首頁Mercedes-Benz GLE
搜尋歷史
熱門搜尋
經銷商登入 / 註冊
In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers often compare Honda WR-V and Mazda CX-8 when choosing a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will do a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
The OTR price of Honda WR-V in Malaysia is RM 89,900 - 107,900, with a total of 4 versions, including 2023 1.5L V (RM 99,900), 2023 1.5L E (RM 95,900), 2023 1.5L S (RM 89,900), etc.
The OTR price of Mazda CX-8 in Malaysia is RM 165,360 - 201,360, with a total of 5 versions, including 2025 2.5T 4WD High Plus Petrol (RM 201,360), 2025 2.2L 2WD High Plus Diesel (RM 193,123), 2025 2.5L 2WD High Plus Petrol (RM 186,360), etc.
From the price perspective, Honda WR-V's starting price is indeed RM 75,460 cheaper than Mazda CX-8. If your budget is limited, Honda's entry-level version is already sufficient for daily needs. But note that the few thousand dollars cheaper might involve trade-offs in features, which depends on your specific needs.
Honda WR-V body length is 4400 mm, boot 400 L.
Mazda CX-8 body length is 4500 mm, boot 450 L.
Regarding space, Mazda CX-8's body is 100 mm longer than Honda WR-V, with superior seating space. However, Honda WR-V is more flexible for parking in the city, each has trade-offs.
Honda WR-V uses FWD drive system.
Mazda CX-8 uses FWD drive system.
Both cars have the same drive system, both are FWD, daily driving experience will not differ much.
Honda WR-V and Mazda CX-8 are both mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale price more, you can prioritize the one with better reputation; if you care more about value for money and features, choose the one with richer configuration. Ultimately, it is recommended to test drive both models, as personal experience is the most important.
Overall, Honda WR-V and Mazda CX-8 are both very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends on your personal needs and budget. We suggest doing your research, comparing quotes from several dealerships, and then test driving before making a final decision. Buying a car is a major matter, spending time on research will never be wrong.
In Malaysia's SUV market, many buyers compare the Honda WR-V and Mazda CX-5 when choosing a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
The OTR price for Honda WR-V in Malaysia is RM 89,900 - 107,900, with a total of 4 variants, including 2023 1.5L V (RM 99,900), 2023 1.5L E (RM 95,900), 2023 1.5L S (RM 89,900) etc.
The OTR price for Mazda CX-5 in Malaysia is RM 135,469 - 166,760, with a total of 3 variants, including 2025 2.0L AT 35th Anniversary (RM 316,154), 2025 2.0L AT (RM 296,154), 2025 2.0L MT (RM 294,154) etc.
From a price perspective, the starting price of Honda WR-V is indeed RM 45,569 cheaper than Mazda CX-5. If your budget is limited, Honda's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. However, also note that the few thousand cheaper might have compromises in features, it depends on your specific needs.
Honda WR-V uses FWD drivetrain.
Mazda CX-5 uses FWD drivetrain.
Both cars have the same drivetrain, both are FWD, there won't be much difference in daily driving experience.
Honda WR-V warranty 5 years/unlimited mileage, service interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Mazda CX-5 warranty 5 years/150,000km, service interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Honda WR-V and Mazda CX-5 are both mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, prioritize the one with better reputation; if you care more about cost-performance ratio and features, choose the one with richer configurations. Ultimately, it is recommended to test drive both, experiencing it personally is the most important.
Overall, Honda WR-V and Mazda CX-5 are both very good car models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends mainly on your personal needs and budget. It is recommended to do your research, compare quotes from several car dealers, and then test drive to make a final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending time doing research will never be wrong.
In Malaysia's SUV market, many buyers compare Honda WR-V and Mazda CX-3 when choosing a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning. Today we will do a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
The OTR price of Honda WR-V in Malaysia is RM 89,900 - 107,900, with a total of 4 versions, including 2023 1.5L V (RM 99,900), 2023 1.5L E (RM 95,900), 2023 1.5L S (RM 89,900), etc.
The OTR price of Mazda CX-3 in Malaysia is RM 126,159 - 139,159, with a total of 2 versions, including 2023 2.0L High (RM 139,159), 2023 2.0L Plus (RM 126,159), etc.
Looking at the price, the starting price of Honda WR-V is indeed RM 36,259 cheaper than Mazda CX-3. If your budget is limited, Honda's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. But also note, the few thousand cheaper might involve trade-offs in features, depending on your specific needs.
Honda WR-V is equipped with a 1.5L 4-cyl, 105 hp. Official fuel consumption 6.0 L/100km.
Mazda CX-3 is equipped with a 1.5L Turbo, 140 hp. Official fuel consumption 7.0 L/100km.
In terms of power, the Mazda CX-3's 1.5L Turbo has 35 more horsepower than the Honda WR-V's 1.5L 4-cyl. However, for daily city driving, both cars have sufficient power, and you won't feel like it lacks power.
Honda WR-V's safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include Honda SENSING.
Mazda CX-3's safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include i-Activsense.
Both cars have the same safety rating, safety features are quite comprehensive in this class. New cars nowadays have good safety, no need to worry too much about this.
Honda WR-V body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
Mazda CX-3 body length 4500 mm, trunk 450 L.
In terms of space, the Mazda CX-3 body is 100 mm longer than Honda WR-V, with an advantage in seating space. However, the Honda WR-V is slightly more flexible for parking in the city, each has trade-offs.
Honda WR-V and Mazda CX-3 are both mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, you can prioritize the one with better reputation; if you care more about price-performance ratio and features, choose the one with richer configuration. Ultimately, it is recommended to test drive both, personal experience is the most important.
Overall, Honda WR-V and Mazda CX-3 are both very good models in the Malaysian market. Choosing which one mainly depends on your personal needs and budget. We suggest doing your research, comparing quotes from several car dealers, and then test driving to make a final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending some time doing research will definitely not go wrong.
In Malaysia's SUV market, many buyers compare Honda WR-V and Toyota Corolla Cross when choosing a car. Both cars are quite close in price and positioning, so today we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
The Honda WR-V OTR price in Malaysia is RM 89,900 - 107,900, with a total of 4 variants, including 2023 1.5L V (RM 99,900), 2023 1.5L E (RM 95,900), 2023 1.5L S (RM 89,900), etc.
The Toyota Corolla Cross OTR price in Malaysia is RM 133,800 - 148,800, with a total of 3 variants, including 2026 HEV 1.8L GR Sport (RM 148,800), 2026 HEV 1.8L Standard (RM 140,800), 2026 1.8L Standard (RM 133,800), etc.
In terms of price, the starting price of the Honda WR-V is indeed RM 43,900 cheaper than the Toyota Corolla Cross. If you have a limited budget, the Honda's entry-level version is already sufficient for daily needs. However, be aware that the few thousand cheaper might involve trade-offs in features, specifically depending on your needs.
Honda WR-V comes with a 1.5L 4-cyl, 105 hp. Official fuel consumption 6.0 L/100km.
Toyota Corolla Cross comes with a 1.5L Turbo, 140 hp. Official fuel consumption 7.0 L/100km.
In terms of power, the Toyota Corolla Cross 1.5L Turbo has 35 more horsepower than the Honda WR-V 1.5L 4-cyl. However, for daily city driving, both cars have sufficient power, you won't feel underpowered.
Honda WR-V body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
Toyota Corolla Cross body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
Both cars' dimensions are almost the same, interior space difference is not significant. For this class of cars, daily use is fully sufficient.
Both Honda WR-V and Toyota Corolla Cross are mainstream choices in the Malaysia market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, you can prioritize the one with better reputation; if you care more about cost-performance and features, then choose the one with richer configuration. Ultimately, it is recommended to test drive both, personal experience is the most important.
Overall, both Honda WR-V and Toyota Corolla Cross are very good models in the Malaysia market. Which one to choose mainly depends on your personal needs and budget. It is recommended to do your research, compare quotes from multiple dealerships, and then test drive to make a final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending time on research will definitely not go wrong.
In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers compare the Honda WR-V and Toyota Corolla Cross when choosing a car. These two models are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
The OTR price of the Honda WR-V in Malaysia is RM 89,900 - 107,900, with a total of 4 versions, including 2023 1.5L V (RM 99,900), 2023 1.5L E (RM 95,900), 2023 1.5L S (RM 89,900), etc.
The OTR price of the Toyota Corolla Cross in Malaysia is RM 133,800 - 148,800, with a total of 3 versions, including 2026 HEV 1.8L GR Sport (RM 148,800), 2026 HEV 1.8L Standard (RM 140,800), 2026 1.8L Standard (RM 133,800), etc.
From the price perspective, the Honda WR-V starting price is indeed RM 43,900 cheaper than the Toyota Corolla Cross. If your budget is limited, Honda's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. However, also note, the few thousand cheaper might involve compromises on features, it depends on your specific needs.
The Honda WR-V safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include Honda SENSING.
The Toyota Corolla Cross safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include TSS (PCS, LDA, ACC, LTA).
Both cars have the same safety rating, and safety features in this segment are quite comprehensive. New cars nowadays have good safety standards, no need to worry too much about this.
The Honda WR-V body length is 4400 mm, trunk capacity 400 L.
The Toyota Corolla Cross body length is 4400 mm, trunk capacity 400 L.
Both cars have almost the same dimensions, and the interior space difference is not significant. Cars in this segment are more than enough for daily use.
Both Honda WR-V and Toyota Corolla Cross are mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, you might prioritize the one with better reputation; if you care more about price-performance ratio and features, then choose the one with richer configuration. Finally, it is suggested to test drive both, as personal experience is the most important.
Overall, both Honda WR-V and Toyota Corolla Cross are very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends on your personal needs and budget. It is recommended to do your homework, compare quotes from several dealers, and then go for a test drive to make the final decision. Buying a car is a big thing, spending some time doing homework will never be wrong.
In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers compare Honda WR-V and Toyota Yaris Cross when choosing a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning. Today we will do a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to save you time on research.
Honda WR-V OTR price in Malaysia is RM 89,900 - 107,900, with a total of 4 versions, including 2023 1.5L V (RM 99,900), 2023 1.5L E (RM 95,900), 2023 1.5L S (RM 89,900), etc.
Toyota Yaris Cross OTR price in Malaysia is RM 99,900 - 109,900, with a total of 2 versions, including 2026 1.5L Standard (RM 99,900), 2026 HEV 1.5L Standard (RM 109,900), etc.
From a price perspective, the Honda WR-V starting price is indeed RM 10,000 cheaper than Toyota Yaris Cross. If your budget is limited, Honda's entry-level version can meet daily needs. But also note, the few thousand difference might involve compromises on features, it depends on your specific needs.
Honda WR-V equipped with 1.5L 4-cyl, 105 hp power. Official fuel consumption 6.0 L/100km.
Toyota Yaris Cross equipped with 1.5L 4-cyl, 105 hp power. Official fuel consumption 6.0 L/100km.
Both cars use the same powertrain, the driving experience is basically no difference. Fuel consumption is also similar, no need to worry too much about this.
Honda WR-V safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety system includes Honda SENSING.
Toyota Yaris Cross safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety system includes TSS.
Both cars have the same safety rating, safety features are quite comprehensive for this class. New car safety nowadays is not bad, no need to worry too much about this.
Honda WR-V body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
Toyota Yaris Cross body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
Both cars dimensions are almost identical, interior space difference is not large. For cars in this class, completely sufficient for daily use.
Honda WR-V and Toyota Yaris Cross are mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use, daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, you can prioritize the one with better reputation; if you care more about value for money and features, choose the model with richer features. Finally, it is recommended to test drive both, personal experience is the most important.
Overall, Honda WR-V and Toyota Yaris Cross are very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends on your personal needs and budget. Everyone is advised to do your research, compare quotes from several dealerships, and then test drive to make a final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending time on research is never wrong.
