首頁VW Caravelle
搜尋歷史
熱門搜尋
經銷商登入 / 註冊
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拿 Proton X70 同 MG MG HS 嚟做比較。呢兩部車喺價碼同定位上都幾相近，而家我哋就從多個方面做一個詳細嘅比較，幫你省返做功課嘅時間。
Proton X70 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 106,800 - 122,300，一共有 3 個版本，包括 1.5L Standard 2WD（RM 106,800）、1.5L Executive 2WD（RM 115,800）、1.5L Premium 2WD（RM 122,300） 等。
MG MG HS 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 130,450 - 146,450，一共有 2 個版本，包括 1.5L Standard（RM 105,000）、1.5L Executive（RM 115,000） 等。
由價錢睇，Proton X70 嘅起售價的確比 MG MG HS 平咗 RM 23,650。如果你預算唔多，Proton 嘅入門版已經足以滿足日常需要。不過都要留意，平嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備上有得有失，具體要看你嘅需要。
Proton X70 裝載 1.5L Turbo，馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。
MG MG HS 裝載 1.5L Turbo，馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。
兩部車用同一套動力系統，日常開起嚟嘅感覺基本冇分別。油耗方面都差唔多，唔使太糾結這一點。
Proton X70 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA)。
MG MG HS 嘅安全評級係 TBD，主動安全系統包括 Basic。
安全配備方面，兩部車都拿到唔錯嘅評級。不過 Proton X70 嘅 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA) 同 MG MG HS 嘅 Basic 喺功能上有啲差異，如果你比較重視主動安全嘅話，可以仔細比較下兩者嘅功能列表。
Proton X70 車身長 4400 mm，尾箱 400 L。
MG MG HS 車身長 4400 mm，尾箱 400 L。
兩部車嘅尺寸差唔多，車內空間差別唔大。呢個級別嘅車，日常使用完全夠用。
Proton X70 同 MG MG HS 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭用、日常上落。如果你更重視品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰一款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，那就揀配置更豐富嗰款。最終都係建議兩部都去試駕，親自體驗先係最重要。
總體嚟講，Proton X70 同 MG MG HS 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊輛車，關鍵都係要看你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
【2026 年 7 月 31 日】上汽通用五菱宣佈五菱代步車用戶將突破 300 萬，並將於 8 月 7 日舉行「繽紛生活 玩心大開」宏光 MINIEV 六週年暨五菱代步車 300 萬用戶盛典！屆時，繽果家族全球代言人孟子義也將親臨現場，與五菱代步車 300 萬用戶共同打造一場屬於用戶嘅盛典派對。此外，第五代宏光 MINIEV 近期喺印尼正式上市，標誌住「人民嘅代步車」正喺加速邁向全球，為全球用戶帶來簡單代步嘅出行享受！
三百萬信賴，冠軍實力鑄就盛典意義
自 2017 年起，上汽通用五菱通過推出寶駿 E100、E200、宏光 MINIEV、繽果家族等車型，持續深耕代步車市場，五菱代步車銷量將突破 300 萬台！其中，作為「人民嘅代步車」，宏光 MINIEV 家族憑藉「靚、好開、好停、抵用」嘅產品實力累計收穫超 195 萬位用戶青睞，並已連續 71 個月獲得國內 A00 級純電銷量冠軍，穩居全球微型新能源汽車累計銷量第一。繽果家族同樣以高靚值繽紛座駕之姿，收穫超 75 萬車主信賴，為用戶帶來繽紛多彩嘅出行體驗。代步車家族雙星閃耀，合力構築起無可撼動嘅代步車產品矩陣——這亦係五菱代步車舉辦 300 萬用戶盛典嘅實力印證。
加速出海，"人民嘅代步車"邁向全球
作為五菱全球新能源戰略嘅關鍵落子，7 月 29 日第五代宏光 MINIEV（Wuling Aira ev）喺印尼國際車展（GIIAS）上正式宣佈喺印尼上市，官方售價 1.55 億印尼盾起（約為人民幣 59,615 元）。作為一部四門四座純電代步車，第五代宏光 MINIEV 既係可以係大學生、職場新人、年輕家庭嘅第一部車，亦係成熟家庭增購代步嘅首選。第五代宏光 MINIEV 輕鬆覆蓋日常高頻短途場景，完美契合用戶對代步車靚、好開、好停、抵用嘅訴求。為貼近年輕家庭與新生代用戶，今次新車更加係喺印尼攜手迪士尼·皮克斯《玩具總動員 5》開啟跨界聯動，以更潮趣嘅形象，讓全球人民每日樂享輕鬆出行（Fun Everyday, For Everyone）。宏光 MINIEV 出海不僅為五菱代步車嘅全球銷量再添新翼，亦以紮實嘅產品實力將簡單代步嘅理念傳遞至更廣闊嘅國際市場。
從銷量冠軍到全球同行嘅潮玩符號，五菱代步車印證，細車亦可承載萬千熱愛。8 月 7 日，喺成都露天音樂公園，近百台用戶潮創車將齊聚現場，五菱車主代表將共赴呢場專屬於佢哋嘅「繽紛生活」盛宴，叫我哋喺成都相約，一齊迎接 300 萬用戶嘅玩心綻放時刻！
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家在揀車嘅時候都會拿 寶騰 X70 同 馬自達 CX-5 嚟做比較。呢兩款車喺價位同定位上都蠻接近嘅，今日我哋就從多個方面做一個詳細嘅對比，幫你省下做功課嘅時間。
寶騰 X70 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 106,800 - 122,300，一共有 3 個版本，包括 1.5L Standard 2WD（RM 106,800）、1.5L Executive 2WD（RM 115,800）、1.5L Premium 2WD（RM 122,300） 等。
馬自達 CX-5 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 135,469 - 166,760，一共有 3 個版本，包括 2025 2.0L AT 35 週年紀念（RM 316,154）、2025 2.0L AT（RM 296,154）、2025 2.0L MT（RM 294,154） 等。
從價錢來看，寶騰 X70 嘅起步價確實比 馬自達 CX-5 便宜咗 RM 28,669。如果你預算有限，寶騰嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需求。但亦都要注意，便宜嘅幾千蚊，可能喺配備上面會有取捨，具體要睇你嘅需求。
寶騰 X70 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA)。
馬自達 CX-5 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 。
兩款車嘅安全評級一樣，喺呢個級別裡面安全配備都算好齊全嘅。而家嘅新車安全性都不差，唔使太擔心呢一點。
寶騰 X70 車身長 4400 毫米，行李箱 400 公升。
馬自達 CX-5 車身長 4500 毫米，行李箱 450 公升。
空間方面，馬自達 CX-5 嘅車身比 寶騰 X70 長咗 100 毫米，乘坐空間更有優勢。不過 寶騰 X70 喺城市入面停車會靈活啲，各有取捨。
寶騰 X70 保養 5 年/150,000 公里，保養間隔 每 10,000 公里或 6 個月。
馬自達 CX-5 保養 5 年/150,000 公里，保養間隔 每 10,000 公里或 6 個月。
兩款車嘅保養條件一樣，呢方面唔使糾結。實際保養成本仲要睇品牌嘅服務網絡同零件價格，建議去車友群問問真實車主嘅經驗。
總的來說，寶騰 X70 同 馬自達 CX-5 都係馬來西亞市場好唔錯嘅車型。揀邊架，關鍵都要睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多家買家喺揀車嗰陣都會拿 Proton X70 同 Mazda CX-5 嚟做比較。這兩款車喺價位同定位上都幾接近，今日我哋就從多個方面嚟做一个詳細嘅比較，幫你節省咗做功課嘅時間。
Proton X70 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 106,800 - 122,300，一共有 3 個版本，包括 1.5L Standard 2WD（RM 106,800）、1.5L Executive 2WD（RM 115,800）、1.5L Premium 2WD（RM 122,300） 等。
Mazda CX-5 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 135,469 - 166,760，一共有 3 個版本，包括 2025 2.0L AT 35th Anniversary（RM 316,154）、2025 2.0L AT（RM 296,154）、2025 2.0L MT（RM 294,154） 等。
從價錢來看，Proton X70 嘅起步價確實比 Mazda CX-5 便宜咗 RM 28,669。如果你預算有限，Proton 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需求。但都要注意，便宜嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備上會有取舍，具體要看你嘅需求。
Proton X70 車身長 4400 mm，尾箱 400 L。
Mazda CX-5 車身長 4500 mm，尾箱 450 L。
空間方面，Mazda CX-5 嘅車身比 Proton X70 長咗 100 mm，乘坐空間更有優勢。不過 Proton X70 喺城市入面泊車會靈活啲，各有取舍。
Proton X70 保養 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Mazda CX-5 保養 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
兩款車嘅保養條件一樣，呢方面唔使糾結。實際保養成本仲要看品牌嘅服務網絡同零件價格，建議去車友群问问真實車主嘅經驗。
Proton X70 同 Mazda CX-5 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更睇重品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰一款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，那就揀配置更豐富嗰款。最終都係建議兩款都去試駕，親身體驗先係最重要嘅。
總嘅嚟講，Proton X70 同 Mazda CX-5 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車款。揀邊一輛，關鍵仲係要看你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行之間嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花啲時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
