首頁Stagea WGNC34
搜尋歷史
熱門搜尋
經銷商登入 / 註冊
July 6, Wanli Tires, under Guangzhou Industrial Control Group, signed a formal agreement in Kuala Lumpur with Malaysia Berjaya Group Berjaya Corp, landing a $320 million intelligent joint venture factory, marking a comprehensive upgrade of the brand's ASEAN layout.
This is not a single case. In the past year, Wanli, Primewell Chengshan, Qingdao Fullunion, Zhaoqing Junhong, New Continent Rubber and other domestic tire enterprises have densely invested in Malaysia.
Heavyweight Signing Lands! Wanli Partners with Malaysian Giant to Open New Export Chapter
The signing ceremony for Wanli Tires this time is of very high caliber. Senior executives from government and enterprises of China and Malaysia, diplomatic envoys, and industry leaders witnessed it together. It is a benchmark event for China-Malaysia tire industry cooperation this year.
According to the cooperation agreement, both sides will build a high-performance green rubber tire production base in Selangor State. The project covers 67.9 acres, with a planned annual production of 1.2 million all-steel radial tires and 5 million semi-steel radial tires.
As a core export hub in Wanli's global production network, the project is positioned as a leading global smart green factory. It will not only perfect the brand's overseas capacity layout but also create over 1,000 high-quality jobs for Malaysia. Through professional skills training, it will assist in local talent cultivation and manufacturing industry upgrade, achieving two-way symbiosis and win-win.
Wang Fuzhu of Guangzhou Industrial Control Group frankly stated that this signing achieves a leap for the group's ASEAN layout from "single-point breakthrough" to "multi-hub linkage."
Team Gathering Layout! Multiple Giants Land, Malaysian Tire Industry Matrix Takes Shape
Wanli's heavy landing is just a microcosm of Chinese-funded tires entering Malaysia. In just a short year, top listed enterprises and powerful private enterprises have continuously landed large projects, completely rewriting the Southeast Asian tire industry landscape.
01
Qingdao Fullunion: Completed Malaysia's Largest Chinese-Funded Tire Base
This June, Qingdao Fullunion Jinma Rubber Phase II Intelligent Factory officially went into production. With a total investment of approximately 818 million RMB, the overall annual tire production exceeds 7 million units, making it the largest Chinese-funded tire production base in Malaysia in terms of scale and capacity volume.
02
Primewell Chengshan: 2.76 Billion Heavy Investment Layout
In November 2024, Primewell Chengshan invested $380 million (approximately 2.76 billion RMB) to land in Kedah Rubber City, Malaysia. The project covers over 96 acres, focusing on high-end intelligent green tire production. After Phase I reaches full capacity, it can produce 6.6 million tires of various types annually. It is expected to trial production in the second half of 2026, and fully release capacity in 2027-2028.
03
Investment Continues to Increase, Export Team Expands Fully
Private tire enterprises are also accelerating entry: Zhaoqing Junhong invests 2 billion yuan to land in Malaysia tire project, with a planned annual production of 6.5 million tires; Shandong New Continent Rubber invests 630 million yuan to land radial tire production project, continuously perfecting overseas capacity layout.
Core Logic of Gathering in Malaysia: Tariff + Location Dual Dividends
Domestic tire enterprises collectively investing heavily in Malaysia is not blindly following the trend, but a precise layout aligning with global trade shifts, with very prominent core advantages.
Tariff dividend is the primary driver. In 2025, the United States and five Southeast Asian countries reached a differentiated tariff agreement. Malaysia's tires exported to the US tariff reduced to 19%, greatly avoiding high trade barriers of direct exports from China, effectively lowering export costs. Even if the local strengthens rules of origin verification, it still cannot stop the enthusiasm of enterprises building local factories.
At the same time, Malaysia possesses core location advantages within ASEAN. Port shipping is mature, and land transport is accessible, covering both ASEAN local markets and Europe, America, Middle East and other global core markets. It is an excellent strategic pivot for building a resilient global supply chain. In addition, the local rubber industry foundation is deep, industrial workers are sufficient. Overlapping with continuously optimized foreign investment business environment, industrial cluster effects continue to highlight, further consolidating investment value.
Obvious Shortcomings! Investment Promotion Policy Competitiveness Lags Behind Thailand and Vietnam
Although layout heat is high, Malaysia's foreign investment incentive policy has obvious shortcomings, constraining industry acceptance strength. Regarding taxation, the local PS Pioneer Plan only offers ordinary projects 5 years 70% income tax exemption, high-tech can get full exemption. While Vietnam offers up to 4 years full exemption, 5-9 years half, Thailand offers up to 15 years full exemption at most. The policy is simpler and stronger.
