可撼動嘅代步車產品矩陣——這亦係五菱代步車舉辦 300 萬用戶盛典嘅實力印證。
加速出海，"人民嘅代步車"邁向全球
作為五菱全球新能源戰略嘅關鍵落子，7 月 29 日第五代宏光 MINIEV（Wuling Aira ev）喺印尼國際車展（GIIAS）上正式宣佈喺印尼上市，官方售價 1.55 億印尼盾起（約為人民幣 59,615 元）。作為一部四門四座純電代步車，第五代宏光 MINIEV 既係可以係大學生、職場新人、年輕家庭嘅第一部車，亦係成熟家庭增購代步嘅首選。第五代宏光 MINIEV 輕鬆覆蓋日常高頻短途場景，完美契合用戶對代步車靚、好開、好停、抵用嘅訴求。為貼近年輕家庭與新生代用戶，今次新車更加係喺印尼攜手迪士尼·皮克斯《玩具總動員 5》開啟跨界聯動，以更潮趣嘅形象，讓全球人民每日樂享輕鬆出行（Fun Everyday, For Everyone）。宏光 MINIEV 出海不僅為五菱代步車嘅全球銷量再添新翼，亦以紮實嘅產品實力將簡單代步嘅理念傳遞至更廣闊嘅國際市場。
從銷量冠軍到全球同行嘅潮玩符號，五菱代步車印證，細車亦可承載萬千熱愛。8 月 7 日，喺成都露天音樂公園，近百台用戶潮創車將齊聚現場，五菱車主代表將共赴呢場專屬於佢哋嘅「繽紛生活」盛宴，叫我哋喺成都相約，一齊迎接 300 萬用戶嘅玩心綻放時刻！
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家在揀車嘅時候都會拿 寶騰 X70 同 馬自達 CX-5 嚟做比較。呢兩款車喺價位同定位上都蠻接近嘅，今日我哋就從多個方面做一個詳細嘅對比，幫你省下做功課嘅時間。
寶騰 X70 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 106,800 - 122,300，一共有 3 個版本，包括 1.5L Standard 2WD（RM 106,800）、1.5L Executive 2WD（RM 115,800）、1.5L Premium 2WD（RM 122,300） 等。
馬自達 CX-5 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 135,469 - 166,760，一共有 3 個版本，包括 2025 2.0L AT 35 週年紀念（RM 316,154）、2025 2.0L AT（RM 296,154）、2025 2.0L MT（RM 294,154） 等。
從價錢來看，寶騰 X70 嘅起步價確實比 馬自達 CX-5 便宜咗 RM 28,669。如果你預算有限，寶騰嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需求。但亦都要注意，便宜嘅幾千蚊，可能喺配備上面會有取捨，具體要睇你嘅需求。
寶騰 X70 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA)。
馬自達 CX-5 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 。
兩款車嘅安全評級一樣，喺呢個級別裡面安全配備都算好齊全嘅。而家嘅新車安全性都不差，唔使太擔心呢一點。
寶騰 X70 車身長 4400 毫米，行李箱 400 公升。
馬自達 CX-5 車身長 4500 毫米，行李箱 450 公升。
空間方面，馬自達 CX-5 嘅車身比 寶騰 X70 長咗 100 毫米，乘坐空間更有優勢。不過 寶騰 X70 喺城市入面停車會靈活啲，各有取捨。
寶騰 X70 保養 5 年/150,000 公里，保養間隔 每 10,000 公里或 6 個月。
馬自達 CX-5 保養 5 年/150,000 公里，保養間隔 每 10,000 公里或 6 個月。
兩款車嘅保養條件一樣，呢方面唔使糾結。實際保養成本仲要睇品牌嘅服務網絡同零件價格，建議去車友群問問真實車主嘅經驗。
總的來說，寶騰 X70 同 馬自達 CX-5 都係馬來西亞市場好唔錯嘅車型。揀邊架，關鍵都要睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多家買家喺揀車嗰陣都會拿 Proton X70 同 Mazda CX-5 嚟做比較。這兩款車喺價位同定位上都幾接近，今日我哋就從多個方面嚟做一个詳細嘅比較，幫你節省咗做功課嘅時間。
Proton X70 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 106,800 - 122,300，一共有 3 個版本，包括 1.5L Standard 2WD（RM 106,800）、1.5L Executive 2WD（RM 115,800）、1.5L Premium 2WD（RM 122,300） 等。
Mazda CX-5 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 135,469 - 166,760，一共有 3 個版本，包括 2025 2.0L AT 35th Anniversary（RM 316,154）、2025 2.0L AT（RM 296,154）、2025 2.0L MT（RM 294,154） 等。
從價錢來看，Proton X70 嘅起步價確實比 Mazda CX-5 便宜咗 RM 28,669。如果你預算有限，Proton 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需求。但都要注意，便宜嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備上會有取舍，具體要看你嘅需求。
Proton X70 車身長 4400 mm，尾箱 400 L。
Mazda CX-5 車身長 4500 mm，尾箱 450 L。
空間方面，Mazda CX-5 嘅車身比 Proton X70 長咗 100 mm，乘坐空間更有優勢。不過 Proton X70 喺城市入面泊車會靈活啲，各有取舍。
Proton X70 保養 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Mazda CX-5 保養 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
兩款車嘅保養條件一樣，呢方面唔使糾結。實際保養成本仲要看品牌嘅服務網絡同零件價格，建議去車友群问问真實車主嘅經驗。
