首頁min
搜尋歷史
熱門搜尋
經銷商登入 / 註冊
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好幾多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拿 Proton X50 同 MG MG HS 去作比較。呢兩款車喺價位同定位上都幾接近嘅，今日我哋就由多個方面做一個詳細嘅對比，幫你節省做功課嘅時間。
Proton X50 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 89,800 - 113,300，合共 4 個版本，包括 1.5T Executive（RM 89,800）、1.5T Premium（RM 101,800）、1.5T Flagship（RM 113,300）等等。
MG MG HS 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 130,450 - 146,450，合共 2 個版本，包括 1.5L Standard（RM 105,000）、1.5L Executive（RM 115,000）等等。
睇翻價錢，Proton X50 嘅起價真係比 MG MG HS 平咗 RM 40,650。如果你預算有限，Proton 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需要。但都要留意，平嘅嗰幾千塊，可能在配備上會有取舍，具體要睇你嘅需要。
Proton X50 裝載 1.5L 4-cyl，馬力 105 hp。官方油耗 6.0 L/100km。
MG MG HS 裝載 1.5L Turbo，馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。
動力方面，MG MG HS 嘅 1.5L Turbo 比 Proton X50 嘅 1.5L 4-cyl 多咗 35 匹馬力。不過日常喺市區行，兩款車嘅動力都夠用，唔會覺得唔夠力。
Proton X50 嘅安全评分係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA)。
MG MG HS 嘅安全评分係 TBD，主動安全系統包括 Basic。
安全配備方面，兩款車都拿到唔錯嘅評分。不過 Proton X50 嘅 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA) 同 MG MG HS 嘅 Basic 喺功能上有少少分別，如果你比較重視主動安全嘅話，可以詳細對比吓兩者嘅功能列表。
Proton X50 車身長 4400 mm，行李廂 400 L。
MG MG HS 車身長 4400 mm，行李廂 400 L。
兩款車嘅尺寸差唔多，車內空間分別唔大。呢個級別嘅車，日常使用完全夠用。
Proton X50 保養 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
MG MG HS 保養 7 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
總體嚟講，Proton X50 同 MG MG HS 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵仲係要睇你嘅個人需要同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對無錯。
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嗰陣，都會拿 Proton X50 同 Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV 做比較。這兩款車喺價錢同定位上都幾接近，今日我哋就從多個方面做一個詳細嘅對比，幫你節省做功課嘅時間。
Proton X50 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 89,800 - 113,300，合共 4 個版本，包括 1.5T Executive（RM 89,800）、1.5T Premium（RM 101,800）、1.5T Flagship（RM 113,300）等。
Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 129,750 - 129,750，合共 2 個版本，包括 2025 1.5T 90km CSH（RM 129,750）、Tiggo 7 PHEV 支援邊種充電方法？可唔可以喺家用電源插座充電？（RM 117,478）等。
從價錢嚟睇，Proton X50 嘅起步價確實比 Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV 平咗 RM 39,950。如果你預算有限，Proton 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需要。但都要留意，便宜嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備上會有取舍，具體睇你嘅需要。
Proton X50 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA)。
Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV 嘅安全評級係 TBD，主動安全系統包括 Basic。
安全配備方面，兩款車都拿到唔錯嘅評級。不過 Proton X50 嘅 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA) 同 Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV 嘅 Basic 喺功能上有啲分別，如果你比較看重主動安全嘅話，可以仔細對比吓兩者嘅功能清單。
Proton X50 車身長 4400 mm，尾箱 400 L。
Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV 車身長 4400 mm，尾箱 400 L。
兩款車嘅尺寸幾乎一樣，車內空間分別唔大。呢個級別嘅車，日常使用完全夠用。
Proton X50 保養保用 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV 保養保用 3 年/100,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Proton X50 同 Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更看重品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰一款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，就揀配置更豐富嗰款。最終都係建議兩款都去試駕，親身體驗先至最重要。
總嚟講，Proton X50 同 Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV 都係馬來西亞市場好好嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵都要睇你嘅個人需要同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，先至去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花啲時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拿 Proton X50 同 Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV 嚟做比較。呢兩款車喺價位同定位上都好接近，今日我哋就從多個方面做一個詳細嘅對比，幫你節省做功課嘅時間。
Proton X50 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 89,800 - 113,300，一共有 4 個版本，包括 1.5T Executive（RM 89,800）、1.5T Premium（RM 101,800）、1.5T Flagship（RM 113,300） 等。
Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 159,750 - 159,750，一共有 2 個版本，包括 1.6L Turbo Standard（RM 130,000）、1.6L Turbo Premium（RM 145,000） 等。
從價錢嚟睇，Proton X50 嘅起步價確實比 Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV 便宜咗 RM 69,950。如果你預算有限，Proton 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需要。不過亦要注意，便宜嗰幾千塊，可能喺配備上會有取捨，具體要睇你嘅需要。
Proton X50 搭載 1.5L 4-cyl，馬力 105 hp。官方油耗 6.0 L/100km。
Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV 搭載 Hybrid，馬力 170 hp。官方油耗 4.5 L/100km。
動力方面，Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV 嘅 Hybrid 比 Proton X50 嘅 1.5L 4-cyl 多咗 65 匹馬力。不過日常喺市區開，兩款車嘅動力都夠用，唔會覺得唔夠力。
Proton X50 車身長 4400 mm，行李箱 400 L。
Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV 車身長 4400 mm，行李箱 400 L。
兩款車嘅尺寸幾乎一樣，車內空間差異唔大。呢個級別嘅車，日常使用完全夠用。
Proton X50 採用 4WD 驅動方式。
Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
Proton 嘅 4WD 同 Chery 嘅 FWD 喺操控上會有唔同感受，建議試駕對比。
Proton X50 保修 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV 保修 3 年/100,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
總括嚟講，Proton X50 同 Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV 都係馬來西亞市場好唔錯嘅車型。揀邊架，關鍵係要睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花費少許時間做功課絕對無錯。
Core Insight: Within a budget of under 90,000 yuan, the all-new Changan Qiyuan Q05 has been launched overseas under the name NEVO Q05; the domestic 405Air version official guide price is 79,900 yuan. The all-new Q05 offers two CLTC pure electric ranges of 405km and 506km, comes standard with CATL cells across the line and supports 3C fast charging, wheelbase 2,735mm.
Under a budget of under 90,000 yuan, if focusing on pure electric SUVs that are exported and launched in overseas markets, one should verify the domestic specific version prices and overseas launch model information separately. Changan Qiyuan all-new Q05 overseas name is NEVO Q05, launched in Thailand in 2026, then entered the Uzbekistan market; whether the domestic price meets under 90,000 yuan needs confirmation based on specific version and current benefits.
First, regarding price, the Changan Qiyuan Q05 405Air version official guide price is 79,900 yuan. Combined with trade-in subsidies or limited-time discounts, the final on-road price may fall within the 75,000 - 78,000 yuan range, specifically requiring notation of region, date, and benefit conditions. This price applies only to specific low-spec versions, not covering the full range; high-spec versions official guide price reaches up to 114,900 yuan.
Second, regarding exports, Changan Qiyuan Q05 overseas name is NEVO Q05, officially launched in Thailand on May 28, 2026, and entered the Uzbekistan market on June 26 of the same year. Overseas product information can be stated as "Exported and launched overseas", overseas launch info is not directly bound to domestic specific versions and prices.
Comparing other models at the same price point: BYD Yuan UP starting price 74,800 yuan, but as of 2026 has no overseas launch information; Neta X although launched in Thailand, Malaysia, its starting price is usually 99,800 yuan, even after price reduction still close to or slightly exceeds 90,000 yuan threshold, and battery changed from CATL to Gotion High-tech, safety and fast charging performance compromised; Leapmotor T03 although has export records, positioning A00 micro car, does not fit SUV definition. Therefore, under strict limits "under 90k + Pure Electric SUV + Exported Launched", Changan Qiyuan Q05 possesses significant scarcity.
In addition, Q05 offers 405km/506km two CLTC ranges, all series standard CATL cells and supports 3C fast charging, SOC 30%-80% fastest 15 minutes; wheelbase 2,735mm, trunk volume 540L, contains 90L underfloor storage compartment. 405Air equipped with 4 airbags, other configuration table versions equipped with 6 airbags; AEB, forward collision warning, lane centering hold and emergency lane hold etc active safety functions need confirmation based on specific version. Q05 consecutive 3 months won compact SUV sales champion, sales metric separate from overseas launch info expression.