In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers compare the Honda WR-V and Toyota Yaris Cross when choosing a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
The Honda WR-V OTR price in Malaysia is RM 89,900 - 107,900, with a total of 4 versions, including 2023 1.5L V (RM 99,900), 2023 1.5L E (RM 95,900), 2023 1.5L S (RM 89,900), etc.
The Toyota Yaris Cross OTR price in Malaysia is RM 99,900 - 109,900, with a total of 2 versions, including 2026 1.5L Standard (RM 99,900), 2026 HEV 1.5L Standard (RM 109,900), etc.
From a price perspective, the Honda WR-V starting price is indeed RM 10,000 cheaper than the Toyota Yaris Cross. If your budget is limited, Honda's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. But also note that the few thousand difference might involve trade-offs in features, depending on your specific needs.
The Honda WR-V safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), with active safety systems including Honda SENSING.
The Toyota Yaris Cross safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), with active safety systems including TSS.
Both cars have the same safety rating; safety features in this segment are quite comprehensive. New cars nowadays generally have good safety, so there is no need to worry too much about this.
The Honda WR-V body length is 4400 mm, with a trunk capacity of 400 L.
The Toyota Yaris Cross body length is 4400 mm, with a trunk capacity of 400 L.
The dimensions of both cars are almost identical, with little difference in interior space. For this segment, it is more than sufficient for daily use.
The Honda WR-V uses a FWD drivetrain.
The Toyota Yaris Cross uses a FWD drivetrain.
Both cars have the same drivetrain, both are FWD, so there won't be a big difference in daily driving feel.
Overall, both the Honda WR-V and Toyota Yaris Cross are excellent models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends mainly on your personal needs and budget. It is recommended to do your research, compare quotes from multiple dealerships, and go for a test drive before making a final decision. Buying a car is a big deal; spending time on research is never a mistake.
On August 17, Geely Automobile announced its mid-year 2026 performance. Almost at the same time, a more symbolic handover was also taking place.
Li Shufu resigned as Chairman and Executive Director of Geely Automobile Holdings Limited, with An Conghui taking over as Chairman. For Geely, amidst simple personnel adjustments, the enterprise achieved a governance upgrade after a new phase of development.
After all, today Geely Automobile has set its 2030 goal at sales volume over 6.5 million units and revenue exceeding 1 trillion yuan. Having reached the current scale, how to establish a systemic, professional, and young management system, to let Geely transform from being driven by "one person" to truly becoming the cause of "a group of people", has become key to supporting the next round of growth.
Right at this node, Geely presented a semi-annual report with considerable weight. In the first half of the year, Geely's total sales volume exceeded 1.42 million units, total revenue reached 173.6 billion yuan, up 15% year-on-year, maintaining growth for six consecutive years; core net profit attributable to shareholders reached 9.68 billion yuan, up 46% year-on-year, profit growth significantly outpaced revenue growth; gross margin reached 17.9%, core net profit margin increased to 5.6%, revenue per vehicle increased 16% year-on-year to 112,000 yuan. By the end of June, cash reserves further reached a historic high of 69.56 billion yuan.
If the management handover solves the question of "who will lead Geely forward in the future", then the semi-annual report this year answers what kind of Geely the new management team is taking over. At least based on the current portfolio, An Conghui is taking over an automotive group with a stable financial foundation, a gradually clear brand matrix, rapid expansion in overseas markets, while still possessing ample technology and cash reserves.
Of course, a good hand does not mean the game will be easy. Geely's full-year sales target for this year reached 3.45 million, completed 1.423 million in the first half, still needs to complete over 2 million in the second half; after rapid growth in new energy vehicle sales, the mainstream market of 120,000 to 250,000 yuan still needs to strengthen "mid-range products"; after overseas sales exceeded 470,000, how to move from exports to truly local operations has become a new exam question; meanwhile, "One Geely" still needs to continue to solve the efficiency problems behind multiple brands, multiple platforms, and a huge organizational system...
At this time, what is truly worth discussing in this semi-annual report is no longer how much money Geely earned. After the important management handover, they are jointly answering: When Geely goes from a 3 million unit-level automaker to a 6.5 million unit-level global automotive group, what does it rely on to achieve the next round of growth?
Aiming for One Million Units, Geely's Globalization Reached the Moment to "Change Track"
One of the most notable changes Geely witnessed in the first half of the year was overseas markets. Data shows that in the first half of the year, Geely Automobile overseas sales exceeded 474,000 units, up 158% year-on-year. Among them, new energy vehicle overseas sales reached 277,000 units, up 585% year-on-year, new energy vehicles accounted for 58.5% of overseas sales proportion. By the first half of the year, Geely has covered 114 core overseas markets, global channels exceeded 2,000.
Such growth directly changed Geely's goals set at the beginning of the year.
At the mid-year performance conference, An Conghui, Chairman of Geely Automobile Holdings Limited, announced raising the 2026 overseas sales target from 640,000 units to 920,000 units, and further proposed challenging 1 million units. The more long-term goal is even more aggressive; in the future, Geely hopes two-thirds of sales come from overseas.
The importance of this sentence may be even greater than "exporting one million units" itself. Because if calculated based on Geely's 2030 sales target of over 6.5 million units, two-thirds means in the future Geely may need to support a sales scale of millions of units overseas. At that time, overseas markets will not be a supplement to Chinese sales but must truly become core business on par with the Chinese market.
Therefore, what Geely is doing now is no longer just "selling more cars abroad".
Gan Jiayue, CEO of Geely Automobile Holdings Limited, stated that Geely is building an overseas system of "One Geely". Zeekr, Lynk & Co, Geely, and other brands share middle and back-office resources, and establish different scale goals around Pan-European, ASEAN, Latin America & Africa, Eastern Europe, Central Asia, and Middle East regions. Among them, Pan-European market target reaches 600,000 units, ASEAN 500,000 units, Latin America & Africa 400,000 units, Eastern Europe 300,000 units, Central Asia & Middle East 200,000 units, together forming a 2 million unit overseas foundation. This is also what Geely internationalization calls the "123456" strategy.
Overseas goals have changed, and the methods to achieve these numbers are all different.
In the past, the most typical path for Chinese cars going overseas was producing domestically and exporting via trade; one step further, independently building factories locally. Now, Geely is trying to utilize industrial resources accumulated from years of global mergers and acquisitions and cooperation to turn overseas partners' existing capacity into its own global manufacturing network.
An Conghui revealed that Geely's overseas manufacturing system has already begun to take shape. Malaysia Proton factory is upgrading to a 500,000 unit Southeast Asian production base; Spain Ford factory has about 500,000 units capacity, will produce multiple Geely brand models in the future; Volvo Europe factory can take on Geely's high-end products; Renault合作的 Brazil project planned capacity about 300,000 units. Geely summarizes this as "industrial symbiotic" going overseas, that is, using existing resources of partners like Volvo, Proton, Renault, Ford, etc., to accelerate localization with a relatively lighter asset model.
The value of this system will be more obvious in the environment where global trade barriers are increasing. For an enterprise planning for most future sales to come from overseas, true globalization is having R&D, production, supply chain, channels, and after-sales service capabilities in different markets. To this, Gan Jiayue specifically emphasized at the press conference "whether after-sales service can be done well is one of the important marks of whether Chinese automakers can successfully go global", which actually explains that Geely's understanding of globalization is changing.
From selling products to managing markets, then to managing local industrial systems, this is a layer of change behind Geely's export numbers that deserves more attention. Moreover, overseas growth is turning back to improve Geely's profit structure. Taking Galaxy Xingyuan as an example, it undertakes the task of sales volume domestically, but overseas markets, due to higher selling prices and profit space, can contribute better revenue per vehicle. In the first half of the year, Xingyuan exported 87,000 units, accounting for over 40% of Galaxy brand exports, some overseas market selling prices significantly higher than domestic.
In other words, past exports solved "selling more cars", in the future Geely hopes to solve "where to sell cars for more profit".
Strengthen Both Ends, Next Step is to Strengthen the "Waist"
However, the beautiful numbers in the semi-annual report do not mean Geely has no problems. At the performance meeting, An Conghui directly pointed out the most realistic shortcoming in the current product structure: Geely new energy still lacks a strong enough "mid-range product".
Today Geely's product matrix two ends are already quite clear.
High-end market, Zeekr has gradually built price and brand support. In the first half of the year, Zeekr sales reached 178,400 units, up 97% year-on-year, sales accounted for 12.5% of Geely total sales, but contributed 31.7% of revenue, average transaction price around 350,000 yuan, meaning Zeekr is undertaking the important task of Geely improving revenue per vehicle and profit structure. The other end, Galaxy has established scale advantages. In the first half of the year, Galaxy sales close to 520,000 units, Xingyuan and other products became important volume-driving models.
What truly needs strengthening is the middle.
120,000 to 250,000 yuan is exactly one of the most cruel and largest mainstream battlefields for China's new energy vehicles today. This market faces not a single brand, but a product group formed by many domestic new energy brands densely layout. Consumers are extremely sensitive to range, space, intelligent driving, cockpit, hybrid efficiency, and even price.
Of course, Geely is not without products. Galaxy E5, Starship 7, and Lynk & Co some models have already entered this market, but from the whole new energy matrix perspective, there is still a need for more "mid-range forces" that can continuously stand at the top of niche markets and form stable monthly sales volumes. This is why the second half of the year is so important for Geely.
Gan Jiayue stated that Galaxy TT, Galaxy Warship 700, and Lynk & Co 07 GT, New Lynk & Co Z20, and other products are entering the market one after another, essentially bearing the same task: to let Geely new energy's sales structure further transform from "few star models + high-end brands" to a product matrix with multiple stable pivot points. According to Geely announced plans, Galaxy will also expand mainstream market coverage through featured new products, main model upgrades, etc., while Lynk & Co 07 GT aims for the 150,000 to 200,000 yuan B-class plug-in hybrid wagon market.
An automotive group that reached 3 million units, 4 million units, and future 6.5 million units scale cannot always rely on one or two hit products to support growth. In the second half of the year, what Geely truly needs to prove is whether it can establish a whole row of "mid-range forces". This is the first product system exam that "One Geely" must accept after completing brand sorting.
"One Geely" Starts Subtraction, Profit Sheet Starts Addition
In the past decade or so, Geely built a huge brand and technology system through acquisitions, incubation, and internal innovation. It helped Geely complete the leap from a Chinese independent automaker to a global automotive group, but following this came multiple brands, multiple platforms, multiple R&D teams, multiple sales systems, and even product cross-over in similar price ranges.
During the industry's high-growth period, this model could cover efficiency problems through incremental growth; when the industry enters stock competition, repeated R&D, repeated procurement, repeated channels, and internal product competition will directly reflect on the profit sheet. Therefore, the most important significance of "One Geely" is to do a "subtraction" to the complex system left behind by past rapid expansion.
Gan Jiayue revealed that after "One Geely" integration, Geely has adjusted product planning with cross-over, reducing product quantity by about 20%. At the same time, R&D starts sharing vehicle architecture, electronic-electrical architecture, three-electric, assisted driving, and smart cockpit technology resources; procurement promotes joint procurement; manufacturing coordinates production; channels and after-sales gradually co-build, middle and back-office human resources, finance, legal, and other resources also begin coordination.
These changes have finally entered the financial statements. In the first half of the year, Geely's administrative expense ratio decreased 0.2 percentage points year-on-year to 1.7%, R&D investment ratio decreased 0.3 percentage points to 5.2%; in the case of rapid overseas business expansion, sales expense ratio still remains basically flat compared to the same period last year. At the same time, Geely's total R&D investment still reached 9.061 billion yuan, up 8% year-on-year.
Even more noteworthy is that in the first half of this year, Geely continued to actively compress supplier payment terms, currently supplier payment terms have been unified to within 60 days, small and medium suppliers further shortened to within 30 days; listed company accounts payable turnover days decreased from 115 days last year to 103 days, second quarter further dropped to 96 days.
