首頁Sprinter Trueno
搜尋歷史
熱門搜尋
經銷商登入 / 註冊
[Car Insight Industry] Let's review the major events that occurred in the automotive sector on July 23, 2026.
Automotive Event One: Horse Power V6 Engine Prototype Successfully Ignited
Recently, the first prototype of Horse Power HORSE W30 successfully ignited. This model is expected to be paired with the Lotus sports car product line, further perfecting its full-spectrum product matrix from home efficient power to high-end performance power.
As a core product designed for the high-performance hybrid market, HORSE W30 balances ultimate performance, multi-scenario adaptation, and platform expansion capabilities. It can meet the demand for continuous power output in track scenarios and adapt to diverse scenarios such as complex terrain and daily commuting thanks to its flexible hybrid architecture, providing a new technical choice for high-performance hybrid vehicles.
Automotive Event Two: Tesla Releases Q2 Financial Report
On July 23, Tesla released its Q2 2026 financial report. Tesla produced over 451,000 pure electric vehicles globally this quarter, a year-over-year increase of about 10%; deliveries exceeded 480,000, a year-over-year increase of about 25%. The Shanghai Super Factory delivered over 89,000 electric vehicles in June, up 24.4% year-over-year, setting a new high for the year; deliveries in the first half of the year totaled nearly 468,000, up 28.4% year-over-year. Tesla's total revenue for the second quarter increased by 26% year-over-year, reaching $28.2 billion.
As of the second quarter, Tesla's global paid assisted driving users have reached 1.48 million, with the assisted driving option rate in the North American market reaching a historic high, and over half of new vehicles subscribed to assisted driving upon delivery.
Automotive Event Three: The First iCAR V23 Officially Rolls Off the Line in Malaysia
On July 22, ICAR Automotive officially announced that the first iCAR V23 in Malaysia officially rolled off the line, and the new car will arrive at dealerships by the end of July. According to previous reports, in November 2025, the sub-brand iCaur under Chery Automobile Group officially launched the iCaur V23 in Malaysia (domestically iCAR V23), launching a total of 2 models, priced at 119,800-132,800 Malaysian Ringgit (approximately 205,300-227,600 RMB).
'Daily Car News', here you have the latest daily car news, please continue to follow 'Car Insight'
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會用 Proton X50 同 Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV 黎做比較。這兩部車喺價錢同定位上都幾接近，今日我哋就從多個方面做一個詳細比較，幫你省返做功課嘅時間。
Proton X50 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 89,800 - 113,300，合共 4 個版本，包括 1.5T Executive（RM 89,800）、1.5T Premium（RM 101,800）、1.5T Flagship（RM 113,300） 等等。
Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 159,750 - 159,750，合共 2 個版本，包括 1.6L Turbo Standard（RM 130,000）、1.6L Turbo Premium（RM 145,000） 等等。
由價錢睇，Proton X50 嘅起步價確實比 Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV 平咗 RM 69,950。如果你預算有限，Proton 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需要。但都要注意，平嘅嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備上有取捨，具體要睇你嘅需求。
Proton X50 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA)。
Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV 嘅安全評級係 TBD，主動安全系統包括 Basic。
安全配備方面，兩部車都拿到唔錯嘅評級。不過 Proton X50 嘅 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA) 同 Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV 嘅 Basic 喺功能上有啲差異，如果你比較重視主動安全嘅話，可以仔細比較下兩者嘅功能列表。
Proton X50 採用 4WD 驅動方式。
Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
Proton 嘅 4WD 同 Chery 嘅 FWD 喺操控上會有唔同感受，建議試駕比較。
Proton X50 同 Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更看重品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰款；如果你更介意性價比同配備，就揀配置更豐富嗰款。最終仍然建議兩部車都去試駕，親身體驗先係最重要嘅。
總括嚟講，Proton X50 同 Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV 都係馬來西亞市場好唔錯嘅車款。揀邊部車，關鍵依然係睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
In Malaysia's SUV market, many buyers compare the Proton X50 and Toyota Corolla Cross when choosing a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
The OTR price of the Proton X50 in Malaysia is RM 89,800 - 113,300, with a total of 4 versions, including 1.5T Executive (RM 89,800), 1.5T Premium (RM 101,800), 1.5T Flagship (RM 113,300), etc.
The OTR price of the Toyota Corolla Cross in Malaysia is RM 133,800 - 148,800, with a total of 3 versions, including 2026 HEV 1.8L GR Sport (RM 148,800), 2026 HEV 1.8L Standard (RM 140,800), 2026 1.8L Standard (RM 133,800), etc.
From a price perspective, the starting price of the Proton X50 is indeed RM 44,000 cheaper than the Toyota Corolla Cross. If your budget is limited, Proton's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. However, keep in mind that the few thousand cheaper might involve trade-offs in features, it depends on your specific needs.
Proton X50 is equipped with 1.5L 4-cyl, 105 hp. Official fuel consumption 6.0 L/100km.
Toyota Corolla Cross is equipped with 1.5L Turbo, 140 hp. Official fuel consumption 7.0 L/100km.
In terms of power, the 1.5L Turbo of Toyota Corolla Cross has 35 hp more than the 1.5L 4-cyl of Proton X50. However, for daily city driving, both cars have enough power, you won't feel lacking.
Proton X50 uses 4WD drive system.
Toyota Corolla Cross uses FWD drive system.
Proton's 4WD and Toyota's FWD will feel different in handling, test drive comparison is recommended.
Proton X50 warranty 5 years/150,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Toyota Corolla Cross warranty 5 years/unlimited mileage, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Proton X50 and Toyota Corolla Cross are both mainstream choices in the Malaysia market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, you can prioritize the one with better reputation; if you care more about value for money and features, choose the one with richer configuration. Ultimately, it is recommended to test drive both, personal experience is the most important.
Overall, Proton X50 and Toyota Corolla Cross are both quite good models in the Malaysia market. Which one to choose depends on your personal needs and budget. It is recommended to do your research, compare quotes from several car dealers, and then test drive to make a final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending some time on research will never be wrong.
In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers tend to compare the Proton X50 and the Honda HR-V when choosing a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning, so today we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
The Proton X50 OTR price in Malaysia is RM 89,800 - 113,300, with a total of 4 versions, including 1.5T Executive (RM 89,800), 1.5T Premium (RM 101,800), 1.5T Flagship (RM 113,300), etc.
The Honda HR-V OTR price in Malaysia is RM 115,900 - 143,900, with a total of 4 versions, including 2026 e:HEV 1.5L RS (RM 143,900), 2026 1.5T V (RM 137,900), 2026 1.5T E (RM 130,900), etc.
From a price perspective, the Proton X50's starting price is indeed RM 26,100 cheaper than the Honda HR-V. If your budget is limited, the Proton's entry-level version is already enough to meet daily needs. But note that that few thousand cheaper might involve trade-offs in features, depending on your specific needs.
The Proton X50 is equipped with a 1.5L 4-cylinder, 105 hp. Official fuel consumption 6.0 L/100km.
The Honda HR-V is equipped with a 1.5L Turbo, 140 hp. Official fuel consumption 7.0 L/100km.
In terms of power, the Honda HR-V's 1.5L Turbo has 35 more horsepower than the Proton X50's 1.5L 4-cylinder. However, for daily city driving, both cars have enough power, you won't feel it's underpowered.
The Proton X50 body length is 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
The Honda HR-V body length is 4500 mm, trunk 450 L.
In terms of space, the Honda HR-V's body is 100 mm longer than the Proton X50, giving it an advantage in passenger space. However, the Proton X50 is more flexible for parking in the city, each has its trade-offs.
