車型概覽

睿藍汽車楓葉80v Pro 值唔值得睇,第一步唔係望牌子或者外形,而係睇佢能唔能夠配合你嘅香港日常。 呢篇會集中講續航、電池同補電安排,幫你用買家角度篩走唔適合嘅選擇。
售價仍待確認,買家可以先把佢放入候選名單,等價格落實後再同同級車逐項比較。
購車價格指南
睿藍汽車楓葉80v Pro 目前售價仍未清晰,較理性嘅做法係先睇版本、車身大小同動力形式,等價格落實後再決定值唔值得落訂。
如果有幾個版本可揀,可以先將 2022 410km 前驅版(價格待確認)、2022 480km 前驅版(價格待確認) 放喺同一張清單。日常通勤重視舒適同易用,家庭買家就要優先睇後排、尾箱同安全配置。
核心規格重點

睇 睿藍汽車楓葉80v Pro 嘅規格,重點唔係背數字,而係理解佢喺香港用車場景會帶嚟咩分別。
52.56/66.57 kWh 嘅電池容量,真正意義係可以幫你估算一星期通勤同周末出車要唔要中途補電。 410/480 km 嘅續航參考,對住喺新界、九龍同港島之間跨區行車嘅用家會更實際。 100 kW、230 N·m 嘅輸出,令高速併線同短距離超車更有信心。 車長 4706 mm、車闊 1909 mm、車高 1699 mm、軸距 2807 mm 可以幫你預判商場停車場、屋苑車位同後排腿部空間。
優缺點分析
睿藍汽車楓葉80v Pro 嘅優點唔需要講到天花龍鳳,真正有價值係佢能唔能夠令日常用車更省心:電池同續航資訊有助安排通勤同補電、動力輸出對高速同上斜更有底氣、空間同車身尺寸方便家庭買家預判實用性。
要留意嘅係,要先確認屋苑、公司或常去商場嘅充電條件、香港停車場同窄路使用要留意車身闊度。呢啲唔一定係缺點,但係落訂前應該先諗清楚。
買家常見問題
買 睿藍汽車楓葉80v Pro 之前,真正要問嘅唔係單一規格,而係佢可唔可以融入你每日嘅生活節奏。
常見疑問係「楓葉 80v Pro (Maple 80v Pro) 行到幾遠?」簡單講,楓葉 80v Pro (Maple 80v Pro) CLTC 續航里程為 410 公里。 放到實際用車,就係要睇佢對通勤、泊車、家庭乘坐同長期成本有幾大幫助。
同級對比內容
將 睿藍汽車楓葉80v Pro 放入同級車清單時,唔建議只用外形或者品牌光環決定。比較順序可以係:先等售價落實,再決定佢應該同邊個級距比較、再睇動力係咪足夠應付高速併線同滿載、再比較能源成本同補能便利、最後睇車身大小、座位同尾箱是否適合家人。
咁樣篩選會貼近香港買家真實生活:平日塞車、商場泊車、周末去新界、甚至一家人出入,先係一部車每日要面對嘅考驗。
用車全周期指南
擁有 睿藍汽車楓葉80v Pro 最重要係先諗清楚充電節奏。屋苑、公司或者常去商場只要有穩定充電選項,電動化用車就會容易相處好多。
如果你主要喺市區行,視野、低速順滑度同泊車輔助會好影響心情;如果經常行高速或跨區,座椅舒適度、隔音同動力從容感會更重要。

對於中國汽車工業嚟講,2026 年 5 月 28 日係一個值得銘記嘅日子。
隨著上汽集團「全球第一億位用戶交車儀式」喺上海北外灘世界會客廳舉行,上汽集團董事長王曉秋將第一億輛車型智己 LS9 Hyper 交付到 Momenta CEO 曹旭東手中,首個累計產銷量突破一億輛嘅中國汽車集團正式誕生!

呢唔單止係上汽嘅里程碑時刻,更加係屬於中國製造、中國汽車行業嘅榮耀。回顧中國首家億級車企嘅來時路,上汽嘅成功有跡可循。
七十餘年深耕:上汽達成一個億「小目標」
成功從來唔係一蹴而就,上汽集團由 0 到「一個億」,經歷咗七十餘年嘅深耕,幾代人付出咗巨大嘅努力。1955 年,上海內燃機配件製造公司成立,上海汽車工業由此起步。1958 年,工人哋用榔頭敲出第一輛「鳳凰牌」轎車,實現上海轎車製造「零嘅突破」。
再到 1983 年上海大眾桑塔納落線,開啟合資合作;1997 年上海通用成立,創造 23 個月建廠出車嘅「上海速度」;2006 年自主品牌榮威誕生,2016 年推出全球首款互聯網汽車榮威 RX5;2020 年高端智能電動車品牌智己汽車成立。

從桑塔納國產化共同體到合資 2.0 技術共創,從互聯網汽車到全線控底盤、固態/半固態電池、AI 大模型上車。事實上,每一次跨越都係「識車」能力嘅進階,都係「識你」初心嘅一脈相承,上汽「識車更識你」用戶理念貫穿始終。
第一億輛交付車型,智己 LS9 Hyper!
作為上汽第一億輛交付車型,智己 LS9 Hyper 嘅地位不容小覷。佢係上汽七十餘年技術積澱嘅集大成之作,開啟咗新能源車「新三大件」嘅嶄新時代。智己 LS9 Hyper 搭載咗下一代底盤技術,同級首發嘅全線控四輪轉向;下一代智駕硬件,520 線超視域激光雷達 + 英偉達 Thor 芯片,下一代三電——全域 800V 高壓平台同恒星超級增程。全面預埋咗面向 L3 及以上高級智駕持續進化嘅冗餘能力。同時,智己 LS9 Hyper 首搭上汽金標颶風三電機,從容躋身性能 3 秒俱樂部;更聯合紫金實驗室,全球首發「內生安全」技術,將汽車安全邊界從「物理安全」拓展至「信息同系統安全」,係 AI 時代嘅必備安全基石。

值得一提的是,上汽第一億位用戶正正係 Momenta CEO 曹旭東!Momenta 係上汽喺智駕領域嘅核心戰略夥伴,雙方深度共創嘅智駕技術已賦能自主與合資多個品牌。從合作夥伴到車主,呢係廠商與用戶嘅雙向奔赴,更加係智能汽車生態夥伴間嘅深度共鳴。
上演全球接力交付,上汽集團向下一億出發
一億輛交付只係開始。由上海主會場出發,南京、柳州、太原等國內多城同英國、印尼、新加坡等國家接力交付,上汽全品牌、全產品矩陣協同發力,開創咗中國汽車品牌嘅全新敘事方式。

其中自主品牌全線出擊:尚界 Z7、華境 S、榮威 M7、MG4 半固態電池版、五菱星光 560、大通 eDeliver5、紅巖重卡、躍進大拿 T1、申沃純電客車、依維柯聚星 EV 等相繼交付,涵蓋個人出行、家庭生活、商用營運、物流運輸等多元場景。合資品牌則係集中亮出「合資 2.0」成果:大眾 ID. ERA 9X、AUDI E7X、別克至境 E7、凱迪拉克凱威德等。

