In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers compare Proton X70 and Chery Tiggo Cross when choosing a car. Both cars are quite close in price and positioning, so today we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.

Price and Variants

Proton X70's OTR price in Malaysia is RM 106,800 - 122,300, with a total of 3 variants, including 1.5L Standard 2WD (RM 106,800), 1.5L Executive 2WD (RM 115,800), 1.5L Premium 2WD (RM 122,300), etc.

Chery Tiggo Cross's OTR price in Malaysia is RM 88,750 - 99,750, with a total of 2 variants, including 2025 HEV 1.5L CSH (RM 99,750), 2025 1.5T Standard (RM 88,750), etc.

In terms of price, the starting price of Chery Tiggo Cross is RM 18,050 cheaper than Proton X70. Honestly, in this price range, a gap of a few thousand is actually not that significant; the key lies in overall cost-performance and long-term usage costs.

Power and Fuel Consumption

Proton X70 is equipped with a 1.5L Turbo, 140 hp. Official fuel consumption is 7.0 L/100km.

Chery Tiggo Cross is equipped with a 1.5L 4-cyl, 105 hp. Official fuel consumption is 6.0 L/100km.

In terms of power, Proton X70's 1.5L Turbo has 35 more horsepower than Chery Tiggo Cross's 1.5L 4-cyl, offering more confidence in mid-range acceleration, especially when overtaking on highways. However, Chery Tiggo Cross may have better fuel economy, and the difference in daily city commuting will not be too large.

Safety Features

Proton X70's safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), with active safety systems including ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).

Chery Tiggo Cross's safety rating is TBD, with active safety systems including Basic.

Regarding safety features, both cars have received good ratings. However, Proton X70's ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA) and Chery Tiggo Cross's Basic differ in functions. If you value active safety more, you can carefully compare the feature lists of both.

Space and Comfort

Proton X70 body length is 4400 mm, trunk is 400 L.

Chery Tiggo Cross body length is 4400 mm, trunk is 400 L.

The dimensions of both cars are almost the same, with little difference in interior space. For cars of this level, daily use is completely sufficient.

Configuration and Technology

Proton X70 adopts FWD drive method.

Chery Tiggo Cross adopts FWD drive method.

Both cars have the same drive method, both are FWD, and the daily driving experience will not differ much.

Conclusion

In general, Proton X70 and Chery Tiggo Cross are both very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends on your personal needs and budget. We suggest doing your research thoroughly, compare quotes from several dealerships, then go for a test drive to make the final decision. Buying a car is a major decision, spending some time doing research will never be wrong.

比亚迪助力香港足球文化节 与足球少年一起见证曼城国米巅峰对决。

8月1日，香港足球文化节迎来一场万众瞩目的豪门对决——英超蓝月曼城与意甲蓝黑军团国际米兰的季前赛。作为曼城和国际米兰双边的官方合作伙伴，同时也是本次赛事的赞助商，比亚迪全力助阵巅峰之战，彰显中国品牌的全球格局，新能源科技邂逅足球热爱，实现中国品牌与世界顶级足球 IP 的双向奔赴。

赛事全程，比亚迪为两支球队提供专属出行保障。比亚迪旗下车型承担了球队通勤、赛事后勤重任，以世界领先的新能源科技护航赛事圆满举办，将绿色出行理念融入这场万人瞩目的足球狂欢。

本场香港足球文化节汇聚足坛双冠豪门与全球新能源冠军，上演了强强联合的戏码。曼城、国米均坐拥联赛与欧冠顶级荣誉，各自缔造足坛五冠王传奇，是欧洲足坛顶尖战力。作为两大豪门官方合作伙伴，比亚迪蝉联全球新能源销量冠军，2025年跻身全球车企前五，海外市场高速增长，凭借世界领先的技术实力联合顶级足球豪门，完成多重冠军的跨界联袂。

喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拿 Proton X70 同 Toyota Yaris Cross 嚟做比較。呢兩款車喺價格同定位上都幾近，今日我就從多個方面做一個詳細嘅比較，幫你省下做功課嘅時間。

價錢同版本

Proton X70 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 106,800 - 122,300，一共有 3 個版本，包括 1.5L Standard 2WD（RM 106,800）、1.5L Executive 2WD（RM 115,800）、1.5L Premium 2WD（RM 122,300） 等。

Toyota Yaris Cross 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 99,900 - 109,900，一共有 2 個版本，包括 2026 1.5L Standard（RM 99,900）、2026 HEV 1.5L Standard（RM 109,900） 等。

由價錢嚟睇，Toyota Yaris Cross 嘅起步價比 Proton X70 平咗 RM 6,900。老實講，喺呢個價格段，幾千蚊嘅差距其實唔算大，關鍵仲係睇整體嘅性價比同長期使用成本。

動力同油耗

Proton X70 配備 1.5L Turbo，馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。

Toyota Yaris Cross 配備 1.5L 4-cyl，馬力 105 hp。官方油耗 6.0 L/100km。

動力方面，Proton X70 嘅 1.5L Turbo 比 Toyota Yaris Cross 嘅 1.5L 4-cyl 多咗 35 匹馬力，中段加速更有信心，尤其係跑高速公路超車嘅時候。不過 Toyota Yaris Cross 嘅油耗可能更友好，日常市區通勤差別唔會太大。

安全配備

Proton X70 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA)。

Toyota Yaris Cross 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 TSS。

兩款車嘅安全評級一樣，喺呢個級別入面安全配備都算俾好齊全啦。而家嘅新車安全性都唔差，唔使太擔心呢一點。

空間同舒適度

Proton X70 車身長 4400 mm，行李廂 400 L。

Toyota Yaris Cross 車身長 4400 mm，行李廂 400 L。

兩款車嘅尺寸幾乎一樣，車內空間差別唔大。呢個級別嘅車，日常使用完全夠用。

配備同科技

Proton X70 採用 FWD 驅動方式。

Toyota Yaris Cross 採用 FWD 驅動方式。

兩款車嘅驅動方式一樣，都係 FWD，日常駕駛感受唔會有太大分別。

總結

總體嚟講，Proton X70 同 Toyota Yaris Cross 都係馬來西亞市場好唔錯嘅車款。揀邊一輛，關鍵仲係睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。

比亚迪终于要把机器人搬进4S店了。官方确认，人形机器人产品8月在郑州“迪空间”首次公开亮相。这款代号“小迪”的机器人身高1.61米，体重58.5公斤，全身31个自由度，能讲6种方言和6种外语。

这不是概念模型，是能实际干活的。手部7个自由度，抓取精度正负1毫米，能完成抓取、放置、按压、装配这些动作。交互方面支持人脸、唇动、手势三重识别，对话响应1.5秒以内，还能多轮打断和话题切换。

李柯之前透了底：“目标是每家门店放2到3台。”这些机器人的日常工作就是迎宾、讲解车型、功能演示、活跃展厅气氛。本质上就是把销售顾问的一部分工作交给机器人来干。

为什么选门店场景切入？比亚迪全球超过3万个经销网点，这是现成的应用场景。中信建投分析师许光坦说得很直白：车企搞机器人有成本、效率、技术三重优势，从门店导购切入是“三步走”的第一步——先商用，再工厂，最终进家庭。

比亚迪的机器人研发其实从2022年就开始了，目前已经有工艺机器人、协作机器人、移动机器人等多条产品线。今年7月还跟香港科技大学签了联合实验室协议，未来几年投入数千万港元搞具身智能研究。

不过有意思的是，6月网上流传过一波“比亚迪机器人代号尧舜禹、150台上岗、年内2万台”的消息，被官方全盘否认。说明比亚迪对这块业务还是相对低调的，不想过度炒概念。

不止比亚迪。特斯拉Optimus、小鹏IRON、理想都在做，广汽也有布局。6月工信部启动了人形机器人实景实训专项行动，目标是年底万台级落地。车企集体下场，这条赛道今年下半年会非常热闹。

In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers compare Proton X50 and MG MG HS when choosing a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time doing research.

Prices and Variants

Proton X50 OTR price in Malaysia is RM 89,800 - 113,300, with a total of 4 variants, including 1.5T Executive (RM 89,800), 1.5T Premium (RM 101,800), 1.5T Flagship (RM 113,300), etc.

