首頁VW Caravelle
搜尋歷史
熱門搜尋
經銷商登入 / 註冊
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家在揀車嘅時候都會拿 Proton X50 同 Kia Sportage 做比較。呢兩款車喺價位同定位上都幾接近，今日我哋就從多個方面做一個詳細嘅對比，幫大家省下做功課嘅時間。
Proton X50 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 89,800 - 113,300，一共有 4 個版本，包括 1.5T Executive（RM 89,800）、1.5T Premium（RM 101,800）、1.5T Flagship（RM 113,300） 等。
Kia Sportage 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 129,639 - 179,320，一共有 4 個版本，包括 2025 1.6T DCT 4WD High（RM 179,320）、2025 1.6T DCT 2WD High（RM 159,320）、2025 2.0L AT 2WD High（RM 139,639） 等。
從價錢嚟睇，Proton X50 嘅起步價確實比 Kia Sportage 平咗 RM 39,839。如果你預算有限，Proton 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需求。但都係要留意，平嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備上會有取舍，具體要睇你嘅需求。
Proton X50 搭載 1.5L 4-cyl，馬力 105 hp。官方油耗 6.0 L/100km。
Kia Sportage 搭載 1.5L Turbo，馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。
動力方面，Kia Sportage 嘅 1.5L Turbo 比 Proton X50 嘅 1.5L 4-cyl 多咗 35 匹馬力。不過日常喺市區開，兩款車嘅動力都夠用，唔會覺得唔夠力。
Proton X50 車身長 4400 mm，后备箱 400 L。
Kia Sportage 車身長 4400 mm，后备箱 400 L。
兩款車嘅尺寸幾乎一樣，車內空間差別唔大。呢個級別嘅車，日常使用完全夠用。
Proton X50 採用 4WD 驅動方式。
Kia Sportage 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
Proton 嘅 4WD 同 Kia 嘅 FWD 喺操控上會有唔同感受，建議試駕對比。
總括嚟講，Proton X50 同 Kia Sportage 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵都要睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
近日，國內購買嘅新能源汽車長時間喺境外行駛觸發安全保障策略導致車機網絡相關功能受限事件，迎來圓滿結局。
此前，該車主因車輛長期定位喺境外區域，觸發車企後台風控機制，車機影音娛樂等智能功能被臨時限制，車主將其經歷發布至社交平台後引發廣泛討論。
對此，極氪官方予以咗澄清並於 26 日凌晨迅速上線優化措施。極氪方面坦承，此次車機限制雖出於保護用戶財產安全嘅初衷，但喺用戶體驗層面確實存在改進空間，結合用戶及網友反饋，立即推進優化。
核心措施為優化出境安全保障體驗，極氪 App 端新增「跨境守護」功能入口，車主只需一鍵啟動，即可快速完成自助解鎖，簡化流程；開發中嘅「跨境守護功能開關」，其後將透過 OTA 推送。
該模組成為業界首套全方位出境安全保障系統，亦係一次用戶、網友與車企共同推動行業進步嘅典型案例。
官方快速響應，分步優化安全保障體驗據了解，該車主從河南出發自駕，駛入哈薩克後，車機彈出強提示界面，導航、影音等智能功能受限。記者核實，車輛動力、制動等核心行駛系統始終正常，冇「無法駕駛」嘅情況。目前，該車輛已完成核實，車機強提示已解除。
事件發生後，極氪虛心聆聽用戶建議、快速回應輿論訴求，分階段落實優化方案，兼顧車輛安全保障與車主使用體驗。
具體優化方案包括：第一，極氪 APP 正式上線「跨境守護」功能入口。車主只需一鍵啟動，即可快速獲取驗證碼，完成自助解鎖，簡化流程，提升回應效率。第二，開發中嘅「跨境守護功能開關」，其後將透過 OTA 推送。開關功能上線後，「跨境守護」將默認處於關閉狀態，出境前車主可根據自身需要，喺手機端手動選擇開啟或關閉。如果車主主動開啟該功能，仍可透過 APP「跨境守護」入口進行自助解鎖。第三，針對已出境或即將出境嘅用戶，極氪開放 24 小時客服熱線（400-003-6036）將提供優先接入通道。如遇解鎖失敗或緊急情況，極氪將第一时间遠程協助。
極氪方面表示，品牌堅守極致全域安全嘅初心，始終把用戶體驗同安全放喺第一位，亦始終重視每一條真實嘅聲音。未來將持續常態化收集、聆聽車主反饋，迭代優化安全風控策略與跨境出行服務流程，喺築牢財產安全、數據安全防線同優化用戶出行體驗之間，持續尋找更完美嘅平衡點。
記者調查：新能源行業普遍使用風控設計，但體驗有待完善事實上，新能源車企部署跨境風控體系，唔係多餘嘅管控手段，而係應對當下汽車跨境黑灰產、守護車主權益嘅必要保障。近年來，新能源汽車跨境盜竊、拆解走私亂象屢見不鮮。此前，某新勢力品牌旗艦車型就曾遭盜竊後被拖運至境外，車輛被快速過戶，車機賬號與備案資訊被遠程篡改，導致車主維權無門。多地也曾偵破批量新車跨境流失案件，背後正係安全防護機制缺失留下嘅安全漏洞。
行業資料顯示，車機限制本質係車企成熟嘅全球車輛安全防護策略。賓士、寶馬、保時捷、特斯拉等全球頭部車企均部署類似機制，俄烏戰爭期間，以上品牌喺缺乏備用通訊機制同智能容錯設計嘅情況下，因外部信號中斷或干擾，導致防盜系統觸發咗安全防控機制，從而強制鎖住車輛。
但長久以來，多數車企只重風控落地，輕用戶告知同體驗適配，流程唔完善、機制唔透明，導致大眾普遍產生「企業越俎代庖、過度干預物權」嘅誤解。本質上，呢類風控邏輯同 iPhone 設備定位防盜、電子圍欄鎖機機制同源，核心係兜底保障用戶財產安全，經用戶報備後即可解鎖。
行業、法律專家：安全策略、用戶隱私保護好有必冇多位汽車行業資深訪問人士表示，今次極氪嘅快速優化舉措，一定程度推動咗新能源行業安全風控體系嘅進步。
智能汽車時代，車企嘅核心責任早已唔局限喺行車操控安全，而係延伸為全域安全保障體系：既包括轉向、制動、動力等基礎行駛安全，亦涵蓋車輛財產防盜安全、車主個人資料隱私安全。極氪今次優化跨境風控規則，本質係喺安全合規底線、財產防護機制同用戶體驗之間，搵到咗最優平衡點，真正將車輛控制權交返俾用戶，實現「安全唔缺位、體驗唔打折」。
對於有人質疑，車廠有無權單方面限制車輛功能。有律師表示：車廠地理圍欄風控只限制車機娛樂、導航等附加功能，全程唔干预轉向、制動、動力等行車安全相關嘅核心硬件。車主提供護照、通關憑證、購車證明等資料完成核實後即可解鎖限制，並唔構成對財產權嘅侵犯。反過嚟，若車廠放任車輛無管控流出境外，將面臨海關高額行政處罰。
一線車主嘅真實反饋，更加印證咗行業優化嘅必要性。唔少極氪車主受訪時表示，揀極氪，正係睇中咗極致安全嘅品牌理念。業內相關人士認為，全域電子圍欄、跨境風控機制係高端豪車必備嘅安全配置，同各類數碼產品嘅防盜鎖機邏輯一致。高端豪車價值高、跨境套利空間大，完善嘅風控機制能有效避免車輛被盜竊、非法倒賣嘅風險，令日常用車、長途跨境出行更安全、更安心。
爭議背後：中國高端新能源全球化嘅必經進階從行業長遠趨勢嚟睇，今次車廠嘅升級舉措，係中國高端新能源汽車全球化嘅必經之路。當下國產高端新能源品牌加速出海，國內外懸殊嘅售價差形成巨大套利空間：極氪 009 國內售價四十餘萬元，新加坡市場超 200 萬元；極氪 9X 境外終端普遍加價 40 萬元，邁莎銳定制改裝版境外售價達 40 萬美元，折合人民幣超 270 萬元。巨大嘅價差紅利，令國產高端豪車成為跨境黑灰產、非法倒賣經銷商嘅重點覬覦目標，各類非法跨境倒賣、整車走私、零件拆解套利行為層出不窮。
與此同時，車輛定位軌跡、車載測繪地理資訊屬於國家法定重要數據，依據《數據安全法》《汽車數據安全管理若干規定（試行）》《汽車數據出境安全指引（2026 版）》《測繪法》，相關數據嚴禁違規跨境傳輸，地理圍欄風控係車廠落實國家數據安全、測繪保密嘅法定責任。且 2026 年國內實施純電動乘用車出口許可證管理制度，無正規許可車輛禁止外流，車廠風控亦係配合國家進出口監管、規避合規風險嘅必要舉措。此外，境外車機影音、流量服務涉及各地版權與屬地法規，無序開放功能亦會俾車主帶嚟合規困擾。
以全域安全著名嘅極氪品牌，被用戶譽為「公路坦氪」，不僅喺車身結構、智能避障等方面追求科技配置領先，亦喺隱私保護、防丟防盜等方面走在行業前列。但再好嘅初心，亦要避免類似「有一種冷叫做媽媽怕你冷」嘅過度保護。汽車本質上係用戶嘅財產，安全策略唔應該令用戶感覺被打擾。
今次爭議從輿情危機轉化為行業升級契機，極氪「聽勸式升級」亦為全行業做出積極示範：安全風控從來唔係多餘嘅束縛，而係中國汽車品牌全球化嘅核心底氣與必備基建。未來，隨著國產高端新能源汽車持續深耕東南亞、中東、新加坡等境外市場，行業必將參考今次優化範式，統一完善「風控兜底 + 用戶自主 + 便捷解鎖」嘅標準化體系。