一億輛嘅背後,係上汽涵蓋整車、零部件、移動出行同服務、金融、國際經營、創新科技六大板塊嘅全價值鏈閉環。2026 年 1-4 月,上汽累計銷售 130.2 萬輛,連續四個月位居中國車企銷量冠軍。其中自主品牌銷量 91 萬輛,佔比近 70%;新能源車銷售 41.2 萬輛;海外市場銷售 45.9 萬輛,同比大漲 50.2%。
最後寫上
跨越七十餘年嘅實業長跑,上汽嘅造車征程迎來階段性勝利。作為中國汽車工業從無到有、從強到弱嘅縮影同見證者,上汽經歷咗由規模領先到質量領先、技術引領。如今站喺「一億輛」新起點,上汽正開啟智電未來「二次創業」,繼續書寫中國車企嘅輝煌新篇章!(文/MANGO)

車型概覽

平治eVito 值唔值得睇,第一步唔係望牌子或者外形,而係睇佢能唔能夠配合你嘅香港日常。 呢篇會集中講每日相處是否輕鬆,幫你用買家角度篩走唔適合嘅選擇。
可用資訊集中喺車型定位、圖片同版本名稱,現階段更適合先做候選名單,再等價格同詳細規格落實。
購車價格指南
平治eVito 目前售價仍未清晰,較理性嘅做法係先睇版本、車身大小同動力形式,等價格落實後再決定值唔值得落訂。
未有清楚版本資訊時,唔建議單靠外形下決定;先諗清楚你需要代步、家庭出行、長途巡航,定係想要更有個性嘅座駕。
核心規格重點

睇 平治eVito 嘅規格,重點唔係背數字,而係理解佢喺香港用車場景會帶嚟咩分別。
平治eVito 現階段最值得留意係車型定位同版本方向,詳細取捨應該等價格同規格更清楚再作決定。
優缺點分析
平治eVito 嘅優點唔需要講到天花龍鳳,真正有價值係佢能唔能夠令日常用車更省心:車型定位清楚,適合作為同級比較起點。
要留意嘅係,要先確認屋苑、公司或常去商場嘅充電條件、售價未清晰前唔應該太早用性價比落結論。呢啲唔一定係缺點,但係落訂前應該先諗清楚。
買家常見問題
買 平治eVito 之前,真正要問嘅唔係單一規格,而係佢可唔可以融入你每日嘅生活節奏。
常見疑問係「Mercedes-Benz eVito 係屬於邊種定位嘅電動車?」簡單講,Mercedes-Benz eVito 係一款專為都市物流同客運設計嘅純電動輕型商用車。 放到實際用車,就係要睇佢對通勤、泊車、家庭乘坐同長期成本有幾大幫助。
同級對比內容
將 平治eVito 放入同級車清單時,唔建議只用外形或者品牌光環決定。比較順序可以係:先由用途、品牌售後、車身大小同版本定位開始比較。
咁樣篩選會貼近香港買家真實生活:平日塞車、商場泊車、周末去新界、甚至一家人出入,先係一部車每日要面對嘅考驗。
用車全周期指南
擁有 平治eVito 最重要係先諗清楚充電節奏。屋苑、公司或者常去商場只要有穩定充電選項,電動化用車就會容易相處好多。
如果你主要喺市區行,視野、低速順滑度同泊車輔助會好影響心情;如果經常行高速或跨區,座椅舒適度、隔音同動力從容感會更重要。

車型概覽

富豪EX30 值唔值得睇,第一步唔係望牌子或者外形,而係睇佢能唔能夠配合你嘅香港日常。 呢篇會集中講花出去嘅錢係咪換到每日都用得着嘅便利,幫你用買家角度篩走唔適合嘅選擇。
完稅價 HK$ 286,800 - 346,800 令預算位置更清楚,買家可以先估算月供、保險、泊車同日常開支。
購車價格指南
富豪EX30 嘅購車預算可以先由 完稅價 HK$ 286,800 - 346,800 開始計。香港買車唔只係睇車價,月供、保險、牌費、泊車同能源成本都會影響每月壓力。
如果有幾個版本可揀,可以先將 2026 476km RWD Plus(HK$ 286,800)、2026 476km RWD Ultra(HK$ 316,800)、2026 450km 4WD Ultra(HK$ 336,800)、2026 Cross Country 436km 4WD Ultra(HK$ 346,800) 放喺同一張清單。日常通勤重視舒適同易用,家庭買家就要優先睇後排、尾箱同安全配置。
核心規格重點

睇 富豪EX30 嘅規格,重點唔係背數字,而係理解佢喺香港用車場景會帶嚟咩分別。
69 kWh 嘅電池容量,真正意義係可以幫你估算一星期通勤同周末出車要唔要中途補電。 17/17.5 kWh/100km 嘅耗電表現,會影響你去快充站或者屋苑充電位嘅頻率。 200/315 kW、343/543 N·m 嘅輸出,令高速併線同短距離超車更有信心。 車長 4233 mm、車闊 1838 mm、車高 1550 mm、軸距 2650 mm 可以幫你預判商場停車場、屋苑車位同後排腿部空間。
優缺點分析
富豪EX30 嘅優點唔需要講到天花龍鳳,真正有價值係佢能唔能夠令日常用車更省心:預算位置清楚,方便同同級車直接比較、日常能源成本有基本參考、電池同續航資訊有助安排通勤同補電。
要留意嘅係,要先確認屋苑、公司或常去商場嘅充電條件、香港停車場同窄路使用要留意車身闊度。呢啲唔一定係缺點,但係落訂前應該先諗清楚。
買家常見問題
買 富豪EX30 之前,真正要問嘅唔係單一規格,而係佢可唔可以融入你每日嘅生活節奏。
常見疑問係「Volvo EX30 嘅拖曳能力有幾強?」簡單講,Volvo EX30 嘅最大拖曳能力為 1,600 公斤(1.6 噸),車頂行李架最大負重為 75 公斤。呢個拖曳能力足以拖動小型露營車或者船隻,適合假日去戶外活動。 放到實際用車,就係要睇佢對通勤、泊車、家庭乘坐同長期成本有幾大幫助。
同級對比內容
將 富豪EX30 放入同級車清單時,唔建議只用外形或者品牌光環決定。比較順序可以係:先用 完稅價 HK$ 286,800 - 346,800 鎖定預算圈、再睇動力係咪足夠應付高速併線同滿載、再比較能源成本同補能便利、最後睇車身大小、座位同尾箱是否適合家人。
咁樣篩選會貼近香港買家真實生活:平日塞車、商場泊車、周末去新界、甚至一家人出入,先係一部車每日要面對嘅考驗。
用車全周期指南

擁有 富豪EX30 最重要係先諗清楚充電節奏。屋苑、公司或者常去商場只要有穩定充電選項,電動化用車就會容易相處好多。
如果你主要喺市區行,視野、低速順滑度同泊車輔助會好影響心情;如果經常行高速或跨區,座椅舒適度、隔音同動力從容感會更重要。

