首頁Gloria Y34
搜尋歷史
熱門搜尋
經銷商登入 / 註冊
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拿 豐田 Corolla Cross 同 馬自達 CX-8 嚟做比較。呢兩款車喺價位同定位上都幾接近，而家我哋就從多個方面做一個詳細嘅比較，幫你省返做功課嘅時間。
豐田 Corolla Cross 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 133,800 - 148,800，一共有 3 個版本，包括 2026 HEV 1.8L GR Sport（RM 148,800）、2026 HEV 1.8L Standard（RM 140,800）、2026 1.8L Standard（RM 133,800） 等。
馬自達 CX-8 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 165,360 - 201,360，一共有 5 個版本，包括 2025 2.5T 4WD High Plus Petrol（RM 201,360）、2025 2.2L 2WD High Plus Diesel（RM 193,123）、2025 2.5L 2WD High Plus Petrol（RM 186,360） 等。
由價錢睇，豐田 Corolla Cross 嘅起步價確實比 馬自達 CX-8 平咗 RM 31,560。如果你預算有限，豐田嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需求。但係都要留意，平嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備方面會有取舍，具體要看你嘅需求。
豐田 Corolla Cross 嘅安全评分係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 TSS (PCS, LDA, ACC, LTA)。
馬自達 CX-8 嘅安全评分係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 Brand ADAS。
兩款車嘅安全评分一樣，喺呢個級別入面安全配備都算好齊全。而家嘅新車安全性都唔差，唔使太擔心呢一點。
豐田 Corolla Cross 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
馬自達 CX-8 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
兩款車嘅驅動方式一樣，都係 FWD，日常駕駛感受唔會有太大分別。
豐田 Corolla Cross 同 馬自達 CX-8 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更睇重品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，就揀配備更豐富嗰款。最後仲係建議兩款都去試駕，親身體驗先係最重要。
總體嚟講，豐田 Corolla Cross 同 馬自達 CX-8 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵仲要睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers compare the Toyota Corolla Cross and Mazda CX-60 when choosing a car. The prices and positioning of these two cars are quite close. Today we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
The Toyota Corolla Cross OTR price in Malaysia is RM 133,800 - 148,800, there are 3 versions in total, including 2026 HEV 1.8L GR Sport (RM 148,800), 2026 HEV 1.8L Standard (RM 140,800), 2026 1.8L Standard (RM 133,800) and so on.
The Mazda CX-60 OTR price in Malaysia is RM 200,510 - 252,873, there are 2 versions in total, including 2026 3.3T 4WD High Plus (RM 252,873), 2025 2.5L 2WD High (RM 200,510) and so on.
In terms of price, the Toyota Corolla Cross is indeed RM 66,710 cheaper at the starting price than the Mazda CX-60. If your budget is limited, Toyota's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. But note also, the cheaper few thousand might have trade-offs in features, it depends on your specific needs.
The Toyota Corolla Cross safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include TSS (PCS, LDA, ACC, LTA).
The Mazda CX-60 safety rating is 5★ (Euro NCAP), active safety systems include i-Activsense Pro.
Regarding safety features, both cars received good ratings. However, the TSS (PCS, LDA, ACC, LTA) of Toyota Corolla Cross and the i-Activsense Pro of Mazda CX-60 have some differences in functions. If you value active safety more, you can compare their function lists carefully.
Toyota Corolla Cross warranty 5 years / unlimited mileage, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Mazda CX-60 warranty 5 years / 150,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Toyota Corolla Cross and Mazda CX-60 are both mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use, daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale price more, you can prioritize the one with better reputation; if you value cost-performance and features more, then choose the one with richer configuration. Finally, it is recommended to test drive both, experiencing it personally is the most important.
Overall, Toyota Corolla Cross and Mazda CX-60 are both very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends mainly on your personal needs and budget. We recommend doing your homework, comparing quotes from several car dealerships, then test driving to make the final decision. Buying a car is a big deal, spending time doing homework is never wrong.
以產品力贏得世界認可！比亞迪正在獲收全球範圍的廣泛認可，用真實品質走出屬於中國新能源汽車的出海之路。美國財政部長貝森特在公開演講中提到，比亞迪車型能讓消費者以3.5萬美元的花費，獲得價值7萬美元的用車體驗，直觀印證了比亞迪車型出色的性價比和越級產品價值。
不止於海外業內人士的認可，比亞迪的技術實力與產業價值，也獲得了多國高層的肯定。美國加州州長體驗仰望U8後，認可其前沿技術突破；烏茲別克斯坦總統為比亞迪頒發國家級友誼勳章，肯定其當地產業貢獻。此外，巴西、泰國、智利等多國政要，也多次認可比亞迪的技術創新、綠色發展理念與本土化建設成果。
這些正向評價也引發海外網友廣泛討論，大眾普遍認可比亞迪的產品價值，期待其深耕海外市場。當下，汽車的價值評判標準，正逐步回歸技術、配置與實際用車體驗，比亞迪也在慢慢改寫全球汽車的固有評價體系。
依托過硬產品力，比亞迪海外市場銷量持續走高，數據表現十分亮眼，今年1-8月海外累計銷售115.8萬輛，成功超越2025年全年104.96萬輛的銷量成績。目前，比亞迪已在泰國、新加坡、西班牙、巴西等十餘個國家登頂當地新能源銷量榜首，穩步推進技術、產品與品牌的全球化落地，成為出海表現穩健的中國汽車品牌。
9月9日，广东高域科技有限公司（以下简称“广汽高域”）与广州铁路投资建设集团有限公司（以下简称“广州铁投”）在广州签署战略合作协议，共同探索建设全国首个“枢纽+低空”空地联运示范项目。围绕未来广州立体交通规划，双方还在广州白云站举办了场景发布活动，并同步开展低空经济科普、高域飞行器展示等配套活动。
作为大湾区低空产业的代表企业，高域此次携手广州铁投，标志着低空出行从单点场景示范迈出交通枢纽网络化布局的关键一步，是双方低空战略合作全面启动的新起点。
从试点到运营 “枢纽+低空”加速落地
此次战略合作的核心，是共同推进全国首个“枢纽+低空”空地联运示范项目建设。依托广州铁投的轨道交通枢纽资源与运营优势，发挥高域载人eVTOL（电动垂直起降飞行器）技术研发、全链条解决方案及产业运营能力，双方将从标准体系编制与试点项目建设入手，进一步探索空地联运的实施路径。
双方计划在未来完成首批试点站点的选址论证、可行性评估及建设方案设计，并优先从广州白云站等综合交通枢纽中选取条件成熟的站点，启动首批“枢纽+低空”试点起降场建设。在此基础上，双方将进一步推动试点方案从规划设计走向实际建设。下一阶段，首批试点站点将进入建设及试运营阶段，逐步验证低空交通与轨道交通、综合交通枢纽协同衔接的可行性，为后续拓展更多应用场景积累实践经验。
值得期待的是，随着首批试点项目逐步推进，双方将围绕空地联运的换乘衔接、安全保障及运营服务等关键环节开展验证，持续完善“轨道+低空”融合发展的实施路径，助力构建面向未来的立体化综合交通网络。
立足广州 探索低空交通发展新模式
对于高域而言，此次与广州铁投的合作，不仅是一次低空出行场景的拓展，更是双方探索低空交通融入城市综合交通体系的重要实践。未来，双方将以此次合作为起点，持续推动低空起降设施与轨道交通枢纽的融合布局，探索从单点示范走向体系化发展的低空交通新路径。
“枢纽+低空”出行服务的战略布局并不止于单一试点项目。随着合作不断深化，双方将围绕不同交通枢纽的低空适配条件，持续推进技术、场景与运营模式的协同探索，拓展“高铁+城际+地铁+低空”的立体交通场景，推动低空科技从单一场景走向更广阔的城市空间，逐步构建起一套可持续、可复制、可推广的空地联运商业模式。
从广州白云站出发，双方希望将一个个可落地的实践场景沉淀为可复制的城市经验，推动“枢纽+低空”从广州实践走向大湾区应用，并为全国轨道交通企业布局低空经济提供“广州样板”。
