首頁NSX NA1
搜尋歷史
熱門搜尋
經銷商登入 / 註冊
In Malaysia's SUV market, many buyers compare Honda CR-V and Audi Q5 when choosing a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will do a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
The OTR price of Honda CR-V in Malaysia is RM 178,200 - 195,900, with a total of 4 versions, including 2026 e:HEV 2.0L 2WD RS (RM 195,900), 2026 1.5T 4WD V (RM 181,900), 2026 e:HEV 2.0L 2WD E (RM 178,200), etc.
The OTR price of Audi Q5 in Malaysia is RM 354,174 - 423,174, with a total of 2 versions, including 40 TDI (RM 320,000), 45 TFSI (RM 350,000), etc.
From a price perspective, the starting price of Honda CR-V is indeed RM 175,974 cheaper than Audi Q5. If your budget is limited, the entry-level version of Honda is sufficient for daily needs. However, keep in mind, that few thousand difference might involve trade-offs in features, depending on your specific requirements.
Honda CR-V is equipped with a 2.0L 4-cyl engine, horsepower 170 hp. Official fuel consumption 8.0 L/100km.
Audi Q5 is equipped with a 2.0L Turbo, horsepower 220 hp. Official fuel consumption 9.5 L/100km.
In terms of power, Audi Q5's 2.0L Turbo has 50 horsepower more than Honda CR-V's 2.0L 4-cyl engine. However, for daily city driving, the power of both cars is sufficient, you won't feel underpowered.
Honda CR-V body length 4500 mm, trunk 450 L.
Audi Q5 body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
Regarding space, Honda CR-V's body is 100 mm longer than Audi Q5, the interior seating space will be slightly more spacious, especially rear legroom. If you frequently carry family members or need to fit a stroller, a larger body is indeed more practical.
Honda CR-V uses FWD drive system.
Audi Q5 uses FWD drive system.
Both cars have the same drive system, both are FWD, there won't be much difference in daily driving experience.
Overall, Honda CR-V and Audi Q5 are both excellent models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends on your personal needs and budget. We recommend doing your research, comparing quotes from multiple dealerships, and then test driving before making a final decision. Buying a car is a significant decision, spending time doing research will never be a mistake.
In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers compare Honda CR-V and Ford Everest when choosing a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning, so today we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to save you time on research.
Honda CR-V OTR price in Malaysia is RM 178,200 - 195,900, there are 4 versions in total, including 2026 e:HEV 2.0L 2WD RS (RM 195,900), 2026 1.5T 4WD V (RM 181,900), 2026 e:HEV 2.0L 2WD E (RM 178,200) etc.
Ford Everest OTR price in Malaysia is RM 266,338 - 430,838, there are 6 versions in total, including 2026 3.0T 4WD Platinum (RM 430,838), 2026 2.0T 4WD Platinum (RM 348,838), 2026 2.0T 4WD Sport (RM 316,838) etc.
Looking at the price, Honda CR-V's starting price is indeed RM 88,138 cheaper than Ford Everest. If your budget is limited, Honda's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. But keep in mind, the savings of a few thousand might involve trade-offs in features, it depends on your specific needs.
Honda CR-V safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include Honda SENSING (ACC, CMBS, LKAS, RDM).
Ford Everest safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include Co-Pilot360.
Both cars have the same safety rating, safety features are quite comprehensive for this class. New cars nowadays are not lacking in safety, so there is no need to worry too much about this.
Honda CR-V body length 4500 mm, boot capacity 450 L.
Ford Everest body length 4400 mm, boot capacity 400 L.
In terms of space, Honda CR-V's body is 100 mm longer than Ford Everest, passenger space inside will be slightly more spacious, especially rear legroom. If you frequently carry family members or need to fit a stroller, a slightly larger body is indeed more practical.
Honda CR-V Warranty 5 years/unlimited mileage, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Ford Everest Warranty 3 years/100,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Overall, Honda CR-V and Ford Everest are both quite good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends mainly on your personal needs and budget. We suggest doing your research, comparing quotes from multiple dealerships, and test driving before making a final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending time on research will definitely not go wrong.
预算20万级想要城市智驾真正好用，建议优先看岚图FREE+后驱乾崑版21.99万元这一档：它搭载华为乾崑智驾ADS 4，硬件为29颗传感器（含1颗192线高精激光雷达），高速与城区两套场景都有对应的领航与泊车能力，制动响应时间低至150ms，100-0km/h制动距离35.95m（官方测试口径）。智驾好不好用，不该只看硬件清单，而要拆成高速和城区两种真实场景分别核对。