車型概覽

廣汽GS8 值唔值得睇,第一步唔係望牌子或者外形,而係睇佢能唔能夠配合你嘅香港日常。 呢篇會集中講值唔值得繼續觀望,幫你用買家角度篩走唔適合嘅選擇。
售價仍待確認,買家可以先把佢放入候選名單,等價格落實後再同同級車逐項比較。
購車價格指南
廣汽GS8 目前售價仍未清晰,較理性嘅做法係先睇版本、車身大小同動力形式,等價格落實後再決定值唔值得落訂。
如果有幾個版本可揀,可以先將 2025 2.0T 兩驅版(價格待確認)、2025 2.0T 四驅版(價格待確認) 放喺同一張清單。日常通勤重視舒適同易用,家庭買家就要優先睇後排、尾箱同安全配置。
核心規格重點

睇 廣汽GS8 嘅規格,重點唔係背數字,而係理解佢喺香港用車場景會帶嚟咩分別。
渦輪增壓、4 個 汽缸、1991 mL 排量 嘅動力底子,重點係市區跟車夠唔夠順、高速巡航會唔會吃力。 252 Ps / 185 kW、400 N·m 嘅輸出,對滿載、上斜同超車都比單睇馬力數字更有意思。 車長 4980 mm、車闊 1950 mm、車高 1780 mm、軸距 2920 mm 可以幫你預判商場停車場、屋苑車位同後排腿部空間。 手自一體(AT)、前置前駆 / 前置四駆 會影響起步順滑度、濕地穩定感同長途巡航性格。
優缺點分析
廣汽GS8 嘅優點唔需要講到天花龍鳳,真正有價值係佢能唔能夠令日常用車更省心:動力輸出對高速同上斜更有底氣、空間同車身尺寸方便家庭買家預判實用性。
要留意嘅係,香港停車場同窄路使用要留意車身闊度、售價未清晰前唔應該太早用性價比落結論。呢啲唔一定係缺點,但係落訂前應該先諗清楚。
買家常見問題
買 廣汽GS8 之前,真正要問嘅唔係單一規格,而係佢可唔可以融入你每日嘅生活節奏。
常見疑問係「廣汽 GS8 適唔適合香港家庭與長途出行?」簡單講,廣汽 GS8 空間大、舒適度高、穩定性強,適合香港家庭與長途出行。 放到實際用車,就係要睇佢對通勤、泊車、家庭乘坐同長期成本有幾大幫助。
同級對比內容
將 廣汽GS8 放入同級車清單時,唔建議只用外形或者品牌光環決定。比較順序可以係:先等售價落實,再決定佢應該同邊個級距比較、再睇動力係咪足夠應付高速併線同滿載、最後睇車身大小、座位同尾箱是否適合家人。
咁樣篩選會貼近香港買家真實生活:平日塞車、商場泊車、周末去新界、甚至一家人出入,先係一部車每日要面對嘅考驗。
用車全周期指南
擁有 廣汽GS8 唔係買車一刻就完結,之後仲有保險、輪胎、保養、泊車同日常能源成本要處理。
如果你主要喺市區行,視野、低速順滑度同泊車輔助會好影響心情;如果經常行高速或跨區,座椅舒適度、隔音同動力從容感會更重要。


港交所網站掛出一咗一份熟悉嘅招股書。
5 月 28 日,繼去年 10 月首次遞表失效後,智能駕駛解決方案提供商蘇州天瞳威視電子科技股份有限公司(天瞳威視)再次向港股主板發起重衝,由匯豐及華泰國際聯席保薦。

喺智能駕駛賽道從「講故事」轉向「拼量產」嘅 2026 年,天瞳威視嘅二次遞表唔單止係一次資本試探,更係一場關於中國智駕供應商生存現狀嘅集中檢閱。
呢間被認為係「算力效率派」代表嘅公司,一邊連住從采埃孚到上汽、北汽嘅豪華產業資本陣營,一邊卻面臨住現金流緊繃、海外明顯回落嘅現實困境。喺呢場 IPO 嘅博弈中,光鮮同陣痛並存。
01
邊個係「天瞳威視」?
天瞳威視嘅創辦人王曦係一位典型嘅「回國」技術派。佢畢業於北京航空航天大學,後喺英國雷丁大學攻讀計算機科學博士學位。
喺決定創業之前,王曦曾經喺汽車零部件供應商天合汽車(TRW)及采埃孚擔任算法工程師同技術負責人,深度參與咗早期 ADAS 系統嘅開發。
2016 年,王曦捕捉到國內汽車智能化嘅風口,回國喺蘇州創立咗天瞳威視,定位係「以軟件算法驅動智能駕駛」嘅本土解決方案提供商。
公司嘅名字「天瞳」寓意「天之眼」,意在打造車輛感知萬物嘅視覺中樞。佢從最初嘅視覺感知算法起步,逐步擴展至行泊一體域控制器、L4 級自動駕駛系統等軟硬件結合嘅整體方案。

天瞳威視融資情況。資料來源:企查查
成立後不久,天瞳威視就獲得德聯資本、盛世投資嘅天使輪融資。此後十年時間,天瞳威視累計完成咗超過 10 輪融資,融資總額近 10 億元。
從招股書披露嘅股權結構嚟睇,天瞳威視構建咗深度綁定嘅「產業 + 資本」生態圈。
一方面,產業夥伴站台,全球汽車零部件巨頭采埃孚唔單止係其 C 輪領投方,亦係其戰略合作夥伴,持有天瞳威視 6.93% 嘅股份,位列第四大股東;國內方面,上汽集團通過上汽北美產投持股,北汽集團通過北汽產投佈局其中,地平線同商湯科技亦係戰略投資者。
另一方面,地方國資護航,唐山機器人基金、吳中金控等國資背景基金喺 D 輪及 D+ 輪入場,提供咗約 5.23 億元嘅資金支持。

截至最後實際可行日期股權架構
截至目前,王曦透過直接持股同員工持股平台合共控制公司約 40.84% 嘅權益,依然保持住對公司嘅控制權。
02
「兩條腿」行路
天瞳威視喺業務佈局上採取咗「雙軌並行」嘅策略。

喺 L2-L2+ 級輔助駕駛領域,天瞳威視嘅選擇非常務實。佢並冇盲目追逐算力堆疊嘅「軍備競賽」,而係走咗一條高性價比路線。
作為典型嘅視覺派智駕供應商,佢喺 L2 量產方案上以視覺感知為主,融合毫米波雷達同超聲波雷達,能夠喺較低算力平台上實現高級功能。例如,基於地平線 J6B 芯片(約 20TOPS)嘅方案即可支持行泊一體、高速 NOA。
呢種打法擊中咗 10 萬 -20 萬級主流車款對成本敏感嘅痛點。根據灼識諮詢嘅數據,按 2024 年裝機量計,天瞳威視係中國第二大同時提供行車同泊車解決方案嘅以軟件為核心嘅 L2-L2+ 級方案提供商,市場份額為 14.3%。

2024 年中國具備行泊一體能力嘅以軟件為核心供應商格局
截至最後實際可行日期,天瞳威視獲得 23 個汽車品牌嘅 198 款車款嘅 L2-L2+ 級解決方案定點函,並實現 6 個汽車品牌嘅 105 款車款嘅量產;獲得定點函嘅 198 款車款中有 87 款覆蓋海外市場,其中 59 款已實現量產。
但值得注意嘅係,L2-L2+ 市場正在經歷劇烈嘅「紅海化」。
一方面,經緯恆潤、福瑞泰克等本土 Tier1 正在加速追趕;另一方面,部分頭部車廠開始將低階智駕方案從外購轉為內部集成。
天瞳威視能否維持佢喺「性價比方案」領域嘅領先地位,取決於佢能否持續保持算法對低算力平台嘅優化能力,而這需要喺研發投入上持續加碼。