Both the Proton X50 and Honda HR-V are mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, you can prioritize the one with better reputation first; if you care more about value for money and features, then choose the one with richer configuration. Ultimately, we suggest test driving both, as personal experience is the most important.
Overall, both the Proton X50 and Honda HR-V are very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends mainly on your personal needs and budget. We suggest doing your homework, comparing quotes from several dealerships, then test driving to make a final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending time doing research will never be wrong.
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嗰陣都會拿 Proton X50 同 Toyota Corolla Cross 嚟做比較。這兩款車喺價位同定位上都相當接近，今日我哋就從多個方面做一個詳細嘅比較，幫你節省咗做功課嘅時間。
Proton X50 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 89,800 - 113,300，一共有 4 個版本，包括 1.5T Executive（RM 89,800）、1.5T Premium（RM 101,800）、1.5T Flagship（RM 113,300） 等。
Toyota Corolla Cross 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 133,800 - 148,800，一共有 3 個版本，包括 2026 HEV 1.8L GR Sport（RM 148,800）、2026 HEV 1.8L Standard（RM 140,800）、2026 1.8L Standard（RM 133,800） 等。
從價錢睇，Proton X50 嘅起步價確實比 Toyota Corolla Cross 平咗 RM 44,000。如果你預算有限，Proton 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需求。但都要注意，平嘅那幾千塊，可能喺配備上會有取舍，具體要看你嘅需求。
Proton X50 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA)。
Toyota Corolla Cross 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 TSS (PCS, LDA, ACC, LTA)。
兩款車嘅安全評級一樣，喺呢個級別入面安全配備都算給得好齊全。而家嘅新車安全性都不差，唔使太擔心這一點。
Proton X50 車身長 4400 mm，後備箱 400 L。
Toyota Corolla Cross 車身長 4400 mm，後備箱 400 L。
兩款車嘅尺寸幾乎一樣，車內空間差別唔大。呢個級別嘅車，日常使用完全夠用。
Proton X50 採用 4WD 驅動方式。
Toyota Corolla Cross 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
Proton 嘅 4WD 同 Toyota 嘅 FWD 喺操控上會有唔同感受，建議試駕對比。
總嘅嚟講，Proton X50 同 Toyota Corolla Cross 都係馬來西亞市場好唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵都要睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做足功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
In Malaysia's SUV market, many buyers compare the Perodua Aruz and Toyota Corolla Cross when choosing a car. These two models are quite close in terms of price and positioning. Today, we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to save you time doing your research.
The Perodua Aruz OTR price in Malaysia is RM 72,900 - 77,900, with a total of 2 versions, including 1.5L X (RM 72,900), 1.5L AV (RM 77,900), etc.
The Toyota Corolla Cross OTR price in Malaysia is RM 133,800 - 148,800, with a total of 3 versions, including 2026 HEV 1.8L GR Sport (RM 148,800), 2026 HEV 1.8L Standard (RM 140,800), 2026 1.8L Standard (RM 133,800), etc.
From a price perspective, the starting price of the Perodua Aruz is indeed RM 60,900 cheaper than the Toyota Corolla Cross. If your budget is limited, the entry-level Perodua is already sufficient for daily needs. However, be aware that the price difference might involve trade-offs in features, depending on your specific needs.
The Perodua Aruz safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include .
The Toyota Corolla Cross safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include TSS (PCS, LDA, ACC, LTA).
Both cars have the same safety rating; safety features in this class are quite comprehensive. New cars nowadays generally have good safety, so there is no need to worry too much about this.
The Perodua Aruz uses FWD drive mode.
The Toyota Corolla Cross uses FWD drive mode.
Both cars have the same drive mode, both are FWD, so there won't be much difference in daily driving experience.
Perodua Aruz warranty 5 years/150,000km, service interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Toyota Corolla Cross warranty 5 years/unlimited mileage, service interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Both the Perodua Aruz and Toyota Corolla Cross are mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, you should prioritize the one with better reputation; if you care more about cost-performance ratio and features, then choose the one with richer configuration. Ultimately, it is recommended to test drive both models; experiencing it personally is the most important thing.
Overall, both the Perodua Aruz and Toyota Corolla Cross are very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends on your personal needs and budget. It is recommended that you do your research, compare quotes from several dealerships, and then test drive to make a final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending some time researching will definitely not go to waste.
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拎 Perodua Aruz 同 馬自達 CX-3 去做比較。這兩款車喺價錢同定位上都幾接近，今日我哋就由多個方面做一個詳細比較，幫你省翻做功課嘅時間。
Perodua Aruz 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 72,900 - 77,900，總共 2 個型號，包括 1.5L X（RM 72,900）、1.5L AV（RM 77,900）等。
馬自達 CX-3 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 126,159 - 139,159，總共 2 個型號，包括 2023 2.0L High（RM 139,159）、2023 2.0L Plus（RM 126,159）等。
由價錢睇落，Perodua Aruz 嘅起跳價確實比 馬自達 CX-3 平咗 RM 53,259。如果你預算有限，Perodua 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需要。但要留意，平嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備上會有取捨，具體要看你嘅需要。
Perodua Aruz 配備 1.5L 4 氣缸，匹馬 105。官方油耗 6.0 L/100km。
馬自達 CX-3 配備 1.5L 渦輪增壓，匹馬 140。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。
動力方面，馬自達 CX-3 嘅 1.5L 渦輪增壓比 Perodua Aruz 嘅 1.5L 4 氣缸多咗 35 匹馬力。不過日常喺市區開，兩款車嘅動力都夠用，唔會覺得冇力。
Perodua Aruz 車身長 4400 mm，行李廂 400 L。
馬自達 CX-3 車身長 4500 mm，行李廂 450 L。
空間方面，馬自達 CX-3 嘅車身比 Perodua Aruz 長咗 100 mm，乘坐空間更有優勢。不過 Perodua Aruz 喺城市裡泊車會靈活啲，各有取捨。
Perodua Aruz 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
馬自達 CX-3 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
兩款車嘅驅動方式一樣，都係 FWD，日常駕駛感受唔會有太大分別。
Perodua Aruz 保修 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
馬自達 CX-3 保修 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
兩款車嘅保修條件一樣，呢方面唔使糾結。實際保養成本仲要睇品牌嘅服務網絡同零件價格，建議去車友群問下真實車主嘅經驗。
總而言之，Perodua Aruz 同 馬自達 CX-3 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊架，關鍵始終係睇你嘅個人需要同預算。建議各位做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，先至試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers compare Perodua Aruz and Proton X90 when choosing a car. Both cars are quite close in price and positioning, today we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
Perodua Aruz's OTR price in Malaysia is RM 72,900 - 77,900, with a total of 2 versions, including 1.5L X (RM 72,900), 1.5L AV (RM 77,900) etc.
Proton X90's OTR price in Malaysia is RM 106,800 - 122,800, with a total of 4 versions, including 2026 1.5T Prime X (RM 122,800), 2026 1.5T Prime (RM 116,800), 2026 1.5T Lite (RM 106,800) etc.
Looking at the price, Perodua Aruz's starting price is indeed RM 33,900 cheaper than Proton X90. If your budget is limited, Perodua's entry version can already meet daily needs. However, keep in mind, the few thousand dollars cheaper, might involve trade-offs in features, depending on your specific needs.
Perodua Aruz is equipped with a 1.5L 4-cyl, 105 hp. Official fuel consumption 6.0 L/100km.
Proton X90 is equipped with a 1.5L Turbo, 140 hp. Official fuel consumption 7.0 L/100km.
