首頁Elgrand E51
搜尋歷史
熱門搜尋
經銷商登入 / 註冊
2026 年 7 月 21 日至 22 日，山東重工全球合作夥伴大會暨綠色智能產品展示會在越南國家會展中心（VEC）舉行。作為集團電力能源板塊核心承接者，會議期間，維柴重磅發佈微電網一體化能源方案，以硬核技術對接區域市場剛需，搶灘東南亞電力能源新藍海，為區域綠色低碳發展注入新動能。
錨定東南亞區域痛點，發佈微電網一體化能源方案
從行業發展態勢來看，東南亞正成為全球電力需求增長的核心引擎，區域經濟快速發展帶動電力需求呈爆炸式增長，但電網基建滯後與低碳轉型雙重挑戰，成為制約其能源發展的核心瓶頸。據國際能源署（IEA）發布的《東南亞能源展望 2026》報告顯示，2015 年以來，東南亞電力需求年均增速達 6%，接近全球平均水平的兩倍，預計到 2050 年，區域總電力需求將在現有基礎上翻 2 至 3 倍。但该區域電網基建薄弱，正面臨電網基建滯後與低碳轉型的雙重挑戰，分佈式微電網作為破解供電難題、推動低碳發展的核心路徑，市場迎來爆發式增長。
此次大會期間，維柴重磅發佈微電網解決方案。這是企業深耕電力能源領域的核心成果，更是精準錨定東南亞電力市場痛點的前瞻性佈局。該方案聚焦算力基建提速、零碳園區普及、偏遠工礦智能化升級等市場剛需，整合混合能源發電站、移動光伏、儲能系統、儲充一體機、SOFC 固體氧化物燃料電池發電系統、發電機組（柴油，燃氣，重油等）等核心裝備，可有效破解各類場景供電不穩、能耗偏高、配套缺失等難題。
與傳統單一發電設備不同，維柴微電網能源解決方案主打“一站式、可落地、全閉環”，覆蓋海島、園區、數據中心等場景，既偏遠區域獨立供電，也為城市園區實現低碳熱電聯供。
這一發佈既是維柴落實集團戰略的關鍵舉措，也標誌著其從“賣產品”向“系統方案 + 全域服務 + 生態共建”的高端業態升級。該方案也將為東南亞提供低碳高效的成套能源範式，助力當地破解區域能源發展難題，推動東南亞能源產業向清潔化、智能化、高效化轉型升級。
電力能源技術持續升級，打造集團戰略轉型增長極
2026 年 1 月，山東重工正式將電力能源列為集團第七大業務板塊，維柴快速將集團戰略部署轉化為發展實效，成為企業高質量發展的全新增長極。2025 年，維柴發電產品全球銷量突破 10 萬台、躋身全球前三；2026 年上半年，維柴電力能源業務收入同比增長 30%，其中數據中心產品收入同比增長 140%，產品全面覆蓋東南亞、歐美、中東等全球核心市場。
亮眼成績單的背後，是維柴多年來對電力能源技術研發的持續投入、對核心技術的不斷突破，精準貼合了全球新興場景用電需求爆發趨勢。
在技術升級的道路上，維柴堅持“傳統能源高效化、新能源低碳化”雙輪驅動，兩大核心產品線持續迭代優化，共同構成微電網方案的堅實硬件底座。傳統柴油、燃氣發電領域，維柴 2009 年戰略重組法國博杜安，全新開發 M 系列大缸徑發電產品，打造起覆蓋 1250kWe-5000kWe 全功率段發電機組產品體系，其中全球首款 5 兆瓦高速柴油發電機組 20M61 啟動能力、載入能力等核心指標達世界一流水平。同時，維柴還對現有柴油、燃氣發電機組進行智能化升級，搭載自主研發的遠程監控系統，可實現機組運行狀態實時監測、故障預警、遠程維運，大幅提升了設備的可靠性和維運效率，適應東南亞不同場景的用電需求。
新能源低碳發電領域，維柴提前佈局、持續攻堅，實現了 SOFC 固體氧化物燃料電池技術的重大突破。維柴 2018 年佈局 SOFC 技術，2022 年發佈全球首款大功率金屬支撐商業化 SOFC 產品，92.55% 的熱電聯產效率創全球紀錄，100kW 商業化 SOFC 發電產品示範項目累計穩定運行近 7 萬小時，技術可靠性充分驗證，為微電網方案落地提供核心支撐。
本次大會展出的維柴 WES600 SOFC 發電系統是微電網解決方案的重要裝置之一，也是此次雙方合作的核心產品。該系統採用先進金屬支撐電堆技術，系統功率可達 600kW，可根據客戶需求實現兆瓦級功率拓展，為數據中心、工業園區、分佈式能源和微電網提供高效低碳、運行安靜、持續穩定、快速部署的電力解決方案。
此外，維柴還持續優化移動光伏、儲能系統、儲充一體機等配套裝備的技術性能，提升光伏組件的轉換效率、儲能系統的充放電效率和安全性，實現各類裝備與微電網系統的高效適配、協同運行，進一步完善了微電網一體化能源方案技術體系。
技術的持續升級，也為維柴在東南亞市場的實踐應用提供了有力支撐，多年來，維柴已在東南亞落地多個標杆項目，用硬核技術贏得了當地客戶的高度認可，也為微電網方案的推廣積累了豐富的實踐經驗。如在泰國某海島發電站，維柴 12M33 柴油發電機組自 2019 年投運以來，安全運行超 3 萬小時，成為當地供電“壓艙石”；8 台維柴博杜安集裝箱式燃氣機組，在東南亞高溫高濕環境下穩定運行，為園區和社區提供清潔電力，獲得當地客戶高度認可。
此次亮相越南展會，是維柴電力能源技術與微電網方案的集中展示，更是其深耕東南亞市場的關鍵一步。當前東南亞微電網市場政策與需求雙利好，維柴將以展會為契機，深化全球合作，依托微電網核心方案助力區域能源轉型，推動集團電力能源板塊實現更高質量增長，在全球能源轉型浪潮中貢獻維柴力量。
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拿 Proton X70 同 Honda WR-V 嚟作比較。呢兩款車喺價位同定位上都幾接近嘅，今日我哋就會從多個方面做一個詳細嘅比較，幫晒你省返做功課嘅時間。
Proton X70 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 106,800 - 122,300，一共有 3 個版本，包括 1.5L Standard 2WD（RM 106,800）、1.5L Executive 2WD（RM 115,800）、1.5L Premium 2WD（RM 122,300） 等。
Honda WR-V 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 89,900 - 107,900，一共有 4 個版本，包括 2023 1.5L V（RM 99,900）、2023 1.5L E（RM 95,900）、2023 1.5L S（RM 89,900） 等。
由價錢睇，Honda WR-V 嘅起步價比 Proton X70 平咗 RM 16,900。講真嘅，喺呢個價位段，幾千蚊嘅差距其實唔算大，關鍵仲係睇整體嘅性價比同長期使用成本。
Proton X70 搭載 1.5L Turbo，馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。
Honda WR-V 搭載 1.5L 4-cyl，馬力 105 hp。官方油耗 6.0 L/100km。
動力方面，Proton X70 嘅 1.5L Turbo 比 Honda WR-V 嘅 1.5L 4-cyl 多咗 35 匹馬力，中段加速更有信心，尤其係行高速公路超車嘅時候。不過 Honda WR-V 嘅油耗可能更啱用，日常市區通勤差別唔會太大。
Proton X70 車身長 4400 mm，後尾箱 400 L。
Honda WR-V 車身長 4400 mm，後尾箱 400 L。
兩款車嘅尺寸幾乎一樣，車內空間差別唔大。呢個級別嘅車，日常使用完全夠用。
Proton X70 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
Honda WR-V 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
兩款車嘅驅動方式一樣，都係 FWD，日常駕駛感受唔會有大分別。
Proton X70 同 Honda WR-V 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更睇重品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰一款；如果你更介意性價比同配備，嗰就揀配備更豐富嗰款。總之後建議兩款都去試駕，親身體驗先至最重要。
總體嚟講，Proton X70 同 Honda WR-V 都係馬來西亞市場幾幾好嘅車款。揀邊一輛，關鍵仲係睇你個人需求同預算。建議大家做足功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係一件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拿 Proton X50 同 Subaru Crosstrek 嚟做比較。
Proton X50 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 89,800 - 113,300，合共 4 個版本，包括 1.5T Executive（RM 89,800）、1.5T Premium（RM 101,800）、1.5T Flagship（RM 113,300）等。
Subaru Crosstrek 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 145,000 - 160,000，合共 1 個版本，包括 2.0L e-Boxer（RM 150,000）等。
睇返價錢，Proton X50 嘅起步價確實比 Subaru Crosstrek 平咗 RM 55,200。如果你預算有限，Proton 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需要。不過都要留意，平嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備上要有取舍，具體要看你嘅需要。
Proton X50 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA)。
Subaru Crosstrek 嘅安全評級係 5★ (Euro NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 EyeSight。
安全配備方面，兩部車都獲咗唔錯嘅評級。不過 Proton X50 嘅 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA) 同 Subaru Crosstrek 嘅 EyeSight 喺功能上有啲分別，如果你比較重視主動安全嘅話，可以仔細對比一下佢哋嘅功能列表。
Proton X50 採用 4WD 驅動方式。
Subaru Crosstrek 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
Proton 嘅 4WD 同 Subaru 嘅 FWD 喺操控上會有唔同感受，建議試駕對比。
Proton X50 保修 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Subaru Crosstrek 保修 3 年/100,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
總體嚟講，Proton X50 同 Subaru Crosstrek 都係馬來西亞市場相當唔錯嘅車型。揀邊部，關鍵仍然係要睇你嘅個人需要同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，先至去試駕做最後決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers compare the Proton X50 and Mitsubishi Xforce when choosing a car. These two models are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
The OTR price of the Proton X50 in Malaysia is RM 89,800 - 113,300, with a total of 4 variants, including 1.5T Executive (RM 89,800), 1.5T Premium (RM 101,800), 1.5T Flagship (RM 113,300), etc.
The OTR price of the Mitsubishi Xforce in Malaysia is RM 109,930 - 119,930, with a total of 2 variants, including 2026 1.5L Ultimate (RM 119,930), 2026 1.5L Urban (RM 109,930), etc.
In terms of price, the starting price of the Proton X50 is indeed RM 20,130 cheaper than the Mitsubishi Xforce. If your budget is limited, the Proton entry-level version is already sufficient for daily needs. However, also note that the few thousand difference might involve trade-offs in features, depending on your specific needs.
Proton X50 features a 1.5L 4-cyl engine, 105 hp. Official fuel consumption 6.0 L/100km.
Mitsubishi Xforce features a 1.5L Turbo engine, 140 hp. Official fuel consumption 7.0 L/100km.
In terms of power, the Mitsubishi Xforce's 1.5L Turbo has 35 more horsepower than the Proton X50's 1.5L 4-cyl. However, for daily city driving, both cars have enough power and won't feel underpowered.
The safety rating of the Proton X50 is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
The safety rating of the Mitsubishi Xforce is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include MI-PILOT.
Both cars have the same safety rating, and safety features are quite comprehensive for this class. New car safety is generally good nowadays, so there's no need to worry too much about this.
Proton X50 warranty 5 years/150,000km, service interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Mitsubishi Xforce warranty 3 years/100,000km, service interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Overall, both the Proton X50 and Mitsubishi Xforce are excellent models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends mainly on your personal needs and budget. We recommend doing your research, comparing quotes from several dealerships, and test-driving before making a final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending time on research will never be wrong.
