首頁night
搜尋歷史
熱門搜尋
經銷商登入 / 註冊
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺選車嗰陣都會拿 Proton X90 同 Toyota Yaris Cross 嚟做比較。呢兩部車喺價位同定位上都幾接近，今日我哋就從多個方面做一個詳細嘅比較，幫你省返做功課嘅時間。
Proton X90 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 106,800 - 122,800，一總共有 4 個版本，包括 2026 1.5T Prime X（RM 122,800）、2026 1.5T Prime（RM 116,800）、2026 1.5T Lite（RM 106,800） 等。
Toyota Yaris Cross 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 99,900 - 109,900，一總共有 2 個版本，包括 2026 1.5L Standard（RM 99,900）、2026 HEV 1.5L Standard（RM 109,900） 等。
由價錢睇落去，Toyota Yaris Cross 嘅入門價比 Proton X90 平咗 RM 6,900。老實講，喺呢個價位段，幾千蚊嘅差距其實唔算大，關鍵仲係睇整體嘅性價比同長期使用成本。
Proton X90 配備 1.5L Turbo，馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。
Toyota Yaris Cross 配備 1.5L 4-cyl，馬力 105 hp。官方油耗 6.0 L/100km。
動力方面，Proton X90 嘅 1.5L Turbo 比 Toyota Yaris Cross 嘅 1.5L 4-cyl 多咗 35 匹馬力，中段加速更有信心，尤其係跑高速公路超車嗰陣。不過 Toyota Yaris Cross 嘅油耗可能更抵，日常市區通勤差別唔會太大。
Proton X90 車身長 4400 mm，後廂 400 L。
Toyota Yaris Cross 車身長 4400 mm，後廂 400 L。
兩款車嘅尺寸幾乎一樣，車廂空間差別唔大。呢個級別嘅車，日常使用完全夠用。
Proton X90 保用 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Toyota Yaris Cross 保用 5 年/無限里程，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
總體嚟講，Proton X90 同 Toyota Yaris Cross 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一部，關鍵仲係睇你個人需求同埋預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最後決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
In the SUV market in Malaysia, many buyers compare the Proton X70 and Chery Tiggo 8 when choosing a car. Both cars are quite similar in price and positioning. Today, we will do a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
The OTR selling price of the Proton X70 in Malaysia is RM 106,800 - 122,300, with a total of 3 versions, including 1.5L Standard 2WD (RM 106,800), 1.5L Executive 2WD (RM 115,800), 1.5L Premium 2WD (RM 122,300) etc.
The OTR selling price of the Chery Tiggo 8 in Malaysia is RM 129,750 - 129,750, with a total of 1 version, including 2026 1.6T Standard (RM 129,750) etc.
From the price perspective, the starting price of the Proton X70 is indeed RM 22,950 cheaper than the Chery Tiggo 8. If your budget is limited, Proton's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. But also note, the price difference of a few thousand might involve compromises in features, depending on your specific needs.
The Proton X70 is equipped with a 1.5L Turbo, 140 hp. Official fuel consumption 7.0 L/100km.
The Chery Tiggo 8 is equipped with a 1.5L Turbo, 140 hp. Official fuel consumption 7.0 L/100km.
Both cars use the same powertrain system, the driving feel is basically no difference in daily use. Fuel consumption is also about the same, no need to dwell on this too much.
The safety rating of the Proton X70 is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
The safety rating of the Chery Tiggo 8 is TBD, active safety systems include Basic.
In terms of safety features, both cars have received decent ratings. However, there are some differences in function between Proton X70's ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA) and Chery Tiggo 8's Basic. If you value active safety more, you can carefully compare the feature lists of both.
Proton X70 warranty 5 years/150,000 km, service interval every 10,000 km or 6 months.
Chery Tiggo 8 warranty 3 years/100,000 km, service interval every 10,000 km or 6 months.
Both Proton X70 and Chery Tiggo 8 are mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, you can prioritize the one with better reputation; if you care more about cost-performance ratio and features, choose the one with more features. Ultimately it is recommended to test drive both, personal experience is the most important.
Overall, both Proton X70 and Chery Tiggo 8 are very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends on your personal needs and budget. It is recommended that everyone does their homework, compares quotes from multiple dealerships, and then test drives to make the final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending time on research will definitely not go wrong.
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拿 寶騰 X70 同 馬自達 CX-8 嚟做比較。這兩款車喺價位同定位上都蠻接近，今日我哋就從多個方面做一個詳細比較，幫你省返做功課嘅時間。
寶騰 X70 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 106,800 - 122,300，一共有 3 個版本，包括 1.5L Standard 2WD（RM 106,800）、1.5L Executive 2WD（RM 115,800）、1.5L Premium 2WD（RM 122,300）等等。
馬自達 CX-8 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 165,360 - 201,360，一共有 5 個版本，包括 2025 2.5T 4WD High Plus Petrol（RM 201,360）、2025 2.2L 2WD High Plus Diesel（RM 193,123）、2025 2.5L 2WD High Plus Petrol（RM 186,360）等等。
從價格嚟睇，寶騰 X70 嘅入門價確實比 馬自達 CX-8 平咗 RM 58,560。如果你預算有限，寶騰嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需求。但都要注意，平嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備上會有取舍，具體要看你嘅需求。
寶騰 X70 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA)。
馬自達 CX-8 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 Brand ADAS。
兩款車嘅安全評級一樣，喺呢個級別裡面安全配備都算好齊全。而家嘅新車安全性都唔差，唔使太擔心這一點。
寶騰 X70 車身長 4400 mm，尾箱 400 L。
馬自達 CX-8 車身長 4500 mm，尾箱 450 L。
空間方面，馬自達 CX-8 嘅車身比 寶騰 X70 長咗 100 mm，乘坐空間更有優勢。不過寶騰 X70 喺市區泊車會靈活啲，各有取舍。
寶騰 X70 保修 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
馬自達 CX-8 保修 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
兩款車嘅保養條件一樣，呢方面唔使糾結。實際保養成本仲要看品牌嘅服務網絡同零件價格，建議去車友群問下真實車主嘅經驗。
寶騰 X70 同 馬自達 CX-8 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更重視品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰一款；如果你更重視性價比同配備，那就揀配備更豐富嗰款。最終都係建議兩款都去試駕，親身體驗先係最重要。
總括嚟講，寶騰 X70 同 馬自達 CX-8 都係馬來西亞市場幾正嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵仲係要看你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好做功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
In the SUV market in Malaysia, many buyers compare Proton X70 and Mazda CX-60 when choosing a car. These two models are quite close in price and positioning. Today we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
Proton X70's OTR price in Malaysia is RM 106,800 - 122,300, with a total of 3 versions, including 1.5L Standard 2WD (RM 106,800), 1.5L Executive 2WD (RM 115,800), 1.5L Premium 2WD (RM 122,300), etc.