In terms of power, Proton X90's 1.5L Turbo has 35 more hp than Perodua Aruz's 1.5L 4-cyl. However, for daily city driving, both cars have enough power, you won't feel it's underpowered.
Perodua Aruz body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
Proton X90 body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
Both cars' dimensions are almost the same, interior space difference is not significant. Cars in this class are fully sufficient for daily use.
Perodua Aruz adopts FWD drive mode.
Proton X90 adopts FWD drive mode.
Both cars have the same drive mode, both are FWD, daily driving feel will not be too different.
Perodua Aruz and Proton X90 are both mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use, daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale price more, you can prioritize the one with better reputation; if you care more about cost-performance ratio and features, then choose the one with richer configuration. Ultimately, it is recommended to test drive both, personal experience is the most important.
Overall, Perodua Aruz and Proton X90 are both very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose, mainly depends on your personal needs and budget. We suggest doing your homework, comparing quotes from several dealerships, then test driving to make a final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending some time on research is never wrong.
In the Malaysia SUV market, many buyers compare Perodua Aruz and Proton X50 when choosing a car. These two models are quite close in price and positioning. Today we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
Perodua Aruz's OTR selling price in Malaysia is RM 72,900 - 77,900, with a total of 2 versions, including 1.5L X (RM 72,900), 1.5L AV (RM 77,900), etc.
Proton X50's OTR selling price in Malaysia is RM 89,800 - 113,300, with a total of 4 versions, including 1.5T Executive (RM 89,800), 1.5T Premium (RM 101,800), 1.5T Flagship (RM 113,300), etc.
From a price perspective, Perodua Aruz's starting price is indeed RM 16,900 cheaper than Proton X50. If your budget is limited, Perodua's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. However, be aware that the few thousand difference might involve compromises in features, depending on your specific needs.
Perodua Aruz comes with a 1.5L 4-cyl, 105 hp. Official fuel consumption 6.0 L/100km.
Proton X50 comes with a 1.5L 4-cyl, 105 hp. Official fuel consumption 6.0 L/100km.
Both cars use the same powertrain, the driving experience feels basically the same in daily use. Fuel consumption is also similar, no need to worry too much about this.
Perodua Aruz safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include.
Proton X50 safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
Both cars have the same safety rating, safety features are quite comprehensive in this class. New cars nowadays are not lacking in safety, no need to worry too much about this.
Perodua Aruz warranty 5 years/150,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Proton X50 warranty 5 years/150,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Both cars have the same warranty conditions, no need to worry about this. Actual maintenance costs also depend on the brand's service network and part prices, suggest asking real owners in car groups for experience.
Overall, Perodua Aruz and Proton X50 are both excellent models in the Malaysia market. Which one to choose depends mainly on your personal needs and budget. We recommend doing research, compare quotes from several dealerships, and then test drive to make the final decision. Buying a car is a big deal, taking time to do research is never wrong.
In Malaysia's SUV market, many buyers compare Perodua Ativa and Toyota Yaris Cross when selecting a car. These two models are quite close in price and positioning. Today we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to save you the time of doing research.
Perodua Ativa's OTR price in Malaysia is RM 62,500 - 73,400, with a total of 3 variants, including 1.0L Turbo X (RM 62,500), 1.0L Turbo H (RM 67,300), 1.0L Turbo AV (RM 73,400), etc.
Toyota Yaris Cross's OTR price in Malaysia is RM 99,900 - 109,900, with a total of 2 variants, including 2026 1.5L Standard (RM 99,900), 2026 HEV 1.5L Standard (RM 109,900), etc.
In terms of price, the Perodua Ativa's starting price is indeed RM 37,400 cheaper than the Toyota Yaris Cross. If your budget is limited, Perodua's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. But note that the savings of a few thousand might involve trade-offs in features, depending on your specific requirements.
Perodua Ativa is equipped with a 1.5L 4-cyl, 105 hp. Official fuel consumption 6.0 L/100km.
Toyota Yaris Cross is equipped with a 1.5L 4-cyl, 105 hp. Official fuel consumption 6.0 L/100km.
Both cars use the same powertrain system, with basically no difference in driving feel during daily use. Fuel consumption is also similar, no need to worry too much about this.
Perodua Ativa body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
Toyota Yaris Cross body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
The dimensions of both cars are almost identical, with little difference in interior space. For vehicles in this class, it is more than sufficient for daily use.
Perodua Ativa warranty 5 years/150,000km, service interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Toyota Yaris Cross warranty 5 years/unlimited mileage, service interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Overall, both Perodua Ativa and Toyota Yaris Cross are excellent models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose ultimately depends on your personal needs and budget. We suggest doing your homework, comparing quotes from multiple dealerships, and then test driving to make the final decision. Buying a car is a major decision, spending time doing research will never be wrong.
In June, automakers mass-announced impressive production and sales data. BYD, Leapmotor, NIO, and XPeng all submitted growth reports, with single-brand sales figures rising steadily, creating a boom-like scene. However, data shows domestic passenger car retail sales dropped 21% year-on-year. Since the end of last year, the domestic auto market has been stuck in a double-digit decline range, with the drop in February touching 25.3% at one point.
On one side, brands are constantly releasing good news to the outside world; on the other, the overall market continues to shrink. Behind this seemingly contradictory collective carnival lies a picture of industry segmentation woven together by the struggle for existing market share and breakthroughs in overseas markets.
Domestic Auto Market Slows Down
Looking solely at the delivery speed reports released by various automakers to the public, the domestic auto industry in June still seemed to be on an upward trajectory, with head-brand sales figures showing red across the board. However, after terminal retail data was finalized, the 21% year-on-year decline indicates that the contraction of overall industry demand is already a set fact.
Many people interpret the positive growth of head brands as breaking the situation against the trend brought by the company's product power breakthrough. In the current market environment, this judgment is incomplete. With overall domestic terminal demand continuously shrinking and the total market volume continuously falling, the reason head automakers can achieve growth against the trend is partly due to incremental offset from overseas exports, and partly due to grabbing shares in the domestic existing stock market. The extra sales volume of head brands mostly comes from stock orders diverted from weak brands, which also leads to SME automakers lacking capital, technology, and channel support having actual decline rates far higher than the industry average of 21%.
Factors such as capital chains, R&D reserves, offline channels, and many others determine whether an automaker can survive this downturn cycle. This year, many marginal automakers have stopped planning annual facelifts and new models, and dealer stores in various places have successively closed down and withdrawn networks. Consumers naturally avoid these risky brands when purchasing new cars, so customer sources naturally tilt towards enterprises with scale advantages such as BYD and Geely. All global mature auto markets have gone through a brand clearance stage; the domestic auto market has simply compressed the time of this process. The more depressed the market is, the more solid the barriers of scale advantages for head enterprises become.
The 150,000 to 250,000 RMB price range, which is the main interval, is becoming the most brutal battleground in this entire stock war, and the collapse of the intermediate market is hard to reverse. This range was once the foundation for joint-venture fuel vehicles and the core battlefield for independent brands to achieve scale. Currently, user willingness to upgrade has weakened significantly, and hesitation has surged. To save sales, joint ventures rely heavily on deep price cuts to clear stock; discounts for classic family cars like Accord and Passat keep widening, completely loosening traditional pricing systems. Independent automakers, on the other hand, are densely launching hybrid and BEV models in this segment. LiDAR and advanced intelligent driving features are trickling down. Highly homogenized products combined with endless price wars compress the profit margins across the entire market.
Consumer hesitation is strongest in this price segment. Most potential car buyers worry about receiving a new model replacement or a new round of price cuts shortly after getting their cars, so they hesitate to finalize orders. The recent pressure on orders for the BYD Qin and Song pillars exactly proves the congestion level of this red sea track.
