首頁Mark II JZX90
搜尋歷史
熱門搜尋
經銷商登入 / 註冊
英超曼城 VS 意甲国米，顶级豪门的对抗，却更像是一场比亚迪德比！
8月1号，香港启德主场馆，曼城和国际米兰的季前赛引来无数球迷的目光。
但场边那群孩子其实和场上的比分同样值得关注。这群孩子都是比亚迪他们请来的！他们中既有中国足球小将队员，更有来自新疆伊犁、陕西宁陕、贵州兴仁、普安、元宝等偏远县域的山区足球小球员。
小球员们穿着统一队服，坐在看台上，眼睛发亮的看着场上的比赛。要说比亚迪这几年类似的事真没少干，欧洲杯、意甲、世界杯，前前手后送了超200人次的足球少年去观赛，更是送到德国、日本、西班牙、意大利、巴西、墨西哥等国，和巴萨、马竞、国米、圣保罗等大牌球队的青训队踢了30多场。不只让孩子们看，更是提供机会，让他们上场跟世界一流青训队伍真刀真枪地干！
近几年可以说是中国足球的至暗时刻，为什么比亚迪会做这些“费力不讨好”的事？
想想比亚迪自己走过的路，可能就明白了，他们就是从“没人看好”里杀出来的。
二十年前，当比亚迪刚开始造车的时候，没人拿正眼看他！而那时的中国汽车，可能比如今的中国足球处境还要差！技术落后、品牌没认知度，以“市场换技术”多年，可发动机、变速箱等核心技术却始终被卡脖子，中国的汽车市场基本是被国际巨头们统治着。谁那时能想到，一家做电池起家的企业，能在二十年后做到全球新能源销量冠军！比亚迪自己坚持搞研发，从电池到电机再到电控，全栈自研，一步步把技术壁垒啃下来。2023年发布云辇，2025年推出第二代刀片电池和闪充技术，5分钟充好、9分钟充饱，直接改写行业标准，更是直接杀进全球车企前五！
足球也是同样的逻辑。青训没有捷径，只能一场一场地踢，一代一代地练！
还记得比亚迪的李云飞说过一句话：“中国足球还不如中国汽车，但比亚迪坚信，只要一直奔跑，总有一天我们会跑向世界。”
所以比亚迪做了！他们既没有在金元足球时代来捞个名声，也不是砸钱买个冠名权就走。就像这次的香港足球文化节，比亚迪既是曼城与国米双方的官方合作伙伴，又是赛事赞助商。比亚迪旗下车型更是承担了球队通勤、赛事后勤保障的任务。应当说，对比亚迪来说，比分不重要，谁赢都是比亚迪赢得曝光。但对于这些小球员们来说，坐在启德主场馆的看台上，亲眼见到了什么叫行云流水的传控配合，什么叫教科书级的战术博弈。这跟他们平时在泥地球场上练的，完全是两回事。
比亚迪坚持把小球员们送出去，跟高手过招，既让孩子们“见世面”，也给这些孩子一个“被看见”的机会。这种事短期内看不到商业回报，但比亚迪一直在做。这哪里是营销，更像是一种“我淋过雨，所以想给别人撑一把伞”的回报。
比亚迪从被看不起到被全世界看见，花了二十年。中国足球需要的时间也许会更长，但总得有人先把路铺好。足球少年有梦想，中国足球才有未来。比亚迪让这批孩子，至少见过世界级的比赛长什么样了。剩下的，就交给时间吧。
如今，比亚迪年营收8000多亿，业务遍布119个国家和地区，海外销量达到105万辆。从泰国联赛到巴西科林蒂安，从巴黎圣日耳曼到欧洲杯，他们搭建起覆盖洲际大赛、欧洲豪门、多国本土联赛的体育营销矩阵。借助顶级足球IP的巨大流量，彰显出中国品牌的全球格局。
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拿 Proton X70 同 Chery Tiggo 9 嚟做比較。呢兩款車喺價錢同定位上都幾接近，今日我哋就從多個方面做一次詳細嘅比較，幫你節省做功課嘅時間。
Proton X70 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 106,800 - 122,300，合共 3 個版本，包括 1.5L Standard 2WD（RM 106,800）、1.5L Executive 2WD（RM 115,800）、1.5L Premium 2WD（RM 122,300）等。
Chery Tiggo 9 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 166,800 - 179,800，合共 1 個版本，包括 2026 2.0T Standard（RM 179,750）等。
由價錢嚟睇，Proton X70 嘅起步價確實比 Chery Tiggo 9 平咗 RM 60,000。如果你預算有限，Proton 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需要。但都要注意，平嗰幾千塊，可能喺配備上會有取舍，具體就要睇你嘅需要。
Proton X70 搭載 1.5L Turbo，馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。
Chery Tiggo 9 搭載 2.0L 4-cyl，馬力 170 hp。官方油耗 8.0 L/100km。
動力方面，Chery Tiggo 9 嘅 2.0L 4-cyl 比 Proton X70 嘅 1.5L Turbo 多咗 30 匹馬力。不過日常喺市區行，兩部車嘅動力都夠用，唔會覺得無夠力。
Proton X70 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA)。
Chery Tiggo 9 嘅安全評級係 TBD，主動安全系統包括 Basic。
安全配備方面，兩款車都拿到唔錯嘅評級。不過 Proton X70 嘅 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA) 同 Chery Tiggo 9 嘅 Basic 喺功能上有些差異，如果你比較重視主動安全嘅話，可以仔細對比吓兩者嘅功能列表。
Proton X70 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
Chery Tiggo 9 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
兩款車嘅驅動方式一樣，都係 FWD，日常駕駛感受唔會有太大分別。
總括嚟講，Proton X70 同 Chery Tiggo 9 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵都要睇你嘅個人需要同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較吓幾間車行嘅報價，再去做試車做最終決定。買車係件大事情，花少少時間做功課絕對無錯。
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嗰陣都會拿 寶騰 X70 同 奇瑞 Tiggo 7 PHEV 嚟做比較。呢兩款車喺價位同定位上都幾接近，今日我哋就從多個方面做一個詳細嘅比較，幫你節省做功課嘅時間。
寶騰 X70 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 106,800 - 122,300，一共有 3 個版本，包括 1.5L Standard 2WD（RM 106,800）、1.5L Executive 2WD（RM 115,800）、1.5L Premium 2WD（RM 122,300） 等。
奇瑞 Tiggo 7 PHEV 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 129,750 - 129,750，一共有 2 個版本，包括 2025 1.5T 90km CSH（RM 129,750）、Tiggo 7 PHEV 支持邊種充電方法？可以使用家用插座充電嗎？（RM 117,478） 等。
從價錢睇，寶騰 X70 嘅起步價真係比 奇瑞 Tiggo 7 PHEV 平咗 RM 22,950。如果你預算有限，寶騰嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需求。但都要記住，平嗰幾千塊，可能喺配備上會有取舍，具體要睇你嘅需求。
寶騰 X70 搭載 1.5L Turbo，馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。
奇瑞 Tiggo 7 PHEV 搭載 Hybrid，馬力 170 hp。官方油耗 4.5 L/100km。
動力方面，奇瑞 Tiggo 7 PHEV 嘅 Hybrid 比 寶騰 X70 嘅 1.5L Turbo 多咗 30 匹馬力。不過日常喺市區開，兩款車嘅動力都夠用，唔會覺得唔夠力。
寶騰 X70 車身長 4400 mm，後備箱 400 L。
奇瑞 Tiggo 7 PHEV 車身長 4400 mm，後備箱 400 L。
兩款車嘅尺寸幾乎一樣，車內空間差別唔大。呢個級別嘅車，日常使用完全夠用。
寶騰 X70 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
奇瑞 Tiggo 7 PHEV 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
兩款車嘅驅動方式一樣，都係 FWD，日常駕駛感受唔會有太大分別。
寶騰 X70 同 奇瑞 Tiggo 7 PHEV 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更睇重品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰一款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，就揀配置更豐富嗰款。最終都係建議兩款都去試駕，親身體驗先係最重要嘅。
總體嚟講，寶騰 X70 同 奇瑞 Tiggo 7 PHEV 都係馬來西亞市場好幾靚嘅車型。揀邊輛，關鍵都要睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花點時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
Editor's Note: The tuition fee for transformation has already been paid; Changan calls this move "Highland Pace Adjustment"; whether the market is willing to wait for its acceleration in the second half depends on the pedal pressure of the Q06 entering the race, whether it is really more responsive than the PPT.