Proton X70 同 Mazda CX-5 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更睇重品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰一款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，那就揀配置更豐富嗰款。最終都係建議兩款都去試駕，親身體驗先係最重要嘅。
總嘅嚟講，Proton X70 同 Mazda CX-5 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車款。揀邊一輛，關鍵仲係要看你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行之間嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花啲時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
进入2026年下半场，商用车行业高管调整仍在持续，人事棋局的每一步落子都暗含着企业战略方向的深度锚定。7月以来，从潍柴动力的核心管理层换帅，到上汽集团副总裁、广汽领程董事长履新，再到斯堪尼亚中国的本土化掌舵人更迭，多起重磅人事变动接连落地。既有老将功成身退的交棒，也有体系内成长起来的熟手担纲重任，更有本土干将的破格提拔，勾勒出行业转型关键期企业谋篇布局的清晰脉络。
潍柴动力：袁宏明辞任执行董事，刘义接棒
7月3日，潍柴动力（02338.HK）宣布，袁宏明已辞任公司执行董事、战略发展及投资委员会委员等职务，辞去上述职务后，袁宏明将不再担任公司（含控股子公司）任何职务。经公司2026年第五次临时董事会会议审议通过，同意选举刘义为公司第七届董事会执行董事，该事项尚需提交公司股东会审议，任期自股东会决议作出之日起至第七届董事会届满之日止。
另外，在7月17日晚间，潍柴动力股份有限公司发布关于变更董事会秘书的公告。潍柴动力董事会于近日收到王丽提交的书面辞职报告，因工作调动，王丽申请辞去公司董事会秘书职务，并将不再担任公司（含控股子公司）任何职务，王丽的原定任期至第七届董事会届满之日止。截至本公告披露日，王丽未持有公司股份，不存在应当履行而未履行的承诺事项。
经公司2026年第六次临时董事会会议审议通过，同意聘任郝庆贵为公司董事会秘书，任期自董事会决议作出之日起至第七届董事会届满之日止。
上汽集团：杨怀景升任副总裁
7月8日，上汽集团召开第九届董事会第十一次会议，经总裁提名、董事会审议，聘任杨怀景担任集团副总裁，任期与本届董事会一致。董事会8人全票通过该项任命。
公开资料显示，杨怀景，1972年6月出生，中共党员，研究生学历，工商管理硕士、工程硕士，是上汽体系内成长起来的资深管理者。曾任上海汽车股份有限公司中国弹簧厂商务部经理、人事信息部经理、厂长助理，上海汽车集团股份有限公司经济运行部副经理、质量和经济运行部副经理，上海汽车集团股份有限公司商用车事业部总经理等职务。现任上海汽车集团股份有限公司副总裁，上汽大通汽车有限公司总经理、党委副书记、南京分公司总经理，上海汽车集团股份有限公司商用车技术中心主任，南京汽车集团有限公司汽车工程研究院院长。
在杨怀景的带领下，上汽商用车板加速推进大通、依维柯、跃进三大品牌的深度整合。据公开数据显示，2026年上半年，上汽商用车累计销售14.76万辆，同比增长24%，其中新能源销量同比增长69%，海外销量同比增长33%。
东风股份：董秘履新 营销公司法定代表人变更
7月13日晚间，东风汽车股份有限公司发布关于变更董事会秘书的公告。公告显示，公司原董事会秘书周方平因工作调整，不再担任公司董事会秘书职务。经董事长提名，公司第七届董事会第二十七次会议审议，同意聘任李夏为公司董事会秘书，任期自本次董事会审议通过之日起至第七届董事会届满之日止。
此外，据企查查平台显示，7月下旬，东风汽车股份有限公司的全资子公司东风轻型商用车营销有限公司完成工商变更，法定代表人由李军智变更为李旸。据悉，李旸此前担任东风股份的副总经理。他1979年9月出生，曾担任东风股份的轻型商用车分公司副总经理、综合管理部副部长、新能源事业部党总支书记兼副总经理等职，后来调任神龙汽车，今年1月，他重回东风股份。
广汽领程：董事长卸任 法定代表人变更
7月中旬，据企查查平台显示，广汽领程新能源商用车有限公司完成工商变更，黄永强卸任该公司董事长、法定代表人，由高锐接替。
据悉，高锐此前担任广汽集团常务副总经理，并曾担任广汽集团资产管理部部长，中隆投资有限公司董事长、总经理，骏威汽车有限公司总经理，广汽集团（中国香港）有限公司董事长、总经理等职务。
斯堪尼亚：NEXT ERA重卡迎来新任本土掌舵人
7月8日，斯堪尼亚集团中国正式任命宋黎辉为 NEXT ERA重卡销售服务新任总经理，该任命将于2026年7月15日正式生效。宋黎辉将接替贺文凯(Volker Hillmann)的职务；贺文凯将继续留在上海，在传拓集团内部出任新职。此次战略性的领导层交接，充分彰显了斯堪尼亚对中国市场长期承诺的坚定决心。据悉，在新的职位上，宋黎辉将向斯堪尼亚集团执行副总裁、斯堪尼亚集团中国总裁柯木兰(Camilla Dewoon)汇报工作。
谈及此次任命，柯木兰对贺文凯打下的坚实基础表示感谢，并指出：“宋黎辉深厚的本土根基与精湛的商业专长，对于NEXT ERA重卡在中国发展的下一阶段至关重要。这将使我们更贴近中国客户与合作伙伴，高度契合集团既定的愿景、商业模式及运营理念。”
远程新能源商用车：旗下公司法定代表人变更
7月中旬，据企查查平台显示，隶属吉利远程新能源商用车集团的吉利四川商用车有限公司全资控股的南充吉利新能源商用车公司完成工商变更，法定代表人由周建群变更为丁鼎，担任该公司经理、董事。该公司2021年成立，注册资本9.1亿元，主要经营业务是汽车新车销售、新能源汽车整车销售等。
结语
纵观7月商用车行业的人事调整，“实干派”与“本土化”成为最鲜明的关键词。自主品牌选择深耕体系多年、熟悉业务脉络的内部人才接棒，外资品牌加速启用本土高管贴近中国市场，所有调整最终都指向同一个目标——在新能源转型与全球化竞争的深水区，用更懂市场、更懂客户的团队打赢下半场。人事更迭从来不是终点，而是企业新一轮战略进攻的“发令枪”。随着这些新高管团队就位，下半年商用车市场的竞争势必会更加激烈。
Written by Han Zihan Edited | Qingzhu
A Prime Minister, plus three cabinet ministers, standing behind an investment by a Chinese automaker. Amid the EU adding layer upon layer of measures to Chinese electric vehicles, it itself conveys a signal.
