首頁Laurel C35
搜尋歷史
熱門搜尋
經銷商登入 / 註冊
In Malaysia's SUV market, many buyers compare Proton X70 and Chery Tiggo 8 when choosing a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning. Today we will do a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time doing research.
The OTR price of Proton X70 in Malaysia is RM 106,800 - 122,300, with a total of 3 versions, including 1.5L Standard 2WD (RM 106,800), 1.5L Executive 2WD (RM 115,800), 1.5L Premium 2WD (RM 122,300) etc.
The OTR price of Chery Tiggo 8 in Malaysia is RM 129,750 - 129,750, with a total of 1 version, including 2026 1.6T Standard (RM 129,750) etc.
From the price perspective, the starting price of Proton X70 is indeed RM 22,950 cheaper than Chery Tiggo 8. If your budget is limited, the Proton entry-level version can already meet daily needs. However, keep in mind, the cheaper few thousand might involve trade-offs in equipment, depending on your specific needs.
Proton X70 is equipped with 1.5L Turbo, horsepower 140 hp. Official fuel consumption 7.0 L/100km.
Chery Tiggo 8 is equipped with 1.5L Turbo, horsepower 140 hp. Official fuel consumption 7.0 L/100km.
Both cars use the same powertrain system, the driving feel is basically the same in daily use. Fuel consumption is also similar, no need to worry too much about this.
The safety rating of Proton X70 is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
The safety rating of Chery Tiggo 8 is TBD, active safety systems include Basic.
Regarding safety equipment, both cars received good ratings. However, the ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA) of Proton X70 and the Basic of Chery Tiggo 8 have some differences in functions. If you value active safety more, you can compare the function lists of both carefully.
Proton X70 Warranty 5 years/150,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Chery Tiggo 8 Warranty 3 years/100,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Overall, Proton X70 and Chery Tiggo 8 are both very good car models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose mainly depends on your personal needs and budget. It is recommended that everyone do their homework, compare quotes from several dealerships, and go for a test drive to make the final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending some time doing research will never be wrong.
In Malaysia's SUV market, many buyers compare Proton X70 and Chery Tiggo Cross when selecting a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time doing research.
Proton X70 has an OTR price in Malaysia of RM 106,800 - 122,300, with a total of 3 versions, including 1.5L Standard 2WD (RM 106,800), 1.5L Executive 2WD (RM 115,800), 1.5L Premium 2WD (RM 122,300), etc.
Chery Tiggo Cross has an OTR price in Malaysia of RM 88,750 - 99,750, with a total of 2 versions, including 2025 HEV 1.5L CSH (RM 99,750), 2025 1.5T Standard (RM 88,750), etc.
In terms of price, the starting price of Chery Tiggo Cross is RM 18,050 cheaper than Proton X70. Honestly, in this price range, a difference of a few thousand is actually not significant; the key is to look at overall value for money and long-term usage costs.
Proton X70's safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
Chery Tiggo Cross's safety rating is TBD, active safety systems include Basic.
Regarding safety features, both cars received good ratings. However, there are some differences in functionality between Proton X70's ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA) and Chery Tiggo Cross's Basic. If you value active safety, you can carefully compare the feature lists of both.
Proton X70 body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
Chery Tiggo Cross body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
The dimensions of both cars are almost the same, and the interior space is not very different. This level of car is completely sufficient for daily use.
Proton X70 warranty 5 years/150,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Chery Tiggo Cross warranty 3 years/100,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Overall, Proton X70 and Chery Tiggo Cross are both very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose mainly depends on your personal needs and budget. It is recommended that you do your research, compare quotes from several dealerships, and then go for a test drive to make a final decision. Buying a car is a major matter, taking time to do research will definitely not be wrong.
In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers compare Proton X70 and Toyota Yaris Cross when choosing a car. Both cars are quite close in price and positioning. Today we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time doing research.
Proton X70's OTR price in Malaysia is RM 106,800 - 122,300, with a total of 3 versions, including 1.5L Standard 2WD (RM 106,800), 1.5L Executive 2WD (RM 115,800), 1.5L Premium 2WD (RM 122,300), etc.
Toyota Yaris Cross's OTR price in Malaysia is RM 99,900 - 109,900, with a total of 2 versions, including 2026 1.5L Standard (RM 99,900), 2026 HEV 1.5L Standard (RM 109,900), etc.
From a price perspective, the starting price of Toyota Yaris Cross is RM 6,900 cheaper than Proton X70. Honestly, in this price range, the difference of a few thousand is not really significant, the key lies in overall cost-effectiveness and long-term usage costs.
Proton X70's safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
Toyota Yaris Cross's safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include TSS.
Both cars have the same safety rating. In this class, safety features are quite comprehensive. New cars nowadays are not lacking in safety, so no need to worry too much about this point.
Proton X70 body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
Toyota Yaris Cross body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
Both cars have almost the same dimensions, interior space difference is not big. For this class of cars, daily usage is completely sufficient.
Proton X70 adopts FWD drive mode.
Toyota Yaris Cross adopts FWD drive mode.
Both cars have the same drive mode, both are FWD, daily driving experience will not have too big of a difference.
Overall, Proton X70 and Toyota Yaris Cross are both very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends on your personal needs and budget. We recommend doing your research, compare quotes from several dealerships, then go for a test drive to make a final decision. Buying a car is a big thing, spending some time doing research is never wrong.
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拿 Proton X50 同 Subaru Forester 嚟做比較。呢兩款車喺價位同定位上都幾接近，今日我哋就從多個方面做一個詳細嘅對比，幫你省咗做功課嘅時間。
Proton X50 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 89,800 - 113,300，一共有 4 個版本，包括 1.5T Executive（RM 89,800）、1.5T Premium（RM 101,800）、1.5T Flagship（RM 113,300） 等。
Subaru Forester 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 174,000 - 197,000，一共有 3 個版本，包括 2024 2.0L S EyeSight GT Edition（RM 189,538）、2024 2.0L S EyeSight（RM 177,538）、2024 2.0L L EyeSight（RM 167,538） 等。
從價錢嚟睇，Proton X50 嘅起步價確實比 Subaru Forester 平咗 RM 84,200。如果你預算有限，Proton 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需求。但要留意，平嗰啲幾千蚊，可能喺配備上會有取捨，具體要睇你嘅需求。
Proton X50 搭載 1.5L 4-cyl，馬力 105 hp。官方油耗 6.0 L/100km。
Subaru Forester 搭載 2.0L 4-cyl，馬力 170 hp。官方油耗 8.0 L/100km。
動力方面，Subaru Forester 嘅 2.0L 4-cyl 比 Proton X50 嘅 1.5L 4-cyl 多咗 65 匹馬力。不過日常喺市區開，兩款車嘅動力都夠用，唔會覺得唔夠力。
Proton X50 車身長 4400 mm，後備箱 400 L。
Subaru Forester 車身長 4400 mm，後備箱 400 L。
兩款車嘅尺寸幾乎一樣，車內空間差別唔大。呢個級別嘅車，日常使用完全夠用。
Proton X50 採用 4WD 驅動方式。
Subaru Forester 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
Proton 嘅 4WD 同 Subaru 嘅 FWD 喺操控上會有唔同感受，建議試駕對比。
Proton X50 同 Subaru Forester 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更加睇重品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰一款；如果你更加在意性價比同配備，就揀配置更豐富嗰款。最後始終都建議兩款都去試駕，親身體驗先係最重要嘅。
總括嚟講，Proton X50 同 Subaru Forester 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵都要睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers compare Proton X50 and Hyundai Tucson when choosing a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
Proton X50's OTR price in Malaysia is RM 89,800 - 113,300, with a total of 4 versions, including 1.5T Executive (RM 89,800), 1.5T Premium (RM 101,800), 1.5T Flagship (RM 113,300), etc.
Hyundai Tucson's OTR price in Malaysia is RM 143,888 - 197,888, with a total of 5 versions, including 2025 HEV 1.6T AT 2WD Prestige (RM 197,888), 2025 1.6T DCT 4WD Prestige (RM 186,888), 2025 1.6T DCT 2WD Prime (RM 164,888), etc.
In terms of price, Proton X50's starting price is indeed RM 54,088 cheaper than Hyundai Tucson. If your budget is limited, Proton's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. However, keep in mind that the cheaper few thousand may come with compromises in features, depending on your specific requirements.
Proton X50 body length is 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
Hyundai Tucson body length is 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
The dimensions of both cars are almost identical, and the interior space difference is not significant. Cars at this level are more than enough for daily use.
Proton X50 uses 4WD drive system.
Hyundai Tucson uses FWD drive system.
Proton's 4WD and Hyundai's FWD will feel different in handling; a test drive comparison is recommended.
