喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場,好多買家喺揀車嗰陣都會揀 Perodua Aruz 同 Honda HR-V 嚟比較。呢兩款車喺價位同定位上都幾接近,而家我哋就從多個方面做一次詳細比較,幫你慳返做功課嘅時間。
Perodua Aruz 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 72,900 - 77,900,合共 2 個版本,包括 1.5L X(RM 72,900)、1.5L AV(RM 77,900)等。
Honda HR-V 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 115,900 - 143,900,合共 4 個版本,包括 2026 e:HEV 1.5L RS(RM 143,900)、2026 1.5T V(RM 137,900)、2026 1.5T E(RM 130,900)等。
由價錢睇落去,Perodua Aruz 嘅起價確實比 Honda HR-V 平咗 RM 43,000。如果你預算有限,Perodua 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需要。但都要留意,平嘅嗰幾千蚊,可能喺配備上會有取舍,具體要看你嘅需要。

Perodua Aruz 配 1.5L 4-cyl,馬力 105 hp。官方油耗 6.0 L/100km。
Honda HR-V 配 1.5L Turbo,馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。
動力方面,Honda HR-V 嘅 1.5L Turbo 比 Perodua Aruz 嘅 1.5L 4-cyl 多咗 35 匹馬力。不過日常喺市區開,兩款車嘅動力都夠用,唔會覺得唔夠力。

Perodua Aruz 車身長 4400 mm,行李箱 400 L。
Honda HR-V 車身長 4500 mm,行李箱 450 L。
空間方面,Honda HR-V 嘅車身比 Perodua Aruz 長咗 100 mm,乘坐空間更有優勢。不過 Perodua Aruz 喺城入面停車會靈活啲,各有取舍。

Perodua Aruz 同 Honda HR-V 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇,適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更睇重品牌口碑同二手價,可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰款;如果你更在意性價比同配備,就揀配備更豐富嗰款。最終都建議兩款都去試駕,親身體驗先至最重要。

總體嚟講,Perodua Aruz 同 Honda HR-V 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車款。揀邊一輛,關鍵仲係睇你個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課,多比較幾間車行嘅報價,再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事,花啲時間做功課絕對唔會錯。

喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場,好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拎 Perodua Ativa 同 Mazda CX-30 嚟做比較。呢兩部車喺價位同定位上都幾近嘅,今日我哋就從多個方面做一個詳細嘅比較,幫你節省做功課嘅時間。
Perodua Ativa 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 62,500 - 73,400,一總有 3 個版本,包括 1.0L Turbo X(RM 62,500)、1.0L Turbo H(RM 67,300)、1.0L Turbo AV(RM 73,400)等。
Mazda CX-30 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 122,409 - 146,409,一總有 4 個版本,包括 2025 2.0L High+ Premium(RM 146,409)、2025 2.0L High+(RM 138,409)、2025 2.0L High(RM 130,409)等。
從價錢來看,Perodua Ativa 嘅起步價確實比 Mazda CX-30 平咗 RM 59,909。如果你預算有限,Perodua 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需求。但都要留意,平嗰幾千塊,可能喺配備上有取舍,具體要睇你嘅需求。

Perodua Ativa 搭載 1.5L 4-cyl,馬力 105 匹。官方油耗 6.0 L/100km。
Mazda CX-30 搭載 1.5L Turbo,馬力 140 匹。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。
動力方面,Mazda CX-30 嘅 1.5L Turbo 比 Perodua Ativa 嘅 1.5L 4-cyl 多咗 35 匹馬力。不過日常喺市區開,兩款車嘅動力都夠用,唔會覺得唔夠力。

Perodua Ativa 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP),主動安全系統包括 ASA 3.0 + ACC + LDA + LKA + BSM + RCTA。
Mazda CX-30 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP),主動安全系統包括 i-Activsense。
兩款車嘅安全評級一樣,喺呢個級別入面安全配備都算畀得好齊全。而家嘅新車安全性都唔差,唔使太擔心呢一點。

Perodua Ativa 車身長 4400 mm,後備箱 400 L。
Mazda CX-30 車身長 4500 mm,後備箱 450 L。
空間方面,Mazda CX-30 嘅車身比 Perodua Ativa 長咗 100 mm,乘坐空間更有優勢。不過 Perodua Ativa 喺城市入面停車會靈活啲,各有取舍。

Perodua Ativa 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
Mazda CX-30 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
兩款車嘅驅動方式一樣,都係 FWD,日常駕駛感受唔會有太大分別。

總體嚟講,Perodua Ativa 同 Mazda CX-30 都係馬來西亞市場好唔錯嘅車款。揀邊一輛,關鍵始終要睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課,多比較幾間車行嘅報價,再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事,花啲時間做功課絕對唔會錯。

On July 9, 2026, Singapore, an Avatr store. A car key was handed to a scholar wearing a shirt and sporting a beard — Konstantin Novoselov, 2010 Nobel Prize in Physics laureate and one of the discoverers of graphene. He officially became the 100,000th owner of the Avatr 07.
This seemingly ordinary delivery ceremony actually contained an unusual signal: a world-class physicist and pioneer in the field of materials science did not choose a Silicon Valley star brand, but instead cast his vote for a Chinese intelligent electric vehicle brand.

From the Lab to the Driver's Seat: A Scientist's Choice
Konstantin Novoselov's name is tightly bound with "graphene". In 2004, he and his mentor Professor Andre Geim successfully separated graphene, composed of single-layer carbon atoms, from graphite using the "scotch tape method", laying a pioneering foundation for the field of two-dimensional materials. They were jointly awarded the 2010 Nobel Prize in Physics for this, at which time Novoselov was only 36 years old.
This top international scholar in the field of condensed matter physics is also now a foreign academician of the Chinese Academy of Sciences and a recipient of the Friendship Award of the Chinese Government, having long been devoted to the Chinese technology sector. This May, Novoselov visited Chongqing to experience Avatr vehicles up close. At the delivery site, he stated: "Its unique, elegant futuristic design, the highly technological surround cabin, and the emotional intelligent interaction are unforgettable. I chose the Avatr 07 because it perfectly matches my aesthetic standards and daily driving needs. This is my first Chinese brand car; its innovative strength and luxurious texture are astonishing."