Head Automakers Profit Overseas
Domestic competition is cutthroat, while overseas markets have become a panacea for head automakers.
For a long time, the model for domestic automakers going overseas was simple and direct: assemble complete vehicles domestically, ship them in containers, and rely on low prices to open up sales channels in markets like Southeast Asia and Latin America. Essentially, it was just digesting excess capacity. This unidirectional commodity export method has a very low error tolerance. Once the target market implements tariff restrictions or import quota policies, the entire export sales chain will be directly blocked. Not long ago, the new policy introduced by Malaysia was an example.
Now, head automakers are starting to land complete manufacturing, supply chain, and service ecosystems overseas, thereby breaking away from the fragile model that relies solely on exporting complete vehicles, and establishing a long-term stable operational foundation in overseas markets.
From a technological development perspective, over the past few years, basic electrification hardware such as battery packs, drive motors, and hybrid architectures have become highly mature, with solutions converging. Head automakers have basically leveled out the generation gap at the hardware level, making it hard to gain a long-term advantage based on single hardware parameters alone. True differentiation is gradually shifting to intelligent driving algorithms, vehicle architecture tuning, global thermal management, and other soft capabilities. Under the premise of hardware homogenization, scale-based cost control has become the core decisive factor for automakers. BYD reduces manufacturing expenses through its vertical industrial chain, CATL has become a top player in power batteries. New entrant brands find it difficult to bridge the software system gap and replicate scale cost advantages. Achieving a curve overtaking on the hardware side is extremely difficult.
Speaking of this, everyone should be able to see clearly: the overseas expansion of an automaker's supply chain is essentially the outward extension of its own industrial chain capabilities. Against the backdrop of domestic technological homogenization and intensified market involution, what truly widens the final gap between automakers is the control over the core supply chain.
If an automaker only retains body manufacturing and complete vehicle assembly business, it is essentially just an assembly OEM for the upstream supply chain. If upstream raw materials or core parts prices fluctuate slightly, the pricing and profit margin of the terminal model will be directly squeezed. It cannot create unique configurations distinct from competitors, nor does it have the confidence for autonomous pricing.
The industry has gradually differentiated into two response modes. Some automakers go deep internally in self-research, keeping key parts in their own hands; others actively bind with top supply chain enterprises, locking in priority supply qualifications to avoid supply disruption and price hike risks. Those SME automakers that cannot land on either side have neither the capital to invest in upstream R&D nor stable parts orders. Not to mention participating in overseas market layouts, they can hardly withstand the price involution in the domestic market either.
Global layout and deepening of the upstream supply chain are essentially two sides of the same coin. Opening up incremental markets outwardly and safeguarding the profit foundation inwardly; missing either one makes it difficult for an automaker to stabilize its position in the upcoming industry reshuffling.
Public Car Review