MG MG HS OTR price in Malaysia is RM 130,450 - 146,450, with a total of 2 variants, including 1.5L Standard (RM 105,000), 1.5L Executive (RM 115,000), etc.

From a price perspective, the Proton X50's starting price is indeed RM 40,650 cheaper than the MG MG HS. If your budget is limited, Proton's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. However, note that the few thousand savings might come with compromises in features, it depends on your specific needs.

Safety Features

Proton X50 safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).

MG MG HS safety rating is TBD, active safety systems include Basic.

Regarding safety features, both cars have received good ratings. However, there are some differences in functionality between Proton X50's ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA) and MG MG HS's Basic. If you value active safety, you can carefully compare their feature lists.

Space and Comfort

Proton X50 body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.

MG MG HS body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.

The dimensions of both cars are almost the same, interior space differences are not significant. For this class of cars, daily use is more than enough.

Who is it suitable for?

Proton X50 and MG MG HS are both mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, prioritize the one with better reputation; if you care more about cost-performance ratio and features, choose the one with richer configuration. Ultimately, it is recommended to test drive both; personal experience is the most important.

Summary

Overall, Proton X50 and MG MG HS are both very good car models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends on your personal needs and budget. It is recommended that everyone do their homework, compare quotes from several car dealerships, then test drive to make the final decision. Buying a car is a big deal, taking time to do research will never be wrong.

In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers compare Proton X50 and MG MG HS when choosing a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.

Price and Versions

Proton X50 OTR price in Malaysia is RM 89,800 - 113,300, there are 4 versions in total, including 1.5T Executive (RM 89,800), 1.5T Premium (RM 101,800), 1.5T Flagship (RM 113,300), etc.

MG MG HS OTR price in Malaysia is RM 130,450 - 146,450, there are 2 versions in total, including 1.5L Standard (RM 105,000), 1.5L Executive (RM 115,000), etc.

From the price perspective, Proton X50's starting price is indeed RM 40,650 cheaper than MG MG HS. If your budget is limited, Proton's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. But note that the few thousand cheaper may have trade-offs in equipment, depending on your needs.

Safety Equipment

Proton X50 safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).

MG MG HS safety rating is TBD, active safety systems include Basic.

In terms of safety equipment, both cars have received decent ratings. However, there are some differences in functions between Proton X50's ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA) and MG MG HS's Basic. If you value active safety more, you can compare the function lists of both in detail.

Maintenance and Service

Proton X50 warranty 5 years/150,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.

MG MG HS warranty 7 years/150,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.

Who is this suitable for?

Proton X50 and MG MG HS are both mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, prioritize the one with better reputation; if you care more about value for money and equipment, choose the one with richer configuration. In the end, it is recommended to test drive both models, personal experience is the most important.

Summary

Overall, Proton X50 and MG MG HS are both quite good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends on your personal needs and budget. We suggest doing your homework, comparing quotes from multiple dealers, and then test driving to make a final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending time on research is never wrong.

By Wan Xulong

On July 20, Honda and GAC Group announced they will extend the joint venture agreement until 2038.

The original joint venture agreement was set to expire in 2028. Honda chose to complete the renewal two years early in 2026. Mainstream analysis in overseas financial circles believes this move aims to forcibly eliminate external uncertainty regarding the future of the joint venture.

Over the past year, rumors about GAC Honda closing backward production lines and reducing capacity have continued to ferment in the market. Overseas capital markets even once interpreted these moves as a precursor to the Japanese giant preparing for strategic withdrawal. This early-signed new agreement indeed allayed so-called concerns about "withdrawal".

This new agreement is full of realistic strategic considerations in terms of duration and equity ratio.

Honda abandoned the grand narrative of a 30-year timeline when the factory was built in 1998, setting the duration conservatively at 10 years. In today's world where smart EV technology iterates rapidly, predicting the industry end-game 30 years later is meaningless. 10 years just covers the reshuffling period for the complete transition from traditional fuel vehicles to new energy.

The Chinese market has long passed the simple profit center stage, evolving into the world's most efficient smart driving testing ground and the source of 3-electric technology. Honda is actually bearing the pain of eliminating backward capacity over 10 years, relying on China's massive supply chain to complete the reconstruction of underlying technology. This is the winning hand for its survival in the new energy era.

On the other hand, the new agreement maintains the 50-50 equal equity ratio. Against the background of the comprehensive opening of joint venture equity ratios, cross-border car companies generally seek absolute control to gain more profits. Honda chose to stand still on equity, obviously having completely different ideas.

The internal combustion engine technology barrier and old system of the fuel vehicle era have become like rotting wood. Facing the brand-new electrification underlying architecture, Honda urgently needs to rely on China's extremely competitive smart driving algorithms and 3-electric supply chain system. Maintaining an equal equity ratio represents a new balancing contract exchanged for technology empowerment after the Chinese local automotive industry explodes comprehensively in core technology fields. This renewal that seems to stabilize the army's morale actually also represents the end of the era of one-way technology input. In the future, the "Joint Venture 2.0" model, where the Chinese side leads the new energy architecture while the foreign side handles brand quality control, will truly determine the future of joint venture car companies.

The Flip of the Underlying Model

In the window period created by this new 10-year contract, GAC Honda needs to undergo a painful and thorough transformation. It is transforming from a pure manufacturing execution unit in Honda's global strategy into a co-creation R&D center highly dependent on Chinese local technology empowerment.

In 1999, GAC Honda introduced the sixth-generation Accord into the Chinese market simultaneously, breaking the price monopoly of imported luxury sedans all at once. For the following 20-plus years, GAC Honda surged ahead. Many heavy-hitting products like Fit, Odyssey, Crider, and Vezel were launched consecutively, finally creating a historical peak of 808,900 annual sales units in 2020.

Supporting this premium and sales volume was Honda's advantage in internal combustion engine and vehicle engineering dimensions, which had a very high match with the domestic market at that time. These technologies not only won sales volume but also established industry standards in the Chinese market for 20 years.

In the powertrain field, Honda was jokingly referred to by the folk as "buying engines and getting a car for free". From VTEC to later i-VTEC technology, then to the Earth Dreams Technology series engines of the turbocharging and hybrid era, relying on efficient combustion technology, it achieved extremely low fuel consumption while outputting surging power. The i-MMD dual-motor hybrid system even directly raised the technology threshold of the entire Chinese hybrid market with over 40% thermal efficiency. In that stage, Honda's engine parameters were the industry benchmark that Chinese local car companies had to catch up in power R&D.

In terms of mechanical space utilization, Honda's concept of maximizing space for human seating and minimizing space occupied by machinery also profoundly reshaped China's family car market. Chinese consumers have an extreme craving for interior space. Relying on extremely exquisite chassis suspension layout and space excavation, small cars like Fit have the most outstanding seating experience among products in the same class, while Odyssey directly created the golden space standard for Chinese family MPVs. This class-skipping space performance forced all car brands attempting to enter the Chinese market to make space optimization the first priority of car building.

But now, the mechanical moat proud of the fuel vehicle era has quickly lost its protective efficiency before the 3-electric system and high-level smart driving. Facing the extremely strict iteration rhythm of the Chinese market, the foreign party finally realized that a global platform made behind closed doors cannot survive at all.

The direction of technology empowerment has undergone a historical reversal. For example, in GAC Honda's current new energy technology spectrum, the underlying Architecture W architecture has completely opened up to Chinese local supply chains. Battery packs directly adopted CATL's ternary lithium batteries, intelligent cockpits integrated iFlytek and Huawei's technical ecosystems, and high-level smart driving systems started to extend olive branches to local algorithm companies like Momenta.

Perhaps you might wonder, this migration of technological focus is already old news for many joint venture brands a few years ago, why did GAC Honda, which had deep insights into the Chinese market for more than 20 years before and produced many best-selling models fitting domestic consumer needs, seem to turn slowly? The core reason is that a set of old supply chain systems, the constraints are far beyond our understanding.

