首頁Perodua Ativa
搜尋歷史
熱門搜尋
經銷商登入 / 註冊
In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers compare Proton X90 and MG MG HS when choosing a car. Both cars are quite close in price and positioning, so today we will conduct a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help save you time doing research.
Proton X90 OTR price in Malaysia is RM 106,800 - 122,800, with a total of 4 versions, including 2026 1.5T Prime X (RM 122,800), 2026 1.5T Prime (RM 116,800), 2026 1.5T Lite (RM 106,800), etc.
MG MG HS OTR price in Malaysia is RM 130,450 - 146,450, with a total of 2 versions, including 1.5L Standard (RM 105,000), 1.5L Executive (RM 115,000), etc.
In terms of price, the starting price of Proton X90 is indeed RM 23,650 cheaper than MG MG HS. If your budget is limited, Proton's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. But also note, the few thousand dollars cheaper, there might be trade-offs in features, it depends on your specific needs.
Proton X90 comes with 1.5L Turbo, 140 hp. Official fuel consumption 7.0 L/100km.
MG MG HS comes with 1.5L Turbo, 140 hp. Official fuel consumption 7.0 L/100km.
Both cars use the same powertrain, the driving experience is basically the same daily. Fuel consumption is also similar, no need to worry too much about this.
Proton X90 safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
MG MG HS safety rating is TBD, active safety systems include Basic.
Regarding safety features, both cars received good ratings. However, Proton X90's ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA) and MG MG HS's Basic have some differences in functionality. If you value active safety, you can compare the feature lists of both.
Proton X90 adopts FWD drive configuration.
MG MG HS adopts FWD drive configuration.
Both cars have the same drive configuration, both are FWD, daily driving experience will not be significantly different.
Overall, Proton X90 and MG MG HS are both very good car models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends on your personal needs and budget. It is recommended to do your research, compare quotes from several dealerships, and go for a test drive to make the final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending time doing research will never be wrong.
In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers often compare the Proton X90 and Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV when choosing a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning. Today we will do a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to save you time doing research.
The Proton X90 has an OTR price of RM 106,800 - 122,800 in Malaysia, with a total of 4 versions, including 2026 1.5T Prime X (RM 122,800), 2026 1.5T Prime (RM 116,800), 2026 1.5T Lite (RM 106,800), etc.
The Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV has an OTR price of RM 129,750 - 129,750 in Malaysia, with a total of 2 versions, including 2025 1.5T 90km CSH (RM 129,750), What charging methods does the Tiggo 7 PHEV support? Can it be charged using a home power socket? (RM 117,478), etc.
From a price perspective, the Proton X90's starting price is indeed RM 22,950 cheaper than the Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV. If your budget is limited, Proton's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. However, note that the few thousand less expensive might involve trade-offs in features, specifically depending on your needs.
Proton X90 body length is 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV body length is 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
The dimensions of both cars are almost the same, with little difference in interior space. Cars in this class are completely sufficient for daily use.
Proton X90 adopts FWD drive mode.
Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV adopts FWD drive mode.
The drive modes of both cars are the same, both are FWD, there won't be much difference in daily driving experience.
Both Proton X90 and Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV are mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, you can prioritize the one with better reputation; if you care more about cost-performance ratio and specifications, choose the one with richer configurations. Ultimately, it is recommended to test drive both, as personal experience is the most important.
In general, both Proton X90 and Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV are very good car models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose mainly depends on your personal needs and budget. It is recommended to do research, compare quotes from several dealerships, and then test drive to make a final decision. Buying a car is a major matter, taking time to do research will never be wrong.
Written By | Du Yongfang
Editor | Huang Dalu
Designer | Zhen Youmei
Featured Image | AI Xiao Xuan
The cars are still driving on the road, but the company that made them collapsed first.
In Neta owner groups, a helpless self-mockery circulates: Now when driving on the road, one fears bumping into others, and fears being bumped into — being hit, you might wait forever for parts; hitting someone, next year you might even struggle to buy insurance.
This dilemma is not an isolated case. In recent years, brands such as WM Motor, Aiways, HiPhi, Jiyue, and Neta have successively fallen into bankruptcy reorganization, halted operations, or contracted after-sales systems. After enterprises exit the market, a large number of vehicles continue to operate, but parts supply, repair authorization, internet car services, and "Three Guarantees" responsibilities may simultaneously be left hanging.
The problem is growing rapidly.
As of the end of 2025, the stock of new energy vehicles in China has reached 43.97 million, whereas at the end of 2014 it was only 120,000.
Over the past decade, new energy vehicles completed a textbook-scale expansion, but the supporting repair service system did not mature synchronously: parts cannot be sourced on time, diagnostic permissions are not granted, technicians with deep repair capabilities for "Three Electrics" are insufficient, and insurance institutions also worry about high payout risks.
Every car sold is a long-term bill for the after-sales system. Now, the first batch of mass-delivered new energy vehicles is approaching their warranty periods, and this bill is starting to mature en masse.
On June 23, 2026, the Ministry of Commerce and eight other departments published the "Notice on Several Measures to Cultivate and Expand the After-Market Consumption of the Automotive Industry," proposing 17 measures around six major areas.
Among them, "optimizing automobile repair and insurance services" was listed separately: whole vehicle enterprises shall not refuse to bear statutory "Three Guarantees" responsibilities on the grounds that consumers choose their own repair enterprises; the policy also proposes guiding whole vehicle and power battery enterprises to open repair technology authorization, encouraging "repair instead of replacement," and exploring "Vehicle-Battery Separation" insurance models.
This is not the first time the national level has prescribed a remedy for new energy vehicle repair.
The new version of the "Provisions on the Liability for Repair, Replacement, and Return of Household Automobile Products" published in 2021 incorporated dedicated parts for new energy vehicles such as power batteries and drive motors into the "Three Guarantees" scope, and clearly stated that operators shall not refuse to bear responsibilities solely on the grounds that consumers have not maintained them at designated repairers.
In 2023, the Ministry of Commerce and eight other departments released the automotive after-market guidance opinion, again proposing to accelerate the construction of repair technology standard systems.
The power battery recycling and utilization management measures implemented from April 2026 also further opened up paths for querying battery-related technical information in the repair and disassembly links.
Rules are constantly being perfected, but why are cars in reality still difficult to repair? More importantly, when a car manufacturer exits the market, who will take over the responsibilities left behind?
