首頁Mazda Miata
搜尋歷史
熱門搜尋
經銷商登入 / 註冊
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拎 Proton X70 同 Mazda CX-30 來比較。這兩款車喺售價同定位上都幾接近，今日我哋就從多個方面做一次詳細嘅比較，幫你節省做功課嘅時間。
Proton X70 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 106,800 - 122,300，一共有 3 個版本，包括 1.5L Standard 2WD（RM 106,800）、1.5L Executive 2WD（RM 115,800）、1.5L Premium 2WD（RM 122,300）等等。
Mazda CX-30 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 122,409 - 146,409，一共有 4 個版本，包括 2025 2.0L High+ Premium（RM 146,409）、2025 2.0L High+（RM 138,409）、2025 2.0L High（RM 130,409）等等。
從價錢睇落去，Proton X70 嘅起跳價確實比 Mazda CX-30 平咗 RM 15,609。如果你預算有限，Proton 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需要。但都要記住，便宜嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備上會有取舍，具體要看你嘅需要。
Proton X70 搭載 1.5L Turbo，馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。
Mazda CX-30 搭載 1.5L Turbo，馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。
兩款車用咗同一套動力系統，日常開出嚟嘅感覺基本冇分別。油耗方面都相若，唔使太糾結這一點。
Proton X70 嘅安全评分係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA)。
Mazda CX-30 嘅安全评分係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 i-Activsense。
兩款車嘅安全评分一樣，喺呢個級別入面安全配備都算好齊全。現在嘅新車安全性都唔差，唔使太擔心這一點。
Proton X70 保修 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Mazda CX-30 保修 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
兩款車嘅保修條件一樣，呢方面唔使糾結。實際保養成本仲要睇品牌嘅服務網絡同零件價錢，建議去車友群問問真實車主嘅經驗。
總括嚟講，Proton X70 同 Mazda CX-30 都係馬來西亞市場好唔錯嘅車型。揀邊輛，關鍵都係睇你嘅個人需要同預算。建議大家做好做功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最後決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嗰陣都會拿 Proton X50 同 Chery Tiggo 8 嚟比較。呢兩款車喺價位同定位上都幾近，今日我哋就從多個方面做一個詳細比較，幫你節省做功課嘅時間。
Proton X50 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 89,800 - 113,300，一共有 4 個版本，包括 1.5T Executive（RM 89,800）、1.5T Premium（RM 101,800）、1.5T Flagship（RM 113,300）等。
Chery Tiggo 8 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 129,750 - 129,750，一共有 1 個版本，包括 2026 1.6T Standard（RM 129,750）等。
從價錢嚟睇，Proton X50 嘅起步價確實比 Chery Tiggo 8 平咗 RM 39,950。如果你預算有限，Proton 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需要。但要注意，平嗰幾千元，可能喺配備上會有取捨，具體要睇你需要。
Proton X50 配備 1.5L 4-cyl，馬力 105 hp。官方油耗 6.0 L/100km。
Chery Tiggo 8 配備 1.5L Turbo，馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。
動力方面，Chery Tiggo 8 嘅 1.5L Turbo 比 Proton X50 嘅 1.5L 4-cyl 多咗 35 匹馬力。不過平日喺市區開，兩款車嘅動力都夠用，唔會覺得唔夠勁。
Proton X50 車身長 4400 mm，後廂 400 L。
Chery Tiggo 8 車身長 4400 mm，後廂 400 L。
兩款車嘅尺寸幾乎一樣，車內空間分別唔大。呢個級別嘅車，日常使用完全夠用。
Proton X50 採用 4WD 驅動方式。
Chery Tiggo 8 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
Proton 嘅 4WD 同 Chery 嘅 FWD 喺操控上會有唔同感受，建議試駕比較。
Proton X50 同 Chery Tiggo 8 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更重視品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰一款；如果你更在乎性價比同配備，就揀配備更豐富嗰款。最終都係建議兩款都去試駕，親身體驗先係最重要。
總體嚟講，Proton X50 同 Chery Tiggo 8 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊輛，關鍵係要睇你嘅個人需要同預算。建議大家做足功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，先至試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嗰陣都會拎 Perodua Aruz 同 Kia Sportage 嚟做比較。呢兩款車喺價位同定位上都幾接近，今日我哋就從多個方面做個詳細對比，幫你省咗做功課嘅時間。
Perodua Aruz 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 72,900 - 77,900，一共 有 2 個版本，包括 1.5L X（RM 72,900）、1.5L AV（RM 77,900） 等。
Kia Sportage 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 129,639 - 179,320，一共 有 4 個版本，包括 2025 1.6T DCT 4WD High（RM 179,320）、2025 1.6T DCT 2WD High（RM 159,320）、2025 2.0L AT 2WD High（RM 139,639） 等。
由價錢睇落，Perodua Aruz 嘅起步價確實比 Kia Sportage 平咗 RM 56,739。如果你預算有限，Perodua 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需求。但都係要注意，平嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備上會有取捨，具體要睇你嘅需求。
Perodua Aruz 車身長 4400 mm，後備箱 400 L。
Kia Sportage 車身長 4400 mm，後備箱 400 L。
兩款車嘅尺寸幾近一樣，車內空間差別唔大。呢個級別嘅車，日常使用完全夠用。
Perodua Aruz 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
Kia Sportage 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
兩款車嘅驅動方式一樣，都係 FWD，日常駕駛感受唔會有太大區別。
Perodua Aruz 同 Kia Sportage 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更睇重品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰一款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，那就揀配置更豐富嗰款。最終都係建議兩款都去試駕，親身體驗先至最重要。
總括嚟講，Perodua Aruz 同 Kia Sportage 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵係要睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
7 月 16 日，隨著一輛右舵版廣汽傳祺 M8 PHEV 緩緩駛下生產線，廣汽集團正式達成第 3000 萬輛整車下線的里程碑。從首輛整車下線到突破 3000 萬大關，廣汽走過了 29 年發展歷程。這個數字不只是一家車企的規模成績單，更濃縮了中國汽車工業從合資起步、自主成長到新能源全球化突圍的進階脈絡。
在行業深度重塑、競爭持續升級的當下，廣汽的 3000 萬時刻，兼具製造業初心的堅守與面向未來的轉型布局，為中國車企高質量發展提供了可參考的實踐路徑。
3000 萬體量的底層支撐，是對品質與安全的長期堅守。作為國內最早開展合資合作的车企之一，廣汽在發展初期便系統吸收本田全面質量管理、豐田精益生產的成熟經驗，並結合自身實踐融合創新，形成了獨具特色的質量管理體系。
這種品質基因貫穿研發到製造全鏈條：每款新車上市前，都要經過高寒、高溫、高原等“五高一山一塵”極端環境測試，完成“兩冬一夏”實地路試，覆蓋整車上千項驗證子項；生產端以廣汽埃安智能生態工廠為代表，通過數字化智慧製造保障量產品質穩定，成為全球首個新能源汽車燈塔工廠。
安全技術與服務保障同步加碼，構成了品質的第二道防線。星靈安全守護體系的八大關鍵系統雙冗餘設計，累計裝車 150 萬輛、安全行駛超 1600 億公里的彈匣電池，再到行業率先推出的自主品牌“三擔責”政策，從技術底層到服務兜底形成完整閉環。
在中國車市從增量轉向存量的階段，用戶選擇的核心標尺正回歸產品本質，廣汽 29 年積累 3000 萬用戶信任，本質上是守住了“品質不讓渡”的製造業底線，這也是中國汽車產業從做大到做強的核心根基。
此次里程碑儀式的另一重信號，是廣汽電動化、智能化轉型全面提速。現場亮相的第 29999995 至 29999999 輛整車，全部為新能源車型，覆蓋廣汽本田、廣汽豐田、廣汽傳祺、廣汽埃安、廣汽昊鉑、啟境汽車六大品牌；而作為第 3000 萬輛的右舵版傳祺 M8 PHEV，最終交付到泰國車主手中，將新能源轉型與全球化出海兩大趨勢串聯在一起。
數據印證了轉型的實際成效：今年上半年，廣汽集團整體銷量 77.31 萬輛，同比增長 2.35%；其中新能源汽車銷量同比大增 68.8%，海外出口突破 12 萬輛，同比增長 132%。在燃油車市場整體承壓的行業背景下，新能源與出口正在成為拉動增長的雙引擎。這種增長建立在長期研發投入之上：截至目前廣汽累計研發投入超 620 億元，全球研發團隊超 6800 人。
從星源動力三大技術路線，到效率突破 99% 的夸克電驅，再到全固態電池中試產線建成、星靈架構持續進化，技術儲備正逐步轉化為產品競爭力。不同於部分車企單押自主新能源的路徑，廣汽推動合資與自主雙線轉型，形成了協同互補的新能源矩陣。在合資車企普遍面臨轉型陣痛的當下，這種模式既保留了合資體系的品質與製造優勢，又借助自主板塊的技術活力帶動整體升級，為合資品牌新能源化探索了可行方向。
3000 萬用戶的沉澱，更印證了“以用戶為中心”的產業共識。當前車市競爭早已從產品端延伸至全生命週期體驗，用戶運營能力成為品牌護城河的重要組成。廣汽的實踐落腳於機制與服務兩端：機制層面，常態化舉辦“用戶全開麥”面對面交流，建立訴求全流程閉環管理，同時成立專屬用戶洞察部門，從組織架構上保障用戶聲音直達決策層；