The Technical Confidence Behind the "Nobel Laureate Choice"
A scientist's choice is never taken lightly. The Avatr 07 is the main model of the Avatr brand and also the world's first mass-produced vehicle fully equipped with Huawei Qiankun Intelligent Driving ADS 4. At its core of intelligent driving, it is equipped with the Huawei WEWA Architecture (World Engine + World Behavior Model), using AI diffusion models to generate high-density difficult scenarios; data density is 1,000 times that obtained in the real world, end-to-end latency reduced by 50%, and traffic efficiency improved by 20%. On the hardware level, it features a 192-line LiDAR, 3 4D millimeter-wave radars, and 27 high-precision sensors, supporting full-scenario pilot assistance and Parking-to-Parking 2.0 functions.
More worth mentioning is that the graphene technology devotedly researched by Novoselov has already been mass-produced in this car's seat heating function — the surface can reach 40°C just 3 seconds after powering on. During his visit to Chongqing, Changan Automobile Executive Vice President Wang Hui introduced Changan Automobile's latest mass-produced application results in the field of graphene technology to Novoselov in detail. As Novoselov said, the cutting-edge technology he devotedly researched "has already been applied and mass-produced into real cars; they are not just living in the laboratory". From the laboratory to the driver's seat, scientific discoveries and industrial applications have completed a closed loop.

A "Chinese Face" in the Million-Yuan Market
The Avatr 07 has a starting price exceeding 1 million RMB in the Singapore market, ranking within the core price range of local luxury brands. This is not a price that hits the market relying on value for money — it directly entered the hinterland of traditional luxury brands.
Since entering the Singapore market in July 2025, Avatr has cooperated deeply with the high-end automotive group DPL Premium Automobiles, continuously improving the localized operation system. In Q1 2026, pure electric vehicles accounted for 57.6% of newly registered vehicles in Singapore — this means that to establish a foothold in this mature high-end market, it relies not on price tags, but on solid product power.
Since its launch, the Avatr 07 has gained recognition from 100,000 users globally, becoming the main sales model of Avatr, helping the brand's global cumulative sales break through 260,000 units. From the 70,000th to the 100,000th unit coming off the line, less than a year. More notably, the 100,000th Avatr 07 coming off the line on July 8 was a right-hand drive model, setting sail from Chongqing for the overseas market — this itself is a testament to its global ambition.

The "Common Choice" of Global Elites
Novoselov is not the first global elite to choose Avatr. Celebrities from all walks of life, such as the Deputy Prime Minister of Thailand, the King of Bhutan, and members of the Qatari Royal Family, had already chosen Avatr as their ride.
As of now, Avatr has entered 43 countries and regions, establishing 95 channel touchpoints. In 2026, Avatr will officially enter the European market; by 2030, it plans to enter over 110 countries and regions. Avatr Technology's globalization strategy is clear and firm — grasping overseas high-end market growth opportunities with localized product and service systems, continuously building a global new luxury intelligent electric vehicle leadership brand.

From "Value-for-Money Export" to "Value Recognition"
In the past, we used to say "Chinese cars going overseas", with the subtext often being "trading market share for value for money". But when a Nobel laureate, a world-class materials scientist, puts Chinese cars into their daily life, this narrative is being subverted — he chose not "adequate", but "good enough to be worth it".
The trust and choice from top global scientists is not only an affirmation of Avatr's product strength but also another example of Chinese brands continuously moving towards new heights in the global high-end market. When a person who deals with "future materials" every day is willing to treat Chinese cars as today's daily travel tools — this is more persuasive than any advertising slogan.


喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場,好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拿 Perodua Ativa 同 Toyota Yaris Cross 嚟做比較。呢兩部車喺價位同定位上都幾接近,今日我哋就從多個方面做一個詳細嘅比較,幫你省下做功課嘅時間。
Perodua Ativa 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 62,500 - 73,400,一共有 3 個版本,包括 1.0L Turbo X(RM 62,500)、1.0L Turbo H(RM 67,300)、1.0L Turbo AV(RM 73,400) 等。
Toyota Yaris Cross 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 99,900 - 109,900,一共有 2 個版本,包括 2026 1.5L Standard(RM 99,900)、2026 HEV 1.5L Standard(RM 109,900) 等。
從價錢來看,Perodua Ativa 嘅起步價確實比 Toyota Yaris Cross 平咗 RM 37,400。如果你預算有限,Perodua 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需求。但都要注意,平嗰幾千蚊,可能喺配備上會有取舍,具體要看你嘅需求。

Perodua Ativa 搭載 1.5L 4-cyl,馬力 105 hp。官方油耗 6.0 L/100km。
Toyota Yaris Cross 搭載 1.5L 4-cyl,馬力 105 hp。官方油耗 6.0 L/100km。
兩部車用嘅係同一套動力系統,日常開落去嘅感受基本冇分別。油耗方面都差唔多,唔使太糾結這一點。

Perodua Ativa 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP),主動安全系統包括 ASA 3.0 + ACC + LDA + LKA + BSM + RCTA。
Toyota Yaris Cross 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP),主動安全系統包括 TSS。
兩部車嘅安全評級一樣,喺呢個級別入面安全配備都算好齊全咗。而家嘅新車安全性都唔差,唔使太擔心這一點。

Perodua Ativa 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
Toyota Yaris Cross 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
兩部車嘅驅動方式一樣,都係 FWD,日常駕駛感受唔會有太大分別。

Perodua Ativa 同 Toyota Yaris Cross 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇,適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更看重品牌聲望同二手價,可以優先考慮聲望更好嗰一款;如果你更在意性價比同配備,那就選配置更豐富嗰款。最後都建議兩部都去試駕,親身體驗先係最重要嘅。

總體嚟講,Perodua Ativa 同 Toyota Yaris Cross 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車款。選擇邊一輛,關鍵仲係睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課,多比較幾間車行嘅報價,再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事,花啲時間做功課絕對唔會錯。