In Malaysia's SUV market, many buyers often compare the Proton X50 and GWM Haval H6 when choosing a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning, today we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
The Proton X50 OTR price in Malaysia is RM 89,800 - 113,300, with a total of 4 versions, including 1.5T Executive (RM 89,800), 1.5T Premium (RM 101,800), 1.5T Flagship (RM 113,300), etc.
The GWM Haval H6 OTR price in Malaysia is RM 139,750 - 139,750, with a total of 2 versions, including 1.5L Turbo Standard (RM 140,000), 1.5L Turbo Premium (RM 155,000), etc.
From a price perspective, the starting price of the Proton X50 is indeed RM 49,950 cheaper than the GWM Haval H6. If your budget is limited, the Proton entry-level version is already sufficient for daily needs. But note that the difference of a few thousand Ringgit might involve compromises in equipment, depending on your specific needs.
Proton X50 body length is 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
GWM Haval H6 body length is 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
The dimensions of both cars are almost the same, with little difference in interior space. For this class of vehicle, it is more than enough for daily use.
Proton X50 adopts 4WD drive mode.
GWM Haval H6 adopts FWD drive mode.
Proton's 4WD and GWM's FWD will have different handling experiences. A test drive comparison is recommended.
Both Proton X50 and GWM Haval H6 are mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, prioritize the one with the better reputation; if you care more about price-performance ratio and features, choose the one with richer configurations. Ultimately, it is recommended to test drive both models; personal experience is the most important.
Overall, both Proton X50 and GWM Haval H6 are quite good models in the Malaysian market. Choosing which one depends mainly on your personal needs and budget. We recommend doing your homework, comparing quotes from several car dealers, and then test driving to make a final decision. Buying a car is a big matter; spending time doing homework will definitely not be a mistake.
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嗰陣都會拿 Proton X50 同 Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV 嚟比較。呢兩部車喺價位同定位上都幾接近，而家我哋就從多個角度做詳細比較，幫你節省做功課嘅時間。
Proton X50 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 89,800 - 113,300，合共有 4 個版本，包括 1.5T Executive（RM 89,800）、1.5T Premium（RM 101,800）、1.5T Flagship（RM 113,300） 等。
Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 129,750 - 129,750，合共有 2 個版本，包括 2025 1.5T 90km CSH（RM 129,750）、Tiggo 7 PHEV 支援邊種充電方法？可以喺家用電源插座充電咩？（RM 117,478） 等。
由價錢睇，Proton X50 嘅起步價確實比 Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV 平咗 RM 39,950。如果你預算有限，Proton 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需要。但都要留意，平嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備上會做取舍，具體要睇你嘅需要。
Proton X50 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA)。
Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV 嘅安全評級係 TBD，主動安全系統包括 Basic。
安全配備方面，兩部車都拿到唔錯嘅評級。不過 Proton X50 嘅 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA) 同 Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV 嘅 Basic 喺功能上有些少分別，如果你比較看重主動安全嘅話，可以仔細比較下兩者嘅功能列表。
Proton X50 採用 4WD 驅動方式。
Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
Proton 嘅 4WD 同 Chery 嘅 FWD 喺操控感會有唔同，建議試駕對比。
Proton X50 同 Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更看重品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑好嗰款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，就揀配置更豐富嗰款。最終都建議兩部都去試駕，親身體驗先最重要。
總括嚟講，Proton X50 同 Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一部，關鍵仲係睇你嘅個人需要同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對無得錯。
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嗰陣都會拿 寶騰 X50 同 奇瑞 瑞虎 7 PHEV 嚟比較。呢兩款車喺價位同定位上都幾接近，今日我哋就從多個方面做一個詳細嘅對比，幫你省咗做功課嘅時間。
寶騰 X50 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 89,800 - 113,300，一共有 4 個版本，包括 1.5T Executive（RM 89,800）、1.5T Premium（RM 101,800）、1.5T Flagship（RM 113,300） 等等。
奇瑞 瑞虎 7 PHEV 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 129,750 - 129,750，一共有 2 個版本，包括 2025 1.5T 90km CSH（RM 129,750）、支持邊種充電方法？可用家用插座充電嗎？（RM 117,478） 等等。
從價錢睇，寶騰 X50 嘅起步價確實比 奇瑞 瑞虎 7 PHEV 平咗 RM 39,950。如果你預算有限，寶騰嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需求。但都要注意，平嗰啲幾千蚊，可能在配備上會有取捨，具體要看你嘅需求。
寶騰 X50 搭載 1.5L 4-cyl，馬力 105 hp。官方油耗 6.0 L/100km。
奇瑞 瑞虎 7 PHEV 搭載 Hybrid，馬力 170 hp。官方油耗 4.5 L/100km。
動力方面，奇瑞 瑞虎 7 PHEV 嘅 Hybrid 比 寶騰 X50 嘅 1.5L 4-cyl 多咗 65 匹馬力。不過日常喺市區開，兩款車嘅動力都夠用，唔會覺得唔夠力。
寶騰 X50 採用 4WD 驅動方式。
奇瑞 瑞虎 7 PHEV 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
寶騰嘅 4WD 同 奇瑞嘅 FWD 喺操控上會有唔同感受，建議試駕對比。
寶騰 X50 保固 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
奇瑞 瑞虎 7 PHEV 保固 3 年/100,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
寶騰 X50 同 奇瑞 瑞虎 7 PHEV 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更睇重品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰款；如果你更重視性價比同配備，就選配置更豐富嗰款。最終都建議兩款都去試駕，親身體驗先至最重要。
總嘅嚟講，寶騰 X50 同 奇瑞 瑞虎 7 PHEV 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵仲係要看你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
In Malaysia's SUV market, many buyers compare Proton X50 and Mazda CX-3 when choosing a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
The OTR price of Proton X50 in Malaysia is RM 89,800 - 113,300, with a total of 4 versions, including 1.5T Executive (RM 89,800), 1.5T Premium (RM 101,800), 1.5T Flagship (RM 113,300) etc.
The OTR price of Mazda CX-3 in Malaysia is RM 126,159 - 139,159, with a total of 2 versions, including 2023 2.0L High (RM 139,159), 2023 2.0L Plus (RM 126,159) etc.
In terms of price, Proton X50's starting price is indeed RM 36,359 cheaper than Mazda CX-3. If your budget is limited, Proton's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. However, note that the savings of a few thousand ringgit might involve trade-offs in equipment, depending on your specific needs.
Proton X50 safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
Mazda CX-3 safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include i-Activsense.
Both cars have the same safety rating. In this class, safety features are quite comprehensive. New car safety these days is not bad, no need to worry too much about this.
Proton X50 body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
Mazda CX-3 body length 4500 mm, trunk 450 L.
Regarding space, Mazda CX-3 body is 100 mm longer than Proton X50, offering an advantage in passenger space. However, Proton X50 is a bit more flexible for parking in the city, each has trade-offs.
Proton X50 warranty 5 years/150,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Mazda CX-3 warranty 5 years/150,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Both cars have the same warranty conditions, no need to worry about this. Actual maintenance costs depend on the brand's service network and parts prices, suggest asking real owners in car owner groups for experience.
Proton X50 and Mazda CX-3 are both mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, you can prioritize the one with better reputation; if you care more about cost-performance ratio and equipment, choose the one with richer configuration. Ultimately, it is recommended to test drive both, personal experience is the most important.
Overall, Proton X50 and Mazda CX-3 are both very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends on your personal needs and budget. We recommend doing your research, comparing quotes from several car dealerships, and then test driving to make the final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending some time on research is never wrong.
On July 16, Geely Galaxy released the world's first "Thunder 16-in-1 Intelligent Electric Drive" (hereinafter referred to as Thunder 16-in-1) at Xingqu Technology's Wuxi base, and will equip it first on Geely Galaxy TT. At the launch event, this electric drive system won two Guinness World Records. Galaxy TT completed the lowest energy consumption challenge for a mass-produced pure electric sedan around Qinghai Lake, with a measured power consumption of 8.20kWh/100km; simultaneously completed the longest continuous dual-car drifting challenge on a slippery road surface, with a continuous drifting distance exceeding 46 km, breaking the record held by Porsche in 2020.
But if you zoom the camera back a bit, you will find that the true protagonist of this launch event was not actually the Thunder 16-in-1, but the partner behind this system, Xingqu Technology. It is the "ace card" of electric drive technology, according to Li Chuanhai, Vice President of Geely Automobile Group and Dean of Geely Automobile Research Institute.
This is the first time Xingqu Technology has stepped into the spotlight as an independent identity. In the previous few years, it existed more as a behind-the-scenes supplier, assisting customers in achieving multiple industry premieres. In addition to Geely, Xingqu Technology is also a partner behind a long list of globally recognized automakers such as Renault, Jaguar Land Rover, Vinfast, HORSE, and Tier 1.
01.
Who is Xingqu Technology
Xingqu Technology, English name InfiMotion, Infi comes from Infinite, Motion means power, implying "providing infinite power for the future". It is an independently operated global electric drive system supplier, whose products and technology services cover brands such as Geely, Zeekr, Lynk & Co, Volvo, smart, Polestar, Proton, as well as international automakers such as Jaguar Land Rover and Renault, and has established deep cooperation with international top-tier Tier 1 suppliers such as ZF and Magna Powertrain.
Geely Galaxy is a representative of its many customers.
Its technical resume is not short.
In 2021, Xingqu Technology pioneered the first 400V SiC electric drive solution in China on the Zeekr 001, which remains a classic benchmark for electric drive efficiency and performance to date;
In 2024, Xingqu Technology mass-produced the world's first 11-in-1 domain control electric drive, equipped on Geely Galaxy E5, it is the pioneer of the super-integrated electric drive route, and the first-equipped vehicle has also become the sales champion for exports of China's A-segment pure electric SUV;
In 2025, Xingqu Technology first applied magnesium alloy housing technology to the distributed electric drive system, and then immediately mass-produced the world's first 900V high-performance magnesium alloy coaxial dual electric drive.
Today, Xingqu Technology's revenue has grown from 40 million yuan in its first year to over 20 billion yuan this year. There are nearly 1,000 R&D engineers, with the Sweden team exceeding 100 people. The R&D and manufacturing network spans Wuxi, Shanghai, Hangzhou, Ningbo, Jiaxing, Quzhou in China, as well as Sweden and Malaysia, covering Eurasia and serving the global market.
Therefore, the Thunder 16-in-1 was able to win two Guinness World Records as soon as it was launched. Relying on it behind the scenes is not luck in a single instance, but the result of years of technical accumulation by Geely and Xingqu Technology.
02.
The advantages of Thunder 16-in-1 are not limited to ultra-high integration
The voltage platform of Thunder 16-in-1 is 800V, peak power is 245kW, and peak torque is 320Nm.
Its "16" refers to 16 functions and components deeply integrated into one system: motor, motor controller, reducer, DCDC, OBC, PDU, HBMS, LBMS, VCU, TMS, active pre-charge control, powertrain gateway, as well as intelligent energy management, intelligent energy replenishment management, intelligent motion control, and intelligent health management.
After integration, high-voltage harnesses are reduced by 30%, low-voltage harnesses are reduced by 15%. Combined with magnesium alloy housing, the whole unit is reduced by 20kg, weighing only 75kg; Z-dimension size is less than 325mm, 8% lower than industry mainstream multi-in-one products.