In the future, electrification hardware will tend towards homogenization, and the competitive barriers of automakers will shift from parameter stacking to cost control, software capability, and supply chain control. Head enterprises will guard the domestic foundation relying on the full-chain system while overseas expanding with localized ecosystems to hedge risks. In the future, industry victory and defeat will no longer depend on the explosive power of a single product, but on the system showdown of supply chain barriers superimposed with global capabilities. The polarized pattern will continue to solidify.
2026 年 7 月 9 日，新加坡，阿維塔門市，一把車匙交咗俾一位著襯衫、留鬍鬚嘅學者手入——康斯坦丁·諾沃肖洛夫，2010 年諾貝爾物理學獎得主，石墨烯發現者之一。佢正式成為阿維塔 07 第十萬位車主。
呢件事有意思。一個靠「用膠帶撕出單層石墨烯」拿諾獎嘅頂尖物理學家，唔揀矽谷明星車，反而將票投咗畀一個中國品牌。點解？
兩個月前，諾沃肖洛夫去重慶出差，順路試咗試阿維塔。佢原話係：「設計獨特、優雅，充滿未來感；座艙好有科技感，智能交互好似有情緒一樣。」佢仲補咗一句：「呢係我第一台中國車，創新實力同豪華質感都令我好驚訝。」
要知道，新加坡市場賣嘅車，係冇「平」呢回事。阿維塔 07 喺當地起售價超過 100 萬人民幣，直接硬撼傳統豪華品牌。而 2026 年第一季度，新加坡純電動車喺新註冊車入面已佔 57.6% —— 呢樣意思係，能夠喺呢個成熟嘅高端市場立足，靠嘅唔係價格標籤，而係實打實嘅產品力。
阿維塔 07 身上有華為乾崑智駕 ADS 4 同鴻蒙座艙 5，智能駕駛、底盤調校、安全配置都堆到行業前列。由第 7 萬輛到第 10 萬輛下線，唔夠一年時間，側面說明市場喺用腳投票。
不過更值得琢磨嘅，係今次選擇背後嘅含義。
過去我哋習慣講「中國車出海」，潛台詞往往係「用性價比換市場」。但係當一個諾獎得主、世界頂級嘅材料科學家，將中國車放進自己日常生活，呢個敘事就俾顛覆咗 —— 佢揀嘅唔係「夠用」，而係「好到值得」。
目前阿維塔已經進入 43 個國家同地區，計劃 2030 年覆蓋 110 個以上。而像泰國副總理、不丹國王、卡塔爾王室成員等，亦早已成為佢嘅用戶。
所以，回到開頭嗰個問題：諾獎得主唔買特斯拉，卻揀咗台中國電車，憑乜？
答案可能唔複雜 —— 憑佢夠好。好到令一位日日同「未來材料」打交嗰人，願意佢當做今日嘅日常出行工具。呢個比任何廣告詞都更有說服力。
7 月 6 日，吉利銀河 TT 對外亮相。該車定位 C 級純電運動轎車，進一步豐富了吉利銀河的產品矩陣，上市後將直面小米 SU7、小鵬 P7+、尚界 Z7 等強勁對手。
吉利品牌堅持燃油、新能源雙線並行發展，銀河是其新能源板塊核心銷量擔當。2026 年上半年，吉利銀河累計銷售新車 51.98 萬輛，佔吉利品牌總銷量的 47.2% 及吉利汽車集團總銷量的 36.5%。但年內吉利銀河銷量增長乏力，前五個月單月銷量均出現同比下滑，直至 6 月止跌回升。
指導價 6.48 萬 -9.48 萬元的 A0 級小車吉利星願是吉利銀河主要的銷量貢獻者，6 月銷量達到 5.09 萬輛，上半年累計銷量達到 24.94 萬輛，佔吉利汽車期內銷量近半。
在 3 月舉辦的 2025 年業績發布會上，吉利控股行政總裁桂生悅、吉利汽車集團 CEO 淦家閱向媒體表示，2026 年，吉利汽車集團爭取做到國內銷量第一。桂生悅還說，“在未來相當長的一段時間內，除了銷量創歷史新高以外，大概率未來的每一次業績發布會，我們（吉利汽車集團）的核心歸屬母公司淨利潤都將會是歷史新高。”
2026 年第一季度，吉利汽車集團以 70.94 萬輛的銷售成績險勝比亞迪（70.05 萬輛），成為自主車企銷量冠軍。集團營收也由去年同期的 726.92 億元提升至 837.76 億元，實現了 15% 的同比增長；核心歸屬母公司淨利潤亦出現 31% 的同比增長。
然而 3 月以來，比亞迪進入新產品密集發布期，還發布了第二代刀片電池及閃充技術，重新拿回主動權。上半年，比亞迪以 180.85 萬輛的銷量重回“自主一哥”寶座，而吉利汽車集團以 142.30 萬輛的銷售成績居於第二。旗下吉利、領克、極氪品牌分別銷售新車 110.04 萬輛、14.42 萬輛及 17.84 萬輛，三大品牌中僅有極氪品牌實現了銷量的同比增長。
跟銷量增長情況同樣值得關注的是產品結構。管理層曾直言，入門級車型銷量佔比過高導致盈利能力下滑，是集團“亟待克服的短板”。
目前，車企尚未披露 2026 年半年報，一季報中也未披露具體收入構成，因此無法計算單車收入和單車盈利變動情況。不過依靠入門車型撐起銷量大盤的吉利汽車集團將如何平衡規模衝高與盈利改善，仍是管理層需持續關注的經營難題。
吉利銀河難逃“低價走量”困局
2025 年，吉利銀河迎來全面“爆發”，多款明星車型表現亮眼。吉利星願連續 7 個月銷量突破 4 萬輛，銀河 M9 自 9 月正式上市不到 4 個月累計銷量接近 4 萬輛，成為 C 級混動 SUV 市場的黑馬。
然而因新車發布相對密集且部分存在價格重疊，客源被內部車型分散，吉利品牌持續走量車型的培育難度大幅提升。
銀河 M9 的銷量（圖/易車）
根據易車公佈的數據，今年以來，銀河 M9 單月零售銷量較首銷期明顯下滑，1 月及 2 月，該車型還保持有 6000 輛及 5000 輛以上的銷售水平，3 月直接降至 3773 輛，4、5 月銷量更是徘徊在 3000 輛左右，前 5 個月累計零售銷量甚至不如 45 萬級的極氪 9X。
面對愈演愈烈的行業競爭，吉利品牌開啟新一輪密集新車投放攻勢以提振銷量，吉利銀河更是成為產品投放的核心主力。上半年，吉利銀河已推出家用轎車銀河 A7 EV 及 2026 款銀河 A7 EM、電混 SUV 銀河 M7 遠航家、電混轎車銀河星耀 7 MAX、A0 級小車全新吉利星願、輕越野 SUV 2026 款銀河牛仔、純電 SUV 銀河星艦 7 EV 等新車，集中佈局 10 萬級價格帶。
在經歷了今年前 5 個月單月銷量同比下滑後，6 月吉利銀河終於迎來了單月銷量同比提升。但細究其背後的原因不難發現，銀河星耀 7 MAX、2026 款銀河牛仔、全新吉利星願、銀河星艦 7 EV 等熱門車型自 5 月中下旬開始陸續上市，並在 6 月集中釋放熱度。換言之，吉利品牌依舊未能擺脫用新車堆銷量的局面。
即便星願自身銷售表現強勁，也難以全盤幫吉利品牌抵擋行業向下滲透的壓力。伴隨 A0 級市場內捲加劇，一众 10 萬 -15 萬級車型憑藉更低的定價、更豐富的配置、更長的續航，不斷侵蝕 A0 級代步車生存空間。吉利星願既要承接比亞迪海鷗、零跑 A10、五菱繽果 PLUS 等同級別車型的競爭壓力，還要應對零跑 C10、長安深藍 S05、小鵬 MONA L03 等 10 萬 -15 萬級車型可能帶來的分流。除此之外，該車或還將與銀河星艦 7 EV 等車型產生內部競爭。
而定位偏中高端的領克、極氪品牌雖有不錯的市場表現，但在吉利汽車集團總銷量佔比中並不是主流。若想重新站上自主品牌銷量頭部位置，吉利汽車集團仍需為吉利品牌打造更多具備持續走量能力的爆款車型。
用海外增量補國內銷量缺口？
根據年初公佈的數據，2026 年，吉利汽車集團整體銷量目標為 345 萬輛、出口銷量目標為 64 萬輛。按品牌劃分，吉利、領克、極氪品牌分別承擔 275 萬、40 萬及 30 萬輛的銷售任務。因此上半年，吉利汽車集團的整體銷量目標完成率为 41.2%，吉利、領克、極氪品牌分別完成 43.2%、36.1% 及 59.5%。
海外市場為吉利汽車集團貢獻了絕大部分增量。上半年，吉利汽車集團加速全球市場擴張：在歐洲區域集中完成西班牙、德國、荷蘭、比利時、盧森堡五國的品牌落地，並與瑞士頭部經銷商集團達成合作，敲定三季度正式進入瑞士市場；在東南亞深耕印尼、馬來西亞、越南等核心市場，投放領克 900、繽越、豪越 L 以擴充產品陣容；在拉美市場落地本地化產能，完成星願在巴西工廠投產；在中東與中亞市場，領克 900 登陸中東多國，銀河系列車型切入中亞市場。
乘聯會最新數據顯示，6 月國內乘用車出口量（含整車與 CKD）同比增長 82.3% 至 87.7 萬輛，佔乘用車廠商總銷量的 37%；其中新能源車出口佔出口總量的 56.9%，較去年同期提升 16 個百分點；自主品牌出口達 76.3 萬輛，同比增長 86%，全行業出口維持高景氣度。
在行業出口整體走強的大背景下，上半年，吉利汽車集團出口量同比增長 158% 至 47.42 萬輛，半年規模已超越 2025 年全年出口總量。根據《國際金融報》報道及東方證券研報信息，得益於海外市場超預期增長，後續集團內部兩度上調出口銷量指引，由 64 萬輛提升至 75 萬輛，再提升至 90 萬輛，說明上半年該集團出口目標完成度過半。
