首頁Gloria Y34
搜尋歷史
熱門搜尋
經銷商登入 / 註冊
撰文｜韓子涵 編輯｜青竹
一位首相，加埋三位內閣部長，為一家中國車企嘅投資站台。喺歐盟對中國電動車層層加碼嘅當下，本身就傳遞住一種信號。
7 月 23 日，西班牙瓦倫西亞工廠，喺首相佩德羅·桑切斯見證下，吉利汽車同福特簽署合資協議，將會透過產能共享，為歐洲市場打造吉利及福特品牌嘅新能源車。
唔係買工廠，而係合資；唔係打敗人哋，而係合作共贏。
無論係引進嚟，定係走出去，吉利嘅國際化，始終落實董事會主席李書福嗰句說話：「商業係美好嘅，既做生意又搵朋友」。
時間撥返 16 年前。2010 年 3 月 28 日，吉利控股集團同福特汽車集團簽訂富豪汽車公司最終 100% 股權收購協議。吉利成為中國汽車行業第一家跨國公司。福特見證並支持咗呢個具有全球汽車產業影響力嘅合作案例，結咗同吉利嘅商業友誼。
16 年後嘅今日，吉利同福特再度握手。對於當下井噴般嘅中國汽車出海，好具啓示性。
2026 年，中國汽車出海正經歷緊要嘅量變到質變嘅躍升。
上半年，我哋國家汽車出口量達到 509.6 萬輛，按年增長 65.3%。6 月單月出口首次突破百萬輛大關。國內每下線 10 架車，就有近 4 架駛向海外碼頭。
諮詢公司艾睿鉑預測，中國汽車全年出口量有望達到 1000 萬輛，將成為全球首個突破呢個數字嘅國家。
數字背後，更深入嘅變化正喺發生。
6 月，中國主要品牌喺歐洲嘅市場佔有率為 13%，連續兩個月超越日系品牌。當我哋佔據歐盟市場嘅更多份額，就唔係淨係賣車咁簡單，必須同當地嘅產業生態、法律法規同社會福祉和諧共贏。
吉利汽車同福特成立西班牙合資公司，恰好站喺呢個質變嘅節點上。亦係李書福從「走出去」到「融進去」嘅又一實踐。
一位首相嘅站台，同跨越 16 年嘅兩次握手
7 月 23 日，簽約儀式當日。西班牙首相佩德羅·桑切斯出現喺瓦倫西亞阿爾穆薩費斯工廠，身邊跟住勞工同經濟部、工業同旅遊部同科學部嘅三位部長，同瓦倫西亞自治區主席。
阿爾穆薩費斯工廠始建於 1976 年，曾經係福特喺美國以外最大嘅生產基地，迄今累計生產超過 1100 萬輛汽車。近 50 年來，呢間工廠係西班牙瓦倫西亞地區數萬家庭嘅生計所繫。
但工業時代從來唔會因情懷而停低腳步。由 2024 年起，隨著歐盟產業同電動化嘅推進，福特逐步停產蒙迪歐、S-MAX、Galaxy 等多款燃油車型，偌大嘅工廠僅剩一條產線生產 Kuga。
去年全年，呢間年產能 50 萬輛嘅工廠，實際只生產咗唔夠 10 萬輛汽車，利用率唔足四分之一。曾經養活數千個西班牙家庭嘅工廠，正面對命運嘅十字路口。
吉利嘅到嚟，可謂恰逢其時。透過產能共享，唔單止畀當地帶來工作崗位、產能、稅收，亦都讓福特能夠以更高效嘅方式盤活剩餘資產，繼續產生價值。
根據規劃，合資公司將於 2027 年上半年正式投入運營。
喺新工廠入面，吉利將投產兩款新能源車型，福特亦會生產三款多能源車型，包括繼續生產 Kuga，並於 2028 年投產 Bronco 家族全新硬派緊湊型 SUV。
五款車型將共享產能、協同排產，雙方喺公告中表示，合資公司將「推動更多車型選擇同價值嘅提升」，並透過「整合產量降低單車成本」。對於當地經濟而言，就業崗位得以保住，一個地區嘅工業命脈被重新激活，可謂一舉多贏。
當下，西班牙正成為中國車企登陸歐洲嘅戰略支點。勞動力成本約為德國嘅三分之一，能源成本低於德國同法國，擁有世界级港口集群，巴塞羅那更加係中國汽車入歐嘅核心門戶。
2026 年第一季度，中國品牌喺西班牙售出約 3.87 萬輛，按年增長 67%。
吉利汽車集團 CEO 淦家閱講過一段說話：車企出海會面對好多問題，喺海外睇嚟，中國品牌係去「佔領」人哋嘅市場，所以中國汽車品牌「走出去」，實際係要「走進去」。走咗入當地市場。喺當地合資建廠，調動屬地資源，係一種多贏路線。
對於吉利嚟講，雖然看似食咗一啲小虧，唔能夠獨享利潤。但其實規避咗好多隱形嘅成本同效率摩擦。
歐盟一直係高門檻市場，合規成本好高，環保要求好高，審批流程冗長，當地選民嘅意見同政治派系影響，會令商業行為變得複雜化。具體案例可以參考特斯拉德國工廠歷劫連續劇一般嘅波折。
其實，而家已經有國內車企食咗同樣嘅虧。單打獨鬥，一味強調野心同銷量目標，反而招致好多敵意同阻礙，甚至成為當地政黨政治博弈嘅籌碼。
但吉利走嘅另一條路，令海外市場保住就業，讓老牌車企盤活資產，讓中國品牌扎根當地，令技術流動成為建設性嘅力量，透過「合作共贏、美美與共」令自己成為被歡迎嘅夥伴。
尋找戰略縱深，重協同
花旗測算，若吉利獲得喺瓦倫西亞工廠 15 萬輛年產能配額，成本僅相當於新建綠地工廠嘅 10%-20%。
成本優勢之外更關鍵嘅價值喺時間。從簽約到投產，合資模式只需 18 個月，而自建工廠通常需要三到五年。喺瞬息萬變嘅歐洲電動車市場，18 個月嘅時間差足以決定一個品牌能否卡住身位。
呢套打法，吉利已喺全球多個市場跑通。
喺馬來西亞，吉利 2017 年收購寶騰 49.9% 股份並全面主導經營。令寶騰從虧損泥潭中走出嚟，實現品牌復興。
2026 年 1 月，寶騰位於丹戎馬林汽車高科技谷嘅專屬電動車工廠正式投產，首款純電車型 eMas7 開啟 CKD 本地化組裝。eMas7 基於吉利銀河 E5 平台打造，連續多月蟬聯馬來西亞 EV 銷量冠軍。
直到而家，由馬來西亞政界到民間，仍都把寶騰視為「自己嘅品牌」。吉利做嘅唔係取代，係令佢變得更好。
喺韓國，吉利同雷諾合作推出智能混動車型。喺巴西，吉利收購雷諾巴西公司 26.4% 股份，共享工廠產能同市場網絡。
喺歐洲，由富豪汽車全面負責凌克喺歐洲區域嘅商業及品牌運營，協助凌克品牌喺歐洲嘅區域化拓展。
正係吉利全球化佈局嘅獨特邏輯——並非孤軍深入，而係編織一張生態協同網絡。每一處合作節點，既係切入本地市場嘅戰略支點，亦係合作伙伴長期信任嘅實證。令全球化成為多方共贏、持續深化嘅價值網絡。
所以，儘管「從產品出海到體系出海」已經成為行業共識，但究係咩體系？把自己體系硬搬過去，定係從零開始自建體系，定係融入當地體系？呢啲操作層面嘅細節，反映咗一家公司嘅商業價值觀同發展觀。
吉利西班牙合資公司同背後呢套邏輯，為中國汽車產業提供咗一個好好嘅樣本同思路，亦反映為實實在在嘅增長數據。
2026 年上半年，吉利汽車海外銷量 47.4 萬輛，按年增長 158%，已超過 2025 年全年出口總量。基於上半年嘅表現，吉利已將全年出口上調至 90 萬輛。
結語：從「學生」到「夥伴」，中國車企嘅蛻變同擔當
2010 年初，吉利同福特喺瑞典哥德堡簽署協議，以 18 億美金收購全球知名嘅瑞典豪華品牌富豪，媒體用「蛇吞象」形容呢筆交易。
吉利用行動兌現咗所有承諾，冇干擾富豪嘅獨立運營，保護並尊重佢既有發展體系，令富豪喺此後十數年間實現咗品牌復興。
更加重要嘅係，吉利亦從富豪身上學到咗體系化嘅研發能力、安全至上嘅製造標準同質量控制。呢筆交易令吉利完成咗一次「深造」，為日後喺全球舞臺上嘅活躍表現奠定能力基礎。
傳統車企手入面握住現成嘅產能、渠道同銷售團隊，中國車企手入面握住增長最快嘅新能源體系優勢同成本效率，雙方喺呢個階段，搵到咗彼此都需要嘅嘢。
正如福特歐洲區總裁吉姆·鮑姆比克所講：「吉利世界級嘅電動化能力、速度同龐大嘅全球規模，同福特結合，就係無與倫比嘅競爭優勢。」
由 2010 年謙卑嘅「學生」，到 2026 年平等嘅「夥伴」，吉利用務實換取信任，用能力贏得尊重，用最佳嘅方式融入全球產業發展。
吉利嘅全球化從來唔係簡單嘅資本遊戲，而係喺依法合規嘅前提下不斷探索開放共贏嘅全球產業合作模式，係對品牌、技術嘅尊重，對協同體系嘅佈局同深構。
由富豪到寶騰、蓮花，再到賓士、雷諾，同福特，吉利打造嘅全球體系化協同，唔單止激活咗吉利全球化發展新動能，仲形成咗助力品牌出海嘅堅實保障。呢亦印證咗李書福所講嘅，「商業係最平等而美好嘅人類文明表現形式。」
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嗰陣都會拿 Proton X50 同 MG MG HS 嚟比較。呢兩款車喺價錢同定位上都幾接近，今日我哋就從多個層面做一個詳細比較，幫你省下做功課嘅時間。
Proton X50 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 89,800 - 113,300，總共 4 個版本，包括 1.5T Executive（RM 89,800）、1.5T Premium（RM 101,800）、1.5T Flagship（RM 113,300） 等等。
MG MG HS 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 130,450 - 146,450，總共 2 個版本，包括 1.5L Standard（RM 105,000）、1.5L Executive（RM 115,000） 等等。
由價錢嚟睇，Proton X50 嘅起價確實係比 MG MG HS 平咗 RM 40,650。如果你預算有限，Proton 嘅入門版已經足以滿足日常需要。不過都要留神，平嗰幾千塊，可能喺配備上有取捨，具體要睇你嘅需要。
Proton X50 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA)。
MG MG HS 嘅安全評級係 TBD，主動安全系統包括 Basic。
安全配備方面，兩款車都拿到咗唔錯嘅評級。不過 Proton X50 嘅 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA) 同 MG MG HS 嘅 Basic 喺功能上有啲差異，如果你比較重視主動安全嘅話，可以仔細對比下兩者嘅功能列表。
Proton X50 車身長 4400 mm，尾箱 400 L。
MG MG HS 車身長 4400 mm，尾箱 400 L。
兩款車嘅尺寸差唔多一樣，車內空間差別唔大。呢個級別嘅車，日常使用完全夠用。
Proton X50 同 MG MG HS 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更加重視品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰一款；如果你更加在意性價比同配備，就揀配置更豐富嗰款。始終都建議兩款都去試駕，親身體驗先至最重要。
總體嚟講，Proton X50 同 MG MG HS 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵都係要睇你嘅個人需要同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