回顧過去一年，極氪一步步將用戶聲音轉化為品牌進化嘅驅動力。從針對改款節奏過快問題，明確「車型改款需提前預告且一年唔超過一次」，到推出「極氪零距離」溝通機制、發布「陽光服務公約」——每一項舉措背後，都係把話語權交返俾用戶嘅誠意。正係這種唔迴避、唔推諉嘅誠懇溝通，令極氪品牌 NPS（用戶淨推薦值）大幅攀升，喺市場上形成咗強勁嘅口碑效應。今年上半年，極氪累計交付 178,370 輛，同比增長 97%，成為新勢力品牌中唯一完成全年銷量目標過半嘅企業。市場嘅認可，正係最好嘅回報。
In the SUV market in Malaysia, many buyers compare Proton X50 and Mazda CX-8 when choosing a car. Both models are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
The OTR price of Proton X50 in Malaysia is RM 89,800 - 113,300, with a total of 4 versions, including 1.5T Executive (RM 89,800), 1.5T Premium (RM 101,800), 1.5T Flagship (RM 113,300), etc.
The OTR price of Mazda CX-8 in Malaysia is RM 165,360 - 201,360, with a total of 5 versions, including 2025 2.5T 4WD High Plus Petrol (RM 201,360), 2025 2.2L 2WD High Plus Diesel (RM 193,123), 2025 2.5L 2WD High Plus Petrol (RM 186,360), etc.
From a price perspective, the starting price of Proton X50 is indeed RM 75,560 cheaper than Mazda CX-8. If your budget is limited, the entry-level version of Proton can already meet daily needs. But also note, the few thousand dollars cheaper may involve trade-offs in features, it depends on your specific needs.
Proton X50 is equipped with a 1.5L 4-cyl engine, 105 hp. Official fuel consumption 6.0 L/100km.
Mazda CX-8 is equipped with a 2.0L 4-cyl engine, 170 hp. Official fuel consumption 8.0 L/100km.
In terms of power, the Mazda CX-8's 2.0L 4-cyl has 65 more horsepower than the Proton X50's 1.5L 4-cyl. However, for daily city driving, both cars have enough power and won't feel underpowered.
Proton X50 safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety system includes ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
Mazda CX-8 safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety system includes Brand ADAS.
Both cars have the same safety rating, safety features are quite comprehensive within this class. New cars nowadays don't lack in safety, no need to worry too much about this point.
Proton X50 warranty 5 years/150,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Mazda CX-8 warranty 5 years/150,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Warranty conditions for both cars are the same, no need to dwell on this aspect. Actual maintenance costs depend on the brand's service network and parts prices, it is recommended to ask real owners in car owner groups for experience.
Both Proton X50 and Mazda CX-8 are mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale price more, you can prioritize the one with better reputation; if you care more about cost-performance ratio and features, choose the one with richer configuration. In the end, it is recommended to test drive both, personal experience is the most important.
Overall, both Proton X50 and Mazda CX-8 are very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends on your personal needs and budget. It is recommended to do your research, compare quotes from several dealerships, and then test drive to make the final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending time doing research will never be wrong.
In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers compare Perodua Aruz and Proton X70 when choosing a car. These two models are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
Perodua Aruz has an OTR price in Malaysia of RM 72,900 - 77,900, with a total of 2 versions, including 1.5L X (RM 72,900), 1.5L AV (RM 77,900), etc.
Proton X70 has an OTR price in Malaysia of RM 106,800 - 122,300, with a total of 3 versions, including 1.5L Standard 2WD (RM 106,800), 1.5L Executive 2WD (RM 115,800), 1.5L Premium 2WD (RM 122,300), etc.
From a price perspective, the starting price of Perodua Aruz is indeed RM 33,900 cheaper than Proton X70. If your budget is limited, Perodua's entry-level version is sufficient for daily needs. However, be aware that the savings of a few thousand Ringgit might involve trade-offs in features, depending on your specific requirements.