喺馬來西亞嘅轎車市場,好多買家喺揀車嗰陣都會揾本田 Civic Type R 同賓士 E-Class 做比較。呢兩款車喺價位同定位上都相當接近,今日我哋就由多個方面做一個詳細嘅比較,幫你節省做功課嘅時間。
本田 Civic Type R 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 399,900 - 399,900,一共有 3 個版本,包括 2023 2.0T Standard(RM 399,900)、OTR NI(RM 399,900)、富豪 ES90(RM 339,888)等等。
賓士 E-Class 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 363,888 - 363,888,一共有 2 個版本,包括 E 200 Avantgarde(RM 350,000)、E 300 AMG Line(RM 400,000)等等。
從價錢睇,賓士 E-Class 嘅起價比本田 Civic Type R 平咗 RM 36,012。老實講,喺呢個價位段,幾千塊嘅差距其實唔算大,關鍵仲係睇整體嘅性價比同長期使用成本。

本田 Civic Type R 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP),主動安全系統包括 Brand ADAS。
賓士 E-Class 嘅安全評級係 5★ (Euro NCAP),主動安全系統包括。

本田 Civic Type R 保養 5 年/無限里程,保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
賓士 E-Class 保養 3 年/100,000km,保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。

本田 Civic Type R 同賓士 E-Class 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇,適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更睇重品牌口碑同二手價,可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰一款;如果你更在意性價比同配備,那就揀配置更豐富嗰款。最終都係建議兩款都去試駕,親身體驗先係最重要嘅。

總嚟講,本田 Civic Type R 同賓士 E-Class 都係馬來西亞市場好唔錯嘅車款。揀邊一輛,關鍵仲係要睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課,多比較幾間車行嘅報價,再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事,花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。

喺馬來西亞嘅汽車市場,好多買家喺揀車嗰陣都會拎 Volvo XC60 PHEV 同 Mercedes-Benz GLC 嚟做比較。今日我哋由多個方面做一個詳細對比,幫你節省咗做功課嘅時間。

Volvo XC60 PHEV 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 362,888 - 362,888,合共 2 個版本,包括 2025 2.0T 89km Ultra(RM 362,888)、Volvo XC60 PHEV 邊啲安全配備?(RM 296,610) 等。
Mercedes-Benz GLC 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 336,888 - 336,888,合共 2 個版本,包括 GLC 200(RM 290,000)、GLC 300(RM 340,000) 等。
由價錢睇,Mercedes-Benz GLC 嘅起步價比 Volvo XC60 PHEV 平咗 RM 26,000。坦白講,喺呢個價位段,幾千蚊嘅差距其實唔算大,關鍵仲係睇整體嘅性價比同長期使用成本。

Volvo XC60 PHEV 嘅安全評級係 5★ (Euro NCAP),主動安全系統包括 Premium ADAS。
Mercedes-Benz GLC 嘅安全評級係 5★ (Euro NCAP),主動安全系統包括 Premium ADAS。
兩款車嘅安全評級一樣,喺呢個級別入面安全配備都算好齊全晒。而家嘅新車安全性都幾唔錯,唔使太擔心呢一點。

Volvo XC60 PHEV 車身長 4400 mm,行李箱 400 L。
Mercedes-Benz GLC 車身長 4400 mm,行李箱 400 L。
兩款車嘅尺寸幾乎一樣,車內空間分別唔大。呢個級別嘅車,日常使用完全夠用。
Volvo XC60 PHEV 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
Mercedes-Benz GLC 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
兩款車嘅驅動方式一樣,都係 FWD,日常駕駛感受唔會有太大分別。
總括嚟講,Volvo XC60 PHEV 同 Mercedes-Benz GLC 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛,關鍵仲係睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課,多比較幾間車行嘅報價,再去做試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事,花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。

車型概覽

名爵5天蠍座 值唔值得睇,第一步唔係望牌子或者外形,而係睇佢能唔能夠配合你嘅香港日常。 呢篇會集中講同級車比較,幫你用買家角度篩走唔適合嘅選擇。
售價仍待確認,買家可以先把佢放入候選名單,等價格落實後再同同級車逐項比較。
購車價格指南
名爵5天蠍座 目前售價仍未清晰,較理性嘅做法係先睇版本、車身大小同動力形式,等價格落實後再決定值唔值得落訂。
如果有幾個版本可揀,可以先將 2022 1.5T 雙離合版(價格待確認) 放喺同一張清單。日常通勤重視舒適同易用,家庭買家就要優先睇後排、尾箱同安全配置。
核心規格重點

睇 名爵5天蠍座 嘅規格,重點唔係背數字,而係理解佢喺香港用車場景會帶嚟咩分別。
181 Ps / 133 kW、285 N·m 嘅輸出,令高速併線同短距離超車更有信心。 車長 4695 mm、車闊 1842 mm、車高 1480 mm、軸距 2680 mm 可以幫你預判商場停車場、屋苑車位同後排腿部空間。 濕式雙離合(DCT)、前置前駆 會影響起步順滑度、濕地穩定感同長途巡航性格。
優缺點分析
名爵5天蠍座 嘅優點唔需要講到天花龍鳳,真正有價值係佢能唔能夠令日常用車更省心:動力輸出對高速同上斜更有底氣、空間同車身尺寸方便家庭買家預判實用性。
要留意嘅係,要先確認屋苑、公司或常去商場嘅充電條件、香港停車場同窄路使用要留意車身闊度。呢啲唔一定係缺點,但係落訂前應該先諗清楚。
買家常見問題
買 名爵5天蠍座 之前,真正要問嘅唔係單一規格,而係佢可唔可以融入你每日嘅生活節奏。
常見疑問係「名爵 5天蠍座 適合女仔開嗎?」簡單講,適合,名爵 5天蠍座 操控靈活且內飾精緻,非常受年輕女性買家歡迎。 放到實際用車,就係要睇佢對通勤、泊車、家庭乘坐同長期成本有幾大幫助。
同級對比內容
將 名爵5天蠍座 放入同級車清單時,唔建議只用外形或者品牌光環決定。比較順序可以係:先等售價落實,再決定佢應該同邊個級距比較、再睇動力係咪足夠應付高速併線同滿載、最後睇車身大小、座位同尾箱是否適合家人。
咁樣篩選會貼近香港買家真實生活:平日塞車、商場泊車、周末去新界、甚至一家人出入,先係一部車每日要面對嘅考驗。
用車全周期指南
擁有 名爵5天蠍座 最重要係先諗清楚充電節奏。屋苑、公司或者常去商場只要有穩定充電選項,電動化用車就會容易相處好多。
如果你主要喺市區行,視野、低速順滑度同泊車輔助會好影響心情;如果經常行高速或跨區,座椅舒適度、隔音同動力從容感會更重要。