Recently, the 8th "China Excellent Management Company" (BMC) list was unveiled in the Xiong'an New Area. Tirechina.net (China Tire Business Network) learned that Linglong Tire successfully retained this authoritative award known as the "Chinese Enterprise Management Oscars", becoming the only enterprise in the tire industry to receive this honor for two consecutive terms.
The "China Excellent Management Company" (BMC) program is a global authoritative award with a 32-year history by Deloitte, and is also the only international award in China currently for comprehensive assessment of enterprise management systems. This year's selection process took 6 months. The jury used closed-door recommendations, entrepreneur interviews, and expert research, employing the globally unified "Deloitte BMC Excellence Management Standards" to conduct comprehensive and high-standard strict assessments on enterprises.
This BMC selection sent a clear signal: leading Chinese private enterprises are moving from "China Champions" to "World Champions". Linglong winning for two consecutive years not only reflects international professional institutions' high recognition of its global strategic layout, digital transformation results, and sustainable development concepts, but is also a strong endorsement of its position as a leader in the Chinese tire industry.
Defining Industry Standards with Excellence Management
As a tire enterprise that has retained the BMC Award, Linglong Tire has continued to deepen its focus on key areas such as R&D, global layout, intelligent manufacturing, and green transition, which constitutes the deep foundation for this consecutive win.
R&D and Product Innovation: Seizing the Heights of New Energy and Green Materials. The company continues to tilt R&D investment towards the new energy track, focusing on breakthroughs in EV-specific technologies like low rolling resistance, noise-reducing cotton, and ultra-wear resistance, and has already formed a product matrix covering all new energy vehicle models. In 2026, the Linglong Master 2nd Gen products will be fully launched relying on the 7th Gen technology platform, achieving "full-cycle peak performance" such as wet handling, quiet driving, and ultra-long mileage, while the proportion of high value-added products steadily increases. Since the beginning of this year, Linglong products have frequently received good news in European authoritative evaluations: "Auto Bild" summer tire pre-selection won first place; German "Netzwelt" test total score was second, rated "Most Value"; and it became the only Chinese brand to be shortlisted and perform excellently in the ACE European Automobile Club test.
Global Capacity and Market Synergy: Comprehensive Implementation from "Product Export" to "System Export". Linglong has built a global R&D system of "Three Countries, Eight Locations" in China, Germany, and the USA. Two major overseas bases in Thailand and Serbia have achieved stable mass production. Among them, the Serbia factory, as the first tire production base for Chinese tires in Europe, has passed audits from German luxury brands like VW, Audi, and BMW, and entered the European mainstream supply chain. The company has established supply chain cooperation with 8 of the top 10 global automakers, with cumulative supply of tires exceeding 300 million units. In the domestic market, Linglong has built a channel network of nearly 30,000 stores and a four-level distribution system, while the new retail "Smart Store System" realizes full-link data management of inventory, sales, and service.
Intelligent Manufacturing and Digital Transformation: Data-Driven "Zero Defect" Manufacturing. Linglong continues to advance factory intelligent transformation, relying on the Industrial Internet Platform to achieve full-process data connectivity and quality control from raw material procurement to manufacturing and terminal distribution, significantly reducing manual inspection error rates. The supply chain synergy platform has opened up capacity allocation links across factories and regions, continuously optimizing order delivery efficiency, and providing more resilient supply guarantees for global customers.
ESG and Green Supply Chain Construction: Embedding Sustainable Development into Corporate DNA. Linglong has clarified a clear roadmap of "Carbon Peaking by 2030, Carbon Neutrality by 2050", which is 10 years ahead of the Paris Agreement targets. The company has already promoted rooftop photovoltaic coverage in multiple production bases, and the proportion of renewable energy usage is steadily increasing in 2026. Meanwhile, Linglong joined hands with downstream partners to build a waste tire recycling network, promoting tire full lifecycle management, and building a circular economy model with practical actions.