Mazda CX-60's OTR price in Malaysia is RM 200,510 - 252,873, with a total of 2 versions, including 2026 3.3T 4WD High Plus (RM 252,873), 2025 2.5L 2WD High (RM 200,510), etc.
From a price perspective, the starting price of the Proton X70 is indeed RM 93,710 cheaper than the Mazda CX-60. If your budget is limited, Proton's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. But note that the cheaper few thousand might involve trade-offs in features, depending on your needs.
Proton X70's safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
Mazda CX-60's safety rating is 5★ (Euro NCAP), active safety systems include i-Activsense Pro.
In terms of safety features, both cars received good ratings. However, there are some differences between the Proton X70's ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA) and the Mazda CX-60's i-Activsense Pro in terms of functions. If you value active safety, you can compare the function lists of both closely.
Proton X70 body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
Mazda CX-60 body length 4500 mm, trunk 450 L.
In terms of space, the Mazda CX-60 body is 100 mm longer than the Proton X70, offering a better advantage in passenger space. However, the Proton X70 is a bit more flexible for parking in the city, each has its trade-offs.
Proton X70 warranty 5 years/150,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Mazda CX-60 warranty 5 years/150,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Both cars have the same warranty conditions, no need to dwell on this. Actual maintenance costs also depend on the brand's service network and parts prices, suggest asking real owners in car communities for their experience.
Overall, Proton X70 and Mazda CX-60 are both very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends on your personal needs and budget. It is recommended to do your research, compare quotes from a few dealerships, and then test drive to make the final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending some time researching will never be wrong.
In Malaysia's SUV market, many buyers tend to compare the Proton X70 and Honda HR-V when selecting a car. The price and positioning of these two cars are quite similar, so today we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
The Proton X70's OTR price in Malaysia is RM 106,800 - 122,300, with a total of 3 versions, including 1.5L Standard 2WD (RM 106,800), 1.5L Executive 2WD (RM 115,800), 1.5L Premium 2WD (RM 122,300), and so on.
The Honda HR-V's OTR price in Malaysia is RM 115,900 - 143,900, with a total of 4 versions, including 2026 e:HEV 1.5L RS (RM 143,900), 2026 1.5T V (RM 137,900), 2026 1.5T E (RM 130,900), and so on.
From a pricing perspective, the Proton X70 is indeed RM 9,100 cheaper than the Honda HR-V in terms of entry price. If your budget is limited, the entry-level version of the Proton should be enough for daily needs. However, keep in mind that the few thousand ringgit saved might involve trade-offs in features, which depends on your specific requirements.
The Proton X70 is equipped with a 1.5L Turbo engine, producing 140 hp. Official fuel consumption is 7.0 L/100km.
The Honda HR-V is equipped with a 1.5L Turbo engine, producing 140 hp. Official fuel consumption is 7.0 L/100km.
Both cars use the same powertrain system, so the driving feel in daily use is basically no different. Fuel economy is also similar, so there is no need to overthink this point.
The Proton X70 has a body length of 4400 mm and a trunk capacity of 400 L.
The Honda HR-V has a body length of 4500 mm and a trunk capacity of 450 L.
In terms of space, the Honda HR-V is 100 mm longer than the Proton X70, giving it an advantage in passenger space. However, the Proton X70 is a bit more flexible when parking in the city, each has its trade-offs.
Both the Proton X70 and Honda HR-V are mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale price more, you might prioritize the one with better reputation; if you care more about value for money and features, choose the one with richer configuration. Ultimately, it is recommended to test drive both models, as personal experience is the most important.
Overall, both the Proton X70 and Honda HR-V are very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose ultimately depends on your personal needs and budget. It is recommended to do your research, compare quotes from several dealerships, and then go for a test drive to make the final decision. Buying a car is a major decision, and taking some time to do research will never go wrong.
In Malaysia's SUV market, many buyers tend to compare Proton X50 and GWM Haval H6 when choosing a car. These two models are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
The OTR price of Proton X50 in Malaysia is RM 89,800 - 113,300, with a total of 4 versions, including 1.5T Executive (RM 89,800), 1.5T Premium (RM 101,800), 1.5T Flagship (RM 113,300), etc.
The OTR price of GWM Haval H6 in Malaysia is RM 139,750 - 139,750, with a total of 2 versions, including 1.5L Turbo Standard (RM 140,000), 1.5L Turbo Premium (RM 155,000), etc.
In terms of price, the starting price of Proton X50 is indeed RM 49,950 cheaper than GWM Haval H6. If your budget is limited, Proton's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. But keep in mind, the cheaper price might involve trade-offs in features, depending on your specific requirements.
Proton X50 is equipped with 1.5L 4-cyl, 105 hp. Official fuel consumption 6.0 L/100km.
GWM Haval H6 is equipped with Hybrid, 170 hp. Official fuel consumption 4.5 L/100km.
In terms of power, GWM Haval H6's Hybrid has 65 more horsepower than Proton X50's 1.5L 4-cyl. However, for daily city driving, both cars have sufficient power and won't feel underpowered.
Proton X50's safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), with active safety systems including ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
GWM Haval H6's safety rating is TBD, with active safety systems including Basic.
Regarding safety features, both cars have achieved decent ratings. However, there are some differences in functionality between Proton X50's ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA) and GWM Haval H6's Basic. If you prioritize active safety, you can compare the feature lists of both carefully.
Proton X50 body length is 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
GWM Haval H6 body length is 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
The dimensions of both cars are almost identical, with little difference in interior space. For this class of cars, it is more than enough for daily use.
Proton X50 uses 4WD drive system.
GWM Haval H6 uses FWD drive system.
Proton's 4WD and GWM's FWD will feel different in handling, test drive comparison is recommended.