Regarding tariff exemption, compliant enterprises in Thailand and Vietnam can directly exempt import tariffs on production equipment and raw materials. Malaysia's preferences are limited to a few special industries and projects, with narrow coverage scope and high threshold. Overall policy tends to be conservative and cumbersome. If optimization is completed subsequently, Malaysia is expected to accept a larger scale tire industry transfer.
From early gathering in Thailand and Cambodia to now collectively layout in Malaysia, Chinese tire export paths are becoming more mature. Starting from Wanli Tires heavy signing, the era of Chinese tire Malaysia layout officially arrives.
In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers compare Proton X70 and Kia Sportage when choosing a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning. Today we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
The OTR price of Proton X70 in Malaysia is RM 106,800 - 122,300. There are 3 versions in total, including 1.5L Standard 2WD (RM 106,800), 1.5L Executive 2WD (RM 115,800), 1.5L Premium 2WD (RM 122,300), etc.
The OTR price of Kia Sportage in Malaysia is RM 129,639 - 179,320. There are 4 versions in total, including 2025 1.6T DCT 4WD High (RM 179,320), 2025 1.6T DCT 2WD High (RM 159,320), 2025 2.0L AT 2WD High (RM 139,639), etc.
From a price perspective, the starting price of Proton X70 is indeed RM 22,839 cheaper than Kia Sportage. If your budget is limited, the entry-level Proton version can already meet daily needs. But be aware that the few thousand RM saved might involve trade-offs in features, depending on your specific needs.
Proton X70 is equipped with 1.5L Turbo, horsepower 140 hp. Official fuel consumption 7.0 L/100km.
Kia Sportage is equipped with 1.5L Turbo, horsepower 140 hp. Official fuel consumption 7.0 L/100km.
Both cars use the same powertrain system, the driving experience feels basically the same in daily use. Fuel consumption is also similar, no need to worry too much about this.
The safety rating of Proton X70 is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
The safety rating of Kia Sportage is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include Drive Wise.
Both cars have the same safety rating, safety features in this class are considered quite comprehensive. New cars' safety is generally not poor nowadays, no need to worry too much about this.
Proton X70 adopts FWD drive mode.
Kia Sportage adopts FWD drive mode.
Both cars have the same drive mode, both are FWD, daily driving experience will not have too much difference.
Overall, both Proton X70 and Kia Sportage are very good car models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose mainly depends on your personal needs and budget. We suggest doing your research well, comparing quotes from several dealerships, and then taking a test drive to make the final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending time on research will never be wrong.
In Malaysia's SUV market, many buyers compare the Proton X70 and Mitsubishi Xforce when choosing a car. These two models are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to save you time on research.
Proton X70 OTR price in Malaysia is RM 106,800 - 122,300, with a total of 3 variants, including 1.5L Standard 2WD (RM 106,800), 1.5L Executive 2WD (RM 115,800), 1.5L Premium 2WD (RM 122,300), etc.
Mitsubishi Xforce OTR price in Malaysia is RM 109,930 - 119,930, with a total of 2 variants, including 2026 1.5L Ultimate (RM 119,930), 2026 1.5L Urban (RM 109,930), etc.
From a price perspective, Proton X70's starting price is indeed RM 3,130 cheaper than Mitsubishi Xforce. If your budget is limited, Proton's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. But be aware that the few thousand less may involve trade-offs in features, depending on your specific needs.
Proton X70 is equipped with 1.5L Turbo, 140 hp. Official fuel consumption 7.0 L/100km.
Mitsubishi Xforce is equipped with 1.5L Turbo, 140 hp. Official fuel consumption 7.0 L/100km.
Both cars use the same powertrain, so the driving feel is basically the same. Fuel economy is also similar, so no need to worry too much about this point.
Proton X70 safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety system includes ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
Mitsubishi Xforce safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety system includes MI-PILOT.
Both cars have the same safety rating, safety features are quite comprehensive in this class. New cars these days are not lacking in safety, no need to worry too much about this.
Proton X70 body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
Mitsubishi Xforce body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
Both cars are almost the same size, interior space difference is not significant. Cars in this class are completely sufficient for daily use.
Proton X70 adopts FWD drive system.
Mitsubishi Xforce adopts FWD drive system.
Both cars have the same drive system, both are FWD, daily driving feel will not differ too much.
Overall, Proton X70 and Mitsubishi Xforce are both very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends mainly on your personal needs and budget. We suggest doing your homework, comparing quotes from multiple dealerships, and test driving before making a final decision. Buying a car is a major matter, taking time to research is never wrong.