There is a natural contradiction in multi-in-one systems: the more components integrated, the easier efficiency losses are to accumulate. Thunder 16-in-1's CLTC comprehensive efficiency reached 93.8%, number one in its class, already close to the level of a three-in-one electric drive. Behind it are two methodologies called "Joule Engineering" and "Mirror Engineering", deeply integrating technical points such as 800V high-voltage platform, SiC power modules, Umini-Pin flat wire windings, ultra-thin silicon steel sheets, gear honing, low-viscosity lubricating oil, and active lubrication technology into a system-level solution.
Beyond performance, what is more worth noting is the reconstruction of the control chain. In traditional electric drives, control algorithms are distributed in different chips, and signals have to be "transferred across departments", with an average response latency of 40 milliseconds. Thunder 16-in-1 adopts a single-chip integrated architecture, compressing this chain to the fastest 2 milliseconds. Ren Xiangfei, Chief Engineering Technology Scientist of Geely Automobile Group, gave an analogy at the launch event: the difference of these two milliseconds is like Messi, who is 39 years old, still leading the team to turn the tables in adversity, relying on a reaction that is naturally one beat faster than others, and the gap between top-tier and ordinary often lies between this beat. Combined with AI deviation predictive control, real-time torque deviation was reduced from 3% to 1%, and this control capability was finally verified in the extreme scenario of 46 km continuous dual-car drifting.
Continuous output capability relies on thermal management as a safety net. Thunder 16-in-1 adopted 54-way directional cooling technology for the first time. 54 nozzles precisely cover the winding ends and rotor cores, reducing the maximum motor temperature by 15°C and increasing insulation life by 10%.
In terms of reliability, 16-in-1 reduced over 180 components at the design stage, lowering failure points structurally. This system ultimately passed over 9,000 test items, and vehicle-level road durability verification cumulative exceeded 5 million km, and much of these tests and verification work were completed by Xingqu Technology's test system.
03.
Assisting customers in multiple premieres, where does Xingqu Technology really excel
In fact, to turn an advanced electric drive system into a product that can be mass-produced stably and withstand 9,000 tests, there is still a long way to go in between.
This road is hard to walk, but it is exactly where Xingqu Technology's core competitiveness lies.
Xingqu Technology CEO Lin Xiaozhe summarized the company's capabilities into three core strengths: technology, quality, and globalization. The first two determine whether Xingqu Technology can precisely manufacture the system; the third determines whether Xingqu Technology can gain global customer recognition.
Technical strength can be intuitively shown from the rigor of "1 mm".
The efficiency of multi-in-one electric drives can be affected by various factors, one of which is the flat wire windings in the motor stator. The parts sticking out at both ends of the winding are called "end turns". This part of the copper wire does not participate in work, but it is always consuming electricity and occupying space. Starting from first principles, Xingqu Technology's logic is simple: since it doesn't do work, it must be compressed to the extreme.
Saying this is light, but doing it is hard.
From a coil of copper wire to a set of flat wire windings, it goes through multiple processes such as straightening, enamel removal, 2D and 3D forming, wire insertion, twisting, expanding, and welding. During this process, if the enamel breaks it will short circuit, if the twisting angle is off the copper wires will interfere with each other, if the weld strength is not enough or there is missed welding, the entire stator will be scrapped. Xingqu Technology's R&D and process teams, in order to reduce the end height by 1 mm, need to repeatedly optimize every process parameter. Every set of matching new tooling fixtures needs to spend several months adjusting.
In 2022, the end height of Xingqu Technology's first-generation U-Pin motor was 8~10 mm; this year, the 4 mm height Umini-P product has gone into production; the next generation 3 mm U-MiniP evo is also on the way (2027). And the current industry average level is still around 5 mm.
The Thunder 16-in-1 used in this event is using this Umini-Pin process. The end height is reduced by 4 mm, and the total length of copper wire per motor is shortened by about 1,296 mm, and copper loss is reduced by over 2%. This is not a technology temporarily overcome by this product, but experience accumulated by Xingqu Technology with a monthly shipment volume exceeding 100,000 units.
This rigor is also reflected in materials and NVH. Xingqu Technology is the first enterprise in the industry to mass-produce 900V magnesium alloy dual electric drives. The magnesium alloy housing reduces weight by over 30% compared to traditional aluminum alloys, and Thunder 16-in-1 is already the fourth product to mass-produce and apply this technology. At the same time, Xingqu Technology is also exploring the application space of amorphous materials to further improve motor efficiency.
In terms of NVH, Xingqu Technology treats it as a "sensory engineering" to overcome — electromagnetic harmonic optimization, gear micro-modification, housing modal analysis and structural frequency avoidance, compressing vehicle cabin noise to below 25 decibels, and also introducing AI large models to analyze massive data to improve noise performance from the source.
Quality strength is reflected in generous investment in test benches.
In 2024, Xingqu Technology commissioned the world's first 30,000 rpm motor direct drive test bench. Before this, the highest speed of global motor test benches was 25,000 rpm. Exceeding this number, the bench would be pushed into the blank area after the limit. Xingqu Technology and the bench supplier team fought for several months to solve this problem, and now this equipment has been running stably for over 10,000 hours.
At the same time, Xingqu Technology is also the fourth electric drive enterprise in China to have assembly-level (motor + controller) EMC testing capabilities, with the entire EMC lab investment exceeding 10 million.
Beyond single-item capabilities, what best reflects Xingqu Technology's emphasis on quality is its set of complete validation systems.
Xingqu Technology test center obtained CNAS national certification, able to cover 100% of electric drive test requirements. Every electric drive development process must go through temperature field tests from -60°C to 140°C, 660,000 peak torque cycles, and over 2,500 hours of comprehensive durability tests. Durability tests start at 300,000 km, reaching up to 800,000 km. To meet the global market, they also have to go through over 1,500 hours of salt spray durability tests.
Not only that, Xingqu Technology has also built an AI test data platform, precipitating 300,000 hours of historical data, using failure prediction models to identify potential risks in advance.
Xingqu Technology has finally implemented this system to the manufacturing end.
Xingqu Technology has deployed five major intelligent manufacturing bases in China, with electric drive total annual capacity of 3 million units. The production line's highest automation rate exceeds 95%, placement machine accuracy is ±25 microns, measurement equipment accuracy is 0.1 microns, which is equivalent to 1% of a cell size. The production line also sets up 106 error-proofing processes, using a 20 million pixel AI visual inspection system to identify subtle defects, with a minimum recognition accuracy of 20 microns. Every part has a digital identity upon entering the site, and process parameters, operators, and quality data are traceable throughout.
The electric drive industry, when it comes to the later stage, is not about single-point technology, but about system capability. Single-point technology can make prototypes, only system capability can ensure stable mass production. Xingqu Technology has repeatedly won industry premieres, relying precisely on this complete closed loop from technology to manufacturing.
04.
Xingqu Technology's global path: an "unconventional" choice
Where Xingqu Technology is more worth expanding is its globalization path.
Many parts companies' logic of going global is to first run scale domestically, and then push mature products to overseas markets. Xingqu Technology chose another approach: putting global R&D, global validation, global processes, and global customer coordination in advance.
Lin Xiaozhe said very directly: the electric drive industry has no option of "domestic first, then global". Different regions have huge differences in environmental conditions, and these diverse global demands will push the product to different boundaries. Whether a system can enter the global automaker supply chain depends not only on performance parameters, but also on software processes, functional safety, validation standards, manufacturing consistency, and response speed.
Lin Xiaozhe cited a European customer case. Xingqu Technology received an order from a European luxury brand customer this year. The other party put forward over 9,000 test indicators, one of which required a large SUV to reach 107% climbing ability, converted to a gradient of about 47 degrees. This has almost never appeared in China.
This indicator is harsh because ordinary family sedans usually have a climbing ability of 15 to 20 degrees, professional off-road vehicles are at 30 to 40 degrees, and vehicles that can reach 45 degrees are already rare. More difficultly, customers require the vehicle to not only climb up, but also be able to stop on a 45-degree slope and start again.
This tests not a single motor power. When the vehicle starts under near-limit slopes, the lubrication system needs to cover all conditions, high-performance motors continuously output high torque, and the motor control system must also adjust wheel-end torque distribution at microsecond level speed, making the vehicle stable, climbable, and non-slip.
This case can explain a characteristic of Xingqu Technology going global. Overseas customers do not just look at electric drive parameter tables, but use real-world scenarios and extreme conditions to test suppliers. Whether entering a European luxury brand project depends on whether motors, motor controllers, lubrication, thermal management, software control, and verification systems can pass together.
In terms of overseas layout, Xingqu Technology has established an R&D and after-sales service center in Gothenburg, Sweden, with full industry chain design, development, and manufacturing capabilities from key components to assembly system levels. Another difficulty of globalization is collaborative development. For this, Xingqu Technology has built a cloud-based collaborative development platform called "World Tree", allowing China and Europe teams to complete software, hardware, and algorithm collaborative development in the same system. This name is taken from the tree in Nordic mythology that connects nine worlds. Xingqu Technology develops according to ASPICE Level 3 processes, following ASIL D highest functional safety level.
For overseas customers, these process capabilities are often more critical than individual performance indicators. It determines whether a supplier can enter project early development, participate in vehicle definition, and bear long-term iteration responsibility.
Changes can also be seen on the customer side. Xingqu Technology has signed nearly 30 billion yuan orders with top European automakers such as UK, France, Germany, and Tier 1. 2026 export growth is expected to exceed 100%.
This shows that Xingqu Technology's global expansion output is not a single electric drive product, but a complete engineering capability from R&D, testing, manufacturing to customer coordination.
This path has barriers and also value. The domestic new energy market has pushed the electric drive to a stage of high efficiency, high integration, and high cost-performance. Overseas markets will continue to filter suppliers using regulations, roads, climate, customer processes, and reliability standards. Xingqu Technology entering the global system in advance is equivalent to putting itself in a stricter evaluation environment. In the short term, this will increase development difficulty; in the long term, it will raise the enterprise's capability ceiling.
Summary.
This launch of Thunder 16-in-1, on the surface, is a Geely electric drive new product launch, but if placed on a longer timeline, it seems more like a centralized display of Xingqu Technology's phased capabilities.
From 400V SiC, to 11-in-1 domain control electric drive, to 900V magnesium alloy coaxial dual electric drive and Thunder 16-in-1, Xingqu Technology has formed a continuous technical promotion rhythm. This behind-the-scenes cannot be separated from the support of R&D teams, test benches, intelligent manufacturing bases, global customers, and complete process systems.
In addition, those detail capabilities usually ignored are also equally important. Tooling adjusted for months for 1 mm, test benches running stably for over 10,000 hours of 30,000 rpm, verification systems behind over 9,000 tests, and also the persistence of "leaving problems in the laboratory" which sounds simple but is hard to do.
Thunder 16-in-1 is certainly the protagonist product of this launch, but what it truly points to is the capability upgrade of Xingqu Technology as an independent electric drive supplier. Electric drives are moving from behind the scenes to the spotlight, and Xingqu Technology is gradually becoming an independent brand remembered by the industry, changing from an invisible supplier supplying multiple car companies. And this launch is just the first one fully told among its many global customer cooperation cases.
When new energy vehicle competition enters the system capability stage, whether a car company can continuously launch high-efficiency, high-performance, and high-reliability products can no longer be seen just from vehicle definition, but also whether it has powerful partners behind it, handling electric drive technology platforms, manufacturing systems, and global delivery capabilities.
