首頁BYD Atto 3
搜尋歷史
熱門搜尋
經銷商登入 / 註冊
喺馬來西亞嘅轎車市場，好多買家喺揀車嗰陣都會攞 BMW M4 同 Porsche 718 嚟做比較。呢兩款車喺價位同定位上都幾啱啱夾，今日我哋就從多個方面做一個詳細嘅比較，幫你節省咗做功課嘅時間。
BMW M4 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 887,800 - 887,800，合共 1 個版本，包括 Standard（RM 887,800） 等等。
Porsche 718 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 545,000 - 1,700,000，合共 6 個版本，包括 2025 AMG G 63（RM 1,948,888）、2025 Cayman 2.0T（RM 585,000）、2025 Boxster 2.0T（RM 545,000） 等等。
從價錢嚟睇，Porsche 718 嘅起價比 BMW M4 平咗 RM 342,800。坦白講，喺呢個價位段，幾千蚊嘅差距其實唔算大，關鍵仲係睇整體嘅性價比同長期使用成本。
BMW M4 嘅安全評級係 5★ (Euro NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 Premium ADAS。
Porsche 718 嘅安全評級係 TBD，主動安全系統包括 Basic。
安全配備方面，兩款車都拿到唔錯嘅評級。不過 BMW M4 嘅 Premium ADAS 同 Porsche 718 嘅 Basic 喺功能上有啲差異，如果你比較重視主動安全嘅話，可以仔細對比一下兩者嘅功能列表。
BMW M4 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
Porsche 718 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
兩款車嘅驅動方式一樣，都係 FWD，日常駕駛感受唔會有太大分別。
BMW M4 保養 5 年/無限里程，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Porsche 718 保養 3 年/100,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
BMW M4 同 Porsche 718 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更重視品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，就揀配備更豐富嗰款。最終仲係建議兩款都去試駕，親自體驗先係最重要嘅。
總體嚟講，BMW M4 同 Porsche 718 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊輛，關鍵仲係睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花點時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
喺馬來西亞嘅汽車市場，好多買家喺揀車嗰陣都會拿 Perodua Aruz 同 馬自達 CX-3 做比較。今日我哋由多個方面做一次詳細嘅對比，幫你省返做功課嘅時間。
Perodua Aruz 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 72,900 - 77,900，一共有 2 個版本，包括 1.5L X（RM 72,900）、1.5L AV（RM 77,900）等。
馬自達 CX-3 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 126,159 - 139,159，一共有 2 個版本，包括 2023 2.0L High（RM 139,159）、2023 2.0L Plus（RM 126,159）等。
由價錢睇落，Perodua Aruz 嘅起步價確實比 馬自達 CX-3 平咗 RM 53,259。如果你預算有限，Perodua 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需要。但都要留意，平嗰幾千蚊，可能在配備上面會有取舍，具體就要睇你嘅需要。
Perodua Aruz 配備 1.5L 4-cyl，馬力 105 hp。官方油耗 6.0 L/100 公里。
馬自達 CX-3 配備 1.5L Turbo，馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100 公里。
動力方面，馬自達 CX-3 嘅 1.5L Turbo 比 Perodua Aruz 嘅 1.5L 4-cyl 多咗 35 匹馬力。不過日常喺市區開嘅話，兩架車嘅動力都夠用，唔會覺得唔夠力。
Perodua Aruz 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 。
馬自達 CX-3 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 i-Activsense。
兩架車嘅安全評級一樣，喺呢個級別入面安全配備都算給得好齊全。依家嘅新車安全性都唔差，唔使太擔心呢一點。
Perodua Aruz 保養保修 5 年/150,000 公里，保養間隔 每 10,000 公里或 6 個月。
馬自達 CX-3 保養保修 5 年/150,000 公里，保養間隔 每 10,000 公里或 6 個月。
兩架車嘅保養條件一樣，呢方面唔使糾結。實際保養成本仲要睇品牌嘅服務網絡同零件價格，建議去車友群問下真實車主嘅經驗。
總體嚟講，Perodua Aruz 同 馬自達 CX-3 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一架，關鍵都要睇你嘅個人需要同預算。建議大家做足功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，先至去試駕先做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
喺馬來西亞嘅汽車市場，好多買家喺揀車嗰陣都會拎本田 WR-V 同奇瑞 Tiggo 9 嚟做比較。今日我哋由多個方面做一詳細比較，幫你節省做功課嘅時間。
本田 WR-V 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 89,900 - 107,900，一共有 4 個版本，包括 2023 1.5L V（RM 99,900）、2023 1.5L E（RM 95,900）、2023 1.5L S（RM 89,900）等。
奇瑞 Tiggo 9 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 166,800 - 179,800，一共有 1 個版本，包括 2026 2.0T Standard（RM 179,750）等。
從價錢嚟睇，本田 WR-V 嘅起步價確實比奇瑞 Tiggo 9 平咗 RM 76,900。如果你預算有限，本田嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需要。但都要注意，平嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備上有取捨，具體要睇你嘅需要。
本田 WR-V 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
奇瑞 Tiggo 9 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
兩款車嘅驅動方式一樣，都係 FWD，日常駕駛感受唔會有太大分別。