On July 23, at the Geely Valencia factory, in the presence of Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez, Geely Automobile and Ford signed a joint venture agreement to create new energy vehicles for Geely and Ford brands for the European market through capacity sharing.
Not buying a factory, but a joint venture; not defeating others, but win-win cooperation.
Whether bringing in or going out, Geely's internationalization has always implemented Chairman Li Shufu's words: "Business is beautiful, doing business and making friends at the same time".
Time rewind to 16 years ago. On March 28, 2010, Geely Holding Group signed the final 100% equity acquisition agreement for Volvo Cars Group with Ford Motor Company. Geely became the first multinational corporation in the Chinese automotive industry. Ford witnessed and supported this cooperation case with global automotive industry influence, forging commercial friendship with Geely.
Today, 16 years later, Geely and Ford shake hands again. For the current explosive growth of Chinese cars going overseas, this has strong implications.
2026, the overseas expansion of China's automotive industry is undergoing a key leap from quantitative change to qualitative change.
In the first half of the year, China's vehicle export volume reached 5.096 million, up 65.3% year-on-year. June's single-month exports broke the 1 million vehicle threshold for the first time. For every 10 vehicles produced domestically, nearly 4 head to overseas docks.
Consulting firm AlixPartners predicts that China's annual vehicle export volume is expected to reach 10 million, becoming the first country globally to break this number.
Behind the numbers, deeper changes are occurring.
In June, the market share of major Chinese brands in Europe was 13%, surpassing Japanese brands for two consecutive months. When we occupy a larger share of the EU market, we cannot just sell cars simply, we must achieve harmonious win-win with the local industrial ecosystem, laws and regulations, and social well-being.
The joint venture between Geely Automobile and Ford to establish a company in Spain happens to stand at this node of qualitative change. It is also another practice of Li Shufu from "going out" to "integrating in".
A Prime Minister's Endorsement, and Two Handshakes Spanning 16 Years
On July 23, the day of the signing ceremony. Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez appeared at the Almussafes factory in Valencia, followed by three ministers from the Ministry of Labor and Economy, Ministry of Industry and Tourism, and Ministry of Science, as well as the President of the Valencian Community.
The Almussafes factory was built in 1976, and was once Ford's largest production base outside the United States, with cumulative production of over 11 million vehicles to date. For nearly 50 years, this factory has been the livelihood for tens of thousands of families in the Valencia region of Spain.
But the industrial era never stops for sentiment. Starting from 2024, with the promotion of EU industry and electrification, Ford gradually ceased production of multiple fuel models such as Mondeo, S-MAX, Galaxy, leaving only one production line producing the Kuga in the huge factory.
Last year, the factory with an annual capacity of 500,000 vehicles actually produced less than 100,000 vehicles, with utilization rate less than one-quarter. The factory that once fed thousands of Spanish families is facing a crossroads of fate.
Geely's arrival could not have been more timely. Through capacity sharing, it not only brings jobs, capacity, and tax revenue to the locality, but also allows Ford to activate remaining assets in a more efficient way, continuing to generate value.
According to the plan, the joint venture company will officially commence operations in the first half of 2027.
In the new factory, Geely will launch two new energy vehicle models, and Ford will also produce three multi-energy vehicle models, including continuing to produce the Kuga, and launching an all-new rugged compact SUV of the Bronco family in 2028.
The five models will share capacity and coordinate production scheduling. Both sides stated in the announcement that the joint venture will "promote more model choices and value enhancement", and through "integrating output to reduce per-vehicle costs". For the local economy, jobs are preserved, and an industrial lifeline of a region is reactivated, which can be called a win-win on multiple fronts.
Currently, Spain is becoming a strategic pivot for Chinese automakers landing in Europe. Labor costs are about one-third of Germany's, energy costs are lower than Germany and France, possessing world-class port clusters, and Barcelona is the core gateway for Chinese cars entering Europe.
In Q1 2026, Chinese brands sold approximately 38,700 vehicles in Spain, up 67% year-on-year.
Jian Jiayue, CEO of Geely Automobile Group, said a passage: Automakers going overseas will face many issues, from the overseas perspective, Chinese brands are there to "conquer" other people's markets, so the "going out" of Chinese automotive brands is actually to "walk in". Walking into the local market. Building factories in joint venture locally, mobilizing local resources, is a path of multi-win.
