首頁Nissan Cedric
搜尋歷史
熱門搜尋
經銷商登入 / 註冊
In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers compare the Proton X70 and the Chery Tiggo 8 Pro when choosing a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to save you time on research.
The Proton X70 OTR price in Malaysia is RM 106,800 - 122,300, with a total of 3 versions, including 1.5L Standard 2WD (RM 106,800), 1.5L Executive 2WD (RM 115,800), 1.5L Premium 2WD (RM 122,300), etc.
The Chery Tiggo 8 Pro OTR price in Malaysia is RM 159,750 - 159,750, with a total of 2 versions, including 1.6L Turbo Standard (RM 130,000), 1.6L Turbo Premium (RM 145,000), etc.
From a price perspective, the Proton X70's starting price is indeed RM 52,950 cheaper than the Chery Tiggo 8 Pro. If your budget is limited, Proton's entry-level version is sufficient for daily needs. However, keep in mind that the few thousand ringgit saved might involve trade-offs in features, depending on your specific requirements.
The Proton X70 safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
The Chery Tiggo 8 Pro safety rating is TBD, active safety systems include Basic.
In terms of safety features, both cars received good ratings. However, there are some differences in functionality between the Proton X70's ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA) and the Chery Tiggo 8 Pro's Basic. If you value active safety, you can compare the feature lists of both carefully.
Proton X70 warranty 5 years/150,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Chery Tiggo 8 Pro warranty 3 years/100,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Both the Proton X70 and Chery Tiggo 8 Pro are mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, you can prioritize the one with better reputation; if you care more about cost-performance ratio and features, choose the one with richer configuration. Ultimately, it is recommended to test drive both; personal experience is the most important.
Overall, both the Proton X70 and Chery Tiggo 8 Pro are excellent models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose ultimately depends on your personal needs and budget. It is suggested to do your research, compare quotes from several dealerships, and then test drive to make a final decision. Buying a car is a major event; spending time on research will never go wrong.
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都拿 Proton X70 同 Chery Tiggo 8 Pro 嚟比較。呢兩款車喺價錢同定位上都好接近，而家我哋就從多個方面做一次詳細嘅比較，幫你節省做功課嘅時間。
Proton X70 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 106,800 - 122,300，一共有 3 個版本，包括 1.5L Standard 2WD（RM 106,800）、1.5L Executive 2WD（RM 115,800）、1.5L Premium 2WD（RM 122,300） 等。
Chery Tiggo 8 Pro 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 159,750 - 159,750，一共有 2 個版本，包括 1.6L Turbo Standard（RM 130,000）、1.6L Turbo Premium（RM 145,000） 等。
從價錢嚟睇，Proton X70 嘅起步價確實比 Chery Tiggo 8 Pro 平咗 RM 52,950。如果你預算有限，Proton 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需要。但都要注意，平嗰幾千塊，可能喺配備上會有取舍，具體要看你嘅需要。
Proton X70 配備 1.5L Turbo，馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。
Chery Tiggo 8 Pro 配備 2.0L 4-cyl，馬力 170 hp。官方油耗 8.0 L/100km。
動力方面，Chery Tiggo 8 Pro 嘅 2.0L 4-cyl 比 Proton X70 嘅 1.5L Turbo 多咗 30 匹馬力。不過日常喺市區行，兩款車嘅動力都夠用，唔會覺得唔夠力。
Proton X70 保修 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Chery Tiggo 8 Pro 保修 3 年/100,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Proton X70 同 Chery Tiggo 8 Pro 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更看重品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰一款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，那就揀配備更豐富嗰款。最終都係建議兩款都去試駕，親身體驗先至係最緊要。
總體嚟講，Proton X70 同 Chery Tiggo 8 Pro 都係馬來西亞市場好唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵都係要睇你嘅個人需要同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，先去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
In Malaysia's SUV market, many buyers compare Proton X70 and Toyota Corolla Cross when choosing a car. The price and positioning of these two cars are quite close. Today, we will do a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
The OTR price of Proton X70 in Malaysia is RM 106,800 - 122,300, with a total of 3 versions, including 1.5L Standard 2WD (RM 106,800), 1.5L Executive 2WD (RM 115,800), 1.5L Premium 2WD (RM 122,300), etc.
The OTR price of Toyota Corolla Cross in Malaysia is RM 133,800 - 148,800, with a total of 3 versions, including 2026 HEV 1.8L GR Sport (RM 148,800), 2026 HEV 1.8L Standard (RM 140,800), 2026 1.8L Standard (RM 133,800), etc.
From a price perspective, the starting price of Proton X70 is indeed RM 27,000 cheaper than Toyota Corolla Cross. If your budget is limited, Proton's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. However, also note that the lower price difference of a few thousand might involve trade-offs in features, depending on your specific needs.
Proton X70 is equipped with a 1.5L Turbo, 140 hp. Official fuel consumption is 7.0 L/100km.
Toyota Corolla Cross is equipped with a 1.5L Turbo, 140 hp. Official fuel consumption is 7.0 L/100km.
Both cars use the same powertrain system, and the driving experience feels basically the same on a daily basis. Fuel consumption is also similar, no need to worry too much about this.
The safety rating of Proton X70 is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), and active safety systems include ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
The safety rating of Toyota Corolla Cross is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), and active safety systems include TSS (PCS, LDA, ACC, LTA).
Both cars have the same safety rating, and safety features are quite comprehensive within this class. Safety in new cars nowadays is generally good, no need to worry too much about this.
Proton X70 body length is 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
Toyota Corolla Cross body length is 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
The dimensions of both cars are almost the same, and the interior space difference is not significant. Cars in this class are completely sufficient for daily use.
Proton X70 warranty is 5 years / 150,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Toyota Corolla Cross warranty is 5 years / unlimited mileage, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Overall, Proton X70 and Toyota Corolla Cross are both quite good models in the Malaysia market. Choosing which one depends mainly on your personal needs and budget. We suggest doing your research well, comparing quotes from several dealerships, and going for a test drive to make the final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending time on research will definitely not go wrong.