As the only enterprise in the tire industry selected for the "China Excellent Management Company" for two consecutive terms, Linglong Tire retaining the award this time is both an authoritative endorsement by the Deloitte global unified evaluation system of its comprehensive management capability, and sets a management benchmark for the high-quality development of the domestic tire industry.
Currently, the Chinese tire industry is in a critical stage of transformation towards globalization, intelligence, and green transformation, and competition between enterprises has long upgraded from single product comparison to system management capability contests. Linglong's practical results in R&D, global capacity synergy, intelligent manufacturing, and ESG full-chain management confirm the supporting role of systematic management for corporate long-term development, and also provide a reference sample for the industry from "Product Export" to "System Export". Subsequent progress of Linglong on management upgrade and brand elevation paths deserves continuous attention from the whole industry.
In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers compare the Proton X50 and Chery Tiggo Cross when choosing a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
The OTR price of the Proton X50 in Malaysia is RM 89,800 - 113,300, with a total of 4 versions, including 1.5T Executive (RM 89,800), 1.5T Premium (RM 101,800), 1.5T Flagship (RM 113,300), etc.
The OTR price of the Chery Tiggo Cross in Malaysia is RM 88,750 - 99,750, with a total of 2 versions, including 2025 HEV 1.5L CSH (RM 99,750), 2025 1.5T Standard (RM 88,750), etc.
From the price perspective, the starting price of the Chery Tiggo Cross is RM 1,050 cheaper than the Proton X50. Honestly, in this price range, a difference of a few thousand is not actually that big. The key is still to look at the overall cost-effectiveness and long-term usage costs.
The Proton X50 is equipped with a 1.5L 4-cyl, 105 hp. Official fuel consumption 6.0 L/100km.
The Chery Tiggo Cross is equipped with a 1.5L 4-cyl, 105 hp. Official fuel consumption 6.0 L/100km.
Both cars use the same powertrain, the driving feel is basically the same for daily use. The fuel consumption is also similar, no need to worry too much about this point.
The Proton X50 body length is 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
The Chery Tiggo Cross body length is 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
The dimensions of the two cars are almost the same, interior space difference is not significant. Cars at this level are completely sufficient for daily use.
The Proton X50 adopts a 4WD drive configuration.
The Chery Tiggo Cross adopts a FWD drive configuration.
The 4WD from Proton and FWD from Chery will have different feelings in handling, test drive comparison is recommended.
Both Proton X50 and Chery Tiggo Cross are mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale price more, you can prioritize the one with better reputation; if you care more about cost-performance ratio and equipment, then choose the one with richer configuration. In the end, it is recommended to test drive both, personal experience is the most important.
Overall, both Proton X50 and Chery Tiggo Cross are very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends on your personal needs and budget. It is recommended to do your homework, compare quotes from several dealerships, and then test drive to make the final decision. Buying a car is a major matter, spending some time on research is never wrong.
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拎寶騰 X50 同奇瑞 Tiggo 8 Pro 嚟做比較。呢兩款車喺價格同定位上都好接近，今日我哋就從多個方面做個詳細比較，幫你慳返做功課嘅時間。
寶騰 X50 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 89,800 至 113,300，一共 4 個版本，包括 1.5T Executive（RM 89,800）、1.5T Premium（RM 101,800）、1.5T Flagship（RM 113,300）等等。
奇瑞 Tiggo 8 Pro 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 159,750 至 159,750，一共 2 個版本，包括 1.6L Turbo Standard（RM 130,000）、1.6L Turbo Premium（RM 145,000）等等。
從價格睇落，寶騰 X50 嘅起步價確實比奇瑞 Tiggo 8 Pro 平咗 RM 69,950。如果你預算有限，寶騰嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需要。不過都要注意，平嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備上會有取捨，具體要看你嘅需要。
寶騰 X50 車身長 4400 mm，行李廂 400 L。
奇瑞 Tiggo 8 Pro 車身長 4400 mm，行李廂 400 L。
兩款車嘅尺寸幾乎一樣，車內空間分別唔大。呢個級別嘅車，日常使用完全夠用。
寶騰 X50 採用 4WD 驅動方式。
奇瑞 Tiggo 8 Pro 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
寶騰嘅 4WD 同奇瑞嘅 FWD 喺操控上會有唔同感覺，建議試駕比較。
寶騰 X50 同奇瑞 Tiggo 8 Pro 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更重視品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，那就揀配置更豐富嗰款。最後始終建議兩款都去試駕，親身體驗先至最重要。
總體嚟講，寶騰 X50 同奇瑞 Tiggo 8 Pro 都係馬來西亞市場好唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵都係要看你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對無錯。
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拿 Perodua Aruz 同 MG MG HS 嚟做比較。呢兩款車喺價位同定位上都好接近嘅，今日我哋就從多個方面做個詳細比較，幫您節省做功課嘅時間。
Perodua Aruz 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 72,900 - 77,900，總共有 2 個版本，包括 1.5L X（RM 72,900）、1.5L AV（RM 77,900） 等。
MG MG HS 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 130,450 - 146,450，總共有 2 個版本，包括 1.5L Standard（RM 105,000）、1.5L Executive（RM 115,000） 等。
從價錢嚟睇，Perodua Aruz 嘅起步價確實比 MG MG HS 平咗 RM 57,550。如果你預算有限，Perodua 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需要。但都要留意，平嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備方面會有取舍，具體睇你嘅需要。
Perodua Aruz 搭載 1.5L 4-cyl，馬力 105 hp。官方油耗 6.0 L/100km。
MG MG HS 搭載 1.5L Turbo，馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。
動力方面，MG MG HS 嘅 1.5L Turbo 比 Perodua Aruz 嘅 1.5L 4-cyl 多咗 35 匹馬力。不過日常喺市區開，兩款車嘅動力都夠用，唔會覺得唔夠力。
Perodua Aruz 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 。
MG MG HS 嘅安全評級係 TBD，主動安全系統包括 Basic。
Perodua Aruz 保修 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
MG MG HS 保修 7 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
總體嚟講，Perodua Aruz 同 MG MG HS 都係馬來西亞市場好唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵仲係要睇你嘅個人需要同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係一件大事，花啲時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
In Malaysia's SUV market, many buyers compare the Perodua Aruz and Mazda CX-5 when choosing a car. Both cars are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on your research.
The Perodua Aruz OTR price in Malaysia is RM 72,900 - 77,900, with a total of 2 versions, including 1.5L X (RM 72,900), 1.5L AV (RM 77,900), etc.
The Mazda CX-5 OTR price in Malaysia is RM 135,469 - 166,760, with a total of 3 versions, including 2025 2.0L AT 35th Anniversary (RM 316,154), 2025 2.0L AT (RM 296,154), 2025 2.0L MT (RM 294,154), etc.
From a price perspective, the Perodua Aruz starting price is indeed RM 62,569 cheaper than the Mazda CX-5. If your budget is limited, Perodua's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. But also note, the few thousand RMB difference might involve trade-offs in features, depending on your needs.
The Perodua Aruz is equipped with 1.5L 4-cyl, 105 hp. Official fuel consumption is 6.0 L/100km.
The Mazda CX-5 is equipped with 1.5L Turbo, 140 hp. Official fuel consumption is 7.0 L/100km.
In terms of power, the Mazda CX-5's 1.5L Turbo has 35 more horsepower than the Perodua Aruz's 1.5L 4-cyl. However, for daily driving in the city, both cars have sufficient power and you won't feel it lacks power.
The Perodua Aruz safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include.
The Mazda CX-5 safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include.
Both cars have the same safety rating, and safety features are quite comprehensive in this class. New car safety is not poor nowadays, no need to worry too much about this.
The Perodua Aruz warranty is 5 years/150,000km, service interval is every 10,000km or 6 months.
The Mazda CX-5 warranty is 5 years/150,000km, service interval is every 10,000km or 6 months.
Both cars have the same warranty conditions, no need to dwell on this. Actual maintenance costs depend on the brand's service network and parts prices. Suggest asking real car owners in car owner groups for experience.