Shattering the Keiretsu System

The flip of the underlying model is accompanied by a sense of violent tearing. GAC Honda's terminal sales volume in the first half of this year encountered a severe decline of over 50 percent. Reuters and Nikkei pointed out in recent reports that this is by no means a simple macroeconomic cycle fluctuation; an irreversible structural collapse is truly happening on Japanese joint venture brands. The appearance of this collapse is the excess of backward capacity, its core originates from the complete failure of the old supply chain system.

In the past few decades, Honda, or rather the Japanese automotive industry, has been invincible worldwide. At the supply chain level, the core winning hand is a closed system known as Keiretsu.

This system is centrally scheduled by the OEM, and component enterprises at various levels form a community of interest through cross-shareholding. Inside Honda, Keihin focuses on engine control, Showa focuses on chassis suspension, and Nissin Industrial focuses on braking systems. These three core suppliers constitute Honda's unique component "Three Families".

The most significant feature of the Keiretsu model is the Design-in joint development mechanism where guest engineers enter the OEM R&D center years in advance. This highly bonded software and hardware development mode compressed component manufacturing costs to the extreme and ensured one-million-level physical quality control consistency with strict internal collaboration. Honda's ability to conquer the global market with extremely high reliability relied entirely on this solid wall built by the "Three Families".

In the Chinese market, this model was perfectly replicated by GAC Honda. In the initial stage of factory building, Honda introduced all Japanese component giants within the system to Guangzhou Huangpu, forming a closed procurement ecology that water cannot penetrate. Chinese suppliers found it extremely difficult to penetrate this solidified component list. This highly closed collaborative development mechanism once helped GAC Honda quickly align with global manufacturing standards and established a ruling market position in the following 20 years.

Entering the era of smart electric vehicles, this method showed systemic rigidity and sluggishness.

The Keiretsu model is built on the incremental improvement of internal combustion engines and mechanical hardware, its core is the highly integrated mechanical calibration of software and hardware. Smart electric vehicles require software and hardware decoupling and centralized computing architecture. Facing the leap of battery chemical materials and the explosion of smart driving algorithms, Japanese component giants cannot incubate 3-electric technology with global competitiveness at all.

The more fatal contradiction lies in the mismatch of development rhythm. Japanese traditional supply chains are used to completing a durability closed-loop verification process lasting 36 to 48 months to ensure absolute component reliability. The technical half-life of the Chinese new energy market has shortened to less than one year. Chinese local car companies use open supply chains to compress vehicle development cycles to 18 to 24 months. Facing the Chinese market where code upgrades are promoted every month, the long verification process has become shackles binding Japanese car companies.

Even if Honda tried to save itself at the cross-border level, merging Keihin, Showa, Nissin Industrial and Hitachi Automotive Systems into Hitachi Astemo, and planning to increase its shareholding to 61% this year to unify command resources and aggressively attack AI and software development. This slow speed of internal integration still cannot keep up with the iteration rhythm of China's local.

To survive, GAC Honda must personally smash this closed high wall built by Japanese suppliers.

Facing the crazy drop in sales and the dissolution of the fuel vehicle base, GAC Honda is undergoing a cruel capacity clearing and supply chain breakthrough. While gradually shutting down some old fuel vehicle production lines in Guangzhou, the brand new new energy exclusive factory located in Guangzhou Huangpu with an initial annual capacity of 120,000 vehicles is in the key period of capacity ramp-up. Using high new heavy assets to replace old assets that could originally sustain blood creation, this alternation of breaking and establishing consumes enterprise cash flow extremely.

Conducted synchronously with capacity clearing is the complete liberation of procurement power.

On the next brand new EV models, GAC Honda decisively bypassed the traditional Japanese supply chain and deeply integrated Chinese local top technology enterprises into its own R&D system. The vehicle's core power battery pack directly switched to CATL's mature solution. The intelligent cockpit underlying level fully integrated iFlytek and Huawei's technology ecosystem. High-level smart driving algorithms directly adopted the end-to-end large model provided by Chinese startup company Chudu.

Completely smashing the interest fortress of the Keiretsu system and integrating China's top local 3-electric and smart driving enterprises into its own underlying architecture is the only path for GAC Honda to adapt to the cruel evolutionary rhythm of the Chinese market. Joint venture car companies are exactly in this pain of breaking old and establishing new, searching for the possibility of regaining vitality.

Staying in the Cruellest Gym

Honda chose to complete the renewal at this node in time, essentially forcing itself to stay in the world's cruelest business gym. In this market, the response speed of smart cockpits, the generalization ability of high-level smart driving, and the thermal efficiency of power batteries are repeatedly subjected to extreme pressure by hundreds of local car companies and tens of millions of consumers every day. This high-intensity competitive environment is an industrial ecosystem that any cross-border car company cannot replicate in its local market or European and American bases.

If choosing to strategically withdraw or contract the battle lines at this time, Honda can indeed protect the short-term financial report, but it will completely lose the antenna to perceive the world's most advanced smart electrification trends. Once leaving this super technology incubator China, Honda's R&D system will quickly degenerate in the following three to five years, becoming an island completely cut off from the global top 3-electric and software supply chains.

Staying at the table, it is not only about market share in China but also about Honda's defense capability at the global level.

The strong overseas expansion of China's local new energy vehicles has been fully opened. In Southeast Asia, Middle East, and South America, etc., which are advantage markets traditionally firmly controlled by Japanese car companies, Chinese car brands are launching fierce attacks carrying high-dimensional product power polished by extreme internal competition. Honda's profit highlands in Thailand, Indonesia and other places are facing unprecedented pressure.

In order to resist this dimensionality reduction strike on the global battlefield, Honda must cultivate product R&D capabilities on the Chinese local that can confront Chinese brands head-on. This is exactly the core strategic value of the reverse joint venture model.

GAC Honda and other joint venture enterprises are undertaking an extremely critical technology feedback role. Honda deeply integrates CATL batteries, Huawei ecosystems, and local startup smart driving algorithms within the Chinese joint venture system, not just to build a few cars suited to Chinese consumer tastes. Its true intention is to use the Chinese underlying technology architecture to quickly iterate a set of new energy solutions with global competitiveness.

Recent rare alliances between Honda and Nissan in electrification and intelligence dimensions also confirm the spread of this global defense anxiety. Facing the technology sprint of Chinese car companies, Japanese giants have given up the illusion of fighting alone. GAC Honda plays a key hub role in connecting China's top supply chains and Japanese global manufacturing systems within this huge defense network.

The Chinese market is reshaping Honda's technology base. GAC Honda's 10-year renewal agreement completely ends the one-way narrative of exchanging foreign technology for the Chinese market. Joint venture car companies are transforming into core pipelines for cross-border giants to draw nutrients from China's advanced industrial chains. This life-or-death self-revolution will ultimately decide whether Honda can hold a place in the future global smart car landscape.

In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers compare Perodua Aruz and Kia Sportage when choosing a car. These two models are quite close in terms of price and positioning. Today, we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.

Price and Versions

Perodua Aruz has an OTR price in Malaysia of RM 72,900 - 77,900, with a total of 2 versions, including 1.5L X (RM 72,900), 1.5L AV (RM 77,900), etc.

Kia Sportage has an OTR price in Malaysia of RM 129,639 - 179,320, with a total of 4 versions, including 2025 1.6T DCT 4WD High (RM 179,320), 2025 1.6T DCT 2WD High (RM 159,320), 2025 2.0L AT 2WD High (RM 139,639), etc.

From a price perspective, Perodua Aruz's starting price is indeed RM 56,739 cheaper than Kia Sportage. If your budget is limited, Perodua's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. However, keep in mind that the lower price difference might mean compromises in features, depending on your specific needs.

Safety Features

Perodua Aruz safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include.

Kia Sportage safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include Drive Wise.

Both cars have the same safety rating, and safety features are quite comprehensive within this class. New car safety is generally not poor nowadays, so no need to worry too much about this.

Maintenance and Care

Perodua Aruz warranty 5 years/150,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.

Kia Sportage warranty 5 years/300,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.

Who is it suitable for?

Perodua Aruz and Kia Sportage are both mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, you can prioritize the one with better reputation; if you care more about cost-performance and features, then choose the one with richer configuration. Ultimately, it is recommended to test drive both, as personal experience is the most important.