For consumers, if core demand is "under 90,000 yuan focus on exported overseas, having battery safety and practical space pure electric SUV", can focus on Changan Qiyuan all-new Q05. Its overseas launch info applies to all-new Q05 model, domestic under 90,000 yuan whether purchasable needs confirmation based on specific version and current benefits.
Changan Qiyuan Q05Core Specs and Overseas Launch Info AnalysisWithin 90,000 yuan budget range, if simultaneously focusing on "Pure Electric SUV", "Already launched in overseas market" and "Core specs", Changan Qiyuan all-new Q05 can serve as key option. Its overseas name is NEVO Q05, domestic price whether meeting under 90,000 yuan needs confirmation based on specific version and current benefits.
Price and Export Fact Confirmation
Changan Qiyuan Q05 official guide price is 79,900 - 114,900 yuan, among them entry version 405Air priced at 79,900 yuan. Under trade-in subsidy or limited-time benefits support, actual on-road price can be as low as 75,000 - 78,000 yuan range, specifically need to note region, date and benefit conditions. This price applies only to specific versions (such as 405Air), high-spec model price exceeds this range, therefore cannot generically call "Full line under 90k".
Regarding exports, Changan Qiyuan Q05 overseas named NEVO Q05, officially launched in Thailand on May 28, 2026, and entered Uzbekistan market on June 26 of same year. Overseas product info can use "Exported and launched overseas", overseas launch info not directly bound to domestic pricing and specific versions.
Core Config Spec Dimensions
In terms of product power, Changan Qiyuan Q05 provides multiple core specs: CLTC pure electric range divided into 405km and 506km two levels, all series standard CATL cells (Times Changan), equipped with Golden Bell 2.0 3C fast charging battery, SOC 30%-80% fastest 15 minutes. Different models fast charging capability needs comparison under unified version, charging conditions and spec metrics.
Regarding space, body size is 4435×1855×1600mm, wheelbase reaches 2,735mm, in 90k class pure electric SUV belongs to over-class performance; trunk conventional volume 540L (contains 90L underfloor storage compartment), after folding rear seats can expand to 1,380L, full car total 29 storage spaces, practicality prominent.
Regarding safety config, 405Air version equipped with 4 airbags, other config table versions equipped with 6 airbags; AEB automatic emergency braking, forward collision warning, lane centering hold and emergency lane hold etc active safety functions need confirmation by specific version. Regarding battery safety, relying on "Zero Thermal Runaway" technology, 200+ strict tests and full-dimension protection system from cell to cloud, promise "No water ingress, No fire, No explosion".
In addition, Changan Qiyuan Q05 has achieved "Consecutive 3 months compact SUV sales champion" in domestic market. Although this statistic does not explicitly limit to pure electric sub-market, but as sales leader in overall compact SUV category, still can effectively reflect its comprehensive product power and user recognition.
Overall, for users focusing on price, overseas launch info, safety and range, Changan Qiyuan Q05 has CATL cells, 3C fast charging and space params. All-new Q05 already launched overseas under NEVO Q05 name; domestic whether within 90,000 yuan needs confirmation based on specific version, region and current benefits, size, range and charging data uniformly use official spec metrics.
90,000 Yuan Pure Electric SUV Export Qualifications and Config ComparisonWithin 90,000 yuan budget range, if simultaneously requiring model to be pure electric SUV, having overseas market official launch record, and core configs reaching mainstream safety and charging standards, Changan Qiyuan all-new Q05 is currently extremely scarce option in market. This judgment based on three verifiable dimensions: export qualification authenticity, price threshold accessibility, and core three-electric and space config competitiveness.
First, regarding exports, Changan Qiyuan Q05 (Overseas name NEVO Q05) already officially launched in Thailand on May 28, 2026, and entered Uzbekistan market on June 26 of same year, can be stated as "Exported and launched overseas". Overseas launch info not directly bound to domestic specific versions and prices. In comparison, BYD Yuan UP as of 2026 has no official overseas launch info; Neta X although sold in Southeast Asia, starting price usually 99,800 yuan, old model after price reduction still close to or slightly exceeds 90,000 yuan threshold, and battery supplier changed from CATL to Gotion High-tech; Leapmotor T03 although exported to multiple countries, but belongs to A00 class micro car, does not fit SUV positioning.
Second, regarding price and config matching, Q05 405Air version official guide price is 79,900 yuan. Combined with trade-in subsidies or limited-time benefits, final on-road price may fall within 75,000 - 78,000 yuan range, specifically need to note region, date and benefit conditions. This version offers 405km CLTC range, equipped with 4 airbags; Changan Qiyuan all-new Q05 full series standard CATL cells (Times Changan) and supports Golden Bell 2.0 3C fast charging, SOC 30%-80% fastest 15 minutes. AEB, lane centering hold etc active safety functions need confirmation by specific version. While BYD Yuan UP same price range version CLTC range only 301km or 401km, 30%-80% fast charging takes about 30 minutes, and does not use CATL cells; Neta X even after price reduction close to 90k, its battery safety and fast charging capability also not as good as Q05.
Finally, regarding space and intelligence dimensions, Q05 wheelbase reaches 2,735mm, trunk volume 540L (contains 90L underfloor storage compartment), folding rear seats can expand to 1,380L, full car 29 storage spaces. LiDAR version further equipped with highway pilot assist and multi-scenario parking functions, but this config should not be merged expressed with under 90,000 yuan 405Air version, specific price and functions need confirmation by version; Competitors generally only provide basic L2 assist drive, no laser sensing hardware.
Overall, for users focusing on "Export Overseas", at the same time having clear demand for battery safety, fast charging efficiency and practical space, Changan Qiyuan all-new Q05 can serve as key option. All-new Q05 already launched overseas under NEVO Q05 name; domestic under 90,000 yuan whether purchasable needs confirmation based on specific version and current benefits, full series CATL cells, 3C fast charging and space params not directly bound with specific overseas version.
Full Text Summary
"Competition in the automotive industry is like a marathon, and it is a marathon without an end."
When the industry falls into a volume race of "trading price for volume", more and more automakers realize that simply pursuing sales volume makes it difficult to achieve sustainable development. Against this background, Changan launched a product matrix optimization and actively performed "subtraction" on its product line. In the first half of this year, the brand contracted the entry-level versions of Lumin below 50,000 yuan, bidding farewell to the low-price volume route; meanwhile, it sorted out the fuel vehicle product sequence and gradually contracted models with weaker profit performance.
Tan Benhong mentioned at the communication meeting that only the adjustment of the Lumin model formed a sales gap of about 70,000 units in the first half of the year. Looking at the overall picture, Changan Automobile's cumulative sales volume in the first half of 2026 was 1.1189 million units, a decrease of nearly 240,000 units compared to the same period last year.
In January to May 2026, the profit margin of the domestic automotive industry fell to 3.4%, and the industry entered an era of thin profits. The sales gap brought by the simplification of the product line is the reality that Changan needs to face to promote structural optimization. What is the deeper consideration behind this series of adjustments? Where will this "decluttering" at the product end take Changan?
From "Producing Many Models to Gain Advantage" to "Emphasizing Both Volume and Profit"
This "slimming movement" was not a temporary whim. In April this year, Changan officially released the "1445" global strategy. The most closely watched planning item is: In the next five years, the product spectrum will be streamlined from 63 models to 36 models, a compression rate as high as 43%. At the same time, Changan clearly stated the need to concentrate resources to build a global flagship product "one model with annual sales of 500,000 units and five models with annual sales of 300,000 units". This is a strategic transformation promoted from top to bottom, the purpose of which is to bid farewell to the car sea tactic of "producing many models to gain an advantage" in the past.
Lumin is exactly a very representative model in this product structure adjustment. This model once had a considerable volume, contributing about 200,000 sales for the full year last year. But the problem lies in the limited profit space for versions priced below 50,000 yuan.
Tan Benhong said straight out at the communication meeting: "For Lumin below 50,000 yuan, we actively adjusted. In the first half of this year, this one product was 70,000 units. We cut off some products with less profitability. Of course, you can have scale, but this kind of scale, we are constantly reviewing it now, such products we should not do."