Xingqu Technology is exactly such a partner being chosen by more car companies simultaneously.
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家揀車嗰陣都會拿 Proton X50 同 Mazda CX-8 嚟做比較。這兩款車喺價位同定位上都好接近，今日我哋就從多個方面做一個詳細嘅對比，幫你省低做功課嘅時間。
Proton X50 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 89,800 - 113,300，一共有 4 個版本，包括 1.5T Executive（RM 89,800）、1.5T Premium（RM 101,800）、1.5T Flagship（RM 113,300） 等。
Mazda CX-8 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 165,360 - 201,360，一共有 5 個版本，包括 2025 2.5T 4WD High Plus Petrol（RM 201,360）、2025 2.2L 2WD High Plus Diesel（RM 193,123）、2025 2.5L 2WD High Plus Petrol（RM 186,360） 等。
睇返價錢，Proton X50 嘅起步價確實比 Mazda CX-8 平咗 RM 75,560。如果你預算有限，Proton 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需求。但都要留意，便宜嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備上會有取舍，具體要看你嘅需求。
Proton X50 搭載 1.5L 4-cyl，馬力 105 hp。官方油耗 6.0 L/100km。
Mazda CX-8 搭載 2.0L 4-cyl，馬力 170 hp。官方油耗 8.0 L/100km。
動力方面，Mazda CX-8 嘅 2.0L 4-cyl 比 Proton X50 嘅 1.5L 4-cyl 多咗 65 匹馬力。不過日常喺市區開，兩款車嘅動力都夠用，唔會覺得唔夠力。
Proton X50 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA)。
Mazda CX-8 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 Brand ADAS。
兩款車嘅安全評級一樣，喺呢個級別入面安全配備都算俾得好齊全。而家嘅新車安全性都唔錯，唔使太擔心這一點。
Proton X50 採用 4WD 驅動方式。
Mazda CX-8 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
Proton 嘅 4WD 同 Mazda 嘅 FWD 喺操控上會有不同感覺，建議試駕對比。
Proton X50 同 Mazda CX-8 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更睇重品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰一款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，那就揀配置更豐富嗰款。最終都係建議兩款都去試駕，親身體驗先係最緊要。
總體嚟講，Proton X50 同 Mazda CX-8 都係馬來西亞市場好唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵係要睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建议大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花點時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
7月15日，由车百会研究院主办、领充新能源支持、车百链智承办的第二届车能融合与智慧生态发展论坛在西安召开。论坛以“把握车能融合机遇 探索技术范式创新”为主题，汇聚了整车企业、能源企业、电池企业、充换电运营商、科研机构及行业相关单位代表，展开为期一天的高质量研讨。
会上，车百会研究院理事长张永伟表示，从全球来看，汽车和充换电联动出海是必然趋势，能源和汽车本质是一体的。在出海新阶段，重视整车和制造业出海的同时，也要重视充换电基础设施在海外的发展。相比整车与制造业出海，以充换电为核心的能源基础产业出海，贸易摩擦更小、黏性更强，且与主要国家减碳和气候变化战略方向一致，能带动大量装备出海，如光伏、充电换电模块、储能电池等。但充换电基础设施出海也面临不同的挑战：认证周期更长，一次性投入高，回收期较长，且需接入当地电网及复杂生态，难以一蹴而就。一旦走通，可打造更体系化的全球竞争壁垒。
上午场：政企学研齐聚，共议车能融合发展大势
论坛上午场由车百会研究院副理事长、车百智库研究院院长师建华主持。
国家能源局原副局长吴吟发表主旨报告，提出当前能源革命与汽车革命已从两条平行线走向深度同频共振。车能融合是一场跨越交通、能源、信息三大万亿级赛道的系统性变革。据《新型能源体系建设“十五五”规划》，2030年车网互动聚合可调充电规模达到5000万千瓦，标志车能融合从探索阶段进入规模化实施阶段。但车能融合规模化落地需打通标准不统一、供需时空错配、行业协同不足、用户参与意愿不强等堵点。
主题演讲环节，香港理工大学杰出讲座教授、香港大学荣誉教授、英国皇家工程院院士陈清泉提出，汽车已完成属性、动力、智能架构三重变革，双向车网互动是交通能源融合的核心抓手。伴随乘用车、商用车应用场景持续拓宽，行业需依托差异化补能、光储充一体化、V2G技术实现车路能协同共赢。
浙江大学龙泉产业创新研究院院长、俄罗斯工程院外籍院士熊树生分享冷却液储能前沿技术。他表示现有车用冷媒路线存在明显短板，依托新型间接式R290热管理系统，可通过冷却液储冷储热充分消纳夜间谷电，有效降低车辆高低温能耗、提升续航，适配车队、光储充、园区等多元场景，开辟车能融合全新增效路径。
交通运输部规划研究院环境资源所总工毛宁表示国家相关政策出台，将新能源重卡的推广提到非常重要的战略高度。为更好地推动新能源重卡规模化应用，建议完善跨部门协同机制；加大政策保障力度；加强财税资金支持；健全多行业协同的标准体系；推广光储充换一体化模式；打造全产业链闭环。
中国电力企业联合会副秘书长刘永东介绍，全国首批9城32个试点已梳理出 27 个可复制V2G应用场景，调研显示超七成车主愿意参与车网互动，但放电协议、并网及资源聚合标准仍是短板，用户核心顾虑集中在电池寿命影响上。他建议建立以煤电标杆电价为导向的放电价格体系，发挥车网互动低成本优势；同时通过保险机制、质保体系消除用户顾虑。
浩瀚能源公司CEO、极氪科技集团副总裁赵昱辉认为车网互动、全场景补能是大势所趋。新能源汽车不再只是交通工具，更是移动储能单元；充电也不再是简单的能量补给，而是能源系统的智能调度，这是车能融合的本质。车能融合需要整车、电网、设备商、城市规划多方共建生态，不是单一企业能唱完的独角戏。
奇瑞绿能常务副总经理尹航结合实践提出，车能融合的关键在于从单一补能向全球化绿色智慧能源新生态转型，车企应定位为能源生态公司而非设备商。
理想汽车智能电动产品负责人唐华寅表示，新能源充电需求不是“涨潮”，而是“海啸” 。超充网络建设应以用户长途出行停留规律（10-20分钟）为基准定义补能速度，而非单纯比拼功率参数；自动充电与L4自动驾驶融合后，充电速度的第一性地位将弱化，远程调度、无感体验成关键。
领充新能源CEO周强表示未来交通体系将从车路云三网融合升级为车路桩云四维一体；能源供给从化石能源转向绿电主导，形成源网荷储一体化；基础设施从单一交通功能升级为“交通+能源+数字”融合的新型基础设施。
瑞浦兰钧能源股份有限公司副总裁侯敏表示，新能源汽车的爆发式增长，推动了充电基础设施全面升级。但如果充电站只是从电网取电，那对电网来说仅是新增负荷，尤其是无序充电会进一步拉大峰谷差。采用“光储充”三位一体的超级充电站，能有效破解这一痛点。
中国汽研后市场事业部副总经理、中检汽车测评（深圳）有限公司总经理郑孟认为充电行业从规模建设进入高质量发展阶段，由“建得多、覆盖广”，走向“提品质、优体验、可互动”。未来V2G竞争的关键，不只是设备能力，更是用户信任的建立。
上海联联睿科能源科技有限公司总经理汤晓栋表示，V2G不仅是连接“双碳”目标的战略桥梁，更是保障能源安全与电网稳定、促进新能源消纳、支撑新型电力系统建设的关键抓手。其推广要从消除车型适配障碍、打通收益分配链路着手。
隆基绿能光建系统事业部市场营销部负责人张振涛分享光伏与交通场景融合创新实践。他表示光伏发电具有间歇性，仅靠白天供电无法满足全天候需求，必须与储能、充电、换电等环节结合，形成完整的零碳能源闭环。
论坛同期，举行了“生态协同发展倡议”启动仪式，并发布《新能源汽车充换电行业生态协同发展研究报告》，标志着行业从单打独斗走向生态共建迈出了实质性一步。
二、下午场：圆桌思辨破难题，重磅发布启新程
论坛下午场，西安高新技术产业开发区管理委员会党工委副书记、管委会主任陈辉首先发表致辞：车能融合是推动能源革命与产业变革的关键力量，也是培育新质生产力的重要赛道。西安持续推动补链、强链、延链，构建从整车制造、关键零部件到后市场服务的完整生态。
主题演讲环节，领充新能源董事长袁庆民表示当前充电行业单一收费模式难盈利，行业竞争转向技术、产品、服务、生态综合比拼。伴随交通、能源、算力三重变革交汇，领充将依托光储充、V2G、兆瓦超充、电池检测全套技术，转型综合能源科技服务商，并搭建跨产业、金融共生生态圈，配套重卡专项金融方案助力干线零碳通道建设。
车百会研究院副理事长、车百智库研究院院长师建华认为车能融合是必然趋势，到2030年会创造超过万亿级的综合经济效益。推进车能融合发展，需从制造与使用两端深化绿电应用，扩大智能有序充电覆盖，加快V2G在车、桩、网、用户侧的规模化联动；依托虚拟电厂聚合分布式资源参与电网调度，并以零碳园区为载体构建“源-网-荷-储-车”协同体系，同时推动“光储充车”综合解决方案出海拓展。
随后的圆桌对话环节，围绕“新能源汽车充电基础设施生态协同发展”主题，由清华大学碳中和研究院零碳交通研究中心主任王贺武主持。中国能源研究会首席专家贾俊国、领充新能源董事长袁庆民、货道新能源董事长迟勇、蔚来能源电力业务总经理胡伟峰、宁德时代乘用车产品总工欧阳小龙五位嘉宾展开深度对话，形成三大核心共识：
1、储充一体是化解电网容量瓶颈的重要柔性接入路径
随着800V高压平台和大功率快充逐步普及，单站用电负荷快速抬升。与会嘉宾一致认为，储充一体是化解电网容量瓶颈的重要柔性接入路径。但V2G的规模化应用必须分阶段推进：有序充电阶段已相对成熟，而真正的车网互动涉及能量流、信息流、价值流三流协同，不能依靠单一市场品种解决。当前最佳路径是通过虚拟电厂聚合商参与电力市场，最终依靠市场化交易机制实现长效可持续运营。
2、V2G商业化需平衡三方利益，构建闭环生态
面对“谁受益、谁承担风险、谁来补偿”的核心难题，与会嘉宾直言超充配储的核心矛盾在于三方利益尚未形成闭环——车端追求更快体验，电网端希望柔性接入，而充电运营商承担了超额投资却难以收回成本。储充一体不是简单的“越多越好、越快越好”，必须在投入合理与收益明确之间找到平衡。否则，即便短期有车企或资本推动，长期也难以可持续，必须形成车、网、运营商三方协同的生态闭环。
3、县域充换电设施建设具“后发优势”
与会嘉宾认为相较于城市核心区土地资源紧张、电网扩容成本高、场站布局饱和、电价偏高的现状，县域及国道、高速出入口区域土地储备充足、用电成本更低，同时配网改造空间大、规划约束少，具备天然的建站优势。依托县域独特禀赋，行业已跑出集约化、生态化、前置化的落地新模式。
论坛下午场集中了落地多项标志性产业成果，包括全新品牌“领芯科技”正式发布、重卡金融生态发布、生态签约等，打通共识到落地转化通道。
本届论坛的成功举办，为车能融合产业的高质量发展注入了新动能。下一步，行业各方将以本次论坛为起点，紧抓车能融合重大发展机遇，持续探索技术创新范式，共建开放协同、互利共生的智慧能源产业生态。
In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers compare Perodua Aruz and Kia Sportage when choosing a car. Both vehicles are quite similar in price range and positioning. Today, we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
Perodua Aruz OTR price in Malaysia is RM 72,900 - 77,900, with 2 versions including 1.5L X (RM 72,900), 1.5L AV (RM 77,900), etc.
