首頁fitness
搜尋歷史
熱門搜尋
經銷商登入 / 註冊
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拿 寶騰 X70 同 奇瑞 Tiggo 8 嚟做比較。這兩款車喺價錢同定位上幾接近，而家我哋就從多個方面做一個詳細嘅對比，幫你省返做功課嘅時間。
寶騰 X70 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 106,800 - 122,300，一共有 3 個版本，包括 1.5L Standard 2WD（RM 106,800）、1.5L Executive 2WD（RM 115,800）、1.5L Premium 2WD（RM 122,300） 等。
奇瑞 Tiggo 8 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 129,750 - 129,750，一共有 1 個版本，包括 2026 1.6T Standard（RM 129,750） 等。
從價錢睇落去，寶騰 X70 嘅起價真係比 奇瑞 Tiggo 8 平咗 RM 22,950。如果你預算有限，寶騰 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需要。但要留意，平嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備上會有取舍，具體要看你嘅需要。
寶騰 X70 搭載 1.5L Turbo，馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。
奇瑞 Tiggo 8 搭載 1.5L Turbo，馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。
兩款車用緊同一套動力系統，日常行起來嘅感受基本冇分別。油耗方面也差唔多，唔使太糾結這一點。
寶騰 X70 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
奇瑞 Tiggo 8 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
兩款車嘅驅動方式一樣，都係 FWD，日常駕駛感受唔會有太大分別。
寶騰 X70 保養 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
奇瑞 Tiggo 8 保養 3 年/100,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
寶騰 X70 同 奇瑞 Tiggo 8 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更重視品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰一款；如果你更計較性價比同配備，就揀配備更豐富嗰款。最終都建議兩款都去試駕，親身體驗先係最重要嘅。
總括嚟講，寶騰 X70 同 奇瑞 Tiggo 8 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵始終要睇你嘅個人需要同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers compare Proton X70 and Toyota Yaris Cross when selecting a car. These two models are quite close in price and positioning. Today we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
Proton X70's OTR price in Malaysia is RM 106,800 - 122,300, with a total of 3 versions, including 1.5L Standard 2WD (RM 106,800), 1.5L Executive 2WD (RM 115,800), 1.5L Premium 2WD (RM 122,300), etc.
Toyota Yaris Cross's OTR price in Malaysia is RM 99,900 - 109,900, with a total of 2 versions, including 2026 1.5L Standard (RM 99,900), 2026 HEV 1.5L Standard (RM 109,900), etc.
In terms of price, the starting price of Toyota Yaris Cross is RM 6,900 cheaper than Proton X70. Honestly, in this price segment, a difference of a few thousand is not really significant; the key lies in overall value for money and long-term usage costs.
Proton X70's safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
Toyota Yaris Cross's safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include TSS.
Both cars have the same safety rating; safety features in this class are quite comprehensive. New cars nowadays have good safety, so there is no need to worry too much about this.
Proton X70 body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
Toyota Yaris Cross body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
The dimensions of both cars are almost the same, with little difference in interior space. For cars in this class, daily use is completely sufficient.
Proton X70 warranty 5 years/150,000 km, maintenance interval every 10,000 km or 6 months.
Toyota Yaris Cross warranty 5 years/unlimited mileage, maintenance interval every 10,000 km or 6 months.
Overall, Proton X70 and Toyota Yaris Cross are both very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends mainly on your personal needs and budget. It is recommended to do your homework, compare quotes from several car dealerships, and then take a test drive to make the final decision. Buying a car is a major matter; spending some time on research will never be wrong.
In the SUV market in Malaysia, many buyers compare the Proton X70 and Honda CR-V when choosing a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time doing your research.
The OTR selling price of the Proton X70 in Malaysia is RM 106,800 - 122,300, with a total of 3 versions, including 1.5L Standard 2WD (RM 106,800), 1.5L Executive 2WD (RM 115,800), 1.5L Premium 2WD (RM 122,300), etc.
The OTR selling price of the Honda CR-V in Malaysia is RM 178,200 - 195,900, with a total of 4 versions, including 2026 e:HEV 2.0L 2WD RS (RM 195,900), 2026 1.5T 4WD V (RM 181,900), 2026 e:HEV 2.0L 2WD E (RM 178,200), etc.