服務網絡層面，推進渠道下沉縣域，年內計劃新增 1000 家縣域授權門店，上線“超級管家”實現快速響應，用效率提升用戶體驗。針對新能源用戶的補能痛點，廣汽搭建"9 縱 10 橫”補能網絡，自營充電樁超 2.7 萬根，核心城區實現“直線 1 公里必有站”，用基礎設施完善消解用戶焦慮。
從“賣產品”到“經營用戶”是行業普遍轉型方向，而廣汽的實踐說明，用戶運營不是營銷話術，而是需要從組織、渠道到生態的全鏈條落地。3000 萬用戶既是過往口碑的積累，也是未來用戶生態的起點——只有真正把用戶訴求放在核心位置，規模效應才能轉化為持續的品牌價值。
站在 3000 萬輛的節點回望，廣汽的發展軌跡正是中國汽車工業升級的縮影：從通過合資學習先進製造經驗，到自主掌握核心技術實現換道超車，再到帶著新能源產品參與全球競爭。
29 年間，中國車企完成了從追趕到並跑、再到部分領域領跑的跨越，3000 萬的數字背後，是整個產業從規模擴張向價值躍升的時代大勢。3000 萬不是終點，而是新一輪競爭的起點。
當前汽車行業正進入智能化深水區，全球市場博弈日趨激烈，技術迭代與品牌向上的壓力持續存在。但可以確定的是，守住品質根基、堅持技術創新、緊扣用戶需求，始终是車企穿越週期的核心邏輯。
對於中國汽車行業而言，廣汽的 3000 萬時刻不僅是一份成績，更印證了樸素的產業規律：以用戶為錨、以品質為底、以創新為翼，方能在行業變革中行穩致遠，在全球市場贏得更多話語權。
In Malaysia's SUV market, many buyers compare the Perodua Aruz and Mazda CX-30 when choosing a car. Both vehicles are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
The Perodua Aruz OTR price in Malaysia is RM 72,900 - 77,900, with a total of 2 versions, including 1.5L X (RM 72,900), 1.5L AV (RM 77,900), etc.
The Mazda CX-30 OTR price in Malaysia is RM 122,409 - 146,409, with a total of 4 versions, including 2025 2.0L High+ Premium (RM 146,409), 2025 2.0L High+ (RM 138,409), 2025 2.0L High (RM 130,409), etc.
In terms of price, the Perodua Aruz starting price is indeed RM 49,509 cheaper than the Mazda CX-30. If your budget is limited, the Perodua entry-level version can already meet daily needs. However, keep in mind that the few thousand less expensive might involve compromises in features, it depends on your specific needs.
The Perodua Aruz safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include.
The Mazda CX-30 safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include i-Activsense.
Both cars have the same safety rating, safety features are considered quite complete in this class. New cars nowadays do not have poor safety, no need to worry too much about this point.
The Perodua Aruz adopts FWD drive mode.
The Mazda CX-30 adopts FWD drive mode.
Both cars have the same drive mode, both are FWD, there will not be much difference in daily driving feel.
Perodua Aruz warranty 5 years/150,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Mazda CX-30 warranty 5 years/150,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
The warranty conditions for both cars are the same, no need to hesitate on this aspect. Actual maintenance costs also depend on the brand's service network and parts prices, recommended to ask real owners in car owner groups for experience.
Both Perodua Aruz and Mazda CX-30 are mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, you can prioritize the one with better reputation; if you care more about cost-performance and features, choose the one with richer configuration. Ultimately, it is recommended to test drive both models, personal experience is the most important.
Overall, both Perodua Aruz and Mazda CX-30 are very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends on your personal needs and budget. It is recommended for everyone to do their homework, compare quotes from multiple dealerships, and then test drive to make the final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending time on research will definitely not go wrong.
In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers compare Perodua Ativa and Honda HR-V when choosing a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will do a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to save you time on research.
Perodua Ativa's OTR price in Malaysia is RM 62,500 - 73,400. There are 3 versions in total, including 1.0L Turbo X (RM 62,500), 1.0L Turbo H (RM 67,300), 1.0L Turbo AV (RM 73,400), etc.
Honda HR-V's OTR price in Malaysia is RM 115,900 - 143,900. There are 4 versions in total, including 2026 e:HEV 1.5L RS (RM 143,900), 2026 1.5T V (RM 137,900), 2026 1.5T E (RM 130,900), etc.
From a price perspective, Perodua Ativa's starting price is indeed RM 53,400 cheaper than Honda HR-V. If your budget is limited, Perodua's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. However, be aware that the few thousand ringgit difference might mean compromises on features, depending on your specific needs.
Perodua Ativa is equipped with 1.5L 4-cyl, 105 hp. Official fuel consumption 6.0 L/100km.
Honda HR-V is equipped with 1.5L Turbo, 140 hp. Official fuel consumption 7.0 L/100km.
In terms of power, Honda HR-V's 1.5L Turbo has 35 more horsepower than Perodua Ativa's 1.5L 4-cyl. However, for daily city driving, both cars have sufficient power, you won't feel underpowered.
Perodua Ativa body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
Honda HR-V body length 4500 mm, trunk 450 L.
In terms of space, Honda HR-V's body is 100 mm longer than Perodua Ativa, offering better passenger space. However, Perodua Ativa is a bit more flexible to park in the city, both have trade-offs.
Perodua Ativa adopts FWD drive configuration.
Honda HR-V adopts FWD drive configuration.
Both cars have the same drive configuration, both are FWD, there won't be much difference in daily driving experience.
Perodua Ativa warranty 5 years/150,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Honda HR-V warranty 5 years/unlimited mileage, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Overall, Perodua Ativa and Honda HR-V are both very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose mainly depends on your personal needs and budget. We recommend doing your research, comparing quotes from several car dealerships, and then test driving to make the final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending time on research is never wrong.