Kia Sportage OTR price in Malaysia is RM 129,639 - 179,320, with 4 versions including 2025 1.6T DCT 4WD High (RM 179,320), 2025 1.6T DCT 2WD High (RM 159,320), 2025 2.0L AT 2WD High (RM 139,639), etc.
In terms of price, Perodua Aruz entry price is indeed RM 56,739 cheaper than Kia Sportage. If your budget is limited, Perodua's entry version is enough to meet daily needs. But note, the few thousand cheaper, may involve trade-offs in features, it depends on your requirements.
Perodua Aruz equipped with 1.5L 4-cyl, horsepower 105 hp. Official fuel consumption 6.0 L/100km.
Kia Sportage equipped with 1.5L Turbo, horsepower 140 hp. Official fuel consumption 7.0 L/100km.
In terms of power, Kia Sportage 1.5L Turbo has 35 more horsepower than Perodua Aruz 1.5L 4-cyl. However, for daily city driving, both cars have sufficient power, will not feel underpowered.
Perodua Aruz body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
Kia Sportage body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
Dimensions of both cars are almost the same, interior space difference is not significant. Cars in this class, daily use is fully sufficient.
Perodua Aruz adopts FWD drive configuration.
Kia Sportage adopts FWD drive configuration.
Drive configuration of both cars is the same, both are FWD, daily driving experience will not be significantly different.
Perodua Aruz and Kia Sportage are both mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use, daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, you can prioritize the one with better reputation; if you care more about value for money and features, then choose the one with more configurations. Ultimately it is recommended to test drive both, personal experience is the most important.
Overall, Perodua Aruz and Kia Sportage are both very good car models in the Malaysian market. Choosing which one, the key is still to see your personal needs and budget. It is recommended to do research, compare quotes from multiple dealerships, then go test drive to make final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending time on research will definitely not be wrong.
July 16, GAC Group held a special gratitude event at the Trumpchi Factory to commemorate its milestone of welcoming the 30 millionth user. On site, leaders from Guangdong Province, Guangzhou City, and Panyu District, Fu Bingfeng (Executive Vice President and Secretary-General of China Association of Automobile Manufacturers), GAC Group Chairman Feng Xingya, General Manager Ge Xianqing, and other management members, as well as representatives from the supply chain, channels, domestic and overseas car owners, employees, and media, gathered together to witness this historic moment.
From the first vehicle rolling off the production line to the delivery of the 30 millionth vehicle today, GAC has walked a full 29 years. Behind this number lies the trust of millions of users for the brand, reflecting GAC's long-standing obsession with quality and safety, and the determination to move forward decisively in the wave of electrification and intelligence. More profoundly, it is also a vivid footnote to the Chinese automobile industry evolving from large to strong, and shifting from scale expansion to value leap.
Global Connection, Intelligent New Energy Array Presents Transformation Foundation
At the event, GAC showcased GAC Honda P7, GAC Toyota bZ7, Qijing GT7, GAC Aion N60, and GAC Hyper S600 sequentially through global multi-base live connections, serving as the 29,999,995th to 29,999,999th vehicles off the line. Subsequently, the right-hand drive Trumpchi M8 PHEV officially appeared as the 30 millionth vehicle. This collective appearance of the full-line new energy vehicles intuitively presents GAC's acceleration rhythm on the electrification and intelligence tracks.
In the delivery segment, Feng Xingya personally handed the key of the 30 millionth vehicle to Thai owner Tony Jaa. This moment not only froze a number but also became an emotional footnote for GAC's "two-way rush" with global users.
This trust spanning national borders also constitutes the confidence for GAC to move forward steadily during the industry's deep adjustment period. Data shows that in the first half of this year, GAC Group's cumulative sales reached 773,100 units, a year-on-year increase of 2.35%, among which new energy vehicle sales increased by 68.8%; overseas exports broke 120,000 units, a surge of 132% year-on-year, running its own rhythm amidst changes.
Quality Establishes the Foundation, Building Confidence for Millions of Users' Travel
"Quality is the bottom line that GAC will never retreat on," Feng Xingya emphasized in his speech. In GAC's growth logic, scale expansion has never been detached from the cornerstone of quality. For years, the group has adhered to the policy of "Quality First," integrating Honda's Total Quality Management, Toyota's Lean Production Methods, and the essence of Lingnan culture, gradually forming a distinctive quality management model centered on "Integrated Innovation." The ultimate goal of all efforts points to only one thing — building cars that let users drive with peace of mind, use with ease, and ride with comfort.
From R&D to manufacturing, GAC has established a rigorous quality control system covering the entire chain: before the launch of every new car, it must undergo extreme environment verification such as extreme cold, high temperature, plateau, high humidity, high corrosion, mountainous areas, sand and dust, completing "Two Winters and One Summer" actual road tests; relying on test sites and laboratories, covering 12 major items and over 1,500 test sub-items, forming a systematic quality verification closed loop. And GAC Aion Smart Eco Factory, as the "world's first new energy vehicle lighthouse factory," ensures the stability of mass production quality through digital intelligent manufacturing systems.
In terms of core technology safety, the Xingling Security Guardian System builds four-dimensional protection dimensions, with eight key systems adopting dual redundancy design, cumulatively protecting nearly 2 million users and successfully avoiding 6.28 million potential travel risks; Prism Battery installations reached 1.5 million units, with safe driving mileage exceeding 160 billion kilometers. Service side also adds support, GAC was the first in the industry to launch the proprietary brand "Three Responsibility Guarantee" policy, actively providing bottom-line guarantees for user concerns related to batteries and intelligent driving assistance. It is these invisible safety lines of defense and visible service commitments that support the brand trust behind 30 million sales.
User First, Creating a Full-Cycle Warm Service System
"What users care about, we remember in our hearts; what users expect, we go all out for." Feng Xingya stated that the user-centric concept has long been integrated into GAC's development genes. The enterprise always follows the values of "People First, Integrity as the Way, Innovation as Priority," and the core of "People First" is being user-centric.
On one hand, GAC regularly holds "User All Microphone Open" activities, inviting users to the site for face-to-face communication, and establishes a full-process closed-loop management mechanism to ensure every suggestion is properly responded to, and common issues are optimized to all users immediately after going online. At the same time, the group has established a dedicated user insight department to promote full-chain transformation from problem discovery to solution, guaranteeing user demands are "answered for every item and implemented for every matter" at the organizational level.
On the other hand, the service network is also sinking fast. At the channel end, 1,000 county-level authorized stores are planned to be added this year; at the response end, launch "Super Butler" service, achieving 5-second response, 2-hour completion, allowing user demands to reach quick handling; at the energy replenishment end, build a "9 Vertical, 10 Horizontal" energy replenishment network, already covering 31 provinces and 213 cities in the country, realizing "1 kilometer straight line must have a station" in core urban areas, self-operated charging piles exceeding 27,000 units, of which supercharging piles exceed 20,000 units, providing efficient and convenient energy replenishment experience for new energy car owners.
The core of this gratitude event is precisely to express sincere thanks to the 30 million users for their long-term companionship. On site, Feng Xingya announced the launch of "GAC Group 30 Million Vehicles Off-Line · Renewal Gratitude Season" from today, GAC Honda, GAC Toyota, GAC Trumpchi, GAC Aion, GAC Hyper, and Qijing Motors six brands will respectively launch special policies for new purchase, replacement, additional purchase and other scenarios to reward every trust.
Technology Grounds, Letting Frontier Innovation Serve Real Travel
Starting from 30 million vehicles as a new starting point, GAC is using innovation as an engine, accelerating towards the future of electrification and intelligence, letting frontier technology truly convert into user-perceivable peace of mind and convenience.
In the power field, Star Source Power created by the "National Excellent Engineer Team" covers three technology routes: Star Source Range Extender, Star Source Plug-in Hybrid, and Star Source Super Dual Engine, which will be successively equipped on more mass production models. Each power product must pass 100,000 hours bench and whole vehicle verification, equivalent mileage over 10 million kilometers, ensuring performance remains stable and reliable in all scenarios and regions.
In terms of three-electrics, GAC continues to tackle pain points such as ultra-fast charging and low-temperature range, has built a full solid-state battery pilot production line, launched extreme energy consumption technology, mass-produced Quark Electric Drive motor highest efficiency exceeds 99%, reaching industry leading level.
In intelligent connected vehicle field, Super Brain Xingling Architecture continues to iterate, connecting intelligence driving, cockpit, power, chassis, body, vehicle networking six systems, realizing "One Brain Management", comprehensive performance increased by 40%; Star River Smart Cabin realizes end-cloud fusion, letting vehicles truly become "thinking, understanding human heart" travel partners. At the same time, GAC will join hands with Huawei, CATL, Didi, Tencent, Alibaba and other top partners to build a more powerful AI smart ecosystem.
As of now, GAC Group cumulative R&D investment exceeds 62 billion yuan, global R&D team scale exceeds 6,800 people. Continuous technical deep plowing is pushing GAC products to evolve comprehensively from commuting tools to intelligent travel partners, mobile smart spaces, and green energy ecosystems.
Facing the future, GAC will continue to take user needs as coordinates, quality as foundation, technological innovation as core driving force, and global layout as path, steadily advance towards ecological tech GAC, march shoulder to shoulder with more users, achieve each other, and jointly drive towards a smarter, greener, and broader new journey.
