首頁Mercedes GLA
搜尋歷史
熱門搜尋
經銷商登入 / 註冊
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拿馬自達 CX-3 同奇瑞 Tiggo 8 Pro 嚟做比較。兩部車喺價位同定位上都幾接近，而家我哋就從多個方面做一個詳細嘅比較，幫你節省做功課嘅時間。
馬自達 CX-3 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 126,159 - 139,159，總共有 2 個版本，包括 2023 2.0L High（RM 139,159）、2023 2.0L Plus（RM 126,159） 等。
奇瑞 Tiggo 8 Pro 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 159,750 - 159,750，總共有 2 個版本，包括 1.6L Turbo Standard（RM 130,000）、1.6L Turbo Premium（RM 145,000） 等。
睇返價錢，馬自達 CX-3 嘅起步價確實比奇瑞 Tiggo 8 Pro 平咗 RM 33,591。如果你預算有限，馬自達嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需求。但要留意，平嗰啲幾千塊，可能喺配備上有取舍，具體要睇你嘅需求。
馬自達 CX-3 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 i-Activsense。
奇瑞 Tiggo 8 Pro 嘅安全評級係 TBD，主動安全系統包括 Basic。
安全配備方面，兩款車都拿到唔錯嘅評級。不過馬自達 CX-3 嘅 i-Activsense 同奇瑞 Tiggo 8 Pro 嘅 Basic 喺功能上有啲差異，如果你比較看重主動安全嘅話，可以仔細對比下兩者嘅功能列表。
馬自達 CX-3 車身長 4500 mm，尾箱 450 L。
奇瑞 Tiggo 8 Pro 車身長 4400 mm，尾箱 400 L。
空間方面，馬自達 CX-3 嘅車身比奇瑞 Tiggo 8 Pro 長咗 100 mm，車內乘坐空間會稍微闊啲，尤其係後座腳部空間。如果你經常載家人或者需要放嬰兒車，大一點嘅車身確實更實用。
馬自達 CX-3 保用 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
奇瑞 Tiggo 8 Pro 保用 3 年/100,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
總嘅嚟講，馬自達 CX-3 同奇瑞 Tiggo 8 Pro 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一架，關鍵始終都要睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去做試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事情，花啲時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嗰陣都會拿 Mazda CX-3 同 Chery Tiggo 7 Pro 嚟比較。呢兩部車喺價位同定位上都幾接近，今日我哋就從多個方面做個詳細對比，幫你省返做功課嘅時間。
Mazda CX-3 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 126,159 - 139,159，一共有 2 個版本，包括 2023 2.0L High（RM 139,159）、2023 2.0L Plus（RM 126,159）等等。
Chery Tiggo 7 Pro 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 123,750 - 123,750，一共有 2 個版本，包括 1.6L Turbo Standard（RM 125,000）、1.6L Turbo Premium（RM 140,000）等等。
由價錢睇，Chery Tiggo 7 Pro 嘅入門價比 Mazda CX-3 平咗 RM 2,409。老實講，喺呢個價碼段，幾千蚊嘅差距其實唔算大，重點仲係睇整體嘅性價比同長期使用成本。
Mazda CX-3 配備 1.5L Turbo，馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。
Chery Tiggo 7 Pro 配備 1.5L Turbo，馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。
兩部車用緊同一套動力系統，日常開嘅感受基本冇分別。油耗方面都幾相似，唔使太糾結呢一點。
Mazda CX-3 車身長 4500 mm，后备箱 450 L。
Chery Tiggo 7 Pro 車身長 4400 mm，后备箱 400 L。
空間方面，Mazda CX-3 嘅車身比 Chery Tiggo 7 Pro 長咗 100 mm，車內乘搭空間會稍微寬鬆啲，尤其係後座腿部空間。如果你經常載家人或者需要放嬰兒車，大啲嘅車身確實更實用。
Mazda CX-3 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
Chery Tiggo 7 Pro 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
兩部車嘅驅動方式一樣，都係 FWD，日常駕駛感受唔會有太大分別。
Mazda CX-3 保養 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Chery Tiggo 7 Pro 保養 3 年/100,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
總體嚟講，Mazda CX-3 同 Chery Tiggo 7 Pro 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一部，重點仲係睇你個人需要同預算。建议大家做足功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花啲時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
At the critical juncture of new energy transformation, everyone is pulling out all the stops, but Changan Automobile pulled off the harshest move — changing leadership.