For Geely, although it seems like taking a small loss, cannot enjoy profits exclusively. But it actually avoided many hidden costs and efficiency frictions.
The EU has always been a high threshold market, with high compliance costs, high environmental protection requirements, long approval processes, influence of local voter opinions and political factions, which will make business behavior complicated. Specific cases can refer to the drama-like twists and turns of Tesla's German factory.
Actually, now there are already domestic automakers who suffered the same loss. Fighting alone, one-sidedly emphasizing ambition and sales targets, instead resulted in much hostility and obstruction, even becoming a chip in local political party games.
But the other path Geely took, preserving jobs in overseas markets, activating assets for old car companies, taking root for Chinese brands locally, letting technology flow become a constructive force, by "win-win cooperation, beauty shared" making oneself a welcomed partner.
Seeking Strategic Depth, Prioritizing Synergy
Citi estimates that if Geely obtains the 150,000 vehicle annual production quota in the Valencia factory, the cost is only equivalent to 10%-20% of building a new greenfield factory.
Beyond cost advantage, the more critical value lies in time. From signing to production, the joint venture model requires only 18 months, while self-built factories usually take three to five years. In the rapidly changing European electric vehicle market, an 18-month time difference is enough to determine whether a brand can lock in position.
Geely has already validated this strategy in many markets globally.
In Malaysia, in 2017, Geely acquired 49.9% stake in Proton and fully dominated operations. Let Proton walk out of the quagmire of losses, achieving brand revitalization.
In January 2026, Proton's exclusive EV factory at Tanjung Malim Automotive High-Tech Valley officially started production, and the first pure electric model eMas7 started CKD local assembly. The eMas7 is built on the Geely Galaxy E5 platform, ranking champion in Malaysia EV sales for consecutive months.
Until today, from Malaysia's political circles to the public, they still regard Proton as "their own brand". What Geely does is not replacing, but making it better.
In Korea, Geely cooperated with Renault to launch intelligent hybrid models. In Brazil, Geely acquired 26.4% stake in Renault Brazil, sharing factory capacity and market network.
In Europe, Volvo Cars is fully responsible for Lynk & Co's commercial and brand operations in the European region, assisting Lynk & Co brand's regional expansion in Europe.
This is exactly Geely's unique logic of global layout — not advancing alone, but weaving an ecological synergy network. Every cooperation node is both a strategic pivot to enter local markets, and proof of long-term trust from partners. Making globalization a value network of multi-win cooperation and continuous deepening.
So, although "from product exports to system exports" has become industry consensus, what exactly is the system? Moving your own system forcefully there, or building a system from scratch, or integrating into the local system? These operational details reflect a company's business values and development outlook.
Geely's Spain joint venture and the logic behind this system provide a good sample and idea for the Chinese automotive industry, and reflect as substantial growth data.
In the first half of 2026, Geely's overseas sales reached 474,000, up 158% year-on-year, already exceeding the total export volume of the full year 2025. Based on the first half performance, Geely has upped the full year export target to 900,000 vehicles.
Conclusion: From "Student" to "Partner", the Metamorphosis and Responsibility of Chinese Automakers
In early 2010, Geely and Ford signed an agreement in Gothenburg, Sweden, to acquire the globally renowned Swedish luxury brand Volvo for 1.8 billion US dollars, and the media used "snake swallowing an elephant" to describe this transaction.
Geely fulfilled all commitments with action, did not intervene in Volvo's independent operations, protected and respected its existing development systems, letting Volvo achieve brand revitalization in the following decade plus.
More importantly, Geely also learned Volvo's systematic R&D capabilities, safety-first manufacturing standards and quality control. This transaction allowed Geely to complete an "advanced study", laying the capability foundation for active performance on the global stage later.
Traditional automakers hold existing capacity, channels, and sales teams, while Chinese automakers hold the advantages and cost efficiency of the fastest growing new energy system, both sides found what both parties need in this stage.
As Ford Europe President Jim Baumback said: "Geely's world-class electrification capabilities, speed, and massive global scale, combined with Ford, are unparalleled competitive advantages."
From the humble "student" in 2010 to the equal "partner" in 2026, Geely exchanged pragmatism for trust, won respect with capability, and integrated into global industry development in the best way.
Geely's globalization has never been a simple capital game, but constantly exploring open and win-win global industry cooperation models under the premise of legality and compliance, it is respect for brands and technology, layout and deep construction of synergy systems.
From Volvo to Proton, Lotus, then Mercedes-Benz, Renault, and Ford, Geely's built global system synergy not only activated new momentum for Geely's global development, but also formed a solid guarantee to help brand going overseas. This also confirms what Li Shufu said, "Business is the most equal and beautiful manifestation of human civilization."
