唔知有幾多朋友最近期關注 10 萬內純電 SUV 市場?近段時間睇嚟,呢個細分市場好熱鬧。就講長安啟源全新 Q05 同零跑 A10,上個月銷量分別達 15814 輛同 14372 輛,全部挺進 2026 年 4 月銷量排行全品類前 10,長安啟源全新 Q05 甚至奪得緊緊湊型純電 SUV 市場嘅銷冠。

(長安啟源全新 Q05)
值得留意係,兩款大熱門產品亮點亦唔少,9 萬級可以得到 500km+嘅續航,零跑 A10 甚至配備激光雷達,有高級智駕輔助需求嘅朋友嚟講,呢架車吸引力的確唔低。但係喺價格上,同為高配嘅長安啟源全新 Q05 506Max+ 同零跑 A10 505 激光雷達版,終端價格分別係 9.59 萬同 8.68 萬,手握 9 萬左右預算嘅朋友都可以考慮。明顯係,又去到決賽圈二揀一環節。
(零跑 A10)
如果對預算比較敏感,咁喺長安啟源全新 Q05 同零跑 A10 之間,後者可能更受歡迎,畢竟終端價格實打實平咗幾千元。而且,高配 A10 配有激光雷達,市區/高速情況均能啟動領航輔助駕駛,呢個就係佢嘅優勢所在。當然,如果預算允許,揀長安啟源全新 Q05 高配,都有帶激光雷達嘅高級輔助駕駛。
(長安啟源全新 Q05)
但既然係買車前嘅橫評,唔少全方位對比。首先從尺寸睇,作為緊湊型 SUV,長安啟源全新 Q05 長寬高分別係 4435*1855*1595mm,軸距為 2735mm。而零跑 A10 車型級別就係小型 SUV,長寬高分別係 4270*1810*1635mm,軸距為 2605mm。
(零跑 A10)
如果只係考慮代步、通勤,零跑 A10 嘅細個嘅略有優勢,方便行街串巷。但實際上,好多人買車都要兼顧家用,10 萬內預算也多以剛需用車群體為主。既然係剛需,且有家用需求,嗰空間自然唔好掉鏈子。
(長安啟源全新 Q05)
(零跑 A10)
講返日常家庭出行嚟講,兩車之間 130mm 軸距差異,直接反映喺後排體驗。坐入長安啟源全新 Q05 後排,腿部空間平整兼寬敞,一齊坐 3 位成年人都唔會太擠;但係坐入零跑 A10 後排,無論坐寬定係腿部空間都會細少少。媽咪喺後排照顧孩子,長安啟源全新 Q05 後排更加寬敞嘅空間會更加方便佢操作,孩子都能有更大嘅活動空間。
(長安啟源全新 Q05)
(零跑 A10)
除咗空間,通勤黨同家庭用戶對舒適配置都比較關注。睇嚟對比,兩車都有配電動尾門、無匙進入、自適應遠近光等外部配置。但係從車廂內睇,零跑 A10 副駕無法電動調節,後排靠背都唔支援角度調節,同埋缺少後排空調出風口、車內 PM2.5 過濾裝置等。
(長安啟源全新 Q05)
(零跑 A10)
反觀長安啟源全新 Q05,除咗副駕支持電動調節,前排仲集成咗加熱/通風/按摩/副駕腿托功能,對比零跑 A10 只提供前排座椅加熱,佢嘅品質無疑更上一層樓。包括後排乘員都有少少照顧,例如靠背角度可調、配有後排空調出風口、後排中央扶手/杯架等,更加適合家人同行呢類場景。
(長安啟源全新 Q05)
(零跑 A10)
除咗舒享體驗,行駛系統嘅對比我哋都唔好忽略。首先從大家關注嘅續航睇,長安啟源全新 Q05 同零跑 A10 分別搭載 51.9kWh、53kWh 電池,CLTC 純電續航做到 506km、505km,差異大可忽略。但從電芯供應鏈睇,前者出自寧德時代,後者就係國軒高科/江蘇正力,若論品牌含金量,“寧王”順位自然靠前,更值得信賴。另外,兩車都有全球品質,按照全球嚴苛嘅標準打造,零跑 A10 符合國內、歐盟雙標準,長安啟源全新 Q05 已經喺泰國上市,未來仲會相繼落地多個國家地區,最終開拓歐洲區域,此外仲有央企背書,質量品質都好可靠。
因為本文討論嘅係 A10 嘅 505 版本,採用電池液冷技術,溫控較好,而如果係 403 版本,採用成本低嘅風冷技術,散熱效果較差。呢點上,全新 Q05 做得更好,入門就採用電池直冷技術,高配用嘅係液冷技術,能更好地實現熱管理,保證電池安全。
(長安啟源全新 Q05)
(零跑 A10)
動力方面,長安啟源全新 Q05 同零跑 A10 都係前置單電機佈局,電機最大動力輸出分別係 120kW/190N·m、90kW/150N·m,0-100km/h 加速時間分別做到 8.9 秒同 10.6 秒。坦率嚟講,兩款車喺純電陣營加速性能都中規中矩;但係相對嚟講,長安啟源全新 Q05 嘅 8 秒級零百加速,喺山路行駛、高速超車等情況下會比零跑 A10 更加分。
(長安啟源全新 Q05)

(零跑 A10)
總結嚟講,零跑 A10 505 激光雷達版優勢突出:價格更低、智駕輔助覆蓋範圍更廣,適合預算優先 + 科技嘗鮮嘅消費者。而長安啟源全新 Q05 更強調“全面”二字:加少少預算同樣可以獲得高級輔助駕駛,而且尺寸更大、舒適配置更高、採用頭部電芯供應鏈,動力亦更強,綜合表現更全能。總括嚟講,預算 9 萬級追求面面俱到嘅家用體驗,長安啟源全新 Q05 506Max+ 更加值得考慮。

兄弟姐妹們,今日講一個出海嘅大新聞——唔係賣車,係賣「司機」。6 月 2 號,文遠知行同 Uber 聯合宣佈咗一件事:計劃喺西班牙馬德里推出該國首個商業化 Robotaxi 試點服務。意思就係:西班牙人好快就可以用 Uber 叫到一台冇司機嘅出租車。呢次係文遠知行同 Uber 第一次一齊進入歐洲市場。馬德里亦成為文遠知行 Robotaxi 駛入嘅全球第十二個城市。
官方消息話,喺馬德里自治區政府嘅支持下,呢項服務今年內就會正式啟動。到嗰陣,馬德里嘅朋友哋打開 Uber App,就有一鍵呼叫文遠知行嘅 Robotaxi。同叫普通網約車一樣,分別係嚟嘅車冇駕駛員——至少喺初期,仲係有分別嘅。運營初期,車入面會配備經過專業培訓嘅安全員,終究係剛上線,穩妥第一。
文遠知行呢間公司,你可能聽過,也可能冇聽過。簡單介紹下:2017 年成立,一直埋頭搞 Robotaxi 技術研發同商業化。而家佢嘅 Robotaxi 已經覆蓋咗廣州、北京、新加坡、阿布達比、迪拜、利雅得、蘇黎世……加埋而家嘅馬德里,一共 12 個城市。西班牙亦係文遠知行進入嘅第五個歐洲市場——之前已經入咗瑞士、法國、比利時、斯洛伐克。按照文遠知行同 Uber 喺 2025 年 5 月達成嘅規劃,佢哋要喺五年內新增 15 個國際城市部署 Robotaxi 服務,全球部署數萬輛 Robotaxi。隨著馬德里落地,目前已經完成咗 4 個城市嘅佈局,仲有 11 個會喺 2030 年前陸續覆蓋。
講真嘅,中國自動駕駛公司出海唔係頭一回,但中國技術 + 全球出行平台 + 歐洲市場呢個組合,定係好有意思。馬德里係歐洲最具商業潛力嘅 Robotaxi 市場之一,人口多、出行需求大,當地政策都好友善。喺呢個市場站穩腳根,對文遠知行嚟講係個唔小嘅里程碑。對 Uber 嚟講,引進 Robotaxi 都係為咗降低成本——終究司機唔使發人工。對馬德里市民嚟講,以後打車可能更平。

BYD officially released the May 2026 production and sales flash report, with new energy vehicles from all brands reaching a monthly sales volume of 383,453 vehicles, a slight increase of 0.26% year-on-year, achieving year-on-year positive growth in monthly sales after ten months; among them, passenger car deliveries reached 376,990 units, surging 19.4% month-on-month, wiping out the pain of previous model iterations, presenting a new pattern where the domestic base is stable, overseas sales are soaring, and high-end brands are scaling up across the board. Amidst the market environment of intensified competition in the domestic new energy sector, Tesla FSD entering China, and an intense launch of independent new products, it has forged a unique structural growth path.

The Dynasty and Ocean main brands combined sold 330,215 vehicles in May, accounting for over 80% of the group's total sales, remaining the stabilizer for BYD's sales volume. The full series had 8 models exceeding 20,000 units in monthly sales, covering products from 50,000 entry-level commuter to 200,000 home SUV.

Inside the Dynasty Network, the Yuan family sold 56,691 units, and the Song family 51,370 units. Both crossed the 50,000 threshold, becoming two major sales pillars for the brand, catering to home commuter and urban-rural travel needs; the Qin family followed closely with a stable performance of 28,360 units. The Han and Tang series maintained a volume in the six-thousand range, deeply cultivating the mid-to-large home sedan and SUV niche markets; the brand new model Xia is in the market cultivation phase, delivering 1,810 units monthly, with potential for steady volume growth as channels expand.
The Ocean Network's growth momentum is even more rapid, with 5 models entering the 20,000 club across the series: Sealion 42,615 units, Seal 34,117 units, Seagull 39,919 units, Dolphin 22,260 units, and Song PLUS 27,755 units. Among them, Seagull remains the best-selling entry-level commuter model thanks to its affordable pricing of 60,000-80,000. Sealion, as a new volume model, stands firm at the 40,000 level upon launch, filling the mid-size SUV product gap in the Ocean Network and perfecting the Ocean product tier layout. From commuter small cars to compact SUVs, the two main brands rely on DM-i hybrid and pure electric dual-line technologies to牢牢锁住 the mainstream home market share within 150,000 domestically.
Fang Cheng Bao Year-on-Year Surges 139.7%, Brand Upward Positioning Takes EffectThe high-end matrix of Denza, Fang Cheng Bao, and Yangwang sold a combined 46,489 vehicles in May, officially breaking away from the niche positioning to become a new pivot for BYD's brand premium and profit growth, breaking the industry curse of difficulty in high-end breakthrough for domestic brands.

The off-road brand Fang Cheng Bao sold 30,186 units monthly, surging 139.7% year-on-year, creating a new high in monthly sales since the brand launched. Its Titanium 7 model sold 18,280 units monthly, while Leopard 5 and Leopard 8 output remained stable, continuously squeezing the survival space for joint venture and imported models in the 250,000-400,000 hardcore off-road niche market.

Denza delivered 16,303 units in May, with the MPV benchmark D9 selling 6,721 units, and the Z9 series close to 6,000 units. MPV and mid-to-large sedan dual-line efforts helped them stand firm in the luxury new energy track; the million-level ultra-luxury brand Yangwang continued its steady climb, delivering 286 units that month, a year-on-year increase of 105.8%, completing market verification of the domestic brand ceiling product and forming a full price range product layout from 100,000+ home, 300,000-400,000 off-road, 500,000 luxury MPV to million-level flagship.

In May, BYD's overseas sales of passenger cars and pickup trucks reached 160,177 units, surging 80.7% year-on-year. Exports accounted for over 42% of the full series total sales, setting a new historical high for brand export and becoming the core driving force to stabilize May overall sales and achieve year-on-year positive growth.
Southeast Asia, Europe, and Latin America became the main incremental markets. Seagull, Song PLUS, and Yuan series continued to top new energy best-seller lists in multiple countries; the SHARK pickup truck exceeded 4,000 units in monthly exports for two consecutive months. Relying on the completion of localization production in Thailand, Brazil, Hungary, and Uzbekistan with four overseas vehicle factories, localized production continues to land, avoiding tariffs while rapidly penetrating terminal channels. Against the background of stock market competition in the domestic auto industry and normalized price wars, the rapidly expanding overseas market effectively counteracts sales volatility brought by domestic model iterations, officially upgrading from a supplementary market to BYD's core growth engine. As of now, BYD's global cumulative new energy vehicle sales have exceeded 16.5 million units, with the globalization map continuously broadening.
Intelligent Driving Empowers Product Iteration, H2 New Products Prepare to Surge VolumeMay marked a key node in BYD's intelligent driving landing, with the God's Eye intelligent driving system becoming a core bonus point for models: the number of vehicles with advanced intelligent driving across all brands exceeded 3.15 million, with daily road test data exceeding 200 million kilometers; that month, BYD implemented City Pilot and Smart Parking dual safety backup services, becoming the world's first auto manufacturer to achieve dual intelligent driving backups. Three days after policy implementation, the activation rate of models equipped with the God's Eye system in cities surged 50%. Intelligent driving experience upgrades directly drove in-store order conversion, solidifying product competitiveness for subsequent models to continue volume sales, and facing the intelligent driving market shock brought by FSD entering China.
From data details, BYD's cumulative sales from January to May 2026 were 1,405,039 units, down 20.32% year-on-year. The core reason is that the full series of main models were concentratedly iterated, and the capacity ramp-up of the 2nd Gen Fast Charge Blade Battery was restricted. The new Flash Charge Battery upgraded fast charging and low-temperature performance. Full series iteration models prioritized installing new batteries, but production line retrofitting dragged down capacity release. Order backlogs on popular models and delayed deliveries compressed the May delivery volume to a certain extent.
As the end of the second quarter approaches and the 2nd Gen Blade Battery capacity continues to release, coupled with new models such as Denza N8L, Fang Cheng Bao Titanium 7 Pure Electric Version, Sealion 05, and Xia L landing the market, the industry generally predicts that BYD's full brand sales in June are expected to exceed 400,000 vehicles. Relying on the four-dimension development logic of low-end volume locking share, high-end raising profit, overseas pushing volume, and intelligence improving product power, amidst the intensified new energy elimination round in the domestic market, BYD's full category layout advantage continues to amplify, securing its status as the domestic new energy leader, accelerating steadily towards global top auto manufacturers.

