首頁Lexus UX
搜尋歷史
熱門搜尋
經銷商登入 / 註冊
In Malaysia's SUV market, many buyers will compare Proton X70 and Chery Tiggo 8 when choosing a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning. Today we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
Proton X70's OTR price in Malaysia is RM 106,800 - 122,300, with a total of 3 versions, including 1.5L Standard 2WD (RM 106,800), 1.5L Executive 2WD (RM 115,800), 1.5L Premium 2WD (RM 122,300), etc.
Chery Tiggo 8's OTR price in Malaysia is RM 129,750 - 129,750, with a total of 1 version, including 2026 1.6T Standard (RM 129,750), etc.
From a pricing perspective, Proton X70's starting price is indeed RM 22,950 cheaper than Chery Tiggo 8. If your budget is limited, Proton's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. However, note that the savings of a few thousand dollars might involve trade-offs in features, depending on your specific needs.
Proton X70 is equipped with 1.5L Turbo, 140 hp. Official fuel consumption 7.0 L/100km.
Chery Tiggo 8 is equipped with 1.5L Turbo, 140 hp. Official fuel consumption 7.0 L/100km.
Both cars use the same powertrain, so the driving feel is basically the same. Fuel consumption is also similar, so there is no need to stress too much about this.
Proton X70 body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
Chery Tiggo 8 body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
Both cars have almost the same dimensions, and the interior space difference is small. Cars at this level are fully sufficient for daily use.
Proton X70 adopts FWD drive mode.
Chery Tiggo 8 adopts FWD drive mode.
Both cars have the same drive mode, both are FWD, so daily driving experience will not differ too much.
In summary, Proton X70 and Chery Tiggo 8 are both very good models in the Malaysia market. Which one to choose depends mainly on your personal needs and budget. We recommend doing your homework, comparing quotes from several dealerships, and then test driving to make a final decision. Buying a car is a major matter, spending time on research will never be wrong.
In Malaysia's SUV market, many buyers compare the Proton X70 and Toyota Corolla Cross when choosing a car. These two models are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
The OTR price of the Proton X70 in Malaysia is RM 106,800 - 122,300, with a total of 3 variants, including 1.5L Standard 2WD (RM 106,800), 1.5L Executive 2WD (RM 115,800), 1.5L Premium 2WD (RM 122,300), etc.
The OTR price of the Toyota Corolla Cross in Malaysia is RM 133,800 - 148,800, with a total of 3 variants, including 2026 HEV 1.8L GR Sport (RM 148,800), 2026 HEV 1.8L Standard (RM 140,800), 2026 1.8L Standard (RM 133,800), etc.
In terms of price, the Proton X70's starting price is indeed RM 27,000 cheaper than the Toyota Corolla Cross. If your budget is limited, the Proton's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. However, note that the few thousand difference might involve trade-offs in features, depending on your needs.
The Proton X70 is equipped with a 1.5L Turbo engine, 140 hp. Official fuel consumption 7.0 L/100km.
The Toyota Corolla Cross is equipped with a 1.5L Turbo engine, 140 hp. Official fuel consumption 7.0 L/100km.
Both cars use the same powertrain system, and the driving experience feels basically the same daily. Fuel consumption is also similar, so no need to worry too much about this point.
Proton X70 body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
Toyota Corolla Cross body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
The dimensions of both cars are almost the same, with little difference in interior space. Cars in this class are more than enough for daily use.
The Proton X70 uses FWD drive system.
The Toyota Corolla Cross uses FWD drive system.
Both cars use the same drive system, both are FWD, there will not be much difference in daily driving experience.
Proton X70 warranty 5 years/150,000km, service interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Toyota Corolla Cross warranty 5 years/unlimited mileage, service interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Overall, both Proton X70 and Toyota Corolla Cross are excellent models in the Malaysia market. Which one to choose depends on your personal needs and budget. We suggest doing your research, comparing quotes from several car dealers, and then test driving to make a final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending time on research will never go wrong.
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嗰陣都會用 寶騰 X70 同 豐田 Yaris Cross 做比較。呢兩款車喺價位同定位上都幾接近，而家我哋就從多個方面做個詳細比較，幫你省咗做功課嘅時間。
寶騰 X70 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 106,800 - 122,300，一共有 3 個版本，包括 1.5L Standard 2WD（RM 106,800）、1.5L Executive 2WD（RM 115,800）、1.5L Premium 2WD（RM 122,300） 等。
豐田 Yaris Cross 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 99,900 - 109,900，一共有 2 個版本，包括 2026 1.5L Standard（RM 99,900）、2026 HEV 1.5L Standard（RM 109,900） 等。
由價錢睇，豐田 Yaris Cross 嘅起步價比 寶騰 X70 平咗 RM 6,900。坦白講，喺呢個價位段，幾千蚊嘅差距其實唔算大，關鍵仲係睇整體嘅性價比同長期使用成本。
寶騰 X70 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA)。
豐田 Yaris Cross 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 TSS。
呢兩款車嘅安全評級一樣，喺呢個級別入面安全配備都算俾好齊全。而家嘅新車安全性都唔差，唔使太擔心呢一點。
寶騰 X70 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
豐田 Yaris Cross 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
兩款車嘅驅動方式一樣，都係 FWD，日常駕駛感受唔會有太大分別。
寶騰 X70 保修 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
豐田 Yaris Cross 保修 5 年/無限制里程，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
總體嚟講，寶騰 X70 同 豐田 Yaris Cross 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵仲係睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers compare the Proton X70 and Honda HR-V when choosing a car.
The OTR price of Proton X70 in Malaysia is RM 106,800 - 122,300, with a total of 3 versions, including 1.5L Standard 2WD (RM 106,800), 1.5L Executive 2WD (RM 115,800), 1.5L Premium 2WD (RM 122,300), etc.
The OTR price of Honda HR-V in Malaysia is RM 115,900 - 143,900, with a total of 4 versions, including 2026 e:HEV 1.5L RS (RM 143,900), 2026 1.5T V (RM 137,900), 2026 1.5T E (RM 130,900), etc.
From a price perspective, the starting price of Proton X70 is indeed RM 9,100 cheaper than Honda HR-V. If your budget is limited, Proton's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. However, it is also worth noting that the difference of a few thousand may involve compromises in features, depending on your specific needs.
Proton X70 comes with a 1.5L Turbo, 140 hp. Official fuel consumption 7.0 L/100km.
Honda HR-V comes with a 1.5L Turbo, 140 hp. Official fuel consumption 7.0 L/100km.
Both cars use the same powertrain system, the driving experience is basically the same in daily use. Fuel consumption is also similar, so no need to worry too much about this point.
Proton X70 warranty 5 years/150,000km, service interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Honda HR-V warranty 5 years/unlimited mileage, service interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Proton X70 and Honda HR-V are both mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, consider the one with better reputation first; if you care more about cost-performance and features, choose the one with richer configurations. Ultimately, it is recommended to test drive both, as personal experience is the most important.
Overall, Proton X70 and Honda HR-V are both very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose ultimately depends on your personal needs and budget. It is recommended to do your research, compare quotes from several dealerships, and then test drive to make a final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, taking time to do research is never wrong.
7 月 21 日，2026 年《財富》中國 500 強排行榜重磅發布。作為國內輪胎龍頭企業，中策橡膠集團首次強勢登榜，以 6254.6 百萬美元營業收入位列第 343 位。
登陸資本市場首年交出亮眼「成績單」
作為今年榜單中耀眼「新面孔」，中策橡膠喺登陸 A 股資本市場後交出首份年度成績單頗為亮眼。2025 年，公司各項核心指標全面躍昇：實現營業收入 449.56 億元，同比增長 14.52%；淨利潤達 41.47 億元，同比增長 9.51%；扣非淨利潤更係大幅飆漲 22.15% 至 40.58 億元，彰顯卓越市場競爭力同盈利質量。喺業績大增同時，公司拋出超 12 億元慷慨分紅方案，分紅比例高達 30.15%，回饋投資者誠意滿滿。
新能源配套「質變」，產銷兩旺勢頭強勁
業績嘅穩健增長源於核心業務嘅全面開花。作為全球最大嘅全鋼胎製造企業，中策橡膠全鋼胎全球市佔率約 12%，海外銷量增速超 20%，全年產銷率高達 102%，產能利用率幾近滿負荷；半鋼胎業務亦呈現量價齊升態勢，預計 2026 年國內半鋼胎銷量將達到約 4500 萬條。
最大亮點在於新能源配套市場歷史性「質變」。2025 年，公司新能源乘用車配套輪胎超 1070 萬條，不僅率先成為全球首家推出新能源商用車專用輪胎系列嘅企業，更成為比亞迪、小鵬、吉利等頭部新能源車企嘅核心原配輪胎供應商。同時，公司成功實現尊界 S800 典藏版、問界 M6 等中高端標杆車型嘅原配定點，穩步推進鴻蒙智行旗下車型配套進程，打破外資壟斷，實現中國輪胎品牌喺中高端整車配套領域嘅歷史性突破。
研發重倉同 AI 賦能，技術突破引領行業
喺科技創新端，中策橡膠憑藉喺高性能輪胎及綠色智慧製造領域嘅系統性突破，榮獲國家科學技術進步獎二等獎。2025 年，公司研發投入高達 15.43 億元，依托自主研發嘅「天工」同「天璣」兩大核心技術系統，加速前沿科技成果向產業優勢轉化。同時，公司全面加速「未來工廠」建設，大力發展 AI 技術全鏈條應用，以新質生產力為高質量發展注入強勁動能。
全球化產能矩陣，有效對沖貿易風險
喺全球化佈局端，中策橡膠依托泰國、印尼生產基地嘅全面投產，以及越南新基地嘅穩步推進，構建起穩健嘅全球化產能矩陣，境外收入佔比已達 48%，有效對沖咗國際貿易風險。
首次登榜《財富》中國 500 強，係里程碑，更係新起點。未來，中策橡膠將繼續深耕主業，以硬核科技賦能智造，以全球化視野謀發展，為中國輪胎產業嘅全面躍昇貢獻中策力量，堅定不移向住世界一流輪胎企業嘅目標穩步邁進。
In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers compare Proton X50 and Mazda CX-8 when choosing a car. Both cars are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will do a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
The Proton X50 OTR price in Malaysia is RM 89,800 - 113,300, with a total of 4 versions, including 1.5T Executive (RM 89,800), 1.5T Premium (RM 101,800), 1.5T Flagship (RM 113,300), etc.