In late July, Changan Automobile released two key signals in succession: on one hand, the semi-annual performance forecast disclosed in mid-July — vehicle sales in the first half were 1.1189 million (down 17.44% year-on-year), net profit attributable to the parent company was only 740 million to 970 million yuan (down 57.66%—67.70% year-on-year), and deducting non-recurring net profit was 230 million to 330 million yuan (down 77.65%—84.42% year-on-year);
On the other hand, on July 23, an announcement of 5.267 billion yuan private placement was approved by the Shenzhen Stock Exchange, funds will be invested in new energy models and digital intelligence platforms (4.217 billion yuan) and the global R&D center (1.05 billion yuan).
In this contrast of cold and heat, this central state-owned enterprise (SOE) auto company, approaching the 3 million vehicle level in annual sales, is actively removing the "scale halo". At the mid-year media communication meeting, Tan Benhong, deputy secretary of the Party Committee and director of Changan Automobile Group, stated this contrast very frankly: "In the first half of the year, the group proactively cut off low-margin inefficient products, no longer solely pursuing scale increments without profit." He used a marathon metaphor — "Running a marathon at high altitude, the pace for the first 5 kilometers and the last 5 kilometers must be different; blind acceleration will only deplete strength."
"Discarding" 70,000 vehicles: Not that they can't be sold, but don't want to sell them
At least one part of Changan's decline this round was cut by their own hand.
In April this year, the "1445" global strategy was implemented, compressing the product series from 63 models to 36 models. The most eye-catching move was halting production of Lumin — a micro electric car priced below 50,000 yuan, which was the volume leader last year, accounting for an empty gap of about 70,000 units in the first half alone. "The profit margin for low-end micro electric vehicles is extremely narrow, and enterprises no longer solely pursue scale increments without profit." Tan Benhong did not beat around the bush at the communication meeting: "After halting Lumin, the average price and profit margin of the new energy sector actually rose; excluding the reduction from Lumin, Changan's new energy sales actually grew 11.2% year-on-year in the first half."
China Auto Network consulted an insider close to Changan's internal team, who calculated a bill of account: "Lumin's peak monthly sales exceeded 10,000, but the gross profit per vehicle hovered for a long time between a few hundred yuan to a little over a thousand. Including channel rebates and capital occupation, sometimes selling one vehicle results in a loss. Rather than using it to rush the ranking list, it is better to give the production line to new energy like Qiyuan Q05 and Deepal S05 that can run through the gross profit." In his view, cutting Lumin is not admitting defeat, it is "exchanging ineffective scale for effective R&D bandwidth".
But proactively losing weight cannot explain everything. The fuel base is retreating even faster: CS75 fuel version fell more than 37% year-on-year in the first half, Eado relied on terminal price cuts to hold market share, CS55, UNI-T/K and other old SUVs weakened环比。New energy sales were 414,200 vehicles, a year-on-year decline of 8.3%, Qiyuan Q05 (about 72,000) and Deepal S05 (about 79,000) held up the market, Avatr sold only 27,600 vehicles in the first half, nearly halved year-on-year, cumulative losses over four years exceeded 13 billion yuan. Tan Benhong also admitted: "We have not yet fully mastered the operating ability of multiple brands."
External squeezing is equally real. The company attributes the primary cause of profit shrinkage to exchange rate losses + raw material price hikes: Overseas sales in the first half were 454,700 vehicles, up 51.87% year-on-year, overseas accounted for about 33.6% of the total; a slight fluctuation in exchange rates causes profit bleeding; lithium carbonate prices rebounded to 180,000 yuan/ton, storage chip unit prices jumped several times, the industry average profit margin was squeezed to around 3.4%. Securities Auto Analyst Li Qiang believes: "Changan's 'decline' is active + passive twisted together, but the active part accounts for a higher proportion than the market thinks — it chooses to step on the brakes at the 3 million vehicle high point itself, rather than waiting until the bottom of the slope to brake."
Betting on self-developed intelligent driving, refusing to be an "assembly plant"
Where money goes explains the problem better than the money itself.
This private placement was fully covered by cash from the controlling shareholder; even if the stock price was below the issuance price, it still locked for three years, and the market generally interpreted it as "Central SOE major shareholder backing confidence". The fundraising does not expand capacity, only invests in R&D: 4.217 billion yuan into new energy models and digital intelligence platforms, 1.05 billion yuan into the global R&D center. Corresponding to Changan's past five years of intelligent accumulation input exceeding 10 billion, team exceeding 7,500 people, 2026 single computing center smashing about 3 billion yuan rhythm.
Intelligent driving is the core landing point of this money. Tan Benhong threw a sharp judgment at the communication meeting: "If automakers give up intelligent driving self-research and only rely on external supply, essentially they are only retaining an assembly factory with a car chassis, without core technology barriers." He calls himself a "heavy intelligent driving user", driving Avatr 90% scenarios with intelligent driving, but emphasized Changan does not choose an aggressive route, "Focus core energy on raising the safety ceiling and polishing the experience".
The landing carrier is the "Tianshu Pilot" system — one-step end-to-end + multimodal large model, scheduled to go into mass production in Qiyuan Q06 this September. Executive Vice President Yang Dayong defined Q06 as the flagship of "Qiyuan fighting for intelligent driving in the second half of the year": "Tianshu Pilot Ultra is not piling on functions, but realizing Changan's digital intelligence promise to mainstream family users." And the "one brain, multiple bodies" in Tan Benhong's mouth is using the intelligent driving large model as the "brain", to radiate to robots, low-altitude travel and other "bodies", Changan Tianshu Intelligent Robot subsidiary is already on the table.
Forcing this logic to ask a new power intelligent driving director, he replied restrainedly: "If 7,500 people are intelligent driving + cockpit + tri-electric packed, single track concentration is not as good as Huawei Car BU (7,000—8,000 people full-time intelligent driving), XPeng (about 3,000 people intelligent driving team + 10 billion R&D). Changan's advantage is the whole vehicle sales base and central SOE financing channel, the disadvantage is C-end users have not yet established mindshare like 'XNGP' 'ADS' for 'Tianshu'. Whether Q06 can fight, depends on national availability and takeover rate, not the press conference PPT."
Organization side is also consolidating: Deepal and Avatr mid-to-back coordination, goal 1.5 million vehicle level mid-to-high-end cluster, cost reduction 20%—30%; four vice presidents focus on overseas, Thailand base has already scaled up production, Tan Benhong put a word "Future domestic and overseas 50/50 split". These actions short-term save no profit, but past "many children good fight" scattered shipping towards "zone complement" gather.
Changan's dual decline in volume and profit in the first half of 2026 is not a collapse narrative, but a central SOE at the 3 million vehicle level in "fuel retreat faster than new energy handover, low-end scale yielding to gross margin quality, intelligent driving heavy investment not yet at realization period" three cracks opened at the same time's active slow driving.