Both the Perodua Aruz and Mazda CX-5 are mainstream choices in the Malaysia market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, prioritize the one with better reputation. If you care more about value for money and features, choose the one with more features. Ultimately, we suggest test driving both, personal experience is the most important.
Overall, both the Perodua Aruz and Mazda CX-5 are excellent models in the Malaysia market. Which one to choose depends on your personal needs and budget. We suggest you do your research, compare quotes from several dealerships, then test drive to make the final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending time on research is never wrong.
July 8, BYD's 17 millionth new energy vehicle rolled off the line at the Xi'an factory. From 16 million to 17 million, it took less than 3 months. Average daily production exceeds 12,000 units.
17 million units, what concept is this? Over a century of global automotive history, no new energy vehicle manufacturer has ever reached this scale. More crucially, from the first million taking 13 years to now adding another million in just over 80 days—this acceleration curve is truly staggering. This is not just a leap in production and sales data, but also creates a new benchmark for the development of the global new energy industry.
Many think BYD just rode the wave of new energy policy benefits. But can policy benefits explain the production ramp-up of a million units in three months? Can it explain the overseas growth rate of 789,000 units in half a year, up 68% year-on-year? Can it explain a Chinese carmaker beginning to export technical standards to the globe?
Obviously not.
What truly supports this number of 17 million units are three core capabilities that are hard for others to replicate.
First: Full-stack independent research, from "being bottlenecked" to "holding in hand"BYD's technology route has never been single-point breakthroughs, but rather full-stack independent research.
In March 2026, the second-generation Blade Battery and Flash Charging technology were released. Fully charged in 5 minutes at room temperature, 9 minutes full, plus only 3 minutes at minus 30 degrees — overcoming the "slow charging" and "cold weather charging difficulty" two major global problems in one go.
In May, China's first 4nm process smart driving chip "Xuanji A3" mass-produced, three-chip collaborative computing power exceeds 2,100 TOPS. Same month, BYD took the lead in promising to guarantee city pilot safety for 1 year, all series available with Sky's Eye B Laser version.
From battery, motor, electronic control to chips, smart driving, chassis, BYD achieved full-link independent controllability from upstream lithium mine resources to downstream complete vehicles. Core link independent R&D and production rate exceeds 90%.
Others build cars by assembling supply chains, BYD builds cars from mine to complete vehicle one-stop. Once this system runs smoothly, it is a moat others cannot copy, and also the bottom-line support for BYD pushing the new energy industry to a new height.
Good technology is just a premise. What makes BYD truly amazing is that — these core technologies are not used for "showing off skills". Sky's Eye standard equipment across series, city pilot and smart parking "safety double guarantee", making good technology accessible to everyone. The 17 million units data proves that domestic suppliers already possess global competitiveness in automotive-grade certification, yield control, and cost optimization.
Technology is not used for enshrinement, but for popularization. This is what defining standards should look like.
Second: Vertical integration, from "subject to others" to "self-sufficient"BYD is not only a complete vehicle manufacturer, but also a vertical integrated supply chain giant. Its subsidiaries such as FinDreams Battery, FinDreams Power, BYD Semiconductor, etc. constitute a complete domestic Tier1 camp.
What is the direct result brought by this model? Core component costs are more than 33% lower than the industry average.
In the early days of global chip shortage and raw material price increase cycles, peers reduced production and stopped work, BYD production capacity was almost unimpacted. When others were bottlenecked by supply chains, BYD quietly built cars. When others were still grabbing chips, BYD had already designed its own chips.
17 million units rolled off the line is not only a victory for the complete vehicle factory, but also a production volume landmark for the domestic supply chain. From second-generation Blade Battery to Sky's Eye smart driving, autonomous controllability and mass production delivery capability of core components have become the industry moat. This fully industry chain autonomous controllability system is itself a new height that the new energy industry can reach.
This model allows cutting-edge technology to quickly trickle down to all series models, no need for high-end cars to exclusively occupy core configurations. Seal 08 sells from 196,900 starting, but equipped with DiSus-A, rear-wheel steering, 905km range, flash charging, smart driving double guarantee — 200,000 RMB car, million-level configuration.
This is not a price war, this is a system war.
Third: Globalization, from "product going overseas" to "standards going overseas"In the first half of 2026, BYD sold 789,000 units overseas, up 68% year-on-year, overseas sales proportion exceeds 43%. June single month exports 175,300 units, creating a new historic high.
But more noteworthy than sales volume is the layout. Thailand, Brazil factories already mass-produced, Hungary, Indonesia factories to start production in 2026. From Southeast Asia to South America to Europe, a localized manufacturing system covering Asia, Europe, and Africa is taking shape.
More crucially — BYD is simultaneously exporting charging standards. Scale implementation of Flash Charging stations overseas at the end of 2026, from "Flash Charge China" to "Flash Charge Planet". Domestic has already built 7,018 Flash Charging stations, covering 325 cities, end of year target 20,000 stations.
Before it was Chinese cars chasing others' standards. Now it is others considering whether to connect to China's charging standards. This role shift is the most worthy of discussion behind 17 million units.
Final Thoughts
Xi'an is the place where BYD's car building dream started. 2003 first car rolled off the line, 2008 global first plug-in hybrid born, to today 17 millionth new energy vehicle rolls out from here.
17 million units is not just cold production capacity numbers, but also a landmark node for Chinese carmakers turning from policy followers to technology definers. From the depth of technology self-research, to the breadth of vertical integration, to the speed of global layout, BYD used a complete system capability to turn 17 million units from numbers into confidence, pushing the Chinese new energy industry to an unprecedented new height.
This is not only a milestone in production and sales volume, but also a new starting point for a Chinese carmaker to export standards and rules to the globe.
#BYD17MillionthNewEnergyVehicleRolledOffLine#
In Malaysia's SUV market, many buyers compare Perodua Ativa and Proton X50 when choosing a car. These two models are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
Perodua Ativa's OTR price in Malaysia is RM 62,500 - 73,400, with a total of 3 versions, including 1.0L Turbo X (RM 62,500), 1.0L Turbo H (RM 67,300), 1.0L Turbo AV (RM 73,400), etc.
Proton X50's OTR price in Malaysia is RM 89,800 - 113,300, with a total of 4 versions, including 1.5T Executive (RM 89,800), 1.5T Premium (RM 101,800), 1.5T Flagship (RM 113,300), etc.
In terms of price, Perodua Ativa's starting price is indeed RM 27,300 cheaper than Proton X50. If your budget is limited, Perodua's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. But also note, that few thousand dollars savings might involve trade-offs in features, depending on your specific requirements.
Perodua Ativa body length is 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
Proton X50 body length is 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
The dimensions of both cars are almost identical, and the interior space difference is not significant. For cars in this class, daily use is more than enough.
Perodua Ativa warranty is 5 years/150,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Proton X50 warranty is 5 years/150,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Both cars have the same warranty conditions, no need to worry about this. Actual maintenance costs also depend on the brand's service network and parts prices. It is recommended to ask real owners in car owner groups for their experience.
Perodua Ativa and Proton X50 are both mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, consider the one with better reputation first; if you care more about price-performance ratio and features, choose the one with richer configuration. In the end, it is recommended to test drive both. Personal experience is the most important.
Overall, Perodua Ativa and Proton X50 are both very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends mainly on your personal needs and budget. It is recommended that everyone do their homework, compare quotes from several dealerships, and then go for a test drive to make the final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending some time on research will never be wrong.