Conclusion

Overall, Perodua Aruz and Kia Sportage are both very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose mainly depends on your personal needs and budget. It is recommended to do your research, compare quotes from several car dealerships, and then test drive to make the final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, taking time to research will never be wrong.

7 月 16 日，廣汽集團 3000 萬用戶感恩活動於廣汽傳祺工廠進行。廣東省、廣州市、番禺區有關領導，中國汽車工業協會常務副會長兼祕書長付炳鋒，廣汽集團董事長馮興亞、總經理閤先慶等領導班子成員，業界合作夥伴、供應商和經銷商代表以及海內外車主代表、員工代表、媒體代表等共同出席，一齊見證廣汽迎來第 3000 萬位用戶嘅里程碑時刻。

活動現場，廣汽全球多座生產基地同步連線，廣汽本田 P7、廣汽豐田铂智 7、啟境 GT7、廣汽埃安 N60、廣汽昊鉑 S600 分別作為廣汽第 29999995 至第 29999999 輛車依次下線。最後，右軚版廣汽傳祺 M8 PHEV 作為第 3000 萬輛整車喺現場舞台閃亮登場。全線新能源下線車型陣列嘅集體亮相，成為廣汽全速推進電動化、智能化轉型嘅直觀印證。

隨後，馮興亞將第 3000 萬輛車嘅車匙交到泰國車主 Tony Jaa 先生手中，呢一刻定格唔只係一個數字，更加係廣汽與全球用戶「雙向奔赴」嘅溫馨見證。

呢份跨越山海嘅信任，正正係廣汽喺行業變局中突圍嘅底气。今年上半年，廣汽集團銷量 77.31 萬輛，按年增長 2.35%，當中新能源汽車銷量按年增長 68.8%；海外出口突破 12 萬輛，按年大增 132%，喺行業深度重塑期跑晒穩健嘅節奏。

「品質係廣汽永遠唔會讓步嘅底線。」馮興亞喺總結致辭時表示。喺廣汽嘅發展中，規模增長始終都以品質為底色。由研發端到製造端，廣汽建立咗全鏈條嚴苛嘅品質管控體系：每款新車上市前均需經過高寒、高溫、高原、高濕、高腐、山區、沙塵等「五高一山一塵」極端環境測試，完成「兩冬一夏」實地路試；借助試驗場、實驗室覆蓋整車 12 個大項、1500 多項驗證子項，實現體系化品質校驗；廣汽埃安智能生態工廠作為「全球首個新能源汽車燈塔工廠」，以數位化智能制造體系保障量產品質穩定。

喺核心安全技術層面，星靈安全守護體系構建四大防護維度，八大關鍵系統採納雙冗餘設計，已守護近 200 萬用戶，規避 628 萬次潛在出行風險；彈匣電池累計裝車 150 萬輛，安全行駛里程超過 1600 億公里；服務端同步加碼保障，廣汽喺行業內率先推出自主品牌「三擔責」政策，針對用戶關注嘅電池同智能駕駛輔助問題主動兜底，打消用戶用車顧慮。正正係呢一道道安全防線同一項項服務承諾，撐起廣汽 3000 萬銷量背後嘅品牌底气。

「用戶在意嘅，我哋放喺心口；用戶期盼嘅，我哋全力以赴。」馮興亞表示，呢份以用戶為中心嘅理念，早已經深深融入廣汽集團嘅發展基因。多年來，廣汽集團始終秉持「人為本、信為道、創為先」嘅企業理念，其中「人為本」嘅核心要義，正正係以用戶為本。

一方面，為直面問題、傾聽用戶心聲，廣汽常态化舉辦用戶全開麥活動，將用戶請到「屋企」，面對面交流。同時，成立專屬用戶洞察部門、推進問題由發現到解決嘅全流程變革，由組織機制上保障用戶訴求件件有回應、事事有着落。

另一方面，服務網絡同步加速滲透。喺渠道端，推進服務網絡下沉縣域，年內計劃新增建設 1000 家縣域授權門店；喺響應端，上線「超級管家」服務，實現 5 秒響應、2 小時訴求辦結，保障用戶訴求直达快辦。喺補能端，建設「9 縱 10 橫」補能網絡，已覆蓋全國 31 個省份 213 座城市，核心城區實現「直線 1 公里必有站」，自營充電樁數量超過 2.7 萬根，其中超充樁突破 2 萬根，為新能源車主提供便捷嘅補能服務。

今次感恩活動嘅核心主旨正正係向 3000 萬用戶嘅長期支持致以誠摯回饋同感謝。活動現場，馮興亞宣佈，由即日起，廣汽正式啟動「廣汽集團 3000 萬輛下線·煥新感恩季」，廣汽本田、廣汽豐田、廣汽傳祺、廣汽埃安、廣汽昊鉑同啟境汽車六大乘用車品牌，將圍繞新購、置換到增購等分別推出特色政策，回饋每一份嘅陪伴同支持。

3 Guinness World Records in Hand! Geely's "Thunder 16-in-1" Electric Drive, Welds Shut the Global E-Drive Ceiling

On July 16, Geely Automobile Group officially released Geely Galaxy's world's first "Thunder 16-in-1 Intelligent Electric Drive". Relying on Xingqu Technology's years of technical accumulation and complete industrial layout, this new electric drive achieved a generational breakthrough in energy saving, performance, and reliability, directly pulling the daily usage experience of pure electric vehicles to a new height. The Geely Galaxy TT, equipped with this electric drive for the first time, won two Guinness World Records at once: "Lowest Energy Consumption for Driving a Production Pure Electric Sedan Around Qinghai Lake" and "Longest Continuous Dual-Car Drift on Slippery Roads (Electric Vehicle)", proving the global leading strength of Chinese brands in the electric drive field with solid results.

The "Thunder 16-in-1 Intelligent Electric Drive" released this time has the most intuitive feature of integrating 16 hardware and software functions that were previously scattered into one, equivalent to packaging several independently working devices into one highly collaborative unit. It not only has over 180 fewer scattered parts, but its weight is also 15% lighter than mainstream industry products, and can free up an additional 28L of trunk space inside the vehicle. For ordinary car owners, it means carrying more luggage and being more practical for daily travel.

In terms of the most concerned matter of saving power, this electric drive achieved the industry's first place in mass production of the same level with a 93.8% comprehensive efficiency. Simply put, from current transmission, energy conversion to daily full-scenario driving, every link is "picking details" to reduce waste: 800V high-voltage platform plus shortened conduction paths directly reduce current transmission loss by 80%; more advanced silicon carbide chips, thinner silicon steel sheets, and high-precision gears further minimize losses in the electricity, magnetism, and force conversion process; plus the support of Geely Xingrui AI Cloud Power Intelligent Energy Management Large Model, when turning on heating in winter, driving long distances on highways, or commuting during city rush hours, the system will automatically find the most power-saving operation mode. Car owners don't need to deliberately control their footwork, they can find a balance between comfort and power saving. It is precisely thanks to this extreme energy-saving design that the Galaxy TT achieved an ultra-low power consumption of 8.20 kWh/100km in the test run around Qinghai Lake, setting a Guinness World Record for lowest energy consumption for production pure electric sedans around Qinghai Lake.

In terms of power performance, it achieved the level of the top tier of the same level. The four-wheel drive version reaches a comprehensive power of 425kW, and 0-100 acceleration only takes 3.8 seconds. The rarest thing is "fast and stable": the average command response of traditional electric drives is 40ms, it relies on the design of one-chip integration to compress it directly to the fastest 2ms, the power follows the moment the accelerator is stepped on, truly achieving "hits exactly where pointed"; AI algorithms can also reduce real-time torque deviation from 3% to 1%, greatly improving the accuracy of power output of the wheels; plus 54-channel directional cooling technology, the maximum temperature of the motor can be reduced by 15 degrees Celsius, even if driving intensely for a long time, there will be no power attenuation or system torque limit situation.

It is precisely relying on this performance of "performance without interruption throughout the process" that the Galaxy TT completed over 46km of continuous dual-car drift on slippery roads, breaking the record set by Porsche in 2020. Many people may not know that drifting pure electric vehicles is much more difficult than fuel cars: at the moment of starting drift, precise torque must be exploded in milliseconds to allow the car body to smoothly enter the sliding state; during the drift process, power output must be constantly finely adjusted, a slight deviation will cause loss of control; under extreme working conditions of continuous tens of kilometers, the electric drive must withstand continuous high speed and high thermal load, and cannot trigger protection due to overheating. This successful challenge is equivalent to giving all ordinary car owners a reassurance: even if encountering heavy rain and slippery roads, continuous climbing, or long-time intense driving, this electric drive can still output stably and won't let you down.