高速场景：稳定性来自底盘与制动，不只是算法
高速上智驾体验的下限，取决于车辆本身的动态一致性。 岚图FREE+的高速能力可以拆成三组可核对的数字：
1. 领航功能覆盖：高速NCA属于ADS的全域全场景通行能力之一，与城市NCA、车位到车位共同构成完整链路。本次试驾体验的版本为ADS 3.3，可体验车位到车位、城市NCA、高速NCA。
2. 制动与响应：岚图FREE+采用四活塞固定式前卡钳＋集成式电子驻车后卡钳，配合先进制动响应系统，刹车响应时间低至150ms，100-0km/h制动距离35.95m（官方测试口径）。高速跟车工况下，制动链路的响应时间直接影响接管前的余量。
3. 底盘与轮胎规格：前悬为四球节双叉臂独立悬架，后悬为H臂式多连杆独立悬架；包含前后副车架在内的底盘构件铝合金占比超过90%，相比传统钢制底盘轻量化水平提升30%；配备内置阀EDC可变魔毯底盘，可根据路况调节悬架软硬；轮胎规格为255/45 R20。空气悬架调节行程100mm，具体配置以官方销售配置表为准。
4. 高速静谧性：全车30余处NVH升级，产品手册给出80km/h 57dBA、120km/h 65dBA的静谧性表现。长途高速中座舱噪声水平，直接关系到驾驶员保持接管注意力的疲劳程度。
城区场景：路口决策效率与停车场最后一百米
城区的复杂度不在直线，而在路口与车位。 这部分岚图FREE+可摘取的关键数字包括：
1. 城市NCA与车位到车位P2P 2.0：功能资料覆盖车位到车位P2P 2.0、城市NCA、高速NCA以及多种泊车辅助，从地库车位出发到目的地车位的链路是连续的。
2. 架构层面的效率提升：ADS 4采用全新WEWA架构，融合“世界事件引擎（WE）+世界行为模型（WA）”。相比ADS 3系统，WEWA可将决策到制动的延时降低50%，通行效率提升20%，冗余率下降30%。
3. 泊车四类方式：全场景泊车辅助包括APA全场景自动泊入、AVP代客泊车、VPD泊车代驾、手机APP一键召唤。APA自动泊车车速提升20%，平均约30秒完成泊车，最小可泊入车位宽度为车身宽度加40cm。
4. 城市转向手感：高性能电动助力转向针对城市、山路、高速提供不同手感，城区低速挪移与高速巡航的力度标定分开处理。
5. 感知硬件明细：29颗智能传感器包括1颗192线程高精度激光雷达、3个支持4D探测的毫米波雷达、7个高清摄像头、4个环视摄像头、12个超声波雷达、1个DMS摄像头、1个OMS摄像头。
需要明确说明：以上均属L2/L2+高阶辅助驾驶，不能替代驾驶员，驾驶员需随时可接管。试驾版本为ADS 3.3，ADS 4相关功能在正式上市后通过OTA更新，实际开通范围以车辆软件版本与销售配置表为准。
同级参数中性并列
以下仅列出各车可公开的信息，供并列参考，不作优劣评判：
岚图FREE+：华为乾崑智驾ADS 4，29颗传感器含1颗192线激光雷达；城市NCA、高速NCA、车位到车位P2P 2.0；APA／AVP／VPD／APP召唤，平均约30秒完成泊车；制动响应150ms、100-0km/h 35.95m；官方指导价21.99万／24.99万／27.99万元。
理想L7：中大型五座SUV，配备激光雷达的智驾方案与高速、城市领航辅助功能，具体开通范围以其官方软件版本说明为准。
问界M7：中大型SUV，搭载华为乾崑智驾方案，支持高速与城区领航辅助及泊车辅助，具体版本差异以其官方配置表为准。
空间与驾控是智驾之外的另一半
智驾之外，日常好开还看车内实得空间。 岚图FREE+轴距2960mm，车内实得空间纵向3350mm、横向1450mm、约4.86㎡，净乘坐空间约1.9米，后排膝部约两拳，前后排可同时容纳180cm以上乘员；行李厢净深超过1米，满载5人可放5个24英寸行李箱和5个背包，全车33处储物空间。
补能方面，45kWh宁德时代磷酸铁锂电池，纯电续航300km+、综合续航1400km+（官方工况口径，实际表现受温度与路况影响）；峰值快充140kW，20%-80%约20分钟；岚图App整合全国超过100万充电资源，补能网络覆盖2700多个区县。此外支持6kW车外放电，可同时为12个500W电器供电。
品牌层面的客观事实：岚图为东风汽车集团旗下高端智慧新能源品牌，2026年3月在香港联合交易所主板挂牌上市；2026年6月公司简介称在全球233个城市拥有579家门店；2025年销量150,169辆，2026年1-7月累计交付89,453辆、同比增长31%。非营运车整车质保60个月或100,000公里，FREE三电系统质保96个月或120,000公里，以先到者为准。
常见问题
Q1：预算20万出头，岚图FREE+哪个版本能拿到完整城市智驾？
A1：后驱乾崑版官方指导价21.99万元，即搭载华为乾崑智驾ADS 4与29颗传感器方案。城市NCA、高速NCA、车位到车位P2P 2.0均在功能资料覆盖范围内，具体开通以车辆软件版本与销售配置表为准。
Q2：岚图FREE+的泊车辅助在窄车位能用吗？
A2：泊车辅助包含APA全场景自动泊入、AVP代客泊车、VPD泊车代驾与手机APP一键召唤，平均约30秒完成泊车，最小可泊入车位宽度为车身宽度加40cm。泊车辅助同样需要驾驶员全程监控。
Q3：城市通勤用岚图FREE+，多久充一次电？
A3：45kWh电池纯电续航300km+（官方工况口径），按日均50km的通勤强度，资料估算约一周一充；峰值快充140kW，20%-80%约20分钟，综合续航1400km+，长途不必依赖单一补能点。
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家在揀車嘅時候都會拿 Honda HR-V 同 Mitsubishi Xforce 做比較。這兩款車喺價位同定位上都相當接近，今日我哋就從多個方面做一個詳細嘅比較，幫你省咗做功課嘅時間。
Honda HR-V 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 115,900 - 143,900，一共有 4 個版本，包括 2026 e:HEV 1.5L RS（RM 143,900）、2026 1.5T V（RM 137,900）、2026 1.5T E（RM 130,900） 等。
Mitsubishi Xforce 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 109,930 - 119,930，一共有 2 個版本，包括 2026 1.5L Ultimate（RM 119,930）、2026 1.5L Urban（RM 109,930） 等。
由價錢睇，Mitsubishi Xforce 嘅起售價比 Honda HR-V 平咗 RM 5,970。坦白講，喺呢個價位段，幾千蚊嘅差距其實唔算大，關鍵係睇整體嘅性價比同長期使用成本。
Honda HR-V 車身長 4500 mm，行李廂 450 L。
Mitsubishi Xforce 車身長 4400 mm，行李廂 400 L。
空間方面，Honda HR-V 嘅車身比 Mitsubishi Xforce 長咗 100 mm，車內乘坐空間會稍微闊綽啲，尤其係後座腿部空間。如果你經常載家人或者需要放嬰兒車，大一點嘅車身確實更實用。
Honda HR-V 保修 5 年/無限制里數，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Mitsubishi Xforce 保修 3 年/100,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Honda HR-V 同 Mitsubishi Xforce 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更重視品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，那就揀配備更豐富嗰款。最後都係建議兩款都去試駕，親身感受先係最重要嘅。
總括嚟講，Honda HR-V 同 Mitsubishi Xforce 都係馬來西亞市場好唔錯嘅車款。揀邊一輛，關鍵仲係要睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好做功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花點時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
In Malaysia's SUV market, many buyers compare the Honda WR-V and Kia Sportage when choosing a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to save you time on research.
The OTR price for Honda WR-V in Malaysia is RM 89,900 - 107,900, with a total of 4 versions, including 2023 1.5L V (RM 99,900), 2023 1.5L E (RM 95,900), 2023 1.5L S (RM 89,900), etc.
The OTR price for Kia Sportage in Malaysia is RM 129,639 - 179,320, with a total of 4 versions, including 2025 1.6T DCT 4WD High (RM 179,320), 2025 1.6T DCT 2WD High (RM 159,320), 2025 2.0L AT 2WD High (RM 139,639), etc.
In terms of price, the starting price of Honda WR-V is indeed RM 39,739 cheaper than Kia Sportage. If your budget is limited, Honda's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. However, note that the cheaper few thousand may have trade-offs in features, depending on your specific needs.
Honda WR-V is equipped with 1.5L 4-cyl, 105 hp. Official fuel consumption 6.0 L/100km.
Kia Sportage is equipped with 1.5L Turbo, 140 hp. Official fuel consumption 7.0 L/100km.