From a price perspective, the starting price of the Proton X70 is indeed RM 71,400 cheaper than the Honda CR-V. If your budget is limited, the Proton entry-level version can already meet daily needs. However, it should be noted that the savings of a few thousand ringgit might involve trade-offs in equipment, depending on your specific needs.
The safety rating of the Proton X70 is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
The safety rating of the Honda CR-V is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include Honda SENSING (ACC, CMBS, LKAS, RDM).
Both cars have the same safety rating, and safety features are quite comprehensive within this class. New cars nowadays generally have good safety, so no need to worry too much about this.
Proton X70 body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
Honda CR-V body length 4500 mm, trunk 450 L.
In terms of space, the Honda CR-V body is 100 mm longer than the Proton X70, giving it an advantage in passenger space. However, the Proton X70 is a bit more flexible for parking in the city, each has its trade-offs.
Proton X70 warranty 5 years/150,000 km, service interval every 10,000 km or 6 months.
Honda CR-V warranty 5 years/unlimited mileage, service interval every 10,000 km or 6 months.
Both the Proton X70 and Honda CR-V are mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, you can prioritize the one with better reputation; if you care more about cost-performance ratio and equipment, then choose the one with richer configurations. Finally, it is recommended to test drive both models, as experiencing it personally is the most important.
Overall, the Proton X70 and Honda CR-V are both very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends mainly on your personal needs and budget. We recommend doing your research, comparing quotes from multiple dealerships, and then test driving to make a final decision. Buying a car is a major matter, spending some time researching will definitely not be wrong.
【CNMO 科技消息】7 月 29 日，據@電車出海 整理發布嘅數據，2020 年至 2026 年上半年，十間中國新勢力車企海外純電累計銷量排名揭盅。該榜單統計咗 39 個國家同地區嘅銷量，其中，小鵬汽車以 105,245 輛位居第一位，亦係榜單入面唯一累計銷量超過 10 萬輛嘅品牌。
小鵬
零跑汽車以 77,279 輛排名第二，同小鵬一齊組成榜單第一梯隊。歐拉累計銷量為 51,653 輛，位列第三，亦係除小鵬、零跑外，唯一突破 5 萬輛嘅品牌。第四至第六名依次為埃安、極氪同深藍，累計銷量分別為 44,047 輛、39,899 輛同 31,588 輛。其中，埃安距離 5 萬輛仲差 6,000 輛左右，極氪則接近 4 萬輛，三間品牌嘅成績均集中在 3 萬至 4.5 萬輛區間，騰勢以 15,427 輛位列第七，蔚來同智己嘅累計銷量較為接近，分別為 7,502 輛同 7,049 輛，排名第八同第九；嵐圖累計銷量為 3,247 輛，位列第十。
據分析，小鵬銷量斷層式第一與其對歐洲同亞太嘅深耕佈局脫唔離。數據顯示，小鵬海外 60% 嘅銷量嚟自歐洲，今年上半年歐洲 21 國賣咗 1.8 萬輛左右，21 國全線飆升，同比增長 154%。同時亞太市場亦喺度發力，泰國、馬來西亞、新加坡、澳洲等國家貢獻咗 20% 嘅銷量。
7 月 28 日，2026 年《財富》世界 500 強榜單正式揭曉，比亞迪連續第 5 年入榜，位列第 91 位，穩居全球百強陣營。
2025 年，比亞迪錄得全年營業額 8040 億元、純利潤 326 億元；新能源汽車全年銷量達 460 萬輛，蟬聯全球新能源汽車銷量冠軍、中國市場車企銷量冠軍等。2026 年 1 至 6 月，公司累計銷量超 180 萬輛。7 月，比亞迪第 1700 萬輛新能源汽車正式下線，成為首家達成這一里程碑嘅車企。