In terms of reliability, this electric drive has undergone an "over-standard level" test. From single parts to complete electric drive assembly, to the whole vehicle on the road, covering 9000+ tests in 15 areas, cumulatively completing 5 million kilometers of durability verification, and also obtained the authoritative certification of CAERI "High Quality Electric Drive". It also comes with a cloud "online doctor" - Smart Health Management System, relying on AI life prediction model to actively give key components a "checkup", not waiting for parts to break to warn maintenance in advance, turning the past "repair after break" into "active care", reducing the failure probability in the process of using the car from the root.

On the day of launch, Xingqu Technology also opened to the outside world for the first time, showing Geely's complete electric drive R&D, intelligent manufacturing and full-chain industrial layout to the outside world. Currently, Xingqu Technology's R&D and manufacturing network spans multiple cities in China as well as Sweden and Malaysia, with cumulative patent applications exceeding 1000, and the highest automation rate of five major intelligent manufacturing bases exceeds 95%, production accuracy reaches micron level, and the whole process of every electric drive can be intelligently traced. In the first half of this year, the motor installation volume of Xingqu Technology has firmly stayed in the industry TOP3. Products not only serve domestic brands like Geely Galaxy and Zeekr, but also supply to many international car companies such as Volvo, Jaguar Land Rover, and Renault, and signed long-term orders with many top European car companies.

At this point, Geely has cultivated three "Hidden Champions" enterprises in the three core fields of hybrid, battery, and electric drive: Haosi Power, Jiyao Tixing, and Xingqu Technology, forming a full-chain autonomous and controllable three-electric technology system. From the Guinness World Record of over 2608km range created by the Thor Intelligent Hybrid before, to the two new records won by this Thunder 16-in-1 Intelligent Electric Drive, Geely is reshaping the global new energy vehicle power technology standards with solid technical breakthroughs, injecting strong Chinese power into the innovation and upgrade of the global new energy industry.

In Malaysia's SUV market, many buyers compare Perodua Aruz and Honda WR-V when choosing a car. The pricing and positioning of these two cars are quite similar. Today, we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to save you the time of doing research.

Price and Versions

Perodua Aruz OTR price in Malaysia is RM 72,900 - 77,900, with a total of 2 versions, including 1.5L X (RM 72,900), 1.5L AV (RM 77,900) etc.

Honda WR-V OTR price in Malaysia is RM 89,900 - 107,900, with a total of 4 versions, including 2023 1.5L V (RM 99,900), 2023 1.5L E (RM 95,900), 2023 1.5L S (RM 89,900) etc.

From the price perspective, Perodua Aruz's starting price is indeed RM 17,000 cheaper than Honda WR-V. If your budget is limited, Perodua's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. But also note, the few thousand saved might involve trade-offs in features, it depends on your specific needs.

Safety Features

Perodua Aruz safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include.

Honda WR-V safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include Honda SENSING.

Both cars have the same safety rating, safety features are quite comprehensive in this class. New car safety is not bad now, no need to worry too much about this.

Space and Comfort

Perodua Aruz body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.

Honda WR-V body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.

Both cars' dimensions are almost the same, interior space difference is not large. Cars in this class are sufficient for daily use.

Maintenance and Service

Perodua Aruz warranty 5 years/150,000 km, service interval every 10,000 km or 6 months.

Honda WR-V warranty 5 years/unlimited mileage, service interval every 10,000 km or 6 months.

Who is it suitable for

Perodua Aruz and Honda WR-V are both mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use, daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale price more, you can prioritize the one with better reputation; if you care more about value for money and features, choose the one with richer configuration. Ultimately, it is recommended to test drive both, personal experience is the most important.

Conclusion

Overall, Perodua Aruz and Honda WR-V are both excellent models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends on your personal needs and budget. It is recommended to do your research, compare quotes from several car dealerships, and then test drive to make the final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending time on research will never go wrong.

喺馬來西亞嘅汽車市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拿 Hyundai Palisade 同 Porsche Macan 嚟做比較。今日我哋由多個方面做一個詳細嘅比較，幫你省返做功課嘅時間。

價錢同版本

現代 Palisade 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 368,838 - 399,838，一共有 4 個版本，包括 2023 3.8L 2WD Luxe 7 Seats Petrol（RM 399,838）、2023 2.2T 4WD Executive 7 Seats Diesel（RM 389,838）、2023 3.8L 2WD Luxe 8 Seats Petrol（RM 378,838） 等。

保時捷 Macan 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 469,000 - 469,000，一共有 4 個版本，包括 2025 55 quattro S line（RM 467,285）、2025 50 quattro Advanced（RM 361,135）、PMT 1874, Lorong IKS BukitTengah 14000 Bukit Mertajam（RM 296,610） 等。

從價錢睇來，現代 Palisade 嘅起步價確實比 Porsche Macan 平咗 RM 100,162。如果你預算有限，現代嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需求。但要注意，平嗰幾千蚊，可能會喺配備上有取舍，具體要睇你嘅需求。

動力同油耗

現代 Palisade 配備 2.0L Turbo，馬力 220 hp。官方油耗 9.5 L/100km。

保時捷 Macan 配備 3.0L Turbo，馬力 350 hp。官方油耗 12.0 L/100km。

動力方面，保時捷 Macan 嘅 3.0L Turbo 比現代 Palisade 嘅 2.0L Turbo 多咗 130 匹馬力。不過日常喺市區開嘅話，兩款車嘅動力都夠用，唔會覺得唔夠力。

空間同舒適度

現代 Palisade 車身長 4400 mm，尾箱 400 L。

保時捷 Macan 車身長 4400 mm，尾箱 400 L。

兩款車嘅尺寸幾乎一樣，車內空間分別唔大。呢個級別嘅車，日常使用完全夠用。

適合邊種人

現代 Palisade 同 Porsche Macan 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更重視品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰一款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，那就揀配備更豐富嗰款。最終都好建議兩款都去試駕，親身體驗先係最重要嘅。

總結

總體嚟講，現代 Palisade 同 Porsche Macan 都係馬來西亞市場好唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵都要睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。

喺馬來西亞嘅汽車市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拿 Ford Everest 同 Volvo XC40 嚟做比較。今日我哋由多個方面做一次詳細嘅比較，幫你省返做功課嘅時間。

價錢同版本

Ford Everest 喺馬來西亞嘅 O T R 售價係 RM 266,338 - 430,838，一共有 6 個版本，包括 2026 3.0T 4WD Platinum（RM 430,838）、2026 2.0T 4WD Platinum（RM 348,838）、2026 2.0T 4WD Sport（RM 316,838）等。

Volvo XC40 喺馬來西亞嘅 O T R 售價係 RM 278,888 - 278,888，一共有 1 個版本，包括 2025 2.0T Plus（RM 278,888）等。

由價錢嚟睇，Ford Everest 嘅起步價確實比 Volvo XC40 平咗 RM 12,550。如果你預算有限，Ford 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需求。但都要注意，平嘅那幾千蚊，可能喺配備上要有取捨，具體要看你嘅需求。

安全配備

Ford Everest 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 Co-Pilot360。

Volvo XC40 嘅安全評級係 5★ (Euro NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 Pilot Assist, City Safety (標準)。

安全配備方面，兩款車都拿到唔錯嘅評級。不過 Ford Everest 嘅 Co-Pilot360 同 Volvo XC40 嘅 Pilot Assist, City Safety (標準) 喺功能上有些分別，如果你比較睇重主動安全嘅話，可以仔細對比下兩者嘅功能清單。

配備同科技

Ford Everest 採用 FWD 驅動方式。

Volvo XC40 採用 FWD 驅動方式。

兩款車嘅驅動方式一樣，都係 FWD，日常駕駛感受唔會有太大分別。

適合邊類人

Ford Everest 同 Volvo XC40 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更睇重品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰一款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，那就揀配備更豐富嗰款。最後都係建議兩款都去試駕，親身體驗先係最重要嘅。