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嗰陣都會拿 Perodua Ativa 同 Honda WR-V 嚟做比較。這兩款車喺價位同定位上都幾近，今日我哋就從多個方面做一個詳細嘅對比，幫你省下做功課嘅時間。
Perodua Ativa 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 62,500 - 73,400，一共有 3 個版本，包括 1.0L Turbo X（RM 62,500）、1.0L Turbo H（RM 67,300）、1.0L Turbo AV（RM 73,400） 等。
Honda WR-V 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 89,900 - 107,900，一共有 4 個版本，包括 2023 1.5L V（RM 99,900）、2023 1.5L E（RM 95,900）、2023 1.5L S（RM 89,900） 等。
從價錢嚟睇，Perodua Ativa 嘅起步價確實比 Honda WR-V 平咗 RM 27,400。如果你預算有限，Perodua 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需求。但都要注意，平嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備上會有取舍，具體要看你嘅需求。
Perodua Ativa 配備 1.5L 4-cyl，馬力 105 hp。官方油耗 6.0 L/100km。
Honda WR-V 配備 1.5L 4-cyl，馬力 105 hp。官方油耗 6.0 L/100km。
兩款車用嘅係同一套動力系統，日常開起嚟嘅感受基本冇咩分別。油耗方面都差唔多，唔使太糾結呢一點。
Perodua Ativa 車身長 4400 mm，行李廂 400 L。
Honda WR-V 車身長 4400 mm，行李廂 400 L。
兩款車嘅尺寸幾乎一樣，車內空間差別唔大。呢個級別嘅車，日常使用完全夠用。
Perodua Ativa 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
Honda WR-V 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
兩款車嘅驅動方式一樣，都係 FWD，日常駕駛感受唔會有太大分別。
總嚟講，Perodua Ativa 同 Honda WR-V 都係馬來西亞市場好唔錯嘅車型。揀邊輛，關鍵都要睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拿 馬自達 CX-9 同 富豪 XC60 嚟比較。呢兩款車喺價位同定位上都好接近，今日我哋就由多個方面做一次詳細嘅比較，幫你省咗做功課嘅時間。
馬自達 CX-9 喺馬來西亞嘅 O T R 售價係 RM 328,810 - 345,810，一共有 2 個版本，包括 2023 2.5T 4WD（RM 345,810）、2023 2.5T 2WD（RM 328,810） 等。
富豪 XC60 喺馬來西亞嘅 O T R 售價係 RM 328,888 - 328,888，一共有 1 個版本，包括 2025 2.0T Core（RM 328,888） 等。
由價錢睇，馬自達 CX-9 嘅起步價的確比 富豪 XC60 平咗 RM 78。如果你預算有限，馬自達嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需要。但都要注意，平嘅嗰幾千塊，可能喺配備上有取捨，具體睇你嘅需要。
馬自達 CX-9 配 2.0L Turbo，馬力 220 hp。官方油耗 9.5 L/100km。
富豪 XC60 配 2.0L Turbo，馬力 220 hp。官方油耗 9.5 L/100km。
兩款車用咗同一套動力系統，日常開起嚟嘅感覺基本上冇分別。油耗方面都差唔多，唔使太糾結呢一點。
馬自達 CX-9 車身長 4500 mm，尾箱 450 L。
富豪 XC60 車身長 4400 mm，尾箱 400 L。
空間方面，馬自達 CX-9 嘅車身比 富豪 XC60 長咗 100 mm，車內乘坐空間會稍微闊少少，尤其係後座腿部空間。如果你經常載家人或者需要放嬰兒車，大少少嘅車身的確更實用。
馬自達 CX-9 保修 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
富豪 XC60 保修 5 年/無限里程，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
總體嚟講，馬自達 CX-9 同 富豪 XC60 都係馬來西亞市場幾不錯嘅車型。揀邊一部，關鍵都要睇你嘅個人需要同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去做試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
喺马来西亚嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嗰陣都會拿 MG MG HS 同 Kia Sportage 做比較。呢兩款車喺價位同定位上都幾接近嘅，今日我哋就從多個方面做一個詳細嘅對比，幫你省咗做功課嘅時間。
MG MG HS 喺马来西亚嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 130,450 - 146,450，合共有 2 個版本，包括 1.5L Standard（RM 105,000）、1.5L Executive（RM 115,000）等。
Kia Sportage 喺马来西亚嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 129,639 - 179,320，合共有 4 個版本，包括 2025 1.6T DCT 4WD High（RM 179,320）、2025 1.6T DCT 2WD High（RM 159,320）、2025 2.0L AT 2WD High（RM 139,639）等。
從價錢睇嚟，Kia Sportage 嘅起步價比 MG MG HS 平咗 RM 811。老實講，喺呢個價位段，幾千塊嘅差距其實唔算大，關鍵仲係睇整體嘅性價比同長期使用成本。
MG MG HS 搭載 1.5L Turbo，馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。
Kia Sportage 搭載 1.5L Turbo，馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。
兩款車用嘅係同一套動力系統，日常開起嚟嘅感覺基本無分別。油耗方面都差唔多，唔使太糾結呢一點。
MG MG HS 嘅安全評級係 TBD，主動安全系統包括 Basic。
Kia Sportage 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 Drive Wise。
安全配備方面，兩款車都拿到唔錯嘅評級。不過 MG MG HS 嘅 Basic 同 Kia Sportage 嘅 Drive Wise 喺功能上有些差異，如果你比較睇重主動安全嘅話，可以仔細對比一下佢哋嘅功能列表。
MG MG HS 車身長 4400 mm，行李箱 400 L。
Kia Sportage 車身長 4400 mm，行李箱 400 L。
兩款車嘅尺寸幾乎一樣，車內空間分別唔大。呢個級別嘅車，日常使用完全夠用。
MG MG HS 保養 7 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Kia Sportage 保養 5 年/300,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
總體嚟講，MG MG HS 同 Kia Sportage 都係马来西亚市場唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一部，關鍵仲係要睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建议大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再上去試駕先做最終決定。買車係件大事，花啲時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拿 Hyundai Palisade 同 BMW X5 嚟做比較。這兩款車喺價位同定位上都幾接近，今日我哋就從多個方面做一次詳細比較，幫你省下做功課嘅時間。
Hyundai Palisade 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 368,838 - 399,838，一共有 4 個版本，包括 2023 3.8L 2WD Luxe 7 Seats Petrol（RM 399,838）、2023 2.2T 4WD Executive 7 Seats Diesel（RM 389,838）、2023 3.8L 2WD Luxe 8 Seats Petrol（RM 378,838） 等。
BMW X5 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 470,800 - 470,800，一共有 3 個版本，包括 1.5L Standard（RM 86,300）、1.5L Executive（RM 95,300）、1.5L Premium（RM 103,300） 等。
從價錢來看，Hyundai Palisade 嘅起步價確實比 BMW X5 平咗 RM 101,962。如果你預算有限，Hyundai 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需要。但都要留意，平嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備上會有取舍，具體要看你嘅需要。
