首頁new
搜尋歷史
熱門搜尋
經銷商登入 / 註冊
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拿寶騰 X70 同斯巴魯 Forester 嚟做比較。呢兩款車喺價錢同定位上都幾接近，今日我哋就從多個方面做一個詳細嘅比較，幫你省返做功課嘅時間。
寶騰 X70 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 106,800 - 122,300，合共 3 個版本，包括 1.5L Standard 2WD（RM 106,800）、1.5L Executive 2WD（RM 115,800）、1.5L Premium 2WD（RM 122,300） 等。
斯巴魯 Forester 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 174,000 - 197,000，合共 3 個版本，包括 2024 2.0L S EyeSight GT Edition（RM 189,538）、2024 2.0L S EyeSight（RM 177,538）、2024 2.0L L EyeSight（RM 167,538） 等。
由價錢睇，寶騰 X70 嘅入門價確實比斯巴魯 Forester 平咗 RM 67,200。如果你預算唔夠，寶騰嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需要。但都要注意，平嗰幾千塊，可能喺配備上會有取捨，具體要看你嘅需要。
寶騰 X70 裝載 1.5L Turbo，馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。
斯巴魯 Forester 裝載 2.0L 4-cyl，馬力 170 hp。官方油耗 8.0 L/100km。
動力方面，斯巴魯 Forester 嘅 2.0L 4-cyl 比寶騰 X70 嘅 1.5L Turbo 多咗 30 匹馬力。不過日常喺市區行，兩款車嘅動力都夠用，唔會覺得冇力。
寶騰 X70 車身長 4400 mm，尾箱 400 L。
斯巴魯 Forester 車身長 4400 mm，尾箱 400 L。
兩款車嘅尺寸差唔多，車內空間差別唔大。呢個級別嘅車，日常使用完全夠用。
寶騰 X70 同斯巴魯 Forester 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更睇重品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰一款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，就揀配備更豐富嗰款。最後仲建議兩款都去試駕，親身體驗先係最重要嘅。
總體嚟講，寶騰 X70 同斯巴魯 Forester 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵仲要睇返你嘅個人需要同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嗰陣都會拿 寶騰 X70 同 起亞 Sportage 嚟做比較。呢兩款車喺價位同定位上都幾接近，今日我哋就從多個方面做一個詳細比較，幫你節省咗做功課嘅時間。
寶騰 X70 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 106,800 - 122,300，一共有 3 個版本，包括 1.5L Standard 2WD（RM 106,800）、1.5L Executive 2WD（RM 115,800）、1.5L Premium 2WD（RM 122,300） 等。
起亞 Sportage 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 129,639 - 179,320，一共有 4 個版本，包括 2025 1.6T DCT 4WD High（RM 179,320）、2025 1.6T DCT 2WD High（RM 159,320）、2025 2.0L AT 2WD High（RM 139,639） 等。
從價錢嚟睇，寶騰 X70 嘅起步價確實比 起亞 Sportage 平咗 RM 22,839。如果你預算有限，寶騰嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需求。但都要留意，平嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備上會有取捨，具體要睇你嘅需求。
寶騰 X70 搭載 1.5L Turbo，馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。
起亞 Sportage 搭載 1.5L Turbo，馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。
兩款車用嘅係同一套動力系統，日常開起嚟嘅感覺基本冇差別。油耗方面也差不多，唔使太糾結這一點。
寶騰 X70 車身長 4400 mm，後廂 400 L。
起亞 Sportage 車身長 4400 mm，後廂 400 L。
兩款車嘅尺寸幾近一樣，車內空間差別唔大。呢個級別嘅車，日常使用完全够用。
寶騰 X70 保修 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
起亞 Sportage 保修 5 年/300,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
總來講，寶騰 X70 同 起亞 Sportage 都係馬來西亞市場幾不錯嘅車型。揀邊一部，關鍵始終要睇你個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，先去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花點時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers compare Proton X70 and Chery Tiggo 9 when choosing a car. Both models are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
The OTR price of Proton X70 in Malaysia is RM 106,800 - 122,300. There are a total of 3 versions, including 1.5L Standard 2WD (RM 106,800), 1.5L Executive 2WD (RM 115,800), 1.5L Premium 2WD (RM 122,300), etc.
The OTR price of Chery Tiggo 9 in Malaysia is RM 166,800 - 179,800. There is a total of 1 version, including 2026 2.0T Standard (RM 179,750), etc.
From the price perspective, Proton X70's starting price is indeed RM 60,000 cheaper than Chery Tiggo 9. If your budget is limited, Proton's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. However, also note that the few thousand ringgit saved might involve trade-offs in features, depending on your specific requirements.
Proton X70 is equipped with a 1.5L Turbo, 140 hp. Official fuel consumption 7.0 L/100km.
Chery Tiggo 9 is equipped with a 2.0L 4-cyl, 170 hp. Official fuel consumption 8.0 L/100km.
In terms of power, Chery Tiggo 9's 2.0L 4-cyl has 30 hp more than Proton X70's 1.5L Turbo. However, for daily driving in the city, both cars have enough power, you won't feel underpowered.
Proton X70 adopts FWD drive mode.
Chery Tiggo 9 adopts FWD drive mode.
Both cars have the same drive mode, both are FWD, there won't be a big difference in daily driving feel.
Proton X70 Warranty 5 years/150,000km, Maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Chery Tiggo 9 Warranty 3 years/100,000km, Maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Both Proton X70 and Chery Tiggo 9 are mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, prioritize the one with better reputation; if you care more about cost-performance and specifications, choose the one with richer configurations. Ultimately, it is recommended to test drive both, personal experience is the most important.
Overall, Proton X70 and Chery Tiggo 9 are both very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends mainly on your personal needs and budget. It is recommended to do your homework, compare quotes from several dealers, and then test drive to make the final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending time on research is never wrong.
In Malaysia's SUV market, many buyers compare Proton X70 and Chery Tiggo 8 Pro when choosing a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
The OTR price of Proton X70 in Malaysia is RM 106,800 - 122,300. There are 3 versions in total, including 1.5L Standard 2WD (RM 106,800), 1.5L Executive 2WD (RM 115,800), 1.5L Premium 2WD (RM 122,300), etc.
The OTR price of Chery Tiggo 8 Pro in Malaysia is RM 159,750 - 159,750. There are 2 versions in total, including 1.6L Turbo Standard (RM 130,000), 1.6L Turbo Premium (RM 145,000), etc.
From a price perspective, the starting price of Proton X70 is indeed RM 52,950 cheaper than Chery Tiggo 8 Pro. If your budget is limited, Proton's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. But note that the cheaper thousand or so may have trade-offs in features, it depends on your specific needs.
Proton X70 is equipped with 1.5L Turbo, 140 hp. Official fuel consumption 7.0 L/100km.
Chery Tiggo 8 Pro is equipped with 2.0L 4-cyl, 170 hp. Official fuel consumption 8.0 L/100km.
In terms of power, Chery Tiggo 8 Pro's 2.0L 4-cyl has 30 more horsepower than Proton X70's 1.5L Turbo. However, for daily city driving, the power of both cars is sufficient, you won't feel underpowered.
Proton X70 body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
Chery Tiggo 8 Pro body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
The dimensions of both cars are almost identical, interior space difference is not significant. Cars of this level are fully sufficient for daily use.
Both Proton X70 and Chery Tiggo 8 Pro are mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, you can prioritize the one with better reputation; if you care more about cost-performance ratio and features, choose the one with richer configuration. Ultimately, it is recommended to test drive both models, personal experience is the most important.
Overall, Proton X70 and Chery Tiggo 8 Pro are both very good car models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose mainly depends on your personal needs and budget. We suggest doing your homework well, comparing quotes from several dealerships, then going for a test drive to make the final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending some time doing homework will definitely not be wrong.
[Auto Market Expert] Great Wall Motor sold 108,067 units in July, up 3.54% year-on-year. Cumulative Jan-July 691,962 units, up 2.64% year-on-year.
The growth rate is not astonishing, but the structure is improving: NEV proportion increased, overseas growth 50.93%, Haval H10 pre-sale secured 22,615 orders in 12 hours—new products are capturing the market.
Haval: 56,272 units, still the cornerstone. Contributed more than half of Great Wall's sales. H10 pre-sale starting from 214,800, 22,600 orders in 12 hours—the most eye-catching pre-sale performance this year. Raptor PLUS, Big Dog continue to sell well, the basic 100,000-200,000 SUV market foundation was not eroded.
TANK: 17,228 units, month-on-month growth 9.64%. New TANK 300 launched, starting from 199,800, continuing to consolidate off-road category advantages. In the 200,000-300,000 hardcore SUV market, TANK currently has no real rivals.
ORA: 10,820 units, surge 151.63% year-on-year. Fastest growth within Great Wall. ORA 5 completed second OTA, hybrid version launched. But 151% has low base effect—ORA base last year was already not high.
