首頁Li Auto L8
搜尋歷史
熱門搜尋
經銷商登入 / 註冊
In Malaysia's SUV market, many buyers compare the Proton X90 and Honda WR-V when choosing a car. These two models are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
The OTR price for the Proton X90 in Malaysia is RM 106,800 - 122,800, with a total of 4 versions, including 2026 1.5T Prime X (RM 122,800), 2026 1.5T Prime (RM 116,800), 2026 1.5T Lite (RM 106,800), etc.
The OTR price for the Honda WR-V in Malaysia is RM 89,900 - 107,900, with a total of 4 versions, including 2023 1.5L V (RM 99,900), 2023 1.5L E (RM 95,900), 2023 1.5L S (RM 89,900), etc.
In terms of price, the Honda WR-V's starting price is RM 16,900 cheaper than the Proton X90. Honestly, in this price range, the difference of a few thousand is not really significant; the key is to look at overall value for money and long-term usage costs.
The Proton X90 uses FWD drive type.
The Honda WR-V uses FWD drive type.
Both cars use the same drive type, which is FWD, so there won't be a huge difference in daily driving feel.
Proton X90 Warranty 5 years/150,000km, Service Interval Every 10,000km or 6 months.
Honda WR-V Warranty 5 years/Unlimited mileage, Service Interval Every 10,000km or 6 months.
Both the Proton X90 and Honda WR-V are mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, you can prioritize the one with better reputation; if you care more about value for money and features, choose the one with richer configuration. Ultimately, it is recommended to test drive both, as personal experience is the most important.
Overall, both the Proton X90 and Honda WR-V are very good models in the Malaysian market. Choosing which one depends mainly on your personal needs and budget. It is recommended to do your research, compare quotes from several car dealerships, and then test drive to make the final decision. Buying a car is a big matter; spending some time on research will never be wrong.
Changan's July performance report, which stabilized the baseline of 200,000 units, still fails to bring any sense of ease.
On August 2nd, Changan Automobile disclosed July delivery data.The group delivered 207,100 units that month, roughly flat compared to the same period last year.Among them, overseas deliveries reached 82,300 units, a significant year-on-year increase of 79.1%, with six consecutive months of positive growth; New energy deliveries hit 96,500 units, a year-on-year increase of 28.8%, with penetration rate approaching 47%. The remaining domestic fuel vehicle segment is quietly shrinking.
Looking back at the first half of the year, sales-wise, cumulative deliveries reached 1.1956 million units, with only 36.2% completion of the annual target of 3.3 million units. In the past three years, the proportion of first-half sales remained stable above 46%, but this year it is at least 10 percentage points lower. For the remaining 5 months, an average of 420,000 units must be sold monthly to meet the target. Compared to the peak season of the second half of 2025, Changan's single-month peak was only around 280,000 units. This means the monthly average target for the second half needs to be nearly 50% higher than the best-selling month of last year to meet the target.
On the profit side, the attributable net profit for shareholders in the first half is expected to be between 740 million and 970 million yuan, a year-on-year decline of 58% to 68%; the net profit from the main business dropped significantly by 78% to 85%, remaining only between 230 million and 330 million yuan. Calculated by total sales volume, the non-deductible net profit per car sold is less than 30 yuan.
Changan officials attribute the reasons to exchange rate losses and raw material price hikes, but the structure is also dragging them down.
The signal on the profit side is even heavier. The earnings forecast shows that the attributable net profit for shareholders in the first half is expected to be between 740 million and 970 million yuan, a year-on-year decline of 58% to 68%; the net profit from the main business dropped significantly by 78% to 85%, remaining only between 230 million and 330 million yuan. Calculated by total sales volume, the non-deductible net profit per car sold is less than 30 yuan. Changan officials attribute the reasons to exchange rate losses and raw material price hikes, but the structure is also dragging them down.
First, the new energy sector's growth rate is lower than the industry average.In the first half of the year, new energy deliveries were 456,000 units, a year-on-year increase of only 5.2%. During the same period, Geely Auto's new energy sales increased by 9.6% year-on-year, Chery Auto's new energy sales increased by 34.2% year-on-year, while Changan clearly lagged behind. Looking at the product structure, the Qiyuan brand relies heavily on the Q05 model, selling 72,000 units in half a year, while other models such as Q07, A07, E07, etc., saw declining sales with negligible contributions; Avatr accumulated deliveries of less than 28,000 units in the first half of the year, halving year-on-year, losing 13.2 billion yuan over the four years from 2022 to 2025, and in the first half of 2026 no car model achieved monthly sales over 10,000; Deepal relies on S05 and L06, with the high-end SUV Deepal S09 monthly sales dropping to over 200 units.