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拿 Perodua Ativa 同 Toyota Yaris Cross 嚟比較。呢兩款車喺價碼同定位上都幾接近，今日我哋就從多個方面做一個詳細嘅比較，幫你省返做功課嘅時間。
Perodua Ativa 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 62,500 - 73,400，一共有 3 個版本，包括 1.0L Turbo X（RM 62,500）、1.0L Turbo H（RM 67,300）、1.0L Turbo AV（RM 73,400） 等。
Toyota Yaris Cross 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 99,900 - 109,900，一共有 2 個版本，包括 2026 1.5L Standard（RM 99,900）、2026 HEV 1.5L Standard（RM 109,900） 等。
由價錢嚟睇，Perodua Ativa 嘅起步價確實比 Toyota Yaris Cross 平咗 RM 37,400。如果你預算有限，Perodua 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需要。但亦都要注意，平嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備上有取舍，具體睇你嘅需要。
Perodua Ativa 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 ASA 3.0 + ACC + LDA + LKA + BSM + RCTA。
Toyota Yaris Cross 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 TSS。
兩款車嘅安全評級一樣，喺呢個級別入面安全配備都算畀好齊全。而家嘅新車安全性都唔差，唔使太擔心呢一點。
Perodua Ativa 車身長 4400 mm，行李箱 400 L。
Toyota Yaris Cross 車身長 4400 mm，行李箱 400 L。
兩款車嘅尺寸幾乎一樣，車內空間差別唔大。呢個級別嘅車，日常使用完全夠用。
Perodua Ativa 保養 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Toyota Yaris Cross 保養 5 年/無限制里程，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
總體嚟講，Perodua Ativa 同 Toyota Yaris Cross 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵始終要看你個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試車做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔錯。
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拎 寶騰 X90 同 福斯 Tiguan 嚟做比較。這兩款車喺價位同定位上都好接近，今日我哋就從多個方面做一個詳細嘅對比，幫你省下做功課嘅時間。
寶騰 X90 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 106,800 - 122,800，一共有 4 個版本，包括 2026 1.5T Prime X（RM 122,800）、2026 1.5T Prime（RM 116,800）、2026 1.5T Lite（RM 106,800） 等。
福斯 Tiguan 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 206,540 - 260,024，一共有 2 個版本，包括 2025 Allspace 2.0T R-Line（RM 260,024）、2025 Allspace 1.4T Elegance（RM 206,540） 等。
由價錢睇，寶騰 X90 嘅起步價確實比 福斯 Tiguan 平咗 RM 99,740。如果你預算有限，寶騰嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需求。但要小心，平嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備上會有取捨，具體要看你嘅需求。
寶騰 X90 搭載 1.5L Turbo，馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。
福斯 Tiguan 搭載 2.0L 4-cyl，馬力 170 hp。官方油耗 8.0 L/100km。
動力方面，福斯 Tiguan 嘅 2.0L 4-cyl 比 寶騰 X90 嘅 1.5L Turbo 多咗 30 匹馬力。不過日常喺市區開，兩款車嘅動力都夠用，唔會覺得唔夠力。
寶騰 X90 嘅安全評級係 5★ (東協 NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA)。
福斯 Tiguan 嘅安全評級係 5★ (歐洲 NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 IQ.Drive。
安全配備方面，兩款車都拿到唔錯嘅評級。不過 寶騰 X90 嘅 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA) 同 福斯 Tiguan 嘅 IQ.Drive 喺功能上有些差異，如果你比較重視主動安全嘅話，可以仔細對比一下兩者嘅功能列表。
寶騰 X90 保養保修 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
福斯 Tiguan 保養保修 3 年/100,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
總而言之，寶騰 X90 同 福斯 Tiguan 都係馬來西亞市場好唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵都要睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花啲時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嗰陣都會拿 Honda WR-V 同 Chery Tiggo 8 Pro 嚟做比較。呢兩款車喺價位同定位上都非常相近，今日我哋就從多方面做一個詳細嘅比較，幫你節省做功課嘅時間。
Honda WR-V 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 89,900 - 107,900，合共 4 個版本，包括 2023 1.5L V（RM 99,900）、2023 1.5L E（RM 95,900）、2023 1.5L S（RM 89,900） 等。
Chery Tiggo 8 Pro 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 159,750 - 159,750，合共 2 個版本，包括 1.6L Turbo Standard（RM 130,000）、1.6L Turbo Premium（RM 145,000） 等。
從價錢睇落，Honda WR-V 嘅起步價確實比 Chery Tiggo 8 Pro 平咗 RM 69,850。如果你預算有限，Honda 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需要。但都要注意，平嘅嗰幾千塊，喺配備上會有取捨，具體要看你嘅需要。
Honda WR-V 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 Honda SENSING。
Chery Tiggo 8 Pro 嘅安全評級係 TBD，主動安全系統包括 Basic。
安全配備方面，兩款車都拿到唔錯嘅評級。不過 Honda WR-V 嘅 Honda SENSING 同 Chery Tiggo 8 Pro 嘅 Basic 喺功能上有啲差異，如果你比較重視主動安全嘅話，可以仔細對比下兩者嘅功能列表。
Honda WR-V 車身長 4400 mm，尾箱 400 L。
Chery Tiggo 8 Pro 車身長 4400 mm，尾箱 400 L。
兩款車嘅尺寸幾乎一樣，車內空間分別唔大。呢個級別嘅車，日常使用完全夠用。
Honda WR-V 保用 5 年/無限里程，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Chery Tiggo 8 Pro 保用 3 年/100,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
總體嚟講，Honda WR-V 同 Chery Tiggo 8 Pro 都係馬來西亞市場幾好嘅車型。揀邊款，關鍵仲要睇你嘅個人需要同預算。建議大家做功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕先做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
車型概覽
平治GLC系列 轎跑車 值唔值得睇，第一步唔係望牌子或者外形，而係睇佢能唔能夠配合你嘅香港日常。 呢篇會集中講每日相處是否輕鬆，幫你用買家角度篩走唔適合嘅選擇。
HK$ 365,581 令預算位置更清楚，買家可以先估算月供、保險、泊車同日常開支。
購車價格指南
平治GLC系列 轎跑車 嘅購車預算可以先由 HK$ 365,581 開始計。香港買車唔只係睇車價，月供、保險、牌費、泊車同能源成本都會影響每月壓力。
如果有幾個版本可揀，可以先將 2024 GLC 300 4MATIC Avantgarde Coupé（HK$ 365,581）、2025 GLC 300 4MATIC AMG Line Coupé（價格待確認） 放喺同一張清單。日常通勤重視舒適同易用，家庭買家就要優先睇後排、尾箱同安全配置。
核心規格重點
睇 平治GLC系列 轎跑車 嘅規格，重點唔係背數字，而係理解佢喺香港用車場景會帶嚟咩分別。
渦輪增壓、4 個 汽缸、1999 mL 排量 嘅動力底子，重點係市區跟車夠唔夠順、高速巡航會唔會吃力。 258 Ps / 190 kW、400 N·m 嘅輸出，對滿載、上斜同超車都比單睇馬力數字更有意思。 車長 4764 mm、車闊 2075 mm、車高 1605 mm 可以幫你預判商場停車場、屋苑車位同後排腿部空間。 手自一體(AT)、前置四駆 會影響起步順滑度、濕地穩定感同長途巡航性格。
優缺點分析
平治GLC系列 轎跑車 嘅優點唔需要講到天花龍鳳，真正有價值係佢能唔能夠令日常用車更省心：預算位置清楚，方便同同級車直接比較、動力輸出對高速同上斜更有底氣、空間同車身尺寸方便家庭買家預判實用性。
要留意嘅係，香港停車場同窄路使用要留意車身闊度。呢啲唔一定係缺點，但係落訂前應該先諗清楚。
買家常見問題
買 平治GLC系列 轎跑車 之前，真正要問嘅唔係單一規格，而係佢可唔可以融入你每日嘅生活節奏。
常見疑問係「Mercedes-Benz GLC Series Coupe 嘅行李箱實用性點樣？」簡單講，Mercedes-Benz GLC Series Coupe 提供約 545 公升嘅標準載物空間，雖然因為斜背設計比 SUV 版本略少，但空間依然足夠擺放日常購物物件或高爾夫球袋。當後座摺低後，Mercedes-Benz GLC Series Coupe 嘅容量可擴展至 1,490 公升，足以應付大部分生活裝載需求。 放到實際用車，就係要睇佢對通勤、泊車、家庭乘坐同長期成本有幾大幫助。
同級對比內容
將 平治GLC系列 轎跑車 放入同級車清單時，唔建議只用外形或者品牌光環決定。比較順序可以係：先用 HK$ 365,581 鎖定預算圈、再睇動力係咪足夠應付高速併線同滿載、最後睇車身大小、座位同尾箱是否適合家人。
咁樣篩選會貼近香港買家真實生活：平日塞車、商場泊車、周末去新界、甚至一家人出入，先係一部車每日要面對嘅考驗。
用車全周期指南
擁有 平治GLC系列 轎跑車 唔係買車一刻就完結，之後仲有保險、輪胎、保養、泊車同日常能源成本要處理。
如果你主要喺市區行，視野、低速順滑度同泊車輔助會好影響心情；如果經常行高速或跨區，座椅舒適度、隔音同動力從容感會更重要。
Folks, today let's talk about big news on going global—not selling cars, but selling "drivers". On June 2, WeRide and Uber jointly announced a plan: to launch the country's first commercial Robotaxi pilot service in Madrid, Spain. In other words: Spanish residents will soon be able to hail a driverless taxi via Uber. This is the first time WeRide and Uber are partnering to enter the European market. Madrid also becomes the 12th city globally where WeRide's Robotaxi arrives.
According to official news, with the support of the Madrid regional government, this service will officially launch within this year. At that time, friends in Madrid can open the Uber App and call WeRide's Robotaxi with one click. It's just like calling an ordinary ride-hailing service, the difference is the arriving car has no driver—at least initially, there is still a difference. In the initial operation phase, a professionally trained safety monitor will be on board, as it's just launched, safety comes first.