Great Wall Pickups: 16,006 units, up 16.22% year-on-year. Po series continues to lead domestic pickup market, Hi4-T hybrid version starts user reviews.
WEY: 7,725 units, month-on-month growth 7.43%. V9X Family version just launched, starting from 316,800. Gaoshan took the NEV MPV sales crown for First Half—the key for WEY, proves it has a foothold in the high-end market. But 7,725 units absolute volume is still small, not at the same level as Li Auto, AITO.
H10: 12 Hours 22,600 Orders
Haval H10 positioned as "new type of box-style vehicle", limited-time promotional price starting from 214,800. 12 hours 22,615 orders, placed in the whole industry, is a top-tier pre-sale performance.
H10 targets hardcore SUV market, 200,000-250,000 range currently only TANK 300 and Fang Cheng Bao Bao 5 two players. H10 enters with lower threshold and newer design, timing fits well.
But there is a big gap between pre-sale orders and actual delivery. Whether H10 can convert 22,600 orders into sales depends on production ramp-up speed and actual launch price.
July overseas sales up 50.93% year-on-year, the fastest growing sector for Great Wall.
Specific actions: ORA lands Australia, South Africa, Malaysia, enters Spain, Italy test drive. Haval Raptor PHEV rolls off line in Uzbekistan—not exporting whole vehicles, is localization production. TANK fleet completes 3,220 km crossing in Kazakhstan, brand synchronously sponsors local activities.
Great Wall overseas is not just selling cars, it is building brand, building channels, building localized capacity. BYD and Chery have already successfully operated, Great Wall is catching up.
Objective Evaluation
Great Wall July has three highlights: H10 pre-sale exploded, overseas growth 51%, ORA recovered. Indicates product definition ability and global execution still online.
Two things to watch out for:
First, overall growth is not fast. 108,000 units, 3.54% year-on-year, compared to BYD (419,000), Geely Group (250,000+), Chery (276,800), volume and growth rate are not in the forefront. Domestic SUV competition intensifies, Haval basic foundation needs continuous reinforcement.
Second, NEV proportion can still improve. Great Wall did not publish NEV sales separately, but from brand structure—Haval main force still fuel and PHEV, TANK mainly fuel, ORA EV but base small—NEV penetration rate should be lower than industry average. In the background of NEV penetration rate breaking 60%, electrification transformation needs acceleration.
Great Wall is a "category innovation" driven company. TANK's success proves it is good at making hit products in niche segments. H10 pre-sale data shows this ability remains.
But category innovation has a ceiling: each niche segment has an upper limit. TANK monthly sales 17,000 is already good, hard to go higher. Great Wall needs to return to annual sales 1.5 million scale, not only needs a few hit categories, but overall NEV penetration rate full improvement.
H10 is a good start. Whether it can catch on, see delivery and reputation after actual launch.
In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers compare the Proton X70 and Honda WR-V when choosing a car. These two cars are quite close in terms of price and positioning. Today we will do a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
The OTR price of the Proton X70 in Malaysia is RM 106,800 - 122,300, with a total of 3 versions, including 1.5L Standard 2WD (RM 106,800), 1.5L Executive 2WD (RM 115,800), 1.5L Premium 2WD (RM 122,300) etc.
The OTR price of the Honda WR-V in Malaysia is RM 89,900 - 107,900, with a total of 4 versions, including 2023 1.5L V (RM 99,900), 2023 1.5L E (RM 95,900), 2023 1.5L S (RM 89,900) etc.
From a price perspective, the Honda WR-V's starting price is RM 16,900 cheaper than the Proton X70. Honestly, in this price range, a difference of a few thousand is not really significant, the key is still looking at overall value for money and long-term usage costs.
The Proton X70 adopts FWD drive mode.
The Honda WR-V adopts FWD drive mode.
Both cars have the same drive mode, both are FWD, so there won't be much difference in the daily driving experience.
Proton X70 warranty 5 years/150,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Honda WR-V warranty 5 years/unlimited mileage, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Both Proton X70 and Honda WR-V are mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale price more, you can prioritize the one with better reputation; if you care more about value for money and features, then choose the one with richer configuration. Ultimately, it is recommended to test drive both, as personal experience is the most important.
In general, both Proton X70 and Honda WR-V are quite good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends on your personal needs and budget. It is recommended that everyone do their research, compare quotes from several dealerships, and then test drive to make a final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending some time doing research will definitely not be wrong.
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家在揀車嘅時候都會拿 Proton X50 同 Mitsubishi Xforce 嚟做比較。呢兩款車喺價位同定位上都相當啱，今日我哋會由多個方面做一個詳細嘅比較，幫你節省做功課嘅時間。
Proton X50 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 89,800 - 113,300，一共有 4 個版本，包括 1.5T Executive（RM 89,800）、1.5T Premium（RM 101,800）、1.5T Flagship（RM 113,300） 等。
Mitsubishi Xforce 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 109,930 - 119,930，一共有 2 個版本，包括 2026 1.5L Ultimate（RM 119,930）、2026 1.5L Urban（RM 109,930） 等。
從價錢嚟睇，Proton X50 嘅起價確實比 Mitsubishi Xforce 平咗 RM 20,130。如果你預算有限，Proton 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需要。但都係要注意，平嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備上會有取捨，具體要看你嘅需要。
Proton X50 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA)。
Mitsubishi Xforce 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 MI-PILOT。
兩款車嘅安全評級一樣，喺呢個級別入面安全配備都算好齊全。依家嘅新車安全性都唔差，唔使太擔心呢一點。
Proton X50 車身長度 4400 mm，車尾箱 400 L。
Mitsubishi Xforce 車身長度 4400 mm，車尾箱 400 L。
兩款車嘅尺寸幾乎一樣，車內空間分別唔大。呢個級別嘅車，日常使用完全夠用。
Proton X50 保養保修 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Mitsubishi Xforce 保養保修 3 年/100,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Proton X50 同 Mitsubishi Xforce 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更重視品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰一款；如果你更介意性價比同配備，就揀配置更豐富嗰款。最後都係建議兩款都去試駕，親身先體驗先至係最緊要。
總體嚟講，Proton X50 同 Mitsubishi Xforce 都係馬來西亞市場好唔錯嘅車款。揀邊一款，關鍵都係要看你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做妥功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最後決定。買車係件大事，花啲時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多車客喺揀車嗰陣都會拿寶騰 X50 同 GWM 哈弗 H6 黎做比較。呢兩款車喺價位同定位上都幾接近，今日我哋就從多個方面做一次詳細對比，幫你省返做功課嘅時間。
寶騰 X50 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 89,800 - 113,300，總共有 4 個版本，包括 1.5T Executive（RM 89,800）、1.5T Premium（RM 101,800）、1.5T Flagship（RM 113,300） 等。
GWM 哈弗 H6 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 139,750 - 139,750，總共有 2 個版本，包括 1.5L Turbo Standard（RM 140,000）、1.5L Turbo Premium（RM 155,000） 等。
由價錢睇落，寶騰 X50 嘅起步價確實比 GWM 哈弗 H6 平咗 RM 49,950。如果你預算有限，寶騰嘅入門版已經可以應付日常需要。但都要留意，平嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備上要有取舍，具體要睇你嘅需要。
寶騰 X50 搭載 1.5L 4-cyl，馬力 105 hp。官方油耗 6.0 L/100km。
GWM 哈弗 H6 搭載 Hybrid，馬力 170 hp。官方油耗 4.5 L/100km。
動力方面，GWM 哈弗 H6 嘅 Hybrid 比寶騰 X50 嘅 1.5L 4-cyl 多咗 65 匹馬力。不過日常喺市區開，兩款車嘅動力都夠用，唔會覺得唔夠力。
寶騰 X50 車身長 4400 mm，尾箱 400 L。
GWM 哈弗 H6 車身長 4400 mm，尾箱 400 L。
兩款車嘅尺寸幾乎一樣，車內空間差別唔大。呢個級別嘅車，日常使用完全夠用。
寶騰 X50 採用 4WD 驅動方式。
GWM 哈弗 H6 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
寶騰嘅 4WD 同 GWM 嘅 FWD 喺操控上會有唔同感受，建議試駕比較。
總括嚟講，寶騰 X50 同 GWM 哈弗 H6 都係馬來西亞市場幾不錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵都係睇你個人需要同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去做試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
In Malaysia's SUV market, many buyers compare Proton X50 and Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV when choosing a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning. Today we will do a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
Proton X50 OTR price in Malaysia is RM 89,800 - 113,300, with a total of 4 versions, including 1.5T Executive (RM 89,800), 1.5T Premium (RM 101,800), 1.5T Flagship (RM 113,300), etc.
Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV OTR price in Malaysia is RM 129,750 - 129,750, with a total of 2 versions, including 2025 1.5T 90km CSH (RM 129,750), What charging methods does the Tiggo 7 PHEV support? Can it be charged using a home power socket? (RM 117,478), etc.
From a price perspective, Proton X50's starting price is indeed RM 39,950 cheaper than Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV. If your budget is limited, Proton's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. But also note, the few thousand cheaper might involve trade-offs in features, it depends on your specific requirements.
Proton X50 comes with 1.5L 4-cyl, horsepower 105 hp. Official fuel consumption 6.0 L/100km.
Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV comes with Hybrid, horsepower 170 hp. Official fuel consumption 4.5 L/100km.
Regarding power, Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV's Hybrid has 65 more horsepower than Proton X50's 1.5L 4-cyl. However, for daily city driving, both cars have enough power, you won't feel underpowered.
Proton X50 safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV safety rating is TBD, active safety systems include Basic.
Regarding safety features, both cars have received good ratings. However, Proton X50's ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA) and Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV's Basic differ in functions. If you value active safety, you can compare their feature lists in detail.
Proton X50 warranty 5 years/150,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV warranty 3 years/100,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Proton X50 and Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV are both mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, consider the one with better reputation first; if you care more about cost-performance ratio and features, choose the one with richer configuration. Finally, it is recommended to test drive both, personal experience is the most important.
Overall, Proton X50 and Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV are both very good car models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends on your personal needs and budget. It is recommended to do your homework, compare quotes from several dealers, and then test drive to make the final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending time on research will never be wrong.
"Great Wall Ora 5 is quietly completing a vertical leap in brand positioning with its versatile performance of three powertrains in one car and natural aesthetics — evolving from a choice of personality for a specific group of people to a 'new option for all people's travel' covering first-time family buyers and quality upgrade/replacement purchase crowds."
July 20-22, Great Wall Motor Global Exploration Day was held in Baoding. Investors from around the world went to Great Wall Technology Center and production base, completed a deep test drive of Great Wall Ora 5 multi-power versions at Xushui professional test track, and conducted a comprehensive field inspection from intelligent manufacturing craftsmanship to dynamic performance. With Great Wall Ora 5's global total sales breaking 10,000, especially with outstanding results in Brazil, Thailand, etc., global market attention once again focused on this new Chinese car.
The First Car for Young People, Why Is Ora 5 an Inevitable Option?
"The first car for young people" is this choice question. The standard answer used to be "just enough is good" — budget is limited, so compromises have to be made repeatedly between looks, space, power, and quality. But with the arrival of Great Wall Ora 5, product power is quietly rewriting this proposition: Who says the first car can't have it all?
From "Specific Groups" to the Elevation of "Everyone's First Choice"
Behind the hot sales of Ora 5, the most critical shift is the drastic expansion of user profiles. In the past, Ora might have been labeled as a specific circle, but now, with the popularity of versatile models like Ora 5, its user pool has expanded to the vast crowd of "Family First Purchase" and "Quality Upgrade/Replacement Purchase".
Young people who just graduated choose it as their first car in life, appreciating the sincerity of high specs at the entry level; Young families use it for commuting travel, needing a balance of space and energy consumption; Even those users who originally drove fuel cars are willing to trade up to an Ora 5 to upgrade travel quality. When a car can please these completely different needs at the same time, it has already jumped out of niche narratives and become a universal solution under the proposition "The First Car for Young People".
Natural Aesthetics, Striking Global Aesthetics at First Glance
When young people buy cars, the first impression is crucial. The entire Ora 5 series adopts the "Natural Aesthetics" design language, drawing inspiration from nature, presenting the purest beauty with minimal rounded lines — no stacking chrome, no creating pseudo-sports, not relying on exaggerated styling to attract attention.
This "subtraction" design philosophy instead achieved cross-cultural recognition — whether it's a pause and look back on the streets of Madrid, or a delivery ceremony in Bangkok business districts.
Ora 5's "stunning at first glance" clean temperament comes from precise insight into global young aesthetics, precisely hitting the aesthetic resonance of the global young generation pursuing authenticity and refusing complexity. For young people, a car is not just a tool, but self-expression, and Ora 5 happens to step on their aesthetic rhythm.
One Car Multiple Powertrains, Freedom of Choice Without Compromise
The core weapon that truly allowed Ora 5 to achieve "global breakthrough" is the product logic of "one car multiple powertrains, one car multiple categories". Whether it is the pure electric version or the hybrid version, Ora 5 shares the same design language, the same set of smart configurations, and the same set of comfort standards — without reducing quality in any aspect due to different power forms.
This means young people can choose completely according to their actual life scenarios: For urban users with dense charging piles in China, the pure electric version is sufficient and worry-free for commuting; While in Europe, many urban public charging facilities are still not perfect, old city streets are narrow, private parking spaces are scarce, the threshold for home charging pile installation is extremely high, and the inconvenience of pure electric replenishment becomes a pain point for daily travel, at this time the hybrid version with the calm attitude of no need to rely on charging piles, using three-engine six-mode full-speed intelligent power switching, achieves both fuel saving and smoothness without conflict.
Not only Europe, starting from July, Great Wall Ora 5 will land in Australia, South Africa, Indonesia and Central/South America in batches, the infrastructure level and travel needs of these markets are different, but all need a product that can flexibly adapt to local conditions — and this is exactly the foresight of the "one car multiple powertrains" strategy. Ora 5, with the same quality standards and different power choices, adapts calmly to the differentiated needs of different regions around the world, allowing every young consumer to have a rational decision that truly fits personal life, no need to compromise due to regional or infrastructure differences.
From "Chinese Boutique" to "Global Trend", Ora 5's Journey Has No Adaptation Issues, Only Local Adaptation.
When a car can sell out in 24 hours in Brazil, can rival Japanese giants in Thailand, and can travel calmly through narrow streets in European old cities, it is no longer just a name card of China Manufacturing, but a vivid footnote of born globally. Ora 5 repeatedly verified one thing in different markets around the world: The first car for young people can already have high looks, high quality and high freedom at the same time.
When "just enough is good" becomes "priority based on needs", Ora 5 is redefining the car buying standards for this generation of young people, it does not require young people to adapt to the car, but let the car adapt to every kind of life and every piece of land. From densely charging pile domestic cities to South America and South Africa where infrastructure is not yet perfect, Ora 5, with the same set of aesthetics, the same intelligence, and the same quality, broke the boundaries of region and infrastructure, adapting to local conditions, making "choose according to needs, travel freely" a right within reach of young people around the world.
Great Wall Ora 5 wrote the same answer for this generation of young people with one real global scenario after another: You deserve to vote with love, not compromise with budget.