The Mazda CX-8 OTR price in Malaysia is RM 165,360 - 201,360, with a total of 5 versions, including 2025 2.5T 4WD High Plus Petrol (RM 201,360), 2025 2.2L 2WD High Plus Diesel (RM 193,123), 2025 2.5L 2WD High Plus Petrol (RM 186,360), etc.
From a price perspective, the starting price of Proton X50 is indeed RM 75,560 cheaper than Mazda CX-8. If your budget is limited, Proton's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. But also note, the cheaper few thousand might involve trade-offs in features, depending on your specific needs.
Proton X50's safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
Mazda CX-8's safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include Brand ADAS.
Both cars have the same safety rating, and safety features in this class are quite comprehensive. New cars nowadays generally have good safety, so don't worry too much about this point.
Proton X50 warranty 5 years/150,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Mazda CX-8 warranty 5 years/150,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Both cars have the same warranty conditions, no need to worry about this aspect. Actual maintenance costs depend on the brand's service network and parts prices. It is recommended to ask real owners in car owner groups for their experience.
Both Proton X50 and Mazda CX-8 are mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, prioritize the one with better reputation; if you care more about cost-performance ratio and features, choose the one with richer configuration. Ultimately, it is recommended to test drive both, as personal experience is the most important.
Overall, Proton X50 and Mazda CX-8 are both quite good car models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends on your personal needs and budget. It is recommended to do your research, compare quotes from several dealers, and then test drive to make a final decision. Buying a car is a major event, spending time on research will definitely not go wrong.
In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers compare the Perodua Aruz and Proton X70 when choosing a car.
The Perodua Aruz OTR price in Malaysia is RM 72,900 - 77,900, with a total of 2 versions, including 1.5L X (RM 72,900), 1.5L AV (RM 77,900), etc.
The Proton X70 OTR price in Malaysia is RM 106,800 - 122,300, with a total of 3 versions, including 1.5L Standard 2WD (RM 106,800), 1.5L Executive 2WD (RM 115,800), 1.5L Premium 2WD (RM 122,300), etc.
In terms of price, the Perodua Aruz's starting price is indeed RM 33,900 cheaper than the Proton X70. If your budget is limited, the Perodua entry-level version already meets daily needs. However, also keep in mind that the cheaper price of a few thousand Ringgit may come with trade-offs in features, which depends on your specific requirements.
The Perodua Aruz safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include .
The Proton X70 safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
Both cars have the same safety rating, and safety features in this segment are quite comprehensive. New cars nowadays generally have good safety, so there is no need to worry too much about this.
The Perodua Aruz adopts FWD drive layout.
The Proton X70 adopts FWD drive layout.
Both cars have the same drive layout, both FWD, so daily driving feel will not differ much.
Perodua Aruz warranty 5 years/150,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Proton X70 warranty 5 years/150,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Both cars have the same warranty conditions, no need to worry about this aspect. Actual maintenance costs also depend on the brand's service network and parts prices. It is recommended to ask real owners in car enthusiast groups for experience.
Both Perodua Aruz and Proton X70 are mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, you can prioritize the one with better reputation; if you care more about cost-performance ratio and features, choose the one with richer configuration. Ultimately, it is recommended to test drive both, and personal experience is the most important.
Overall, Perodua Aruz and Proton X70 are both very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends mainly on your personal needs and budget. It is recommended that everyone do their homework, compare quotes from several dealerships, and then test drive to make the final decision. Buying a car is a big deal, spending some time on research will definitely not be wrong.
In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers compare Perodua Ativa and Mazda CX-30 when choosing a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning. Today we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
The OTR price of Perodua Ativa in Malaysia is RM 62,500 - 73,400, with a total of 3 versions, including 1.0L Turbo X (RM 62,500), 1.0L Turbo H (RM 67,300), 1.0L Turbo AV (RM 73,400), etc.
The OTR price of Mazda CX-30 in Malaysia is RM 122,409 - 146,409, with a total of 4 versions, including 2025 2.0L High+ Premium (RM 146,409), 2025 2.0L High+ (RM 138,409), 2025 2.0L High (RM 130,409), etc.
From a price perspective, the starting price of Perodua Ativa is indeed RM 59,909 cheaper than Mazda CX-30. If your budget is limited, Perodua's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. But note, the few thousand dollars saved might mean compromises on features, depending on your needs.
The safety rating of Perodua Ativa is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include ASA 3.0 + ACC + LDA + LKA + BSM + RCTA.
The safety rating of Mazda CX-30 is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include i-Activsense.
Both cars have the same safety rating, safety features are quite comprehensive for this class. New cars nowadays don't lack safety, no need to worry too much about this point.
Perodua Ativa adopts FWD drive system.
Mazda CX-30 adopts FWD drive system.
Both cars have the same drive system, both are FWD, daily driving experience won't differ much.
Both Perodua Ativa and Mazda CX-30 are mainstream choices in the Malaysia market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, you can prioritize the one with better reputation; if you care more about value for money and features, choose the one with richer configuration. Ultimately, we suggest test driving both, personal experience is most important.
Overall, both Perodua Ativa and Mazda CX-30 are very good car models in the Malaysia market. Which one to choose depends on your personal needs and budget. We suggest doing your research, comparing quotes from multiple dealerships, and then test driving to make the final decision. Buying a car is a big deal, taking time to research is never wrong.
As 2026 passes the halfway mark, China's car market has produced a "heaven and hell" half-year report. New energy penetration rate historically broke through 60%, but the completion rate of annual targets for most car companies is generally in the 30% to 40% range. Under pressure on the industry as a whole, SAIC Group became the only Chinese car company to break the 2 million vehicle milestone with a half-year cumulative sales of 2.045 million vehicles, taking the halfway sales crown.
This is not an isolated number. On May 28, SAIC completed the delivery of the 100 millionth vehicle, becoming the first automotive group in the history of China's automobile industry to break 100 million cumulative production and sales, making China officially a country with "100 million-level car companies," and taking the development of China's automobile industry to a new level.
The "speed" of 2.045 million vehicles in half a year and the "accumulation" of 100 million vehicles interweave, letting this 71-year-old car company stand at two unprecedented heights in 2026. But more worthy of inquiry than the numbers is: How was this 100 million accumulated? How was this 2.045 million in half a year driven out?
The Only One Breaking 2 Million in Half a Year
First, look at the "skeleton" of the half-year scorecard. In June, SAIC Group's complete vehicle sales were 395,000 units, up 8.1% year-on-year and 13.1% quarter-on-quarter; cumulative from January to June was 2.045 million vehicles. In terms of total volume, it is the only car company to break 2 million vehicles in the first half of the year, and compared to the second-place car company's 1.8085 million vehicles, the leading advantage is very obvious.
But what is truly worth noting is the internal structural changes in these 2.045 million vehicles.
Independent brand cumulative sales from January to June reached 1.469 million vehicles, up 12.6% year-on-year, accounting for 71.8% of the group's total sales, up 8.3 percentage points compared to the same period last year. In other words, for every 10 vehicles SAIC sells, more than 7 are independent brands. This number was almost unimaginable five years ago.