This company, WeRide, you might have heard of it, or you might not. A brief introduction: Established in 2017, it has been dedicated to Robotaxi technology R&D and commercialization. Currently, its Robotaxis cover Guangzhou, Beijing, Singapore, Abu Dhabi, Dubai, Riyadh, Zurich... plus Madrid now, totaling 12 cities. Spain is also the 5th European market WeRide has entered—previously entered Switzerland, France, Belgium, Slovakia. According to the plan agreed by WeRide and Uber in May 2025, they plan to deploy Robotaxi services in 15 new international cities within five years, deploying tens of thousands of Robotaxis globally. With the Madrid launch, the deployment in 4 cities has been completed, and 11 more will be covered successively before 2030.
To be honest, it's not the first time Chinese autonomous driving companies are going global, but the combination of Chinese technology + global mobility platform + European market is quite interesting. Madrid is one of the European Robotaxi markets with the most commercial potential, with a large population, high travel demand, and friendly local policies. Being able to take root in this market is a significant milestone for WeRide. For Uber, introducing Robotaxis is also a way to reduce costs—after all, drivers don't need salaries. For Madrid residents, hailing a taxi might be cheaper in the future.
車型概覽
長安銳程Plus 值唔值得睇，第一步唔係望牌子或者外形，而係睇佢能唔能夠配合你嘅香港日常。 呢篇會集中講售價未落實前點樣先篩選，幫你用買家角度篩走唔適合嘅選擇。
售價仍待確認，買家可以先把佢放入候選名單，等價格落實後再同同級車逐項比較。
購車價格指南
長安銳程Plus 目前售價仍未清晰，較理性嘅做法係先睇版本、車身大小同動力形式，等價格落實後再決定值唔值得落訂。
如果有幾個版本可揀，可以先將 2024 1.5T 雙離合版（價格待確認） 放喺同一張清單。日常通勤重視舒適同易用，家庭買家就要優先睇後排、尾箱同安全配置。
核心規格重點
睇 長安銳程Plus 嘅規格，重點唔係背數字，而係理解佢喺香港用車場景會帶嚟咩分別。
渦輪增壓、4 個 汽缸、1494 mL 排量 嘅動力底子，重點係市區跟車夠唔夠順、高速巡航會唔會吃力。 188 Ps / 138 kW、300 N·m 嘅輸出，對滿載、上斜同超車都比單睇馬力數字更有意思。 車長 4800 mm、車闊 1825 mm、車高 1465 mm、軸距 2770 mm 可以幫你預判商場停車場、屋苑車位同後排腿部空間。 濕式雙離合(DCT)、前置前駆 會影響起步順滑度、濕地穩定感同長途巡航性格。
優缺點分析
長安銳程Plus 嘅優點唔需要講到天花龍鳳，真正有價值係佢能唔能夠令日常用車更省心：動力輸出對高速同上斜更有底氣、空間同車身尺寸方便家庭買家預判實用性。
要留意嘅係，香港停車場同窄路使用要留意車身闊度、售價未清晰前唔應該太早用性價比落結論。呢啲唔一定係缺點，但係落訂前應該先諗清楚。
買家常見問題
買 長安銳程Plus 之前，真正要問嘅唔係單一規格，而係佢可唔可以融入你每日嘅生活節奏。
常見疑問係「長安銳程 Plus 於香港的落地價大約係幾多？」簡單講，長安銳程 Plus 於香港落地價約240,000–280,000 港元，視配置而定。 放到實際用車，就係要睇佢對通勤、泊車、家庭乘坐同長期成本有幾大幫助。
同級對比內容
將 長安銳程Plus 放入同級車清單時，唔建議只用外形或者品牌光環決定。比較順序可以係：先等售價落實，再決定佢應該同邊個級距比較、再睇動力係咪足夠應付高速併線同滿載、最後睇車身大小、座位同尾箱是否適合家人。
咁樣篩選會貼近香港買家真實生活：平日塞車、商場泊車、周末去新界、甚至一家人出入，先係一部車每日要面對嘅考驗。
用車全周期指南
擁有 長安銳程Plus 唔係買車一刻就完結，之後仲有保險、輪胎、保養、泊車同日常能源成本要處理。
如果你主要喺市區行，視野、低速順滑度同泊車輔助會好影響心情；如果經常行高速或跨區，座椅舒適度、隔音同動力從容感會更重要。
Folks, today let's talk about big news on going global—not selling cars, but selling "drivers". On June 2, WeRide and Uber jointly announced a plan: to launch the country's first commercial Robotaxi pilot service in Madrid, Spain. In other words: Spanish residents will soon be able to hail a driverless taxi via Uber. This is the first time WeRide and Uber are partnering to enter the European market. Madrid also becomes the 12th city globally where WeRide's Robotaxi arrives.
According to official news, with the support of the Madrid regional government, this service will officially launch within this year. At that time, friends in Madrid can open the Uber App and call WeRide's Robotaxi with one click. It's just like calling an ordinary ride-hailing service, the difference is the arriving car has no driver—at least initially, there is still a difference. In the initial operation phase, a professionally trained safety monitor will be on board, as it's just launched, safety comes first.
This company, WeRide, you might have heard of it, or you might not. A brief introduction: Established in 2017, it has been dedicated to Robotaxi technology R&D and commercialization. Currently, its Robotaxis cover Guangzhou, Beijing, Singapore, Abu Dhabi, Dubai, Riyadh, Zurich... plus Madrid now, totaling 12 cities. Spain is also the 5th European market WeRide has entered—previously entered Switzerland, France, Belgium, Slovakia. According to the plan agreed by WeRide and Uber in May 2025, they plan to deploy Robotaxi services in 15 new international cities within five years, deploying tens of thousands of Robotaxis globally. With the Madrid launch, the deployment in 4 cities has been completed, and 11 more will be covered successively before 2030.
To be honest, it's not the first time Chinese autonomous driving companies are going global, but the combination of Chinese technology + global mobility platform + European market is quite interesting. Madrid is one of the European Robotaxi markets with the most commercial potential, with a large population, high travel demand, and friendly local policies. Being able to take root in this market is a significant milestone for WeRide. For Uber, introducing Robotaxis is also a way to reduce costs—after all, drivers don't need salaries. For Madrid residents, hailing a taxi might be cheaper in the future.
車型概覽
吉利EX5 值唔值得睇，第一步唔係望牌子或者外形，而係睇佢能唔能夠配合你嘅香港日常。 呢篇會集中講版本取捨，幫你用買家角度篩走唔適合嘅選擇。 近期市場討論到「自動駕駛全新突破 吉利Eva Cab亮相香港汽車博覽會」，代表呢類車型仍然有一定關注度。