2026赛季，国际汽联F4方程式中国锦标赛已走过上海、天津、宁波三站。凯飞赛车的大师组车手罗檍丰继续保持着稳定的竞技状态，多次登上组别颁奖台并有夺冠的表现，目前在大师组车手积分榜领跑。从2024年的新秀赛季到如今的大师组冠军，罗檍丰用两年时间完成了一次扎实的进阶。而这条路，始于一个普通车迷对速度的纯粹热爱。
从车迷到车手：热爱的力量
在成为车手之前，罗檍丰就是一个狂热的车迷。他喜爱汽车升级，热衷卡丁车，长期以普通车迷的身份享受着驾驶和研究车辆机械的乐趣。在热爱的驱使下，他接触到了方程式赛车，第一次试车后就彻底迷上了方程式充满挑战性的驾驶体验。
回忆起从车迷到车手的转变，罗檍丰说：“我本身就是深度汽车爱好者，很早就喜欢改装街车、玩卡丁车，原本只是以车迷身份单纯享受开车、研究车辆机械。后来，我通过凯飞赛车接触到方程式试车机会，第一次坐进开放式车轮的赛车之后，彻底被方程式的驾驶魅力吸引。”
从街车到F4方程式，驾驶体验的差距几乎是天壤之别。
罗檍丰这样描述：“以往开街车，车身有包围、转向有助力、悬挂偏舒适，容错率很高。但F4方程式完全没有任何助力，刹车要靠全身力量去踩，悬挂非常硬朗，路面任何细微颠簸都会直接传到手上，没有容错空间，对走线、刹车点精准度要求苛刻到极致。第一次坐进F4座舱压迫感很强，空间狭小、视野开阔无遮挡，整个人被安全带牢牢固定，起步踩下油门那一刻，才真正明白方程式所有操作都容不得半点失误，和以往所有车辆的驾驶逻辑完全不一样。”
从车迷到正式参加F4，他花了很长时间打磨基础：“大量模拟器练习、反复跑卡丁车夯实走线，利用空余时间不断到赛道试车，适应无助力刹车、硬悬挂的驾驶感，同时学习赛事规则、体能训练，一步步完成从公路驾驶者到可以独立完成排位、正赛的方程式车手的转变，最终拿到参赛资格坐上F4座舱。”
2024新秀赛季：超额完成的年度冠军
2024年是罗檍丰完整跑F4的第一个赛季。赛季初，他的目标并不高远——安全完赛、积累经验。他甚至没有想过冲击组别年度冠军。赛季过程里，他一站一站调整状态。成都站，他面对高温和事故不断的比赛，以惊人的稳定性豪揽两冠两亚；宁波站再下一城勇夺冠军；在随后的上海和珠海分站中，罗檍丰也顺利登上颁奖台。最终，他拿下了绅士组组别年度冠军。
回顾这个赛季，罗檍丰坦言：“年初给自己定的目标只有安全完赛、不断积累经验，并没有想过去冲击年度冠军。赛季过程里我一站一站调整状态，成都站拿到两冠两亚之后，才看到争夺年度冠军的可能性。最后能够拿下绅士组年度冠军，属于超额完成目标，有自己努力的成分，也离不开车队的支持。最终这个结果是惊喜，但也是一整年每一场比赛拼出来的回报。”
阿联酋方程式杯：国际舞台的历练
2024年末，罗檍丰随凯飞赛车进军海外，参加阿联酋方程式杯（Formula Trophy UAE），成为首位参加该项赛事的中国香港车手。
阿联酋方程式杯是F1阿布扎比大奖赛的支援赛事。罗檍丰于12月13日至14日在阿布扎比亚斯码头大奖赛赛道参加了最后一站的角逐。赛事云集了20多位来自意大利、阿联酋、澳大利亚、英国、西班牙、中国等国的优秀车手。
亚斯码头是一条F1级别永久赛道，整条赛道路面平整度、赛道缓冲区、安全设施都是全世界顶级水准。罗檍丰说：“这条赛道的安全性非常高，为车手提供了充足的安全保障，让我更有信心不断挑战极限，另外赛道的维护保养和周边环境也让我大开眼界。”
他对比了这条赛道和国内赛道的不同：“亚斯码头整条赛道几乎没有高低落差，而国内赛道大多带有天然地势起伏，很多弯道带有上坡、下坡，路面也会有细微起伏，非常考验对路面的判断。另外亚斯码头有超长直道，尾速远比国内赛道更高，高速刹车压力更大；而且这条赛道白天、黄昏灯光环境差异极大，视线变化也是国内赛道不会遇到的特点。”
在阿联酋，他驾驶的是Tatus F4 T421 GEN2赛车，这与他在国内驾驶的Mygale赛车截然不同。罗檍丰坦言：“Tatus和Mygale赛车无论是稳定性、刹车、车架调校还是灵活性都非常不同。Mygale刹车线性温和，Tatus刹车初段非常灵敏，很容易锁死轮胎。最难适应的就是不能用固有的驾驶习惯，每一个刹车点、转向时机都要全部推翻重新判断。短短几天时间就要在排位和正赛里做到完全适配，是最大考验。”
时差和密集赛程是这次参赛的最大挑战。罗檍丰回忆道：“第一天抵达阿布扎比后就马上到车队报到，第二天开始练习，第三天练习赛、排位赛和两场正赛都在同一天进行。由于时差关系，正赛时段我的体力开始下降，全凭意志支撑直至比赛完毕。赛前我只预想了开车的挑战，但去到国外才发现场外消耗远比想象中大。时差加上中东干燥酷热的气候，严重消耗体能，就算不上赛道，身体也一直在超负荷。国外赛事的工作节奏、沟通模式完全不同，全部要自己和外籍工程师沟通车辆调校，语言、沟通方式都需要磨合。赛程安排极度紧凑，没有多余调整休息时间，很多细节问题是在国内比赛完全不需要操心的事情。”
尽管挑战重重，罗檍丰还是在排位赛阶段做出了亮眼的圈速，并顺利完成了两回合决赛。“我希望能通过这次比赛，拓宽自己的眼界，与国外的车手们交流学习，持续提升我的驾驶技巧。同时，驾驶不同的方程式赛车，也能让我累积更多的驾驶经验。”
2026赛季：更沉稳的心态，更清晰的定位
进入2026赛季，罗檍丰的心态发生了明显变化。上海揭幕战，他斩获一回合组别杆位，正赛中三次闯入全场前十，于大师组三冠凯旋。天津站多变的天气中，他包揽大师组三冠，第三回合更以全场第五名完赛，创下本赛季大师组最佳战绩；宁波站，他继续稳健发挥，再次有组别冠军进账。
对比2024和2026两个赛季，罗檍丰说：“2024第一年参赛，更多是急于证明自己，每一圈都在追求最快圈速，很容易因为急躁犯错。到2026赛季，我已经非常清楚自己的定位，不再盲目和全场年轻人比拼绝对速度，更懂得取舍——排位尽力拿位置，正赛优先保住走线和节奏，减少失误。心态更加沉稳，懂得控制情绪，不会因为一次走线失误打乱整场比赛，懂得用经验弥补年龄上的体能差距，比赛思路比前两年成熟很多，这也是今年上海站可以拿下大师组三冠最核心的原因。”
面对陈誉齐、赵子竣等天赋极高的年轻车手，罗檍丰坦言压力存在，但更多转化成了动力：“他们代表着目前国内方程式最高的速度标准，跟他们同场，会逼着我不断打磨自己的走线、刹车点，不能停留在原有水平。看着这群年轻人快速成长，也会让我保持进取心，不会因为组别成绩就松懈，每一场比赛都逼着自己持续进步。”
未来：坚守方程式赛场，突破昨天的自己
对于赛车生涯的目标，罗檍丰的规划清晰而务实。
展望未来，罗檍丰说：“短期目标是把每一个赛季稳定发挥，把大师组的竞技状态保持下去，用经验不断完善自己的驾驶，尽量缩短和全场顶尖车手的圈速差距。中长期希望多参与海外国际赛事，多跑不同规格的方程式赛车，拓宽眼界，弥补国内比赛看不到的不足。赛车对我来说是长期热爱，不会追求一定要去到更高组别，最大目标就是一直保持竞争力，长久留在方程式赛场，在每一次上车的时候，都可以突破昨天的自己。”
首秀赛季就勇夺组别年度冠军，远赴阿联酋勇闯国际舞台，到如今稳健领跑在组别积分榜，罗檍丰用两年时间完成了从“一年级生”到成熟车手的蜕变。他的进阶之路没有捷径——模拟器、卡丁车、赛道试车、体能训练，每一步都扎实。正如他所说：“突破自己、比之前的自己更快才是最难的。”而最难的事，他正在一步步做到。
二零二六年七月十六日，吉利汽車集團正式發布全球首款雷霆 16 合一智能電驅。這套由旗下星驅科技全棧自研的新一代 800V 高壓電驅系統，以極致節能、巔峰性能、全域可靠三大代際優勢突破行業技術天花板，首搭吉利銀河 TT 車型，一舉拿下“量產純電轎車環青海湖最低能耗”“濕滑路面最長連續雙車飄移電動車”兩項吉尼斯世界紀錄，重新定義全球高性能集成電驅標準，標誌中國品牌電驅技術全面邁入全球第一梯隊。
當前新能源行業電驅普遍存在集成度不足、能耗與性能難以兼顧、極限工況動力衰減、長期使用可靠性偏弱等痛點。吉利依托星驅科技千餘項專利技術積澱，打通研發、材料、製造、驗證全產業鏈，打造 16 合一深度集成架構，將電機、電控、小三電、熱管理、全域 AI 控制共 16 項軟件硬件功能融為一體，實現輕量化、高效率、高算力、強耐久四大核心突破，徹底解決傳統電驅“節能與性能不可兼得”的行業難題。
極致能效突破，93.8% 綜合效率創下量產同級峰值
雷霆 16 合一智能電驅定位全球集成度最高量產電驅總成，整機僅 75kg，較行業主流產品減重 15% 以上，Z 向高度壓縮至 325mm 以內，為座艙多出 28L 儲物空間；一體化鎂合金殼體、共殼體設計精簡 180 餘個零部件，高壓、低壓線束長度分別縮減 30%、15%，從結構源頭降低能量傳導損耗。
依托 800V 高壓平台、碳化矽功率器件、超薄矽鋼片、Umini-Pin 扁線四大核心材料工藝革新，整套電驅實現 CLTC 綜合效率 93.8%，達到量產車型行業第一。其中 800V 高壓架構將工作電流大幅降低，傳導損耗減少 80%；SiC 芯片搭配小型化封裝，開關、導通損耗分別下降 30%、15%；0.2mm 超薄低應力矽鋼片對比市面 0.35mm 主流產品，鐵損直接降低 30%；扁線工藝縮短銅線總長近 1296mm，銅損優化 2%。多重工藝疊加，讓每一度電能高效轉化為行駛動能，效率每提升 1%，整車百公里電耗降低 1.5%。
為適配全場景出行能耗需求，吉利星睿 AI 雲動力大模型搭載三大智能能量算法，覆蓋冬季低溫、高速巡航、城市通勤全場景。低溫場景下 AI 儲能控制可提前儲存熱能，-18℃極寒環境暖氣功耗降低 40%；高速工況 AI 全域損耗尋優動態平衡銅鐵損耗，電機效率提升 0.8%；城市道路自動能量回收結合路況調節回饋強度，能量響應速度提升 50%。在環青海湖全域複雜路況能耗挑戰中，搭載該電驅的銀河 TT 實測電耗低至 8.20kWh/100km，刷新量產純電轎車能耗吉尼斯世界紀錄，充分驗證超高能效硬實力。