August 1st, the auto industry's gaze was fixed on the same poster.
Geely announced July sales data: 250,100 units. A historic high for the same period, with month-on-month and year-on-year double growth for 5 consecutive months.
In this brutal July where the total passenger car market dropped 18% year-on-year, this set of data stands out extremely sharply. While others are bleeding in the quagmire of price wars, Geely is "counting money" on the track of high-quality growth.
The day before the announcement, on July 31, Geely held its mid-term management conference. Group CEO Gan Jiayue set the tone on site: no engaging in inefficient price wars, comprehensively promote fuel vehicle HEV transformation, and seek profits from high-value incremental markets.
From the internal strategy meeting on July 31 to the sales announcement on August 1, within just 24 hours, Geely presented the outside world with a "anti-fragile" equation for crossing cycles.
1
Chinese auto companies going global, in the past few years focused on one thing: "hardship". Either go to emerging markets to sell low-price cars and earn hard money, or get ground into the dirt by tariffs in the European and American markets.
But Geely's overseas performance in July saw a sudden change in style.
Exports that month reached 106,600 units, a violent surge of 202% year-on-year, breaking 100,000 for two consecutive months. Even more harsh is the structure: New energy exports were 62,600 units, skyrocketing 616% year-on-year, accounting for a high proportion of 59% of total exports.
This is no longer simply "selling tin plates", but high-premium "technology export". Geely EX2 took the sales champion in Thailand for electric cars, EX5 EM-i swept through the European plug-in hybrid markets such as Poland and Bulgaria.
Just having a hard product isn't enough, you also need to understand the Tai Chi of geopolitics. In July, Geely acquired Ford's factory in Spain.
Ford, the ancestor of assembly line car manufacturing. Now in the European headquarters, handing over the factory to Chinese car companies. This strategy of "asset-light overseas expansion", using lower capital expenditure and shorter cycles, directly cut into the European hinterland, perfectly hedging trade barriers.
Back then, Toyota went to Kentucky to build a factory to avoid US sanctions, eventually capturing North America. Now, Geely has also learned this trick of "local rooting". From product output to ecosystem rooting, Geely's overseas expansion has entered the 2.0 era of earning high gross margins.
2
If going overseas is opening up new territory, then the domestic new energy situation is a trench warfare where bayonets meet blood.
In July, Geely new energy sales reached 160,100 units, a 23% year-on-year increase, with the new energy share rising to 64%. In this fiercely competitive market, Geely relies on the "wolf pack tactic".
Zeekr builds brand in the sky. July deliveries reached 35,800 units, up 111% year-on-year. The Shooting Brake delivered over 10,000 units in a single month, and the Zeekr 7X global deliveries broke 10,000 units. More importantly, its flagship model 9X has established itself in the 500,000-level market, NPS (Net Promoter Score) ranks first among all categories above 500,000. People buying cars at this price point used to buy the "car badge", now Zeekr gives them "smart floor efficiency" and ultimate experience.
Galaxy and Lynk & Co fight for supplies on the ground. The Galaxy series sold 107,700 units in July, Star Wish sold hot 55,100 units in a single month, becoming a genuine "National Miracle Car"; Lynk & Co sold 16,300 units, new energy share as high as 86%, transformation results in phased achievements.
Under the background of pressure on the industry total volume, Geely did not rely on a single blockbuster to gamble on luck, but used a multi-brand layered matrix, plowing through the market segments from 100,000 to 500,000. Others lead with a single core, Geely fights with full squad battle formation.
3
In the carnival of new energy, many car companies wished to smash all fuel vehicle production lines tomorrow. But Geely doesn't believe in this.
In July, Geely China Star sold 90,100 units, a 15% month-on-month increase. Xingyue L quietly broke through 1 million units, becoming the first Chinese brand high-end fuel SUV to break one million.
In today's shrinking fuel car total market, this is simply a miracle. How did Geely "extend the life" of fuel vehicles?
At the mid-term management conference on July 31, Gan Jiayue gave the answer: comprehensively promote fuel vehicle HEVization. The goal is to sprint monthly sales of i-HEV models to over 30,000 before the end of the year, and fully advance the Million China Star goal.
Japanese cars relied on THS hybrid technology to eat dividends for decades globally. But Geely's self-developed i-HEV Zhiqing technology has started to loosen the monopoly structure of Japanese hybrids. Ultra-low fuel consumption, electric feel acceleration, Geely used intelligence and industrial chain advantages to equip traditional fuel vehicles with "mecha".