Perodua Aruz is equipped with a 1.5L 4-cyl, 105 hp. Official fuel consumption 6.0 L/100km.
Proton X70 is equipped with a 1.5L Turbo, 140 hp. Official fuel consumption 7.0 L/100km.
In terms of power, Proton X70's 1.5L Turbo has 35 more horsepower than Perodua Aruz's 1.5L 4-cyl. However, for daily city driving, both cars have sufficient power, you won't feel lacking.
Perodua Aruz body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
Proton X70 body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
The dimensions of the two cars are almost the same, interior space difference is not significant. Cars at this level are more than enough for daily use.
Perodua Aruz adopts FWD drive mode.
Proton X70 adopts FWD drive mode.
The drive mode of the two cars is the same, both are FWD, daily driving experience will not be much different.
Perodua Aruz warranty 5 years/150,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Proton X70 warranty 5 years/150,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
The warranty conditions for the two cars are the same, no need to worry about this. Actual maintenance cost also depends on the brand's service network and parts prices, suggested to ask real owners in car owner groups for experience.
Overall, Perodua Aruz and Proton X70 are both very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends on your personal needs and budget. We suggest doing your research, compare quotes from several dealerships, and test drive before making a final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending time on research will definitely not be wrong.
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都拿 寶路華 Ativa 同 三菱 Xforce 嚟做比較。呢兩款車喺價位同定位上都幾接近嘅，今日我哋就從多個方面做一次詳細嘅比較，幫你節省咗做功課嘅時間。
寶路華 Ativa 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 62,500 - 73,400，一共有 3 個版本，包括 1.0L Turbo X（RM 62,500）、1.0L Turbo H（RM 67,300）、1.0L Turbo AV（RM 73,400）等。
三菱 Xforce 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 109,930 - 119,930，一共有 2 個版本，包括 2026 1.5L Ultimate（RM 119,930）、2026 1.5L Urban（RM 109,930）等。
從價錢嚟看，寶路華 Ativa 嘅起步價的確比三菱 Xforce 平咗 RM 47,430。如果你預算有限，寶路華嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需求。但都要注意，平嗰幾千蚊，可能會喺配備上有取舍，具體要看你嘅需求。
寶路華 Ativa 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 ASA 3.0 + ACC + LDA + LKA + BSM + RCTA。
三菱 Xforce 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 MI-PILOT。
兩款車嘅安全評級一樣，喺呢個級數嚟講安全配備都算好齊全嘅。而家嘅新車安全性都唔差，唔使太擔心呢一點。
寶路華 Ativa 保養 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
三菱 Xforce 保養 3 年/100,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
寶路華 Ativa 同三菱 Xforce 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更睇重品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑好嗰款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，那就揀配置更豐富嗰款。最終都建議兩款都去試駕，親身體驗先係最重要。
總嚟講，寶路華 Ativa 同三菱 Xforce 都係馬來西亞市場好唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵都要睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係一件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拿 Perodua Ativa 同 Chery Tiggo Cross 做比較。這兩款車喺價位同定位上都蠻接近嘅，今日我哋就從多個方面做一個詳細嘅比較，幫你省下做功課嘅時間。
Perodua Ativa 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 62,500 - 73,400，一共有 3 個版本，包括 1.0L Turbo X（RM 62,500）、1.0L Turbo H（RM 67,300）、1.0L Turbo AV（RM 73,400） 等。
Chery Tiggo Cross 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 88,750 - 99,750，一共有 2 個版本，包括 2025 HEV 1.5L CSH（RM 99,750）、2025 1.5T Standard（RM 88,750） 等。
從價錢睇，Perodua Ativa 嘅起步價確實比 Chery Tiggo Cross 便宜咗 RM 26,250。如果你預算有限，Perodua 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需求。但都要注意，便宜嗰幾千塊，可能喺配備上會有取捨，具體要看你嘅需求。
Perodua Ativa 搭載 1.5L 4-cyl，馬力 105 hp。官方油耗 6.0 L/100km。
Chery Tiggo Cross 搭載 1.5L 4-cyl，馬力 105 hp。官方油耗 6.0 L/100km。
兩款車用嘅係同一套動力系統，日常開起嚟嘅感受基本上冇咩差別。油耗方面都差不多，唔使太糾結這一點。
Perodua Ativa 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 ASA 3.0 + ACC + LDA + LKA + BSM + RCTA。
Chery Tiggo Cross 嘅安全評級係 TBD，主動安全系統包括 Basic。
安全配備方面，兩款車都拿唔錯嘅評級。不過 Perodua Ativa 嘅 ASA 3.0 + ACC + LDA + LKA + BSM + RCTA 同 Chery Tiggo Cross 嘅 Basic 喺功能上有啲差異，如果你比較著重主動安全嘅話，可以仔細對比一下兩者嘅功能列表。
Perodua Ativa 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
Chery Tiggo Cross 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
兩款車嘅驅動方式一樣，都係 FWD，日常駕駛感受唔會有太大區別。
總體嚟講，Perodua Ativa 同 Chery Tiggo Cross 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵都要睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花啲時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嗰陣都會將 Perodua Aruz 同 Toyota Yaris Cross 作比較。呢兩款車喺價位同定位上都幾接近，今日我哋就從多個方面做一個詳細比較，幫你省做功課嘅時間。
Perodua Aruz 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 72,900 - 77,900，一共有 2 個版本，包括 1.5L X（RM 72,900）、1.5L AV（RM 77,900）等。
Toyota Yaris Cross 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 99,900 - 109,900，一共有 2 個版本，包括 2026 1.5L Standard（RM 99,900）、2026 HEV 1.5L Standard（RM 109,900）等。
從價錢來看，Perodua Aruz 嘅起價確實比 Toyota Yaris Cross 平咗 RM 27,000。如果你預算有限，Perodua 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需要。但亦要注意，平嗰幾千蚊，可能會喺配備上面有取舍，具體要看你嘅需要。
Perodua Aruz 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
Toyota Yaris Cross 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