Recently, Changan Automobile Co., Ltd. (Changan Automobile) suddenly issued an announcement that Zhu Hairong resigned from the positions of Chairman, Director, and Legal Representative, no longer holds any position in the company and its controlled subsidiaries, and continues to serve as Party Secretary and Chairman of China Changan Automobile Group Co., Ltd. (China Changan).
At the same time, the board elected Zhao Fei as Chairman of Changan Automobile, appointed Ye Pei as President, Yang Dayong as Executive Senior Vice President, and Deng Chenghao as Executive Vice President.
The announcement stated that this adjustment aims to leverage China Changan Automobile's role as a specialized automotive industry group in "formulating strategy, allocating resources, promoting synergy, controlling risk, and strengthening incentives".
Zhu Hairong added in the media interview on that day, explaining the intention is to clarify the governance boundary between the group and the listed company, the President position will be generated internally from within the company, and will no longer be directly concurrently held by group leadership members.
Since this personnel adjustment involves Changan Automobile's top leader Zhu Hairong, especially just last month he just completed his re-election as Chairman, yet now resigns directly, sparking many speculations within the industry.
For the newly appointed Zhao Fei, being at the critical juncture of Changan's new energy transformation is enough to show the heavy responsibility entrusted by the group. Currently, Changan Automobile's fuel vehicle share continues to decline, new energy has not yet been able to shoulder the sales burden, and multi-brand operations face challenges, indicating that Zhao Fei's pressure is significant.
Changan Automobile's Ledger
First look at September. Changan Automobile sold 215,400 units, down 19.11% year-on-year. Among them, new energy 119,800 units, up 15.64% year-on-year, accounting for 55.6% of group sales; overseas 94,200 units, accounting for 43.72%.
Looking at the structure, this is a decent performance. New energy accounts for over half, overseas exceeds 40%, fuel vehicles are no longer the main force. According to CPCA data, domestic passenger car retail in September decreased by 28% year-on-year. Maintaining this structure under such a market context shows that the direction of transformation is not wrong.
The problem lies in the cumulative data. January-September, Changan Automobile cumulative sales 1.69 million units, down 18.07% year-on-year; new energy cumulative 709,300 units, down 2.07% year-on-year. The 15.64% growth in September for new energy is real, but one month's numbers cannot change the trend of the first three quarters. The subsidy panic buying in the same period last year raised the base, and the rhythm of new car launches this year was slower, squeezing both ends, and cumulative data went down.
Looking at brands, the situation of the three businesses differs greatly.
Qiyuan is the only one that stood out. September 46,500 units, August 45,900 units, consistently maintained above 45,000 units for two consecutive months, brand cumulative sales broke 1 million units in September. In the first half of the year, Qiyuan Q05 monthly sales were stable above 15,000 units, ranking first in compact pure electric SUVs for three consecutive months; in Q2, Qiyuan achieved quarterly profit for the first time, average vehicle price increased by 12,000 yuan year-on-year. In this year's price war, being able to increase volume, raise prices, and make profit, getting these three things done simultaneously is not easy.
Deepal's scale stood firm, but the speed slowed down. September 30,200 units, Jan-Sept 252,200 units, up 8.59% year-on-year, 1 millionth vehicle rolled off the line on September 28. Last year's full year growth was 36.6%, this year dropped to single digits. In the first half of the year, Deepal S05 ranked first in sales in the 120,000 to 180,000 yuan pure electric compact SUV sub-sector for four consecutive months, the product itself had no problem, the problem is that the capacity of this price band is limited, and Deepal is still losing money to this day.
The situation of Avatr is the worst. September 8,183 units, down 25.8% year-on-year, Jan-Sept about 51,500 units, only slightly higher than the monthly sales of 30,000 to 40,000 of top new luxury brands. Losses are narrowing, average vehicle price is increasing, HK Stock IPO is also proceeding. High-end brand with monthly sales under 10,000, hard to amortize R&D and channel fixed investment.
The three brands combined 84,900 units in September.