喺高級 L4 級自動駕駛領域,天瞳威視更多扮演「先鋒」角色。這亦係佢近兩年增長最快嘅板塊。
早在 2019 年,佢就參與咗上海洋山港嘅 5G 智能重卡項目。目前佢嘅 L4 方案覆蓋 Robobus、Robotaxi 同 Robotruck。其中,Robobus 係佢最具代表性嘅產品線,已喺蘇州、天津等城市嘅公開道路投入常態化試營運。
2025 年,天瞳威視從 L4 級解決方案產生收入 3.75 億元,佔公司總收入嘅 68% 以上,大部分收入來自 L4 級軟件解決方案。
然而,硬幣嘅另一面係商業化嘅曲折。雖然 L4 業務營收暴增,但佢嘅交付形態目前以「軟硬件一體解決方案」為主,呢種模式本質上接近「項目制交付」或「小規模車隊部署」,與 L2 業務中「純軟件授權 + 白盒交付」嘅高毛利、大規模複製邏輯存在顯著差異。
呢就直接導致 L4 業務毛利率嘅大幅波動:喺部分自研硬件佔比较高嘅項目中,毛利率一度低至 15%。

截至遞表日,公司雖手握超 10 億元嘅 L4 意向訂單,涵蓋 2500 架車,但呢啲訂單預計要喺未來三至五年內先會陸續交付,短期內對現金流嘅改善作用有限。
此外,天瞳威視仲有部分應收來自工程服務,主要涉及道路測試、數據收集支援及數據標註服務以及公司嘅專有工具鏈。
03
財務嘅雙面鏡
招股書嘅財務部分,展現咗智駕行業最真實嘅「B 面」:規模同虧損嘅極限拉扯,同埋賬面現金同營運消耗之間嘅緊張博弈。

營收高增長,但結構劇烈波動。
財務數據顯示,公司嘅營收呈現爆發式增長,從 2022 年嘅 1.72 億元增長至 2024 年嘅 4.83 億元,複合年增長率高達 67.7%。2025 年全年營收進一步增長至 5.5 億元。
但收入結構嘅變化明顯。2023 年,公司依賴 L2-L2+ 業務,佔比 90.2%;去到 2024 年,L4 業務佔比升至 50.2%;2025 年,L4 業務佔比進一步拉高至 68%。呢種「斷崖式」嘅結構切換,雖然證明佢 L4 技術搵到咗落地場景,但亦令市場質疑佢 L2 業務係咪已觸及天花板。
毛利率同純利潤嘅背離,呢係天瞳威視面臨嘅最大挑戰。
從毛利睇,整體毛利率喺 30% 左右徘徊,喺呢個技術密集型嘅智駕行業屬於中等水平。但細拆睇嚟,L2-L2+ 業務嘅毛利率通常能維持喺 40% 以上,純軟件授權模式,而 L4 業務嘅毛利率則因「軟硬件一體」交付中硬件佔比提高而被顯著拉低。
從純利潤睇,雖然表面虧損額較大,2024 年虧損 4.63 億、2025 年虧損約 2 億,呢度包含大量因優先股公平值變動帶來嘅「紙面虧損」。剔除呢個因素後嘅經調整純利潤更能反映公司嘅真實經營狀況:2024 年已收窄至 -438 萬元,但 2025 年並未如市場預期實現轉正,而係錄得約 -1086 萬元,虧損較 2024 年有所擴大。
呢個背後有一個不可回避嘅關鍵前提:調整後嘅「減虧」乃至「接近盈虧平衡」,係喺公司持續壓縮研發投入嘅基礎上實現嘅,研發費用從 2024 年嘅 1.17 億元降至 2025 年嘅 9231 萬元,研發費用率從 2024 年嘅 24.3% 進一步降至 16.8%,而 2022 年呢個數字曾高達 108.7%。對於一家科技公司嚟講,研發強度嘅「退坡」是否會影響未來嘅技術護城河,係一個潛在風險點。
現金流持續告急,最令人擔憂嘅信號。
根據最新招股書,截至 2025 年 12 月 31 日,公司賬上嘅現金及現金等价物為 2.35 億元,較 2025 年 6 月 30 日嘅 3.74 億元淨減少 1.39 億元,現金消耗速度較快。

更值得警惕嘅係經營現金流由正轉負且缺口持續擴大嘅趨勢。2023 年,公司經營活動現金流淨額為正向流入 1.15 億元,但 2024 年迅速轉為淨流出 1.89 億元,2025 年進一步惡化至淨流出 2.93 億元。
與此同時,應收賬款周轉急劇惡化。公司嘅貿易應收款項從 2023 年嘅 0.89 億元升至 2025 年嘅 5.48 億元,三年增長超過五倍,而同期營收增幅僅約 2.7 倍。
更令人擔憂嘅係應收款項周轉天數從 2023 年嘅 191 天同 2024 年嘅 166 天,到 2025 年驟升至 300 天,意味著公司從完成交付到收回款項平均需要接近一年時間。呢相當於變相為客戶提供長期無息墊資,喺資金本就緊張嘅情況下進一步加劇咗流動性壓力。

此外,雖然天瞳威視係首家出海嘅中國智駕軟件供應商,但 2025 年佢嘅海外業務遭遇咗明顯回落。2023 年天瞳威視海外收入為 1.27 億元,佔總營收比重達到 62.2%;到 2025 年海外收入降至 1100 萬元,佔比僅 2.0%。
喺而家全球地緣政治複雜、部分國家對智能汽車數據監管趨嚴嘅背景下,為佢嘅全球化故事增添咗一絲不確定性。
04
結語
天瞳威視嘅二次闖關,係智能駕駛行業進入「淘汰賽」階段嘅一個縮影。
從好嘅方面睇,佢踩準咗 L2 性價比同 L4 場景化落地嘅雙重節奏,且經調整純利潤喺特定口徑下已接近盈虧平衡,呢啲都畀投資者提供咗「有亮點可講」嘅故事線。
但從風險嘅角度睇,情況遠比首次遞表時更為嚴峻。業務重心嘅急速漂移、L4 業務商業化初期嘅盈利磨難、研發投入嘅被動收縮,呢啲此前就已存在嘅問題並未緩解。

天瞳威視 L4 級智能巴士
而真正令此次 IPO 帶「求生」色彩嘅,係現金流數據嘅實質性惡化:2.35 億元嘅賬面現金,面對每年近 3 億元嘅经营性現金淨流出,安全邊際已不足一年。疊加 300 天嘅應收賬款周轉天數,意味著公司每交付一筆訂單,都要墊付近一年嘅資金成本。
換言之,天瞳威視正處喺一個危險嘅財務窗口期:賬上嘅錢僅夠維持唔足一年嘅正常運作,而 L4 業務嘅大規模交付同回款卻需要更長時間。喺呢個智駕資本熱潮退去、一級市場融資邊際收緊嘅時刻,公司已冇太多等待嘅餘地。
首次遞表失效後僅隔半年便再次衝擊港股,對天瞳威視而言,與其話係戰略選擇,唔如話係現金倒逼下嘅必然之舉。

