首頁Stagea WGNC34
搜尋歷史
熱門搜尋
經銷商登入 / 註冊
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家揀車嘅時候都會拿本田 CR-V 同梅賽德斯 - 奔馳 GLC 做比較。呢兩款車喺價位同定位上都幾相近，今日我哋就由多個方面做一個詳細比較，幫你節省做功課嘅時間。
本田 CR-V 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 178,200 - 195,900，一共有 4 個版本，包括 2026 e:HEV 2.0L 2WD RS（RM 195,900）、2026 1.5T 4WD V（RM 181,900）、2026 e:HEV 2.0L 2WD E（RM 178,200） 等等。
梅賽德斯 - 奔馳 GLC 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 336,888 - 336,888，一共有 2 個版本，包括 GLC 200（RM 290,000）、GLC 300（RM 340,000） 等等。
從價錢睇，本田 CR-V 嘅起價真係比梅賽德斯 - 奔馳 GLC 平咗 RM 158,688。如果你預算有限，本田嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需要。但要留意，平咗嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備上有取捨，具體要睇你嘅需求。
本田 CR-V 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括本田 SENSING (ACC, CMBS, LKAS, RDM)。
梅賽德斯 - 奔馳 GLC 嘅安全評級係 5★ (Euro NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 Premium ADAS。
安全配備方面，兩款車都拿到唔錯嘅評級。不過本田 CR-V 嘅本田 SENSING (ACC, CMBS, LKAS, RDM) 同梅賽德斯 - 奔馳 GLC 嘅 Premium ADAS 喺功能上啲差異，如果你比較重視主動安全嘅話，可以仔細對比下兩者嘅功能列表。
本田 CR-V 車身長 4500 mm，尾箱 450 L。
梅賽德斯 - 奔馳 GLC 車身長 4400 mm，尾箱 400 L。
空間方面，本田 CR-V 嘅車身比梅賽德斯 - 奔馳 GLC 長咗 100 mm，車內乘坐空間會稍微寬敞少少，尤其係後座腿部空間。如果你經常載家人或者需要放嬰兒車，大少少嘅車身真係更實用。
本田 CR-V 同梅賽德斯 - 奔馳 GLC 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更重視品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰一款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，嗰就揀配置更豐富嗰款。最終都係建議兩款都去試駕，親身體驗先係最重要嘅。
總括嚟講，本田 CR-V 同梅賽德斯 - 奔馳 GLC 都係馬來西亞市場好唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵都要睇你嘅個人需要同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
In Malaysia's SUV market, many buyers compare the Honda WR-V and Kia Sportage when choosing a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning, so today we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
The OTR price of the Honda WR-V in Malaysia is RM 89,900 - 107,900, with a total of 4 versions, including 2023 1.5L V (RM 99,900), 2023 1.5L E (RM 95,900), 2023 1.5L S (RM 89,900), etc.
The OTR price of the Kia Sportage in Malaysia is RM 129,639 - 179,320, with a total of 4 versions, including 2025 1.6T DCT 4WD High (RM 179,320), 2025 1.6T DCT 2WD High (RM 159,320), 2025 2.0L AT 2WD High (RM 139,639), etc.
From a price perspective, the Honda WR-V's entry price is indeed RM 39,739 cheaper than the Kia Sportage. If your budget is limited, Honda's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. However, note that the savings of a few thousand ringgit might involve trade-offs in features, depending on your specific needs.
Honda WR-V is equipped with 1.5L 4-cyl, horsepower 105 hp. Official fuel consumption 6.0 L/100km.
Kia Sportage is equipped with 1.5L Turbo, horsepower 140 hp. Official fuel consumption 7.0 L/100km.
In terms of power, the Kia Sportage's 1.5L Turbo has 35 more hp than the Honda WR-V's 1.5L 4-cyl. However, for daily city driving, both cars have enough power and won't feel underpowered.
The Honda WR-V safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), with active safety system including Honda SENSING.
The Kia Sportage safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), with active safety system including Drive Wise.