比亞迪一直堅持「技術為主，創新為本」嘅發展理念。2025 年公司研發投入達 634 億元，同比增長 17%，連續兩年位居 A 股上市公司第一位。2026 年第一季度，公司研發投入達 113 億元，領先國內主流車企同龍頭新勢力。截至目前，公司累計研發投入已突破 2500 億元。持續嘅高強度技術投入，推動更多顛覆性技術成果加速落地。2026 年 3 月，比亞迪發布第二代刀片電池同閃充技術，計劃喺年尾前喺全國建成 20000 座閃充站。此外，比亞迪仲喺全球佈局 6000 座海外閃充站。5 月，比亞迪率先承諾為城市領航安全兜底 1 年，並宣佈全係車型均可搭載天神之眼 B 輔助駕駛激光版，開創全民城市領航時代。
2025 年比亞迪海外銷量首次突破 100 萬輛，同比增長 145%；2026 年上半年，海外銷量持續增長，銷量超 78 萬輛。公司出海戰略已形成「拉美領跑、歐洲突破、亞洲多點開花」嘅格局。今年，比亞迪首條海外雲軌喺巴西開通，巴西工廠達成第 10 萬輛新能源汽車下線；騰勢 Z、Z9GT 同 D9 共同開啟歐洲科技新豪華篇章；比亞迪首款海外專研車型海獭 (BYD RACCO) 落地日本；泰國工廠迎來投產兩週年。比亞迪正加速邁入深耕本土、高質量發展嘅全球化新階段。截至目前，比亞迪嘅業務已遍布全球 121 個國家同地區。
在可持續發展方面，截至 6 月 30 日，比亞迪新能源汽車較傳統燃油車，喺能源生產同使用環節累計實現碳減排量 1.49 億噸，相當於植樹 24.8 億棵。在社會責任踐行方面，比亞迪啟動 30 億元教育慈善基金，並同全國 127 所高校達成捐贈協議，激勵超 6000 名學子。
作為全球新能源汽車領導者，比亞迪穩居世界百強陣營，係其堅持技術創新同全球突破嘅成果。展望未來，比亞迪將繼續堅決不移秉持可持續發展理念，以更前沿嘅科技同更完善嘅全球佈局，為地球降溫 1℃。
版權聲明：此文源自廠商供稿，如需轉載請尊重版權並保留出處。內容若存有質量疑問請立即同本網聯繫，《商用车之家/汽车立体声》將盡快處理並作出回應。
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拿 寶騰 X70 同 豐田 Corolla Cross 嚟做比較。呢兩款車喺價位同定位上都幾接近，今日我哋就從多個方面做一個詳細嘅對比，幫你節省咗做功課嘅時間。
寶騰 X70 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 106,800 - 122,300，一共有 3 個版本，包括 1.5L Standard 2WD（RM 106,800）、1.5L Executive 2WD（RM 115,800）、1.5L Premium 2WD（RM 122,300）等。
豐田 Corolla Cross 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 133,800 - 148,800，一共有 3 個版本，包括 2026 HEV 1.8L GR Sport（RM 148,800）、2026 HEV 1.8L Standard（RM 140,800）、2026 1.8L Standard（RM 133,800）等。
由價錢嚟睇，寶騰 X70 嘅起步價確實比 豐田 Corolla Cross 平咗 RM 27,000。如果你預算有限，寶騰嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需要。但都要注意，平嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備上面會有取舍，具體就要睇你嘅需要。
寶騰 X70 車身長 4400 mm，尾箱 400 L。
豐田 Corolla Cross 車身長 4400 mm，尾箱 400 L。
兩款車嘅尺寸幾乎一樣，車內空間差別唔大。呢級別嘅車，日常使用完全足夠。
寶騰 X70 採用人前驅動方式。
豐田 Corolla Cross 採用人前驅動方式。
兩款車嘅驅動方式一樣，都係 FWD，日常駕駛感受唔會有太大區別。
寶騰 X70 同 豐田 Corolla Cross 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更加睇重品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰一款；如果你更加在意性價比同配備，就揀配備更豐富嗰款。最終都係建議兩款都去試駕，親身體驗先係最重要嘅。
總體嚟講，寶騰 X70 同 豐田 Corolla Cross 都係馬來西亞市場好唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵都係要睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做足功課，多比較幾間車行之報價，再去做試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
In Malaysia's SUV market, many buyers compare the Proton X50 and Honda WR-V when choosing a car. These two models are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will conduct a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
The OTR price of the Proton X50 in Malaysia is RM 89,800 - 113,300, with a total of 4 versions, including 1.5T Executive (RM 89,800), 1.5T Premium (RM 101,800), 1.5T Flagship (RM 113,300), etc.
The OTR price of the Honda WR-V in Malaysia is RM 89,900 - 107,900, with a total of 4 versions, including 2023 1.5L V (RM 99,900), 2023 1.5L E (RM 95,900), 2023 1.5L S (RM 89,900), etc.