兩款車嘅驅動方式一樣，都係 FWD，日常駕駛感受唔會有太大分別。
Perodua Aruz 保修 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Toyota Yaris Cross 保修 5 年/無限制里程，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Perodua Aruz 同 Toyota Yaris Cross 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更看重品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，那就揀配備更豐富嗰款。最後始終建議兩款都去試駕，親身體驗先係最重要嘅。
總體嚟講，Perodua Aruz 同 Toyota Yaris Cross 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車款。揀邊一部，關鍵始終係睇你個人嘅需要同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行之報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嗰陣都會拿 Mazda CX-60 同 Ford Everest 嚟做比較。這兩款車喺價位同定位上都幾接近，今日我哋就從多個方面做一個詳細嘅比較，幫你省咗做功課嘅時間。
Mazda CX-60 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 200,510 - 252,873，一共有 2 個版本，包括 2026 3.3T 4WD High Plus（RM 252,873）、2025 2.5L 2WD High（RM 200,510） 等。
Ford Everest 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 266,338 - 430,838，一共有 6 個版本，包括 2026 3.0T 4WD Platinum（RM 430,838）、2026 2.0T 4WD Platinum（RM 348,838）、2026 2.0T 4WD Sport（RM 316,838） 等。
從價錢來看，Mazda CX-60 嘅起步價確實比 Ford Everest 便宜咗 RM 65,828。如果你預算有限，Mazda 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需求。但都需要注意，便宜嗰幾千塊，可能喺配備上會有取舍，具體睇你嘅需求。
Mazda CX-60 搭載 2.0L 4-cyl，馬力 170 hp。官方油耗 8.0 L/100km。
Ford Everest 搭載 2.5L Diesel，馬力 187 hp。官方油耗 8.5 L/100km。
動力方面，Ford Everest 嘅 2.5L Diesel 比 Mazda CX-60 嘅 2.0L 4-cyl 多咗 17 匹馬力。不過日常喺市區開，兩款車嘅動力都夠用，唔會覺得唔夠力。
Mazda CX-60 車身長 4500 mm，後備箱 450 L。
Ford Everest 車身長 4400 mm，後備箱 400 L。
空間方面，Mazda CX-60 嘅車身比 Ford Everest 長咗 100 mm，車內乘坐空間會稍微寬裕啲，尤其係後座腿部空間。如果你經常載家人或者需要放嬰兒車，大少少嘅車身確實更實用。
Mazda CX-60 保修 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Ford Everest 保修 3 年/100,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
總體嚟講，Mazda CX-60 同 Ford Everest 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一部，關鍵都要睇你個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
喺馬來西亞嘅汽車市場，好多買家喺揀車嗰陣都會拿 MG MG HS 同 Mercedes-Benz GLA 嚟做比較。今日我哋由多個方面做一個詳細嘅比較，幫你攞啲做功課嘅時間。
MG MG HS 喺馬來西亞嘅 O T R 售價係 RM 130,450 - 146,450，一共有 2 個版本，包括 1.5L Standard（RM 105,000）、1.5L Executive（RM 115,000）等。
Mercedes-Benz GLA 喺馬來西亞嘅 O T R 售價係 RM 258,888 - 295,888，一共有 1 個版本，包括 Standard（RM 258,888）等。
由價錢嚟睇，MG MG HS 嘅起價確實比 Mercedes-Benz GLA 平咗 RM 128,438。如果你預算有限，MG 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需要。但都要留意，平嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備上會有取舍，具體要睇你嘅需要。
MG MG HS 嘅安全評級係 TBD，主動安全系統包括 Basic。
Mercedes-Benz GLA 嘅安全評級係 5★ (Euro NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 Premium ADAS。
安全配備方面，兩款車都拿到唔錯嘅評級。不過 MG MG HS 嘅 Basic 同 Mercedes-Benz GLA 嘅 Premium ADAS 喺功能上有些差異，如果你比較看重主動安全嘅話，可以仔細對比吓兩者嘅功能列表。
MG MG HS 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
Mercedes-Benz GLA 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
兩款車嘅驅動方式一樣，都係 FWD，日常駕駛感受唔會有太大分別。
MG MG HS 同 Mercedes-Benz GLA 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更看重品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰一款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，那就揀配備更豐富嗰款。最終都係建議兩款都去試駕，親身體驗先係最重要嘅。
總嘅嚟講，MG MG HS 同 Mercedes-Benz GLA 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵都係要睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建议大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最後決定。買車係件大事，花點時間做功課絕對無錯。
車型概覽
積架E-PACE PHEV 值唔值得睇，第一步唔係望牌子或者外形，而係睇佢能唔能夠配合你嘅香港日常。 呢篇會集中講充電節奏同日常通勤，幫你用買家角度篩走唔適合嘅選擇。
售價仍待確認，買家可以先把佢放入候選名單，等價格落實後再同同級車逐項比較。
購車價格指南
積架E-PACE PHEV 目前售價仍未清晰，較理性嘅做法係先睇版本、車身大小同動力形式，等價格落實後再決定值唔值得落訂。
如果有幾個版本可揀，可以先將 2022 2.0T 60km Standard（價格待確認） 放喺同一張清單。日常通勤重視舒適同易用，家庭買家就要優先睇後排、尾箱同安全配置。
核心規格重點
睇 積架E-PACE PHEV 嘅規格，重點唔係背數字，而係理解佢喺香港用車場景會帶嚟咩分別。
積架E-PACE PHEV 現階段最值得留意係車型定位同版本方向，詳細取捨應該等價格同規格更清楚再作決定。
優缺點分析
積架E-PACE PHEV 嘅優點唔需要講到天花龍鳳，真正有價值係佢能唔能夠令日常用車更省心：車型定位清楚，適合作為同級比較起點。
要留意嘅係，要先確認屋苑、公司或常去商場嘅充電條件、售價未清晰前唔應該太早用性價比落結論。呢啲唔一定係缺點，但係落訂前應該先諗清楚。
買家常見問題
買 積架E-PACE PHEV 之前，真正要問嘅唔係單一規格，而係佢可唔可以融入你每日嘅生活節奏。
常見疑問係「Jaguar E-PACE PHEV 支持邊款充電？」簡單講，Jaguar E-PACE PHEV 支援主流嘅歐標 Type 2 充電。 放到實際用車，就係要睇佢對通勤、泊車、家庭乘坐同長期成本有幾大幫助。
同級對比內容
將 積架E-PACE PHEV 放入同級車清單時，唔建議只用外形或者品牌光環決定。比較順序可以係：先等售價落實，再決定佢應該同邊個級距比較。
咁樣篩選會貼近香港買家真實生活：平日塞車、商場泊車、周末去新界、甚至一家人出入，先係一部車每日要面對嘅考驗。
用車全周期指南
擁有 積架E-PACE PHEV 最重要係先諗清楚充電節奏。屋苑、公司或者常去商場只要有穩定充電選項，電動化用車就會容易相處好多。
如果你主要喺市區行，視野、低速順滑度同泊車輔助會好影響心情；如果經常行高速或跨區，座椅舒適度、隔音同動力從容感會更重要。
In May, China's automotive market overall presented a gentle recovery trend, with domestic brands still being the sales backbone of the market. Recently, BYD, Geely, Chery, Changan, and Great Wall, the top 5 domestic automakers, successively released their monthly performance reports. From the data, these five companies show a general characteristic of "stable total growth, divergence between domestic and international markets, and accelerated new energy penetration". Overseas exports and new energy vehicles have become the most core growth engines; export business has evolved from a "bonus item" to the "core foundation" for some companies. BYD's "dominant leader" status is further consolidated, Chery achieved high growth via exports, Geely's new energy penetration rate broke 56%, Changan focused steadily on balanced development, while Great Wall appeared slightly under pressure during structural transformation.