Both cars have the same safety rating, and safety features are quite comprehensive for this class. New cars nowadays generally have good safety, so there is no need to worry too much about this.
Honda WR-V body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
Kia Sportage body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
The dimensions of both cars are almost the same, and the interior space difference is not significant. For this class of cars, it is completely sufficient for daily use.
Honda WR-V adopts FWD drive configuration.
Kia Sportage adopts FWD drive configuration.
Both cars have the same drive configuration, both are FWD, so there should not be a significant difference in daily driving experience.
In general, both the Honda WR-V and Kia Sportage are very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose ultimately depends on your personal needs and budget. We recommend doing your homework, comparing quotes from several car dealerships, and then test-driving before making a final decision. Buying a car is a big deal; spending some time doing research is never wrong.
On August 26, the global quality pure electric SUV Fengyun T7 officially launched. The new car offers 3 versions. The launch guide price is 97,900-118,900 yuan, with an early trade-in price of 94,900-115,900 yuan. The new car adheres to a long-termist car-making philosophy, rejecting the impetuous idea of "nothing beats speed" under fierce industry competition, practicing "slow work makes good cars, global cars cannot be rushed", bringing consumers a new reliable choice for pure electric travel.
As a native global car, Fengyun T7 is not simply a domestic model revised for export. Adapting to global regulations and diverse usage environments from the R&D source, it completes overseas market verification first before returning to the domestic market. Relying on Chery's 1+7+N global R&D system, it underwent a 3-year R&D cycle, conducted 5,000+ user co-creation, and was built according to the 2026 version E-NCAP five-star safety standards. The total cumulative testing mileage exceeded 6 million kilometers. Durability special tests covered 1.45 million kilometers. It traversed over 100 types of extreme road conditions globally, enduring global environment tests from -40°C to 55°C, calmly coping with scenarios like extreme cold, high temperature, water wading, complex unpaved roads, and others.
At the launch event, musician Wu Kequn appeared as the "Happiness Experience Officer" and engaged in dialogue with Chery Automobile Executive Vice President Li Xueyong around "Steady Happiness", jointly launching the "Happiness Co-creation Plan". Overseas R&D engineers and overseas car owners stood on site to endorse, confirming the four core values: Super Performance, Global Beauty, Safer, and Smarter.
The same-source model Lepas L6 has landed in South African and Thai markets and will subsequently land in Indonesia, the EU, Australia-New Zealand, and other regions. Delivery was started simultaneously with this launch. Foreign users became the first batch of car owners. Delivery upon launch confirms global quality strength. Relying on Chery's accumulation of ranking first in Chinese brand passenger car exports for 23 consecutive years, Fengyun T7 unlocks the "Super Beautiful and Better" car life with hardcore strength.
In Malaysia's SUV market, many buyers compare Proton X90 and Hyundai Tucson when choosing a car. These two models are quite close in price and positioning. Today we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to save you time doing research.
The OTR selling price of Proton X90 in Malaysia is RM 106,800 - 122,800, with a total of 4 versions, including 2026 1.5T Prime X (RM 122,800), 2026 1.5T Prime (RM 116,800), 2026 1.5T Lite (RM 106,800), etc.
The OTR selling price of Hyundai Tucson in Malaysia is RM 143,888 - 197,888, with a total of 5 versions, including 2025 HEV 1.6T AT 2WD Prestige (RM 197,888), 2025 1.6T DCT 4WD Prestige (RM 186,888), 2025 1.6T DCT 2WD Prime (RM 164,888), etc.
From the price perspective, the starting price of Proton X90 is indeed RM 37,088 cheaper than Hyundai Tucson. If your budget is limited, Proton's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. But be aware, that few thousand Ringgit difference may involve trade-offs in features, depending on your needs.
Proton X90's safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
Hyundai Tucson's safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include SmartSense.
The safety ratings of both cars are the same, and safety features in this class are quite comprehensive. New cars these days do not have poor safety, so there is no need to worry too much about this point.