从“飞行”走向“出行”，从“低空”融入“城市”，高域正进一步打通轨道与低空的连接，加速推动低空科技走进真实生活，向构建城市立体交通新生态更进一步！
高域科技企业介绍
广东高域科技有限公司（GOVY）是广汽集团孵化的低空出行科技企业，致力于构建一键式、放心的低空智慧出行生态。
目前，高域已形成GOVY AirCab、GOVY AirCar、GOVY AirJet三款产品矩阵，覆盖低空观光、城市短途接驳、城际快速出行等场景。其中，AirCab于2025年6月在香港全球首发，获超2000架意向订单；AirCar于2023年6月全球首飞；AirJet面向200公里级城际出行。
自2024年12月品牌发布以来，高域加速产业化：2025年累计融资5亿元，产品亮相慕尼黑车展、迪拜GITEX、迪拜航展、巴西圣保罗车展、泰国车展及卡塔尔国庆盛典等国际舞台；2026年3月完成AirCab在海心沙城市核心区飞行演示，获AS 9100D认证，牵头三项飞行汽车团体标准；5月黄埔工厂落成、首台AirCab下线；7月携手大湾区气象分中心签署战略合作协议，打造“低空运营示范中心”。
作为"低空出行生态引领者"，高域正以技术创新与场景落地，推动低空出行从概念走向现实。
In Malaysia's SUV market, many buyers compare Honda WR-V and Chery Tiggo 7 Pro when choosing a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will conduct a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time doing research.
Honda WR-V OTR price in Malaysia is RM 89,900 - 107,900, with a total of 4 versions, including 2023 1.5L V (RM 99,900), 2023 1.5L E (RM 95,900), 2023 1.5L S (RM 89,900), etc.
Chery Tiggo 7 Pro OTR price in Malaysia is RM 123,750 - 123,750, with a total of 2 versions, including 1.6L Turbo Standard (RM 125,000), 1.6L Turbo Premium (RM 140,000), etc.
From a price perspective, the starting price of Honda WR-V is indeed RM 33,850 cheaper than Chery Tiggo 7 Pro. If your budget is limited, Honda's entry-level version is sufficient for daily needs. But also note, the price difference of a few thousand might involve trade-offs in features, depends on your specific needs.
Honda WR-V is equipped with 1.5L 4-cyl, 105 hp. Official fuel consumption 6.0 L/100km.
Chery Tiggo 7 Pro is equipped with 1.5L Turbo, 140 hp. Official fuel consumption 7.0 L/100km.
In terms of power, the 1.5L Turbo of Chery Tiggo 7 Pro has 35 hp more than Honda WR-V's 1.5L 4-cyl. However, for daily city driving, the power of both cars is sufficient, you won't feel it lacks power.
Honda WR-V body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
Chery Tiggo 7 Pro body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
The dimensions of both cars are almost the same, interior space difference is not large. For cars of this class, daily use is completely sufficient.
Honda WR-V adopts FWD drive mode.
Chery Tiggo 7 Pro adopts FWD drive mode.
The drive mode of both cars is the same, both are FWD, daily driving experience will not have too big of a difference.
Honda WR-V and Chery Tiggo 7 Pro are both mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, you can prioritize the one with better reputation; if you care more about cost-performance and features, choose the one with richer configuration. Ultimately, it is recommended to test drive both, personal experience is the most important.
Overall, Honda WR-V and Chery Tiggo 7 Pro are both very good car models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends mainly on your personal needs and budget. We recommend doing your research, comparing quotes from several car dealerships, and then test driving to make the final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending some time doing research is never wrong.
In Malaysia's SUV market, many buyers often compare the Honda WR-V and Chery Tiggo 7 Pro when choosing a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning. Today we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
The Honda WR-V OTR price in Malaysia is RM 89,900 - 107,900, with a total of 4 versions, including 2023 1.5L V (RM 99,900), 2023 1.5L E (RM 95,900), 2023 1.5L S (RM 89,900) and more.
The Chery Tiggo 7 Pro OTR price in Malaysia is RM 123,750 - 123,750, with a total of 2 versions, including 1.6L Turbo Standard (RM 125,000), 1.6L Turbo Premium (RM 140,000) and more.
From a price perspective, the Honda WR-V starting price is indeed RM 33,850 cheaper than the Chery Tiggo 7 Pro. If your budget is limited, the Honda entry-level version already meets daily needs. But be aware, the few thousand difference may involve trade-offs in features, depending on your specific needs.
The Honda WR-V is equipped with a 1.5L 4-cyl, with 105 hp. Official fuel consumption is 6.0 L/100km.
The Chery Tiggo 7 Pro is equipped with a 1.5L Turbo, with 140 hp. Official fuel consumption is 7.0 L/100km.
In terms of power, the Chery Tiggo 7 Pro 1.5L Turbo has 35 more horsepower than the Honda WR-V 1.5L 4-cyl. However, for daily city driving, the power of both cars is sufficient, and you won't feel it lacks power.
The safety rating of the Honda WR-V is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), and active safety systems include Honda SENSING.
The safety rating of the Chery Tiggo 7 Pro is TBD, and active safety systems include Basic.
Regarding safety features, both cars received good ratings. However, the Honda SENSING of the Honda WR-V and the Basic of the Chery Tiggo 7 Pro have some differences in functionality. If you value active safety, you can carefully compare the feature lists of both.
The Honda WR-V adopts FWD drive mode.
The Chery Tiggo 7 Pro adopts FWD drive mode.
Both cars have the same drive mode, which is FWD, so there won't be a significant difference in driving feel for daily use.
Overall, the Honda WR-V and Chery Tiggo 7 Pro are both excellent models in the Malaysia market. Choosing which one depends mainly on your personal needs and budget. We recommend doing your research, comparing quotes from several dealerships, and test driving before making a final decision. Buying a car is a major event, and spending time on research is never wrong.