进入2026年下半场，商用车行业高管调整仍在持续，人事棋局的每一步落子都暗含着企业战略方向的深度锚定。7月以来，从潍柴动力的核心管理层换帅，到上汽集团副总裁、广汽领程董事长履新，再到斯堪尼亚中国的本土化掌舵人更迭，多起重磅人事变动接连落地。既有老将功成身退的交棒，也有体系内成长起来的熟手担纲重任，更有本土干将的破格提拔，勾勒出行业转型关键期企业谋篇布局的清晰脉络。
潍柴动力：袁宏明辞任执行董事，刘义接棒
7月3日，潍柴动力（02338.HK）宣布，袁宏明已辞任公司执行董事、战略发展及投资委员会委员等职务，辞去上述职务后，袁宏明将不再担任公司（含控股子公司）任何职务。经公司2026年第五次临时董事会会议审议通过，同意选举刘义为公司第七届董事会执行董事，该事项尚需提交公司股东会审议，任期自股东会决议作出之日起至第七届董事会届满之日止。
另外，在7月17日晚间，潍柴动力股份有限公司发布关于变更董事会秘书的公告。潍柴动力董事会于近日收到王丽提交的书面辞职报告，因工作调动，王丽申请辞去公司董事会秘书职务，并将不再担任公司（含控股子公司）任何职务，王丽的原定任期至第七届董事会届满之日止。截至本公告披露日，王丽未持有公司股份，不存在应当履行而未履行的承诺事项。
经公司2026年第六次临时董事会会议审议通过，同意聘任郝庆贵为公司董事会秘书，任期自董事会决议作出之日起至第七届董事会届满之日止。
上汽集团：杨怀景升任副总裁
7月8日，上汽集团召开第九届董事会第十一次会议，经总裁提名、董事会审议，聘任杨怀景担任集团副总裁，任期与本届董事会一致。董事会8人全票通过该项任命。
公开资料显示，杨怀景，1972年6月出生，中共党员，研究生学历，工商管理硕士、工程硕士，是上汽体系内成长起来的资深管理者。曾任上海汽车股份有限公司中国弹簧厂商务部经理、人事信息部经理、厂长助理，上海汽车集团股份有限公司经济运行部副经理、质量和经济运行部副经理，上海汽车集团股份有限公司商用车事业部总经理等职务。现任上海汽车集团股份有限公司副总裁，上汽大通汽车有限公司总经理、党委副书记、南京分公司总经理，上海汽车集团股份有限公司商用车技术中心主任，南京汽车集团有限公司汽车工程研究院院长。
在杨怀景的带领下，上汽商用车板加速推进大通、依维柯、跃进三大品牌的深度整合。据公开数据显示，2026年上半年，上汽商用车累计销售14.76万辆，同比增长24%，其中新能源销量同比增长69%，海外销量同比增长33%。
东风股份：董秘履新 营销公司法定代表人变更
7月13日晚间，东风汽车股份有限公司发布关于变更董事会秘书的公告。公告显示，公司原董事会秘书周方平因工作调整，不再担任公司董事会秘书职务。经董事长提名，公司第七届董事会第二十七次会议审议，同意聘任李夏为公司董事会秘书，任期自本次董事会审议通过之日起至第七届董事会届满之日止。
此外，据企查查平台显示，7月下旬，东风汽车股份有限公司的全资子公司东风轻型商用车营销有限公司完成工商变更，法定代表人由李军智变更为李旸。据悉，李旸此前担任东风股份的副总经理。他1979年9月出生，曾担任东风股份的轻型商用车分公司副总经理、综合管理部副部长、新能源事业部党总支书记兼副总经理等职，后来调任神龙汽车，今年1月，他重回东风股份。
广汽领程：董事长卸任 法定代表人变更
7月中旬，据企查查平台显示，广汽领程新能源商用车有限公司完成工商变更，黄永强卸任该公司董事长、法定代表人，由高锐接替。
据悉，高锐此前担任广汽集团常务副总经理，并曾担任广汽集团资产管理部部长，中隆投资有限公司董事长、总经理，骏威汽车有限公司总经理，广汽集团（中国香港）有限公司董事长、总经理等职务。
斯堪尼亚：NEXT ERA重卡迎来新任本土掌舵人
7月8日，斯堪尼亚集团中国正式任命宋黎辉为 NEXT ERA重卡销售服务新任总经理，该任命将于2026年7月15日正式生效。宋黎辉将接替贺文凯(Volker Hillmann)的职务；贺文凯将继续留在上海，在传拓集团内部出任新职。此次战略性的领导层交接，充分彰显了斯堪尼亚对中国市场长期承诺的坚定决心。据悉，在新的职位上，宋黎辉将向斯堪尼亚集团执行副总裁、斯堪尼亚集团中国总裁柯木兰(Camilla Dewoon)汇报工作。
谈及此次任命，柯木兰对贺文凯打下的坚实基础表示感谢，并指出：“宋黎辉深厚的本土根基与精湛的商业专长，对于NEXT ERA重卡在中国发展的下一阶段至关重要。这将使我们更贴近中国客户与合作伙伴，高度契合集团既定的愿景、商业模式及运营理念。”
远程新能源商用车：旗下公司法定代表人变更
7月中旬，据企查查平台显示，隶属吉利远程新能源商用车集团的吉利四川商用车有限公司全资控股的南充吉利新能源商用车公司完成工商变更，法定代表人由周建群变更为丁鼎，担任该公司经理、董事。该公司2021年成立，注册资本9.1亿元，主要经营业务是汽车新车销售、新能源汽车整车销售等。
结语
纵观7月商用车行业的人事调整，“实干派”与“本土化”成为最鲜明的关键词。自主品牌选择深耕体系多年、熟悉业务脉络的内部人才接棒，外资品牌加速启用本土高管贴近中国市场，所有调整最终都指向同一个目标——在新能源转型与全球化竞争的深水区，用更懂市场、更懂客户的团队打赢下半场。人事更迭从来不是终点，而是企业新一轮战略进攻的“发令枪”。随着这些新高管团队就位，下半年商用车市场的竞争势必会更加激烈。
Written by Han Zihan Edited | Qingzhu
A Prime Minister, plus three cabinet ministers, standing behind an investment by a Chinese automaker. Amid the EU adding layer upon layer of measures to Chinese electric vehicles, it itself conveys a signal.
On July 23, at the Geely Valencia factory, in the presence of Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez, Geely Automobile and Ford signed a joint venture agreement to create new energy vehicles for Geely and Ford brands for the European market through capacity sharing.
Not buying a factory, but a joint venture; not defeating others, but win-win cooperation.
Whether bringing in or going out, Geely's internationalization has always implemented Chairman Li Shufu's words: "Business is beautiful, doing business and making friends at the same time".
Time rewind to 16 years ago. On March 28, 2010, Geely Holding Group signed the final 100% equity acquisition agreement for Volvo Cars Group with Ford Motor Company. Geely became the first multinational corporation in the Chinese automotive industry. Ford witnessed and supported this cooperation case with global automotive industry influence, forging commercial friendship with Geely.
Today, 16 years later, Geely and Ford shake hands again. For the current explosive growth of Chinese cars going overseas, this has strong implications.
2026, the overseas expansion of China's automotive industry is undergoing a key leap from quantitative change to qualitative change.
In the first half of the year, China's vehicle export volume reached 5.096 million, up 65.3% year-on-year. June's single-month exports broke the 1 million vehicle threshold for the first time. For every 10 vehicles produced domestically, nearly 4 head to overseas docks.
Consulting firm AlixPartners predicts that China's annual vehicle export volume is expected to reach 10 million, becoming the first country globally to break this number.
Behind the numbers, deeper changes are occurring.
In June, the market share of major Chinese brands in Europe was 13%, surpassing Japanese brands for two consecutive months. When we occupy a larger share of the EU market, we cannot just sell cars simply, we must achieve harmonious win-win with the local industrial ecosystem, laws and regulations, and social well-being.
The joint venture between Geely Automobile and Ford to establish a company in Spain happens to stand at this node of qualitative change. It is also another practice of Li Shufu from "going out" to "integrating in".
A Prime Minister's Endorsement, and Two Handshakes Spanning 16 Years
On July 23, the day of the signing ceremony. Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez appeared at the Almussafes factory in Valencia, followed by three ministers from the Ministry of Labor and Economy, Ministry of Industry and Tourism, and Ministry of Science, as well as the President of the Valencian Community.
The Almussafes factory was built in 1976, and was once Ford's largest production base outside the United States, with cumulative production of over 11 million vehicles to date. For nearly 50 years, this factory has been the livelihood for tens of thousands of families in the Valencia region of Spain.