Tan Benhong cut off the 70,000 units of Lumin, exchanging for the bottom line of not using ineffective scale to dress up the financial statements; 5.267 billion private placement passed, exchanging for Tianshu intelligent driving and digital intelligence platform to run for 18 months of ammunition.
The three variables really to watch in the second half are very specific — Qiyuan Q06 Tianshu Pilot real takeover performance after mass production, whether Deepal/Qiyuan/Avatr three-brand internal consumption really reduced, whether overseas 450,000 vehicle sales base can offset the exchange rate backlash.
The tuition fee for transformation has already been paid, Changan calls this move "Highland Pace Adjustment"; whether the market is willing to wait for its acceleration in the second half depends on the pedal pressure of the Q06 entering the race, whether it is really more responsive than the PPT.
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多买家喺揀車嘅時候都會拿 Proton X70 同 Mazda CX-5 來做比較。這兩款車喺價位同定位上都好接近，今日我哋就從多個方面做一個詳細嘅比較，幫你節省做功課嘅時間。
Proton X70 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 106,800 - 122,300，總共有 3 個版本，包括 1.5L Standard 2WD（RM 106,800）、1.5L Executive 2WD（RM 115,800）、1.5L Premium 2WD（RM 122,300） 等。
Mazda CX-5 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 135,469 - 166,760，總共有 3 個版本，包括 2025 2.0L AT 35th Anniversary（RM 316,154）、2025 2.0L AT（RM 296,154）、2025 2.0L MT（RM 294,154） 等。
由價錢睇，Proton X70 嘅起步價確實比 Mazda CX-5 平咗 RM 28,669。如果你預算有限，Proton 嘅入門版已經可以满足日常需求。但都係要注意，便宜嘅那幾千塊，可能喺配備上會有取舍，具體要睇你嘅需求。
Proton X70 搭載 1.5L Turbo，馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。
Mazda CX-5 搭載 1.5L Turbo，馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。
兩款車用嘅係同一套動力系統，日常開起來嘅感受基本冇分別。油耗方面也差唔多，唔使太糾結這一點。
Proton X70 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA)。
Mazda CX-5 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 。
兩款車嘅安全評級一樣，喺呢個級別入面安全配備都算好齊全。而家嘅新車安全性都唔差，唔使太擔心這一點。
Proton X70 車身長 4400 mm，行李廂 400 L。
Mazda CX-5 車身長 4500 mm，行李廂 450 L。
空間方面，Mazda CX-5 嘅車身比 Proton X70 長咗 100 mm，乘坐空間更有優勢。不過 Proton X70 喺市區泊車會靈活啲，各有取捨。
Proton X70 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
Mazda CX-5 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
兩款車嘅驅動方式一樣，都係 FWD，日常駕駛感受唔會有太大分別。
總體嚟講，Proton X70 同 Mazda CX-5 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵仲係要睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最後決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
In Malaysia's SUV market, many buyers compare Proton X70 and Toyota Yaris Cross when choosing a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning. Today we will do a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
Proton X70 OTR price in Malaysia is RM 106,800 - 122,300, with a total of 3 versions, including 1.5L Standard 2WD (RM 106,800), 1.5L Executive 2WD (RM 115,800), 1.5L Premium 2WD (RM 122,300) etc.
Toyota Yaris Cross OTR price in Malaysia is RM 99,900 - 109,900, with a total of 2 versions, including 2026 1.5L Standard (RM 99,900), 2026 HEV 1.5L Standard (RM 109,900) etc.
From a price perspective, Toyota Yaris Cross's starting price is RM 6,900 cheaper than Proton X70. Honestly, in this price range, a difference of a few thousand is actually not significant, the key is to look at overall value for money and long-term usage costs.
Proton X70 body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
Toyota Yaris Cross body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
The dimensions of both cars are almost the same, interior space difference is not significant. For this class of cars, daily use is completely sufficient.
Proton X70 warranty 5 years/150,000km, service interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Toyota Yaris Cross warranty 5 years/unlimited mileage, service interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Proton X70 and Toyota Yaris Cross are both mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, you can prioritize the one with better reputation; if you care more about value for money and features, then choose the one with richer configuration. Ultimately it is recommended to test drive both, personal experience is the most important.
Overall, Proton X70 and Toyota Yaris Cross are both very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose mainly depends on your personal needs and budget. It is recommended to do your research, compare quotes from several dealerships, and then test drive to make the final decision. Buying a car is a big deal, spending time doing homework will definitely not go wrong.
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拿 Proton X50 同 Subaru Crosstrek 嚟做比較。呢兩款車喺價位同定位上都好接近，今日我哋就從多個方面做一個詳細嘅對比，幫你省返做功課嘅時間。
Proton X50 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 89,800 - 113,300，一共有 4 個版本，包括 1.5T Executive（RM 89,800）、1.5T Premium（RM 101,800）、1.5T Flagship（RM 113,300） 等。
Subaru Crosstrek 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 145,000 - 160,000，一共有 1 個版本，包括 2.0L e-Boxer（RM 150,000） 等。
由價錢睇落，Proton X50 嘅起步價確係比 Subaru Crosstrek 平咗 RM 55,200。如果你預算有限，Proton 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需求。但要留意，平嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備上有取捨，具體要看你嘅需求。
Proton X50 搭載 1.5L 4-cyl，馬力 105 hp。官方油耗 6.0 L/100km。
Subaru Crosstrek 搭載 1.5L Turbo，馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。
動力方面，Subaru Crosstrek 嘅 1.5L Turbo 比 Proton X50 嘅 1.5L 4-cyl 多咗 35 匹馬力。不過日常喺市區行，兩款車嘅動力都夠用，唔會覺得唔夠力。
Proton X50 車身長 4400 mm，尾箱 400 L。
Subaru Crosstrek 車身長 4400 mm，尾箱 400 L。
兩款車嘅尺寸幾乎一樣，車內空間分別唔大。呢個級別嘅車，日常使用完全夠用。
Proton X50 採用 4WD 驅動方式。
Subaru Crosstrek 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
Proton 嘅 4WD 同 Subaru 嘅 FWD 喺操控上有唔同感受，建議試駕對比。
總體嚟講，Proton X50 同 Subaru Crosstrek 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一部，關鍵係要看你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers tend to compare Proton X50 and Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV when choosing a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will do a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
Proton X50 OTR price in Malaysia is RM 89,800 - 113,300, with a total of 4 versions, including 1.5T Executive (RM 89,800), 1.5T Premium (RM 101,800), 1.5T Flagship (RM 113,300), etc.
Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV OTR price in Malaysia is RM 129,750 - 129,750, with a total of 2 versions, including 2025 1.5T 90km CSH (RM 129,750), What charging methods does the Tiggo 7 PHEV support? Can it be charged using a home power socket? (RM 117,478), etc.
From a price perspective, Proton X50's starting price is indeed RM 39,950 cheaper than Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV. If your budget is limited, Proton's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. But be aware that the few thousand cheaper might involve compromises in features, depending on your specific needs.
Proton X50 is equipped with 1.5L 4-cyl, 105 hp. Official fuel consumption 6.0 L/100km.
Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV is equipped with Hybrid, 170 hp. Official fuel consumption 4.5 L/100km.
In terms of power, Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV's Hybrid has 65 more horsepower than Proton X50's 1.5L 4-cyl. However, for daily city driving, the power of both cars is sufficient and won't feel underpowered.
Proton X50 safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV safety rating is TBD, active safety systems include Basic.
Regarding safety features, both cars have received decent ratings. However, there are some differences in function between Proton X50's ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA) and Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV's Basic. If you value active safety highly, you can carefully compare the function lists of both.
Proton X50 body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
The dimensions of both cars are almost the same, with little difference in interior space. For this class of cars, it is fully sufficient for daily use.
