首頁Skyline V35
搜尋歷史
熱門搜尋
經銷商登入 / 註冊
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嗰陣都會拿豐田 Yaris Cross 同現代 Tucson 嚟做比較。這兩款車喺價格同定位上都幾接近，今日我就從多個方面做一个詳細比較，幫你省返做功課嘅時間。
豐田 Yaris Cross 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係令吉 99,900 - 109,900，一共有 2 個版本，包括 2026 年 1.5L 標準型（令吉 99,900）、2026 HEV 1.5L 標準型（令吉 109,900） 等。
現代 Tucson 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係令吉 143,888 - 197,888，一共有 5 個版本，包括 2025 HEV 1.6T AT 2 驅 Prestige（令吉 197,888）、2025 1.6T DCT 4 驅 Prestige（令吉 186,888）、2025 1.6T DCT 2 驅 Prime（令吉 164,888） 等。
由價錢睇，豐田 Yaris Cross 嘅起售價確實比現代 Tucson 平咗令吉 43,988。如果你預算有限，豐田嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需要。但都要注意，便宜嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備上會有取捨，具體要看你嘅需要。
豐田 Yaris Cross 車身長度 4400 毫米，行李廂 400 公升。
現代 Tucson 車身長度 4400 毫米，行李廂 400 公升。
兩款車嘅尺寸幾乎一樣，車內空間差別唔大。呢個級距嘅車，日常使用完全夠用。
豐田 Yaris Cross 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
現代 Tucson 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
兩款車嘅驅動方式一樣，都係 FWD，日常駕駛感受唔會有太大分別。
豐田 Yaris Cross 同現代 Tucson 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更睇重品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰一款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，嗰就揀配備更豐富嗰款。最終都係建議兩款都去試駕，親自體驗先係最重要嘅。
總括嚟講，豐田 Yaris Cross 同現代 Tucson 都係馬來西亞市場好唔錯嘅車型。揀邊輛，關鍵仲要睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建议大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
In the SUV market in Malaysia, many buyers compare Honda CR-V and Subaru Outback when choosing a car. These two models are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
The Honda CR-V's OTR price in Malaysia ranges from RM 178,200 to RM 195,900, with a total of 4 versions, including 2026 e:HEV 2.0L 2WD RS (RM 195,900), 2026 1.5T 4WD V (RM 181,900), 2026 e:HEV 2.0L 2WD E (RM 178,200), etc.
The Subaru Outback OTR price in Malaysia ranges from RM 260,000 to RM 280,000, with a total of 2 versions, including 2025 2.4T R-Touring EyeSight (RM 310,340), 2025 2.5L Touring EyeSight (RM 280,340), etc.
In terms of price, the starting price of Honda CR-V is indeed RM 81,800 cheaper than Subaru Outback. If your budget is limited, Honda's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. But keep in mind that the few thousand ringgit savings might involve trade-offs in features, depending on your specific requirements.
Honda CR-V comes with a 2.0L 4-cyl, horsepower 170 hp. Official fuel consumption 8.0 L/100km.
Subaru Outback comes with a 2.0L Turbo, horsepower 220 hp. Official fuel consumption 9.5 L/100km.
In terms of power, the Subaru Outback's 2.0L Turbo has 50 more horsepower than the Honda CR-V's 2.0L 4-cyl. However, for daily city driving, both cars have sufficient power and won't feel underpowered.
Honda CR-V body length 4500 mm, trunk 450 L.
Subaru Outback body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
Regarding space, the Honda CR-V body is 100 mm longer than the Subaru Outback, and the interior seating space will be slightly more spacious, especially the rear legroom. If you frequently carry family or need to fit a stroller, the larger body is indeed more practical.
Honda CR-V warranty 5 years/unlimited mileage, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Subaru Outback warranty 3 years/100,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Overall, Honda CR-V and Subaru Outback are both excellent models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends mainly on your personal needs and budget. It is recommended to do your research, compare quotes from multiple dealerships, and then test drive before making a final decision. Buying a car is a major matter; spending some time doing homework will never be wrong.
Monthly sales of 100,000, yet market cap only half of competitors: Why can't Leapmotor's scale earn valuation?
Evening of August 24, Leapmotor released an interim performance report with almost flawless data: First half deliveries 356,487 units, YoY growth 60.8%, ranking first among New EV makers; Revenue 38.11 billion yuan, growth 57.2%; Net profit attributable 208 million yuan, achieving profitability for two consecutive half-years. July single-month deliveries 101,267 units, becoming the first domestic New EV maker to break 100,000 monthly sales. Established for 11 years, cumulative deliveries exceeded 1.6 million units.