But the industrial era never stops for sentiment. Starting from 2024, with the promotion of EU industry and electrification, Ford gradually ceased production of multiple fuel models such as Mondeo, S-MAX, Galaxy, leaving only one production line producing the Kuga in the huge factory.
Last year, the factory with an annual capacity of 500,000 vehicles actually produced less than 100,000 vehicles, with utilization rate less than one-quarter. The factory that once fed thousands of Spanish families is facing a crossroads of fate.
Geely's arrival could not have been more timely. Through capacity sharing, it not only brings jobs, capacity, and tax revenue to the locality, but also allows Ford to activate remaining assets in a more efficient way, continuing to generate value.
According to the plan, the joint venture company will officially commence operations in the first half of 2027.
In the new factory, Geely will launch two new energy vehicle models, and Ford will also produce three multi-energy vehicle models, including continuing to produce the Kuga, and launching an all-new rugged compact SUV of the Bronco family in 2028.
The five models will share capacity and coordinate production scheduling. Both sides stated in the announcement that the joint venture will "promote more model choices and value enhancement", and through "integrating output to reduce per-vehicle costs". For the local economy, jobs are preserved, and an industrial lifeline of a region is reactivated, which can be called a win-win on multiple fronts.
Currently, Spain is becoming a strategic pivot for Chinese automakers landing in Europe. Labor costs are about one-third of Germany's, energy costs are lower than Germany and France, possessing world-class port clusters, and Barcelona is the core gateway for Chinese cars entering Europe.
In Q1 2026, Chinese brands sold approximately 38,700 vehicles in Spain, up 67% year-on-year.
Jian Jiayue, CEO of Geely Automobile Group, said a passage: Automakers going overseas will face many issues, from the overseas perspective, Chinese brands are there to "conquer" other people's markets, so the "going out" of Chinese automotive brands is actually to "walk in". Walking into the local market. Building factories in joint venture locally, mobilizing local resources, is a path of multi-win.
For Geely, although it seems like taking a small loss, cannot enjoy profits exclusively. But it actually avoided many hidden costs and efficiency frictions.
The EU has always been a high threshold market, with high compliance costs, high environmental protection requirements, long approval processes, influence of local voter opinions and political factions, which will make business behavior complicated. Specific cases can refer to the drama-like twists and turns of Tesla's German factory.
Actually, now there are already domestic automakers who suffered the same loss. Fighting alone, one-sidedly emphasizing ambition and sales targets, instead resulted in much hostility and obstruction, even becoming a chip in local political party games.
But the other path Geely took, preserving jobs in overseas markets, activating assets for old car companies, taking root for Chinese brands locally, letting technology flow become a constructive force, by "win-win cooperation, beauty shared" making oneself a welcomed partner.
Seeking Strategic Depth, Prioritizing Synergy
Citi estimates that if Geely obtains the 150,000 vehicle annual production quota in the Valencia factory, the cost is only equivalent to 10%-20% of building a new greenfield factory.
Beyond cost advantage, the more critical value lies in time. From signing to production, the joint venture model requires only 18 months, while self-built factories usually take three to five years. In the rapidly changing European electric vehicle market, an 18-month time difference is enough to determine whether a brand can lock in position.
Geely has already validated this strategy in many markets globally.
In Malaysia, in 2017, Geely acquired 49.9% stake in Proton and fully dominated operations. Let Proton walk out of the quagmire of losses, achieving brand revitalization.
In January 2026, Proton's exclusive EV factory at Tanjung Malim Automotive High-Tech Valley officially started production, and the first pure electric model eMas7 started CKD local assembly. The eMas7 is built on the Geely Galaxy E5 platform, ranking champion in Malaysia EV sales for consecutive months.
Until today, from Malaysia's political circles to the public, they still regard Proton as "their own brand". What Geely does is not replacing, but making it better.
In Korea, Geely cooperated with Renault to launch intelligent hybrid models. In Brazil, Geely acquired 26.4% stake in Renault Brazil, sharing factory capacity and market network.
In Europe, Volvo Cars is fully responsible for Lynk & Co's commercial and brand operations in the European region, assisting Lynk & Co brand's regional expansion in Europe.
This is exactly Geely's unique logic of global layout — not advancing alone, but weaving an ecological synergy network. Every cooperation node is both a strategic pivot to enter local markets, and proof of long-term trust from partners. Making globalization a value network of multi-win cooperation and continuous deepening.
So, although "from product exports to system exports" has become industry consensus, what exactly is the system? Moving your own system forcefully there, or building a system from scratch, or integrating into the local system? These operational details reflect a company's business values and development outlook.
Geely's Spain joint venture and the logic behind this system provide a good sample and idea for the Chinese automotive industry, and reflect as substantial growth data.
In the first half of 2026, Geely's overseas sales reached 474,000, up 158% year-on-year, already exceeding the total export volume of the full year 2025. Based on the first half performance, Geely has upped the full year export target to 900,000 vehicles.
Conclusion: From "Student" to "Partner", the Metamorphosis and Responsibility of Chinese Automakers
In early 2010, Geely and Ford signed an agreement in Gothenburg, Sweden, to acquire the globally renowned Swedish luxury brand Volvo for 1.8 billion US dollars, and the media used "snake swallowing an elephant" to describe this transaction.
Geely fulfilled all commitments with action, did not intervene in Volvo's independent operations, protected and respected its existing development systems, letting Volvo achieve brand revitalization in the following decade plus.
More importantly, Geely also learned Volvo's systematic R&D capabilities, safety-first manufacturing standards and quality control. This transaction allowed Geely to complete an "advanced study", laying the capability foundation for active performance on the global stage later.
Traditional automakers hold existing capacity, channels, and sales teams, while Chinese automakers hold the advantages and cost efficiency of the fastest growing new energy system, both sides found what both parties need in this stage.
As Ford Europe President Jim Baumback said: "Geely's world-class electrification capabilities, speed, and massive global scale, combined with Ford, are unparalleled competitive advantages."
From the humble "student" in 2010 to the equal "partner" in 2026, Geely exchanged pragmatism for trust, won respect with capability, and integrated into global industry development in the best way.
Geely's globalization has never been a simple capital game, but constantly exploring open and win-win global industry cooperation models under the premise of legality and compliance, it is respect for brands and technology, layout and deep construction of synergy systems.
From Volvo to Proton, Lotus, then Mercedes-Benz, Renault, and Ford, Geely's built global system synergy not only activated new momentum for Geely's global development, but also formed a solid guarantee to help brand going overseas. This also confirms what Li Shufu said, "Business is the most equal and beautiful manifestation of human civilization."