總結

總嚟講，Ford Everest 同 Volvo XC40 都係馬來西亞市場好唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一部，關鍵始終都要睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建议大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。

喺馬來西亞嘅汽車市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拿 Subaru Outback 同 Land Rover Discovery Sport 嚟做比較。今日我哋從多個方面做一個詳細嘅對比，幫你省下做功課嘅時間。

價錢同版本

Subaru Outback 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 260,000 - 280,000，一共有 2 個版本，包括 2025 2.4T R-Touring EyeSight（RM 310,340）、2025 2.5L Touring EyeSight（RM 280,340） 等。

Land Rover Discovery Sport 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 499,800 - 499,800，一共有 1 個版本，包括 Standard（RM 499,800） 等。

從價錢嚟睇，Subaru Outback 嘅起步價確實比 Land Rover Discovery Sport 便宜咗 RM 239,800。如果你預算有限，Subaru 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需求。但都要注意，便宜嗰幾千塊，可能喺配備上會有取舍，具體要睇你嘅需求。

安全配備

Subaru Outback 嘅安全評級係 TBD，主動安全系統包括 Basic。

Land Rover Discovery Sport 嘅安全評級係 TBD，主動安全系統包括 Basic。

兩款車嘅安全評級一樣，喺呢個級別入面安全配備都算畀得好齊全。而家嘅新車安全性都唔差，唔使太擔心這一點。

空間同舒適度

Subaru Outback 車身長 4400 mm，行李廂 400 L。

Land Rover Discovery Sport 車身長 4400 mm，行李廂 400 L。

兩款車嘅尺寸幾乎一樣，車內空間差別唔大。呢個級別嘅車，日常使用完全夠用。

適合邊種人

Subaru Outback 同 Land Rover Discovery Sport 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更睇重品牌聲譽同二手價，可以優先考慮聲譽更好嗰款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，嗰就揀配置更豐富嗰款。始終都係建議兩款都去試駕，親身體驗先係最重要。

總結

總嘅嚟講，Subaru Outback 同 Land Rover Discovery Sport 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車款。揀邊一輛，關鍵仲要睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，先去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。

車型概覽

智己汽車IM5 值唔值得睇，第一步唔係望牌子或者外形，而係睇佢能唔能夠配合你嘅香港日常。 呢篇會集中講整體購車判斷，幫你用買家角度篩走唔適合嘅選擇。 近期市場討論到「Momenta完成來港上市備案 智駕龍頭加速港交所IPO進程」，代表呢類車型仍然有一定關注度。

完稅價 HK$ 398,000 - 568,000 令預算位置更清楚，買家可以先估算月供、保險、泊車同日常開支。

購車價格指南

智己汽車IM5 嘅購車預算可以先由 完稅價 HK$ 398,000 - 568,000 開始計。香港買車唔只係睇車價，月供、保險、牌費、泊車同能源成本都會影響每月壓力。

如果有幾個版本可揀，可以先將 2025 490km 後驅標準版（HK$ 398,000）、2025 710km 後驅長續航版（HK$ 468,000）、2025 615km 四驅性能版（HK$ 568,000）、2026 GTS（價格待確認） 放喺同一張清單。日常通勤重視舒適同易用，家庭買家就要優先睇後排、尾箱同安全配置。

核心規格重點

睇 智己汽車IM5 嘅規格，重點唔係背數字，而係理解佢喺香港用車場景會帶嚟咩分別。

75/100 kWh 嘅電池容量，真正意義係可以幫你估算一星期通勤同周末出車要唔要中途補電。 217/300/572 kW、450/500/802 N·m 嘅輸出，令高速併線同短距離超車更有信心。 車長 4931 mm、車闊 1960 mm、車高 1474 mm、軸距 2950 mm 可以幫你預判商場停車場、屋苑車位同後排腿部空間。 固定齒比、後置後駆 / 雙電機四駆 會影響起步順滑度、濕地穩定感同長途巡航性格。

優缺點分析

智己汽車IM5 嘅優點唔需要講到天花龍鳳，真正有價值係佢能唔能夠令日常用車更省心：預算位置清楚，方便同同級車直接比較、電池同續航資訊有助安排通勤同補電、動力輸出對高速同上斜更有底氣。

要留意嘅係，要先確認屋苑、公司或常去商場嘅充電條件、香港停車場同窄路使用要留意車身闊度。呢啲唔一定係缺點，但係落訂前應該先諗清楚。

買家常見問題

買 智己汽車IM5 之前，真正要問嘅唔係單一規格，而係佢可唔可以融入你每日嘅生活節奏。

常見疑問係「智己 IM5 (LS6) 喺香港買到嗎？」簡單講，目前 智己 IM5 (LS6) 暫時未引進香港右軚版市場。 放到實際用車，就係要睇佢對通勤、泊車、家庭乘坐同長期成本有幾大幫助。

同級對比內容

將 智己汽車IM5 放入同級車清單時，唔建議只用外形或者品牌光環決定。比較順序可以係：先用 完稅價 HK$ 398,000 - 568,000 鎖定預算圈、再睇動力係咪足夠應付高速併線同滿載、再比較能源成本同補能便利、最後睇車身大小、座位同尾箱是否適合家人。

咁樣篩選會貼近香港買家真實生活：平日塞車、商場泊車、周末去新界、甚至一家人出入，先係一部車每日要面對嘅考驗。

用車全周期指南

擁有 智己汽車IM5 最重要係先諗清楚充電節奏。屋苑、公司或者常去商場只要有穩定充電選項，電動化用車就會容易相處好多。

如果你主要喺市區行，視野、低速順滑度同泊車輔助會好影響心情；如果經常行高速或跨區，座椅舒適度、隔音同動力從容感會更重要。

車型概覽

Aston Martin Vanquish 值唔值得睇，第一步唔係望牌子或者外形，而係睇佢能唔能夠配合你嘅香港日常。 呢篇會集中講家庭乘坐、行李同舒適度，幫你用買家角度篩走唔適合嘅選擇。

售價仍待確認，買家可以先把佢放入候選名單，等價格落實後再同同級車逐項比較。

購車價格指南

Aston Martin Vanquish 目前售價仍未清晰，較理性嘅做法係先睇版本、車身大小同動力形式，等價格落實後再決定值唔值得落訂。

如果有幾個版本可揀，可以先將 2025 5.2T Standard（價格待確認）、2025 5.2T Volante（價格待確認）、2025 5.2T Volante 60th Anniversary Edition（價格待確認） 放喺同一張清單。日常通勤重視舒適同易用，家庭買家就要優先睇後排、尾箱同安全配置。

核心規格重點

睇 Aston Martin Vanquish 嘅規格，重點唔係背數字，而係理解佢喺香港用車場景會帶嚟咩分別。

雙渦輪增壓、12 個 汽缸 嘅動力底子，重點係市區跟車夠唔夠順、高速巡航會唔會吃力。 835 Ps / 614 kW、1000 N·m 嘅輸出，對滿載、上斜同超車都比單睇馬力數字更有意思。 車長 4855 mm、車闊 2044 mm、車高 1290/1295 mm、軸距 2885 mm 可以幫你預判商場停車場、屋苑車位同後排腿部空間。 手自一體(AT)、前置後駆 會影響起步順滑度、濕地穩定感同長途巡航性格。

優缺點分析

Aston Martin Vanquish 嘅優點唔需要講到天花龍鳳，真正有價值係佢能唔能夠令日常用車更省心：動力輸出對高速同上斜更有底氣、空間同車身尺寸方便家庭買家預判實用性。

要留意嘅係，香港停車場同窄路使用要留意車身闊度、售價未清晰前唔應該太早用性價比落結論。呢啲唔一定係缺點，但係落訂前應該先諗清楚。

買家常見問題

買 Aston Martin Vanquish 之前，真正要問嘅唔係單一規格，而係佢可唔可以融入你每日嘅生活節奏。

常見疑問係「Vanquish Volante 60th Anniversary 特別版有咩特色？」簡單講，Vanquish Volante 60th Anniversary 特別版由 Q by Aston Martin 部門打造，全球限量 60 部。外觀採用專屬 Q Pentland Green 墨綠色車身，配 Westminster Green 綠色軟篷、青銅色飾件（鬼面罩、側腮）及 21 吋緞面青銅輪圈。內櫳採用三色皮革（Cente。 放到實際用車，就係要睇佢對通勤、泊車、家庭乘坐同長期成本有幾大幫助。