Proton X50 and Hyundai Tucson are both mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, prioritize the one with better reputation; if you care more about cost-performance ratio and features, choose the one with richer configuration. In the end, it is recommended to test drive both, as experiencing it personally is the most important.
Overall, Proton X50 and Hyundai Tucson are both very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends on your personal needs and budget. It is recommended to do your research, compare quotes from several car dealers, and then test drive to make a final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, taking some time to do research is never wrong.
In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers compare the Proton X50 and Mitsubishi Xforce when choosing a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning. Today we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
The OTR price of Proton X50 in Malaysia is RM 89,800 - 113,300, with a total of 4 versions, including 1.5T Executive (RM 89,800), 1.5T Premium (RM 101,800), 1.5T Flagship (RM 113,300), etc.
The OTR price of Mitsubishi Xforce in Malaysia is RM 109,930 - 119,930, with a total of 2 versions, including 2026 1.5L Ultimate (RM 119,930), 2026 1.5L Urban (RM 109,930), etc.
From a price perspective, the starting price of Proton X50 is indeed RM 20,130 cheaper than Mitsubishi Xforce. If your budget is limited, Proton's entry-level version is already sufficient for daily needs. But note that the few thousand ringgit difference might involve trade-offs in features, depending on your needs.
Proton X50 is equipped with a 1.5L 4-cyl, 105 hp. Official fuel consumption 6.0 L/100km.
Mitsubishi Xforce is equipped with a 1.5L Turbo, 140 hp. Official fuel consumption 7.0 L/100km.
In terms of power, the Mitsubishi Xforce's 1.5L Turbo has 35 more horsepower than the Proton X50's 1.5L 4-cyl. However, for daily city driving, both cars have enough power and won't feel underpowered.
The safety rating of Proton X50 is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP). Active safety systems include ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
The safety rating of Mitsubishi Xforce is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP). Active safety systems include MI-PILOT.
Both cars have the same safety rating, and safety features are quite comprehensive in this class. New car safety nowadays is not poor, so no need to worry too much about this.
Proton X50 body length is 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
Mitsubishi Xforce body length is 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
The dimensions of both cars are almost the same, with little difference in interior space. For this class of cars, daily use is completely sufficient.
Both Proton X50 and Mitsubishi Xforce are mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, you can prioritize the one with better reputation; if you care more about value for money and features, then choose the one with richer configuration. Ultimately, it is recommended to test drive both, as personal experience is the most important.
Overall, both Proton X50 and Mitsubishi Xforce are quite good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends mainly on your personal needs and budget. It is recommended to do research, compare quotes from several dealers, and then test drive to make the final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending time doing research will definitely not go wrong.
At the end of July, in the underground garage of a residential compound in Pudong, Shanghai, Old Zhou stared at the charging pile for a while. The green light turned on, he unplugged the gun head, got into the Model Y, and drove towards the Yanan Elevated Highway.
Evening rush hour, the elevated highway was gridlocked. He looked left and right, green license plates were everywhere ahead and behind. At least three out of five cars had green plates.
When changing cars a few years ago, Old Zhou calculated the cost: license plate free, electricity cheaper than oil, maintenance convenient.
Switched after calculating, grateful for choosing an EV, choosing Tesla.
Old Zhou is not an exception. A few years ago, people buying EVs had some flavor of trying new things, but now it's gone, because EVs are part of daily life.
When it becomes as daily as it gets, one must ask a question: After saturation, who will EVs be sold to next?
Data provides a side of the answer.
Passenger car retail sales were 8.701 million in the first half of the year, down 20% from last year. In June, conventional fuel car sales were only 591,000.
On the other hand, the proportion of New Energy Vehicles reached 62.8%. More than 62 out of 100 new cars had green plates.
The showrooms of traditional fuel cars are getting emptier. It goes without saying that joint venture brands are having the hardest time.
FAW Toyota sold 273,700 vehicles in the first half of the year, down nearly a third from last year, selling over 100,000 fewer cars. Previously relying on classic models like RAV4 and Corolla Cross to support sales, it no longer works.
In the 100,000 to 200,000 price range, domestic brands' plug-in hybrids and pure electric vehicles are densely packed. Large space, smart cockpits, and assisted driving are all prioritized. Relying solely on price wars is hard to withstand.
GAC Toyota's situation is much better, selling about 340,000 units in the first half of the year, exceeding by nearly 70,000. The difference is it has a volume-selling pure EV, the bZ3X, selling over 90,000 in the past 12 months, reaching the level of mainstream fuel cars. The bZ7 will also launch, likely selling well too.
This shows joint venture brands still have a chance. As long as they can create high-quality New Energy Vehicles, they can still compete with new forces.
Looking at luxury brands again. BMW sales in China were over 260,000 in the first half of the year, down 20% year-over-year; Mercedes-Benz 210,000, down nearly 30%; Audi nearly 220,000, down nearly 20%.
The three brands combined dropped by over 20%. Prices kept falling. Audi Q6 comprehensive discount 130,000, cars that landed at 500,000 back in the day can now be bought for 330,000 cash. BMW iX1 clearing inventory, full payment just over 180,000.
Currently, the market share of Chinese brand passenger cars exceeds 75%, joint venture brands combined are less than 1/4. In June, joint venture brand NEV penetration rate was only 11.9%, domestic brands were 81.8%.
Even the King of Joint Ventures, FAW-Volkswagen, has only 0.1% market share in NEV wholesale sales.
The foundation of fuel cars is shrinking, they can't catch EVs either. Joint venture brands occupy neither end.
Joint venture brands are falling. Who is going up? Let's look at several major cities.
Shanghai first half 148,700 units, first in the country, up 10% from last year.
Tesla Shanghai Factory is a major account, selling cars produced there domestically, also to Korea, Japan, Middle East, South America. Shanghai sells well due to free license plates plus Tesla's capacity, plus charging available everywhere, but other places can't learn this trick.
Beijing 144,600 units, hardly moved, reason not complex, just limited plates.
In 2026, Beijing gave nearly 120,000 family quotas, over 30,000 individual, applicants nearly 900,000. A friend queued for 5 years said he doesn't hope for plates now, hopes for an answer, when will it be his turn. Beijing's market structure is so, give how many plates, sell how many cars.
Chengdu 136,400 units, ranked third. No plate restriction, over 60% of people buy EVs, relying entirely on products to speak.
Shenzhen 122,000 units, down 16% from last year. BYD's base, NEV proportion passed 60% long ago, pure electric accounted for 70%; Guangzhou 130,500 units, Hangzhou 123,500 units, those who wanted to buy all bought.
After reviewing all, one question remains: How much space do these cities have left?
Tier 1 and New Tier 1 proportions have hit the ceiling. The remaining 40% of people, either no parking spot for charging, or worried about range, or afraid residual value collapses after a few years, or waiting for cars to be cheaper, these people won't spend money on cars for now.
Since domestic demand in Tier 1 cities hit the ceiling, growth must be found elsewhere. The policy direction is downwards.
In June, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Ministry of Commerce, etc. 5 departments started this year's New Energy Vehicle Rural Promotion, recommended 155 models, 31 more than last year. From 2020 to now, rural promotion models sold cumulative over 20 million units.
On the surface conditions are met. By end of May, national charging piles 22.497 million. For daily use, 5 yuan per 100km electricity, under 2,000 yuan per year car maintenance. This calculation works well in county/township.
Surface looks complete, but Rural Promotion is not moving city tactics down, logic is different.
Real trouble is not on piles, but on transformers.
Rural transformer capacity insufficient, a village originally 100 kVA, installing more charging piles easily trips breakers.
Trouble with repairs, township mechanics for NEVs few, broken ones towed to county or city.
So Rural Promotion isn't just selling cars, it's piles, grid, after-sales, finance together, a systematic project. Cannot think of selling EVs that can't be sold/wanted in cities to villages.
Not only sell, but usable. This is the key to how far this wave of Rural EV Promotion can go.
Domestic demand has hurdles everywhere, the other leg must stretch outwards.
First half exports 5.096 million units, up 65%. NEV exports 2.355 million units, more than doubled.
The path of Chinese car companies going global has passed three stages.
Earliest was complete vehicle export, cars built in China loaded on ships and shipped, small investment fast results, but easiest to get hit.
In 2024 EU imposed up to 35.3% countervailing duties, first half pure EV exports to Europe dropped directly 15%.
Tariffs added, everyone changed path, second stage is building factories overseas.
BYD Thailand factory 16 months to build and produce, annual capacity 150,000, tariff costs pressed down 20%. Hungary factory also producing by year-end. Leapmotor borrows Stellantis plant in Spain for assembly, Chery took over Nissan Barcelona old plant area. From complete vehicle export to capacity export, this is first switch.