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家在揀車嘅時候都會拿 Proton X50 同 Kia Sportage 做比較。呢兩款車喺價位同定位上都幾接近，今日我哋就從多個方面做一個詳細嘅對比，幫大家省下做功課嘅時間。
Proton X50 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 89,800 - 113,300，一共有 4 個版本，包括 1.5T Executive（RM 89,800）、1.5T Premium（RM 101,800）、1.5T Flagship（RM 113,300） 等。
Kia Sportage 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 129,639 - 179,320，一共有 4 個版本，包括 2025 1.6T DCT 4WD High（RM 179,320）、2025 1.6T DCT 2WD High（RM 159,320）、2025 2.0L AT 2WD High（RM 139,639） 等。
從價錢嚟睇，Proton X50 嘅起步價確實比 Kia Sportage 平咗 RM 39,839。如果你預算有限，Proton 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需求。但都係要留意，平嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備上會有取舍，具體要睇你嘅需求。
Proton X50 搭載 1.5L 4-cyl，馬力 105 hp。官方油耗 6.0 L/100km。
Kia Sportage 搭載 1.5L Turbo，馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。
動力方面，Kia Sportage 嘅 1.5L Turbo 比 Proton X50 嘅 1.5L 4-cyl 多咗 35 匹馬力。不過日常喺市區開，兩款車嘅動力都夠用，唔會覺得唔夠力。
Proton X50 車身長 4400 mm，后备箱 400 L。
Kia Sportage 車身長 4400 mm，后备箱 400 L。
兩款車嘅尺寸幾乎一樣，車內空間差別唔大。呢個級別嘅車，日常使用完全夠用。
Proton X50 採用 4WD 驅動方式。
Kia Sportage 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
Proton 嘅 4WD 同 Kia 嘅 FWD 喺操控上會有唔同感受，建議試駕對比。
總括嚟講，Proton X50 同 Kia Sportage 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵都要睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
近日，國內購買嘅新能源汽車長時間喺境外行駛觸發安全保障策略導致車機網絡相關功能受限事件，迎來圓滿結局。
此前，該車主因車輛長期定位喺境外區域，觸發車企後台風控機制，車機影音娛樂等智能功能被臨時限制，車主將其經歷發布至社交平台後引發廣泛討論。
對此，極氪官方予以咗澄清並於 26 日凌晨迅速上線優化措施。極氪方面坦承，此次車機限制雖出於保護用戶財產安全嘅初衷，但喺用戶體驗層面確實存在改進空間，結合用戶及網友反饋，立即推進優化。
核心措施為優化出境安全保障體驗，極氪 App 端新增「跨境守護」功能入口，車主只需一鍵啟動，即可快速完成自助解鎖，簡化流程；開發中嘅「跨境守護功能開關」，其後將透過 OTA 推送。
該模組成為業界首套全方位出境安全保障系統，亦係一次用戶、網友與車企共同推動行業進步嘅典型案例。
官方快速響應，分步優化安全保障體驗據了解，該車主從河南出發自駕，駛入哈薩克後，車機彈出強提示界面，導航、影音等智能功能受限。記者核實，車輛動力、制動等核心行駛系統始終正常，冇「無法駕駛」嘅情況。目前，該車輛已完成核實，車機強提示已解除。
事件發生後，極氪虛心聆聽用戶建議、快速回應輿論訴求，分階段落實優化方案，兼顧車輛安全保障與車主使用體驗。
具體優化方案包括：第一，極氪 APP 正式上線「跨境守護」功能入口。車主只需一鍵啟動，即可快速獲取驗證碼，完成自助解鎖，簡化流程，提升回應效率。第二，開發中嘅「跨境守護功能開關」，其後將透過 OTA 推送。開關功能上線後，「跨境守護」將默認處於關閉狀態，出境前車主可根據自身需要，喺手機端手動選擇開啟或關閉。如果車主主動開啟該功能，仍可透過 APP「跨境守護」入口進行自助解鎖。第三，針對已出境或即將出境嘅用戶，極氪開放 24 小時客服熱線（400-003-6036）將提供優先接入通道。如遇解鎖失敗或緊急情況，極氪將第一时间遠程協助。
極氪方面表示，品牌堅守極致全域安全嘅初心，始終把用戶體驗同安全放喺第一位，亦始終重視每一條真實嘅聲音。未來將持續常態化收集、聆聽車主反饋，迭代優化安全風控策略與跨境出行服務流程，喺築牢財產安全、數據安全防線同優化用戶出行體驗之間，持續尋找更完美嘅平衡點。
記者調查：新能源行業普遍使用風控設計，但體驗有待完善事實上，新能源車企部署跨境風控體系，唔係多餘嘅管控手段，而係應對當下汽車跨境黑灰產、守護車主權益嘅必要保障。近年來，新能源汽車跨境盜竊、拆解走私亂象屢見不鮮。此前，某新勢力品牌旗艦車型就曾遭盜竊後被拖運至境外，車輛被快速過戶，車機賬號與備案資訊被遠程篡改，導致車主維權無門。多地也曾偵破批量新車跨境流失案件，背後正係安全防護機制缺失留下嘅安全漏洞。
行業資料顯示，車機限制本質係車企成熟嘅全球車輛安全防護策略。賓士、寶馬、保時捷、特斯拉等全球頭部車企均部署類似機制，俄烏戰爭期間，以上品牌喺缺乏備用通訊機制同智能容錯設計嘅情況下，因外部信號中斷或干擾，導致防盜系統觸發咗安全防控機制，從而強制鎖住車輛。
但長久以來，多數車企只重風控落地，輕用戶告知同體驗適配，流程唔完善、機制唔透明，導致大眾普遍產生「企業越俎代庖、過度干預物權」嘅誤解。本質上，呢類風控邏輯同 iPhone 設備定位防盜、電子圍欄鎖機機制同源，核心係兜底保障用戶財產安全，經用戶報備後即可解鎖。
行業、法律專家：安全策略、用戶隱私保護好有必冇多位汽車行業資深訪問人士表示，今次極氪嘅快速優化舉措，一定程度推動咗新能源行業安全風控體系嘅進步。
智能汽車時代，車企嘅核心責任早已唔局限喺行車操控安全，而係延伸為全域安全保障體系：既包括轉向、制動、動力等基礎行駛安全，亦涵蓋車輛財產防盜安全、車主個人資料隱私安全。極氪今次優化跨境風控規則，本質係喺安全合規底線、財產防護機制同用戶體驗之間，搵到咗最優平衡點，真正將車輛控制權交返俾用戶，實現「安全唔缺位、體驗唔打折」。
對於有人質疑，車廠有無權單方面限制車輛功能。有律師表示：車廠地理圍欄風控只限制車機娛樂、導航等附加功能，全程唔干预轉向、制動、動力等行車安全相關嘅核心硬件。車主提供護照、通關憑證、購車證明等資料完成核實後即可解鎖限制，並唔構成對財產權嘅侵犯。反過嚟，若車廠放任車輛無管控流出境外，將面臨海關高額行政處罰。
一線車主嘅真實反饋，更加印證咗行業優化嘅必要性。唔少極氪車主受訪時表示，揀極氪，正係睇中咗極致安全嘅品牌理念。業內相關人士認為，全域電子圍欄、跨境風控機制係高端豪車必備嘅安全配置，同各類數碼產品嘅防盜鎖機邏輯一致。高端豪車價值高、跨境套利空間大，完善嘅風控機制能有效避免車輛被盜竊、非法倒賣嘅風險，令日常用車、長途跨境出行更安全、更安心。
爭議背後：中國高端新能源全球化嘅必經進階從行業長遠趨勢嚟睇，今次車廠嘅升級舉措，係中國高端新能源汽車全球化嘅必經之路。當下國產高端新能源品牌加速出海，國內外懸殊嘅售價差形成巨大套利空間：極氪 009 國內售價四十餘萬元，新加坡市場超 200 萬元；極氪 9X 境外終端普遍加價 40 萬元，邁莎銳定制改裝版境外售價達 40 萬美元，折合人民幣超 270 萬元。巨大嘅價差紅利，令國產高端豪車成為跨境黑灰產、非法倒賣經銷商嘅重點覬覦目標，各類非法跨境倒賣、整車走私、零件拆解套利行為層出不窮。
與此同時，車輛定位軌跡、車載測繪地理資訊屬於國家法定重要數據，依據《數據安全法》《汽車數據安全管理若干規定（試行）》《汽車數據出境安全指引（2026 版）》《測繪法》，相關數據嚴禁違規跨境傳輸，地理圍欄風控係車廠落實國家數據安全、測繪保密嘅法定責任。且 2026 年國內實施純電動乘用車出口許可證管理制度，無正規許可車輛禁止外流，車廠風控亦係配合國家進出口監管、規避合規風險嘅必要舉措。此外，境外車機影音、流量服務涉及各地版權與屬地法規，無序開放功能亦會俾車主帶嚟合規困擾。
以全域安全著名嘅極氪品牌，被用戶譽為「公路坦氪」，不僅喺車身結構、智能避障等方面追求科技配置領先，亦喺隱私保護、防丟防盜等方面走在行業前列。但再好嘅初心，亦要避免類似「有一種冷叫做媽媽怕你冷」嘅過度保護。汽車本質上係用戶嘅財產，安全策略唔應該令用戶感覺被打擾。
今次爭議從輿情危機轉化為行業升級契機，極氪「聽勸式升級」亦為全行業做出積極示範：安全風控從來唔係多餘嘅束縛，而係中國汽車品牌全球化嘅核心底氣與必備基建。未來，隨著國產高端新能源汽車持續深耕東南亞、中東、新加坡等境外市場，行業必將參考今次優化範式，統一完善「風控兜底 + 用戶自主 + 便捷解鎖」嘅標準化體系。
回顧過去一年，極氪一步步將用戶聲音轉化為品牌進化嘅驅動力。從針對改款節奏過快問題，明確「車型改款需提前預告且一年唔超過一次」，到推出「極氪零距離」溝通機制、發布「陽光服務公約」——每一項舉措背後，都係把話語權交返俾用戶嘅誠意。正係這種唔迴避、唔推諉嘅誠懇溝通，令極氪品牌 NPS（用戶淨推薦值）大幅攀升，喺市場上形成咗強勁嘅口碑效應。今年上半年，極氪累計交付 178,370 輛，同比增長 97%，成為新勢力品牌中唯一完成全年銷量目標過半嘅企業。市場嘅認可，正係最好嘅回報。
In the SUV market in Malaysia, many buyers compare Proton X50 and Mazda CX-8 when choosing a car. Both models are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
The OTR price of Proton X50 in Malaysia is RM 89,800 - 113,300, with a total of 4 versions, including 1.5T Executive (RM 89,800), 1.5T Premium (RM 101,800), 1.5T Flagship (RM 113,300), etc.
The OTR price of Mazda CX-8 in Malaysia is RM 165,360 - 201,360, with a total of 5 versions, including 2025 2.5T 4WD High Plus Petrol (RM 201,360), 2025 2.2L 2WD High Plus Diesel (RM 193,123), 2025 2.5L 2WD High Plus Petrol (RM 186,360), etc.
From a price perspective, the starting price of Proton X50 is indeed RM 75,560 cheaper than Mazda CX-8. If your budget is limited, the entry-level version of Proton can already meet daily needs. But also note, the few thousand dollars cheaper may involve trade-offs in features, it depends on your specific needs.
Proton X50 is equipped with a 1.5L 4-cyl engine, 105 hp. Official fuel consumption 6.0 L/100km.