零售價 HK$ 160,216、完稅價 HK$ 238,000 - 299,900 令預算位置更清楚，買家可以先估算月供、保險、泊車同日常開支。
購車價格指南
吉利EX5 嘅購車預算可以先由 零售價 HK$ 160,216、完稅價 HK$ 238,000 - 299,900 開始計。香港買車唔只係睇車價，月供、保險、牌費、泊車同能源成本都會影響每月壓力。
如果有幾個版本可揀，可以先將 2026 550km Max Plus（HK$ 299,900）、2025 430km Pro（HK$ 238,000）、2025 425km Max（HK$ 257,389） 放喺同一張清單。日常通勤重視舒適同易用，家庭買家就要優先睇後排、尾箱同安全配置。
核心規格重點
睇 吉利EX5 嘅規格，重點唔係背數字，而係理解佢喺香港用車場景會帶嚟咩分別。
68.39/60.22 kWh 嘅電池容量，真正意義係可以幫你估算一星期通勤同周末出車要唔要中途補電。 14.3/15.8/16 kWh/100km 嘅耗電表現，會影響你去快充站或者屋苑充電位嘅頻率。 160 kW、320 N·m 嘅輸出，令高速併線同短距離超車更有信心。 車長 4615 mm、車闊 1901 mm、車高 1670 mm、軸距 2750 mm 可以幫你預判商場停車場、屋苑車位同後排腿部空間。
優缺點分析
吉利EX5 嘅優點唔需要講到天花龍鳳，真正有價值係佢能唔能夠令日常用車更省心：預算位置清楚，方便同同級車直接比較、日常能源成本有基本參考、電池同續航資訊有助安排通勤同補電。
要留意嘅係，要先確認屋苑、公司或常去商場嘅充電條件、香港停車場同窄路使用要留意車身闊度。呢啲唔一定係缺點，但係落訂前應該先諗清楚。
買家常見問題
買 吉利EX5 之前，真正要問嘅唔係單一規格，而係佢可唔可以融入你每日嘅生活節奏。
常見疑問係「吉利 EX5 於香港的落地價大約係幾多？」簡單講，吉利 EX5 於香港的落地價大約介乎 240,000–300,000 港元，視乎版本而定。 放到實際用車，就係要睇佢對通勤、泊車、家庭乘坐同長期成本有幾大幫助。
同級對比內容
將 吉利EX5 放入同級車清單時，唔建議只用外形或者品牌光環決定。比較順序可以係：先用 零售價 HK$ 160,216、完稅價 HK$ 238,000 - 299,900 鎖定預算圈、再睇動力係咪足夠應付高速併線同滿載、再比較能源成本同補能便利、最後睇車身大小、座位同尾箱是否適合家人。
咁樣篩選會貼近香港買家真實生活：平日塞車、商場泊車、周末去新界、甚至一家人出入，先係一部車每日要面對嘅考驗。
用車全周期指南
擁有 吉利EX5 最重要係先諗清楚充電節奏。屋苑、公司或者常去商場只要有穩定充電選項，電動化用車就會容易相處好多。
如果你主要喺市區行，視野、低速順滑度同泊車輔助會好影響心情；如果經常行高速或跨區，座椅舒適度、隔音同動力從容感會更重要。
車型概覽
Ferrari Monza SP2 值唔值得睇，第一步唔係望牌子或者外形，而係睇佢能唔能夠配合你嘅香港日常。 呢篇會集中講同級車比較，幫你用買家角度篩走唔適合嘅選擇。
售價仍待確認，買家可以先把佢放入候選名單，等價格落實後再同同級車逐項比較。
購車價格指南
Ferrari Monza SP2 目前售價仍未清晰，較理性嘅做法係先睇版本、車身大小同動力形式，等價格落實後再決定值唔值得落訂。
如果有幾個版本可揀，可以先將 2025 6.5L Standard（價格待確認） 放喺同一張清單。日常通勤重視舒適同易用，家庭買家就要優先睇後排、尾箱同安全配置。
核心規格重點
睇 Ferrari Monza SP2 嘅規格，重點唔係背數字，而係理解佢喺香港用車場景會帶嚟咩分別。
自然進氣、12 個 汽缸 嘅動力底子，重點係市區跟車夠唔夠順、高速巡航會唔會吃力。 596 kW、719 N·m 嘅輸出，對滿載、上斜同超車都比單睇馬力數字更有意思。 車長 4657 mm、車闊 1996 mm、車高 1155 mm、軸距 2720 mm 可以幫你預判商場停車場、屋苑車位同後排腿部空間。 濕式雙離合(DCT)、前置後駆 會影響起步順滑度、濕地穩定感同長途巡航性格。
優缺點分析
Ferrari Monza SP2 嘅優點唔需要講到天花龍鳳，真正有價值係佢能唔能夠令日常用車更省心：動力輸出對高速同上斜更有底氣、空間同車身尺寸方便家庭買家預判實用性。
要留意嘅係，香港停車場同窄路使用要留意車身闊度、售價未清晰前唔應該太早用性價比落結論。呢啲唔一定係缺點，但係落訂前應該先諗清楚。
買家常見問題
買 Ferrari Monza SP2 之前，真正要問嘅唔係單一規格，而係佢可唔可以融入你每日嘅生活節奏。
常見疑問係「Ferrari Monza SP2 全球限量生產幾多部？」簡單講，Ferrari Monza SP1 同 SP2 合共全球限量生產 499 部。由於兩款車嘅產量係共同計算，而且只會邀請品牌最核心嘅 VIP 客戶購買，令佢喺二手市場嘅升值潛力極高。 放到實際用車，就係要睇佢對通勤、泊車、家庭乘坐同長期成本有幾大幫助。
同級對比內容
將 Ferrari Monza SP2 放入同級車清單時，唔建議只用外形或者品牌光環決定。比較順序可以係：先等售價落實，再決定佢應該同邊個級距比較、再睇動力係咪足夠應付高速併線同滿載、最後睇車身大小、座位同尾箱是否適合家人。
咁樣篩選會貼近香港買家真實生活：平日塞車、商場泊車、周末去新界、甚至一家人出入，先係一部車每日要面對嘅考驗。
用車全周期指南
擁有 Ferrari Monza SP2 唔係買車一刻就完結，之後仲有保險、輪胎、保養、泊車同日常能源成本要處理。
如果你主要喺市區行，視野、低速順滑度同泊車輔助會好影響心情；如果經常行高速或跨區，座椅舒適度、隔音同動力從容感會更重要。
近日，國家市場監督管理總局正式公布首批國家質量標準實驗室培育建設名單。上汽通用五菱汽車股份有限公司申報的「新能汽車國家質量標準實驗室」成功入選，成為車企申報唯一獲批建設的國家質量標準實驗室。這標誌着企業在新能汽車質量技術體系建設方面邁入國家級新階段。
國家質量標準實驗室是依據《質量強國建設綱要》設立的國家級技術創新平台，主要承擔產業重大質量標準的基礎研究與應用、高水平質量標準的研制與推廣、以及質量標準人才的培養與集結等任務，對推動質量強國建設具有重要戰略意義。
【上汽通用五菱「新能汽車國家質量標準實驗室」成功入選】
上汽通用五菱獲批的「新能汽車國家質量標準實驗室」，匯聚了4000 餘名研發人員，涵蓋博士、碩士及外籍專家，設有博士後工作站、國家企業技術中心、國家級工業設計中心等多個國家級創新平台，擁有14 個國際一流水準的實驗室，涵蓋三電、碰撞、NVH、EMC、熱管理、智能聯網、輕量化材料等全鏈條驗證能力，已獲 CNAS 認可 275 項（其中包含 ECE 國際認可 81 項），具備從整車到零部件的全鏈路測試能力。
依托 3200 萬基盤用戶的場景數據及百萬輛級新能汽車大數據中心，實驗室能夠復現用戶真實使用工況，實現從研發試驗到用戶使用的全鏈條質量預判與閉環迭代，全面支撐新能汽車電智化技術的試驗驗證。
【整車試驗場】
【碰撞實驗室】
【三電系統實驗室】
目前，實驗室已形成一批全球首創、國際領先、行業先進的標誌性成果，其中包括全球首創的智能島製造體系，入選國家首批「領航級智能工廠」培育名單；華境 S 通過行業首次 80km/h 側碰 15 米高坡墜落挑戰；神煉電池實現 766 億公里 0 自燃記錄。此外，五菱 Air ev 安全設計納入東盟官方技術規範，直流充電標準獲印尼 SNI 認證，實現中國車企在東盟標準制定領域「零的突破」，成功打破歐美日標準壁壘。
【華境 S 通過行業首次 80km/h 側碰 15 米高坡墜落挑戰】
此次入選首批國家質量標準實驗室，是上汽通用五菱長期堅持正向研發、深耕質量基礎設施建設的成果。它意味著企業的新能汽車質量技術標準將與國家級最高標桿對齊，實現從「造好車」到「定義好車標準」的關鍵一躍，真正做到技術自主、標準自主、質量自主、安全可控。與此同時，實驗室將通過創新質量管理與服務模式，實現技術攻關、標準引領、試驗驗證、產業賦能，讓「中國標準」沿著產業鏈出海，為「一帶一路」標準联通貢獻五菱力量。對用戶而言，國家質量標準實驗室將成為上汽通用五菱產品品質的「最高校驗場」——從三電安全到車身結構，從智能聯網到整車耐久，每一款車型都將在高標準、高起點的質量體系下完成嚴苛打磨。
面向未來，上汽通用五菱將以國家質量標準實驗室建設為戰略支撐，推動中國新能汽車從規模領先邁向標準領先，為全球消費者帶來更高品質的出行體驗。
Have you ever seen the roads in India?
I've seen them online.
The scene is usually like this: a sedan blocked behind a cow, motorcycles running wild nearby, even milk tea vendors nearby, so "clean and hygienic".
However, in a place where many feel physically uncomfortable after watching, Toyota, Suzuki, Honda and other Japanese car companies decided to bet on India.
According to the Indian "Brand Quality Foundation" website, the three car companies will invest nearly $11 billion to build factories, increase capacity, and develop exports in India.
Some netizens commented: Did the three Japanese car companies have too much money?
In fact, they didn't have endless money to spend, nor were they bewildered by Indian curry. These Japanese car executives are much clearer than us.
Current Japanese car revenue and market share are declining. Raw material costs are soaring. Looking at the world map, finding a market that can accommodate capacity, expand share, and has gentle competition is not easy.
So, it wasn't that Japanese car companies chose India, but because they had no choice.
The Pain of Japanese Car Companies
Past Japanese cars were truly the envy of others.
Ask old drivers who drove Japanese cars over ten years ago, talking about Japanese cars, almost no one doesn't give a thumbs up, cheap price, fuel saving, durable...