而家汽車行業都喺度拼上新速度，唔少車型短短一年就能迭代幾款，速成車造漸漸變成常態，但 8 月 12 日開啟預售嘅風雲 T7 偏要反嚟，直接話全球車快唔得一點，將慢工打磨品質呢件事擺到台面。預售 10.99 萬起嘅定價，配上實打實嘅全球車造功底，放喺十萬級家用純電市場，確實令人眼前一亮。
呢部車慢得有道理，前後兩年整體規劃、三年完整研發，冇為咗搶佔市場壓縮任何環節。佢都唔係只做國內特供，海外同源車型 Lepas L6 早已喺泰國、南非落地發售，接下來仲要陸續登陸印尼、歐盟、澳新等多地，係經過全球市場檢驗，先再返嚟交付消費者嘅車型。
為咗適應全球唔同地域，品牌聯動全球十大設計中心、上百位設計師協同打磨，仲收集五千多名全球用戶嘅真實需求做共創，單係前期同方案打磨，就耗費咗大量時間。
為咗貼合嚴苛嘅海外法規，整車直接對標 2026 版 E-NCAP 安全標準打造，安全底子拉滿。研發階段投入九百多台試驗車，累計完成一百四十五萬公里耐久測試，從零下四十度北歐極寒到五十五度熱帶高溫，高濕、高鹽鹼、砂石爛路全部都挨住試練。
同級少見嘅五百毫米涉水深度、雙源熱泵制熱系統，都係針對全球多樣氣候做嘅專項優化，巴西顛簸路段、南非泥濘路況嘅防護結構亦全部配齊，各種極端場景都提前驗證到位。
產品層面完全踩中家用用戶所有需求。全系統一搭載 65.05kWh 犀牛電池，CLTC 續航 600 公里，實測續航甚至能夠達到六百多公里，唔存在低配縮水續航嘅套路。
車內軸距 2700 毫米，空間利用率好高，後排腿部餘量充足，座椅放倒後能形成超大純平空間，日常代步、自駕露營都夠用。內飾用料採用歐盟級環保材質，搭配 4nm 製程 8775 智能芯片，搭配豆包大模型嘅智能座艙，語音交互順滑，跨樓層記憶泊車等智駕功能亦全部配齊。
安全配置更是誠意十足，八成高強度鋼車身搭配九氣囊，電池配備三十一層 6D 鎖子甲防護，防水等級達到 IP68。購車保障亦足夠安心，首任非營運車主享受整車含三電終身質保，六百六十六元就能攞落終身基礎保養套餐，電池熱失控、智能駕駛事故仲設有雙重高額兜底賠付，徹底打消用車顧慮。
而家太多新車只求快速落地，卻忽略長期使用可靠性，風雲 T7 願意沉下心用五年時間打磨一台全球化純電 SUV，10.99 萬起就能攞落全套全球標準品質，呢份長期主義，對於普通家庭用戶嚟講格外實在。
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拿 Proton X90 同 Mazda CX-60 嚟做比較。這兩款車喺價錢同定位上都幾接近，而家我哋就從多個方面做一個詳細嘅對比，幫你省下做功課嘅時間。
Proton X90 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 106,800 - 122,800，一共有 4 個版本，包括 2026 1.5T Prime X（RM 122,800）、2026 1.5T Prime（RM 116,800）、2026 1.5T Lite（RM 106,800） 等。
Mazda CX-60 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 200,510 - 252,873，一共有 2 個版本，包括 2026 3.3T 4WD High Plus（RM 252,873）、2025 2.5L 2WD High（RM 200,510） 等。
從價錢嚟睇，Proton X90 嘅起步價確實比 Mazda CX-60 平咗 RM 93,710。如果你預算有限，Proton 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需求。但都要注意，平啲嗰幾千塊，可能喺配備上會有所取捨，具體要睇你嘅需求。
Proton X90 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA)。
Mazda CX-60 嘅安全評級係 5★ (Euro NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 i-Activsense Pro。
安全配備方面，兩款車都拿到咗唔錯嘅評級。不過 Proton X90 嘅 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA) 同 Mazda CX-60 嘅 i-Activsense Pro 喺功能上有啲差異，如果你比較睇重主動安全嘅話，可以仔細對比吓兩者嘅功能列表。
Proton X90 車身長 4400 mm，尾箱 400 L。
Mazda CX-60 車身長 4500 mm，尾箱 450 L。
空間方面，Mazda CX-60 嘅車身比 Proton X90 長咗 100 mm，乘坐空間更有優勢。不過 Proton X90 喺城市入面停車會靈活啲，各有取捨。
Proton X90 同 Mazda CX-60 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更係睇重品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰款；如果你更係在意性價比同配備，嗰就揀配置更豐富嗰款。最終都係建議兩款都去試駕，親身體驗先係最重要嘅。
總嘅嚟講，Proton X90 同 Mazda CX-60 都係馬來西亞市場好好嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵都係要睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花點時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
In Malaysia's SUV market, many buyers choose to compare Proton X90 and Honda HR-V when selecting a car. The two cars are quite close in price and positioning. Today we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
In Malaysia, the Proton X90 OTR price is RM 106,800 - 122,800. There are a total of 4 versions, including 2026 1.5T Prime X (RM 122,800), 2026 1.5T Prime (RM 116,800), 2026 1.5T Lite (RM 106,800), etc.
In Malaysia, the Honda HR-V OTR price is RM 115,900 - 143,900. There are a total of 4 versions, including 2026 e:HEV 1.5L RS (RM 143,900), 2026 1.5T V (RM 137,900), 2026 1.5T E (RM 130,900), etc.
Looking at the price, the starting price of the Proton X90 is indeed RM 9,100 cheaper than the Honda HR-V. If your budget is limited, Proton's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. But you also need to note that the few thousand cheaper might involve compromises in equipment, depending on your specific needs.
The Proton X90 has a body length of 4400 mm and a trunk capacity of 400 L.
The Honda HR-V has a body length of 4500 mm and a trunk capacity of 450 L.
In terms of space, the Honda HR-V's body is 100 mm longer than the Proton X90, offering an advantage in passenger space. However, the Proton X90 is a bit more flexible for parking in the city, with each having its own trade-offs.
The Proton X90 uses FWD drive mode.
The Honda HR-V uses FWD drive mode.
Both cars use the same drive mode, both are FWD, and there will not be much difference in the daily driving experience.
Proton X90 and Honda HR-V are both mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale price more, you can prioritize the one with better reputation; if you care more about cost-performance and equipment, then choose the one with more configurations. Finally, we suggest test driving both cars, as personal experience is the most important.
In general, Proton X90 and Honda HR-V are both very good car models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends mainly on your personal needs and budget. We suggest everyone do their research, compare quotes from several car dealerships, then go for a test drive to make the final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending some time on research will definitely not be wrong.