Proton X90 uses FWD drive mode.
Hyundai Tucson uses FWD drive mode.
Both cars have the same drive mode, both are FWD, daily driving experience will not have too much difference.
Proton X90 warranty 5 years/150,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Hyundai Tucson warranty 5 years/300,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Proton X90 and Hyundai Tucson are both mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, consider the one with better reputation first; if you care more about cost-performance ratio and features, choose the one with richer specifications. Ultimately, it is recommended to test drive both, personal experience is the most important.
Overall, Proton X90 and Hyundai Tucson are both very good car models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends mainly on your personal needs and budget. It is recommended to do your homework, compare quotes from several dealerships, and then test drive to make the final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending time doing research will never be wrong.
July 6, Wanli Tires, under Guangzhou Industrial Control Group, signed a formal agreement in Kuala Lumpur with Malaysia Berjaya Group Berjaya Corp, landing a $320 million intelligent joint venture factory, marking a comprehensive upgrade of the brand's ASEAN layout.
This is not a single case. In the past year, Wanli, Primewell Chengshan, Qingdao Fullunion, Zhaoqing Junhong, New Continent Rubber and other domestic tire enterprises have densely invested in Malaysia.
Heavyweight Signing Lands! Wanli Partners with Malaysian Giant to Open New Export Chapter
The signing ceremony for Wanli Tires this time is of very high caliber. Senior executives from government and enterprises of China and Malaysia, diplomatic envoys, and industry leaders witnessed it together. It is a benchmark event for China-Malaysia tire industry cooperation this year.
According to the cooperation agreement, both sides will build a high-performance green rubber tire production base in Selangor State. The project covers 67.9 acres, with a planned annual production of 1.2 million all-steel radial tires and 5 million semi-steel radial tires.
As a core export hub in Wanli's global production network, the project is positioned as a leading global smart green factory. It will not only perfect the brand's overseas capacity layout but also create over 1,000 high-quality jobs for Malaysia. Through professional skills training, it will assist in local talent cultivation and manufacturing industry upgrade, achieving two-way symbiosis and win-win.
Wang Fuzhu of Guangzhou Industrial Control Group frankly stated that this signing achieves a leap for the group's ASEAN layout from "single-point breakthrough" to "multi-hub linkage."
Team Gathering Layout! Multiple Giants Land, Malaysian Tire Industry Matrix Takes Shape
Wanli's heavy landing is just a microcosm of Chinese-funded tires entering Malaysia. In just a short year, top listed enterprises and powerful private enterprises have continuously landed large projects, completely rewriting the Southeast Asian tire industry landscape.
01
Qingdao Fullunion: Completed Malaysia's Largest Chinese-Funded Tire Base
This June, Qingdao Fullunion Jinma Rubber Phase II Intelligent Factory officially went into production. With a total investment of approximately 818 million RMB, the overall annual tire production exceeds 7 million units, making it the largest Chinese-funded tire production base in Malaysia in terms of scale and capacity volume.
02
Primewell Chengshan: 2.76 Billion Heavy Investment Layout
In November 2024, Primewell Chengshan invested $380 million (approximately 2.76 billion RMB) to land in Kedah Rubber City, Malaysia. The project covers over 96 acres, focusing on high-end intelligent green tire production. After Phase I reaches full capacity, it can produce 6.6 million tires of various types annually. It is expected to trial production in the second half of 2026, and fully release capacity in 2027-2028.
03
Investment Continues to Increase, Export Team Expands Fully
Private tire enterprises are also accelerating entry: Zhaoqing Junhong invests 2 billion yuan to land in Malaysia tire project, with a planned annual production of 6.5 million tires; Shandong New Continent Rubber invests 630 million yuan to land radial tire production project, continuously perfecting overseas capacity layout.
Core Logic of Gathering in Malaysia: Tariff + Location Dual Dividends
Domestic tire enterprises collectively investing heavily in Malaysia is not blindly following the trend, but a precise layout aligning with global trade shifts, with very prominent core advantages.