Mazda CX-8 is equipped with a 2.0L 4-cyl engine, 170 hp. Official fuel consumption 8.0 L/100km.
In terms of power, the Mazda CX-8's 2.0L 4-cyl has 65 more horsepower than the Proton X50's 1.5L 4-cyl. However, for daily city driving, both cars have enough power and won't feel underpowered.
Proton X50 safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety system includes ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
Mazda CX-8 safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety system includes Brand ADAS.
Both cars have the same safety rating, safety features are quite comprehensive within this class. New cars nowadays don't lack in safety, no need to worry too much about this point.
Proton X50 warranty 5 years/150,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Mazda CX-8 warranty 5 years/150,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Warranty conditions for both cars are the same, no need to dwell on this aspect. Actual maintenance costs depend on the brand's service network and parts prices, it is recommended to ask real owners in car owner groups for experience.
Both Proton X50 and Mazda CX-8 are mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale price more, you can prioritize the one with better reputation; if you care more about cost-performance ratio and features, choose the one with richer configuration. In the end, it is recommended to test drive both, personal experience is the most important.
Overall, both Proton X50 and Mazda CX-8 are very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends on your personal needs and budget. It is recommended to do your research, compare quotes from several dealerships, and then test drive to make the final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending time doing research will never be wrong.
In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers compare Perodua Aruz and Proton X70 when choosing a car. These two models are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
Perodua Aruz has an OTR price in Malaysia of RM 72,900 - 77,900, with a total of 2 versions, including 1.5L X (RM 72,900), 1.5L AV (RM 77,900), etc.
Proton X70 has an OTR price in Malaysia of RM 106,800 - 122,300, with a total of 3 versions, including 1.5L Standard 2WD (RM 106,800), 1.5L Executive 2WD (RM 115,800), 1.5L Premium 2WD (RM 122,300), etc.
From a price perspective, the starting price of Perodua Aruz is indeed RM 33,900 cheaper than Proton X70. If your budget is limited, Perodua's entry-level version is sufficient for daily needs. However, be aware that the savings of a few thousand Ringgit might involve trade-offs in features, depending on your specific requirements.
Perodua Aruz is equipped with a 1.5L 4-cyl, 105 hp. Official fuel consumption 6.0 L/100km.
Proton X70 is equipped with a 1.5L Turbo, 140 hp. Official fuel consumption 7.0 L/100km.
In terms of power, Proton X70's 1.5L Turbo has 35 more horsepower than Perodua Aruz's 1.5L 4-cyl. However, for daily city driving, both cars have sufficient power, you won't feel lacking.
Perodua Aruz body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
Proton X70 body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
The dimensions of the two cars are almost the same, interior space difference is not significant. Cars at this level are more than enough for daily use.
Perodua Aruz adopts FWD drive mode.
Proton X70 adopts FWD drive mode.
The drive mode of the two cars is the same, both are FWD, daily driving experience will not be much different.
Perodua Aruz warranty 5 years/150,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Proton X70 warranty 5 years/150,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
The warranty conditions for the two cars are the same, no need to worry about this. Actual maintenance cost also depends on the brand's service network and parts prices, suggested to ask real owners in car owner groups for experience.
Overall, Perodua Aruz and Proton X70 are both very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends on your personal needs and budget. We suggest doing your research, compare quotes from several dealerships, and test drive before making a final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending time on research will definitely not be wrong.
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都拿 寶路華 Ativa 同 三菱 Xforce 嚟做比較。呢兩款車喺價位同定位上都幾接近嘅，今日我哋就從多個方面做一次詳細嘅比較，幫你節省咗做功課嘅時間。
寶路華 Ativa 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 62,500 - 73,400，一共有 3 個版本，包括 1.0L Turbo X（RM 62,500）、1.0L Turbo H（RM 67,300）、1.0L Turbo AV（RM 73,400）等。
三菱 Xforce 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 109,930 - 119,930，一共有 2 個版本，包括 2026 1.5L Ultimate（RM 119,930）、2026 1.5L Urban（RM 109,930）等。
從價錢嚟看，寶路華 Ativa 嘅起步價的確比三菱 Xforce 平咗 RM 47,430。如果你預算有限，寶路華嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需求。但都要注意，平嗰幾千蚊，可能會喺配備上有取舍，具體要看你嘅需求。
寶路華 Ativa 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 ASA 3.0 + ACC + LDA + LKA + BSM + RCTA。
三菱 Xforce 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 MI-PILOT。
兩款車嘅安全評級一樣，喺呢個級數嚟講安全配備都算好齊全嘅。而家嘅新車安全性都唔差，唔使太擔心呢一點。
寶路華 Ativa 保養 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
三菱 Xforce 保養 3 年/100,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
寶路華 Ativa 同三菱 Xforce 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更睇重品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑好嗰款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，那就揀配置更豐富嗰款。最終都建議兩款都去試駕，親身體驗先係最重要。
總嚟講，寶路華 Ativa 同三菱 Xforce 都係馬來西亞市場好唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵都要睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係一件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拿 Perodua Ativa 同 Chery Tiggo Cross 做比較。這兩款車喺價位同定位上都蠻接近嘅，今日我哋就從多個方面做一個詳細嘅比較，幫你省下做功課嘅時間。
Perodua Ativa 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 62,500 - 73,400，一共有 3 個版本，包括 1.0L Turbo X（RM 62,500）、1.0L Turbo H（RM 67,300）、1.0L Turbo AV（RM 73,400） 等。
Chery Tiggo Cross 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 88,750 - 99,750，一共有 2 個版本，包括 2025 HEV 1.5L CSH（RM 99,750）、2025 1.5T Standard（RM 88,750） 等。
從價錢睇，Perodua Ativa 嘅起步價確實比 Chery Tiggo Cross 便宜咗 RM 26,250。如果你預算有限，Perodua 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需求。但都要注意，便宜嗰幾千塊，可能喺配備上會有取捨，具體要看你嘅需求。
Perodua Ativa 搭載 1.5L 4-cyl，馬力 105 hp。官方油耗 6.0 L/100km。
Chery Tiggo Cross 搭載 1.5L 4-cyl，馬力 105 hp。官方油耗 6.0 L/100km。
兩款車用嘅係同一套動力系統，日常開起嚟嘅感受基本上冇咩差別。油耗方面都差不多，唔使太糾結這一點。
Perodua Ativa 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 ASA 3.0 + ACC + LDA + LKA + BSM + RCTA。
Chery Tiggo Cross 嘅安全評級係 TBD，主動安全系統包括 Basic。
安全配備方面，兩款車都拿唔錯嘅評級。不過 Perodua Ativa 嘅 ASA 3.0 + ACC + LDA + LKA + BSM + RCTA 同 Chery Tiggo Cross 嘅 Basic 喺功能上有啲差異，如果你比較著重主動安全嘅話，可以仔細對比一下兩者嘅功能列表。
Perodua Ativa 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
Chery Tiggo Cross 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
兩款車嘅驅動方式一樣，都係 FWD，日常駕駛感受唔會有太大區別。
總體嚟講，Perodua Ativa 同 Chery Tiggo Cross 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵都要睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花啲時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嗰陣都會將 Perodua Aruz 同 Toyota Yaris Cross 作比較。呢兩款車喺價位同定位上都幾接近，今日我哋就從多個方面做一個詳細比較，幫你省做功課嘅時間。
Perodua Aruz 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 72,900 - 77,900，一共有 2 個版本，包括 1.5L X（RM 72,900）、1.5L AV（RM 77,900）等。
Toyota Yaris Cross 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 99,900 - 109,900，一共有 2 個版本，包括 2026 1.5L Standard（RM 99,900）、2026 HEV 1.5L Standard（RM 109,900）等。
從價錢來看，Perodua Aruz 嘅起價確實比 Toyota Yaris Cross 平咗 RM 27,000。如果你預算有限，Perodua 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需要。但亦要注意，平嗰幾千蚊，可能會喺配備上面有取舍，具體要看你嘅需要。
Perodua Aruz 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