From a price perspective, the Proton X50's starting price is indeed RM 100 cheaper than the Honda WR-V. If you have a limited budget, Proton's entry-level model is already sufficient for daily needs. However, note that the few thousand saved might involve trade-offs in features, specifically depending on your needs.
The Proton X50's safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), and active safety systems include ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
The Honda WR-V's safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), and active safety systems include Honda SENSING.
Both cars have the same safety rating, and safety features are quite comprehensive within this class. New cars nowadays generally do not lack safety, so there is no need to worry too much about this.
Proton X50 body length is 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
Honda WR-V body length is 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
The dimensions of both cars are almost identical, with little difference in interior space. Cars in this class are more than enough for daily use.
Proton X50 warranty is 5 years/150,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Honda WR-V warranty is 5 years/unlimited mileage, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Proton X50 and Honda WR-V are both mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, prioritize the one with better reputation; if you care more about value for money and specifications, choose the one with richer configurations. Ultimately, it is recommended to test drive both, as personal experience is the most important.
Overall, Proton X50 and Honda WR-V are both very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose mainly depends on your personal needs and budget. It is recommended to do your homework, compare quotes from several car dealers, and then test drive before making a final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, taking some time to research is never wrong.
The pace of the Chinese automotive industry going global has been faster than anyone anticipated.
On July 9, the China Association of Automobile Manufacturers revealed H1 data: In June alone, Chinese auto exports reached 1.037 million units, a 75.1% year-on-year increase, achieving single-month exports over 1 million for the first time; from January to June, cumulative exports hit 5.096 million units, a 65.3% year-on-year increase, and semi-annual exports broke through 5 million units for the first time.
The full-year export target of 7.4 million units set at the beginning of the year now appears too conservative. Based on current growth rates, achieving 10 million units in full-year exports has become a high-probability event. However, beyond the breakthrough in sales figures, the structural changes behind them are worth more attention. Domestic car sales for the first half of the year were only 9.921 million units, a 21.1% year-on-year decrease, while exports accounted for nearly 40% of passenger car production.
In this magnificent wave of going global, which companies are leading the pack? Which models are selling the best? Which markets are the main drivers for growth? Where is the next trend?
Overview of Company Exports
With the continuous surge in the scale of going global, the overseas layout of domestic automakers has differentiated into clear tiers, with the top tier forming a pattern of "one dominant leader and multiple strong contenders".
Chery Group sat firmly in the top spot with a H1 export figure of 943,800 units, up 71.5% year-on-year. Notably, Chery's exports accounted for 69.5% of its total sales, and for three consecutive months from April to June, overseas sales share exceeded 70%. June single-month overseas sales reached an all-time high of 191,000 units. For every car sold domestically, Chery sold nearly three overseas, showing that exports have become Chery's absolute primary growth pole.
Following closely, BYD delivered a H1 export performance of 789,000 units, up 71% year-on-year, with June single-month exports reaching 170,900 units alone. Especially in the new energy export niche, BYD's advantage is more obvious. In the first half of the year, new energy exports reached 769,300 units, with a market share as high as 34.5%. In other words, for every three exported new energy vehicles, nearly one was a BYD.
Geely Automobile was the most eye-catching dark horse in terms of growth rate: Exporting 474,200 units in the first half of the year, up 158% year-on-year, with a growth rate leading among top automakers; June overseas sales broke 100,000 units for the first time, reaching 102,900 units. In terms of new energy exports, Geely's increase was even more stunning, with H1 new energy exports reaching 275,400 units, surging 601.4% year-on-year.
SAIC, relying on its well-perfect multi-brand globalization matrix, also remains firmly in the first tier. Overseas wholesale sales in the first half of the year reached 735,000 units. Its MG brand has cultivated the European market for many years and has ranked first in Chinese brand sales in Europe for 11 consecutive years. Great Wall Motor has steadily progressed overseas pacing, with H1 exports of 291,400 units, up 47.4% year-on-year, and the overseas market maintained stable expansion.
From the perspective of niche sectors, the competition landscape of new energy exports reflects the strength of each company more. In the top 10 list of new energy export manufacturers in the first half of the year, BYD firmly stayed in the first place, with Chery and Geely in second and third place, corresponding new energy export volumes of 290,300 units and 275,400 units respectively. Following them were Tesla China, SAIC Passenger Car, Leapmotor, Dongfeng, SAIC-GM-Wuling, Changan, and XPeng. Among them, Leapmotor's overseas breakthrough was particularly eye-catching. H1 overseas sales neared 100,000 units, exceeding its own total overseas sales for all of 2025 in just half a year.