兄弟姐妹們,今日講一個出海嘅大新聞——唔係賣車,係賣「司機」。6 月 2 號,文遠知行同 Uber 聯合宣佈咗一件事:計劃喺西班牙馬德里推出該國首個商業化 Robotaxi 試點服務。意思就係:西班牙人好快就可以用 Uber 叫到一台冇司機嘅出租車。呢次係文遠知行同 Uber 第一次一齊進入歐洲市場。馬德里亦成為文遠知行 Robotaxi 駛入嘅全球第十二個城市。
官方消息話,喺馬德里自治區政府嘅支持下,呢項服務今年內就會正式啟動。到嗰陣,馬德里嘅朋友哋打開 Uber App,就有一鍵呼叫文遠知行嘅 Robotaxi。同叫普通網約車一樣,分別係嚟嘅車冇駕駛員——至少喺初期,仲係有分別嘅。運營初期,車入面會配備經過專業培訓嘅安全員,終究係剛上線,穩妥第一。
文遠知行呢間公司,你可能聽過,也可能冇聽過。簡單介紹下:2017 年成立,一直埋頭搞 Robotaxi 技術研發同商業化。而家佢嘅 Robotaxi 已經覆蓋咗廣州、北京、新加坡、阿布達比、迪拜、利雅得、蘇黎世……加埋而家嘅馬德里,一共 12 個城市。西班牙亦係文遠知行進入嘅第五個歐洲市場——之前已經入咗瑞士、法國、比利時、斯洛伐克。按照文遠知行同 Uber 喺 2025 年 5 月達成嘅規劃,佢哋要喺五年內新增 15 個國際城市部署 Robotaxi 服務,全球部署數萬輛 Robotaxi。隨著馬德里落地,目前已經完成咗 4 個城市嘅佈局,仲有 11 個會喺 2030 年前陸續覆蓋。
講真嘅,中國自動駕駛公司出海唔係頭一回,但中國技術 + 全球出行平台 + 歐洲市場呢個組合,定係好有意思。馬德里係歐洲最具商業潛力嘅 Robotaxi 市場之一,人口多、出行需求大,當地政策都好友善。喺呢個市場站穩腳根,對文遠知行嚟講係個唔小嘅里程碑。對 Uber 嚟講,引進 Robotaxi 都係為咗降低成本——終究司機唔使發人工。對馬德里市民嚟講,以後打車可能更平。

比亞迪正式發布 2026 年 5 月產銷快報,全品牌新能源汽車單月銷量 383453 輛,同比微增 0.26%,時隔十個月實現單月銷量同比轉正;其中乘用車交付 376990 輛,環比大漲 19.4%,一掃前期車型換代陣痛,呈現國內基本盤穩固、海外銷量狂飆、高端品牌全線放量的全新格局,在國內新能源內捲加劇、特斯拉 FSD 入華、自主新品密集上市的市場環境中,走出獨有的結構性增長路線。

王朝 + 海洋兩大主力品牌 5 月合計售出 330215 輛,佔據集團總銷量超八成,仍是比亞迪銷量壓艙石,全系列共 8 款車型單月銷量突破 2 萬台,產品從 5 萬入門代步到 20 萬家用 SUV 實現全覆蓋。

王朝網內部,元家族 56691 輛、宋家族 51370 輛。雙雙跨過五萬門檻,成為品牌兩大銷量支柱,兼顧家用代步與城鄉出行需求;秦家族緊隨其後交出 28360 台穩定表現,漢、唐系列月銷維持六千級體量,深耕中大型家用轎車、SUV 細分市場;全新車型夏處於市場培育期,單月交付 1810 台,後續隨渠道鋪開有望穩步上量。
海洋網增長勢頭更為迅猛,全系五款車型跨入兩萬俱樂部:海獅 42615 台、海豹 34117 台、海鷗 39919 台、海豚 22260 台、宋 PLUS 27755 台。其中海鷗憑藉 6-8 萬親民定價穩居入門代步銷冠,海獅作為全新走量車型上市即站穩四萬量級,補齊海洋網中型 SUV 產品空白,完善海洋產品梯隊佈局。從代步小車到緊湊 SUV,兩大主品牌依托 DM-i 混動與純電雙線技術,牢牢鎖住 15 萬以內國內主流家用市場份額。
方程豹同比暴漲 139.7% 品牌向上落地見效騰勢、方程豹、仰望組成的高端矩陣 5 月合計銷售 46489 輛,正式擺脫小眾定位,成為比亞迪品牌溢價與利潤增長新支點,打破自主品牌高端化難破局的行業魔咒。

越野品牌方程豹單月 30186 輛,同比暴漲 139.7%,創下品牌上市以來月度銷量新高,旗下鎦 7 單月 18280 台,豹 5、豹 8 穩定輸出,在 25-40 萬硬派越野細分市場持續擠壓合資、進口車型生存空間。

騰勢 5 月交付 16303 台,MPV 標桿 D9 售出 6721 台,Z9 系列近 6000 台,MPV、中大型轎車雙線發力,站穩豪華新能源賽道;百萬元級超豪華品牌仰望穩步爬坡,當月交付 286 台,同比增幅 105.8%,完成自主品牌天花板產品的市場驗證,形成從十幾萬家用、三四十萬越野、五十萬豪華 MPV 到百萬元級旗艦的全價格帶產品佈局。

5 月比亞迪乘用車和皮卡海外銷量 160177 輛,同比大漲 80.7%,出口佔全系總銷量突破 42%,創下品牌出海歷史新高,成為穩住 5 月整體銷量、實現同比轉正的核心驅動力。
東南亞、歐洲、拉美成為主力增量市場,海鷗、宋 PLUS、元系列持續登頂多國新能源熱銷榜單,SHARK 皮卡連續兩月單月出口突破 4000 台;依托泰國、巴西、匈牙利、烏茲別克斯坦四大海外整車工廠落地投產,本地化生產持續落地,規避關稅同時快速下沉終端渠道。在國內車市存量競爭、價格戰常態化背景下,高速擴容的海外市場有效對沖國內車型換代帶來的銷量波動,正式從補充市場升級為比亞迪核心增長引擎。截至當前,比亞迪新能源汽車全球累計銷量已經突破 1650 萬輛,全球化版圖持續拓寬。
智駕賦能產品迭代 下半年新品蓄力衝量5 月比亞迪智能化落地迎來關鍵節點,天神之眼智駕系統成為車型核心加分項:全品牌搭載高級智駕車型保有量突破 315 萬輛,日均路測數據超 2 億公里;當月比亞迪落地城市領航、智能泊車雙安全兜底服務,成為全球首家實現兩項智駕兜底的車企,政策落地三天後,搭載天神之眼系統車型的城市 NOA 激活率暴漲 50%,智能化體驗升級直接拉動終端到店訂單轉化,為後續車型持續走量築牢產品競爭力,直面 FSD 入華帶來的智駕市場衝擊。
從數據細節來看,2026 年 1-5 月比亞迪累計銷量 1405039 輛,同比下滑 20.32%,核心誘因是全系主力車型集中換代、第二代閃充刀片電池產能爬坡受限。新款閃充電池升級快充與低溫性能,全系換代車型優先換裝新電池,但產線改造拖累產能釋放,熱門車型訂單積壓、交付延後,一定程度壓縮 5 月交付體量。
隨著二季度末二代刀片電池產能持續釋放,疊加騰勢 N8L、方程豹鎦 7 純電版、海獅 05、夏 L 等多款新車陸續登陸市場,業內普遍預判比亞迪 6 月全品牌銷量有望突破 40 萬輛。依托低端走量鎖份額、高端提利潤、海外衝增量、智能化提產品力的四維發展邏輯,在國內新能源淘汰賽加劇的當下,比亞迪全品類佈局優勢持續放大,坐穩國內新能源龍頭,加速向著全球頭部車企穩步邁進。

唔知有幾多朋友最近期關注 10 萬內純電 SUV 市場?近段時間睇嚟,呢個細分市場好熱鬧。就講長安啟源全新 Q05 同零跑 A10,上個月銷量分別達 15814 輛同 14372 輛,全部挺進 2026 年 4 月銷量排行全品類前 10,長安啟源全新 Q05 甚至奪得緊緊湊型純電 SUV 市場嘅銷冠。

(長安啟源全新 Q05)
值得留意係,兩款大熱門產品亮點亦唔少,9 萬級可以得到 500km+嘅續航,零跑 A10 甚至配備激光雷達,有高級智駕輔助需求嘅朋友嚟講,呢架車吸引力的確唔低。但係喺價格上,同為高配嘅長安啟源全新 Q05 506Max+ 同零跑 A10 505 激光雷達版,終端價格分別係 9.59 萬同 8.68 萬,手握 9 萬左右預算嘅朋友都可以考慮。明顯係,又去到決賽圈二揀一環節。
(零跑 A10)
如果對預算比較敏感,咁喺長安啟源全新 Q05 同零跑 A10 之間,後者可能更受歡迎,畢竟終端價格實打實平咗幾千元。而且,高配 A10 配有激光雷達,市區/高速情況均能啟動領航輔助駕駛,呢個就係佢嘅優勢所在。當然,如果預算允許,揀長安啟源全新 Q05 高配,都有帶激光雷達嘅高級輔助駕駛。
(長安啟源全新 Q05)
但既然係買車前嘅橫評,唔少全方位對比。首先從尺寸睇,作為緊湊型 SUV,長安啟源全新 Q05 長寬高分別係 4435*1855*1595mm,軸距為 2735mm。而零跑 A10 車型級別就係小型 SUV,長寬高分別係 4270*1810*1635mm,軸距為 2605mm。
(零跑 A10)
如果只係考慮代步、通勤,零跑 A10 嘅細個嘅略有優勢,方便行街串巷。但實際上,好多人買車都要兼顧家用,10 萬內預算也多以剛需用車群體為主。既然係剛需,且有家用需求,嗰空間自然唔好掉鏈子。
(長安啟源全新 Q05)
(零跑 A10)
講返日常家庭出行嚟講,兩車之間 130mm 軸距差異,直接反映喺後排體驗。坐入長安啟源全新 Q05 後排,腿部空間平整兼寬敞,一齊坐 3 位成年人都唔會太擠;但係坐入零跑 A10 後排,無論坐寬定係腿部空間都會細少少。媽咪喺後排照顧孩子,長安啟源全新 Q05 後排更加寬敞嘅空間會更加方便佢操作,孩子都能有更大嘅活動空間。
(長安啟源全新 Q05)
(零跑 A10)
除咗空間,通勤黨同家庭用戶對舒適配置都比較關注。睇嚟對比,兩車都有配電動尾門、無匙進入、自適應遠近光等外部配置。但係從車廂內睇,零跑 A10 副駕無法電動調節,後排靠背都唔支援角度調節,同埋缺少後排空調出風口、車內 PM2.5 過濾裝置等。
(長安啟源全新 Q05)
(零跑 A10)
反觀長安啟源全新 Q05,除咗副駕支持電動調節,前排仲集成咗加熱/通風/按摩/副駕腿托功能,對比零跑 A10 只提供前排座椅加熱,佢嘅品質無疑更上一層樓。包括後排乘員都有少少照顧,例如靠背角度可調、配有後排空調出風口、後排中央扶手/杯架等,更加適合家人同行呢類場景。
(長安啟源全新 Q05)
(零跑 A10)
除咗舒享體驗,行駛系統嘅對比我哋都唔好忽略。首先從大家關注嘅續航睇,長安啟源全新 Q05 同零跑 A10 分別搭載 51.9kWh、53kWh 電池,CLTC 純電續航做到 506km、505km,差異大可忽略。但從電芯供應鏈睇,前者出自寧德時代,後者就係國軒高科/江蘇正力,若論品牌含金量,“寧王”順位自然靠前,更值得信賴。另外,兩車都有全球品質,按照全球嚴苛嘅標準打造,零跑 A10 符合國內、歐盟雙標準,長安啟源全新 Q05 已經喺泰國上市,未來仲會相繼落地多個國家地區,最終開拓歐洲區域,此外仲有央企背書,質量品質都好可靠。
因為本文討論嘅係 A10 嘅 505 版本,採用電池液冷技術,溫控較好,而如果係 403 版本,採用成本低嘅風冷技術,散熱效果較差。呢點上,全新 Q05 做得更好,入門就採用電池直冷技術,高配用嘅係液冷技術,能更好地實現熱管理,保證電池安全。
(長安啟源全新 Q05)
(零跑 A10)
動力方面,長安啟源全新 Q05 同零跑 A10 都係前置單電機佈局,電機最大動力輸出分別係 120kW/190N·m、90kW/150N·m,0-100km/h 加速時間分別做到 8.9 秒同 10.6 秒。坦率嚟講,兩款車喺純電陣營加速性能都中規中矩;但係相對嚟講,長安啟源全新 Q05 嘅 8 秒級零百加速,喺山路行駛、高速超車等情況下會比零跑 A10 更加分。
(長安啟源全新 Q05)