BYD: Export Hits New High Becomes Biggest HighlightIn May, BYD stood firmly at the top of domestic brands with a monthly sales volume of 383,500 vehicles, maintaining positive growth both year-on-year and month-over-month under a large base. Its two main brands, Dynasty and Ocean, sold a combined 330,200 vehicles, contributing 86.1% of total sales; Fangchengbao's monthly sales broke 30,000 units to reach 30,200, a year-on-year increase of 139.7%, setting a new high for the year; Denza sold 16,300 vehicles, and Yangwang delivered 286 vehicles. From a model perspective, BYD had eight models in May with monthly sales exceeding 20,000 vehicles. The Song Family and Yuan Family both broke 50,000 units, selling 51,370 and 56,691 vehicles respectively. The Sea Lion Family followed closely with 42,615 vehicles, and Seagull sales were also close to 40,000 vehicles.
BYD's biggest highlight in May was exports. Overseas new energy vehicle sales reached 160,600 units, an 80.4% year-on-year increase, accounting for about 42%. The sharp expansion of export scale effectively countered the phased weakness in domestic demand. Cumulative exports from January to May exceeded 620,000 vehicles. High export growth mainly benefited from continued ramping up of overseas factory capacity, improved ocean shipping capacity, and accelerated channel network expansion. In the domestic market, BYD promoted Megawatt Super Charging and intelligent strategies simultaneously—Megawatt charging achieved about 90% charge in 9 minutes; 20,000 super charging stations are planned to be built by 2026; all series models are available with Sky Eye B intelligent driving solutions and city navigation safety fallback plans, accelerating the popularization of high-level intelligent driving. As Gen 2 Blade Battery capacity gradually releases, the company's orders are expected to continue rising.
Chery: Sales Growth Leads the Top 5Chery Group's total sales volume in May was 247,800 vehicles, a significant year-on-year increase of 20.5%, ranking first in growth speed among the top 5. Exports remained its most core growth engine—May exports reached 181,900 vehicles, an 80.5% year-on-year increase, accounting for 73.4% of total sales that month, continuously breaking the single-month export record for Chinese brands for three months. In terms of new energy, Chery New Energy sold 100,300 vehicles, a 58.8% year-on-year increase. April and May consecutively saw monthly new energy sales breaking 100,000 vehicles.
The strong performance in exports benefited from Chery's long-term deep cultivation of overseas channel advantages and localized operation capabilities. While overseas orders continued to rise, high export growth formed a sharp contrast with domestic sales—Chery's domestic sales in May were only 60,000 vehicles, accounting for one-quarter of total sales. From cumulative data, Chery Group accumulated 1.101 million sales from January to May, but against the annual goal of 3.2 million vehicles, monthly averages need to reach about 420,000 vehicles later, and pressure remains significant.
Geely: New Energy Penetration Rate Breaks 56%Geely Auto's total sales volume in May was 237,600 vehicles, a 1% year-on-year increase, achieving month-over-month double growth for three consecutive months. In terms of structure, Geely's "New Four Transformations" transformation showed significant results: new energy vehicle sales reached 133,400 units, accounting for 56% of total sales, with new energy share exceeding 50% for four consecutive months.
From sub-brands, performance was significantly divergent. Zeekr brand sales in May reached 34,400 vehicles, a 82% year-on-year increase; Zeekr 9 Series and 8 Series models combined sales approached 50% of total sales, showing bright performance in the high-end market; Galaxy brand sales were 81,700 vehicles; Geely brand sales were 182,500 vehicles, among which China Star Series sales reached 100,800 vehicles; Lynk & Co brand sales were 20,700 vehicles, with new energy vehicle sales share rising to 71%.
In terms of exports, Geely's overseas vehicle exports in May reached 85,100 vehicles, a explosive 184% year-on-year increase, setting a brand single-month export record high. Among exported products, new energy vehicles reached 40,800 units, accounting for nearly half; hybrid and pure electric products have successively landed in Southeast Asia, Middle East, Latin America, and other markets, highlighting the results of global strategy implementation.
Changan: Multi-brand Matrix Balanced EffortChangan Auto's delivery volume in May was 209,100 vehicles, among which new energy deliveries were 92,400 vehicles, a 5.8% year-on-year increase, with new energy share about 44%. In terms of exports, overseas deliveries reached 70,700 vehicles, a 38% year-on-year increase, becoming another major growth highlight for Changan in May.
In the sub-brand matrix, Changan Qiyuan delivered 34,500 vehicles in May; All-New Q05 delivered 15,800 units, with orders breaking 3,000 units within three days of listing in Thailand; Deepal sales in May were 33,200 vehicles, a 30% year-on-year increase; January to May overseas cumulative sales were 28,700 vehicles, a significant 167% year-on-year increase; Avatr delivered 7,336 vehicles in May; Changan Auto (Gravity) delivered nearly 49,000 vehicles in May.
Changan Auto's balanced layout was fully reflected in May: the fuel car base remained stable, new energy brands Deepal and Qiyuan accelerated volume growth, high-end brand Avatr continued to break through in technical cooperation, and overseas markets simultaneously achieved breakthrough growth. The pattern of five brands working together, driven by both new energy and exports, is initially taking shape.
Great Wall: Overseas Sales Growth Year-on-Year 46.75%Great Wall Motor's sales in May were 100,400 vehicles, slightly down compared to last May's 102,200 vehicles, making it the only company among the top 5 to show a year-on-year negative growth. From sub-brands, Haval brand sales in May were 55,500 vehicles, remaining Great Wall's most important sales pillar; Tank brand sales were 17,100 vehicles; both Haval and Tank brand sales showed year-on-year declines; Wey brand sold 8,119 vehicles, a 31.78% year-on-year increase, achieving growth against the trend; Ora brand performance was most stunning, with sales of 6,018 vehicles, a significant 206.88% year-on-year increase. In terms of new energy, Great Wall sold 30,400 new energy vehicles in May, with new energy vehicle transformation gradually accelerating.
The overseas market became Great Wall's biggest highlight in May, with overseas sales growing 46.75% year-on-year. Against the background of pressure on the domestic market, strong growth in overseas business effectively made up for the decline in the domestic market. Great Wall Motor's current core contradiction lies in: Haval and Tank, the two traditional main-selling brands, face weak growth, while Wey and Ora brands, although growing notably, have relatively small volume and are not yet enough to support overall growth. How to complete the "relay" between old and new brands is the key issue Great Wall must solve subsequently.
Final ThoughtsFrom May data, the growth pattern of the top 5 domestic brands has clearly diverged, but there are three common trends worth noting: First, exports have become a key engine for domestic brands to seek stability and growth. Second, new energy transformation is still accelerating, but paths differ among enterprises. Third, technological innovation continues to deepen brand moats. Looking ahead to the second half of the year, competition in the automotive industry will continue to upgrade around these three trends. Although everyone has a common direction, these three trends are all competing for the entire enterprise's industrial chain strength, and the strong will remain strong, which has almost become an inevitable outcome.