Leapmotor displayed its full series of models at a promotion event | Source: Leapmotor official website
But the reaction from the capital market was quite interesting. As of the August 26 market close, Leapmotor's HK stock market cap was approximately HKD 45.36 billion; on the same day, Nio was about HKD 85.5 billion, XPeng about HKD 88.4 billion, and Li Auto about HKD 97.7 billion. The one selling the most, its market cap is less than half of Li Auto. More importantly, Li Auto's second-quarter net loss was 1.705 billion yuan, XPeng's second-quarter net loss was 1.34 billion yuan — they are making losses, yet the market is willing to give them higher prices.
Being the sales champion doesn't beat the market cap, this is not just a problem for Leapmotor, but it is Leapmotor's most prominent issue. This deep dive wants to clearly break down three things: how exactly these 200 million in profit was squeezed out; why that overseas report is Leapmotor's real trump card; and what evidence the market is waiting for before re-pricing this company.
01 How the 200 Million in Profit was "Squeezed" OutFirst, let's look at the profit structure. First half revenue of 38.11 billion yuan and 11.7% comprehensive gross margin, corresponds to gross profit of approximately 4.45 billion yuan. After deducting R&D, sales, administrative and other period expenses and taxes, final operating profit was 128 million yuan, with net profit attributable to shareholders of 208 million yuan.
Converted to per unit: 356,487 vehicles, with an average profit of only about 585 yuan per car. A 100,000 yuan level car, profit isn't enough for a decent meal. Net margin 0.55%, thin as a blade.
Leapmotor 2026 Semi-Annual Report · Performance Highlights | Source: Leapmotor official website
These 208 million are pieced together from several parts. The first part is selling cars itself. Management gave whole vehicle gross margin guidance of 10~11 percentage points at the conference call — meaning selling cars is low profit high volume, the bulk of gross margin depends on scale rolling. The second part is carbon credits, contributing 800 to 900 million yuan in the first half, about 500 million yuan in the second quarter. This is the profit's "plug-in", and its unit price is declining, management original words: "Carbon credit sales unit price fell compared to last year", "Just like the path our country walked back then". The third part is R&D service revenue, contributed in the first half but not much; the fourth part is Leapmotor International, slightly profitable but with a small loss in the first half due to exchange rates, management expects to recover in the second half.
The trend of gross margin also hides structure: First half comprehensive gross margin 11.7%, YoY decline of 2.4 percentage points, but second quarter single quarter recovered to 12.6%, QoQ improvement 3.2 percentage points. Full year guidance is 13%~14%. Management attributed the improvement to scale effect and raw material price stabilization — to translate: volume growth is diluting per-unit cost, but carbon credit decline is pulling profit margin back from the other side.
Compare with peers, the irony is stronger. Li Auto second-quarter net loss 1.705 billion yuan, deliveries 98,330 units, YoY still declined 11.5%; XPeng second-quarter net loss 1.34 billion yuan. Full market only Leapmotor, the only New EV maker stable in making money, market cap yet bottomed out. In Tech Jungle's view, the market is not that it doesn't recognize profit, but doesn't recognize "profit of doubtful gold content" and "profit that hasn't proven sustainable scaling".
02 Going Overseas: The Real Profit Pool is FormingLeapmotor interim report's most eye-catching numbers are actually not in the domestic market. First half exports 96,294 units, YoY growth 372.6%, already exceeded 2025 full year export total, accounting for 27% of total sales; July single month exports 17,569 units. European market revenue 8.875 billion yuan, YoY surge 379.7%, accounting for about 23% of total revenue.
Leapmotor exceeded 900,000 global deliveries in June | Source: Leapmotor official website
Overseas per-unit gold content is far higher than domestic: Same platform models selling price in Europe is several times that of domestic, even after incurring freight, tariffs and channel costs, per-unit gross margin is clearly better than the involution of domestic market. This is the real meaning of "Second growth curve" — not selling tens of thousands more cars, but selling a market with higher profit margin.