(零跑 A10)
總結嚟講,零跑 A10 505 激光雷達版優勢突出:價格更低、智駕輔助覆蓋範圍更廣,適合預算優先 + 科技嘗鮮嘅消費者。而長安啟源全新 Q05 更強調“全面”二字:加少少預算同樣可以獲得高級輔助駕駛,而且尺寸更大、舒適配置更高、採用頭部電芯供應鏈,動力亦更強,綜合表現更全能。總括嚟講,預算 9 萬級追求面面俱到嘅家用體驗,長安啟源全新 Q05 506Max+ 更加值得考慮。

In May, China's automotive market overall presented a gentle recovery trend, with domestic brands still being the sales backbone of the market. Recently, BYD, Geely, Chery, Changan, and Great Wall, the top 5 domestic automakers, successively released their monthly performance reports. From the data, these five companies show a general characteristic of "stable total growth, divergence between domestic and international markets, and accelerated new energy penetration". Overseas exports and new energy vehicles have become the most core growth engines; export business has evolved from a "bonus item" to the "core foundation" for some companies. BYD's "dominant leader" status is further consolidated, Chery achieved high growth via exports, Geely's new energy penetration rate broke 56%, Changan focused steadily on balanced development, while Great Wall appeared slightly under pressure during structural transformation.
BYD: Export Hits New High Becomes Biggest HighlightIn May, BYD stood firmly at the top of domestic brands with a monthly sales volume of 383,500 vehicles, maintaining positive growth both year-on-year and month-over-month under a large base. Its two main brands, Dynasty and Ocean, sold a combined 330,200 vehicles, contributing 86.1% of total sales; Fangchengbao's monthly sales broke 30,000 units to reach 30,200, a year-on-year increase of 139.7%, setting a new high for the year; Denza sold 16,300 vehicles, and Yangwang delivered 286 vehicles. From a model perspective, BYD had eight models in May with monthly sales exceeding 20,000 vehicles. The Song Family and Yuan Family both broke 50,000 units, selling 51,370 and 56,691 vehicles respectively. The Sea Lion Family followed closely with 42,615 vehicles, and Seagull sales were also close to 40,000 vehicles.

BYD's biggest highlight in May was exports. Overseas new energy vehicle sales reached 160,600 units, an 80.4% year-on-year increase, accounting for about 42%. The sharp expansion of export scale effectively countered the phased weakness in domestic demand. Cumulative exports from January to May exceeded 620,000 vehicles. High export growth mainly benefited from continued ramping up of overseas factory capacity, improved ocean shipping capacity, and accelerated channel network expansion. In the domestic market, BYD promoted Megawatt Super Charging and intelligent strategies simultaneously—Megawatt charging achieved about 90% charge in 9 minutes; 20,000 super charging stations are planned to be built by 2026; all series models are available with Sky Eye B intelligent driving solutions and city navigation safety fallback plans, accelerating the popularization of high-level intelligent driving. As Gen 2 Blade Battery capacity gradually releases, the company's orders are expected to continue rising.
Chery: Sales Growth Leads the Top 5Chery Group's total sales volume in May was 247,800 vehicles, a significant year-on-year increase of 20.5%, ranking first in growth speed among the top 5. Exports remained its most core growth engine—May exports reached 181,900 vehicles, an 80.5% year-on-year increase, accounting for 73.4% of total sales that month, continuously breaking the single-month export record for Chinese brands for three months. In terms of new energy, Chery New Energy sold 100,300 vehicles, a 58.8% year-on-year increase. April and May consecutively saw monthly new energy sales breaking 100,000 vehicles.

The strong performance in exports benefited from Chery's long-term deep cultivation of overseas channel advantages and localized operation capabilities. While overseas orders continued to rise, high export growth formed a sharp contrast with domestic sales—Chery's domestic sales in May were only 60,000 vehicles, accounting for one-quarter of total sales. From cumulative data, Chery Group accumulated 1.101 million sales from January to May, but against the annual goal of 3.2 million vehicles, monthly averages need to reach about 420,000 vehicles later, and pressure remains significant.
Geely: New Energy Penetration Rate Breaks 56%Geely Auto's total sales volume in May was 237,600 vehicles, a 1% year-on-year increase, achieving month-over-month double growth for three consecutive months. In terms of structure, Geely's "New Four Transformations" transformation showed significant results: new energy vehicle sales reached 133,400 units, accounting for 56% of total sales, with new energy share exceeding 50% for four consecutive months.

From sub-brands, performance was significantly divergent. Zeekr brand sales in May reached 34,400 vehicles, a 82% year-on-year increase; Zeekr 9 Series and 8 Series models combined sales approached 50% of total sales, showing bright performance in the high-end market; Galaxy brand sales were 81,700 vehicles; Geely brand sales were 182,500 vehicles, among which China Star Series sales reached 100,800 vehicles; Lynk & Co brand sales were 20,700 vehicles, with new energy vehicle sales share rising to 71%.
In terms of exports, Geely's overseas vehicle exports in May reached 85,100 vehicles, a explosive 184% year-on-year increase, setting a brand single-month export record high. Among exported products, new energy vehicles reached 40,800 units, accounting for nearly half; hybrid and pure electric products have successively landed in Southeast Asia, Middle East, Latin America, and other markets, highlighting the results of global strategy implementation.
Changan: Multi-brand Matrix Balanced EffortChangan Auto's delivery volume in May was 209,100 vehicles, among which new energy deliveries were 92,400 vehicles, a 5.8% year-on-year increase, with new energy share about 44%. In terms of exports, overseas deliveries reached 70,700 vehicles, a 38% year-on-year increase, becoming another major growth highlight for Changan in May.
In the sub-brand matrix, Changan Qiyuan delivered 34,500 vehicles in May; All-New Q05 delivered 15,800 units, with orders breaking 3,000 units within three days of listing in Thailand; Deepal sales in May were 33,200 vehicles, a 30% year-on-year increase; January to May overseas cumulative sales were 28,700 vehicles, a significant 167% year-on-year increase; Avatr delivered 7,336 vehicles in May; Changan Auto (Gravity) delivered nearly 49,000 vehicles in May.

Changan Auto's balanced layout was fully reflected in May: the fuel car base remained stable, new energy brands Deepal and Qiyuan accelerated volume growth, high-end brand Avatr continued to break through in technical cooperation, and overseas markets simultaneously achieved breakthrough growth. The pattern of five brands working together, driven by both new energy and exports, is initially taking shape.
Great Wall: Overseas Sales Growth Year-on-Year 46.75%Great Wall Motor's sales in May were 100,400 vehicles, slightly down compared to last May's 102,200 vehicles, making it the only company among the top 5 to show a year-on-year negative growth. From sub-brands, Haval brand sales in May were 55,500 vehicles, remaining Great Wall's most important sales pillar; Tank brand sales were 17,100 vehicles; both Haval and Tank brand sales showed year-on-year declines; Wey brand sold 8,119 vehicles, a 31.78% year-on-year increase, achieving growth against the trend; Ora brand performance was most stunning, with sales of 6,018 vehicles, a significant 206.88% year-on-year increase. In terms of new energy, Great Wall sold 30,400 new energy vehicles in May, with new energy vehicle transformation gradually accelerating.

The overseas market became Great Wall's biggest highlight in May, with overseas sales growing 46.75% year-on-year. Against the background of pressure on the domestic market, strong growth in overseas business effectively made up for the decline in the domestic market. Great Wall Motor's current core contradiction lies in: Haval and Tank, the two traditional main-selling brands, face weak growth, while Wey and Ora brands, although growing notably, have relatively small volume and are not yet enough to support overall growth. How to complete the "relay" between old and new brands is the key issue Great Wall must solve subsequently.
Final ThoughtsFrom May data, the growth pattern of the top 5 domestic brands has clearly diverged, but there are three common trends worth noting: First, exports have become a key engine for domestic brands to seek stability and growth. Second, new energy transformation is still accelerating, but paths differ among enterprises. Third, technological innovation continues to deepen brand moats. Looking ahead to the second half of the year, competition in the automotive industry will continue to upgrade around these three trends. Although everyone has a common direction, these three trends are all competing for the entire enterprise's industrial chain strength, and the strong will remain strong, which has almost become an inevitable outcome.

比亞迪正式發布 2026 年 5 月產銷快報,全品牌新能源汽車單月銷量 383453 輛,同比微增 0.26%,時隔十個月實現單月銷量同比轉正;其中乘用車交付 376990 輛,環比大漲 19.4%,一掃前期車型換代陣痛,呈現國內基本盤穩固、海外銷量狂飆、高端品牌全線放量的全新格局,在國內新能源內捲加劇、特斯拉 FSD 入華、自主新品密集上市的市場環境中,走出獨有的結構性增長路線。

王朝 + 海洋兩大主力品牌 5 月合計售出 330215 輛,佔據集團總銷量超八成,仍是比亞迪銷量壓艙石,全系列共 8 款車型單月銷量突破 2 萬台,產品從 5 萬入門代步到 20 萬家用 SUV 實現全覆蓋。

王朝網內部,元家族 56691 輛、宋家族 51370 輛。雙雙跨過五萬門檻,成為品牌兩大銷量支柱,兼顧家用代步與城鄉出行需求;秦家族緊隨其後交出 28360 台穩定表現,漢、唐系列月銷維持六千級體量,深耕中大型家用轎車、SUV 細分市場;全新車型夏處於市場培育期,單月交付 1810 台,後續隨渠道鋪開有望穩步上量。
海洋網增長勢頭更為迅猛,全系五款車型跨入兩萬俱樂部:海獅 42615 台、海豹 34117 台、海鷗 39919 台、海豚 22260 台、宋 PLUS 27755 台。其中海鷗憑藉 6-8 萬親民定價穩居入門代步銷冠,海獅作為全新走量車型上市即站穩四萬量級,補齊海洋網中型 SUV 產品空白,完善海洋產品梯隊佈局。從代步小車到緊湊 SUV,兩大主品牌依托 DM-i 混動與純電雙線技術,牢牢鎖住 15 萬以內國內主流家用市場份額。
方程豹同比暴漲 139.7% 品牌向上落地見效騰勢、方程豹、仰望組成的高端矩陣 5 月合計銷售 46489 輛,正式擺脫小眾定位,成為比亞迪品牌溢價與利潤增長新支點,打破自主品牌高端化難破局的行業魔咒。

越野品牌方程豹單月 30186 輛,同比暴漲 139.7%,創下品牌上市以來月度銷量新高,旗下鎦 7 單月 18280 台,豹 5、豹 8 穩定輸出,在 25-40 萬硬派越野細分市場持續擠壓合資、進口車型生存空間。

騰勢 5 月交付 16303 台,MPV 標桿 D9 售出 6721 台,Z9 系列近 6000 台,MPV、中大型轎車雙線發力,站穩豪華新能源賽道;百萬元級超豪華品牌仰望穩步爬坡,當月交付 286 台,同比增幅 105.8%,完成自主品牌天花板產品的市場驗證,形成從十幾萬家用、三四十萬越野、五十萬豪華 MPV 到百萬元級旗艦的全價格帶產品佈局。