重慶車展這幾日，長安馬自達嘅展台好有睇頭。N8 館入面，傳奇跑車 MX-5、新能源轎車 EZ-6、SUV EZ-60，外加 4 月剛上市嘅 EZ-60 馬年版，四款車一字排開。主題好直接：「依然馬自達」。電動化咗，我都係嗰個講究操控、講究設計嘅馬自達。
全球車唔係貼標籤，係真係拿去海外賣
傾產品。EZ-6 同 EZ-60 呢兩款新能源車，長安馬自達由頭到尾都按照全球標準嚟做，唔係內地特供版。EZ-6 攞咗「2026 世界年度設計車」大獎，係第一個攞到呢個奬嘅中國新能源車型。EZ-60 更勁，全球八個頂級設計大獎全部攞晒，SUV 入面獨一無二。
安全方面，兩款車都按照中歐雙五星標準開發。EZ-6 已經攞咗 C-NCAP、E-NCAP 等五個權威認證，EZ-60 嘅電池安全提前滿足咗新國標同歐標。長安馬自達仲俾咗一個好硬淨嘅承諾：電池終身自燃包賠，唔限里程、唔限車主。呢個條款喺合資新能源入面好少見，算係俾用戶食咗顆定心丸。
操控係馬自達嘅老本行。現場請咗長安馬自達車主、亦都係冠軍車手嘅紀浩，佢開住一台原廠未改裝嘅純電 EZ-60，跑完咗中國新能源汽車拉力錦標賽。6 日 910 公里，對手大多數係增程同插混，最後 EZ-60 攞咗場地賽 SUV 組冠軍、拉力賽總成績亞軍。呢種極限工況下嘅穩定性，比任何試駕都咁有說服力。
更加值唔得關注嘅係，長安馬自達已經拿到歐盟、英國、澳洲三大市場嘅整車認證，係國內第一個同時攞到呢三個認證嘅合資新能源車企。5 月底，80 幾位來自歐洲、澳洲、泰國嘅海外經銷商專門跑咗一趟南京工廠，考察生產工藝同品控體系。目前 EZ-6 同 EZ-60 喺海外銷售同預售勢頭都唔錯，國內市場 EZ-60 連續 7 個月係合資新能源中型 SUV 嘅銷量冠軍。
長安馬自達銷售分公司執行副總經理吳旭曦喺現場講得好直接：長安馬自達已經成為馬自達全球新能源嘅研發、製造同出口中心。以往合資車企都係將海外車型引入國內，而家長安馬自達係反向輸出：中國造嘅新能源車，要賣返去馬自達嘅全球市場去。
用戶唔止係買車嘅人，仲係品牌嘅一部分
今次車展上，長安馬自達花咗好大篇幅講用戶共創，而係唔係只係談產品參數。呢個思路好啱，新能源時代產品同質化好嚴重，拼邊個同用戶行得更近。
從年初開始嘅「心願之旅」，用戶提願望、品牌幫佢哋實現，每個願望背後都係真實嘅個人故事。「車主故事薈」已經出咗 11 期，入面有連續 7 年捐助貧困小學嘅公益達人，有連續 4 年組織車友會關心特殊兒童嘅領隊，仲有因為馬自達認識、最終走到埋一齊嘅情侶。呢啲內容比廣告片真實好多。
「悅馬創作家」同「全民經紀人」計劃，鼓勵用戶自己拍片、寫分享、推介朋友買。現場嚟咗個零零後嘅 EZ-60 車主孫靖依，話自己平時工作忙，但有空就發啲用車感受，車友同工作人員都好幫手。呢種自發嘅口碑傳播，比硬廣告轉化率高太多。
5 月啟動嘅「青苗計劃」第二季，正行入全國高校，同學生傾設計、駕控、安全同智能化。同步仲搞咗 EZ-60 全國高校改裝設計大賽，優秀作品有機會做成實車，仲俾參賽學生提供咗暑期實習名額。呢一招既培養咗潛在用戶，亦順便做咗年輕人才儲備。
社會責任無落下。從 2015 年而家，長安馬自達喺雲南捐咗 12 間希望小學，總投入超過 1000 萬，惠及過萬師生。6 月又發起「每一公里都有善意」公益行動，將用戶每次出行轉化為公益基金，用來改善希望小學嘅條件。
618 優惠簡練講
車展期間到 6 月 30 日，全系有購車禮遇。廠補至高 17000 元，國補至高 20000 元，買指定車型送價值 7999 元嘅尊享套裝（包含原廠充電樁、龍膜太陽膜、TPE 腳墊同尾箱墊）。金融方案係 0 首期 5 年低息，年均費率 1.99%，仲加一個價值 7999 元嘅終身零燃權益。到場試駕新能源車嘅送金陵金箔。詳情直接問當地經銷商。
寫在最後：
睇完今次重慶車展長安馬自達嘅動作，有一個感覺好明顯：呢間合資品牌喺新能源轉型上行咗一條唔太一樣嘅路。無盲目捲配置、捲價格，而係將「全球標準」同「用戶共創」作為兩個支撐點。「依然馬自達」呢句主題，講到底，係喺電動化浪潮入面守住自己嘅魂：設計、操控、安全，呢啲老底子唔好丟。同時將用戶真正放喺度一齊玩、一齊成長。呢種打法唔一定最快，但好大機會行得更遠。
6 月 13 日到 21 日，重慶國際博覽中心 N8 館，有興趣嘅可以去看看。車好唔好，開過先至知。
5 月 28 日，上汽集團迎來歷史性時刻——全球第一億輛整車正式交付，成為中國首家累計產銷量突破 1 億輛的汽車集團。
而喺呢 1 億輛背後，上汽通用五菱貢獻咗超過 3200 萬輛。呢個數字，其實都好能說明五菱呢幾年喺中國汽車市場中的地位。值得一提係，同一天，上汽通用五菱嘅全球車 EKSION 喺印尼雅加達正式交付用戶。
提到五菱，就會諗到那句經典嘅標語「人民需要什麼，五菱就造什麼」。事實上，呢句說話都唔係白叫嘅。回望五菱嘅發展史，佢總能踩中中國汽車市場嘅每一個關鍵節點。
早些年，五菱宏光憑藉「能拉貨、能坐人、仲平啲耐用」，成為無數個體經營者創業路上嘅第一部車；後來消費升級，寶駿 730 又切入家用 MPV 市場，用更低門檻滿足家庭用戶對大空間、多功能嘅需求。
到咗新能源時代，宏光 MINIEV 幾乎係用一種「重新定義代步車」嘅方式，打開咗中國微型電動車市場。可以話，上汽通用五菱總能精準捕捉用戶嘅真實需求，理解用戶到底需要什麼。
而家，上汽通用五菱亦嘗試向更高端、更智能嘅方向行。譬如同華為乾崑合作推出嘅華境 S。五菱希望透過雙方嘅合作，打破高端智駕嘅技術溢價壁壘，讓更多用戶亦能體驗到高階智駕。
除咗國內市場，呢幾年上汽通用五菱亦積極佈局海外市場。數據顯示，目前，佢海外累計銷量已經突破 150 萬輛，覆蓋全球 110 多個國家同地區。
上汽通用五菱能有而家嘅成績，靠係實打實嘅硬核能力。譬如，喺製造端，上汽通用五菱打造咗全球首创嘅「智能島」製造體系，透過「車揾工位、料揾車」嘅柔性生產模式，進一步提升生產效率同成本控制能力，這亦令佢能更快適應唔同市場需求變化。
對於中國汽車產業嚟講，1 億輛唔僅係規模上嘅突破，更加意味住中國車企已經開始真正參與全球市場競爭。而上汽通用五菱，亦正從「國民品牌」向「全球品牌」邁進。
比亞迪正式發布 2026 年 5 月產銷快報，全品牌新能源汽車單月銷量 383453 輛，同比微增 0.26%，時隔十個月實現單月銷量同比轉正；其中乘用車交付 376990 輛，環比大漲 19.4%，一掃前期車型換代陣痛，呈現國內基本盤穩固、海外銷量狂飆、高端品牌全線放量的全新格局，在國內新能源內捲加劇、特斯拉 FSD 入華、自主新品密集上市的市場環境中，走出獨有的結構性增長路線。