Even many Japanese cars needed to be bought at a markup, but who would think this iron fortress would be beaten out of sight in a few short years.
With the wave of new energy vehicles coming, electrification and intelligence became the goal for many domestic car companies to "leapfrog". Relying on China's strong new energy vehicle industry chain advantages and car companies' own persistence on R&D and technology, Chinese independent brands quickly achieved "leapfrogging".
Domestic cars once criticized are now becoming more and more common on the roads, even surpassing joint ventures in share.
According to CPCA data, in April 2026, the share of independent brands reached as high as 62.5%, far exceeding Japan's 13.1%.
You need to know, the Chinese car market is the largest car market in the world. Losing speed in the Chinese market is like losing a huge piece of cake.
Meanwhile, the main theme of the Chinese market in recent years is still price wars. Racing on configuration, price, and service has become a normal state, which also had a huge impact on Japanese cars' profits.
Apart from China, Japanese cars are also not doing well in the US.
On January 20, 2025, Trump swore in as the 47th US President, starting a series of chaotic operations, including imposing additional car tariffs in the name of national security, causing the tariff rate for imported Japanese cars to reach as high as 27.5% at one point. Although it decreased later, it was still far higher than the initial tax rate.
This operation directly led to a tariff loss of over 2 trillion yen for seven Japanese car companies in fiscal year 2025.
Looking at Japan itself, it is actually not easy either.
Middle East geopolitical conflicts blocked shipping in the Strait of Hormuz, transportation costs and raw material costs soared, Japanese car companies also had to suffer in silence.
Executives looking at the reports, their backs went cold, only to find a new growth curve.
So, Japanese car companies didn't fall in love with India, there was nowhere else to go.
Deep Thought on Choosing India
So, what magic does India have, to make Japanese car companies invest heavily?
The first advantage is big. In 2025, the Indian car market achieved 5.517 million new car sales, up 6% year-on-year, breaking the historical record, ranking as the third largest car market in the world, exceeding Japan for four consecutive years, second only to China and the United States.
The value of this doesn't need me to say much. India achieved this result mainly because India has been promoting tax reduction policies to promote consumption, which led to a significant increase in domestic consumption willingness.
The second advantage is close, meaning it is close to places where Japanese cars sell well, such as Africa.
So, India for Japanese car companies is more like a convenience store built in the center of a crossroad. You don't need to ship cars to eight countries separately, just build well at this stop in India, then unload ship by ship, and you can save a lot of costs.
The Nikkei also believes that India is expected to become its global car supply center.
The third advantage is stability. You know, Japanese cars' advantage is fuel cars, after all, the three major components of engines, gearboxes, and chassis, they have played for many years, technology accumulation is number one in the world.
But the Chinese car market has fully promoted electrification and intelligence development, leading to Japanese cars' advantage becoming weaker and weaker, impossible to play out. But India is different, it has the characteristics of few charging piles and slow electrification process. Indian old people buying cars still look for cheap, fuel saving, easy to fix, and these three points are exactly Japanese cars' old trade.
Especially Suzuki, always been India's car market evergreen, almost always sitting on the best-selling model throne, reputation of being worry-free, better than any advertisement.
So, Japanese car companies' vigorous layout of the Indian market is obviously carefully considered.
But, is the Indian market really that easy to mix?
The Hard-to-Bite Indian Market
Of course, India is not perfect like a hot commodity, its disadvantages are as obvious as its advantages, and every one is enough for Japanese car companies to face a hard time.
First talk about electrification. Yes, right now India has few charging piles and electric cars don't sell well, it is indeed a shelter for Japanese fuel cars. But you have to think, how long can this "shelter" avoid?
India previously shouted the slogan of 30% of new cars being electric vehicles by 2030. Although it sounds like bragging, but can't help but they really give subsidies, really build charging stations.
Imagine, what if one day India suddenly wakes up, starts vigorously promoting electrification, doing infrastructure, charging piles popping out like mushrooms after rain, then Japanese cars will be dumbfounded?
Isn't this a version of the Thai market?
Back then Japanese cars in Thailand won easily. The entire Southeast Asian market was called Japanese cars' backyard. Result Thailand took the lead in promoting electrification. Chinese electric vehicles came in, directly became a hot commodity. Look at Japanese cars again, share in Thailand falling down rapidly.
If India accelerates electrification, history will likely repeat, and this time, Japanese cars don't even have a place to flee, how to prevent will become the first problem for Japanese car companies.
Next talk about policy. India's policy is like a pot of curry, you never know if you will eat chicken or potato next time.
This magical country, today low tariff encourages building factories, tomorrow may fine you a huge amount. What's more annoying is mandatory joint venture. Foreign car companies want to sell cars in India, have to find local partners to partner up. When your factory is built, supply chain is done, India directly backstabs you. At that time whether adding money or withdrawing capital, what you get is heartache.
So you see, this market like India is like a mango that looks very sweet, bite the first mouth it's okay, chew two more mouths hit the hard core.
Japanese cars now is calculating, while the core hasn't bit the tooth, hurry up to nibble a few more mouths, but the core will bite sooner or later, just don't know which day.
Epilogue
Japanese cars this trip to India, not go for tourism, is go to make a living.
Chinese and Southeast Asian dining tables are more crowded, production and transportation costs have risen. Looking around the world, only this pot in India is still steaming, even if what is boiling inside is curry-flavored stones, have to bite hard and chew down.
Japanese car companies want to expand market, India wants to pull economy, solve employment, both sides have their own thoughts.
As for the ending is Japanese cars in India regain their glory, or like past competitors shamefully walk away, then is not known.
But no matter how, this play just started, we slowly watch is okay.
Anyway India's story, never bored.
When it comes to domestic car brands, many people's impression may still be stuck at the stage of mainstream family cars. However, this is already old news from a few years ago. You should know that current domestic car brands not only beat joint venture brands in the domestic market, but have also surpassed foreign car brands on multiple tracks such as high-end development and overseas exports. Take the Geely Automobile we are talking about today for example.
Growth Momentum Leads the Industry
According to the latest data released by the official, Geely Automobile's cumulative sales in May reached 237,637 vehicles. It achieved double growth year-on-year and month-on-month for three consecutive months, leading the overall market with stable growth and impressive results. However, compared to this already excellent total performance, many industry insiders, after seeing the sales results of each brand under Geely Automobile, will be amazed that its quality is also getting higher.
As is well known, there are two hardest markets in the automotive industry: the luxury high-end market and the overseas export market.
Taking Geely Automobile as an example, its "Global Luxury Technology Brand" — Zeekr Automobile, reached deliveries of 34,377 vehicles in May, an 81.8% increase year-on-year and an 8.1% increase month-on-month, achieving double growth for four consecutive months. The average transaction price per vehicle also increased by 52.4% year-on-year. What is even more shocking is that the sales share of Zeekr 9 Series and 8 Series, which are priced as high as 400,000 to 500,000, accounts for nearly 50%!
Not only that, Geely Automobile's "Global New Energy High-End Brand" — Lynk & Co, also achieved May sales of 20,732 vehicles, with new energy vehicle sales accounting for 70.8%, and the brand's cumulative sales have broken 1.8 million. This shows that Geely Automobile's high-end models have not only won the recognition of a large number of consumers with excellent product power, but have also completed the transformation of volume and price rising together at the brand level.
Of course, as the undisputed leading automotive enterprise in China, Geely Automobile's focus is no longer limited to the domestic market. It chose to go global to challenge the more difficult overseas market. This is not the case, May's overseas export achievement of 85,144 vehicles set a new record for export sales. It is worth mentioning that the hot-selling products of Geely Automobile brands overseas are also mostly high-end or new energy vehicles.
For example, Zeekr has entered more than 50 countries and regions, and the cumulative global delivery volume of Zeekr 7X has exceeded 160,000 vehicles; Geely Galaxy Starship 7 EM-i remained the champion of new energy plug-in hybrid SUV sales in Kazakhstan for March and April; Geely Galaxy E5 remained the champion of pure electric SUV-C market sales in Australia, Argentina, UAE, Morocco, and Uruguay for the first quarter, and stayed in the top three in Brazil, Uzbekistan, and Indonesia new energy pure electric SUV-C models!
Hardcore Strength Creates Brilliance
Obviously, whether it is the rapid sales growth trend, or the hot sales in new energy, high-end market and overseas market, it is inseparable from hard strength as support. Taking Lynk & Co Automobile as the first car racing brand in China for example, top technology shouldn't just stay on the marketing level, but must be proven on the track. Therefore, it recently announced carrying 03+ TCR Racer, 03++ Racer, and 03 CUP EVO three racing cars to participate in TCR China, CTCC China Cup, and Lynk & Co Cup three major events simultaneously.