同級對比內容

將 Aston Martin Vanquish 放入同級車清單時，唔建議只用外形或者品牌光環決定。比較順序可以係：先等售價落實，再決定佢應該同邊個級距比較、再睇動力係咪足夠應付高速併線同滿載、最後睇車身大小、座位同尾箱是否適合家人。

咁樣篩選會貼近香港買家真實生活：平日塞車、商場泊車、周末去新界、甚至一家人出入，先係一部車每日要面對嘅考驗。

用車全周期指南

擁有 Aston Martin Vanquish 唔係買車一刻就完結，之後仲有保險、輪胎、保養、泊車同日常能源成本要處理。

如果你主要喺市區行，視野、低速順滑度同泊車輔助會好影響心情；如果經常行高速或跨區，座椅舒適度、隔音同動力從容感會更重要。

In May, China's automotive market overall presented a gentle recovery trend, with domestic brands still being the sales backbone of the market. Recently, BYD, Geely, Chery, Changan, and Great Wall, the top 5 domestic automakers, successively released their monthly performance reports. From the data, these five companies show a general characteristic of "stable total growth, divergence between domestic and international markets, and accelerated new energy penetration". Overseas exports and new energy vehicles have become the most core growth engines; export business has evolved from a "bonus item" to the "core foundation" for some companies. BYD's "dominant leader" status is further consolidated, Chery achieved high growth via exports, Geely's new energy penetration rate broke 56%, Changan focused steadily on balanced development, while Great Wall appeared slightly under pressure during structural transformation.

BYD: Export Hits New High Becomes Biggest Highlight

In May, BYD stood firmly at the top of domestic brands with a monthly sales volume of 383,500 vehicles, maintaining positive growth both year-on-year and month-over-month under a large base. Its two main brands, Dynasty and Ocean, sold a combined 330,200 vehicles, contributing 86.1% of total sales; Fangchengbao's monthly sales broke 30,000 units to reach 30,200, a year-on-year increase of 139.7%, setting a new high for the year; Denza sold 16,300 vehicles, and Yangwang delivered 286 vehicles. From a model perspective, BYD had eight models in May with monthly sales exceeding 20,000 vehicles. The Song Family and Yuan Family both broke 50,000 units, selling 51,370 and 56,691 vehicles respectively. The Sea Lion Family followed closely with 42,615 vehicles, and Seagull sales were also close to 40,000 vehicles.

BYD's biggest highlight in May was exports. Overseas new energy vehicle sales reached 160,600 units, an 80.4% year-on-year increase, accounting for about 42%. The sharp expansion of export scale effectively countered the phased weakness in domestic demand. Cumulative exports from January to May exceeded 620,000 vehicles. High export growth mainly benefited from continued ramping up of overseas factory capacity, improved ocean shipping capacity, and accelerated channel network expansion. In the domestic market, BYD promoted Megawatt Super Charging and intelligent strategies simultaneously—Megawatt charging achieved about 90% charge in 9 minutes; 20,000 super charging stations are planned to be built by 2026; all series models are available with Sky Eye B intelligent driving solutions and city navigation safety fallback plans, accelerating the popularization of high-level intelligent driving. As Gen 2 Blade Battery capacity gradually releases, the company's orders are expected to continue rising.

Chery: Sales Growth Leads the Top 5

Chery Group's total sales volume in May was 247,800 vehicles, a significant year-on-year increase of 20.5%, ranking first in growth speed among the top 5. Exports remained its most core growth engine—May exports reached 181,900 vehicles, an 80.5% year-on-year increase, accounting for 73.4% of total sales that month, continuously breaking the single-month export record for Chinese brands for three months. In terms of new energy, Chery New Energy sold 100,300 vehicles, a 58.8% year-on-year increase. April and May consecutively saw monthly new energy sales breaking 100,000 vehicles.

The strong performance in exports benefited from Chery's long-term deep cultivation of overseas channel advantages and localized operation capabilities. While overseas orders continued to rise, high export growth formed a sharp contrast with domestic sales—Chery's domestic sales in May were only 60,000 vehicles, accounting for one-quarter of total sales. From cumulative data, Chery Group accumulated 1.101 million sales from January to May, but against the annual goal of 3.2 million vehicles, monthly averages need to reach about 420,000 vehicles later, and pressure remains significant.

Geely: New Energy Penetration Rate Breaks 56%

Geely Auto's total sales volume in May was 237,600 vehicles, a 1% year-on-year increase, achieving month-over-month double growth for three consecutive months. In terms of structure, Geely's "New Four Transformations" transformation showed significant results: new energy vehicle sales reached 133,400 units, accounting for 56% of total sales, with new energy share exceeding 50% for four consecutive months.

From sub-brands, performance was significantly divergent. Zeekr brand sales in May reached 34,400 vehicles, a 82% year-on-year increase; Zeekr 9 Series and 8 Series models combined sales approached 50% of total sales, showing bright performance in the high-end market; Galaxy brand sales were 81,700 vehicles; Geely brand sales were 182,500 vehicles, among which China Star Series sales reached 100,800 vehicles; Lynk & Co brand sales were 20,700 vehicles, with new energy vehicle sales share rising to 71%.

In terms of exports, Geely's overseas vehicle exports in May reached 85,100 vehicles, a explosive 184% year-on-year increase, setting a brand single-month export record high. Among exported products, new energy vehicles reached 40,800 units, accounting for nearly half; hybrid and pure electric products have successively landed in Southeast Asia, Middle East, Latin America, and other markets, highlighting the results of global strategy implementation.

Changan: Multi-brand Matrix Balanced Effort

Changan Auto's delivery volume in May was 209,100 vehicles, among which new energy deliveries were 92,400 vehicles, a 5.8% year-on-year increase, with new energy share about 44%. In terms of exports, overseas deliveries reached 70,700 vehicles, a 38% year-on-year increase, becoming another major growth highlight for Changan in May.

In the sub-brand matrix, Changan Qiyuan delivered 34,500 vehicles in May; All-New Q05 delivered 15,800 units, with orders breaking 3,000 units within three days of listing in Thailand; Deepal sales in May were 33,200 vehicles, a 30% year-on-year increase; January to May overseas cumulative sales were 28,700 vehicles, a significant 167% year-on-year increase; Avatr delivered 7,336 vehicles in May; Changan Auto (Gravity) delivered nearly 49,000 vehicles in May.

Changan Auto's balanced layout was fully reflected in May: the fuel car base remained stable, new energy brands Deepal and Qiyuan accelerated volume growth, high-end brand Avatr continued to break through in technical cooperation, and overseas markets simultaneously achieved breakthrough growth. The pattern of five brands working together, driven by both new energy and exports, is initially taking shape.

Great Wall: Overseas Sales Growth Year-on-Year 46.75%

Great Wall Motor's sales in May were 100,400 vehicles, slightly down compared to last May's 102,200 vehicles, making it the only company among the top 5 to show a year-on-year negative growth. From sub-brands, Haval brand sales in May were 55,500 vehicles, remaining Great Wall's most important sales pillar; Tank brand sales were 17,100 vehicles; both Haval and Tank brand sales showed year-on-year declines; Wey brand sold 8,119 vehicles, a 31.78% year-on-year increase, achieving growth against the trend; Ora brand performance was most stunning, with sales of 6,018 vehicles, a significant 206.88% year-on-year increase. In terms of new energy, Great Wall sold 30,400 new energy vehicles in May, with new energy vehicle transformation gradually accelerating.

The overseas market became Great Wall's biggest highlight in May, with overseas sales growing 46.75% year-on-year. Against the background of pressure on the domestic market, strong growth in overseas business effectively made up for the decline in the domestic market. Great Wall Motor's current core contradiction lies in: Haval and Tank, the two traditional main-selling brands, face weak growth, while Wey and Ora brands, although growing notably, have relatively small volume and are not yet enough to support overall growth. How to complete the "relay" between old and new brands is the key issue Great Wall must solve subsequently.