Overall, Proton X50 and GWM Haval H6 are both very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends on your personal needs and budget. It is recommended to do your research, compare quotes from multiple dealers, and test drive before making a final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending time on research will never be wrong.
In Malaysia's SUV market, many buyers compare the Proton X50 and Chery Tiggo 8 when choosing a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning. Today we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
The OTR price of Proton X50 in Malaysia is RM 89,800 - 113,300, with a total of 4 versions, including 1.5T Executive (RM 89,800), 1.5T Premium (RM 101,800), 1.5T Flagship (RM 113,300), etc.
The OTR price of Chery Tiggo 8 in Malaysia is RM 129,750 - 129,750, with a total of 1 version, including 2026 1.6T Standard (RM 129,750), etc.
In terms of price, the starting price of Proton X50 is indeed RM 39,950 cheaper than Chery Tiggo 8. If your budget is limited, Proton's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. However, be aware that the few thousand cheaper may involve trade-offs in features, depending on your specific needs.
Proton X50 is equipped with a 1.5L 4-cyl, 105 hp. Official fuel consumption is 6.0 L/100km.
Chery Tiggo 8 is equipped with a 1.5L Turbo, 140 hp. Official fuel consumption is 7.0 L/100km.
In terms of power, Chery Tiggo 8's 1.5L Turbo has 35 more horsepower than Proton X50's 1.5L 4-cyl. However, for daily driving in the city, both cars have sufficient power and won't feel underpowered.
Proton X50 body length is 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
Chery Tiggo 8 body length is 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
The dimensions of both cars are almost identical, and the interior space is not much different. For this class of cars, it is fully sufficient for daily use.
Proton X50 and Chery Tiggo 8 are both mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale price more, you can prioritize the one with a better reputation; if you care more about cost-performance ratio and features, choose the one with more configurations. In the end, it is recommended to test drive both, as experiencing it yourself is the most important.
Overall, Proton X50 and Chery Tiggo 8 are both very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends mainly on your personal needs and budget. It is recommended to do your research well, compare quotes from several dealerships, and then test drive to make a final decision. Buying a car is a big deal, taking time to research will definitely not be a mistake.
Recently, China Bus Network released export statistics data for new energy buses in the first half of 2026. BYD ranked first with an export volume of 2,233 units, accounting for a market share of 22.15%. It was the only enterprise in the industry to break through 2,000 units in exports in the first half. Under the wave of global green transportation transformation, BYD maintains steady growth and has won the annual export champion of new energy buses for three consecutive years.
BYD electric buses have achieved a pattern of global blossoming with simultaneous deep cultivation in multiple continents, high-end markets, and emerging markets. As of the end of June, in the high-standard European market, BYD has cumulatively delivered over 7,000 pure electric buses. Among them, over 2,700 buses are in operation in the United Kingdom, accounting for 45% of the market share of zero-emission buses in the United Kingdom.
BYD Buses in the United Kingdom
In the Americas region, BYD continues to achieve breakthroughs at multiple points and maintains a leading posture. In Colombia, BYD has cumulatively operated over 1,500 buses, ranking first in market share; the Brazilian market has continuously deepened and expanded since initiating local production of electric bus chassis in 2015. In June this year, BYD delivered 265 electric buses to São Paulo at once, setting a new record for the single-batch delivery scale of heavy electric buses in Brazil. Relying on localization strategy and technical accumulation, BYD has long remained at the top of the market share of imported electric bus brands in Brazil. In addition, the Middle East and African markets are steadily advancing, and orders are being delivered successively in places such as Morocco and the UAE.
In the Asia-Pacific region, business covers multiple countries such as Singapore, Thailand, Malaysia, and Australia, becoming the main model for local public transportation electrification. Currently, BYD electric buses have orders exceeding 500 units in Japan, with a market share exceeding 50%, ranking first in the industry.
BYD Buses in Singapore
The core foundation of BYD electric buses continuing to lead comes from a fully self-developed core technology system. Relying on technologies such as e-BUS Platform 3.0 and Blade Battery, it can adapt to global complex operating conditions such as high temperature, extreme cold, and mountainous areas. It has prominent advantages in safety performance and lifecycle costs, successfully passed strict market certifications such as Europe, America, Japan, and South Korea, and gained recognition from global customers.
In the SUV market in Malaysia, many buyers compare Proton X50 and Mazda CX-8 when choosing a car. Both models are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
The OTR price of Proton X50 in Malaysia is RM 89,800 - 113,300, with a total of 4 versions, including 1.5T Executive (RM 89,800), 1.5T Premium (RM 101,800), 1.5T Flagship (RM 113,300), etc.
The OTR price of Mazda CX-8 in Malaysia is RM 165,360 - 201,360, with a total of 5 versions, including 2025 2.5T 4WD High Plus Petrol (RM 201,360), 2025 2.2L 2WD High Plus Diesel (RM 193,123), 2025 2.5L 2WD High Plus Petrol (RM 186,360), etc.
From a price perspective, the starting price of Proton X50 is indeed RM 75,560 cheaper than Mazda CX-8. If your budget is limited, the entry-level version of Proton can already meet daily needs. But also note, the few thousand dollars cheaper may involve trade-offs in features, it depends on your specific needs.
Proton X50 is equipped with a 1.5L 4-cyl engine, 105 hp. Official fuel consumption 6.0 L/100km.
Mazda CX-8 is equipped with a 2.0L 4-cyl engine, 170 hp. Official fuel consumption 8.0 L/100km.
In terms of power, the Mazda CX-8's 2.0L 4-cyl has 65 more horsepower than the Proton X50's 1.5L 4-cyl. However, for daily city driving, both cars have enough power and won't feel underpowered.
Proton X50 safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety system includes ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
Mazda CX-8 safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety system includes Brand ADAS.
Both cars have the same safety rating, safety features are quite comprehensive within this class. New cars nowadays don't lack in safety, no need to worry too much about this point.
Proton X50 warranty 5 years/150,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Mazda CX-8 warranty 5 years/150,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Warranty conditions for both cars are the same, no need to dwell on this aspect. Actual maintenance costs depend on the brand's service network and parts prices, it is recommended to ask real owners in car owner groups for experience.
Both Proton X50 and Mazda CX-8 are mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale price more, you can prioritize the one with better reputation; if you care more about cost-performance ratio and features, choose the one with richer configuration. In the end, it is recommended to test drive both, personal experience is the most important.