Behind the frenzied sales volume, the capacity to bottom out stock vehicles is under test. A simple truth repeatedly emphasized by traditional car manufacturers is reappearing in significance: making a car is not difficult; what is difficult is providing parts, repair, and services continuously over the decades that follow.
For the new energy vehicle industry, true long-termism is reflected not only in product updates and sales growth, but also in whether enterprises can be responsible for every car already sold.
Dilemma of Repair Rights:
The After-Market Locked by Software-Hardware Closed Loops
Source: Consumer Reports
In the fuel vehicle era, an independent repair shop could cover multiple brands relying on repair manuals, general diagnostic equipment, and mature parts supply chains. New energy vehicles changed this logic.
Today, a new energy vehicle is both a mechanical product and a digital terminal composed of power batteries, electronic control systems, sensors, vehicle software, and cloud services. After parts replacement, software matching, fault code clearing, and online authorization are often required.
Lang Xuehong, Deputy Secretary-General of the China Association of Automobile Distributors, said: "If you replace a certain part, even a tire, without the OEM's dedicated diagnostic equipment and corresponding software, you might not be able to clear the fault or complete the matching."
Therefore, "allowing consumers to choose where to get repaired" is only the first step. Whether independent repair enterprises can obtain continuously updated technical data, diagnostic tools, software permissions, and compliant parts truly determines if owners have a choice.
Compared to the fuel vehicle era, new energy vehicle manufacturers control not only parts supply, but also software OTA, underlying communication protocols, fault diagnosis permissions, and cloud account systems. Hardware, software, and data are encapsulated within the same technical closed loop; manufacturers effectively control the entry point for whether a vehicle can be identified, matched, and repaired.
The "data hegemony" referred to in the industry points precisely to this inequality of capability: owners nominally own the vehicles, and independent repair enterprises have operating qualifications, but as long as they cannot obtain necessary data and authorization, both parties cannot fully exercise "repair rights."
This closed model protects the manufacturer's technical security and service quality, but it may also block independent repair shops outside the system, leaving consumers with less bargaining power and bearing higher repair costs after the original factory exits.
Data openness does not equal having no boundaries. Vehicle safety, personal privacy, and network security all require protection. What truly needs to be established is a hierarchical, compliant, and traceable authorization mechanism: which data is necessary to complete repairs, who is qualified to obtain it, how to record the usage process, and within what timeframe manufacturers should provide it. Only by turning these questions into executable rules will "repair choice rights" not remain on paper.
Currently, there are about 20,000 to 30,000 enterprises nationwide with new energy vehicle repair service capabilities, far fewer than traditional fuel vehicle repair enterprises; among them, the proportion of stores capable of conducting "Three Electrics" system deep detection and repair is even lower.
The talent gap is also obvious; many social repair stations can only handle tires, sheet metal painting, and routine maintenance. Once involving battery packs, electronic control systems, or intelligent driving components, they must revert to the authorized system.
Source: Pixabay
The iteration speed of new energy vehicles is far faster than that of fuel vehicles. Different batches of the same car model may have changes in battery cells, modules, sensors, and software versions. Independent repair enterprises not only find it difficult to "anticipate" by stocking up on parts, but must also continuously invest in high-voltage safety equipment, diagnostic systems, and personnel training. For small and medium-sized stores, this is a cost they cannot bear alone.
When the original factory system is still operating normally, these problems can still be solved through 4S stores. Once a car manufacturer collapses, the repair capabilities originally sealed within the enterprise may also disappear.
Owners of abandoned cars first face parts supply cutoff. Key components affecting driving safety are out of stock; from ordering to installation often requires waiting months; helplessly, some owners can only seek dismantled parts or counterfeit parts. Originally promised long-term warranties for power batteries and electric drive systems may also disappear due to the responsible subject losing the ability to perform, ultimately forcing owners to pay tens of thousands of yuan for repairs themselves.
More troublesome than hardware is software. Third-party service providers not receiving fees may lead to internet of vehicles service interruptions; mobile phone keys, remote air conditioning control, and vehicle location functions fail accordingly. Some owners have to purchase data traffic from service providers themselves to maintain basic vehicle connectivity.
Insurance will quickly perceive these risks. Parts scarcity, opaque repair prices, and declining vehicle residual value will all push up the uncertainty of payouts.
In 2025, China's insurance industry underwrote 43.58 million new energy vehicles, with insurance premium income of 190 billion yuan, while the underwriting end still lost 5.6 billion yuan. Faced with brands that have already lost original factory after-sales support, insurance institutions are naturally more cautious.
In January 2025, the National Financial Regulatory Administration and three other departments issued new energy vehicle insurance guidance opinions. The "Good Car Insurance" platform was subsequently launched, providing underwriting channels for new energy vehicles that find it difficult to insure through conventional channels. The platform requires relevant insurance companies to refuse to insure vehicles meeting conditions, alleviating the dilemma of some owners "having no insurance to buy."
But getting a vehicle an insurance policy cannot solve where parts come from or who repairs it after an accident. Insurance difficulty is the phenomenon; the rupture of after-sales capability is the root cause.
Post-Bankruptcy Vacuum:
Car Manufacturers Exit, Responsibilities Cannot Be Cleared
The after-sales for abandoned cars currently rely on a self-formed system to maintain itself.
Some original factory dealers and technical personnel have not completely disappeared after the car manufacturer halted operations; instead, they have transformed into social repair stations, continuing to undertake original brand vehicles. They are familiar with the car models and master certain parts channels and repair experience, partially filling the void left by the original factory's exit.
Owners are also building their own "folk repair networks." They exchange parts information in chat groups, look for original factory technicians still willing to take orders, and even save repair manuals that the manufacturer stopped updating, then instruct local repair shops to disassemble gradually.
However, whether this self-rescue system can operate largely depends on brand stock. The larger the stock, the easier it is for dismantled parts to circulate, and the more likely it is to sustain a group of technicians specializing in repairing that brand.
Neta's cumulative sales are relatively high, and some parts and repair resources can still be found in the market. After Jiyue halted operations, shareholders Geely and Baidu jointly proposed follow-up arrangements, and Geely also opened some after-sales outlets to undertake maintenance.
In 2023, Neta Automotive Thailand factory held the Neta V-II exit ceremony
Source: Autodang
Even more difficult are those brands with small stock sizes and no shareholders or supply chain entities willing to take over after-sales. Vehicles are scattered across the country, dismantled parts cannot form a stable market, original factory technical personnel are limited in number, and social repair enterprises lack the commercial motivation to invest in training and equipment. These owners are most easily forgotten by the entire service system.