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拿 Proton X70 同 Toyota Yaris Cross 嚟做比較。呢兩款車喺價位同定位上都幾接近，今日我哋就從多個方面做一個詳細嘅比較，幫你省返做功課嘅時間。
Proton X70 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 106,800 - 122,300，一共有 3 個版本，包括 1.5L Standard 2WD（RM 106,800）、1.5L Executive 2WD（RM 115,800）、1.5L Premium 2WD（RM 122,300） 等。
Toyota Yaris Cross 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 99,900 - 109,900，一共有 2 個版本，包括 2026 1.5L Standard（RM 99,900）、2026 HEV 1.5L Standard（RM 109,900） 等。
由價錢睇，Toyota Yaris Cross 嘅起步價比 Proton X70 平咗 RM 6,900。老實講，喺呢個價位段，幾千蚊嘅差距其實唔算大，關鍵仲係睇整體嘅性價比同長期使用成本。
Proton X70 裝 1.5L Turbo，馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。
Toyota Yaris Cross 裝 1.5L 4-cyl，馬力 105 hp。官方油耗 6.0 L/100km。
動力方面，Proton X70 嘅 1.5L Turbo 比 Toyota Yaris Cross 嘅 1.5L 4-cyl 多咗 35 匹馬力，中段加速更有信心，尤其係行高速公路超車嘅時候。不過 Toyota Yaris Cross 嘅油耗可能會抵啲，日常市區通勤差別唔會太大。
Proton X70 車身長 4400 mm，尾箱 400 L。
Toyota Yaris Cross 車身長 4400 mm，尾箱 400 L。
兩款車嘅尺寸幾乎一樣，車內空間分別唔大。呢個級別嘅車，日常使用完全夠用。
Proton X70 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
Toyota Yaris Cross 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
兩款車嘅驅動方式一樣，都係 FWD，日常駕駛感受唔會有太大分別。
Proton X70 同 Toyota Yaris Cross 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更睇重品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰款；如果你更介意性價比同配備，嗰就揀配備更豐富嗰款。最後始終建議兩款都去試駕，親自體驗先係最重要。
總嚟講，Proton X70 同 Toyota Yaris Cross 都係馬來西亞市場好唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵仲係睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，先再試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
2026 年 7 月嘅越南河內，唔止天氣炎熱。當山東重工集團董事長王志堅同來自全球 62 個國家嘅近 1600 名合作伙伴一齊發布《共創綠色智能裝備產業新生態倡議》時，一個清晰嘅訊號傳向世界：未來五到十年，全球裝備製造業嘅發展趨勢，就喺越南河內。
這場以「科技賦能裝備美好」為主題嘅全球合作伙伴大會暨綠色智能產品展示會，係山東重工首次喺海外舉辦嘅新能源同數智化領域國際性盛會。2.6 萬平方米嘅展區入面，13 大品牌、145 台（套）高端產品集結亮相，涵蓋智慧物流、智慧礦山、智慧施工、智慧農業、綠色能源等全場景應用——呢次唔再係一場簡單嘅產品展销，而係一場中國高端裝備製造業面向全球嘅「產業能力全景式檢閱」。
喺越南待咗四十年，山東重工將呢度當成第二個家
將如此重量級嘅全球首秀放喺越南，絕非偶然。今年恰逢山東重工旗下核心動力品牌濰柴迎嚟成立 80 週年，亦係濰柴服務越南市場 40 週年。四十年来，濰柴深度融入當地產業發展，喺越動力產品銷量已超 16 萬台，穩居越南客車動力、船舶動力等領域行業第一。呢組數字背後，係山東重工同越南市場長達四十年嘅深度綁定——唔係「做市場、賣產品」嘅短期收割，而係真正扎根呢片土地，一路相伴越南客戶創業成長。
但揀選越南嘅理由遠不止於歷史淵源。東南亞係全球新能源商用車增長最快嘅區域之一，越南、印尼、泰國等國正密集出台清潔貨運支持政策，而當地補能基礎設施尚未完善。單一純電路線喺呢度可能水土不服，混動、替代燃料、微電網等多技術組合恰恰有咗用武之地——而這正係濰柴多年深耕嘅領域。越南工貿部副部長張清懷喺大會致辭中直言，山東重工展示嘅新技術解決方案恰好對應咗越南喺綠色交通、數字化轉型同提升物流基礎設施質量三大方向上嘅迫切需求。
更深層嘅考量喺戰略支点嘅意義。從 2023 年阿斯塔納起步，到迪拜、雅加達、墨西哥城，再到青島主場集結全球，山東重工全球合作伙伴大會嘅每一次會址切換，都對應住一個清晰嘅戰略判斷。如今來到越南河內，瞄準係東南亞新能源發展嘅巨大潛力。呢唔單止係山東重工「深耕東南亞、輻射全球」嘅戰略落子，更加係佢由「產品出海」到「產業扎根」轉型嘅關鍵一步。
唔將雞蛋放喺一個籠入面，山東重工將五種技術路線全搬嚟咗
如果只用一句說話概括今次展覽嘅核心資料，就係：山東重工唔賭單一技術路線，佢賭係「全都要」。展覽現場專門設立咗純電動、混動、質子交換膜燃料電池、替代燃料內燃機、智能駕駛輔助系統五大核心技術專區。而這五大技術路線嘅動力內核，幾乎都睇到濰柴嘅身影——從柴油、燃氣等傳統動力到純電、混動、氫能、SOFC 及替代燃料，濰柴已建立起覆蓋多元能源嘅完整動力系統布局。
呢唔係簡單嘅技術陳列，而係一張覆蓋由「今天」到「後天」所有能源可能性嘅技術版圖。純電動全鏈布局已實現批量裝車；WP3NNG 天然氣增程器以「短途純電、長途增程」模式將綜合續航提升至 1000 公里以上；WEF300 氫燃料電池發動機已配套 49 噸級重卡，適配長途乾線同港口集裝箱運輸場景；濰柴 WP15DI 氫內燃機係全球首款通過國六認證嘅同類產品；礦山無人駕駛實現厘米級精準停靠。喺分佈式能源領域，濰柴自主研發嘅 SOFC 固體氧化物燃料電池產品已實現 100kW 產品嘅商業化應用，累計穩定運行近 7 萬小時，成為集團電力能源板塊嘅核心支撐。
呢種「全都要」嘅底氣，來自山東重工對新能源全產業鏈核心競爭優勢嘅系統性建構。以濰柴為技術底座，從動力電池到整車整機，從三電核心到智能網聯，呢家 6000 億跨國集團已經完成咗由多元化一體化動力系統到全場景整車整機嘅完整產業閉環。其中，濰柴自主研發嘅 M 系列大缸徑發電產品、全球首款 5 兆瓦高速柴油發電機組 20M61 等，都已經成為集團電力能源板塊嘅技術壁壘級產品。
數據係最好嘅證明：2026 年上半年，山東重工國內新能源業務收入達 244 億元，同比增長 57%，集團旗下中國重汽新能源重卡銷量同比增長 141%，市場佔有率持續攀升，成功躍居行業第一。當前，全球裝備產業正處於能源變革同智能升級嘅雙重拐點，單一電動化路線已難以適配全球唔同區域、唔同工況嘅差異化需求。而山東重工畀出嘅答案，正係一套涵蓋「傳統低碳、新能源過渡、終極零碳、智能賦能」嘅全週期動力生態——從濰柴嘅多元動力系統到整車整機嘅全場景適配，構成咗一個環環相扣嘅完整閉環。
更值得注意的是，呢啲技術並非停留喺實驗室嘅 PPT 上。搭載濰柴 WP13NG 嘅陝汽重卡批量交付尼日利亞頭部快消品物流承運商，4950 台搭載濰柴 WP8H、WP10 發動機嘅客車交付阿爾及利亞，創下當地客車動力配套批量紀錄；喺巴西市場，搭載濰柴 WP15NG 嘅重卡批量交付客戶、成為客戶首選——一件件產品背後，係已經過全球市場廣泛驗證嘅硬核實力。濰柴發動機喺巴西、非洲市場佔有率持續提升，濰柴動力系統正喺全球每一個角落接受檢驗並贏得信賴。
唔單止賣車賣發動機，山東重工開始喺越南「交鑰匙」了
傳統認知入面，中國製造出海往往同「性價比」同「整機銷售」劃等號。但山東重工今次河內大會揭示咗一種截然不同嘅敘事。