In May, China's automotive market overall presented a gentle recovery trend, with domestic brands still being the sales backbone of the market. Recently, BYD, Geely, Chery, Changan, and Great Wall, the top 5 domestic automakers, successively released their monthly performance reports. From the data, these five companies show a general characteristic of "stable total growth, divergence between domestic and international markets, and accelerated new energy penetration". Overseas exports and new energy vehicles have become the most core growth engines; export business has evolved from a "bonus item" to the "core foundation" for some companies. BYD's "dominant leader" status is further consolidated, Chery achieved high growth via exports, Geely's new energy penetration rate broke 56%, Changan focused steadily on balanced development, while Great Wall appeared slightly under pressure during structural transformation.
BYD: Export Hits New High Becomes Biggest HighlightIn May, BYD stood firmly at the top of domestic brands with a monthly sales volume of 383,500 vehicles, maintaining positive growth both year-on-year and month-over-month under a large base. Its two main brands, Dynasty and Ocean, sold a combined 330,200 vehicles, contributing 86.1% of total sales; Fangchengbao's monthly sales broke 30,000 units to reach 30,200, a year-on-year increase of 139.7%, setting a new high for the year; Denza sold 16,300 vehicles, and Yangwang delivered 286 vehicles. From a model perspective, BYD had eight models in May with monthly sales exceeding 20,000 vehicles. The Song Family and Yuan Family both broke 50,000 units, selling 51,370 and 56,691 vehicles respectively. The Sea Lion Family followed closely with 42,615 vehicles, and Seagull sales were also close to 40,000 vehicles.

BYD's biggest highlight in May was exports. Overseas new energy vehicle sales reached 160,600 units, an 80.4% year-on-year increase, accounting for about 42%. The sharp expansion of export scale effectively countered the phased weakness in domestic demand. Cumulative exports from January to May exceeded 620,000 vehicles. High export growth mainly benefited from continued ramping up of overseas factory capacity, improved ocean shipping capacity, and accelerated channel network expansion. In the domestic market, BYD promoted Megawatt Super Charging and intelligent strategies simultaneously—Megawatt charging achieved about 90% charge in 9 minutes; 20,000 super charging stations are planned to be built by 2026; all series models are available with Sky Eye B intelligent driving solutions and city navigation safety fallback plans, accelerating the popularization of high-level intelligent driving. As Gen 2 Blade Battery capacity gradually releases, the company's orders are expected to continue rising.
Chery: Sales Growth Leads the Top 5Chery Group's total sales volume in May was 247,800 vehicles, a significant year-on-year increase of 20.5%, ranking first in growth speed among the top 5. Exports remained its most core growth engine—May exports reached 181,900 vehicles, an 80.5% year-on-year increase, accounting for 73.4% of total sales that month, continuously breaking the single-month export record for Chinese brands for three months. In terms of new energy, Chery New Energy sold 100,300 vehicles, a 58.8% year-on-year increase. April and May consecutively saw monthly new energy sales breaking 100,000 vehicles.

The strong performance in exports benefited from Chery's long-term deep cultivation of overseas channel advantages and localized operation capabilities. While overseas orders continued to rise, high export growth formed a sharp contrast with domestic sales—Chery's domestic sales in May were only 60,000 vehicles, accounting for one-quarter of total sales. From cumulative data, Chery Group accumulated 1.101 million sales from January to May, but against the annual goal of 3.2 million vehicles, monthly averages need to reach about 420,000 vehicles later, and pressure remains significant.
Geely: New Energy Penetration Rate Breaks 56%Geely Auto's total sales volume in May was 237,600 vehicles, a 1% year-on-year increase, achieving month-over-month double growth for three consecutive months. In terms of structure, Geely's "New Four Transformations" transformation showed significant results: new energy vehicle sales reached 133,400 units, accounting for 56% of total sales, with new energy share exceeding 50% for four consecutive months.

From sub-brands, performance was significantly divergent. Zeekr brand sales in May reached 34,400 vehicles, a 82% year-on-year increase; Zeekr 9 Series and 8 Series models combined sales approached 50% of total sales, showing bright performance in the high-end market; Galaxy brand sales were 81,700 vehicles; Geely brand sales were 182,500 vehicles, among which China Star Series sales reached 100,800 vehicles; Lynk & Co brand sales were 20,700 vehicles, with new energy vehicle sales share rising to 71%.
In terms of exports, Geely's overseas vehicle exports in May reached 85,100 vehicles, a explosive 184% year-on-year increase, setting a brand single-month export record high. Among exported products, new energy vehicles reached 40,800 units, accounting for nearly half; hybrid and pure electric products have successively landed in Southeast Asia, Middle East, Latin America, and other markets, highlighting the results of global strategy implementation.
Changan: Multi-brand Matrix Balanced EffortChangan Auto's delivery volume in May was 209,100 vehicles, among which new energy deliveries were 92,400 vehicles, a 5.8% year-on-year increase, with new energy share about 44%. In terms of exports, overseas deliveries reached 70,700 vehicles, a 38% year-on-year increase, becoming another major growth highlight for Changan in May.
In the sub-brand matrix, Changan Qiyuan delivered 34,500 vehicles in May; All-New Q05 delivered 15,800 units, with orders breaking 3,000 units within three days of listing in Thailand; Deepal sales in May were 33,200 vehicles, a 30% year-on-year increase; January to May overseas cumulative sales were 28,700 vehicles, a significant 167% year-on-year increase; Avatr delivered 7,336 vehicles in May; Changan Auto (Gravity) delivered nearly 49,000 vehicles in May.

Changan Auto's balanced layout was fully reflected in May: the fuel car base remained stable, new energy brands Deepal and Qiyuan accelerated volume growth, high-end brand Avatr continued to break through in technical cooperation, and overseas markets simultaneously achieved breakthrough growth. The pattern of five brands working together, driven by both new energy and exports, is initially taking shape.
Great Wall: Overseas Sales Growth Year-on-Year 46.75%Great Wall Motor's sales in May were 100,400 vehicles, slightly down compared to last May's 102,200 vehicles, making it the only company among the top 5 to show a year-on-year negative growth. From sub-brands, Haval brand sales in May were 55,500 vehicles, remaining Great Wall's most important sales pillar; Tank brand sales were 17,100 vehicles; both Haval and Tank brand sales showed year-on-year declines; Wey brand sold 8,119 vehicles, a 31.78% year-on-year increase, achieving growth against the trend; Ora brand performance was most stunning, with sales of 6,018 vehicles, a significant 206.88% year-on-year increase. In terms of new energy, Great Wall sold 30,400 new energy vehicles in May, with new energy vehicle transformation gradually accelerating.

The overseas market became Great Wall's biggest highlight in May, with overseas sales growing 46.75% year-on-year. Against the background of pressure on the domestic market, strong growth in overseas business effectively made up for the decline in the domestic market. Great Wall Motor's current core contradiction lies in: Haval and Tank, the two traditional main-selling brands, face weak growth, while Wey and Ora brands, although growing notably, have relatively small volume and are not yet enough to support overall growth. How to complete the "relay" between old and new brands is the key issue Great Wall must solve subsequently.
Final ThoughtsFrom May data, the growth pattern of the top 5 domestic brands has clearly diverged, but there are three common trends worth noting: First, exports have become a key engine for domestic brands to seek stability and growth. Second, new energy transformation is still accelerating, but paths differ among enterprises. Third, technological innovation continues to deepen brand moats. Looking ahead to the second half of the year, competition in the automotive industry will continue to upgrade around these three trends. Although everyone has a common direction, these three trends are all competing for the entire enterprise's industrial chain strength, and the strong will remain strong, which has almost become an inevitable outcome.