兄弟姐妹們,今日講一個出海嘅大新聞——唔係賣車,係賣「司機」。6 月 2 號,文遠知行同 Uber 聯合宣佈咗一件事:計劃喺西班牙馬德里推出該國首個商業化 Robotaxi 試點服務。意思就係:西班牙人好快就可以用 Uber 叫到一台冇司機嘅出租車。呢次係文遠知行同 Uber 第一次一齊進入歐洲市場。馬德里亦成為文遠知行 Robotaxi 駛入嘅全球第十二個城市。
官方消息話,喺馬德里自治區政府嘅支持下,呢項服務今年內就會正式啟動。到嗰陣,馬德里嘅朋友哋打開 Uber App,就有一鍵呼叫文遠知行嘅 Robotaxi。同叫普通網約車一樣,分別係嚟嘅車冇駕駛員——至少喺初期,仲係有分別嘅。運營初期,車入面會配備經過專業培訓嘅安全員,終究係剛上線,穩妥第一。
文遠知行呢間公司,你可能聽過,也可能冇聽過。簡單介紹下:2017 年成立,一直埋頭搞 Robotaxi 技術研發同商業化。而家佢嘅 Robotaxi 已經覆蓋咗廣州、北京、新加坡、阿布達比、迪拜、利雅得、蘇黎世……加埋而家嘅馬德里,一共 12 個城市。西班牙亦係文遠知行進入嘅第五個歐洲市場——之前已經入咗瑞士、法國、比利時、斯洛伐克。按照文遠知行同 Uber 喺 2025 年 5 月達成嘅規劃,佢哋要喺五年內新增 15 個國際城市部署 Robotaxi 服務,全球部署數萬輛 Robotaxi。隨著馬德里落地,目前已經完成咗 4 個城市嘅佈局,仲有 11 個會喺 2030 年前陸續覆蓋。
講真嘅,中國自動駕駛公司出海唔係頭一回,但中國技術 + 全球出行平台 + 歐洲市場呢個組合,定係好有意思。馬德里係歐洲最具商業潛力嘅 Robotaxi 市場之一,人口多、出行需求大,當地政策都好友善。喺呢個市場站穩腳根,對文遠知行嚟講係個唔小嘅里程碑。對 Uber 嚟講,引進 Robotaxi 都係為咗降低成本——終究司機唔使發人工。對馬德里市民嚟講,以後打車可能更平。

車型概覽

上汽大通V70 值唔值得睇,第一步唔係望牌子或者外形,而係睇佢能唔能夠配合你嘅香港日常。 呢篇會集中講高速巡航、併線同超車信心,幫你用買家角度篩走唔適合嘅選擇。
售價仍待確認,買家可以先把佢放入候選名單,等價格落實後再同同級車逐項比較。
購車價格指南
上汽大通V70 目前售價仍未清晰,較理性嘅做法係先睇版本、車身大小同動力形式,等價格落實後再決定值唔值得落訂。
如果有幾個版本可揀,可以先將 2025 2.0T 手動短軸超低頂版(價格待確認)、2025 2.0T 手動短軸低頂版(價格待確認)、2025 2.0T 手動長軸低頂版(價格待確認)、2025 2.0T 手動長軸中頂版(價格待確認) 放喺同一張清單。日常通勤重視舒適同易用,家庭買家就要優先睇後排、尾箱同安全配置。
核心規格重點

睇 上汽大通V70 嘅規格,重點唔係背數字,而係理解佢喺香港用車場景會帶嚟咩分別。
渦輪增壓、4 個 汽缸、1996 mL 排量 嘅動力底子,重點係市區跟車夠唔夠順、高速巡航會唔會吃力。 150 Ps / 110 kW、375 N·m 嘅輸出,對滿載、上斜同超車都比單睇馬力數字更有意思。 車長 4998/5364 mm、車闊 2030 mm、車高 1998/2035 mm、軸距 3000/3366 mm 可以幫你預判商場停車場、屋苑車位同後排腿部空間。 手動(MT) / 自動(AT)、前置前駆 會影響起步順滑度、濕地穩定感同長途巡航性格。
優缺點分析
上汽大通V70 嘅優點唔需要講到天花龍鳳,真正有價值係佢能唔能夠令日常用車更省心:動力輸出對高速同上斜更有底氣、空間同車身尺寸方便家庭買家預判實用性。
要留意嘅係,香港停車場同窄路使用要留意車身闊度、售價未清晰前唔應該太早用性價比落結論。呢啲唔一定係缺點,但係落訂前應該先諗清楚。
買家常見問題
買 上汽大通V70 之前,真正要問嘅唔係單一規格,而係佢可唔可以融入你每日嘅生活節奏。
常見疑問係「上汽大通 V70 的動力同燃油效率表現係點樣?」簡單講,上汽大通 V70 搭載 2.0T 柴油引擎,動力順滑,綜合油耗約 7.8L/100 公里。 放到實際用車,就係要睇佢對通勤、泊車、家庭乘坐同長期成本有幾大幫助。
同級對比內容
將 上汽大通V70 放入同級車清單時,唔建議只用外形或者品牌光環決定。比較順序可以係:先等售價落實,再決定佢應該同邊個級距比較、再睇動力係咪足夠應付高速併線同滿載、最後睇車身大小、座位同尾箱是否適合家人。
咁樣篩選會貼近香港買家真實生活:平日塞車、商場泊車、周末去新界、甚至一家人出入,先係一部車每日要面對嘅考驗。
用車全周期指南
擁有 上汽大通V70 唔係買車一刻就完結,之後仲有保險、輪胎、保養、泊車同日常能源成本要處理。
如果你主要喺市區行,視野、低速順滑度同泊車輔助會好影響心情;如果經常行高速或跨區,座椅舒適度、隔音同動力從容感會更重要。