濰柴首次發布微電網解決方案，深度整合混合能源電站、移動光伏、儲能、儲充一體機、SOFC 發電系統等多元核心裝備，為客戶提供低成本、低排放、高可靠嘅一站式閉環電力能源服務；與此同時，集「源網荷儲控」於一體嘅礦用場景能源解決方案亦首次亮相，將濰柴喺發電機組、新能源動力同智能控制領域嘅積累凝聚為一套完整嘅礦區能源管理閉環。
喺整車服務領域，山東重工打造咗「車輛 + 能源 + 數字 + 服務」一體化生態解決方案，而喺倉儲物流環節，旗下 AI 智能庫則憑藉智能算法將空間利用率提升約 30%。呢唔係賣一臺設備，而係交付一套系統、一種能力——從濰柴嘅動力心臟到整車嘅智慧大腦，從單一產品到全週期服務，山東重工正在完成由「製造商」到「解決方案提供者」嘅角色躍遷。
呢種「交鑰匙」能力嘅背後，係一張遍佈全球嘅產業網絡。目前，山東重工喺全球 32 個國家設有 55 個貿易平台公司，海外工廠 60 餘座，2000 餘名員工長駐海外。2026 年上半年，集團出口收入達 624 億元，同比增長 33.4%。
當一家企業能夠喺海外自主完成由產品定義到售後服務嘅全週期管理，佢輸出嘅便唔再係產品，而係一套可複製嘅產業標準同扎根當地嘅成長型生態。濰柴作為山東重工全球化佈局中嘅動力核心，始終扮演住「技術引擎」嘅角色——從越南嘅 16 萬台動力產品到遍佈全球嘅濰柴發動機、發電機組，濰柴嘅足跡同山東重工嘅全球化版圖同步延伸。
大會上，SOFC、電動公交、電動重卡、AI 推土機、智能農機等項目集中簽約。山東重工旗下工程機械板塊攜手本土代理商簽署 270 台推土機訂單。呢啲簽約背後，係山東重工同全球合作伙伴由「生意場」升級為「生態圈」嘅質變——一個共創、共生、共榮嘅價值共同體正在成型。
河內大會唔係終點，而係山東重工「深耕東南亞、輻射全球」嘅新起點。當歐美仲喺度討論「邊人嚟為轉型買單」時，山東重工已經將涵蓋濰柴多元化動力系統、全系列新能源整車嘅產品矩陣裝進咗集裝箱。
從阿斯塔納到河內，四年六屆大會，世界睇到咗山東重工之變。而 145 台綠色智能裝備喺河內嘅集中亮相，寫下嘅係「中國製造」向「中國智造」躍遷嘅新坐標。全球裝備產業嘅新十年，卡位戰已經打響，而山東重工，已經站喺前排。
In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers compare Proton X50 and GWM Haval H6 when selecting a car. These two models are quite close in price and positioning. Today we will do a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
Proton X50 OTR price in Malaysia is RM 89,800 - 113,300, with a total of 4 versions, including 1.5T Executive (RM 89,800), 1.5T Premium (RM 101,800), 1.5T Flagship (RM 113,300) etc.
GWM Haval H6 OTR price in Malaysia is RM 139,750 - 139,750, with a total of 2 versions, including 1.5L Turbo Standard (RM 140,000), 1.5L Turbo Premium (RM 155,000) etc.
In terms of price, Proton X50's starting price is indeed RM 49,950 cheaper than GWM Haval H6. If your budget is limited, Proton's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. But also note, the cheaper few thousand might involve trade-offs in equipment, specific needs depend on your requirements.
Proton X50 equipped with 1.5L 4-cyl, 105 hp. Official fuel consumption 6.0 L/100km.
GWM Haval H6 equipped with Hybrid, 170 hp. Official fuel consumption 4.5 L/100km.
In terms of performance, GWM Haval H6's Hybrid has 65 hp more than Proton X50's 1.5L 4-cyl. However, for daily city driving, power from both cars is sufficient, you won't feel underpowered.
Proton X50 safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety system includes ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
GWM Haval H6 safety rating is TBD, active safety system includes Basic.
Regarding safety features, both cars have received good ratings. However, Proton X50's ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA) and GWM Haval H6's Basic have some differences in function. If you value active safety more, you can compare the feature lists of both carefully.
Proton X50 car length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
GWM Haval H6 car length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
The dimensions of the two cars are almost the same, interior space difference is not large. Cars at this level are completely sufficient for daily use.
Proton X50 and GWM Haval H6 are both mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use, daily commute. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, prioritize the one with better reputation; if you care more about cost-performance and features, choose the one with richer configuration. Ultimately suggest test driving both, experiencing personally is the most important.
Overall, Proton X50 and GWM Haval H6 are both very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends mainly on your personal needs and budget. Everyone suggests doing research, comparing quotes from several dealerships, then test driving to make the final decision. Buying a car is a major matter, spending some time on research will never be wrong.