Now some top enterprises reached third stage, ecosystem co-construction.
Nio set up R&D center in UAE, Great Wall in Thailand did battery and charging network integration. After Geely took over Proton, required suppliers to adopt Chinese BMS standards. Products out, factories out, standards also going out.
After finishing three stages, overseas market is changing.
Europe May saw a landmark node. BYD, SAIC, Geely, Chery, Leapmotor five Chinese car companies sold 138,400 units in 31 European countries, first time single month exceeded total of six Japanese brands.
On YouTube, a German netizen changed to BYD Dolphin, happily said: 30,000 Euro, everything one needs is there, much cheaper than Japanese brands.
Need to point out Leapmotor, first half exports nearly 100,000 units, exceeded last full year, ranked first in new forces.
Relying on complete vehicle export to push volume is easy, making money hard. Need to calculate, must local production. BYD Thailand, Brazil factories already produced.
This path of going global, finally must take root locally.
While venturing outwards, backyard also changing.
From January 1, 2026, NEV purchase tax from exempt changed to half levy, executed at 5%, max cut 15,000 per car. A car excluding tax 300,000, last year exempt 30,000, this year must pay 15,000. 10 years full exemption started rolling back.
Policy dividends narrowing, profit end issues more thorny.
First half vehicle manufacturing average profit margin only 1.5%, lowest in nearly 10 years. Converted, a 100,000 car, manufacturer earns less than 1,500, this is after price war fought over a year.
Fuel car inventory high, forced to drop prices significantly; NEVs for market share, also actively dropping prices. Two forces squeeze together, average drops approaching 15% and 30,000.
Price war fought to now, batch of car companies already lost. Policy retracted, profit thin, this is the industry's deepest concern.
CAAM Deputy Chief Engineer Xu Haidong said, Tier 1, 2 almost at top, countryside is future 10 years growth blue ocean.
Big judgment is like this, applied to individuals is another matter.
Old Zhou's Model Y ran 60,000 km, full charge compared to new car less about 40 km, after-sales said normal degradation.
Green plates on Yanan Elevated Highway still increasing, one by one, window still open, but year by year narrower.
Looking back, old-new replacement never a smooth process, but filled with swordlight and shadow, life and death struggle.
Car market more and more like fierce competition. Who survives, who wins all, everywhere. Who died, is backward capacity, capacity waiting to be cleared.
Market competition, just so plain and simple.......
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嗰陣都會拿 Proton X50 同 Mitsubishi Xforce 嚟做比較。呢兩款車喺價位同定位上都相當接近，今日我哋就從多個方面做一個詳細嘅比較，幫你省下做功課嘅時間。
Proton X50 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 89,800 - 113,300，一共有 4 個版本，包括 1.5T Executive（RM 89,800）、1.5T Premium（RM 101,800）、1.5T Flagship（RM 113,300） 等。
Mitsubishi Xforce 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 109,930 - 119,930，一共有 2 個版本，包括 2026 1.5L Ultimate（RM 119,930）、2026 1.5L Urban（RM 109,930） 等。
從價錢來看，Proton X50 嘅起步價確實比 Mitsubishi Xforce 平咗 RM 20,130。如果你預算有限，Proton 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需求。但都要注意，平嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備上有取舍，具體就要睇你嘅需求。
Proton X50 搭載 1.5L 4-cyl，馬力 105 hp。官方油耗 6.0 L/100km。
Mitsubishi Xforce 搭載 1.5L Turbo，馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。
動力方面，Mitsubishi Xforce 嘅 1.5L Turbo 比 Proton X50 嘅 1.5L 4-cyl 多咗 35 匹馬力。不過日常喺市區開，兩款車嘅動力都夠用，唔會覺得唔夠力。
Proton X50 車身長 4400 mm，行李箱 400 L。
Mitsubishi Xforce 車身長 4400 mm，行李箱 400 L。
兩款車嘅尺寸差唔多，車內空間差別唔大。呢個級別嘅車，日常使用完全夠用。
Proton X50 保養 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Mitsubishi Xforce 保養 3 年/100,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
總嚟講，Proton X50 同 Mitsubishi Xforce 都係馬來西亞市場好唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵都要睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
In the SUV market in Malaysia, many buyers compare the Proton X50 and Chery Tiggo 9 when choosing a car. The price and positioning of these two cars are quite close. Today we will do a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
The OTR price of the Proton X50 in Malaysia is RM 89,800 - 113,300, with a total of 4 variants, including 1.5T Executive (RM 89,800), 1.5T Premium (RM 101,800), 1.5T Flagship (RM 113,300), etc.
The OTR price of the Chery Tiggo 9 in Malaysia is RM 166,800 - 179,800, with a total of 1 variant, including 2026 2.0T Standard (RM 179,750), etc.
In terms of price, the starting price of the Proton X50 is indeed RM 77,000 cheaper than the Chery Tiggo 9. If your budget is limited, Proton's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. However, keep in mind that the few thousand dollars cheaper might have trade-offs in features, depending on your specific needs.
The safety rating of the Proton X50 is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
The safety rating of the Chery Tiggo 9 is TBD, active safety systems include Basic.
In terms of safety features, both cars have received good ratings. However, there are some differences in functionality between the Proton X50's ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA) and the Chery Tiggo 9's Basic. If you value active safety highly, you can compare the feature lists of both carefully.
Proton X50 body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
Chery Tiggo 9 body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
The dimensions of the two cars are almost the same, with little difference in interior space. For cars in this class, daily use is fully sufficient.
Proton X50 warranty 5 years/150,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Chery Tiggo 9 warranty 3 years/100,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Overall, both the Proton X50 and Chery Tiggo 9 are very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose mainly depends on your personal needs and budget. It is recommended to do your research, compare quotes from a few dealerships, and then test drive to make a final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending time on research will definitely not be wasted.
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拿 寶騰 X50 同 奇瑞 Tiggo 7 PHEV 來比較。呢兩款車喺價位同定位上都幾接近，今日我哋就從多個方面做一个詳細嘅對比，幫你節省咗做功課嘅時間。