Proton X50 uses 4WD drive method.
Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV uses FWD drive method.
Proton's 4WD and Chery's FWD will have different handling experiences, test drives are recommended for comparison.
Overall, Proton X50 and Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV are both very good models in the Malaysian market. Choosing which one depends mainly on your personal needs and budget. We suggest doing your homework, comparing quotes from several dealerships, and then test driving to make a final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending some time doing homework will definitely not be wrong.
当横跨欧亚的纯电车队驶入深圳湾畔，43天15000公里的丝路征程在深圳这座全球科创高地落下帷幕。七百五十年前，马可波罗踏上远行之路，开启了东西方文明的互通交融；今天，比亚迪的新能源汽车和闪充补能网络作为新丝路上的“科技使者”和“绿色驿站”，续写着“千年文明·万里闪充”的新篇章。
北京时间7月25日，在比亚迪全球总部，由知名经济学家Jeffrey D. Sachs（杰弗里·萨克斯）教授与M31资本创始管理合伙人仲雷共同发起的马可波罗之旅迎来完美收官。这场以新能源绿色科技重走千年丝绸之路的行动，在深圳的创新土壤上沉淀为跨越文明的可持续发展共识。当古老丝路的互通精神与当代绿色科技深度融合，新时代的文明对话有了更坚实的依托与更广阔的全球视野。
收官当日，“科技引领 共创未来”青年论坛在南方科技大学举办，本次论坛汇聚了知名学者、科创企业家、高校学子，打造了科技与中西方文化交融的高质量对话，启发青年思考，赋能人才发展。深圳市委宣传部相关领导在致辞中表示，本次马可波罗之旅与APEC“互联互通、共生共赢”的内核、以及我国一带一路倡议的理念高度契合。以比亚迪为代表的深圳本土科技企业，也正以开放包容的姿态链接全球市场。
在主旨演讲环节，全球知名经济学家、哥伦比亚大学教授Jeffrey D. Sachs回顾了比亚迪重走马可波罗之路的旅程，认为这不仅是一次技术实测，更是一场文明对话，高度认可比亚迪为世界的互联互通及可持续发展作出的卓越贡献；同时为“深圳-香港-广州”创新集群首次登顶《2025年全球创新指数》百强创新集群的成就，和中国一带一路倡议的前瞻理念和务实推进点赞。
华大集团首席执行官尹烨，立足生命科学前沿发展，探讨AI浪潮下人才培育与可持续发展。他提出，随着生命医学突破，人类百岁时代正向我们走来，寄语青年勇于探索拼搏，把握时代机遇。
随后的圆桌对话环节，比亚迪集团董事会秘书、首席投资官李黔结合企业全球化布局谈到，比亚迪进入全球100多个国家的实践证明，真正的技术领先不是对市场的单向赋能，而是打造可持续发展的科技生态链和人才链。速腾聚创首席执行官邱纯潮回顾了团队从校园科研到在新能源产业浪潮中实现高速的成长跨越，同时也分享了面向AI时代，为物理智能世界做技术底座的前瞻战略。南方科技大学孟庆虎院士从深圳的科创基因切入，认为深圳的优势，不在于单一产业的领先，更在于构建了从高校人才培养、基础研究突破到产业孵化落地的完整闭环，这种创新生态是支撑深圳科技走向世界的底层逻辑。
Jeffrey D. Sachs教授强调，合作共赢是全球经济与科技创新可持续发展的重要共识。M31资本创始管理合伙人仲雷提出，新时代的丝路不仅是地理上的线性通道，更是以科技创新和文明对话为纽带的全球协作网络，深圳作为这个网络的东方枢纽，发挥着至关重要的作用。
未来，比亚迪将继续立足深圳、链接全球，持续以技术创新搭建中西方对话的桥梁，续写丝路互通共生的新故事，助力全球可持续发展。
July 16, GAC Group 30 million user gratitude event held at GAC Trumpchi factory.
At the venue, GAC's multiple global production bases were connected simultaneously. GAC Honda P7, GAC Toyota bZ7, Qijing GT7, GAC AION N60, GAC Hyper S600 were rolled off the line sequentially as GAC's 29,999,995th to 29,999,999th vehicles. Finally, the right-hand drive GAC Trumpchi M8 PHEV made a shining debut on the on-site stage as the 30 millionth vehicle. The collective appearance of the new energy vehicle lineup rolled off the line became a direct verification of GAC's full-speed promotion of electrification and intelligent transformation.
[GAC Intelligent New Energy Matrix Shines On Stage]
Subsequently, Feng Xingya handed the key of the 30 millionth vehicle to Thai owner Mr. Tony Jaa. This moment captured was not just a number, but a warm testimony of GAC and global users "two-way commitment".
This trust spanning mountains and seas is the confidence with which GAC breaks through amidst industry changes. In the first half of this year, GAC Group's sales reached 773,100 units, a year-on-year increase of 2.35%, among which new energy vehicle sales grew by 68.8% year-on-year; overseas exports exceeded 120,000 units, a significant increase of 132% year-on-year, achieving a steady pace during the industry's deep reshaping period.
"Quality is the bottom line that GAC will never compromise on." Feng Xingya stated in the concluding remarks. In GAC's development, scale growth has always been based on quality. For many years, GAC Group has adhered to the concept of "Quality First", integrating Honda's Total Quality Management (TQM), Toyota's Lean Production System (TPS), and Lingnan culture to build a quality management model centered on "Integrated Innovation". The ultimate goal is to build good cars that allow users to drive with confidence, use with peace of mind, and sit comfortably.
Feng Xingya announced that effective immediately, GAC officially launched the "GAC Group 30 Million Vehicle Rollout - Renewal Gratitude Season". GAC Honda, GAC Toyota, GAC Trumpchi, GAC AION, GAC Hyper, and Qijing Automotive, the six passenger car brands, will launch characteristic policies around new purchases, trade-ins, to additional purchases, etc., to reward every companionship and support.
[GAC Group 30 Million Vehicle Rollout - Renewal Gratitude Season Officially Launched]
Taking 30 million as the new starting point, GAC will drive innovation, embark on a new journey of electrification and intelligence, and allow cutting-edge technology to truly translate into user-perceivable peace of mind and convenience.
In the power domain, Xingyuan Power developed by the "National Distinguished Engineer Team" covers three major technologies: Xingyuan Extended Range, Xingyuan Plug-in Hybrid, and Xingyuan Super Dual Engine, which will be mass-produced on more models. Each product must undergo 100,000 hours of bench and whole vehicle verification, with equivalent mileage exceeding 10 million kilometers, ensuring that performance remains stable as a rock in all scenarios and regions.
[GAC Xingyuan Power Allows Users to Choose "No Longer Compromising"]
In the three-electric systems field, GAC continues to tackle industry pain points such as battery ultra-fast charging and low-temperature range, has built a pilot production line for all-solid-state batteries, launched extreme energy consumption technology, and the mass-produced Quark electric drive motor's highest efficiency breaks through 99%, reaching the industry's highest level.
In the intelligent connected field, the Super Brain Xingling Architecture continues to evolve, connecting six major systems: intelligent driving assistance, intelligent cockpit, power, chassis, body, and vehicle networking, achieving "One Brain Unified Command", with overall performance improved by 40%; Xinghe Smart Cockpit achieves end-cloud integration, making the car a true partner that can "think and understand human hearts". GAC will also fight side by side with top partners such as Huawei, CATL, DiDi, Tencent, and Alibaba to build a stronger AI intelligent ecosystem.
As of now, GAC Group's cumulative R&D investment exceeds 62 billion yuan, and the global R&D team exceeds 6,800 people. Continuous technical investment is driving GAC's products to evolve from commuting tools to smart mobility partners, mobile smart spaces, and green energy ecosystems.