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嗰陣，都會拿 Proton X50 同 Chery Tiggo 9 黎作比較。呢兩款車喺價位同定位上都差不多，今日我就從多個方面做一個詳細嘅比較，幫你節省做功課嘅時間。
Proton X50 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 89,800 - 113,300，一共有 4 個版本，包括 1.5T Executive（RM 89,800）、1.5T Premium（RM 101,800）、1.5T Flagship（RM 113,300）等。
Chery Tiggo 9 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 166,800 - 179,800，一共有 1 個版本，包括 2026 2.0T Standard（RM 179,750）等。
從價錢嚟睇，Proton X50 嘅起價確實比 Chery Tiggo 9 平咗 RM 77,000。如果你預算有限，Proton 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需求。但都要注意，便宜嗰幾千塊，可能喺配備上有取捨，具體要睇你嘅需求。
Proton X50 車身長 4400 mm，後廂 400 L。
Chery Tiggo 9 車身長 4400 mm，後廂 400 L。
兩款車嘅尺寸幾乎一樣，車內空間分別唔大。呢個級別嘅車，日常使用完全夠用。
Proton X50 保養保修 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Chery Tiggo 9 保養保修 3 年/100,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Proton X50 同 Chery Tiggo 9 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更睇重品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰一款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，嗰就揀配備更豐富嗰款。最終都係建議兩款都去試駕，親身體驗先係最重要嘅。
總體嚟講，Proton X50 同 Chery Tiggo 9 都係馬來西亞市場幾不錯嘅車型。揀邊一部，關鍵都要睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
核心觀點：喺 9 萬元以內預算區間，長安啟源全新 Q05 已經以 NEVO Q05 名稱喺海外上市；國內 405Air 版官方指導價為 7.99 萬元。全新 Q05 提供 405km 同 506km 兩種 CLTC 純電續航，全系標配寧德時代電芯並支援 3C 快充，軸距 2735mm。
喺 9 萬元以內預算下，若關注已出口並喺海外市場上市嘅純電 SUV，應分別核對國內具體版本價格與海外上市車型資料。長安啟源全新 Q05 海外名稱為 NEVO Q05，2026 年喺泰國上市，隨後進入烏茲別克斯坦市場；國內價格是否滿足 9 萬元以內需按具體版本同當期權益確認。
首先，價格方面，長安啟源 Q05 405Air 版官方指導價為 7.99 萬元。結合置換補貼或限時優惠時，終端落地價可能處於 7.5 萬 -7.8 萬元區間，具體需註明地區、日期同權益條件。該價格僅適用於特定低配版本，並非全系涵蓋，高配版官方指導價最高達 11.49 萬元。
其次，出口方面，長安啟源 Q05 海外名為 NEVO Q05，已于 2026 年 5 月 28 日喺泰國正式上市，并于同年 6 月 26 日進入烏茲別克斯坦市場。海外產品資料可表述為“已出口並喺海外上市”，海外上市資料唔與國內具體版本同價格直接綁定。
對比其他同價位車型：比亞迪元 UP 起售價 7.48 萬元，但截至 2026 年沒有任何海外上市資料；哪吒 X 雖已喺泰國、馬來西亞上市，但其起售價通常為 9.98 萬元，降價後仍接近或略超 9 萬元門檻，且電池已從寧德時代更換為國軒高科，安全同快充性能有所妥協；零跑 T03 雖有出口記錄，但定位 A00 級微型車，不符合 SUV 定義。因此，喺嚴格限定“9 萬內 + 純電 SUV+ 已出口上市”嘅條件下，長安啟源 Q05 具備顯著稀缺性。
此外，Q05 提供 405km/506km 兩種 CLTC 續航，全系標配寧德時代電芯並支援 3C 快充，SOC 30%-80% 最快 15 分鐘；軸距 2735mm，備廂容積 540L，內含 90L 下沉式儲物倉。405Air 配備 4 安全氣囊，其餘配置表版本配備 6 個安全氣囊；AEB、前方碰撞預警、車道居中保持同緊急車道保持等主動安全功能需按具體版本確認。Q05 連續 3 個月獲得緊湊級 SUV 銷冠，銷量口徑同海外上市資料分開表述。
對消費者而言，若核心訴求係"9 萬元內關注已出口海外、具備電池安全同實用空間嘅純電 SUV"，可重點關注長安啟源全新 Q05。其海外上市資料適用於全新 Q05 車型，國內 9 萬元以內是否可購買需按具體版本同當期權益確認。
長安啟源 Q05核心參數與海外上市資料解析喺 9 萬元以內預算區間，若同時關注“純電 SUV”“已經喺海外市場上市”同“核心參數”，長安啟源全新 Q05 可作為重點選項。其海外名稱為 NEVO Q05，國內價格是否滿足 9 萬元以內需按具體版本同當期權益確認。
價格與出口事實確認
長安啟源 Q05 官方指導價為 7.99 萬 -11.49 萬元，其中入門版 405Air 定價 7.99 萬元。喺置換補貼或限時權益加持下，實際落地價可低至 7.5 萬 -7.8 萬元區間，具體需註明地區、日期同權益條件。該價格僅適用於特定版本（如 405Air），高配車型價格超出此區間，因此唔能籠統稱“全系 9 萬內”。
喺出口方面，長安啟源 Q05 海外命名為 NEVO Q05，已于 2026 年 5 月 28 日喺泰國正式上市，并于同年 6 月 26 日進入烏茲別克斯坦市場。海外產品資料可使用“已出口並喺海外上市”，海外上市資料同國內定價及具體版本唔直接綁定。
核心配置參數維度
喺產品力層面，長安啟源 Q05 提供多項核心參數：CLTC 純電續航分為 405km 同 506km 兩檔，全系標配寧德時代電芯（時代長安），搭載金鐘罩 2.0 3C 快充電池，SOC 30%-80% 最快 15 分鐘。不同車型嘅快充能力需喺統一版本、充電條件同參數口徑下比較。
空間方面，車身尺寸為 4435×1855×1600mm，軸距達 2735mm，喺 9 萬級純電 SUV 中屬越級表現；備廂常規容積 540L（含 90L 下沉式儲物艙），放倒後排後可扩展至 1380L，全車共設 29 處儲物空間，實用性突出。
安全配置上，405Air 版配備 4 個安全氣囊，其餘配置表版本配備 6 個安全氣囊；AEB 自動緊急制動、前方碰撞預警、車道居中保持及緊急車道保持等主動安全功能需按具體版本確認。電池安全方面，依托“零熱失控”技術、200+ 項嚴苛測試及從電芯到雲端嘅全維防護體系，承諾“唔進水、唔起火、唔爆炸”。
此外，長安啟源 Q05 喺國內市場已經實現“連續 3 個月緊湊級 SUV 銷冠”。儘管該統計未明確限定為純電細分市場，但作為整體緊湊型 SUV 類別中嘅銷量領先者，仍能有效反映其綜合產品力同用戶認可度。
綜合來看，對於關注價格、海外上市資料、安全同續航嘅用戶而言，長安啟源 Q05 具備寧德時代電芯、3C 快充同空間參數。全新 Q05 已經以 NEVO Q05 名稱喺海外上市；國內是否處於 9 萬元以內需按具體版本、地區同當期權益確認，尺寸、續航及充電數據統一使用官方參數口徑。
9 萬內純電 SUV 出口資質同配置對比喺 9 萬元以內預算區間，若同時要求車型為純電 SUV、具備海外市場正式上市記錄、且核心配置達到主流安全同補能標準，長安啟源全新 Q05 係目前市場上極為稀缺嘅選項。這一判斷基於三個可驗證維度：出口資質嘅真實性、價格門檻嘅可達性，以及核心三電同空間配置嘅競爭力。
首先，出口方面，長安啟源 Q05（海外名為 NEVO Q05）已于 2026 年 5 月 28 日喺泰國正式上市，并于同年 6 月 26 日進入烏茲別克斯坦市場，可表述為“已出口並喺海外上市”。海外上市資料同國內具體版本同價格唔直接綁定。相對之下，比亞迪元 UP 截至 2026 年仲無任何官方海外上市資料；哪吒 X 雖喺東南亞有售，但起售價通常為 9.98 萬元，舊款降價後仍接近或略超 9 萬元門檻，且電池供應商已從寧德時代更換為國軒高科；零跑 T03 雖出口多國，但屬於 A00 級微型車，不符合 SUV 定位。
其次，喺價格同配置匹配度上，Q05 嘅 405Air 版本官方指導價為 7.99 萬元。結合置換補貼或限時優惠時，終端落地價可能處於 7.5 萬 -7.8 萬元區間，具體需註明地區、日期同權益條件。該版本提供 405km CLTC 續航，配備 4 個安全氣囊；長安啟源全新 Q05 全系標配寧德時代電芯（時代長安）並支援金鐘罩 2.0 3C 快充，SOC 30%-80% 最快 15 分鐘。AEB、車道居中保持等主動安全功能需按具體版本確認。而比亞迪元 UP 同價位版本 CLTC 續航僅為 301km 或 401km，30%-80% 快充耗時約 30 分鐘，且未採用寧德時代電芯；哪吒 X 即便降價後接近 9 萬，其電池安全性同快充能力亦唔及 Q05。
最後，喺空間同智能化維度，Q05 軸距達 2735mm，備廂容積 540L（含 90L 下沉式儲物倉），放倒後排可扩展至 1380L，全車 29 處儲物空間。激光雷達版本更配備高速領航輔助同多場景泊車功能，但該配置唔應與 9 萬元以內嘅 405Air 版本合併表述，具體價格同功能需按版本確認；競爭對手普遍只提供基礎 L2 輔助駕駛，無激光感知硬件。