Hyundai Palisade 搭載 2.0L Turbo，馬力 220 hp。官方油耗 9.5 L/100km。
BMW X5 搭載 3.0L Turbo，馬力 350 hp。官方油耗 12.0 L/100km。
動力方面，BMW X5 嘅 3.0L Turbo 比 Hyundai Palisade 嘅 2.0L Turbo 多咗 130 匹馬力。不過日常喺市區開，兩款車嘅動力都夠用，唔會覺得唔夠力。
Hyundai Palisade 車身長 4400 mm，行李箱 400 L。
BMW X5 車身長 4400 mm，行李箱 400 L。
兩款車嘅尺寸幾乎一樣，車內空間差別唔大。呢個級別嘅車，日常使用完全夠用。
Hyundai Palisade 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
BMW X5 採用 4WD 驅動方式。
Hyundai 嘅 FWD 同 BMW 嘅 4WD 喺操控上會有唔同感受，建議試車比較。
Hyundai Palisade 同 BMW X5 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更睇重品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嘅嗰一款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，就揀配備更豐富嗰款。最終都係建議兩款都去試車，親身體驗先係最重要嘅。
總括嚟講，Hyundai Palisade 同 BMW X5 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵都要睇你個人需求同預算。建議大家做做功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試車做最終決定。買車係件大事，花點時間做做功課絕對唔會錯。
喺馬來西亞嘅汽車市場，好多買家喺揀車嗰陣，都會將 Toyota Harrier 同 BMW X5 作比較。今日我哋從多個方面做一次詳細嘅比較，幫你省返做功課嘅時間。
Toyota Harrier 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 289,000 - 289,000，總共有 1 個版本，包括 2026 HEV 2.5L Standard（RM 289,000） 等等。
BMW X5 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 470,800 - 470,800，總共有 3 個版本，包括 1.5L Standard（RM 86,300）、1.5L Executive（RM 95,300）、1.5L Premium（RM 103,300） 等等。
由價錢睇嚟，Toyota Harrier 嘅起步價的確比 BMW X5 平咗 RM 181,800。如果你預算有限，Toyota 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需要。但要留意，平嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備上有取捨，具體就要睇你嘅需要。
Toyota Harrier 嘅安全评分係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 Brand ADAS。
BMW X5 嘅安全评分係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA)。
兩款車嘅安全评分一樣，喺呢個級別入面安全配備都好齊全。而家嘅新車安全性都唔差，唔使太擔心呢一點。
Toyota Harrier 車身長 4400 mm，行李廂 400 L。
BMW X5 車身長 4400 mm，行李廂 400 L。
兩款車嘅尺寸幾乎一樣，車內空間分別唔大。呢個級別嘅車，日常使用完全夠用。
Toyota Harrier 保修 5 年/無限制里程，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
BMW X5 保修 5 年/無限里程，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
總嚟講，Toyota Harrier 同 BMW X5 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一部，關鍵依然係睇你嘅個人需要同預算。建議大家做功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，先至去試駕做最後決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
喺馬來西亞嘅汽車市場，好多買家喺揀車嗰陣都會用 Volvo XC60 同 Porsche Cayenne 嚟做比較。而家我哋從多個方面做一個詳細嘅比較，幫你省下做功課嘅時間。
Volvo XC60 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 328,888 - 328,888，一共有 1 個版本，包括 2025 2.0T Core（RM 328,888） 等。
Porsche Cayenne 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 609,000 - 1,200,000，一共有 3 個版本，包括 2025 Sportback 2.0T quattro S line（RM 442,112）、2026 Cayenne 3.0T（RM 609,000）、2026 Cayenne S 4.0T（RM 1,200,000） 等。
由價錢睇，Volvo XC60 嘅起步價確實比 Porsche Cayenne 便宜咗 RM 280,112。如果你預算有限，Volvo 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需求。但都要留意，便宜嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備上要有取舍，具體要睇你嘅需求。
Volvo XC60 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
Porsche Cayenne 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
兩款車嘅驅動方式一樣，都係 FWD，日常駕駛感受唔會有太大分別。
Volvo XC60 保養 5 年/無限里程，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Porsche Cayenne 保養 3 年/100,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Volvo XC60 同 Porsche Cayenne 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更睇重品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰一款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，那就揀配備更豐富嗰款。最終都係建議兩款都去試車，親身體驗先至最重要。
整體嚟講，Volvo XC60 同 Porsche Cayenne 都係馬來西亞市場好唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵仲係要睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試車做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
車型概覽
平治Maybach S系列 值唔值得睇，第一步唔係望牌子或者外形，而係睇佢能唔能夠配合你嘅香港日常。 呢篇會集中講同級車比較，幫你用買家角度篩走唔適合嘅選擇。
零售價 HK$ 1,500,431 - 1,992,242、完稅價 HK$ 3,399,900 - 3,920,000 令預算位置更清楚，買家可以先估算月供、保險、泊車同日常開支。
購車價格指南
平治Maybach S系列 嘅購車預算可以先由 零售價 HK$ 1,500,431 - 1,992,242、完稅價 HK$ 3,399,900 - 3,920,000 開始計。香港買車唔只係睇車價，月供、保險、牌費、泊車同能源成本都會影響每月壓力。
如果有幾個版本可揀，可以先將 2026 S 680 4MATIC FL（HK$ 3,920,000）、2026 S 580 4MATIC FL（HK$ 3,399,900）、2024 S 580 4MATIC（HK$ 1,500,431）、2024 S 680 4MATIC（HK$ 1,992,242） 放喺同一張清單。日常通勤重視舒適同易用，家庭買家就要優先睇後排、尾箱同安全配置。
核心規格重點
睇 平治Maybach S系列 嘅規格，重點唔係背數字，而係理解佢喺香港用車場景會帶嚟咩分別。
17 kW / 612 Ps / 450 kW / 503 Ps、850/700/900 N·m 嘅輸出，令高速併線同短距離超車更有信心。 車長 5484/5469 mm、車闊 2123/2109 mm、車高 1510 mm 可以幫你預判商場停車場、屋苑車位同後排腿部空間。 手自一體(AT)、前置四駆 會影響起步順滑度、濕地穩定感同長途巡航性格。
優缺點分析
平治Maybach S系列 嘅優點唔需要講到天花龍鳳，真正有價值係佢能唔能夠令日常用車更省心：預算位置清楚，方便同同級車直接比較、動力輸出對高速同上斜更有底氣、空間同車身尺寸方便家庭買家預判實用性。