本田 WR-V 保修 5 年/里程無限制，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
奇瑞 Tiggo 9 保修 3 年/100,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
本田 WR-V 同奇瑞 Tiggo 9 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭用途、日常通勤。如果你更重視品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰款；如果你更重視性價比同配備，就揀配備更豐富嗰款。最終都係建議兩款都去試駕，親身體驗先係最緊要嘅。
總體嚟講，本田 WR-V 同奇瑞 Tiggo 9 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊輛，關鍵都要睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去做試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕唔會錯。
喺馬來西亞嘅汽車市場，好多買家在揀車嘅時候都會揀 Honda HR-V 同 Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV 黎做比較。今日我哋由多個方面做一個詳細嘅比較，幫你省返做功課嘅時間。
Honda HR-V 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 115,900 - 143,900，總共有 4 個版本，包括 2026 e:HEV 1.5L RS（RM 143,900）、2026 1.5T V（RM 137,900）、2026 1.5T E（RM 130,900） 等等。
Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 159,750 - 159,750，總共有 2 個版本，包括 1.6L Turbo Standard（RM 130,000）、1.6L Turbo Premium（RM 145,000） 等等。
由價錢睇落，Honda HR-V 嘅起步價的確比 Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV 平咗 RM 43,850。如果你預算有限，Honda 嘅入門版已經可以满足日常需要。但都要留意，平嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備方面有取捨，具體就要睇你嘅需要。
Honda HR-V 搭載 1.5L Turbo，馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。
Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV 搭載 Hybrid，馬力 170 hp。官方油耗 4.5 L/100km。
動力方面，Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV 嘅 Hybrid 比 Honda HR-V 嘅 1.5L Turbo 多咗 30 匹馬力。不過日常喺市區開嘅話，兩款車嘅動力都夠用，唔會覺得唔夠力。
Honda HR-V 保養保修 5 年/無限制里程，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV 保養保修 3 年/100,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Honda HR-V 同 Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更看重品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰一款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，就揀配置更豐富嗰款。最終始終都建議兩款都去試駕，親身體驗先至係最重要。
總括嚟講，Honda HR-V 同 Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一部，關鍵都要睇你嘅個人需要同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
喺馬來西亞嘅汽車市場，好多買家喺揾車嘅時候都會拿 富豪 XC90 PHEV 同 路虎 Defender 嚟做比較。今日我哋由多個方面做一個詳細嘅比較，幫你省返做功課嘅時間。
富豪 XC90 PHEV 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 434,888 - 434,888，一共有 2 個版本，包括 2025 2.0T 77km Ultra（RM 434,888）、Volvo XC90 PHEV 有咩安全配備？（RM 362,888）等。
路虎 Defender 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 688,000 - 688,000，一共有 1 個版本，包括 Standard（RM 688,000）等。
從價錢嚟睇，富豪 XC90 PHEV 嘅起價確實比 路虎 Defender 平咗 RM 253,112。如果你預算有限，富豪嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需要。不過都要注意，平嗰幾千蚊，可能在配備上會有取舍，具體要看你嘅需要。
富豪 XC90 PHEV 嘅安全評級係 5★ (Euro NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 Premium ADAS。
路虎 Defender 嘅安全評級係 TBD，主動安全系統包括 Basic。
安全配備方面，兩款車都拿到唔錯嘅評級。不過 富豪 XC90 PHEV 嘅 Premium ADAS 同 路虎 Defender 嘅 Basic 喺功能上少少有分別，如果你比較重視主動安全嘅話，可以仔細比較下兩者嘅功能列表。
富豪 XC90 PHEV 車身長 4400 mm，後備箱 400 L。
路虎 Defender 車身長 4400 mm，後備箱 400 L。
兩款車嘅尺寸幾乎一樣，車廂空間差別唔大。呢個級別嘅車，日常使用完全夠用。
富豪 XC90 PHEV 同 路虎 Defender 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更看重品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰一款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，那就揀配置更豐富嗰款。最終都係建議兩款都去試駕，親身體驗先係最重要嘅。
總體嚟講，富豪 XC90 PHEV 同 路虎 Defender 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵仲係要睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建议大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係一件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
Sodium-ion battery energy storage is transitioning from demonstration and verification to the fast lane of scaled application.