According to current automobile sales management regulations, suppliers shall guarantee parts supply within a certain period after a model is discontinued or sales stop. But when enterprise cash flow dries up or bankruptcy proceedings begin, how paper obligations continue to be fulfilled remains a realistic difficulty.
Parts are just one item. Intelligent cars also bring new problems not present in the fuel vehicle era: who will migrate vehicle accounts and cloud data? Who will maintain mobile applications? Who will open diagnostic permissions? Can features already sold to consumers disappear because the server stops running?
The WM Motor bankruptcy reorganization case added a key judicial puzzle piece to this institutional vacuum.
In this case, to maintain internet car services and necessary after-sales operations, relevant enterprises and investors advanced service fees. The reorganization plan recognized these fees as common benefit debt, to be paid off first in bankruptcy proceedings. Later, the reorganization team also promoted vehicle data migration, key parts supply, and software updates.
In 2018, WM Motor's booth at the Shenzhen Auto Show
Source: Internet
The important significance of this case is not that all repair or "Three Guarantees" claims filed by ordinary owners will be prioritized for compensation, but that the Supreme People's Court, in the form of a reference case, clarified: maintaining internet car and after-sales operations is not just an ancillary affair after enterprise bankruptcy, but also relates to the basic usage rights of a large number of owners, vehicle safety, enterprise brand value, and reorganization possibilities. Necessary expenditures incurred for this can be included as common benefit debt and obtain priority compensation in bankruptcy proceedings under qualified conditions.
This changed the position of after-sales services in bankruptcy proceedings. In the past, it was easily regarded as ordinary costs that can be compressed after enterprises stop operations; in the WM Motor case, it was regarded as necessary expenditures to preserve enterprise operational value and protect the interests of all relevant subjects.
For "abandoned cars" still driving on the road, this is a realistic path to stay alive; for future car manufacturer reorganization cases that may appear, it is also a institutional sample that administrators, investors, and courts can refer to when arranging after-sales guarantees.
But judicial cases cannot replace a universally applicable exit system. Not every car manufacturer in difficulty can find investors, nor is every bankruptcy reorganization guaranteed to retain enough funds for the after-sales system.
Current regulations more stipulate what responsibilities an enterprise should bear during normal operation, but rarely answer how responsibilities and data should be transferred after an enterprise loses the ability to perform. If repair data, software permissions, and parts drawings are still sealed within the enterprise until bankruptcy, even if administrators are willing to maintain after-sales, they may have nowhere to start.
New energy vehicles need not only a production access system, but also an executable exit aftercare system.
How to Insure the Pricey Battery:
Capabilities and Boundaries of Financial Instruments
The new policy proposed exploring "Vehicle-Battery Separation" insurance models because power batteries have become one of the biggest variables in new energy vehicle insurance payouts.
Power batteries have high value, and detection and repair require high specialization. Once an accident occurs, insurance institutions not only need to judge whether the battery is damaged but also know whether the battery can be repaired and how much the repair will cost. Without unified inspection standards and real repair data, replacing the entire battery pack often becomes the simplest and most expensive option.
"Vehicle-Battery Separation" can have two layers of meaning. One is property rights separation, meaning the body belongs to the owner and the battery belongs to the battery asset company; the other is determining premiums and rates separately for the vehicle and battery in the policy even when property rights are not separated.
Nio's BaaS mode is a more typical sample of the former mode. Users purchase vehicles without batteries; batteries are held by the asset company and used, detected, and repaired through the battery swap system. This arrangement helps centralize battery risk management and makes it easier to split insurance responsibilities.
Source: Nio Automotive
However, for the vast majority of models sold as whole vehicles with batteries, "pricing separation" in the short term is still more realistic. For insurance institutions to price batteries separately, they must first obtain trustworthy battery health status, accident data, and repair costs.
This brings us back to the same origin: whether car manufacturers and battery companies are willing to open data, and whether the independent repair system has the ability to detect and repair.
Some car manufacturers are also trying to open up vehicle data, parts supply, and repair services through insurance business. Car manufacturers have more complete data on driving behavior, parts prices, and repair costs; theoretically, this can improve pricing efficiency and reduce sales and claims costs.
But this model is also difficult to replicate universally. Insurance license thresholds are high, and car manufacturers themselves must bear capital occupation and business cycle risks. More importantly, if a car manufacturer is already in operational crisis, sealing insurance, repair, and software services entirely within the enterprise might instead cause owners to suffer more thorough service interruptions when the enterprise exits.
Whether "taking the battery out" or including insurance into the car manufacturer's service system, all can only solve how risks are identified and priced. Insurance can compensate for losses but cannot produce discontinued parts out of thin air, nor can it replace a repair system that has lost authorization and data.
After-Market Filling the Gap:
A Race with the Vehicle's Insurance Expiration Speed
Xpeng Automotive highly automated factory in Zhaoqing, China
Source: THE NEW YORK TIMES
The new energy vehicle after-market has begun to fill the gap.
Top-chain repair enterprises are establishing authorized cooperation with whole vehicle manufacturers and power battery companies to obtain parts, technical data, and in-warranty repair qualifications; power battery manufacturers, relying on technology and supply chain advantages, are extending into after-sales, building battery detection and repair networks. Some professional stores transformed from original factory technicians are also beginning to concentrate on digging deep into a few brands.
These explorations will gradually improve the capacity of the social repair system, but the market can only enter places with commercial value. Brands with large stock sizes and cities with dense demand are more likely to obtain services; brands with small stock sizes and scattered vehicles, still abandoned brands, may still have no one willing to take over.
True bottom-out mechanisms should prepare for the worst during normal enterprise operations.
For example, during model launch and continuous sales periods, establish exit plans covering parts, repair technology, software permissions, and internet car services; for technical data relating to vehicle safety and basic use, independent institutions can be explored to hold them in trust, to be legally activated when the car manufacturer stops operations or loses the ability to perform; the supply period, inventory arrangement, and replacement production responsibility of discontinued parts also need clearer execution and accountability mechanisms.
After entering bankruptcy proceedings, the public value of the after-sales system should be identified as early as possible. Funds required to maintain necessary internet car services, open repair data, migrate owner accounts, and guarantee key parts supply should not be seen only when enterprise asset disposal is nearing its end.
For enterprises with reorganization value, these investments can maintain brand and vehicle residual value; for enterprises ultimately liquidating, they also relate to whether tens of thousands of vehicles can continue to drive safely.