Use advanced hybrid technology to "invade their strongholds" (i-HEV will go global in the fourth quarter) in the global market, use the fuel base to provide continuous profit ammunition for new energy transformation. This is the confidence for Geely not to engage in price wars and pursue operational quality.
4
Capital market is the most realistic. In the first half of this year, the auto sector was suffocated by pessimistic expectations. But Geely Automobile (0175.HK) became the only Chinese full-vehicle stock with positive stock price growth since the beginning of the year in "A+H shares".
Institutions are not stupid, what they see is Geely's leap from "scale leading" to "value leading".
Simultaneous improvement in net profit per vehicle and gross margin, profitable loop for high value-added models overseas, these are all solid "money-making capabilities".
In 1997, when Li Shufu first entered the auto industry, he said a famous quote: "A car is just four wheels and two sofas." At that time, Chinese car companies were still looking up to Ford and Toyota, crossing the river by feeling the stones.
Nearly 30 years have passed, the gears of history have completed a wonderful meshing.
Back then Ford taught the world to make cars with assembly lines; now Geely, in Ford's European factories, teaches them how to do globalization; back then Toyota monopolized the market with hybrid technology; now Geely, with i-HEV and pure electric dual tracks, grabs their share globally.
The 250,000 unit sales on August 1st is just a footnote. Behind this report card, a group of Chinese automotive people are using long-term technical tenacity and strategic resilience to pry open the cracks of history and gripped firmly the steering wheel belonging to this era.
In the SUV market in Malaysia, many buyers compare Proton X70 and Mazda CX-60 when choosing a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning. Today we will do a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
Proton X70 OTR price in Malaysia is RM 106,800 - 122,300, with a total of 3 versions, including 1.5L Standard 2WD (RM 106,800), 1.5L Executive 2WD (RM 115,800), 1.5L Premium 2WD (RM 122,300), etc.
Mazda CX-60 OTR price in Malaysia is RM 200,510 - 252,873, with a total of 2 versions, including 2026 3.3T 4WD High Plus (RM 252,873), 2025 2.5L 2WD High (RM 200,510), etc.
From a pricing standpoint, the entry price of Proton X70 is indeed RM 93,710 lower than Mazda CX-60. If your budget is limited, Proton's entry-level version is sufficient for daily needs. However, be aware that the savings of a few thousand might involve compromises in features, depending on your specific requirements.
Proton X70 is equipped with 1.5L Turbo, 140 hp. Official fuel consumption 7.0 L/100km.
Mazda CX-60 is equipped with 2.0L 4-cyl, 170 hp. Official fuel consumption 8.0 L/100km.
In terms of power, Mazda CX-60's 2.0L 4-cyl has 30 more horsepower than Proton X70's 1.5L Turbo. However, for daily driving in the city, both cars have sufficient power, you won't feel underpowered.
Proton X70 safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
Mazda CX-60 safety rating is 5★ (Euro NCAP), active safety systems include i-Activsense Pro.
Regarding safety equipment, both cars received good ratings. However, there are some differences in function between Proton X70's ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA) and Mazda CX-60's i-Activsense Pro. If you value active safety more, you can compare the function lists of both carefully.
Proton X70 warranty 5 years/150,000km, service interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Mazda CX-60 warranty 5 years/150,000km, service interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
The warranty conditions for both cars are the same, no need to worry about this aspect. Actual maintenance costs also depend on the brand's service network and parts prices, suggested to ask real owners in car groups for experience.
Proton X70 and Mazda CX-60 are both mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, you can prioritize the one with better reputation; if you care more about cost-performance and equipment, choose the one with richer configuration. Ultimately it is suggested to test drive both, personal experience is the most important.
Overall, Proton X70 and Mazda CX-60 are both very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose, it depends on your personal needs and budget. It is recommended to do your homework, compare quotes from several car dealers, and then test drive to make the final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending some time doing homework will never be wrong.
In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers compare the Proton X70 and Toyota Yaris Cross when choosing a car. These two models are quite close in terms of price and positioning. Today, we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time doing research.
The Proton X70 OTR price in Malaysia is RM 106,800 - 122,300, with a total of 3 versions, including 1.5L Standard 2WD (RM 106,800), 1.5L Executive 2WD (RM 115,800), 1.5L Premium 2WD (RM 122,300), etc.
The Toyota Yaris Cross OTR price in Malaysia is RM 99,900 - 109,900, with a total of 2 versions, including 2026 1.5L Standard (RM 99,900), 2026 HEV 1.5L Standard (RM 109,900), etc.