Local assembly map also unfolds simultaneously: Malaysia relies on Stellantis Kedah plant, C10 already mass production, B10 planned Q3 mass production launch; European Spain Zaragoza plant completed retrofit, B10 Q3 start production, B05 trial production within the year, 2027 formal mass production, supporting battery plant Q3 start mass production; South America selected Brazil Goiania plant, B10 planned 2027 second half start production. Management stance is: This year overseas expected around 200,000 units (start of year target 100,000~150,000 units), next year target 350,000~400,000 units, internal challenge 400,000 units.
But management also said two sentences worth noting truths. First is local production gross margin indeed better than whole vehicle export has improvement, "but improvement not as obvious as imagined", profit margin's real improvement needs to wait for "policy changes" — simply put, wait for EU tariff and local procurement rules to clear. Second is RoRo ship capacity tight, company has reached cooperation with Shipping Group, "Full year 200,000 units is guaranteed". Going overseas doesn't lack orders, lacks capacity and policy window.
There is also a detail ignored by most interpretations: Leapmotor International is Leapmotor 49%, Stellantis 51% joint venture, when established agreed on previous three years lower gross margin split. Management explicitly said at conference call, both parties "3-year agreement period" gradually approaching, will sit down to re-communicate. This is both an area where first half comprehensive gross margin was "structurally suppressed" dark corner, also potential option for gross margin upward repair in future one to two years — Stellantis sells every car, after re-pricing may contribute more profit.
03 Balance Sheet: Where Did Money and Goods GoSeveral numbers on the interim report balance sheet explain Leapmotor's current strategy better than income statement.
Leapmotor 2026 Semi-Annual Report · Financial Performance | Source: Leapmotor official website
Cash and equivalents 38.59 billion yuan, borrowing only 2.39 billion yuan, net cash over 36 billion yuan. A car company with annual sales of hundreds of thousands of units holding such scale of cash, at least on cash flow there is no danger signal.
What is truly worth pondering is inventory: 9.27 billion yuan, QoQ increase 103.7%, approximately equal to 1.65 months cost of sales. Why prepare so much inventory? Two months ago this number was not even half. The answer is written in the timeline: A05 launched on August 11, A10 enter ramp-up, D19 and C series volume, second half delivery target obviously is to go high; plus exports in transit whole vehicles and parts all floating at sea, inventory double more like intentional "ammo".
More ruthless is accounts payable: 47.08 billion yuan, is 5.1 times inventory. This shows in supply chain system, upstream suppliers are advancing funds for Leapmotor. Use suppliers' goods first, then pay money, account period dragged longer, Leapmotor cash more abundant. This is an invisible low cost financing, also realization of scale effect — only when your procurement volume large enough no one dares easily cut supply, this chain then can move. Huawei-style "V-formation supply chain" in auto industry replicate difficulty compared to consumer electronics is much bigger, but Leapmotor is trying to run with same logic.
Future two years still need to spend a big sum: As of end of June, company for purchase of properties, factory and equipment capital commitments were 7.76 billion yuan, first half capital expenditure 2.03 billion yuan, mainly used for new factory equipment and new car production line introduction. Where do these money go? Answer is 2027 — management's words "very big product big year": D series brand new models, C series existing brand new and also replacement, B series new products. 2026 profit, largely is for 2027 product matrix storing water.
04 FAW and Stellantis: Two "Technology for Market" AccountsAugust 24, same day financial report release, Leapmotor and China FAW signed deepening cooperation framework, listed ten major synergy fields: Battery, Electric Drive, Chassis, Intelligent Cockpit, Intelligent Driving, Auto Electronics, Whole Vehicle Design Manufacturing, Export, Supply Chain, and Embodied AI Robot. Time line extended look, March 3, 2025 both parties signed strategic cooperation MOU, December 28, 2025 FAW subscribed about 5% domestic shares with 3.744 billion yuan (per share 50.03 yuan) — this investment's book floating loss, according to Chegulu Media calculation already exceeded 1 billion yuan (Aug 19); and concurrently, founder Zhu Jiangming was reported multiple announcements increase holdings.
Leapmotor and China FAW signed deepening strategic cooperation agreement | Source: Leapmotor official website
A state-owned giant floating loss, founder investing against trend, both parties again on financial report day announced ten major synergy — this set of signals put together, reads like a "Long-termist mutual confirmation" agreement. Leapmotor wants one FAW R&D synergy and policy resources, FAW wants Leapmotor full domain self-developed powertrain ready-made capability, use money and technology double binding.