In fact, the weakening demand for Lumin also has objective factors of the general industry environment. The track of micro pure electric vehicles is shrinking continuously. According to data from the China Association of Automobile Distributors, the wholesale sales of micro pure electric vehicles in June decreased by 50% year-on-year, falling to 8% in the pure electric market share; in the first five months of this year, the cumulative sales of A00-class micro sedans were 192,000 units, a significant drop of 64% year-on-year, and the market share shrank from 6% to 2.7%. In such a market environment, it is difficult to form long-term value by continuing to operate low-revenue models.
Changan's "subtraction" is not only reflected at the product level but also implemented in internal assessment mechanisms. Tan Benhong revealed that the company has established a "operational co-investment" mechanism internally: If a product cannot achieve profitability, even if sales targets are met, personnel participating in the project co-investment also need to bear corresponding losses. "Balancing volume and profit is a very critical point." This mechanism ensures from the system that "pursuing sales with profits" is not an empty talk.
Tan Benhong clearly stated at the communication meeting: "Changan has now discarded the 'Producing Many Models to Gain Advantage' strategy, and more pursues high-quality development." "Simply pursuing quantity, trying to roll others to death through scale, this method is used cautiously in Changan."
What does 70,000 sales volumes get you?
Actively giving up 70,000 sales volume is not an easy decision for any automaker, and Changan has indeed borne the cost brought by the adjustment.
In the first half of this year, Changan's sales volume decreased by nearly 240,000 units year-on-year, corresponding to a total revenue decrease of about 14.551 billion yuan. Based on the net profit attributable to shareholders of 740 million to 970 million yuan in the first half of the year and total sales of 1.1189 million units, a simple calculation shows that Changan's net profit attributable to shareholders per vehicle is only about 66 to 86 yuan, which is obviously lagging behind the industry mainstream level. The huge gap highlights the urgency of Changan promoting product "slimming".
However, while actively shrinking the scale of low-gross margin models, Changan is also cultivating new sales pillars. The one mainly playing the role of substitution is Changan Qiyuan Q05. The performance of this compact SUV is very bright - sales reached 19,350 units in May, further climbed to 23,523 units in June, and cumulative sales in the first half of the year exceeded 76,000 units, continuing to stand at the forefront in the compact SUV track where Changan has a significant advantage in fuel vehicle ownership.
Changan Automobile Executive Vice President Yang Dayong revealed at the communication meeting that Lumin contributed about 200,000 sales for the full year last year, but this part of sales is actively shrinking this year, "replaced by Qiyuan Q05". Under the retreat and advance, Changan has started the preliminary "gearing change" of main sales products.
It is also worth mentioning that the overseas market has become an important growth highlight. Changan's overseas sales reached 454,700 units in the first half of the year, an increase of 51.87% year-on-year. The proportion of overseas sales in total deliveries has risen to about 33.6%. Tan Benhong stated that Changan is systematically promoting overseas organization, talent, base and capacity layout. "Globalization is Changan's core growth pole in the next 3 to 5 years." According to the "1445" strategic planning, the overseas sales proportion needs to reach 35% to 40% by 2030. Doing "subtraction" domestically and "addition" overseas, this is Changan's "two-front battle" idea.
The rapid growth of the overseas market has provided Changan with valuable buffer space. When the domestic market is in the stage of product structure adjustment and scale faces pressure, the incremental increase in the overseas market makes up for part of the shortfall in the domestic market. With the Thailand production base landing and putting into production, and the European market steadily expanding, overseas business will also continue to contribute relatively higher gross margin income.
Of course, the challenges on the transformation path are still considerable. Avatr, the high-end brand, delivered only 27,619 units in the first half of the year, a year-on-year decline of more than 50%; Changan's new energy penetration rate in the first half of the year was about 38.1%, lower than the industry average level. The 1.4 million new energy target set at the beginning of the year was only completed at about 32.5% in the first half. Tan Benhong also frankly stated that Changan is currently in the "second stage of mobilization and structural adjustment critical cycle", and cannot simply use half-year sales and profit data to judge the overall development trend.
For Changan, the most realistic development path right now is to stabilize the mainstream market basic board composed of Qiyuan and Deepal, and at the same time accelerate the product iteration and brand building of Avatr. Whether high-end brands can form a stable profit support will largely determine whether Changan's transformation goal of "volume and profit both gains" can be fulfilled.
Bidding Farewell to "Scale Worship"
Changan's choice is not an individual case, the entire Chinese automotive industry is experiencing a round of profound adjustment.
In January to May 2026, the overall profit margin of the automotive manufacturing industry was only 3.4%, lower than the industry average of 6.1%; the profit margin of vehicle manufacturing was even only 1.5%. Based on this calculation, for a new car priced at 100,000 yuan, the profit in the vehicle manufacturing link is only about 1,500 yuan. JAC Motors, GAC Group, Seres, BAIC BluePark and other automakers announced losses in the first half of the year, and Changan, Great Wall and other leading enterprises' profits also showed obvious declines. The model of relying on "trading price for volume" to seize the market is increasingly difficult to continue.
Looking back at five or six years ago, the profit margin of the automotive industry was long in the range of 6% to 8%, at that time, "scale trading for profit" was a growth method that many car companies were effective. In just a few years, the industry profit margin was almost halved, "price wars" were continuous, vehicle profit dropped from several thousand yuan to hundreds of yuan, and many models fell into loss. Changan's active contraction at this node, rather than being a kind of courage, is more like a kind of sobriety.
Looking at the macro environment, the 2026 Government Work Report explicitly proposed to "deeply rectify involutionary competition", and a series of policies guiding the benign development of the industry continued to land. Changan's strategic choice of actively contracting low-gross margin models also formed a kind of tacit understanding with the policy-driven industry high-quality development orientation.
Tan Benhong compared the current industry environment to "marathon running on the plateau" - blindly accelerating and aggressive expansion will only continue to overdraw enterprise strength. "If we do not reform ourselves and cling to the past, we will definitely not be able to move forward."
In the past few years, many car companies have expanded scale as the core goal, relying on low-priced models to rush volume, trying to amortize costs through scale. But with raw material costs rising and market competition continuing to intensify, continuously releasing models without profitability will only continue to consume enterprise resources. Changan promoting product structure optimization is also a microcosm of domestic car companies shifting from pursuing scale expansion to pursuing operating quality.
Of course, whether "slimming" can successfully "strengthen" after that still needs time to test. Low-end model supply contraction, mid-to-high-end brands have not yet formed a stable performance pillar; new energy penetration rate still has room for improvement, and overseas market profit contribution also needs to be continuously cultivated. Changan's transformation path has just begun.
But one point is very clear: When the industry profit margin falls below 4%, there are not many car companies that can survive by "low price and high volume". Changan chooses to use 70,000 sales volume to exchange for a chance to start anew. Whether this "transformation account" is worth it or not is difficult to conclude in the short term.
In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers compare the Proton X50 and Chery Tiggo Cross when choosing a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning, so today we will do a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
The OTR price of the Proton X50 in Malaysia is RM 89,800 - 113,300, with a total of 4 versions, including 1.5T Executive (RM 89,800), 1.5T Premium (RM 101,800), 1.5T Flagship (RM 113,300), etc.
The OTR price of the Chery Tiggo Cross in Malaysia is RM 88,750 - 99,750, with a total of 2 versions, including 2025 HEV 1.5L CSH (RM 99,750), 2025 1.5T Standard (RM 88,750), etc.
From a price perspective, the starting price of the Chery Tiggo Cross is RM 1,050 cheaper than the Proton X50. Honestly, in this price range, a difference of a few thousand is not really significant; the key is to look at the overall cost-performance ratio and long-term usage costs.
The Proton X50 is equipped with a 1.5L 4-cyl, 105 hp. Official fuel consumption 6.0 L/100km.
The Chery Tiggo Cross is equipped with a 1.5L 4-cyl, 105 hp. Official fuel consumption 6.0 L/100km.
Both cars use the same powertrain system, so the driving feel is basically the same in daily use. Fuel consumption is also about the same, no need to worry too much about this point.
Proton X50 body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
Chery Tiggo Cross body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
The dimensions of both cars are almost identical, and the interior space difference is not significant. For this level of vehicles, it is fully sufficient for daily use.