In the SUV market in Malaysia, many buyers compare the Proton X70 and Hyundai Tucson when choosing a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning, so today we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time doing your research.
The OTR price of the Proton X70 in Malaysia is RM 106,800 - 122,300, with a total of 3 versions, including 1.5L Standard 2WD (RM 106,800), 1.5L Executive 2WD (RM 115,800), 1.5L Premium 2WD (RM 122,300), etc.
The OTR price of the Hyundai Tucson in Malaysia is RM 143,888 - 197,888, with a total of 5 versions, including 2025 HEV 1.6T AT 2WD Prestige (RM 197,888), 2025 1.6T DCT 4WD Prestige (RM 186,888), 2025 1.6T DCT 2WD Prime (RM 164,888), etc.
From a price perspective, the starting price of the Proton X70 is indeed RM 37,088 cheaper than the Hyundai Tucson. If your budget is limited, the entry-level version of Proton can already meet daily needs. However, be aware that saving that few thousand might involve trade-offs in features, it depends on your specific needs.
The safety rating of the Proton X70 is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), with active safety systems including ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
The safety rating of the Hyundai Tucson is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), with active safety systems including SmartSense.
Both cars have the same safety rating, and safety features in this class are quite comprehensive. New car safety nowadays is generally good, so there is no need to worry too much about this point.
The body length of the Proton X70 is 4400 mm, and the trunk capacity is 400 L.
The body length of the Hyundai Tucson is 4400 mm, and the trunk capacity is 400 L.
The dimensions of both cars are almost the same, and the interior space difference is minimal. For a car in this class, it is perfectly adequate for daily use.
Both the Proton X70 and Hyundai Tucson are mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, you can prioritize the one with a better reputation; if you care more about value for money and features, choose the one with richer configuration. Ultimately, it is recommended to test drive both, as personal experience is the most important.
Overall, both the Proton X70 and Hyundai Tucson are very good car models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose ultimately depends on your personal needs and budget. We suggest doing your research, comparing quotes from multiple dealerships, and then test driving to make the final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, and spending some time doing research is never a mistake.
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嗰陣都會拿 Proton X70 同 Honda WR-V 嚟做比較。呢兩款車喺價位同定位上都幾接近，今日我哋就由多個方面做一次詳細嘅比較，幫你節省做功夫嘅時間。
Proton X70 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 106,800 - 122,300，一共有 3 個版本，包括 1.5L Standard 2WD（RM 106,800）、1.5L Executive 2WD（RM 115,800）、1.5L Premium 2WD（RM 122,300） 等。
Honda WR-V 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 89,900 - 107,900，一共有 4 個版本，包括 2023 1.5L V（RM 99,900）、2023 1.5L E（RM 95,900）、2023 1.5L S（RM 89,900） 等。
從價錢嚟睇，Honda WR-V 嘅起步價比 Proton X70 平咗 RM 16,900。坦白講，喺呢個價位段，幾千蚊嘅差距其實唔算大，關鍵仲係睇整體嘅性價比同長期使用成本。
Proton X70 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA)。
Honda WR-V 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 Honda SENSING。
兩款車嘅安全評級一樣，喺呢個級別裡面安全配備都算俾好全晒啦。而家嘅新車安全性都唔差，唔使太擔心呢一點。
Proton X70 車身長 4400 mm，後備箱 400 L。
Honda WR-V 車身長 4400 mm，後備箱 400 L。
兩款車嘅尺寸幾乎一樣，車內空間差別唔大。呢個級別嘅車，日常使用完全夠用。
Proton X70 保修 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Honda WR-V 保修 5 年/無限制里程，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
總嘅嚟講，Proton X70 同 Honda WR-V 都係馬來西亞市場好唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一部，關鍵仲係要睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功夫，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕先做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功夫絕對唔會錯。
撰文｜韓子涵 編輯｜青竹
一位首相，加埋三位內閣部長，為一家中國車企嘅投資站台。喺歐盟對中國電動車層層加碼嘅當下，本身就傳遞住一種信號。
7 月 23 日，西班牙瓦倫西亞工廠，喺首相佩德羅·桑切斯見證下，吉利汽車同福特簽署合資協議，將會透過產能共享，為歐洲市場打造吉利及福特品牌嘅新能源車。
唔係買工廠，而係合資；唔係打敗人哋，而係合作共贏。
無論係引進嚟，定係走出去，吉利嘅國際化，始終落實董事會主席李書福嗰句說話：「商業係美好嘅，既做生意又搵朋友」。
時間撥返 16 年前。2010 年 3 月 28 日，吉利控股集團同福特汽車集團簽訂富豪汽車公司最終 100% 股權收購協議。吉利成為中國汽車行業第一家跨國公司。福特見證並支持咗呢個具有全球汽車產業影響力嘅合作案例，結咗同吉利嘅商業友誼。
16 年後嘅今日，吉利同福特再度握手。對於當下井噴般嘅中國汽車出海，好具啓示性。
2026 年，中國汽車出海正經歷緊要嘅量變到質變嘅躍升。
上半年，我哋國家汽車出口量達到 509.6 萬輛，按年增長 65.3%。6 月單月出口首次突破百萬輛大關。國內每下線 10 架車，就有近 4 架駛向海外碼頭。