Another line is Stellantis. 2023 shareholding, May 2024 established Leapmotor International, May 2026 both parties announced cooperation upgrade (Opel etc brand dedicated production line and technical support, according to public reports). Conference call management revealed, cooperation direction with Stellantis is "Empowerment based on mature powertrain component supply capability", and "Recent very likely there will be further good news"; With FAW, Stellantis R&D service cooperation, "Very soon everyone will receive external announcement".
This words actually already fulfilled half: FAW framework agreement is announcement day hammered. Leapmotor is upgrading "Selling cars" into "Selling cars + Selling technology + Selling supply chain capability" three parts income. This is also Zhu Jiangming repeatedly publicly expressing "Market cap undervalued" confidence source — market gives Leapmotor valuation according to whole vehicle manufacturer, but its financial statements are growing into technology exporter shape.
05 Robots: Second Curve Waiting Behind AnnouncementAnd FAW's ten synergy list appeared "Embodied AI Robot", this is official level first time writing robot into cooperation framework. Accompanying public business information (Leapmotor power subsidiary business scope newly added robot related content), and conference call management "Company has robot related planning, very soon will formal announcement" statement, Leapmotor's robot business has entered "Night before official announcement" from "Rumors".
But to speak rigorous: Robot currently still is expectation, not profit. Before announcement landing, it is just valuation imagination option. Management at conference call also confirmed, September 16 will hold technology launch conference in Huzhou, Zhejiang, heavyweight content concentrated on Intelligent Driving, Battery and Electric Drive — this is future few weeks most immediately visible catalyst, Robot is farther that "Easter egg".
Risks also need to be mentionedOutside bullish, a few risks worth listing on table.
First is carbon credit decline. First half 80~900 million points income pushed net profit to 200 million, but unit price is returning towards "Country back then path". If next year points income shrinks, and whole vehicle gross margin not substantially stand at 13%~14%, profit statement will be hit back to original form. Leapmotor needs to use real material scale effect, to fill points decline dug hole.
Second is customer concentration. Financial report disclosed single largest customer contribution accounted for about 23.3% revenue ratio — combine European revenue scale and joint relationship, overseas big customers are double-edged sword: It supports growth, also handed over fate's much part into others hands.
Third is policy window. EU localization procurement proportion requirement is rising, anti-subsidy tax and price commitment "Soft landing" whether continue, directly decides 2027 400,000 units overseas target whether can fulfill; and localization profit margin improvement, management also said "Needs policy changes".
Fourth is execution difficulty. Next year overseas 350,000~400,000 units, means need to on this year about 200,000 units basis close to double, capacity, channel, localization capacity three lines parallel, any link fail chain will transmit to report.
Conclusion: Monthly Sales of 100,000 is Just an Entry Ticket
Leapmotor full series of models lineup | Source: Leapmotor official website
In Tech Jungle's view, market cap repair not rely on shouting, market wants three verifiable evidence: Whole vehicle gross margin whether can stabilize 13%~14% and continue upward, prove "Selling cars itself can make money"; Carbon credits decline after profit not empty, prove "Profit is real"; Overseas 350,000~400,000 units and robot announcement quality, prove "Second curve is not an empty promise".
This half year, Leapmotor proved itself can use extremely low per-unit profit roll up scale, also can hold cash firmly in hand — Net cash over 36 billion, Accounts payable leverage 470 billion supply chain account period, this is not every New EV maker can do. But capital market not pay for "Amazing", only pay for "Proven sustainability".
Monthly sales of 100,000 is just an entry ticket, net profit of 200 million is a passing score, and dozens of times market cap gap, need to rely on next one or two years' report page by page to fill.
In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers compare the Honda WR-V and Kia Sportage when choosing a car. Both cars are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
The OTR price of Honda WR-V in Malaysia is RM 89,900 - 107,900, with a total of 4 variants, including 2023 1.5L V (RM 99,900), 2023 1.5L E (RM 95,900), 2023 1.5L S (RM 89,900), etc.
The OTR price of Kia Sportage in Malaysia is RM 129,639 - 179,320, with a total of 4 variants, including 2025 1.6T DCT 4WD High (RM 179,320), 2025 1.6T DCT 2WD High (RM 159,320), 2025 2.0L AT 2WD High (RM 139,639), etc.
Looking at the price, the Honda WR-V entry price is indeed RM 39,739 cheaper than the Kia Sportage. If your budget is limited, Honda's entry-level model can already meet daily needs. However, note that the few thousand dollars saved might involve trade-offs in features, depending on your specific needs.