Another worth mentioning is that in May 2026, across 31 European markets, BYD, SAIC, Geely, Chery, and Leapmotor, these five Chinese automakers sold a total of 138,400 new cars, up 65% year-on-year. Total sales for the first time exceeded the sum of six Japanese automakers such as Toyota and Nissan. The market share of Chinese brands locally jumped from 5.6% in May of the previous year to 10.7%. This was the first time Chinese automakers hit it out head-on against Japanese rivals in Europe, the world's third-largest automotive market.
Model Breakthrough and Market Map
The success or failure of going global ultimately depends on market acceptance. Focusing eyes from automaker tiers to specific models, from the disclosed market model performance, the outline of hit models is already very clear.
BYD Song Plus is the undisputed star model in the current export camp. In the first half of 2025, it topped the export model list with 134,000 units, a year-on-year increase of 184%; entering 2026, its overseas deployment pace accelerated further, continuously stocking from Southeast Asia to Western Europe, opening the situation with balanced design, extremely low usage costs, and accessible pricing, and is very likely to become the first true "Global Car" among Chinese brands.
From the technology route perspective, emerging markets such as Latin America and Southeast Asia focus on price-performance ratio, with 100,000 yuan range compact pure electric vehicles being the most popular; mature markets such as Europe are more accepting of plug-in hybrid SUVs in the 150,000-200,000 yuan price range under the influence of policies and usage habits. The pattern of pure electric and plug-in hybrid double line breakthrough is very clear.
Meanwhile, the more critical change is in price and technology. China's automotive export is accelerating from the old model of "low-price volume sales" to a leap of "value-based globalization". Zeekr's average export price per vehicle in the first half of the year approached 350,000 yuan, and there are plans to launch high-end models with a starting price exceeding 460,000 yuan overseas; Denza, Yangwang, and other high-end brands have also achieved simultaneous volume and price increases overseas. Intelligence is becoming the "new business card" for China's automotive export—Chery was the first to pass the EU UN/ECE R171 safety management system audit, equivalent to obtaining a "technical pass" for high-level intelligent driving export.
Turning eyes to the overall market map again, according to data from Gasgoo Automotive Research Institute, from January to May 2026, Brazil topped the list of China's passenger car export markets for the first time with an export volume of 372,000 units and a 178.7% year-on-year growth rate; Russia followed closely with 351,000 units and a 139.8% growth rate. These two markets alone contributed more than 40% of the top ten total.
Among them, Brazil's explosive growth was behind a special background: starting July 1, 2026, local new energy vehicle import tariffs will rise from 25% to 35%, causing dealers to focus on抢运 in the first half of the year, pushing up shipment volumes. However, even if the short-term window closes, as the largest economy in Latin America, Brazil's long-term consumption potential remains solid.
The European market showed a situation of multiple points blooming: The UK ranked third with 189,000 units and 82% growth, Belgium, Italy, and Spain recorded export volumes of 156,000, 123,000, and 94,000 units respectively, with Italy's year-on-year increase reaching 140.7%. If Russia is included, the entire Europe has occupied half of China's passenger car exports.
However, under high growth, hidden worries are also showing: UAE export volume decreased by 32.6% year-on-year, and Mexico's drop reached 40%. The former is an adjustment period after high-speed growth, and the latter is directly impacted by the tariff hike in January this year. This also means that going global is no longer a blue ocean with everywhere growth. Tariff policy fluctuations and market cycle rotation shocks will always be normal variables the industry needs to face directly.
Where is the Next Trend?
In the market map of hot and cold differentiation, combined with H1 data trends and policy movements, there are three markets most likely to become the incremental core for the next stage of China's automotive exports.
The first worth mentioning is Brazil. Although new energy vehicle tariffs rose to 35% from July 1st and the short-term rush window is closed, this does not mean the end of market dividends. As the largest economy in Latin America, Brazil's automotive electrification has just started, and Chinese brands have laid the initial user perception with price-performance ratio and product power.
More critically, automakers like Chery have already established production capacity layout locally. Localized production can become a handle to bypass tariff barriers and deeply penetrate the market. Next, competition in the Brazil market will no longer be a simple comparison of export volumes, but a contest of localized operation depth.