Recently, BYD launched a panel van based on the Dolphin in the UK, named DolphinCargoe-Van. The local price is 29,300 pounds, roughly 264,000 RMB, and pre-orders have now opened at authorized BYD stores in the UK.
This vehicle is modified from the familiar home-use Dolphin. BYD removes the rear seats and adds a metal partition behind the front row. The modified vehicle offers a loading capacity of 1,093 liters and also provides 47 liters of hidden storage space, transforming the original passenger car into a light commercial vehicle. That is to say, it is the "Cargo Version Dolphin", specifically targeting light logistics markets such as urban distribution, express delivery, repair services, etc.

Max length 1.25 meters, max width 1.16 meters, width between wheel arches about 1.02 meters, height 0.71 meters. A 47-liter small compartment is also hidden under the floor. The floor has been treated for wear resistance. The rear of the vehicle offers two choices: enclosed baffle or retaining the window, making it convenient for different merchants to select as needed.

Regarding power, the new car continues to adopt the Dolphin's power system, equipped with a 60.4kWh Blade Battery and a 204 horsepower motor. The combined range can reach 426 kilometers, and the urban driving range can reach up to about 558 kilometers.
In terms of configuration, the vehicle comes standard with seat heating, steering wheel heating, 360-degree panoramic vision, and 220V external discharge functionality, allowing direct connection of electrical equipment for repairs or street vending.
The new car is marketed in the UK, an important step for BYD to complete its European product layout, filling the passenger and light commercial vehicle product lines. Overall, the launch performance needs market validation, and it is expected to be promoted to other European countries in the future.
BYD's strategy this year is to go global and target international markets. In May, BYD sold a total of 160,600 vehicles overseas, an increase of 80.7% year-on-year. Overseas sales accounted for more than 42% of total sales, and BYD's Ro-Ro ships are nearly insufficient. Recently, BYD sold the Denza Z9GT to Europe, making a grand impression.
BYD has already built or plans to build factories in countries such as Brazil, Thailand, Uzbekistan, Turkey, and Hungary. Ultimately, going global, having a solid product is the first step, but it is just the first step. If every subsequent step is taken firmly, then more and more foreigners who are "hooked" on domestic cars, or even "obsessed", will become more numerous.


港交所網站掛出一咗一份熟悉嘅招股書。
5 月 28 日,繼去年 10 月首次遞表失效後,智能駕駛解決方案提供商蘇州天瞳威視電子科技股份有限公司(天瞳威視)再次向港股主板發起重衝,由匯豐及華泰國際聯席保薦。

喺智能駕駛賽道從「講故事」轉向「拼量產」嘅 2026 年,天瞳威視嘅二次遞表唔單止係一次資本試探,更係一場關於中國智駕供應商生存現狀嘅集中檢閱。
呢間被認為係「算力效率派」代表嘅公司,一邊連住從采埃孚到上汽、北汽嘅豪華產業資本陣營,一邊卻面臨住現金流緊繃、海外明顯回落嘅現實困境。喺呢場 IPO 嘅博弈中,光鮮同陣痛並存。
01
邊個係「天瞳威視」?
天瞳威視嘅創辦人王曦係一位典型嘅「回國」技術派。佢畢業於北京航空航天大學,後喺英國雷丁大學攻讀計算機科學博士學位。
喺決定創業之前,王曦曾經喺汽車零部件供應商天合汽車(TRW)及采埃孚擔任算法工程師同技術負責人,深度參與咗早期 ADAS 系統嘅開發。
2016 年,王曦捕捉到國內汽車智能化嘅風口,回國喺蘇州創立咗天瞳威視,定位係「以軟件算法驅動智能駕駛」嘅本土解決方案提供商。
公司嘅名字「天瞳」寓意「天之眼」,意在打造車輛感知萬物嘅視覺中樞。佢從最初嘅視覺感知算法起步,逐步擴展至行泊一體域控制器、L4 級自動駕駛系統等軟硬件結合嘅整體方案。

天瞳威視融資情況。資料來源:企查查
成立後不久,天瞳威視就獲得德聯資本、盛世投資嘅天使輪融資。此後十年時間,天瞳威視累計完成咗超過 10 輪融資,融資總額近 10 億元。
從招股書披露嘅股權結構嚟睇,天瞳威視構建咗深度綁定嘅「產業 + 資本」生態圈。
一方面,產業夥伴站台,全球汽車零部件巨頭采埃孚唔單止係其 C 輪領投方,亦係其戰略合作夥伴,持有天瞳威視 6.93% 嘅股份,位列第四大股東;國內方面,上汽集團通過上汽北美產投持股,北汽集團通過北汽產投佈局其中,地平線同商湯科技亦係戰略投資者。
另一方面,地方國資護航,唐山機器人基金、吳中金控等國資背景基金喺 D 輪及 D+ 輪入場,提供咗約 5.23 億元嘅資金支持。

截至最後實際可行日期股權架構
截至目前,王曦透過直接持股同員工持股平台合共控制公司約 40.84% 嘅權益,依然保持住對公司嘅控制權。
02
「兩條腿」行路
天瞳威視喺業務佈局上採取咗「雙軌並行」嘅策略。