但值得注意的是，儘管大幅提升海外銷量目標，吉利汽車集團卻並未释放出提升整體銷售目標的信息。
2025 年，吉利汽車集團累計銷量為 302.46 萬輛，其中涵蓋出口銷量 42.01 萬輛，相當於去年其國內銷量為 260.45 萬輛左右。按最新出口指標測算，2026 年該集團在國內需銷售 255 萬輛新車就能達成整體目標，较去年國內銷量甚至減少了近 5.5 萬輛。
根據乘聯會數據，6 月，A00 及 A0 級經濟型電動車市場壓力較大，A00 級車型批發銷量 7.7 萬輛，同比下降 50%，環比下降 11%，佔純電車型 8% 的份額，較去年同期下降 11.9 個百分點；A0 級車型批發銷量 31.4 萬輛，佔純電車型 32% 的份額，同比增長 9 個百分點；A 級車批發銷量 23.6 萬輛，佔純電市場 24% 的份額，同比下降 2.7 個百分點。
而吉利品牌旗下新能源車型多處於 A00-A 級市場，其國內新能源銷量走勢與前述細分市場的波動高度綁定，經濟型電動車市場的結構調整，也將對品牌國內市場的生長節奏形成直接影響。
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會揀 Mazda CX-8 同 Chery Tiggo 9 來做比較。呢兩款車喺價位同定位上都好接近，而家我哋就由多個方面做一個詳細嘅比較，幫你省返做功課嘅時間。
Mazda CX-8 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 165,360 - 201,360，一共有 5 個版本，包括 2025 2.5T 4WD High Plus Petrol（RM 201,360）、2025 2.2L 2WD High Plus Diesel（RM 193,123）、2025 2.5L 2WD High Plus Petrol（RM 186,360） 等。
Chery Tiggo 9 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 166,800 - 179,800，一共有 1 個版本，包括 2026 2.0T Standard（RM 179,750） 等。
從價錢嚟睇，Mazda CX-8 嘅起步價確實比 Chery Tiggo 9 平咗 RM 1,440。如果你預算有限，Mazda 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需求。但都要留意，平嘅嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備上會有取捨，具體睇你嘅需求。
Mazda CX-8 裝載 2.0L 4-cyl，馬力 170 hp。官方油耗 8.0 L/100km。
Chery Tiggo 9 裝載 2.0L 4-cyl，馬力 170 hp。官方油耗 8.0 L/100km。
兩款車用緊同一套動力系統，日常開出嚟嘅感覺基本冇咩分別。油耗方面都幾近似，唔使太糾結這一點。
Mazda CX-8 車身長 4500 mm，行李廂 450 L。
Chery Tiggo 9 車身長 4400 mm，行李廂 400 L。
空間方面，Mazda CX-8 嘅車身比 Chery Tiggo 9 長咗 100 mm，車內坐人嘅空間會稍微寬鬆啲，尤其係後座腳位空間。如果你經常載家人或者要放嬰兒車，大少少嘅車身確實更實用。
Mazda CX-8 保養保障 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Chery Tiggo 9 保養保障 3 年/100,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
總體嚟講，Mazda CX-8 同 Chery Tiggo 9 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊輛，關鍵仲係睇你個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再過去試駕做最後決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買喺揀車嘅時候都會拿奇瑞瑞虎 8 PHEV 同福斯途觀做比較。這兩款車喺價格同定位上都幾接近，今日我就哋從多個方面做一個詳細比較，幫你節省做功課嘅時間。
奇瑞瑞虎 8 PHEV 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係馬幣 159,750 - 159,750，一齊共有 2 個版本，包括 1.6L Turbo Standard（馬幣 130,000）、1.6L Turbo Premium（馬幣 145,000） 等。
福斯途觀喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係馬幣 206,540 - 260,024，一齊共有 2 個版本，包括 2025 Allspace 2.0T R-Line（馬幣 260,024）、2025 Allspace 1.4T Elegance（馬幣 206,540） 等。
從價錢睇，奇瑞瑞虎 8 PHEV 嘅起步價確實比福斯途觀平咗馬幣 46,790。如果你預算有限，奇瑞嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需求。但都要注意，平嗰幾千塊，可能喺配備上有取舍，具體要看你嘅需求。
奇瑞瑞虎 8 PHEV 搭載 Hybrid，馬力 170 hp。官方油耗 4.5 公升/100 公里。
福斯途觀搭載 2.0L 4-cyl，馬力 170 hp。官方油耗 8.0 公升/100 公里。
動力方面，福斯途觀嘅 2.0L 4-cyl 比奇瑞瑞虎 8 PHEV 嘅 Hybrid 多咗 0 匹馬力。不過日常喺市區開，兩款車嘅動力都夠用，唔會覺得唔夠力。
奇瑞瑞虎 8 PHEV 嘅安全評級係 TBD，主動安全系統包括 Basic。
福斯途觀嘅安全評級係 5★ (Euro NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 IQ.Drive。
安全配備方面，兩款車都拿到唔錯嘅評級。不過奇瑞瑞虎 8 PHEV 嘅 Basic 同福斯途觀嘅 IQ.Drive 喺功能上有啲分別，如果你比較看重主動安全嘅話，可以仔細對比一下兩者嘅功能列表。
奇瑞瑞虎 8 PHEV 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
福斯途觀採用 FWD 驅動方式。
兩款車嘅驅動方式一樣，都係 FWD，日常駕駛感受唔會有太大分別。
奇瑞瑞虎 8 PHEV 同福斯途觀都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更看重品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰一款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，那就揀配備更豐富嗰款。最終都係建議兩款都去試駕，親身體驗先係最重要嘅。
總嘅嚟講，奇瑞瑞虎 8 PHEV 同福斯途觀都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵都係睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建议大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花點時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會用 奧迪 Q7 同 路虎 Defender 嚟比較。這兩款車喺價位同定位上都好接近，今日我哋就由多個方面做一個詳細嘅比較，幫你節省咗做功課嘅時間。
奧迪 Q7 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 462,222 - 462,222，合共 1 個版本，包括 Standard（RM 462,222） 等等。
路虎 Defender 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 688,000 - 688,000，合共 1 個版本，包括 Standard（RM 688,000） 等等。