Conclusion:
From the rollout of the first whole vehicle to the delivery of the 30 millionth vehicle, GAC has experienced a 29-year development history. Behind the number 30 million lies the choice and trust of tens of millions of users, GAC's long-term commitment to quality and safety, the determination to transform towards electrification and intelligence, and also a microcosm of China's automotive industry growing from big to strong and shifting from scale expansion to value leap.
In Malaysia's SUV market, many buyers compare Perodua Aruz and Subaru Crosstrek when choosing a car. These two models are quite close in price and positioning. Today we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
The OTR price of Perodua Aruz in Malaysia is RM 72,900 - 77,900, with a total of 2 versions, including 1.5L X (RM 72,900), 1.5L AV (RM 77,900), etc.
The OTR price of Subaru Crosstrek in Malaysia is RM 145,000 - 160,000, with a total of 1 version, including 2.0L e-Boxer (RM 150,000), etc.
Looking at the price, the starting price of Perodua Aruz is indeed RM 72,100 cheaper than Subaru Crosstrek. If your budget is limited, Perodua's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. But be aware that the few thousand ringgit saved might involve trade-offs in features, which depends on your needs.
Perodua Aruz is equipped with a 1.5L 4-cyl, 105 hp. Official fuel consumption 6.0 L/100km.
Subaru Crosstrek is equipped with a 1.5L Turbo, 140 hp. Official fuel consumption 7.0 L/100km.
In terms of power, Subaru Crosstrek's 1.5L Turbo has 35 more hp than Perodua Aruz's 1.5L 4-cyl. However, for daily driving in the city, both cars have sufficient power and won't feel sluggish.
Perodua Aruz safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include .
Subaru Crosstrek safety rating is 5★ (Euro NCAP), active safety systems include EyeSight.
Perodua Aruz body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
Subaru Crosstrek body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
The dimensions of both cars are almost the same, and the interior space difference is not significant. For a car of this class, daily use is completely sufficient.
Perodua Aruz warranty 5 years/150,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Subaru Crosstrek warranty 3 years/100,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Overall, Perodua Aruz and Subaru Crosstrek are both very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose mainly depends on your personal needs and budget. We suggest doing your research, comparing quotes from several dealerships, and test driving before making a final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending time on research will definitely not be wrong.
7 月 14 日，通用股份（601500）公佈 2026 年半年度業績預增公告。在全球關稅博弈加劇嘅逆風中，公司憑藉強勁嘅「出海韌性」實現業績大爆發。經初步測算，公司預計上半年歸屬母公司股東淨利潤達 1.38 億元至 1.78 億元，按年大增 114.66% 到 176.88%；扣非淨利潤預計 1.37 億元至 1.77 億元，按年狂增 176.51% 到 257.24%。
泰柬雙基地發力，對沖外貿壁壘
面對美國對華半鋼胎最高達 188.76% 嘅附加稅率及歐盟訂單轉移，通用股份前瞻性佈局嘅海外基地成為利潤引擎。上半年，泰國基地 5 月單月發貨量突破 100 萬條創歷史新高，6 月量產首條超高性能 28 吋輪胎；柬埔寨基地銷量按年提升 20%，二期項目達產增效。同時，公司正有序推進海外第三基地選址，「多點開花」嘅全球化佈局有效分散貿易風險，提升全球高毛利市場份額。
材料破局與 AI 提效，優化利潤結構
緊扣「新質生產力」，通用股份喺材料與智造兩端齊發力。材料端，3 月發佈「超級杜仲輪胎」切入新能源替換市場，高附加值產品佔比攀升；智造端，公司全面加速 AI 穿透，與聯想落實「全鋼 X 光缺陷檢測」項目，並攜手中科南京共建「通用人工智能應用創新實驗室」，以算法算力大幅提升良品率並壓縮製造成本。
跨界營銷破圈，品牌躍升深耕渠道
營銷端，公司打出「品效合一」組合拳。國內市場，千里馬輪胎借勢 2026「蘇超」探索「科技 + 體育」破圈，赤兔馬征戰環塔拉力賽夯實專業形象；渠道依托「遠航行動」賦能終端門店。國際上，公司亮相廣交會、科隆輪胎展，首次將杜仲輪胎推向海外。
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嗰陣都會拿 Perodua Ativa 同 Mazda CX-30 嚟做比較。呢兩款車喺價格同定位上都幾近嘅，今日我哋就從多個方面做一個詳細嘅對比，幫你省卻咗做功課嘅時間。
Perodua Ativa 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 62,500 - 73,400，合共 3 個版本，包括 1.0L Turbo X（RM 62,500）、1.0L Turbo H（RM 67,300）、1.0L Turbo AV（RM 73,400）等。
Mazda CX-30 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 122,409 - 146,409，合共 4 個版本，包括 2025 2.0L High+ Premium（RM 146,409）、2025 2.0L High+（RM 138,409）、2025 2.0L High（RM 130,409）等。
由價錢睇，Perodua Ativa 嘅入門價確實比 Mazda CX-30 平咗 RM 59,909。如果你預算有限，Perodua 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需求。但要留心，平嗰幾千塊，可能喺配備上要有取舍，具體睇你嘅需求。
Perodua Ativa 搭載 1.5L 4-cyl，馬力 105 hp。官方油耗 6.0 L/100km。
Mazda CX-30 搭載 1.5L Turbo，馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。
動力方面，Mazda CX-30 嘅 1.5L Turbo 比 Perodua Ativa 嘅 1.5L 4-cyl 多咗 35 匹馬力。不過日常喺市區開，兩款車嘅動力都夠用，唔會覺得唔夠力。
Perodua Ativa 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 ASA 3.0 + ACC + LDA + LKA + BSM + RCTA。
Mazda CX-30 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 i-Activsense。
兩款車嘅安全評級一樣，喺呢個級數裏面安全配備都算好齊全。依家嘅新车安全性都唔差，唔使太擔心呢一點。
Perodua Ativa 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
Mazda CX-30 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
兩款車嘅驅動方式一樣，都係 FWD，日常駕駛感受唔會有太大分別。
總括嚟講，Perodua Ativa 同 Mazda CX-30 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵仲係睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再試駕先做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
喺馬來西亞嘅汽車市場，好多車主喺揀車嘅時候都會拿 Mazda CX-30 同 GWM Haval H6 黎比較。今日我哋從多個方面做詳細比較，幫你節省做功課嘅時間。
Mazda CX-30 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 122,409 - 146,409，合共 4 個版本，包括 2025 2.0L High+ Premium（RM 146,409）、2025 2.0L High+（RM 138,409）、2025 2.0L High（RM 130,409） 等。
GWM Haval H6 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 139,750 - 139,750，合共 2 個版本，包括 1.5L Turbo Standard（RM 140,000）、1.5L Turbo Premium（RM 155,000） 等。
由價錢睇，Mazda CX-30 嘅入門價的確比 GWM Haval H6 平咗 RM 17,341。如果你預算有限，Mazda 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需要。但都要注意，平嗰幾千蚊，可能在配備上有取捨，具體要看你嘅需要。
Mazda CX-30 搭載 1.5L Turbo，馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。
GWM Haval H6 搭載 Hybrid，馬力 170 hp。官方油耗 4.5 L/100km。
動力方面，GWM Haval H6 嘅 Hybrid 比 Mazda CX-30 嘅 1.5L Turbo 多咗 30 匹馬力。不過日常喺市區開嘅話，兩款車嘅動力都夠用，唔會覺得唔夠力。
Mazda CX-30 車身長 4500 mm，行李箱 450 L。
GWM Haval H6 車身長 4400 mm，行李箱 400 L。
空間方面，Mazda CX-30 嘅車身比 GWM Haval H6 長咗 100 mm，車內乘車空間會稍微寬鬆啲，尤其係後座腿部空間。如果你經常載家人或者要放嬰兒車，大啲嘅車身的確更實用。
Mazda CX-30 保修 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
GWM Haval H6 保修 7 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
總括嚟講，Mazda CX-30 同 GWM Haval H6 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵都係睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，先去試駕再做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
喺馬來西亞嘅汽車市場，好多買家在揀車嘅時候都會拿 MG MG HS 同 BMW X1 嚟做比較。今日我哋由多個方面做一個詳細嘅比較，幫你省做功課嘅時間。
MG MG HS 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 130,450 - 146,450，一共有 2 個版本，包括 1.5L 標準（RM 105,000）、1.5L 行政（RM 115,000） 等。
BMW X1 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 252,800 - 252,800，一共有 2 個版本，包括 sDrive18i（RM 220,000）、sDrive20i（RM 250,000） 等。
由價錢嚟睇，MG MG HS 嘅起步價確實比 BMW X1 平咗 RM 122,350。如果你預算有限，MG 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需求。但都要注意，平嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備上會有取捨，具體要看你嘅需求。
MG MG HS 嘅安全評級係 TBD，主動安全系統包括 Basic。
BMW X1 嘅安全評級係 5★ (Euro NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 Premium ADAS。
安全配備方面，兩款車都拿到唔錯嘅評級。不過 MG MG HS 嘅 Basic 同 BMW X1 嘅 Premium ADAS 喺功能上有啲差異，如果你比較睇重主動安全嘅話，可以仔細比較一下兩者嘅功能列表。
MG MG HS 車身長 4400 mm，車尾箱 400 L。