Between car manufacturers, battery companies, insurance institutions, and the social repair system, there also needs to be a responsibility handover. Car manufacturers exiting should not mean repair data and software permissions for sold vehicles permanently disappear; suppliers stopping cooperation should not let safety-critical components completely lose their source.
In the past ten years, China's new energy vehicles solved the problem of "whether they exist" and "how fast they sell." Next, it must prove it can also solve "how long they can be used" and "what to do if the enterprise is gone."
43.97 million new energy vehicles are still very young. Currently, the average age of new energy passenger vehicles is not high, and deep repair needs have not been fully released, leaving a window period to complete the after-sales system. But this window period will not last long. As early vehicles go out of warranty one after another, repair, parts, and insurance demand will all grow rapidly.
The speed of "making up lessons" must be faster than the speed of stock vehicles going out of warranty, and also faster than the speed of the next car manufacturer collapsing. After all, companies can exit the market, but cars still need to drive on the road every day.
Hello everyone, today we're talking about a new car that just opened pre-sale — Chery Fengyun T7. On August 12, the official pre-sale price for this all-electric SUV targeting the global market was announced: 109,900 to 129,900 yuan, with a total of 3 trims, along with 7 sets of purchase benefits.
The launch event theme is quite interesting, termed "Crafting Good Cars Requires Patience, The Wait Was Long". To put it plainly, Chery wants to tell everyone: this car wasn't rushed out, but was polished step-by-step according to global standards. Currently, Chinese new energy vehicles are indeed going global, but Fengyun T7 takes a slightly different path—it first validates the car in different countries, climates, and road conditions before bringing it back to sell domestically. Chery's 23 years of global experience are directly reflected in this car. It aims not to solve a single flashy selling point, but the six fundamental problems for family users: aesthetics, safety, range, intelligence, comfort, and peace of mind.
Looks: Must Be Lasting, Not Just First Impressions
The design of Fengyun T7 was co-created by Chery's 10 global design centers, with feedback from over 5,000 domestic and international users. Its sibling model, Lepas L6, has even debuted at the Milan Design Week.
The front fascia is officially called the "Wind-Rider Face," with body lines like satin, and the tailgate features a "Skyline Glow" effect. The overall style is minimalist with an Eastern touch.
There are 6 paint colors: Flame Orange, Mountain Smoke Purple, Cloud Pink Beige, Flowing Light Silver, Green Bamboo Grey, and Ink Stone Black. The paint standard also meets overseas weathering requirements, resisting aging. There are two interior colors: Black-Brown and Obsidian. The wraparound cockpit features a large soft-touch area, speakers shaped like pebbles, and diamond stitching on the seats. Officially, the leather, seals, and plastic materials used in the interior resist hardening and fading, staying looking new even after a few years.
Safety: Specs Are One Thing, True Protection Is the Skill
Safety is the main highlight of this car. Fengyun T7 is designed according to the 2026 E-NCAP 5-star standard, with a functional safety level of ASILD, the highest in the industry. In R&D, 2 years were spent on planning and 3 years on development. 81 durability vehicles were used for road testing, accumulating over 6 million km, including 1.45 million km dedicated to durability. Extreme tests such as high temperature, high humidity, and heavy rain were also conducted in Southeast Asia, the Middle East, and Indonesia.
The body uses 80% high-strength steel, 18.84% of which is hot-formed steel, forming a cage structure with 9 horizontal and 5 vertical reinforcements, paired with a shotgun structure, dual-frame subframe, and battery pack crash beams. In a collision, there are 9 front and 6 side force transmission paths to disperse impact force and leave survival space for the passenger cabin. There are 9 airbags, including 48L dual-chamber far-end airbags and rear side airbags.
The battery is called the Rhino Battery, featuring 6D protection with an IP68 waterproof rating. According to official claims, its waterproof capability is 96 times the national standard requirement. Encountering heavy rain, flooding, or wading outdoors in summer is unlikely to cause short circuits due to water ingress.
Range: Rated 600, Actual Test 667+, Performs Well in Winter
All Fengyun T7 trims are equipped with a 65.05kWh Rhino battery, CLTC rated at 600 km. However, the manufacturer claims actual testing reaches over 667 km, which is considered "Reverse Labeling" — actually running more than rated. Fast charging from 30% to 80% takes only 20 minutes, roughly the time it takes to drink a cup of coffee.
Thermal management uses a dual-source wide-temperature-range heat pump, supplemented by high-voltage PTC. It works stably from -30 to +55 degrees Celsius. Heating is more energy-efficient in northern winters, and heat dissipation is faster in southern summers. All trims feature Active Grille Shutter (AGS) and 14 low-drag optimizations, making energy consumption more stable at both high and low speeds.
Intelligence: One Chip, Understanding You and Protecting You
In the smart sector, Fengyun T7 uses an integrated cockpit-drive 8775 chip, 4nm process, with 72 TOPS compute power and 80ms response time, increasing boot speed by 33%. Simply put, the cockpit and driving assistance are connected using the same chip, one side understanding humans, the other protecting them.
The central console features a 15.6-inch 2.5K screen with anti-glare, anti-reflection, and anti-fingerprint properties. CarPlay, HiCar, and CarLink support wireless connection, allowing screen casting for over 99% of phones on the market. The car system, called Lingxi Smart Cockpit 2.0, includes 6 personalities: "Xiao Qi Classmate," "Northeast Aunt," "Debate Master," "Spoken Language Teacher," "Story King," and "Professional Debater," which sounds quite interesting. There are also scene modes like Nap, Camping, Pet, and Energize.
The driving assistance system is called Falcon 500, with a total of 22 sensors: 3 mmWave radars, 7 cameras, and 12 ultrasonic radars. Auto parking covers over 300 scenarios, handling dead-end roads, track reverse, and multi-floor parking, making it very friendly for those who struggle with parking.
Space and Chassis: Comfortable to Sit, Stable to Drive
Fengyun T7 dimensions are 4570×1852×1694mm, with a 2700mm wheelbase, and 84% interior space efficiency. The rear floor is completely flat, with 911mm legroom. Folding the rear seats creates a 1955mm flat space, usable as a bed. The trunk is 450L normally, expanding to 1550L when folded, sufficient for camping gear and multiple people's luggage.
The seats feature a 9-layer cloud sensation structure, soft yet supportive, with ventilation and heating. Heating has three levels; in a -20 degree environment, it can reach 30 degrees in 5 minutes. Ventilation is suction-type, preventing sweat buildup on the back in summer. The car has 38 storage locations throughout. The trunk also includes 4 lashing rings capable of holding 300kg and 2 hooks capable of 3kg, making it convenient to secure large items.