從價錢睇，奧迪 Q7 嘅起價確實比路虎 Defender 平咗 RM 225,778。如果你預算有限，奧迪嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需要。但亦要注意，平嗰幾千蚊，可能會喺配備上有取舍，具體要睇你嘅需要。
奧迪 Q7 搭載 3.0L Turbo，馬力 350 hp。官方油耗 12.0 L/100km。
路虎 Defender 搭載 3.0L Turbo，馬力 350 hp。官方油耗 12.0 L/100km。
兩部車用嘅係同一套動力系統，日常開落嘅感覺基本冇分別。油耗方面都差唔多，唔使太糾結呢一點。
奧迪 Q7 嘅安全評級係 5★ (Euro NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 Premium ADAS。
路虎 Defender 嘅安全評級係 TBD，主動安全系統包括 Basic。
安全配備方面，兩部車都拿到唔錯嘅評級。不過奧迪 Q7 嘅 Premium ADAS 同路虎 Defender 嘅 Basic 喺功能上有啲差異，如果你比較重視主動安全嘅話，可以仔細比較下兩者嘅功能列表。
奧迪 Q7 保養 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
路虎 Defender 保養 3 年/100,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
總括嚟講，奧迪 Q7 同路虎 Defender 都係馬來西亞市場幾好嘅車型。揀邊一部，關鍵係要睇你嘅個人需要同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去做試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔錯。
喺馬來西亞嘅汽車市場，好多買家喺揀車嗰陣都會拿 Proton X50 同 Honda HR-V 嚟做比較。今日我哋從多個方面做一個詳細嘅對比，幫你省咗做功課嘅時間。
Proton X50 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 89,800 - 113,300，一共有 4 個版本，包括 1.5T Executive（RM 89,800）、1.5T Premium（RM 101,800）、1.5T Flagship（RM 113,300）等。
Honda HR-V 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 115,900 - 143,900，一共有 4 個版本，包括 2026 e:HEV 1.5L RS（RM 143,900）、2026 1.5T V（RM 137,900）、2026 1.5T E（RM 130,900）等。
從價錢嚟睇，Proton X50 嘅起步價確實比 Honda HR-V 平咗 RM 26,100。如果你預算有限，Proton 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需求。但都係要留意，平嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備上會有取捨，具體要睇你嘅需求。
Proton X50 搭載 1.5L 4-cyl，馬力 105 hp。官方油耗 6.0 L/100km。
Honda HR-V 搭載 1.5L Turbo，馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。
動力方面，Honda HR-V 嘅 1.5L Turbo 比 Proton X50 嘅 1.5L 4-cyl 多咗 35 匹馬力。不過日常喺市區開嘅話，兩部車嘅動力都夠用，唔會覺得唔夠力。
Proton X50 保修 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Honda HR-V 保修 5 年/無限制里程，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Proton X50 同 Honda HR-V 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更重視品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑好嗰款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，那就揀配置更豐富嗰款。最終都係建議兩款都去試駕，親身體驗先係最重要嘅。
總括嚟講，Proton X50 同 Honda HR-V 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵始終係睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕先做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對無錯。
車型概覽
寶駿雲海 值唔值得睇，第一步唔係望牌子或者外形，而係睇佢能唔能夠配合你嘅香港日常。 呢篇會集中講高速巡航、併線同超車信心，幫你用買家角度篩走唔適合嘅選擇。
售價仍待確認，買家可以先把佢放入候選名單，等價格落實後再同同級車逐項比較。
購車價格指南
寶駿雲海 目前售價仍未清晰，較理性嘅做法係先睇版本、車身大小同動力形式，等價格落實後再決定值唔值得落訂。
如果有幾個版本可揀，可以先將 2026 PHEV 1.5L 140km 前驅版（價格待確認）、2026 BEV 500km 前驅版（價格待確認）、2026 BEV 600km 前驅版（價格待確認）、2025 BEV 500km 前驅版（價格待確認） 放喺同一張清單。日常通勤重視舒適同易用，家庭買家就要優先睇後排、尾箱同安全配置。
核心規格重點
睇 寶駿雲海 嘅規格，重點唔係背數字，而係理解佢喺香港用車場景會帶嚟咩分別。
20.5/56.7/69.2/9.5 kWh 嘅電池容量，真正意義係可以幫你估算一星期通勤同周末出車要唔要中途補電。 140/500/600/60 km 嘅續航參考，對住喺新界、九龍同港島之間跨區行車嘅用家會更實際。 15.7/13.3/13.5 kWh/100km 嘅耗電表現，會影響你去快充站或者屋苑充電位嘅頻率。 106 Ps / 78 kW / 150 kW、130/310 N·m 嘅輸出，令高速併線同短距離超車更有信心。
優缺點分析
寶駿雲海 嘅優點唔需要講到天花龍鳳，真正有價值係佢能唔能夠令日常用車更省心：日常能源成本有基本參考、電池同續航資訊有助安排通勤同補電、動力輸出對高速同上斜更有底氣。
要留意嘅係，要先確認屋苑、公司或常去商場嘅充電條件、香港停車場同窄路使用要留意車身闊度。呢啲唔一定係缺點，但係落訂前應該先諗清楚。
買家常見問題
買 寶駿雲海 之前，真正要問嘅唔係單一規格，而係佢可唔可以融入你每日嘅生活節奏。
常見疑問係「寶駿雲海於香港落地價大約係幾多？」簡單講，寶駿雲海於香港落地價約240,000–300,000 港元，視版本而定。 放到實際用車，就係要睇佢對通勤、泊車、家庭乘坐同長期成本有幾大幫助。
同級對比內容
將 寶駿雲海 放入同級車清單時，唔建議只用外形或者品牌光環決定。比較順序可以係：先等售價落實，再決定佢應該同邊個級距比較、再睇動力係咪足夠應付高速併線同滿載、再比較能源成本同補能便利、最後睇車身大小、座位同尾箱是否適合家人。
咁樣篩選會貼近香港買家真實生活：平日塞車、商場泊車、周末去新界、甚至一家人出入，先係一部車每日要面對嘅考驗。
用車全周期指南
擁有 寶駿雲海 最重要係先諗清楚充電節奏。屋苑、公司或者常去商場只要有穩定充電選項，電動化用車就會容易相處好多。
如果你主要喺市區行，視野、低速順滑度同泊車輔助會好影響心情；如果經常行高速或跨區，座椅舒適度、隔音同動力從容感會更重要。
5 月 29 日，2026 粵港澳大灣區車展於深圳國際會展中心（寶安）正式拉開帷幕。作為國內新能源汽車市場嘅中堅力量，深藍汽車攜旗下6 款主力車型集體亮相（7 號館 09 展位），涵蓋家用、智能駕駛、性能、越野等全場景需求。同時，品牌官方宣佈成為葡萄牙國家隊全球官方合作夥伴，以硬核產品實力與親民嘅購車優惠，引發現場廣泛關注。
深耕全球市場，銷量與口碑雙豐收
深耕新能源賽道多年，深藍汽車憑藉成熟嘅技術積累與清晰嘅產品佈局，市場表現持續領跑。數據顯示，2026 年 3-4 月，深藍汽車連續兩個月銷量突破3 萬輛；截至目前，全球累計交付量已突破80 萬輛，穩居央企新能源品牌銷量榜首。
此次車展前夕，深藍汽車在葡萄牙首都里斯本官方宣佈與葡萄牙國家隊達成合作，並向球隊交付全球爆款車型深藍 S05，同步開啟 1000km 歐洲長測。這既係中國新能源品牌與國際頂級球隊嘅強強聯手，亦標誌著深藍汽車全球化佈局邁入新階段。
全陣列車型亮相，涵蓋灣區多元出行需求