喺 L2-L2+ 級輔助駕駛領域,天瞳威視嘅選擇非常務實。佢並冇盲目追逐算力堆疊嘅「軍備競賽」,而係走咗一條高性價比路線。
作為典型嘅視覺派智駕供應商,佢喺 L2 量產方案上以視覺感知為主,融合毫米波雷達同超聲波雷達,能夠喺較低算力平台上實現高級功能。例如,基於地平線 J6B 芯片(約 20TOPS)嘅方案即可支持行泊一體、高速 NOA。
呢種打法擊中咗 10 萬 -20 萬級主流車款對成本敏感嘅痛點。根據灼識諮詢嘅數據,按 2024 年裝機量計,天瞳威視係中國第二大同時提供行車同泊車解決方案嘅以軟件為核心嘅 L2-L2+ 級方案提供商,市場份額為 14.3%。

2024 年中國具備行泊一體能力嘅以軟件為核心供應商格局
截至最後實際可行日期,天瞳威視獲得 23 個汽車品牌嘅 198 款車款嘅 L2-L2+ 級解決方案定點函,並實現 6 個汽車品牌嘅 105 款車款嘅量產;獲得定點函嘅 198 款車款中有 87 款覆蓋海外市場,其中 59 款已實現量產。
但值得注意嘅係,L2-L2+ 市場正在經歷劇烈嘅「紅海化」。
一方面,經緯恆潤、福瑞泰克等本土 Tier1 正在加速追趕;另一方面,部分頭部車廠開始將低階智駕方案從外購轉為內部集成。
天瞳威視能否維持佢喺「性價比方案」領域嘅領先地位,取決於佢能否持續保持算法對低算力平台嘅優化能力,而這需要喺研發投入上持續加碼。

喺高級 L4 級自動駕駛領域,天瞳威視更多扮演「先鋒」角色。這亦係佢近兩年增長最快嘅板塊。
早在 2019 年,佢就參與咗上海洋山港嘅 5G 智能重卡項目。目前佢嘅 L4 方案覆蓋 Robobus、Robotaxi 同 Robotruck。其中,Robobus 係佢最具代表性嘅產品線,已喺蘇州、天津等城市嘅公開道路投入常態化試營運。
2025 年,天瞳威視從 L4 級解決方案產生收入 3.75 億元,佔公司總收入嘅 68% 以上,大部分收入來自 L4 級軟件解決方案。
然而,硬幣嘅另一面係商業化嘅曲折。雖然 L4 業務營收暴增,但佢嘅交付形態目前以「軟硬件一體解決方案」為主,呢種模式本質上接近「項目制交付」或「小規模車隊部署」,與 L2 業務中「純軟件授權 + 白盒交付」嘅高毛利、大規模複製邏輯存在顯著差異。
呢就直接導致 L4 業務毛利率嘅大幅波動:喺部分自研硬件佔比较高嘅項目中,毛利率一度低至 15%。

截至遞表日,公司雖手握超 10 億元嘅 L4 意向訂單,涵蓋 2500 架車,但呢啲訂單預計要喺未來三至五年內先會陸續交付,短期內對現金流嘅改善作用有限。
此外,天瞳威視仲有部分應收來自工程服務,主要涉及道路測試、數據收集支援及數據標註服務以及公司嘅專有工具鏈。
03
財務嘅雙面鏡
招股書嘅財務部分,展現咗智駕行業最真實嘅「B 面」:規模同虧損嘅極限拉扯,同埋賬面現金同營運消耗之間嘅緊張博弈。

營收高增長,但結構劇烈波動。
財務數據顯示,公司嘅營收呈現爆發式增長,從 2022 年嘅 1.72 億元增長至 2024 年嘅 4.83 億元,複合年增長率高達 67.7%。2025 年全年營收進一步增長至 5.5 億元。
但收入結構嘅變化明顯。2023 年,公司依賴 L2-L2+ 業務,佔比 90.2%;去到 2024 年,L4 業務佔比升至 50.2%;2025 年,L4 業務佔比進一步拉高至 68%。呢種「斷崖式」嘅結構切換,雖然證明佢 L4 技術搵到咗落地場景,但亦令市場質疑佢 L2 業務係咪已觸及天花板。
毛利率同純利潤嘅背離,呢係天瞳威視面臨嘅最大挑戰。
從毛利睇,整體毛利率喺 30% 左右徘徊,喺呢個技術密集型嘅智駕行業屬於中等水平。但細拆睇嚟,L2-L2+ 業務嘅毛利率通常能維持喺 40% 以上,純軟件授權模式,而 L4 業務嘅毛利率則因「軟硬件一體」交付中硬件佔比提高而被顯著拉低。
從純利潤睇,雖然表面虧損額較大,2024 年虧損 4.63 億、2025 年虧損約 2 億,呢度包含大量因優先股公平值變動帶來嘅「紙面虧損」。剔除呢個因素後嘅經調整純利潤更能反映公司嘅真實經營狀況:2024 年已收窄至 -438 萬元,但 2025 年並未如市場預期實現轉正,而係錄得約 -1086 萬元,虧損較 2024 年有所擴大。
呢個背後有一個不可回避嘅關鍵前提:調整後嘅「減虧」乃至「接近盈虧平衡」,係喺公司持續壓縮研發投入嘅基礎上實現嘅,研發費用從 2024 年嘅 1.17 億元降至 2025 年嘅 9231 萬元,研發費用率從 2024 年嘅 24.3% 進一步降至 16.8%,而 2022 年呢個數字曾高達 108.7%。對於一家科技公司嚟講,研發強度嘅「退坡」是否會影響未來嘅技術護城河,係一個潛在風險點。
現金流持續告急,最令人擔憂嘅信號。
根據最新招股書,截至 2025 年 12 月 31 日,公司賬上嘅現金及現金等价物為 2.35 億元,較 2025 年 6 月 30 日嘅 3.74 億元淨減少 1.39 億元,現金消耗速度較快。

更值得警惕嘅係經營現金流由正轉負且缺口持續擴大嘅趨勢。2023 年,公司經營活動現金流淨額為正向流入 1.15 億元,但 2024 年迅速轉為淨流出 1.89 億元,2025 年進一步惡化至淨流出 2.93 億元。
與此同時,應收賬款周轉急劇惡化。公司嘅貿易應收款項從 2023 年嘅 0.89 億元升至 2025 年嘅 5.48 億元,三年增長超過五倍,而同期營收增幅僅約 2.7 倍。
更令人擔憂嘅係應收款項周轉天數從 2023 年嘅 191 天同 2024 年嘅 166 天,到 2025 年驟升至 300 天,意味著公司從完成交付到收回款項平均需要接近一年時間。呢相當於變相為客戶提供長期無息墊資,喺資金本就緊張嘅情況下進一步加劇咗流動性壓力。