5 月比亞迪乘用車和皮卡海外銷量 160177 輛,同比大漲 80.7%,出口佔全系總銷量突破 42%,創下品牌出海歷史新高,成為穩住 5 月整體銷量、實現同比轉正的核心驅動力。
東南亞、歐洲、拉美成為主力增量市場,海鷗、宋 PLUS、元系列持續登頂多國新能源熱銷榜單,SHARK 皮卡連續兩月單月出口突破 4000 台;依托泰國、巴西、匈牙利、烏茲別克斯坦四大海外整車工廠落地投產,本地化生產持續落地,規避關稅同時快速下沉終端渠道。在國內車市存量競爭、價格戰常態化背景下,高速擴容的海外市場有效對沖國內車型換代帶來的銷量波動,正式從補充市場升級為比亞迪核心增長引擎。截至當前,比亞迪新能源汽車全球累計銷量已經突破 1650 萬輛,全球化版圖持續拓寬。
智駕賦能產品迭代 下半年新品蓄力衝量5 月比亞迪智能化落地迎來關鍵節點,天神之眼智駕系統成為車型核心加分項:全品牌搭載高級智駕車型保有量突破 315 萬輛,日均路測數據超 2 億公里;當月比亞迪落地城市領航、智能泊車雙安全兜底服務,成為全球首家實現兩項智駕兜底的車企,政策落地三天後,搭載天神之眼系統車型的城市 NOA 激活率暴漲 50%,智能化體驗升級直接拉動終端到店訂單轉化,為後續車型持續走量築牢產品競爭力,直面 FSD 入華帶來的智駕市場衝擊。
從數據細節來看,2026 年 1-5 月比亞迪累計銷量 1405039 輛,同比下滑 20.32%,核心誘因是全系主力車型集中換代、第二代閃充刀片電池產能爬坡受限。新款閃充電池升級快充與低溫性能,全系換代車型優先換裝新電池,但產線改造拖累產能釋放,熱門車型訂單積壓、交付延後,一定程度壓縮 5 月交付體量。
隨著二季度末二代刀片電池產能持續釋放,疊加騰勢 N8L、方程豹鎦 7 純電版、海獅 05、夏 L 等多款新車陸續登陸市場,業內普遍預判比亞迪 6 月全品牌銷量有望突破 40 萬輛。依托低端走量鎖份額、高端提利潤、海外衝增量、智能化提產品力的四維發展邏輯,在國內新能源淘汰賽加劇的當下,比亞迪全品類佈局優勢持續放大,坐穩國內新能源龍頭,加速向著全球頭部車企穩步邁進。

兄弟姐妹們,今日講一個出海嘅大新聞——唔係賣車,係賣「司機」。6 月 2 號,文遠知行同 Uber 聯合宣佈咗一件事:計劃喺西班牙馬德里推出該國首個商業化 Robotaxi 試點服務。意思就係:西班牙人好快就可以用 Uber 叫到一台冇司機嘅出租車。呢次係文遠知行同 Uber 第一次一齊進入歐洲市場。馬德里亦成為文遠知行 Robotaxi 駛入嘅全球第十二個城市。
官方消息話,喺馬德里自治區政府嘅支持下,呢項服務今年內就會正式啟動。到嗰陣,馬德里嘅朋友哋打開 Uber App,就有一鍵呼叫文遠知行嘅 Robotaxi。同叫普通網約車一樣,分別係嚟嘅車冇駕駛員——至少喺初期,仲係有分別嘅。運營初期,車入面會配備經過專業培訓嘅安全員,終究係剛上線,穩妥第一。
文遠知行呢間公司,你可能聽過,也可能冇聽過。簡單介紹下:2017 年成立,一直埋頭搞 Robotaxi 技術研發同商業化。而家佢嘅 Robotaxi 已經覆蓋咗廣州、北京、新加坡、阿布達比、迪拜、利雅得、蘇黎世……加埋而家嘅馬德里,一共 12 個城市。西班牙亦係文遠知行進入嘅第五個歐洲市場——之前已經入咗瑞士、法國、比利時、斯洛伐克。按照文遠知行同 Uber 喺 2025 年 5 月達成嘅規劃,佢哋要喺五年內新增 15 個國際城市部署 Robotaxi 服務,全球部署數萬輛 Robotaxi。隨著馬德里落地,目前已經完成咗 4 個城市嘅佈局,仲有 11 個會喺 2030 年前陸續覆蓋。
講真嘅,中國自動駕駛公司出海唔係頭一回,但中國技術 + 全球出行平台 + 歐洲市場呢個組合,定係好有意思。馬德里係歐洲最具商業潛力嘅 Robotaxi 市場之一,人口多、出行需求大,當地政策都好友善。喺呢個市場站穩腳根,對文遠知行嚟講係個唔小嘅里程碑。對 Uber 嚟講,引進 Robotaxi 都係為咗降低成本——終究司機唔使發人工。對馬德里市民嚟講,以後打車可能更平。

Folks, today let's talk about big news on going global—not selling cars, but selling "drivers". On June 2, WeRide and Uber jointly announced a plan: to launch the country's first commercial Robotaxi pilot service in Madrid, Spain. In other words: Spanish residents will soon be able to hail a driverless taxi via Uber. This is the first time WeRide and Uber are partnering to enter the European market. Madrid also becomes the 12th city globally where WeRide's Robotaxi arrives.
According to official news, with the support of the Madrid regional government, this service will officially launch within this year. At that time, friends in Madrid can open the Uber App and call WeRide's Robotaxi with one click. It's just like calling an ordinary ride-hailing service, the difference is the arriving car has no driver—at least initially, there is still a difference. In the initial operation phase, a professionally trained safety monitor will be on board, as it's just launched, safety comes first.
This company, WeRide, you might have heard of it, or you might not. A brief introduction: Established in 2017, it has been dedicated to Robotaxi technology R&D and commercialization. Currently, its Robotaxis cover Guangzhou, Beijing, Singapore, Abu Dhabi, Dubai, Riyadh, Zurich... plus Madrid now, totaling 12 cities. Spain is also the 5th European market WeRide has entered—previously entered Switzerland, France, Belgium, Slovakia. According to the plan agreed by WeRide and Uber in May 2025, they plan to deploy Robotaxi services in 15 new international cities within five years, deploying tens of thousands of Robotaxis globally. With the Madrid launch, the deployment in 4 cities has been completed, and 11 more will be covered successively before 2030.
To be honest, it's not the first time Chinese autonomous driving companies are going global, but the combination of Chinese technology + global mobility platform + European market is quite interesting. Madrid is one of the European Robotaxi markets with the most commercial potential, with a large population, high travel demand, and friendly local policies. Being able to take root in this market is a significant milestone for WeRide. For Uber, introducing Robotaxis is also a way to reduce costs—after all, drivers don't need salaries. For Madrid residents, hailing a taxi might be cheaper in the future.

In May, China's automotive market overall presented a gentle recovery trend, with domestic brands still being the sales backbone of the market. Recently, BYD, Geely, Chery, Changan, and Great Wall, the top 5 domestic automakers, successively released their monthly performance reports. From the data, these five companies show a general characteristic of "stable total growth, divergence between domestic and international markets, and accelerated new energy penetration". Overseas exports and new energy vehicles have become the most core growth engines; export business has evolved from a "bonus item" to the "core foundation" for some companies. BYD's "dominant leader" status is further consolidated, Chery achieved high growth via exports, Geely's new energy penetration rate broke 56%, Changan focused steadily on balanced development, while Great Wall appeared slightly under pressure during structural transformation.
BYD: Export Hits New High Becomes Biggest HighlightIn May, BYD stood firmly at the top of domestic brands with a monthly sales volume of 383,500 vehicles, maintaining positive growth both year-on-year and month-over-month under a large base. Its two main brands, Dynasty and Ocean, sold a combined 330,200 vehicles, contributing 86.1% of total sales; Fangchengbao's monthly sales broke 30,000 units to reach 30,200, a year-on-year increase of 139.7%, setting a new high for the year; Denza sold 16,300 vehicles, and Yangwang delivered 286 vehicles. From a model perspective, BYD had eight models in May with monthly sales exceeding 20,000 vehicles. The Song Family and Yuan Family both broke 50,000 units, selling 51,370 and 56,691 vehicles respectively. The Sea Lion Family followed closely with 42,615 vehicles, and Seagull sales were also close to 40,000 vehicles.

BYD's biggest highlight in May was exports. Overseas new energy vehicle sales reached 160,600 units, an 80.4% year-on-year increase, accounting for about 42%. The sharp expansion of export scale effectively countered the phased weakness in domestic demand. Cumulative exports from January to May exceeded 620,000 vehicles. High export growth mainly benefited from continued ramping up of overseas factory capacity, improved ocean shipping capacity, and accelerated channel network expansion. In the domestic market, BYD promoted Megawatt Super Charging and intelligent strategies simultaneously—Megawatt charging achieved about 90% charge in 9 minutes; 20,000 super charging stations are planned to be built by 2026; all series models are available with Sky Eye B intelligent driving solutions and city navigation safety fallback plans, accelerating the popularization of high-level intelligent driving. As Gen 2 Blade Battery capacity gradually releases, the company's orders are expected to continue rising.
Chery: Sales Growth Leads the Top 5Chery Group's total sales volume in May was 247,800 vehicles, a significant year-on-year increase of 20.5%, ranking first in growth speed among the top 5. Exports remained its most core growth engine—May exports reached 181,900 vehicles, an 80.5% year-on-year increase, accounting for 73.4% of total sales that month, continuously breaking the single-month export record for Chinese brands for three months. In terms of new energy, Chery New Energy sold 100,300 vehicles, a 58.8% year-on-year increase. April and May consecutively saw monthly new energy sales breaking 100,000 vehicles.

The strong performance in exports benefited from Chery's long-term deep cultivation of overseas channel advantages and localized operation capabilities. While overseas orders continued to rise, high export growth formed a sharp contrast with domestic sales—Chery's domestic sales in May were only 60,000 vehicles, accounting for one-quarter of total sales. From cumulative data, Chery Group accumulated 1.101 million sales from January to May, but against the annual goal of 3.2 million vehicles, monthly averages need to reach about 420,000 vehicles later, and pressure remains significant.
Geely: New Energy Penetration Rate Breaks 56%Geely Auto's total sales volume in May was 237,600 vehicles, a 1% year-on-year increase, achieving month-over-month double growth for three consecutive months. In terms of structure, Geely's "New Four Transformations" transformation showed significant results: new energy vehicle sales reached 133,400 units, accounting for 56% of total sales, with new energy share exceeding 50% for four consecutive months.

From sub-brands, performance was significantly divergent. Zeekr brand sales in May reached 34,400 vehicles, a 82% year-on-year increase; Zeekr 9 Series and 8 Series models combined sales approached 50% of total sales, showing bright performance in the high-end market; Galaxy brand sales were 81,700 vehicles; Geely brand sales were 182,500 vehicles, among which China Star Series sales reached 100,800 vehicles; Lynk & Co brand sales were 20,700 vehicles, with new energy vehicle sales share rising to 71%.
In terms of exports, Geely's overseas vehicle exports in May reached 85,100 vehicles, a explosive 184% year-on-year increase, setting a brand single-month export record high. Among exported products, new energy vehicles reached 40,800 units, accounting for nearly half; hybrid and pure electric products have successively landed in Southeast Asia, Middle East, Latin America, and other markets, highlighting the results of global strategy implementation.
Changan: Multi-brand Matrix Balanced EffortChangan Auto's delivery volume in May was 209,100 vehicles, among which new energy deliveries were 92,400 vehicles, a 5.8% year-on-year increase, with new energy share about 44%. In terms of exports, overseas deliveries reached 70,700 vehicles, a 38% year-on-year increase, becoming another major growth highlight for Changan in May.
In the sub-brand matrix, Changan Qiyuan delivered 34,500 vehicles in May; All-New Q05 delivered 15,800 units, with orders breaking 3,000 units within three days of listing in Thailand; Deepal sales in May were 33,200 vehicles, a 30% year-on-year increase; January to May overseas cumulative sales were 28,700 vehicles, a significant 167% year-on-year increase; Avatr delivered 7,336 vehicles in May; Changan Auto (Gravity) delivered nearly 49,000 vehicles in May.

Changan Auto's balanced layout was fully reflected in May: the fuel car base remained stable, new energy brands Deepal and Qiyuan accelerated volume growth, high-end brand Avatr continued to break through in technical cooperation, and overseas markets simultaneously achieved breakthrough growth. The pattern of five brands working together, driven by both new energy and exports, is initially taking shape.
Great Wall: Overseas Sales Growth Year-on-Year 46.75%Great Wall Motor's sales in May were 100,400 vehicles, slightly down compared to last May's 102,200 vehicles, making it the only company among the top 5 to show a year-on-year negative growth. From sub-brands, Haval brand sales in May were 55,500 vehicles, remaining Great Wall's most important sales pillar; Tank brand sales were 17,100 vehicles; both Haval and Tank brand sales showed year-on-year declines; Wey brand sold 8,119 vehicles, a 31.78% year-on-year increase, achieving growth against the trend; Ora brand performance was most stunning, with sales of 6,018 vehicles, a significant 206.88% year-on-year increase. In terms of new energy, Great Wall sold 30,400 new energy vehicles in May, with new energy vehicle transformation gradually accelerating.

The overseas market became Great Wall's biggest highlight in May, with overseas sales growing 46.75% year-on-year. Against the background of pressure on the domestic market, strong growth in overseas business effectively made up for the decline in the domestic market. Great Wall Motor's current core contradiction lies in: Haval and Tank, the two traditional main-selling brands, face weak growth, while Wey and Ora brands, although growing notably, have relatively small volume and are not yet enough to support overall growth. How to complete the "relay" between old and new brands is the key issue Great Wall must solve subsequently.
Final ThoughtsFrom May data, the growth pattern of the top 5 domestic brands has clearly diverged, but there are three common trends worth noting: First, exports have become a key engine for domestic brands to seek stability and growth. Second, new energy transformation is still accelerating, but paths differ among enterprises. Third, technological innovation continues to deepen brand moats. Looking ahead to the second half of the year, competition in the automotive industry will continue to upgrade around these three trends. Although everyone has a common direction, these three trends are all competing for the entire enterprise's industrial chain strength, and the strong will remain strong, which has almost become an inevitable outcome.