BYD officially released the May 2026 production and sales flash report, with new energy vehicles from all brands reaching a monthly sales volume of 383,453 vehicles, a slight increase of 0.26% year-on-year, achieving year-on-year positive growth in monthly sales after ten months; among them, passenger car deliveries reached 376,990 units, surging 19.4% month-on-month, wiping out the pain of previous model iterations, presenting a new pattern where the domestic base is stable, overseas sales are soaring, and high-end brands are scaling up across the board. Amidst the market environment of intensified competition in the domestic new energy sector, Tesla FSD entering China, and an intense launch of independent new products, it has forged a unique structural growth path.

The Dynasty and Ocean main brands combined sold 330,215 vehicles in May, accounting for over 80% of the group's total sales, remaining the stabilizer for BYD's sales volume. The full series had 8 models exceeding 20,000 units in monthly sales, covering products from 50,000 entry-level commuter to 200,000 home SUV.

Inside the Dynasty Network, the Yuan family sold 56,691 units, and the Song family 51,370 units. Both crossed the 50,000 threshold, becoming two major sales pillars for the brand, catering to home commuter and urban-rural travel needs; the Qin family followed closely with a stable performance of 28,360 units. The Han and Tang series maintained a volume in the six-thousand range, deeply cultivating the mid-to-large home sedan and SUV niche markets; the brand new model Xia is in the market cultivation phase, delivering 1,810 units monthly, with potential for steady volume growth as channels expand.
The Ocean Network's growth momentum is even more rapid, with 5 models entering the 20,000 club across the series: Sealion 42,615 units, Seal 34,117 units, Seagull 39,919 units, Dolphin 22,260 units, and Song PLUS 27,755 units. Among them, Seagull remains the best-selling entry-level commuter model thanks to its affordable pricing of 60,000-80,000. Sealion, as a new volume model, stands firm at the 40,000 level upon launch, filling the mid-size SUV product gap in the Ocean Network and perfecting the Ocean product tier layout. From commuter small cars to compact SUVs, the two main brands rely on DM-i hybrid and pure electric dual-line technologies to牢牢锁住 the mainstream home market share within 150,000 domestically.
Fang Cheng Bao Year-on-Year Surges 139.7%, Brand Upward Positioning Takes EffectThe high-end matrix of Denza, Fang Cheng Bao, and Yangwang sold a combined 46,489 vehicles in May, officially breaking away from the niche positioning to become a new pivot for BYD's brand premium and profit growth, breaking the industry curse of difficulty in high-end breakthrough for domestic brands.

The off-road brand Fang Cheng Bao sold 30,186 units monthly, surging 139.7% year-on-year, creating a new high in monthly sales since the brand launched. Its Titanium 7 model sold 18,280 units monthly, while Leopard 5 and Leopard 8 output remained stable, continuously squeezing the survival space for joint venture and imported models in the 250,000-400,000 hardcore off-road niche market.

Denza delivered 16,303 units in May, with the MPV benchmark D9 selling 6,721 units, and the Z9 series close to 6,000 units. MPV and mid-to-large sedan dual-line efforts helped them stand firm in the luxury new energy track; the million-level ultra-luxury brand Yangwang continued its steady climb, delivering 286 units that month, a year-on-year increase of 105.8%, completing market verification of the domestic brand ceiling product and forming a full price range product layout from 100,000+ home, 300,000-400,000 off-road, 500,000 luxury MPV to million-level flagship.

In May, BYD's overseas sales of passenger cars and pickup trucks reached 160,177 units, surging 80.7% year-on-year. Exports accounted for over 42% of the full series total sales, setting a new historical high for brand export and becoming the core driving force to stabilize May overall sales and achieve year-on-year positive growth.
Southeast Asia, Europe, and Latin America became the main incremental markets. Seagull, Song PLUS, and Yuan series continued to top new energy best-seller lists in multiple countries; the SHARK pickup truck exceeded 4,000 units in monthly exports for two consecutive months. Relying on the completion of localization production in Thailand, Brazil, Hungary, and Uzbekistan with four overseas vehicle factories, localized production continues to land, avoiding tariffs while rapidly penetrating terminal channels. Against the background of stock market competition in the domestic auto industry and normalized price wars, the rapidly expanding overseas market effectively counteracts sales volatility brought by domestic model iterations, officially upgrading from a supplementary market to BYD's core growth engine. As of now, BYD's global cumulative new energy vehicle sales have exceeded 16.5 million units, with the globalization map continuously broadening.
Intelligent Driving Empowers Product Iteration, H2 New Products Prepare to Surge VolumeMay marked a key node in BYD's intelligent driving landing, with the God's Eye intelligent driving system becoming a core bonus point for models: the number of vehicles with advanced intelligent driving across all brands exceeded 3.15 million, with daily road test data exceeding 200 million kilometers; that month, BYD implemented City Pilot and Smart Parking dual safety backup services, becoming the world's first auto manufacturer to achieve dual intelligent driving backups. Three days after policy implementation, the activation rate of models equipped with the God's Eye system in cities surged 50%. Intelligent driving experience upgrades directly drove in-store order conversion, solidifying product competitiveness for subsequent models to continue volume sales, and facing the intelligent driving market shock brought by FSD entering China.
From data details, BYD's cumulative sales from January to May 2026 were 1,405,039 units, down 20.32% year-on-year. The core reason is that the full series of main models were concentratedly iterated, and the capacity ramp-up of the 2nd Gen Fast Charge Blade Battery was restricted. The new Flash Charge Battery upgraded fast charging and low-temperature performance. Full series iteration models prioritized installing new batteries, but production line retrofitting dragged down capacity release. Order backlogs on popular models and delayed deliveries compressed the May delivery volume to a certain extent.
As the end of the second quarter approaches and the 2nd Gen Blade Battery capacity continues to release, coupled with new models such as Denza N8L, Fang Cheng Bao Titanium 7 Pure Electric Version, Sealion 05, and Xia L landing the market, the industry generally predicts that BYD's full brand sales in June are expected to exceed 400,000 vehicles. Relying on the four-dimension development logic of low-end volume locking share, high-end raising profit, overseas pushing volume, and intelligence improving product power, amidst the intensified new energy elimination round in the domestic market, BYD's full category layout advantage continues to amplify, securing its status as the domestic new energy leader, accelerating steadily towards global top auto manufacturers.

From a loss of 326 million baht in the previous quarter to a windfall of 645 million baht in a single quarter, the global natural rubber giant, Thai Shidong Rubber, staged a stunning turnaround in just one quarter.
Recently, Shidong Rubber released its Q1 2026 financial report: net profit attributable to the parent company reached 645.4 million baht (approximately 130 million RMB), successfully turning losses into profits; EBITDA skyrocketed 307.4% quarter-over-quarter to 2.3693 billion baht.