Looking at segments, SAIC Motor had 549,000 units in half a year, surging 49.4% year-on-year; SAIC Maxus 138,000 units, up 29.1% year-on-year; SAIC-GM-Wuling 681,000 units. IM Motors cumulative sales in the first half were 40,000 units, up 107% year-on-year. The launch of the range-extender large SUV LS8 drove the brand into a new stage of scaled growth.
The new energy sector also accelerated significantly. Cumulative new energy vehicle sales in the first half were 796,000 units, up 23.1% year-on-year. Among them, SAIC Motor new energy vehicles surged 218.1% year-on-year. The MG4 family delivered over 18,000 units in June, breaking 10,000 for 9 consecutive months; Shangjie Z7/Z7T single monthly delivery broke 10,000; Wuling Bingo Pro sales broke 30,000 units 38 days after launch.
Joint venture new energy also entered a growth channel. SAIC-GM new energy reached nearly 50,000 units in half a year, up 81.1% year-on-year; Volkswagen ID. ERA 9X delivered over 10,000 units cumulatively in two months after launch; Audi E7X delivered over 4,000 units in the first month.
The overseas market also contributed strong incremental growth. Cumulative overseas sales in the first half were 735,000 units, up 48.7% year-on-year. The MG brand's cumulative sales in Europe in the first half were nearly 190,000 units, up over 20% year-on-year, ranking as the top selling Chinese brand in Europe for 11 consecutive years.
It should be known that the total volume of China's passenger car market in the first half of this year was under pressure, down nearly 20% year-on-year, with car companies generally "shrinking". Behind SAIC's rising trend against the counter is a clear clue: SAIC's growth engine is switching from joint venture "single-core" to independent, new energy, and overseas "multi-core" drive. This is not a simple sales recovery, but a structural transformation lasting several years is entering the harvest period.
The Global Relay of 100 Million Vehicles
If the 2.045 million vehicles in half a year shows "current speed," then the cumulative 100 million vehicles tells of "the weight of time."
In 1955, Shanghai Internal Combustion Engine Parts Manufacturing Company was established. In 1958, workers hammered out the first "Phoenix" sedan in a small alley factory. In 1983, Santana went off the line, starting joint venture cooperation; Shanghai General was established in 1997; Independent brand Roewe was born in 2006; In 2016, the world's first internet car Roewe RX5 was launched; In 2020, the high-end smart electric brand IM Motors was established.
In 71 years, from "breaking zero" to "100 million vehicles," SAIC's growth trajectory almost overlaps with the evolutionary history of China's automobile industry.
The delivery ceremony on May 28 itself also carried symbolic significance. SAIC did not choose the traditional press conference format, but connected Shanghai's main venue and multiple cities such as the UK, Indonesia, and Singapore with "Global Relay Delivery", with over a dozen brands and 19 models spanning the Eurasian continent completing delivery.
The first 100 millionth delivery model was IM LS9 Hyper, equipped with full-steer-by-wire four-wheel steering, 520-line LiDAR, NVIDIA Thor chip, and all-domain 800V high-voltage platform. The car owner is Momenta CEO Cao Xudong, and Momenta is also SAIC's core strategic partner in the intelligent driving field. "Partner becoming car owner" itself is a very persuasive footnote.
Triple Genes: Breakthrough, Cooperation, Quality
Behind 100 million vehicles and 2.045 million vehicles, if only one main thread can be extracted, it might be the triple cultural genes accumulated by SAIC over 71 years: breakthrough, cooperation, quality, finally settling on SAIC's refined "Understand cars better, understand you better."
Breakthrough is carved into SAIC's bones. Hammering out the Phoenix brand by hand in 1958 was a breakthrough; launching the world's first internet car in 2016 was a breakthrough; today, mass production of semi-solid-state batteries, steer-by-wire, and AI large model landing are still breakthroughs. SAIC has cumulatively invested over 150 billion yuan in R&D over the past decade, possessing nearly 26,000 valid patents. From January to April 2026, SAIC accumulated sales of 1.302 million vehicles, ranking as the top selling Chinese car company for four consecutive months.
Cooperation is the methodology underlying SAIC. From the Santana localization community in the 1980s, to moving from "market for technology" to "technology co-creation" in the JV 2.0 era with Volkswagen, GM, and Audi; from jointly launching the Shangjie brand with Huawei, to deeply co-creating intelligent driving solutions empowering IM, Volkswagen, Audi, Buick, Cadillac and other brands; from joining hands with tech companies like Alibaba, OPPO, ByteDance, SAIC always upholds the open concept of "no technical walls, no ecological islands".
Quality is the most fundamental trust cornerstone. From the "never allow quality substitution" quality commitment during the Santana localization period, to the Magic Cube Battery's "zero spontaneous combustion" safety record, to the European E-NCAP five-star safety certification, quality is the foundation upon which 100 million vehicles were accumulated.
These three genes eventually converge into a core concept: "Understand cars better, understand you better." "Understanding cars" is the extreme pursuit of core technology, "Understanding you" is landing cutting-edge technology into beautiful mobility experiences perceivable by users.
The "Downward Shift" from 60,000 Level to 500,000 Level
The 2.045 million vehicles in the first half of the year is not "resting on past laurels", but more from "innovation". Just from the April Beijing Auto Show to now, SAIC has densely launched over 20 major new cars with a "Independent + Joint Venture + Luxury" full matrix, covering A0 level to full size, 50,000 level to 500,000 level, all technical routes of pure electric/range extender/plug-in hybrid.
In April, IM LS8 launched, full series standard with Star Super Range Extender, steer-by-wire + rear wheel steering, orders broke 8,000 units 1 hour after launch. Shangjie Z7/Z7T dual cars launched together, full series standard with Huawei Qiankun Intelligent Driving ADS 4.1 and 896-line LiDAR, June delivery broke 10,000. Buick Zhijing E7 industry first with Doubao Large Model and Qualcomm 8775 chip, orders broke 10,000 in 90 minutes after launch, first month delivery broke 10,000. 2026 MG4 launched semi-solid battery in 100,000 level market. Roewe i6 full series standard with 8155 chip and Doubao Large Model.
In May, Huajing S launched, full series standard with Huawei Qiankun Intelligent Driving ADS Pro Enhanced Version and HarmonyOS Cockpit, bringing high-level intelligent driving into 150,000 level family market. Audi E7X launched, full series standard with 900V high-voltage platform, quattro 4WD and rear wheel steering. Tiguan L ePro and Passat ePro launched simultaneously, limited-time fixed prices starting at 191,900 yuan and 169,900 yuan respectively, further improving cost-effectiveness.
In June, new Shangjie H5 launched, selling price 159,800 to 199,800 yuan, annual model change completed seven key upgrades. Wuling Star Light L Black Warrior version official images released.
In addition, ID. ERA 5S, Zhijing L7 Pure Electric Version, MG 07 completed declaration; in June, Roewe Jiayue 07, IM LS8 Pure Electric Version, ID. ERA 8X appeared successively. These models will enter the market in the second half of the year, reserving ammunition for subsequent growth.
SAIC's new cars in the first half of the year launched one "hot" after another, one of the most core reasons is the speed of technology "sinking".
In the past, words like "High-level Intelligent Driving", "AI Large Models", "Semi-solid-state Batteries" were often bound with models over 300,000. But in the first half of this year, SAIC broke this line: Roewe i6 at 60,000 level full series standard with 8155 chip and Doubao Large Model; MG4X at 90,000 level full series standard with semi-solid battery and rear drive five-link independent suspension; Buick Zhijing E7 at 150,000 level industry first with Doubao Large Model and Qualcomm 8775 chip; Shangjie at 200,000 level full series standard with Huawei ADS 4.1 and 896-line LiDAR.
Technology is no longer exclusive to high-spec models, but is becoming the "standard configuration" for the entire price band. Market orders are the most direct vote for technology value. When semi-solid batteries, AI large models, and high-level intelligent driving move from the laboratory to mass production, from high-end to universal access, SAIC is verifying a proposition: the value of technology lies not in "whether it has", but in "how many people can use it".
Standing on Two "Firsts"
Half-year 2.045 million vehicles and cumulative 100 million vehicles, the former is speed, the latter is thickness. Speed comes from the accumulation of thickness, thickness expands continuously due to speed.
From the Phoenix brand hammered out in the alley in 1958 to the 2026 IM LS9 Hyper equipped with full steer-by-wire chassis and semi-solid-state batteries; from the "Quality for Survival" of the Santana localization era to the "Tech Equity" of AI large models and high-level intelligent driving today. SAIC's 71-year trajectory is essentially a gradual progress following the times and industry development from "Making Cars" to "Making Good Cars" to "Making Cars That Understand You".
For SAIC, the 2.045 million half-year scorecard and the 100 million historical milestone together constitute two "Firsts" of 2026. But more important than the "Firsts" itself is a fact they point to: This 71-year-old car company is completing the leap from "Scale Leading" to "Quality Leading" and "Tech Equity Leading", to "User Care Leading".