7 月 16 日，廣汽傳祺工廠內引擎聲與掌聲交織。當一輛右軚版廣汽傳祺 M8 PHEV 緩緩駛下生產線，聚光燈打在車身上時，廣汽集團正式宣告迎來了其發展歷程中的第 3000 萬位用戶。這一天，廣東省、廣州市及番禺區有關領導，中國汽車工業協會常務副會長兼秘書長付炳鋒，廣汽集團董事長馮興亞、總經理何先慶等核心管理層，連同全球供應商、經銷商、海內外車主及媒體代表共同在場，見證了這個被定義為“從規模擴張到價值躍升”的歷史性切片。
從 1997 年廣汽成立到首輛整車下線，再到今日突破 3000 萬量級，廣汽走了 29 年。若拆解這個時間軸：從 0 到 1000 萬輛，用了 20 年；而從 1000 萬到 3000 萬輛，僅用了 9 年。這種加速度不僅是企業自身的成長曲線，更是中國汽車工業從合資引進、自主崛起再到全球化突圍的縮影。但在鮮花與數字之外，透過這場“3000 萬用戶感恩活動”，我們更能看清一家老牌汽車集團在行業深度重塑期的堅守與轉向。
3000 萬的含金量：不是單一神話，而是矩陣合力
活動現場有一個極具象徵意義的細節：廣汽全球多座生產基地同步連線，廣汽本田 P7、廣汽豐田铂智 7、啟境 GT7、廣汽埃安 N60、廣汽昊鉑 S600 分別作為第 29999995 至第 29999999 輛車依次下線，隨後第 3000 萬輛整車——右軚版傳祺 M8 PHEV 在舞台中心亮相。全線新能源車車型集體登場，這在過往的里程碑慶典中並不常見。
這一安排透露出兩個信號：其一，廣汽的 3000 萬體量並非依賴某款“神車”或單一板塊拉動，而是合資（廣本、廣豐）、自主（傳祺、埃安、昊鉑）、新序列（啟境）以及新能源轉型多條腿並行的結果；其二，第 3000 萬輛選擇了右軚插電混合動力 MPV 並交付泰國車主東尼賈（著名影星《拳霸》主演），明確將“新能源轉型”與“全球化出海”兩股主線捆綁在一起。這不僅是給國內用戶看的，更是給全球市場傳遞信心：廣汽的產品結構已徹底越過純燃油時代的邊界。
數據支撐了這種轉向。2026 年上半年，廣汽集團累計銷量 77.31 萬輛，同比增長 2.35%；其中新能源汽車銷量達 26.02 萬輛，同比大增 68.8%，節能與新能源車佔比已提升至 62.82%；海外出口更是突破 12 萬輛，同比增長 132%，在美洲、亞太、中東、非洲及歐洲五大區域同步高增。在行業大盤承壓的背景下，新能源與出海成為廣汽穿越週期的雙引擎。
品質底線的“老派固執”：在快時代慢下來
在致辭中，馮興亞的一句話被反覆引用：“品質是廣汽永遠不會讓渡的底線。”“有些東西可以追快求新，有些東西絕不能貪多求強。”在智能化、價格戰、迭代速度被無限放大的今天，這種表態顯得有些“老派”，卻恰恰是 3000 萬銷量背後的地基。
廣汽的質量觀有其歷史淵源。作為國內最早系統引入合資經驗的車企之一，廣汽早期便吸收了本田全面質量管理（TQM）與豐田精益生產方式（TPS），再融合嶺南務實文化，構建了“融合創新”的質量管理模式。這種基因被延續到自主研發與製造環節：每款新車上市前需經歷高寒、高溫、高原、高濕、高腐、山區、沙塵等“五高一山一塵”極端環境測試，完成“兩冬一夏”實地路試；整車驗證覆蓋 12 個大項、1500 餘個子項；廣汽埃安智能生態工廠作為全球首個新能源汽車“燈塔工廠”，以數位化智能製造保障量產一致性。
在安全技術上，廣汽提出“安全必須由車企定義”。星靈安全守護體系構建四大防護維度，八大關鍵系統採用雙冗餘設計，已守護近 200 萬用戶，規避 628 萬次潛在出行風險；彈匣電池累計裝車 150 萬輛，安全行駛超 1600 億公里。針對用戶焦慮，廣汽在行業內率先推出自主品牌“三擔責”政策，對電池與智能駕駛輔助問題主動兜底。這些看不見的投入，構成了 3000 萬用戶“開得放心”的隱性成本。
從工程師思維到用戶思維：組織機制的轉身
“過去我們總站在工程師的角度打磨技術，今天我們要徹底站在用戶的角度審視體驗。”馮興亞用“感恩、堅守、誠意、共赴”四個詞總結 3000 萬時刻，其中的“誠意”直指用戶關係的重構。
這種重構不是口號。廣汽常態化舉辦“用戶全開麥”活動，把用戶請到總部面對面“挑刺”，並建立全流程閉環管理機制，確保每條建議可追溯、共性问题全量優化；組織架構上成立專屬用戶洞察部門，推進從問題發現到解決的全流程變革。服務網絡也在下沉：年內計劃新增 1000 家縣域授權門店，目前已認定 600 家；線上線下“超級管家”服務，承諾 5 秒響應、2 小時訴求辦結；補能端建成“9 縱 10 橫”網絡，覆蓋 31 省 213 城，自營充電樁超 2.7 萬根，核心城區直線 1 公里必有站。從聽得到炮火的前線到後台機制，廣汽試圖把“人為本”落到可執行的細處。
技術長坡厚雪：從代步工具到生態型科技
3000 萬是里程碑，也是新起點。在電動化與智能化賽道，廣汽拿出來的是一套系統化技術矩陣而非單點突破：
動力領域：“國家卓越工程師團隊”研發的星源動力覆蓋星源增程、星源插混、星源超級雙擎三大技術，每款產品經過 10 萬小時台架與等效超 1000 萬公里驗證；
三電領域：建成全固態電池中試產線，夸克電驅電機最高效率突破 99%，攻堅超快充與低溫續航痛點；
智能聯網：超級大腦星靈架構 4.0 打通智駕、座艙、動力、底盤、車身、車聯網六域，綜合性能提升 40%；星河智艙端雲一體，融合千問大模型，讓車從代步工具向“會思考的夥伴”進化；
開放生態：與華為、寧德時代、滴滴、騰訊、阿里等共建 AI 智能生態，累計研發投入超 620 億元，全球研發團隊超 6800 人。
這些技術投入的指向很明確：廣汽要從傳統製造企業向“生態型科技廣汽”進階，產品將從移動空間延伸至綠色能源生態。
當馮興亞將第 3000 萬輛車鑰匙交到泰國車主東尼賈手中時，鏡頭定格的不只是一個數字，而是中國製造從“賣出去”到“被信任”的跨海瞬間。3000 萬用戶是一面鏡子，照見了廣汽 29 年的堅守與轉型，也照見了下一階段的考題：在全球博弈、技術迭代與用戶需求碎片化的未來，如何用同樣的品質定力與用戶誠意，去跑好下一個 3000 萬？
答案或許就寫在當天啟動的“廣汽集團 3000 萬輛下線·煥新感恩季”裡——六大品牌同步推出新購、置換、增購回饋政策，用實利回應陪伴。但比短期回饋更長遠的答案，藏在那些極端環境測試的里程裡、在星靈架構的冗餘設計裡、在縣域門店的招牌裡，也在每一次用戶“全開麥”後被認真處理的建議裡。
3000 萬不是終點，而是廣汽與全球用戶“雙向奔赴”的下一段起跑線。
Currently, the fierce competition in the domestic new energy vehicle market is already obvious. Many brands have long used price cuts to exchange for sales volume, forcibly narrowing the competition track. In stark contrast, Avatr recently welcomed a key milestone: the 100,000th Avatr 07 vehicle successfully went off the assembly line. Significantly, this commemorative model is a right-hand drive version, sent overseas immediately after completion, showing that from the beginning, its focus was never limited to the domestic market.
Since launch, the 07 has consistently held the throne of the brand's sales champion, helping the brand's overall sales climb, successfully breaking through the 260,000 unit mark. The key to maintaining its hot sales status for a long time lies in refusing to blindly follow trends, abandoning homogeneous appearances, and relying on a unique design style to win international design awards. Whether in Southeast Asia or the Middle East markets, it has won high recognition from local people. Daily driving experience focuses on comfort and balance, whether it's city commuting or family short trips, it can perfectly fit, with no obvious shortcomings, precisely covering the diverse vehicle usage needs of ordinary families at home and abroad.
Stable delivery of 100,000 units is inseparable from the factory's digital production model. The whole online control process simplifies many manufacturing links, supporting both mass production and personalized selection of different interiors and colors. Unified quality control standards ensure the vehicle experience delivered to different countries is not far apart, which is also the basis for its mass export.
Going overseas is absolutely not a marketing strategy born of impulse, but a long-term strategic layout of the brand. Currently, its models have successfully entered markets such as Singapore, Thailand, UAE, etc., and the offline sales network has expanded to 43 countries. According to the established brand plan, it will enter the European market this year, and by 2030, it plans to achieve comprehensive coverage of over 110 countries. Unlike many models that expand overseas markets using low-price strategies, Avatr firmly focuses on the high-end smart electric vehicle track, dedicated to shaping the excellent image of domestic high-end electric cars overseas. However, the level of recognition of this positioning by the overseas high-end market still needs to be tested by subsequent long-term market practice.
Coinciding with the achievement of the 100,000 unit milestone, the Avatr 07L also started pre-sale simultaneously. The current 07 precisely focuses on urban daily commuting scenarios, while the new model, after an extended design, better fits the travel needs of multi-member families. The two cars collaborate to layout, comprehensively covering consumer groups with diverse budgets and differentiated vehicle usage demands, thereby deeply expanding the user group, effectively resolving the sales risks brought by relying on a single model alone.
Looking at the overall picture of the new energy industry, relying solely on price-cut strategies to seize the local market has already entered a predicament that is difficult to sustain. Avatr 07's advancement trajectory brings new insights to the industry: rely on products that fit daily needs and precisely connect with needs to build a solid domestic foundation, rely on a complete and mature intelligent manufacturing system to successfully open up the overseas map, and then expand the audience group comprehensively with diversified model layout. The achievement of 100,000 units is merely a milestone on the brand's journey ahead, deeply cultivating the domestic family travel field, while steadily planning the global market. This dual-track parallel strategic layout is the core support for the brand to achieve continuous advancement.