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家在揀車嘅時候都會拿 Proton X50 同 Kia Sportage 做比較。呢兩款車喺價位同定位上都幾接近，今日我哋就從多個方面做一個詳細嘅對比，幫大家省下做功課嘅時間。
Proton X50 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 89,800 - 113,300，一共有 4 個版本，包括 1.5T Executive（RM 89,800）、1.5T Premium（RM 101,800）、1.5T Flagship（RM 113,300） 等。
Kia Sportage 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 129,639 - 179,320，一共有 4 個版本，包括 2025 1.6T DCT 4WD High（RM 179,320）、2025 1.6T DCT 2WD High（RM 159,320）、2025 2.0L AT 2WD High（RM 139,639） 等。
從價錢嚟睇，Proton X50 嘅起步價確實比 Kia Sportage 平咗 RM 39,839。如果你預算有限，Proton 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需求。但都係要留意，平嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備上會有取舍，具體要睇你嘅需求。
Proton X50 搭載 1.5L 4-cyl，馬力 105 hp。官方油耗 6.0 L/100km。
Kia Sportage 搭載 1.5L Turbo，馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。
動力方面，Kia Sportage 嘅 1.5L Turbo 比 Proton X50 嘅 1.5L 4-cyl 多咗 35 匹馬力。不過日常喺市區開，兩款車嘅動力都夠用，唔會覺得唔夠力。
Proton X50 車身長 4400 mm，后备箱 400 L。
Kia Sportage 車身長 4400 mm，后备箱 400 L。
兩款車嘅尺寸幾乎一樣，車內空間差別唔大。呢個級別嘅車，日常使用完全夠用。
Proton X50 採用 4WD 驅動方式。
Kia Sportage 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
Proton 嘅 4WD 同 Kia 嘅 FWD 喺操控上會有唔同感受，建議試駕對比。
總括嚟講，Proton X50 同 Kia Sportage 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵都要睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
近日，國內購買嘅新能源汽車長時間喺境外行駛觸發安全保障策略導致車機網絡相關功能受限事件，迎來圓滿結局。
此前，該車主因車輛長期定位喺境外區域，觸發車企後台風控機制，車機影音娛樂等智能功能被臨時限制，車主將其經歷發布至社交平台後引發廣泛討論。
對此，極氪官方予以咗澄清並於 26 日凌晨迅速上線優化措施。極氪方面坦承，此次車機限制雖出於保護用戶財產安全嘅初衷，但喺用戶體驗層面確實存在改進空間，結合用戶及網友反饋，立即推進優化。
核心措施為優化出境安全保障體驗，極氪 App 端新增「跨境守護」功能入口，車主只需一鍵啟動，即可快速完成自助解鎖，簡化流程；開發中嘅「跨境守護功能開關」，其後將透過 OTA 推送。
該模組成為業界首套全方位出境安全保障系統，亦係一次用戶、網友與車企共同推動行業進步嘅典型案例。
官方快速響應，分步優化安全保障體驗據了解，該車主從河南出發自駕，駛入哈薩克後，車機彈出強提示界面，導航、影音等智能功能受限。記者核實，車輛動力、制動等核心行駛系統始終正常，冇「無法駕駛」嘅情況。目前，該車輛已完成核實，車機強提示已解除。
事件發生後，極氪虛心聆聽用戶建議、快速回應輿論訴求，分階段落實優化方案，兼顧車輛安全保障與車主使用體驗。
具體優化方案包括：第一，極氪 APP 正式上線「跨境守護」功能入口。車主只需一鍵啟動，即可快速獲取驗證碼，完成自助解鎖，簡化流程，提升回應效率。第二，開發中嘅「跨境守護功能開關」，其後將透過 OTA 推送。開關功能上線後，「跨境守護」將默認處於關閉狀態，出境前車主可根據自身需要，喺手機端手動選擇開啟或關閉。如果車主主動開啟該功能，仍可透過 APP「跨境守護」入口進行自助解鎖。第三，針對已出境或即將出境嘅用戶，極氪開放 24 小時客服熱線（400-003-6036）將提供優先接入通道。如遇解鎖失敗或緊急情況，極氪將第一时间遠程協助。
極氪方面表示，品牌堅守極致全域安全嘅初心，始終把用戶體驗同安全放喺第一位，亦始終重視每一條真實嘅聲音。未來將持續常態化收集、聆聽車主反饋，迭代優化安全風控策略與跨境出行服務流程，喺築牢財產安全、數據安全防線同優化用戶出行體驗之間，持續尋找更完美嘅平衡點。
記者調查：新能源行業普遍使用風控設計，但體驗有待完善事實上，新能源車企部署跨境風控體系，唔係多餘嘅管控手段，而係應對當下汽車跨境黑灰產、守護車主權益嘅必要保障。近年來，新能源汽車跨境盜竊、拆解走私亂象屢見不鮮。此前，某新勢力品牌旗艦車型就曾遭盜竊後被拖運至境外，車輛被快速過戶，車機賬號與備案資訊被遠程篡改，導致車主維權無門。多地也曾偵破批量新車跨境流失案件，背後正係安全防護機制缺失留下嘅安全漏洞。
行業資料顯示，車機限制本質係車企成熟嘅全球車輛安全防護策略。賓士、寶馬、保時捷、特斯拉等全球頭部車企均部署類似機制，俄烏戰爭期間，以上品牌喺缺乏備用通訊機制同智能容錯設計嘅情況下，因外部信號中斷或干擾，導致防盜系統觸發咗安全防控機制，從而強制鎖住車輛。