Turnaround Strategy One: Production Zone Restrictions, Surge in Tire Raw Material Rubber Prices
The primary driver of Shidong's performance turnaround was the strong recovery of the natural rubber business, triggered by shortages in core tire raw materials.
Previously, rubber prices were plagued by speculative disturbances. However, Shidong CEO Veerasith pointed out that rubber prices in the first quarter had "shifted from speculative to real," returning to industry fundamentals. He emphasized: "The total supply of natural rubber from several major producing countries has not increased significantly, especially in Thailand and Indonesia, where production restrictions remain."
For downstream tire companies, this means the hard constraint of tight core raw material supply remains unsolved. Data confirms this trend: In the first quarter, the average price of TSR20 rubber (commonly used for tires) on the SICOM market reached 191.5 US cents/kg, a 10.6% surge quarter-over-quarter. Riding this wave, Shidong sold 341,800 tons of rubber, and the gross profit margin of this business jumped from 5.7% to 8.7%, becoming the most profitable cash cow.

Turnaround Strategy Two: Recovery of Glove Production Capacity, Icing on the Cake
Another engine is the comprehensive recovery of the medical glove business. Heavy flooding severely damaged production lines at the end of last year, but with operations restored, glove sales in the first quarter reached 9.159 billion pieces, a 4.6% increase quarter-over-quarter; capacity utilization rose significantly from 78.2% to 84.2%, directly converting into profit increments. Additionally, the gradual recognition of insurance claim proceeds from flooding further bolstered the current performance.

Conclusion: Cost Pressures for Tire Manufacturers Continue to Accumulate
From huge losses to windfall profits, Shidong's turnaround is a resonance of improved supply and demand and capacity recovery. However, for downstream tire manufacturers, this is by no means a relaxed signal. The persistent supply restrictions in the main production areas of Thailand and India suggest that the bottom support for tire raw materials remains strong. Against the backdrop of rubber prices returning to fundamentals and supply difficult to increase, the huge profits of the rubber giant may well herald the beginning of a new round of cost battle in the tire industry chain.

「以前賣豐田,客戶進門第一句話係:幾時可以提現車。而家第一句話係:呢部車用邊家嘅智能駕駛?」呢個係豐田 4S 店銷售前陣子同我講嘅說話。
佢 2018 年入行。嗰陣時凱美瑞加價,漢蘭達排隊,艾爾法好似理財產品。日系車銷售最難做嘅工,唔係賣車,而係安撫客戶情緒。

而家,佢每日做得最多嘅一件嘢,係解釋:「我哋呢部車,其實都用咗好多中國供應鏈。」佢講呢句話嘅時候,語氣甚至仲有啲驕傲。
真係,十年前,中國車企仲喺度研究點樣將門縫做到均勻;五年前,中國新能源車仲完全被行業人超越;結果而家,日系車想將新能源做好,第一件事已經變成:係先接入中國供應鏈。
你會發現,一個時代真正結束嘅時候,往往唔係因為邊個倒下。
而係曾經高高在上嘅人,開始主動學習你。

最近豐田嘅純電動 SUV 銷量重新破萬,好多人將佢理解成「日系反撲」。但如果你將呢部車拆開睇,會發現事唔咁簡單。
Momenta 智能駕駛、禾賽激光雷達、德賽西威域控制器、弗迪電池、中創新航、正力新能……
講難聽啲,而家好多所謂「日系新能源車」,已經越來越似「中國供應鏈組裝嘅日系殼」。但係問題係,呢個恰恰說明,中國汽車工業真係贏咗。因為真正嘅產業勝利,從來唔係將別人打死,而係連對手都唔得唔用你。
呢樣其實比銷量反超更恐怖。
以前大家成日話,中國車企係喺度「彎道超車」。而家回頭睇,呢個說法其實太保守。中國汽車產業根本唔係超車,而係直接將賽道換咗。

燃油車時代,日本供應鏈點解強?因為嗰個時代拼係精密製造、穩定品控、長週期迭代同封閉供應體系。講白啲,係「慢工出細活」。豐田嗰套體系,本質上係工業時代最頂尖嘅秩序感。
問題係,新能源時代唔一樣。
而家拼係迭代速度、軟件能力、成本控制、供應鏈協同,同埋大規模快速試錯。以前一部車五年一換代,而家半年一次 OTA;以前供應商改下模具三個月,而家中國廠商三星期。

以前日本製造最強嘅地方係「唔出錯」。而家中國製造最強嘅地方係,容許快速犯錯,然後快速進化。呢係兩種完全唔同嘅工業哲學。所以好多人其實誤會咗中國新能源車。大家總覺得,中國車企贏,係因為平。但真正恐怖嘅從來唔係平。而係中國開始同時擁有「平」、「夠好」、「仲好快」。
先係最嚇人嘅。因為工業世界入面最無解嘅嘢,就係,你比我平,仲比我迭代快。亦都係點解,而家越來越多日系供應商開始崩。好多人見到日本零部件企業破產,以為只係銷量問題。
其實唔係。真正嘅問題係,整個日系供應鏈賴以生存嗰套工業邏輯,開始失效。以前日本供應商最大嘅護城河,係系列體系。豐田只用豐田體系,本田只養本田供應鏈。電裝、愛信、捷太格特、矢崎……整個體系好似個封閉帝國。
但新能源時代有啲特別殘酷嘅嘢,封閉,就係意味著慢。而慢,喺而家幾乎係原罪。
所以你見到一個特別荒謬嘅現象。以前中國供應商拼命想入日系體系,而家變成日系車企主動搵中國供應商。因為唔用中國供應鏈,車根本卷唔過。
呢件事喺東南亞尤其明顯。前兩年好多人仲喺度討論:「中國車會唔會喺泰國跟日本車狠命搏埋手?」結果而家發現,根本唔係「對打」。而係中國供應鏈直接滲透進咗日系車工廠。

呢樣比搶市場更絕。因為搶市場,只係搶銷量。搶供應鏈,等於搶工業命脈。以前日本製造最令人驚懼嘅一點,係佢控制咗亞洲工業體系。而家呢個控制權,正喺轉移。而且係非常快速地轉移。
最有意思嘅係,日本人自己其實最先意識到問題。《日經新聞》已經開始頻繁用「Keiretsu 瓦解」呢類字詞。翻譯過嚟其實就一句說話:日本汽車工業最核心嘅嘢,正喺度崩潰。
所以而家最痛苦嘅,已經唔係日系品牌,而係嗰群日系供應商。因為整車廠至少仲可以「投降」。供應鏈唔咁容易轉身。
豐田仲可以用中國智能駕駛,日產仲可以接中國電池,本田仲可以學新勢力做座艙。但嗰啲傳統供應商點算?