So independent brand share breaking 70%, dual-wheel drive of new energy and overseas, technology moving from reserve to mass production and continuously sinking, these structural changes are the root foundation of sales figures constantly rising, and SAIC is also driving towards a faster lane for grander goals.
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拿 Perodua Aruz 同 Hyundai Tucson 來做比較。呢兩部車喺價位同定位上都相當接近，今日我哋就從多個方面做一個詳細嘅比較，幫你節省做功課嘅時間。
Perodua Aruz 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 72,900 - 77,900，總共有 2 個版本，包括 1.5L X（RM 72,900）、1.5L AV（RM 77,900） 等。
Hyundai Tucson 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 143,888 - 197,888，總共有 5 個版本，包括 2025 HEV 1.6T AT 2WD Prestige（RM 197,888）、2025 1.6T DCT 4WD Prestige（RM 186,888）、2025 1.6T DCT 2WD Prime（RM 164,888） 等。
睇價錢嚟講，Perodua Aruz 嘅起步價確實比 Hyundai Tucson 平咗 RM 70,988。如果你預算有限，Perodua 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需要。但都要注意，平嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備上會有取捨，具體要睇你嘅需要。
Perodua Aruz 裝嵌 1.5L 4-cyl，馬力 105 hp。官方油耗 6.0 L/100km。
Hyundai Tucson 裝嵌 1.5L Turbo，馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。
動力方面，Hyundai Tucson 嘅 1.5L Turbo 比 Perodua Aruz 嘅 1.5L 4-cyl 多咗 35 匹馬力。不過日常喺市區開，兩部車嘅動力都夠用，唔會覺得唔夠勁。
Perodua Aruz 車身長 4400 mm，後備箱 400 L。
Hyundai Tucson 車身長 4400 mm，後備箱 400 L。
兩部車嘅尺寸幾乎一樣，車內空間差別唔大。呢個級別嘅車，日常使用完全夠用。
Perodua Aruz 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
Hyundai Tucson 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
兩部車嘅驅動方式一樣，都係 FWD，日常駕駛感受唔會有太大分別。
總括嚟講，Perodua Aruz 同 Hyundai Tucson 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一部，重點始終係睇你嘅個人需要同預算。建議大家做足功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去做試駕做最後決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對無錯。
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拿 Mazda CX-3 同 Mitsubishi Xforce 嚟做比較。呢兩款車喺價位同定位上都有啲接近，今日我就喺多個方面做一個詳細嘅對比，幫你節省做功課嘅時間。
Mazda CX-3 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 126,159 - 139,159，一共有 2 個版本，包括 2023 2.0L High（RM 139,159）、2023 2.0L Plus（RM 126,159） 等。
Mitsubishi Xforce 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 109,930 - 119,930，一共有 2 個版本，包括 2026 1.5L Ultimate（RM 119,930）、2026 1.5L Urban（RM 109,930） 等。
由價錢睇落，Mitsubishi Xforce 嘅起步價比 Mazda CX-3 平咗 RM 16,229。老實講，喺呢個價位段，幾千蚊嘅差距其實唔算大，關鍵仲係睇整體嘅性價比同埋長期使用成本。
Mazda CX-3 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 i-Activsense。
Mitsubishi Xforce 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 MI-PILOT。
兩款車嘅安全評級一樣，喺呢個級別入面安全配備都算好齊全。而家嘅新車安全性都唔差，唔使太擔心呢一點。
Mazda CX-3 保用 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Mitsubishi Xforce 保用 3 年/100,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Mazda CX-3 同 Mitsubishi Xforce 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更睇重品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰一款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，就揀配置更豐富嗰款。始終都建議兩款都去試駕，親身體驗先係最重要。
總而言之，Mazda CX-3 同 Mitsubishi Xforce 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊輛，關鍵都係要睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對無錯。
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拿 BMW X5 同 Audi Q7 嚟做比較。這兩款車喺價位同定位上都好接近，而家我哋就從多個方面做一個詳細嘅比較，幫你節省做功課嘅時間。
BMW X5 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 470,800 - 470,800，一共有 3 個版本，包括 1.5L Standard（RM 86,300）、1.5L Executive（RM 95,300）、1.5L Premium（RM 103,300） 等。
Audi Q7 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 462,222 - 462,222，一共有 1 個版本，包括 Standard（RM 462,222） 等。
從價錢睇，Audi Q7 嘅起價比 BMW X5 平咗 RM 8,578。老實講，喺呢個價位段，幾千塊嘅差距其實唔算大，關鍵始終係睇整體嘅性價比同長期使用成本。
BMW X5 搭載 3.0L Turbo，馬力 350 hp。官方油耗 12.0 L/100km。
Audi Q7 搭載 3.0L Turbo，馬力 350 hp。官方油耗 12.0 L/100km。
兩款車用緊同一套動力系統，日常開落嚟嘅感覺基本上冇乜分別。油耗方面都差唔多，唔使太計較呢一點。
BMW X5 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA)。
Audi Q7 嘅安全評級係 5★ (Euro NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 Premium ADAS。
安全配備方面，兩款車都拿到唔錯嘅評級。不過 BMW X5 嘅 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA) 同 Audi Q7 嘅 Premium ADAS 喺功能上有啲差異，如果你比較重視主動安全嘅話，可以仔細比較吓兩者嘅功能列表。
BMW X5 保用 5 年/無限里程，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Audi Q7 保用 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
BMW X5 同 Audi Q7 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更加重視品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰款；如果你更加在意性價比同配備，就揀配置更豐富嗰款。最後始終建議兩款都去試駕，親身體驗先係最重要嘅。
總體嚟講，BMW X5 同 Audi Q7 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵始終係睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕先至做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對無錯。
車型概覽
長安UNI-Z 值唔值得睇，第一步唔係望牌子或者外形，而係睇佢能唔能夠配合你嘅香港日常。 呢篇會集中講保險、輪胎、保養同能源開支，幫你用買家角度篩走唔適合嘅選擇。
售價仍待確認，買家可以先把佢放入候選名單，等價格落實後再同同級車逐項比較。
購車價格指南
長安UNI-Z 目前售價仍未清晰，較理性嘅做法係先睇版本、車身大小同動力形式，等價格落實後再決定值唔值得落訂。
如果有幾個版本可揀，可以先將 2025 1.5T 雙離合版（價格待確認） 放喺同一張清單。日常通勤重視舒適同易用，家庭買家就要優先睇後排、尾箱同安全配置。
核心規格重點
睇 長安UNI-Z 嘅規格，重點唔係背數字，而係理解佢喺香港用車場景會帶嚟咩分別。
渦輪增壓、4 個 汽缸、1494 mL 排量 嘅動力底子，重點係市區跟車夠唔夠順、高速巡航會唔會吃力。 188 Ps / 138 kW、300 N·m 嘅輸出，對滿載、上斜同超車都比單睇馬力數字更有意思。 車長 4730 mm、車闊 1890 mm、車高 1680 mm、軸距 2795 mm 可以幫你預判商場停車場、屋苑車位同後排腿部空間。 濕式雙離合(DCT)、前置前駆 會影響起步順滑度、濕地穩定感同長途巡航性格。
優缺點分析
長安UNI-Z 嘅優點唔需要講到天花龍鳳，真正有價值係佢能唔能夠令日常用車更省心：動力輸出對高速同上斜更有底氣、空間同車身尺寸方便家庭買家預判實用性。
要留意嘅係，香港停車場同窄路使用要留意車身闊度、售價未清晰前唔應該太早用性價比落結論。呢啲唔一定係缺點，但係落訂前應該先諗清楚。
買家常見問題
買 長安UNI-Z 之前，真正要問嘅唔係單一規格，而係佢可唔可以融入你每日嘅生活節奏。
常見疑問係「長安 UNI-Z 適合香港家庭代步嗎？」簡單講，長安 UNI-Z 空間實用、舒適靜謐，適合香港小家庭日常使用。 放到實際用車，就係要睇佢對通勤、泊車、家庭乘坐同長期成本有幾大幫助。
同級對比內容
將 長安UNI-Z 放入同級車清單時，唔建議只用外形或者品牌光環決定。比較順序可以係：先等售價落實，再決定佢應該同邊個級距比較、再睇動力係咪足夠應付高速併線同滿載、最後睇車身大小、座位同尾箱是否適合家人。
咁樣篩選會貼近香港買家真實生活：平日塞車、商場泊車、周末去新界、甚至一家人出入，先係一部車每日要面對嘅考驗。
用車全周期指南
擁有 長安UNI-Z 唔係買車一刻就完結，之後仲有保險、輪胎、保養、泊車同日常能源成本要處理。
如果你主要喺市區行，視野、低速順滑度同泊車輔助會好影響心情；如果經常行高速或跨區，座椅舒適度、隔音同動力從容感會更重要。