全域性能拉滿，425kW 四驅 3.8 秒破百，極限飄移 46 公里動力無衰減
雷霆 16 合一電驅打破“節能電車無性能”固有認知，四驅版本搭載前 180kW 異步輔驅 + 後 245kW 永磁主驅，綜合峰值功率 425kW，零百加速僅 3.8 秒，實現家用舒適與超跑級動力兼顧。
行業首創一芯全域集成控制是性能核心支撐，傳統電驅多芯片分佈式控制鏈路延遲約 40ms，而雷霆 16 合一將動力域全部運算集成至單顆高算力芯片，指令響應最快壓縮至 2 毫秒，動力輸出隨踩隨有、人車合一。配合 AI 偏差預測控制與自適應 PID 算法，實時扭矩誤差從 3% 收窄至 1%；AI 強化學習姿態預判結合 IMU 多維度傳感，毫秒級動態分配前後軸扭矩，濕滑、彎道行駛車身姿態更穩定。
針對激烈駕駛高溫衰減痛點，行業首發 54 路定向向心油冷系統，360°全覆蓋繞組端部，電機最高工作溫度降低 15℃，絕緣壽命提升 10%，長時間滿功率輸出不限扭、無衰減。在東營智能網聯測試場，兩台銀河 TT 完成超 46 公里濕滑路面連續雙車飄移，一舉打破保時捷保持多年的電動車飄移距離吉尼斯紀錄。持續高轉速、高扭矩、高熱負荷極限工況下，電驅全程動力穩定、扭矩輸出精準，充分證明冷卻系統與電控算法的極限可靠性。
全鏈路嚴苛驗證，500 萬公里耐久構建全域安全可靠體系
在可靠性層面，雷霆 16 合一電驅完成超 9000 項全域測試、累計 500 萬公里整車道路耐久驗證，覆蓋 15 大驗證領域，通過中汽中心“高品質電驅”權威認證。深度集成架構大幅減少線束、接插件等易損件，從硬件層面降低故障概率；產線實現微米級加工精度，轉子產線自動化率超 95%，全流程生產數據可追溯，保障每一台電驅品質統一。
智能化主動保養體系實現安全升級，電驅搭載 AI 智慧健康管理系統，依托數碼孿生與壽命預測模型，實時監測電機溫度、軸承損耗、潤滑油狀態、功率模組健康度，提前預判零部件損耗風險，以雲端“在線醫生”模式實現主動預警，替代傳統被動維修，大幅降低用車故障概率。整套電驅通過 -60℃至 140℃寬溫區、1512 小時鹽霧、24 小時 900mm 水深浸泡等超綱測試，達到 IP68 最高防塵防水等級，適配全球各類極端氣候與路況。
星驅科技構筑全球化產業底座，吉利三電隱形冠軍矩陣成型
本次雷霆 16 合一電驅的落地，背後是吉利集團佈局多年的三電全棧自研體系，電驅板塊核心載體星驅科技作為吉利三大動力“隱形冠軍”之一，構建起覆蓋全球的研發製造網絡。國內佈局無錫、杭州、寧波、衢州、嘉興五大智能製造基地，瑞典設立海外研發中心，規劃馬來西亞海外工廠，電驅總成年產能達 300 萬台；累計申請專利超 1000 項，發明專利佔比超 60%，擁有全球首台 30000rpm 大功率電機試驗台架，實驗室獲 CNAS 國家級認證，可獨立完成全部電驅測試項目。
2026 上半年星驅科技電機電控裝機量穩居行業 TOP3，產品矩陣覆蓋 400V-900V 全電壓平台，配套吉利銀河、極氪、領克、富豪、蓮花等自有品牌，同時批量供貨捷豹路虎、雷諾等海外車企，與歐洲多家頭部車企簽訂長期定單，持續向全球輸出中國自研動力技術。
至此，吉利完成混動、電池、電驅三大賽道“隱形冠軍”佈局：浩思動力打造全球領先混動系統，吉曜通行佈局 150GWh 短刀電池產能，星驅科技登頂全球電驅技術第一梯隊，三者形成協同生態，構建完全自主可控的三電產業鏈，徹底擺脫海外核心零部件技術依賴。從雷神電混、神盾金磚電池到本次雷霆 16 合一智能電驅，吉利實現純電、混動、甲醇多元動力技術全覆蓋，為品牌全球化擴張築牢技術護城河。
引領行業高質量轉型，中國電驅技術實現全球話語權躍升
隨著全球新能源汽車加速普及，電驅作為整車核心動力部件，成為衡量車企核心技術實力的關鍵標尺。過去海外企業長期主導電驅底層架構、材料工藝與標準體系，而以星驅科技雷霆 16 合一為代表的國產電驅方案，實現集成度、能效、性能、可靠性全方位反超國際一線產品，完成從技術跟跑到全球領跑的跨越。
業內專家表示，吉利雷霆 16 合一智能電驅的發布，不僅為消費者帶來更低能耗、更強性能、更耐用的純電出行體驗，更推動國內電驅產業鏈材料、芯片、製造工藝整體升級。依托規模化量產、全球化配套、全鏈路自研優勢，吉利將持續推動高壓高集成電驅技術普及，帶動本土供應鏈協同發展，助力中國汽車產業在全球新能源賽道搶占技術制高點。
百姓評車
未來，雷霆 16 合一智能電驅將陸續下放至吉利銀河、極氪全系多款純電車型，覆蓋家用、運動、高端多細分市場，以成熟量產技術普惠用戶；星驅科技也將持續迭代新一代電驅產品，拓展海外市場配套份額，持續輸出中國自研發的新能源動力方案，推動全球汽車產業綠色低碳轉型邁向新階段。
2026 年上半年，国内商用车行业步入存量竞争新阶段，大盘总量平稳扩容，但企业增长分化显著。数据显示，6 月国内商用车整体同比增长 10.73%，福田、中国重汽、东风、一汽等头部企业增速普遍不足30%。上半年，全商用车大盘累计同比仅8.28%，而这些头部企业增速均不足20%，多家企业仅维持个位数增长甚至销量下滑。
在此行业背景下，上汽商用车跑出独立增长曲线：6 月销量增速达52.79%，约为行业均值4.9倍，是头部厂商中唯一增速跨越50%门槛的企业；上半年累计销量增速 28.37%，约为行业平均水平3.4倍。
表格数据来源：中汽协
旗下上汽大通增长势能更为突出， 6月上汽大通全系销量近3万辆，商用车整体增速超64%，约为行业均值6倍，稳居头部阵营增速首位，也是唯一突破 60% 增速的企业；上半年累计销售13.8万辆，商用车增速达35.36%，是行业前十阵营中唯一增速超35%的企业。
现阶段，上汽商用车轻客、皮卡、轻卡多条细分赛道同步走高，总销量、海外出口、新能源产销三项指标同步刷新历史纪录，形成全品类协同向上的良好发展格局。
亮眼的半年业绩，不只是产销规模的稳步扩容，更标志企业增长动能完成迭代升级，新能源技术转型、全球化市场开拓两大板块，已成为支撑中长期稳定增长的核心双引擎。
轻客强势稳固基本盘，皮卡、轻卡多点开花
拆解上汽商用车增长结构可见，以轻客板块为首的各细分赛道均衡发力，在行业承压环境下走出独立行情，共同托举整体断层式增长。
轻客牢牢守住行业领先位置。6月大通轻客单月销量13902 辆，同比增长 62%；上半年累计销售 61144 辆，包揽单月、累计销量 “双冠王”，销量领先行业第二名7200 台、第三名超万台，单一品牌市占率突破 27%，行业份额断层领先。对比行业大盘，上半年国内轻客整体增速 19.78%，两家头部竞品增速仅 20.20%、6.26%，大通 62% 的月度增速约为行业均值 3 倍，竞争优势持续拉大。
轻卡赛道实现碾压式增长。2026 年上半年国内轻卡市场增长乏力，行业存量竞争持续白热化。跃进轻卡同步实现销量规模、产品结构双向优化，6月销售5258辆，同比增长54%；上半年累计售出 23864 辆，同比增速 48%；5月跃进新能源轻卡国内上险量跻身行业前三，电动化渗透率、增长幅度均大幅领先行业平均水平。依托原生电动化研发体系，品牌跳出传统油改电转型路径，走出差异化高质量发展道路。
皮卡业务发展稳中有升，出口优势持续扩大。今年4月，大通皮卡无锡制造基地完成第40万台整车下线；5月皮卡出口规模登顶行业，6月销量7871辆，同比增长83%，远超行业增速。
6月，上汽商用车轻客、皮卡、轻卡三大核心品类销量增幅全部突破50%，共同拉动上汽商用车整体产销快速攀升。
全球化纵深推进 海外市场打造第二增长曲线
国内细分市场实现领跑的同时，上汽商用车同步抓住行业出海红利，开辟全新增长空间。中汽协数据显示，2026 年 6 月国内商用车出口 13.3 万辆，同比增长 46.7%；1—6 月累计出口 66.4 万辆，同比增长 32.5%，国产商用车出海整体保持高景气。
紧抓全球化发展机遇，上汽商用车6 月海外销量 14071 辆，同比上涨70%；上半年累计出口 65183 辆，同比增长 33%，海外市场成为稳定增长核心支撑。其中核心轻客板块，6月、半年累计出口量双双行业第一。6月出口4644辆，同比增长107%，超过整体国内轻客出口大盘增速2倍。
依托过硬产品实力，上汽商用车在多个海外成熟市场站稳脚跟、树立中国制造品牌标杆。今年前五个月，企业轻型商用车在希腊市场份额较 2025 年同期翻四倍，位居当地中国品牌首位；新加坡轻型商用车市场市占率6月持续登顶，品牌市占率连续三个月排名第一；MIFA 7 中型 MPV 拿下中国香港市场半年度销量冠军，泰国市场车型销量同比增长近三倍；G50 PHEV4 月登陆菲律宾，上市两月订单突破千台，海外市场认可度持续攀升。
现阶段，大通轻客、高端皮卡出口规模稳居国内自主品牌第一梯队。企业全球化战略已从单一整车出口，升级为体系化、本地化共生模式，后续将持续推进海外本地化生产、全场景商用解决方案输出，落地区域服务中心，完善全球销售与维保网络，以长期产业共生替代短期产品贸易，持续放大海外第二增长曲线潜力。
前瞻布局赋能转型 新能源渗透率领跑行业
产销规模稳步上行的同时，新能源转型成为上汽商用车高质量发展的核心亮点。
中汽协数据显示，2026上半年国内商用车新能源渗透率为30.4%，国内新能源商用车整体销量增速为40.2%。有头部商用车企预判，全年行业渗透率有望突破35%。
对比行业均值，上汽商用车绿色转型进度显著领先行业均值：6月当月、上半年新能源车型销量同比分别大涨80%、69%，国内新能源渗透率分别达到 60%、47%，销量增速约是行业均值的两倍。其中，6月新能源轻客大拿同比大涨218%，跃进新能源轻卡同比增长65%，双线车型高速放量。