For automakers, extending payment terms can improve short-term cash flow, shortening payment terms means true money flows out earlier. Geely chose the latter, essentially using its own cash reserves to exchange for supply chain stability. By the end of June, Geely cash reserves still reached a historic high of 69.56 billion yuan.
So, the value of 69.56 billion yuan besides "Geely has a lot of money on the ledger", it also gave Geely the qualification to make long-term choices in the industry's low-profit cycle.
Gasoline Vehicles Are Another Card in Geely's Globalization
There is another number in the semi-annual report that is easily overlooked.
In the first half of the year, Geely gasoline and gasoline hybrid model sales reached 623,500 units, down 8.8% year-on-year. Surface appearance seems not very eye-catching. But Gan Jiayue responded that the same period China gasoline and gasoline hybrid market overall decreased about 17%, Geely decline significantly smaller than market, thus instead achieving market share increase.
In past few years, some automakers equated "comprehensive new energy transformation" with quickly exiting gasoline vehicles, but for an ultra-large automotive group like Geely, the answer is obviously more complex. So what Geely did to gasoline vehicles was redefinition, laying out from harmless and intelligentization two directions.
Gan Jiayue pointed out that in the future Geely will no longer continue to develop traditional pure gasoline products, but gradually transition to i-HEV Smart Engine hybrid, reducing fuel consumption through electrification, while moving intelligent cockpit, assisted driving, and other capabilities formed in new energy era to gasoline foundation.
Currently i-HEV has covered Emgrand, Xingyue L, Xingrui and other main products, within the year will also add 3 model types, year-end i-HEV plan to hit monthly sales over 30,000 units, and enter European, Asia-Pacific, UK, Australia New Zealand and other overseas markets in 2027. In this way, China Star's role will also change. In the first half of the year, China Star sales exceeded 580,000 units, continuing to contribute stable sales and profits to Geely. For today's Geely, cash flow created by gasoline vehicles can continue to support large-scale investment in new energy, AI, globalization, etc.; after i-HEV transformation, China Star can again become an important product tool for Geely entering some overseas markets.
This strategy is actually a very realistic technical route selection, letting different energy forms serve different markets. Pure electric suits mature infrastructure markets, plug-in hybrid, extended-range cover more new energy scenarios, i-HEV adapts to areas with insufficient charging facilities, methanol can enter more special energy markets. Geely ultimately hopes to establish a system where five technical routes parallel: pure electric, plug-in hybrid, extended-range, gasoline hybrid, alcohol-hydrogen.
From this perspective, gasoline vehicles are not Geely new energy transformation's "historical burden", but are being re-constructed as a tool in the globalization era.
在行業從規模競爭進入利潤競爭、從價格競爭進入價值競爭、從單點產品競爭進入體系競爭之後，決定一家车企上限的因素，已經從單款爆款、單次資本運作或者單位時間的銷量衝刺，轉向組織效率、戰略定力、技術複用能力和全球經營能力。李書福用他獨特的方式完成了又一次「戰略轉型」——從企業家到制度設計者的轉型。
文 | 智駕網 零醬
編輯 | 浪浪山與明知山
63 歲的李書福在 8 月 17 日又佔據了一步先手。
他在吉利汽車在港交所上市的第 21 個年頭宣佈退居幕後，將接力棒交給了吉利自己培養的繼承人安聰慧，安聰慧生於 1970 年，今年 56 歲。
中國最大的民營汽車集團之一吉利率先完成了去家族化管理的歷史性一步。
01.
李書福的成績單
有「汽車狂人」之稱的李書福在自己卸任吉利控股董事長的講話中為自己的業績做了一段簡單的總結：
2005 年 5 月 19 日，吉利汽車正式在港交所上市交易，股票價格從 2005 年 5 月 19 日的 0.4 元港幣，到 2026 年 8 月 12 日的 18.06 元港幣。公司市值從 16 億港幣，到 2026 年 8 月 12 日的 1948 億。分紅從 2005 年的 4000 萬港元到 2025 年的 54 億港元。
李書福言下之意，吉利的業績對得起股東和投資人。
在辭任吉利汽車控股董事會主席及執行董事之後，李書福依然保留了終身榮譽主席一職，與此同時，安聰慧接任董事會主席，桂生悅轉任董事會副主席，淦家閱出任行政總裁。
對於李書福的離任，吉利汽車董事會副主席桂生悅將其定義稱為「吉利汽車戰略級的組織進化宣言」：
「李書福的卸任（董事會主席）和安聰慧的接任，是一場去家族化的宣言，標誌著吉利汽車已經從創始人驅動的創業期和發展期，邁向了由制度和團隊驅動的成熟期。」
「企業將不再依賴個人魅力和權威，而是依賴組織系統和人才梯隊。它意味著吉利汽車未來治理將更加透明，管理更加科學。對於內部人才而言，也是打破天花板的信號。有利於讓企業給股東帶來更大回報，為國家作出更大貢獻。」
當然，63 歲的李書福並未完全離開。
他將繼續擔任浙江吉利控股集團董事長，同時在該集團旗下的其他職位暫時保持不變。
對於為何選擇在此時退出一線，李書福直言，「汽車產業是沒有盡頭的馬拉松，企業傳承與價值觀取向決定企業的可持續發展能力」，而「人是決定企業文化傳承、價值觀取向的核心要素。」
對於一家橫跨多個品牌、多個技術路線、多個海外市場的大型车企來說，戰略定力仍然需要強中樞，經營執行則需要職業化分權。
眼下吉利的結構，更接近「創始人定方向，經理人跑系統」，既保證了企業戰略的連續性，又為職業經理人團隊騰出了充分的經營自主權。
而一個更深的背景是，李書福認為，「全球經濟一體化、投資貿易自由化的時代已經結束了。新的經濟全球化時代正在形成。吉利要扎根中國市場，加速佈局全球市場。」
而要实现 2/3 的銷量來自海外，李書福給安聰慧留下了一個遍佈歐盟、英國、馬來西亞等地的本土化生產網絡，但要完成這一願景需要新生代完成。
正如桂生悅所說言：
「任何事業都需要更為年輕的身體，也更為年輕的智慧。」
豐田、大眾曾經是吉利追趕學習的目標，但李書福比豐田喜一郎走的更远，他在自己任上完成了公司的去家族化；在 2024 年初，安聰慧喊出「做新能源時代的大眾」之後，在當年 9 月，李書福敏銳機警的發布了振聾發聵的《台州宣言》，開啟了戰略整合、收縮擴張，對多品牌模式進行反思調整持續至今的「一個吉利」。
李書福的卸任選擇了一個恰當的時機，他以吉利上市以為最好的一份半年報收尾：
上半年，吉利汽車實現營收 1736 億元，同比增長 15%；核心歸母淨利潤 96.8 億元，同比增長 46%；毛利率提升至 17.9%；海外銷量 47.4 萬輛，同比增長 158%。
這份「量價利齊升」的半年報，恰恰是在李書福逐步退出日常管理、職業經理人全面接棒後交出的首份成績單。
業績兌現與治理切換的同一時間窗口落地驗證了一個關鍵命題：當創始人主動讓渡管理權杖、企業完成從「家族驅動」到「制度驅動」的蛻變，經營質量反而實現了躍升。
02.
「李書福的吉利」變成「制度的吉利」
據全國工商聯數據，中國民營企業中約有 80% 為家族企業，而改革開放第一代創業者已普遍進入 60 至 70 歲的年齡區間，「創一代」向「企二代」的權力交接正在批量發生。
在民營企業中，「創始人退出」往往伴隨著「二代接班」的劇本，但吉利選擇了完全不同的路徑。
李書福之子李星星雖為吉利控股監事和股東，但近年來未在吉利體系核心出現；女兒李妮也未進入吉利核心管理層，主要经营圍繞吉利的配套生意。
這意味著，李書福選擇的不是「子承父業」的傳統路徑，而是依托職業經理人團隊實現企業的現代化治理與可持續發展。
事實上，吉利的去家族化早在二十年前就已啟動。
2002 年 5 月，吉利集團進行公司制改造，李書福的三個兄弟完全退出決策層，職業經理人開始進入高管層。2003 年 3 月，浙江吉利控股集團有限公司正式成立。
而李書福本人的的退出路徑，也呈現出清晰的「由淺入深、由局部到全局」的特徵。
2021 年 7 月，李書福卸任吉利汽車集團有限公司董事長。
2022 年 3 月，退出浙江吉利汽車有限公司董事。
2026 年 6 月，李書福在重慶論壇上曾系統闡述企業傳承理念，明確表示構建「治理架構更加清晰、權責更加明確、運轉高效、全球合規的現代企業運營體系」，從治理架構、人事調整、內生人才培養到《台州宣言》發布，傳承工作已在有序推進。
李書福當月卸任極氪智能科技董事長，領克汽車董事長同步變更。
從家族制企業到現代股份制企業，吉利走了二十多年，到今天終於完成了最关键的一步，也是最具象徵意義的一步。
03.
「一個吉利」下的平台企業
在吉利的官方公告中，將此次的管理層調整定義為：
「根据公司治理要求和幹部梯隊建設規劃，進一步完善職業經理人授權經營機制，推進公司可持續健康發展」，目標是「以現代企業治理體系做强『一個吉利』」。
也就是說，創始人退出與「一個吉利」戰略是一體兩面。
吉利的「一個吉利」啟動，始于 2024 年 9 月發布的《台州宣言》。
當時這份宣言的核心，不是簡單收縮戰線，而是面對行業價格戰、技術路線重疊和多品牌並行帶來的資源分散，開始系統推動戰略聚焦、內部整合和協同提效。
到 2025 年 1 月，吉利進一步把《台州宣言》具體化為「一三三」思路和「兩橫七縱」架構：
吉利汽車集團整合吉利、銀河、雷達、翼真等主流業務，極氪科技集團整合極氪與領克，高端新能源板塊由此歸入同一主體，技術、產品、供應鏈和組織體系開始按統一邏輯重組。
隨後，極氪與領克的股權整合落地，標誌著「一個吉利」從業務協同推進到資本層面的實質整合；再往後，極氪私有化、從紐交所退市並重新回歸吉利汽車主平台，則進一步把分散在外部資本市場的高端新能源資產重新收攏到統一上市體系之內。
進入 2026 年後，吉利又提出「一個吉利，全面領先」2030 戰略目標，並著手理順吉利汽車集團與吉利汽車控股關係、關停並轉冗餘主體。
在今天之前，「一個吉利」經歷了從戰略宣示、品牌整合、股權重組和資本歸攏，而到了今年中報與管理層調整這一時點，它開始表現出更清晰的制度含義：
只有創始人不再執著於對各個子公司的直接控制，體系化整合才能真正落地。
吉利正在成為一個資源配置更集中、協同效率更高、全球化能力更強的统一平台。
它選擇了在最好的時候，完成最具戰略性的組織調整。
2026 年上半年，吉利汽車的經營規模與盈利質量同步提升，總銷量突破 142 萬輛創同期新高；總收入超 1700 億元，同比增長 15%，連續六年正增長；核心歸母淨利潤達 96.8 億元，同比增長 46%，顯著跑贏營收增速；毛利率提升至 17.9%，單車核心歸母淨利潤同比提升 45% 至 6806 元。
極氪上半年銷量超 17.8 萬輛，僅佔總銷量的 12.5%，卻貢獻了 31.7% 的營業收入，平均客單價約 35 萬元，已超越 BBA 等傳統豪華品牌。
吉利銀河上半年銷量近 52 萬輛，躋身全球新能源前三；中國星上半年銷量超 58 萬輛，連續第 10 年蟬聯中國品牌燃油乘用車銷量冠軍。
這種「高端樹品牌、主流走規模」的雙輪驅動格局，正是職業經理人團隊在「一個吉利」框架下統籌資源的結果。
而伴隨「一個吉利」戰略深化落實，行政費用率同比下降 0.2 百分點至 1.7%，研發投入比下降 0.3 百分點至 5.2%，而研發投入絕對值卻同比提升 8% 至 90.6 億元，在加大技術投入的同時，通過平台化協同和採購集中顯著提升了資源使用效率。
高質量增長為吉利帶來充裕的資金儲備，截至 2026 年 6 月末，資金儲備達 695.6 億元。
但吉利管理層自己並沒有把這份財報包裝成狂飆式勝利，業績會上，桂生悅將其定義為「亮眼但不驚豔的財報」。
在這個定位背後，2026 年上半年，中國新能源汽車銷量達到 744.6 萬輛，汽車出口達到 509.6 萬輛，規模還在擴張；但行業利潤持續承壓。
國家統計局數據顯示，上半年汽車行業營業收入約 5.19 萬億元，同比增長 1.8%；營業成本約 4.61 萬億元，同比增長 2.8%；利潤總額約 1954 億元，同比下降 20%，銷售利潤率僅 3.8%。
而根據中國汽車流通協會的公開分析，2026 年 1—5 月汽車行業利潤率只有 3.4%，處於偏低水平。
中汽協的數據則更為刺眼：上半年行業平均利潤率已壓到 1.6%。
儘管幾個口徑之間有統計範圍和時間窗口差異，但結論一致：
中國汽車業仍在增長，但賺錢難度顯著上升。
在管理層看來，2026 年的吉利儘管跑贏了行業，沒有脫離週期；盈利質量在改善，但行業的下行壓力、國內需求承壓、晶片和原材料價格上漲、競爭白熱化，這些變量仍然存在。
在中期業績會上，吉利管理層將 AI 實力認定為吉利應對市場變局的最新抓手，全域 AI 將賦能智擎混動、數字底盤、電驅、儲能等多個環節，推動汽車向「智慧生命體」進化。
AI 將成為吉利一條足夠長的技术主線，把銀河、極氪、領克等不同品牌，以及研發、製造、供應鏈和海外業務組織到同一個平台框架中，形成跨品牌、跨業務、跨市場的能力複用，從而更有機會守住利潤和估值。
「一個吉利」正式這套平台中最底層的規模基礎。
04.