車型概覽
哈弗M6 值唔值得睇，第一步唔係望牌子或者外形，而係睇佢能唔能夠配合你嘅香港日常。 呢篇會集中講高速巡航、併線同超車信心，幫你用買家角度篩走唔適合嘅選擇。
售價仍待確認，買家可以先把佢放入候選名單，等價格落實後再同同級車逐項比較。
購車價格指南
哈弗M6 目前售價仍未清晰，較理性嘅做法係先睇版本、車身大小同動力形式，等價格落實後再決定值唔值得落訂。
如果有幾個版本可揀，可以先將 2024 1.5T 雙離合版（價格待確認） 放喺同一張清單。日常通勤重視舒適同易用，家庭買家就要優先睇後排、尾箱同安全配置。
核心規格重點
睇 哈弗M6 嘅規格，重點唔係背數字，而係理解佢喺香港用車場景會帶嚟咩分別。
渦輪增壓、4 個 汽缸、1497 mL 排量 嘅動力底子，重點係市區跟車夠唔夠順、高速巡航會唔會吃力。 150 Ps / 110 kW、218 N·m 嘅輸出，對滿載、上斜同超車都比單睇馬力數字更有意思。 車長 4664 mm、車闊 1830 mm、車高 1729 mm、軸距 2680 mm 可以幫你預判商場停車場、屋苑車位同後排腿部空間。 濕式雙離合(DCT)、前置前駆 會影響起步順滑度、濕地穩定感同長途巡航性格。
優缺點分析
哈弗M6 嘅優點唔需要講到天花龍鳳，真正有價值係佢能唔能夠令日常用車更省心：動力輸出對高速同上斜更有底氣、空間同車身尺寸方便家庭買家預判實用性。
要留意嘅係，香港停車場同窄路使用要留意車身闊度、售價未清晰前唔應該太早用性價比落結論。呢啲唔一定係缺點，但係落訂前應該先諗清楚。
買家常見問題
買 哈弗M6 之前，真正要問嘅唔係單一規格，而係佢可唔可以融入你每日嘅生活節奏。
常見疑問係「哈弗 Haval M6 定位係點樣？」簡單講，哈弗 Haval M6 係一款主打性價比嘅超值家用 SUV。 放到實際用車，就係要睇佢對通勤、泊車、家庭乘坐同長期成本有幾大幫助。
同級對比內容
將 哈弗M6 放入同級車清單時，唔建議只用外形或者品牌光環決定。比較順序可以係：先等售價落實，再決定佢應該同邊個級距比較、再睇動力係咪足夠應付高速併線同滿載、最後睇車身大小、座位同尾箱是否適合家人。
咁樣篩選會貼近香港買家真實生活：平日塞車、商場泊車、周末去新界、甚至一家人出入，先係一部車每日要面對嘅考驗。
用車全周期指南
擁有 哈弗M6 唔係買車一刻就完結，之後仲有保險、輪胎、保養、泊車同日常能源成本要處理。
如果你主要喺市區行，視野、低速順滑度同泊車輔助會好影響心情；如果經常行高速或跨區，座椅舒適度、隔音同動力從容感會更重要。
車型概覽
Rolls-Royce Cullinan 值唔值得睇，第一步唔係望牌子或者外形，而係睇佢能唔能夠配合你嘅香港日常。 呢篇會集中講預算、月供同同級定位，幫你用買家角度篩走唔適合嘅選擇。
完稅價 HK$ 7,300,001 令預算位置更清楚，買家可以先估算月供、保險、泊車同日常開支。
購車價格指南
Rolls-Royce Cullinan 嘅購車預算可以先由 完稅價 HK$ 7,300,001 開始計。香港買車唔只係睇車價，月供、保險、牌費、泊車同能源成本都會影響每月壓力。
如果有幾個版本可揀，可以先將 2023 6.7T Standard 4 Seats（HK$ 7,300,001） 放喺同一張清單。日常通勤重視舒適同易用，家庭買家就要優先睇後排、尾箱同安全配置。
核心規格重點
睇 Rolls-Royce Cullinan 嘅規格，重點唔係背數字，而係理解佢喺香港用車場景會帶嚟咩分別。
Rolls-Royce Cullinan 現階段最值得留意係車型定位同版本方向，詳細取捨應該等價格同規格更清楚再作決定。
優缺點分析
Rolls-Royce Cullinan 嘅優點唔需要講到天花龍鳳，真正有價值係佢能唔能夠令日常用車更省心：預算位置清楚，方便同同級車直接比較。
要留意嘅係，最終取捨會落喺版本配置、保險同長期保養成本。呢啲唔一定係缺點，但係落訂前應該先諗清楚。
買家常見問題
買 Rolls-Royce Cullinan 之前，真正要問嘅唔係單一規格，而係佢可唔可以融入你每日嘅生活節奏。
常見疑問係「勞斯萊斯 Rolls-Royce Cullinan 喺香港賣幾錢？」簡單講，2026 款 勞斯萊斯 Rolls-Royce Cullinan Series II 喺香港起價約港幣 $7,500,000 起。 放到實際用車，就係要睇佢對通勤、泊車、家庭乘坐同長期成本有幾大幫助。
同級對比內容
將 Rolls-Royce Cullinan 放入同級車清單時，唔建議只用外形或者品牌光環決定。比較順序可以係：先用 完稅價 HK$ 7,300,001 鎖定預算圈。
咁樣篩選會貼近香港買家真實生活：平日塞車、商場泊車、周末去新界、甚至一家人出入，先係一部車每日要面對嘅考驗。
用車全周期指南
擁有 Rolls-Royce Cullinan 唔係買車一刻就完結，之後仲有保險、輪胎、保養、泊車同日常能源成本要處理。
如果你主要喺市區行，視野、低速順滑度同泊車輔助會好影響心情；如果經常行高速或跨區，座椅舒適度、隔音同動力從容感會更重要。
Let's look at a situation first: In 2025, the single best-selling car model in China was neither the Model Y nor the BYD Qin, but an A0-class pure EV small car with a starting price of under 70,000 yuan — the Geely Xingyuan. With 465,775 units sold annually, it was the best seller across all categories. Including fuel vehicles, SUVs, and MPVs, it ranked first. Equivalent to selling one unit per minute. Cumulative deliveries of 700,000 units were achieved in 573 days, making it the fastest model in the industry to reach this goal.
In Q1 2026, the car went a step further, breaking into the top 3 in global new energy vehicle sales, surpassed only by the Model Y and Model 3, and was the only Chinese brand model to enter this list.
On May 28, it added more. The all-new Geely Xingyuan went on sale, launching four models: 410 km Aspiration Edition, 410 km Riding Wind Edition, 480 km Exploration Edition, 480 km Exploration Plus Edition. Limited-time rights price from 61,800 to 91,800 yuan, launching the banner of "Five Champion Strength Upgrades".
Question arises: Why make such a big overhaul and upgrade for a competitor who has already taken the domestic sales crown? I believe there is only one answer — Geely's ambition is no longer domestic number one, but global new energy vehicle sales number one.
I. From "Domestic Sales Crown" to "Global Top 3", What Makes Xingyuan Qualify?
To understand "why Geely dares to think of global number one", first look at the old model Xingyuan's report card:
In terms of data, from its launch in October 2024 to the new generation upgrade in May 2026, cumulative deliveries reached 700,000 units in 573 days. In 2025, it took the annual best seller across all categories with 465,800 units. Total sales of A0-class pure EV sedans for the year were 1.323 million units, and the Xingyuan accounted for more than 35% of it. For every 3 A0-class EVs sold, one is the Xingyuan.
In terms of overseas, the Xingyuan has entered more than 30 countries and regions under the name EX2. In Brazil, sales broke through 2,300 units in two months after launch. In the Thailand Auto Show, weekly orders reached 3,300 units. It also won two international awards: "Brazilian Best Compact EV of the Year" and "Indonesia Auto Show Favorite EV". In Egypt, one out of every 3 EVs sold is the Xingyuan; pre-sale orders in Mexico exceeded 4,100; monthly registrations in the UK broke 1,000.
In terms of product capability, the old Xingyuan breaking out relied not on a single leading parameter, but on a set of "differentiated competition": Standard rear-drive and multi-link independent suspension across all series. The first to adopt a native architecture in the class, the first to standardize rear-drive independent suspension, the first to undergo global tuning. Wheelbase of 2,650 mm, crossing into the A-class space threshold. All series equipped with CATL cells, laying the trust foundation for range and battery safety.
Behind this combination strategy is a "Three-Pronged Attack" — using A0-class prices, near A-class space, and chassis quality common in 150,000-yuan class cars, competing upwards for family users and downwards for essential commuting groups. The killing power is visible from the sales trend: Monthly sales of the Xingyuan in May 2025 approached 39,000 units, expanded to 46,000 units in August, and in April 2026 it remained at the top with 41,938 units, with a significant gap remaining with competitors.