Overall, both Proton X50 and Mazda CX-8 are very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends on your personal needs and budget. It is recommended to do your research, compare quotes from several dealerships, and then test drive to make the final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending time doing research will never be wrong.
July16, GAC Trumpchi factory in Panyu, Guangzhou, a brand new right-hand drive Trumpchi M8 PHEV slowly drove off the production line. GAC Group Chairman Feng Xingya handed the car keys to Thai owner Tony Jaa. At this moment, GAC welcomed the milestone production of the 30 millionth vehicle. From the 1st to the 30 millionth vehicle, this Chinese automotive giant took 29 years. Amidst the industry's deep transformation, GAC revealed its confidence in navigating the cycle to the outside world through a performance sheet led by "Stability" and a cross-border delivery ceremony.
A Special Delivery, Witnessing "Mutual Effort"
Unlike the dazzling spotlights at previous delivery ceremonies, GAC Group reserved the "C-position" for the owner of the 30 millionth vehicle -- Thai action star Tony Jaa. When Feng Xingya handed him the keys, this was not just a simple delivery, but a vivid microcosm of GAC's globalization strategy from "Going Out" to "Going In".
At the event site, this "Global Sync" atmosphere was fully displayed: GAC Honda P7, GAC Toyota Intelliz 7, Qijing GT7, GAC Aion N60, GAC Hyper S600, as the 29,999,995th to 29,999,999th vehicles, sequentially rolled off the line in sync with GAC's multiple global production bases. This wave of new energy models clearly outlines GAC's determined figure in fully advancing electrification and intelligence transformation.
The Dialectic of "Fast" and "Steady": Resilience Behind the Data
If 30 million vehicles is the result, then supporting this result is GAC's resilience in "not rushing forward, only deepening cultivation" amidst change.
Data shows, in the first half of this year, GAC Group sales reached 773,100 vehicles, up 2.35% year-on-year, among which new energy vehicle sales surged 68.8% year-on-year; overseas exports exceeded 120,000, up 132% year-on-year. Against the backdrop of surging price wars and generally pressured industry profitability, GAC's "Stability" stood out especially.
Feng Xingya gave the answer in his speech: "Quality is the bottom line GAC will never yield." Behind this seemingly simple promise lies a system of strictness bordering on obsession. Before each new car is launched, it must undergo extreme environment tempering of "Five Highs, One Mountain, One Dust", and complete "Two Winters, One Summer" of on-site road testing. It is precisely this relentless pursuit of quality that made the GAC Aion Smart Eco-Factory become the "World's First New Energy Vehicle Lighthouse Factory", and also won users' trust of the Slate Battery cumulative installation of 1.5 million units, safe driving over 160 billion kilometers.
From "Product Delivery" to "Emotional Delivery"
Under the grand narrative of 30 million vehicles, GAC wants to tell more specific and micro user stories. At the event site, Feng Xingya announced the launch of "GAC Group 30 Million Vehicle Production Launch · Renewal Gratitude Season", six passenger car brands will launch special policies around new purchase, trade-in, etc.
But what is more worth attention is GAC's layout on service soft power. Facing user anxiety about battery degradation and intelligent driving safety, GAC took the lead in launching the brand's "Three Responsibilities" policy, actively taking the bottom line; facing charging pain points, GAC has already built a "9 Vertical 10 Horizontal" charging network covering 31 provinces and 213 cities nationwide, core urban areas achieving "Station Every 1 Kilometer in a Straight Line".
In addition, GAC is using activities like "User Open Mic", inviting users to "Home" to give opinions, and establishing a full-process closed-loop management mechanism. This transformation from "I Build Cars You Pay" to "You Use Cars I Accompany" is reshaping the relationship between GAC and 30 million users.
User Logic Behind Technology "Arms Race"
Standing at the new starting point of 30 million vehicles, GAC's gaze is cast towards a farther future. In Feng Xingya's view, technology should not be showing off skills, but should be converted into peace of mind and convenience that users can perceive.
In the power field, Xingyuan Power developed by the "National Distinguished Engineer Team" will be mass-produced on more models; in the "Three Electrics" field, the all-solid-state battery pilot production line has been built, and the Quark electric drive motor efficiency has broken through 99%; in the intelligent connected field, the Xingling architecture has connected six major systems, making cars become partners that "Think and Understand People". As of now, GAC cumulative R&D investment exceeded 62 billion Yuan, global R&D team exceeds 6,800 people.
As one on-site owner said: "Buying GAC, the point is "Peace of Mind"." This might be the simplest annotation for GAC's 30 million vehicle milestone, and also its strongest power to continue moving forward in the next 30 years.
3 Guinness World Records in Hand! Geely's "Thunder 16-in-1" Electric Drive, Welds Shut the Global E-Drive Ceiling
On July 16, Geely Automobile Group officially released Geely Galaxy's world's first "Thunder 16-in-1 Intelligent Electric Drive". Relying on Xingqu Technology's years of technical accumulation and complete industrial layout, this new electric drive achieved a generational breakthrough in energy saving, performance, and reliability, directly pulling the daily usage experience of pure electric vehicles to a new height. The Geely Galaxy TT, equipped with this electric drive for the first time, won two Guinness World Records at once: "Lowest Energy Consumption for Driving a Production Pure Electric Sedan Around Qinghai Lake" and "Longest Continuous Dual-Car Drift on Slippery Roads (Electric Vehicle)", proving the global leading strength of Chinese brands in the electric drive field with solid results.
The "Thunder 16-in-1 Intelligent Electric Drive" released this time has the most intuitive feature of integrating 16 hardware and software functions that were previously scattered into one, equivalent to packaging several independently working devices into one highly collaborative unit. It not only has over 180 fewer scattered parts, but its weight is also 15% lighter than mainstream industry products, and can free up an additional 28L of trunk space inside the vehicle. For ordinary car owners, it means carrying more luggage and being more practical for daily travel.