The chassis was tuned by a team led by a former Maserati chassis tuning expert, with an axle load ratio of 50.8:49.2, making it less prone to understeer or oversteer in turns. Chery produced the first dual-axle K&C test bench in China in 2009, giving the chassis tuning a 26-year foundation.
After-Sales: Two Guarantees, Two Lifetimes, Solving Concerns in Advance
Finally, let's talk about after-sales use. This time, Chery provided two safety nets and two lifetime benefits.
Two safety nets: First is power battery safety coverage. If the whole vehicle suffers thermal runaway damage due to the battery itself, it will be directly compensated with a new car of the same model or a new car equal to or higher than the original configuration. Second is driving assistance coverage. Within the first year of purchase, if an accident occurs while in automatic parking or intelligent cruise mode, and it is determined to be caused by the driving assistance system itself, personnel injury and third-party losses are compensated up to 5 million.
Two lifetimes: First is whole vehicle lifetime warranty, including the three-electric system, excluding wear and tear parts and special parts, officially priced at 10,000 yuan. Second is a lifetime basic maintenance package worth 3,999 yuan available for 666 yuan, valid once a year.
Looking at it overall, Fengyun T7's strategy is clear: taking global standards as the baseline and family essential needs as the core. With a pre-sale price starting at 109,900 yuan plus all these benefits, in the all-electric SUV market, it is indeed quite competitive. If you plan to buy an all-electric SUV for commuting, long-distance travel, and carrying family, this car is definitely worth a closer look.
On August 12, Chery Fengyun T7 officially launched its pre-sale. This event centers on the theme "Crafting good cars with patience, thank you for waiting", conveying the brand's initial aspiration to focus on refining vehicle models and persisting in long-term car manufacturing, and also expressing sincere gratitude to consumers who have waited a long time for new cars. The new car launches three different configuration versions, with a pre-sale price range of 109,900 to 129,900 RMB. Currently, paying a 1,000 RMB deposit allows you to enjoy seven practical car-buying benefits.
Relying on Chery's over 20 years of global technical accumulation, Fengyun T7 adopts a development route that first completes strict road tests overseas before launching for the domestic market, abandoning the industry's sloppy and hasty manufacturing method. The whole vehicle design, production, and testing processes are all built according to international high standards. Focusing on the six core needs of ordinary family vehicles, the new car comprehensively refines six dimensions: exterior texture, driving protection, range travel, intelligent interaction, riding comfort, and vehicle usage assurance. Whether it is daily commuting, long-distance self-driving, outdoor camping, or group travel, various travel scenarios can be easily adapted.
High-quality texture both inside and out, durable and good-looking for daily use
The whole vehicle design integrates international simple trends and the elegance of Oriental softness, refined jointly by Chery's top 10 global design centers and more than 5,000 domestic and foreign users. The same series vehicles once landed at the Milan Design Week and received recognition from many overseas professionals. A smooth streamlined body shape is paired with a layered front grille design and a through-type taillight, providing a relaxed and grand visual perception; the car paint uses weather-resistant processes synchronized overseas, not easy to fade or lose luster after long-term sun and rain exposure. A total of six body color options are available for selection, including Crimson Orange, Mountain Smoke Purple, and Cloud Pink Beige.
Inside, two interior styles are provided: Warm Black-Brown and Polar Night Obsidian. The enveloping cabin features large-area soft wrapping, while details such as diamond-quilted stitching seats and pebble-shaped car speakers further enhance the exquisite atmosphere inside the car. Leather, sealing strips, and plastic trim parts inside the car are all selected as anti-aging materials, which do not easily become hard or whiten after long-term use, maintaining a fresh look for a long time. The rear row adopts a pure flat floor design, making it more convenient for rear passengers to rest their feet and place personal items.
Dual support for range and safety, travel with peace of mind across various climates
During the Fengyun T7 development phase, it benchmarks the 2026 E-NCAP 5-Star Safety Design Standard. After years of planning and development, it completed millions of kilometers of whole vehicle durability tests, and also specially went to Southeast Asian rainy regions, Middle Eastern high-temperature zones, Indonesian high-humidity environments, and other global locations to carry out extreme real-vehicle trials. More than 80% of the vehicle structure uses high-strength steel, nearly 20% is built with hot-formed steel to create a nine-horizontal and five-vertical cage body, paired with multiple collision energy dispersion paths, combined with nine airbags to buffer the damage caused by impacts from all directions.
The entire series is standard-equipped with Rhino power batteries, and the multi-layer stereo protective structure can effectively resist squeezing, piercing, and powerful impacts; the battery reaches the IP68 advanced waterproof standard, so there is no need to worry about battery water ingress or short circuits in urban waterlogging or rainy wading sections. At the same time, the brand launched two underlying guarantee policies: if the power battery itself malfunctions and causes vehicle thermal runaway damage, compensation can be made for a new car of the same model or configuration; in the first year of car purchase, if the intelligent driving assistance system malfunction causes an accident resulting in personal injury or third-party property loss, compensation of up to 5 million RMB can be provided.
All three car models are equipped with 65.05kWh large-capacity Rhino batteries, with a CLTC operating range of 600km. The vehicle's actual driving range performance is better than the official calibrated value, effectively alleviating owners' range anxiety. Charging from 30% to 80% takes only 20 minutes. A short break midway is enough to replenish the charge and continue the long journey. The vehicle is equipped with an all-domain integrated dual-source wide-range heat pump air conditioning system paired with high-voltage PTC, which can operate stably in a broad temperature range from -30°C to 55°C. It saves electricity for heating in northern winters and efficiently dissipates heat in southern summers; combined with smart front grille and more than a dozen low-drag optimization designs, the vehicle's energy consumption performance is stable at high and low speeds, and owners do not need to worry about the range shrinking significantly for long-distance travel in all four seasons.
Smooth and easy-to-use intelligent interaction, spacious comfort meeting family needs
The car is equipped with a 4nm process cabin-driving integrated 8775 chip, with ample computing power. The car system boot-up and screen operation are fast and smooth. The 15.6-inch 2.5K HD central control screen has anti-glare and anti-fingerprint features, supports wireless interconnection with multiple mainstream mobile phones, and most phones on the market can achieve seamless screen casting. The Lingxi Smart Cockpit 2.0 system is equipped with various distinctive voice interaction personas and also includes six exclusive scene modes such as power nap, camping, pet travel, and awakening, fitting the owner's diverse travel scenarios. The whole car is equipped with 22 high-precision sensors, supporting the Falcon 500 driving assistance system, which can cover more than 300 types of daily parking scenarios. Difficulties such as dead-end road parking, one-key trace reversal, and multi-floor automatic parking can be handed over to the vehicle to complete independently, even new drivers can easily solve parking problems.