Tariff dividend is the primary driver. In 2025, the United States and five Southeast Asian countries reached a differentiated tariff agreement. Malaysia's tires exported to the US tariff reduced to 19%, greatly avoiding high trade barriers of direct exports from China, effectively lowering export costs. Even if the local strengthens rules of origin verification, it still cannot stop the enthusiasm of enterprises building local factories.
At the same time, Malaysia possesses core location advantages within ASEAN. Port shipping is mature, and land transport is accessible, covering both ASEAN local markets and Europe, America, Middle East and other global core markets. It is an excellent strategic pivot for building a resilient global supply chain. In addition, the local rubber industry foundation is deep, industrial workers are sufficient. Overlapping with continuously optimized foreign investment business environment, industrial cluster effects continue to highlight, further consolidating investment value.
Obvious Shortcomings! Investment Promotion Policy Competitiveness Lags Behind Thailand and Vietnam
Although layout heat is high, Malaysia's foreign investment incentive policy has obvious shortcomings, constraining industry acceptance strength. Regarding taxation, the local PS Pioneer Plan only offers ordinary projects 5 years 70% income tax exemption, high-tech can get full exemption. While Vietnam offers up to 4 years full exemption, 5-9 years half, Thailand offers up to 15 years full exemption at most. The policy is simpler and stronger.
Regarding tariff exemption, compliant enterprises in Thailand and Vietnam can directly exempt import tariffs on production equipment and raw materials. Malaysia's preferences are limited to a few special industries and projects, with narrow coverage scope and high threshold. Overall policy tends to be conservative and cumbersome. If optimization is completed subsequently, Malaysia is expected to accept a larger scale tire industry transfer.
From early gathering in Thailand and Cambodia to now collectively layout in Malaysia, Chinese tire export paths are becoming more mature. Starting from Wanli Tires heavy signing, the era of Chinese tire Malaysia layout officially arrives.
In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers compare Proton X70 and Kia Sportage when choosing a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning. Today we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
The OTR price of Proton X70 in Malaysia is RM 106,800 - 122,300. There are 3 versions in total, including 1.5L Standard 2WD (RM 106,800), 1.5L Executive 2WD (RM 115,800), 1.5L Premium 2WD (RM 122,300), etc.
The OTR price of Kia Sportage in Malaysia is RM 129,639 - 179,320. There are 4 versions in total, including 2025 1.6T DCT 4WD High (RM 179,320), 2025 1.6T DCT 2WD High (RM 159,320), 2025 2.0L AT 2WD High (RM 139,639), etc.
From a price perspective, the starting price of Proton X70 is indeed RM 22,839 cheaper than Kia Sportage. If your budget is limited, the entry-level Proton version can already meet daily needs. But be aware that the few thousand RM saved might involve trade-offs in features, depending on your specific needs.
Proton X70 is equipped with 1.5L Turbo, horsepower 140 hp. Official fuel consumption 7.0 L/100km.
Kia Sportage is equipped with 1.5L Turbo, horsepower 140 hp. Official fuel consumption 7.0 L/100km.
Both cars use the same powertrain system, the driving experience feels basically the same in daily use. Fuel consumption is also similar, no need to worry too much about this.
The safety rating of Proton X70 is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
The safety rating of Kia Sportage is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include Drive Wise.
Both cars have the same safety rating, safety features in this class are considered quite comprehensive. New cars' safety is generally not poor nowadays, no need to worry too much about this.
Proton X70 adopts FWD drive mode.
Kia Sportage adopts FWD drive mode.
Both cars have the same drive mode, both are FWD, daily driving experience will not have too much difference.
Overall, both Proton X70 and Kia Sportage are very good car models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose mainly depends on your personal needs and budget. We suggest doing your research well, comparing quotes from several dealerships, and then taking a test drive to make the final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending time on research will never be wrong.
In Malaysia's SUV market, many buyers compare the Proton X70 and Mitsubishi Xforce when choosing a car. These two models are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to save you time on research.