Secondly, there is pressure on the fuel vehicle side.The CS75 fuel version's sales in the first half of the year dropped by more than 30%. Although the Eado managed to maintain its position on the sedan list, it relied on continuous price cuts. Several older models saw sales drop to zero. Changan actively stopped production of the Lumin priced below 50,000 yuan, an entry and exit resulting in a gap of 70,000 units.
Fortunately, the overseas side was a bright spot in the first half of the year. The situation of domestic fuel vehicle contraction and weak new energy growth is difficult to fully support with overseas legs alone. Overseas deliveries in the first half of the year reached 402,000 units, a year-on-year increase of 35.1%. Compared to Changan's own announced 2026 overseas annual sales target, the completion rate has already exceeded 53%. However, the situation of domestic fuel vehicle contraction and weak new energy growth is difficult to support solely by overseas markets.
Currently, Changan has dispatched four vice-president level executives to lead the overseas expansion. Factories in Thailand and Brazil have been put into production successively. In the second half of the year, models such as Qiyuan Q05 and Deepal S05 will be launched in multiple locations in Southeast Asia and Europe. However, overseas markets are still in the investment phase of channels and capacity, short-term profit returns are limited, and exchange rate fluctuations continue to erode book data.
Facing multiple pressures such as weak domestic business and unbalanced multi-brand operations, Changan launched the most drastic reform in recent years in April. Deepal and Avatr backend integration aims to reduce R&D and supply chain costs by 20% to 30%. The overall product lineup was cut from 63 models to 36 models, no longer pursuing scale without profit.
As Tan Benhong, Deputy Secretary of the Party Committee and Director of China Changan Automobile Group Co., Ltd., stated frankly at the mid-year communication meeting:"We have not yet fully mastered the operational capabilities of multiple brands."
The variables for the second half lie in the new vehicles.
Deepal S05 will be launched on August 6th, with a pre-sale price of 119,900 to 151,900 yuan, equipped with Tianshu Pilot + LiDAR; Changan Qiyuan Q06 comes standard with the Tianshu Pilot Intelligent Driving system across all trims, planned for launch in September, focusing on the 200,000 yuan class medium-large SUV market; Avatr 07L is positioned as a smart beauty family luxury SUV, expected to launch in the third quarter, providing both extended-range and pure electric dual power, the first batch equipped with Huawei Qiankun ADS 5 intelligent driving system, targeting the family market above 220,000 yuan.
A new vehicle list scheduled until the end of the year carries all of Changan's expectations for shifting from stability maintenance to an offensive push. Whether the integration can release system capabilities and whether the new vehicles can become blockbusters are the two key questions to break the stagnation in the second half of the year.
Source: Car Observation
In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers compare Proton X70 and Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV when choosing a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
The OTR price of Proton X70 in Malaysia is RM 106,800 - 122,300, with a total of 3 versions, including 1.5L Standard 2WD (RM 106,800), 1.5L Executive 2WD (RM 115,800), 1.5L Premium 2WD (RM 122,300), etc.
The OTR price of Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV in Malaysia is RM 129,750 - 129,750, with a total of 2 versions, including 2025 1.5T 90km CSH (RM 129,750), What charging methods does the Tiggo 7 PHEV support? Can it be charged using a home power socket? (RM 117,478), etc.
From the price perspective, Proton X70's starting price is indeed RM 22,950 cheaper than Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV. If your budget is limited, Proton's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. But be aware that the cheaper few thousand may involve compromises in equipment, it depends on your needs.
Proton X70 is equipped with 1.5L Turbo, 140 hp. Official fuel consumption 7.0 L/100km.
Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV is equipped with Hybrid, 170 hp. Official fuel consumption 4.5 L/100km.
In terms of power, Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV's Hybrid has 30 more horsepower than Proton X70's 1.5L Turbo. However, for daily city driving, both cars have enough power, you won't feel it's lacking.
Proton X70's safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV's safety rating is TBD, active safety systems include Basic.