Toyota Yaris Cross 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
兩款車嘅驅動方式一樣，都係 FWD，日常駕駛感受唔會有太大分別。
Perodua Aruz 保修 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Toyota Yaris Cross 保修 5 年/無限制里程，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Perodua Aruz 同 Toyota Yaris Cross 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更看重品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，那就揀配備更豐富嗰款。最後始終建議兩款都去試駕，親身體驗先係最重要嘅。
總體嚟講，Perodua Aruz 同 Toyota Yaris Cross 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車款。揀邊一部，關鍵始終係睇你個人嘅需要同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行之報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嗰陣都會拿 Mazda CX-60 同 Ford Everest 嚟做比較。這兩款車喺價位同定位上都幾接近，今日我哋就從多個方面做一個詳細嘅比較，幫你省咗做功課嘅時間。
Mazda CX-60 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 200,510 - 252,873，一共有 2 個版本，包括 2026 3.3T 4WD High Plus（RM 252,873）、2025 2.5L 2WD High（RM 200,510） 等。
Ford Everest 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 266,338 - 430,838，一共有 6 個版本，包括 2026 3.0T 4WD Platinum（RM 430,838）、2026 2.0T 4WD Platinum（RM 348,838）、2026 2.0T 4WD Sport（RM 316,838） 等。
從價錢來看，Mazda CX-60 嘅起步價確實比 Ford Everest 便宜咗 RM 65,828。如果你預算有限，Mazda 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需求。但都需要注意，便宜嗰幾千塊，可能喺配備上會有取舍，具體睇你嘅需求。
Mazda CX-60 搭載 2.0L 4-cyl，馬力 170 hp。官方油耗 8.0 L/100km。
Ford Everest 搭載 2.5L Diesel，馬力 187 hp。官方油耗 8.5 L/100km。
動力方面，Ford Everest 嘅 2.5L Diesel 比 Mazda CX-60 嘅 2.0L 4-cyl 多咗 17 匹馬力。不過日常喺市區開，兩款車嘅動力都夠用，唔會覺得唔夠力。
Mazda CX-60 車身長 4500 mm，後備箱 450 L。
Ford Everest 車身長 4400 mm，後備箱 400 L。
空間方面，Mazda CX-60 嘅車身比 Ford Everest 長咗 100 mm，車內乘坐空間會稍微寬裕啲，尤其係後座腿部空間。如果你經常載家人或者需要放嬰兒車，大少少嘅車身確實更實用。
Mazda CX-60 保修 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Ford Everest 保修 3 年/100,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
總體嚟講，Mazda CX-60 同 Ford Everest 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一部，關鍵都要睇你個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
喺馬來西亞嘅汽車市場，好多買家喺揀車嗰陣都會拿 MG MG HS 同 Mercedes-Benz GLA 嚟做比較。今日我哋由多個方面做一個詳細嘅比較，幫你攞啲做功課嘅時間。
MG MG HS 喺馬來西亞嘅 O T R 售價係 RM 130,450 - 146,450，一共有 2 個版本，包括 1.5L Standard（RM 105,000）、1.5L Executive（RM 115,000）等。
Mercedes-Benz GLA 喺馬來西亞嘅 O T R 售價係 RM 258,888 - 295,888，一共有 1 個版本，包括 Standard（RM 258,888）等。
由價錢嚟睇，MG MG HS 嘅起價確實比 Mercedes-Benz GLA 平咗 RM 128,438。如果你預算有限，MG 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需要。但都要留意，平嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備上會有取舍，具體要睇你嘅需要。
MG MG HS 嘅安全評級係 TBD，主動安全系統包括 Basic。
Mercedes-Benz GLA 嘅安全評級係 5★ (Euro NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 Premium ADAS。
安全配備方面，兩款車都拿到唔錯嘅評級。不過 MG MG HS 嘅 Basic 同 Mercedes-Benz GLA 嘅 Premium ADAS 喺功能上有些差異，如果你比較看重主動安全嘅話，可以仔細對比吓兩者嘅功能列表。
MG MG HS 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
Mercedes-Benz GLA 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
兩款車嘅驅動方式一樣，都係 FWD，日常駕駛感受唔會有太大分別。
MG MG HS 同 Mercedes-Benz GLA 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更看重品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰一款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，那就揀配備更豐富嗰款。最終都係建議兩款都去試駕，親身體驗先係最重要嘅。
總嘅嚟講，MG MG HS 同 Mercedes-Benz GLA 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵都係要睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建议大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最後決定。買車係件大事，花點時間做功課絕對無錯。
車型概覽
積架E-PACE PHEV 值唔值得睇，第一步唔係望牌子或者外形，而係睇佢能唔能夠配合你嘅香港日常。 呢篇會集中講充電節奏同日常通勤，幫你用買家角度篩走唔適合嘅選擇。
售價仍待確認，買家可以先把佢放入候選名單，等價格落實後再同同級車逐項比較。
購車價格指南
積架E-PACE PHEV 目前售價仍未清晰，較理性嘅做法係先睇版本、車身大小同動力形式，等價格落實後再決定值唔值得落訂。
如果有幾個版本可揀，可以先將 2022 2.0T 60km Standard（價格待確認） 放喺同一張清單。日常通勤重視舒適同易用，家庭買家就要優先睇後排、尾箱同安全配置。
核心規格重點
睇 積架E-PACE PHEV 嘅規格，重點唔係背數字，而係理解佢喺香港用車場景會帶嚟咩分別。
積架E-PACE PHEV 現階段最值得留意係車型定位同版本方向，詳細取捨應該等價格同規格更清楚再作決定。
優缺點分析
積架E-PACE PHEV 嘅優點唔需要講到天花龍鳳，真正有價值係佢能唔能夠令日常用車更省心：車型定位清楚，適合作為同級比較起點。
要留意嘅係，要先確認屋苑、公司或常去商場嘅充電條件、售價未清晰前唔應該太早用性價比落結論。呢啲唔一定係缺點，但係落訂前應該先諗清楚。
買家常見問題
買 積架E-PACE PHEV 之前，真正要問嘅唔係單一規格，而係佢可唔可以融入你每日嘅生活節奏。
常見疑問係「Jaguar E-PACE PHEV 支持邊款充電？」簡單講，Jaguar E-PACE PHEV 支援主流嘅歐標 Type 2 充電。 放到實際用車，就係要睇佢對通勤、泊車、家庭乘坐同長期成本有幾大幫助。
同級對比內容
將 積架E-PACE PHEV 放入同級車清單時，唔建議只用外形或者品牌光環決定。比較順序可以係：先等售價落實，再決定佢應該同邊個級距比較。
咁樣篩選會貼近香港買家真實生活：平日塞車、商場泊車、周末去新界、甚至一家人出入，先係一部車每日要面對嘅考驗。
用車全周期指南
擁有 積架E-PACE PHEV 最重要係先諗清楚充電節奏。屋苑、公司或者常去商場只要有穩定充電選項，電動化用車就會容易相處好多。
如果你主要喺市區行，視野、低速順滑度同泊車輔助會好影響心情；如果經常行高速或跨區，座椅舒適度、隔音同動力從容感會更重要。
In May, China's automotive market overall presented a gentle recovery trend, with domestic brands still being the sales backbone of the market. Recently, BYD, Geely, Chery, Changan, and Great Wall, the top 5 domestic automakers, successively released their monthly performance reports. From the data, these five companies show a general characteristic of "stable total growth, divergence between domestic and international markets, and accelerated new energy penetration". Overseas exports and new energy vehicles have become the most core growth engines; export business has evolved from a "bonus item" to the "core foundation" for some companies. BYD's "dominant leader" status is further consolidated, Chery achieved high growth via exports, Geely's new energy penetration rate broke 56%, Changan focused steadily on balanced development, while Great Wall appeared slightly under pressure during structural transformation.
BYD: Export Hits New High Becomes Biggest HighlightIn May, BYD stood firmly at the top of domestic brands with a monthly sales volume of 383,500 vehicles, maintaining positive growth both year-on-year and month-over-month under a large base. Its two main brands, Dynasty and Ocean, sold a combined 330,200 vehicles, contributing 86.1% of total sales; Fangchengbao's monthly sales broke 30,000 units to reach 30,200, a year-on-year increase of 139.7%, setting a new high for the year; Denza sold 16,300 vehicles, and Yangwang delivered 286 vehicles. From a model perspective, BYD had eight models in May with monthly sales exceeding 20,000 vehicles. The Song Family and Yuan Family both broke 50,000 units, selling 51,370 and 56,691 vehicles respectively. The Sea Lion Family followed closely with 42,615 vehicles, and Seagull sales were also close to 40,000 vehicles.
BYD's biggest highlight in May was exports. Overseas new energy vehicle sales reached 160,600 units, an 80.4% year-on-year increase, accounting for about 42%. The sharp expansion of export scale effectively countered the phased weakness in domestic demand. Cumulative exports from January to May exceeded 620,000 vehicles. High export growth mainly benefited from continued ramping up of overseas factory capacity, improved ocean shipping capacity, and accelerated channel network expansion. In the domestic market, BYD promoted Megawatt Super Charging and intelligent strategies simultaneously—Megawatt charging achieved about 90% charge in 9 minutes; 20,000 super charging stations are planned to be built by 2026; all series models are available with Sky Eye B intelligent driving solutions and city navigation safety fallback plans, accelerating the popularization of high-level intelligent driving. As Gen 2 Blade Battery capacity gradually releases, the company's orders are expected to continue rising.
Chery: Sales Growth Leads the Top 5Chery Group's total sales volume in May was 247,800 vehicles, a significant year-on-year increase of 20.5%, ranking first in growth speed among the top 5. Exports remained its most core growth engine—May exports reached 181,900 vehicles, an 80.5% year-on-year increase, accounting for 73.4% of total sales that month, continuously breaking the single-month export record for Chinese brands for three months. In terms of new energy, Chery New Energy sold 100,300 vehicles, a 58.8% year-on-year increase. April and May consecutively saw monthly new energy sales breaking 100,000 vehicles.