In the past, sodium-ion batteries were viewed as "spare tires" or "supplements", but at the June Ministry of Industry and Information Technology (MIIT) "Sodium-ion Battery Energy Storage Industry Technology and Application Survey Exchange Activity" meeting, representatives from all links of the industry chain, from material innovation to system integration and further to downstream applications, gave completely different judgments.
Synchronized maturity at the material, manufacturing, system, and application ends.
The era of sodium batteries has truly arrived.
The most solid advantage of sodium-ion batteries is not technology, but the geopolitical immunity of resource endowments.
Lithium resources are extremely unevenly distributed globally, and China's dependence on external lithium raw materials has long exceeded 60%. Cobalt and nickel resources are also highly concentrated in countries such as the Democratic Republic of Congo and Indonesia.
This concentration of resources exposes the lithium battery industry chain to continuous geopolitical risks and price volatility risks.
Sodium resources are completely different, with a crustal abundance of about 2.3%, over 1,000 times that of lithium; reserves in seawater and salt lakes are almost infinite; China is the world's largest producer of crude salt, with crude salt production exceeding 100 million tons in 2025.
This means the raw material supply for sodium battery cathode materials is completely free from international resource political constraints.
Breakthrough at the Material End
Recreating the LFP Miracle
Whether sodium-ion batteries can be applied on a large scale depends on materials and costs.
"Sodium-ion batteries are recreating the Lithium Iron Phosphate path of 2020." Wang Zunzhi, General Manager of the Sodium Battery Division of Ronbay Technology, judged.
He provided specific data support:
Currently, the pressed density of sodium battery cathode sheets has increased to 2.5g/cm³, the cycle life of composite sodium ferrous phosphate (NFPP) exceeds 15,000 times, and production stability is constantly being verified.
As the leader in cathode materials, Ronbay Technology is vigorously promoting the polyanion route centered on NFPP.
Wang Zunzhi revealed that the company, through its pioneering adaptation of sodium battery processes and equipment, innovatively reduced the processing cost of polyanion sodium battery materials by 30%-50%, which is undoubtedly a key move to accelerate sodium battery mass production.
In terms of capacity layout, Ronbay has landed 6,000 tons of polyanion cathode material capacity in Xiantao, Hubei, which will expand to 28,000 tons in 2026. By 2027, it plans to build a 300,000-ton sodium battery production line according to market demand.
There is also good news for anode materials.
The cost reduction rate of hard carbon anodes has exceeded market expectations, and is expected to drop from 60,000 to 70,000 Yuan per ton in 2024 to 35,000 to 40,000 Yuan in 2026, with a long-term goal aimed below 25,000 Yuan/ton.
Wei Dong, General Manager of the Marketing Center of Wanhua Chemical Battery Industry Company, stated that opening up two engineering hard carbon technology routes based on coal and resin fundamentally solves the supply limitations and performance fluctuations caused by early reliance on natural biomass raw materials.
The coal-based route has prominent cost advantages, suitable for price-sensitive scenarios, while the resin-based route performs better in product consistency and comprehensive performance.
Specifically, the NFPP (composite sodium ferrous phosphate) route promoted by Ronbay Technology has sodium phosphate and ferrous sulfate as its core raw materials, which are bulk chemical products with extremely mature supply chains.
The coal/resin-based hard carbon route opened by Wanhua Chemical, the raw materials come from coal chemical by-products and petrochemical products, both of which have sufficient domestic supply in China.
Cathode cost halved, anode cost halved, the cost reduction curve at the material end is clear.
Sodium-ion Battery
Has Welcomed Full Productization
The maturity of the material end has provided battery and system integrators with the possibility of stepping onto the stage.
Lin Jiubiao, CTO of CATL's domestic energy storage solutions, stated: "Sodium-ion batteries have ushered in the era of full productization."
CATL has made rapid progress in sodium-ion batteries.
Sodium-ion battery characteristics reconstruct electrochemical models, tackling mass production difficulties such as hard carbon electrode moisture control and gas production, and the products have wide temperature ranges and 15,000 times ultra-long cycle life.
Lin Jiubiao introduced that CATL adopts a "One Shell, Two Cores" platform solution, maintaining the same dimensions as lithium battery systems and achieving convenient switching.
A complete energy storage unit composed of a 3MWh DC cabin and a 3MW step-up converter integrated machine has been launched, with a system lifespan of 20 years.