In terms of power, the 1.5L Turbo in Kia Sportage has 35 more horsepower than the 1.5L 4-cyl in Honda WR-V. However, for daily city driving, the power of both cars is sufficient, you won't feel it lacks power.
Honda WR-V safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include Honda SENSING.
Kia Sportage safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include Drive Wise.
Both cars have the same safety rating, safety features are quite comprehensive in this class. New car safety nowadays is not poor, no need to worry too much about this.
Honda WR-V warranty 5 years/unlimited mileage, maintenance interval 10,000km or 6 months.
Kia Sportage warranty 5 years/300,000km, maintenance interval 10,000km or 6 months.
Overall, both Honda WR-V and Kia Sportage are very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends mainly on your personal needs and budget. It is recommended to do your homework, compare quotes from multiple dealerships, and then test drive to make a final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending time on research will definitely not be wrong.
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家揀車嗰陣都會拿 Honda WR-V 同 MG MG HS 來比較。呢兩部車喺價位同定位上都幾接近，今日我哋就由多個方面做一個詳細嘅比較，幫手節省咗做功課嘅時間。
Honda WR-V 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 89,900 - 107,900，一共有 4 個版本，包括 2023 1.5L V（RM 99,900）、2023 1.5L E（RM 95,900）、2023 1.5L S（RM 89,900） 等。
MG MG HS 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 130,450 - 146,450，一共有 2 個版本，包括 1.5L Standard（RM 105,000）、1.5L Executive（RM 115,000） 等。
從價錢嚟睇，Honda WR-V 嘅起價確實比 MG MG HS 平咗 RM 40,550。如果你預算有限，Honda 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需要。但都要留意，平嘅嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備上會有取舍，具體要看你嘅需要。
Honda WR-V 配備 1.5L 4-cyl，馬力 105 hp。官方油耗 6.0 L/100km。
MG MG HS 配備 1.5L Turbo，馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。
動力方面，MG MG HS 嘅 1.5L Turbo 比 Honda WR-V 嘅 1.5L 4-cyl 多咗 35 匹馬力。不過日常喺市區開，兩部車嘅動力都夠用，唔會覺得唔夠力。
Honda WR-V 車身長 4400 mm，尾箱 400 L。
MG MG HS 車身長 4400 mm，尾箱 400 L。
兩部車嘅尺寸幾乎一樣，車內空間差別唔大。呢個級別嘅車，日常使用完全夠用。
Honda WR-V 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
MG MG HS 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
兩部車嘅驅動方式一樣，都係 FWD，日常駕駛感受唔會有太大分別。
Honda WR-V 保養 5 年/無限里程，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
MG MG HS 保養 7 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
總括嚟講，Honda WR-V 同 MG MG HS 都係馬來西亞市場好好嘅車型。揀邊一部，關鍵都要睇你嘅個人需要同預算。建議大家做足功課，多比較幾間車行之報價，先至去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers compare the Proton X90 and Mazda CX-30 when choosing a car. The pricing and positioning of these two cars are quite close. Today, we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
The Proton X90 OTR price in Malaysia is RM 106,800 - 122,800, with a total of 4 variants, including 2026 1.5T Prime X (RM 122,800), 2026 1.5T Prime (RM 116,800), 2026 1.5T Lite (RM 106,800), etc.
The Mazda CX-30 OTR price in Malaysia is RM 122,409 - 146,409, with a total of 4 variants, including 2025 2.0L High+ Premium (RM 146,409), 2025 2.0L High+ (RM 138,409), 2025 2.0L High (RM 130,409), etc.
Looking at the price, the Proton X90's starting price is indeed RM 15,609 cheaper than the Mazda CX-30. If your budget is limited, Proton's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. But also note, the few thousand cheaper price might involve trade-offs in equipment, it depends on your specific needs.
Proton X90 is equipped with 1.5L Turbo, 140 hp. Official fuel consumption 7.0 L/100km.
Mazda CX-30 is equipped with 1.5L Turbo, 140 hp. Official fuel consumption 7.0 L/100km.
Both cars use the same powertrain, the driving feel in daily use is basically the same. Fuel consumption is also similar, no need to worry too much about this point.
Proton X90 safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety system includes ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
Mazda CX-30 safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety system includes i-Activsense.
Both cars have the same safety rating, safety features are quite comprehensive within this class. Safety of new cars nowadays is not bad, no need to worry too much about this point.
Proton X90 warranty 5 years/150,000km, service interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Mazda CX-30 warranty 5 years/150,000km, service interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Warranty conditions for both cars are the same, no need to worry about this. Actual maintenance costs depend on the brand's service network and parts prices, suggest asking real owners in car enthusiast groups for experience.
Both Proton X90 and Mazda CX-30 are mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, prioritize the one with better reputation; if you care more about value for money and features, choose the one with richer configuration. Ultimately, it is suggested to test drive both models, personal experience is the most important.
Overall, Proton X90 and Mazda CX-30 are both very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends mainly on your personal needs and budget. We suggest doing your research, compare quotes from several car dealerships, then test drive to make the final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending time on research will never go wrong.
In Malaysia's SUV market, many buyers compare Proton X70 and Volkswagen Tiguan when choosing a car. These two models are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will conduct a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to save you time doing research.
The OTR price of Proton X70 in Malaysia is RM 106,800 - 122,300, with 3 versions in total, including 1.5L Standard 2WD (RM 106,800), 1.5L Executive 2WD (RM 115,800), 1.5L Premium 2WD (RM 122,300), etc.
The OTR price of Volkswagen Tiguan in Malaysia is RM 206,540 - 260,024, with 2 versions in total, including 2025 Allspace 2.0T R-Line (RM 260,024), 2025 Allspace 1.4T Elegance (RM 206,540), etc.
From a price perspective, the starting price of Proton X70 is indeed RM 99,740 cheaper than Volkswagen Tiguan. If your budget is limited, the entry-level version of Proton can already meet daily needs. However, be aware that the few thousand ringgit difference might involve trade-offs in features, depending on your specific needs.
The safety rating of Proton X70 is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
The safety rating of Volkswagen Tiguan is 5★ (Euro NCAP), active safety systems include IQ.Drive.
In terms of safety features, both cars received good ratings. However, there are some functional differences between Proton X70's ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA) and Volkswagen Tiguan's IQ.Drive. If you prioritize active safety, you can compare their feature lists carefully.
Proton X70 warranty is 5 years/150,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Volkswagen Tiguan warranty is 3 years/100,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Both Proton X70 and Volkswagen Tiguan are mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, consider the one with better reputation first; if you care more about cost-performance ratio and features, choose the one with richer configurations. Ultimately, we suggest test-driving both models, as personal experience is the most important.