要留意嘅係，要先確認屋苑、公司或常去商場嘅充電條件、香港停車場同窄路使用要留意車身闊度。呢啲唔一定係缺點，但係落訂前應該先諗清楚。
買家常見問題
買 平治Maybach S系列 之前，真正要問嘅唔係單一規格，而係佢可唔可以融入你每日嘅生活節奏。
常見疑問係「Mercedes-Maybach S Series 嘅車身長度同普通 S-Class 有咩分別？」簡單講，Mercedes-Maybach S Series 嘅軸距比長軸版 S-Class 仲要再增加 18 厘米，全車長度達到約 5.47 米。增加嘅長度完全應用喺 Mercedes-Maybach S Series 嘅後座空間，令後排乘客可以享受前所未有嘅腿部伸展空間同尊貴感。 放到實際用車，就係要睇佢對通勤、泊車、家庭乘坐同長期成本有幾大幫助。
同級對比內容
將 平治Maybach S系列 放入同級車清單時，唔建議只用外形或者品牌光環決定。比較順序可以係：先用 零售價 HK$ 1,500,431 - 1,992,242、完稅價 HK$ 3,399,900 - 3,920,000 鎖定預算圈、再睇動力係咪足夠應付高速併線同滿載、最後睇車身大小、座位同尾箱是否適合家人。
咁樣篩選會貼近香港買家真實生活：平日塞車、商場泊車、周末去新界、甚至一家人出入，先係一部車每日要面對嘅考驗。
用車全周期指南
擁有 平治Maybach S系列 最重要係先諗清楚充電節奏。屋苑、公司或者常去商場只要有穩定充電選項，電動化用車就會容易相處好多。
如果你主要喺市區行，視野、低速順滑度同泊車輔助會好影響心情；如果經常行高速或跨區，座椅舒適度、隔音同動力從容感會更重要。
車型概覽
買 Perodua Traz 值唔值得，關鍵唔係佢睇落幾吸引，而係佢夠唔夠解決你嘅真實用車需要。呢篇文章會集中放喺佢同級別車比較嘅生活適應程度。最近圍繞呢款車嘅討論包括「KLIMS 2026: Perodua Traz and the National Brand's SUV Foundation」，反映喺本地買家視野入面仍然有關注度。
價格範圍喺 RM 76,100 - 82,000，買家可以先用佢判斷預算壓力同同級定位。
購車價格指南
Perodua Traz 嘅購車預算可以先由 RM 76,100 - 82,000 開始衡量。呢個數字真正影響嘅係月供、保險同現金流，而不係只係展廳入面嘅標價。
如果你喺幾個版本之間猶豫，可以把 2026 1.5L H 2T（RM 82,000）、2026 1.5L H（RM 81,100）、2026 1.5L X（RM 76,100） 放喺同一張清單入面比較。日常通勤買家優先睇舒適同安全，常跑高速嘅買家則更應重視動力、輔助駕駛同座艙方便。
核心參數匯總
睇 Perodua Traz 嘅核心規格，最重要係將數字翻譯成生活入面嘅感受。
自然進氣、4 缸嘅動力底子，適合拿來判斷市區跟車同高速巡航是否輕鬆。106 Ps、138 N·m嘅輸出，真正意義在於滿載、爬坡同超車時唔會太吃力。4.69 L/100km嘅油耗，對於每天通勤嘅人嚟講會直接影響加油頻率。車長 4310 mm、車寬 1770 mm、車高 1655 mm、軸距 2620 mm，可以幫你預判停車難度同後排乘坐空間。
優缺點分析
Perodua Traz 嘅優點唔使誇張，真正有價值嘅係佢夠唔夠讓日常使用更加少操心：預算位置清楚，方便同級別車直接比較、日常能源成本有明確參考、動力輸出能支撐高速同超車需要。
需要留意嘅係，市區停車同狹窄路段仍然睇個人駕駛習慣。呢啲唔係扣分項，而係落訂之前應該先諗清楚嘅生活細節。
購車常見問題解答
購買 Perodua Traz 之前，買家最常問嘅唔係單一規格，而係佢夠唔夠融入自己嘅生活。
呢輛車適合邊個？適合把佢同級別車相比嘅生活適應程度放喺首位嘅買家。家庭用戶要看咩？優先睇後排乘坐、兒童座椅、行李同日常上下車是否順手。每天開會唔會麻煩？4.69 L/100km嘅油耗參考讓通勤成本更加容易預估。
競爭對手比較內容
把 Perodua Traz 放進同級別車名單嘅時候，唔建議只睇品牌或外形。真正有用嘅比較順序係：先用 RM 76,100 - 82,000 鎖定預算圈、再睇動力夠唔夠應付高速同滿載、跟住比較能源成本同補能方便、最後睇空間是否適合家人同行李。
咁樣篩選出嚟嘅結果更加貼近日常生活。你會更清楚佢係適合城市通勤、家庭代步、長途巡航，定係更適合作為一輛講求個性嘅選擇。
用車全週期指南
擁有 Perodua Traz 嘅日常成本，最直接會反映喺燃油、保險、輪胎同定期保養上。4.69 L/100km嘅油耗讓通勤預算更加容易掌握。
如果你常跑南北大道，動力同座艙舒適度會比單純低價更重要；如果主要喺市區，停車靈活性、視野同低速順滑度會更加影響心情。
車型概覽
五菱E5 值唔值得睇，第一步唔係望牌子或者外形，而係睇佢能唔能夠配合你嘅香港日常。 呢篇會集中講續航、電池同補電安排，幫你用買家角度篩走唔適合嘅選擇。
售價仍待確認，買家可以先把佢放入候選名單，等價格落實後再同同級車逐項比較。
購車價格指南
五菱E5 目前售價仍未清晰，較理性嘅做法係先睇版本、車身大小同動力形式，等價格落實後再決定值唔值得落訂。
如果有幾個版本可揀，可以先將 2024 410km 前驅版（價格待確認）、2024 510km 前驅版（價格待確認） 放喺同一張清單。日常通勤重視舒適同易用，家庭買家就要優先睇後排、尾箱同安全配置。
核心規格重點
睇 五菱E5 嘅規格，重點唔係背數字，而係理解佢喺香港用車場景會帶嚟咩分別。
41.9/54.3 kWh 嘅電池容量，真正意義係可以幫你估算一星期通勤同周末出車要唔要中途補電。 410/510 km 嘅續航參考，對住喺新界、九龍同港島之間跨區行車嘅用家會更實際。 100 kW、200 N·m 嘅輸出，令高速併線同短距離超車更有信心。 車長 4835 mm、車闊 1860 mm、車高 1515 mm、軸距 2800 mm 可以幫你預判商場停車場、屋苑車位同後排腿部空間。
優缺點分析
五菱E5 嘅優點唔需要講到天花龍鳳，真正有價值係佢能唔能夠令日常用車更省心：電池同續航資訊有助安排通勤同補電、動力輸出對高速同上斜更有底氣、空間同車身尺寸方便家庭買家預判實用性。
要留意嘅係，要先確認屋苑、公司或常去商場嘅充電條件、香港停車場同窄路使用要留意車身闊度。呢啲唔一定係缺點，但係落訂前應該先諗清楚。
買家常見問題
買 五菱E5 之前，真正要問嘅唔係單一規格，而係佢可唔可以融入你每日嘅生活節奏。
常見疑問係「五菱 Wuling E5 嘅主要續航里程係？」簡單講，五菱 Wuling E5 提供約 400 公里嘅純電續航，滿足日常所需。 放到實際用車，就係要睇佢對通勤、泊車、家庭乘坐同長期成本有幾大幫助。
同級對比內容
將 五菱E5 放入同級車清單時，唔建議只用外形或者品牌光環決定。比較順序可以係：先等售價落實，再決定佢應該同邊個級距比較、再睇動力係咪足夠應付高速併線同滿載、再比較能源成本同補能便利、最後睇車身大小、座位同尾箱是否適合家人。
咁樣篩選會貼近香港買家真實生活：平日塞車、商場泊車、周末去新界、甚至一家人出入，先係一部車每日要面對嘅考驗。
用車全周期指南
擁有 五菱E5 最重要係先諗清楚充電節奏。屋苑、公司或者常去商場只要有穩定充電選項，電動化用車就會容易相處好多。
如果你主要喺市區行，視野、低速順滑度同泊車輔助會好影響心情；如果經常行高速或跨區，座椅舒適度、隔音同動力從容感會更重要。
車型概覽
奧迪Q6 e-tron 值唔值得睇，第一步唔係望牌子或者外形，而係睇佢能唔能夠配合你嘅香港日常。 呢篇會集中講預算、月供同同級定位，幫你用買家角度篩走唔適合嘅選擇。 近期市場討論到「定價區間26.98-35.98萬元 奧迪E7X粵港澳大灣區車展正式開售」，代表呢類車型仍然有一定關注度。
完稅價 HK$ 599,800 - 749,800 令預算位置更清楚，買家可以先估算月供、保險、泊車同日常開支。
購車價格指南
奧迪Q6 e-tron 嘅購車預算可以先由 完稅價 HK$ 599,800 - 749,800 開始計。香港買車唔只係睇車價，月供、保險、牌費、泊車同能源成本都會影響每月壓力。
如果有幾個版本可揀，可以先將 2025 Standard（HK$ 599,800）、2025 quattro（HK$ 749,800） 放喺同一張清單。日常通勤重視舒適同易用，家庭買家就要優先睇後排、尾箱同安全配置。
核心規格重點
睇 奧迪Q6 e-tron 嘅規格，重點唔係背數字，而係理解佢喺香港用車場景會帶嚟咩分別。
奧迪Q6 e-tron 現階段最值得留意係車型定位同版本方向，詳細取捨應該等價格同規格更清楚再作決定。
優缺點分析
奧迪Q6 e-tron 嘅優點唔需要講到天花龍鳳，真正有價值係佢能唔能夠令日常用車更省心：預算位置清楚，方便同同級車直接比較。
要留意嘅係，最終取捨會落喺版本配置、保險同長期保養成本。呢啲唔一定係缺點，但係落訂前應該先諗清楚。
買家常見問題
買 奧迪Q6 e-tron 之前，真正要問嘅唔係單一規格，而係佢可唔可以融入你每日嘅生活節奏。
常見疑問係「奧迪 Audi Q6 e-tron 喺香港賣幾錢？」簡單講，奧迪 Audi Q6 e-tron (RWD) 喺香港嘅意向零售價由港幣 $599,800 起。 放到實際用車，就係要睇佢對通勤、泊車、家庭乘坐同長期成本有幾大幫助。
同級對比內容
將 奧迪Q6 e-tron 放入同級車清單時，唔建議只用外形或者品牌光環決定。比較順序可以係：先用 完稅價 HK$ 599,800 - 749,800 鎖定預算圈。
咁樣篩選會貼近香港買家真實生活：平日塞車、商場泊車、周末去新界、甚至一家人出入，先係一部車每日要面對嘅考驗。
用車全周期指南
擁有 奧迪Q6 e-tron 唔係買車一刻就完結，之後仲有保險、輪胎、保養、泊車同日常能源成本要處理。
如果你主要喺市區行，視野、低速順滑度同泊車輔助會好影響心情；如果經常行高速或跨區，座椅舒適度、隔音同動力從容感會更重要。
In this early summer of 2026, what we see is not just a set of record-breaking numbers, but the complete logic of a Chinese brand moving from quantitative change to qualitative change.