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拎 Volvo XC60 PHEV 同 Audi Q7 嚟做比較。呢兩款車喺價位同定位上都好接近，今日我哋就從多個方面做一個詳細嘅對比，幫你省咗做功課嘅時間。
Volvo XC60 PHEV 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 362,888 - 362,888，一共有 2 個版本，包括 2025 年 2.0T 89km Ultra（RM 362,888）、Volvo XC60 PHEV 有咩安全配置？（RM 296,610）等。
Audi Q7 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 462,222 - 462,222，一共有 1 個版本，包括 Standard（RM 462,222）等。
由價錢睇落去，Volvo XC60 PHEV 嘅入門價確實比 Audi Q7 平咗 RM 99,334。如果你預算有限，Volvo 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需求。但都要注意，平嗰幾千塊，可能在配備上會有取舍，具體要看你嘅需求。
Volvo XC60 PHEV 搭載 Hybrid，馬力 170 hp。官方油耗 4.5 L/100km。
Audi Q7 搭載 3.0L Turbo，馬力 350 hp。官方油耗 12.0 L/100km。
動力方面，Audi Q7 嘅 3.0L Turbo 比 Volvo XC60 PHEV 嘅 Hybrid 多咗 180 匹馬力。不過日常喺市區開，兩款車嘅動力都夠用，唔會覺得唔夠力。
Volvo XC60 PHEV 嘅安全評級係 5★ (Euro NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 Premium ADAS。
Audi Q7 嘅安全評級係 5★ (Euro NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 Premium ADAS。
兩款車嘅安全評級一樣，喺呢個級別入面安全配備都算給好齊全。而家嘅新車安全性都唔差，唔使太擔心呢一點。
Volvo XC60 PHEV 車身長 4400 mm，行李箱 400 L。
Audi Q7 車身長 4400 mm，行李箱 400 L。
兩款車嘅尺寸差唔多一樣，車內空間差別唔大。呢個級別嘅車，日常使用完全夠用。
Volvo XC60 PHEV 保修 5 年/無限里程，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Audi Q7 保修 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
總嘅嚟講，Volvo XC60 PHEV 同 Audi Q7 都係馬來西亞市場好唔錯嘅車款。揀邊一輛，關鍵都要睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
年中收官，上汽商用车五大品牌多线突破，新能源转型领跑，出口再创纪录。继1-5月取得“轻客双冠王”、增速大幅领先商用车行业后，6月，上汽商用车热销31,033辆，同比大增42%；1-6月全系热销147,592辆，同比增长24%。其中，海外6月热销14,071辆再创纪录，同比激增70%；1-6月累计出海65,183辆，同比增长33%。新能源转型纵深突破，6月及上半年新能源销量增速分别达到80%和69%，国内新能源渗透率分别高达60%和47%，引领商用车绿色转型。旗下大通、跃进、依维柯、红岩、申沃五大品牌全线发力，轻客断层领跑、皮卡出口夺冠、轻卡逆势突围、重卡客车绿色进阶，全品类、全赛道协同向上，持续夯实中国商用车领军者地位。
【上汽商用车2026年6月热销】
轻客断层领跑、再创新高，夯实“中国轻客第一品牌”地位。轻客板块在商用车企业中持续霸榜，月销和年累销连续多月蝉联国内上险、出口、总批售量三大第一。其中大通轻客以绝对优势坐稳行业头把交椅：5月拿下单月+累计“双冠王”，6月销量再创新高、热销13,902辆，同比大增62%，稳居“中国轻客第一品牌”。明星车型大拿系列上演现象级爆发：6月热销7,207辆，同比大涨218%，持续刷新销量纪录。年初上市的大拿V1（宁德天行电池50度）实现续航、补能、质保全方位升级，加量不加价的诚意进一步巩固“创富神车”口碑。大拿超级增程作为行业首款超级增程大轻客上市后，完美破解城配用户续航焦虑与运营成本痛点，快速抢占跨城物流细分市场。
【大拿V1（宁德天行电池50度）】
依维柯同步多点突破，6月推出行业首个半固态电池宜商宜家大轻客——全新聚星EV，电池安全性能超越行业标准20%，重新定义新能源轻客安全天花板；年初上市的得意8AT车型“升级不加价”，集强劲动力、超低油耗、智能操控与高性价比于一身；行业唯一三把锁真四驱越野轻客——欧霸·山海系列，在苏州GT Show和上汽商用车“越野越行”越野体验营中展现硬核实力。依维柯在城市商用车与越野改装两大赛道同步发力，以多元产品满足不同用户出行需求。此外，依维柯还陆续斩获医疗公益、城市警用、金融安保等行业大单，专用车市场认可度持续攀升。
【聚星EV】
皮卡、轻卡双线走强，全品类增长格局稳固。延续“中国高端皮卡出口第一”“5月皮卡整体出口第一”领先势能，大通皮卡6月销售7,871辆，同比大涨83%，高基数下依然保持高速增长。上半年，全新星际L、26款星际EV、26款T60三车齐发，全面覆盖商用创富、专业作业、越野出行多元需求，同步迎来第40万辆皮卡荣耀下线的里程碑时刻；行业首创的“7天免费试用”政策与“星际计划”助农行动同步推进，产品价值与品牌口碑双向提升。
【全新星际L】
跃进轻卡黑马突围，6月热销5,258辆，同比增长54%；1-6月销售23,864辆、同比增长48%，在行业存量竞争中逆势冲高，其中新能源车热销12,971辆，同比增长65%，电动化转型提速增效。大拿T3斩获行业年度小卡销量TOP奖，市场实绩与行业口碑双向加冕。福星S90荣耀版、大拿T2换电版-81°、大拿T3-71°长续航纯电小卡三款新品集中上市，全面覆盖多元补能模式与运营场景。
【大拿T3】
重卡与客车赛道绿色进阶，新动力保持双位数增长。上汽红岩转型后再起航，依托“可电可氢可混动”岩链技术架构，第三代新能源重卡上市即斩获2,700辆订单，新能源渣土车批量交付基建一线，以零碳运力护航产业升级。早已完成全面绿色转型的申沃客车，纯电城市客车批量服务核心城市公交网络，海外布局同步提速。零部件板块新动力科技1-6月发动机累计销量破11万台，连续6个月保持二位数增长，全球市场配套竞争力稳步提升。
【申沃绿色公交】
【上汽商用车6月销量全线突破】
海外销量大幅增长，核心市场领跑，标杆订单加速落地。6月海外热销14,071辆再创纪录，同比激增70%；1-6月累计销售65,183辆，同比增长33%，增长质量持续提升。成熟市场龙头地位持续巩固，新加坡市场6月继续保持轻型商用车市占率第一，已连续三个月蝉联榜首；中国香港市场MIFA 7（国内大家7）稳居中型MPV市场市占率第一，乘用与商用双线领跑。新兴市场增长势能强劲，菲律宾市场G50 PHEV于4月首发，上市仅两个月累计订单已超1,000台；泰国市场MIFA 7上半年累计销量近400台，同比增长近300%；还携手越南企业开拓东南亚电动轻卡赛道。
【MIFA 7在香港市场】
大客户标杆订单频频斩获：6月吉隆坡国际车展上，上汽大通斩获马来西亚300台eDeliver 5（国内大拿V1）新能源轻客订单，创下当地史上最大新能源轻客单笔订单纪录；DHL集团累计批量采购2500台纯电轻客，大通成为首个进驻DHL德国邮政投递车队的中国汽车品牌，全球头部客户认可度持续攀升。皮卡板块再获批量订单，委内瑞拉市场6月收获100台T60批量订单，智利市场140台T60矿区客户订单将于6月底交付，高端皮卡出口优势持续夯实。目前上汽商用车产品畅销全球100多个国家和地区，轻客、高端皮卡出口量稳居中国品牌前列，形成多个万辆级核心市场，“中国智造”的全球影响力持续提升。
【T60在海外】
从单月稳步增长到上半年圆满收官，从新能源深度转型到全球化纵深拓展，上汽商用车以新能源转型和全球化布局为抓手，五大品牌全线发力，持续巩固商用车行业领军地位。下半年，上汽商用车将继续锚定全球商用车领先品牌愿景，深化技术迭代、完善全球布局、升级生态服务，以更强的产品力与品牌力，推动中国商用车产业向全球价值链高端攀升。
版权声明：此文源自厂家供稿 ，如需转载请尊重版权并保留出处。内容若存有质量疑问请立即与本网联系，《商用车之家/汽车立体声》将尽快处理并予以回应。
喺馬來西亞嘅汽車市場，好多客喺揀車嗰陣都會拿 Volvo XC60 PHEV 同 Porsche Macan 做比較。今日我哋由多個方面做個詳細嘅比較，幫你省咗做功課嘅時間。
Volvo XC60 PHEV 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 362,888 - 362,888，總共有 2 個版本，包括 2025 2.0T 89km Ultra（RM 362,888）、Volvo XC60 PHEV 有咩安全配備？（RM 296,610） 等。
Porsche Macan 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 469,000 - 469,000，總共有 4 個版本，包括 2025 55 quattro S line（RM 467,285）、2025 50 quattro Advanced（RM 361,135）、PMT 1874, Lorong IKS BukitTengah 14000 Bukit Mertajam（RM 296,610） 等。
睇番價錢，Volvo XC60 PHEV 嘅起步價確實比 Porsche Macan 平咗 RM 106,112。如果你預算有限，Volvo 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需求。但要留意，便宜嘅那幾千蚊，可能喺配備上有取舍，具體睇你嘅需求。
Volvo XC60 PHEV 嘅安全評級係 5★ (Euro NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 Premium ADAS。
Porsche Macan 嘅安全評級係 5★ (Euro NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 InnoDrive。
兩款車嘅安全評級一樣，喺呢個級數入面安全配備都算給得好齊全。而家嘅新車安全性都不差，唔使太擔心呢一點。
Volvo XC60 PHEV 保養保修 5 年/無限里程，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Porsche Macan 保養保修 3 年/100,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Volvo XC60 PHEV 同 Porsche Macan 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭用途、日常上落。如果你更睇重品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，那就揀配備更豐富嗰款。最後都係建議兩款都去試駕，親身體驗先係最重要嘅。
總括嚟講，Volvo XC60 PHEV 同 Porsche Macan 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵都係睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
車型概覽
Zeekr 009 值唔值得睇，第一步唔係望牌子或者外形，而係睇佢能唔能夠配合你嘅香港日常。 呢篇會集中講整體購車判斷，幫你用買家角度篩走唔適合嘅選擇。 近期市場討論到「Zeekr展台應該係今次最多人睇嘅展台【2026香港車博會】」，代表呢類車型仍然有一定關注度。