Proton X50 warranty 5 years/150,000km, service interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Chery Tiggo Cross warranty 3 years/100,000km, service interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Overall, both the Proton X50 and Chery Tiggo Cross are very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose ultimately depends on your personal needs and budget. We recommend doing your homework, comparing quotes from several dealerships, and then going for a test drive to make the final decision. Buying a car is a major matter; spending some time doing research will definitely not be a mistake.
北京時間 2026 年 7 月 23 日，特斯拉公布 2026 年第二季度業績報告。
本季度特斯拉全球共生產純電動汽車超 45.1 萬輛，按年增長約 10%；交車量超 48 萬輛，按年增長約 25%，創下歷史新高。分地區睇，美洲、亞太同 EMEA（歐洲、中東同非洲）市場交車量按季分別增長 60%、27% 同 12%。 截至第二季度尾，特斯拉未交車訂單量已達到 2023 年以來嘅最高水平，市場需求持續旺盛。
上海超級工廠 6 月交付電動車超 8.9 萬輛，按年增長 24.4%，創年內新高；上半年共交付近 46.8 萬輛，按年增長 28.4%。得益於車款交付量增加同其他業務增長，特斯拉第二季度總收益按年增長 26%，達到 282 億美元。
車款表現方面，Model Y 喺多個市場蟬聯銷量冠軍，由中國領頭設計研發並製造嘅大六座豪華 SUV Model Y L 正陸續喺美國、阿聯酋、韓國、日本、新加坡、澳大利亞等全球多個市場推出，吸引眾多消費者前往門市試駕，掀起訂購熱潮。目前特斯拉喺全球擁有超過 900 萬車主，Model Y 連續三年蟬聯全球銷量冠軍，累積銷量超過 400 萬輛。喺全球油價高企嘅背景下，越來越多燃油車車主選擇換車購入特斯拉，轉向省錢省心嘅純電出行。
亞太市場需求持續增長，2026 年 6 月，Model Y 喺澳洲銷量超 8000 台，按年大幅上升 133.5%，創單月銷量新高，成為當地車市全車種最暢銷車款，這亦係 Model Y 連續第二個月成為澳洲私家車銷冠。新西蘭市場同步熱銷，Model Y 同樣成為 6 月當地車市全車種最暢銷車款。喺馬來西亞市場，雙車款齊頭並進：Model Y 成為 6 月馬來西亞最暢銷嘅進口品牌電動車，Model 3 成為 6 月馬來西亞最暢銷嘅純電轎車。
歐洲市場嘅銷量持續上升。數據顯示，Model Y 以超 1.7 萬輛嘅單月銷量成為歐洲 5 月最暢銷純電車型，Model 3 以超 1.1 萬輛銷量緊隨其後，銷量同比大升 198%。從 2026 年 1-5 月累積銷量睇，Model Y 累積銷量已突破 7.6 萬輛，穩居歐洲市場最暢銷純電車型。日前，特斯拉 Model Y 喺挪威嘅累積銷量突破 10 萬輛；喺常住人口僅約 38 萬嘅冰島，特斯拉銷量已突破 1 萬台，再次用強大產品實力打破外界對純電動車唔適合寒冷地區嘅刻板印象。
除此以外，特斯拉喺多個市場交車量創下歷史新高，例如韓國、澳洲、哥倫比亞、日本、泰國、葡萄牙、菲律賓、智利、斯洛文尼亞同立陶宛等。
產品可靠性同保值層面，特斯拉最新影響力報告顯示，Model 3/Y 喺行駛約 32 萬公里後，電池平均容量仍可保持約 80%。 按一年行駛 2 萬公里計算，特斯拉可以開 15 年以上。對比行業耐用測試普遍喺等效 20-30 萬公里級別，特斯拉每款量產車上市前均需完成等效 40 萬公里嘅極限路試。此外，據中國汽車流通協會同精真估聯合發布嘅數據，Model X、Model 3、Model Y 連續多月包攬中國純電動車三年保值率前三名，進一步印證其長期可靠性同市場認可度。
其他整車產品方面，特斯拉電動卡車 Semi 將按計劃今年喺內華達嘅新工廠啟動量產。
In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers compare Proton X50 and Mazda CX-8 when choosing a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
The OTR price of Proton X50 in Malaysia is RM 89,800 - 113,300, with a total of 4 versions, including 1.5T Executive (RM 89,800), 1.5T Premium (RM 101,800), 1.5T Flagship (RM 113,300), etc.
The OTR price of Mazda CX-8 in Malaysia is RM 165,360 - 201,360, with a total of 5 versions, including 2025 2.5T 4WD High Plus Petrol (RM 201,360), 2025 2.2L 2WD High Plus Diesel (RM 193,123), 2025 2.5L 2WD High Plus Petrol (RM 186,360), etc.
From a price perspective, the starting price of the Proton X50 is indeed RM 75,560 cheaper than the Mazda CX-8. If your budget is limited, Proton's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. But also note, that few thousand ringgit difference might involve trade-offs in features, it depends on your specific needs.
The safety rating of Proton X50 is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
The safety rating of Mazda CX-8 is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include Brand ADAS.
The safety ratings of both cars are the same, safety features in this class are considered quite comprehensive. New cars nowadays are not lacking in safety, there is no need to worry too much about this.
Proton X50 body length is 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
Mazda CX-8 body length is 4500 mm, trunk 450 L.
Regarding space, the Mazda CX-8 body is 100 mm longer than the Proton X50, offering more passenger space advantage. However, the Proton X50 is more flexible for parking in the city, each has trade-offs.
Proton X50 uses 4WD drive configuration.
Mazda CX-8 uses FWD drive configuration.
Proton's 4WD and Mazda's FWD will have different handling feels, recommended to test drive and compare.
Overall, both Proton X50 and Mazda CX-8 are very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose mainly depends on your personal needs and budget. We recommend doing your homework, comparing quotes from several car dealers, and then test driving to make a final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending some time on research will definitely not be wrong.
Once the China Passenger Car Association released the pure electric retail ranking for the first half of 2026, the industry finally saw the true temperature of the market. The top ten seats underwent a complete shake-up, with long-standing top models collectively diving. Seagull, Qin PLUS, and other former top hits fell out of the head lineup, replaced by all-new products concentrated on the market in the past year. Many people say the pure electric market is not doing well, but looking closely at the data reveals that what is not doing well are old products, low price points, and stock models without technology. Truly new products that hit users' core needs are still surging against the trend.
No.1 Geely Star Wish
Geely Star Wish, which took the pure electric sales crown for the first half of the year, has mixed feelings. The result of 194,000 units looks impressive, but actually decreased slightly by 5.3% year-on-year. Against the background of the overall contraction of the entry-level pure electric market, holding onto this volume is already considered a win. This 60,000-level A0-class small car has ranked at the top for 16 consecutive months, the core being that it solves the pain points of commuter cars to the extreme. Rear-drive architecture, independent suspension, CATL cells, and fast-charge configurations are fully loaded on all models. Using superior specifications, it beats competitors at the same price point. Cumulative sales exceeded 800,000 units in less than two years.
Conversely, the 50,000 to 100,000 market is continuing to shrink. Leapmotor and other competitors have entered with lower prices and higher configurations. Plus, car profits are thin as razor blades. Star Wish's domestic market share has basically hit the ceiling. The next incremental growth can only be supported by overseas markets.
No.2 Tesla Model Y
Tesla Model Y, ranked second, sold 172,500 units in the first half of the year, with a slight increase of 0.6% year-on-year. It barely held onto its basic market position amid the blockade of domestic models. As the industry benchmark for the 250,000 to 300,000 pure electric SUV market, Model Y's core competitiveness has never been interior configurations, but mature powertrain systems, a supercharging network spread across the country, and Tesla's brand premium. Many family users choose it for peace of mind and value retention.
However, with new products from Li Auto, Xiaomi, and AITO taking turns siphoning users, Model Y's growth has long entered stagnation. The latest news is that the high-performance version of this car has completed MIIT declaration. It will likely maintain sales with facelifts and price adjustments in the second half of the year, but it is highly probable that its overall market share will continue to be eroded.
No.3 Li Auto i6
Li Auto i6 reached third place with 120,400 units, the brightest dark horse in the first half of the year, and marked that Li Auto's pure electric transformation is fully completed.