In terms of the most concerned matter of saving power, this electric drive achieved the industry's first place in mass production of the same level with a 93.8% comprehensive efficiency. Simply put, from current transmission, energy conversion to daily full-scenario driving, every link is "picking details" to reduce waste: 800V high-voltage platform plus shortened conduction paths directly reduce current transmission loss by 80%; more advanced silicon carbide chips, thinner silicon steel sheets, and high-precision gears further minimize losses in the electricity, magnetism, and force conversion process; plus the support of Geely Xingrui AI Cloud Power Intelligent Energy Management Large Model, when turning on heating in winter, driving long distances on highways, or commuting during city rush hours, the system will automatically find the most power-saving operation mode. Car owners don't need to deliberately control their footwork, they can find a balance between comfort and power saving. It is precisely thanks to this extreme energy-saving design that the Galaxy TT achieved an ultra-low power consumption of 8.20 kWh/100km in the test run around Qinghai Lake, setting a Guinness World Record for lowest energy consumption for production pure electric sedans around Qinghai Lake.
In terms of power performance, it achieved the level of the top tier of the same level. The four-wheel drive version reaches a comprehensive power of 425kW, and 0-100 acceleration only takes 3.8 seconds. The rarest thing is "fast and stable": the average command response of traditional electric drives is 40ms, it relies on the design of one-chip integration to compress it directly to the fastest 2ms, the power follows the moment the accelerator is stepped on, truly achieving "hits exactly where pointed"; AI algorithms can also reduce real-time torque deviation from 3% to 1%, greatly improving the accuracy of power output of the wheels; plus 54-channel directional cooling technology, the maximum temperature of the motor can be reduced by 15 degrees Celsius, even if driving intensely for a long time, there will be no power attenuation or system torque limit situation.
It is precisely relying on this performance of "performance without interruption throughout the process" that the Galaxy TT completed over 46km of continuous dual-car drift on slippery roads, breaking the record set by Porsche in 2020. Many people may not know that drifting pure electric vehicles is much more difficult than fuel cars: at the moment of starting drift, precise torque must be exploded in milliseconds to allow the car body to smoothly enter the sliding state; during the drift process, power output must be constantly finely adjusted, a slight deviation will cause loss of control; under extreme working conditions of continuous tens of kilometers, the electric drive must withstand continuous high speed and high thermal load, and cannot trigger protection due to overheating. This successful challenge is equivalent to giving all ordinary car owners a reassurance: even if encountering heavy rain and slippery roads, continuous climbing, or long-time intense driving, this electric drive can still output stably and won't let you down.
In terms of reliability, this electric drive has undergone an "over-standard level" test. From single parts to complete electric drive assembly, to the whole vehicle on the road, covering 9000+ tests in 15 areas, cumulatively completing 5 million kilometers of durability verification, and also obtained the authoritative certification of CAERI "High Quality Electric Drive". It also comes with a cloud "online doctor" - Smart Health Management System, relying on AI life prediction model to actively give key components a "checkup", not waiting for parts to break to warn maintenance in advance, turning the past "repair after break" into "active care", reducing the failure probability in the process of using the car from the root.
On the day of launch, Xingqu Technology also opened to the outside world for the first time, showing Geely's complete electric drive R&D, intelligent manufacturing and full-chain industrial layout to the outside world. Currently, Xingqu Technology's R&D and manufacturing network spans multiple cities in China as well as Sweden and Malaysia, with cumulative patent applications exceeding 1000, and the highest automation rate of five major intelligent manufacturing bases exceeds 95%, production accuracy reaches micron level, and the whole process of every electric drive can be intelligently traced. In the first half of this year, the motor installation volume of Xingqu Technology has firmly stayed in the industry TOP3. Products not only serve domestic brands like Geely Galaxy and Zeekr, but also supply to many international car companies such as Volvo, Jaguar Land Rover, and Renault, and signed long-term orders with many top European car companies.
At this point, Geely has cultivated three "Hidden Champions" enterprises in the three core fields of hybrid, battery, and electric drive: Haosi Power, Jiyao Tixing, and Xingqu Technology, forming a full-chain autonomous and controllable three-electric technology system. From the Guinness World Record of over 2608km range created by the Thor Intelligent Hybrid before, to the two new records won by this Thunder 16-in-1 Intelligent Electric Drive, Geely is reshaping the global new energy vehicle power technology standards with solid technical breakthroughs, injecting strong Chinese power into the innovation and upgrade of the global new energy industry.
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拿 Perodua Aruz 同 Mitsubishi Xforce 來比較。這兩款車喺價位同定位上都幾接近嘅，今日我哋會由多個方面做詳細嘅比較，幫你節省做功課嘅時間。