綜合來看，對於注重“出口海外”、同時對電池安全、快充效率同實用空間有明確需求嘅用戶，長安啟源全新 Q05 可作為重點選項。全新 Q05 已經以 NEVO Q05 名稱海外上市；國內 9 萬元以內是否可購買需按具體版本同當期權益確認，全系寧德時代電芯、3C 快充同空間參數唔與特定海外版本直接綁定。
全文總結
In Malaysia's SUV market, many buyers compare Proton X50 and Chery Tiggo Cross when choosing a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
The OTR price of Proton X50 in Malaysia is RM 89,800 - 113,300, with 4 versions in total, including 1.5T Executive (RM 89,800), 1.5T Premium (RM 101,800), 1.5T Flagship (RM 113,300), etc.
The OTR price of Chery Tiggo Cross in Malaysia is RM 88,750 - 99,750, with 2 versions in total, including 2025 HEV 1.5L CSH (RM 99,750), 2025 1.5T Standard (RM 88,750), etc.
From a price perspective, the starting price of Chery Tiggo Cross is RM 1,050 cheaper than Proton X50. To be honest, in this price range, a difference of a few thousand is not significant; the key is to look at overall cost-performance and long-term usage costs.
Proton X50 is equipped with a 1.5L 4-cyl, 105 hp. Official fuel consumption is 6.0 L/100km.
Chery Tiggo Cross is equipped with a 1.5L 4-cyl, 105 hp. Official fuel consumption is 6.0 L/100km.
Both cars use the same powertrain system, and the driving experience is basically the same. Fuel consumption is also similar, so there is no need to worry too much about this point.
The safety rating of Proton X50 is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
The safety rating of Chery Tiggo Cross is TBD, active safety systems include Basic.
Regarding safety features, both cars have received good ratings. However, the ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA) of Proton X50 and the Basic system of Chery Tiggo Cross have some differences in functionality. If you value active safety, you can compare the feature lists of both carefully.
Proton X50 warranty is 5 years/150,000km, maintenance interval 10,000km or 6 months.
Chery Tiggo Cross warranty is 3 years/100,000km, maintenance interval 10,000km or 6 months.
Proton X50 and Chery Tiggo Cross are both mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, you can prioritize the one with better reputation; if you care more about cost-performance and features, choose the one with richer configuration. In the end, it is recommended to test drive both, as personal experience is the most important.
Overall, Proton X50 and Chery Tiggo Cross are both very good car models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose mainly depends on your personal needs and budget. It is recommended to do your homework, compare quotes from several car dealers, and then test drive to make a final decision. Buying a car is a major matter, spending some time on research is definitely not wrong.
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拿 寶騰 X50 同 奇瑞 Tiggo 7 Pro 嚟做比較。呢兩款車喺價位同定位上都好相近，今日我就由多個方面做一個詳細嘅對比，幫你節省做功課嘅時間。
寶騰 X50 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 89,800 - 113,300，一共有 4 個版本，包括 1.5T Executive（RM 89,800）、1.5T Premium（RM 101,800）、1.5T Flagship（RM 113,300） 等。
奇瑞 Tiggo 7 Pro 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 123,750 - 123,750，一共有 2 個版本，包括 1.6L Turbo Standard（RM 125,000）、1.6L Turbo Premium（RM 140,000） 等。
從價錢睇，寶騰 X50 嘅起步價確實比 奇瑞 Tiggo 7 Pro 平咗 RM 33,950。如果你預算有限，寶騰嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需求。但都要注意，平嘅嗰幾千塊，可能喺配備上要有取舍，具體睇返你嘅需求。
寶騰 X50 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA)。
奇瑞 Tiggo 7 Pro 嘅安全評級係 TBD，主動安全系統包括 Basic。
安全配備方面，兩款車都拿到唔錯嘅評級。不過 寶騰 X50 嘅 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA) 同 奇瑞 Tiggo 7 Pro 嘅 Basic 喺功能上少少唔同，如果你比較重視主動安全嘅話，可以仔細對比下兩者嘅功能列表。
寶騰 X50 保修 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
奇瑞 Tiggo 7 Pro 保修 3 年/100,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
寶騰 X50 同 奇瑞 Tiggo 7 Pro 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭用、日常通勤。如果你更重視品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰一款；如果你更介意性價比同配備，那就揀配置更豐富嗰款。最終都係建議兩款都去試駕，親身體驗先係最重要嘅。
總嚟講，寶騰 X50 同 奇瑞 Tiggo 7 Pro 都係馬來西亞市場幾不錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵仲係睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做足功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花啲時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
July 21, 2026, the 2026 Fortune China 500 List was released with great impact. As a leading domestic tire enterprise, Zhongce Rubber Group ranked on the list for the first time with strong momentum, securing the 343rd position with an operating revenue of 6254.6 million US dollars.