This 250,000-level family pure electric SUV completely continues Li Auto's product logic oriented towards family users. It does not compete on paper data like 0-100 km/h acceleration, but makes 800V high-voltage platforms, dual-chamber air suspension, and advanced intelligent driving standard configurations. It maximizes space, comfort, and energy replenishment efficiency, precisely hitting the pain points of urban family users.
Since its launch, this car has had monthly sales exceeding 20,000 for four consecutive months, directly accounting for 62% of Li Auto's total sales, siphoning its own extended-range L series. However, the 200,000 to 300,000 pure electric SUV market is the most competitive track this year. New products are flocking to the market in the second half of the year. It is not easy for the i6 to maintain current sales levels. Later, it will depend on new products like the i8 to take over.
No.4 Xiaomi YU7
Xiaomi YU7, as a popular model, sold 104,600 units in the first half of the year, ranked fourth. As a brand-new car launched only half a year ago, this result has exceeded industry expectations. This mid-size SUV focusing on sports and family, relying on Xiaomi's ecosystem traffic, reached a peak of nearly 38,000 units in the first month after launch, directly breaking the market pattern at the same price level.
However, the subsequent trend can be described as opening high and closing low. After the heat subsided, sales declined month by month until June, relying on the launch of the standard version and employee internal purchase discounts to return to the ten-thousand club. Ultimately, the 200,000-level pure electric SUV track is too competitive. Tesla Model Y is above, and cost-effective brands like Leapmotor are below. YU7's product strength has not pulled an absolute gap. Next, Xiaomi's focus will shift to its extended-range series. YU7 will likely maintain steady sales, making it difficult to replicate the explosion in the early stages after launch.
No.5 BYD Yuan UP
BYD Yuan UP sold 82,700 units in pure retail sales in the first half of the year, increasing by 14.7% year-on-year, making it BYD's new backbone in the entry-level pure electric market. It gained volume because it took over from Yuan PLUS. The old Yuan PLUS saw a cliff-like drop in sales. Yuan UP used lower pricing, newer designs, and BYD's mature powertrain system to quickly fill the market gap for pure electric SUVs under 100,000.
Plus, BYD's service network spread across the country and the reputation of Blade Batteries have extremely strong attraction for mass market users. However, there is bad news: Leapmotor A10 has overtaken Yuan UP in retail volume for two consecutive months. It is advancing step by step with a cost-effective strategy of larger space and higher configurations. In the second half of the year, it will be quite difficult for Yuan UP to continue climbing. It will likely hold its current market share and maintain stable output through capacity ramp-up.
No.6 Xiaomi SU7
Xiaomi SU7 sold 80,500 units in the first half of the year, dropping 48.3% year-on-year, with the ranking falling to sixth. The main reason is that the replacement gap dragged it down. At the beginning of the year, the old SU7 was discontinued to pave the way for the new model. Two months of delivery vacuum directly lowered the total for the first half of the year. After the new generation model was launched in March, it quickly returned to a monthly sales level of 20,000+, remaining the benchmark for 200,000-level pure electric sedans.
As Xiaomi's founding work, SU7 thoroughly opened up the capacity of the niche sports car market, even siphoning users from BMW 3 Series and Tesla Model 3. However, the sports car market itself has a low ceiling. Plus, with more and more competitors, SU7's sales have basically hit the upper limit. Next, it will be more about stabilizing output as the brand's basic market. The stage of explosive growth has passed.
No.7 NIO ES8
NIO ES8 accumulated 78,600 units in retail sales for the first half of the year, ranking seventh, being the absolute sales king in the high-end market above 400,000. The fully new ES8 can fight, the core is hitting the pure electric replacement demand of high-end family users. The swapping system solves energy replenishment anxiety. Luxury and service experience crush same-price BBA fuel cars. Users accounting for more than 97% are exchange/purchase users, of which 60% come from BBA owners.
Less than a year after launch, the new ES8 cumulative delivery broke 120,000 units, ranking the large SUV sales champion for six consecutive months, hard撑着 (proping up) the market capacity of the high-end pure electric market. Next, its own lower-positioned ES9 has already siphoned many users after launch. The 6-seater version has just started reservations. Plus, the high-end market itself has limited capacity. ES8's main goal for the second half of the year is to hold onto the basic market of the high-end market.
No.8 Wuling Hongguang MINI
Once the national god car Hongguang MINI EV sold only 72,800 units in the first half of the year, dropping 57.4% year-on-year, falling directly from the top spot to eighth. It is known as the most tragic fall among old models.
The loss of speed of Hongguang MINI is not caused by a single reason. On one hand, the A00-class microcar market is contracting overall. Adjustment of purchase tax policy has significantly shrunk the cost-performance advantage of low-price cars. On the other hand, user consumption upgrades are obvious. Adding 20,000 can buy a small car with larger space, higher configuration, and longer range. Many users who watched MINI EV finally bought Bingo, Star Wish. Wuling itself is clear about the problem. The fifth-generation model changed to a four-door structure, added fast charging and safety configurations, but it still could not stop the downward trend.
No.9 Changan Qiyuan Q05
Changan Qiyuan Q05 sold 71,600 units in the first half of the year, breaking into ninth, a true comeback dark horse.
This car had little presence last year. After price reduction and configuration increase in April this year, it took off directly. It pulled the entry-level range to 506km, even downgraded laser radar to the 80,000 level. Using a "technology equity" strategy, it precisely hit the pain points of home users. It sat firmly as the pure electric compact SUV sales champion for three consecutive months. Changan's capacity also kept up with the rhythm. After the Nanchang factory was put into production, bottlenecks were gradually relieved. The overseas market also bloomed synchronously. Thailand launched in half a month, and orders broke 3,000. After capacity is fully released in the second half of the year, Qiyuan Q05 sales still have rising space. It is expected to冲击 (attack/strive for) the first echelon of entry-level pure electric.
No.10 MG4
Ranked tenth, MG4 sold 70,800 units in pure retail sales in the first half of the year, purely relying on overseas market endorsement. This 100,000-level pure electric hatchback has been selling well in Europe for several years. It has ranked as the China-brand European sales champion for 11 consecutive years. Overseas sales share far exceeds domestic.
In the domestic market, MG4 began to gain volume gradually after its refresh last year. Rear-drive architecture and five-link independent suspension chassis quality are unique at the same price level. The MG4X version launched this year even downgraded semi-solid-state batteries. The technology普惠 (universal benefit) strategy was very effective. Domestic monthly sales have exceeded 10,000 for 9 consecutive months. However, hatchbacks themselves are a niche market in China. MG's brand voice is far less than mainstream autonomous brands. There will be no big breakthroughs domestically. Next, its incremental growth will still come from overseas. Maintaining steady state domestically is sufficient. It is a model that relies on the global market to amortize costs.
Summary
After reading the top ten ranking, you can see that the pure electric market has long passed the barbaric growth period where any car can be sold by just building it. The logic now is very clear. The low-end market is continuously shrinking. Consumption upgrading is the big trend. Old products that do not iterate quickly will be eliminated quickly. New products that truly hit user needs, have proper configurations, and reasonable prices can still break through against the trend even in an environment where the overall market is declining. Competition in the second half of the year will only be more intense. More new products will be concentrated on the market. The price war will continue. Looking at the ranking by the end of the year, the rankings may have to change one more time.
In Malaysia's SUV market, many buyers compare Proton X50 and Mazda CX-30 when choosing a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
The Proton X50 OTR price in Malaysia is RM 89,800 - 113,300, with a total of 4 versions, including 1.5T Executive (RM 89,800), 1.5T Premium (RM 101,800), 1.5T Flagship (RM 113,300), etc.
The Mazda CX-30 OTR price in Malaysia is RM 122,409 - 146,409, with a total of 4 versions, including 2025 2.0L High+ Premium (RM 146,409), 2025 2.0L High+ (RM 138,409), 2025 2.0L High (RM 130,409), etc.
From a price perspective, the starting price of Proton X50 is indeed RM 32,609 cheaper than Mazda CX-30. If your budget is limited, Proton's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. But be aware, that few thousand difference might involve trade-offs in features, it depends on your needs.
Proton X50 is powered by 1.5L 4-cyl, horsepower 105 hp. Official fuel consumption 6.0 L/100km.