諮詢公司艾睿鉑預測，中國汽車全年出口量有望達到 1000 萬輛，將成為全球首個突破呢個數字嘅國家。
數字背後，更深入嘅變化正喺發生。
6 月，中國主要品牌喺歐洲嘅市場佔有率為 13%，連續兩個月超越日系品牌。當我哋佔據歐盟市場嘅更多份額，就唔係淨係賣車咁簡單，必須同當地嘅產業生態、法律法規同社會福祉和諧共贏。
吉利汽車同福特成立西班牙合資公司，恰好站喺呢個質變嘅節點上。亦係李書福從「走出去」到「融進去」嘅又一實踐。
一位首相嘅站台，同跨越 16 年嘅兩次握手
7 月 23 日，簽約儀式當日。西班牙首相佩德羅·桑切斯出現喺瓦倫西亞阿爾穆薩費斯工廠，身邊跟住勞工同經濟部、工業同旅遊部同科學部嘅三位部長，同瓦倫西亞自治區主席。
阿爾穆薩費斯工廠始建於 1976 年，曾經係福特喺美國以外最大嘅生產基地，迄今累計生產超過 1100 萬輛汽車。近 50 年來，呢間工廠係西班牙瓦倫西亞地區數萬家庭嘅生計所繫。
但工業時代從來唔會因情懷而停低腳步。由 2024 年起，隨著歐盟產業同電動化嘅推進，福特逐步停產蒙迪歐、S-MAX、Galaxy 等多款燃油車型，偌大嘅工廠僅剩一條產線生產 Kuga。
去年全年，呢間年產能 50 萬輛嘅工廠，實際只生產咗唔夠 10 萬輛汽車，利用率唔足四分之一。曾經養活數千個西班牙家庭嘅工廠，正面對命運嘅十字路口。
吉利嘅到嚟，可謂恰逢其時。透過產能共享，唔單止畀當地帶來工作崗位、產能、稅收，亦都讓福特能夠以更高效嘅方式盤活剩餘資產，繼續產生價值。
根據規劃，合資公司將於 2027 年上半年正式投入運營。
喺新工廠入面，吉利將投產兩款新能源車型，福特亦會生產三款多能源車型，包括繼續生產 Kuga，並於 2028 年投產 Bronco 家族全新硬派緊湊型 SUV。
五款車型將共享產能、協同排產，雙方喺公告中表示，合資公司將「推動更多車型選擇同價值嘅提升」，並透過「整合產量降低單車成本」。對於當地經濟而言，就業崗位得以保住，一個地區嘅工業命脈被重新激活，可謂一舉多贏。
當下，西班牙正成為中國車企登陸歐洲嘅戰略支點。勞動力成本約為德國嘅三分之一，能源成本低於德國同法國，擁有世界级港口集群，巴塞羅那更加係中國汽車入歐嘅核心門戶。
2026 年第一季度，中國品牌喺西班牙售出約 3.87 萬輛，按年增長 67%。
吉利汽車集團 CEO 淦家閱講過一段說話：車企出海會面對好多問題，喺海外睇嚟，中國品牌係去「佔領」人哋嘅市場，所以中國汽車品牌「走出去」，實際係要「走進去」。走咗入當地市場。喺當地合資建廠，調動屬地資源，係一種多贏路線。
對於吉利嚟講，雖然看似食咗一啲小虧，唔能夠獨享利潤。但其實規避咗好多隱形嘅成本同效率摩擦。
歐盟一直係高門檻市場，合規成本好高，環保要求好高，審批流程冗長，當地選民嘅意見同政治派系影響，會令商業行為變得複雜化。具體案例可以參考特斯拉德國工廠歷劫連續劇一般嘅波折。
其實，而家已經有國內車企食咗同樣嘅虧。單打獨鬥，一味強調野心同銷量目標，反而招致好多敵意同阻礙，甚至成為當地政黨政治博弈嘅籌碼。
但吉利走嘅另一條路，令海外市場保住就業，讓老牌車企盤活資產，讓中國品牌扎根當地，令技術流動成為建設性嘅力量，透過「合作共贏、美美與共」令自己成為被歡迎嘅夥伴。
尋找戰略縱深，重協同
花旗測算，若吉利獲得喺瓦倫西亞工廠 15 萬輛年產能配額，成本僅相當於新建綠地工廠嘅 10%-20%。
成本優勢之外更關鍵嘅價值喺時間。從簽約到投產，合資模式只需 18 個月，而自建工廠通常需要三到五年。喺瞬息萬變嘅歐洲電動車市場，18 個月嘅時間差足以決定一個品牌能否卡住身位。
呢套打法，吉利已喺全球多個市場跑通。
喺馬來西亞，吉利 2017 年收購寶騰 49.9% 股份並全面主導經營。令寶騰從虧損泥潭中走出嚟，實現品牌復興。
2026 年 1 月，寶騰位於丹戎馬林汽車高科技谷嘅專屬電動車工廠正式投產，首款純電車型 eMas7 開啟 CKD 本地化組裝。eMas7 基於吉利銀河 E5 平台打造，連續多月蟬聯馬來西亞 EV 銷量冠軍。
直到而家，由馬來西亞政界到民間，仍都把寶騰視為「自己嘅品牌」。吉利做嘅唔係取代，係令佢變得更好。
喺韓國，吉利同雷諾合作推出智能混動車型。喺巴西，吉利收購雷諾巴西公司 26.4% 股份，共享工廠產能同市場網絡。
喺歐洲，由富豪汽車全面負責凌克喺歐洲區域嘅商業及品牌運營，協助凌克品牌喺歐洲嘅區域化拓展。
正係吉利全球化佈局嘅獨特邏輯——並非孤軍深入，而係編織一張生態協同網絡。每一處合作節點，既係切入本地市場嘅戰略支點，亦係合作伙伴長期信任嘅實證。令全球化成為多方共贏、持續深化嘅價值網絡。
所以，儘管「從產品出海到體系出海」已經成為行業共識，但究係咩體系？把自己體系硬搬過去，定係從零開始自建體系，定係融入當地體系？呢啲操作層面嘅細節，反映咗一家公司嘅商業價值觀同發展觀。
吉利西班牙合資公司同背後呢套邏輯，為中國汽車產業提供咗一個好好嘅樣本同思路，亦反映為實實在在嘅增長數據。
2026 年上半年，吉利汽車海外銷量 47.4 萬輛，按年增長 158%，已超過 2025 年全年出口總量。基於上半年嘅表現，吉利已將全年出口上調至 90 萬輛。
結語：從「學生」到「夥伴」，中國車企嘅蛻變同擔當
2010 年初，吉利同福特喺瑞典哥德堡簽署協議，以 18 億美金收購全球知名嘅瑞典豪華品牌富豪，媒體用「蛇吞象」形容呢筆交易。
吉利用行動兌現咗所有承諾，冇干擾富豪嘅獨立運營，保護並尊重佢既有發展體系，令富豪喺此後十數年間實現咗品牌復興。
更加重要嘅係，吉利亦從富豪身上學到咗體系化嘅研發能力、安全至上嘅製造標準同質量控制。呢筆交易令吉利完成咗一次「深造」，為日後喺全球舞臺上嘅活躍表現奠定能力基礎。
傳統車企手入面握住現成嘅產能、渠道同銷售團隊，中國車企手入面握住增長最快嘅新能源體系優勢同成本效率，雙方喺呢個階段，搵到咗彼此都需要嘅嘢。
正如福特歐洲區總裁吉姆·鮑姆比克所講：「吉利世界級嘅電動化能力、速度同龐大嘅全球規模，同福特結合，就係無與倫比嘅競爭優勢。」
由 2010 年謙卑嘅「學生」，到 2026 年平等嘅「夥伴」，吉利用務實換取信任，用能力贏得尊重，用最佳嘅方式融入全球產業發展。
吉利嘅全球化從來唔係簡單嘅資本遊戲，而係喺依法合規嘅前提下不斷探索開放共贏嘅全球產業合作模式，係對品牌、技術嘅尊重，對協同體系嘅佈局同深構。
由富豪到寶騰、蓮花，再到賓士、雷諾，同福特，吉利打造嘅全球體系化協同，唔單止激活咗吉利全球化發展新動能，仲形成咗助力品牌出海嘅堅實保障。呢亦印證咗李書福所講嘅，「商業係最平等而美好嘅人類文明表現形式。」
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嗰陣都會拿 Proton X50 同 MG MG HS 嚟比較。呢兩款車喺價錢同定位上都幾接近，今日我哋就從多個層面做一個詳細比較，幫你省下做功課嘅時間。
Proton X50 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 89,800 - 113,300，總共 4 個版本，包括 1.5T Executive（RM 89,800）、1.5T Premium（RM 101,800）、1.5T Flagship（RM 113,300） 等等。
MG MG HS 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 130,450 - 146,450，總共 2 個版本，包括 1.5L Standard（RM 105,000）、1.5L Executive（RM 115,000） 等等。
由價錢嚟睇，Proton X50 嘅起價確實係比 MG MG HS 平咗 RM 40,650。如果你預算有限，Proton 嘅入門版已經足以滿足日常需要。不過都要留神，平嗰幾千塊，可能喺配備上有取捨，具體要睇你嘅需要。
Proton X50 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA)。
MG MG HS 嘅安全評級係 TBD，主動安全系統包括 Basic。
安全配備方面，兩款車都拿到咗唔錯嘅評級。不過 Proton X50 嘅 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA) 同 MG MG HS 嘅 Basic 喺功能上有啲差異，如果你比較重視主動安全嘅話，可以仔細對比下兩者嘅功能列表。
Proton X50 車身長 4400 mm，尾箱 400 L。
MG MG HS 車身長 4400 mm，尾箱 400 L。
兩款車嘅尺寸差唔多一樣，車內空間差別唔大。呢個級別嘅車，日常使用完全夠用。
Proton X50 同 MG MG HS 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更加重視品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰一款；如果你更加在意性價比同配備，就揀配置更豐富嗰款。始終都建議兩款都去試駕，親身體驗先至最重要。
總體嚟講，Proton X50 同 MG MG HS 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵都係要睇你嘅個人需要同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
Recently, the 8th "China Excellent Management Company" (BMC) list was unveiled in the Xiong'an New Area. Tirechina.net (China Tire Business Network) learned that Linglong Tire successfully retained this authoritative award known as the "Chinese Enterprise Management Oscars", becoming the only enterprise in the tire industry to receive this honor for two consecutive terms.