零售價 HK$ 455,581 - 499,767、完稅價 HK$ 832,500 - 9,275,000 令預算位置更清楚，買家可以先估算月供、保險、泊車同日常開支。
購車價格指南
Zeekr 009 嘅購車預算可以先由 零售價 HK$ 455,581 - 499,767、完稅價 HK$ 832,500 - 9,275,000 開始計。香港買車唔只係睇車價，月供、保險、牌費、泊車同能源成本都會影響每月壓力。
如果有幾個版本可揀，可以先將 2025 604km 兩驅奢華中通道版 7座（HK$ 832,500）、2025 582km 四驅高級中通道版 7座（HK$ 9,275,000）、2025 582km 四驅鉑金行政版 6座（HK$ 9,275,000）、2026 光輝版（價格待確認） 放喺同一張清單。日常通勤重視舒適同易用，家庭買家就要優先睇後排、尾箱同安全配置。
核心規格重點
睇 Zeekr 009 嘅規格，重點唔係背數字，而係理解佢喺香港用車場景會帶嚟咩分別。
116 kWh 嘅電池容量，真正意義係可以幫你估算一星期通勤同周末出車要唔要中途補電。 740/702 km 嘅續航參考，對住喺新界、九龍同港島之間跨區行車嘅用家會更實際。 250/450 kW、373/693 N·m 嘅輸出，令高速併線同短距離超車更有信心。 車長 5209 mm、車闊 2024 mm、車高 1812 mm、軸距 3205 mm 可以幫你預判商場停車場、屋苑車位同後排腿部空間。
優缺點分析
Zeekr 009 嘅優點唔需要講到天花龍鳳，真正有價值係佢能唔能夠令日常用車更省心：預算位置清楚，方便同同級車直接比較、電池同續航資訊有助安排通勤同補電、動力輸出對高速同上斜更有底氣。
要留意嘅係，要先確認屋苑、公司或常去商場嘅充電條件、香港停車場同窄路使用要留意車身闊度。呢啲唔一定係缺點，但係落訂前應該先諗清楚。
買家常見問題
買 Zeekr 009 之前，真正要問嘅唔係單一規格，而係佢可唔可以融入你每日嘅生活節奏。
常見疑問係「極氪 009 適唔適合香港頂級商務與貴賓接待？」簡單講，極氪 009 奢華旗艦級配置、行車極致靜謐，專為香港頂級商務接待打造。 放到實際用車，就係要睇佢對通勤、泊車、家庭乘坐同長期成本有幾大幫助。
同級對比內容
將 Zeekr 009 放入同級車清單時，唔建議只用外形或者品牌光環決定。比較順序可以係：先用 零售價 HK$ 455,581 - 499,767、完稅價 HK$ 832,500 - 9,275,000 鎖定預算圈、再睇動力係咪足夠應付高速併線同滿載、再比較能源成本同補能便利、最後睇車身大小、座位同尾箱是否適合家人。
咁樣篩選會貼近香港買家真實生活：平日塞車、商場泊車、周末去新界、甚至一家人出入，先係一部車每日要面對嘅考驗。
用車全周期指南
擁有 Zeekr 009 最重要係先諗清楚充電節奏。屋苑、公司或者常去商場只要有穩定充電選項，電動化用車就會容易相處好多。
如果你主要喺市區行，視野、低速順滑度同泊車輔助會好影響心情；如果經常行高速或跨區，座椅舒適度、隔音同動力從容感會更重要。
港交所網站掛出一咗一份熟悉嘅招股書。
5 月 28 日，繼去年 10 月首次遞表失效後，智能駕駛解決方案提供商蘇州天瞳威視電子科技股份有限公司（天瞳威視）再次向港股主板發起重衝，由匯豐及華泰國際聯席保薦。
喺智能駕駛賽道從「講故事」轉向「拼量產」嘅 2026 年，天瞳威視嘅二次遞表唔單止係一次資本試探，更係一場關於中國智駕供應商生存現狀嘅集中檢閱。
呢間被認為係「算力效率派」代表嘅公司，一邊連住從采埃孚到上汽、北汽嘅豪華產業資本陣營，一邊卻面臨住現金流緊繃、海外明顯回落嘅現實困境。喺呢場 IPO 嘅博弈中，光鮮同陣痛並存。
01
邊個係「天瞳威視」？
天瞳威視嘅創辦人王曦係一位典型嘅「回國」技術派。佢畢業於北京航空航天大學，後喺英國雷丁大學攻讀計算機科學博士學位。
喺決定創業之前，王曦曾經喺汽車零部件供應商天合汽車（TRW）及采埃孚擔任算法工程師同技術負責人，深度參與咗早期 ADAS 系統嘅開發。
2016 年，王曦捕捉到國內汽車智能化嘅風口，回國喺蘇州創立咗天瞳威視，定位係「以軟件算法驅動智能駕駛」嘅本土解決方案提供商。
公司嘅名字「天瞳」寓意「天之眼」，意在打造車輛感知萬物嘅視覺中樞。佢從最初嘅視覺感知算法起步，逐步擴展至行泊一體域控制器、L4 級自動駕駛系統等軟硬件結合嘅整體方案。
天瞳威視融資情況。資料來源：企查查
成立後不久，天瞳威視就獲得德聯資本、盛世投資嘅天使輪融資。此後十年時間，天瞳威視累計完成咗超過 10 輪融資，融資總額近 10 億元。
從招股書披露嘅股權結構嚟睇，天瞳威視構建咗深度綁定嘅「產業 + 資本」生態圈。
一方面，產業夥伴站台，全球汽車零部件巨頭采埃孚唔單止係其 C 輪領投方，亦係其戰略合作夥伴，持有天瞳威視 6.93% 嘅股份，位列第四大股東；國內方面，上汽集團通過上汽北美產投持股，北汽集團通過北汽產投佈局其中，地平線同商湯科技亦係戰略投資者。
另一方面，地方國資護航，唐山機器人基金、吳中金控等國資背景基金喺 D 輪及 D+ 輪入場，提供咗約 5.23 億元嘅資金支持。
截至最後實際可行日期股權架構
截至目前，王曦透過直接持股同員工持股平台合共控制公司約 40.84% 嘅權益，依然保持住對公司嘅控制權。
02
「兩條腿」行路
天瞳威視喺業務佈局上採取咗「雙軌並行」嘅策略。
喺 L2-L2+ 級輔助駕駛領域，天瞳威視嘅選擇非常務實。佢並冇盲目追逐算力堆疊嘅「軍備競賽」，而係走咗一條高性價比路線。
作為典型嘅視覺派智駕供應商，佢喺 L2 量產方案上以視覺感知為主，融合毫米波雷達同超聲波雷達，能夠喺較低算力平台上實現高級功能。例如，基於地平線 J6B 芯片（約 20TOPS）嘅方案即可支持行泊一體、高速 NOA。
呢種打法擊中咗 10 萬 -20 萬級主流車款對成本敏感嘅痛點。根據灼識諮詢嘅數據，按 2024 年裝機量計，天瞳威視係中國第二大同時提供行車同泊車解決方案嘅以軟件為核心嘅 L2-L2+ 級方案提供商，市場份額為 14.3%。
2024 年中國具備行泊一體能力嘅以軟件為核心供應商格局
截至最後實際可行日期，天瞳威視獲得 23 個汽車品牌嘅 198 款車款嘅 L2-L2+ 級解決方案定點函，並實現 6 個汽車品牌嘅 105 款車款嘅量產；獲得定點函嘅 198 款車款中有 87 款覆蓋海外市場，其中 59 款已實現量產。
但值得注意嘅係，L2-L2+ 市場正在經歷劇烈嘅「紅海化」。
一方面，經緯恆潤、福瑞泰克等本土 Tier1 正在加速追趕；另一方面，部分頭部車廠開始將低階智駕方案從外購轉為內部集成。
天瞳威視能否維持佢喺「性價比方案」領域嘅領先地位，取決於佢能否持續保持算法對低算力平台嘅優化能力，而這需要喺研發投入上持續加碼。
喺高級 L4 級自動駕駛領域，天瞳威視更多扮演「先鋒」角色。這亦係佢近兩年增長最快嘅板塊。
早在 2019 年，佢就參與咗上海洋山港嘅 5G 智能重卡項目。目前佢嘅 L4 方案覆蓋 Robobus、Robotaxi 同 Robotruck。其中，Robobus 係佢最具代表性嘅產品線，已喺蘇州、天津等城市嘅公開道路投入常態化試營運。
2025 年，天瞳威視從 L4 級解決方案產生收入 3.75 億元，佔公司總收入嘅 68% 以上，大部分收入來自 L4 級軟件解決方案。
然而，硬幣嘅另一面係商業化嘅曲折。雖然 L4 業務營收暴增，但佢嘅交付形態目前以「軟硬件一體解決方案」為主，呢種模式本質上接近「項目制交付」或「小規模車隊部署」，與 L2 業務中「純軟件授權 + 白盒交付」嘅高毛利、大規模複製邏輯存在顯著差異。
呢就直接導致 L4 業務毛利率嘅大幅波動：喺部分自研硬件佔比较高嘅項目中，毛利率一度低至 15%。
截至遞表日，公司雖手握超 10 億元嘅 L4 意向訂單，涵蓋 2500 架車，但呢啲訂單預計要喺未來三至五年內先會陸續交付，短期內對現金流嘅改善作用有限。
此外，天瞳威視仲有部分應收來自工程服務，主要涉及道路測試、數據收集支援及數據標註服務以及公司嘅專有工具鏈。
03
財務嘅雙面鏡
招股書嘅財務部分，展現咗智駕行業最真實嘅「B 面」：規模同虧損嘅極限拉扯，同埋賬面現金同營運消耗之間嘅緊張博弈。
營收高增長，但結構劇烈波動。
財務數據顯示，公司嘅營收呈現爆發式增長，從 2022 年嘅 1.72 億元增長至 2024 年嘅 4.83 億元，複合年增長率高達 67.7%。2025 年全年營收進一步增長至 5.5 億元。
但收入結構嘅變化明顯。2023 年，公司依賴 L2-L2+ 業務，佔比 90.2%；去到 2024 年，L4 業務佔比升至 50.2%；2025 年，L4 業務佔比進一步拉高至 68%。呢種「斷崖式」嘅結構切換，雖然證明佢 L4 技術搵到咗落地場景，但亦令市場質疑佢 L2 業務係咪已觸及天花板。
毛利率同純利潤嘅背離，呢係天瞳威視面臨嘅最大挑戰。
從毛利睇，整體毛利率喺 30% 左右徘徊，喺呢個技術密集型嘅智駕行業屬於中等水平。但細拆睇嚟，L2-L2+ 業務嘅毛利率通常能維持喺 40% 以上，純軟件授權模式，而 L4 業務嘅毛利率則因「軟硬件一體」交付中硬件佔比提高而被顯著拉低。
從純利潤睇，雖然表面虧損額較大，2024 年虧損 4.63 億、2025 年虧損約 2 億，呢度包含大量因優先股公平值變動帶來嘅「紙面虧損」。剔除呢個因素後嘅經調整純利潤更能反映公司嘅真實經營狀況：2024 年已收窄至 -438 萬元，但 2025 年並未如市場預期實現轉正，而係錄得約 -1086 萬元，虧損較 2024 年有所擴大。
呢個背後有一個不可回避嘅關鍵前提：調整後嘅「減虧」乃至「接近盈虧平衡」，係喺公司持續壓縮研發投入嘅基礎上實現嘅，研發費用從 2024 年嘅 1.17 億元降至 2025 年嘅 9231 萬元，研發費用率從 2024 年嘅 24.3% 進一步降至 16.8%，而 2022 年呢個數字曾高達 108.7%。對於一家科技公司嚟講，研發強度嘅「退坡」是否會影響未來嘅技術護城河，係一個潛在風險點。
現金流持續告急，最令人擔憂嘅信號。
根據最新招股書，截至 2025 年 12 月 31 日，公司賬上嘅現金及現金等价物為 2.35 億元，較 2025 年 6 月 30 日嘅 3.74 億元淨減少 1.39 億元，現金消耗速度較快。
更值得警惕嘅係經營現金流由正轉負且缺口持續擴大嘅趨勢。2023 年，公司經營活動現金流淨額為正向流入 1.15 億元，但 2024 年迅速轉為淨流出 1.89 億元，2025 年進一步惡化至淨流出 2.93 億元。
與此同時，應收賬款周轉急劇惡化。公司嘅貿易應收款項從 2023 年嘅 0.89 億元升至 2025 年嘅 5.48 億元，三年增長超過五倍，而同期營收增幅僅約 2.7 倍。
更令人擔憂嘅係應收款項周轉天數從 2023 年嘅 191 天同 2024 年嘅 166 天，到 2025 年驟升至 300 天，意味著公司從完成交付到收回款項平均需要接近一年時間。呢相當於變相為客戶提供長期無息墊資，喺資金本就緊張嘅情況下進一步加劇咗流動性壓力。
此外，雖然天瞳威視係首家出海嘅中國智駕軟件供應商，但 2025 年佢嘅海外業務遭遇咗明顯回落。2023 年天瞳威視海外收入為 1.27 億元，佔總營收比重達到 62.2%；到 2025 年海外收入降至 1100 萬元，佔比僅 2.0%。
喺而家全球地緣政治複雜、部分國家對智能汽車數據監管趨嚴嘅背景下，為佢嘅全球化故事增添咗一絲不確定性。
04
結語
天瞳威視嘅二次闖關，係智能駕駛行業進入「淘汰賽」階段嘅一個縮影。
從好嘅方面睇，佢踩準咗 L2 性價比同 L4 場景化落地嘅雙重節奏，且經調整純利潤喺特定口徑下已接近盈虧平衡，呢啲都畀投資者提供咗「有亮點可講」嘅故事線。
但從風險嘅角度睇，情況遠比首次遞表時更為嚴峻。業務重心嘅急速漂移、L4 業務商業化初期嘅盈利磨難、研發投入嘅被動收縮，呢啲此前就已存在嘅問題並未緩解。
天瞳威視 L4 級智能巴士
而真正令此次 IPO 帶「求生」色彩嘅，係現金流數據嘅實質性惡化：2.35 億元嘅賬面現金，面對每年近 3 億元嘅经营性現金淨流出，安全邊際已不足一年。疊加 300 天嘅應收賬款周轉天數，意味著公司每交付一筆訂單，都要墊付近一年嘅資金成本。
換言之，天瞳威視正處喺一個危險嘅財務窗口期：賬上嘅錢僅夠維持唔足一年嘅正常運作，而 L4 業務嘅大規模交付同回款卻需要更長時間。喺呢個智駕資本熱潮退去、一級市場融資邊際收緊嘅時刻，公司已冇太多等待嘅餘地。
首次遞表失效後僅隔半年便再次衝擊港股，對天瞳威視而言，與其話係戰略選擇，唔如話係現金倒逼下嘅必然之舉。