Proton X70 OTR price in Malaysia is RM 106,800 - 122,300, with a total of 3 variants, including 1.5L Standard 2WD (RM 106,800), 1.5L Executive 2WD (RM 115,800), 1.5L Premium 2WD (RM 122,300), etc.
Mitsubishi Xforce OTR price in Malaysia is RM 109,930 - 119,930, with a total of 2 variants, including 2026 1.5L Ultimate (RM 119,930), 2026 1.5L Urban (RM 109,930), etc.
From a price perspective, Proton X70's starting price is indeed RM 3,130 cheaper than Mitsubishi Xforce. If your budget is limited, Proton's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. But be aware that the few thousand less may involve trade-offs in features, depending on your specific needs.
Proton X70 is equipped with 1.5L Turbo, 140 hp. Official fuel consumption 7.0 L/100km.
Mitsubishi Xforce is equipped with 1.5L Turbo, 140 hp. Official fuel consumption 7.0 L/100km.
Both cars use the same powertrain, so the driving feel is basically the same. Fuel economy is also similar, so no need to worry too much about this point.
Proton X70 safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety system includes ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
Mitsubishi Xforce safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety system includes MI-PILOT.
Both cars have the same safety rating, safety features are quite comprehensive in this class. New cars these days are not lacking in safety, no need to worry too much about this.
Proton X70 body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
Mitsubishi Xforce body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
Both cars are almost the same size, interior space difference is not significant. Cars in this class are completely sufficient for daily use.
Proton X70 adopts FWD drive system.
Mitsubishi Xforce adopts FWD drive system.
Both cars have the same drive system, both are FWD, daily driving feel will not differ too much.
Overall, Proton X70 and Mitsubishi Xforce are both very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends mainly on your personal needs and budget. We suggest doing your homework, comparing quotes from multiple dealerships, and test driving before making a final decision. Buying a car is a major matter, taking time to research is never wrong.
August 1st, the auto industry's gaze was fixed on the same poster.
Geely announced July sales data: 250,100 units. A historic high for the same period, with month-on-month and year-on-year double growth for 5 consecutive months.
In this brutal July where the total passenger car market dropped 18% year-on-year, this set of data stands out extremely sharply. While others are bleeding in the quagmire of price wars, Geely is "counting money" on the track of high-quality growth.
The day before the announcement, on July 31, Geely held its mid-term management conference. Group CEO Gan Jiayue set the tone on site: no engaging in inefficient price wars, comprehensively promote fuel vehicle HEV transformation, and seek profits from high-value incremental markets.
From the internal strategy meeting on July 31 to the sales announcement on August 1, within just 24 hours, Geely presented the outside world with a "anti-fragile" equation for crossing cycles.
1
Chinese auto companies going global, in the past few years focused on one thing: "hardship". Either go to emerging markets to sell low-price cars and earn hard money, or get ground into the dirt by tariffs in the European and American markets.
But Geely's overseas performance in July saw a sudden change in style.
Exports that month reached 106,600 units, a violent surge of 202% year-on-year, breaking 100,000 for two consecutive months. Even more harsh is the structure: New energy exports were 62,600 units, skyrocketing 616% year-on-year, accounting for a high proportion of 59% of total exports.
This is no longer simply "selling tin plates", but high-premium "technology export". Geely EX2 took the sales champion in Thailand for electric cars, EX5 EM-i swept through the European plug-in hybrid markets such as Poland and Bulgaria.
Just having a hard product isn't enough, you also need to understand the Tai Chi of geopolitics. In July, Geely acquired Ford's factory in Spain.
Ford, the ancestor of assembly line car manufacturing. Now in the European headquarters, handing over the factory to Chinese car companies. This strategy of "asset-light overseas expansion", using lower capital expenditure and shorter cycles, directly cut into the European hinterland, perfectly hedging trade barriers.