但長久以來，多數車企只重風控落地，輕用戶告知同體驗適配，流程唔完善、機制唔透明，導致大眾普遍產生「企業越俎代庖、過度干預物權」嘅誤解。本質上，呢類風控邏輯同 iPhone 設備定位防盜、電子圍欄鎖機機制同源，核心係兜底保障用戶財產安全，經用戶報備後即可解鎖。
行業、法律專家：安全策略、用戶隱私保護好有必冇多位汽車行業資深訪問人士表示，今次極氪嘅快速優化舉措，一定程度推動咗新能源行業安全風控體系嘅進步。
智能汽車時代，車企嘅核心責任早已唔局限喺行車操控安全，而係延伸為全域安全保障體系：既包括轉向、制動、動力等基礎行駛安全，亦涵蓋車輛財產防盜安全、車主個人資料隱私安全。極氪今次優化跨境風控規則，本質係喺安全合規底線、財產防護機制同用戶體驗之間，搵到咗最優平衡點，真正將車輛控制權交返俾用戶，實現「安全唔缺位、體驗唔打折」。
對於有人質疑，車廠有無權單方面限制車輛功能。有律師表示：車廠地理圍欄風控只限制車機娛樂、導航等附加功能，全程唔干预轉向、制動、動力等行車安全相關嘅核心硬件。車主提供護照、通關憑證、購車證明等資料完成核實後即可解鎖限制，並唔構成對財產權嘅侵犯。反過嚟，若車廠放任車輛無管控流出境外，將面臨海關高額行政處罰。
一線車主嘅真實反饋，更加印證咗行業優化嘅必要性。唔少極氪車主受訪時表示，揀極氪，正係睇中咗極致安全嘅品牌理念。業內相關人士認為，全域電子圍欄、跨境風控機制係高端豪車必備嘅安全配置，同各類數碼產品嘅防盜鎖機邏輯一致。高端豪車價值高、跨境套利空間大，完善嘅風控機制能有效避免車輛被盜竊、非法倒賣嘅風險，令日常用車、長途跨境出行更安全、更安心。
爭議背後：中國高端新能源全球化嘅必經進階從行業長遠趨勢嚟睇，今次車廠嘅升級舉措，係中國高端新能源汽車全球化嘅必經之路。當下國產高端新能源品牌加速出海，國內外懸殊嘅售價差形成巨大套利空間：極氪 009 國內售價四十餘萬元，新加坡市場超 200 萬元；極氪 9X 境外終端普遍加價 40 萬元，邁莎銳定制改裝版境外售價達 40 萬美元，折合人民幣超 270 萬元。巨大嘅價差紅利，令國產高端豪車成為跨境黑灰產、非法倒賣經銷商嘅重點覬覦目標，各類非法跨境倒賣、整車走私、零件拆解套利行為層出不窮。
與此同時，車輛定位軌跡、車載測繪地理資訊屬於國家法定重要數據，依據《數據安全法》《汽車數據安全管理若干規定（試行）》《汽車數據出境安全指引（2026 版）》《測繪法》，相關數據嚴禁違規跨境傳輸，地理圍欄風控係車廠落實國家數據安全、測繪保密嘅法定責任。且 2026 年國內實施純電動乘用車出口許可證管理制度，無正規許可車輛禁止外流，車廠風控亦係配合國家進出口監管、規避合規風險嘅必要舉措。此外，境外車機影音、流量服務涉及各地版權與屬地法規，無序開放功能亦會俾車主帶嚟合規困擾。
以全域安全著名嘅極氪品牌，被用戶譽為「公路坦氪」，不僅喺車身結構、智能避障等方面追求科技配置領先，亦喺隱私保護、防丟防盜等方面走在行業前列。但再好嘅初心，亦要避免類似「有一種冷叫做媽媽怕你冷」嘅過度保護。汽車本質上係用戶嘅財產，安全策略唔應該令用戶感覺被打擾。
今次爭議從輿情危機轉化為行業升級契機，極氪「聽勸式升級」亦為全行業做出積極示範：安全風控從來唔係多餘嘅束縛，而係中國汽車品牌全球化嘅核心底氣與必備基建。未來，隨著國產高端新能源汽車持續深耕東南亞、中東、新加坡等境外市場，行業必將參考今次優化範式，統一完善「風控兜底 + 用戶自主 + 便捷解鎖」嘅標準化體系。
回顧過去一年，極氪一步步將用戶聲音轉化為品牌進化嘅驅動力。從針對改款節奏過快問題，明確「車型改款需提前預告且一年唔超過一次」，到推出「極氪零距離」溝通機制、發布「陽光服務公約」——每一項舉措背後，都係把話語權交返俾用戶嘅誠意。正係這種唔迴避、唔推諉嘅誠懇溝通，令極氪品牌 NPS（用戶淨推薦值）大幅攀升，喺市場上形成咗強勁嘅口碑效應。今年上半年，極氪累計交付 178,370 輛，同比增長 97%，成為新勢力品牌中唯一完成全年銷量目標過半嘅企業。市場嘅認可，正係最好嘅回報。
In the SUV market in Malaysia, many buyers compare Proton X50 and Mazda CX-8 when choosing a car. Both models are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
The OTR price of Proton X50 in Malaysia is RM 89,800 - 113,300, with a total of 4 versions, including 1.5T Executive (RM 89,800), 1.5T Premium (RM 101,800), 1.5T Flagship (RM 113,300), etc.
The OTR price of Mazda CX-8 in Malaysia is RM 165,360 - 201,360, with a total of 5 versions, including 2025 2.5T 4WD High Plus Petrol (RM 201,360), 2025 2.2L 2WD High Plus Diesel (RM 193,123), 2025 2.5L 2WD High Plus Petrol (RM 186,360), etc.
From a price perspective, the starting price of Proton X50 is indeed RM 75,560 cheaper than Mazda CX-8. If your budget is limited, the entry-level version of Proton can already meet daily needs. But also note, the few thousand dollars cheaper may involve trade-offs in features, it depends on your specific needs.