BMW X1 車身長 4400 mm，車尾箱 400 L。
兩款車嘅尺寸幾乎一樣，車內空間差別唔大。呢個級別嘅車，日常使用完全夠用。
MG MG HS 保修 7 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
BMW X1 保修 5 年/無限里程，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
總嘅嚟講，MG MG HS 同 BMW X1 都係馬來西亞市場好唔錯嘅車型。揀邊架，關鍵都要睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做足功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花啲時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
BYD officially released the May 2026 production and sales flash report, with new energy vehicles from all brands reaching a monthly sales volume of 383,453 vehicles, a slight increase of 0.26% year-on-year, achieving year-on-year positive growth in monthly sales after ten months; among them, passenger car deliveries reached 376,990 units, surging 19.4% month-on-month, wiping out the pain of previous model iterations, presenting a new pattern where the domestic base is stable, overseas sales are soaring, and high-end brands are scaling up across the board. Amidst the market environment of intensified competition in the domestic new energy sector, Tesla FSD entering China, and an intense launch of independent new products, it has forged a unique structural growth path.
The Dynasty and Ocean main brands combined sold 330,215 vehicles in May, accounting for over 80% of the group's total sales, remaining the stabilizer for BYD's sales volume. The full series had 8 models exceeding 20,000 units in monthly sales, covering products from 50,000 entry-level commuter to 200,000 home SUV.
Inside the Dynasty Network, the Yuan family sold 56,691 units, and the Song family 51,370 units. Both crossed the 50,000 threshold, becoming two major sales pillars for the brand, catering to home commuter and urban-rural travel needs; the Qin family followed closely with a stable performance of 28,360 units. The Han and Tang series maintained a volume in the six-thousand range, deeply cultivating the mid-to-large home sedan and SUV niche markets; the brand new model Xia is in the market cultivation phase, delivering 1,810 units monthly, with potential for steady volume growth as channels expand.
The Ocean Network's growth momentum is even more rapid, with 5 models entering the 20,000 club across the series: Sealion 42,615 units, Seal 34,117 units, Seagull 39,919 units, Dolphin 22,260 units, and Song PLUS 27,755 units. Among them, Seagull remains the best-selling entry-level commuter model thanks to its affordable pricing of 60,000-80,000. Sealion, as a new volume model, stands firm at the 40,000 level upon launch, filling the mid-size SUV product gap in the Ocean Network and perfecting the Ocean product tier layout. From commuter small cars to compact SUVs, the two main brands rely on DM-i hybrid and pure electric dual-line technologies to牢牢锁住 the mainstream home market share within 150,000 domestically.
Fang Cheng Bao Year-on-Year Surges 139.7%, Brand Upward Positioning Takes EffectThe high-end matrix of Denza, Fang Cheng Bao, and Yangwang sold a combined 46,489 vehicles in May, officially breaking away from the niche positioning to become a new pivot for BYD's brand premium and profit growth, breaking the industry curse of difficulty in high-end breakthrough for domestic brands.
The off-road brand Fang Cheng Bao sold 30,186 units monthly, surging 139.7% year-on-year, creating a new high in monthly sales since the brand launched. Its Titanium 7 model sold 18,280 units monthly, while Leopard 5 and Leopard 8 output remained stable, continuously squeezing the survival space for joint venture and imported models in the 250,000-400,000 hardcore off-road niche market.
Denza delivered 16,303 units in May, with the MPV benchmark D9 selling 6,721 units, and the Z9 series close to 6,000 units. MPV and mid-to-large sedan dual-line efforts helped them stand firm in the luxury new energy track; the million-level ultra-luxury brand Yangwang continued its steady climb, delivering 286 units that month, a year-on-year increase of 105.8%, completing market verification of the domestic brand ceiling product and forming a full price range product layout from 100,000+ home, 300,000-400,000 off-road, 500,000 luxury MPV to million-level flagship.
In May, BYD's overseas sales of passenger cars and pickup trucks reached 160,177 units, surging 80.7% year-on-year. Exports accounted for over 42% of the full series total sales, setting a new historical high for brand export and becoming the core driving force to stabilize May overall sales and achieve year-on-year positive growth.
Southeast Asia, Europe, and Latin America became the main incremental markets. Seagull, Song PLUS, and Yuan series continued to top new energy best-seller lists in multiple countries; the SHARK pickup truck exceeded 4,000 units in monthly exports for two consecutive months. Relying on the completion of localization production in Thailand, Brazil, Hungary, and Uzbekistan with four overseas vehicle factories, localized production continues to land, avoiding tariffs while rapidly penetrating terminal channels. Against the background of stock market competition in the domestic auto industry and normalized price wars, the rapidly expanding overseas market effectively counteracts sales volatility brought by domestic model iterations, officially upgrading from a supplementary market to BYD's core growth engine. As of now, BYD's global cumulative new energy vehicle sales have exceeded 16.5 million units, with the globalization map continuously broadening.
Intelligent Driving Empowers Product Iteration, H2 New Products Prepare to Surge VolumeMay marked a key node in BYD's intelligent driving landing, with the God's Eye intelligent driving system becoming a core bonus point for models: the number of vehicles with advanced intelligent driving across all brands exceeded 3.15 million, with daily road test data exceeding 200 million kilometers; that month, BYD implemented City Pilot and Smart Parking dual safety backup services, becoming the world's first auto manufacturer to achieve dual intelligent driving backups. Three days after policy implementation, the activation rate of models equipped with the God's Eye system in cities surged 50%. Intelligent driving experience upgrades directly drove in-store order conversion, solidifying product competitiveness for subsequent models to continue volume sales, and facing the intelligent driving market shock brought by FSD entering China.
From data details, BYD's cumulative sales from January to May 2026 were 1,405,039 units, down 20.32% year-on-year. The core reason is that the full series of main models were concentratedly iterated, and the capacity ramp-up of the 2nd Gen Fast Charge Blade Battery was restricted. The new Flash Charge Battery upgraded fast charging and low-temperature performance. Full series iteration models prioritized installing new batteries, but production line retrofitting dragged down capacity release. Order backlogs on popular models and delayed deliveries compressed the May delivery volume to a certain extent.