「從未失敗」的安聰慧
如果说李書福是「一個吉利」的戰略設計師，那麼安聰慧就是這一藍圖最忠實的執行者和最堅定的推進者。
1996 年加入吉利、從審計員起步的安聰慧，用三十年時間走完了從基層到董事會主席的完整路徑：
他親手打造了累計銷量超 380 萬輛的帝豪 EC7，牽頭完成了吉利併購沃爾沃後的「消化」過程，主導研發了 SEA 浩瀚架構，創立了領克和極氪兩大高端品牌。
這樣的履歷，使他在吉利內部並不僅僅是一個管理者，更熟悉這家公司過去二十多年能力積累的形成過程。
李書福曾如此評價這位接班人：
「安聰慧总在挑戰最難的任務，且從未失敗。」
今天，繼任者安聰慧接過的，不僅是一個年銷 142 萬輛、營收 1736 億元的汽車集團，更是一份關於「全球化」與「智能化」的戰略遺產。
在出海維度，李書福用二十年時間為吉利鋪就了「產業共生型」的全球化路基：從收購沃爾沃獲得歐洲製造與品牌基因，到與寶騰、雷諾、福特建立合作夥伴關係，再到 12 座海外工廠、2000 家海外渠道、114 個核心市場的佈局。
安聰慧要做的，是將這份戰略遺產從「佈局期」推向「收穫期」。
他在業績發布會上明確表示，吉利未來超六成銷量將來自海外市場，沃爾沃歐洲工廠將於 2028 年起承接吉利體系內高檔豪華車的生產，與福特合資的西班牙工廠同樣將於 2028 年投產。
安聰慧正在將李書福「買下來」的全球資產，轉化為吉利「走出去」的製造能力和品牌能力。
而在相對抽象的技術領域，李書福為吉利搭起了天地一體化的科技生態，包括晶片、大模型、衛星、具身智能機器人，WAM 世界行為模型，1+2+N 多智能體協同框架，完成了技術的「從 0 到 1」和生態的「從 1 到 N」。
安聰慧則需要將這 N 多的技術生態推向市場：讓千里浩瀚 G-ASD 的智駕能力、WAM 世界行為模型的 AI 底座、2030 實驗室的前瞻技術，真正嵌入到每一款量產車型中，轉化為用戶的付費意願和資本市場的估值認可。
在業績會上，桂生悅還代表管理層向股東表態：
「吉利汽車將是安聰慧唯一擔任主席的上市公司，這意味著吉利將進一步落實《台州宣言》，落實『一個吉利』戰略。」
這一現場解讀向外界傳遞兩個信號：一是安聰慧將全身心聚焦 0175.HK，二是吉利所有汽車主業資源將向港股上市主體進一步集中。
安聰慧這位從審計員成長為董事會主席的職業經理人，始終是「一個吉利」最堅定的操盤手——他既是這一戰略的受益者（從極氪 CEO 升任控股集團 CEO 再任上市公司董事會主席），也是這一戰略最徹底的執行者。
他或許正在證明：李書福最好的戰略遺產，不是某一个品牌、某一項技術或某一座工廠，而是一個能夠自我進化、自我傳承的現代企業治理體系。
而他自己，正是這一體系培育出的第一個「成品」。
「要做實做強做大 0175。」
這是新晉掌舵人的第一個目標，希望李書福的判斷依然準確，安聰慧「從未失敗」。
寫在最後：
2026 年是吉利控股集團創立四十週年。
四十年來，從台州一家民營小廠到年銷百萬輛級的全球化汽車集團，吉利的成長史是中國汽車工業崛起的縮影。
而今，當李書福將管理權杖交予安聰慧、淦家閱等職業經理人團隊，吉利正在完成一次更為深刻的蛻變：
從「李書福的吉利」變成「制度的吉利」，從「中國的吉利」變成「世界的吉利」。
當然，就現今行業形勢來看，全年 345 萬輛的銷量目標、衝刺 100 萬輛的海外目標、全域 AI 技術的商業化落地，吉利下半年的挑戰依然艱巨。
而在行業從規模競爭進入利潤競爭，從價格競爭進入價值競爭，從單點產品競爭進入體系競爭之後，決定一家车企上限的因素，已經從單款爆款、單次資本運作或者單位時間的銷量衝刺，轉向組織效率、戰略定力、技術複用能力和全球經營能力。
吉利在這一輪中交出的答案，是用一份盈利質量改善的中報，去托舉一場治理重組；再用一場治理重組，為下一輪增長騰挪出更穩定的組織底盤。
對李書福而言，這意味著他用中國民營企業少有的方式完成了從企業家到制度設計者的又一次「戰略轉型」。
對吉利而言，這意味著「一個吉利」開始從戰略口號進入制度階段。
而對於行業而言，這意味著中國頭部民營車企的競爭，正在從產品和市場層面，進一步延伸到治理和組織層面。
In Malaysia's SUV market, many buyers compare Proton X90 and Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV when choosing a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning. Today we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to save you time on research.
Proton X90 OTR price in Malaysia is RM 106,800 - 122,800, with a total of 4 versions, including 2026 1.5T Prime X (RM 122,800), 2026 1.5T Prime (RM 116,800), 2026 1.5T Lite (RM 106,800), etc.
Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV OTR price in Malaysia is RM 129,750 - 129,750, with a total of 2 versions, including 2025 1.5T 90km CSH (RM 129,750), What charging methods does the Tiggo 7 PHEV support? Can it be charged using a home power socket? (RM 117,478), etc.
From a price perspective, the starting price of Proton X90 is indeed RM 22,950 cheaper than Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV. If your budget is limited, Proton's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. But also note, the few thousand dollars cheaper, there might be compromises in equipment, it depends on your specific requirements.
Proton X90 is equipped with 1.5L Turbo, 140 hp. Official fuel consumption 7.0 L/100km.
Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV is equipped with Hybrid, 170 hp. Official fuel consumption 4.5 L/100km.
In terms of power, Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV's Hybrid has 30 more hp than Proton X90's 1.5L Turbo. However, in daily city driving, both cars have enough power, you won't feel it's lacking.
Proton X90 safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety system includes ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV safety rating is TBD, active safety system includes Basic.
Regarding safety features, both cars received decent ratings. However, Proton X90's ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA) and Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV's Basic differ in functionality. If you value active safety, you can compare their feature lists carefully.
Proton X90 Warranty 5 years/150,000km, maintenance interval Every 10,000km or 6 months.
Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV Warranty 3 years/100,000km, maintenance interval Every 10,000km or 6 months.
Overall, both Proton X90 and Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV are very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose mainly depends on your personal needs and budget. We recommend doing your research, comparing quotes from a few dealers, and then test driving before making a final decision. Buying a car is a big deal, spending time on research will never go wrong.
On August 12, Chery Fengyun T7 officially launched pre-sale. The new vehicle is positioned as a global quality pure electric SUV, offering 3 trim levels in total, with a pre-sale guide price range of 109,900 to 129,900 RMB. The new car centers on the core philosophy of 'crafting quality cars with patience', developed relying on Chery's global R&D system. It focuses on home user necessities across dimensions such as range, safety, intelligence, and after-sales service, while also providing lifetime warranty policies and dual safeguards for battery and intelligent driving.
I. Pre-sale Versions and Benefits: Range Equality Across All Trims, Maximized After-sales Protection
The three models in this pre-sale are all 600km range versions, namely the 600km Joy Edition (109,900 RMB), 600km Comfort Edition (119,900 RMB), and 600km Smart Edition (129,900 RMB). There is no range difference between high and low specs across the series; the entry-level version enjoys full-spec range capability.
Pay 1,000 RMB deposit during the pre-sale period to enjoy 7 purchasing benefits. Core value focuses on purchase discounts and long-term usage protection:
Purchase Discounts: 1,000 RMB deposit offsets 2,000 RMB purchase price; Official guide price 6,000 RMB 'Blaze Orange' and 'Mountain Smoke Purple' personalized car colors are free for a limited time; Priority delivery rights are also enjoyed.
Dual Lifetime Benefits (Limited to first non-commercial owners): Enjoy full vehicle lifetime warranty (including three-electric systems, except consumable parts and special parts); Additionally, you can select a lifetime basic maintenance package worth 3,999 RMB for 666 RMB (1 basic maintenance per year).
Dual Bottom-line Safeguards (Limited to first non-commercial owners): If the power battery causes vehicle thermal runaway damage due to its own reasons, Chery compensates with the same model or a new car not lower than original specifications. Within one year of purchase, in parking and intelligent navigation scenarios, accidents caused by intelligent driving system reasons result in compensation for vehicle occupants and third parties up to 5 million RMB.
Pre-sale benefit validity ends at 24:00 on the launch day. The official statement clarifies that these can be stacked with launch benefits.
II. Core Product Power: Global Standard R&D, Focus on Home Balance
Fengyun T7 adopts the 'Reverse Overseas' R&D logic—first complete R&D and extreme verification according to global market standards, then launch in the domestic market. Whole vehicle planning + R&D cycle total 5 years, investing 81 exclusive durability test vehicles. Whole vehicle cumulative test mileage exceeds 6 million km, covering Southeast Asian rainy seasons, Middle East high-temperature exposure, Indonesian high humidity, and other extreme regional operating conditions.
Range: Full series 600km, wide temperature range adapts to North and South climates
Fengyun T7 full series standard equip 65.05kWh capacity Rhino Battery. CLTC condition range is 600km. Official actual test range can reach above 667km, taking a pragmatic route that opposes inflated specs. In fast charging mode, charging 30%-80% takes only 20 minutes, meeting mid-journey energy replenishment needs.
Temperature control system equipped with global integrated dual-source wide heat pump AC + high voltage PTC. Supports -30°C to 55°C ultra-wide temperature range stable operation. Cooperating with AGS intelligent front grille and 14 items low drag optimization reduces energy consumption fluctuation in high and low temperature environments, alleviating range decay problems in northern winters.