The strong performance in exports benefited from Chery's long-term deep cultivation of overseas channel advantages and localized operation capabilities. While overseas orders continued to rise, high export growth formed a sharp contrast with domestic sales—Chery's domestic sales in May were only 60,000 vehicles, accounting for one-quarter of total sales. From cumulative data, Chery Group accumulated 1.101 million sales from January to May, but against the annual goal of 3.2 million vehicles, monthly averages need to reach about 420,000 vehicles later, and pressure remains significant.
Geely: New Energy Penetration Rate Breaks 56%Geely Auto's total sales volume in May was 237,600 vehicles, a 1% year-on-year increase, achieving month-over-month double growth for three consecutive months. In terms of structure, Geely's "New Four Transformations" transformation showed significant results: new energy vehicle sales reached 133,400 units, accounting for 56% of total sales, with new energy share exceeding 50% for four consecutive months.
From sub-brands, performance was significantly divergent. Zeekr brand sales in May reached 34,400 vehicles, a 82% year-on-year increase; Zeekr 9 Series and 8 Series models combined sales approached 50% of total sales, showing bright performance in the high-end market; Galaxy brand sales were 81,700 vehicles; Geely brand sales were 182,500 vehicles, among which China Star Series sales reached 100,800 vehicles; Lynk & Co brand sales were 20,700 vehicles, with new energy vehicle sales share rising to 71%.
In terms of exports, Geely's overseas vehicle exports in May reached 85,100 vehicles, a explosive 184% year-on-year increase, setting a brand single-month export record high. Among exported products, new energy vehicles reached 40,800 units, accounting for nearly half; hybrid and pure electric products have successively landed in Southeast Asia, Middle East, Latin America, and other markets, highlighting the results of global strategy implementation.
Changan: Multi-brand Matrix Balanced EffortChangan Auto's delivery volume in May was 209,100 vehicles, among which new energy deliveries were 92,400 vehicles, a 5.8% year-on-year increase, with new energy share about 44%. In terms of exports, overseas deliveries reached 70,700 vehicles, a 38% year-on-year increase, becoming another major growth highlight for Changan in May.
In the sub-brand matrix, Changan Qiyuan delivered 34,500 vehicles in May; All-New Q05 delivered 15,800 units, with orders breaking 3,000 units within three days of listing in Thailand; Deepal sales in May were 33,200 vehicles, a 30% year-on-year increase; January to May overseas cumulative sales were 28,700 vehicles, a significant 167% year-on-year increase; Avatr delivered 7,336 vehicles in May; Changan Auto (Gravity) delivered nearly 49,000 vehicles in May.
Changan Auto's balanced layout was fully reflected in May: the fuel car base remained stable, new energy brands Deepal and Qiyuan accelerated volume growth, high-end brand Avatr continued to break through in technical cooperation, and overseas markets simultaneously achieved breakthrough growth. The pattern of five brands working together, driven by both new energy and exports, is initially taking shape.
Great Wall: Overseas Sales Growth Year-on-Year 46.75%Great Wall Motor's sales in May were 100,400 vehicles, slightly down compared to last May's 102,200 vehicles, making it the only company among the top 5 to show a year-on-year negative growth. From sub-brands, Haval brand sales in May were 55,500 vehicles, remaining Great Wall's most important sales pillar; Tank brand sales were 17,100 vehicles; both Haval and Tank brand sales showed year-on-year declines; Wey brand sold 8,119 vehicles, a 31.78% year-on-year increase, achieving growth against the trend; Ora brand performance was most stunning, with sales of 6,018 vehicles, a significant 206.88% year-on-year increase. In terms of new energy, Great Wall sold 30,400 new energy vehicles in May, with new energy vehicle transformation gradually accelerating.
The overseas market became Great Wall's biggest highlight in May, with overseas sales growing 46.75% year-on-year. Against the background of pressure on the domestic market, strong growth in overseas business effectively made up for the decline in the domestic market. Great Wall Motor's current core contradiction lies in: Haval and Tank, the two traditional main-selling brands, face weak growth, while Wey and Ora brands, although growing notably, have relatively small volume and are not yet enough to support overall growth. How to complete the "relay" between old and new brands is the key issue Great Wall must solve subsequently.