Final Thoughts

From May data, the growth pattern of the top 5 domestic brands has clearly diverged, but there are three common trends worth noting: First, exports have become a key engine for domestic brands to seek stability and growth. Second, new energy transformation is still accelerating, but paths differ among enterprises. Third, technological innovation continues to deepen brand moats. Looking ahead to the second half of the year, competition in the automotive industry will continue to upgrade around these three trends. Although everyone has a common direction, these three trends are all competing for the entire enterprise's industrial chain strength, and the strong will remain strong, which has almost become an inevitable outcome.

你睇過印度嘅馬路嗎？

我喺網上見過。

畫面通常係咁，一輛轎車俾牛尾擋住，旁邊仲有亂竄嘅摩托，甚至周圍仲有賣奶茶嘅小夥，嗰叫一個“乾淨又衛生”。

然而，喺呢啲睇完好多人覺得生理不適嘅地方，豐田、鈴木、本田等日本車廠，卻決定將籌碼押落印度。

據印度“品牌質量基金會”網站顯示，三家車廠將喺印度投資近110 億美元建廠、提產能、搞出口。

對此有网友表示，三家日本車廠係咪錢多到無處花？

事實上，佢哋唔係錢多到花唔完，亦唔係被印度嘅咖哩蒙蔽咗心竅，呢啲日本車廠高層遠比我哋清醒。

而家嘅日系車，營業額、市場份額都喺下滑，原材料成本仲係升得飛起，打開世界地圖，搵一個能夠容納產能、拓充份額、競爭溫和嘅市場，唔係咁容易嘅事。

所以，唔係日本車廠選擇咗印度，而係因為冇得揀。

日本車廠之痛

曾經嘅日系車，嗰時妥妥係人哋個仔。

你問下十幾年前開過日系車嘅老司機，一提起日系車，幾乎就冇唔豎大拇指嘅，價錢平、省油、耐用又抵撞……

甚至好多日系車，仲要加價購買，但邊個諗到，呢個鐵打嘅江山，短短幾年時間就俾佢哋打得找唔著北。

隨著新能源汽車浪潮嚟到，電動化、智能化變成好多自主車廠“彎道超車”嘅目標，依托於中國強大嘅新能源汽車產業鏈優勢同車廠自身對研發、技術嘅堅持，中國自主品牌迅速實現咗“彎道超車”。

曾經被人吐槽嘅國產車，而家喺馬路越來越多人，甚至份額超越咗合資。

根據乘聯會嘅數據，喺2026 年4 月，自主品牌嘅份額已經高達62.5%，遠超日系嘅13.1%。

要知道，中國汽車市場係全球最大嘅汽車市場，喺中國市場失速，就相當於丟咗一塊巨大嘅蛋糕。

同時，中國市場近年嚟嘅主旋律依舊係價格戰，捲配置、捲價格、捲服務已經成為一種常態，亦對日系車嘅利潤產生咗巨大嘅影響。

除咗中國，日系車喺美國過得亦唔太好。

2025 年 1 月 20 日，特朗普宣誓就職第 47 任美國總統，自此開啟咗一連串搞搞震，其中就包括以國家安全為理由徵收額外嘅汽車關稅，導致進口日本汽車嘅關稅稅率一度高達 27.5%，雖然後嚟有所降低，但亦遠高於最初嘅稅率。

呢個操作，直接導致七大日本車廠喺2025 財政年度嘅關稅損失超2 萬億日元。

再睇日本本土，其實亦唔容易。

中東地緣衝突導致霍爾木茲海峽航運受阻，運輸成本、原材料成本暴漲，日本車廠都有苦難言。

高管們看著報表，背後發涼，只能尋找全新嘅增長曲線。

所以，日本車廠唔係愛上印度，係冇地方去。

揀選印度嘅深思熟慮

咁，印度點解咁有魔力，先至令日本車廠重資投入呢？

第一個優勢就係大。喺2025 年，印度汽車市場取得咗551.7 萬輛嘅新車銷量，同比增長 6%，刷新咗歷史紀錄，位居全球第三大汽車市場，已经连续四年超越日本，僅次於中國同美國。

呢個含金量唔使多講啦，而印度取得呢一成績，主要係因為印度一直喺推動減稅政策，促進消費，這導致國內消費意願出現咗明顯增強。

第二個優點係近，就係離日系車賣得動嘅地方近，如非洲等其他地區。

所以，印度對於日本車廠，更似一個建喺十字路口中央嘅便利店，你唔使將車分別運去八個國家，只需要喺印度呢站造好，然後一船一船甩去，就能削減唔少成本。

《日本經濟新聞》亦認為，印度有望轉變為佢哋全球嘅汽車供應中心。

第三個優點係穩。要知道，日系車嘅優勢就係燃油車，畢竟引擎、變速箱、底盤三大件，佢哋已經玩咗好多年，技術積累喺全球都係數一數二。

但係中國汽車市場已經全力推動電動化、智能化發展，導致日系車嘅優勢越來越弱，根本無法發揮出嚟，但印度唔一樣，佢擁有充電樁少、電動化進程緩慢嘅特點，印度老百姓買車，都仲係盯住平、省油、易修，而呢三點正係日系車嘅老本行。

尤其係鈴木，一直係印度汽車市場嘅常青樹，幾乎年年穩坐暢銷車型寶座，口碑好，勝過任何廣告。

所以，日本車廠大力佈局印度市場，顯然是經過深思熟慮嘅。

但，印度市場真係咁好混咩？

難啃嘅印度市場

當然，印度亦唔係完美得似個香口格，佢嘅缺點同佢嘅優點一樣明顯，而且每一個都夠日本車廠喝一壺。

先講電動化，冇錯，眼睇下印度充電樁少、電動車賣唔動，確實係日系燃油車嘅避風港。但你得諗諗，呢個“避風港”能避幾耐？

印度此前可係喊出咗 2030 年電動車佔新車 30% 嘅口號，雖然聽落似吹水，但抵唔住人哋真補錢、真建充電站。

試諗下，萬一有日印度突然開竅，開始大力推動電動化、搞基建，充電樁似雨後春筍咁冒出來，嗰日系車唔就傻眼？

呢唔係泰國市場嘅翻版咩？

當年日系車喺泰國都係躺贏，整個東南亞市場，都被稱為日系車嘅後花園，結果泰國率先推動電動化，中國電動車一嚟，直接就成咗香口格，再睇日系車，喺泰國嘅市場份額嘩嘩嚟咗落。

如果印度係電動化一加速，歷史大概率會重演，而而家呢次，日系車連逃嘅地方都快冇咗，點樣預防，將成為日本車廠嘅首要問題。

再講政策，印度嘅政策就似一鍋咖哩，你永遠唔知下一口食到係雞肉定係馬鈴薯。

呢個魔幻嘅國家，今日係低關稅鼓勵建廠，明日就可能罰你一筆巨款，更令人頭痛嘅係強制合資，外國車廠想喺印度賣車，要搵本地夥伴搭檔，等你工廠建好咗、供應鏈搭完咗，印度直接背刺你，到嗰陣無論係加錢定撤資，換嚟嘅都係心痛。

所以你看，印度呢個市場，就好似一個睇落好甜嘅芒果，咬落去第一口仲行，再啃幾口就摸著硬核。

日系車而家嘅算盤係，趁住核都未硌牙，趕緊多啃幾口，但核遲早會硌到，只係唔知係邊一日。

尾聲

日系車呢趟印度之旅，唔係去旅遊，係去搵食。

中國同東南亞嘅飯桌更擁擠，生產、運輸嘅成本又提高咗，放眼全球，就印度呢口鍋仲冒住熱氣，哪怕入面煮嘅係咖哩味嘅石頭，都要硬著頭皮啃落去。

日本車廠想擴大市場，印度想嘅係拉動經濟、解決就業，雙方都有各自嘅心思。

至於結局係日系車喺印度重新封神，定係好似當年嘅部分友商一樣灰溜溜走人，那就唔知啦。

但無論點樣，呢場戲先至開始，我哋慢慢睇就得啦。

反正印度嘅故事，從來唔會悶。