Safety: Body + Battery Dual Protection, Benchmarking Global 5-Star Standard
Body safety benchmarks 2026 version E-NCAP 5-star standard and functional safety ASIL D highest level. Adopts 9 transverse 5 longitudinal cage body structure. High-strength steel ratio 80%, hot-formed steel ratio 18.84%. Equipped with shotgun structure, dual-frame subframe, and battery pack anti-collision beam to optimize collision force transmission paths, maximizing survival space for occupants. Whole vehicle equipped with 9 airbags, including 48L dual-chamber remote airbag and rear side airbag, achieving 360° occupant protection.
At the battery safety level, Rhino Battery adopts 6D stereo protection structure, possessing IP68 waterproof capability. Protection duration is 96 times the national standard requirement. Can resist squeezing, piercing, impact, and deep wading scenarios, reducing short-circuit risks brought by rainy season waterlogging and road surface water accumulation.
Intelligence: Cockpit and Driving Integrated Chip, Practical Functions Priority Launch
New car equipped with Cockpit-Driving Integrated 8775 chip. Adopting 4nm process, computing power 72TOPS, system response time 80ms. Boot speed increased by 33%. Single chip balances cockpit interaction and driving assistance computing power needs, reducing multi-chip coordination latency problems.
Cockpit part equipped with 15.6-inch 2.5K HD central control screen. Supports anti-glare, anti-reflection, anti-fingerprint processing. Compatible with Wireless CarPlay, HUAWEI HiCar, and CarLink three screen casting protocols, covering most mobile phone models on the market. Built-in Lingxi Smart Cockpit 2.0 system, providing 6 real person voice personas and 6 scenario modes such as Power Nap, Camping, Pet, and Wake-up.
Driving assistance equipped with Falcon 500 Intelligent Driving Assistance System. Equipped with 3 mmWave radars, 7 HD cameras, 12 ultrasonic radars, total 22 sensors. Support 300+ scenario auto-parking. Can realize dead-end road parking, one-key track reverse, cross-floor parking, etc., covering most daily parking difficulties.
Space and Comfort: Home-oriented Detail Optimization
Fengyun T7 body dimensions are 4570×1852×1694mm, wheelbase 2700mm. Interior space utilization rate reaches 84%. Rear row adopts pure flat floor design, leg space 911mm. Standard trunk capacity 450L. Rear seats folded can expand to 1550L, forming 1955mm length pure flat loading space, adapting to camping and large luggage loading needs.
Seats adopt 9-layer cloud feel structure. Support ventilation and 3-gear heating functions. In -20°C low temp environment, 5 minutes can warm up to 30°C. Ventilation adopts suction design to reduce summer back stuffiness. Whole vehicle designed with 38 storage spaces. Equipped with 4 max load 300kg rivet rings and 2 max load 3kg hooks, convenient for fixing outdoor equipment. Chassis built by international tuning team. 50.8:49.2 gold axle load ratio, optimizing cornering stability and straight-line tracking texture.
III. Market Observation: Pragmatic New Path for 100,000 RMB Level Pure Electric SUV
100,000-130,000 RMB level home pure electric SUV is one of the most competitive sub-markets currently. Most models choose to make high-low spec differentiation in range and configuration, using low-range entry versions to lower the price threshold.
Fengyun T7's differentiated approach is entering the market with full-series equal range, globally unified R&D standards, and full-cycle after-sales protection. No stacking of flashy non-practical configurations. Core selling points all revolve around home users' most concerned range anxiety, safety concerns, and usage costs, walking a pragmatic route of long-termism. For home users who value long-term usage stability, dislike range false labeling, and care about after-sales costs, this car provides a new option.
8 月 12 日，奇瑞全新全球品質純電 SUV——風雲 T7 正式開啟預售。本次預售發布會以“慢功造好車，久等了”為主題，主打踏踏實實造車的長期主義理念。不同於行業快速堆料、速成造車的模式，風雲 T7 堅持以全球嚴苛標準打磨品質，用心做好每一台車，同時也致敬和感謝每一位耐心等待的用戶。
本次預售新車共推出 3 款配置版本，預售指導價 10.99 萬 -12.99 萬元，購車用戶還可享受全套 7 重購車權益，從購車、用車到售後维保，全方位降低用戶用車成本。
如今中國新能源汽車智造實力響譽全球，成為行業發展核心主力。依托奇瑞 23 年深厚的全球化技術積累，風雲 T7 走出了一條“先闖全球、再回饋國內用戶”的反向出海試煉之路。整車拒絕速成套路，從研發、設計、製造到實測，全流程對標全球嚴苛標準，精準拿捏當代家庭用車的六大核心剛需：顏值、安全、出行續航、智能體驗、乘駕舒享、用車安心，全面適配日常通勤、長途出遊、戶外露營、多人全家出行等各類用車場景。
顏值在線耐看不落伍，中西美學兼顧長效質感風雲 T7 的外觀設計並非閉門造車，依托奇瑞全球 10 大設計中心資源，還有 5000 多名海內外用戶全程參與共創。其同源車型 Lepas L6 曾亮相米蘭設計周，斬獲國際設計認可，顏值實力經得起全球審美考驗。
整車外觀融合簡約國際風與東方雅致韻味，馭風前臉、風塑綢緞車身、天際霞光尾門的組合，線條流暢大氣，辨識度拉滿。同時提供熾焰橙、山煙紫、雲粉米、流光銀、青竹灰、墨石黑 6 款配色，風格多樣、適配不同審美。車漆嚴格對標海外耐候標準，抗曬、抗老化，長期使用不易褪色變色，常年如新。
內飾提供溫暖黑棕、極夜黑曜兩種百搭風格，搭載雲翼環抱式座艙，大面積軟質包覆覆蓋全車。鵝卵石懸浮揚聲器、精緻菱格綾縫等細節設計，質感十足。全車內飾皮革、密封條、塑料件均採用高品質材質，不易硬化、發白、老化，長期用車依舊整潔耐看，顏值與實用性雙向在線。
全域五星安全防護，全路況、全場景保駕護航安全是家用車的核心底線，風雲 T7 從源頭築牢安全壁壘。整車對標 2026 版 E-NCAP 五星安全標準打造，同時達到功能安全 ASILD 最高等級。這款車歷經 2 年策劃、3 年研發，投入 81 台專屬耐久測試車同步路試，整車累計測試里程超 600 萬公里，專項耐久測試里程達 145 萬公里。不僅如此，車輛還奔赴全球多地開展極限實測，適配東南亞雨季、中東高溫暴曬、印尼高濕等極端環境，兼顧全球複雜路況與氣候工況。
車身採用 80% 高強度鋼 +18.84% 熱成型鋼，打造九橫五縱籠式安全車身，搭配專屬 shotgun 結構、雙框副車架與電池包防撞梁，車身剛性拉滿。同時設計 9 條正向、6 條側向碰撞傳力路徑，能快速分散碰撞衝擊力，最大程度保留乘員艙生存空間。全車標準 9 個安全氣囊，包含 48L 雙腔遠端氣囊與後排側氣囊，實現 360 度無死角乘員防護。
電池安全方面，風雲 T7 全系搭載犀牛電池，配備超強 6D 立體防護結構，可有效抵禦擠壓、穿刺、衝擊等各類風險。電池防水等級達到 IP68，防護能力是國標 96 倍，面對夏季暴雨、城市內澇、路面積水、戶外涉水場景都能從容應對，徹底杜絕電池進水、短路隱患。
全系 600km 續航平權，無懼寒暑告別續航焦慮為讓所有用戶都能享受優質續航體驗，風雲 T7 做到續航配置全系平權，不搞高低配區別對待。全車標準 65.05kWh 大容量犀牛電池，CLTC 純電續航 600km，實際實測續航可達 667km+，實現行業少見的“反向虛標”，徹底解決日常用車續航焦慮。補能效率同樣亮眼，電池從 30% 充至 80% 僅需 20 分鐘，一杯咖啡的時間就能滿血復活，短途代步、長途出行都無壓力。
針對南北方差異化氣候，風雲 T7 搭載全域一體化熱管理系統，配備雙源寬熱泵空調 + 高壓 PTC，可在 -30℃至 55℃超寬溫域穩定工作。冬季低溫制熱更省電、升溫更快，夏季高溫散熱高效、能耗更低。再加上全系統標準 AGS 智能進氣格柵與 14 項低風阻優化設計，無論高速、低速行駛，能耗表現都十分穩定，全季用車體驗拉滿。
高算力智能座艙 + 輔助駕駛，好用又貼心智能體驗是當下家用車的核心標準配備，風雲 T7 搭載行業主流的艙駕一體 8775 芯片，採用 4nm 先進製程，擁有 72TOPS 超高算力，系統響應速度僅 80ms，整機開機速度提升 33%，屏幕操作順滑不卡頓、智能交互反應超快，實現智能座艙與駕駛輔助雙域無縫協同，既懂用戶需求，又能守護出行安全。
智能座艙配備 15.6 英寸 2.5K 高清大屏，畫質清晰細膩，同時具備防眩光、抗反射、抗指紋特性，強光下也能清晰看清屏幕。支援 CarPlay、HUAWEI HiCar、CarLink 等主流無線投屏功能，兼容市面 99% 以上手機機型，上車即可無縫互聯。