From a price perspective, the starting price of the Toyota Yaris Cross is RM 6,900 cheaper than the Proton X70. Honestly, in this price range, the gap of a few thousand is actually not significant. The key is to look at the overall cost-performance ratio and long-term usage costs.
The Proton X70 is equipped with a 1.5L Turbo, with 140 hp. Official fuel consumption is 7.0 L/100km.
The Toyota Yaris Cross is equipped with a 1.5L 4-cyl, with 105 hp. Official fuel consumption is 6.0 L/100km.
In terms of power, the Proton X70's 1.5L Turbo has 35 more horsepower than the Toyota Yaris Cross's 1.5L 4-cyl, providing more confidence in mid-range acceleration, especially when overtaking on highways. However, the Toyota Yaris Cross may have more favorable fuel economy, and the difference in daily city commuting will not be too large.
The Proton X70 body length is 4400 mm, with a trunk of 400 L.
The Toyota Yaris Cross body length is 4400 mm, with a trunk of 400 L.
The dimensions of the two cars are almost the same, and the interior space is not significantly different. For cars in this class, it is completely sufficient for daily use.
Both Proton X70 and Toyota Yaris Cross are mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, prioritize the one with better reputation; if you care more about cost-performance ratio and features, choose the one with richer configuration. Ultimately, it is recommended to test drive both models, as experiencing it firsthand is the most important.
Overall, both Proton X70 and Toyota Yaris Cross are very good models in the Malaysian market. Choosing which one depends on your personal needs and budget. It is recommended to do your homework well, compare quotes from multiple car dealerships, and then test drive before making the final decision. Buying a car is a major matter, spending some time doing homework will never be wrong.
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嗰陣都會拿 Proton X50 同 Subaru Forester 嚟比較。呢兩款車喺價位同定位上都相當接近，今日我哋就從多個方面做個詳細嘅比較，幫你省返做功課嘅時間。
Proton X50 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 89,800 - 113,300，一共有 4 個版本，包括 1.5T Executive（RM 89,800）、1.5T Premium（RM 101,800）、1.5T Flagship（RM 113,300） 等。
Subaru Forester 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 174,000 - 197,000，一共有 3 個版本，包括 2024 2.0L S EyeSight GT Edition（RM 189,538）、2024 2.0L S EyeSight（RM 177,538）、2024 2.0L L EyeSight（RM 167,538） 等。
從價錢睇落，Proton X50 嘅起步價確實比 Subaru Forester 平咗 RM 84,200。如果你預算有限，Proton 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需求。但都要注意，平啲嘅那幾千塊，可能喺配備上有取捨，具體要看你嘅需求。
Proton X50 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA)。
Subaru Forester 嘅安全評級係 5★ (Euro NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 EyeSight。
安全配備方面，兩款車都拿到不錯嘅評級。不過 Proton X50 嘅 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA) 同 Subaru Forester 嘅 EyeSight 喺功能上有少少分別，如果你比較鍾意主動安全嘅話，可以仔細睇下兩者嘅功能列表。
Proton X50 採用 4WD 驅動方式。
Subaru Forester 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
Proton 嘅 4WD 同 Subaru 嘅 FWD 喺操控上有唔同感受，建議試駕對比。
Proton X50 保修 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Subaru Forester 保修 3 年/100,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Proton X50 同 Subaru Forester 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更鍾意品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，就揀配置更豐富嗰款。始終都建議兩款都去試駕，親自體驗先係最重要嘅。
總而言之，Proton X50 同 Subaru Forester 都係馬來西亞市場幾好嘅車型。揀邊輛，關鍵始終係睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
In the SUV market in Malaysia, many buyers compare Proton X50 and Hyundai Tucson when choosing a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning. Today we will do a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to save you the time of research.
The OTR price of Proton X50 in Malaysia is RM 89,800 - 113,300, with a total of 4 versions, including 1.5T Executive (RM 89,800), 1.5T Premium (RM 101,800), 1.5T Flagship (RM 113,300), etc.
The OTR price of Hyundai Tucson in Malaysia is RM 143,888 - 197,888, with a total of 5 versions, including 2025 HEV 1.6T AT 2WD Prestige (RM 197,888), 2025 1.6T DCT 4WD Prestige (RM 186,888), 2025 1.6T DCT 2WD Prime (RM 164,888), etc.
From a price perspective, the starting price of Proton X50 is indeed RM 54,088 cheaper than Hyundai Tucson. If your budget is limited, Proton's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. But note, the few thousand cheaper, there might be trade-offs in features, it depends on your needs.
Proton X50 comes with 1.5L 4-cyl, horsepower 105 hp. Official fuel consumption 6.0 L/100km.