Honda WR-V is equipped with a 1.5L 4-cyl, 105 hp. Official fuel consumption 6.0 L/100km.
Kia Sportage is equipped with a 1.5L Turbo, 140 hp. Official fuel consumption 7.0 L/100km.
In terms of power, Kia Sportage's 1.5L Turbo has 35 more horsepower than Honda WR-V's 1.5L 4-cyl. However, for daily city driving, both cars have sufficient power and won't feel underpowered.
Honda WR-V safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety system includes Honda SENSING.
Kia Sportage safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety system includes Drive Wise.
Both cars have the same safety rating, and safety features are quite comprehensive for this class. Safety of new cars nowadays is not poor, no need to worry too much about this.
Honda WR-V adopts FWD drive mode.
Kia Sportage adopts FWD drive mode.
Both cars use the same drive mode, both are FWD, there will not be a big difference in daily driving experience.
Both Honda WR-V and Kia Sportage are mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, you can prioritize the one with better reputation; if you care more about cost-performance ratio and features, then choose the one with richer configuration. Ultimately, it is recommended to test drive both, and experiencing it personally is the most important.
Overall, Honda WR-V and Kia Sportage are both excellent models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends mainly on your personal needs and budget. It is recommended to do your research, compare quotes from several dealerships, and then go for a test drive to make the final decision. Buying a car is a major event, spending time on research will never be wrong.
In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers compare the Honda WR-V and Mazda CX-5 when choosing a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will do a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
The OTR price of the Honda WR-V in Malaysia is RM 89,900 - 107,900, with a total of 4 versions, including 2023 1.5L V (RM 99,900), 2023 1.5L E (RM 95,900), 2023 1.5L S (RM 89,900), etc.
The OTR price of the Mazda CX-5 in Malaysia is RM 135,469 - 166,760, with a total of 3 versions, including 2025 2.0L AT 35th Anniversary (RM 316,154), 2025 2.0L AT (RM 296,154), 2025 2.0L MT (RM 294,154), etc.
Looking at the price, the starting price of the Honda WR-V is indeed RM 45,569 cheaper than the Mazda CX-5. If your budget is limited, Honda's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. But note that the few thousand difference might involve trade-offs in features, depending on your needs.
Honda WR-V is equipped with 1.5L 4-cyl, 105 hp. Official fuel consumption 6.0 L/100km.
Mazda CX-5 is equipped with 1.5L Turbo, 140 hp. Official fuel consumption 7.0 L/100km.
In terms of power, the Mazda CX-5's 1.5L Turbo has 35 more horsepower than the Honda WR-V's 1.5L 4-cyl. However, for daily city driving, both cars have enough power, you won't feel underpowered.
Honda WR-V warranty 5 years/unlimited mileage, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Mazda CX-5 warranty 5 years/150,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Both the Honda WR-V and Mazda CX-5 are mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, consider the one with better reputation first; if you care more about cost-performance and features, choose the one with richer configuration. Ultimately, it is recommended to test drive both, as personal experience is most important.
Overall, the Honda WR-V and Mazda CX-5 are both very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose mainly depends on your personal needs and budget. We suggest doing your research, compare quotes from several dealerships, and then test drive to make a final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, taking time to research will never be wrong.