Lin Jiubiao also revealed the mass production and delivery schedule.
CATL is promoting cost reduction in two aspects: product design and manufacturing production, and a dedicated sodium-ion battery production line has been built and put into production. At the same time, since sodium battery materials do not contain lithium, cobalt, or nickel, it does not need to bear the premium of these strategic metals.
In September this year, the company will deliver the first batch of sodium-ion battery energy storage systems to customers, achieving GWh-level shipments for the full year. This marks that sodium battery energy storage has truly entered the commercial delivery stage.
GWh-level shipments mean that sodium-ion battery energy storage is no longer megawatt-level demonstration, but has truly entered the track of scaled commercial delivery.
Large Orders Locked
Wang Lei, General Manager of HiTHiSTOR Experimental Test Center, gave a clear application scenario:
Sodium-ion battery energy storage has significant differentiation advantages in large-scale independent energy storage power stations, computing-power synergy and other new high-energy-consuming scenarios, 4-6 hours and above long-duration energy storage, high-cycle frequency energy storage projects, and projects with operational cycles of more than 15 years.
At a large wind-solar base in Northwest China, a lithium-sodium fusion energy storage power station was built supporting it. During the day, solar power generates, and the lithium battery system is responsible for high-frequency frequency regulation response; at night, when 4-6 hours of stable power support is needed, sodium batteries with cost advantages and long cycle life begin to play a role.
This "Lithium-Sodium Fusion" mode not only exerts the high energy density and fast response advantages of lithium batteries, but also utilizes the economy and long-duration energy storage capabilities of sodium batteries, achieving the maximization of overall system benefits.
In addition, with the development of AI large models, "computing-power synergy" has become a highly promising scenario.
Data center power demand surges and requires uninterrupted, high-quality power supply. The excellent wide temperature range performance and inherent safety of sodium-ion batteries make it an ideal choice for data center backup power and peak-valley arbitrage.
Seeing the potential demand, the market has voted with its feet. HiTHiSTOR will promote the scaled application of sodium-ion battery energy storage and build a lithium-sodium fusion energy storage power station demonstration project, with the first batch of projects to be implemented and landed within 2026.
CATL and HiTHiSTOR have signed a 3-year sodium-ion battery energy storage order with a scale of 60GWh. This super-large order has injected strong confidence into the entire sodium battery industry chain.
Future
Industry confidence also comes from the support of top-level design.
Liu Yafang, adjunct professor at Zhejiang University and chief expert at China Energy Society, pointed out that looking forward to the "15th Five-Year Plan", the sodium-ion battery energy storage industry should take advantage of policy tailwinds to accelerate R&D and industrialization landing, and actively expand large base, computing-power synergy and other application scenarios.
Of course, challenges still exist.
Zhou Bo, General Manager of the Research Center of the Power Battery Application Branch of China Association for Chemical and Physics Power Sources, suggested that the industry needs to quickly promote the establishment of standards and certification systems for the full lifecycle and accelerate the industrialization process.
Ronbay Technology's 300,000-ton capacity plan, Wanhua Chemical hard carbon anode cost moving towards 25,000 Yuan/ton, CATL's GWh-level shipment and "One Shell, Two Cores" platform design, HiTHiSTOR's 60GWh order lock.
15,000 times cycle life technology verification, 20-year system life commercial commitment, sodium-ion battery energy storage industry is completing the key leap from "technically feasible" to "commercially feasible".
From cost reduction breakthroughs at the material end, to GWh-level delivery at the system end, to the 60GWh large order lock at the application end, sodium-ion battery energy storage is no longer a "concept" or "alternative".
The key point is that HiTHiSTOR proposed "building a lithium-sodium fusion energy storage power station demonstration project", and CATL adopted the "One Shell, Two Cores" scheme to achieve lithium-sodium same dimension switching.
The true advantage of sodium-ion battery energy storage is not to replace lithium iron phosphate, but to form a complementary combination with lithium batteries in a large-scale energy storage system:
Lithium batteries undertake the main role of high energy density and high power density.
Sodium batteries undertake the auxiliary role of long-duration energy storage, high cycle frequency, and low-temperature environments.
Through unified platform design (same dimensions, same interface), reduce the complexity of system integration and switching costs.
This "Lithium-Sodium Fusion" architecture can optimize the asset portfolio of the entire energy storage system:
Use sodium batteries to cover operating conditions that lithium batteries are not good at or uneconomical, thereby improving the full lifecycle returns of the entire power plant. Under this framework, the advantages of sodium batteries are not absolute, but relatively complementary.
Cars in winter, that's the guarantee~