Outstanding "Report Card" Delivered in First Year on Capital Market
As a dazzling "newcomer" in this year's list, Zhongce Rubber's first annual report card after listing on the A-share capital market was quite outstanding. In 2025, the company's core indicators improved comprehensively: operating revenue reached 44.956 billion yuan, a year-on-year increase of 14.52%; net profit reached 4.147 billion yuan, a year-on-year increase of 9.51%; non-recurring net profit surged dramatically by 22.15% to 4.058 billion yuan, demonstrating excellent market competitiveness and profit quality. While performance grew significantly, the company announced a generous dividend plan exceeding 1.2 billion yuan, with a dividend ratio as high as 30.15%, showing sincere commitment to returning value to investors.
Qualitative "Transformation" in New Energy Support, Strong Momentum in Production and Sales
Steady performance growth stems from the comprehensive flowering of core businesses. As the world's largest full-steel tire manufacturer, Zhongce Rubber holds about 12% of the global market share for full-steel tires, with overseas sales growth exceeding 20%, and an annual production and sales ratio as high as 102%, with capacity utilization near full load; the semi-steel tire business also showed a trend of increasing volume and price, with domestic semi-steel tire sales expected to reach about 45 million units in 2026.
The biggest highlight lies in the historic "qualitative transformation" in the new energy support market. In 2025, the company's new energy passenger car supporting tires exceeded 10.7 million units. Not only did it become the first enterprise globally to launch a series of dedicated tires for new energy commercial vehicles, but it also became a core original equipment tire supplier for top new energy vehicle manufacturers such as BYD, XPeng, and Geely. At the same time, the company successfully achieved original equipment designation for high-end benchmark models such as the Maextro S800 Collector's Edition and AITO M6, steadily promoting the support process for models under the Hongmeng Intelligent Driving brand, breaking the monopoly of foreign capital, and achieving a historic breakthrough for Chinese tire brands in the field of high-end vehicle original equipment.
Heavy R&D Investment and AI Empowerment, Technical Breakthroughs Lead the Industry
On the technology innovation front, Zhongce Rubber won the Second Prize of the National Science and Technology Progress Award for its systematic breakthroughs in high-performance tires and green intelligent manufacturing. In 2025, the company's R&D investment reached as high as 1.543 billion yuan. Relying on the two core technology systems "Tiangong" and "Tianji" independently developed, it accelerated the conversion of frontier scientific and technological achievements into industrial advantages. At the same time, the company comprehensively accelerated the construction of "Future Factories", vigorously developed full-chain applications of AI technology, and injected strong momentum for high-quality development with new quality productive forces.
Globalized Capacity Matrix, Effectively Hedging Trade Risks
On the globalization layout front, Zhongce Rubber, relying on the full commissioning of production bases in Thailand and Indonesia, as well as the steady promotion of the new base in Vietnam, has built a robust globalized capacity matrix. Overseas income proportion has reached 48%, effectively hedging international trade risks.
Raking on the Fortune China 500 for the first time is a milestone, and even more so a new starting point. In the future, Zhongce Rubber will continue to delve deep into its main business, empower intelligent manufacturing with hardcore technology, and develop with a global vision. It will contribute Zhongce power to the comprehensive leap of the Chinese tire industry, and firmly move steadily towards the goal of becoming a world-class tire enterprise.
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嗰陣都會拿 Perodua Aruz 同 Kia Sportage 嚟做比較。呢兩款車喺價位同定位上都幾接近，今日我哋就從多個方面做一個詳細嘅比較，幫你省下做功課嘅時間。
Perodua Aruz 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 72,900 - 77,900，一共有 2 個版本，包括 1.5L X（RM 72,900）、1.5L AV（RM 77,900）等。
Kia Sportage 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 129,639 - 179,320，一共有 4 個版本，包括 2025 1.6T DCT 4WD High（RM 179,320）、2025 1.6T DCT 2WD High（RM 159,320）、2025 2.0L AT 2WD High（RM 139,639）等。
由價錢睇，Perodua Aruz 嘅起價確實比 Kia Sportage 平咗 RM 56,739。如果你預算有限，Perodua 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需要。但亦都要留意，平啲嘅幾千蚊，喺配備上或者會有取舍，具體就要睇你嘅需求。
Perodua Aruz 配備 1.5L 4-cyl，馬力 105 hp。官方油耗 6.0 L/100km。
Kia Sportage 配備 1.5L Turbo，馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。
動力方面，Kia Sportage 嘅 1.5L Turbo 比 Perodua Aruz 嘅 1.5L 4-cyl 多咗 35 匹馬力。不過日常喺市區行，兩款車嘅動力都够用，唔會覺得唔夠力。
Perodua Aruz 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括。
Kia Sportage 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 Drive Wise。
兩款車嘅安全評級一樣，喺呢個級別入面安全配備都算給得好齊全嘅。而家嘅新車安全性都唔差，唔使太擔心呢一點。
Perodua Aruz 車身長 4400 mm，尾箱 400 L。
Kia Sportage 車身長 4400 mm，尾箱 400 L。
兩款車嘅尺寸差唔多一樣，車內空間差別唔大。呢個級別嘅車，日常使用完全够用。
Perodua Aruz 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
Kia Sportage 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
兩款車嘅驅動方式一樣，都係 FWD，日常駕駛感受唔會有太大分別。
總體嚟講，Perodua Aruz 同 Kia Sportage 都係馬來西亞市場幾不錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵仲係睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去做試駕做最後決定。買車係件大事，花啲時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
Auto-First | Liu Tianming
How to view GAC Group's cumulative 30 million vehicles? Not only should we look at the milestone of 30 million vehicles in 29 years, but more importantly, we must look at the value of prioritizing quality and user orientation in the 30 million vehicles, and we must also "connect" the heavy past accumulation with the promising future innovation.
On July 16, the cumulative 30 million vehicles went off the production line, which is a milestone for GAC Group. This "big event" reflects the equal benefit sharing of GAC Group as a Fortune Global 500 "big factory", with multiple global production bases connected simultaneously. GAC Honda P7, GAC Toyota bZ7, Qijing GT7, GAC Aion N60, and GAC Hyper S600 went off the production line sequentially as GAC's 29,999,995th to 29,999,999th vehicles. The 30 millionth vehicle is a right-hand drive version of GAC Trumpchi M8 PHEV exported to Thailand. GAC Group Chairman Feng Xingya handed the keys to the Thai owner's hand, signifying GAC Group pressing the "shortcut key" for electrified GAC, intelligent GAC, innovative GAC, and internationalized GAC.
"Quality is the bottom line that GAC will never cede," said Feng Xingya at the 30 millionth vehicle off-line ceremony. In GAC's development, scale growth has always had quality as the foundation color.
For many years, GAC Group has always adhered to the "Quality First" concept, integrating Honda Total Quality Management (TQM), Toyota Lean Production (TPS), and Lingnan Culture, building a quality management mode centered on "Integrated Innovation". The focus of everything is to create good cars that users can drive with peace of mind, use with less worry, and sit in with comfort.