亮眼数据背后，源于企业长期坚持前瞻技术布局。2025年4月，上汽商用车发布全新发展战略，全面开启转型升级；同年11 月，大通品牌完成焕新升级，确立以领先技术、全产业链生态打造用户导向型企业的发展路径。
产品端，企业持续丰富多元化新能源产品矩阵。大拿V1全系标配宁德时代天行电池；行业首款超级增程轻客大拿超级增程正式落地，满油满电 CLTC 综合续航可达1260公里，百公里综合能耗低至2.65升。
技术端，2025年上汽大通推出鸿图2.0商用电动专属架构、星栈皮卡专属平台，先后与宁德时代、华为达成深度战略合作，全系车型通过 Euro NCAP 五星安全认证。2026 年企业在增程系统、储能电池领域取得关键技术突破：自主研发星湃超级 mini 增程器，实现1升燃油可发电3.3度；配套宁德时代天行电池循环寿命可达7000 次，提供8年或60万公里超长质保，电芯单体失效率低至十亿分之一，具备 IP68 级防水防尘能力，低温续航表现优于行业多数产品。这样的“大电池+小增程”解决方案，兼顾纯电用车成本、长途出行无续航焦虑双重优势。
依托纯电、插电混动、氢燃料电池、超级增程四条并行技术路线，上汽商用车形成适配商用车运营场景的多元绿色技术体系。截至 2026 年上半年，企业已完成轻客、轻卡、重卡、客车全品类多能源产品布局，完整的绿色产业体系成型，为持续高增长筑牢技术底盘。
全周期服务完善生态 多元赋能夯实长期增长底盘
销量持续增长、新能源与海外赛道双线突破的背后，覆盖购车、用车、改装、售后、出海的全周期服务体系，为企业增长提供坚实保障，产品与服务双向赋能，构筑可持续综合竞争力。
上汽商用车坚持以用户需求为核心，将服务体系贯穿全业务链条。2026 年企业牵头成立全球改装生态联盟，打通技术配套、金融服务、售后维保、海外销售全链条服务体系，化解改装行业售后权责划分不清等行业痛点；线下渠道升级 8S 综合服务门店，搭建全球超 2000 家服务网点，创新推出皮卡 “7 天免费试用” 模式，全面优化用户全流程体验。
在产业发展之外，企业主动践行社会责任，拓宽民生服务边界：年内设立 AED 无忧救援公益基金，组建覆盖全国 36 座城市的移动公益救援车队，面向货运从业者、基层群众提供应急急救保障；落地 “星际计划・墨脱站”，依托皮卡全地形通行优势助力边疆物资运输与乡村产业发展，将技术与产品优势转化为民生服务能力。完善的服务生态与社会担当，持续强化品牌壁垒，为企业长期保持领先增长提供底层支撑。
2026 年上半年，国内商用车行业步入存量竞争新阶段，大盘增长动能有限，企业分化鸿沟空前拉大。
在此大环境下，上汽商用车走出一条与行业截然不同的高质量上扬曲线，以断层式增速，成为2026上半年整个商用车行业最耀眼的星。
依托全品类产品布局、前瞻新能源技术研发、全球化市场深耕，上汽商用车实现全面提速，交出一份结构持续优化、增长动能充沛的半年答卷。这份断层领先的答卷足以证明，坚持新能源技术与全球化布局，才能在行业周期中持续领跑。
In July, the Chu Energy Automotive ET test vehicle rolled off the line in Wuhan, behind which is the owner of China's second-largest 4S group — Hengxin Automotive Group, Dai Deming, holding 10 billion in self-owned funds, gripping three cards: batteries, channels, and qualifications, looking to move up from the downstream channel to manufacture complete vehicles.
This matter hasn't made much of a splash in the automotive industry yet, but in the more 'grassroots' tire industry, the strategy of 'dealers entering the product business' has actually been in play for 20-30 years.
Currently, the replacement market for tires accounts for over 70%, dealers hold a complete grassroots network ranging from county-level repair shops to roadside tire stores, more fragmented than 4S channels and closer to real demand.
But currently, the capacity utilization rate for the entire industry is less than 70%, price wars have driven prices down to the cost line, dealers entering tire manufacturing, are they copying Chu Energy's playbook, or jumping into another fire pit?
Several Real Examples of 'Dealers Making Tires' in the Tire Industry
Let's list a few representative examples first. Qin Long, Chairman of Qingdao SenQilin, founded Sendatai in 1999. Earlier, he was an agent for Huanghai, Shuangqian, and Linglong, later also represented Michelin and Continental. Started fresh in 2007 to make SenQilin, targeting high-end passenger car tires, built a factory in Thailand, positioned in Spain. Now is an A-share listed company, revenue exceeded 4 billion in the first half of 2024, one of the representatives of domestic high-end tires.
Father and son Zhao Jianbin and Zhao Ruilong originally worked with Qingdao Ruilong Tire Technology, mainly engaging in tire import and export, owned brands 'Maibote' and 'Jingnai' under them. In 2019, Zhucheng Guopeng Rubber went bankrupt, they purchased the entire assets for 117 million, renamed Yousheng Tires to enter manufacturing; in 2024, invested another 5.16 billion to launch a new Shandong Youyue Rubber project.
Shenyang Ruihua Group Jin Penghui started in the 1990s, doing motor oil, batteries, tires, was a core agent for Toyo Tires in China, absolute channel advantage in the three northeastern provinces. In August 2025, Liaoning Hengdasheng (controlled by Ruihua) acquired with 91.59 million USD 86% equity of Tongyio Zhangjiagang, a subsidiary of Japan Toyo, renamed 'Hengdasheng Toyo Tires' — dealing for thirty years, turned around and swallowed the original manufacturer.
In 2024, Qingdao Sunset Tire Co., Ltd. planned to build a new factory in Brazil. When the news broke, the industry was shocked, this unknown dealer not only changed industries to build a factory, but also went straight overseas, likely to become the first domestic company to build a factory in Brazil.