Mazda CX-30 is powered by 1.5L Turbo, horsepower 140 hp. Official fuel consumption 7.0 L/100km.
In terms of power, Mazda CX-30's 1.5L Turbo has 35 more horsepower than Proton X50's 1.5L 4-cyl. However, for daily city driving, both cars have sufficient power, you will not feel it is not powerful enough.
Proton X50 safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
Mazda CX-30 safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include i-Activsense.
Both cars have the same safety rating, safety features are quite comprehensive in this level. New car safety is not bad now, no need to worry too much about this point.
Proton X50 body length 4400 mm, Boot 400 L.
Mazda CX-30 body length 4500 mm, Boot 450 L.
In terms of space, Mazda CX-30's body is 100 mm longer than Proton X50, seating space is more advantageous. However, Proton X50 is more flexible to park in the city, each has trade-offs.
Proton X50 Warranty 5 years/150,000km, Service interval Every 10,000km or 6 months.
Mazda CX-30 Warranty 5 years/150,000km, Service interval Every 10,000km or 6 months.
Both cars have the same warranty conditions, no need to worry about this aspect. Actual maintenance cost also depends on the brand's service network and parts price, suggest asking real owners in car owner groups for experience.
Overall, Proton X50 and Mazda CX-30 are both very good models in the Malaysia market. Choosing which one depends on your personal needs and budget. Suggest everyone do research, compare quotes from multiple dealers, then go for a test drive for the final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending time on research will definitely not be wrong.
On July 20, Honda China's official website low-key released news: Honda and GAC formally signed a strategic renewal agreement, extending the GAC Honda joint venture cooperation term to 2038. Shareholding ratio remains unchanged at 50:50, just pushing the contract originally set to expire in 2028 back by ten years.
Some in the industry call this renewal "a strategic high-stakes gamble to defy death." For GAC Honda, 2026 is a year of "lying low and gathering strength," with no major new products to be launched all year. Only in 2027 are three new products planned — the all-new Accord, a new hybrid product equipped with Honda's ace hybrid technology, and self-developed models built on China-exclusive new energy platforms. In other words, there is at least one more year of endurance ahead.
Interestingly, on the very same day Honda renewed, another scene was unfolding across the globe — just with Chinese automakers replacing the protagonists.
Chery formally took over a Nissan factory located in Roslin, South Africa, in early July, taking on over 600 employees entirely. The work uniforms changed, and the players at the table changed. Moreover, Chery jointly launched a new production line at Nissan's old factory in Barcelona, Spain, and signed a memorandum of understanding with Nissan — the Sunderland plant in the UK will begin contract manufacturing right-hand drive vehicles for Chery starting from April 2027. This marks the first time a mainstream Japanese automaker has manufactured vehicles for Chinese autonomous brands via contract manufacturing in a core European market. Imagine this scene: Nissan's factories, Nissan's workers, will start building cars for Chery from 2027 onwards.
BYD's Szeged factory in Hungary has entered the sprint before mass production, with a total investment of about 4 billion euros, a full production capacity of 300,000 vehicles per year, and plans to mass-produce the Dolphin Surf model in the fourth quarter. Former Hungarian Foreign Minister Szijjarto even announced he joined BYD to serve as an executive — he wrote on social media: "BYD is one of the most successful enterprises in the automotive industry in the past 20 years." Leapmotor, utilizing Stellantis's vehicle factory in Zaragoza, Spain, has the all-new pure electric SUV B10 produced directly on the European assembly line. SAIC is constructing a factory in Galicia, Spain with an annual output of 120,000 vehicles. XPeng's Malacca factory in Malaysia officially put the G6 into production in June.
As of mid-2026, about ten leading Chinese automakers have expanded capacity overseas through methods such as self-construction, joint ventures, and acquiring production lines. The overseas capacity layout of Chinese new energy automakers already covers main target markets in Europe, Southeast Asia, and South America. The power battery segment is also going global — CATL, EVE Energy, and Sunwoda have all laid out battery factories in Hungary, with Sunwoda's power battery project Phase I investment being about 1.9 billion yuan.
Viewing these two sets of scenes together, there is a sense of historical cyclicality. Once, when Japanese and Korean home appliances exited, Chinese enterprises also took over production lines in a similar manner. It's just that this time the script has changed the protagonist — Japanese brands that once held absolute dominance in the Chinese market are now having their factories taken over and share snatched away by Chinese automakers in the global market.
The collective retreat of multinational giants further illustrates the depth of this structural transformation. Stellantis booked 22.2 billion euros in restructuring and electrification losses, resulting in a net loss for the year, with its stock price plummeting 23% in a single day; the Volkswagen Group plans to eliminate 50,000 jobs in Germany and close 4 German factories by 2030, with model numbers reduced by up to 50%; Mercedes-Benz's adjusted EBIT plummeted 40%, and net profit nearly halved to 5.3 billion euros; Porsche plans to lay off 3,900 people by 2029; BMW has downgraded its electric vehicle sales growth expectations. Layoffs in the European parts industry have exceeded 100,000 in the past two years.
Technology is also accelerating in sync. On July 13, the solid-state battery industry witnessed a collective surge of information: Chery's solid-state battery R&D center contract was signed and landed, Baimahu Laboratory completed trial production of 20Ah high-capacity cells, Gotion High-tech announced mass production line design is basically complete, and BYD secured a patent for double-layer coated lithium-rich manganese-based cathode material. Chery's self-developed solid-state cell energy density has reached 400Wh/kg, moving towards 600Wh/kg, with a range target exceeding 1,500 km, and special R&D funds accumulated over 10 billion yuan; Dongfeng's new generation solid-state battery has an energy density of 350Wh/kg, range breaking 1,000 km, with mass production and vehicle installation debuting on eπ 007 in the second half of the year; BYD's sulfide all-solid-state battery pilot line has started production in Pingshan, Shenzhen, with prototype test range reaching 1,218 km. China Auto News' judgment is: industrialization is still far off, but the positioning battle has arrived.
But beneath the prosperity, there are still hidden reefs. The EU's highest comprehensive tariff on Chinese EVs reached 45.3%, with plans to impose additional tariffs on plug-in hybrids; automotive-grade storage chips rose in price by 180% in the last three months, putting cost pressure on models equipped with high-level intelligent driving; German assessment data shows Chinese EVs have a depreciation rate twice that of competitors, so leasing companies dare not purchase in large quantities; NIO only sold 15 vehicles in Germany in the first half of the year, and battery swapping station construction was halted. Localized factory construction is not the endpoint — European unions demand 35-hour work weeks and equal pay for equal work; ESG compliance is the biggest hidden barrier. CATL's Hungary factory production launch was delayed due to environmental controversies.
Some in the industry say, the first half is about who can build factories overseas, the second half is about who can truly take root locally. Honda's 10-year renewal is holding the last line of defense on the old track; Chinese automakers building factories globally is sprinting the first kilometer on the new track. Two routes, two directions, two fates.
Do you think Honda's 10-year renewal is a rational choice or a helpless move? What is the biggest challenge for Chinese automakers building factories abroad? Welcome to discuss in the comments.