The "China Excellent Management Company" (BMC) program is a global authoritative award with a 32-year history by Deloitte, and is also the only international award in China currently for comprehensive assessment of enterprise management systems. This year's selection process took 6 months. The jury used closed-door recommendations, entrepreneur interviews, and expert research, employing the globally unified "Deloitte BMC Excellence Management Standards" to conduct comprehensive and high-standard strict assessments on enterprises.
This BMC selection sent a clear signal: leading Chinese private enterprises are moving from "China Champions" to "World Champions". Linglong winning for two consecutive years not only reflects international professional institutions' high recognition of its global strategic layout, digital transformation results, and sustainable development concepts, but is also a strong endorsement of its position as a leader in the Chinese tire industry.
Defining Industry Standards with Excellence Management
As a tire enterprise that has retained the BMC Award, Linglong Tire has continued to deepen its focus on key areas such as R&D, global layout, intelligent manufacturing, and green transition, which constitutes the deep foundation for this consecutive win.
R&D and Product Innovation: Seizing the Heights of New Energy and Green Materials. The company continues to tilt R&D investment towards the new energy track, focusing on breakthroughs in EV-specific technologies like low rolling resistance, noise-reducing cotton, and ultra-wear resistance, and has already formed a product matrix covering all new energy vehicle models. In 2026, the Linglong Master 2nd Gen products will be fully launched relying on the 7th Gen technology platform, achieving "full-cycle peak performance" such as wet handling, quiet driving, and ultra-long mileage, while the proportion of high value-added products steadily increases. Since the beginning of this year, Linglong products have frequently received good news in European authoritative evaluations: "Auto Bild" summer tire pre-selection won first place; German "Netzwelt" test total score was second, rated "Most Value"; and it became the only Chinese brand to be shortlisted and perform excellently in the ACE European Automobile Club test.
Global Capacity and Market Synergy: Comprehensive Implementation from "Product Export" to "System Export". Linglong has built a global R&D system of "Three Countries, Eight Locations" in China, Germany, and the USA. Two major overseas bases in Thailand and Serbia have achieved stable mass production. Among them, the Serbia factory, as the first tire production base for Chinese tires in Europe, has passed audits from German luxury brands like VW, Audi, and BMW, and entered the European mainstream supply chain. The company has established supply chain cooperation with 8 of the top 10 global automakers, with cumulative supply of tires exceeding 300 million units. In the domestic market, Linglong has built a channel network of nearly 30,000 stores and a four-level distribution system, while the new retail "Smart Store System" realizes full-link data management of inventory, sales, and service.
Intelligent Manufacturing and Digital Transformation: Data-Driven "Zero Defect" Manufacturing. Linglong continues to advance factory intelligent transformation, relying on the Industrial Internet Platform to achieve full-process data connectivity and quality control from raw material procurement to manufacturing and terminal distribution, significantly reducing manual inspection error rates. The supply chain synergy platform has opened up capacity allocation links across factories and regions, continuously optimizing order delivery efficiency, and providing more resilient supply guarantees for global customers.
ESG and Green Supply Chain Construction: Embedding Sustainable Development into Corporate DNA. Linglong has clarified a clear roadmap of "Carbon Peaking by 2030, Carbon Neutrality by 2050", which is 10 years ahead of the Paris Agreement targets. The company has already promoted rooftop photovoltaic coverage in multiple production bases, and the proportion of renewable energy usage is steadily increasing in 2026. Meanwhile, Linglong joined hands with downstream partners to build a waste tire recycling network, promoting tire full lifecycle management, and building a circular economy model with practical actions.
As the only enterprise in the tire industry selected for the "China Excellent Management Company" for two consecutive terms, Linglong Tire retaining the award this time is both an authoritative endorsement by the Deloitte global unified evaluation system of its comprehensive management capability, and sets a management benchmark for the high-quality development of the domestic tire industry.
Currently, the Chinese tire industry is in a critical stage of transformation towards globalization, intelligence, and green transformation, and competition between enterprises has long upgraded from single product comparison to system management capability contests. Linglong's practical results in R&D, global capacity synergy, intelligent manufacturing, and ESG full-chain management confirm the supporting role of systematic management for corporate long-term development, and also provide a reference sample for the industry from "Product Export" to "System Export". Subsequent progress of Linglong on management upgrade and brand elevation paths deserves continuous attention from the whole industry.
In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers compare the Proton X50 and Chery Tiggo Cross when choosing a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
The OTR price of the Proton X50 in Malaysia is RM 89,800 - 113,300, with a total of 4 versions, including 1.5T Executive (RM 89,800), 1.5T Premium (RM 101,800), 1.5T Flagship (RM 113,300), etc.
The OTR price of the Chery Tiggo Cross in Malaysia is RM 88,750 - 99,750, with a total of 2 versions, including 2025 HEV 1.5L CSH (RM 99,750), 2025 1.5T Standard (RM 88,750), etc.
From the price perspective, the starting price of the Chery Tiggo Cross is RM 1,050 cheaper than the Proton X50. Honestly, in this price range, a difference of a few thousand is not actually that big. The key is still to look at the overall cost-effectiveness and long-term usage costs.