Regarding safety equipment, both cars have received good ratings. However, Proton X70's ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA) and Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV's Basic have some differences in functions. If you value active safety, you can compare the function lists of both carefully.
Proton X70 warranty 5 years/150,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV warranty 3 years/100,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Overall, Proton X70 and Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV are both quite good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends on your personal needs and budget. We suggest doing your research, compare quotes from several dealerships, and then test drive to make the final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending some time on research will never be wrong.
On July 28, the Fortune Global 500 list was released. BYD ranked 91st. This marks the fifth consecutive year it has held this position. Among the 35 companies listed in the global vehicles and parts sector, this ranking signifies that it has secured its spot in the world's top 100.
Over the past year, the global automotive industry faced difficulties, with 7 vehicle manufacturers on the list reporting losses. In such a climate, maintaining the same ranking itself reflects an embodiment of resilience.
Where the Money Goes, Is Where the Lifeline Lies
Outsiders often focus on the income statement, but opening BYD's books from last year reveals one expense worth more attention: 63.4 billion yuan in R&D investment, nearly double its net profit for the same period. Simply put, this isn't burning cash; it's buying the right to remain unstrangled. By the end of last year, BYD had cumulatively filed over 71,000 patents globally. These patents have been translated into second-generation Blade Batteries, megawatt-level flash charging technology, and the "Sky Eye" advanced driver-assistance system. When a carmaker masters full-stack technology from cells to chips, its posture becomes naturally stronger when negotiating within the global supply chain.
Going Global Is No Longer Just Selling Cars
Last year, BYD's overseas sales surpassed 1 million units, a 145% year-on-year increase. In Brazil, a passenger car factory was not only built, but SkyRail also started operations; in Thailand, a factory that has been running for two years has become a regional manufacturing hub; in Japan, the exclusive Sea Otter model specifically targeting the K-Car market was launched. This "manufacturing + infrastructure + localization adaptation" combination punch signifies that the logic of Chinese automakers going global is shifting from simple commodity trade to the overall export of the industrial chain.
The Value of Ranking 91st