王朝 + 海洋兩大主力品牌 5 月合計售出 330215 輛，佔據集團總銷量超八成，仍是比亞迪銷量壓艙石，全系列共 8 款車型單月銷量突破 2 萬台，產品從 5 萬入門代步到 20 萬家用 SUV 實現全覆蓋。
王朝網內部，元家族 56691 輛、宋家族 51370 輛。雙雙跨過五萬門檻，成為品牌兩大銷量支柱，兼顧家用代步與城鄉出行需求；秦家族緊隨其後交出 28360 台穩定表現，漢、唐系列月銷維持六千級體量，深耕中大型家用轎車、SUV 細分市場；全新車型夏處於市場培育期，單月交付 1810 台，後續隨渠道鋪開有望穩步上量。
海洋網增長勢頭更為迅猛，全系五款車型跨入兩萬俱樂部：海獅 42615 台、海豹 34117 台、海鷗 39919 台、海豚 22260 台、宋 PLUS 27755 台。其中海鷗憑藉 6-8 萬親民定價穩居入門代步銷冠，海獅作為全新走量車型上市即站穩四萬量級，補齊海洋網中型 SUV 產品空白，完善海洋產品梯隊佈局。從代步小車到緊湊 SUV，兩大主品牌依托 DM-i 混動與純電雙線技術，牢牢鎖住 15 萬以內國內主流家用市場份額。
方程豹同比暴漲 139.7% 品牌向上落地見效騰勢、方程豹、仰望組成的高端矩陣 5 月合計銷售 46489 輛，正式擺脫小眾定位，成為比亞迪品牌溢價與利潤增長新支點，打破自主品牌高端化難破局的行業魔咒。
越野品牌方程豹單月 30186 輛，同比暴漲 139.7%，創下品牌上市以來月度銷量新高，旗下鎦 7 單月 18280 台，豹 5、豹 8 穩定輸出，在 25-40 萬硬派越野細分市場持續擠壓合資、進口車型生存空間。
騰勢 5 月交付 16303 台，MPV 標桿 D9 售出 6721 台，Z9 系列近 6000 台，MPV、中大型轎車雙線發力，站穩豪華新能源賽道；百萬元級超豪華品牌仰望穩步爬坡，當月交付 286 台，同比增幅 105.8%，完成自主品牌天花板產品的市場驗證，形成從十幾萬家用、三四十萬越野、五十萬豪華 MPV 到百萬元級旗艦的全價格帶產品佈局。
5 月比亞迪乘用車和皮卡海外銷量 160177 輛，同比大漲 80.7%，出口佔全系總銷量突破 42%，創下品牌出海歷史新高，成為穩住 5 月整體銷量、實現同比轉正的核心驅動力。
東南亞、歐洲、拉美成為主力增量市場，海鷗、宋 PLUS、元系列持續登頂多國新能源熱銷榜單，SHARK 皮卡連續兩月單月出口突破 4000 台；依托泰國、巴西、匈牙利、烏茲別克斯坦四大海外整車工廠落地投產，本地化生產持續落地，規避關稅同時快速下沉終端渠道。在國內車市存量競爭、價格戰常態化背景下，高速擴容的海外市場有效對沖國內車型換代帶來的銷量波動，正式從補充市場升級為比亞迪核心增長引擎。截至當前，比亞迪新能源汽車全球累計銷量已經突破 1650 萬輛，全球化版圖持續拓寬。
智駕賦能產品迭代 下半年新品蓄力衝量5 月比亞迪智能化落地迎來關鍵節點，天神之眼智駕系統成為車型核心加分項：全品牌搭載高級智駕車型保有量突破 315 萬輛，日均路測數據超 2 億公里；當月比亞迪落地城市領航、智能泊車雙安全兜底服務，成為全球首家實現兩項智駕兜底的車企，政策落地三天後，搭載天神之眼系統車型的城市 NOA 激活率暴漲 50%，智能化體驗升級直接拉動終端到店訂單轉化，為後續車型持續走量築牢產品競爭力，直面 FSD 入華帶來的智駕市場衝擊。
從數據細節來看，2026 年 1-5 月比亞迪累計銷量 1405039 輛，同比下滑 20.32%，核心誘因是全系主力車型集中換代、第二代閃充刀片電池產能爬坡受限。新款閃充電池升級快充與低溫性能，全系換代車型優先換裝新電池，但產線改造拖累產能釋放，熱門車型訂單積壓、交付延後，一定程度壓縮 5 月交付體量。
隨著二季度末二代刀片電池產能持續釋放，疊加騰勢 N8L、方程豹鎦 7 純電版、海獅 05、夏 L 等多款新車陸續登陸市場，業內普遍預判比亞迪 6 月全品牌銷量有望突破 40 萬輛。依托低端走量鎖份額、高端提利潤、海外衝增量、智能化提產品力的四維發展邏輯，在國內新能源淘汰賽加劇的當下，比亞迪全品類佈局優勢持續放大，坐穩國內新能源龍頭，加速向著全球頭部車企穩步邁進。
In May, China's automotive market overall presented a gentle recovery trend, with domestic brands still being the sales backbone of the market. Recently, BYD, Geely, Chery, Changan, and Great Wall, the top 5 domestic automakers, successively released their monthly performance reports. From the data, these five companies show a general characteristic of "stable total growth, divergence between domestic and international markets, and accelerated new energy penetration". Overseas exports and new energy vehicles have become the most core growth engines; export business has evolved from a "bonus item" to the "core foundation" for some companies. BYD's "dominant leader" status is further consolidated, Chery achieved high growth via exports, Geely's new energy penetration rate broke 56%, Changan focused steadily on balanced development, while Great Wall appeared slightly under pressure during structural transformation.