The Proton X50 is equipped with a 1.5L 4-cyl, 105 hp. Official fuel consumption 6.0 L/100km.
The Chery Tiggo Cross is equipped with a 1.5L 4-cyl, 105 hp. Official fuel consumption 6.0 L/100km.
Both cars use the same powertrain, the driving feel is basically the same for daily use. The fuel consumption is also similar, no need to worry too much about this point.
The Proton X50 body length is 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
The Chery Tiggo Cross body length is 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
The dimensions of the two cars are almost the same, interior space difference is not significant. Cars at this level are completely sufficient for daily use.
The Proton X50 adopts a 4WD drive configuration.
The Chery Tiggo Cross adopts a FWD drive configuration.
The 4WD from Proton and FWD from Chery will have different feelings in handling, test drive comparison is recommended.
Both Proton X50 and Chery Tiggo Cross are mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale price more, you can prioritize the one with better reputation; if you care more about cost-performance ratio and equipment, then choose the one with richer configuration. In the end, it is recommended to test drive both, personal experience is the most important.
Overall, both Proton X50 and Chery Tiggo Cross are very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends on your personal needs and budget. It is recommended to do your homework, compare quotes from several dealerships, and then test drive to make the final decision. Buying a car is a major matter, spending some time on research is never wrong.
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拎寶騰 X50 同奇瑞 Tiggo 8 Pro 嚟做比較。呢兩款車喺價格同定位上都好接近，今日我哋就從多個方面做個詳細比較，幫你慳返做功課嘅時間。
寶騰 X50 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 89,800 至 113,300，一共 4 個版本，包括 1.5T Executive（RM 89,800）、1.5T Premium（RM 101,800）、1.5T Flagship（RM 113,300）等等。
奇瑞 Tiggo 8 Pro 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 159,750 至 159,750，一共 2 個版本，包括 1.6L Turbo Standard（RM 130,000）、1.6L Turbo Premium（RM 145,000）等等。
從價格睇落，寶騰 X50 嘅起步價確實比奇瑞 Tiggo 8 Pro 平咗 RM 69,950。如果你預算有限，寶騰嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需要。不過都要注意，平嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備上會有取捨，具體要看你嘅需要。
寶騰 X50 車身長 4400 mm，行李廂 400 L。
奇瑞 Tiggo 8 Pro 車身長 4400 mm，行李廂 400 L。
兩款車嘅尺寸幾乎一樣，車內空間分別唔大。呢個級別嘅車，日常使用完全夠用。
寶騰 X50 採用 4WD 驅動方式。
奇瑞 Tiggo 8 Pro 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
寶騰嘅 4WD 同奇瑞嘅 FWD 喺操控上會有唔同感覺，建議試駕比較。
寶騰 X50 同奇瑞 Tiggo 8 Pro 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更重視品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，那就揀配置更豐富嗰款。最後始終建議兩款都去試駕，親身體驗先至最重要。
總體嚟講，寶騰 X50 同奇瑞 Tiggo 8 Pro 都係馬來西亞市場好唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵都係要看你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對無錯。
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拿 Perodua Aruz 同 MG MG HS 嚟做比較。呢兩款車喺價位同定位上都好接近嘅，今日我哋就從多個方面做個詳細比較，幫您節省做功課嘅時間。
Perodua Aruz 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 72,900 - 77,900，總共有 2 個版本，包括 1.5L X（RM 72,900）、1.5L AV（RM 77,900） 等。
MG MG HS 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 130,450 - 146,450，總共有 2 個版本，包括 1.5L Standard（RM 105,000）、1.5L Executive（RM 115,000） 等。
從價錢嚟睇，Perodua Aruz 嘅起步價確實比 MG MG HS 平咗 RM 57,550。如果你預算有限，Perodua 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需要。但都要留意，平嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備方面會有取舍，具體睇你嘅需要。
Perodua Aruz 搭載 1.5L 4-cyl，馬力 105 hp。官方油耗 6.0 L/100km。
MG MG HS 搭載 1.5L Turbo，馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。
動力方面，MG MG HS 嘅 1.5L Turbo 比 Perodua Aruz 嘅 1.5L 4-cyl 多咗 35 匹馬力。不過日常喺市區開，兩款車嘅動力都夠用，唔會覺得唔夠力。
Perodua Aruz 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 。
MG MG HS 嘅安全評級係 TBD，主動安全系統包括 Basic。
Perodua Aruz 保修 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
MG MG HS 保修 7 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
總體嚟講，Perodua Aruz 同 MG MG HS 都係馬來西亞市場好唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵仲係要睇你嘅個人需要同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係一件大事，花啲時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
In Malaysia's SUV market, many buyers compare the Perodua Aruz and Mazda CX-5 when choosing a car. Both cars are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on your research.
The Perodua Aruz OTR price in Malaysia is RM 72,900 - 77,900, with a total of 2 versions, including 1.5L X (RM 72,900), 1.5L AV (RM 77,900), etc.
The Mazda CX-5 OTR price in Malaysia is RM 135,469 - 166,760, with a total of 3 versions, including 2025 2.0L AT 35th Anniversary (RM 316,154), 2025 2.0L AT (RM 296,154), 2025 2.0L MT (RM 294,154), etc.
From a price perspective, the Perodua Aruz starting price is indeed RM 62,569 cheaper than the Mazda CX-5. If your budget is limited, Perodua's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. But also note, the few thousand RMB difference might involve trade-offs in features, depending on your needs.
The Perodua Aruz is equipped with 1.5L 4-cyl, 105 hp. Official fuel consumption is 6.0 L/100km.
The Mazda CX-5 is equipped with 1.5L Turbo, 140 hp. Official fuel consumption is 7.0 L/100km.
In terms of power, the Mazda CX-5's 1.5L Turbo has 35 more horsepower than the Perodua Aruz's 1.5L 4-cyl. However, for daily driving in the city, both cars have sufficient power and you won't feel it lacks power.
The Perodua Aruz safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include.
The Mazda CX-5 safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include.
Both cars have the same safety rating, and safety features are quite comprehensive in this class. New car safety is not poor nowadays, no need to worry too much about this.
The Perodua Aruz warranty is 5 years/150,000km, service interval is every 10,000km or 6 months.
The Mazda CX-5 warranty is 5 years/150,000km, service interval is every 10,000km or 6 months.
Both cars have the same warranty conditions, no need to dwell on this. Actual maintenance costs depend on the brand's service network and parts prices. Suggest asking real car owners in car owner groups for experience.
Both the Perodua Aruz and Mazda CX-5 are mainstream choices in the Malaysia market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, prioritize the one with better reputation. If you care more about value for money and features, choose the one with more features. Ultimately, we suggest test driving both, personal experience is the most important.
Overall, both the Perodua Aruz and Mazda CX-5 are excellent models in the Malaysia market. Which one to choose depends on your personal needs and budget. We suggest you do your research, compare quotes from several dealerships, then test drive to make the final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending time on research is never wrong.