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拿 寶騰 X90 同 福斯途銳 嚟作比較。呢兩款車喺價錢同定位上都幾接近，今日我哋就從多個方面作詳細比較，幫你省返做功課嘅時間。
寶騰 X90 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 106,800 - 122,800，一共有 4 個版本，包括 2026 1.5T Prime X（RM 122,800）、2026 1.5T Prime（RM 116,800）、2026 1.5T Lite（RM 106,800） 等。
福斯途銳 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 206,540 - 260,024，一共有 2 個版本，包括 2025 Allspace 2.0T R-Line（RM 260,024）、2025 Allspace 1.4T Elegance（RM 206,540） 等。
由價錢嚟睇，寶騰 X90 嘅起步價確實比 福斯途銳 平咗 RM 99,740。如果你預算有限，寶騰嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需求。但都要注意，平嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備上會有取捨，具體要看你嘅需求。
寶騰 X90 搭載 1.5L Turbo，馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。
福斯途銳 搭載 2.0L 4-cyl，馬力 170 hp。官方油耗 8.0 L/100km。
動力方面，福斯途銳嘅 2.0L 4-cyl 比 寶騰 X90 嘅 1.5L Turbo 多咗 30 匹馬力。不過日常喺市區開，兩款車嘅動力都夠用，唔會覺得唔夠力。
寶騰 X90 車身長 4400 mm，備用箱 400 L。
福斯途銳 車身長 4400 mm，備用箱 400 L。
兩款車嘅尺寸幾近相同，車內空間差別唔大。呢個級別嘅車，日常使用完全夠用。
寶騰 X90 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
福斯途銳 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
兩款車嘅驅動方式一樣，都係 FWD，日常駕駛感受唔會有太大分別。
寶騰 X90 同 福斯途銳 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更睇重品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰一款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，那就揀配置更豐富嗰款。最尾都係建議兩款都去試駕，親身體驗先係最重要嘅。
總體嚟講，寶騰 X90 同 福斯途銳 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵都係要看你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花點時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嗰陣都會拿 Proton X90 同 Hyundai Tucson 嚟做比較。這兩款車喺價位同定位上都幾接近，今日我哋就從多個方面做一次詳細嘅比較，幫你省返做功課嘅時間。
Proton X90 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 106,800 - 122,800，一共有 4 個版本，包括 2026 1.5T Prime X（RM 122,800）、2026 1.5T Prime（RM 116,800）、2026 1.5T Lite（RM 106,800） 等。
Hyundai Tucson 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 143,888 - 197,888，一共有 5 個版本，包括 2025 HEV 1.6T AT 2WD Prestige（RM 197,888）、2025 1.6T DCT 4WD Prestige（RM 186,888）、2025 1.6T DCT 2WD Prime（RM 164,888） 等。
從價錢嚟睇，Proton X90 嘅起步價確實比 Hyundai Tucson 平咗 RM 37,088。如果你預算有限，Proton 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需求。但都要留意，平嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備上會有取捨，具體要看你嘅需求。
Proton X90 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA)。
Hyundai Tucson 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 SmartSense。
兩款車嘅安全評級一樣，喺呢個級別入面安全配備都算好齊全嘅。而家嘅新車安全性都唔錯，唔使太擔心這一點。
Proton X90 保修 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Hyundai Tucson 保修 5 年/300,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Proton X90 同 Hyundai Tucson 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭用、日常通勤。如果你更睇重品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰一款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，就選配置更豐富嗰款。最後都建議兩款都去試駕，親身體驗先係最重要。
總括嚟講，Proton X90 同 Hyundai Tucson 都係馬來西亞市場幾好嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵仲係要看你個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去做試駕先做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對無錯。
In Malaysia's SUV market, many buyers compare the Proton X90 and MG MG HS when choosing a car. These two models are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
The OTR price of Proton X90 in Malaysia is RM 106,800 - 122,800, with a total of 4 versions, including 2026 1.5T Prime X (RM 122,800), 2026 1.5T Prime (RM 116,800), 2026 1.5T Lite (RM 106,800), etc.
The OTR price of MG MG HS in Malaysia is RM 130,450 - 146,450, with a total of 2 versions, including 1.5L Standard (RM 105,000), 1.5L Executive (RM 115,000), etc.
From a price perspective, the entry price of Proton X90 is indeed RM 23,650 cheaper than MG MG HS. If your budget is limited, Proton's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. But also note, the savings of a few thousand might involve trade-offs in features, depending on your specific needs.
Proton X90 is equipped with a 1.5L Turbo, 140 hp. Official fuel consumption 7.0 L/100km.
MG MG HS is equipped with a 1.5L Turbo, 140 hp. Official fuel consumption 7.0 L/100km.
Both cars use the same powertrain system, and the driving experience feels basically the same. Fuel consumption is also similar, no need to worry too much about this point.
Proton X90 body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
MG MG HS body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
The dimensions of both cars are almost identical, and the interior space differs little. For cars in this class, it is fully sufficient for daily use.
Proton X90 adopts FWD drive mode.
MG MG HS adopts FWD drive mode.
The drive mode of both cars is the same, both FWD, daily driving experience will not have much difference.
Proton X90 and MG MG HS are both mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, you can prioritize the one with better reputation; if you care more about cost-performance ratio and features, choose the one with richer configurations. Finally, it is recommended to test drive both models, as personal experience is the most important.
Overall, Proton X90 and MG MG HS are both very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends mainly on your personal needs and budget. We suggest doing your research, comparing quotes from several dealerships, and then test driving to make the final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending time on research will definitely not be wrong.