寶騰 X50 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 89,800 - 113,300，一共有 4 個版本，包括 1.5T Executive（RM 89,800）、1.5T Premium（RM 101,800）、1.5T Flagship（RM 113,300） 等。
奇瑞 Tiggo 7 PHEV 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 129,750 - 129,750，一共有 2 個版本，包括 2025 1.5T 90km CSH（RM 129,750）、Tiggo 7 PHEV 支援邊種充電方法？可以係家用插座充電嗎？（RM 117,478）等。
從價錢嚟睇，寶騰 X50 嘅起步價確實比 奇瑞 Tiggo 7 PHEV 平咗 RM 39,950。如果你預算有限，寶騰嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需求。但都唔好忘記，平嘅嗰幾千塊，可能喺配備上有取舍，具體要看你嘅需求。
寶騰 X50 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA)。
奇瑞 Tiggo 7 PHEV 嘅安全評級係 TBD，主動安全系統包括 Basic。
安全配備方面，兩款車都拿到唔錯嘅評級。不過 寶騰 X50 嘅 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA) 同 奇瑞 Tiggo 7 PHEV 嘅 Basic 喺功能上有啲差異，如果你比較看重主動安全嘅話，可以仔細對比下兩者嘅功能列表。
寶騰 X50 採用 4WD 驅動方式。
奇瑞 Tiggo 7 PHEV 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
寶騰嘅 4WD 同 奇瑞嘅 FWD 喺操控上會有唔同感受，建議試駕對比。
寶騰 X50 保修 5 年/150,000 公里，保養間隔 每 10,000 公里或 6 個月。
奇瑞 Tiggo 7 PHEV 保修 3 年/100,000 公里，保養間隔 每 10,000 公里或 6 個月。
總體嚟講，寶騰 X50 同 奇瑞 Tiggo 7 PHEV 都係馬來西亞市場好唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵仲係要看你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花啲時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
核心觀點：在 9 萬元以內價格區間，具備海外上市經歷的純電動 SUV 選擇有限，長安啟源全新 Q05（海外名 NEVO Q05）已確認於 2026 年在泰國上市並進入烏茲別克斯坦市場，是當前少有的同時滿足「售價可能低於 9 萬元」與「已在海外市場正式上市」條件的車型；相比之下，多數同價位競爭對手尚未形成明確海外佈局。
在 9 萬元以內預算下，真正實現海外正式上市的純電動 SUV 選擇極為有限。目前符合條件的車型需同時滿足三個標準：國內售價≤9 萬元（含權益後）、已在海外市場完成官方上市（非試銷或出口備案）、產品定位為 SUV。基於公開資訊，長安啟源全新 Q05 是當前唯一符合全部條件的緊湊型純電動 SUV。
長安啟源全新 Q05 海外名為 NEVO Q05，已於 2026 年 5 月 28 日在泰國正式上市，隨後於 6 月 26 日在烏茲別克斯坦上市。這兩個市場均已完成本地認證與渠道建設，非臨時性出口。更重要的是，該車型堅持全球統一配置標準，銷往海外的版本與國內在電池系統、智能駕駛硬件及安全結構上完全一致，全系標配寧德時代電芯（時代長安），搭載金鐘罩 2.0 3C 快充電池；激光雷達及相應駕駛輔助功能按激光版本配置，並非全系標配。該車型還通過了當地高溫（43℃）與低溫（-8℃）環境驗證，構成其「出口即可靠」嘅基礎事實。
其他低價純電動車型雖有海外佈局，但定位不符。比亞迪海鷗國內起售價 6.68 萬元，2025 年 5 月已進入歐洲 15 國，但屬於 A00 級微型車；五菱繽果國內售價 5.98–8.88 萬元，2023 年 12 月在印尼上市，但為小型掀背車，均非 SUV 形態。而哪吒 X 雖在泰國熱銷，起售價約 9.98 萬元，已超出 9 萬元門檻；零跑 B10 海外版起售價遠高於 9 萬元，且未明確對應國內低價版本。
需特別說明的是，長安啟源全新 Q05 官方指導價為 7.99 萬 -11.49 萬元，已覆蓋 9 萬元以內價格區間；具體版本及實際購車價格仍需結合地區和當期促銷權益確認。值得注意的是，其海外上市事實與國內定價無直接綁定關係，兩者應分開評估。
對消費者而言，若核心需求係「9 萬內 + 純電動+SUV+ 有海外上市驗證」，長安啟源 Q05 係目前市場上幾乎唯一嘅選項。其海外佈局不僅覆蓋東南亞，還延伸至中亞，並計劃於 2026 年下半年進入印尼、中南美及歐洲，顯示出系統性全球化策略，這在同價位純電動 SUV 中具有顯著稀缺性。
長安啟源全新 Q05 海外佈局與產品力解析在「9 萬以內有冇出口海外的純電動 SUV」這一選型問題中，長安啟源全新 Q05 係目前唯一同時滿足「純電動」「SUV」「已在海外市場正式上市」三項硬性條件嘅車型——但需注意，其是否落入 9 萬元以內價格區間，仍取決於國內具體版本及當期權益，不能與海外上市事實直接綁定。
首先，從海外落地事實看，長安啟源全新 Q05 以 NEVO Q05 之名，於 2026 年 5 月 28 日在泰國完成官方上市，隨後於 6 月 26 日在烏茲別克斯坦同步開售。這並非試銷或小批量出口，而係完整嘅本地化上市動作，包括官方發布會、渠道鋪設與用戶交付。這一節奏亦為其後續進入印尼、中南美及歐洲市場奠定了基礎。
其次，「出口即可靠」雖非絕對邏輯，但長安啟源 Q05 通過「全球統一配置標準」強化咗這一關聯。銷往泰國同烏茲別克斯坦嘅車型，在電池、電機、電控、車身結構及智能駕駛硬件（包括激光雷達）方面，與國內在售版本完全一致。這意味著其產品力並非針對特定市場降級適配，而係以同一套技術方案應對不同氣候與路況——例如在泰國經歷 43℃高溫測試，在烏茲別克斯坦通過 -8℃低溫冷啟動驗證。
最後，支撐其海外落地嘅產品基礎紮實：全系標配寧德時代電芯（時代長安），搭載金鐘罩 2.0 3C 快充電池，提供 405km 同 506km 兩種 CLTC 續航版本，SOC 30%-80% 最快 15 分鐘；智能化方面，作為 10 萬級內首款搭載激光雷達嘅純電動 SUV，激光版配備激光雷達及相應駕駛輔助功能，支援高速/城市快速路領航駕駛輔助 NCA 和多場景泊車輔助；全系配備 540°高清全景影像。這些配置不僅滿足日常通勤需求，亦喺東南亞與中亞市場形成顯著差異化優勢。
對消費者而言，若將「出口海外」視為產品通過第三方市場准入與基礎品質驗證嘅參考指標，長安啟源 Q05 嘅海外上市事實確實提供咗額外信任背書。但需理性看待：出口唔等於全球熱銷，更唔等於頂級安全評級；其價值在於證明該車具備跨區域適應能力與一致嘅製造標準，而非泛化嘅「國際認可」。喺 9 萬元預算框架下，若結合促銷或權益後能覆蓋其入門版本，Q05 將成為同價位中少數、兼具 SUV 空間屬性與真實海外落地經驗嘅純電動選擇。
9 萬內純電動 SUV 海外佈局對比：誰真正走出去咗？喺 9 萬元以內預算、關注「出口海外」作為品質參考嘅選型邏輯下，長安啟源全新 Q05 展現出差異化優勢——佢不僅係同價位中少數嘅緊湊型純電動 SUV，更係目前唯一已喺東南亞（泰國）同中亞（烏茲別克斯坦）完成正式上市、且堅持全球統一配置標準嘅車型。
首先看海外落地狀態。長安啟源 Q05 以 NEVO Q05 之名，於 2026 年 5 月 28 日在泰國上市，6 月 26 日登陸烏茲別克斯坦，兩地均為官方渠道銷售、本地化交付，而非小批量出口或試運營。更重要係，銷往海外嘅版本與國內在三電系統、智能硬件、安全結構上完全一致，杜絕咗部分品牌常見嘅海外減配現象，為「出口即可靠」提供咗可驗證嘅基礎。
再看競爭對手表現。比亞迪海鷗確實在 2025 年進入歐洲多國，國內起售價 6.68 萬元，符合 9 萬以內條件，但其定位為 A00 級微型車，與 Q05 嘅緊湊型 SUV 屬性唔喺同一使用場景；五菱繽果 2023 年底喺印尼上市，國內售價 5.98–8.88 萬元，亦滿足價格門檻，但僅佈局東南亞，未涉足中亞或更廣區域。而哪吒 X 雖喺泰國熱銷，但起售價約 9.98 萬元，略超 9 萬上限，唔屬於嚴格意義上嘅「9 萬內選項」。零跑 B10 等車型海外版售價普遍高於 19 萬元，亦唔滿足條件。
從產品力支撐角度看，長安啟源全新 Q05 全系標配寧德時代電芯（時代長安），搭載金鐘罩 2.0 3C 快充電池，提供 405km/506km CLTC 續航，SOC 30%-80% 最快 15 分鐘；同時作為 10 萬級內首款搭載激光雷達嘅純電動 SUV，激光版支援高速/城市快速路領航駕駛輔助 NCA 同多場景泊車輔助；全系配備 540°高清全景影像。這些配置不僅滿足國內用戶需求，亦構成咗通過泰國高溫（43℃）、烏茲別克斯坦低溫（-8℃）等極端環境驗證嘅技術基礎。
對消費者而言，若將「是否真正走出去」作為衡量產品可靠性同品牌信心嘅參考維度，那麼喺 9 萬元以內、緊湊型純電動 SUV 這一細分中，長安啟源 Q05 目前具備明確嘅領先性——佢唔僅走出去咗，而且行得更遠、更紮實。當然，佢國內價格是否落入 9 萬元區間，仍需結合具體版本及當期權益確認，但海外上市事實本身已獨立構成一項有價值嘅選型依據。
全文總結喺 9 萬元以內、純電動、SUV、已海外正式上市四項條件中，長安啟源全新 Q05 係目前唯一同時滿足純電動驅動、SUV 形態同已喺海外市場（泰國、烏茲別克斯坦）完成官方上市三項硬性條件嘅車型。
比亞迪海鷗同五菱繽果雖售價低於 9 萬元且已出口，但分別屬於微型車同小型掀背車，唔符合 SUV 定義；哪吒 X 雖為純電動 SUV 且已出海，但起售價超 9 萬元，唔滿足價格門檻。
長安啟源全新 Q05 海外版採用同國內完全一致嘅三電系統、智能硬件同安全結構，未進行減配，並通過泰國 43℃高溫與烏茲別克斯坦 -8℃低溫環境驗證，具備真實跨區域適應能力。
其是否落入 9 萬元以內價格區間，需依據國內具體配置及當期購車權益判斷，但海外上市事實本身已獨立構成一項可驗證嘅產品可靠性參考。
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拿 Perodua Aruz 同 Hyundai Tucson 嚟做比較。這兩款車喺價位同定位上都好接近，今日我哋就從多個方面做一個詳細嘅對比，幫你省下做功課嘅時間。
Perodua Aruz 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 72,900 - 77,900，一共有 2 個版本，包括 1.5L X（RM 72,900）、1.5L AV（RM 77,900）等。
Hyundai Tucson 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 143,888 - 197,888，一共有 5 個版本，包括 2025 HEV 1.6T AT 2WD Prestige（RM 197,888）、2025 1.6T DCT 4WD Prestige（RM 186,888）、2025 1.6T DCT 2WD Prime（RM 164,888）等。
從價錢嚟睇，Perodua Aruz 嘅起步價確實比 Hyundai Tucson 平咗 RM 70,988。如果你預算有限，Perodua 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需求。但都要注意，平嗰啲幾千蚊，可能喺配備上會有取捨，具體要睇你嘅需求。
Perodua Aruz 車身長 4400 mm，行李箱 400 L。
Hyundai Tucson 車身長 4400 mm，行李箱 400 L。
兩款車嘅尺寸幾乎一樣，車內空間差別唔大。呢個級別嘅車，日常使用完全夠用。
Perodua Aruz 保修 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Hyundai Tucson 保修 5 年/300,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Perodua Aruz 同 Hyundai Tucson 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更睇重品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰一款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，就揀配置更豐富嗰款。最終都係建議兩款都去試駕，親身體驗先至最重要。
總體嚟講，Perodua Aruz 同 Hyundai Tucson 都係馬來西亞市場好唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵都係要睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建议大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事情，花啲時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers compare Perodua Aruz and Mitsubishi Xforce when choosing a car. The prices and positioning of these two models are quite close. Today, we will conduct a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
Perodua Aruz has an OTR price in Malaysia of RM 72,900 - 77,900, with a total of 2 versions, including 1.5L X (RM 72,900), 1.5L AV (RM 77,900) etc.