July 8, BYD's 17 millionth new energy vehicle rolled off the line at the Xi'an factory. From 16 million to 17 million, it took less than 3 months. Average daily production exceeds 12,000 units.
17 million units, what concept is this? Over a century of global automotive history, no new energy vehicle manufacturer has ever reached this scale. More crucially, from the first million taking 13 years to now adding another million in just over 80 days—this acceleration curve is truly staggering. This is not just a leap in production and sales data, but also creates a new benchmark for the development of the global new energy industry.
Many think BYD just rode the wave of new energy policy benefits. But can policy benefits explain the production ramp-up of a million units in three months? Can it explain the overseas growth rate of 789,000 units in half a year, up 68% year-on-year? Can it explain a Chinese carmaker beginning to export technical standards to the globe?
Obviously not.
What truly supports this number of 17 million units are three core capabilities that are hard for others to replicate.
First: Full-stack independent research, from "being bottlenecked" to "holding in hand"BYD's technology route has never been single-point breakthroughs, but rather full-stack independent research.
In March 2026, the second-generation Blade Battery and Flash Charging technology were released. Fully charged in 5 minutes at room temperature, 9 minutes full, plus only 3 minutes at minus 30 degrees — overcoming the "slow charging" and "cold weather charging difficulty" two major global problems in one go.
In May, China's first 4nm process smart driving chip "Xuanji A3" mass-produced, three-chip collaborative computing power exceeds 2,100 TOPS. Same month, BYD took the lead in promising to guarantee city pilot safety for 1 year, all series available with Sky's Eye B Laser version.
From battery, motor, electronic control to chips, smart driving, chassis, BYD achieved full-link independent controllability from upstream lithium mine resources to downstream complete vehicles. Core link independent R&D and production rate exceeds 90%.
Others build cars by assembling supply chains, BYD builds cars from mine to complete vehicle one-stop. Once this system runs smoothly, it is a moat others cannot copy, and also the bottom-line support for BYD pushing the new energy industry to a new height.
Good technology is just a premise. What makes BYD truly amazing is that — these core technologies are not used for "showing off skills". Sky's Eye standard equipment across series, city pilot and smart parking "safety double guarantee", making good technology accessible to everyone. The 17 million units data proves that domestic suppliers already possess global competitiveness in automotive-grade certification, yield control, and cost optimization.
Technology is not used for enshrinement, but for popularization. This is what defining standards should look like.
Second: Vertical integration, from "subject to others" to "self-sufficient"BYD is not only a complete vehicle manufacturer, but also a vertical integrated supply chain giant. Its subsidiaries such as FinDreams Battery, FinDreams Power, BYD Semiconductor, etc. constitute a complete domestic Tier1 camp.
What is the direct result brought by this model? Core component costs are more than 33% lower than the industry average.
In the early days of global chip shortage and raw material price increase cycles, peers reduced production and stopped work, BYD production capacity was almost unimpacted. When others were bottlenecked by supply chains, BYD quietly built cars. When others were still grabbing chips, BYD had already designed its own chips.
17 million units rolled off the line is not only a victory for the complete vehicle factory, but also a production volume landmark for the domestic supply chain. From second-generation Blade Battery to Sky's Eye smart driving, autonomous controllability and mass production delivery capability of core components have become the industry moat. This fully industry chain autonomous controllability system is itself a new height that the new energy industry can reach.
This model allows cutting-edge technology to quickly trickle down to all series models, no need for high-end cars to exclusively occupy core configurations. Seal 08 sells from 196,900 starting, but equipped with DiSus-A, rear-wheel steering, 905km range, flash charging, smart driving double guarantee — 200,000 RMB car, million-level configuration.
This is not a price war, this is a system war.
Third: Globalization, from "product going overseas" to "standards going overseas"In the first half of 2026, BYD sold 789,000 units overseas, up 68% year-on-year, overseas sales proportion exceeds 43%. June single month exports 175,300 units, creating a new historic high.
But more noteworthy than sales volume is the layout. Thailand, Brazil factories already mass-produced, Hungary, Indonesia factories to start production in 2026. From Southeast Asia to South America to Europe, a localized manufacturing system covering Asia, Europe, and Africa is taking shape.
More crucially — BYD is simultaneously exporting charging standards. Scale implementation of Flash Charging stations overseas at the end of 2026, from "Flash Charge China" to "Flash Charge Planet". Domestic has already built 7,018 Flash Charging stations, covering 325 cities, end of year target 20,000 stations.
Before it was Chinese cars chasing others' standards. Now it is others considering whether to connect to China's charging standards. This role shift is the most worthy of discussion behind 17 million units.
Final Thoughts
Xi'an is the place where BYD's car building dream started. 2003 first car rolled off the line, 2008 global first plug-in hybrid born, to today 17 millionth new energy vehicle rolls out from here.
17 million units is not just cold production capacity numbers, but also a landmark node for Chinese carmakers turning from policy followers to technology definers. From the depth of technology self-research, to the breadth of vertical integration, to the speed of global layout, BYD used a complete system capability to turn 17 million units from numbers into confidence, pushing the Chinese new energy industry to an unprecedented new height.
This is not only a milestone in production and sales volume, but also a new starting point for a Chinese carmaker to export standards and rules to the globe.
#BYD17MillionthNewEnergyVehicleRolledOffLine#
In Malaysia's SUV market, many buyers compare Perodua Ativa and Proton X50 when choosing a car. These two models are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
Perodua Ativa's OTR price in Malaysia is RM 62,500 - 73,400, with a total of 3 versions, including 1.0L Turbo X (RM 62,500), 1.0L Turbo H (RM 67,300), 1.0L Turbo AV (RM 73,400), etc.
Proton X50's OTR price in Malaysia is RM 89,800 - 113,300, with a total of 4 versions, including 1.5T Executive (RM 89,800), 1.5T Premium (RM 101,800), 1.5T Flagship (RM 113,300), etc.
In terms of price, Perodua Ativa's starting price is indeed RM 27,300 cheaper than Proton X50. If your budget is limited, Perodua's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. But also note, that few thousand dollars savings might involve trade-offs in features, depending on your specific requirements.
Perodua Ativa body length is 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
Proton X50 body length is 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
The dimensions of both cars are almost identical, and the interior space difference is not significant. For cars in this class, daily use is more than enough.
Perodua Ativa warranty is 5 years/150,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Proton X50 warranty is 5 years/150,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Both cars have the same warranty conditions, no need to worry about this. Actual maintenance costs also depend on the brand's service network and parts prices. It is recommended to ask real owners in car owner groups for their experience.
Perodua Ativa and Proton X50 are both mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, consider the one with better reputation first; if you care more about price-performance ratio and features, choose the one with richer configuration. In the end, it is recommended to test drive both. Personal experience is the most important.
Overall, Perodua Ativa and Proton X50 are both very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends mainly on your personal needs and budget. It is recommended that everyone do their homework, compare quotes from several dealerships, and then go for a test drive to make the final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending some time on research will never be wrong.