Looking back at this 91st ranking again. Through it, we see a daily R&D investment of 174 million yuan, a sales system covering 121 countries and regions, and the presence of eight self-built RoRo ships shuttling across the oceans. This "Technology + Manufacturing + Logistics" full-chain control capability is the true foundation of the world's top 100.
The list changes every year, and rankings vary. But as long as this vertically integrated system keeps operating, BYD's piece in the global industrial chain game will become increasingly active.
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多人揀車嘅時候都會拿 Proton X70 同 Toyota Yaris Cross 比較。呢兩款車喺價位同定位上都幾接近，今日我哋就由多個方面做一次詳細嘅比較，幫你節省做功課嘅時間。
Proton X70 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 106,800 - 122,300，一共有 3 個版本，包括 1.5L Standard 2WD（RM 106,800）、1.5L Executive 2WD（RM 115,800）、1.5L Premium 2WD（RM 122,300） 等。
Toyota Yaris Cross 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 99,900 - 109,900，一共有 2 個版本，包括 2026 1.5L Standard（RM 99,900）、2026 HEV 1.5L Standard（RM 109,900） 等。
由價錢睇嚟，Toyota Yaris Cross 嘅起步價比 Proton X70 平咗 RM 6,900。老實講，喺呢個價位段，幾千蚊嘅差距其實唔算大，關鍵仲係睇整體嘅性價比同長期使用成本。
Proton X70 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA)。
Toyota Yaris Cross 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 TSS。
兩款車嘅安全評級一樣，喺呢個級別入面安全配備都算畀得好齊全。而家嘅新車安全性都唔差，唔使太擔心呢一點。
Proton X70 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
Toyota Yaris Cross 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
兩款車嘅驅動方式一樣，都係 FWD，日常駕駛感受唔會有太大分別。
Proton X70 保修 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Toyota Yaris Cross 保修 5 年/無限制里程，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Proton X70 同 Toyota Yaris Cross 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更重視品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰一款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，嗰就揀配置更豐富嗰款。最後仲係建議兩款都去試駕，親身體驗先係最重要嘅。
總括嚟講，Proton X70 同 Toyota Yaris Cross 都係馬來西亞市場好唔錯嘅車型。揀邊部車，關鍵仲係睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行之嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
歲至中流，擊水者誰？2026 年，中國汽車市場進入深度調整期，同質化的價格競爭考驗着每一家車企的盈利能力與戰略定力。在這一背景下，上汽集團展現出穩健的發展態勢。1-6 月，上汽集團實現整車銷量 204.5 萬輛，成為上半年唯一突破 200 萬輛大關的中國車企。
這份成績單的發布，恰逢上汽集團迎來全球累計產銷突破一億輛的歷史性里程碑。站在一億輛的節點上，上汽並未止步於過往的規模積累，而是將其視為面向智能電動時代“二次創業”的新起點。在行業格局重塑的當下，204.5 萬輛的銷量，標誌着上汽集團在“懂車更懂你”理念的指導下，正穩步完成從規模追趕到全球領航的轉型，也向行業展現了其穿越週期的長期主義實踐。
結構質變：精準洞察用戶需求，自主品牌佔比破七成
今年上半年，上汽自主品牌累計銷售 146.9 萬輛，佔比高達 71.8%，並實現同比六連漲。在存量博弈的市場環境中，精準洞察用戶需求成為構建企業護城河的關鍵。
上汽自主品牌的高增長，建立在對家庭出行場景與年輕一代消費心理的深入理解之上。過去，入門級車型往往伴隨著智能體驗的妥協，但上汽透過供應鏈整合與技術普惠，讓 A0 級市場的消費者也能享受到越級的智能座艙體驗。以五菱繽果 Pro 為例，它精準契合了城市代步用戶對空間與質感的双重訴求；而在榮威 i6 上，上汽將高通 8155 芯片與 AI 大模型下探至 6 萬級市場，切實回應了入門級用戶對智能化體驗的升級需求。
與此同時，上汽乘用車、上汽通用五菱、智己汽車與上汽大通四大板塊協同發展，展現出較強的結構韌性。上半年，上汽乘用車銷量同比增長 49.4%，上汽大通增長 29.1%，智己汽車更是大幅增長 107%。多品牌矩陣的互補，有效對沖了單一賽道波動帶來的經營風險。
這種結構質變源於上汽在研發端的長期投入。近十餘年，上汽在智電領域累計研發投入近 1900 億元，擁有 2.4 萬餘項有效專利。正是這些技術儲備，讓上汽有能力在不同價格帶推出符合用戶期待的產品。自主品牌佔比突破七成，標誌着上汽集團的增長引擎已實現平穩切換，從技術引進，轉向深入理解並定義本土市場，並通過技術共創反向賦能合資品牌。
雙線提速：回應多元出行期待，新能源“兩翼齊飛”