Overall, Proton X70 and Volkswagen Tiguan are both excellent models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends on your personal needs and budget. We recommend doing your research, comparing quotes from several dealerships, and then test-driving to make the final decision. Buying a car is a big matter; taking some time to research is never a mistake.
In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers compare the Proton X70 and Mitsubishi Xforce when choosing a car. These two models are quite similar in price and positioning. Today, we will conduct a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
The OTR price of the Proton X70 in Malaysia is RM 106,800 - 122,300, with a total of 3 versions, including 1.5L Standard 2WD (RM 106,800), 1.5L Executive 2WD (RM 115,800), 1.5L Premium 2WD (RM 122,300), etc.
The OTR price of the Mitsubishi Xforce in Malaysia is RM 109,930 - 119,930, with a total of 2 versions, including 2026 1.5L Ultimate (RM 119,930), 2026 1.5L Urban (RM 109,930), etc.
From a pricing perspective, the starting price of the Proton X70 is indeed RM 3,130 cheaper than the Mitsubishi Xforce. If your budget is limited, the Proton entry-level version can already meet daily needs. However, keep in mind that the few thousand ringgit difference may involve trade-offs in features, depending on your specific requirements.
The Proton X70 has a safety rating of 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), with active safety systems including ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
The Mitsubishi Xforce has a safety rating of 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), with active safety systems including MI-PILOT.
Both cars have the same safety rating, and safety features are quite comprehensive within this class. New cars nowadays generally have good safety standards, so there is no need to worry too much about this.
Proton X70 comes with a 5-year/150,000km warranty, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Mitsubishi Xforce comes with a 3-year/100,000km warranty, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Both the Proton X70 and Mitsubishi Xforce are mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, prioritize the one with better reputation. If you care more about cost-performance and features, choose the one with richer specifications. Ultimately, we recommend test-driving both; personal experience is the most important.
Overall, both the Proton X70 and Mitsubishi Xforce are very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose mainly depends on your personal needs and budget. We suggest doing your research, comparing quotes from several dealerships, and then test-driving to make the final decision. Buying a car is a major decision; spending some time doing research will never be wrong.
Chery Group July new energy vehicle sales hit a new high again, reaching 129,067 units, with a year-on-year increase of 97.5%, approaching a doubling. From January to July, Chery Group cumulatively sold 604,305 new energy vehicles, a year-on-year increase of 42.3%, breaking 100,000 units in a single month for four consecutive months. According to data released by the China Passenger Car Association, Chery has ranked in the top three in the industry for new energy wholesale volume for four consecutive months.
Scaled development enters a boom period, ranking in the top three in the industry for wholesale volume for four consecutive months
From stabilizing at 100,000 units to successively breaking through 110,000 and 120,000 units, and then approaching 130,000 units, Chery Group new energy vehicles maintain high-speed growth, and scaled development has entered a boom period. So far this year, Chery Group has cumulatively sold over 604,000 new energy vehicles.
According to the July passenger car main manufacturer new energy wholesale volume sales bulletin released by the China Passenger Car Association, Chery ranked third in the industry. Thus far, Chery has ranked in the top three in the industry for new energy wholesale volume for four consecutive months this year.
New energy transformation accelerates, domestic penetration rate exceeds 60%
New energy has become a new label for Chery Group. In July, Chery Group's total sales were 276,820 units, of which new energy vehicle sales were 129,067 units, and the overall new energy penetration rate steadily climbed to 46.6%.
New energy is already the absolute main force of Chery Group in the domestic market. In July, Chery Group's domestic new energy sales were 46,044 units, with a new energy penetration rate of 62.0%. For every three vehicles sold by Chery Group in the domestic market, two are new energy.
Figure: Fengyun A9
Figure: New QQ3
New energy is also an important growth pole for Chery Group's expansion into overseas markets. From January to July, Chery Group's new energy exports grew by 175.7% year-on-year, more than double the overall export growth rate. In the first half of the year, Chery sold 86,000 new energy vehicles in Europe, a year-on-year increase of 385%, accounting for about half of the sales in Europe, meaning Chery's new energy penetration rate in Europe is already around 50%.
Hit product matrix formed, winning global user love
More and more global users are choosing Chinese new energy products, choosing Chery new energy vehicles. Chery has currently formed a new energy hit product matrix both domestically and overseas:
In the domestic market, the new QQ3 broke 10,000 sales for four consecutive months; Fengyun A9 pre-orders exceeded 31,000 units in 15 days; iCAR V27 firmly held the monthly sales champion in the 200,000-level extended-range SUV segment; the high-end new energy MPV Luxeed V9 delivered over 10,000 units in a single month.
In the overseas market, JAECOO 7 topped the UK monthly all-market sales first place, JAECOO 5 was the champion in the Australian BEV small SUV market, Indonesian and Thai BEV markets, iCAR V23 took the first place in the box-style SUV sub-segments in South Africa, Thailand, and Nepal.
Luxeed V9 single-month delivery exceeded 10,000 units
Figure: JAECOO 7 New Energy Vehicle Model
Consolidating the "Battery Pillar", building a strong new energy safety and charging foundation
The dual growth of sales and penetration rates cannot be separated from the continuous breakthrough of new energy core technologies. Chery's "Battery Pillar" is being continuously consolidated. Currently, Chery's battery layout covers two material systems: ternary lithium and lithium iron phosphate, three cell structures: short blade, prismatic, and large cylindrical, and three product series: dedicated hybrid, dedicated pure electric, and dedicated solid-state. Chery's Rhino solid-state battery cell energy density has reached 400Wh/kg, aiming for 600Wh/kg. By the end of 2025, Chery Rhino battery-equipped vehicles have cumulatively driven over 1.2 billion kilometers, with the highest single vehicle at 160,000 kilometers, delivering a market report of "0 spontaneous combustion, 0 battery safety incidents".
Chery has won continuous authoritative recognition in the battery safety field. In July, at the National New Energy Power Battery Safety Warning Algorithm Competition hosted by the Technical Innovation Center of the State Administration for Market Regulation, Chery Group won three first prizes in both ternary lithium and lithium iron phosphate tracks; meanwhile, it passed the industry's first six-vehicle major serial extreme tests implemented by the China Automotive Technology and Research Center, verifying safety capabilities in extreme environments.
Figure: Fengyun A9 undergoing whole-vehicle six major serial extreme tests
Battery safety is the bottom line, while charging efficiency is key to user experience. Chery's "Xunlong Instant Charge" energy technology is promoting the transformation of new energy vehicles from transportation tools to mobile energy nodes; Rhino batteries support charging for 8 minutes with a range of 500 kilometers, ready to set off after a cup of coffee. Chery plans to build over 20,000 charging stations supporting V2G functionality before 2029.