兄弟姐妹們,今日講一個出海嘅大新聞——唔係賣車,係賣「司機」。6 月 2 號,文遠知行同 Uber 聯合宣佈咗一件事:計劃喺西班牙馬德里推出該國首個商業化 Robotaxi 試點服務。意思就係:西班牙人好快就可以用 Uber 叫到一台冇司機嘅出租車。呢次係文遠知行同 Uber 第一次一齊進入歐洲市場。馬德里亦成為文遠知行 Robotaxi 駛入嘅全球第十二個城市。
官方消息話,喺馬德里自治區政府嘅支持下,呢項服務今年內就會正式啟動。到嗰陣,馬德里嘅朋友哋打開 Uber App,就有一鍵呼叫文遠知行嘅 Robotaxi。同叫普通網約車一樣,分別係嚟嘅車冇駕駛員——至少喺初期,仲係有分別嘅。運營初期,車入面會配備經過專業培訓嘅安全員,終究係剛上線,穩妥第一。
文遠知行呢間公司,你可能聽過,也可能冇聽過。簡單介紹下:2017 年成立,一直埋頭搞 Robotaxi 技術研發同商業化。而家佢嘅 Robotaxi 已經覆蓋咗廣州、北京、新加坡、阿布達比、迪拜、利雅得、蘇黎世……加埋而家嘅馬德里,一共 12 個城市。西班牙亦係文遠知行進入嘅第五個歐洲市場——之前已經入咗瑞士、法國、比利時、斯洛伐克。按照文遠知行同 Uber 喺 2025 年 5 月達成嘅規劃,佢哋要喺五年內新增 15 個國際城市部署 Robotaxi 服務,全球部署數萬輛 Robotaxi。隨著馬德里落地,目前已經完成咗 4 個城市嘅佈局,仲有 11 個會喺 2030 年前陸續覆蓋。
講真嘅,中國自動駕駛公司出海唔係頭一回,但中國技術 + 全球出行平台 + 歐洲市場呢個組合,定係好有意思。馬德里係歐洲最具商業潛力嘅 Robotaxi 市場之一,人口多、出行需求大,當地政策都好友善。喺呢個市場站穩腳根,對文遠知行嚟講係個唔小嘅里程碑。對 Uber 嚟講,引進 Robotaxi 都係為咗降低成本——終究司機唔使發人工。對馬德里市民嚟講,以後打車可能更平。

比亚迪的缩写BYD,一直被解释为Build Your Dream,但在投资者眼里,则被理解为Build Your Dollar(成就你的美刀)。
自2011年登陆A股市场,比亚迪以18元的发行价,经历2012年的历史低谷和多年股价震荡,一度在2022年触及350元-360元的历史高位,总市值历史性突破1万亿元人民币。
但如今,伴随国内车市旷日持久的价格战与今年一季度的市场需求回落,目前比亚迪A股股价围绕在每股90元区间震荡。

6月9日,比亚迪2025年度股东会上,比亚迪董事长王传福表示,相信业绩会越来越好,希望股东保持耐心,公司将持续用技术创新来推动未来进一步的增长,把握各个节点,科学前瞻布局,来实现公司更好更快速地发展。他承诺:“一定会实现股东更好的回报”。
的确,比亚迪股价的起伏历程伴随着中国新能源汽车产业从萌芽到爆发的发展过程,每一次股价的飞跃,都与其底层技术与销量规模深深绑定在一起。
王传福在股东大会上谈到销量瓶颈、高端化布局、智能驾驶迭代等多个问题,这些股东关切的内容也在比亚迪之后在资本市场的发展给出答案。
比亚迪市值能冲上10万亿吗?
当前,比亚迪的A股总市值约为8,314亿至8,500亿元人民币,距离万亿市值近在咫尺。在汽车行业全球市值排行榜中,比亚迪稳居全球前三大汽车集团行列,与特斯拉、丰田并列为全球汽车工业的万亿级/准万亿级风向标。
不过,相比特斯拉近1.5万亿美元的市值,比亚迪与丰田的市值加起来,还不足特斯拉的零头。而比亚迪股东大会上有投资人提问,比亚迪市值能否冲破10万亿?能追上特斯拉吗?
对于这个问题,王传福延续比亚迪一贯的策略,选择用技术回应。他表示:“只要技术做得好,一定会发展得好。我们始终坚信要把技术做好,因为比亚迪有最庞大的工程师团队,也相信我们的工程师团队是全球最优秀的。”
比亚迪是一家追求长期主义的企业,坚信技术可以穿透一切。这是制造业的逻辑,而非不断用故事画饼,吹捧市值的特斯拉的逻辑。前者更务实,带来的市值更稳健。
回望比亚迪的来时路,刀片电池、DM-i、易四方、全域千伏高压架构......每一次技术发布都推动其销量增长,股价飞跃。

从今年三月开始,比亚迪再一次在技术上发力,接连发布了第二代刀片电池及闪充技术、行业首款四纳米芯片——璇玑A3芯片。
目前,快充技术已经成为行业内最具代表性的性能基准,全球咨询公司Wood Mackenzie分析师认为:“它在转化燃油车消费者和维持中国电动汽车普及势头方面日益重要。”
智能化方面,王传福在技术发布时指出,凭借三颗璇玑A3芯片集群,总计算能力超过每秒2100万亿次运算,车辆可实现L3或L4自主。
在此次股东大会上,他再次谈到比亚迪高阶智驾的落地,表示比亚迪辅助驾驶车型保有量已超315万辆;每日产生智驾相关行驶数据超2亿公里;智能驾驶研发工程师规模超5000人。
王传福认为,借助当前 AI 技术的发展,L3、L4 级自动驾驶将比预期更早实现。比亚迪已在技术层面上做好准备,一旦相关法规正式出台,将立即推出符合L3要求的新产品,并同步推进全球化落地。
通过技术实现高端化也是比亚迪一以贯之的路径。王传福认为:“少一些套路、少一些花哨,回到本源,做好技术和产品,才能获得中高端消费者认可。在高端化车型上量后,公司毛利问题、单车利润问题也都会迎刃而解。”他指出,目前,比亚迪在海外已经树立起高端的品牌形象。

“成为全球最好的公司”
5月,比亚迪终于结束了持续的销量下滑,实现超38万辆的销量业绩。其中,比亚迪海外销量超过了16万辆,同比增长80%。海外市场的高客单价正在有效对冲国内市场价格战对毛利率带来的压力。
面对国内市场的疲软,向上与向外成为众多车企提升利润、谋求长远发展的解药,比亚迪也不例外,而自2021年起启动“乘用车出海”计划已为比亚迪带来回报。
借助刀片电池+DM-i等技术代差,比亚迪逐渐收割全球市场。
如今,比亚迪在海外加速工厂建设:亚太地区,泰国工厂迅速投产,成为东南亚右舵车型的核心基地,印尼工厂紧随其后;拉美地区,比亚迪在巴西打造了大型生产基地复合体,并正式下线本土化车辆,巴西总统卢拉更是亲自出席见证;欧洲市场,比亚迪在匈牙利布达佩斯设立欧洲总部,并兴建欧洲首个乘用车工厂;北美市场上,则积极在墨西哥选址并推进供应链本地化,以此作为辐射拉美和国际贸易的重要枢纽。
王传福多次强调:“我们死磕研发与技术,让比亚迪成为全球最好的公司。”而技术升级正在进一步推动比亚迪在海外的市场表现。
到今年年底,比亚迪目标在国内布局20,000个闪光充电桩,并计划于年底开始在欧洲大规模建设站点,以加速其闪充技术的落地。而首搭比亚迪第二代刀片电池及闪充技术的腾势Z9GT已在4月亮相欧洲,售价11.5万欧元起,进一步推动比亚迪高端化。

王传福在三月底于香港举办的投资者关系活动上曾表示,比亚迪计划在2026年将海外销量提升至150万辆,并从长远来看将中国境外年度销售额占一半。在本次股东大会上,王传福推翻了这一销量目标,他指出,比亚迪代表了一批中国新能源车企,在产品竞争力、价格、体验、技术等方方面面,都超越了当地同行,获得了很好的成长,“现在预计应该会超越这个目标。”
他表示,展望未来三到五年,比亚迪都将保持持续增长。在二代刀片、闪充技术,以及明后年将会推出的新技术的加持下,国内、国外有望实现双轮驱动,形成良性互动,让中国的技术走向全球。他表示,预期到2030年,比亚迪将“获得很大的增长,五年以后,比亚迪在规模上,能够做到真正的全球第一。”

唔知有幾多朋友最近期關注 10 萬內純電 SUV 市場?近段時間睇嚟,呢個細分市場好熱鬧。就講長安啟源全新 Q05 同零跑 A10,上個月銷量分別達 15814 輛同 14372 輛,全部挺進 2026 年 4 月銷量排行全品類前 10,長安啟源全新 Q05 甚至奪得緊緊湊型純電 SUV 市場嘅銷冠。

(長安啟源全新 Q05)
值得留意係,兩款大熱門產品亮點亦唔少,9 萬級可以得到 500km+嘅續航,零跑 A10 甚至配備激光雷達,有高級智駕輔助需求嘅朋友嚟講,呢架車吸引力的確唔低。但係喺價格上,同為高配嘅長安啟源全新 Q05 506Max+ 同零跑 A10 505 激光雷達版,終端價格分別係 9.59 萬同 8.68 萬,手握 9 萬左右預算嘅朋友都可以考慮。明顯係,又去到決賽圈二揀一環節。
(零跑 A10)
如果對預算比較敏感,咁喺長安啟源全新 Q05 同零跑 A10 之間,後者可能更受歡迎,畢竟終端價格實打實平咗幾千元。而且,高配 A10 配有激光雷達,市區/高速情況均能啟動領航輔助駕駛,呢個就係佢嘅優勢所在。當然,如果預算允許,揀長安啟源全新 Q05 高配,都有帶激光雷達嘅高級輔助駕駛。
(長安啟源全新 Q05)
但既然係買車前嘅橫評,唔少全方位對比。首先從尺寸睇,作為緊湊型 SUV,長安啟源全新 Q05 長寬高分別係 4435*1855*1595mm,軸距為 2735mm。而零跑 A10 車型級別就係小型 SUV,長寬高分別係 4270*1810*1635mm,軸距為 2605mm。
(零跑 A10)
如果只係考慮代步、通勤,零跑 A10 嘅細個嘅略有優勢,方便行街串巷。但實際上,好多人買車都要兼顧家用,10 萬內預算也多以剛需用車群體為主。既然係剛需,且有家用需求,嗰空間自然唔好掉鏈子。
(長安啟源全新 Q05)
(零跑 A10)
講返日常家庭出行嚟講,兩車之間 130mm 軸距差異,直接反映喺後排體驗。坐入長安啟源全新 Q05 後排,腿部空間平整兼寬敞,一齊坐 3 位成年人都唔會太擠;但係坐入零跑 A10 後排,無論坐寬定係腿部空間都會細少少。媽咪喺後排照顧孩子,長安啟源全新 Q05 後排更加寬敞嘅空間會更加方便佢操作,孩子都能有更大嘅活動空間。
(長安啟源全新 Q05)
(零跑 A10)
除咗空間,通勤黨同家庭用戶對舒適配置都比較關注。睇嚟對比,兩車都有配電動尾門、無匙進入、自適應遠近光等外部配置。但係從車廂內睇,零跑 A10 副駕無法電動調節,後排靠背都唔支援角度調節,同埋缺少後排空調出風口、車內 PM2.5 過濾裝置等。
(長安啟源全新 Q05)
(零跑 A10)
反觀長安啟源全新 Q05,除咗副駕支持電動調節,前排仲集成咗加熱/通風/按摩/副駕腿托功能,對比零跑 A10 只提供前排座椅加熱,佢嘅品質無疑更上一層樓。包括後排乘員都有少少照顧,例如靠背角度可調、配有後排空調出風口、後排中央扶手/杯架等,更加適合家人同行呢類場景。
(長安啟源全新 Q05)
(零跑 A10)
除咗舒享體驗,行駛系統嘅對比我哋都唔好忽略。首先從大家關注嘅續航睇,長安啟源全新 Q05 同零跑 A10 分別搭載 51.9kWh、53kWh 電池,CLTC 純電續航做到 506km、505km,差異大可忽略。但從電芯供應鏈睇,前者出自寧德時代,後者就係國軒高科/江蘇正力,若論品牌含金量,“寧王”順位自然靠前,更值得信賴。另外,兩車都有全球品質,按照全球嚴苛嘅標準打造,零跑 A10 符合國內、歐盟雙標準,長安啟源全新 Q05 已經喺泰國上市,未來仲會相繼落地多個國家地區,最終開拓歐洲區域,此外仲有央企背書,質量品質都好可靠。
因為本文討論嘅係 A10 嘅 505 版本,採用電池液冷技術,溫控較好,而如果係 403 版本,採用成本低嘅風冷技術,散熱效果較差。呢點上,全新 Q05 做得更好,入門就採用電池直冷技術,高配用嘅係液冷技術,能更好地實現熱管理,保證電池安全。
(長安啟源全新 Q05)
(零跑 A10)
動力方面,長安啟源全新 Q05 同零跑 A10 都係前置單電機佈局,電機最大動力輸出分別係 120kW/190N·m、90kW/150N·m,0-100km/h 加速時間分別做到 8.9 秒同 10.6 秒。坦率嚟講,兩款車喺純電陣營加速性能都中規中矩;但係相對嚟講,長安啟源全新 Q05 嘅 8 秒級零百加速,喺山路行駛、高速超車等情況下會比零跑 A10 更加分。
(長安啟源全新 Q05)