上半年，上汽新能源車累計銷售 79.6 萬輛，6 月單月新能源滲透率突破 50%。在新能源滲透率跨越關鍵節點的當下，上汽透過自主與合資“兩翼齊飛”的策略，回應了不同圈層用戶的多元出行期待，也用事實證明，真正懂用戶的車企才能贏得市場的長期認可。
在自主端，上汽憑藉 MG4、尚界 Z7 及智己 LS8 等車型矩陣保持增長態勢。MG4 家族率先搭載半固態電池，提升了產品的技術競爭力；尚界 Z7 全系配備 896 線激光雷達，智己 LS8 也將在年內補齊純電版本，透過增程與純電雙線布局，將高級智能輔助駕駛與線控底盤引入主流價格帶。
在合資端，上汽同樣取得了積極進展。上汽通用新能源上半年銷售近 5 萬輛，同比增長 81.1%；上汽大衆 ID. ERA 9X 上市兩個月累計交付破萬，奧迪 E7X 上市首月交付超 4000 輛。合資品牌在新能源賽道穩步前行，關鍵在於其開始深度傾聽中國用戶的聲音。大衆 ID. ERA 9X 搭載歷經市場驗證的 EA211 黃金增程器，配合行云智能底盤與後輪轉向，專為中國用戶定制座艙與全場景智駕；奧迪 E7X 則全球首發“智慧客廳”，並預埋 L3 級自動駕駛能力。別克至境 E7 聯合丁香醫生發布《兒童出行健康 C.A.R.E 模型》，打造“五恆健康座艙”與“滿分座艙”，將兒童健康防護理念全面融入座艙設計。這些細節的打磨，正是上汽“懂車更懂你”理念在不同品牌陣營中的落地。合資板塊正透過“中國定義、全球賦能”的路徑，實現本土化需求的深度定制。
第二曲線：MG 英倫“技術亮劍”，全價值鏈出海迎來收穫期
在海外市場，上汽集團的銷售成績同樣穩健。今年上半年，集團海外累計銷售 73.5 萬輛，同比大幅增長 48.7%，海外業務已成為支撐上汽長期發展的重要基石。
在這場跨越山海的征途中，MG 品牌在英國的技術展示，正是上汽踐行 Glocal 3.0 戰略、將“懂車更懂你”理念推向全球的最佳縮影。今年 7 月，MG 在倫敦舉辦了 Tech Day 技術大會，集中展示了 Plug-in Hybrid+ 混合動力技術、SolidCore 半固態電池以及 MG Parking 智慧座艙與輔助駕駛系統。作為全球首個實現半固態電池量產的汽車品牌，MG 此舉向歐洲市場傳遞了一個明確信號：中國汽車出海，正從單純的產品輸出，邁向技術標準與生態體系的輸出。緊接着，MG 品牌亮相古德伍德速度節，全球首發了兩廂純電小車 MG Go!和轎跑 SUV Cyber Concept 兩款概念車型，展現了品牌傳承與未來願景的交融。
MG 在歐洲的穩健表現，印證了“技術 + 文化”雙輪驅動的价值。上半年，MG 在欧洲累計銷售近 19 萬輛，連續十一年蟬聯中國品牌歐洲銷量冠軍。
商用車領域同樣傳來捷報，上汽紅巖與泰國頭部港口大客戶達成 1000 輛新能源重卡戰略合作，打破了當地重卡市場外資品牌壟斷的格局。首批整車已完成整裝、批量登船，從國內生產基地啟程發往泰國。這也標誌着上汽紅巖憑藉自主三電核心技術、全場景定制能力與完善海外屬地服務體系，向全球展現中國商用車完整產業鏈與綠色智造硬實力。
真正的“懂你”，不僅在於深耕本土，更在於對全球不同市場規則的敬畏與適應。73.5 萬輛的海外銷量，是上汽體系力在全球舞台上的集中體現。
底層邏輯：穿越週期的“穩與進”，長期體系力鑄就護城河
204.5 萬輛的半程銷冠、全球累計產銷突破一億輛，絕非靠單一爆款或短期價格戰賭出的運氣，而是上汽集團長期體系力的集中爆發。在行業風起雲湧的價格混戰裡，多品牌矩陣與國內外雙向支撐賦予了其極強的抗風險能力，這就是“穩”的底色。而“進”的鋒芒，則體現在近 1900 億研發投入帶來的技術漏斗加速變現、全面深化改革釋放的原生動力、以及與頭部生態合作夥伴共建智慧出行的生態上。
在上汽集團全球第一億位用戶交付儀式上，一個極具象徵意義的細節引發了行業關注：第一億位用戶正是 Momenta CEO 曹旭東。交付的車型正是集上汽技術大成的旗艦智己 LS9 Hyper。這種“夥伴變車主”的交付，不僅是廠商與用戶間的信任接力，更是上汽構建開放生態的絕佳體現。
近期，Momenta 正式登陸港交所，成為“物理 AI 第一股”。上汽通持股成為其第一大外部股東；同時 Momenta 也持有上汽旗下智己汽車的股份，形成雙向持股的獨特格局。雙方走出了“資本 + 場景”共生路徑，不僅存在採購關係，更透過股權綁定、聯合研發、共同定義產品路線，把算法能力和量產能力深度融合。從高端自主到主流合資，Momenta 的智駕方案在上汽旗下多個品牌的車型上完成了多輪技術迭代與場景驗證。量產應用的規模效應直接轉化為市場份額，據佐思汽研數據，2026 年 4 月城市 NOA 市場中，華為與 Momenta 合計佔據 72.8% 的市場份額，其中 Momenta 單獨佔比 33.6%。更重要的是，上汽旗下享道出行聯合 Momenta 試點運營 Robotaxi 服務，使 L4 技術從封閉場景測試進入真實運營場景，率先開啟商業化驗證。
從首款高級智駕車型攻堅到第一億輛交付里程碑見證，再到如今 Momenta 衝擊港股，這種共生模式既為上汽多品牌矩陣的智駕快速迭代提供了持續支撐，也為汽車產業新型分工模式探索出了可參考的實踐樣本。
結語：以“穩”為錨，以“進”為帆，邁向下一個億級新程
從 1958 年弄堂工廠敲出的第一輛鳳凰牌轎車，到如今一億輛的里程碑，上汽七十餘年的歲月跨度，見證了中國汽車工業的崛起之路；而在這條漫長的征途上，始終不變的，是上汽對‘懂車更懂你’理念的執着堅守。
上半年 204.5 萬輛銷量，既是上半程的階段性高光，更是上汽跨越一億輛里程碑後，邁向新征程的堅實基盤。展望下半年，上汽集團的產品矩陣正加速煥新。固態電池、高級智能輔助駕駛等前沿技術將密集量產落地，智己、榮威、MG 等品牌的新能源車型也將接力登場，為傳統旺季注入強勁動能。在這場沒有終點的馬拉松中，上汽集團始終保持着清醒與定力，堅持高質量發展路線。
未來的汽車市場，必將是體系力與用戶洞察力的雙重較量。讓我們共同期待，在下一個億級新程中，上汽集團以“穩”為錨、以“進”為帆，在時代的浪潮中穩步前行，駛向更加廣闊的未來。
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拿 Proton X50 同 Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV 嚟做比較。這兩款車喺價位同定位上都幾接近，今日我哋就從多個方面做一個詳細嘅比較，幫你省下做功課嘅時間。
Proton X50 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 89,800 - 113,300，一共有 4 個版本，包括 1.5T Executive（RM 89,800）、1.5T Premium（RM 101,800）、1.5T Flagship（RM 113,300） 等。
Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 129,750 - 129,750，一共有 2 個版本，包括 2025 1.5T 90km CSH（RM 129,750）、支持邊種充電方式？可以用家用電源插座充電嗎？（RM 117,478） 等。
從價錢嚟睇，Proton X50 嘅起步價確實比 Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV 平咗 RM 39,950。如果你預算有限，Proton 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需求。但都要注意，平嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備上有取舍，具體要看你嘅需求。
Proton X50 搭載 1.5L 4-cyl，馬力 105 hp。官方油耗 6.0 L/100km。
Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV 搭載 Hybrid，馬力 170 hp。官方油耗 4.5 L/100km。
動力方面，Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV 嘅 Hybrid 比 Proton X50 嘅 1.5L 4-cyl 多咗 65 匹馬力。不過日常喺市區開，兩款車嘅動力都夠用，唔會覺得唔夠力。
Proton X50 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA)。
Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV 嘅安全評級係 TBD，主動安全系統包括 Basic。
安全配備方面，兩款車都拿到唔錯嘅評級。不過 Proton X50 嘅 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA) 同 Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV 嘅 Basic 喺功能上有啲差異，如果你比較睇重主動安全嘅話，可以仔細比較下兩者嘅功能列表。
Proton X50 車身長 4400 mm，後車箱 400 L。
Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV 車身長 4400 mm，後車箱 400 L。
兩款車嘅尺寸幾乎一樣，車內空間差別唔大。呢個級別嘅車，日常使用完全夠用。
Proton X50 同 Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更睇重品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰一款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，嗰就揀配置更豐富嗰款。最尾仲係建議兩款都去試駕，親身體驗先係最重要嘅。
總嘅嚟講，Proton X50 同 Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車款。揀邊一輛，關鍵仲係要看你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花啲時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
Even excluding KD badge production capacity, there is still a surge. Geely firmly secures the 3rd place in exports and takes the top growth rate among leading automakers.
In the first half of 2026, the Chinese automotive export market surged 65.3% year-on-year. The ranking of leading automakers is very clear. Calculating by total export volume, Chery Group ranks 1st with 931,600 units, BYD ranks 2nd with 769,300 units, and Geely ranks 3rd with 472,400 units. The 158% year-on-year increase ranks 1st among all leading automakers, with growth speed far surpassing all competitors.
The outside world habitually assumes that Geely's impressive export data comes mostly from CKD parts sent to Malaysia's Proton and Brazil's Renault, relying on local badge swapping to scale up. However, if all KD parts and cooperative branded models are excluded, and only whole vehicles exported under Geely's main brand, Lynk & Co, and Zeekr's three self-owned brands displaying their own logos are counted, it still achieved high-speed growth of 165%, with substantial value. The same period last year, overseas whole vehicles of the three brands were less than 90,000 units, while this year the first half reached 238,500 units. The increase comes entirely from true retail of own brands, no longer relying on the old model of moving volume through badge swapping.