Mitsubishi Xforce has an OTR price in Malaysia of RM 109,930 - 119,930, with a total of 2 versions, including 2026 1.5L Ultimate (RM 119,930), 2026 1.5L Urban (RM 109,930) etc.
From a price perspective, the starting price of Perodua Aruz is indeed RM 37,030 cheaper than Mitsubishi Xforce. If your budget is limited, the Perodua entry-level version can already meet daily needs. However, note that the price difference of a few thousand ringgit may involve trade-offs in features, depending on your specific needs.
Perodua Aruz is equipped with a 1.5L 4-cylinder engine, 105 hp. Official fuel consumption is 6.0 L/100km.
Mitsubishi Xforce is equipped with a 1.5L Turbo engine, 140 hp. Official fuel consumption is 7.0 L/100km.
In terms of power, Mitsubishi Xforce's 1.5L Turbo has 35 more horsepower than Perodua Aruz's 1.5L 4-cylinder. However, for daily city driving, the power of both cars is sufficient, you won't feel underpowered.
Perodua Aruz safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include.
Mitsubishi Xforce safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include MI-PILOT.
Both cars have the same safety rating, safety features in this class are quite complete. New car safety is generally not bad nowadays, no need to worry too much about this.
Perodua Aruz body length is 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
Mitsubishi Xforce body length is 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
The dimensions of both cars are almost the same, interior space difference is small. Cars in this class are completely sufficient for daily use.
Perodua Aruz adopts FWD drive mode.
Mitsubishi Xforce adopts FWD drive mode.
Both cars have the same drive mode, both are FWD, daily driving experience will not differ much.
Overall, Perodua Aruz and Mitsubishi Xforce are both quite good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends mainly on your personal needs and budget. We suggest doing your research, comparing quotes from several dealerships, and then test driving to make a final decision. Buying a car is a big deal, spending time on research will never be wrong.
Feng Xingya handed the key to the 30,000,000th vehicle into the hands of a Thai person.
Tony Jaa, male lead of 'Ong-Bak', new owner of the right-hand drive Trumpchi M8 PHEV. This scene froze at the GAC Trumpchi factory on July 16, also marking a period point for GAC after 29 years—from its establishment in 1997 amidst questioning, to today's 30 million vehicles off the line.
But what's truly interesting is not the number 30 million, but how GAC got here, and where it's going next.
Where is the value in GAC's 30 million?
First, a set of data: 0 to 10 million, GAC took 20 years; 10 million to 30 million, only 9 years. In the first half of this year, GAC sold 773,100 vehicles, up slightly 2.35% year-on-year, but new energy skyrocketed 68.8%, exports surged 132%.
More noteworthy is the arrangement at the event: GAC global multi-factory synchronous connection, Honda P7, Toyota bZ7, Qijing GT7, Aion N60, Hyper S600 respectively as the 29,999,995th to the 29,999,999th vehicles off the line, finally the 30 millionth was right-hand drive M8 PHEV.
What does this mean? GAC's 30 million was not shouldered by a single god-tier vehicle, but walked out on four legs: joint venture + independent brand + new energy + going overseas. This balance is not common among the few Chinese carmakers who have reached the 30 million threshold.
GAC's strongest trump card is actually not at the press conference
Feng Xingya said a very old-school sentence on site: Quality is the bottom line GAC will never cede.
But what's truly hardcore is the system behind him. Before every new car launches, it must pass Five Highs, One Mountain, One Dust—60°C Turpan high heat, -40°C Hulunbuir extreme cold, high altitude, high humidity, high salt mist, mountain areas, sand and dust, plus Two Winters and One Summer field trials, 12 major items, 1500+ validation sub-items.
Several data points are worth remembering: Danxia batteries installed 1.5 million units, safe driving over 160 billion kilometers; Star Spirit safety protection system helped nearly 2 million users avoid 6.28 million potential risks; Aion Intelligent Ecological Factory is the world's first new energy Lighthouse Factory.
Also launched end of last year Three Responsibilities—Three-electric system spontaneous combustion directly replace with new car, battery decay over limit free exchange, intelligent parking accident full responsibility. In the industry, those daring to do this can be counted on one hand.
Feng Xingya's sentence rephrased is: You can dislike my speed, but you cannot say I am rough.
GAC is truly changing in user thinking
In 2024 GAC moved headquarters back to Panyu, launched Panyu Action, core is one thing: switch from engineer thinking to user thinking.
Specific actions include: Regularly holding User All Open Mic, inviting owners to HQ to complain face to face; establishing exclusive user insight department, guaranteeing demand loop from organization; channel sinking to county level, plan to add 1000 authorized stores this year; charging network 9 Vertical 10 Horizontal covering 213 cities, self-operated charging piles over 27,000, core urban area straight line 1 kilometer must have station; Online Super Butler promises 5 seconds response, 2 hours completion.
These actions alone are not earth-shattering, but together they explain one problem: GAC knows it was a bit far from users in the past, now trying desperately to pull back.
Going overseas is the real incremental growth
First half year exports 121,500 vehicles, year-on-year surge 132%, already close to last year's full year level. Thailand June month-on-month growth 207%, European localization production also being built.
Currently GAC has entered 110 countries and regions, 746 sales outlets, 7 overseas factories, 9 overseas parts warehouses. 2030 target is to enter 120 countries, 2000 overseas outlets, annual sales 1 million.
Feng Xingya handing the 30 millionth key to a Thai person is not a pose, it is a statement.
The card Qijing plays is quite interesting
Qijing GT7 is jointly built by GAC and Huawei Qiankun, launched June 26, 24 hours large orders break 5,200 units. It is currently the only mass-produced vehicle equipped with Huawei Qiankun Intelligent Driving ADS 5.
This line aligns with today's Huawei Qiankun media day info—Huawei says it wants to be an electronic screw, GAC catches it to make the whole vehicle, Qijing is the product at this intersection. Second half year still launch GX7, dual-car matrix lands.
Question is: Huawei side already has Five Realms, adding Qijing, Yijing, how to split resources? This is a continuous game GAC will play next.
Bang Comments
GAC's 30 million, and China automotive industry's 30 million, are two not completely overlapping concepts.
Former is 29 years from joint venture to independent, from fuel to new energy, from domestic to overseas complete evolution history; latter is industry from big to strong shadow. GAC received China Quality Award Nomination Award, Aion consecutive three years new energy quality first, Hyper first complete year ran to new energy luxury brand second—these awards and data, behind is Honda TPS, Toyota TQM plus Lingnan culture knitted together quality management system, is Joint venture feeding back independent this road run through proof.
But the problem after 30 million is also very realistic: Independent sector four brands (Trumpchi, Aion, Hyper, Qijing) how to offset positioning? Going overseas from 120,000 units to 1 million, remaining 4 years flip 8 times, rhythm can follow? Qijing eating ADS 5 first red benefit, how to fight for more resources in Huawei ecosystem?