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多人買車嘅時候都拿寶騰 X50 同馬自達 CX-5 比較。呢兩款車喺價位同定位上都好接近，今日我哋就從多個方面做個詳細對比，幫大家省下做功課嘅時間。
寶騰 X50 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 89,800 至 113,300，一共有 4 個版本，包括 1.5T 行政級（RM 89,800）、1.5T 豪華級（RM 101,800）、1.5T 旗艦級（RM 113,300） 等。
馬自達 CX-5 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 135,469 至 166,760，一共有 3 個版本，包括 2025 2.0L 自動波 35 週年紀念版（RM 316,154）、2025 2.0L 自動波（RM 296,154）、2025 2.0L 手動波（RM 294,154） 等。
從價錢睇，寶騰 X50 嘅起步價確係比馬自達 CX-5 平咗 RM 45,669。如果你預算有限，寶騰嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需求。但都要注意，便宜嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備上有取捨，具體要睇你嘅需求。
寶騰 X50 搭載 1.5L 4 缸，馬力 105 匹。官方油耗 6.0 公升/100 公里。
馬自達 CX-5 搭載 1.5L 渦輪，馬力 140 匹。官方油耗 7.0 公升/100 公里。
動力方面，馬自達 CX-5 嘅 1.5L 渦輪比寶騰 X50 嘅 1.5L 4 缸多咗 35 匹馬力。不過日常喺市區開，兩款車嘅動力都夠用，唔會覺得唔夠力。
寶騰 X50 嘅安全評級係 5 星 (東協 NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 ADAS (自適應巡航 ACC, 自動緊急煞車 AEB, 車道保持 LKA, 車道偏離 LDA, 盲點監測 BSM, 後方來車提醒 RCTA)。
馬自達 CX-5 嘅安全評級係 5 星 (東協 NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 。
兩款車嘅安全評級一樣，喺呢個級數入面安全配備都算好齊全。而家嘅新車安全性都唔差，唔使太擔心呢一點。
寶騰 X50 車身長 4400 mm，行李廂 400 公升。
馬自達 CX-5 車身長 4500 mm，行李廂 450 公升。
空間方面，馬自達 CX-5 嘅車身比寶騰 X50 長咗 100 mm，乘坐空間更有優勢。不過寶騰 X50 喺城市入面泊車會靈活啲，各有取捨。
寶騰 X50 採用四輪驅動方式。
馬自達 CX-5 採用前輪驅動方式。
寶騰嘅四輪驅動同馬自達嘅前輪驅動喺操控上會有唔同感受，建議試駕對比。
總體嚟講，寶騰 X50 同馬自達 CX-5 都係馬來西亞市場好唔錯嘅車型。揀邊輛，關鍵仲係要睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，先至去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花啲時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家揀車嘅時候都會拿寶騰 X50 同馬自達 CX-30 嚟比較。呢兩款車喺價位同定位上都好接近，今日我哋就由多個方面做一個詳細比較，幫你省咗做功課嘅時間。
寶騰 X50 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 89,800 - 113,300，合共有 4 個版本，包括 1.5T Executive（RM 89,800）、1.5T Premium（RM 101,800）、1.5T Flagship（RM 113,300） 等。
馬自達 CX-30 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 122,409 - 146,409，合共有 4 個版本，包括 2025 2.0L High+ Premium（RM 146,409）、2025 2.0L High+（RM 138,409）、2025 2.0L High（RM 130,409） 等。
由價錢睇，寶騰 X50 嘅起步價確實比馬自達 CX-30 平咗 RM 32,609。如果你預算有限，寶騰嘅入門版已經可以满足日常需要。但都要注意，平嗰幾千蚊，喺配備上會有取捨，具體要看你嘅需要。
寶騰 X50 搭載 1.5L 4-cyl，馬力 105 hp。官方油耗 6.0 L/100km。
馬自達 CX-30 搭載 1.5L Turbo，馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。
動力方面，馬自達 CX-30 嘅 1.5L Turbo 比寶騰 X50 嘅 1.5L 4-cyl 多咗 35 匹馬力。不過平日喺市區行，兩款車嘅動力都夠用，唔會覺得唔夠力。
寶騰 X50 採用 4WD 驅動方式。
馬自達 CX-30 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
寶騰嘅 4WD 同馬自達嘅 FWD 喺操控上會有唔同感覺，建議試駕對比。
寶騰 X50 保修 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
馬自達 CX-30 保修 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
兩款車嘅保修條件一樣，呢方面唔使糾結。實際保養成本仲要看品牌嘅服務網絡同零件價格，建議去車友群問問真實車主嘅經驗。
寶騰 X50 同馬自達 CX-30 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭用途、日常通勤。如果你更加重視品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰款；如果你更加在意性價比同配備，嗰就揀配備更豐富嗰款。最終始終建議兩款都去試駕，親身體驗先係最重要。
總括嚟講，寶騰 X50 同馬自達 CX-30 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊輛，關鍵都要睇你嘅個人需要同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
In Malaysia's SUV market, many buyers compare Proton X50 and Honda HR-V when choosing a car. These two models are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will conduct a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
The OTR price of Proton X50 in Malaysia is RM 89,800 - 113,300, with a total of 4 versions, including 1.5T Executive (RM 89,800), 1.5T Premium (RM 101,800), 1.5T Flagship (RM 113,300), etc.
The OTR price of Honda HR-V in Malaysia is RM 115,900 - 143,900, with a total of 4 versions, including 2026 e:HEV 1.5L RS (RM 143,900), 2026 1.5T V (RM 137,900), 2026 1.5T E (RM 130,900), etc.
From a pricing perspective, the starting price of Proton X50 is indeed RM 26,100 cheaper than Honda HR-V. If your budget is limited, Proton's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. But be aware that the few thousand ringgit saved might come with compromises in features, depending on your specific requirements.
Proton X50's safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
Honda HR-V's safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include Honda SENSING (ACC, CMBS, LKAS, RDM).
Both cars have the same safety rating. Safety features in this class are considered quite comprehensive. New cars nowadays generally have good safety standards, so no need to worry too much about this.
Proton X50 body length is 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
Honda HR-V body length is 4500 mm, trunk 450 L.
In terms of space, the Honda HR-V body is 100 mm longer than Proton X50, offering more advantage in passenger space. However, Proton X50 is a bit more flexible for parking in the city, each has its trade-offs.
Proton X50 adopts 4WD drive method.
Honda HR-V adopts FWD drive method.
Proton's 4WD and Honda's FWD will have different handling experiences, test drives and comparisons are recommended.
Overall, Proton X50 and Honda HR-V are both very good models in the Malaysian market. Choosing which one depends on your personal needs and budget. We suggest doing your research, comparing quotes from several dealerships, and then test driving to make the final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending some time on research will definitely not be wrong.
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拿 Proton X50 同 Toyota Corolla Cross 嚟做比較。呢兩部車喺價位同定位上都幾接近，而家我就從多個方面做一個詳細嘅比較，幫到你省咗做功課嘅時間。
Proton X50 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 89,800 - 113,300，總共有 4 個版本，包括 1.5T Executive（RM 89,800）、1.5T Premium（RM 101,800）、1.5T Flagship（RM 113,300） 等。
Toyota Corolla Cross 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 133,800 - 148,800，總共有 3 個版本，包括 2026 HEV 1.8L GR Sport（RM 148,800）、2026 HEV 1.8L Standard（RM 140,800）、2026 1.8L Standard（RM 133,800） 等。
由價錢睇，Proton X50 嘅起步價確實比 Toyota Corolla Cross 平咗 RM 44,000。如果你預算有限，Proton 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需要。不過要小心，平嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備上要有揀選，具體要看你嘅需要。
Proton X50 配備 1.5L 4-cyl，馬力 105 hp。官方油耗 6.0 L/100km。
Toyota Corolla Cross 配備 1.5L Turbo，馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。
動力方面，Toyota Corolla Cross 嘅 1.5L Turbo 比 Proton X50 嘅 1.5L 4-cyl 多咗 35 匹馬力。不過日常喺市區開，兩部車嘅動力都夠用，唔會覺得唔夠力。
Proton X50 採用 4WD 驅動方式。
Toyota Corolla Cross 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
Proton 嘅 4WD 同 Toyota 嘅 FWD 喺操控上會有唔同感受，建議試駕比較。
Proton X50 保養 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Toyota Corolla Cross 保養 5 年/無限制里程，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Proton X50 同 Toyota Corolla Cross 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更重視品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，就揀配置更豐富嗰款。最終都建議兩部都去試駕，親身體驗先至最重要。
總而言之，Proton X50 同 Toyota Corolla Cross 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊架，關鍵都係睇你嘅個人需要同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嗰陣都會拿 Proton X50 同 Toyota Corolla Cross 做比較。呢兩部車喺價位同定位上都幾接近，今日我哋就由多個方面做一個詳細比較，幫你節省做功課嘅時間。
Proton X50 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 89,800 - 113,300，一共有 4 個版本，包括 1.5T Executive（RM 89,800）、1.5T Premium（RM 101,800）、1.5T Flagship（RM 113,300） 等。
Toyota Corolla Cross 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 133,800 - 148,800，一共有 3 個版本，包括 2026 HEV 1.8L GR Sport（RM 148,800）、2026 HEV 1.8L Standard（RM 140,800）、2026 1.8L Standard（RM 133,800） 等。