Perodua Aruz 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 72,900 - 77,900，一共有 2 個版本，包括 1.5L X（RM 72,900）、1.5L AV（RM 77,900） 等。
Mitsubishi Xforce 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 109,930 - 119,930，一共有 2 個版本，包括 2026 1.5L Ultimate（RM 119,930）、2026 1.5L Urban（RM 109,930） 等。
由價錢睇，Perodua Aruz 嘅起步價確實比 Mitsubishi Xforce 平咗 RM 37,030。如果你預算有限，Perodua 嘅入門版已經可以满足日常需要。但都要留意，平嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備方面要有取捨，具體要睇你嘅需求。
Perodua Aruz 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
Mitsubishi Xforce 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
兩款車嘅驅動方式一樣，都係 FWD，日常駕駛感覺唔會差幾多。
Perodua Aruz 包修 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Mitsubishi Xforce 包修 3 年/100,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Perodua Aruz 同 Mitsubishi Xforce 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更重視品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，就揀配備更豐富嗰款。最後都建議兩款都去試駕，親身體驗先至最重要。
總括嚟講，Perodua Aruz 同 Mitsubishi Xforce 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵都要睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做足功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，先去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事情，花啲時間做功課絕對無問題。
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嗰陣都會揀 Honda WR-V 同 MG MG HS 嚟比較。呢兩款車喺價位同定位上都幾相近，今日我哋就由多個方面做個詳細比較，幫你慳啲做功課嘅時間。
Honda WR-V 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 89,900 - 107,900，一共有 4 個版本，包括 2023 1.5L V（RM 99,900）、2023 1.5L E（RM 95,900）、2023 1.5L S（RM 89,900） 等。
MG MG HS 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 130,450 - 146,450，一共有 2 個版本，包括 1.5L Standard（RM 105,000）、1.5L Executive（RM 115,000） 等。
睇返價錢，Honda WR-V 嘅起步價真係比 MG MG HS 平咗 RM 40,550。如果你預算有限，Honda 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需要。但都要留意，平嗰幾千蚊，喺配備上可能會有所取舍，具體要看你嘅需要。
Honda WR-V 配 1.5L 4-cyl，馬力 105 hp。官方油耗 6.0 L/100km。
MG MG HS 配 1.5L Turbo，馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。
動力方面，MG MG HS 嘅 1.5L Turbo 比 Honda WR-V 嘅 1.5L 4-cyl 多咗 35 匹馬力。不過日常喺市區行，兩款車嘅動力都夠用，唔會覺得唔夠力。
Honda WR-V 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 Honda SENSING。
MG MG HS 嘅安全評級係 TBD，主動安全系統包括 Basic。
安全配備方面，兩款車都係唔錯嘅評級。不過 Honda WR-V 嘅 Honda SENSING 同 MG MG HS 嘅 Basic 喺功能上有些差異，如果你比較睇重主動安全嘅話，可以仔細比較下兩者嘅功能列表。
Honda WR-V 採 FWD 驅動方式。
MG MG HS 採 FWD 驅動方式。
兩款車嘅驅動方式一樣，都係 FWD，日常駕駛感受唔會有太大分別。
總括嚟講，Honda WR-V 同 MG MG HS 都係馬來西亞市場好唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵仲係要睇你嘅個人需要同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去做試駕先做最終決定。買車係件大事，花啲時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嗰陣都會拿 Mazda CX-3 同 Volkswagen Tiguan 黎做比較。呢兩部車喺價錢同定位上都幾接近嘅，今日我哋就由多個方面做一個詳細嘅比較，幫你節省做功課嘅時間。
Mazda CX-3 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 126,159 - 139,159，一共有 2 個版本，包括 2023 2.0L High（RM 139,159）、2023 2.0L Plus（RM 126,159） 等。
Volkswagen Tiguan 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 206,540 - 260,024，一共有 2 個版本，包括 2025 Allspace 2.0T R-Line（RM 260,024）、2025 Allspace 1.4T Elegance（RM 206,540） 等。
由價錢嚟睇，Mazda CX-3 嘅起步價確實比 Volkswagen Tiguan 平咗 RM 80,381。如果你預算有限，Mazda 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需要。但都要留意，平嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備上會有取舍，具體要睇你嘅需要。
Mazda CX-3 配搭 1.5L Turbo，140 hp 馬力。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。
Volkswagen Tiguan 配搭 2.0L 4-cyl，170 hp 馬力。官方油耗 8.0 L/100km。
動力方面，Volkswagen Tiguan 嘅 2.0L 4-cyl 比 Mazda CX-3 嘅 1.5L Turbo 多咗 30 匹馬力。不過日常喺市區開，兩部車嘅動力都夠用，唔會覺得唔夠力。
Mazda CX-3 車身長 4500 mm，行李廂 450 L。
Volkswagen Tiguan 車身長 4400 mm，行李廂 400 L。
空間方面，Mazda CX-3 嘅車身比 Volkswagen Tiguan 長咗 100 mm，車內乘坐空間會稍微寬鬆啲，尤其係後座腿部空間。如果你經常載家人或者需要放嬰兒車，大少少嘅車身確實更實用。
Mazda CX-3 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
Volkswagen Tiguan 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
兩部車嘅驅動方式一樣，都係 FWD，日常駕駛感受唔會睇到太大分別。
總括嚟講，Mazda CX-3 同 Volkswagen Tiguan 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一部，關鍵仲係要睇你嘅個人需要同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嗰陣都會拿 Mazda CX-8 同 Hyundai Tucson 嚟做比較。呢兩部車喺價位同定位上都幾接近，今日我哋就由多個方面做一個詳細嘅對比，幫你省下做功課嘅時間。
Mazda CX-8 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 165,360 - 201,360，一共有 5 個版本，包括 2025 2.5T 4WD High Plus 汽油（RM 201,360）、2025 2.2L 2WD High Plus 柴油（RM 193,123）、2025 2.5L 2WD High Plus 汽油（RM 186,360）等。
Hyundai Tucson 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 143,888 - 197,888，一共有 5 個版本，包括 2025 HEV 1.6T AT 2WD Prestige（RM 197,888）、2025 1.6T DCT 4WD Prestige（RM 186,888）、2025 1.6T DCT 2WD Prime（RM 164,888）等。
由價錢嚟睇，Hyundai Tucson 嘅起步價比 Mazda CX-8 平咗 RM 21,472。講真嘅，喺呢個價位段，幾千蚊嘅差距其實唔算大，關鍵仲係睇整體嘅性價比同長期使用成本。
Mazda CX-8 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
Hyundai Tucson 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
兩部車嘅驅動方式一樣，都係 FWD，日常駕駛感受唔會有太大分別。
Mazda CX-8 保修 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Hyundai Tucson 保修 5 年/300,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Mazda CX-8 同 Hyundai Tucson 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更重視品牌口碑同二手價，可以优先考虑口碑更好嗰款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，就揀配備更豐富嗰款。最後都係建議兩部車都去試駕，親身體驗先至最重要。
總體嚟講，Mazda CX-8 同 Hyundai Tucson 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵係睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做足功課，比較多間車行嘅報價，再去試駕先做最後決定。買車係件大事，花啲時間做功課絕對無錯。
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多人買車嗰陣都會拿 Mazda CX-9 同 Hyundai Palisade 做比較。呢兩款車喺價位同定位上都幾啱，今日我哋就從多個方面做一個詳細嘅比較，幫大家省做功課嘅時間。
Mazda CX-9 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 328,810 - 345,810，一共有 2 個版本，包括 2023 2.5T 4WD（RM 345,810）、2023 2.5T 2WD（RM 328,810） 等。
Hyundai Palisade 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 368,838 - 399,838，一共有 4 個版本，包括 2023 3.8L 2WD Luxe 7 Seats Petrol（RM 399,838）、2023 2.2T 4WD Executive 7 Seats Diesel（RM 389,838）、2023 3.8L 2WD Luxe 8 Seats Petrol（RM 378,838） 等。