The profit situation explains the problem better than sales. In the first half of the year, Changan Automobile operating revenue 65.634 billion yuan, down 9.71% year-on-year; net profit attributable to parent shareholders 817 million yuan, down 64.32% year-on-year; deducting non-recurring gains/losses net profit attributable to parent shareholders 251 million yuan, down 83.01% year-on-year, of which Q2 deducting non-recurring net profit was only 80 million yuan. Net operating cash flow was negative 11.413 billion yuan, same period last year was negative 8.607 billion yuan.
Sales are growing, but profit and cash flow are deteriorating, indicating that the scale of new energy has not yet reached the level to cover investment. Penetration rate, product structure, partial profitability indicators have been achieved, but overall economic feasibility has not yet been proven.
Overseas data can serve as a reference. In the first half of the year, Changan overseas gross margin 20.13%, domestic only 11.67%; overseas revenue 21.942 billion yuan, up 78.77% year-on-year, accounting ratio of total revenue rose from 16.89% to 33.43%. Current profits, largely overseas gross margin compensating for domestic thin profits. September overseas ratio surged to 43.72% is also due to this reason. But overseas is simultaneously in investment phase, Thailand's Rayong factory, Brazil's Anapolis factory are both ramping up, channels, stockpiling, local teams all need to spend money first, in short term still revenue growth without profit growth.
Industry Coordinates: Leading Second Tier
Comparing Changan among major automotive groups, the position is relatively clear.
Data in the table comes from various company announcements or production and sales quick reports, statistical scope is not consistent, for reference only.
Among these 8 companies, Changan and BYD are the only two with negative numbers, but reasons differ. BYD is actively adjusting structure on a 3.13 million unit scale, shifting increments to overseas, September overseas sales 180,700 units, close to 40% of total sales. Changan is on a 700,000 unit scale, simultaneously held back by product iterations and fuel vehicle clearance.
Paths of several rivals are also worth comparing.
BYD goes all-in on new energy, vertical integration pushed costs to positions others cannot follow, now relies on overseas for increments. 3.13 million unit scale is more than four times Changan's, this path Changan cannot learn yet.
Geely September new energy 190,900 units, penetration rate 65%, also spread across multiple brands, difference is each brand reached top tier in its own price band.
Chery relies on exports for pull. New energy 858,500 units, up 46.1% year-on-year, September exports 207,800 units, set a record. In its new energy increments, a significant portion comes from overseas.
Changan goes with multi-brand plus overseas, form most close to Geely, gap also falls on scale. Qiyuan 46,500 units placed in 80,000 to 250,000 yuan mainstream market not weak, but opposite is Geely Galaxy's 130,500 units and BYD Dynasty plus Ocean's 394,900 units; Deepal 30,200 units stood in 150,000 to 200,000 yuan new energy SUVs, but this pool itself is not big; Avatr 8,183 units in over 300,000 yuan, opposite is monthly sales 37,200 units, doubled year-on-year Zeekr, and AITO and NIO. Three brands combined, only equals two-thirds of one Geely Galaxy.
Problems faced by multi-brands in 2026 are common to the whole industry. Market has shifted from increment expansion to stock replacement, new energy retail penetration rate 67%, independent brand new energy domestic retail penetration rate 84.5%, mainstream joint venture only 15.9%. Share that can be divided is basically divided, remaining is joint venture fuel vehicle final base. Multi-brand originally was to cover blank price bands, now became cutting more slices in the same market, the thinner the cut, the harder to amortize R&D, platform and channel costs for each brand.
Adjustments in these two years all show this direction. Changan combined Avatr and Deepal styling, product development, platform technology, HR and finance into the newly established AD collaborative development department; GAC merged Hyper and Aion into the same business department at the end of 2025. Methods are same, all reduce brand count, increase scale of single brand.
This leadership change is also a continuation of this train of thought. Zhao Fei concurrently serves as listed company Chairman with group General Manager identity, Ye Pei promoted from Executive Senior Vice President to President, Deepal Chairman Deng Chenghao entered listed company Executive Vice President sequence. Purpose of this arrangement is to shorten decision chain between group and listed company, bring Avatr and Deepal synergy from documents to departments. It solves more efficiency problems.
So, let's see where the new core leadership team led by Zhao Fei can lead Changan Automobile.