For over ten years, Geely's globalization has always followed a low-key localization strategy, relying on cooperative brands to hide its own identity for a long time, seeking only shipment volume, without promoting the Geely mother brand. In recent years, the group's strategy has completely changed. No longer hiding via detours, it is pushing the three brands Geely, Lynk & Co, and Zeekr to the global market. This year's explosion is the concentrated realization of years of systematic layout.
1. A complete new energy matrix avoids EU anti-subsidy tariffs, becoming the strongest driver of growth.
The EU imposed punitive tariffs on pure electric models, and many automakers encountered bottlenecks in the Western European market. Geely focuses on its Thor Hybrid, not on the tax list, successfully cutting into mature markets. Galaxy Hybrid, Lynk & Co Hybrid, and Zeekr high-end pure electric form a complete product matrix, adapting to regulations in Europe, Australia, the Middle East, and elsewhere. Unlike many automakers relying on old fuel vehicles to seize backward markets, the vast majority of Geely's overseas increase comes from new energy vehicles, with new energy exports surging 585%. Product capabilities benchmark Japanese and German mainstream models, allowing them to stand firm in the market without heavy price wars.
2. Relying on Volvo's mature dealer network, skipping the long brand cultivation cycle, is a unique moat.
Lynk & Co is wholly operated by Volvo's European channels, directly entering luxury brand showrooms, naturally resolving overseas consumers' bias against Chinese brands, saving several years of market cultivation. Zeekr layouts in Western Europe and Middle East high-end markets, selecting luxury brand agents, HQ unified pricing, strictly controlling prices, preventing dealers from price chaos harming the brand. Geely Galaxy enters Europe and Australia, able to share the group's mature overseas logistics and spare parts systems; the speed of channel construction is difficult to compare with car companies starting from scratch.
3. Three brands are layered in layout, positioning is clear with no internal friction, front-end independent, back-end synergy.
Geely Galaxy focuses on mainstream home use 100,000 to 200,000 RMB, benchmarked against Toyota, Volkswagen; Lynk & Co dives deep into European high-end sports market; Zeekr focuses on luxury pure electric. Three brand showrooms are completely separate, won't grab orders from each other; supply chain, spare parts, logistics are integrated uniformly to lower operating costs. In contrast, some car companies keep setting up new independent brands overseas, splitting the mother brand and dispersing resources. Geely overseas is all true terminal retail, no bubble of pressuring dealers with inventory, growth is very solid.
4. HQ unified pricing, abandoning the extensive low-price route, slowly accumulating overseas brand reputation.
In the early years, like many self-owned brands, Geely gave overseas sales entirely to agents, prices were chaotic, and the cheap label was hard to tear off. Now Geely directly controls global pricing, refuses disorderly price cuts, paired with long-cycle warranties, dispelling overseas users' concerns about unfamiliar brands. Australia Galaxy takes the sales crown in its sub-category, Middle East Zeekr stands firm in the luxury market, Lynk & Co ranks at the forefront of Chinese brands in Europe for years, not relying on fierce internal competition, but on product and service to achieve stable growth.
5. Market layout is balanced, does not rely on special favorable markets like Russia, Iran, anti-risk ability is stronger.
A significant proportion of Chery's exports comes from special markets like Russia, Iran. Once the geopolitical environment changes, sales will fluctuate wildly. Geely's three self-owned brands' increases all come from open mature markets such as Europe, Australia, Southeast Asia, Middle East, no over-reliance on a single country, structure is healthier.
Chinese car companies' overseas expansion has long been divided into two paths: one relies on new overseas brands, KD parts, special geopolitical markets to build scale, brands are hard to move up; one goes high, heavy asset investment to build global brands from scratch.
Geely has taken the third path: in early years relying on industrial cooperation to complete accumulation, now facing the global market with Geely, Lynk & Co, Zeekr. Even excluding all KD badge swapping, still high-speed growth, firmly holds 3rd place in exports, growth rate is first in the industry. This also means, Geely's overseas expansion has said goodbye to extensive scale competition, entering a system-driven high-quality stage.