On the first day of June 2026, when most car companies were still making a final sprint for the 'half-year exam', Geely Automobile has delivered a remarkable May performance report: monthly sales of 237,637 units, achieving year-on-year and month-on-month double growth for three consecutive months.
This is not just a simple sales sprint, but more like a carefully choreographed 'technical symphony'. Under the current high penetration rate of new energy, Geely did not fall into pure price wars, but chose a harder path — using the confidence of fully self-developed technology to reshape the value benchmark of every segment market. Through these cold numbers, we try to explore: How exactly did Geely make 'technical belief' take root in users' hearts?
The 'Multi-dimensional Chess Game' Behind Sales: From Single-unit Breakthrough to Army-style Operations
If the automotive market is compared to a battlefield, then Geely in 2026 is no longer a warrior holding a single weapon, but a well-equipped, clearly divided modern army.
First to come into view is the performance of ZEEKR. Delivery volume of 34,377 units, up 81.8% year-on-year. This number itself means that the discourse power in the high-end pure electric market is shifting. Interestingly, ZEEKR did not dilute its 'luxury technology' brand concentration due to pursuing scale. On the contrary, the proportion of ZEEKR Series 9 and Series 8 is close to 50%, and the average transaction price per vehicle grew counter-trendly by 52.4%. This shows that in the high-end market, users are willing to pay for ultimate technical experiences.
The launch of the new generation flagship MPV ZEEKR 009 can be called a 'technical show'. Full-stack 900V high-voltage architecture, 10-minute charging replenishing 510 kilometers, 0-100 acceleration 3.9 seconds. These parameters might have existed only in concepts a year ago, but now are actually put into the car. Especially its equipped Thor-U chip, with 700 TOPS computing power. This is not just an accumulation of computing power, but infinite possibilities reserved for future all-scenario intelligent driving control. ZEEKR is proving that Chinese brands can not only make luxury cars, but also define the technical standards of luxury cars.
Turning attention to LYNK & CO, this 'Born Global' brand is undergoing a profound 'electrification metamorphosis'. May sales 20,732 units, new energy share up to 70.8%. The newly launched LYNK & CO 10 and LYNK & CO 10+ no longer only emphasize 'sport', but propose a 'controllable, stable' driving experience. On TCR China and CTCC race tracks, LYNK & CO 03+ TCR racing cars won multiple championships. This transfer of 'race track genetics' to civilian products built a unique brand moat. LYNK & CO is telling the world in a very new way: Electrification does not equal boredom, driving fun can still be precisely tuned.
As the sales cornerstone, Geely Galaxy and Geely Brand have shown amazing system strength. Geely Galaxy Starship 7 EM-i, completing the 'Excessive Standard Bilateral Serial Limit Crash Test' in the French UTAC laboratory, verified 'Chinese-style safety' in a way that was almost harsh. In A-class and B-class markets, Geely Star Wish, Boyue, Emgrand, and other models not only held their basic market share, but through the empowerment of AI technology, achieved intergenerational leadership in the comfort and intelligent experience of family cars.
From 'Parameter Involution' to 'Value Symbiosis'
After going through the 'parameter arms race' of the past few years, the 2026 automotive market began to return to rationality. Users no longer only look at driving range, but value charging efficiency, safety redundancy, and the stability of intelligent experience. Geely's brilliance lies in that it realized this early on, and began to implement technology from 'paper' to 'road'.
Intelligence is no longer an option, but a standard configuration
Geely's published 'Qianli Haohan Intelligent Driving China Full-domain Travel Report' revealed a stunning fact: the activation rate of assisted driving was as high as 93.8%. This means the vast majority of Geely owners have already formed the habit of using intelligent driving. Accumulated avoidance 8.9 million times, AEB automatic emergency braking successfully triggered 2.4 million times. Behind these data is the safety of countless families. Geely's logic is clear: The core of intelligence is safety, is liberating users' energy, not creating anxiety.
Safety is the Gene Carved into the Bone
On Euro NCAP test tracks, in Italy's Misano circuit, on Australia's wilderness roads, Geely's products are undergoing the harshest environment tests globally. From ZEEKR 7X topping sales in Australia to Geely Starship 7 EM-i performing well in crash tests, Geely is defining Chinese car safety with global standards. This 'Full-domain Safety' concept gives Geely's products the confidence to face established European and American car companies when going global.
From 'Product Output' to 'Value Output'
May overseas export sales 85,144 units, reaching a new high again. Behind this number, Geely's globalization strategy has entered the 'deep water zone'.
In the past, Chinese car companies going global were often seen as synonymous with 'cost-performance ratio'. But now, ZEEKR 7X became the best-selling luxury pure electric SUV in markets such as Mexico and Malaysia, Geely Star Wish topped the charts in markets such as Brazil and Indonesia. This shows that what Geely exports is not just products, but a set of 'Chinese Value' including design, intelligence, and safety.
Strategic cooperation with the England National Team, becoming the 2026 World Cup (Mexico/Canada/USA) broadcast partner, these moves seem to be marketing, but are actually a global resonance of brand values. The fighting, transcendence, and team collaboration in sports spirit aligns perfectly with Geely's brand core of 'Great due to joy' and 'Born Global'. Geely is using a subtle yet impactful way to make global users produce emotional identification with Chinese brands.
What did Geely do right?
While writing this article, I repeatedly thought about a question: In the fierce competition of 2026, why could Geely maintain year-on-year and month-on-month double growth for three consecutive months?
The answer may be hidden in the strategic synergy of 'One Geely'. Geely did not let each brand fall into internal friction, but built a multi-level matrix covering mainstream, high-end, and luxury. Each brand has a clear positioning, and at the same time can share the technical dividends of the group in three-electric, intelligent driving, and safety architecture.
More importantly, Geely maintained a kind of 'long-termism' stability. Whether it is continuous investment in the CMA architecture, or iteration of Thor hybrid technology, or refining the Qianli Haohan intelligent driving system, Geely did not seek success in haste, but was waiting for the 'critical point' of technology. When the market returned to rationality from frenzy, those solid technical reserves became the sharpest weapons.
Move Towards the New, Not Just Cars
Looking back at the 2026 Chinese automotive market, the first half of new energy is drawing to a close, and the second half of intelligence has just opened.
Geely's May performance report is not just a victory in sales, but also a victory in technology route. It tells us that the essence of the automotive industry has not changed: Good products are always the core, the ultimate purpose of technology is to serve people
From the Hangzhou Bay manufacturing base, to Italy's race tracks, to Australia's streets, Geely Automobile is telling a new story about 'China Intelligent Manufacturing' to the world with a steady and powerful pace. In this story, there are no exaggerated slogans, only respect for technology, sincerity to users, and the purest love for the 'car making' matter.
When technical belief becomes a habit, the explosion of sales is just a natural result. For Geely, 238,000 units is just a new starting point, the true stars and seas are still ahead.