Proton X50 is equipped with a 1.5L 4-cyl engine, 105 hp. Official fuel consumption 6.0 L/100km.
Mazda CX-8 is equipped with a 2.0L 4-cyl engine, 170 hp. Official fuel consumption 8.0 L/100km.
In terms of power, the Mazda CX-8's 2.0L 4-cyl has 65 more horsepower than the Proton X50's 1.5L 4-cyl. However, for daily city driving, both cars have enough power and won't feel underpowered.
Proton X50 safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety system includes ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
Mazda CX-8 safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety system includes Brand ADAS.
Both cars have the same safety rating, safety features are quite comprehensive within this class. New cars nowadays don't lack in safety, no need to worry too much about this point.
Proton X50 warranty 5 years/150,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Mazda CX-8 warranty 5 years/150,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Warranty conditions for both cars are the same, no need to dwell on this aspect. Actual maintenance costs depend on the brand's service network and parts prices, it is recommended to ask real owners in car owner groups for experience.
Both Proton X50 and Mazda CX-8 are mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale price more, you can prioritize the one with better reputation; if you care more about cost-performance ratio and features, choose the one with richer configuration. In the end, it is recommended to test drive both, personal experience is the most important.
Overall, both Proton X50 and Mazda CX-8 are very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends on your personal needs and budget. It is recommended to do your research, compare quotes from several dealerships, and then test drive to make the final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending time doing research will never be wrong.
In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers compare Perodua Aruz and Proton X70 when choosing a car. These two models are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
Perodua Aruz has an OTR price in Malaysia of RM 72,900 - 77,900, with a total of 2 versions, including 1.5L X (RM 72,900), 1.5L AV (RM 77,900), etc.
Proton X70 has an OTR price in Malaysia of RM 106,800 - 122,300, with a total of 3 versions, including 1.5L Standard 2WD (RM 106,800), 1.5L Executive 2WD (RM 115,800), 1.5L Premium 2WD (RM 122,300), etc.
From a price perspective, the starting price of Perodua Aruz is indeed RM 33,900 cheaper than Proton X70. If your budget is limited, Perodua's entry-level version is sufficient for daily needs. However, be aware that the savings of a few thousand Ringgit might involve trade-offs in features, depending on your specific requirements.
Perodua Aruz is equipped with a 1.5L 4-cyl, 105 hp. Official fuel consumption 6.0 L/100km.
Proton X70 is equipped with a 1.5L Turbo, 140 hp. Official fuel consumption 7.0 L/100km.
In terms of power, Proton X70's 1.5L Turbo has 35 more horsepower than Perodua Aruz's 1.5L 4-cyl. However, for daily city driving, both cars have sufficient power, you won't feel lacking.
Perodua Aruz body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
Proton X70 body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
The dimensions of the two cars are almost the same, interior space difference is not significant. Cars at this level are more than enough for daily use.
Perodua Aruz adopts FWD drive mode.
Proton X70 adopts FWD drive mode.
The drive mode of the two cars is the same, both are FWD, daily driving experience will not be much different.
Perodua Aruz warranty 5 years/150,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Proton X70 warranty 5 years/150,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
The warranty conditions for the two cars are the same, no need to worry about this. Actual maintenance cost also depends on the brand's service network and parts prices, suggested to ask real owners in car owner groups for experience.
Overall, Perodua Aruz and Proton X70 are both very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends on your personal needs and budget. We suggest doing your research, compare quotes from several dealerships, and test drive before making a final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending time on research will definitely not be wrong.
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都拿 寶路華 Ativa 同 三菱 Xforce 嚟做比較。呢兩款車喺價位同定位上都幾接近嘅，今日我哋就從多個方面做一次詳細嘅比較，幫你節省咗做功課嘅時間。
寶路華 Ativa 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 62,500 - 73,400，一共有 3 個版本，包括 1.0L Turbo X（RM 62,500）、1.0L Turbo H（RM 67,300）、1.0L Turbo AV（RM 73,400）等。
三菱 Xforce 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 109,930 - 119,930，一共有 2 個版本，包括 2026 1.5L Ultimate（RM 119,930）、2026 1.5L Urban（RM 109,930）等。