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會用 豐田 Fortuner 同 寶馬 X3 嚟比較。呢兩款車喺價位同定位上都幾接近，今日我就從多個方面做一個詳細嘅比較，幫你省返做功課嘅時間。
豐田 Fortuner 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 195,880 - 241,880，一共有 3 個版本，包括 2024 2.8T VRZ Diesel（RM 241,880）、2024 2.7L SRZ Petrol（RM 202,880）、2024 2.4L Standard Diesel（RM 195,880） 等。
寶馬 X3 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 325,800 - 358,800，一共有 2 個版本，包括 xDrive20i（RM 320,000）、xDrive30e（RM 360,000） 等。
從價錢嚟睇，豐田 Fortuner 嘅入門價確實比 寶馬 X3 平咗 RM 129,920。如果你預算有限，豐田 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需要。但都係要注意，平嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備上會有取捨，具體就要睇你嘅需要。
豐田 Fortuner 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
寶馬 X3 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
兩款車嘅驅動方式一樣，都係 FWD，日常駕駛感覺唔會有太大區別。
豐田 Fortuner 保養 5 年/無限里程，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
寶馬 X3 保養 5 年/無限里程，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
豐田 Fortuner 同 寶馬 X3 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更睇重品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰一款；如果你更重視性價比同配備，就揀配備更豐富嗰款。最終都係建議兩款都去試駕，親身體驗先係最緊要。
總括嚟講，豐田 Fortuner 同 寶馬 X3 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊架，關鍵都係睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再嚟試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嗰陣都會拿 豐田 Corolla Cross 同 奇瑞 Tiggo 8 PHEV 嚟做比較。呢兩款車喺價位同定位上都幾相近，今日我哋就從多個方面做一個詳細嘅比較，幫你慳返做功課嘅時間。
豐田 Corolla Cross 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 133,800 - 148,800，一共有 3 個版本，包括 2026 HEV 1.8L GR Sport（RM 148,800）、2026 HEV 1.8L Standard（RM 140,800）、2026 1.8L Standard（RM 133,800） 等。
奇瑞 Tiggo 8 PHEV 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 159,750 - 159,750，一共有 2 個版本，包括 1.6L Turbo Standard（RM 130,000）、1.6L Turbo Premium（RM 145,000） 等。
從價錢來看，豐田 Corolla Cross 嘅起步價確實比 奇瑞 Tiggo 8 PHEV 平咗 RM 25,950。如果你預算有限，豐田嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需要。但都要留意，平嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備方面會有取舍，具體要看你嘅需要。
豐田 Corolla Cross 配備 1.5L Turbo，馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。
奇瑞 Tiggo 8 PHEV 配備 Hybrid，馬力 170 hp。官方油耗 4.5 L/100km。
動力方面，奇瑞 Tiggo 8 PHEV 嘅 Hybrid 比 豐田 Corolla Cross 嘅 1.5L Turbo 多咗 30 匹馬力。不過平日喺市區開，兩款車嘅動力都夠用，唔會覺得無夠力。
豐田 Corolla Cross 車身長度 4400 mm，後備箱 400 L。
奇瑞 Tiggo 8 PHEV 車身長度 4400 mm，後備箱 400 L。
兩款車嘅尺寸幾乎一樣，車內空間冇乜分別。呢級別嘅車，日常使用完全夠用。
豐田 Corolla Cross 保養 5 年/無限制里程，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
奇瑞 Tiggo 8 PHEV 保養 3 年/100,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
總體嚟講，豐田 Corolla Cross 同 奇瑞 Tiggo 8 PHEV 都係馬來西亞市場好好嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵都係睇你嘅個人需要同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較下幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕先做最終決定。買車係一件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
In the SUV market in Malaysia, many buyers compare the Toyota Yaris Cross and Subaru Crosstrek when selecting a car. These two models are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
The OTR price of the Toyota Yaris Cross in Malaysia is RM 99,900 - 109,900. There are 2 versions in total, including 2026 1.5L Standard (RM 99,900), 2026 HEV 1.5L Standard (RM 109,900), etc.
The OTR price of the Subaru Crosstrek in Malaysia is RM 145,000 - 160,000. There is 1 version in total, including 2.0L e-Boxer (RM 150,000), etc.
From a price perspective, the Toyota Yaris Cross is indeed RM 45,100 cheaper to start than the Subaru Crosstrek. If your budget is limited, Toyota's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. However, you should also note that the savings of a few thousand may involve trade-offs in features, depending on your specific needs.