(零跑 A10)
總結嚟講,零跑 A10 505 激光雷達版優勢突出:價格更低、智駕輔助覆蓋範圍更廣,適合預算優先 + 科技嘗鮮嘅消費者。而長安啟源全新 Q05 更強調“全面”二字:加少少預算同樣可以獲得高級輔助駕駛,而且尺寸更大、舒適配置更高、採用頭部電芯供應鏈,動力亦更強,綜合表現更全能。總括嚟講,預算 9 萬級追求面面俱到嘅家用體驗,長安啟源全新 Q05 506Max+ 更加值得考慮。


港交所網站掛出一咗一份熟悉嘅招股書。
5 月 28 日,繼去年 10 月首次遞表失效後,智能駕駛解決方案提供商蘇州天瞳威視電子科技股份有限公司(天瞳威視)再次向港股主板發起重衝,由匯豐及華泰國際聯席保薦。

喺智能駕駛賽道從「講故事」轉向「拼量產」嘅 2026 年,天瞳威視嘅二次遞表唔單止係一次資本試探,更係一場關於中國智駕供應商生存現狀嘅集中檢閱。
呢間被認為係「算力效率派」代表嘅公司,一邊連住從采埃孚到上汽、北汽嘅豪華產業資本陣營,一邊卻面臨住現金流緊繃、海外明顯回落嘅現實困境。喺呢場 IPO 嘅博弈中,光鮮同陣痛並存。
01
邊個係「天瞳威視」?
天瞳威視嘅創辦人王曦係一位典型嘅「回國」技術派。佢畢業於北京航空航天大學,後喺英國雷丁大學攻讀計算機科學博士學位。
喺決定創業之前,王曦曾經喺汽車零部件供應商天合汽車(TRW)及采埃孚擔任算法工程師同技術負責人,深度參與咗早期 ADAS 系統嘅開發。
2016 年,王曦捕捉到國內汽車智能化嘅風口,回國喺蘇州創立咗天瞳威視,定位係「以軟件算法驅動智能駕駛」嘅本土解決方案提供商。
公司嘅名字「天瞳」寓意「天之眼」,意在打造車輛感知萬物嘅視覺中樞。佢從最初嘅視覺感知算法起步,逐步擴展至行泊一體域控制器、L4 級自動駕駛系統等軟硬件結合嘅整體方案。

天瞳威視融資情況。資料來源:企查查
成立後不久,天瞳威視就獲得德聯資本、盛世投資嘅天使輪融資。此後十年時間,天瞳威視累計完成咗超過 10 輪融資,融資總額近 10 億元。
從招股書披露嘅股權結構嚟睇,天瞳威視構建咗深度綁定嘅「產業 + 資本」生態圈。
一方面,產業夥伴站台,全球汽車零部件巨頭采埃孚唔單止係其 C 輪領投方,亦係其戰略合作夥伴,持有天瞳威視 6.93% 嘅股份,位列第四大股東;國內方面,上汽集團通過上汽北美產投持股,北汽集團通過北汽產投佈局其中,地平線同商湯科技亦係戰略投資者。
另一方面,地方國資護航,唐山機器人基金、吳中金控等國資背景基金喺 D 輪及 D+ 輪入場,提供咗約 5.23 億元嘅資金支持。

截至最後實際可行日期股權架構
截至目前,王曦透過直接持股同員工持股平台合共控制公司約 40.84% 嘅權益,依然保持住對公司嘅控制權。
02
「兩條腿」行路
天瞳威視喺業務佈局上採取咗「雙軌並行」嘅策略。

喺 L2-L2+ 級輔助駕駛領域,天瞳威視嘅選擇非常務實。佢並冇盲目追逐算力堆疊嘅「軍備競賽」,而係走咗一條高性價比路線。
作為典型嘅視覺派智駕供應商,佢喺 L2 量產方案上以視覺感知為主,融合毫米波雷達同超聲波雷達,能夠喺較低算力平台上實現高級功能。例如,基於地平線 J6B 芯片(約 20TOPS)嘅方案即可支持行泊一體、高速 NOA。
呢種打法擊中咗 10 萬 -20 萬級主流車款對成本敏感嘅痛點。根據灼識諮詢嘅數據,按 2024 年裝機量計,天瞳威視係中國第二大同時提供行車同泊車解決方案嘅以軟件為核心嘅 L2-L2+ 級方案提供商,市場份額為 14.3%。

2024 年中國具備行泊一體能力嘅以軟件為核心供應商格局
截至最後實際可行日期,天瞳威視獲得 23 個汽車品牌嘅 198 款車款嘅 L2-L2+ 級解決方案定點函,並實現 6 個汽車品牌嘅 105 款車款嘅量產;獲得定點函嘅 198 款車款中有 87 款覆蓋海外市場,其中 59 款已實現量產。
但值得注意嘅係,L2-L2+ 市場正在經歷劇烈嘅「紅海化」。
一方面,經緯恆潤、福瑞泰克等本土 Tier1 正在加速追趕;另一方面,部分頭部車廠開始將低階智駕方案從外購轉為內部集成。
天瞳威視能否維持佢喺「性價比方案」領域嘅領先地位,取決於佢能否持續保持算法對低算力平台嘅優化能力,而這需要喺研發投入上持續加碼。

喺高級 L4 級自動駕駛領域,天瞳威視更多扮演「先鋒」角色。這亦係佢近兩年增長最快嘅板塊。
早在 2019 年,佢就參與咗上海洋山港嘅 5G 智能重卡項目。目前佢嘅 L4 方案覆蓋 Robobus、Robotaxi 同 Robotruck。其中,Robobus 係佢最具代表性嘅產品線,已喺蘇州、天津等城市嘅公開道路投入常態化試營運。
2025 年,天瞳威視從 L4 級解決方案產生收入 3.75 億元,佔公司總收入嘅 68% 以上,大部分收入來自 L4 級軟件解決方案。
然而,硬幣嘅另一面係商業化嘅曲折。雖然 L4 業務營收暴增,但佢嘅交付形態目前以「軟硬件一體解決方案」為主,呢種模式本質上接近「項目制交付」或「小規模車隊部署」,與 L2 業務中「純軟件授權 + 白盒交付」嘅高毛利、大規模複製邏輯存在顯著差異。
呢就直接導致 L4 業務毛利率嘅大幅波動:喺部分自研硬件佔比较高嘅項目中,毛利率一度低至 15%。

截至遞表日,公司雖手握超 10 億元嘅 L4 意向訂單,涵蓋 2500 架車,但呢啲訂單預計要喺未來三至五年內先會陸續交付,短期內對現金流嘅改善作用有限。
此外,天瞳威視仲有部分應收來自工程服務,主要涉及道路測試、數據收集支援及數據標註服務以及公司嘅專有工具鏈。
03
財務嘅雙面鏡
招股書嘅財務部分,展現咗智駕行業最真實嘅「B 面」:規模同虧損嘅極限拉扯,同埋賬面現金同營運消耗之間嘅緊張博弈。

營收高增長,但結構劇烈波動。
財務數據顯示,公司嘅營收呈現爆發式增長,從 2022 年嘅 1.72 億元增長至 2024 年嘅 4.83 億元,複合年增長率高達 67.7%。2025 年全年營收進一步增長至 5.5 億元。
但收入結構嘅變化明顯。2023 年,公司依賴 L2-L2+ 業務,佔比 90.2%;去到 2024 年,L4 業務佔比升至 50.2%;2025 年,L4 業務佔比進一步拉高至 68%。呢種「斷崖式」嘅結構切換,雖然證明佢 L4 技術搵到咗落地場景,但亦令市場質疑佢 L2 業務係咪已觸及天花板。
毛利率同純利潤嘅背離,呢係天瞳威視面臨嘅最大挑戰。
從毛利睇,整體毛利率喺 30% 左右徘徊,喺呢個技術密集型嘅智駕行業屬於中等水平。但細拆睇嚟,L2-L2+ 業務嘅毛利率通常能維持喺 40% 以上,純軟件授權模式,而 L4 業務嘅毛利率則因「軟硬件一體」交付中硬件佔比提高而被顯著拉低。
從純利潤睇,雖然表面虧損額較大,2024 年虧損 4.63 億、2025 年虧損約 2 億,呢度包含大量因優先股公平值變動帶來嘅「紙面虧損」。剔除呢個因素後嘅經調整純利潤更能反映公司嘅真實經營狀況:2024 年已收窄至 -438 萬元,但 2025 年並未如市場預期實現轉正,而係錄得約 -1086 萬元,虧損較 2024 年有所擴大。
呢個背後有一個不可回避嘅關鍵前提:調整後嘅「減虧」乃至「接近盈虧平衡」,係喺公司持續壓縮研發投入嘅基礎上實現嘅,研發費用從 2024 年嘅 1.17 億元降至 2025 年嘅 9231 萬元,研發費用率從 2024 年嘅 24.3% 進一步降至 16.8%,而 2022 年呢個數字曾高達 108.7%。對於一家科技公司嚟講,研發強度嘅「退坡」是否會影響未來嘅技術護城河,係一個潛在風險點。
現金流持續告急,最令人擔憂嘅信號。
根據最新招股書,截至 2025 年 12 月 31 日,公司賬上嘅現金及現金等价物為 2.35 億元,較 2025 年 6 月 30 日嘅 3.74 億元淨減少 1.39 億元,現金消耗速度較快。

更值得警惕嘅係經營現金流由正轉負且缺口持續擴大嘅趨勢。2023 年,公司經營活動現金流淨額為正向流入 1.15 億元,但 2024 年迅速轉為淨流出 1.89 億元,2025 年進一步惡化至淨流出 2.93 億元。
與此同時,應收賬款周轉急劇惡化。公司嘅貿易應收款項從 2023 年嘅 0.89 億元升至 2025 年嘅 5.48 億元,三年增長超過五倍,而同期營收增幅僅約 2.7 倍。
更令人擔憂嘅係應收款項周轉天數從 2023 年嘅 191 天同 2024 年嘅 166 天,到 2025 年驟升至 300 天,意味著公司從完成交付到收回款項平均需要接近一年時間。呢相當於變相為客戶提供長期無息墊資,喺資金本就緊張嘅情況下進一步加劇咗流動性壓力。

此外,雖然天瞳威視係首家出海嘅中國智駕軟件供應商,但 2025 年佢嘅海外業務遭遇咗明顯回落。2023 年天瞳威視海外收入為 1.27 億元,佔總營收比重達到 62.2%;到 2025 年海外收入降至 1100 萬元,佔比僅 2.0%。
喺而家全球地緣政治複雜、部分國家對智能汽車數據監管趨嚴嘅背景下,為佢嘅全球化故事增添咗一絲不確定性。
04
結語
天瞳威視嘅二次闖關,係智能駕駛行業進入「淘汰賽」階段嘅一個縮影。
從好嘅方面睇,佢踩準咗 L2 性價比同 L4 場景化落地嘅雙重節奏,且經調整純利潤喺特定口徑下已接近盈虧平衡,呢啲都畀投資者提供咗「有亮點可講」嘅故事線。
但從風險嘅角度睇,情況遠比首次遞表時更為嚴峻。業務重心嘅急速漂移、L4 業務商業化初期嘅盈利磨難、研發投入嘅被動收縮,呢啲此前就已存在嘅問題並未緩解。

天瞳威視 L4 級智能巴士
而真正令此次 IPO 帶「求生」色彩嘅,係現金流數據嘅實質性惡化:2.35 億元嘅賬面現金,面對每年近 3 億元嘅经营性現金淨流出,安全邊際已不足一年。疊加 300 天嘅應收賬款周轉天數,意味著公司每交付一筆訂單,都要墊付近一年嘅資金成本。
換言之,天瞳威視正處喺一個危險嘅財務窗口期:賬上嘅錢僅夠維持唔足一年嘅正常運作,而 L4 業務嘅大規模交付同回款卻需要更長時間。喺呢個智駕資本熱潮退去、一級市場融資邊際收緊嘅時刻,公司已冇太多等待嘅餘地。
首次遞表失效後僅隔半年便再次衝擊港股,對天瞳威視而言,與其話係戰略選擇,唔如話係現金倒逼下嘅必然之舉。

When closely observing this global shift in production capacity, the most intriguing aspect has never been the change of ownership of the factories themselves, but rather the quiet shift in industrial discourse behind it.
When documents showing that XPeng Motors recently completed the acquisition of 90.1% equity in Indonesia's core electric vehicle manufacturing entity appeared on the screens of the Indonesia Stock Exchange, the significance of this transaction went far beyond the landing of a new production base.
In just a month, Dongfeng and Stellantis Group prepared local production for their French factory, Leapmotor connected with existing capacity in Spain, and together with BYD, Great Wall, Chery and other automakers continuously laying out idle capacity across the globe, a series of moves are outlining a new profile for Chinese automakers going global.
But if we turn the clock back ten years, no one would have guessed the picture we see today.
Once, automotive giants from Europe, America, Japan, and South Korea came to China with blueprints and capital to build new factories, spreading production capacity to the world's largest emerging market. Today, Chinese automakers bring new energy technology and capital, take over the idle capacity they left behind, take root locally to produce, and reactivate machines one by one that were sleeping.
Localization Transformation Comes Naturally
The latest data from the General Administration of Customs is bright enough; in the first quarter of 2026, China's new energy vehicle exports approached one million units, surging more than double year-on-year. In other words, for every ten new energy vehicles sold globally, six carry a 'Made in China' label.
But as ro-ro ships for exports run more densely, new problems are also accumulating at the docks. Logistics costs crossing the ocean are getting higher, and the anti-subsidy tariffs imposed by the EU directly push up terminal prices. Waiting for ships to arrive at port before delivery to consumers involves a cycle of often two or three months. Market hotspots change on a whim, and distant water cannot quench immediate thirst.
"The 1.0 era of exporting goods relying on ro-ro ships can no longer hold the ambitions of Chinese automakers." This is how an industry insider describes it. Against this backdrop, those idle factories that traditional automakers put on the balance sheet to 'gather dust' suddenly became desirable treats in the eyes of Chinese automakers.