II. What Did the New Xingyuan Add?
1. Driving Control Upgrade: This time, full-dimensional verification was conducted for different extreme road conditions, comprehensively upgrading the three core experiences of "Driving, Steering, Braking". With the G-TCS 2.0 all-weather anti-slip system retaining rear-drive flexible fun, ensuring no slipping, no skidding, and no rollback on flat roads, slopes, and curves. The new brushless steering system responds twice as fast, supports three steering modes and self-learning at steering neutral position. The G-CST 2.0 all-scenario comfort braking system simulates experienced driver's foot feel, braking without nodding, driving without motion sickness.
2. Powertrain Upgrade: Old model 310 km version upgraded to 410 km, 410 km version upgraded to 480 km, all series range upgraded. Batteries still use CATL exclusive custom new generation cells, energy density 190 Wh/kg. It is the only A0-class EV small car in the class with all series standard CATL cells, liquid cooling temperature control, and 11-in-1 highly integrated electric drive. In terms of refueling, 30%-80% fast charging only takes 19 minutes. Liquid cooling system and new BMS ensure full-speed charging whether cold or hot, without sacrificing battery life.
3. AI Smart Cockpit Upgrade: Equipped with Galaxy Flyme Auto 2 smart cockpit system, based on 7-nanometer automotive grade Dragon Eagle 1 chip, 16GB RAM plus 128GB storage. 14.6-inch central control screen supports CarPlay, Huawei HiCar, Carlink full-domain connectivity. Voice Assistant Hi Eva supports fuzzy command understanding and context memory. Saying "I want to go home" automatically calls the latest Amap Version 850 to select the optimal route.
4. ADAS Upgrade: This is the most core change — equipped with the Qianli Haohan ADAS H3 solution, same source as high-end models. Highway/Roadside NOA is not restricted by roads and rain/fog weather, supports voice lane change, multi-scenario avoidance and automatic on/off ramp. Full-scenario MPI takeover rate exceeds 200 km. Parking can achieve full-scenario adaptation. APA parking assist supports one-touch parking, fingertip parking, remote control parking, covering more than 300 scenarios. HPA memory parking supports 2 km ultra-long memory, centimeter-level precision positioning. Learning a route once allows full automatic parking, with smart car following, auto spot finding, obstacle avoidance functions. Temporary route change requires no relearning.
III. Market Comparison
In 2026, the A0-class pure EV market competition intensity is more than one level higher than in the previous two years:
In terms of product capability, A0-class pure EVs have entered the "whether good" stage from "whether available". Xingyuan's advantage is that chassis quality and space performance are at the top level in the class. 2,650 mm wheelbase brought class-upgrade space, rear-drive independent suspension chassis layout. This is an extremely scarce combination in this price segment. Qianli Haohan H3 ADAS solution and Flyme Auto 2 cockpit system belong to Geely ecosystem capability downward release. The integrity and usability of intelligence have obvious generational gap advantages in the class. 19-minute fast charging brings substantive improvement to charging convenience.
In terms of market landscape, A0-class car retail volume reached 1.13 million units in 2025, up 59% year-on-year, one of the fastest-growing niche markets. Participants accelerated entry, Wuling Bingo S range pulled to 525 km, MG4 pricing dropped forming cross-boundary competition. But the turning point appeared in 2026 — purchase tax subsidy adjusted from full exemption to half collection, forming direct impact on the A0-class user group with extremely high price sensitivity. Small EV market growth slowed significantly in the first quarter. Some competitor models in April sales dropped more than 50% year-on-year. The market is undergoing drastic structural adjustment.
IV. Conclusion
Back to the question at the beginning: Is the all-new Geely Xingyuan enhancement aiming to seize the top spot in global new energy vehicle sales? My judgment is: Yes, but the path is not through a single hit product, but through global system capability. And this upgrade of the new Xingyuan can be called "Champion's Re-layout". It is not passive response, but adding more to actively open up a new gap before the opponent catches up. For it, the technical route has been chosen correctly, and market trends are also on its side. What remains to be seen is execution.
Folks, today let's talk about big news on going global—not selling cars, but selling "drivers". On June 2, WeRide and Uber jointly announced a plan: to launch the country's first commercial Robotaxi pilot service in Madrid, Spain. In other words: Spanish residents will soon be able to hail a driverless taxi via Uber. This is the first time WeRide and Uber are partnering to enter the European market. Madrid also becomes the 12th city globally where WeRide's Robotaxi arrives.
According to official news, with the support of the Madrid regional government, this service will officially launch within this year. At that time, friends in Madrid can open the Uber App and call WeRide's Robotaxi with one click. It's just like calling an ordinary ride-hailing service, the difference is the arriving car has no driver—at least initially, there is still a difference. In the initial operation phase, a professionally trained safety monitor will be on board, as it's just launched, safety comes first.
This company, WeRide, you might have heard of it, or you might not. A brief introduction: Established in 2017, it has been dedicated to Robotaxi technology R&D and commercialization. Currently, its Robotaxis cover Guangzhou, Beijing, Singapore, Abu Dhabi, Dubai, Riyadh, Zurich... plus Madrid now, totaling 12 cities. Spain is also the 5th European market WeRide has entered—previously entered Switzerland, France, Belgium, Slovakia. According to the plan agreed by WeRide and Uber in May 2025, they plan to deploy Robotaxi services in 15 new international cities within five years, deploying tens of thousands of Robotaxis globally. With the Madrid launch, the deployment in 4 cities has been completed, and 11 more will be covered successively before 2030.