搭載迭代升級的靈犀智艙 2.0 系統，解鎖六大真人感陪伴模式，涵蓋小奇同學、東北老姨、抬杠大師、口語老師、故事大王、職業辯手，人機交互更自然、更有溫度。同時內置小憩、露營、寵物、醒神等六大专屬場景模式，精準適配多元化用車場景，讓車子成為貼心的移動生活空間。
駕駛輔助方面，風雲 T7 配備獵鷹 500 智能駕駛輔助系統，搭載 3 顆毫米波雷達、7 個高清攝像頭、12 個超聲波雷達，共计 22 顆高精度傳感器，探測距離遠、精度高、反應快。支援 300+ 全場景自動泊車，覆蓋斷頭路泊車、一鍵循跡倒車、跨樓層泊車等小眾高難度場景，徹底解決日常停車難題，實現輕鬆泊車自由。
大空間 + 大師級底盤，久坐舒服、乘駕穩當風雲 T7 主打家用舒適屬性，整車尺寸為 4570×1852×1694mm，軸距 2700mm，車內得房率高達 84%。後排採用純平地台設計，腿部空間達 911mm，同級優勢明顯，後排乘客久坐不擠腿。後排座椅放倒後可形成 1955mm 純平大牀，常規後備箱容積 450L，最大可拓展至 1550L，戶外露營、大件裝載、多人出行都能輕鬆滿足。
座椅採用 9 層雲感填充材質，軟而不塌，支撐性與舒適性兼顧，長途久坐不累。同時配備通風、加熱雙功能，加熱支援 3 檔溫控調節，-20℃低溫環境下 5 分鐘即可升溫至 30℃，快速驅散寒意；通風採用吸風式設計，夏天久坐後背不悶汗、不黏身。細節之處，全車設置 38 處人性化儲物空間，零碎物品有序收納，同時配備 4 個承重 300kg 鉚環、2 個承重 3kg 掛鉤，露營裝備、大件貨物都能牢固固定，實用性拉滿。
底盤由瑪莎拉蒂前底盤調校專家領銜的國際化團隊精心打磨，依托奇瑞 26 年底盤設計經驗、國內首台自主研發地面移動型雙軸 K&C 試驗台的硬核技術加持，打造 50.8:49.2 黃金軸荷比。有效抑制車輛推頭、甩尾問題，過彎更穩、直線行駛循跡性更強，無論是城市通勤還是高速巡航，乘駕質感都十分出色。
雙兜底 + 雙終身權益，全週期用車無憂除了過硬的產品實力，風雲 T7 更聚焦用戶全週期用車痛點，針對車輛故障、養車成本、智能駕駛風險等問題，推出兩大兜底保障、兩項終身權益，從購車到長期用車全程守護，讓用戶買得放心、用得安心。
從全球設計、全球研發、全球製造到全球路況實測，風雲 T7 以全鏈路全球品質，重新定義 10 萬級純電 SUV 标杆。它摒棄行業浮躁的速成造車模式，以長期主義打磨產品，精準解決家庭用戶顏值、安全、續航、智能、舒適、安心六大核心剛需。既是一台凝聚全球硬核技術的家用座駕，也是適配中國家庭日常出行、品質生活的優選車型。目前風雲 T7 已正式開啟預售，靜待每一位熱愛生活、追求品質的用戶選擇。
8 月 12 號晚，奇瑞風雲 T7 開啟預售，三個版型 10.99 萬、11.99 萬、12.99 萬，全系標配 65.05kWh 犀牛電池，CLTC 續航統一鎖喺 600km。這組數據一出來，10 萬級純電 SUV 呢個本就血流成河嘅細分市場，又被扔咗一顆深水炸彈。
但今日我唔想同你傾“內捲”。
作為一個睇過太多新車上市即啞火嘅行業內觀察者，我更願意同你傾一事：奇瑞到底喺落咗咩棋？
把"600 公里”從選配變成入門權
傳統 10 萬級純電 SUV 有個潛規則：想買長續航？加錢上高配。入門版畀你 400 多公里意思意思，高配先給到 600，中間差住兩三萬。
風雲 T7 直接悅享版 10.99 萬起，就畀你 600km ；舒享版 11.99 萬、智享版 12.99 萬，電池一模一樣。以前你為了 600 公里要多掏嘅錢，奇瑞替你省咗。
更狠嘅係，官方實測續航幹到咗 667km 以上，"反向虛標"嘅詞雖然已經被用爛咗，但放喺 10 萬級呢個段位，依然係好廠家先係得出嚟嘅事。
結合 178kW 前置單電機、275N·m 扭矩、180km/h 極速、12.9kWh/100km 電耗嘅底子，呢台車喺城市通勤場景下嘅"千公里成本"，基本可以壓到油車嘅 1/5。呢先係 10 萬級用戶真正在乎嘅。
"全球車"回流本土背後需要強大嘅力量
風雲 T7 有個畀好多人忽略嘅身份——佢嘅同源車型 Lepas L6 已經喺海外市場亮相過米蘭設計周。換句話說，這係一台"反向出海"之後回流國內嘅全球車。
呢件事嘅意味非常深：奇瑞 23 年嘅全球化技術積澱，加上針對東南亞雨季、中東高溫、印尼高濕嘅極限實車試煉，相當於把海外市場嘅"驗證成本"攤進咗研發費，再用國內規模化生產嘅成本優勢反哺定價。
一邊食海外標準（2026 版 E-NCAP 五星、功能安全 ASIL-D）嘅溢價，一邊用國內產業鏈嘅成本定價，喺汽車行業並唔新鮮，但奇瑞把它壓縮到咗 10 萬級別。
電池"燒咗賠新車"，膽子點大咗起嚟？
7 重購車權益入面最騷嘅操作，係"動力電池安全兜底"——因電池自身質量問題引發熱失控損毀，奇瑞賠付同款或同配置新車；輔助駕駛兜底最高賠付 500 萬。
純電車二手殘值低，核心焦慮就係"電池唔會某天俾我整自燃"。傳統廠家把呢個風險甩畀消費者，殘值由市場定。奇瑞直接站出嚟接鍋——你敢買，我敢賠。呢一手等於變相畀電池做咗增信，提升咗整車嘅"信用溢價"。
艙駕一體 8775，係智能平權嘅又一次下沉
15.6 英寸 2.5K 屏、4nm 製程 8775 艙駕一體芯片、72TOPS 算力、80ms 響應，獵鷹 500 智駕系統搭配 3 顆毫米波雷達 +7 個攝像頭 +12 個超聲波雷達共 22 顆傳感器，支持 300+ 場景自動泊車、跨樓層記憶泊車。
放喺兩年前，呢套配置也就是 20 萬級嘅待遇。如今塞進 12 萬多嘅頂配入，感覺係見到 8775 芯片一旦規模化量產，單車分攤成本斷崖式下跌。
這對消費者係好消息，對同行係壞消息。尤其係嗰啲仲喺靠"智駕選裝包"割韭菜嘅友商，風雲 T7 呢一波相當於把對方嘅碗砸咗。
10 萬級純電 SUV 嘅"擠水分"時刻到咗
奇瑞風雲 T7 嘅出現，令 10 萬級純電 SUV 過去嗰啲"理所當然嘅湊合"，被呢台車重新定義咗。
當然，佢都唔係沒短板——全系前置前驅，快充 30%-80% 約 20-22 分鐘，喺 800V 快充遍地嘅 2026 年唔算頂尖；三個版之間差異主要集中喺智駕功能解鎖程度上。
元 PLUS、銀河 E5、比亞迪海豚們，接下來嘅日子唔會太好過。而消費者——尤其係嗰啲儲咗半年錢、第一次買純電嘅家庭——呢次係贏家。慢功造好車，佢哋等咗好耐。
8 月 12 日，全球品質純電 SUV——風雲 T7 正式展開預訂，新車共推出 3 款車型，預訂指導價格為 10.99 萬元至 12.99 萬元，且享受 7 重購車權益。
本次預訂發布會以“慢功造好車，久等了”為主題，傳遞風雲 T7 秉持長期主義的造車理念，以全球標準打磨產品、踏實製造品質全球車的堅守，也道出品牌對用戶長久期待的誠摯感恩。
1）
風雲 T7 是一款中規中矩的中型純電 SUV，整車尺寸為 4570 毫米×1852 毫米×1694 毫米，軸距達 2700 毫米；後排純平地台，以同級領先的 911 毫米腿部空間，後排座椅放倒拓展到 1955 毫米長的純平大床；常規後備廂容積為 450 升、可拓展至 1550 升，充足的載貨空間適配戶外穿越、多人結伴出行。
憑藉奇瑞十大全球設計中心，5000 餘名海內外用戶全程共同創作，同源車型 Lepas L6 亮相米蘭設計週獲國際認可，風雲 T7 融匯全球審美，顏值持久在線。御風前臉、風塑緞面車身、天際霞光尾門，平衡國際簡約審美與東方雅致氣韻。 整車漆面標準同步海外嚴苛耐候要求，提供熾焰橙、山煙紫、雲粉米、流光銀、青竹灰、墨石黑等 6 款配色。
內飾分溫暖黑棕、極夜黑曜兩種風格，雲翼環抱座艙搭配大面積軟包覆，鵝卵石懸浮揚聲器、菱格縫製細節精緻；所有內飾皮革、密封條、塑料件均不易硬化褪色，常年使用依舊新穎耐看，兼顧顏值與質感。
風雲 T7 有 9 層雲感座椅，軟而不塌，久坐不累。此外，座椅還有通風加熱功能，可實現 3 擋溫控調節，在零下 20℃環境下，5 分鐘速加熱至 30℃，快速溫暖全身；座椅通風採用吸風設計，夏天後背不悶汗，滿足用戶的舒適需求。在細節方面，全車 38 處巧思儲物空間，收納有序，盡享精緻生活。四個最大承重 300 公斤的鉚環和兩個最大承重 3 公斤的掛鉤，露營裝備、大件貨物都能牢牢固定。
2）
風雲 T7 對標 2026 版 E-NCAP 五星安全標準設計、功能安全 ASILD 最高等級。歷經兩年策劃，3 年研發，共投入 81 輛專屬耐久車同步路試，整車累計測試里程超 600 萬公里，耐久專項實測 145 萬公里。同時，針對東南亞雨季、中東高溫暴曬、印尼高濕等多種全球多地域進行極限實車試煉。
車身採用 80% 高強度鋼、18.84% 熱成型鋼打造九橫五縱籠式車身，採用 Shotgun 結構、雙框副車架+Pack 防撞樑，鋼筋鐵骨保障乘員艙安全，前面 9 條 + 側面 6 條碰撞傳力路徑最大化分散碰撞能量，留存乘員生存空間；此外，該車還搭載 9 個安全氣囊，包含 48 升雙腔遠端氣囊和後排側氣囊，360°全方位保護乘員安全。風雲 T7 全系搭載犀牛電池，超強 6D 防護構築電池安全堡壘全方位抵禦擠壓、穿刺、衝擊，為動力電池構建多層立體安全屏障。面對夏季暴雨頻發，犀牛電池 IP68 防水為國標 96 倍，無懼雨季內澇、路面積水、戶外涉水，有效防止電池進水短路隱患。
風雲 T7 的底盤採由由瑪莎拉蒂前底盤調校專家領銜的國際化底盤團隊傾力“打磨”，50.8:49.2 的黃金軸荷比能有效抑制轉向推頭、甩尾現象，提升過彎穩定性與直線行駛循跡性。早在 2009 年，奇瑞就自主設計了中國第一台地面移動型雙軸 K&C 試驗台。26 年的設計功底賦能底盤性能，帶來更卓越的駕乘質感體驗。
3）
基於全球多地域能源與氣候需求，風雲 T7 實現續航配置全系平權，全系標準配備大容量犀牛電池 65.05 千瓦時，CLTC 工況達到 600 公里續航，實測續航超過 667 公里，以“反向虛標”解決焦慮。電池 30% 充至 80% 只需 20 分鐘。
風雲 T7 搭載全域一體化熱管理雙源寬熱泵空調 + 高壓 PTC，北方用戶冬季也能放心開。零下 30°C-55°C 超寬溫域穩定運轉，低溫環境制熱更省電、高溫環境散熱更高效。配合全系標準配備的 AGS 智能進氣格柵與 14 項低風阻優化，高低速能耗更穩定。
風雲 T7 搭載艙駕一體 8775 芯片，做到艙駕雙優，兩大域無縫協同，“一半懂你，一半護你”。該芯片具備 4 納米製程，72TOPS 高運算力，響應僅需 80 毫秒，開機提速 33%，開機速度更快、屏幕操作更順滑，智能交互響應更迅捷。
在智能座艙方面，15.6 英寸 2.5K 高清大屏幕畫面細膩真實，防眩光、抗反射、抗指紋，CarPlay、HUAWEI HiCar、CarLink 無線連接，覆蓋市面 99% 以上手機投屏，上車即可實現無縫互聯。靈犀智艙 2.0 帶來全能陪伴的夥伴，擁有小奇同學、東北老姨、抬杠大師、口語老師、故事大王、職業辯手等六大真人感陪伴體驗。內置小憩、露營、寵物、醒神等六大場景模式，讓車真正成為懂你的移動空間。
風雲 T7 還搭載獵鷹 500 駕駛輔助系統，集成 3 顆毫米波雷達、7 個高性能攝影機、12 個超聲波雷達，總計 22 顆高精度傳感器（3R7V12U），看得遠、看得清、測得準。能夠 300+ 全場景自動泊車，行業覆蓋最全。斷頭路泊車、一鍵循跡倒車、跨樓層泊車等都能實現，從此告別“停車難”，實現泊車自由。
4）
憑藉奇瑞 23 年全球化技術積澱，風雲 T7 走出反向出海試煉路徑，拒絕行業速成造車思路，以全鏈路全球嚴苛標準打磨整車實力。圍繞品質生活六大核心新剛需，將顏值剛需、安全剛需、出行剛需、智能剛需、舒享剛需、安心剛需融為一體，打造全球品質純電 SUV，適配通勤、遠途、戶外、多人出行等多元場景。
奇瑞不止為用戶帶來硬核实力的產品，更站在用戶視角，全盤考量購車之後的全周期用車體驗，直面大家對於車輛故障、後期養車成本等實際顧慮。為此，風雲 T7 推出兩大兜底保障、兩項終身權益，從購車到長期使用全程守護。
兩大兜底：一是動力電池安全兜底：因動力電池自身原因導致整車發生熱失控損毀，奇瑞將賠償同款新車或不低於原車配置新車；二是輔助駕駛兜底：自購車之日起一年內，在“泊車場景”、“智能領航場景”判定為“智能駕駛輔助系統原因”導致事故，造成車上人員傷害與第三者損失賠償的，最高賠償 500 萬元。
兩大終身權益：一是整車終身質保：價值 10000 元整車終身質保（含三電），易損件、特殊件除外；二是終身保養套餐：666 元購價值 3999 元終身基礎保養套餐（1 次/年）。
寫在後面：從全球標準研發、全球審美設計、全球工藝製造，到全球路況驗證，風雲 T7 以全鏈路全球品質，樹立起純電 SUV 的價值標杆。它歷經世界各地標準的淬煉，最終奔赴中國用戶，以顏值、出行、安全、智能、舒享、安心六大剛需的全滿足，回應品質家庭的所有期待。
由此，風雲 T7，不僅是一輛凝結全球技術與品質的座駕，更是全球標準與中國家庭需求深度共鳴的時代之選。
In Malaysia's SUV market, many buyers compare the Proton X90 and Mazda CX-8 when choosing a car. The price and positioning of these two cars are quite close. Today, we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
The OTR price of Proton X90 in Malaysia is RM 106,800 - 122,800. There are a total of 4 versions, including 2026 1.5T Prime X (RM 122,800), 2026 1.5T Prime (RM 116,800), 2026 1.5T Lite (RM 106,800), etc.