從價錢嚟看，寶路華 Ativa 嘅起步價的確比三菱 Xforce 平咗 RM 47,430。如果你預算有限，寶路華嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需求。但都要注意，平嗰幾千蚊，可能會喺配備上有取舍，具體要看你嘅需求。
寶路華 Ativa 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 ASA 3.0 + ACC + LDA + LKA + BSM + RCTA。
三菱 Xforce 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 MI-PILOT。
兩款車嘅安全評級一樣，喺呢個級數嚟講安全配備都算好齊全嘅。而家嘅新車安全性都唔差，唔使太擔心呢一點。
寶路華 Ativa 保養 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
三菱 Xforce 保養 3 年/100,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
寶路華 Ativa 同三菱 Xforce 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更睇重品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑好嗰款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，那就揀配置更豐富嗰款。最終都建議兩款都去試駕，親身體驗先係最重要。
總嚟講，寶路華 Ativa 同三菱 Xforce 都係馬來西亞市場好唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵都要睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係一件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拿 Perodua Ativa 同 Chery Tiggo Cross 做比較。這兩款車喺價位同定位上都蠻接近嘅，今日我哋就從多個方面做一個詳細嘅比較，幫你省下做功課嘅時間。
Perodua Ativa 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 62,500 - 73,400，一共有 3 個版本，包括 1.0L Turbo X（RM 62,500）、1.0L Turbo H（RM 67,300）、1.0L Turbo AV（RM 73,400） 等。
Chery Tiggo Cross 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 88,750 - 99,750，一共有 2 個版本，包括 2025 HEV 1.5L CSH（RM 99,750）、2025 1.5T Standard（RM 88,750） 等。
從價錢睇，Perodua Ativa 嘅起步價確實比 Chery Tiggo Cross 便宜咗 RM 26,250。如果你預算有限，Perodua 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需求。但都要注意，便宜嗰幾千塊，可能喺配備上會有取捨，具體要看你嘅需求。
Perodua Ativa 搭載 1.5L 4-cyl，馬力 105 hp。官方油耗 6.0 L/100km。
Chery Tiggo Cross 搭載 1.5L 4-cyl，馬力 105 hp。官方油耗 6.0 L/100km。
兩款車用嘅係同一套動力系統，日常開起嚟嘅感受基本上冇咩差別。油耗方面都差不多，唔使太糾結這一點。
Perodua Ativa 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 ASA 3.0 + ACC + LDA + LKA + BSM + RCTA。
Chery Tiggo Cross 嘅安全評級係 TBD，主動安全系統包括 Basic。
安全配備方面，兩款車都拿唔錯嘅評級。不過 Perodua Ativa 嘅 ASA 3.0 + ACC + LDA + LKA + BSM + RCTA 同 Chery Tiggo Cross 嘅 Basic 喺功能上有啲差異，如果你比較著重主動安全嘅話，可以仔細對比一下兩者嘅功能列表。
Perodua Ativa 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
Chery Tiggo Cross 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
兩款車嘅驅動方式一樣，都係 FWD，日常駕駛感受唔會有太大區別。
總體嚟講，Perodua Ativa 同 Chery Tiggo Cross 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵都要睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花啲時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嗰陣都會將 Perodua Aruz 同 Toyota Yaris Cross 作比較。呢兩款車喺價位同定位上都幾接近，今日我哋就從多個方面做一個詳細比較，幫你省做功課嘅時間。
Perodua Aruz 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 72,900 - 77,900，一共有 2 個版本，包括 1.5L X（RM 72,900）、1.5L AV（RM 77,900）等。
Toyota Yaris Cross 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 99,900 - 109,900，一共有 2 個版本，包括 2026 1.5L Standard（RM 99,900）、2026 HEV 1.5L Standard（RM 109,900）等。
從價錢來看，Perodua Aruz 嘅起價確實比 Toyota Yaris Cross 平咗 RM 27,000。如果你預算有限，Perodua 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需要。但亦要注意，平嗰幾千蚊，可能會喺配備上面有取舍，具體要看你嘅需要。
Perodua Aruz 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
Toyota Yaris Cross 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
兩款車嘅驅動方式一樣，都係 FWD，日常駕駛感受唔會有太大分別。
Perodua Aruz 保修 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Toyota Yaris Cross 保修 5 年/無限制里程，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Perodua Aruz 同 Toyota Yaris Cross 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更看重品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，那就揀配備更豐富嗰款。最後始終建議兩款都去試駕，親身體驗先係最重要嘅。
總體嚟講，Perodua Aruz 同 Toyota Yaris Cross 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車款。揀邊一部，關鍵始終係睇你個人嘅需要同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行之報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嗰陣都會拿 Mazda CX-60 同 Ford Everest 嚟做比較。這兩款車喺價位同定位上都幾接近，今日我哋就從多個方面做一個詳細嘅比較，幫你省咗做功課嘅時間。
Mazda CX-60 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 200,510 - 252,873，一共有 2 個版本，包括 2026 3.3T 4WD High Plus（RM 252,873）、2025 2.5L 2WD High（RM 200,510） 等。
Ford Everest 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 266,338 - 430,838，一共有 6 個版本，包括 2026 3.0T 4WD Platinum（RM 430,838）、2026 2.0T 4WD Platinum（RM 348,838）、2026 2.0T 4WD Sport（RM 316,838） 等。
從價錢來看，Mazda CX-60 嘅起步價確實比 Ford Everest 便宜咗 RM 65,828。如果你預算有限，Mazda 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需求。但都需要注意，便宜嗰幾千塊，可能喺配備上會有取舍，具體睇你嘅需求。
Mazda CX-60 搭載 2.0L 4-cyl，馬力 170 hp。官方油耗 8.0 L/100km。
Ford Everest 搭載 2.5L Diesel，馬力 187 hp。官方油耗 8.5 L/100km。
動力方面，Ford Everest 嘅 2.5L Diesel 比 Mazda CX-60 嘅 2.0L 4-cyl 多咗 17 匹馬力。不過日常喺市區開，兩款車嘅動力都夠用，唔會覺得唔夠力。
Mazda CX-60 車身長 4500 mm，後備箱 450 L。
Ford Everest 車身長 4400 mm，後備箱 400 L。
空間方面，Mazda CX-60 嘅車身比 Ford Everest 長咗 100 mm，車內乘坐空間會稍微寬裕啲，尤其係後座腿部空間。如果你經常載家人或者需要放嬰兒車，大少少嘅車身確實更實用。
Mazda CX-60 保修 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Ford Everest 保修 3 年/100,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
總體嚟講，Mazda CX-60 同 Ford Everest 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一部，關鍵都要睇你個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