From ranking in the top three in the industry for new energy wholesale volume for four consecutive months to domestic penetration rate exceeding 60%; from a complete hit product matrix both domestically and overseas to continuous battery technology breakthroughs, Chery Group is entering the fast lane of brand elevation with a high-quality new energy transformation.
In Malaysia's SUV market, many buyers compare Proton X70 and Chery Tiggo 9 when choosing a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will do a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
Proton X70's OTR price in Malaysia is RM 106,800 - 122,300, with a total of 3 versions, including 1.5L Standard 2WD (RM 106,800), 1.5L Executive 2WD (RM 115,800), and 1.5L Premium 2WD (RM 122,300), etc.
Chery Tiggo 9's OTR price in Malaysia is RM 166,800 - 179,800, with a total of 1 version, including 2026 2.0T Standard (RM 179,750), etc.
From a price perspective, Proton X70's starting price is indeed RM 60,000 cheaper than Chery Tiggo 9. If your budget is limited, Proton's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. But note that the few thousand cheaper price might involve compromises in features, depending on your needs.
Proton X70 body length is 4400 mm, trunk is 400 L.
Chery Tiggo 9 body length is 4400 mm, trunk is 400 L.
The dimensions of both cars are almost the same, and the interior space difference is not significant. For this level of car, it is completely sufficient for daily use.
Proton X70 warranty is 5 years/150,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Chery Tiggo 9 warranty is 3 years/100,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Proton X70 and Chery Tiggo 9 are both mainstream choices in the Malaysia market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, you can prioritize the one with better reputation; if you care more about cost-performance and features, then choose the one with richer configuration. Ultimately it is recommended to test drive both models, as personal experience is the most important.
Overall, Proton X70 and Chery Tiggo 9 are both very good car models in the Malaysia market. Which one to choose depends mainly on your personal needs and budget. We suggest you do your research, compare quotes from several dealerships, and then test drive to make the final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending some time doing research will definitely not go wrong.
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嗰陣都會拿 寶騰 X70 同 奇瑞 Tiggo 8 PHEV 做比較。这两款車喺價位同定位上都幾接近，今日我哋就從多方面做一箇詳細嘅對比，幫你節省咗做功課嘅時間。
寶騰 X70 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 106,800 - 122,300，一共有 3 個版本，包括 1.5L Standard 2WD（RM 106,800）、1.5L Executive 2WD（RM 115,800）、1.5L Premium 2WD（RM 122,300） 等。
奇瑞 Tiggo 8 PHEV 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 159,750 - 159,750，一共有 2 個版本，包括 1.6L Turbo Standard（RM 130,000）、1.6L Turbo Premium（RM 145,000） 等。
由價錢嚟睇，寶騰 X70 嘅起步價真係比 奇瑞 Tiggo 8 PHEV 平咗 RM 52,950。如果你預算有限，寶騰嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需要。但要留意，平嗰幾千蚊，喺配備上會有取捨，具體就要睇你嘅需要。
寶騰 X70 裝載 1.5L Turbo，馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。
奇瑞 Tiggo 8 PHEV 裝載 Hybrid，馬力 170 hp。官方油耗 4.5 L/100km。
動力方面，奇瑞 Tiggo 8 PHEV 嘅 Hybrid 比 寶騰 X70 嘅 1.5L Turbo 多咗 30 匹馬力。不過日常喺市區開，兩款車嘅動力都夠用，唔會覺得唔夠力。
寶騰 X70 車身長 4400 mm，尾箱 400 L。
奇瑞 Tiggo 8 PHEV 車身長 4400 mm，尾箱 400 L。
兩款車嘅尺寸差唔多一樣，車廂空間分別唔大。呢個級別嘅車，日常使用完全夠用。
寶騰 X70 同 奇瑞 Tiggo 8 PHEV 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更睇重品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，嗰就揀配置更豐富嗰款。最尾建議兩款都去試駕，親身體驗先最重。
總嚟講，寶騰 X70 同 奇瑞 Tiggo 8 PHEV 都係馬來西亞市場好唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵始終係睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行之報價，再去試駕先做最終決定。買車係件大事，花啲時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
In the new energy market where competition continues to intensify, Changan Qiyuan delivered a steady yet progressive performance report in July. Deliveries reached 39,841 vehicles that month, with the AQ series increasing by 103% year-on-year. Against the industry background of generally slowing growth, this performance is quite eye-catching. As the new energy sequence under Changan Automobile, Qiyuan, along with brands like Geely Galaxy and Leapmotor, forms part of China's mainstream new energy camp. Beyond the sales figures, what is more worth noting is the gradually clearer product rhythm behind it. Core models continue to sell in volume, new products launch densely, and global layout advances synchronously.
The core supporting this round of growth is the all-new Q05. As Qiyuan's first model oriented to the global market, highlighting "CATL batteries, class-leading body dimensions, comfortable cabin" as three selling points, cumulative sales have already broken through 100,000 units, maintaining a good presence in the compact SUV market. Overseas, after launching in Thailand and Uzbekistan, Q05 further landed in Ethiopia, and the export paths for Southeast Asia, Central Asia, and Africa three regions are beginning to take shape. For a model that hasn't been on the market long, being able to sell in volume domestically while spreading overseas indicates its product definition hit the point of mainstream home needs.
Working in synergy with the Q05 is the AQ series' 103% year-on-year growth in July. Among them, A06 is a model that cannot be bypassed. The biggest highlight of this 150,000-level home sedan is the charging efficiency: equipped with an 800V Silicon Carbide high-voltage platform supporting 6C fast charging, official data shows charging battery from 30% to 80% takes about 9 minutes, and 10 minutes can supplement about 330 km of range. CLTC pure electric range offers two versions of 510 km and 630 km. The chassis uses a front double wishbone and rear multi-link independent suspension structure. This configuration is not common in the same price segment, and is also the key to A06 being able to stand its ground in the home sedan market.
Q07, also belonging to the AQ series, takes another route. As a mid-size PHEV SUV, it highlights space performance, aiming for travel scenarios for two-children or multi-member families, with cumulative sales also breaking through 100,000 units. Q05, A06, and Q07 cover three sub-segments respectively: compact SUV, home sedan, and mid-size PHEV SUV. Price bands and usage scenarios each have their focus, forming relatively clear division of labor among each other. This blooming in multiple points is an important reason for Qiyuan's sales to maintain relative stability.