The OTR price of Mazda CX-8 in Malaysia is RM 165,360 - 201,360. There are a total of 5 versions, including 2025 2.5T 4WD High Plus Petrol (RM 201,360), 2025 2.2L 2WD High Plus Diesel (RM 193,123), 2025 2.5L 2WD High Plus Petrol (RM 186,360), etc.
From a price perspective, the starting price of the Proton X90 is indeed RM 58,560 cheaper than the Mazda CX-8. If your budget is limited, Proton's entry-level version is sufficient for daily needs. But note, the few thousand dollars cheaper might involve trade-offs in features, depending on your specific needs.
The safety rating of Proton X90 is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP). Active safety systems include ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
The safety rating of Mazda CX-8 is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP). Active safety systems include Brand ADAS.
Both cars have the same safety rating, and safety features are quite comprehensive in this class. New cars nowadays generally have good safety, so there is no need to worry too much about this.
Proton X90 body length is 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
Mazda CX-8 body length is 4500 mm, trunk 450 L.
Regarding space, Mazda CX-8 is 100 mm longer than Proton X90, offering more passenger space. However, Proton X90 is more flexible for parking in the city. There are trade-offs for each.
Both Proton X90 and Mazda CX-8 are mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, you can prioritize the one with a better reputation. If you care more about cost-performance ratio and features, choose the one with more configurations. In the end, it is recommended to test drive both; personal experience is the most important.
Overall, Proton X90 and Mazda CX-8 are both very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose mainly depends on your personal needs and budget. It is recommended to do your research, compare quotes from multiple dealerships, and then test drive to make a final decision. Buying a car is a major matter; spending time on research will never be wrong.
8 月 6 日，深藍汽車旗下緊湊型 SUV——全新深藍 S05 正式上市。今次共推出 5 款車型，限時優惠價為 11.59 萬元至 14.49 萬元。新車喺外觀設計、智能駕駛輔助、底盤操控同座艙體驗方面進行多項升級，其中，搭載激光雷達同一段式端到端算法嘅智駕版本係其重要亮點。
喺智能駕駛輔助方面，全新深藍 S05 嘅智臻激光版搭載咗 1 顆激光雷達，全車擁有 27 顆高感知傳感器，配合 2 顆地平線 J6M 芯片。呢套硬件系統同特斯拉同源嘅一段式端到端算法相結合，旨在提升車輛對複雜路況嘅識別同決策能力。
據官方介紹，該系統嘅識別距離可達 200 米，喺黑夜、雨天、强光等場景下能提供更精準嘅環境感知，輔助駕駛行為更為連貫同擬人，減少咗頓挫感。其全場景漫遊輔助功能，允許車輛喺冇咗設置導航嘅情況下，亦能喺園區或鄉村小路等非結構化道路上進行自主尋路同輔助駕駛，呢樣覆蓋咗日常通勤、短途出行等多種使用場景。
操控同底盤方面，全新深藍 S05 全系標準配備咗 FSD+HRS 高階可變自適應懸掛。呢套懸掛系統能夠根據路面震動頻率，透過機械結構自動調節阻尼嘅軟硬，喺震盪路段變軟以提升舒適性，喺過彎或急煞時變硬以增強車身支撐。配合純電後驅架構同前麥弗遜後五連桿獨立懸掛，新車喺駕駛乘坐舒適性同操控穩定性之間尋求一種平衡，以應對煞車點頭、過彎側傾、爛路震盪等常見嘅駕駛乘坐唔適感。
設計層面，全新深藍 S05 喺外觀同內飾上均有更新。外觀延續咗星际飛翼設計語言，並新增咗全車流光飾線、18 吋「星璇」運動輪轂等元素。內飾方面，新增咗星雲紫配色，搭載咗 256 色懸浮式環抱氛圍燈，仲對中控台等區域進行咗材質升級，座艙整體質感有所提升。
車身尺寸方面，新車長闊高分別為 4620mm、1900mm、1600mm，軸距為 2880mm，呢個軸距數據喺同級車型中具有一定優勢，為後排乘客提供咗較寬裕嘅腿部空間。尾箱容積為 492L，並擁有 159L 嘅前備箱，全車儲物空間共 37 處。
喺空間舒適性配置上，新車嘅二排座椅靠背支援 2 檔可調，最大傾角可至 32 度。前排座椅則集成咗通風、加熱、記憶、禮讓功能，並提供咗 8 點式按摩同 4 向腰托。副駕位置仲配備咗帶電動腿托嘅零重力座椅，可支援 124 度躺倒，旨在緩解長途乘車嘅疲勞感。
動力同續航方面，全新深藍 S05 提供 CLTC 工況下 520km 同 620km 兩種續航版本。新車全系標準配備咗來自寧德時代嘅電芯同金鐘罩電池，並搭載咗 3C 超充技術，官方數據顯示，SOC 從 30% 充至 80% 嘅時間唔超過 15 分鐘。此外，車輛仲配備咗熱泵空調同微核高頻脈衝加熱技術，以改善冬季低溫環境下嘅續航表現同充電效率。
座艙內部，新車搭載咗 3nm 製程嘅車規級座艙芯片，為車機系統嘅流暢運行同多任務處理提供咗算力基礎。其 DEEPAL OS 4.2 系統帶來咗新嘅桌面交互形式，並集成咗 DeepSeek R1 大模型，提升咗語音交互嘅識別率同理解能力。新車仲配備咗 50 吋 AR-HUD 同 15.6 吋嘅 2.5K 分辨率「向日葵」中控屏。
市場表現方面，深藍 S05 自上市以來，全球累計銷量已超 25 萬輛。今年 3 月至 6 月，該車型連續四個月位列國內 12-18 萬級純電緊湊型 SUV 細分市場銷量首位。喺海外市場，該車型已進入泰國、西班牙、墨西哥、沙特阿拉伯等 73 個國家同地區。
2026年7月27日，香港机场岛。一辆头顶激光雷达、主驾空无一人的Robotaxi，正在右舵左行的道路上平稳行驶。
这是全球首次在右舵交通体系中实现车内全无人的公开道路测试。完成这一突破的，不是美国巨头Waymo，而是来自中国的萝卜快跑。
一天之后，伦敦。萝卜快跑出现在这座千年古城的街头。萝卜快跑宣布分别携手Uber和Lyft旗下Freenow，启动公开道路测试。伦敦由此成为全球唯一一个萝卜快跑与Waymo同时部署测试的城市。
不过，不同于Waymo配备安全员、“先采集数据、再小规模验证、逐步推进无人化”的常规路径，萝卜快跑是带着香港成熟的右舵全无人经验入场，实现降维适配，先发优势十分显著。
历经十余年技术迭代、场景打磨与资本沉淀，全球Robotaxi赛道彻底告别零散试点的草莽阶段，正式迈入中美双寡头稳态竞争格局：美国看Waymo，中国看萝卜快跑。两大头部企业累计订单均突破2000万单量级，牢牢占据中美核心市场基本盘，引领全球Robotaxi产业化、商业化进程。
而这场国家级科技竞赛的核心赛场，正在聚焦于两座太平洋沿岸的创新之都——美国洛杉矶与中国深圳。
如果说洛杉矶凭借深厚科创底蕴，成为美国无人驾驶商业化的最优试验场，那么深圳则以制度创新、复杂场景、年轻客群、大湾区区位等优势，构建起了中国无人驾驶的东方范本。
如今深圳不仅实现了无人驾驶产业的弯道超车，更正式与洛杉矶隔空对垒，向世界展现中国智能出行的科创实力与城市底气。
01
深圳VS洛杉矶：中美Robotaxi的核心赛场对决
深圳与洛杉矶，两座城市有着高度契合的城市基因：同为太平洋沿海外向型都市，科创产业密集、人口结构年轻、创新活力充沛，且均是本国智能网联汽车法规落地、商业化探索的先行示范区，全年温和的气候条件也为无人驾驶常态化路测提供了天然优势。
但相似的起点之下，两座城市培育出了完全差异化的无人驾驶产业竞争力，也造就了Waymo与萝卜快跑截然不同的技术底色。
洛杉矶的优势在于低密度郊区路网、规整的交通秩序与成熟的资本体系，为Waymo提供了规模化、标准化的运营场景，依托160亿美元顶级融资加持，Waymo快速实现美国10城全无人商业化落地，构筑起美国市场的绝对壁垒。
深圳则是全球最贴近真实民生出行的高压场域——常住人口超1800万，机动车保有量超400万辆，电动自行车超600万辆，城市路网复杂、交通密集流量大。高密度的城中村、频繁的人车混行、多变的天气，构成了全球最复杂的城市混合交通流。这也倒逼无人驾驶技术在感知、决策、避险、交互等全维度持续迭代，打磨出适配全球多元路况的成熟算法体系。
政策层面，深圳拥有全国唯一的智能网联汽车专项特区法规，完整覆盖无人车测试准入、收费运营、事故权责划分等全链条环节，彻底解决了行业商业化落地的合规痛点，为产业规模化发展筑牢法治根基。
在地理位置上，深圳毗邻港澳，链接国际，作为大湾区核心引擎，天然拥有向内沉淀技术、向外出海试验的独特区位优势。
更关键的是，深圳年轻化、高学历的人口结构，造就了国内最高的无人驾驶接受度与复乘意愿。高频的通勤、商圈接驳、枢纽往返需求，让Robotaxi彻底摆脱“科技尝鲜”的标签，成为市民日常出行的刚需选择，为技术商业化迭代提供了持续的用户反馈与市场支撑，也让深圳成为全球观察无人驾驶从技术试验融入城市基础交通的最佳样本。
02
攻克右舵壁垒，中国技术领跑世界无人区
如果说深圳VS洛杉矶的双城对决，是Robotaxi本土赛道的格局博弈，那么右舵市场的技术突破与伦敦赛道的正面交锋，则标志着中国无人驾驶正式主导全球行业规则，完成从“本土跟随”到“全球引领”的蜕变。
过去十年来，右舵市场却长期处于“沉默的大多数”状态。 全球约70多个国家和地区采用左侧通行，覆盖超过20亿人口，占全球汽车市场约三分之一份额。特别是伦敦、东京、新加坡、悉尼——这些城市人口密度高、出行需求集中，出租车和网约车价格远高于中美，人力成本更是居高不下。
以伦敦为例，5公里出租车费用约合人民币160元，单公里价格是旧金山的1.6倍，是中国网约车的十余倍。高客单价、高密度、高需求，这正是Robotaxi商业化的理想土壤。
但长期以来，右舵市场的交通语义、路权规则、驾驶习惯与左舵市场完全不同，绝非简单的方向盘镜像切换，环岛绕行、路口让行、上下客规则的变化与重构，成为全球车企难以攀登的技术高峰。
无人驾驶系统最难处理的场景，往往处于规则与现实驾驶习惯之间的灰色地带。 同样是并线、礼让和临停，不同城市的交通参与者会留下不同距离、采取不同节奏。香港有双层巴士、红色小巴、密集出租车和狭窄道路；伦敦有中世纪路网、大量环岛、频繁的人车混行。这不仅仅是画面镜像的问题，而是整套交通语义的迁移。
过去，头部企业在中美积累了海量左舵数据，见过绝大多数复杂场景都来自左舵右行道路。右舵环境下可用于训练和验证的数据相对匮乏，进入全无人阶段的经验更是空白。
萝卜快跑在香港和伦敦的突破，恰恰证明了这套能力是可以跨体系迁移的。
2026 年 7 月，萝卜快跑在香港机场岛启动全球首次右舵左行体系下车内无安全员的全无人公开道路测试，打破这一行业空白。从拿到香港首张无人驾驶先导牌照开始，历经五次扩区，一步步完成载人、扩范围、提车速，最终获得监管部门认可，实现撤掉车内安全员的里程碑突破。
△ 萝卜快跑在香港。
香港完成右舵全无人的 “模拟考”，伦敦迎来真正的 “终极大考”。随后萝卜快跑携手 Uber、Lyft 旗下 Freenow 登陆伦敦开展公开道路测试，成为唯一进入伦敦 Robotaxi 测试体系的中国无人驾驶企业。
伦敦老城区路网错综复杂，环岛众多，黑色出租车、自行车、行人高度混杂，监管标准严苛，是右舵市场难度最高的考场。
有意思的是，Waymo 同样布局伦敦，两大中美 Robotaxi 头部玩家，第一次跳出各自本土主场，在同一座城市、同一套交通规则、同一监管框架下同台竞技。
过去两者各自在中美左舵市场发展，赛道彼此隔离，伦敦的落地，意味着全球竞争进入统一标尺下的实战阶段。
当深圳与洛杉矶隔太平洋遥遥相望，萝卜快跑与 Waymo 在伦敦街头迎来相遇，我们看见的不只是两家企业的博弈，更是中国城市、中国 AI 产业参与全球前沿科技竞争的生动故事。
03
不止于技术
今年6月，海外研究机构Autnmy AI发布的“无人驾驶之路指数”显示，萝卜快跑以81.7分位居全球Robotaxi榜首，超过Waymo的77.6分、特斯拉的41.9分。 排名从运营能力、车队规模、商业合作生态、量产制造能力等六大维度加权计算，每12小时更新⼀次。截至8月6号，萝卜快跑以78.4分位居全球第一，Waymo以77.1分位列第二，两者与第三名的差距接近15分。
△ 8月4日，Road to Autonomy Index排名。
落地数据更具说服力。截至目前，萝卜快跑累计出行订单突破2200万单，超越Waymo本土订单规模，无人驾驶总路测里程超3.3亿公里，其中全无人无人驾驶里程达2.2亿公里，实现全球27城落地。
这也折射出一个关键变化：行业竞争早已告别单一的技术参数比拼，进入规模化运营、场景适配、全球化落地的综合实力较量。