Back then, Toyota went to Kentucky to build a factory to avoid US sanctions, eventually capturing North America. Now, Geely has also learned this trick of "local rooting". From product output to ecosystem rooting, Geely's overseas expansion has entered the 2.0 era of earning high gross margins.
2
If going overseas is opening up new territory, then the domestic new energy situation is a trench warfare where bayonets meet blood.
In July, Geely new energy sales reached 160,100 units, a 23% year-on-year increase, with the new energy share rising to 64%. In this fiercely competitive market, Geely relies on the "wolf pack tactic".
Zeekr builds brand in the sky. July deliveries reached 35,800 units, up 111% year-on-year. The Shooting Brake delivered over 10,000 units in a single month, and the Zeekr 7X global deliveries broke 10,000 units. More importantly, its flagship model 9X has established itself in the 500,000-level market, NPS (Net Promoter Score) ranks first among all categories above 500,000. People buying cars at this price point used to buy the "car badge", now Zeekr gives them "smart floor efficiency" and ultimate experience.
Galaxy and Lynk & Co fight for supplies on the ground. The Galaxy series sold 107,700 units in July, Star Wish sold hot 55,100 units in a single month, becoming a genuine "National Miracle Car"; Lynk & Co sold 16,300 units, new energy share as high as 86%, transformation results in phased achievements.
Under the background of pressure on the industry total volume, Geely did not rely on a single blockbuster to gamble on luck, but used a multi-brand layered matrix, plowing through the market segments from 100,000 to 500,000. Others lead with a single core, Geely fights with full squad battle formation.
3
In the carnival of new energy, many car companies wished to smash all fuel vehicle production lines tomorrow. But Geely doesn't believe in this.
In July, Geely China Star sold 90,100 units, a 15% month-on-month increase. Xingyue L quietly broke through 1 million units, becoming the first Chinese brand high-end fuel SUV to break one million.
In today's shrinking fuel car total market, this is simply a miracle. How did Geely "extend the life" of fuel vehicles?
At the mid-term management conference on July 31, Gan Jiayue gave the answer: comprehensively promote fuel vehicle HEVization. The goal is to sprint monthly sales of i-HEV models to over 30,000 before the end of the year, and fully advance the Million China Star goal.
Japanese cars relied on THS hybrid technology to eat dividends for decades globally. But Geely's self-developed i-HEV Zhiqing technology has started to loosen the monopoly structure of Japanese hybrids. Ultra-low fuel consumption, electric feel acceleration, Geely used intelligence and industrial chain advantages to equip traditional fuel vehicles with "mecha".
Use advanced hybrid technology to "invade their strongholds" (i-HEV will go global in the fourth quarter) in the global market, use the fuel base to provide continuous profit ammunition for new energy transformation. This is the confidence for Geely not to engage in price wars and pursue operational quality.
4
Capital market is the most realistic. In the first half of this year, the auto sector was suffocated by pessimistic expectations. But Geely Automobile (0175.HK) became the only Chinese full-vehicle stock with positive stock price growth since the beginning of the year in "A+H shares".
Institutions are not stupid, what they see is Geely's leap from "scale leading" to "value leading".
Simultaneous improvement in net profit per vehicle and gross margin, profitable loop for high value-added models overseas, these are all solid "money-making capabilities".
In 1997, when Li Shufu first entered the auto industry, he said a famous quote: "A car is just four wheels and two sofas." At that time, Chinese car companies were still looking up to Ford and Toyota, crossing the river by feeling the stones.
Nearly 30 years have passed, the gears of history have completed a wonderful meshing.
Back then Ford taught the world to make cars with assembly lines; now Geely, in Ford's European factories, teaches them how to do globalization; back then Toyota monopolized the market with hybrid technology; now Geely, with i-HEV and pure electric dual tracks, grabs their share globally.
The 250,000 unit sales on August 1st is just a footnote. Behind this report card, a group of Chinese automotive people are using long-term technical tenacity and strategic resilience to pry open the cracks of history and gripped firmly the steering wheel belonging to this era.