粵港澳大灣區作為國內新能源消費嘅核心市場，用戶需求呈現多元化、精細化特徵。本次車展，深藍汽車一次性帶來 6 款車型，從 15 萬級家用车到 30 萬級旗艦，從城市通勤到戶外越野，全面涵蓋灣區用戶日常出行場景。
深藍 S05：全球爆款 SUV，家用代步省心之選
作為深藍汽車嘅「全球大單品」，深藍 S05 上市後月均銷量破萬，全球累計銷量超20 萬輛，並斬獲德國 iF 設計大奬、泰國年度汽車大奬等國際榮譽。
該車主打安全耐用、長續航、快補能，全系搭載寧德時代電芯與金鐘罩電池，適應深圳高溫多雨氣候；CLTC 續航達620km，支援 3C 超充，15 分鐘可將電量從 30% 充至 80%，日常通勤、週末周邊遊都無里程焦慮。
深藍 L06 Max：性能駕控首選，年輕人嘅「駕駛樂趣」
面向追求操控感嘅年輕用戶，深藍 L06 Max 搭載300 萬級超跑同款磁流變底盤，轉向精準、濾震細膩，無論是城市穿梭還是山路馳騁，都能帶來流暢嘅駕駛體驗。
此外，該車配備一體化大壓鑄技術，CLTC 續航最高670km，5.9 秒即可破百，兼顧性能與實用性，係 15 萬級少有嘅「駕控取向」家轎。
深藍 S07 華為乾崑激光版：高級智駕下放，複雜路況從容應對
本次車展嘅智能擔當——深藍 S07 華為乾崑激光版，將高級激光智駕配置普及至主流價位。該車搭載華為乾崑激光 ADS 4 Pro 增強版，配備激光視覺 Limera，支援城區/高速全場景 NCA 輔助駕駛，能輕鬆應對深圳早晚高峰、老城窄巷等複雜路況。
續航方面，CLTC 續航達630km，搭配 3C 超充，跨城出行亦無需頻繁補能，係都市高知人群嘅智駕首選。
深藍 S09：旗艦大六座，家用商務兩不誤
定位智慧旗艦大六座 SUV，深藍 S09 精準匹配灣區多孩家庭、商務接待嘅雙重需求。車內採用三排六座佈局，行業首創中排可橫滑雙零重力座椅與一體式智能移動中島，空間靈活多變。
動力上，純電續航310km，支援 5C 超充，10 分鐘可將電量從 30% 充至 80%；全系標準配備華為乾崑智駕 ADS 4.1 與鴻蒙座艙，兼顧豪華感與智能化。
深藍 L07：15 萬級智駕家轎，上班族通勤好拍檔
作為15 萬級唯一全系標準配備華為乾崑智駕嘅轎車，深藍 L07 完美契合灣區上班族嘅通勤需求。其搭載新一代原力超集電驅，純電續航660km、增程續航1500km，高速智駕覆蓋率超 99.2%，能有效緩解廣深、莞深等城際高速嘅駕駛疲勞。
同時，全系標準配備金鐘罩電池，累計裝車 70 萬台保持零自燃記錄，安全可靠，係日常代步嘅「省心之選」。
深藍 G318 無憂穿越版：硬派越野氣質，解鎖戶外多元樂趣
打破硬派車型與城市用車嘅邊界，深藍 G318 無憂穿越版配備雙電機真四驅、兩把機械差速鎖與全地形駕駛系統，能輕鬆征服粵北山區、戶外野地等複雜路況。
同時，同級獨有嘅空氣懸掛、CDC 減震與主動魔毯系統，又能保證城市行駛嘅平穩舒適，適合週末露營、長線自駕嘅戶外愛好者。
車展專屬優惠，誠意回饋灣區消費者
除咗全陣容好車，深藍汽車本次仲帶來實打實嘅購車優惠，降低用戶購車門檻。
活動時間為5 月 29 日至 6 月 14 日，用戶喺廠方原有基礎權益之上，可額外享受：
下定即贈深藍商場價值1000 元藍寶石，可兌換原廠精品；深圳區域購車用戶，額外享受交通強製險免單優惠。
無需複雜規則，沒有隱藏套路，真正做到「好車不貴，優惠到位」，讓灣區消費者逛展、選車、享優惠一步到位。
扎根用戶需求，持續打造高價值出行體驗
從產品佈局嚟睇，深藍汽車 6 款車型精準切入家庭、性能、智駕、越野四大核心場景，不堆砌冗餘配置，只聚焦用戶真實需求；從技術實力嚟講，無論係與華為深度合作嘅智能系統，定係自研嘅三電與底盤技術，都經過市場驗證，可靠耐用。
粵港澳大灣區作為深藍汽車嘅重點戰略市場，此次車展既係產品實力嘅集中展示，亦係貼近用戶、回饋用戶嘅契機。未來，深藍汽車將繼續立足用戶需求，以更成熟嘅技術、更豐富嘅產品、更實在嘅優惠，為消費者帶來高價值嘅智慧出行體驗。
目前，2026 粵港澳大灣區車展仍在進行中（6 月 7 日前），歡迎前往深圳國際會展中心（寶安）7 號館 09 展位，近距離體驗深藍全系車型嘅硬核實力，把握購車良機。
唔知有幾多朋友最近期關注 10 萬內純電 SUV 市場？近段時間睇嚟，呢個細分市場好熱鬧。就講長安啟源全新 Q05 同零跑 A10，上個月銷量分別達 15814 輛同 14372 輛，全部挺進 2026 年 4 月銷量排行全品類前 10，長安啟源全新 Q05 甚至奪得緊緊湊型純電 SUV 市場嘅銷冠。
（長安啟源全新 Q05）
值得留意係，兩款大熱門產品亮點亦唔少，9 萬級可以得到 500km+嘅續航，零跑 A10 甚至配備激光雷達，有高級智駕輔助需求嘅朋友嚟講，呢架車吸引力的確唔低。但係喺價格上，同為高配嘅長安啟源全新 Q05 506Max+ 同零跑 A10 505 激光雷達版，終端價格分別係 9.59 萬同 8.68 萬，手握 9 萬左右預算嘅朋友都可以考慮。明顯係，又去到決賽圈二揀一環節。
（零跑 A10）
如果對預算比較敏感，咁喺長安啟源全新 Q05 同零跑 A10 之間，後者可能更受歡迎，畢竟終端價格實打實平咗幾千元。而且，高配 A10 配有激光雷達，市區/高速情況均能啟動領航輔助駕駛，呢個就係佢嘅優勢所在。當然，如果預算允許，揀長安啟源全新 Q05 高配，都有帶激光雷達嘅高級輔助駕駛。
（長安啟源全新 Q05）
但既然係買車前嘅橫評，唔少全方位對比。首先從尺寸睇，作為緊湊型 SUV，長安啟源全新 Q05 長寬高分別係 4435*1855*1595mm，軸距為 2735mm。而零跑 A10 車型級別就係小型 SUV，長寬高分別係 4270*1810*1635mm，軸距為 2605mm。
（零跑 A10）
如果只係考慮代步、通勤，零跑 A10 嘅細個嘅略有優勢，方便行街串巷。但實際上，好多人買車都要兼顧家用，10 萬內預算也多以剛需用車群體為主。既然係剛需，且有家用需求，嗰空間自然唔好掉鏈子。
（長安啟源全新 Q05）
（零跑 A10）
講返日常家庭出行嚟講，兩車之間 130mm 軸距差異，直接反映喺後排體驗。坐入長安啟源全新 Q05 後排，腿部空間平整兼寬敞，一齊坐 3 位成年人都唔會太擠；但係坐入零跑 A10 後排，無論坐寬定係腿部空間都會細少少。媽咪喺後排照顧孩子，長安啟源全新 Q05 後排更加寬敞嘅空間會更加方便佢操作，孩子都能有更大嘅活動空間。
（長安啟源全新 Q05）
（零跑 A10）
除咗空間，通勤黨同家庭用戶對舒適配置都比較關注。睇嚟對比，兩車都有配電動尾門、無匙進入、自適應遠近光等外部配置。但係從車廂內睇，零跑 A10 副駕無法電動調節，後排靠背都唔支援角度調節，同埋缺少後排空調出風口、車內 PM2.5 過濾裝置等。
（長安啟源全新 Q05）
（零跑 A10）
反觀長安啟源全新 Q05，除咗副駕支持電動調節，前排仲集成咗加熱/通風/按摩/副駕腿托功能，對比零跑 A10 只提供前排座椅加熱，佢嘅品質無疑更上一層樓。包括後排乘員都有少少照顧，例如靠背角度可調、配有後排空調出風口、後排中央扶手/杯架等，更加適合家人同行呢類場景。
（長安啟源全新 Q05）
（零跑 A10）
除咗舒享體驗，行駛系統嘅對比我哋都唔好忽略。首先從大家關注嘅續航睇，長安啟源全新 Q05 同零跑 A10 分別搭載 51.9kWh、53kWh 電池，CLTC 純電續航做到 506km、505km，差異大可忽略。但從電芯供應鏈睇，前者出自寧德時代，後者就係國軒高科/江蘇正力，若論品牌含金量，“寧王”順位自然靠前，更值得信賴。另外，兩車都有全球品質，按照全球嚴苛嘅標準打造，零跑 A10 符合國內、歐盟雙標準，長安啟源全新 Q05 已經喺泰國上市，未來仲會相繼落地多個國家地區，最終開拓歐洲區域，此外仲有央企背書，質量品質都好可靠。
因為本文討論嘅係 A10 嘅 505 版本，採用電池液冷技術，溫控較好，而如果係 403 版本，採用成本低嘅風冷技術，散熱效果較差。呢點上，全新 Q05 做得更好，入門就採用電池直冷技術，高配用嘅係液冷技術，能更好地實現熱管理，保證電池安全。
（長安啟源全新 Q05）
（零跑 A10）
動力方面，長安啟源全新 Q05 同零跑 A10 都係前置單電機佈局，電機最大動力輸出分別係 120kW/190N·m、90kW/150N·m，0-100km/h 加速時間分別做到 8.9 秒同 10.6 秒。坦率嚟講，兩款車喺純電陣營加速性能都中規中矩；但係相對嚟講，長安啟源全新 Q05 嘅 8 秒級零百加速，喺山路行駛、高速超車等情況下會比零跑 A10 更加分。
（長安啟源全新 Q05）
（零跑 A10）
總結嚟講，零跑 A10 505 激光雷達版優勢突出：價格更低、智駕輔助覆蓋範圍更廣，適合預算優先 + 科技嘗鮮嘅消費者。而長安啟源全新 Q05 更強調“全面”二字：加少少預算同樣可以獲得高級輔助駕駛，而且尺寸更大、舒適配置更高、採用頭部電芯供應鏈，動力亦更強，綜合表現更全能。總括嚟講，預算 9 萬級追求面面俱到嘅家用體驗，長安啟源全新 Q05 506Max+ 更加值得考慮。