Of course, there have been many failed attempts in recent years. In 2017, a provincial Michelin agent in East China launched a private label, commissioned a small factory in Shandong, focusing on e-commerce and partner repair shops, resulting in 2019, because the factory substituted materials, a batch of tires showed bulging and falling pieces, compensated over 2 million, the brand went bust immediately.
A large dealer in Nanjing started a private label in 2018, for 3 years, sold only 100,000 tires a year, not even as much as a big brand agent sold in a quarter, finally gave up...
Advantages of Dealers Making Tires
First is ready channels, dominating the replacement end. Over 70% of tire sales are in the replacement market, dealers already deal with hundreds of thousands of repair shops and tire stores nationwide, even sinking to county and township outlets, distributing their own brand is almost zero cost, no need to throw money at investment promotion and promotion like new brands.
Even 4S cannot match this point — 4S shops only cover new cars and warranties, tire dealers' terminals are more scattered and closer to replacement scenarios, promoting their own tires just requires giving repair shops a few percent rebate, and can expand quickly.
Second is understanding terminal pain points, products stay on track. Dealers receive feedback from repair shops every day, knowing which patterns are wear-resistant, which specs sell well in the Northeast, whether new energy vehicle owners care more about low rolling resistance or quietness, product positioning is more accurate than marketing departments of pure manufacturers.
Third is controllable capital and risk. Top dealers have stable cash flow, no need to seek financing like new forces and watch faces, first try OEM/ODM, expand if selling well, stop if not, loss is not big.
Disadvantages are equally prominent, failures far outnumber successes
First is technical and production shortcomings. Tires look simple, but formula, structure, process thresholds are not low, especially now with EV tires, silent foam, self-healing, etc., dealers lack technical accumulation, either find OEM or build factory themselves, need to hire R&D, buy equipment, high investment, long cycle, currently full industry capacity utilization is less than 70%, building a factory is like throwing money into a red ocean.
Second is conflict with agency brands. Dealers originally represent big brands like Linglong, Sailun, Michelin, starting own brand is like stealing big brands' business, big brands will definitely squeeze rebates, or even cancel agency rights, left hand fighting right hand.
Third is difficult to break brand recognition. Tires are safety parts, car owners replace tires by recognizing big brands or repair shop recommendations, own brand has no endorsement, can only take mid-to-low end cost-performance route, cannot sell at high prices, no one recognizes top end, thin profits, poor risk resistance.
Fourth is the dividend period is over. The bosses before caught the 2000-2010 window of capacity shortage and demand explosion, now capacity is overstocked, price wars driven to cost line, if you do mid-low end again, you can't make money, cannot do high end, stuck.
Now tire industry dealer profits are getting thinner and thinner, rebates for agency big brands are lower every year, some really want to integrate upwards to make their own brands, but don't blindly copy Chu Energy's 'full-chain closed loop' for car manufacturing.
The logic of tires is simpler: first OEM, avoid direct competition, use channel advantages to earn stable money, much more reliable than throwing money to build a factory and be a manufacturer. After all, even the top players in the tire industry are competing fiercely now, dealers have no technology or capacity reserves, forcing in means likely being a cannon fodder.
In Malaysia's SUV market, many buyers often compare Perodua Ativa and Proton X90 when choosing a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning, so today we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
Perodua Ativa's OTR price in Malaysia is RM 62,500 - 73,400, with a total of 3 versions, including 1.0L Turbo X (RM 62,500), 1.0L Turbo H (RM 67,300), 1.0L Turbo AV (RM 73,400), etc.
Proton X90's OTR price in Malaysia is RM 106,800 - 122,800, with a total of 4 versions, including 2026 1.5T Prime X (RM 122,800), 2026 1.5T Prime (RM 116,800), 2026 1.5T Lite (RM 106,800), etc.
From a pricing perspective, Perodua Ativa's starting price is indeed RM 44,300 cheaper than Proton X90. If your budget is limited, Perodua's entry-level version is sufficient for daily needs. However, be aware that the savings of a few thousand might involve trade-offs in features, depending on your specific needs.
Perodua Ativa is equipped with a 1.5L 4-cylinder, with 105 hp. Official fuel consumption is 6.0 L/100km.
Proton X90 is equipped with a 1.5L Turbo, with 140 hp. Official fuel consumption is 7.0 L/100km.
In terms of power, Proton X90's 1.5L Turbo has 35 more horsepower than Perodua Ativa's 1.5L 4-cylinder. However, when driving daily in the city, both cars have sufficient power and won't feel underpowered.
Perodua Ativa body length is 4400 mm, trunk capacity 400 L.
Proton X90 body length is 4400 mm, trunk capacity 400 L.
The dimensions of both cars are almost the same, with little difference in interior space. For cars at this level, it is completely sufficient for daily use.
Perodua Ativa and Proton X90 are both mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, you can prioritize the one with better reputation; if you care more about value for money and features, choose the one with richer configuration. Ultimately, it is suggested to test drive both, as personal experience is the most important.
Overall, Perodua Ativa and Proton X90 are both very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose mainly depends on your personal needs and budget. It is recommended to do your research, compare quotes from several dealerships, and then test drive to make the final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, and spending time on research will never be wrong.
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揾車嘅時候都會拿 Proton X70 同 Chery Tiggo 8 嚟做比較。呢兩款車喺價位同定位上都好接近，今日我哋就從多個方面做一個詳細嘅對比，幫你節省做功課嘅時間。