The whole vehicle dimensions are 4570×1852×1694mm, with impressive wheelbase performance and excellent interior space utilization, providing ample legroom in the rear row. The conventional trunk can hold daily luggage, and after folding down the rear seats, it can expand into an extra-large storage area. The interior can be laid directly into a flat large bed, which is especially suitable for outdoor camping and rest. The seats use nine-layer cloud-sensation filling material, soft but not collapsing, not easy to get tired after long-term sitting, the entire series is standard-equipped with ventilation and heating functions, heating quickly in low-temperature environments, summer ventilation mode avoids back stuffiness and sweating. Heartfelt storage points are visible throughout the car, the trunk is equipped with multiple groups of load-bearing rivet rings and hooks, and large outdoor equipment such as tents and suitcases can be firmly fixed. The chassis is refined by an international expert team with Maserati tuning experience. Balancing the axle load ratio optimizes cornering stability and straight-line driving quality, making it not easy to produce dizziness during long-distance travel.
Thoughtful guarantee for the entire cycle of vehicle use, two lifetime benefits reduce car maintenance costs
Except for the multiple car-buying benefits during the pre-sale stage, Fengyun T7 has prepared two lifetime exclusive benefits for car owners, covering the complete cycle of the vehicle from purchase to long-term use. The first item is a whole-vehicle lifetime warranty, including three-electric core components, only consumable parts and special accessories are not within the guarantee scope, eliminating the high cost of major repairs later; the second item only requires spending 666 RMB to purchase a lifetime basic maintenance package originally priced at 3,999 RMB, enjoying one free basic maintenance per year, significantly reducing long-term car maintenance costs.
From developing with reference to global standards, going to multiple countries for on-site testing, to landing according to the travel needs of ordinary domestic families, Fengyun T7 relies on balanced and comprehensive product strength to cover various needs of family daily travel. The new car has now launched pre-sale, paying a 1,000 RMB deposit can unlock exclusive car paint gift packages, vehicle price expansion deductions, priority vehicle pickup, and other seven rights. Families pursuing appearance, range, comfort, and long-term car usage guarantees can visit offline stores for a close experience.
In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers compare Proton X90 and Toyota Fortuner when selecting a car. Both models are quite close in pricing and positioning. Today, we will conduct a detailed comparison from multiple angles to save you time on research.
The Proton X90 OTR price in Malaysia is RM 106,800 - 122,800, with a total of 4 variants, including 2026 1.5T Prime X (RM 122,800), 2026 1.5T Prime (RM 116,800), 2026 1.5T Lite (RM 106,800), and others.
The Toyota Fortuner OTR price in Malaysia is RM 195,880 - 241,880, with a total of 3 variants, including 2024 2.8T VRZ Diesel (RM 241,880), 2024 2.7L SRZ Petrol (RM 202,880), 2024 2.4L Standard Diesel (RM 195,880), and others.
In terms of price, the Proton X90's starting price is indeed RM 89,080 cheaper than the Toyota Fortuner. If your budget is limited, the Proton's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. However, note that the lower price of a few thousand might involve trade-offs in features; it specifically depends on your requirements.
The Proton X90's safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
The Toyota Fortuner's safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include .
Both cars have the same safety rating, and safety features are quite comprehensive for this class. New cars nowadays generally do not lack in safety, so there is no need to worry too much about this point.
The Proton X90 adopts FWD drive configuration.
The Toyota Fortuner adopts FWD drive configuration.
Both cars share the same drive configuration, both being FWD, so there will not be a significant difference in daily driving experience.
The Proton X90 and Toyota Fortuner are both mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, you can prioritize the model with the better reputation; if you care more about cost-performance and features, choose the model with the richer configuration. Ultimately, it is recommended to test drive both, as personal experience is the most important.
Overall, both the Proton X90 and Toyota Fortuner are very good car models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose mainly depends on your personal needs and budget. It is recommended to do your research, compare quotes from several dealers, and then test drive to make the final decision. Buying a car is a major decision; spending some time on research will certainly not be a mistake.
喺馬來西亞嘅SUV市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拿 Proton X90 同 Toyota Fortuner 嚟比較。呢兩款車喺價位同定位上都幾接近，今日我哋就由多個方面做一個詳細嘅對比，幫你節省做功課嘅時間。
Proton X90 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 106,800 - 122,800，合共有 4 個版本，包括 2026 1.5T Prime X（RM 122,800）、2026 1.5T Prime（RM 116,800）、2026 1.5T Lite（RM 106,800） 等。
Toyota Fortuner 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 195,880 - 241,880，合共有 3 個版本，包括 2024 2.8T VRZ Diesel（RM 241,880）、2024 2.7L SRZ Petrol（RM 202,880）、2024 2.4L Standard Diesel（RM 195,880） 等。
由價錢睇，Proton X90 嘅起步價確實比 Toyota Fortuner 平咗 RM 89,080。如果你預算有限，Proton 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需要。但都要留意，平嗰幾千塊，可能喺配備上要有取捨，具體睇你嘅需要。
Proton X90 搭載 1.5L Turbo，馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。
Toyota Fortuner 搭載 2.5L Diesel，馬力 187 hp。官方油耗 8.5 L/100km。
動力方面，Toyota Fortuner 嘅 2.5L Diesel 比 Proton X90 嘅 1.5L Turbo 多咗 47 匹馬力。不過日常喺市區開，兩款車嘅動力都夠用，唔會覺得唔夠力。
Proton X90 車身長 4400 mm，尾箱 400 L。
Toyota Fortuner 車身長 4400 mm，尾箱 400 L。
兩款車嘅尺寸幾乎一樣，車內空間分別唔大。呢個級別嘅車，日常使用完全夠用。
Proton X90 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
Toyota Fortuner 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
兩款車嘅驅動方式一樣，都係 FWD，日常駕駛感覺唔會有太大分別。
Proton X90 保養 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Toyota Fortuner 保養 5 年/無限里程，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
總括嚟講，Proton X90 同 Toyota Fortuner 都係馬來西亞市場幾好嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵都要睇你嘅個人需要同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去做試車做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拿 Proton X90 同 Toyota Fortuner 嚟做比較。呢兩款車喺價位同定位上都好接近，今日我哋就從多個方面做一個詳細比較，幫你省返做功課嘅時間。