The safety rating of the Toyota Yaris Cross is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), and the active safety system includes TSS.
The safety rating of the Subaru Crosstrek is 5★ (Euro NCAP), and the active safety system includes EyeSight.
Regarding safety features, both models received good ratings. However, the TSS of the Toyota Yaris Cross and the EyeSight of the Subaru Crosstrek have some functional differences. If you value active safety highly, you can compare the feature lists of both closely.
The Toyota Yaris Cross adopts FWD drive configuration.
The Subaru Crosstrek adopts FWD drive configuration.
The drive configuration of both cars is the same, both are FWD, so there won't be much difference in daily driving experience.
Both the Toyota Yaris Cross and Subaru Crosstrek are mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, you can prioritize the one with better reputation. If you care more about cost-performance ratio and features, choose the one with richer configuration. Ultimately, it is recommended to test drive both models, as personal experience is the most important.
Overall, the Toyota Yaris Cross and Subaru Crosstrek are both very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends mainly on your personal needs and budget. It is recommended to do your research, compare quotes from several dealers, and then test drive to make a final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending some time on research will never go wrong.
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拎豐田 Yaris Cross 同奇瑞 Tiggo 8 嚟做比較。呢兩款車喺價位同定位上都幾接近，今日我哋就從多個方面做個詳細嘅對比，幫你省咗做功課嘅時間。
豐田 Yaris Cross 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 99,900 - 109,900，一共有 2 個版本，包括 2026 1.5L Standard（RM 99,900）、2026 HEV 1.5L Standard（RM 109,900） 等。
奇瑞 Tiggo 8 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 129,750 - 129,750，一共有 1 個版本，包括 2026 1.6T Standard（RM 129,750） 等。
從價錢睇落嚟，豐田 Yaris Cross 嘅起步價確實比奇瑞 Tiggo 8 平咗 RM 29,850。如果你預算有限，豐田嘅入門版已經可以满足日常需求。但都要留意，平嗰幾千塊，可能喺配備上會有取舍，具體要睇你嘅需求。
豐田 Yaris Cross 搭載 1.5L 4-cyl，馬力 105 hp。官方油耗 6.0 L/100km。
奇瑞 Tiggo 8 搭載 1.5L Turbo，馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。
動力方面，奇瑞 Tiggo 8 嘅 1.5L Turbo 比豐田 Yaris Cross 嘅 1.5L 4-cyl 多咗 35 匹馬力。不過日常喺市區開，兩款車嘅動力都夠用，唔會覺得唔夠力。
豐田 Yaris Cross 車身長 4400 mm，行李箱 400 L。
奇瑞 Tiggo 8 車身長 4400 mm，行李箱 400 L。
兩款車嘅尺寸幾近一樣，車內空間差別唔大。呢個級別嘅車，日常使用完全夠用。
豐田 Yaris Cross 同奇瑞 Tiggo 8 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更看重品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，就揀配置更豐富嗰款。最終都係建議兩款都去試駕，親身經歷先係最重要嘅。