With hardcore strength, Lynk & Co naturally fears no high-difficulty tests. In the two-round finals of TCR China, the 03+ TCR Racer achieved the results of 4 championships, 1 runner-up, and 2 third-place finishes with its hardcore performance strength; in the CTCC China Cup, the Lynk & Co Zongheng Racing Team even achieved the results of 2 championships, 2 runner-ups, and 1 third-place finish. At the same time, in the 2026 Season FIA TCR World Tour opener, the Starri TCR Racer of Geely China Star Racing Team (Geely Cyan Racing) also won the race in the final and brought back the historical first win. This not only means that Starri TCR has world-class competitiveness, but also marks that Geely China Star Racing Team has officially completed the first chapter of the Geely Automobile Sports New Era.
At the same time, in technical levels such as intelligence and safety, the Haohan inherited Geely and Volvo safety heritage, assisted driving mileage grew by 215% in one year, leading the entire industry with the fastest growth rate. In the recent Euro NCAP official test, Geely Galaxy Starship 7 EM-i (Geely STARRAY EM-i) successfully completed the exceeding standard bilateral serial limit crash test at the France UTAC Laboratory. This not only intuitively confirms Geely's leading vehicle safety technology and mature systematic safety strength, but also lays a solid foundation for Chinese automotive safety technology to go international and participate in global industry standards!
Daxia Car Talk: I believe many people, after seeing Geely Automobile's sales data, will have the praise "It's too comprehensive" in mind. After all, car enterprises that can achieve impressive results in new energy, high-end, overseas exports, and even on the track at the same time, let alone in the independent domestic brand circle, you can't even find a few car enterprises in the global automotive industry that can achieve these things simultaneously!
In May, China's automotive market overall presented a gentle recovery trend, with domestic brands still being the sales backbone of the market. Recently, BYD, Geely, Chery, Changan, and Great Wall, the top 5 domestic automakers, successively released their monthly performance reports. From the data, these five companies show a general characteristic of "stable total growth, divergence between domestic and international markets, and accelerated new energy penetration". Overseas exports and new energy vehicles have become the most core growth engines; export business has evolved from a "bonus item" to the "core foundation" for some companies. BYD's "dominant leader" status is further consolidated, Chery achieved high growth via exports, Geely's new energy penetration rate broke 56%, Changan focused steadily on balanced development, while Great Wall appeared slightly under pressure during structural transformation.
BYD: Export Hits New High Becomes Biggest HighlightIn May, BYD stood firmly at the top of domestic brands with a monthly sales volume of 383,500 vehicles, maintaining positive growth both year-on-year and month-over-month under a large base. Its two main brands, Dynasty and Ocean, sold a combined 330,200 vehicles, contributing 86.1% of total sales; Fangchengbao's monthly sales broke 30,000 units to reach 30,200, a year-on-year increase of 139.7%, setting a new high for the year; Denza sold 16,300 vehicles, and Yangwang delivered 286 vehicles. From a model perspective, BYD had eight models in May with monthly sales exceeding 20,000 vehicles. The Song Family and Yuan Family both broke 50,000 units, selling 51,370 and 56,691 vehicles respectively. The Sea Lion Family followed closely with 42,615 vehicles, and Seagull sales were also close to 40,000 vehicles.
BYD's biggest highlight in May was exports. Overseas new energy vehicle sales reached 160,600 units, an 80.4% year-on-year increase, accounting for about 42%. The sharp expansion of export scale effectively countered the phased weakness in domestic demand. Cumulative exports from January to May exceeded 620,000 vehicles. High export growth mainly benefited from continued ramping up of overseas factory capacity, improved ocean shipping capacity, and accelerated channel network expansion. In the domestic market, BYD promoted Megawatt Super Charging and intelligent strategies simultaneously—Megawatt charging achieved about 90% charge in 9 minutes; 20,000 super charging stations are planned to be built by 2026; all series models are available with Sky Eye B intelligent driving solutions and city navigation safety fallback plans, accelerating the popularization of high-level intelligent driving. As Gen 2 Blade Battery capacity gradually releases, the company's orders are expected to continue rising.
Chery: Sales Growth Leads the Top 5Chery Group's total sales volume in May was 247,800 vehicles, a significant year-on-year increase of 20.5%, ranking first in growth speed among the top 5. Exports remained its most core growth engine—May exports reached 181,900 vehicles, an 80.5% year-on-year increase, accounting for 73.4% of total sales that month, continuously breaking the single-month export record for Chinese brands for three months. In terms of new energy, Chery New Energy sold 100,300 vehicles, a 58.8% year-on-year increase. April and May consecutively saw monthly new energy sales breaking 100,000 vehicles.
The strong performance in exports benefited from Chery's long-term deep cultivation of overseas channel advantages and localized operation capabilities. While overseas orders continued to rise, high export growth formed a sharp contrast with domestic sales—Chery's domestic sales in May were only 60,000 vehicles, accounting for one-quarter of total sales. From cumulative data, Chery Group accumulated 1.101 million sales from January to May, but against the annual goal of 3.2 million vehicles, monthly averages need to reach about 420,000 vehicles later, and pressure remains significant.
Geely: New Energy Penetration Rate Breaks 56%Geely Auto's total sales volume in May was 237,600 vehicles, a 1% year-on-year increase, achieving month-over-month double growth for three consecutive months. In terms of structure, Geely's "New Four Transformations" transformation showed significant results: new energy vehicle sales reached 133,400 units, accounting for 56% of total sales, with new energy share exceeding 50% for four consecutive months.
From sub-brands, performance was significantly divergent. Zeekr brand sales in May reached 34,400 vehicles, a 82% year-on-year increase; Zeekr 9 Series and 8 Series models combined sales approached 50% of total sales, showing bright performance in the high-end market; Galaxy brand sales were 81,700 vehicles; Geely brand sales were 182,500 vehicles, among which China Star Series sales reached 100,800 vehicles; Lynk & Co brand sales were 20,700 vehicles, with new energy vehicle sales share rising to 71%.
In terms of exports, Geely's overseas vehicle exports in May reached 85,100 vehicles, a explosive 184% year-on-year increase, setting a brand single-month export record high. Among exported products, new energy vehicles reached 40,800 units, accounting for nearly half; hybrid and pure electric products have successively landed in Southeast Asia, Middle East, Latin America, and other markets, highlighting the results of global strategy implementation.
Changan: Multi-brand Matrix Balanced EffortChangan Auto's delivery volume in May was 209,100 vehicles, among which new energy deliveries were 92,400 vehicles, a 5.8% year-on-year increase, with new energy share about 44%. In terms of exports, overseas deliveries reached 70,700 vehicles, a 38% year-on-year increase, becoming another major growth highlight for Changan in May.
In the sub-brand matrix, Changan Qiyuan delivered 34,500 vehicles in May; All-New Q05 delivered 15,800 units, with orders breaking 3,000 units within three days of listing in Thailand; Deepal sales in May were 33,200 vehicles, a 30% year-on-year increase; January to May overseas cumulative sales were 28,700 vehicles, a significant 167% year-on-year increase; Avatr delivered 7,336 vehicles in May; Changan Auto (Gravity) delivered nearly 49,000 vehicles in May.
Changan Auto's balanced layout was fully reflected in May: the fuel car base remained stable, new energy brands Deepal and Qiyuan accelerated volume growth, high-end brand Avatr continued to break through in technical cooperation, and overseas markets simultaneously achieved breakthrough growth. The pattern of five brands working together, driven by both new energy and exports, is initially taking shape.
Great Wall: Overseas Sales Growth Year-on-Year 46.75%Great Wall Motor's sales in May were 100,400 vehicles, slightly down compared to last May's 102,200 vehicles, making it the only company among the top 5 to show a year-on-year negative growth. From sub-brands, Haval brand sales in May were 55,500 vehicles, remaining Great Wall's most important sales pillar; Tank brand sales were 17,100 vehicles; both Haval and Tank brand sales showed year-on-year declines; Wey brand sold 8,119 vehicles, a 31.78% year-on-year increase, achieving growth against the trend; Ora brand performance was most stunning, with sales of 6,018 vehicles, a significant 206.88% year-on-year increase. In terms of new energy, Great Wall sold 30,400 new energy vehicles in May, with new energy vehicle transformation gradually accelerating.