As the end of the second quarter approaches and the 2nd Gen Blade Battery capacity continues to release, coupled with new models such as Denza N8L, Fang Cheng Bao Titanium 7 Pure Electric Version, Sealion 05, and Xia L landing the market, the industry generally predicts that BYD's full brand sales in June are expected to exceed 400,000 vehicles. Relying on the four-dimension development logic of low-end volume locking share, high-end raising profit, overseas pushing volume, and intelligence improving product power, amidst the intensified new energy elimination round in the domestic market, BYD's full category layout advantage continues to amplify, securing its status as the domestic new energy leader, accelerating steadily towards global top auto manufacturers.
車型概覽
哈弗神獸 值唔值得睇，第一步唔係望牌子或者外形，而係睇佢能唔能夠配合你嘅香港日常。 呢篇會集中講值唔值得繼續觀望，幫你用買家角度篩走唔適合嘅選擇。
售價仍待確認，買家可以先把佢放入候選名單，等價格落實後再同同級車逐項比較。
購車價格指南
哈弗神獸 目前售價仍未清晰，較理性嘅做法係先睇版本、車身大小同動力形式，等價格落實後再決定值唔值得落訂。
如果有幾個版本可揀，可以先將 2023 1.5T DHT兩驅版（價格待確認）、2023 2.0T 雙離合四驅版（價格待確認）、2023 2.0T 雙離合兩驅版（價格待確認）、2023 1.5T 雙離合兩驅版（價格待確認） 放喺同一張清單。日常通勤重視舒適同易用，家庭買家就要優先睇後排、尾箱同安全配置。
核心規格重點
睇 哈弗神獸 嘅規格，重點唔係背數字，而係理解佢喺香港用車場景會帶嚟咩分別。
1.69 kWh 嘅電池容量，真正意義係可以幫你估算一星期通勤同周末出車要唔要中途補電。 154 Ps / 113 kW / 130 kW / 224 Ps、233/300/345/275 N·m 嘅輸出，令高速併線同短距離超車更有信心。 車長 4780 mm、車闊 1890 mm、車高 1675 mm、軸距 2800 mm 可以幫你預判商場停車場、屋苑車位同後排腿部空間。 混合動力專用(DHT) / 濕式雙離合(DCT)、前置前駆 / 前置四駆 會影響起步順滑度、濕地穩定感同長途巡航性格。
優缺點分析
哈弗神獸 嘅優點唔需要講到天花龍鳳，真正有價值係佢能唔能夠令日常用車更省心：電池同續航資訊有助安排通勤同補電、動力輸出對高速同上斜更有底氣、空間同車身尺寸方便家庭買家預判實用性。
要留意嘅係，要先確認屋苑、公司或常去商場嘅充電條件、香港停車場同窄路使用要留意車身闊度。呢啲唔一定係缺點，但係落訂前應該先諗清楚。
買家常見問題
買 哈弗神獸 之前，真正要問嘅唔係單一規格，而係佢可唔可以融入你每日嘅生活節奏。
常見疑問係「哈弗 神獸 喺香港有無得買？」簡單講，哈弗 神獸 暫時未引進香港銷售。 放到實際用車，就係要睇佢對通勤、泊車、家庭乘坐同長期成本有幾大幫助。
同級對比內容
將 哈弗神獸 放入同級車清單時，唔建議只用外形或者品牌光環決定。比較順序可以係：先等售價落實，再決定佢應該同邊個級距比較、再睇動力係咪足夠應付高速併線同滿載、再比較能源成本同補能便利、最後睇車身大小、座位同尾箱是否適合家人。
咁樣篩選會貼近香港買家真實生活：平日塞車、商場泊車、周末去新界、甚至一家人出入，先係一部車每日要面對嘅考驗。
用車全周期指南
擁有 哈弗神獸 最重要係先諗清楚充電節奏。屋苑、公司或者常去商場只要有穩定充電選項，電動化用車就會容易相處好多。
如果你主要喺市區行，視野、低速順滑度同泊車輔助會好影響心情；如果經常行高速或跨區，座椅舒適度、隔音同動力從容感會更重要。
車型概覽
奧迪RS 6 值唔值得睇，第一步唔係望牌子或者外形，而係睇佢能唔能夠配合你嘅香港日常。 呢篇會集中講每日相處是否輕鬆，幫你用買家角度篩走唔適合嘅選擇。
完稅價 HK$ 2,028,000 令預算位置更清楚，買家可以先估算月供、保險、泊車同日常開支。
購車價格指南
奧迪RS 6 嘅購車預算可以先由 完稅價 HK$ 2,028,000 開始計。香港買車唔只係睇車價，月供、保險、牌費、泊車同能源成本都會影響每月壓力。
如果有幾個版本可揀，可以先將 2024 Avant quattro（HK$ 2,028,000） 放喺同一張清單。日常通勤重視舒適同易用，家庭買家就要優先睇後排、尾箱同安全配置。
核心規格重點
睇 奧迪RS 6 嘅規格，重點唔係背數字，而係理解佢喺香港用車場景會帶嚟咩分別。
奧迪RS 6 現階段最值得留意係車型定位同版本方向，詳細取捨應該等價格同規格更清楚再作決定。
優缺點分析
奧迪RS 6 嘅優點唔需要講到天花龍鳳，真正有價值係佢能唔能夠令日常用車更省心：預算位置清楚，方便同同級車直接比較。
要留意嘅係，最終取捨會落喺版本配置、保險同長期保養成本。呢啲唔一定係缺點，但係落訂前應該先諗清楚。
買家常見問題
買 奧迪RS 6 之前，真正要問嘅唔係單一規格，而係佢可唔可以融入你每日嘅生活節奏。
常見疑問係「奧迪 Audi RS 6 適合日常家庭用嗎？」簡單講，絕對適合，奧迪 Audi RS 6 Avant 擁有 565 公升行李空間，買餸車都要咁快。 放到實際用車，就係要睇佢對通勤、泊車、家庭乘坐同長期成本有幾大幫助。
同級對比內容
將 奧迪RS 6 放入同級車清單時，唔建議只用外形或者品牌光環決定。比較順序可以係：先用 完稅價 HK$ 2,028,000 鎖定預算圈。
咁樣篩選會貼近香港買家真實生活：平日塞車、商場泊車、周末去新界、甚至一家人出入，先係一部車每日要面對嘅考驗。
用車全周期指南
擁有 奧迪RS 6 唔係買車一刻就完結，之後仲有保險、輪胎、保養、泊車同日常能源成本要處理。
如果你主要喺市區行，視野、低速順滑度同泊車輔助會好影響心情；如果經常行高速或跨區，座椅舒適度、隔音同動力從容感會更重要。
車型概覽
吉利博越 值唔值得睇，第一步唔係望牌子或者外形，而係睇佢能唔能夠配合你嘅香港日常。 呢篇會集中講家庭乘坐、行李同舒適度，幫你用買家角度篩走唔適合嘅選擇。
售價仍待確認，買家可以先把佢放入候選名單，等價格落實後再同同級車逐項比較。