由價錢睇落，Mazda CX-9 嘅起步價確實係比 Hyundai Palisade 平咗 RM 40,028。如果你預算有限，Mazda 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需求。但都唔好忘記，平啲嘅幾千蚊，喺配備上可能會有的取舍，具體要看你嘅需求。
Mazda CX-9 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
Hyundai Palisade 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
兩款車嘅驅動方式一樣，都係 FWD，日常駕駛感覺唔會有大分別。
Mazda CX-9 保修 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Hyundai Palisade 保修 5 年/300,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Mazda CX-9 同 Hyundai Palisade 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更睇重品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰一款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，就揀配置更豐富嗰款。最終都係建議兩款都去試車，親身體驗先係最重要。
總括嚟講，Mazda CX-9 同 Hyundai Palisade 都係馬來西亞市場好唔錯嘅車型。揀邊輛車，關鍵就係睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做夠功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，先至去試車做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拿 Volvo XC90 PHEV 同 Audi Q7 嚟做比較。呢兩款車喺價位同定位上都幾接近嘅，今日我哋就從多個方面做一個詳細嘅對比，幫你省返做功課嘅時間。
Volvo XC90 PHEV 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 434,888 - 434,888，一共有 2 個版本，包括 2025 2.0T 77km Ultra（RM 434,888）、Volvo XC90 PHEV 邊啲安全配備？（RM 362,888）等。
Audi Q7 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 462,222 - 462,222，一共有 1 個版本，包括 Standard（RM 462,222）等。
由價錢睇，Volvo XC90 PHEV 嘅起步價確係比 Audi Q7 平咗 RM 27,334。如果你預算有限，Volvo 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需要。但都要留意，平嘅嗰幾千塊，可能喺配備上會有取舍，具體要看你嘅需求。
Volvo XC90 PHEV 配備 Hybrid，馬力 170 hp。官方油耗 4.5 L/100km。
Audi Q7 配備 3.0L Turbo，馬力 350 hp。官方油耗 12.0 L/100km。
動力方面，Audi Q7 嘅 3.0L Turbo 比 Volvo XC90 PHEV 嘅 Hybrid 多咗 180 匹馬力。不過日常喺市區開，兩款車嘅動力都夠用，唔會覺得唔夠力。
Volvo XC90 PHEV 嘅安全評級係 5★ (Euro NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 Premium ADAS。
Audi Q7 嘅安全評級係 5★ (Euro NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 Premium ADAS。
兩款車嘅安全評級一樣，喺呢個級別入面安全配備都算給得好齊全。而家嘅新車安全性都幾好，唔使太擔心呢一點。
Volvo XC90 PHEV 保修 5 年/無限里程，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Audi Q7 保修 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
總體嚟講，Volvo XC90 PHEV 同 Audi Q7 都係馬來西亞市場好唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵都係要睇你嘅個人需要同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，先至去試駕做最終決定。買車係一件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
喺馬來西亞嘅汽車市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拿 Ford Everest 同 Volvo XC40 嚟做比較。今日我哋由多個方面做一次詳細嘅比較，幫你省返做功課嘅時間。
Ford Everest 喺馬來西亞嘅 O T R 售價係 RM 266,338 - 430,838，一共有 6 個版本，包括 2026 3.0T 4WD Platinum（RM 430,838）、2026 2.0T 4WD Platinum（RM 348,838）、2026 2.0T 4WD Sport（RM 316,838）等。
Volvo XC40 喺馬來西亞嘅 O T R 售價係 RM 278,888 - 278,888，一共有 1 個版本，包括 2025 2.0T Plus（RM 278,888）等。
由價錢嚟睇，Ford Everest 嘅起步價確實比 Volvo XC40 平咗 RM 12,550。如果你預算有限，Ford 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需求。但都要注意，平嘅那幾千蚊，可能喺配備上要有取捨，具體要看你嘅需求。
Ford Everest 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 Co-Pilot360。
Volvo XC40 嘅安全評級係 5★ (Euro NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 Pilot Assist, City Safety (標準)。
安全配備方面，兩款車都拿到唔錯嘅評級。不過 Ford Everest 嘅 Co-Pilot360 同 Volvo XC40 嘅 Pilot Assist, City Safety (標準) 喺功能上有些分別，如果你比較睇重主動安全嘅話，可以仔細對比下兩者嘅功能清單。
Ford Everest 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
Volvo XC40 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
兩款車嘅驅動方式一樣，都係 FWD，日常駕駛感受唔會有太大分別。
Ford Everest 同 Volvo XC40 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更睇重品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰一款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，那就揀配備更豐富嗰款。最後都係建議兩款都去試駕，親身體驗先係最重要嘅。
總嚟講，Ford Everest 同 Volvo XC40 都係馬來西亞市場好唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一部，關鍵始終都要睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建议大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
喺馬來西亞嘅汽車市場，好多買家喺揀車嗰陣都會拿 Volvo XC60 同 Mercedes-Benz GLA 嚟做比較。今日我哋由多個方面做詳細比較，幫你們省晒做功課嘅時間。
Volvo XC60 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 328,888 - 328,888，一共有 1 個版本，包括 2025 2.0T Core（RM 328,888） 等。
Mercedes-Benz GLA 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 258,888 - 295,888，一共有 1 個版本，包括 Standard（RM 258,888） 等。
由價錢睇，Mercedes-Benz GLA 嘅起步價比 Volvo XC60 平咗 RM 70,000。講到底，喺呢個價位段，幾千蚊嘅差唔算大，關鍵始終係睇整體嘅性價比同埋長期使用成本。
Volvo XC60 裝嵌 2.0L Turbo，馬力 220 hp。官方油耗 9.5 L/100km。
Mercedes-Benz GLA 裝嵌 2.0L Turbo，馬力 220 hp。官方油耗 9.5 L/100km。
兩款車用咗同一套動力系統，所以日常行起嚟嘅感受基本冇分別。油耗方面都差不多，唔使太糾結呢一點。
Volvo XC60 車身長 4400 mm，後尾箱 400 L。
Mercedes-Benz GLA 車身長 4400 mm，後尾箱 400 L。
兩款車嘅尺寸幾乎一樣，車內空間差別唔大。呢個級別嘅車，日常使用完全夠用。
Volvo XC60 同 Mercedes-Benz GLA 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭用、日常上下班。如果你更睇重品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，就揀配置更豐富嗰款。最終始終建議兩款都去試車，親身體驗先係最重要嘅。
總嘅嚟講，Volvo XC60 同 Mercedes-Benz GLA 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊輛，關鍵始終係睇你個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去做試車做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
BYD officially released the May 2026 production and sales flash report, with new energy vehicles from all brands reaching a monthly sales volume of 383,453 vehicles, a slight increase of 0.26% year-on-year, achieving year-on-year positive growth in monthly sales after ten months; among them, passenger car deliveries reached 376,990 units, surging 19.4% month-on-month, wiping out the pain of previous model iterations, presenting a new pattern where the domestic base is stable, overseas sales are soaring, and high-end brands are scaling up across the board. Amidst the market environment of intensified competition in the domestic new energy sector, Tesla FSD entering China, and an intense launch of independent new products, it has forged a unique structural growth path.