燃油車時代建立嗰啲一切優勢,突然都冇用。更殘酷係,新能源時代最重要嘅嘢,電池、智能化、軟件、智能駕駛,中國全部攞晒。
於是你會見到一種特別黑色幽默嘅畫面。一邊,日本媒體喺度痛心「日系車靈魂畀咗中國」;一邊,日本供應商又開始接比亞迪訂單續命。呢樣其實特別似歷史入面嘅王朝更替。
舊時代嘅人,唔會突然消失。佢哋會先震驚,然後否認,接住憤怒,最後加入。
好多人而家仲覺得,中國汽車工業只係「新能源領先」。但我認為,真正嘅變化遠不止汽車。汽車只係中國製造升級最明顯嘅一場公開考試。因為汽車係工業皇冠。佢背後連結嘅係晶片、材料、軟件、電池、機械、製造、AI、自動化,以及供應鏈協同。

邊個贏汽車,邊個就有資格重構下一代工業秩序。而今日中國真正恐怖嘅地方,係開始出現一種「產業鏈黑洞效應」。
咩係黑洞?就係所有產業,最後都會被佢吸入去。
你做車,就得接中國電池;做智能駕駛,就得接中國算力;做供應鏈,就得接受中國速度;做製造,就得適應中國成本。
未來好大機會出現一個特別現實嘅情況,唔加入中國產業鏈嘅製造業,會越來越難留喺牌局。呢唔係咩民族情緒。呢係工業規律。
因為製造業發展到最後,比拼嘢已經唔係單點技術,而係邊個能夠將整個產業鏈壓縮成「一臺機器」。
而中國而家最強嘅能力,就係呢個。由電池到智能駕駛,由零部件到整車,由研發到量產,中國工業第一次真正形成咗完整閉環、超大规模、超高速迭代同超強成本控制。
呢套嘢,先係而家真正令全世界焦慮嘅地方。所以回頭再睇嗰啲「日系車用咗中國供應鏈」嘅新聞。
你會發現,佢真正嘅意義唔係「中國零部件進入咗日系體系」。而係,中國製造,第一次開始成為全球工業體系本身。

唔知有幾多朋友最近期關注 10 萬內純電 SUV 市場?近段時間睇嚟,呢個細分市場好熱鬧。就講長安啟源全新 Q05 同零跑 A10,上個月銷量分別達 15814 輛同 14372 輛,全部挺進 2026 年 4 月銷量排行全品類前 10,長安啟源全新 Q05 甚至奪得緊緊湊型純電 SUV 市場嘅銷冠。

(長安啟源全新 Q05)
值得留意係,兩款大熱門產品亮點亦唔少,9 萬級可以得到 500km+嘅續航,零跑 A10 甚至配備激光雷達,有高級智駕輔助需求嘅朋友嚟講,呢架車吸引力的確唔低。但係喺價格上,同為高配嘅長安啟源全新 Q05 506Max+ 同零跑 A10 505 激光雷達版,終端價格分別係 9.59 萬同 8.68 萬,手握 9 萬左右預算嘅朋友都可以考慮。明顯係,又去到決賽圈二揀一環節。
(零跑 A10)
如果對預算比較敏感,咁喺長安啟源全新 Q05 同零跑 A10 之間,後者可能更受歡迎,畢竟終端價格實打實平咗幾千元。而且,高配 A10 配有激光雷達,市區/高速情況均能啟動領航輔助駕駛,呢個就係佢嘅優勢所在。當然,如果預算允許,揀長安啟源全新 Q05 高配,都有帶激光雷達嘅高級輔助駕駛。
(長安啟源全新 Q05)
但既然係買車前嘅橫評,唔少全方位對比。首先從尺寸睇,作為緊湊型 SUV,長安啟源全新 Q05 長寬高分別係 4435*1855*1595mm,軸距為 2735mm。而零跑 A10 車型級別就係小型 SUV,長寬高分別係 4270*1810*1635mm,軸距為 2605mm。
(零跑 A10)
如果只係考慮代步、通勤,零跑 A10 嘅細個嘅略有優勢,方便行街串巷。但實際上,好多人買車都要兼顧家用,10 萬內預算也多以剛需用車群體為主。既然係剛需,且有家用需求,嗰空間自然唔好掉鏈子。
(長安啟源全新 Q05)
(零跑 A10)
講返日常家庭出行嚟講,兩車之間 130mm 軸距差異,直接反映喺後排體驗。坐入長安啟源全新 Q05 後排,腿部空間平整兼寬敞,一齊坐 3 位成年人都唔會太擠;但係坐入零跑 A10 後排,無論坐寬定係腿部空間都會細少少。媽咪喺後排照顧孩子,長安啟源全新 Q05 後排更加寬敞嘅空間會更加方便佢操作,孩子都能有更大嘅活動空間。
(長安啟源全新 Q05)
(零跑 A10)
除咗空間,通勤黨同家庭用戶對舒適配置都比較關注。睇嚟對比,兩車都有配電動尾門、無匙進入、自適應遠近光等外部配置。但係從車廂內睇,零跑 A10 副駕無法電動調節,後排靠背都唔支援角度調節,同埋缺少後排空調出風口、車內 PM2.5 過濾裝置等。
(長安啟源全新 Q05)
(零跑 A10)
反觀長安啟源全新 Q05,除咗副駕支持電動調節,前排仲集成咗加熱/通風/按摩/副駕腿托功能,對比零跑 A10 只提供前排座椅加熱,佢嘅品質無疑更上一層樓。包括後排乘員都有少少照顧,例如靠背角度可調、配有後排空調出風口、後排中央扶手/杯架等,更加適合家人同行呢類場景。
(長安啟源全新 Q05)
(零跑 A10)
除咗舒享體驗,行駛系統嘅對比我哋都唔好忽略。首先從大家關注嘅續航睇,長安啟源全新 Q05 同零跑 A10 分別搭載 51.9kWh、53kWh 電池,CLTC 純電續航做到 506km、505km,差異大可忽略。但從電芯供應鏈睇,前者出自寧德時代,後者就係國軒高科/江蘇正力,若論品牌含金量,“寧王”順位自然靠前,更值得信賴。另外,兩車都有全球品質,按照全球嚴苛嘅標準打造,零跑 A10 符合國內、歐盟雙標準,長安啟源全新 Q05 已經喺泰國上市,未來仲會相繼落地多個國家地區,最終開拓歐洲區域,此外仲有央企背書,質量品質都好可靠。
因為本文討論嘅係 A10 嘅 505 版本,採用電池液冷技術,溫控較好,而如果係 403 版本,採用成本低嘅風冷技術,散熱效果較差。呢點上,全新 Q05 做得更好,入門就採用電池直冷技術,高配用嘅係液冷技術,能更好地實現熱管理,保證電池安全。
(長安啟源全新 Q05)
(零跑 A10)
動力方面,長安啟源全新 Q05 同零跑 A10 都係前置單電機佈局,電機最大動力輸出分別係 120kW/190N·m、90kW/150N·m,0-100km/h 加速時間分別做到 8.9 秒同 10.6 秒。坦率嚟講,兩款車喺純電陣營加速性能都中規中矩;但係相對嚟講,長安啟源全新 Q05 嘅 8 秒級零百加速,喺山路行駛、高速超車等情況下會比零跑 A10 更加分。
(長安啟源全新 Q05)

(零跑 A10)
總結嚟講,零跑 A10 505 激光雷達版優勢突出:價格更低、智駕輔助覆蓋範圍更廣,適合預算優先 + 科技嘗鮮嘅消費者。而長安啟源全新 Q05 更強調“全面”二字:加少少預算同樣可以獲得高級輔助駕駛,而且尺寸更大、舒適配置更高、採用頭部電芯供應鏈,動力亦更強,綜合表現更全能。總括嚟講,預算 9 萬級追求面面俱到嘅家用體驗,長安啟源全新 Q05 506Max+ 更加值得考慮。