Hyundai Tucson comes with 1.5L Turbo, horsepower 140 hp. Official fuel consumption 7.0 L/100km.
In terms of power, Hyundai Tucson's 1.5L Turbo has 35 more horsepower than Proton X50's 1.5L 4-cyl. However, for daily city driving, the power of both cars is sufficient, you won't feel lacking power.
Proton X50's safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
Hyundai Tucson's safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include SmartSense.
Both cars have the same safety rating, safety features are quite complete in this class. New cars nowadays have no issues with safety, no need to worry too much about this.
Proton X50 warranty 5 years/150,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Hyundai Tucson warranty 5 years/300,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Overall, Proton X50 and Hyundai Tucson are both excellent models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends on your personal needs and budget. We suggest doing your research, comparing quotes from multiple dealerships, and then test driving to make a final decision. Buying a car is a big deal, spending time researching is never wrong.
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拿 Proton X50 同 Hyundai Tucson 嚟作比較。這兩款車喺價錢同定位上都幾接近，今日我哋就由多個方面做一個詳細對比，幫你節省做功課嘅時間。
Proton X50 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 89,800 - 113,300，一共有 4 個版本，包括 1.5T Executive（RM 89,800）、1.5T Premium（RM 101,800）、1.5T Flagship（RM 113,300）等。
Hyundai Tucson 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 143,888 - 197,888，一共有 5 個版本，包括 2025 HEV 1.6T AT 2WD Prestige（RM 197,888）、2025 1.6T DCT 4WD Prestige（RM 186,888）、2025 1.6T DCT 2WD Prime（RM 164,888）等。
從價錢嚟睇，Proton X50 嘅起步價確實比 Hyundai Tucson 平咗 RM 54,088。如果你預算有限，Proton 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需求。但亦要留意，平嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備上會有取捨，具體要睇你嘅需求。
Proton X50 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA)。
Hyundai Tucson 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 SmartSense。
兩款車嘅安全評級一樣，喺呢個級數入面安全配備都算好齊全。而家嘅新車安全性都唔錯，唔使太擔心這一點。
Proton X50 採用 4WD 驅動方式。
Hyundai Tucson 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
Proton 嘅 4WD 同 Hyundai 嘅 FWD 喺操控上會有唔同感覺，建議試駕對比。
Proton X50 同 Hyundai Tucson 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更重視品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰一款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，就揀配備更豐富嗰款。最終都係建議兩款都去試駕，親身體驗先係最緊要。