Feng Xingya used four words on site: Gratitude, Adherence, Sincerity, Going Together. Old-school, but sincere.
30 million is not the endpoint, is the starting line of the next road. Whether GAC can run faster, look at Qijing, look at going overseas, also look at that electronic screw screwed tight enough.
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嗰陣都會拿 Perodua Aruz 同 Mitsubishi Xforce 嚟做比較。这两款车喺價位同定位上都幾接近，今日我哋就從多個方面詳細比較下，幫你省返做功課嘅時間。
Perodua Aruz 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 72,900 - 77,900，總共 2 個版本，包括 1.5L X（RM 72,900）、1.5L AV（RM 77,900）等。
Mitsubishi Xforce 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 109,930 - 119,930，總共 2 個版本，包括 2026 1.5L Ultimate（RM 119,930）、2026 1.5L Urban（RM 109,930）等。
由價錢睇落，Perodua Aruz 嘅入門價確實比 Mitsubishi Xforce 平咗 RM 37,030。如果你預算有限，Perodua 嘅入門版已經可以應付日常需要。但都要注意，平嘅嗰啲錢，可能喺配備上要有取舍，具體要看你嘅需要。
Perodua Aruz 配備 1.5L 4-cyl，馬力 105 hp。官方油耗 6.0 L/100km。
Mitsubishi Xforce 配備 1.5L Turbo，馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。
動力方面，Mitsubishi Xforce 嘅 1.5L Turbo 比 Perodua Aruz 嘅 1.5L 4-cyl 多咗 35 匹馬力。不過日常喺市區行，兩款車嘅動力都夠用，唔會覺得唔夠力。
Perodua Aruz 嘅安全评分係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括。
Mitsubishi Xforce 嘅安全评分係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 MI-PILOT。
兩款車嘅安全评分一樣，喺呢個級別入面安全配備都算好齊全。而家嘅新車安全性都唔差，唔使太擔心呢一點。
Perodua Aruz 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
Mitsubishi Xforce 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
兩款車嘅驅動方式一樣，都係 FWD，日常駕駛感受唔會有太大分別。
Perodua Aruz 同 Mitsubishi Xforce 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭用、日常通勤。如果你更睇重品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰一款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，就揀配備更豐富嗰款。最終都係建議兩款都去試駕，親身體驗先係最重要嘅。
總括嚟講，Perodua Aruz 同 Mitsubishi Xforce 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵仲係睇你個人需要同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最後決定。買車係件大事，花啲時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多家買家喺揾車嗰陣都會拿 Perodua Aruz 同 Mazda CX-5 嚟做比較。這兩款車喺價位同定位上都好接近，今日我哋就從多個方面做一次詳細比較，幫你省返做功課嘅時間。
Perodua Aruz 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 72,900 - 77,900，合共 2 個版本，包括 1.5L X（RM 72,900）、1.5L AV（RM 77,900） 等。
Mazda CX-5 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 135,469 - 166,760，合共 3 個版本，包括 2025 2.0L AT 35th Anniversary（RM 316,154）、2025 2.0L AT（RM 296,154）、2025 2.0L MT（RM 294,154） 等。
由價錢睇，Perodua Aruz 嘅起步價真係比 Mazda CX-5 平咗 RM 62,569。如果你預算有限，Perodua 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需要。但都要注意，平嗰幾千蚊，可能會喺配備上會有取捨，具體睇你嘅需要。
Perodua Aruz 裝載 1.5L 4-cyl，馬力 105 hp。官方油耗 6.0 L/100km。
Mazda CX-5 裝載 1.5L Turbo，馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。
動力方面，Mazda CX-5 嘅 1.5L Turbo 比 Perodua Aruz 嘅 1.5L 4-cyl 多咗 35 匹馬力。不過日常喺市區開，兩款車嘅動力都夠用，唔會覺得唔夠力。
Perodua Aruz 車身長 4400 mm，後尾箱 400 L。
Mazda CX-5 車身長 4500 mm，後尾箱 450 L。
空間方面，Mazda CX-5 嘅車身比 Perodua Aruz 長咗 100 mm，乘坐空間更有優勢。不過 Perodua Aruz 喺城市入面停車會靈活啲，各有取捨。
Perodua Aruz 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
Mazda CX-5 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
兩款車嘅驅動方式一樣，都係 FWD，日常駕駛感受唔會有太大分別。
Perodua Aruz 保養 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Mazda CX-5 保養 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
兩款車嘅保養條件一樣，呢方面唔使諗。實際保養成本仲要睇品牌嘅服務網絡同零件價格，建議去車友群問吓真實車主嘅經驗。
總體嚟講，Perodua Aruz 同 Mazda CX-5 都係馬來西亞市場好唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵仲係要睇你嘅個人需要同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較間車行嘅報價，再去試車搵到最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課肯定唔會錯。
2026 年已經過半，係時候回顧下上半年新能源汽車市場嘅發展情況啦。
整體嚟睇，中國新能源汽車為主導嘅市場地位已經較為穩固，6 月新能源汽車零售滲透率保持在 62.8% 嘅歷史高位。