Proton X70 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 106,800 - 122,300，總共有 3 個版本，包括 1.5L Standard 2WD（RM 106,800）、1.5L Executive 2WD（RM 115,800）、1.5L Premium 2WD（RM 122,300） 等。
Chery Tiggo 8 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 129,750 - 129,750，總共有 1 個版本，包括 2026 1.6T Standard（RM 129,750） 等。
由價錢睇，Proton X70 嘅起步價真係比 Chery Tiggo 8 平咗 RM 22,950。如果你預算有限，Proton 嘅入門版已經足夠應付日常需求。但都要留意，平咗嘅幾千蚊，喺配備上可能会有取捨，具體要看你嘅需求。
Proton X70 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA)。
Chery Tiggo 8 嘅安全評級係 TBD，主動安全系統包括 Basic。
安全配備方面，兩款車都攞到唔錯嘅評級。不過 Proton X70 嘅 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA) 同 Chery Tiggo 8 嘅 Basic 喺功能上有些差異，如果你比較看重主動安全嘅話，可以仔細對比下兩者嘅功能列表。
Proton X70 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
Chery Tiggo 8 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
兩款車嘅驅動方式一樣，都係 FWD，日常駕駛感覺唔會有太大分別。
Proton X70 保修 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Chery Tiggo 8 保修 3 年/100,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Proton X70 同 Chery Tiggo 8 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更看重品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰一款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，那就揀配備更豐富嗰款。最終都建議兩款都去試駕，親身體驗先係最重要。
總體嚟講，Proton X70 同 Chery Tiggo 8 都係馬來西亞市場好唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵都要睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕先做最後決定。買車係件大事，花啲時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拿 BMW X5 同 Audi Q7 嚟做比較。這兩款車喺價位同定位上都好接近，而家我哋就從多個方面做一個詳細嘅比較，幫你節省做功課嘅時間。
BMW X5 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 470,800 - 470,800，一共有 3 個版本，包括 1.5L Standard（RM 86,300）、1.5L Executive（RM 95,300）、1.5L Premium（RM 103,300） 等。
Audi Q7 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 462,222 - 462,222，一共有 1 個版本，包括 Standard（RM 462,222） 等。
從價錢睇，Audi Q7 嘅起價比 BMW X5 平咗 RM 8,578。老實講，喺呢個價位段，幾千塊嘅差距其實唔算大，關鍵始終係睇整體嘅性價比同長期使用成本。
BMW X5 搭載 3.0L Turbo，馬力 350 hp。官方油耗 12.0 L/100km。
Audi Q7 搭載 3.0L Turbo，馬力 350 hp。官方油耗 12.0 L/100km。
兩款車用緊同一套動力系統，日常開落嚟嘅感覺基本上冇乜分別。油耗方面都差唔多，唔使太計較呢一點。
BMW X5 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA)。
Audi Q7 嘅安全評級係 5★ (Euro NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 Premium ADAS。
安全配備方面，兩款車都拿到唔錯嘅評級。不過 BMW X5 嘅 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA) 同 Audi Q7 嘅 Premium ADAS 喺功能上有啲差異，如果你比較重視主動安全嘅話，可以仔細比較吓兩者嘅功能列表。
BMW X5 保用 5 年/無限里程，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Audi Q7 保用 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
BMW X5 同 Audi Q7 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更加重視品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰款；如果你更加在意性價比同配備，就揀配置更豐富嗰款。最後始終建議兩款都去試駕，親身體驗先係最重要嘅。
總體嚟講，BMW X5 同 Audi Q7 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵始終係睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕先至做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對無錯。
車型概覽
吉普Grand Cherokee 值唔值得睇，第一步唔係望牌子或者外形，而係睇佢能唔能夠配合你嘅香港日常。 呢篇會集中講同級車比較，幫你用買家角度篩走唔適合嘅選擇。
售價仍待確認，買家可以先把佢放入候選名單，等價格落實後再同同級車逐項比較。
購車價格指南
吉普Grand Cherokee 目前售價仍未清晰，較理性嘅做法係先睇版本、車身大小同動力形式，等價格落實後再決定值唔值得落訂。
如果有幾個版本可揀，可以先將 2025 3.6L 4WD Summit（價格待確認）、2025 3.6L 2WD Summit（價格待確認）、2025 3.6L 4WD Trailhawk（價格待確認）、2025 3.6L 4WD Limited（價格待確認） 放喺同一張清單。日常通勤重視舒適同易用，家庭買家就要優先睇後排、尾箱同安全配置。
核心規格重點
睇 吉普Grand Cherokee 嘅規格，重點唔係背數字，而係理解佢喺香港用車場景會帶嚟咩分別。
吉普Grand Cherokee 現階段最值得留意係車型定位同版本方向，詳細取捨應該等價格同規格更清楚再作決定。
優缺點分析
吉普Grand Cherokee 嘅優點唔需要講到天花龍鳳，真正有價值係佢能唔能夠令日常用車更省心：車型定位清楚，適合作為同級比較起點。
要留意嘅係，售價未清晰前唔應該太早用性價比落結論。呢啲唔一定係缺點，但係落訂前應該先諗清楚。
買家常見問題
買 吉普Grand Cherokee 之前，真正要問嘅唔係單一規格，而係佢可唔可以融入你每日嘅生活節奏。
常見疑問係「Jeep Grand Cherokee 適合長途駕駛嗎？」簡單講，Jeep Grand Cherokee 提供極佳嘅豪華感同隔音，非常適合長途公路旅行。 放到實際用車，就係要睇佢對通勤、泊車、家庭乘坐同長期成本有幾大幫助。
同級對比內容
將 吉普Grand Cherokee 放入同級車清單時，唔建議只用外形或者品牌光環決定。比較順序可以係：先等售價落實，再決定佢應該同邊個級距比較。
咁樣篩選會貼近香港買家真實生活：平日塞車、商場泊車、周末去新界、甚至一家人出入，先係一部車每日要面對嘅考驗。
用車全周期指南
擁有 吉普Grand Cherokee 唔係買車一刻就完結，之後仲有保險、輪胎、保養、泊車同日常能源成本要處理。
如果你主要喺市區行，視野、低速順滑度同泊車輔助會好影響心情；如果經常行高速或跨區，座椅舒適度、隔音同動力從容感會更重要。
車型概覽
Zeekr 009 值唔值得睇，第一步唔係望牌子或者外形，而係睇佢能唔能夠配合你嘅香港日常。 呢篇會集中講香港停車場同窄路使用，幫你用買家角度篩走唔適合嘅選擇。 近期市場討論到「Zeekr展台應該係今次最多人睇嘅展台【2026香港車博會】」，代表呢類車型仍然有一定關注度。
零售價 HK$ 455,581 - 499,767、完稅價 HK$ 832,500 - 9,275,000 令預算位置更清楚，買家可以先估算月供、保險、泊車同日常開支。
購車價格指南
Zeekr 009 嘅購車預算可以先由 零售價 HK$ 455,581 - 499,767、完稅價 HK$ 832,500 - 9,275,000 開始計。香港買車唔只係睇車價，月供、保險、牌費、泊車同能源成本都會影響每月壓力。
如果有幾個版本可揀，可以先將 2025 604km 兩驅奢華中通道版 7座（HK$ 832,500）、2025 582km 四驅高級中通道版 7座（HK$ 9,275,000）、2025 582km 四驅鉑金行政版 6座（HK$ 9,275,000）、2026 光輝版（價格待確認） 放喺同一張清單。日常通勤重視舒適同易用，家庭買家就要優先睇後排、尾箱同安全配置。
核心規格重點
睇 Zeekr 009 嘅規格，重點唔係背數字，而係理解佢喺香港用車場景會帶嚟咩分別。
116 kWh 嘅電池容量，真正意義係可以幫你估算一星期通勤同周末出車要唔要中途補電。 740/702 km 嘅續航參考，對住喺新界、九龍同港島之間跨區行車嘅用家會更實際。 250/450 kW、373/693 N·m 嘅輸出，令高速併線同短距離超車更有信心。 車長 5209 mm、車闊 2024 mm、車高 1812 mm、軸距 3205 mm 可以幫你預判商場停車場、屋苑車位同後排腿部空間。
優缺點分析
Zeekr 009 嘅優點唔需要講到天花龍鳳，真正有價值係佢能唔能夠令日常用車更省心：預算位置清楚，方便同同級車直接比較、電池同續航資訊有助安排通勤同補電、動力輸出對高速同上斜更有底氣。
要留意嘅係，要先確認屋苑、公司或常去商場嘅充電條件、香港停車場同窄路使用要留意車身闊度。呢啲唔一定係缺點，但係落訂前應該先諗清楚。
買家常見問題
買 Zeekr 009 之前，真正要問嘅唔係單一規格，而係佢可唔可以融入你每日嘅生活節奏。
常見疑問係「極氪 009 於香港之落地價格大約係幾多？」簡單講，極氪 009 於香港之落地價大約介乎 880,000 至 1,100,000 港元，視乎版本而定。 放到實際用車，就係要睇佢對通勤、泊車、家庭乘坐同長期成本有幾大幫助。
同級對比內容
將 Zeekr 009 放入同級車清單時，唔建議只用外形或者品牌光環決定。比較順序可以係：先用 零售價 HK$ 455,581 - 499,767、完稅價 HK$ 832,500 - 9,275,000 鎖定預算圈、再睇動力係咪足夠應付高速併線同滿載、再比較能源成本同補能便利、最後睇車身大小、座位同尾箱是否適合家人。
咁樣篩選會貼近香港買家真實生活：平日塞車、商場泊車、周末去新界、甚至一家人出入，先係一部車每日要面對嘅考驗。
用車全周期指南
擁有 Zeekr 009 最重要係先諗清楚充電節奏。屋苑、公司或者常去商場只要有穩定充電選項，電動化用車就會容易相處好多。
如果你主要喺市區行，視野、低速順滑度同泊車輔助會好影響心情；如果經常行高速或跨區，座椅舒適度、隔音同動力從容感會更重要。
兄弟姐妹們，今日講一個出海嘅大新聞——唔係賣車，係賣「司機」。6 月 2 號，文遠知行同 Uber 聯合宣佈咗一件事：計劃喺西班牙馬德里推出該國首個商業化 Robotaxi 試點服務。意思就係：西班牙人好快就可以用 Uber 叫到一台冇司機嘅出租車。呢次係文遠知行同 Uber 第一次一齊進入歐洲市場。馬德里亦成為文遠知行 Robotaxi 駛入嘅全球第十二個城市。
官方消息話，喺馬德里自治區政府嘅支持下，呢項服務今年內就會正式啟動。到嗰陣，馬德里嘅朋友哋打開 Uber App，就有一鍵呼叫文遠知行嘅 Robotaxi。同叫普通網約車一樣，分別係嚟嘅車冇駕駛員——至少喺初期，仲係有分別嘅。運營初期，車入面會配備經過專業培訓嘅安全員，終究係剛上線，穩妥第一。
文遠知行呢間公司，你可能聽過，也可能冇聽過。簡單介紹下：2017 年成立，一直埋頭搞 Robotaxi 技術研發同商業化。而家佢嘅 Robotaxi 已經覆蓋咗廣州、北京、新加坡、阿布達比、迪拜、利雅得、蘇黎世……加埋而家嘅馬德里，一共 12 個城市。西班牙亦係文遠知行進入嘅第五個歐洲市場——之前已經入咗瑞士、法國、比利時、斯洛伐克。按照文遠知行同 Uber 喺 2025 年 5 月達成嘅規劃，佢哋要喺五年內新增 15 個國際城市部署 Robotaxi 服務，全球部署數萬輛 Robotaxi。隨著馬德里落地，目前已經完成咗 4 個城市嘅佈局，仲有 11 個會喺 2030 年前陸續覆蓋。
講真嘅，中國自動駕駛公司出海唔係頭一回，但中國技術 + 全球出行平台 + 歐洲市場呢個組合，定係好有意思。馬德里係歐洲最具商業潛力嘅 Robotaxi 市場之一，人口多、出行需求大，當地政策都好友善。喺呢個市場站穩腳根，對文遠知行嚟講係個唔小嘅里程碑。對 Uber 嚟講，引進 Robotaxi 都係為咗降低成本——終究司機唔使發人工。對馬德里市民嚟講，以後打車可能更平。