總的嚟講，Proton X50 同 Hyundai Tucson 都係馬來西亞市場好唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵仲要睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最後決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
「 2026 中國汽車論壇熱議智能化全球化 」
作者 | 龔宸芫
編輯 | 李國政
出品 | 幫寧工作室（gbngzs）
「我哋而家正正處喺一個好好嘅時代。汽車行業未來前途非常壯麗。」7 月 22 日，喺 2026 中國汽車論壇上，中國汽車工業協會（簡稱「中汽協」）副會長兼祕書長付炳鋒如是說。
正值上半年業界閉幕、銜接全年發展嘅關鍵節點，中國汽車工業協會於 7 月 21 日至 23 日喺上海嘉定舉行本屆論壇。
今年論壇設置 1 場閉門峰會、1 場大會論壇、1 場技術領袖峰會、13 場主題專題論壇，以及多場發佈活動。各場會議均聚焦汽車行業熱點與核心議題，探索產業發展方向，引領行業未來趨勢。
7 月 22 日上午舉行大會論壇，核心係針對國際環境複雜多變、國內市場競爭激烈、企業發展承壓嘅挑戰，探討行業點樣樹立長遠信心、堅持戰略定力、深耕長期價值，推動產業從規模擴張，轉向高質量發展。
中國機械工業聯合會副會長羅俊傑，中國工程院院士、清華大學車輛與運載學院教授李駿，東風汽車集團有限公司副總經理、黨委常務委員尤嶸，上海汽車集團股份有限公司總裁、黨委副書記賈健旭，重慶長安汽車股份有限公司執行副總裁、阿維塔科技重慶股份有限公司董事長王輝，同付炳鋒等嘉賓，喺大會論壇發表主題演講。
貫穿呢個主論壇嘅高頻詞，係智能化、全球化。參會嘉賓認為，電動化係中國車企出海敲門磚，AI 智能化、自研能力係決勝全球市場嘅核心壁壘，車企出海模式已從單一產品出口，升級為全產業鏈、全體系本地化深耕。
步入「十五五」開局之年後，國內車市進入存量白熱化競爭，海外成為中國汽車產業增長嘅核心引擎。
今年上半年，汽車產銷分別完成 1499.3 萬輛同 1501.7 萬輛，同比上升 4% 同 4.1%，降幅比前 5 個月收窄。其中，出口超預期增長，形成穩定支撐，銷量達 509.6 萬輛，同比上升 65.3%——據中汽協介紹，這係我國上半年出口首次突破 500 萬輛。
良好嘅行業生態，係產業行穩致遠嘅關鍵保障。
羅俊傑喺演講中提出，全行業應完善治理體系、質量體系、自律體系，規範有序咁競爭，堅決抵制非理性競爭、盲目擴張等亂象，持續推進質量提升、品牌培育行動，助力打造一批具全球競爭力嘅中國汽車品牌同標杆企業。
▍01
海外夥伴看重中國汽車 AI
同往年論壇聚焦海外銷量、車型供貨、渠道鋪設唔同，今年會上，多位車企高管帶嚟海外一線走訪見聞。
佢哋睇嚟，海外客商嘅關注點，已從車型、價格，轉向車企 AI 同智能駕駛佈局，行業需堅持長期主義，以技術、品牌、標準協同出海，塑造中國汽車全球新形象。
「我而家去海外，合作夥伴關注嘅唔係我哋下一代嘅車，係我哋下一代 AI 點佈局。」王輝喺大會論壇分享嘅海外走訪細節，引發現場熱議。
王輝於參會前一週回國，未來 3 個月，佢仲會奔赴 20 個國家，開展海外市場工作。結合一線出海觀察，王輝認為，中國品牌嘅海外教育成本喺大幅降低，全球各地市場嘅接受度同認可度顯著提升。
「走到海外每一個國家，能充分感受到自信心，這對中國汽車品牌嚟講係非常好嘅機遇。」佢話，「海外市場係增量擴張嘅拉力賽。中國汽車嘅全球化征程已全面開啟。」
喺賈健旭睇嚟，歐洲市場發生嘅認知拐點，更直觀印證海外需求嘅變遷；中國汽車出海模式將從產品輸出，轉向全產業鏈協同輸出。
佢表示，今年 5 月，中國乘用車喺歐洲 31 國嘅月度註冊量，已超越日系品牌，呢係極具標誌性嘅拐點。中國車企唔再依靠價格搶佔市場，而係憑藉三電系統、智能座艙、智能駕駛等原創技術同國際一線品牌同台競技，輸出一套完整嘅新能源汽車製造標準同智能出行解決方案。
● 上汽集團總裁、黨委副書記賈健旭
行業過往固有認知係歐洲偏愛小型代步車，但而家搭載高級智駕、大尺寸智能座艙嘅車型銷量增速遙遙領先。歐洲消費者買車決策時，唔再只權衡價格同續航，車輛 AI 交互、全域智能體驗成為核心加分項。
中國汽車亦喺改写同跨國車企嘅合作邏輯。
會上，零跑科技創辦人、董事長、CEO 朱江明介紹咗同 Stellantis 合作嘅細節，指打破咗過往中國車企只對外銷售整車嘅固有模式。
「我哋同一汽紅旗、一汽奔騰、Stellantis 都有經典嘅合作案例。我哋提供平台化解決方案、核心零部件，佢哋出品就非常快，質量都有保證。」朱江明話，呢相當於打包服務，係零跑作為供應商嘅新模式，同華為模式相似。
這表明，電動化係中國汽車打開海外市場嘅入場券，但單憑比拼車型、性價比嘅時代已然落幕。AI 智能化、自研技術，先係海外企業評判中國車企長期價值、敲定深度合作嘅核心標尺。
▍02
輸出整套智能造車方案
海外合作方需求迭代，並非短期市場偏好臨時波動，而係全球汽車產業技術路線、出海模式雙重變革下嘅必然趨勢。
今次大會論壇上，發言嘅車企高管判斷一致——車企競爭從單一單車產品，延伸至整套智能產業生態；車企出海亦從簡單嘅整車貿易，升級為技術、產能、服務同步落地嘅全鏈條產業模式。
王輝介紹咗長安出海模式嘅轉型發展之路。
「今年 4 月，我哋發佈海納百川戰略 2.0，推動全球化發展，從產品貿易主導型，向製造貿易、投資服務、ESG 建設協同嘅全業務綜合性模式升級。為此，我哋將聚焦七大方向進行全面升級。」王輝話，升級主要體現喺技術、產品、品牌、投入、合作模式、服務同團隊。
團隊方面，未來 3 年，長安海外員工將突破 4600 人，本地化員工佔比將超過 70%，帶動上下游產業鏈就業總規模突破 15000 人。通過 7 個方向全面升維，衝刺 2030 年海外銷量至 150 萬到 180 萬輛。
尤嶸喺演講中提出，行業過去比邊間車跑得咁快，今後比邊間車更聰明。