BYD: Export Hits New High Becomes Biggest HighlightIn May, BYD stood firmly at the top of domestic brands with a monthly sales volume of 383,500 vehicles, maintaining positive growth both year-on-year and month-over-month under a large base. Its two main brands, Dynasty and Ocean, sold a combined 330,200 vehicles, contributing 86.1% of total sales; Fangchengbao's monthly sales broke 30,000 units to reach 30,200, a year-on-year increase of 139.7%, setting a new high for the year; Denza sold 16,300 vehicles, and Yangwang delivered 286 vehicles. From a model perspective, BYD had eight models in May with monthly sales exceeding 20,000 vehicles. The Song Family and Yuan Family both broke 50,000 units, selling 51,370 and 56,691 vehicles respectively. The Sea Lion Family followed closely with 42,615 vehicles, and Seagull sales were also close to 40,000 vehicles.
BYD's biggest highlight in May was exports. Overseas new energy vehicle sales reached 160,600 units, an 80.4% year-on-year increase, accounting for about 42%. The sharp expansion of export scale effectively countered the phased weakness in domestic demand. Cumulative exports from January to May exceeded 620,000 vehicles. High export growth mainly benefited from continued ramping up of overseas factory capacity, improved ocean shipping capacity, and accelerated channel network expansion. In the domestic market, BYD promoted Megawatt Super Charging and intelligent strategies simultaneously—Megawatt charging achieved about 90% charge in 9 minutes; 20,000 super charging stations are planned to be built by 2026; all series models are available with Sky Eye B intelligent driving solutions and city navigation safety fallback plans, accelerating the popularization of high-level intelligent driving. As Gen 2 Blade Battery capacity gradually releases, the company's orders are expected to continue rising.
Chery: Sales Growth Leads the Top 5Chery Group's total sales volume in May was 247,800 vehicles, a significant year-on-year increase of 20.5%, ranking first in growth speed among the top 5. Exports remained its most core growth engine—May exports reached 181,900 vehicles, an 80.5% year-on-year increase, accounting for 73.4% of total sales that month, continuously breaking the single-month export record for Chinese brands for three months. In terms of new energy, Chery New Energy sold 100,300 vehicles, a 58.8% year-on-year increase. April and May consecutively saw monthly new energy sales breaking 100,000 vehicles.
The strong performance in exports benefited from Chery's long-term deep cultivation of overseas channel advantages and localized operation capabilities. While overseas orders continued to rise, high export growth formed a sharp contrast with domestic sales—Chery's domestic sales in May were only 60,000 vehicles, accounting for one-quarter of total sales. From cumulative data, Chery Group accumulated 1.101 million sales from January to May, but against the annual goal of 3.2 million vehicles, monthly averages need to reach about 420,000 vehicles later, and pressure remains significant.
Geely: New Energy Penetration Rate Breaks 56%Geely Auto's total sales volume in May was 237,600 vehicles, a 1% year-on-year increase, achieving month-over-month double growth for three consecutive months. In terms of structure, Geely's "New Four Transformations" transformation showed significant results: new energy vehicle sales reached 133,400 units, accounting for 56% of total sales, with new energy share exceeding 50% for four consecutive months.
From sub-brands, performance was significantly divergent. Zeekr brand sales in May reached 34,400 vehicles, a 82% year-on-year increase; Zeekr 9 Series and 8 Series models combined sales approached 50% of total sales, showing bright performance in the high-end market; Galaxy brand sales were 81,700 vehicles; Geely brand sales were 182,500 vehicles, among which China Star Series sales reached 100,800 vehicles; Lynk & Co brand sales were 20,700 vehicles, with new energy vehicle sales share rising to 71%.
In terms of exports, Geely's overseas vehicle exports in May reached 85,100 vehicles, a explosive 184% year-on-year increase, setting a brand single-month export record high. Among exported products, new energy vehicles reached 40,800 units, accounting for nearly half; hybrid and pure electric products have successively landed in Southeast Asia, Middle East, Latin America, and other markets, highlighting the results of global strategy implementation.
Changan: Multi-brand Matrix Balanced EffortChangan Auto's delivery volume in May was 209,100 vehicles, among which new energy deliveries were 92,400 vehicles, a 5.8% year-on-year increase, with new energy share about 44%. In terms of exports, overseas deliveries reached 70,700 vehicles, a 38% year-on-year increase, becoming another major growth highlight for Changan in May.
In the sub-brand matrix, Changan Qiyuan delivered 34,500 vehicles in May; All-New Q05 delivered 15,800 units, with orders breaking 3,000 units within three days of listing in Thailand; Deepal sales in May were 33,200 vehicles, a 30% year-on-year increase; January to May overseas cumulative sales were 28,700 vehicles, a significant 167% year-on-year increase; Avatr delivered 7,336 vehicles in May; Changan Auto (Gravity) delivered nearly 49,000 vehicles in May.
Changan Auto's balanced layout was fully reflected in May: the fuel car base remained stable, new energy brands Deepal and Qiyuan accelerated volume growth, high-end brand Avatr continued to break through in technical cooperation, and overseas markets simultaneously achieved breakthrough growth. The pattern of five brands working together, driven by both new energy and exports, is initially taking shape.
Great Wall: Overseas Sales Growth Year-on-Year 46.75%Great Wall Motor's sales in May were 100,400 vehicles, slightly down compared to last May's 102,200 vehicles, making it the only company among the top 5 to show a year-on-year negative growth. From sub-brands, Haval brand sales in May were 55,500 vehicles, remaining Great Wall's most important sales pillar; Tank brand sales were 17,100 vehicles; both Haval and Tank brand sales showed year-on-year declines; Wey brand sold 8,119 vehicles, a 31.78% year-on-year increase, achieving growth against the trend; Ora brand performance was most stunning, with sales of 6,018 vehicles, a significant 206.88% year-on-year increase. In terms of new energy, Great Wall sold 30,400 new energy vehicles in May, with new energy vehicle transformation gradually accelerating.
The overseas market became Great Wall's biggest highlight in May, with overseas sales growing 46.75% year-on-year. Against the background of pressure on the domestic market, strong growth in overseas business effectively made up for the decline in the domestic market. Great Wall Motor's current core contradiction lies in: Haval and Tank, the two traditional main-selling brands, face weak growth, while Wey and Ora brands, although growing notably, have relatively small volume and are not yet enough to support overall growth. How to complete the "relay" between old and new brands is the key issue Great Wall must solve subsequently.
Final ThoughtsFrom May data, the growth pattern of the top 5 domestic brands has clearly diverged, but there are three common trends worth noting: First, exports have become a key engine for domestic brands to seek stability and growth. Second, new energy transformation is still accelerating, but paths differ among enterprises. Third, technological innovation continues to deepen brand moats. Looking ahead to the second half of the year, competition in the automotive industry will continue to upgrade around these three trends. Although everyone has a common direction, these three trends are all competing for the entire enterprise's industrial chain strength, and the strong will remain strong, which has almost become an inevitable outcome.