Final ThoughtsFrom May data, the growth pattern of the top 5 domestic brands has clearly diverged, but there are three common trends worth noting: First, exports have become a key engine for domestic brands to seek stability and growth. Second, new energy transformation is still accelerating, but paths differ among enterprises. Third, technological innovation continues to deepen brand moats. Looking ahead to the second half of the year, competition in the automotive industry will continue to upgrade around these three trends. Although everyone has a common direction, these three trends are all competing for the entire enterprise's industrial chain strength, and the strong will remain strong, which has almost become an inevitable outcome.
重慶車展這幾日，長安馬自達嘅展台好有睇頭。N8 館入面，傳奇跑車 MX-5、新能源轎車 EZ-6、SUV EZ-60，外加 4 月剛上市嘅 EZ-60 馬年版，四款車一字排開。主題好直接：「依然馬自達」。電動化咗，我都係嗰個講究操控、講究設計嘅馬自達。
全球車唔係貼標籤，係真係拿去海外賣
傾產品。EZ-6 同 EZ-60 呢兩款新能源車，長安馬自達由頭到尾都按照全球標準嚟做，唔係內地特供版。EZ-6 攞咗「2026 世界年度設計車」大獎，係第一個攞到呢個奬嘅中國新能源車型。EZ-60 更勁，全球八個頂級設計大獎全部攞晒，SUV 入面獨一無二。
安全方面，兩款車都按照中歐雙五星標準開發。EZ-6 已經攞咗 C-NCAP、E-NCAP 等五個權威認證，EZ-60 嘅電池安全提前滿足咗新國標同歐標。長安馬自達仲俾咗一個好硬淨嘅承諾：電池終身自燃包賠，唔限里程、唔限車主。呢個條款喺合資新能源入面好少見，算係俾用戶食咗顆定心丸。
操控係馬自達嘅老本行。現場請咗長安馬自達車主、亦都係冠軍車手嘅紀浩，佢開住一台原廠未改裝嘅純電 EZ-60，跑完咗中國新能源汽車拉力錦標賽。6 日 910 公里，對手大多數係增程同插混，最後 EZ-60 攞咗場地賽 SUV 組冠軍、拉力賽總成績亞軍。呢種極限工況下嘅穩定性，比任何試駕都咁有說服力。
更加值唔得關注嘅係，長安馬自達已經拿到歐盟、英國、澳洲三大市場嘅整車認證，係國內第一個同時攞到呢三個認證嘅合資新能源車企。5 月底，80 幾位來自歐洲、澳洲、泰國嘅海外經銷商專門跑咗一趟南京工廠，考察生產工藝同品控體系。目前 EZ-6 同 EZ-60 喺海外銷售同預售勢頭都唔錯，國內市場 EZ-60 連續 7 個月係合資新能源中型 SUV 嘅銷量冠軍。
長安馬自達銷售分公司執行副總經理吳旭曦喺現場講得好直接：長安馬自達已經成為馬自達全球新能源嘅研發、製造同出口中心。以往合資車企都係將海外車型引入國內，而家長安馬自達係反向輸出：中國造嘅新能源車，要賣返去馬自達嘅全球市場去。
用戶唔止係買車嘅人，仲係品牌嘅一部分
今次車展上，長安馬自達花咗好大篇幅講用戶共創，而係唔係只係談產品參數。呢個思路好啱，新能源時代產品同質化好嚴重，拼邊個同用戶行得更近。
從年初開始嘅「心願之旅」，用戶提願望、品牌幫佢哋實現，每個願望背後都係真實嘅個人故事。「車主故事薈」已經出咗 11 期，入面有連續 7 年捐助貧困小學嘅公益達人，有連續 4 年組織車友會關心特殊兒童嘅領隊，仲有因為馬自達認識、最終走到埋一齊嘅情侶。呢啲內容比廣告片真實好多。
「悅馬創作家」同「全民經紀人」計劃，鼓勵用戶自己拍片、寫分享、推介朋友買。現場嚟咗個零零後嘅 EZ-60 車主孫靖依，話自己平時工作忙，但有空就發啲用車感受，車友同工作人員都好幫手。呢種自發嘅口碑傳播，比硬廣告轉化率高太多。
5 月啟動嘅「青苗計劃」第二季，正行入全國高校，同學生傾設計、駕控、安全同智能化。同步仲搞咗 EZ-60 全國高校改裝設計大賽，優秀作品有機會做成實車，仲俾參賽學生提供咗暑期實習名額。呢一招既培養咗潛在用戶，亦順便做咗年輕人才儲備。
社會責任無落下。從 2015 年而家，長安馬自達喺雲南捐咗 12 間希望小學，總投入超過 1000 萬，惠及過萬師生。6 月又發起「每一公里都有善意」公益行動，將用戶每次出行轉化為公益基金，用來改善希望小學嘅條件。
618 優惠簡練講
車展期間到 6 月 30 日，全系有購車禮遇。廠補至高 17000 元，國補至高 20000 元，買指定車型送價值 7999 元嘅尊享套裝（包含原廠充電樁、龍膜太陽膜、TPE 腳墊同尾箱墊）。金融方案係 0 首期 5 年低息，年均費率 1.99%，仲加一個價值 7999 元嘅終身零燃權益。到場試駕新能源車嘅送金陵金箔。詳情直接問當地經銷商。
寫在最後：
睇完今次重慶車展長安馬自達嘅動作，有一個感覺好明顯：呢間合資品牌喺新能源轉型上行咗一條唔太一樣嘅路。無盲目捲配置、捲價格，而係將「全球標準」同「用戶共創」作為兩個支撐點。「依然馬自達」呢句主題，講到底，係喺電動化浪潮入面守住自己嘅魂：設計、操控、安全，呢啲老底子唔好丟。同時將用戶真正放喺度一齊玩、一齊成長。呢種打法唔一定最快，但好大機會行得更遠。
6 月 13 日到 21 日，重慶國際博覽中心 N8 館，有興趣嘅可以去看看。車好唔好，開過先至知。
5 月 28 日，上汽集團迎來歷史性時刻——全球第一億輛整車正式交付，成為中國首家累計產銷量突破 1 億輛的汽車集團。
而喺呢 1 億輛背後，上汽通用五菱貢獻咗超過 3200 萬輛。呢個數字，其實都好能說明五菱呢幾年喺中國汽車市場中的地位。值得一提係，同一天，上汽通用五菱嘅全球車 EKSION 喺印尼雅加達正式交付用戶。
提到五菱，就會諗到那句經典嘅標語「人民需要什麼，五菱就造什麼」。事實上，呢句說話都唔係白叫嘅。回望五菱嘅發展史，佢總能踩中中國汽車市場嘅每一個關鍵節點。
早些年，五菱宏光憑藉「能拉貨、能坐人、仲平啲耐用」，成為無數個體經營者創業路上嘅第一部車；後來消費升級，寶駿 730 又切入家用 MPV 市場，用更低門檻滿足家庭用戶對大空間、多功能嘅需求。
到咗新能源時代，宏光 MINIEV 幾乎係用一種「重新定義代步車」嘅方式，打開咗中國微型電動車市場。可以話，上汽通用五菱總能精準捕捉用戶嘅真實需求，理解用戶到底需要什麼。
而家，上汽通用五菱亦嘗試向更高端、更智能嘅方向行。譬如同華為乾崑合作推出嘅華境 S。五菱希望透過雙方嘅合作，打破高端智駕嘅技術溢價壁壘，讓更多用戶亦能體驗到高階智駕。
除咗國內市場，呢幾年上汽通用五菱亦積極佈局海外市場。數據顯示，目前，佢海外累計銷量已經突破 150 萬輛，覆蓋全球 110 多個國家同地區。
上汽通用五菱能有而家嘅成績，靠係實打實嘅硬核能力。譬如，喺製造端，上汽通用五菱打造咗全球首创嘅「智能島」製造體系，透過「車揾工位、料揾車」嘅柔性生產模式，進一步提升生產效率同成本控制能力，這亦令佢能更快適應唔同市場需求變化。
對於中國汽車產業嚟講，1 億輛唔僅係規模上嘅突破，更加意味住中國車企已經開始真正參與全球市場競爭。而上汽通用五菱，亦正從「國民品牌」向「全球品牌」邁進。
比亞迪正式發布 2026 年 5 月產銷快報，全品牌新能源汽車單月銷量 383453 輛，同比微增 0.26%，時隔十個月實現單月銷量同比轉正；其中乘用車交付 376990 輛，環比大漲 19.4%，一掃前期車型換代陣痛，呈現國內基本盤穩固、海外銷量狂飆、高端品牌全線放量的全新格局，在國內新能源內捲加劇、特斯拉 FSD 入華、自主新品密集上市的市場環境中，走出獨有的結構性增長路線。
王朝 + 海洋兩大主力品牌 5 月合計售出 330215 輛，佔據集團總銷量超八成，仍是比亞迪銷量壓艙石，全系列共 8 款車型單月銷量突破 2 萬台，產品從 5 萬入門代步到 20 萬家用 SUV 實現全覆蓋。
王朝網內部，元家族 56691 輛、宋家族 51370 輛。雙雙跨過五萬門檻，成為品牌兩大銷量支柱，兼顧家用代步與城鄉出行需求；秦家族緊隨其後交出 28360 台穩定表現，漢、唐系列月銷維持六千級體量，深耕中大型家用轎車、SUV 細分市場；全新車型夏處於市場培育期，單月交付 1810 台，後續隨渠道鋪開有望穩步上量。
海洋網增長勢頭更為迅猛，全系五款車型跨入兩萬俱樂部：海獅 42615 台、海豹 34117 台、海鷗 39919 台、海豚 22260 台、宋 PLUS 27755 台。其中海鷗憑藉 6-8 萬親民定價穩居入門代步銷冠，海獅作為全新走量車型上市即站穩四萬量級，補齊海洋網中型 SUV 產品空白，完善海洋產品梯隊佈局。從代步小車到緊湊 SUV，兩大主品牌依托 DM-i 混動與純電雙線技術，牢牢鎖住 15 萬以內國內主流家用市場份額。
方程豹同比暴漲 139.7% 品牌向上落地見效騰勢、方程豹、仰望組成的高端矩陣 5 月合計銷售 46489 輛，正式擺脫小眾定位，成為比亞迪品牌溢價與利潤增長新支點，打破自主品牌高端化難破局的行業魔咒。
越野品牌方程豹單月 30186 輛，同比暴漲 139.7%，創下品牌上市以來月度銷量新高，旗下鎦 7 單月 18280 台，豹 5、豹 8 穩定輸出，在 25-40 萬硬派越野細分市場持續擠壓合資、進口車型生存空間。
騰勢 5 月交付 16303 台，MPV 標桿 D9 售出 6721 台，Z9 系列近 6000 台，MPV、中大型轎車雙線發力，站穩豪華新能源賽道；百萬元級超豪華品牌仰望穩步爬坡，當月交付 286 台，同比增幅 105.8%，完成自主品牌天花板產品的市場驗證，形成從十幾萬家用、三四十萬越野、五十萬豪華 MPV 到百萬元級旗艦的全價格帶產品佈局。
5 月比亞迪乘用車和皮卡海外銷量 160177 輛，同比大漲 80.7%，出口佔全系總銷量突破 42%，創下品牌出海歷史新高，成為穩住 5 月整體銷量、實現同比轉正的核心驅動力。
東南亞、歐洲、拉美成為主力增量市場，海鷗、宋 PLUS、元系列持續登頂多國新能源熱銷榜單，SHARK 皮卡連續兩月單月出口突破 4000 台；依托泰國、巴西、匈牙利、烏茲別克斯坦四大海外整車工廠落地投產，本地化生產持續落地，規避關稅同時快速下沉終端渠道。在國內車市存量競爭、價格戰常態化背景下，高速擴容的海外市場有效對沖國內車型換代帶來的銷量波動，正式從補充市場升級為比亞迪核心增長引擎。截至當前，比亞迪新能源汽車全球累計銷量已經突破 1650 萬輛，全球化版圖持續拓寬。
智駕賦能產品迭代 下半年新品蓄力衝量5 月比亞迪智能化落地迎來關鍵節點，天神之眼智駕系統成為車型核心加分項：全品牌搭載高級智駕車型保有量突破 315 萬輛，日均路測數據超 2 億公里；當月比亞迪落地城市領航、智能泊車雙安全兜底服務，成為全球首家實現兩項智駕兜底的車企，政策落地三天後，搭載天神之眼系統車型的城市 NOA 激活率暴漲 50%，智能化體驗升級直接拉動終端到店訂單轉化，為後續車型持續走量築牢產品競爭力，直面 FSD 入華帶來的智駕市場衝擊。
從數據細節來看，2026 年 1-5 月比亞迪累計銷量 1405039 輛，同比下滑 20.32%，核心誘因是全系主力車型集中換代、第二代閃充刀片電池產能爬坡受限。新款閃充電池升級快充與低溫性能，全系換代車型優先換裝新電池，但產線改造拖累產能釋放，熱門車型訂單積壓、交付延後，一定程度壓縮 5 月交付體量。
隨著二季度末二代刀片電池產能持續釋放，疊加騰勢 N8L、方程豹鎦 7 純電版、海獅 05、夏 L 等多款新車陸續登陸市場，業內普遍預判比亞迪 6 月全品牌銷量有望突破 40 萬輛。依托低端走量鎖份額、高端提利潤、海外衝增量、智能化提產品力的四維發展邏輯，在國內新能源淘汰賽加劇的當下，比亞迪全品類佈局優勢持續放大，坐穩國內新能源龍頭，加速向著全球頭部車企穩步邁進。