Proton X90 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 106,800 - 122,800，一總共有 4 個版本，包括 2026 1.5T Prime X（RM 122,800）、2026 1.5T Prime（RM 116,800）、2026 1.5T Lite（RM 106,800） 等。
Toyota Fortuner 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 195,880 - 241,880，一總共有 3 個版本，包括 2024 2.8T VRZ Diesel（RM 241,880）、2024 2.7L SRZ Petrol（RM 202,880）、2024 2.4L Standard Diesel（RM 195,880） 等。
從價格嚟睇，Proton X90 嘅起價確實比 Toyota Fortuner 平咗 RM 89,080。如果你預算有限，Proton 嘅入門版已經已經可以满足日常需要。但都要注意，平嗰幾千蚊，可能在配備上會有取捨，具體要睇你嘅需要。
Proton X90 配備 1.5L Turbo，馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。
Toyota Fortuner 配備 2.5L Diesel，馬力 187 hp。官方油耗 8.5 L/100km。
動力方面，Toyota Fortuner 嘅 2.5L Diesel 比 Proton X90 嘅 1.5L Turbo 多咗 47 匹馬力。不過日常喺市區開，兩款車嘅動力都夠用，唔會覺得唔夠力。
Proton X90 嘅安全评分係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA)。
Toyota Fortuner 嘅安全评分係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 。
兩款車嘅安全评分一樣，喺呢個級別入面安全配備都算好齊全。而家嘅新車安全性都唔差，唔使太擔心呢一點。
Proton X90 保修 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Toyota Fortuner 保修 5 年/無限里程，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
總體嚟講，Proton X90 同 Toyota Fortuner 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊部，關鍵始終係睇你嘅個人需要同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，然後去試車做最後決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers compare the Proton X70 and Subaru Crosstrek when choosing a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning, so today we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
The Proton X70 OTR price in Malaysia is RM 106,800 - 122,300, with a total of 3 versions, including 1.5L Standard 2WD (RM 106,800), 1.5L Executive 2WD (RM 115,800), 1.5L Premium 2WD (RM 122,300), among others.
The Subaru Crosstrek OTR price in Malaysia is RM 145,000 - 160,000, with a total of 1 version, including 2.0L e-Boxer (RM 150,000), among others.
In terms of price, the starting price of the Proton X70 is indeed RM 38,200 cheaper than the Subaru Crosstrek. If your budget is limited, Proton's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. But also note, the few thousand savings might involve trade-offs in equipment, depending on your specific needs.
The Proton X70 is equipped with a 1.5L Turbo engine, with 140 hp. Official fuel consumption is 7.0 L/100km.
The Subaru Crosstrek is equipped with a 1.5L Turbo engine, with 140 hp. Official fuel consumption is 7.0 L/100km.
Both cars use the same powertrain, so the driving feel is basically the same in daily use. Fuel economy is also similar, so no need to worry too much about this.
The Proton X70 body length is 4400 mm, with a trunk capacity of 400 L.
The Subaru Crosstrek body length is 4400 mm, with a trunk capacity of 400 L.
The dimensions of both cars are almost identical, with little difference in interior space. For this class of car, it is fully sufficient for daily use.
Both the Proton X70 and Subaru Crosstrek are mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, you can prioritize the one with better reputation; if you care more about cost-performance ratio and equipment, then choose the one with richer configuration. Ultimately, it is recommended to test drive both, as personal experience is the most important.
In general, both the Proton X70 and Subaru Crosstrek are very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends mainly on your personal needs and budget. We suggest doing your research, comparing quotes from several dealers, and then test driving to make a final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending some time researching is never wrong.
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嗰陣都愛用 Proton X70 同 Subaru Crosstrek 嚟做比較。這兩部車喺價位同定位都幾接近，今日我哋就由多個角度做一次詳細比較，幫手你省下做功課嘅時間。
Proton X70 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 106,800 - 122,300，合共 3 個版本，包括 1.5L Standard 2WD（RM 106,800）、1.5L Executive 2WD（RM 115,800）、1.5L Premium 2WD（RM 122,300） 等。
Subaru Crosstrek 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 145,000 - 160,000，合共 1 個版本，包括 2.0L e-Boxer（RM 150,000） 等。
由價錢睇，Proton X70 嘅起步價確實比 Subaru Crosstrek 平咗 RM 38,200。如果你預算有限，Proton 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需要。但要留意，平嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備方面會有取捨，具體睇你嘅需要。
Proton X70 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA)。
Subaru Crosstrek 嘅安全評級係 5★ (Euro NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 EyeSight。
安全配備方面，兩部車都攞到唔錯嘅評級。不過 Proton X70 嘅 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA) 同 Subaru Crosstrek 嘅 EyeSight 喺功能方面有些差異，如果你比較重視主動安全嘅話，可以仔細比較下兩者嘅功能列表。
Proton X70 車身長 4400 mm，尾箱 400 L。
Subaru Crosstrek 車身長 4400 mm，尾箱 400 L。
兩部車嘅尺寸幾乎一樣，車內空間分別唔大。呢個級別嘅車，日常使用完全夠用。
Proton X70 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
Subaru Crosstrek 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
兩部車嘅驅動方式一樣，都係 FWD，日常駕駛感覺唔會有太大分別。
總體嚟講，Proton X70 同 Subaru Crosstrek 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵仲係睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，先去試駕先做最後決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對無錯。
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嗰陣都會揀 Proton X70 同 Volkswagen Tiguan 嚟做比較。呢兩款車喺價位同定位上都幾接近，今日我哋就由多個方面做詳細對比，幫你節省做功課嘅時間。
Proton X70 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 106,800 - 122,300，一共有 3 個版本，包括 1.5L Standard 2WD（RM 106,800）、1.5L Executive 2WD（RM 115,800）、1.5L Premium 2WD（RM 122,300）等。
Volkswagen Tiguan 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 206,540 - 260,024，一共有 2 個版本，包括 2025 Allspace 2.0T R-Line（RM 260,024）、2025 Allspace 1.4T Elegance（RM 206,540）等。
由價錢睇落，Proton X70 嘅起步價確實比 Volkswagen Tiguan 平咗 RM 99,740。如果你預算有限，Proton 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需要。但都要注意，平嗰幾千蚊，喺配備上可能有取舍，具體要看你嘅需求。
Proton X70 車身長 4400 mm，行李廂 400 L。
Volkswagen Tiguan 車身長 4400 mm，行李廂 400 L。
兩款車嘅尺寸幾乎一樣，車內空間差別唔大。呢個級別嘅車，日常使用完全夠用。
Proton X70 保養（保修）5 年/150,000km，保養間隔為每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Volkswagen Tiguan 保養（保修）3 年/100,000km，保養間隔為每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Proton X70 同 Volkswagen Tiguan 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更睇重品牌聲望同二手價，可以優先考慮聲望更好嗰一款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，就揀配置更豐富嗰款。最後都建議兩款都去試駕，親身體驗先係最重要。
總括嚟講，Proton X70 同 Volkswagen Tiguan 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵仲係睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，先去試駕先做最終決定。買車係件大事，花啲時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
In Malaysia's SUV market, many buyers compare the Proton X70 and Hyundai Tucson when choosing a car. Both cars are quite close in price and positioning. Today we will provide a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to save you time on research.