此外,雖然天瞳威視係首家出海嘅中國智駕軟件供應商,但 2025 年佢嘅海外業務遭遇咗明顯回落。2023 年天瞳威視海外收入為 1.27 億元,佔總營收比重達到 62.2%;到 2025 年海外收入降至 1100 萬元,佔比僅 2.0%。
喺而家全球地緣政治複雜、部分國家對智能汽車數據監管趨嚴嘅背景下,為佢嘅全球化故事增添咗一絲不確定性。
04
結語
天瞳威視嘅二次闖關,係智能駕駛行業進入「淘汰賽」階段嘅一個縮影。
從好嘅方面睇,佢踩準咗 L2 性價比同 L4 場景化落地嘅雙重節奏,且經調整純利潤喺特定口徑下已接近盈虧平衡,呢啲都畀投資者提供咗「有亮點可講」嘅故事線。
但從風險嘅角度睇,情況遠比首次遞表時更為嚴峻。業務重心嘅急速漂移、L4 業務商業化初期嘅盈利磨難、研發投入嘅被動收縮,呢啲此前就已存在嘅問題並未緩解。

天瞳威視 L4 級智能巴士
而真正令此次 IPO 帶「求生」色彩嘅,係現金流數據嘅實質性惡化:2.35 億元嘅賬面現金,面對每年近 3 億元嘅经营性現金淨流出,安全邊際已不足一年。疊加 300 天嘅應收賬款周轉天數,意味著公司每交付一筆訂單,都要墊付近一年嘅資金成本。
換言之,天瞳威視正處喺一個危險嘅財務窗口期:賬上嘅錢僅夠維持唔足一年嘅正常運作,而 L4 業務嘅大規模交付同回款卻需要更長時間。喺呢個智駕資本熱潮退去、一級市場融資邊際收緊嘅時刻,公司已冇太多等待嘅餘地。
首次遞表失效後僅隔半年便再次衝擊港股,對天瞳威視而言,與其話係戰略選擇,唔如話係現金倒逼下嘅必然之舉。

Folks, today let's talk about big news on going global—not selling cars, but selling "drivers". On June 2, WeRide and Uber jointly announced a plan: to launch the country's first commercial Robotaxi pilot service in Madrid, Spain. In other words: Spanish residents will soon be able to hail a driverless taxi via Uber. This is the first time WeRide and Uber are partnering to enter the European market. Madrid also becomes the 12th city globally where WeRide's Robotaxi arrives.
According to official news, with the support of the Madrid regional government, this service will officially launch within this year. At that time, friends in Madrid can open the Uber App and call WeRide's Robotaxi with one click. It's just like calling an ordinary ride-hailing service, the difference is the arriving car has no driver—at least initially, there is still a difference. In the initial operation phase, a professionally trained safety monitor will be on board, as it's just launched, safety comes first.
This company, WeRide, you might have heard of it, or you might not. A brief introduction: Established in 2017, it has been dedicated to Robotaxi technology R&D and commercialization. Currently, its Robotaxis cover Guangzhou, Beijing, Singapore, Abu Dhabi, Dubai, Riyadh, Zurich... plus Madrid now, totaling 12 cities. Spain is also the 5th European market WeRide has entered—previously entered Switzerland, France, Belgium, Slovakia. According to the plan agreed by WeRide and Uber in May 2025, they plan to deploy Robotaxi services in 15 new international cities within five years, deploying tens of thousands of Robotaxis globally. With the Madrid launch, the deployment in 4 cities has been completed, and 11 more will be covered successively before 2030.
To be honest, it's not the first time Chinese autonomous driving companies are going global, but the combination of Chinese technology + global mobility platform + European market is quite interesting. Madrid is one of the European Robotaxi markets with the most commercial potential, with a large population, high travel demand, and friendly local policies. Being able to take root in this market is a significant milestone for WeRide. For Uber, introducing Robotaxis is also a way to reduce costs—after all, drivers don't need salaries. For Madrid residents, hailing a taxi might be cheaper in the future.

In May, China's automotive market overall presented a gentle recovery trend, with domestic brands still being the sales backbone of the market. Recently, BYD, Geely, Chery, Changan, and Great Wall, the top 5 domestic automakers, successively released their monthly performance reports. From the data, these five companies show a general characteristic of "stable total growth, divergence between domestic and international markets, and accelerated new energy penetration". Overseas exports and new energy vehicles have become the most core growth engines; export business has evolved from a "bonus item" to the "core foundation" for some companies. BYD's "dominant leader" status is further consolidated, Chery achieved high growth via exports, Geely's new energy penetration rate broke 56%, Changan focused steadily on balanced development, while Great Wall appeared slightly under pressure during structural transformation.
BYD: Export Hits New High Becomes Biggest HighlightIn May, BYD stood firmly at the top of domestic brands with a monthly sales volume of 383,500 vehicles, maintaining positive growth both year-on-year and month-over-month under a large base. Its two main brands, Dynasty and Ocean, sold a combined 330,200 vehicles, contributing 86.1% of total sales; Fangchengbao's monthly sales broke 30,000 units to reach 30,200, a year-on-year increase of 139.7%, setting a new high for the year; Denza sold 16,300 vehicles, and Yangwang delivered 286 vehicles. From a model perspective, BYD had eight models in May with monthly sales exceeding 20,000 vehicles. The Song Family and Yuan Family both broke 50,000 units, selling 51,370 and 56,691 vehicles respectively. The Sea Lion Family followed closely with 42,615 vehicles, and Seagull sales were also close to 40,000 vehicles.