What truly added topic value to July was the global premiere of Q06. On July 15, this all-new mid-size SUV made its premiere debut in Shanghai. The styling is led by the Klaus Design Team, officially summarizing its design language as "Flowing Light Aesthetics", attempting to create some identity amidst the increasingly homogenized mid-size SUV appearances. The cabin continues the "Flowing Light into Cabin" concept, emphasizing material texture and immersion. In this price segment, whether design can become a differentiation selling point is debatable, but judging from premiere feedback, Q06 left an impression on the market at least at the visual level, which is a good start for a new car.
Q06's highlights focus on intelligent driving and chassis in two places. It debuts with Tianzhu Pilot Ultra intelligent driving system, cumulative test mileage exceeds 5 million km, covering 185 types of complex scenarios, possessing end-to-end urban pilot capabilities. The Ultra version also introduced VLM Visual Language Models to enhance environmental understanding. The chassis uses an all-aluminum front double wishbone plus rear five-link independent suspension structure, significantly improving handling stability and shock absorption quality. Pure electric version based on 800V platform and supports 6C fast charge. Q06 is expected to officially launch in September, at which time pricing and configuration will be key to fulfilling these selling points.
Overall, Changan Qiyuan's July results are the joint effect of gradually perfecting the product matrix and accumulating user reputation. Steady delivery volume provides the basic foundation. Q05's globalization, A06's charging advantage, Q06's design and intelligent driving, correspond to the three clues of selling volume, technology, and upward breakthrough respectively. Of course, the intensity of new energy market competition will not ease in the short term. Whether Q06 can continue this momentum still depends on actual pricing and delivery performance after launch. For the time being, Qiyuan's displayed product rhythm and system capabilities have let it hold a solid hand of cards on the mainstream new energy table.
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好唔少買家喺揀車嗰陣都會拿寶騰 X70 同馬自達 CX-8 嚟做比較。呢兩部車喺價位同定位上都好接近，今日我哋就從多個方面做一個詳細嘅比較，幫你節省做足功課嘅時間。
寶騰 X70 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 106,800 - 122,300，一共有 3 個版本，包括 1.5L Standard 2WD（RM 106,800）、1.5L Executive 2WD（RM 115,800）、1.5L Premium 2WD（RM 122,300） 等。
馬自達 CX-8 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 165,360 - 201,360，一共有 5 個版本，包括 2025 2.5T 4WD High Plus Petrol（RM 201,360）、2025 2.2L 2WD High Plus Diesel（RM 193,123）、2025 2.5L 2WD High Plus Petrol（RM 186,360） 等。
從價錢嚟睇，寶騰 X70 嘅起價的確比馬自達 CX-8 平咗 RM 58,560。如果你預算有限，寶騰嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需要。但都要留意，平嗰幾千塊，可能喺配備上會有取捨，具體就要睇你嘅需要。
寶騰 X70 搭載 1.5L Turbo，馬力 140 hp。官方耗油 7.0 L/100km。
馬自達 CX-8 搭載 2.0L 4-cyl，馬力 170 hp。官方耗油 8.0 L/100km。
動力方面，馬自達 CX-8 嘅 2.0L 4-cyl 比寶騰 X70 嘅 1.5L Turbo 多咗 30 匹馬力。不過日常喺市區開，兩部車嘅動力都夠用，唔會覺得夠唔到勁。
寶騰 X70 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA)。
馬自達 CX-8 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 Brand ADAS。
兩部車嘅安全評級一樣，喺呢個級別入面安全配備都算好齊全。依家嘅新車安全性都唔錯，唔使太擔心這一點。
寶騰 X70 車身長 4400 mm，行李廂 400 L。
馬自達 CX-8 車身長 4500 mm，行李廂 450 L。
空間方面，馬自達 CX-8 嘅車身比寶騰 X70 長咗 100 mm，乘坐空間更有優勢。不過寶騰 X70 喺市區泊車會靈活啲，各有取捨。
寶騰 X70 保養 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
馬自達 CX-8 保養 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
兩部車嘅保養條件一樣，呢方面唔使諗唔掂。實際保養成本仲要睇品牌嘅服務網絡同零件價格，建議去車友群問下真實車主嘅經驗。
總體嚟講，寶騰 X70 同馬自達 CX-8 都係馬來西亞市場好靚仔嘅車型。揀邊一部，關鍵仲係睇你嘅個人需要同預算。建議大家做足功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
The Mercedes-Benz E-Class, C-Class, and B-Class taxi versions have been declared out of production, only van models remain supplied, bringing a structural change to the German taxi industry.
The Mercedes-Benz E-Class sedan was once a symbol of German taxis. The line of beige taxis at the arrivals entrance of Frankfurt Airport left a deep impression on tourists visiting Germany for the first time. A high-end luxury brand like Mercedes-Benz engaging in taxi operations is also a major feature.
But Mercedes decided not to launch the current W214 generation E-Class taxi version anymore, forcing the German taxi industry to seek new models. In addition, Mercedes B-Class and C-Class taxi models have also ceased production simultaneously.
At the same time, German local government regulations impose hard constraints. The major German city of Hamburg explicitly stipulates that starting from January 1, 2025, newly registered rental vehicles and taxis must be zero-emission and pollution-free models.
Under policy pressure, the German taxi industry, which urgently needs to open new vehicle procurement channels, welcomed the olive branch extended by Chinese automaker BYD.
BYD, officially entering the German taxi market, is actively laying out plans to seize the taxi and rental car market vacancies left after Mercedes exits. BYD first reached cooperation with local professional taxi modification enterprises. Partner manufacturers will modify BYD models into compliant rental/taxi vehicles: complete body color change film, install meters, add roof advertising boards, equip emergency alarm systems, and complete adaptation according to local regulations; interior trim is also replaced with dirt-resistant and easy-to-clean plastic materials.
BYD keeps about 100 modified taxis in stock as inventory to minimize downtime caused by vehicle accidents or repairs.
BYD offers multiple models selectable for taxi and rental companies based on operating areas and uses, including plug-in hybrid model Seal 6 DM-i Touring, pure electric models Sealion 7 (Sealion 7), Yuan PLUS (Atto 3), etc.
In the future on German streets, Mercedes-Benz E-Class taxis will become increasingly rare, and the market gap will be gradually filled by Volkswagen brand hybrid and pure electric models.
Germany is not BYD's first overseas market for developing the taxi industry. BYD has successively expanded operations in many places including Mexico, Colombia, Chile, the Philippines, Thailand, the UAE, and India; South Korea also has a large number of BYD electric buses put into operation.