The OTR price of Proton X70 in Malaysia is RM 106,800 - 122,300. There are 3 versions in total, including 1.5L Standard 2WD (RM 106,800), 1.5L Executive 2WD (RM 115,800), 1.5L Premium 2WD (RM 122,300), etc.
The OTR price of Hyundai Tucson in Malaysia is RM 143,888 - 197,888. There are 5 versions in total, including 2025 HEV 1.6T AT 2WD Prestige (RM 197,888), 2025 1.6T DCT 4WD Prestige (RM 186,888), 2025 1.6T DCT 2WD Prime (RM 164,888), etc.
Looking at the price, the starting price of Proton X70 is indeed RM 37,088 cheaper than Hyundai Tucson. If your budget is limited, Proton's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. But keep in mind, the difference of a few thousand may involve trade-offs in features, it depends on your specific needs.
Proton X70 adopts FWD drive system.
Hyundai Tucson adopts FWD drive system.
Both cars have the same drive system, both are FWD, there won't be much difference in daily driving experience.
Proton X70 warranty 5 years/150,000km, service interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Hyundai Tucson warranty 5 years/300,000km, service interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Both Proton X70 and Hyundai Tucson are popular choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, you can prioritize the one with better reputation; if you care more about cost-performance and features, choose the one with richer configurations. Ultimately, it is recommended to test drive both models, personal experience is the most important.
Overall, both Proton X70 and Hyundai Tucson are quite good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends on your personal needs and budget. It is recommended to do your homework, compare quotations from a few dealers, and then test drive to make a final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending some time doing homework will never be wrong.
In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers compare the Proton X70 and MG MG HS when choosing a car. These two models are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time doing research.
The OTR price of Proton X70 in Malaysia is RM 106,800 - 122,300, with a total of 3 versions, including 1.5L Standard 2WD (RM 106,800), 1.5L Executive 2WD (RM 115,800), 1.5L Premium 2WD (RM 122,300), etc.
The OTR price of MG MG HS in Malaysia is RM 130,450 - 146,450, with a total of 2 versions, including 1.5L Standard (RM 105,000), 1.5L Executive (RM 115,000), etc.
Looking at the price, the starting price of Proton X70 is indeed RM 23,650 cheaper than MG MG HS. If your budget is limited, Proton's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. But keep in mind, the cheaper few thousand might mean compromises on features, depending on your needs.
Proton X70 is equipped with 1.5L Turbo, 140 hp. Official fuel consumption 7.0 L/100km.
MG MG HS is equipped with 1.5L Turbo, 140 hp. Official fuel consumption 7.0 L/100km.
Both cars use the same powertrain system, so the driving experience is basically the same. Fuel consumption is also similar, so no need to worry too much about this point.
Proton X70 warranty 5 years/150,000 km, maintenance interval every 10,000 km or 6 months.
MG MG HS warranty 7 years/150,000 km, maintenance interval every 10,000 km or 6 months.
Both Proton X70 and MG MG HS are mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, you can prioritize the one with better reputation. If you care more about value for money and features, choose the one with richer configurations. In the end, it is recommended to test drive both, as experiencing it personally is the most important.
Overall, Proton X70 and MG MG HS are both very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose mainly depends on your personal needs and budget. It is recommended to do your research, compare quotes from several car dealers, and then test drive to make a final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, taking some time to do your research will definitely not go wrong.
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嗰陣都會拿 Proton X50 同 Mazda CX-5 來比較。呢兩款車喺價位同定位上都幾接近，今日我哋就從多個方面做一個詳細對比，幫你節省做功課嘅時間。
Proton X50 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 89,800 - 113,300，一共有 4 個版本，包括 1.5T Executive（RM 89,800）、1.5T Premium（RM 101,800）、1.5T Flagship（RM 113,300） 等。
Mazda CX-5 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 135,469 - 166,760，一共有 3 個版本，包括 2025 2.0L AT 35th Anniversary（RM 316,154）、2025 2.0L AT（RM 296,154）、2025 2.0L MT（RM 294,154） 等。
從價錢來看，Proton X50 嘅起步價真係比 Mazda CX-5 平咗 RM 45,669。如果你預算有限，Proton 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需要。但都要注意，平嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備上有取捨，具體要看你嘅需要。
Proton X50 搭載 1.5L 4-cyl，馬力 105 hp。官方油耗 6.0 L/100km。
Mazda CX-5 搭載 1.5L Turbo，馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。
動力方面，Mazda CX-5 嘅 1.5L Turbo 比 Proton X50 嘅 1.5L 4-cyl 多咗 35 匹馬力。不過日常喺市區開，兩款車嘅動力都夠用，唔會覺得唔夠力。
Proton X50 車身長 4400 mm，尾箱 400 L。
Mazda CX-5 車身長 4500 mm，尾箱 450 L。
空間方面，Mazda CX-5 嘅車身比 Proton X50 長咗 100 mm，乘坐空間更有優勢。不過 Proton X50 喺城市裡泊車會靈活啲，各有取捨。
Proton X50 採用 4WD 驅動方式。
Mazda CX-5 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
Proton 嘅 4WD 同 Mazda 嘅 FWD 喺操控上會唔同感受，建議試駕下比較。
Proton X50 同 Mazda CX-5 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭用、日常通勤。如果你更重視品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，就揀配備更豐富嗰款。最後都係建議兩款都去試駕，親身體驗先最重要。
總體嚟講，Proton X50 同 Mazda CX-5 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一部，關鍵都係睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花點時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