萝卜快跑亮眼的全球化成果收获了国际各界的高度认可。2026年7月，斯洛伐克总统彼得·佩列格里尼实地试乘萝卜快跑无人车，对其技术成熟度与乘坐体验予以高度评价。
此前，迪拜王储、欧洲央行行长、Lyft全球CEO等多国政要与行业大咖纷纷点赞背书，印证了萝卜快跑的全球技术认可度，也让中国无人出行技术走向世界舞台中央。
在这场全球竞速的宏大叙事之外，萝卜快跑还有一个更接地气的维度。
行业调研数据显示，萝卜快跑品牌知名度稳居国内Robotaxi首位，用户核心好评集中在科技安全感、智能座舱体验与出行舒适度三大维度。
在深圳，它已融入市民的日常生活，覆盖南山、宝安、坪山等核心城区，成为串联写字楼、商圈、居民区、机场口岸的常态化出行工具。
毕业生在萝卜快跑无人车里拉小提琴庆祝毕业，球迷乘坐萝卜快跑去看米卢指导的球赛，上班族用它接驳云巴系统，更不用说加班后的深夜归途、周末的商圈短途接驳、通勤的跨区往返这些这“无人车日常化”场景了。无司机的私密座舱、平稳丝滑的行驶质感、干净舒适的车内环境，精准契合了年轻群体的出行需求。
△ 视频拍摄者称：“用无人车这一中国科技名片承载毕业记忆，既是告别青春，也是见证国家科技进步。”
萝卜快跑正在规模化运营中持续优化驾乘体验，让无人驾驶从“科技概念”转化为市民可感、可享的民生红利。
从城市发展维度来看，萝卜快跑也助力深圳构建起更高效、智能的城市交通体系。根据深圳“十五五”规划，深圳各类无人驾驶车辆规模将从目前的1800台扩容至2030年的1万台，无人出行服务将全面融入公共交通体系，成为城市交通升级的核心支撑。
萝卜快跑的规模化运营经验，正是深圳实现这一目标的核心底气，助力深圳打造全国首个全域智能化出行标杆城市。
洛杉矶孕育了美国无人驾驶的商业化范本，而萝卜快跑依托深圳的硬核实力，打造出了适配复杂场景、可全球复制、兼顾科技高度与民生温度的中国范本。
从深圳到香港，从香港到伦敦，萝卜快跑的全球突围，不止是一家企业的胜利，更是中国智能驾驶产业的全球话语权彰显。在中美科技博弈的大背景下，深圳以Robotaxi为抓手，与洛杉矶隔空对标，也构建起中国智造引领全球智能出行的全新认知。
未来，随着萝卜快跑持续深化全球化布局、迭代全无人技术、优化民生出行服务，深圳将进一步巩固全球Robotaxi核心标杆城市地位，以一城之力带动中国无人驾驶产业持续领跑，在全球智能出行的新时代赛道，书写属于中国的科创答卷。
In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers compare Proton X70 and Mazda CX-5 when choosing a car. Both models are quite close in price and positioning, so today we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time doing research.
The OTR price of Proton X70 in Malaysia is RM 106,800 - 122,300, with a total of 3 versions, including 1.5L Standard 2WD (RM 106,800), 1.5L Executive 2WD (RM 115,800), 1.5L Premium 2WD (RM 122,300), etc.
The OTR price of Mazda CX-5 in Malaysia is RM 135,469 - 166,760, with a total of 3 versions, including 2025 2.0L AT 35th Anniversary (RM 316,154), 2025 2.0L AT (RM 296,154), 2025 2.0L MT (RM 294,154), etc.
In terms of price, the Proton X70's starting price is indeed RM 28,669 cheaper than the Mazda CX-5. If your budget is limited, the Proton's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. However, also note that the few thousand saved might involve trade-offs in features, depending on your specific needs.
Proton X70 is equipped with a 1.5L Turbo, horsepower 140 hp. Official fuel consumption 7.0 L/100km.
Mazda CX-5 is equipped with a 1.5L Turbo, horsepower 140 hp. Official fuel consumption 7.0 L/100km.
Both cars use the same powertrain system, and the daily driving experience is basically the same. Fuel consumption is also similar, so there is no need to overthink this point.
The Proton X70's safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), and active safety systems include ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
The Mazda CX-5's safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), and active safety systems include.
Both cars have the same safety rating, and safety features in this class are considered very complete. Safety in new cars nowadays is not poor, so there is no need to worry too much about this.
Proton X70 adopts FWD drive type.
Mazda CX-5 adopts FWD drive type.
Both cars have the same drive type, both are FWD, and there will not be much difference in the daily driving experience.
Both Proton X70 and Mazda CX-5 are mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, you can prioritize the one with better reputation; if you care more about value for money and features, choose the model with richer configuration. Finally, it is recommended to test drive both, as personal experience is the most important.
In general, both Proton X70 and Mazda CX-5 are quite good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends primarily on your personal needs and budget. It is recommended to do your research, compare quotes from a few dealerships, and then test drive before making a final decision. Buying a car is a big decision, so spending some time doing research is never wrong.
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拎 寶騰 X70 同 馬自達 CX-60 嚟做比較。呢兩部車喺價位同定位上都幾近，今日我哋就由多個角度做一個詳細比較，幫你省返做功課嘅時間。
寶騰 X70 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 106,800 - 122,300，合共有 3 個版本，包括 1.5L Standard 2WD（RM 106,800）、1.5L Executive 2WD（RM 115,800）、1.5L Premium 2WD（RM 122,300） 等。
馬自達 CX-60 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 200,510 - 252,873，合共有 2 個版本，包括 2026 3.3T 4WD High Plus（RM 252,873）、2025 2.5L 2WD High（RM 200,510） 等。
由價錢睇，寶騰 X70 嘅起步價確實比馬自達 CX-60 平咗 RM 93,710。如果你預算有限，寶騰嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需要。但都要留意，平嗰幾千蚊，喺配備上可能有取舍，具體就要睇你嘅需要。
寶騰 X70 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA)。
馬自達 CX-60 嘅安全評級係 5★ (Euro NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 i-Activsense Pro。
安全配備方面，兩部車都拿到唔錯嘅評級。不過寶騰 X70 嘅 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA) 同馬自達 CX-60 嘅 i-Activsense Pro 喺功能上有所分別，如果你比較重視主動安全嘅話，可以仔細比較下兩者嘅功能列表。
寶騰 X70 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
馬自達 CX-60 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
兩部車嘅驅動方式一樣，都係 FWD，日常駕駛感受唔會有太大分別。
寶騰 X70 保用 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
馬自達 CX-60 保用 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
兩部車嘅保用條件一樣，呢方面唔使煩惱。實際保養成本仲要睇品牌嘅服務網絡同零件價格，建議去車友群問下真實車主嘅經驗。
總體嚟講，寶騰 X70 同馬自達 CX-60 都係馬來西亞市場相當唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一部，關鍵都要睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做足功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，先至去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嗰陣都拿 Proton X70 同 Mazda CX-30 做比較。這兩款車喺價位同定位上都幾接近，今日我哋就由多個方面做一個詳細比較，幫你省返做功課嘅時間。
Proton X70 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 106,800 - 122,300，一共有 3 個版本，包括 1.5L Standard 2WD（RM 106,800）、1.5L Executive 2WD（RM 115,800）、1.5L Premium 2WD（RM 122,300） 等。
Mazda CX-30 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 122,409 - 146,409，一共有 4 個版本，包括 2025 2.0L High+ Premium（RM 146,409）、2025 2.0L High+（RM 138,409）、2025 2.0L High（RM 130,409） 等。
從價錢睇，Proton X70 嘅起價確實比 Mazda CX-30 平咗 RM 15,609。如果你預算有限，Proton 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需要。但都要注意，平嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備上會有取舍，具體睇你嘅需要。
Proton X70 嘅安全评分係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA)。
Mazda CX-30 嘅安全评分係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 i-Activsense。
兩款車嘅安全评分一樣，喺呢個級別入面安全配備都算好齊全了。現在嘅新車安全性都唔差，唔使太擔心呢一點。
Proton X70 車身長度 4400 mm，車尾箱 400 L。
Mazda CX-30 車身長度 4500 mm，車尾箱 450 L。
空間方面，Mazda CX-30 嘅車身比 Proton X70 長咗 100 mm，乘坐空間更有優勢。不過 Proton X70 喺城市入面泊車會靈活少少，各有取舍。
Proton X70 用 FWD 驅動方式。
Mazda CX-30 用 FWD 驅動方式。
兩款車嘅驅動方式一樣，都係 FWD，日常駕駛感覺唔會有太大分別。
總體嚟講，Proton X70 同 Mazda CX-30 都係馬來西亞市場好唔錯嘅車型。選擇邊一輛，關鍵都係要睇你嘅個人需要同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花啲時間做功課絕對無錯。