GAC Group's strict quality control system throughout the chain runs through R&D and production. Before the launch of every product, it must undergo extreme environment tests such as "Five Highs, One Mountain, One Dust" including high cold, high heat, high altitude, high humidity, high corrosion, mountainous, and dusty conditions, completing "Two Winters and One Summer" on-site road tests. At the same time, relying on test fields and laboratories covering 12 major categories and over 1,500 verification sub-items for the whole vehicle, it achieves system-based quality validation.
At the manufacturing end, GAC Group has built the world's first new energy vehicle Lighthouse Factory — GAC Aion Smart Ecological Factory, ensuring stable quality of mass products through a digital intelligent manufacturing system.
In terms of core safety technology, the Xingling Safety Guard System builds four protection dimensions. Eight key systems adopt dual redundancy design, having protected nearly 2 million users, avoiding 6.28 million potential travel risks; the Cassette Battery has cumulatively installed 1.5 million vehicles, with safe driving mileage exceeding 160 billion kilometers; the service side also adds protection guarantees. GAC took the lead in the industry to launch the proprietary "Three Responsibilities" policy, proactively covering battery and intelligent driving assistance issues concerned by users to eliminate user worries about vehicle usage.
User Thinking Engraved in DNA"What users care about, we put in our hearts; what users expect, we go all out for," said Feng Xingya. This user-centric concept has long been deeply integrated into the development genes of GAC Group. Since always, GAC Group has always adhered to the corporate concept of "People-oriented, Integrity-based, Innovation-first", where the core meaning of "People-oriented" is user-oriented.
The user thinking in GAC Group's bones is not simply guessing user needs, but sitting together for face-to-face communication. Currently, GAC regularly holds user Full Open Mic activities, facing problems directly and listening to the users' voice. At the same time, a full-process closed-loop management mechanism is established to ensure that every suggestion can be handled properly, and common problems are optimized for all users at the first time.
In addition, GAC also established a dedicated user insight department, promoted the full-process change from problem discovery to resolution, and ensured user requests have a response and matters have a settlement from the organizational mechanism.
In channel network construction, GAC Group also penetrated user thinking throughout, shifting from "Product-Centered" to "User Scenario and Experience-Centered". On one hand, channel networks sink into counties, with a plan to add 1,000 county-level authorized stores within the year. On the other hand, the "Super Butler" service was launched, achieving 5-second response and 2-hour request handling, guaranteeing user requests are sent and handled quickly.
To solve the inconvenience of charging for new energy users, GAC Group built a "9 Vertical 10 Horizontal" energy supplement network, already covering 31 provinces and 213 cities nationwide, achieving "one station in straight kilometer in core urban areas", with self-operated charging piles exceeding 27,000, among which supercharging piles broke through 20,000, providing convenient energy supplement services for new energy car owners.
Standing on the new starting point of 30 million users, GAC Group gives back to users with real money. GAC officially launched the "GAC Group 30 Million Vehicles Off-Line · Renewal Gratitude Season". GAC Honda, GAC Toyota, GAC Trumpchi, GAC Aion, GAC Hyper, and Qijing Automotive six passenger car brands will launch characteristic policies respectively around new purchase, replacement, to additional purchase.
Polishing the Tech Innovation SignboardWith 30 million as a new starting point, GAC Group continues to polish the tech innovation signboard, accelerating towards the new journey of electrification and intelligence.
In the power field, the Xingyuan Power developed by the "National Distinguished Engineer Team" covers three technologies: Xingyuan Extended Range, Xingyuan Plug-in Hybrid, and Xingyuan Super Twin Engine, which will be mass-produced in more models. Every product must undergo 100,000 hours of dynamometer and whole vehicle verification, equivalent mileage exceeding 10 million kilometers, ensuring that performance remains stable like a rock in all scenarios and regions.
In the "Three Electrics" field, GAC continues to attack industry pain points such as battery super-fast charging and low-temperature range, having built an all-solid-state battery pilot production line, launched extreme energy consumption technology, and the mass-produced Quark Electric Drive Motor has a maximum efficiency breakthrough of 99%, which is the highest level in the industry.
In the intelligent connectivity field, the Super Brain Xingling Architecture continues to evolve, connecting six systems: intelligent driving assistance, intelligent cockpit, power, chassis, body, and vehicle networking, achieving "one brain unified command", with comprehensive performance increased by 40%; Galaxy Smart Cockpit achieves terminal-cloud integration, making the car a true "thinking, understanding hearts" partner. GAC will also fight side by side with top partners such as Huawei, CATL, Didi, Tencent, and Alibaba to build a more powerful AI intelligent ecosystem.
So far, GAC Group's cumulative R&D investment exceeds 62 billion yuan, with a global R&D team exceeding 6,800 people. Continuous technical investment is pushing GAC's products from transportation tools to intelligent travel partners, mobile smart spaces, and green energy ecosystems.
Auto-First View: Upholding Quality Earns User TrustFrom the first complete vehicle off the line to the 30 millionth vehicle delivery, GAC used long-term adherence to quality and safety, as well as the results of transformation to electrification and intelligence, to win the choice and trust of 30 million users.
This user trust is also GAC's confidence to break out in the industry shift. In the first half of this year, GAC Group's sales volume was 773,100 vehicles, with a year-on-year increase of 2.35%, among which new energy vehicle sales volume increased year-on-year by 68.8%; overseas exports broke through 120,000 vehicles, with a year-on-year increase of 132%, running a steady rhythm during the industry's deep reshaping period.
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家揀車嘅時候都會拿 Perodua Aruz 同 GWM Haval H6 嚟比較。呢兩款車價同定位都幾接近，今日我哋就從多個方面做一個詳細嘅比較，幫你節省做功課嘅時間。
Perodua Aruz 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 72,900 - 77,900，一共有 2 個版本，包括 1.5L X（RM 72,900）、1.5L AV（RM 77,900） 等。
GWM Haval H6 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 139,750 - 139,750，一共有 2 個版本，包括 1.5L Turbo Standard（RM 140,000）、1.5L Turbo Premium（RM 155,000） 等。
由價錢睇，Perodua Aruz 嘅起價確實比 GWM Haval H6 平咗 RM 66,850。如果你預算有限，Perodua 嘅入門版已經可以满足日常需要。但都要記住，平嗰幾千塊，可能喺配備上會要有取舍，具體要睇你嘅需要。
Perodua Aruz 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
GWM Haval H6 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
兩款車嘅驅動方式一樣，都係 FWD，日常駕駛感覺唔會有太大分別。
Perodua Aruz 保固 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
GWM Haval H6 保固 7 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Perodua Aruz 同 GWM Haval H6 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭用、日常通勤。如果你更睇重品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰一款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，就揀配置更豐富嗰款。最後都建議兩款都去試駕，親身體驗先係最重要嘅。
總體嚟講，Perodua Aruz 同 GWM Haval H6 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵都要睇你嘅個人需要同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
July, the European Tire Association released a position paper targeting the EU's "Industrial Acceleration Act". The Association welcomes the EU's recognition of tire manufacturing as a "strategic, energy-intensive industry", but believes the draft has critical gaps in "market scope, demand-side incentives, investment support, and regulatory coordination".