To be honest, it's not the first time Chinese autonomous driving companies are going global, but the combination of Chinese technology + global mobility platform + European market is quite interesting. Madrid is one of the European Robotaxi markets with the most commercial potential, with a large population, high travel demand, and friendly local policies. Being able to take root in this market is a significant milestone for WeRide. For Uber, introducing Robotaxis is also a way to reduce costs—after all, drivers don't need salaries. For Madrid residents, hailing a taxi might be cheaper in the future.
唔知有幾多朋友最近期關注 10 萬內純電 SUV 市場？近段時間睇嚟，呢個細分市場好熱鬧。就講長安啟源全新 Q05 同零跑 A10，上個月銷量分別達 15814 輛同 14372 輛，全部挺進 2026 年 4 月銷量排行全品類前 10，長安啟源全新 Q05 甚至奪得緊緊湊型純電 SUV 市場嘅銷冠。
（長安啟源全新 Q05）
值得留意係，兩款大熱門產品亮點亦唔少，9 萬級可以得到 500km+嘅續航，零跑 A10 甚至配備激光雷達，有高級智駕輔助需求嘅朋友嚟講，呢架車吸引力的確唔低。但係喺價格上，同為高配嘅長安啟源全新 Q05 506Max+ 同零跑 A10 505 激光雷達版，終端價格分別係 9.59 萬同 8.68 萬，手握 9 萬左右預算嘅朋友都可以考慮。明顯係，又去到決賽圈二揀一環節。
（零跑 A10）
如果對預算比較敏感，咁喺長安啟源全新 Q05 同零跑 A10 之間，後者可能更受歡迎，畢竟終端價格實打實平咗幾千元。而且，高配 A10 配有激光雷達，市區/高速情況均能啟動領航輔助駕駛，呢個就係佢嘅優勢所在。當然，如果預算允許，揀長安啟源全新 Q05 高配，都有帶激光雷達嘅高級輔助駕駛。
（長安啟源全新 Q05）
但既然係買車前嘅橫評，唔少全方位對比。首先從尺寸睇，作為緊湊型 SUV，長安啟源全新 Q05 長寬高分別係 4435*1855*1595mm，軸距為 2735mm。而零跑 A10 車型級別就係小型 SUV，長寬高分別係 4270*1810*1635mm，軸距為 2605mm。
（零跑 A10）
如果只係考慮代步、通勤，零跑 A10 嘅細個嘅略有優勢，方便行街串巷。但實際上，好多人買車都要兼顧家用，10 萬內預算也多以剛需用車群體為主。既然係剛需，且有家用需求，嗰空間自然唔好掉鏈子。
（長安啟源全新 Q05）
（零跑 A10）
講返日常家庭出行嚟講，兩車之間 130mm 軸距差異，直接反映喺後排體驗。坐入長安啟源全新 Q05 後排，腿部空間平整兼寬敞，一齊坐 3 位成年人都唔會太擠；但係坐入零跑 A10 後排，無論坐寬定係腿部空間都會細少少。媽咪喺後排照顧孩子，長安啟源全新 Q05 後排更加寬敞嘅空間會更加方便佢操作，孩子都能有更大嘅活動空間。
（長安啟源全新 Q05）
（零跑 A10）
除咗空間，通勤黨同家庭用戶對舒適配置都比較關注。睇嚟對比，兩車都有配電動尾門、無匙進入、自適應遠近光等外部配置。但係從車廂內睇，零跑 A10 副駕無法電動調節，後排靠背都唔支援角度調節，同埋缺少後排空調出風口、車內 PM2.5 過濾裝置等。
（長安啟源全新 Q05）
（零跑 A10）
反觀長安啟源全新 Q05，除咗副駕支持電動調節，前排仲集成咗加熱/通風/按摩/副駕腿托功能，對比零跑 A10 只提供前排座椅加熱，佢嘅品質無疑更上一層樓。包括後排乘員都有少少照顧，例如靠背角度可調、配有後排空調出風口、後排中央扶手/杯架等，更加適合家人同行呢類場景。
（長安啟源全新 Q05）
（零跑 A10）
除咗舒享體驗，行駛系統嘅對比我哋都唔好忽略。首先從大家關注嘅續航睇，長安啟源全新 Q05 同零跑 A10 分別搭載 51.9kWh、53kWh 電池，CLTC 純電續航做到 506km、505km，差異大可忽略。但從電芯供應鏈睇，前者出自寧德時代，後者就係國軒高科/江蘇正力，若論品牌含金量，“寧王”順位自然靠前，更值得信賴。另外，兩車都有全球品質，按照全球嚴苛嘅標準打造，零跑 A10 符合國內、歐盟雙標準，長安啟源全新 Q05 已經喺泰國上市，未來仲會相繼落地多個國家地區，最終開拓歐洲區域，此外仲有央企背書，質量品質都好可靠。
因為本文討論嘅係 A10 嘅 505 版本，採用電池液冷技術，溫控較好，而如果係 403 版本，採用成本低嘅風冷技術，散熱效果較差。呢點上，全新 Q05 做得更好，入門就採用電池直冷技術，高配用嘅係液冷技術，能更好地實現熱管理，保證電池安全。
（長安啟源全新 Q05）
（零跑 A10）
動力方面，長安啟源全新 Q05 同零跑 A10 都係前置單電機佈局，電機最大動力輸出分別係 120kW/190N·m、90kW/150N·m，0-100km/h 加速時間分別做到 8.9 秒同 10.6 秒。坦率嚟講，兩款車喺純電陣營加速性能都中規中矩；但係相對嚟講，長安啟源全新 Q05 嘅 8 秒級零百加速，喺山路行駛、高速超車等情況下會比零跑 A10 更加分。
（長安啟源全新 Q05）
（零跑 A10）
總結嚟講，零跑 A10 505 激光雷達版優勢突出：價格更低、智駕輔助覆蓋範圍更廣，適合預算優先 + 科技嘗鮮嘅消費者。而長安啟源全新 Q05 更強調“全面”二字：加少少預算同樣可以獲得高級輔助駕駛，而且尺寸更大、舒適配置更高、採用頭部電芯供應鏈，動力亦更強，綜合表現更全能。總括嚟講，預算 9 萬級追求面面俱到嘅家用體驗，長安啟源全新 Q05 506Max+ 更加值得考慮。
你睇過印度嘅馬路嗎？
我喺網上見過。
畫面通常係咁，一輛轎車俾牛尾擋住，旁邊仲有亂竄嘅摩托，甚至周圍仲有賣奶茶嘅小夥，嗰叫一個“乾淨又衛生”。
然而，喺呢啲睇完好多人覺得生理不適嘅地方，豐田、鈴木、本田等日本車廠，卻決定將籌碼押落印度。
據印度“品牌質量基金會”網站顯示，三家車廠將喺印度投資近110 億美元建廠、提產能、搞出口。
對此有网友表示，三家日本車廠係咪錢多到無處花？
事實上，佢哋唔係錢多到花唔完，亦唔係被印度嘅咖哩蒙蔽咗心竅，呢啲日本車廠高層遠比我哋清醒。
而家嘅日系車，營業額、市場份額都喺下滑，原材料成本仲係升得飛起，打開世界地圖，搵一個能夠容納產能、拓充份額、競爭溫和嘅市場，唔係咁容易嘅事。
所以，唔係日本車廠選擇咗印度，而係因為冇得揀。
日本車廠之痛
曾經嘅日系車，嗰時妥妥係人哋個仔。
你問下十幾年前開過日系車嘅老司機，一提起日系車，幾乎就冇唔豎大拇指嘅，價錢平、省油、耐用又抵撞……
甚至好多日系車，仲要加價購買，但邊個諗到，呢個鐵打嘅江山，短短幾年時間就俾佢哋打得找唔著北。
隨著新能源汽車浪潮嚟到，電動化、智能化變成好多自主車廠“彎道超車”嘅目標，依托於中國強大嘅新能源汽車產業鏈優勢同車廠自身對研發、技術嘅堅持，中國自主品牌迅速實現咗“彎道超車”。
曾經被人吐槽嘅國產車，而家喺馬路越來越多人，甚至份額超越咗合資。
根據乘聯會嘅數據，喺2026 年4 月，自主品牌嘅份額已經高達62.5%，遠超日系嘅13.1%。
要知道，中國汽車市場係全球最大嘅汽車市場，喺中國市場失速，就相當於丟咗一塊巨大嘅蛋糕。
同時，中國市場近年嚟嘅主旋律依舊係價格戰，捲配置、捲價格、捲服務已經成為一種常態，亦對日系車嘅利潤產生咗巨大嘅影響。
除咗中國，日系車喺美國過得亦唔太好。
2025 年 1 月 20 日，特朗普宣誓就職第 47 任美國總統，自此開啟咗一連串搞搞震，其中就包括以國家安全為理由徵收額外嘅汽車關稅，導致進口日本汽車嘅關稅稅率一度高達 27.5%，雖然後嚟有所降低，但亦遠高於最初嘅稅率。
呢個操作，直接導致七大日本車廠喺2025 財政年度嘅關稅損失超2 萬億日元。
再睇日本本土，其實亦唔容易。
中東地緣衝突導致霍爾木茲海峽航運受阻，運輸成本、原材料成本暴漲，日本車廠都有苦難言。
高管們看著報表，背後發涼，只能尋找全新嘅增長曲線。
所以，日本車廠唔係愛上印度，係冇地方去。
揀選印度嘅深思熟慮
咁，印度點解咁有魔力，先至令日本車廠重資投入呢？
第一個優勢就係大。喺2025 年，印度汽車市場取得咗551.7 萬輛嘅新車銷量，同比增長 6%，刷新咗歷史紀錄，位居全球第三大汽車市場，已经连续四年超越日本，僅次於中國同美國。
呢個含金量唔使多講啦，而印度取得呢一成績，主要係因為印度一直喺推動減稅政策，促進消費，這導致國內消費意願出現咗明顯增強。
第二個優點係近，就係離日系車賣得動嘅地方近，如非洲等其他地區。
所以，印度對於日本車廠，更似一個建喺十字路口中央嘅便利店，你唔使將車分別運去八個國家，只需要喺印度呢站造好，然後一船一船甩去，就能削減唔少成本。
《日本經濟新聞》亦認為，印度有望轉變為佢哋全球嘅汽車供應中心。
第三個優點係穩。要知道，日系車嘅優勢就係燃油車，畢竟引擎、變速箱、底盤三大件，佢哋已經玩咗好多年，技術積累喺全球都係數一數二。
但係中國汽車市場已經全力推動電動化、智能化發展，導致日系車嘅優勢越來越弱，根本無法發揮出嚟，但印度唔一樣，佢擁有充電樁少、電動化進程緩慢嘅特點，印度老百姓買車，都仲係盯住平、省油、易修，而呢三點正係日系車嘅老本行。
尤其係鈴木，一直係印度汽車市場嘅常青樹，幾乎年年穩坐暢銷車型寶座，口碑好，勝過任何廣告。
所以，日本車廠大力佈局印度市場，顯然是經過深思熟慮嘅。
但，印度市場真係咁好混咩？
難啃嘅印度市場
當然，印度亦唔係完美得似個香口格，佢嘅缺點同佢嘅優點一樣明顯，而且每一個都夠日本車廠喝一壺。
先講電動化，冇錯，眼睇下印度充電樁少、電動車賣唔動，確實係日系燃油車嘅避風港。但你得諗諗，呢個“避風港”能避幾耐？
印度此前可係喊出咗 2030 年電動車佔新車 30% 嘅口號，雖然聽落似吹水，但抵唔住人哋真補錢、真建充電站。
試諗下，萬一有日印度突然開竅，開始大力推動電動化、搞基建，充電樁似雨後春筍咁冒出來，嗰日系車唔就傻眼？
呢唔係泰國市場嘅翻版咩？
當年日系車喺泰國都係躺贏，整個東南亞市場，都被稱為日系車嘅後花園，結果泰國率先推動電動化，中國電動車一嚟，直接就成咗香口格，再睇日系車，喺泰國嘅市場份額嘩嘩嚟咗落。
如果印度係電動化一加速，歷史大概率會重演，而而家呢次，日系車連逃嘅地方都快冇咗，點樣預防，將成為日本車廠嘅首要問題。
再講政策，印度嘅政策就似一鍋咖哩，你永遠唔知下一口食到係雞肉定係馬鈴薯。
呢個魔幻嘅國家，今日係低關稅鼓勵建廠，明日就可能罰你一筆巨款，更令人頭痛嘅係強制合資，外國車廠想喺印度賣車，要搵本地夥伴搭檔，等你工廠建好咗、供應鏈搭完咗，印度直接背刺你，到嗰陣無論係加錢定撤資，換嚟嘅都係心痛。
所以你看，印度呢個市場，就好似一個睇落好甜嘅芒果，咬落去第一口仲行，再啃幾口就摸著硬核。
日系車而家嘅算盤係，趁住核都未硌牙，趕緊多啃幾口，但核遲早會硌到，只係唔知係邊一日。
尾聲
日系車呢趟印度之旅，唔係去旅遊，係去搵食。
中國同東南亞嘅飯桌更擁擠，生產、運輸嘅成本又提高咗，放眼全球，就印度呢口鍋仲冒住熱氣，哪怕入面煮嘅係咖哩味嘅石頭，都要硬著頭皮啃落去。
日本車廠想擴大市場，印度想嘅係拉動經濟、解決就業，雙方都有各自嘅心思。
至於結局係日系車喺印度重新封神，定係好似當年嘅部分友商一樣灰溜溜走人，那就唔知啦。
但無論點樣，呢場戲先至開始，我哋慢慢睇就得啦。
反正印度嘅故事，從來唔會悶。
In May, China's automotive market overall presented a gentle recovery trend, with domestic brands still being the sales backbone of the market. Recently, BYD, Geely, Chery, Changan, and Great Wall, the top 5 domestic automakers, successively released their monthly performance reports. From the data, these five companies show a general characteristic of "stable total growth, divergence between domestic and international markets, and accelerated new energy penetration". Overseas exports and new energy vehicles have become the most core growth engines; export business has evolved from a "bonus item" to the "core foundation" for some companies. BYD's "dominant leader" status is further consolidated, Chery achieved high growth via exports, Geely's new energy penetration rate broke 56%, Changan focused steadily on balanced development, while Great Wall appeared slightly under pressure during structural transformation.