The Dynasty and Ocean main brands combined sold 330,215 vehicles in May, accounting for over 80% of the group's total sales, remaining the stabilizer for BYD's sales volume. The full series had 8 models exceeding 20,000 units in monthly sales, covering products from 50,000 entry-level commuter to 200,000 home SUV.
Inside the Dynasty Network, the Yuan family sold 56,691 units, and the Song family 51,370 units. Both crossed the 50,000 threshold, becoming two major sales pillars for the brand, catering to home commuter and urban-rural travel needs; the Qin family followed closely with a stable performance of 28,360 units. The Han and Tang series maintained a volume in the six-thousand range, deeply cultivating the mid-to-large home sedan and SUV niche markets; the brand new model Xia is in the market cultivation phase, delivering 1,810 units monthly, with potential for steady volume growth as channels expand.
The Ocean Network's growth momentum is even more rapid, with 5 models entering the 20,000 club across the series: Sealion 42,615 units, Seal 34,117 units, Seagull 39,919 units, Dolphin 22,260 units, and Song PLUS 27,755 units. Among them, Seagull remains the best-selling entry-level commuter model thanks to its affordable pricing of 60,000-80,000. Sealion, as a new volume model, stands firm at the 40,000 level upon launch, filling the mid-size SUV product gap in the Ocean Network and perfecting the Ocean product tier layout. From commuter small cars to compact SUVs, the two main brands rely on DM-i hybrid and pure electric dual-line technologies to牢牢锁住 the mainstream home market share within 150,000 domestically.
Fang Cheng Bao Year-on-Year Surges 139.7%, Brand Upward Positioning Takes EffectThe high-end matrix of Denza, Fang Cheng Bao, and Yangwang sold a combined 46,489 vehicles in May, officially breaking away from the niche positioning to become a new pivot for BYD's brand premium and profit growth, breaking the industry curse of difficulty in high-end breakthrough for domestic brands.
The off-road brand Fang Cheng Bao sold 30,186 units monthly, surging 139.7% year-on-year, creating a new high in monthly sales since the brand launched. Its Titanium 7 model sold 18,280 units monthly, while Leopard 5 and Leopard 8 output remained stable, continuously squeezing the survival space for joint venture and imported models in the 250,000-400,000 hardcore off-road niche market.
Denza delivered 16,303 units in May, with the MPV benchmark D9 selling 6,721 units, and the Z9 series close to 6,000 units. MPV and mid-to-large sedan dual-line efforts helped them stand firm in the luxury new energy track; the million-level ultra-luxury brand Yangwang continued its steady climb, delivering 286 units that month, a year-on-year increase of 105.8%, completing market verification of the domestic brand ceiling product and forming a full price range product layout from 100,000+ home, 300,000-400,000 off-road, 500,000 luxury MPV to million-level flagship.
In May, BYD's overseas sales of passenger cars and pickup trucks reached 160,177 units, surging 80.7% year-on-year. Exports accounted for over 42% of the full series total sales, setting a new historical high for brand export and becoming the core driving force to stabilize May overall sales and achieve year-on-year positive growth.
Southeast Asia, Europe, and Latin America became the main incremental markets. Seagull, Song PLUS, and Yuan series continued to top new energy best-seller lists in multiple countries; the SHARK pickup truck exceeded 4,000 units in monthly exports for two consecutive months. Relying on the completion of localization production in Thailand, Brazil, Hungary, and Uzbekistan with four overseas vehicle factories, localized production continues to land, avoiding tariffs while rapidly penetrating terminal channels. Against the background of stock market competition in the domestic auto industry and normalized price wars, the rapidly expanding overseas market effectively counteracts sales volatility brought by domestic model iterations, officially upgrading from a supplementary market to BYD's core growth engine. As of now, BYD's global cumulative new energy vehicle sales have exceeded 16.5 million units, with the globalization map continuously broadening.
Intelligent Driving Empowers Product Iteration, H2 New Products Prepare to Surge VolumeMay marked a key node in BYD's intelligent driving landing, with the God's Eye intelligent driving system becoming a core bonus point for models: the number of vehicles with advanced intelligent driving across all brands exceeded 3.15 million, with daily road test data exceeding 200 million kilometers; that month, BYD implemented City Pilot and Smart Parking dual safety backup services, becoming the world's first auto manufacturer to achieve dual intelligent driving backups. Three days after policy implementation, the activation rate of models equipped with the God's Eye system in cities surged 50%. Intelligent driving experience upgrades directly drove in-store order conversion, solidifying product competitiveness for subsequent models to continue volume sales, and facing the intelligent driving market shock brought by FSD entering China.
From data details, BYD's cumulative sales from January to May 2026 were 1,405,039 units, down 20.32% year-on-year. The core reason is that the full series of main models were concentratedly iterated, and the capacity ramp-up of the 2nd Gen Fast Charge Blade Battery was restricted. The new Flash Charge Battery upgraded fast charging and low-temperature performance. Full series iteration models prioritized installing new batteries, but production line retrofitting dragged down capacity release. Order backlogs on popular models and delayed deliveries compressed the May delivery volume to a certain extent.
As the end of the second quarter approaches and the 2nd Gen Blade Battery capacity continues to release, coupled with new models such as Denza N8L, Fang Cheng Bao Titanium 7 Pure Electric Version, Sealion 05, and Xia L landing the market, the industry generally predicts that BYD's full brand sales in June are expected to exceed 400,000 vehicles. Relying on the four-dimension development logic of low-end volume locking share, high-end raising profit, overseas pushing volume, and intelligence improving product power, amidst the intensified new energy elimination round in the domestic market, BYD's full category layout advantage continues to amplify, securing its status as the domestic new energy leader, accelerating steadily towards global top auto manufacturers.