BYD's biggest highlight in May was exports. Overseas new energy vehicle sales reached 160,600 units, an 80.4% year-on-year increase, accounting for about 42%. The sharp expansion of export scale effectively countered the phased weakness in domestic demand. Cumulative exports from January to May exceeded 620,000 vehicles. High export growth mainly benefited from continued ramping up of overseas factory capacity, improved ocean shipping capacity, and accelerated channel network expansion. In the domestic market, BYD promoted Megawatt Super Charging and intelligent strategies simultaneously—Megawatt charging achieved about 90% charge in 9 minutes; 20,000 super charging stations are planned to be built by 2026; all series models are available with Sky Eye B intelligent driving solutions and city navigation safety fallback plans, accelerating the popularization of high-level intelligent driving. As Gen 2 Blade Battery capacity gradually releases, the company's orders are expected to continue rising.
Chery: Sales Growth Leads the Top 5Chery Group's total sales volume in May was 247,800 vehicles, a significant year-on-year increase of 20.5%, ranking first in growth speed among the top 5. Exports remained its most core growth engine—May exports reached 181,900 vehicles, an 80.5% year-on-year increase, accounting for 73.4% of total sales that month, continuously breaking the single-month export record for Chinese brands for three months. In terms of new energy, Chery New Energy sold 100,300 vehicles, a 58.8% year-on-year increase. April and May consecutively saw monthly new energy sales breaking 100,000 vehicles.

The strong performance in exports benefited from Chery's long-term deep cultivation of overseas channel advantages and localized operation capabilities. While overseas orders continued to rise, high export growth formed a sharp contrast with domestic sales—Chery's domestic sales in May were only 60,000 vehicles, accounting for one-quarter of total sales. From cumulative data, Chery Group accumulated 1.101 million sales from January to May, but against the annual goal of 3.2 million vehicles, monthly averages need to reach about 420,000 vehicles later, and pressure remains significant.
Geely: New Energy Penetration Rate Breaks 56%Geely Auto's total sales volume in May was 237,600 vehicles, a 1% year-on-year increase, achieving month-over-month double growth for three consecutive months. In terms of structure, Geely's "New Four Transformations" transformation showed significant results: new energy vehicle sales reached 133,400 units, accounting for 56% of total sales, with new energy share exceeding 50% for four consecutive months.

From sub-brands, performance was significantly divergent. Zeekr brand sales in May reached 34,400 vehicles, a 82% year-on-year increase; Zeekr 9 Series and 8 Series models combined sales approached 50% of total sales, showing bright performance in the high-end market; Galaxy brand sales were 81,700 vehicles; Geely brand sales were 182,500 vehicles, among which China Star Series sales reached 100,800 vehicles; Lynk & Co brand sales were 20,700 vehicles, with new energy vehicle sales share rising to 71%.
In terms of exports, Geely's overseas vehicle exports in May reached 85,100 vehicles, a explosive 184% year-on-year increase, setting a brand single-month export record high. Among exported products, new energy vehicles reached 40,800 units, accounting for nearly half; hybrid and pure electric products have successively landed in Southeast Asia, Middle East, Latin America, and other markets, highlighting the results of global strategy implementation.
Changan: Multi-brand Matrix Balanced EffortChangan Auto's delivery volume in May was 209,100 vehicles, among which new energy deliveries were 92,400 vehicles, a 5.8% year-on-year increase, with new energy share about 44%. In terms of exports, overseas deliveries reached 70,700 vehicles, a 38% year-on-year increase, becoming another major growth highlight for Changan in May.
In the sub-brand matrix, Changan Qiyuan delivered 34,500 vehicles in May; All-New Q05 delivered 15,800 units, with orders breaking 3,000 units within three days of listing in Thailand; Deepal sales in May were 33,200 vehicles, a 30% year-on-year increase; January to May overseas cumulative sales were 28,700 vehicles, a significant 167% year-on-year increase; Avatr delivered 7,336 vehicles in May; Changan Auto (Gravity) delivered nearly 49,000 vehicles in May.

Changan Auto's balanced layout was fully reflected in May: the fuel car base remained stable, new energy brands Deepal and Qiyuan accelerated volume growth, high-end brand Avatr continued to break through in technical cooperation, and overseas markets simultaneously achieved breakthrough growth. The pattern of five brands working together, driven by both new energy and exports, is initially taking shape.
Great Wall: Overseas Sales Growth Year-on-Year 46.75%Great Wall Motor's sales in May were 100,400 vehicles, slightly down compared to last May's 102,200 vehicles, making it the only company among the top 5 to show a year-on-year negative growth. From sub-brands, Haval brand sales in May were 55,500 vehicles, remaining Great Wall's most important sales pillar; Tank brand sales were 17,100 vehicles; both Haval and Tank brand sales showed year-on-year declines; Wey brand sold 8,119 vehicles, a 31.78% year-on-year increase, achieving growth against the trend; Ora brand performance was most stunning, with sales of 6,018 vehicles, a significant 206.88% year-on-year increase. In terms of new energy, Great Wall sold 30,400 new energy vehicles in May, with new energy vehicle transformation gradually accelerating.

The overseas market became Great Wall's biggest highlight in May, with overseas sales growing 46.75% year-on-year. Against the background of pressure on the domestic market, strong growth in overseas business effectively made up for the decline in the domestic market. Great Wall Motor's current core contradiction lies in: Haval and Tank, the two traditional main-selling brands, face weak growth, while Wey and Ora brands, although growing notably, have relatively small volume and are not yet enough to support overall growth. How to complete the "relay" between old and new brands is the key issue Great Wall must solve subsequently.
Final ThoughtsFrom May data, the growth pattern of the top 5 domestic brands has clearly diverged, but there are three common trends worth noting: First, exports have become a key engine for domestic brands to seek stability and growth. Second, new energy transformation is still accelerating, but paths differ among enterprises. Third, technological innovation continues to deepen brand moats. Looking ahead to the second half of the year, competition in the automotive industry will continue to upgrade around these three trends. Although everyone has a common direction, these three trends are all competing for the entire enterprise's industrial chain strength, and the strong will remain strong, which has almost become an inevitable outcome.