BYD: Export Hits New High Becomes Biggest HighlightIn May, BYD stood firmly at the top of domestic brands with a monthly sales volume of 383,500 vehicles, maintaining positive growth both year-on-year and month-over-month under a large base. Its two main brands, Dynasty and Ocean, sold a combined 330,200 vehicles, contributing 86.1% of total sales; Fangchengbao's monthly sales broke 30,000 units to reach 30,200, a year-on-year increase of 139.7%, setting a new high for the year; Denza sold 16,300 vehicles, and Yangwang delivered 286 vehicles. From a model perspective, BYD had eight models in May with monthly sales exceeding 20,000 vehicles. The Song Family and Yuan Family both broke 50,000 units, selling 51,370 and 56,691 vehicles respectively. The Sea Lion Family followed closely with 42,615 vehicles, and Seagull sales were also close to 40,000 vehicles.
BYD's biggest highlight in May was exports. Overseas new energy vehicle sales reached 160,600 units, an 80.4% year-on-year increase, accounting for about 42%. The sharp expansion of export scale effectively countered the phased weakness in domestic demand. Cumulative exports from January to May exceeded 620,000 vehicles. High export growth mainly benefited from continued ramping up of overseas factory capacity, improved ocean shipping capacity, and accelerated channel network expansion. In the domestic market, BYD promoted Megawatt Super Charging and intelligent strategies simultaneously—Megawatt charging achieved about 90% charge in 9 minutes; 20,000 super charging stations are planned to be built by 2026; all series models are available with Sky Eye B intelligent driving solutions and city navigation safety fallback plans, accelerating the popularization of high-level intelligent driving. As Gen 2 Blade Battery capacity gradually releases, the company's orders are expected to continue rising.
Chery: Sales Growth Leads the Top 5Chery Group's total sales volume in May was 247,800 vehicles, a significant year-on-year increase of 20.5%, ranking first in growth speed among the top 5. Exports remained its most core growth engine—May exports reached 181,900 vehicles, an 80.5% year-on-year increase, accounting for 73.4% of total sales that month, continuously breaking the single-month export record for Chinese brands for three months. In terms of new energy, Chery New Energy sold 100,300 vehicles, a 58.8% year-on-year increase. April and May consecutively saw monthly new energy sales breaking 100,000 vehicles.
The strong performance in exports benefited from Chery's long-term deep cultivation of overseas channel advantages and localized operation capabilities. While overseas orders continued to rise, high export growth formed a sharp contrast with domestic sales—Chery's domestic sales in May were only 60,000 vehicles, accounting for one-quarter of total sales. From cumulative data, Chery Group accumulated 1.101 million sales from January to May, but against the annual goal of 3.2 million vehicles, monthly averages need to reach about 420,000 vehicles later, and pressure remains significant.
Geely: New Energy Penetration Rate Breaks 56%Geely Auto's total sales volume in May was 237,600 vehicles, a 1% year-on-year increase, achieving month-over-month double growth for three consecutive months. In terms of structure, Geely's "New Four Transformations" transformation showed significant results: new energy vehicle sales reached 133,400 units, accounting for 56% of total sales, with new energy share exceeding 50% for four consecutive months.
From sub-brands, performance was significantly divergent. Zeekr brand sales in May reached 34,400 vehicles, a 82% year-on-year increase; Zeekr 9 Series and 8 Series models combined sales approached 50% of total sales, showing bright performance in the high-end market; Galaxy brand sales were 81,700 vehicles; Geely brand sales were 182,500 vehicles, among which China Star Series sales reached 100,800 vehicles; Lynk & Co brand sales were 20,700 vehicles, with new energy vehicle sales share rising to 71%.
In terms of exports, Geely's overseas vehicle exports in May reached 85,100 vehicles, a explosive 184% year-on-year increase, setting a brand single-month export record high. Among exported products, new energy vehicles reached 40,800 units, accounting for nearly half; hybrid and pure electric products have successively landed in Southeast Asia, Middle East, Latin America, and other markets, highlighting the results of global strategy implementation.
Changan: Multi-brand Matrix Balanced EffortChangan Auto's delivery volume in May was 209,100 vehicles, among which new energy deliveries were 92,400 vehicles, a 5.8% year-on-year increase, with new energy share about 44%. In terms of exports, overseas deliveries reached 70,700 vehicles, a 38% year-on-year increase, becoming another major growth highlight for Changan in May.
In the sub-brand matrix, Changan Qiyuan delivered 34,500 vehicles in May; All-New Q05 delivered 15,800 units, with orders breaking 3,000 units within three days of listing in Thailand; Deepal sales in May were 33,200 vehicles, a 30% year-on-year increase; January to May overseas cumulative sales were 28,700 vehicles, a significant 167% year-on-year increase; Avatr delivered 7,336 vehicles in May; Changan Auto (Gravity) delivered nearly 49,000 vehicles in May.
Changan Auto's balanced layout was fully reflected in May: the fuel car base remained stable, new energy brands Deepal and Qiyuan accelerated volume growth, high-end brand Avatr continued to break through in technical cooperation, and overseas markets simultaneously achieved breakthrough growth. The pattern of five brands working together, driven by both new energy and exports, is initially taking shape.
Great Wall: Overseas Sales Growth Year-on-Year 46.75%Great Wall Motor's sales in May were 100,400 vehicles, slightly down compared to last May's 102,200 vehicles, making it the only company among the top 5 to show a year-on-year negative growth. From sub-brands, Haval brand sales in May were 55,500 vehicles, remaining Great Wall's most important sales pillar; Tank brand sales were 17,100 vehicles; both Haval and Tank brand sales showed year-on-year declines; Wey brand sold 8,119 vehicles, a 31.78% year-on-year increase, achieving growth against the trend; Ora brand performance was most stunning, with sales of 6,018 vehicles, a significant 206.88% year-on-year increase. In terms of new energy, Great Wall sold 30,400 new energy vehicles in May, with new energy vehicle transformation gradually accelerating.
The overseas market became Great Wall's biggest highlight in May, with overseas sales growing 46.75% year-on-year. Against the background of pressure on the domestic market, strong growth in overseas business effectively made up for the decline in the domestic market. Great Wall Motor's current core contradiction lies in: Haval and Tank, the two traditional main-selling brands, face weak growth, while Wey and Ora brands, although growing notably, have relatively small volume and are not yet enough to support overall growth. How to complete the "relay" between old and new brands is the key issue Great Wall must solve subsequently.
Final ThoughtsFrom May data, the growth pattern of the top 5 domestic brands has clearly diverged, but there are three common trends worth noting: First, exports have become a key engine for domestic brands to seek stability and growth. Second, new energy transformation is still accelerating, but paths differ among enterprises. Third, technological innovation continues to deepen brand moats. Looking ahead to the second half of the year, competition in the automotive industry will continue to upgrade around these three trends. Although everyone has a common direction, these three trends are all competing for the entire enterprise's industrial chain strength, and the strong will remain strong, which has almost become an inevitable outcome.