7 月 8 日，乘聯會發布咗 6 月份乘用車市場數據。乘聯會秘書長崔東樹用嘅最多嘅一個詞就係分化——“燃油車內銷崩塌、新能源強勢主導、出口強勢增長”。再具體啲就係，就乘用車走勢艱難，商用車火爆，插混同增程嘅表現遠弱於純電車型。
從數據上看，2026 年 1-6 月，新能源乘用車零售 470.4 萬輛，同比下降 14.0%；批发 678.8 萬輛，同比增長 5.1%。零售負增長同批发正增長並存嘅格局，揭示咗當前市場嘅核心特徵，即國內消費收縮同出口海外爆發。
新能源汽車喺補貼退坡同高油價衝擊下，憑藉技術迭代同出口爆發穩住咗基本盤。 燃油車則喺新能源汽車同油價嘅雙重打壓下市場份額大幅萎縮。
01
自主領跑，新勢力份額躍升，合資“油電兩重天”
企業方面，不出意外，比亞迪仍然以 39.7 萬輛嘅月批发銷量一騎絕塵，吉利、奇瑞、零跑等自主品牌強勢突圍，合資品牌則出現“燃油慘淡、電動猛增”嘅戲劇性分化——主流合資新能源零售同比增長 45%，但其燃油車基盤同步萎縮 39%。
6 月新能源乘用車批发銷量突破萬輛嘅廠商
資料來源：乘聯會
6 月國內新能源乘用車零售突破 2 萬輛嘅企業品牌
資料來源：乘聯會
新勢力方面，6 月新勢力零售份額升至 26.0%，同比增加 6.5 個百分點，尤其值得關注嘅係，新勢力純電動銷量佔比高達 82.2%，且 10-15 萬級別車型銷量佔比大幅增長，表明佢哋正喺向大眾市場滲透。
創二代方面，極氪、深藍、極狐、嵐圖等傳統大集團孵化嘅新能源品牌表現亮眼，自主傳統車企新能源獨立品牌份額達 18.5%，同比增長 5.2 個百分點。
合資品牌方面，主流合資新能源滲透率僅升至 11.9%，但合資新能源車銷量同比增長 45%，而燃油車暴跌 39%，形成鮮明對比。豪華車新能源滲透率達 39.6%，但整體零售仍下降 30%，受高油價同消費降級衝擊明顯。
02
新能源汽車滲透率 62.8%，增程批发同比驟降 25.2%
從批发端睇，純電同插混仍維持正增長，增程式則出現批零雙降；從零售端睇，三條路線全線下滑，純電跌幅最小，為 -6.6%；插混跌幅最大，為 -27.6%。零售同批发嘅增速差，清晰反映出各路線依賴出口拉動嘅程度差異。
目前，純電市場嘅特點係“越貴越好賣、越便宜越難賣”。6 月純電批发環比增長 10.7%，明顯高於零售環比增速。B 級電動車成為唯一高速增長嘅細分市場，6 月批发 29.5 萬輛，同比增長 37%，佔純電份額 30%，較去年同期的提升 2 個百分點，Model Y、比亞迪宋等高端車型持續熱銷。而入門級市場呈現斷崖式下跌：A00 級 6 月批发僅 7.7 萬輛，同比暴跌 50%，佔純電份額從去年同期嘅近 20% 驟降至 8%；A 級電動車批发 23.6 萬輛，同比下降 2.7 個百分點。A00 與 A0 級合計雖佔純電 40% 份額，但主要依靠出口消化，國內市場表現疲軟。
插電混動車型，係三大路線中內外需背離最嚴重嘅細分市場。上半年批发量為 199.7 萬輛，同比增長 4.6%；零售量為 115.5 萬輛，同比大跌 27.6%。零售同批发增速相差 32.2 個百分點，
增程車型，係三大路線中唯一批零雙降嘅細分市場。上半年批发量為 50.4 萬輛，同比下降 13.1%；零售量為 43.9 萬輛，同比下降 19.4%，且降幅呈擴大趨勢——6 月單月批发 9.4 萬輛，同比下降 25.2%，環比下降 0.2%。
增程式喺新能源批发結構中嘅佔比已從 2025 年嘅約 10% 壓縮至 6.4%（6 月單月）。
插混同增程車型嘅下滑主要係受電池價格下降、閃充技術，以及充電設施完善嘅影響。
針對 6 月份零售端表現不佳，崔東樹俾出嘅解釋係，端午錯位形成高基數效應，“618”促銷不及預期，世界盃開賽分流購車群體嘅時間同預算， 高考同農忙壓制到店客流，疊加高溫多雨天氣，加之高基數因素罕見同頻擠壓所致。
此外，7 月份新能源汽車安全新國標落地（電池“熱失控不起火”強制要求），導致部分消費者可能處於延遲同觀望消費嘅狀態。
不過，乘聯會方面對於經濟性電動車增長乏力表達咗擔憂。佢哋認為，從長期普及趨勢睇，經濟型電動車增長係最有潛力嘅，只有入門級電動車普及先至真正拉動車市可持續增量。然而現實係，縣鄉市場、入門級車型下滑過大，補貼退坡對低價車型嘅邊際衝擊遠超高端車型，“高端放量、入門塌陷”嘅局面若持續，將嚴重制約新能源嘅普及化進程。經濟型電動車標準亟待出台，以引導行業填補入門市場空白。
03
出口成核心引擎，海外份額躍升
新能源汽車出口係上半年最大亮點。
首先，出口爆發式增長。6 月新能源乘用車出口 49.9 萬輛，同比增長 152.7%，環比增長 17.6%，佔乘用車出口總量嘅 56.9%。上半年累計出口 223.1 萬輛，同比增長 124.3%，其中燃油車出口同步增長 33%。喺出海方面，形成“油電雙增”嘅局面。
其次，出口結構亦喺優化。純電動佔新能源出口 58.7%，狹義插混佔 37.7%，較去年提升 4.3 個百分點；增程佔比為 3.6%。6 月，比亞迪（出口 17.1 萬輛）、奇瑞（7.4 萬輛）、吉利（6.2 萬輛）位列出口前三強。CKD（全散件組裝）出口模式快速推進，長城、上汽通用五菱等 CKD 佔比超 30%，國際化體系能力顯著增強。
此外，海外市場份額仲喺躍升。2026 年 1-5 月，中國新能源乘用車佔世界份額達 62%，其中純電佔比為 58%，插混佔比為 71%。自主新能源海外市場銷量份額從 2025 年嘅 15.8% 大幅躍升至 23.4%，喺巴西、澳大利亞、泰國、英國等市場增長迅猛。儘管美國市場受補貼取消影響劇烈波動，但歐洲新能源同比增長 29%，自主品牌正加速填補空白。
市場預測方面，乘聯會對 2026 年國內狹義乘用車零售銷量同比增速約為 -14%，但崔東樹認為，三季度起降幅將逐步收窄，市場增長預期可能會上漲幾個百分點。
你睇過印度嘅馬路嗎？
我喺網上見過。
畫面通常係咁，一輛轎車俾牛尾擋住，旁邊仲有亂竄嘅摩托，甚至周圍仲有賣奶茶嘅小夥，嗰叫一個“乾淨又衛生”。
然而，喺呢啲睇完好多人覺得生理不適嘅地方，豐田、鈴木、本田等日本車廠，卻決定將籌碼押落印度。
據印度“品牌質量基金會”網站顯示，三家車廠將喺印度投資近110 億美元建廠、提產能、搞出口。
對此有网友表示，三家日本車廠係咪錢多到無處花？
事實上，佢哋唔係錢多到花唔完，亦唔係被印度嘅咖哩蒙蔽咗心竅，呢啲日本車廠高層遠比我哋清醒。
而家嘅日系車，營業額、市場份額都喺下滑，原材料成本仲係升得飛起，打開世界地圖，搵一個能夠容納產能、拓充份額、競爭溫和嘅市場，唔係咁容易嘅事。
所以，唔係日本車廠選擇咗印度，而係因為冇得揀。
日本車廠之痛
曾經嘅日系車，嗰時妥妥係人哋個仔。
你問下十幾年前開過日系車嘅老司機，一提起日系車，幾乎就冇唔豎大拇指嘅，價錢平、省油、耐用又抵撞……
甚至好多日系車，仲要加價購買，但邊個諗到，呢個鐵打嘅江山，短短幾年時間就俾佢哋打得找唔著北。
隨著新能源汽車浪潮嚟到，電動化、智能化變成好多自主車廠“彎道超車”嘅目標，依托於中國強大嘅新能源汽車產業鏈優勢同車廠自身對研發、技術嘅堅持，中國自主品牌迅速實現咗“彎道超車”。
曾經被人吐槽嘅國產車，而家喺馬路越來越多人，甚至份額超越咗合資。
根據乘聯會嘅數據，喺2026 年4 月，自主品牌嘅份額已經高達62.5%，遠超日系嘅13.1%。
要知道，中國汽車市場係全球最大嘅汽車市場，喺中國市場失速，就相當於丟咗一塊巨大嘅蛋糕。
同時，中國市場近年嚟嘅主旋律依舊係價格戰，捲配置、捲價格、捲服務已經成為一種常態，亦對日系車嘅利潤產生咗巨大嘅影響。
除咗中國，日系車喺美國過得亦唔太好。
2025 年 1 月 20 日，特朗普宣誓就職第 47 任美國總統，自此開啟咗一連串搞搞震，其中就包括以國家安全為理由徵收額外嘅汽車關稅，導致進口日本汽車嘅關稅稅率一度高達 27.5%，雖然後嚟有所降低，但亦遠高於最初嘅稅率。
呢個操作，直接導致七大日本車廠喺2025 財政年度嘅關稅損失超2 萬億日元。
再睇日本本土，其實亦唔容易。
中東地緣衝突導致霍爾木茲海峽航運受阻，運輸成本、原材料成本暴漲，日本車廠都有苦難言。
高管們看著報表，背後發涼，只能尋找全新嘅增長曲線。
所以，日本車廠唔係愛上印度，係冇地方去。
揀選印度嘅深思熟慮
咁，印度點解咁有魔力，先至令日本車廠重資投入呢？
第一個優勢就係大。喺2025 年，印度汽車市場取得咗551.7 萬輛嘅新車銷量，同比增長 6%，刷新咗歷史紀錄，位居全球第三大汽車市場，已经连续四年超越日本，僅次於中國同美國。
呢個含金量唔使多講啦，而印度取得呢一成績，主要係因為印度一直喺推動減稅政策，促進消費，這導致國內消費意願出現咗明顯增強。
第二個優點係近，就係離日系車賣得動嘅地方近，如非洲等其他地區。