The core message of this statement from the Association is clear: the European tire industry is using policy tools to "de-Chinese" this product.
Continued Loss of Market Share, Import Surge is the Main Cause
The data provided by the Association is quite direct. Since 2018, EU tire manufacturers have lost over 12% of their domestic market share.
Regarding passenger car tires, the EU domestic share dropped from 71% in 2018 to 59.6% in 2025; truck and bus tire share dropped from 72% to 60.8%. However, imports surged by 195%, mainly driven by China.
A number often overlooked is: replacement tires account for 75% of total tire sales in the EU, but the current "Industrial Acceleration Act" draft offers no support for the replacement market.
The Association's logic is that the Original Equipment (OE) market is bound to car manufacturers, while the replacement market is the core base for European tire companies. If policies only protect OE but not replacement, the resilience of the European automotive value chain cannot be built.
The main breakthrough point for Chinese tires in the EU is precisely the replacement market. The Association elevated the replacement market to the level of a "strategic component", aiming to pave the way for subsequent demand-side incentives.
The Association's Five Policy Demands
At the same time, the Association proposed a set of targeted demands regarding the draft's gaps, essentially adding a protective layer for European manufacturing.
The first is identity upgrading. Recognizing tires as "strategic components" in both OE and replacement markets, not just as ancillary parts for car manufacturers. This step is to let tires hitch a ride on the industrial support of the "Industrial Acceleration Act".
The second is rules of origin plus procurement priority. The Association supports current customs rules, but requires priority layering on top of this—in public procurement and public support programs, prioritize EU manufacturing, followed by customs union countries, then followed by countries meeting equivalent trade and procurement standards.
This means that even if vulcanized in Vietnam or Thailand, as long as it is not in the EU, customs union, or equivalent country, it is ranked third.
The third is support for retreaded tires. In the commercial vehicle sector, the Association calls for support for EU-manufactured retreaded truck and bus tires. Retreading reduces emissions by 52% compared to new tires, allowing it to carry a decarbonization label while protecting the truck and bus tire industry chain in Europe. Chinese truck and bus tires remain a main import source in the EU; retread support is a lever for European companies to fight the new tire price war.
The fourth is upgrading tire labels and linking them to public procurement. The Association cites Commission data stating that EU tire labels save 45 terawatt-hours of electricity annually and reduce 15 million tons of CO2 emissions. Tires account for only 2% to 3% of the value of a complete vehicle, yet affect vehicle energy efficiency by 20% to 30%. The subtext is: public procurement should prioritize buying high-performance labeled tires and European tires, using demand-side boosting to drive European manufacturing.
The fifth is decarbonization funding and permitting acceleration. The Association demands stronger fiscal support for industrial decarbonization projects, accelerate permitting procedures, and clarify governance rules for "Industrial Manufacturing Acceleration Zones". These are hard requirements for European tire plants to cope with high energy and carbon costs.
This Strategy Aligns with Anti-Dumping Measures
The EU "Industrial Acceleration Act" was originally positioned as a pan-industrial policy, and the tire industry wants to fit itself into a strategic cage, getting decarbonization funds, procurement preferences, and rules of origin protection. This strategy aligns with the EU's implemented anti-dumping and pending anti-subsidy measures on tires from China—trade relief manages "blocking", industrial policy manages "supporting".
But this European self-rescue also has hard constraints. First is cost. European energy, labor, and compliance costs are what they are; policies can boost demand and provide funds, but it is hard to level manufacturing costs to the level of China and Southeast Asia.
Second is the spillover form of Chinese capacity. The Association's "priority layering" can block some, but not all. If Chinese companies build plants in regions with EU tariff preferences such as Serbia and Morocco, the rules of origin issue becomes more complex.
Third is how much the draft will ultimately concede is still unknown. Car manufacturers within the EU may not be willing to be bound by "European priority procurement", and cost pressure will be passed back to vehicles. The Tire Association and vehicle manufacturing interests are not fully aligned.
For Chinese companies, several things need to be done in advance. Overseas origins must withstand scrutiny, and supply chains must withstand tracing. High-end performance, green indicators, and new energy vehicle support are the only viable currency to bypass discrimination. Retreading and service systems can be looked at in advance; once the European truck and bus tire retreading loop is leveraged by policy, tire body supply and retreading cooperation might be new entry points.
This statement from the European Tire Association is not the end of the trade war, it is the prologue to industrial policy wars. For Chinese tires, the EU, this largest export market, the game has upgraded from competing on price to competing on origin, green, and high-end.
In Malaysia's SUV market, many buyers compare Perodua Aruz and Proton X70 when choosing a car. The prices and positioning of these two models are quite similar. Today, we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
The OTR price of Perodua Aruz in Malaysia is RM 72,900 - 77,900, with a total of 2 versions, including 1.5L X (RM 72,900), 1.5L AV (RM 77,900), etc.
The OTR price of Proton X70 in Malaysia is RM 106,800 - 122,300, with a total of 3 versions, including 1.5L Standard 2WD (RM 106,800), 1.5L Executive 2WD (RM 115,800), 1.5L Premium 2WD (RM 122,300), etc.
From a price perspective, the starting price of Perodua Aruz is indeed RM 33,900 cheaper than Proton X70. If your budget is limited, Perodua's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. But be aware, the difference of a few thousand might involve trade-offs in equipment, it depends on your specific requirements.
Perodua Aruz is equipped with a 1.5L 4-cyl, 105 hp. Official fuel consumption 6.0 L/100km.
Proton X70 is equipped with a 1.5L Turbo, 140 hp. Official fuel consumption 7.0 L/100km.
In terms of power, Proton X70's 1.5L Turbo has 35 more horsepower than Perodua Aruz's 1.5L 4-cyl. However, for daily city driving, the power of both cars is sufficient, you won't feel it lacks power.
Perodua Aruz safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include .
Proton X70 safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
Both cars have the same safety rating, safety features are quite comprehensive within this class. New car safety nowadays is not bad, no need to worry too much about this point.
Perodua Aruz body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
Proton X70 body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
The dimensions of both cars are almost the same, interior space difference is not big. For cars in this class, daily use is completely sufficient.
Perodua Aruz warranty 5 years/150,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Proton X70 warranty 5 years/150,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Warranty conditions for both cars are the same, no need to worry about this. Actual maintenance cost depends on the brand's service network and parts prices, suggest asking real owners in car owner groups for experience.
Overall, Perodua Aruz and Proton X70 are both very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends on your personal needs and budget. It is recommended to do your homework, compare quotes from several car dealerships, and then go for a test drive to make the final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending time doing research will never be wrong.