The overseas market became Great Wall's biggest highlight in May, with overseas sales growing 46.75% year-on-year. Against the background of pressure on the domestic market, strong growth in overseas business effectively made up for the decline in the domestic market. Great Wall Motor's current core contradiction lies in: Haval and Tank, the two traditional main-selling brands, face weak growth, while Wey and Ora brands, although growing notably, have relatively small volume and are not yet enough to support overall growth. How to complete the "relay" between old and new brands is the key issue Great Wall must solve subsequently.
Final ThoughtsFrom May data, the growth pattern of the top 5 domestic brands has clearly diverged, but there are three common trends worth noting: First, exports have become a key engine for domestic brands to seek stability and growth. Second, new energy transformation is still accelerating, but paths differ among enterprises. Third, technological innovation continues to deepen brand moats. Looking ahead to the second half of the year, competition in the automotive industry will continue to upgrade around these three trends. Although everyone has a common direction, these three trends are all competing for the entire enterprise's industrial chain strength, and the strong will remain strong, which has almost become an inevitable outcome.
In May, China's automotive market overall presented a gentle recovery trend, with domestic brands still being the sales backbone of the market. Recently, BYD, Geely, Chery, Changan, and Great Wall, the top 5 domestic automakers, successively released their monthly performance reports. From the data, these five companies show a general characteristic of "stable total growth, divergence between domestic and international markets, and accelerated new energy penetration". Overseas exports and new energy vehicles have become the most core growth engines; export business has evolved from a "bonus item" to the "core foundation" for some companies. BYD's "dominant leader" status is further consolidated, Chery achieved high growth via exports, Geely's new energy penetration rate broke 56%, Changan focused steadily on balanced development, while Great Wall appeared slightly under pressure during structural transformation.
BYD: Export Hits New High Becomes Biggest HighlightIn May, BYD stood firmly at the top of domestic brands with a monthly sales volume of 383,500 vehicles, maintaining positive growth both year-on-year and month-over-month under a large base. Its two main brands, Dynasty and Ocean, sold a combined 330,200 vehicles, contributing 86.1% of total sales; Fangchengbao's monthly sales broke 30,000 units to reach 30,200, a year-on-year increase of 139.7%, setting a new high for the year; Denza sold 16,300 vehicles, and Yangwang delivered 286 vehicles. From a model perspective, BYD had eight models in May with monthly sales exceeding 20,000 vehicles. The Song Family and Yuan Family both broke 50,000 units, selling 51,370 and 56,691 vehicles respectively. The Sea Lion Family followed closely with 42,615 vehicles, and Seagull sales were also close to 40,000 vehicles.
BYD's biggest highlight in May was exports. Overseas new energy vehicle sales reached 160,600 units, an 80.4% year-on-year increase, accounting for about 42%. The sharp expansion of export scale effectively countered the phased weakness in domestic demand. Cumulative exports from January to May exceeded 620,000 vehicles. High export growth mainly benefited from continued ramping up of overseas factory capacity, improved ocean shipping capacity, and accelerated channel network expansion. In the domestic market, BYD promoted Megawatt Super Charging and intelligent strategies simultaneously—Megawatt charging achieved about 90% charge in 9 minutes; 20,000 super charging stations are planned to be built by 2026; all series models are available with Sky Eye B intelligent driving solutions and city navigation safety fallback plans, accelerating the popularization of high-level intelligent driving. As Gen 2 Blade Battery capacity gradually releases, the company's orders are expected to continue rising.
Chery: Sales Growth Leads the Top 5Chery Group's total sales volume in May was 247,800 vehicles, a significant year-on-year increase of 20.5%, ranking first in growth speed among the top 5. Exports remained its most core growth engine—May exports reached 181,900 vehicles, an 80.5% year-on-year increase, accounting for 73.4% of total sales that month, continuously breaking the single-month export record for Chinese brands for three months. In terms of new energy, Chery New Energy sold 100,300 vehicles, a 58.8% year-on-year increase. April and May consecutively saw monthly new energy sales breaking 100,000 vehicles.
The strong performance in exports benefited from Chery's long-term deep cultivation of overseas channel advantages and localized operation capabilities. While overseas orders continued to rise, high export growth formed a sharp contrast with domestic sales—Chery's domestic sales in May were only 60,000 vehicles, accounting for one-quarter of total sales. From cumulative data, Chery Group accumulated 1.101 million sales from January to May, but against the annual goal of 3.2 million vehicles, monthly averages need to reach about 420,000 vehicles later, and pressure remains significant.
Geely: New Energy Penetration Rate Breaks 56%Geely Auto's total sales volume in May was 237,600 vehicles, a 1% year-on-year increase, achieving month-over-month double growth for three consecutive months. In terms of structure, Geely's "New Four Transformations" transformation showed significant results: new energy vehicle sales reached 133,400 units, accounting for 56% of total sales, with new energy share exceeding 50% for four consecutive months.
From sub-brands, performance was significantly divergent. Zeekr brand sales in May reached 34,400 vehicles, a 82% year-on-year increase; Zeekr 9 Series and 8 Series models combined sales approached 50% of total sales, showing bright performance in the high-end market; Galaxy brand sales were 81,700 vehicles; Geely brand sales were 182,500 vehicles, among which China Star Series sales reached 100,800 vehicles; Lynk & Co brand sales were 20,700 vehicles, with new energy vehicle sales share rising to 71%.
In terms of exports, Geely's overseas vehicle exports in May reached 85,100 vehicles, a explosive 184% year-on-year increase, setting a brand single-month export record high. Among exported products, new energy vehicles reached 40,800 units, accounting for nearly half; hybrid and pure electric products have successively landed in Southeast Asia, Middle East, Latin America, and other markets, highlighting the results of global strategy implementation.
Changan: Multi-brand Matrix Balanced EffortChangan Auto's delivery volume in May was 209,100 vehicles, among which new energy deliveries were 92,400 vehicles, a 5.8% year-on-year increase, with new energy share about 44%. In terms of exports, overseas deliveries reached 70,700 vehicles, a 38% year-on-year increase, becoming another major growth highlight for Changan in May.
In the sub-brand matrix, Changan Qiyuan delivered 34,500 vehicles in May; All-New Q05 delivered 15,800 units, with orders breaking 3,000 units within three days of listing in Thailand; Deepal sales in May were 33,200 vehicles, a 30% year-on-year increase; January to May overseas cumulative sales were 28,700 vehicles, a significant 167% year-on-year increase; Avatr delivered 7,336 vehicles in May; Changan Auto (Gravity) delivered nearly 49,000 vehicles in May.
Changan Auto's balanced layout was fully reflected in May: the fuel car base remained stable, new energy brands Deepal and Qiyuan accelerated volume growth, high-end brand Avatr continued to break through in technical cooperation, and overseas markets simultaneously achieved breakthrough growth. The pattern of five brands working together, driven by both new energy and exports, is initially taking shape.
Great Wall: Overseas Sales Growth Year-on-Year 46.75%Great Wall Motor's sales in May were 100,400 vehicles, slightly down compared to last May's 102,200 vehicles, making it the only company among the top 5 to show a year-on-year negative growth. From sub-brands, Haval brand sales in May were 55,500 vehicles, remaining Great Wall's most important sales pillar; Tank brand sales were 17,100 vehicles; both Haval and Tank brand sales showed year-on-year declines; Wey brand sold 8,119 vehicles, a 31.78% year-on-year increase, achieving growth against the trend; Ora brand performance was most stunning, with sales of 6,018 vehicles, a significant 206.88% year-on-year increase. In terms of new energy, Great Wall sold 30,400 new energy vehicles in May, with new energy vehicle transformation gradually accelerating.
The overseas market became Great Wall's biggest highlight in May, with overseas sales growing 46.75% year-on-year. Against the background of pressure on the domestic market, strong growth in overseas business effectively made up for the decline in the domestic market. Great Wall Motor's current core contradiction lies in: Haval and Tank, the two traditional main-selling brands, face weak growth, while Wey and Ora brands, although growing notably, have relatively small volume and are not yet enough to support overall growth. How to complete the "relay" between old and new brands is the key issue Great Wall must solve subsequently.
Final ThoughtsFrom May data, the growth pattern of the top 5 domestic brands has clearly diverged, but there are three common trends worth noting: First, exports have become a key engine for domestic brands to seek stability and growth. Second, new energy transformation is still accelerating, but paths differ among enterprises. Third, technological innovation continues to deepen brand moats. Looking ahead to the second half of the year, competition in the automotive industry will continue to upgrade around these three trends. Although everyone has a common direction, these three trends are all competing for the entire enterprise's industrial chain strength, and the strong will remain strong, which has almost become an inevitable outcome.