From the industry's perspective, building a new factory from scratch not only requires heavy investment and a long cycle, but also has to deal with a series of uncertainties such as land, approvals, and labor. Acquiring or cooperating to utilize existing mature factories overseas can significantly shorten the production capacity landing cycle, quickly achieve local production and supply, avoid trade barriers, and also show sincerity for long-term investment to the local market.
Whether it is to consider avoiding tariffs or to realize sharing with local industries and stakeholders, localized production has changed from a long-term plan to a realistic issue that Chinese automakers must face.
So we have also seen a series of industrial turnovers.

Idle factories originally tagged as 'non-performing assets' by traditional automakers have come back to life in the hands of Chinese automakers. In the old Ford factory in Camaçari, Brazil, the retrofitted production line rolls out thousands of BYD vehicles every month; workers who were originally going to be laid off have returned to their posts; the former GM factory in Rayong Province, Thailand, has now become the core production base for Great Wall Motor in Southeast Asia...
It can be said that behind the dense takeover of overseas idle capacity by Chinese automakers lies the restructuring of production capacity brought about by the electrification transformation of the global automotive industry.
In recent years, traditional automotive companies in Europe and America have been under obvious pressure in electrification transformation. Demand for fuel vehicles continues to decline. Electrification transformation involves heavy investment and a long return cycle. The production capacity utilization of a large number of traditional fuel vehicle factories is insufficient, becoming low-efficiency assets for enterprises. Long-idle factories not only require continuous investment in depreciation, labor, and maintenance costs but also tie up a lot of energy for enterprise transformation.

For these traditional automakers, opening idle capacity for cooperation with Chinese automakers is essentially an asset optimization. It revitalizes existing assets to gain revenue, stabilizes local employment, maintains supply chain operations, and secures a buffer space for their own electrification transformation. It is a win-win deal where everyone gets what they need.
From the perspective of global industrial division of labor, behind this production capacity flow is the shift of the value center of the automotive industry.
In the past, these mature overseas factories were the core assets of traditional automakers' global expansion, representing manufacturing capabilities and market discourse power in the fuel vehicle era. In the electrification era, traditional fuel capacity gradually became a burden for transformation. Chinese automakers, relying on new energy technology advantages, complete supply chain systems, and high cost-performance product competitiveness, take over these existing assets, turning them back into bridgeheads to enter the local market.
What New Wine Can the Old Bottles Hold?
Revitalizing idle capacity sounds light, but for Chinese automakers, it is actually a difficult exam more challenging than exporting complete vehicles. Taking over the factory keys is just the first step; whether one can make the cars, sell them, and survive is the real test.
The most intuitive challenge comes from 'acclimatization issues'.
Factories in each country have their own 'rules'. For example, European factories have strict working hour systems, trade unions have significant discourse power, wage increases and process changes require half a day of negotiation; environmental protection regulations and certification standards in the South American market are completely different from domestic ones, and a slight lack of attention could cross the red line; even workers' operational habits are different. Highly efficient management methods honed in domestic factories may not even work when applied to overseas factories.
If only the production line modification is implemented, but the localization construction of the operational system and service network is ignored, it is difficult to achieve stable production and continuous profitability.

The head of the German Association of the Automotive Industry said straightforwardly: 'Factories are just skeletons; service and brand are the soul. Without a soul, even the newest production lines cannot produce cars that sell well.'
Guest Professor Zhang Xiang from Huanghe Science and Technology University also pointed out that after entering overseas markets, Chinese automakers need to complete the localization reconstruction of the entire chain from production to service. Especially for Chinese automakers used to efficient domestic supply chains and rapid decision-making, how to adapt to regulatory environments and cultural differences in different countries and establish operational systems that conform to local rules is a more difficult topic than obtaining production capacity.
So taking over idle capacity is just getting the ticket to enter the game. Whether you can win this battle depends on whether Chinese automakers can calm down and learn to live on others' land. As Chery Chairman Yin Tongyue said, 'Overseas factories are not tools for short-term sales promotion, they are touchstones. They test the enterprise's true global capabilities.'
However, having said that, closely observing this global shift in production capacity, the most intriguing aspect has never been the change of ownership of the factories themselves, but rather the quiet shift in industrial discourse behind it.

Thirty years ago, when the Chinese auto market first opened, the script was: European, American, and Japanese automakers brought technology and money to open factories in China, transferring their capacity to the low-cost Chinese market. We gave up the market to exchange for technology, and they took profits and occupied the market.
At that time, the rules of the global automotive industry were set by them, and they decided where production capacity would flow. In the past decade or so, Chinese automakers also completed their own technical accumulation and product upgrades through acquiring core technologies of bankrupt overseas automakers. From acquiring Rover and Saab to Volvo, the Chinese automotive industry completed the technical pursuit from 0 to 1.
It can be said that the switch to the electrification track has completely rewritten the script.
Chinese automakers laid out plans in advance, gathered a complete supply chain, leading three-electric technologies, and rapid iteration product capabilities, leaving traditional European and American automakers behind. They transitioned slowly, dared not close fuel factories lightly, and could not afford new EV production lines, so they could only watch idle capacity and step-by-step yield the market.

From another angle, behind the flow of global automotive capacity to Chinese automakers is the transfer of discourse power in the global automotive industry.
Of course, we must also see that shifting to 'local production' is just the new starting point for the globalization of Chinese automakers. From operational challenges of acclimatization to long-term construction of brand awareness, this 2.0 journey of Chinese automakers going global is destined not to be smooth sailing. But it cannot be denied that those old factories originally silent across the globe have started the rumble of machines again because of the arrival of Chinese new energy vehicles.
Looking back from the crossroads of industrial change, this reversal of production capacity flow is like a mirror, reflecting the vivid trajectory of the 100-year change in the global automotive industry, and even more predicting that a new era of automobiles is slowly opening its curtain. In the future, there will be more and more locally produced Chinese electric vehicles running on the global roads, and this is the best footnote that the Chinese automotive industry has written for the world's industrial change.

5 月 27 日,橡膠板塊早盤大幅向上震盪,多頭情緒顯著回暖。RU 主力 2609 合約平開高走,最高觸及 17775 元/噸,放量突破 17500 元/噸關口;20 號膠主力大漲 2.70%,合成橡膠跟漲,板塊共振走強。盤面的強勢飆升,折射出當前輪胎製造上游正全面陷入“價格高、波動高、不確定性高”的“三高”困局。在成本重壓之下,國內外輪胎企業密集發聲,6 月加價潮已箭在弦上。

供需失衡,天然膠價格創兩年新高
今日盤面的猛攻,是現貨市場持續緊平衡的集中爆發。今年以來,天然橡膠價格持續走高,目前現貨價格在 17500-17900 元/噸區間,較年初上漲約 14%;期貨價格亦上漲 11%,均處近兩年高位。在海南白沙,乾膠收購價達 17 元/公斤左右的高點,加工企業紛紛搶收。

然而,高價位雖調動了割膠積極性,卻難改全球結構性短缺的底層邏輯。據天然橡膠生產國協會預測,2026 年全球需求量將達 1560.2 萬噸,產量預計僅為 1532.4 萬噸,缺口明顯。主產區泰國因膠園改種、膠樹老化產量乏力,厄爾尼諾現象帶來的高溫乾旱亦加劇了 5-6 月產量釋放不足的減產預期。國內雲南、海南開割初期產量偏慢,供應低產期拉長。

需求端,國內輪胎企業開工率穩步修復,新能源汽車 4 月產銷同比分別增長 5.5% 和 9.7%,整車出口大漲 74.4%,下游剛需穩健托底。供需錯配之下,國內庫存持續去化。5 月 22 日當周,青島保稅區區內庫存環比減少 0.59 萬噸至 13.36 萬噸,一般貿易庫存環比減少 0.25 萬噸,現貨流通偏緊為盤面提供強支撐。

格局顛覆,合成膠上演歷史性反超
天膠飆升僅是冰山一角,合成橡膠的異動更讓輪胎企業承壓。今年 3 月,國內合成橡膠期貨主力合約盤中強勢漲停,單日漲幅高達 11.99%,年內累計漲幅超 53%。

更值得關注的是,合成橡膠價格當時首次反超了天然橡膠,兩者價差一度超過 1300 元/噸,徹底顛覆了行業“天然膠比合成膠貴”的長期認知。雖近期受中東局勢和緩影響,合成膠價格下探至 14000 元一線,但受國際原油反彈超 3% 及資金回流能化板塊帶動,合成橡膠價格近期再度抬頭,間接支撐天然橡膠走強,原材料波動率居高不下。

成本倒逼,6 月加價潮再度逼宮
面對上游原材料的狂飆,輪胎企業利潤嚴重受壓,加價成為唯一出路。國際品牌率先佈局 6 月:韓泰、鄧祿普、錦湖相繼宣佈自 6 月 1 日起上調產品價格 2%-6% 不等;米其林、普利司通、固特異等也在 5 月完成了新一輪調價。
國內品牌亦不甘落後,迎來今年的第二波甚至第三波加價。超 40 家輪胎企業在 5 月發佈調價函,採取“小步快跑”策略,高頻微調對沖成本劇烈震盪。

不過,6 月加價潮雖已確立,落地節奏卻將顯著分化。在產能整體過剩背景下,“加價函”與“促銷政策”並存的扭曲局面或將延續。頭部企業憑藉成本轉嫁能力借勢升級,而部分中小型品牌為保市場份額,可能被迫暫緩調價或變相促銷。這場由“三高”引發的風暴,正加速重塑輪胎產業的競爭版圖。
圖片來源:央視財經

唔知有幾多朋友最近期關注 10 萬內純電 SUV 市場?近段時間睇嚟,呢個細分市場好熱鬧。就講長安啟源全新 Q05 同零跑 A10,上個月銷量分別達 15814 輛同 14372 輛,全部挺進 2026 年 4 月銷量排行全品類前 10,長安啟源全新 Q05 甚至奪得緊緊湊型純電 SUV 市場嘅銷冠。