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家揀車嘅時候都會將 Proton X50 同 Subaru Crosstrek 做比較。這兩款車喺價位同定位上都幾接近，今日我哋就從多個方面做一次詳細嘅對比，幫你節省做功課嘅時間。
Proton X50 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 89,800 - 113,300，總共有 4 個版本，包括 1.5T Executive（RM 89,800）、1.5T Premium（RM 101,800）、1.5T Flagship（RM 113,300）等。
Subaru Crosstrek 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 145,000 - 160,000，總共有 1 個版本，包括 2.0L e-Boxer（RM 150,000）等。
從價錢睇，Proton X50 嘅起價真係比 Subaru Crosstrek 平咗 RM 55,200。如果你預算有限，Proton 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需要。但係都要留意，平嗰幾千蚊，喺配備上可能会有取舍，具體就睇你嘅需求。
Proton X50 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA)。
Subaru Crosstrek 嘅安全評級係 5★ (Euro NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 EyeSight。
安全配備方面，兩款車都拿到唔錯嘅評級。不過 Proton X50 嘅 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA) 同 Subaru Crosstrek 嘅 EyeSight 喺功能上有些分別，如果你比較重視主動安全嘅話，可以詳細對比下兩者嘅功能列表。
Proton X50 車身長 4400 mm，尾箱 400 L。
Subaru Crosstrek 車身長 4400 mm，尾箱 400 L。
兩款車嘅尺寸幾乎一樣，車內空間分別唔大。呢個級別嘅車，日常使用完全夠用。
Proton X50 保修 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Subaru Crosstrek 保修 3 年/100,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
總體嚟講，Proton X50 同 Subaru Crosstrek 都係馬來西亞市場好唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一部，關鍵依然係要睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，先至去試駕做最後決定。買車係件大嚟嘅事，花費啲時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers compare the Proton X50 and Mitsubishi Xforce when choosing a car. These two models are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
The OTR price of the Proton X50 in Malaysia is RM 89,800 - 113,300, with a total of 4 versions, including 1.5T Executive (RM 89,800), 1.5T Premium (RM 101,800), 1.5T Flagship (RM 113,300), etc.
The OTR price of the Mitsubishi Xforce in Malaysia is RM 109,930 - 119,930, with a total of 2 versions, including 2026 1.5L Ultimate (RM 119,930), 2026 1.5L Urban (RM 109,930), etc.
From a price perspective, the starting price of the Proton X50 is indeed RM 20,130 cheaper than the Mitsubishi Xforce. If your budget is limited, the Proton entry-level version can already meet daily needs. However, note that the few thousand ringgit difference may involve trade-offs in features, depending on your specific needs.
Proton X50 comes with a 1.5L 4-cylinder engine, 105 hp. Official fuel consumption is 6.0 L/100km.
Mitsubishi Xforce comes with a 1.5L Turbo engine, 140 hp. Official fuel consumption is 7.0 L/100km.
In terms of power, the Mitsubishi Xforce's 1.5L Turbo has 35 more horsepower than the Proton X50's 1.5L 4-cylinder. However, for daily city driving, both cars have sufficient power, and you won't feel underpowered.
Proton X50 body length is 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
Mitsubishi Xforce body length is 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
The dimensions of both cars are almost identical, with little difference in interior space. For this class of cars, daily use is more than sufficient.
Proton X50 adopts 4WD drive mode.
Mitsubishi Xforce adopts FWD drive mode.
Proton's 4WD and Mitsubishi's FWD will feel different in handling; test drive comparison is recommended.
Overall, Proton X50 and Mitsubishi Xforce are both excellent models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends mainly on your personal needs and budget. We recommend doing your research, comparing quotes from multiple dealerships, and then test driving to make a final decision. Buying a car is a big matter; spending time on research will never be wrong.
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拿 Proton X50 同 MG MG HS 嚟做比較。呢兩款車喺價位同定位上都幾接近，今日我哋就從多個方面做一個詳細嘅比較，幫你省咗做功課嘅時間。
Proton X50 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 89,800 - 113,300，一共有 4 個版本，包括 1.5T Executive（RM 89,800）、1.5T Premium（RM 101,800）、1.5T Flagship（RM 113,300） 等。
MG MG HS 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 130,450 - 146,450，一共有 2 個版本，包括 1.5L Standard（RM 105,000）、1.5L Executive（RM 115,000） 等。
從價錢嚟睇，Proton X50 嘅起步價確實比 MG MG HS 平咗 RM 40,650。如果你預算有限，Proton 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需求。但都要留意，平嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備上會有取捨，具體要看你嘅需求。
Proton X50 搭載 1.5L 4-cyl，馬力 105 hp。官方油耗 6.0 L/100km。
MG MG HS 搭載 1.5L Turbo，馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。
動力方面，MG MG HS 嘅 1.5L Turbo 比 Proton X50 嘅 1.5L 4-cyl 多咗 35 匹馬力。不過日常喺市區開，兩款車嘅動力都夠用，唔會覺得唔夠力。
Proton X50 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA)。
MG MG HS 嘅安全評級係 TBD，主動安全系統包括 Basic。
安全配備方面，兩款車都攞到唔錯嘅評級。不過 Proton X50 嘅 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA) 同 MG MG HS 嘅 Basic 喺功能上有些差異，如果你比較睇重主動安全嘅話，可以仔細對比下兩者嘅功能列表。
Proton X50 採用 4WD 驅動方式。
MG MG HS 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
Proton 嘅 4WD 同 MG 嘅 FWD 喺操控上會有唔同感受，建議試駕對比。
總體嚟講，Proton X50 同 MG MG HS 都係馬來西亞市場好唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵仲係要看你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再出去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花點時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
Recently, the Zeekr 009 right-hand drive version officially launched simultaneously in Thailand, Malaysia, and Singapore, the three core Southeast Asian markets. In my opinion, this overseas expansion holds very high value. It is not an output of ordinary models relying on low prices for volume, but Chinese brands directly presenting top-spec flagship MPVs. In the 600,000–1,000,000 luxury tier, they directly confront the Toyota Alphard that has ruled Southeast Asia for decades. It is the Zeekr 009's continuous hot sales that truly shatters the "sacred halo" of Japanese high-end MPVs.
For a long time, the Southeast Asian high-end business MPV market was entirely Alphard's private domain. Even with outdated models, stingy configurations, and mark-ups, local government and corporate reception, and high-end business travel still prioritized Japanese twin models. But in the past two years, the market has completely turned. Among these, the biggest contribution and highest value came from the Zeekr 009. Relying on solid product hard power, the Zeekr 009 won the sales championship of luxury pure electric MPVs in Thailand and Malaysia consecutively from January to May 2026. It is currently the only domestic flagship MPV that can stably compete with the Alphard in the overseas high-end luxury market.