面向全球市場，東風汽車啟航「天際揚帆計劃」，推進產品、產能、產業全方位出海，透過投入超千億核心資源，投放 55 款全球新能源車型，嚟滿足全球各區域法律法規同技術要求，實現 50% 以上本土化製造佔比。到 2030 年，海外銷量佔比力爭做到 40%。
● 東風汽車副總經理、黨委常委尤嶸
「喺全球規則持續重構嘅背景下，唯有倚靠合規化、體系化嘅佈局，把產業鏈、創新鏈、服務鏈融入當地，先至能實現從『走出去』到『走進去』再到『走上去』嘅躍升。」
尤嶸話，「出海嘅真正考驗，唔係唔係唔能『走進去』，而係唔係唔能喺當地留得落」。
賈健旭亦號召，當佈局模式從貿易出海升級為全價值鏈嘅本地化深耕，中國企業尤其要注意合規問題。
「到人家屋企去做客，我覺得客人要講主人家嘅規矩，否則早晚會被主人家趕出去。所以我嘅第一個號召係要合規。如果唔合規，主人肯定唔會鍾意你。」賈健旭提醒道。
據佢介紹，上汽累計投入超 1500 億，攻堅智能電動核心技術，手握 26000 餘項自研專利，第三代電子電氣架構打通智駕、座艙、底盤全域控制，採取自研底座、開放生態嘅路線，兼容各國智能法規同軟硬件體系。
同時，上汽集團落地泰國、印度、印尼海外製造基地，配套建設本土零部件產業園，自有滾裝船打通全球物流鏈路，實現整車、智能零部件同步出海，唔單獨輸出車輛，而係輸出整套智能造車解決方案。
針對東南亞充電基建薄弱、歐洲長途出行需求，零跑自研直驅插混技術，用一套底層架構適應全球不同市場，可直接向海外車企輸出標準化智能動力方案，降低合作方嘅研發週期同成本，能為合作品牌單車節省千元級零部件開支。
面對全球貿易規則重構，尤嶸建議，行業堅持體系化佈局、品牌化經營、合規化營運，共同維護中國汽車品牌形象，打造一批世界一流汽車品牌。
「出海總體係市場化行為。企業各有唔同嘅打法、佈局考慮，千變萬化無可非議，但有一樣係一樣：企業出海要掌握節奏，我哋要同當地市場、經濟融係一起，要考慮當地嘅承受能力。」付炳鋒認為，國際市場要穩步開拓，創新合資合作模式，提升海外本土化營運同跨文化管理能力，實現出海穩健發展。
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拿 Perodua Aruz 同 Hyundai Tucson 黎做比較。呢兩款車喺售價同定位上都好接近嘅，今日我就由多個方面黎做一個詳細嘅比較，幫你節省做功課嘅時間。
Perodua Aruz 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 72,900 - 77,900，一共有 2 個版本，包括 1.5L X（RM 72,900）、1.5L AV（RM 77,900） 等。
Hyundai Tucson 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 143,888 - 197,888，一共有 5 個版本，包括 2025 HEV 1.6T AT 2WD Prestige（RM 197,888）、2025 1.6T DCT 4WD Prestige（RM 186,888）、2025 1.6T DCT 2WD Prime（RM 164,888） 等。
由價錢嚟睇，Perodua Aruz 嘅起步價確實比 Hyundai Tucson 平咗 RM 70,988。如果你預算有限，Perodua 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需要。但都要注意，平嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備上會有取舍，具體要睇你嘅需要。
Perodua Aruz 嘅安全评分係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 。
Hyundai Tucson 嘅安全评分係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 SmartSense。
兩款車嘅安全评分一樣，喺呢個級別入面安全配備都算給得好齊全。而家嘅新車安全性都唔差，唔使太擔心這一點。
Perodua Aruz 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
Hyundai Tucson 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
兩款車嘅驅動方式一樣，都係 FWD，日常駕駛感受唔會有太大分別。
Perodua Aruz 保用 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Hyundai Tucson 保用 5 年/300,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Perodua Aruz 同 Hyundai Tucson 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更看中品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰一款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，就揀配置更豐富嗰款。最終都係建議兩款都去試駕，親自體驗先係最重要嘅。
總體嚟講，Perodua Aruz 同 Hyundai Tucson 都係馬來西亞市場好唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵都要睇你嘅個人需要同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，先去試駕先至做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