(長安啟源全新 Q05)
值得留意係,兩款大熱門產品亮點亦唔少,9 萬級可以得到 500km+嘅續航,零跑 A10 甚至配備激光雷達,有高級智駕輔助需求嘅朋友嚟講,呢架車吸引力的確唔低。但係喺價格上,同為高配嘅長安啟源全新 Q05 506Max+ 同零跑 A10 505 激光雷達版,終端價格分別係 9.59 萬同 8.68 萬,手握 9 萬左右預算嘅朋友都可以考慮。明顯係,又去到決賽圈二揀一環節。
(零跑 A10)
如果對預算比較敏感,咁喺長安啟源全新 Q05 同零跑 A10 之間,後者可能更受歡迎,畢竟終端價格實打實平咗幾千元。而且,高配 A10 配有激光雷達,市區/高速情況均能啟動領航輔助駕駛,呢個就係佢嘅優勢所在。當然,如果預算允許,揀長安啟源全新 Q05 高配,都有帶激光雷達嘅高級輔助駕駛。
(長安啟源全新 Q05)
但既然係買車前嘅橫評,唔少全方位對比。首先從尺寸睇,作為緊湊型 SUV,長安啟源全新 Q05 長寬高分別係 4435*1855*1595mm,軸距為 2735mm。而零跑 A10 車型級別就係小型 SUV,長寬高分別係 4270*1810*1635mm,軸距為 2605mm。
(零跑 A10)
如果只係考慮代步、通勤,零跑 A10 嘅細個嘅略有優勢,方便行街串巷。但實際上,好多人買車都要兼顧家用,10 萬內預算也多以剛需用車群體為主。既然係剛需,且有家用需求,嗰空間自然唔好掉鏈子。
(長安啟源全新 Q05)
(零跑 A10)
講返日常家庭出行嚟講,兩車之間 130mm 軸距差異,直接反映喺後排體驗。坐入長安啟源全新 Q05 後排,腿部空間平整兼寬敞,一齊坐 3 位成年人都唔會太擠;但係坐入零跑 A10 後排,無論坐寬定係腿部空間都會細少少。媽咪喺後排照顧孩子,長安啟源全新 Q05 後排更加寬敞嘅空間會更加方便佢操作,孩子都能有更大嘅活動空間。
(長安啟源全新 Q05)
(零跑 A10)
除咗空間,通勤黨同家庭用戶對舒適配置都比較關注。睇嚟對比,兩車都有配電動尾門、無匙進入、自適應遠近光等外部配置。但係從車廂內睇,零跑 A10 副駕無法電動調節,後排靠背都唔支援角度調節,同埋缺少後排空調出風口、車內 PM2.5 過濾裝置等。
(長安啟源全新 Q05)
(零跑 A10)
反觀長安啟源全新 Q05,除咗副駕支持電動調節,前排仲集成咗加熱/通風/按摩/副駕腿托功能,對比零跑 A10 只提供前排座椅加熱,佢嘅品質無疑更上一層樓。包括後排乘員都有少少照顧,例如靠背角度可調、配有後排空調出風口、後排中央扶手/杯架等,更加適合家人同行呢類場景。
(長安啟源全新 Q05)
(零跑 A10)
除咗舒享體驗,行駛系統嘅對比我哋都唔好忽略。首先從大家關注嘅續航睇,長安啟源全新 Q05 同零跑 A10 分別搭載 51.9kWh、53kWh 電池,CLTC 純電續航做到 506km、505km,差異大可忽略。但從電芯供應鏈睇,前者出自寧德時代,後者就係國軒高科/江蘇正力,若論品牌含金量,“寧王”順位自然靠前,更值得信賴。另外,兩車都有全球品質,按照全球嚴苛嘅標準打造,零跑 A10 符合國內、歐盟雙標準,長安啟源全新 Q05 已經喺泰國上市,未來仲會相繼落地多個國家地區,最終開拓歐洲區域,此外仲有央企背書,質量品質都好可靠。
因為本文討論嘅係 A10 嘅 505 版本,採用電池液冷技術,溫控較好,而如果係 403 版本,採用成本低嘅風冷技術,散熱效果較差。呢點上,全新 Q05 做得更好,入門就採用電池直冷技術,高配用嘅係液冷技術,能更好地實現熱管理,保證電池安全。
(長安啟源全新 Q05)
(零跑 A10)
動力方面,長安啟源全新 Q05 同零跑 A10 都係前置單電機佈局,電機最大動力輸出分別係 120kW/190N·m、90kW/150N·m,0-100km/h 加速時間分別做到 8.9 秒同 10.6 秒。坦率嚟講,兩款車喺純電陣營加速性能都中規中矩;但係相對嚟講,長安啟源全新 Q05 嘅 8 秒級零百加速,喺山路行駛、高速超車等情況下會比零跑 A10 更加分。
(長安啟源全新 Q05)

(零跑 A10)
總結嚟講,零跑 A10 505 激光雷達版優勢突出:價格更低、智駕輔助覆蓋範圍更廣,適合預算優先 + 科技嘗鮮嘅消費者。而長安啟源全新 Q05 更強調“全面”二字:加少少預算同樣可以獲得高級輔助駕駛,而且尺寸更大、舒適配置更高、採用頭部電芯供應鏈,動力亦更強,綜合表現更全能。總括嚟講,預算 9 萬級追求面面俱到嘅家用體驗,長安啟源全新 Q05 506Max+ 更加值得考慮。

Folks, today let's talk about big news on going global—not selling cars, but selling "drivers". On June 2, WeRide and Uber jointly announced a plan: to launch the country's first commercial Robotaxi pilot service in Madrid, Spain. In other words: Spanish residents will soon be able to hail a driverless taxi via Uber. This is the first time WeRide and Uber are partnering to enter the European market. Madrid also becomes the 12th city globally where WeRide's Robotaxi arrives.
According to official news, with the support of the Madrid regional government, this service will officially launch within this year. At that time, friends in Madrid can open the Uber App and call WeRide's Robotaxi with one click. It's just like calling an ordinary ride-hailing service, the difference is the arriving car has no driver—at least initially, there is still a difference. In the initial operation phase, a professionally trained safety monitor will be on board, as it's just launched, safety comes first.
This company, WeRide, you might have heard of it, or you might not. A brief introduction: Established in 2017, it has been dedicated to Robotaxi technology R&D and commercialization. Currently, its Robotaxis cover Guangzhou, Beijing, Singapore, Abu Dhabi, Dubai, Riyadh, Zurich... plus Madrid now, totaling 12 cities. Spain is also the 5th European market WeRide has entered—previously entered Switzerland, France, Belgium, Slovakia. According to the plan agreed by WeRide and Uber in May 2025, they plan to deploy Robotaxi services in 15 new international cities within five years, deploying tens of thousands of Robotaxis globally. With the Madrid launch, the deployment in 4 cities has been completed, and 11 more will be covered successively before 2030.
To be honest, it's not the first time Chinese autonomous driving companies are going global, but the combination of Chinese technology + global mobility platform + European market is quite interesting. Madrid is one of the European Robotaxi markets with the most commercial potential, with a large population, high travel demand, and friendly local policies. Being able to take root in this market is a significant milestone for WeRide. For Uber, introducing Robotaxis is also a way to reduce costs—after all, drivers don't need salaries. For Madrid residents, hailing a taxi might be cheaper in the future.

In May, China's automotive market overall presented a gentle recovery trend, with domestic brands still being the sales backbone of the market. Recently, BYD, Geely, Chery, Changan, and Great Wall, the top 5 domestic automakers, successively released their monthly performance reports. From the data, these five companies show a general characteristic of "stable total growth, divergence between domestic and international markets, and accelerated new energy penetration". Overseas exports and new energy vehicles have become the most core growth engines; export business has evolved from a "bonus item" to the "core foundation" for some companies. BYD's "dominant leader" status is further consolidated, Chery achieved high growth via exports, Geely's new energy penetration rate broke 56%, Changan focused steadily on balanced development, while Great Wall appeared slightly under pressure during structural transformation.
BYD: Export Hits New High Becomes Biggest HighlightIn May, BYD stood firmly at the top of domestic brands with a monthly sales volume of 383,500 vehicles, maintaining positive growth both year-on-year and month-over-month under a large base. Its two main brands, Dynasty and Ocean, sold a combined 330,200 vehicles, contributing 86.1% of total sales; Fangchengbao's monthly sales broke 30,000 units to reach 30,200, a year-on-year increase of 139.7%, setting a new high for the year; Denza sold 16,300 vehicles, and Yangwang delivered 286 vehicles. From a model perspective, BYD had eight models in May with monthly sales exceeding 20,000 vehicles. The Song Family and Yuan Family both broke 50,000 units, selling 51,370 and 56,691 vehicles respectively. The Sea Lion Family followed closely with 42,615 vehicles, and Seagull sales were also close to 40,000 vehicles.

BYD's biggest highlight in May was exports. Overseas new energy vehicle sales reached 160,600 units, an 80.4% year-on-year increase, accounting for about 42%. The sharp expansion of export scale effectively countered the phased weakness in domestic demand. Cumulative exports from January to May exceeded 620,000 vehicles. High export growth mainly benefited from continued ramping up of overseas factory capacity, improved ocean shipping capacity, and accelerated channel network expansion. In the domestic market, BYD promoted Megawatt Super Charging and intelligent strategies simultaneously—Megawatt charging achieved about 90% charge in 9 minutes; 20,000 super charging stations are planned to be built by 2026; all series models are available with Sky Eye B intelligent driving solutions and city navigation safety fallback plans, accelerating the popularization of high-level intelligent driving. As Gen 2 Blade Battery capacity gradually releases, the company's orders are expected to continue rising.
Chery: Sales Growth Leads the Top 5Chery Group's total sales volume in May was 247,800 vehicles, a significant year-on-year increase of 20.5%, ranking first in growth speed among the top 5. Exports remained its most core growth engine—May exports reached 181,900 vehicles, an 80.5% year-on-year increase, accounting for 73.4% of total sales that month, continuously breaking the single-month export record for Chinese brands for three months. In terms of new energy, Chery New Energy sold 100,300 vehicles, a 58.8% year-on-year increase. April and May consecutively saw monthly new energy sales breaking 100,000 vehicles.

The strong performance in exports benefited from Chery's long-term deep cultivation of overseas channel advantages and localized operation capabilities. While overseas orders continued to rise, high export growth formed a sharp contrast with domestic sales—Chery's domestic sales in May were only 60,000 vehicles, accounting for one-quarter of total sales. From cumulative data, Chery Group accumulated 1.101 million sales from January to May, but against the annual goal of 3.2 million vehicles, monthly averages need to reach about 420,000 vehicles later, and pressure remains significant.
Geely: New Energy Penetration Rate Breaks 56%Geely Auto's total sales volume in May was 237,600 vehicles, a 1% year-on-year increase, achieving month-over-month double growth for three consecutive months. In terms of structure, Geely's "New Four Transformations" transformation showed significant results: new energy vehicle sales reached 133,400 units, accounting for 56% of total sales, with new energy share exceeding 50% for four consecutive months.

From sub-brands, performance was significantly divergent. Zeekr brand sales in May reached 34,400 vehicles, a 82% year-on-year increase; Zeekr 9 Series and 8 Series models combined sales approached 50% of total sales, showing bright performance in the high-end market; Galaxy brand sales were 81,700 vehicles; Geely brand sales were 182,500 vehicles, among which China Star Series sales reached 100,800 vehicles; Lynk & Co brand sales were 20,700 vehicles, with new energy vehicle sales share rising to 71%.
In terms of exports, Geely's overseas vehicle exports in May reached 85,100 vehicles, a explosive 184% year-on-year increase, setting a brand single-month export record high. Among exported products, new energy vehicles reached 40,800 units, accounting for nearly half; hybrid and pure electric products have successively landed in Southeast Asia, Middle East, Latin America, and other markets, highlighting the results of global strategy implementation.
Changan: Multi-brand Matrix Balanced EffortChangan Auto's delivery volume in May was 209,100 vehicles, among which new energy deliveries were 92,400 vehicles, a 5.8% year-on-year increase, with new energy share about 44%. In terms of exports, overseas deliveries reached 70,700 vehicles, a 38% year-on-year increase, becoming another major growth highlight for Changan in May.
In the sub-brand matrix, Changan Qiyuan delivered 34,500 vehicles in May; All-New Q05 delivered 15,800 units, with orders breaking 3,000 units within three days of listing in Thailand; Deepal sales in May were 33,200 vehicles, a 30% year-on-year increase; January to May overseas cumulative sales were 28,700 vehicles, a significant 167% year-on-year increase; Avatr delivered 7,336 vehicles in May; Changan Auto (Gravity) delivered nearly 49,000 vehicles in May.

Changan Auto's balanced layout was fully reflected in May: the fuel car base remained stable, new energy brands Deepal and Qiyuan accelerated volume growth, high-end brand Avatr continued to break through in technical cooperation, and overseas markets simultaneously achieved breakthrough growth. The pattern of five brands working together, driven by both new energy and exports, is initially taking shape.
Great Wall: Overseas Sales Growth Year-on-Year 46.75%Great Wall Motor's sales in May were 100,400 vehicles, slightly down compared to last May's 102,200 vehicles, making it the only company among the top 5 to show a year-on-year negative growth. From sub-brands, Haval brand sales in May were 55,500 vehicles, remaining Great Wall's most important sales pillar; Tank brand sales were 17,100 vehicles; both Haval and Tank brand sales showed year-on-year declines; Wey brand sold 8,119 vehicles, a 31.78% year-on-year increase, achieving growth against the trend; Ora brand performance was most stunning, with sales of 6,018 vehicles, a significant 206.88% year-on-year increase. In terms of new energy, Great Wall sold 30,400 new energy vehicles in May, with new energy vehicle transformation gradually accelerating.

The overseas market became Great Wall's biggest highlight in May, with overseas sales growing 46.75% year-on-year. Against the background of pressure on the domestic market, strong growth in overseas business effectively made up for the decline in the domestic market. Great Wall Motor's current core contradiction lies in: Haval and Tank, the two traditional main-selling brands, face weak growth, while Wey and Ora brands, although growing notably, have relatively small volume and are not yet enough to support overall growth. How to complete the "relay" between old and new brands is the key issue Great Wall must solve subsequently.
Final ThoughtsFrom May data, the growth pattern of the top 5 domestic brands has clearly diverged, but there are three common trends worth noting: First, exports have become a key engine for domestic brands to seek stability and growth. Second, new energy transformation is still accelerating, but paths differ among enterprises. Third, technological innovation continues to deepen brand moats. Looking ahead to the second half of the year, competition in the automotive industry will continue to upgrade around these three trends. Although everyone has a common direction, these three trends are all competing for the entire enterprise's industrial chain strength, and the strong will remain strong, which has almost become an inevitable outcome.