總括嚟講，豐田 Yaris Cross 同奇瑞 Tiggo 8 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊部，關鍵仲要睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，先去試駕先做最後決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嗰陣都會拎豐田 Yaris Cross 同馬自達 CX-5 嚟比較。呢兩款車喺價位同定位上都好接近，今日我哋就從多個方面做個詳細嘅比較，幫你攞返做功課嘅時間。
豐田 Yaris Cross 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 99,900 - 109,900，一總共有 2 個版本，包括 2026 1.5L 標準（RM 99,900）、2026 HEV 1.5L 標準（RM 109,900）等等。
馬自達 CX-5 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 135,469 - 166,760，一總共有 3 個版本，包括 2025 2.0L AT 35 週年紀念（RM 316,154）、2025 2.0L AT（RM 296,154）、2025 2.0L MT（RM 294,154）等等。
睇返價錢，豐田 Yaris Cross 嘅起價確實比馬自達 CX-5 平咗 RM 35,569。如果你預算有限，豐田嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需要。不過要留意，平嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備上會有取捨，具體就要睇你嘅需要。
豐田 Yaris Cross 車身長 4400 mm，尾箱 400 L。
馬自達 CX-5 車身長 4500 mm，尾箱 450 L。
空間方面，馬自達 CX-5 嘅車身比豐田 Yaris Cross 長咗 100 mm，乘坐空間更有優勢。不過豐田 Yaris Cross 喺城市入面泊車會靈活啲，各有取捨。
豐田 Yaris Cross 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
馬自達 CX-5 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
兩款車嘅驅動方式一樣，都係 FWD，日常駕駛感覺唔會有太大分別。
豐田 Yaris Cross 同馬自達 CX-5 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭用、日常上落班。如果你更睇重品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰一款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，那就揀配置更豐富嗰款。最終都係建議兩款都去試駕，親身體驗先係最重要嘅。
總而言之，豐田 Yaris Cross 同馬自達 CX-5 都係馬來西亞市場幾好嘅車款。揀邊一輛，關鍵仲係睇你嘅個人需要同預算。建議大家做足功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，先至去試駕做最終決定。買車係一件大事，花啲時間做功課絕對無錯。
8 月 26 日晚上，全球品質純電 SUV，風雲 T7 正式上市。
上市指導價 9.79-11.89 萬元，搶先置換價 9.49-11.59 萬元，比預售價低咗好多，上市即交車。
發佈會上面，李學用再次提及“速成車”，話“全球車快唔到一點”，而風雲 T7 信奉慢功造好車，呢度嘅慢唔係效率低，而係唔喺研發、測試上面偷工減料，風雲 T7 唔行國內改一改就出海嘅套路，屬於原生全球車。
簡單理解，就係先跟隨全球各國法規做開發，跑遍全球各地極限路況驗證之後，再回歸國內市場賣。
風雲 T7 整整 3 年研發週期，倚靠全球 1+7+N 研發體系打磨；設計階段聯動百幾名設計師，收集 5000 多份全球用戶嘅真實需求。車輛直接對標 2026 版 E-NCAP 五星安全標準，目標進軍歐洲高法規市場。
81 台試驗車參與耐久測試，完成 145 萬公里耐久路試，闖過高溫、高寒、高濕、高鹽鹼各類極端環境。打個比方，北歐極寒地區，佢嘅雙源制熱效能直接翻倍；碰到雨季水浸，500 毫米深水亦都唔怕涉水。
發佈會現場海外底盤、造型、研發工程師全部到場，所有性能數據都嚟自真實海外道路實測，唔係實驗室模擬出嚟嘅結果，整車適配全球 210 個國家地區嘅用車需求。
風雲 T7 嘅全球口碑唔係營銷話術，係市場實打實驗證出嚟嘅。奇瑞連續 23 年拿下中國品牌乘用車出口第一，全球用戶已經突破 2000 萬。
風雲 T7 嘅同源性車 Lepas L6 已經喺南非、泰國上市，跟住印尼、歐盟、英國、澳新等市場會陸續投放，仲上過米蘭設計周。早喺國內發佈前，測試車輛就跑遍全球各大洲，海外路人經常偶遇路試車。
美聯社亦對這款車做過報導，成都車展仲有海外達人專門過來睇車、現場下定。上市發佈會直接現場交車，唔少喺華外籍用戶成為首批車主。
區別於市面上好多十萬級純電 SUV 減配嘅現狀，風雲 T7 拋出“六大冗餘”嘅產品理念，簡單講就係硬件、安全、續航都留足餘量，唔搞高低配區別對待。
全系標配 65.05kWh 犀牛電池，CLTC 續航 600km，實測跑到 681.6km，做到反向虛標；20 分鐘就完成 30%-80% 快充。
安全層面，80% 高強度鋼籠式車身，配備 9 個安全氣囊，電池擁有 6D 鎖子甲 31 層防護結構；
智能上搭載同級首發 4nm 工藝 8775 艙駕一體晶片，接入豆包大模型，搭配獵鷹 500 智駕系統，300+ 場景自動泊車，高速長途開車更省心。
購車政策亦相當勁，截至 9 月 30 日訂車，能享 8 重權益，包含免費個性車色、金融免息、置換補貼，仲有電池、智駕雙重兜底保障，整車終身質保等福利。
十萬級就能拎到經過全球嚴苛驗證嘅原生純電 SUV，風雲 T7，亦畀普通家庭可以享受到“穩穩嘅幸福”出行體驗。