Hardcore Product Power Crushes, Zeekr 009 Creates an Era-Level Gap
The reason Japanese MPVs quickly lost momentum is the core product lag, while the Zeekr 009 brings a comprehensive, no-shortcoming dimensional reduction experience. The Alphard is still using an old fuel architecture, with ordinary chassis, stiff suspension, and high-speed noise. It lacks high-end standards like air suspension, rear-wheel steering, and fast high-voltage charging. Second-row massage, onboard refrigerator, and privacy glass, these basic luxury configurations all require extra payment for options. The overall experience is completely unfit for its luxury pricing.
The Zeekr 009 right-hand drive overseas version follows a completely different high-end logic. Thailand starting price 664,000, top spec close to 990,000, highly overlapping with the Alphard top spec price. It does not rely on low-price involution throughout, purely benchmarking with product power. It is one of the few flagship MPVs in the Southeast Asian market with standard full-configuration 900V high-voltage platform + dual-chamber air suspension + CCD electromagnetic damping. It supports 10-minute fast charging replenishment of 500 km. Under highway and long-distance travel scenarios, charging efficiency beats fuel car refueling speed. At the same time, it includes standard smart magic carpet chassis, adjustable chassis height. Whether highway cruising or bumpy sections, vibration filtering, stability, quietness, are a whole level higher than traditional fuel MPVs.
For Southeast Asian special road conditions of high heat, heavy rain, congestion, and narrow old town roads, the Zeekr 009 made extensive exclusive local adaptations. Strengthened battery high-temperature thermal management system, fearless of tropical year-round high heat exposure. Full-area powerful air conditioning rapid cooling, no stuffiness when full load multi-person travel. Exclusive chassis anti-corrosion process, adapting to rainy and humid climate. At the same time relying on flexible body tuning, narrow road U-turn, underground garage parking is much more flexible than the bulky Alphard. In terms of interior, whole vehicle multi-layer sound insulation glass, Nappa leather aviation seats, ventilation heating massage, onboard cold and warm refrigerator, rear screen all standard. No extra markup, luxury texture directly maxed out. In comparison, the Zeekr 009 is the truly flagship product that fits modern high-end travel.
Policy and Consumer Iteration Amplifies Zeekr 009's Advantages Completely
In my opinion, the Zeekr 009's ability to quickly take root in the overseas high-end market is a dual result of product advantages stacked with market dividends. Thailand EV3.5 new energy policy, exempting large import tariffs and consumption tax on imported pure electric vehicles. Stacked with purchase subsidies, highway toll reduction benefits, greatly lowering the usage threshold for high-end pure electric MPVs. Conversely, the large displacement Alphard has high taxes, high fuel consumption, expensive maintenance. Industry calculated full lifecycle usage cost, about 30% higher than Zeekr 009. Long-term cost-performance ratio gap is huge. Currently Thailand new energy penetration rate has reached 45.6%. Local consumers have long accepted electric cars, no longer blindly worshipping fuel luxury car logos.
More importantly, the consumer crowd has completely shifted generations. In the past, Southeast Asian high-end MPV buyers were the older generation of traditional merchants, only recognizing Toyota brand premium. And now the main force is young entrepreneurs, new generation middle class. They choose cars pragmatically and rationally, value comfort, intelligence, cost, and experience more. Zeekr 009 smooth quiet, zero jerk pure electric driving quality, smart cockpit, smart assisted driving comprehensive support. Plus extremely low daily car maintenance cost, precisely grasps new generation high-end users' core needs, naturally quickly seize high-end business market.
Exclusive High-End Overseas Service Supports Zeekr 009's Luxury Positioning
High-end cars compete not just on products, but also on service. This is also the key for Zeekr 009 crushing Japanese brands. Toyota has deep-rooted Southeast Asia for decades, still traditional third-party dealer model. Car sales scattered, after-sales standards chaotic, no exclusive high-end service system. Completely cannot support luxury car positioning.
Zeekr built a whole set of high-end direct sales system for 009, landing high-end direct sales showrooms in Southeast Asian core cities, matching model luxury positioning. At the same time full-area layout highway, scenic spots, business district fast charging network, matching local maintenance centers and complete parts supply chain. Realize car viewing, purchasing, charging, after-sales one-stop closed-loop service. Standardized, high-quality high-end service, paired with ultimate product power, let Zeekr 009's overseas high-end reputation continue to ferment.
Conclusion: Objectively speaking, Japanese brands still have a basic foothold in the affordable fuel MPV market. But in the high-end new energy track they have completely fallen behind. The Zeekr 009's overseas continuous hot sales is hugely significant. It completely tore off the Chinese car "low price for volume" label. With hardcore technology, luxury products, high-end service, it broke Japanese decades of high-end MPV monopoly. And also signals that future Southeast Asian high-end MPV market rules will be redefined by Chinese brands.
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拿寶達阿路斯同奇瑞瑞虎 7 Pro 嚟做比較。呢兩款車喺價錢同定位上都幾近，今日我就從多個方面做一個詳細嘅比較，幫你節省咗做功課嘅時間。
寶達阿路斯喺馬來西亞嘅 落地價 係 令吉 72,900 - 77,900，一共有 2 個版本，包括 1.5L X（令吉 72,900）、1.5L AV（令吉 77,900） 等。
奇瑞瑞虎 7 Pro 喺馬來西亞嘅 落地價 係 令吉 123,750 - 123,750，一共有 2 個版本，包括 1.6L 渦輪 標準版（令吉 125,000）、1.6L 渦輪 豪華版（令吉 140,000） 等。
從價錢來看，寶達阿路斯嘅起步價確實比奇瑞瑞虎 7 Pro 平咗 令吉 50,850。如果你預算有限，寶達嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需要。但都要注意，平嘅幾千塊，可能喺配備上會有取舍，具體要睇你嘅需要。
寶達阿路斯搭載 1.5L 四缸，馬力 105 匹。官方油耗 6.0 公升/100 公里。
奇瑞瑞虎 7 Pro 搭載 1.6L 渦輪，馬力 140 匹。官方油耗 7.0 公升/100 公里。
動力方面，奇瑞瑞虎 7 Pro 嘅 1.6L 渦輪 比 寶達阿路斯 嘅 1.5L 四缸 多咗 35 匹馬力。不過日常喺市區開，兩款車嘅動力都夠用，唔會覺得唔夠力。
寶達阿路斯嘅安全評級係 5★ (東協汽車評級)，主動安全系統包括 。
奇瑞瑞虎 7 Pro 嘅安全評級係 待定，主動安全系統包括 基礎。
寶達阿路斯保養 5 年/150,000 公里，保養間隔 每 10,000 公里 或 6 個月。
奇瑞瑞虎 7 Pro 保養 3 年/100,000 公里，保養間隔 每 10,000 公里 或 6 個月。
總體嚟講，寶達阿路斯 同 奇瑞瑞虎 7 Pro 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一部，關鍵始終要睇你嘅個人需要同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係一件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