所以，印度對於日本車廠，更似一個建喺十字路口中央嘅便利店，你唔使將車分別運去八個國家，只需要喺印度呢站造好，然後一船一船甩去，就能削減唔少成本。
《日本經濟新聞》亦認為，印度有望轉變為佢哋全球嘅汽車供應中心。
第三個優點係穩。要知道，日系車嘅優勢就係燃油車，畢竟引擎、變速箱、底盤三大件，佢哋已經玩咗好多年，技術積累喺全球都係數一數二。
但係中國汽車市場已經全力推動電動化、智能化發展，導致日系車嘅優勢越來越弱，根本無法發揮出嚟，但印度唔一樣，佢擁有充電樁少、電動化進程緩慢嘅特點，印度老百姓買車，都仲係盯住平、省油、易修，而呢三點正係日系車嘅老本行。
尤其係鈴木，一直係印度汽車市場嘅常青樹，幾乎年年穩坐暢銷車型寶座，口碑好，勝過任何廣告。
所以，日本車廠大力佈局印度市場，顯然是經過深思熟慮嘅。
但，印度市場真係咁好混咩？
難啃嘅印度市場
當然，印度亦唔係完美得似個香口格，佢嘅缺點同佢嘅優點一樣明顯，而且每一個都夠日本車廠喝一壺。
先講電動化，冇錯，眼睇下印度充電樁少、電動車賣唔動，確實係日系燃油車嘅避風港。但你得諗諗，呢個“避風港”能避幾耐？
印度此前可係喊出咗 2030 年電動車佔新車 30% 嘅口號，雖然聽落似吹水，但抵唔住人哋真補錢、真建充電站。
試諗下，萬一有日印度突然開竅，開始大力推動電動化、搞基建，充電樁似雨後春筍咁冒出來，嗰日系車唔就傻眼？
呢唔係泰國市場嘅翻版咩？
當年日系車喺泰國都係躺贏，整個東南亞市場，都被稱為日系車嘅後花園，結果泰國率先推動電動化，中國電動車一嚟，直接就成咗香口格，再睇日系車，喺泰國嘅市場份額嘩嘩嚟咗落。
如果印度係電動化一加速，歷史大概率會重演，而而家呢次，日系車連逃嘅地方都快冇咗，點樣預防，將成為日本車廠嘅首要問題。
再講政策，印度嘅政策就似一鍋咖哩，你永遠唔知下一口食到係雞肉定係馬鈴薯。
呢個魔幻嘅國家，今日係低關稅鼓勵建廠，明日就可能罰你一筆巨款，更令人頭痛嘅係強制合資，外國車廠想喺印度賣車，要搵本地夥伴搭檔，等你工廠建好咗、供應鏈搭完咗，印度直接背刺你，到嗰陣無論係加錢定撤資，換嚟嘅都係心痛。
所以你看，印度呢個市場，就好似一個睇落好甜嘅芒果，咬落去第一口仲行，再啃幾口就摸著硬核。
日系車而家嘅算盤係，趁住核都未硌牙，趕緊多啃幾口，但核遲早會硌到，只係唔知係邊一日。
尾聲
日系車呢趟印度之旅，唔係去旅遊，係去搵食。
中國同東南亞嘅飯桌更擁擠，生產、運輸嘅成本又提高咗，放眼全球，就印度呢口鍋仲冒住熱氣，哪怕入面煮嘅係咖哩味嘅石頭，都要硬著頭皮啃落去。
日本車廠想擴大市場，印度想嘅係拉動經濟、解決就業，雙方都有各自嘅心思。
至於結局係日系車喺印度重新封神，定係好似當年嘅部分友商一樣灰溜溜走人，那就唔知啦。
但無論點樣，呢場戲先至開始，我哋慢慢睇就得啦。
反正印度嘅故事，從來唔會悶。
車型概覽
Lamborghini Urus 值唔值得睇，第一步唔係望牌子或者外形，而係睇佢能唔能夠配合你嘅香港日常。 呢篇會集中講高速巡航、併線同超車信心，幫你用買家角度篩走唔適合嘅選擇。
售價仍待確認，買家可以先把佢放入候選名單，等價格落實後再同同級車逐項比較。
購車價格指南
Lamborghini Urus 目前售價仍未清晰，較理性嘅做法係先睇版本、車身大小同動力形式，等價格落實後再決定值唔值得落訂。
如果有幾個版本可揀，可以先將 2024 4.0T S（價格待確認）、2024 4.0T Performante（價格待確認） 放喺同一張清單。日常通勤重視舒適同易用，家庭買家就要優先睇後排、尾箱同安全配置。
核心規格重點
睇 Lamborghini Urus 嘅規格，重點唔係背數字，而係理解佢喺香港用車場景會帶嚟咩分別。
471/490 kW、850 N·m 嘅輸出，令高速併線同短距離超車更有信心。 車長 5112/5137 mm、車闊 2018/2026 mm、車高 1638/1618 mm、軸距 3003/3006 mm 可以幫你預判商場停車場、屋苑車位同後排腿部空間。 手自一體(AT)、前置四駆 會影響起步順滑度、濕地穩定感同長途巡航性格。
優缺點分析
Lamborghini Urus 嘅優點唔需要講到天花龍鳳，真正有價值係佢能唔能夠令日常用車更省心：動力輸出對高速同上斜更有底氣、空間同車身尺寸方便家庭買家預判實用性。
要留意嘅係，要先確認屋苑、公司或常去商場嘅充電條件、香港停車場同窄路使用要留意車身闊度。呢啲唔一定係缺點，但係落訂前應該先諗清楚。
買家常見問題
買 Lamborghini Urus 之前，真正要問嘅唔係單一規格，而係佢可唔可以融入你每日嘅生活節奏。
常見疑問係「燃油版 Lamborghini Urus 嘅馬力同加速表現係點？」簡單講，停售前嘅 Lamborghini Urus 繼續沿用以 4.0 公升 V8 雙渦輪增壓引擎作為心臟。前期版本標準車型最大輸出約 650 匹馬力，扭力 850 Nm，0-100 km/h 加速需時 3.6 秒，極速可達 305 km/h。 放到實際用車，就係要睇佢對通勤、泊車、家庭乘坐同長期成本有幾大幫助。
同級對比內容
將 Lamborghini Urus 放入同級車清單時，唔建議只用外形或者品牌光環決定。比較順序可以係：先等售價落實，再決定佢應該同邊個級距比較、再睇動力係咪足夠應付高速併線同滿載、最後睇車身大小、座位同尾箱是否適合家人。
咁樣篩選會貼近香港買家真實生活：平日塞車、商場泊車、周末去新界、甚至一家人出入，先係一部車每日要面對嘅考驗。
用車全周期指南
擁有 Lamborghini Urus 最重要係先諗清楚充電節奏。屋苑、公司或者常去商場只要有穩定充電選項，電動化用車就會容易相處好多。
如果你主要喺市區行，視野、低速順滑度同泊車輔助會好影響心情；如果經常行高速或跨區，座椅舒適度、隔音同動力從容感會更重要。
車型概覽
睿藍汽車楓葉80v 值唔值得睇，第一步唔係望牌子或者外形，而係睇佢能唔能夠配合你嘅香港日常。 呢篇會集中講版本取捨，幫你用買家角度篩走唔適合嘅選擇。
售價仍待確認，買家可以先把佢放入候選名單，等價格落實後再同同級車逐項比較。
購車價格指南
睿藍汽車楓葉80v 目前售價仍未清晰，較理性嘅做法係先睇版本、車身大小同動力形式，等價格落實後再決定值唔值得落訂。
如果有幾個版本可揀，可以先將 2025 515km 前驅版（價格待確認）、2024 407km 前驅版（價格待確認）、2024 515km 前驅版（價格待確認） 放喺同一張清單。日常通勤重視舒適同易用，家庭買家就要優先睇後排、尾箱同安全配置。
核心規格重點
睇 睿藍汽車楓葉80v 嘅規格，重點唔係背數字，而係理解佢喺香港用車場景會帶嚟咩分別。
66.57/50.4/68.08 kWh 嘅電池容量，真正意義係可以幫你估算一星期通勤同周末出車要唔要中途補電。 515/407 km 嘅續航參考，對住喺新界、九龍同港島之間跨區行車嘅用家會更實際。 100 kW、230 N·m 嘅輸出，令高速併線同短距離超車更有信心。 車長 4812 mm、車闊 1909 mm、車高 1699 mm、軸距 2807 mm 可以幫你預判商場停車場、屋苑車位同後排腿部空間。
優缺點分析
睿藍汽車楓葉80v 嘅優點唔需要講到天花龍鳳，真正有價值係佢能唔能夠令日常用車更省心：電池同續航資訊有助安排通勤同補電、動力輸出對高速同上斜更有底氣、空間同車身尺寸方便家庭買家預判實用性。
要留意嘅係，要先確認屋苑、公司或常去商場嘅充電條件、香港停車場同窄路使用要留意車身闊度。呢啲唔一定係缺點，但係落訂前應該先諗清楚。
買家常見問題
買 睿藍汽車楓葉80v 之前，真正要問嘅唔係單一規格，而係佢可唔可以融入你每日嘅生活節奏。
常見疑問係「楓葉 80v (Maple 80v) 係咩車？」簡單講，楓葉 80v (Maple 80v) 係一部純電緊湊型 MPV，主打實用空間。 放到實際用車，就係要睇佢對通勤、泊車、家庭乘坐同長期成本有幾大幫助。
同級對比內容
將 睿藍汽車楓葉80v 放入同級車清單時，唔建議只用外形或者品牌光環決定。比較順序可以係：先等售價落實，再決定佢應該同邊個級距比較、再睇動力係咪足夠應付高速併線同滿載、再比較能源成本同補能便利、最後睇車身大小、座位同尾箱是否適合家人。
咁樣篩選會貼近香港買家真實生活：平日塞車、商場泊車、周末去新界、甚至一家人出入，先係一部車每日要面對嘅考驗。
用車全周期指南
擁有 睿藍汽車楓葉80v 最重要係先諗清楚充電節奏。屋苑、公司或者常去商場只要有穩定充電選項，電動化用車就會容易相處好多。
如果你主要喺市區行，視野、低速順滑度同泊車輔助會好影響心情；如果經常行高速或跨區，座椅舒適度、隔音同動力從容感會更重要。