購車價格指南
吉利博越 目前售價仍未清晰，較理性嘅做法係先睇版本、車身大小同動力形式，等價格落實後再決定值唔值得落訂。
如果有幾個版本可揀，可以先將 2024 1.5T 雙離合版（價格待確認）、2025 1.5T 雙離合版（價格待確認） 放喺同一張清單。日常通勤重視舒適同易用，家庭買家就要優先睇後排、尾箱同安全配置。
核心規格重點
睇 吉利博越 嘅規格，重點唔係背數字，而係理解佢喺香港用車場景會帶嚟咩分別。
渦輪增壓、4 個 汽缸、1499 mL 排量 嘅動力底子，重點係市區跟車夠唔夠順、高速巡航會唔會吃力。 181 Ps / 133 kW、290 N·m 嘅輸出，對滿載、上斜同超車都比單睇馬力數字更有意思。 車長 4510/4549 mm、車闊 1865 mm、車高 1650 mm、軸距 2701/2707 mm 可以幫你預判商場停車場、屋苑車位同後排腿部空間。 濕式雙離合(DCT)、前置前駆 會影響起步順滑度、濕地穩定感同長途巡航性格。
優缺點分析
吉利博越 嘅優點唔需要講到天花龍鳳，真正有價值係佢能唔能夠令日常用車更省心：動力輸出對高速同上斜更有底氣、空間同車身尺寸方便家庭買家預判實用性。
要留意嘅係，香港停車場同窄路使用要留意車身闊度、售價未清晰前唔應該太早用性價比落結論。呢啲唔一定係缺點，但係落訂前應該先諗清楚。
買家常見問題
買 吉利博越 之前，真正要問嘅唔係單一規格，而係佢可唔可以融入你每日嘅生活節奏。
常見疑問係「吉利 Geely 博越 內飾設計係咩風格？」簡單講，吉利 Geely 博越 採用豪華 Nappa 真皮座椅，設計大氣典雅。 放到實際用車，就係要睇佢對通勤、泊車、家庭乘坐同長期成本有幾大幫助。
同級對比內容
將 吉利博越 放入同級車清單時，唔建議只用外形或者品牌光環決定。比較順序可以係：先等售價落實，再決定佢應該同邊個級距比較、再睇動力係咪足夠應付高速併線同滿載、最後睇車身大小、座位同尾箱是否適合家人。
咁樣篩選會貼近香港買家真實生活：平日塞車、商場泊車、周末去新界、甚至一家人出入，先係一部車每日要面對嘅考驗。
用車全周期指南
擁有 吉利博越 唔係買車一刻就完結，之後仲有保險、輪胎、保養、泊車同日常能源成本要處理。
如果你主要喺市區行，視野、低速順滑度同泊車輔助會好影響心情；如果經常行高速或跨區，座椅舒適度、隔音同動力從容感會更重要。
车见万宜讯—2026年6月，香港亚洲国际博览馆，极氪展台成为本届车博会人气最集中的区域。明星到场、企业家驻足、观众排队体验——这些现象本身并不稀奇，但有两个细节值得注意。
一是演员古天乐在展台当场下定极氪9X右舵版，成为全球首位预定该车型的用户。二是搜狐创始人张朝阳专程飞抵香港，在极氪展台停留许久，对极氪009光辉的物理隔断设计和8X的AI智慧能源管理连连称赞。
如果把这些仅仅归结为“明星效应”或“营销活动”，恐怕会错过更重要的信号。在中国香港这个全球最成熟的豪华车市场之一，消费者正在用订单投票，而他们投票的依据正在发生变化。
先看一组数据：2026年1至5月，极氪在中国香港豪华车市场占据40.7%的份额，位居销量榜首。这意味着每卖出两辆豪华车，就有一辆是极氪。其中，极氪009长期蝉联豪华MPV销冠，极氪7X则在豪华SUV细分市场登顶。
这个成绩放在三年前几乎不可想象。彼时，中国香港的豪华MPV市场长期由丰田埃尔法等传统车型主导，中国品牌几乎没有存在感。极氪能打破这一格局，靠的并非价格战——极氪单车均价超过36万元人民币，9X平均成交价达到53万元，009光辉售价更高。
那靠的是什么？张朝阳的参观提供了一条线索。他在体验009光辉后，专门指出了后排与前排的物理隔断设计——在物理学博士眼中，这不是简单的“私密性”配置，而是一套利用吸声材料、多层隔音玻璃和主动降噪技术构建的声学系统。他对8X“越跑电越多”的评价同样指向工程逻辑：通过AI大模型实时调度能量分配，在下坡、滑行等工况下高效回收能量，让电量在特定条件下不降反升。
简而言之，打动这位物理学博士的，不是品牌光环，而是可验证的工程能力。这或许也解释了香港消费者的选择——在一个地狭人稠、用车场景复杂的城市，用户对产品的审视往往更务实。他们关心技术能否真正解决实际问题，而非营销话术。极氪能在香港站稳脚跟，核心在于浩瀚架构、900V高压系统、一体化压铸等底层技术得到了实际路况的检验。
本届车博会上，极氪正式发布9系双旗舰全球化战略——极氪9X与极氪009光辉将走向海外市场。极氪9X已在中东开启预售，后续计划拓展至拉美、中亚、欧洲；009光辉右舵版则将于2026年第四季度登陆中国香港。
选择香港作为战略发布地，本身就是一个务实决策。作为右舵市场的“桥头堡”，香港市场的认可意味着品牌具备了向澳大利亚、东南亚、英国等右舵地区输出的基础。而9系双旗舰的定位也很有针对性——9X主打超豪华SUV，009光辉主打四座超豪华MPV，分别瞄准两个细分领域的顶端。
这种打法不再是“把车卖出去”的初级阶段，而是试图用旗舰产品重新定义细分市场的竞争标准。极氪9X在中国内地市场连续七个月位居50万元级大型SUV销冠，80%的用户来自BBA、路虎、保时捷等传统豪华品牌，这说明产品力在高端用户群体中已获得初步验证。009光辉则以“MPV中的劳斯莱斯”为定位，通过一体式压铸C环结构、专属SPA理疗座椅等差异化配置，在四座超豪华MPV细分市场建立了认知优势。
对普通消费者而言，极氪在香港的表现传递出一个信号：中国豪华品牌的产品力已经具备与国际传统豪华品牌正面竞争的技术基础。
极氪9X主打超长续航（综合续航超1000公里）和快速补能（20%-80%充电仅需9分钟），适合有长途出行需求且对性能要求较高的用户。但其车身尺寸较大，在停车位紧张的城市中心区域可能不够便利。极氪009光辉则定位极致私密与舒适，二排独立座椅、物理隔断、殿堂级影音系统均为商务接待或高端私人出行设计，但四座布局牺牲了载人灵活性，更适合特定场景而非家庭日常使用。
极氪7X和8X则覆盖了更大众化的细分市场。7X作为纯电SUV，在中国香港市场已击败特斯拉Model Y，适合注重空间和舒适性的家庭用户；8X作为插混车型，综合续航达1416公里，解决了里程焦虑问题，同时零百加速2.96秒的性能表现也兼顾了驾驶乐趣。
总体而言，极氪的产品矩阵已初步形成了从30万到近百万的价格覆盖，消费者可以根据自身需求、用车场景和预算进行选择。但需注意，电动车和插混车型的使用体验高度依赖当地充电网络和售后服务，购买前应充分考察品牌在当地的网点布局和维修保障能力。
古天乐的定车、张朝阳的点赞、香港市场的份额跃升——这些现象共同指向一个事实：中国汽车品牌出海的竞争逻辑正在从“产品输出”转向“技术输出”。极氪能在香港这个“试金石”市场站稳脚跟，说明其工程体系得到了严苛用户的认可。
但挑战同样真实：海外市场的消费习惯、法规标准、品牌忠诚度都与中国内地和香港不同，旗舰车型的定价策略和服务体系也需要因地制宜。极氪的全球化之路刚刚开始，未来的考验还在后面。
对于消费者而言，极氪的出现增加了豪华车市场的选择多样性，但购车决策仍需基于自身实际需求，而非品牌热度。理性的选择，永远建立在充分了解产品特性与自身使用场景的匹配度之上。