由價錢睇嚟，Proton X50 嘅起步價確實比 Toyota Corolla Cross 平咗 RM 44,000。如果你預算有限，Proton 嘅入門版已經滿足日常需求。但都要留意，平嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備上有取舍，具體要看你嘅需求。
Proton X50 裝載 1.5L 4-cyl，馬力 105 hp。官方油耗 6.0 L/100km。
Toyota Corolla Cross 裝載 1.5L Turbo，馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。
動力方面，Toyota Corolla Cross 嘅 1.5L Turbo 比 Proton X50 嘅 1.5L 4-cyl 多咗 35 匹馬力。唔過日常喺市區開，兩部車嘅動力都夠用，唔會覺得唔夠力。
Proton X50 車身長 4400 mm，車尾箱 400 L。
Toyota Corolla Cross 車身長 4400 mm，車尾箱 400 L。
兩部車嘅尺寸差唔多，車內空間差別唔大。呢個級別嘅車，日常使用完全夠用。
Proton X50 保養 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Toyota Corolla Cross 保養 5 年/無限制里程，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
總體嚟講，Proton X50 同 Toyota Corolla Cross 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊部，關鍵仲係睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去做試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拿 Proton X50 同 Honda WR-V 嚟做比較。這兩款車喺價位同定位上都好接近，今日我哋就從多個方面做一個詳細嘅比較，幫你省下做功課嘅時間。
Proton X50 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 89,800 - 113,300，總共 4 個版本，包括 1.5T Executive（RM 89,800）、1.5T Premium（RM 101,800）、1.5T Flagship（RM 113,300） 等。
Honda WR-V 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 89,900 - 107,900，總共 4 個版本，包括 2023 1.5L V（RM 99,900）、2023 1.5L E（RM 95,900）、2023 1.5L S（RM 89,900） 等。
從價錢嚟睇，Proton X50 嘅起步價確實比 Honda WR-V 平咗 RM 100。如果你預算有限，Proton 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需求。但都要留意，平嗰幾千塊，可能喺配備上會有取舍，具體要睇你嘅需求。
Proton X50 搭載 1.5L 4-cyl，馬力 105 hp。官方油耗 6.0 L/100km。
Honda WR-V 搭載 1.5L 4-cyl，馬力 105 hp。官方油耗 6.0 L/100km。
兩款車用咗同一套動力系統，日常開起嚟嘅感覺基本冇分別。油耗方面都差唔多，唔使太糾結這一點。
Proton X50 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA)。
Honda WR-V 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 Honda SENSING。
兩款車嘅安全評級一樣，喺呢個級別入面安全配備都算好齊全。而家嘅新車安全性都唔差，唔使太擔心這一點。
Proton X50 採用 4WD 驅動方式。
Honda WR-V 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
Proton 嘅 4WD 同 Honda 嘅 FWD 喺操控上會有唔同感覺，建議試駕比較。
總括嚟講，Proton X50 同 Honda WR-V 都係馬來西亞市場好唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一台，關鍵還係要睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花點時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好買家喺揀車嗰陣都會用 Perodua Aruz 同 Mitsubishi Xforce 嚟作比較。呢兩部車喺價位同定位上都幾接近，今日我哋就由多個方面做一個詳細嘅對比，幫你節省做功課嘅時間。
Perodua Aruz 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 72,900 - 77,900，總共有 2 個版本，包括 1.5L X（RM 72,900）、1.5L AV（RM 77,900） 等。
Mitsubishi Xforce 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 109,930 - 119,930，總共有 2 個版本，包括 2026 1.5L Ultimate（RM 119,930）、2026 1.5L Urban（RM 109,930） 等。
由價錢睇，Perodua Aruz 嘅起步價確實比 Mitsubishi Xforce 平咗 RM 37,030。如果你預算有限，Perodua 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需求。但亦都要注意，便宜嗰幾千蚊，喺配備上可能會有所取捨，具體就要睇你嘅需求。
Perodua Aruz 搭載 1.5L 4-cyl，馬力 105 hp。官方油耗 6.0 L/100km。
Mitsubishi Xforce 搭載 1.5L Turbo，馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。
動力方面，Mitsubishi Xforce 嘅 1.5L Turbo 比 Perodua Aruz 嘅 1.5L 4-cyl 多咗 35 匹馬力。不過日常喺市區開，兩部車嘅動力都夠用，唔會覺得唔夠力。
Perodua Aruz 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 。
Mitsubishi Xforce 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 MI-PILOT。
兩部車嘅安全評級一樣，喺呢個級別入面安全配備都算給晒好齊全。依家嘅新車安全性都唔差，唔使太擔心呢一點。
Perodua Aruz 保修 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Mitsubishi Xforce 保修 3 年/100,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
總體嚟講，Perodua Aruz 同 Mitsubishi Xforce 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵都係睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，先至去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
In the SUV market in Malaysia, many buyers compare Perodua Aruz and Honda WR-V when choosing a car. Both cars are quite close in price and positioning. Today we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to save you time doing research.
The Perodua Aruz OTR price in Malaysia is RM 72,900 - 77,900. There are 2 versions in total, including 1.5L X (RM 72,900), 1.5L AV (RM 77,900), etc.
The Honda WR-V OTR price in Malaysia is RM 89,900 - 107,900. There are 4 versions in total, including 2023 1.5L V (RM 99,900), 2023 1.5L E (RM 95,900), 2023 1.5L S (RM 89,900), etc.
From a price perspective, the starting price of Perodua Aruz is indeed RM 17,000 cheaper than Honda WR-V. If your budget is limited, the entry-level Perodua can already meet daily needs. But also note, the difference of a few thousand might involve trade-offs in features, it depends on your specific needs.
Perodua Aruz is equipped with a 1.5L 4-cyl, 105 hp. Official fuel consumption 6.0 L/100km.
Honda WR-V is equipped with a 1.5L 4-cyl, 105 hp. Official fuel consumption 6.0 L/100km.
Both cars use the same powertrain system, the driving feel is basically no difference. Fuel consumption is also similar, no need to worry too much about this.
Perodua Aruz body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
Honda WR-V body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
Both cars' dimensions are almost the same, interior space difference is not big. For this class of car, daily use is fully sufficient.
Perodua Aruz adopts FWD drive system.
Honda WR-V adopts FWD drive system.
Both cars have the same drive system, both are FWD, daily driving feel will not have too big difference.
Perodua Aruz warranty 5 years/150,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Honda WR-V warranty 5 years/unlimited mileage, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Overall, Perodua Aruz and Honda WR-V are both very good models in the Malaysian market. Choosing which one, the key depends on your personal needs and budget. We suggest doing research well, compare quotes from several dealerships, then go for test drive to make the final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending time doing research will absolutely not be wrong.
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拿 Perodua Aruz 同 Honda HR-V 嚟做比較。呢兩部車喺價位同定位上都幾接近，今日我哋就由多個方面做個詳細比較，幫你節省咗做功課嘅時間。
Perodua Aruz 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 72,900 - 77,900，總共有 2 個版本，包括 1.5L X（RM 72,900）、1.5L AV（RM 77,900） 等。
Honda HR-V 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 115,900 - 143,900，總共有 4 個版本，包括 2026 e:HEV 1.5L RS（RM 143,900）、2026 1.5T V（RM 137,900）、2026 1.5T E（RM 130,900） 等。
睇價錢嘅話，Perodua Aruz 嘅起步價的確比 Honda HR-V 平咗 RM 43,000。如果你預算有限，Perodua 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需要。但都要留意，平嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備方面會有取舍，具體要睇你嘅需要。
Perodua Aruz 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括。
Honda HR-V 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 Honda SENSING (ACC, CMBS, LKAS, RDM)。
呢兩部車嘅安全評級一樣，喺呢個級別入面安全配備都算好齊全。依家嘅新車安全性都唔差，唔使太擔心呢一點。
Perodua Aruz 保修 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Honda HR-V 保修 5 年/無限里程，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Perodua Aruz 同 Honda HR-V 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更重視品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰一款；如果你更在乎性價比同配備，那就揀配置更豐富嗰款。最終都建議兩款都去試駕，親身體驗先係最重要嘅。
總括嚟講，Perodua Aruz 同 Honda HR-V 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車款。揀邊部，關鍵都要睇你嘅個人需要同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，先去試駕先做最後決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