The second trend belongs to Europe, which is the most contradictory yet most certain battlefield. The EU's anti-subsidy tariffs on Chinese pure electric vehicles have been in effect for nearly two years. Some automakers' comprehensive tax rates have exceeded 45%. At the moment, they are also brewing to include plug-in hybrid models into the tax scope, and the tariff wall seems to be getting higher and higher. But the actual trend is exactly the opposite: In May 2026, the market share of Chinese brands in Europe had surpassed Japanese automakers.
The more control, the more growth. The logic behind this is: The comprehensive advantages formed by Chinese new energy vehicles in 800V high-voltage platforms, integrated die-casting, self-developed batteries, and other technologies, just filled the supply gap during the global electrification transition period.
Tariffs will temporarily raise costs and compress profits, but cannot reverse product-side advantages. That is why top automakers are accelerating to respond to tariff barriers with localization: BYD's Hungary factory is expected to start whole vehicle assembly in the fourth quarter of 2026. Chery's joint venture factory in Barcelona, Spain achieved mass production by the end of 2025. The new M1 production line officially started production in June this year. "Trading localization for market" is the strategy currently consensus among automakers on the European battlefield.
And the third potential trend is Southeast Asia, traditionally regarded as the "backyard" of Japanese brands. From January to May, Malaysia ranked tenth in export destination countries with 78,599 units of export volume. This volume is not particularly outstanding, but the signal revealed behind is extremely strong: The Southeast Asian market has long been monopolized by Japanese brands. Now Chinese brands have torn a gap here.
SAIC MG has cultivated Thailand for many years and laid the foundation. Leapmotor plans to land European local production through Stellantis's Spain factory. As RCEP tariff dividends continue to be released, this region is very likely to become the next explosive growth point following Europe. Especially countries that have launched new energy vehicle incentive policies such as Thailand, Indonesia, Malaysia, etc.
Overall, the H1 export figure of 5.096 million units marks that China's automotive export has moved from testing the waters to the stage of harvest. But a clearer signal is that the competitive logic of the second half of the game has changed. Tariff barriers, geopolitical fluctuations, localized operations, every level is a hard battle.
As Chen Shihua, Secretary-General of the China Association of Automobile Manufacturers, said, export for the second half of the year should be maintained with "cautious optimism". But without a doubt, Chinese car brands have already stood at the center of the global stage. From "going out" to "going in" and then to "going up", this industry's deep reform has just opened the curtain.
In Malaysia's SUV market, many buyers compare Perodua Aruz and Honda HR-V when choosing a car. These two models are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
Perodua Aruz OTR price in Malaysia is RM 72,900 - 77,900, with a total of 2 versions, including 1.5L X (RM 72,900), 1.5L AV (RM 77,900), etc.
Honda HR-V OTR price in Malaysia is RM 115,900 - 143,900, with a total of 4 versions, including 2026 e:HEV 1.5L RS (RM 143,900), 2026 1.5T V (RM 137,900), 2026 1.5T E (RM 130,900), etc.
From a price perspective, the starting price of Perodua Aruz is indeed RM 43,000 cheaper than Honda HR-V. If your budget is limited, Perodua's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. But note that the few thousand cheaper might mean compromises on equipment, it depends on your specific needs.
Perodua Aruz is equipped with 1.5L 4-cyl, 105 hp. Official fuel consumption 6.0 L/100km.
Honda HR-V is equipped with 1.5L Turbo, 140 hp. Official fuel consumption 7.0 L/100km.
Regarding power, Honda HR-V's 1.5L Turbo has 35 more horsepower than Perodua Aruz's 1.5L 4-cyl. However, for daily city driving, both cars have enough power and won't feel underpowered.
Perodua Aruz body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
Honda HR-V body length 4500 mm, trunk 450 L.
In terms of space, Honda HR-V's body is 100 mm longer than Perodua Aruz, offering an advantage in seating space. However, Perodua Aruz is more flexible for parking in the city, each has its trade-offs.
Perodua Aruz uses FWD drive type.
Honda HR-V uses FWD drive type.
Both cars have the same drive type, both are FWD, daily driving experience won't differ much.
Overall, Perodua Aruz and Honda HR-V are both very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends mainly on your personal needs and budget. We suggest doing research, comparing quotes from several dealerships, and test driving before making a final decision. Buying a car is a big deal, spending time on research will never be wrong.
In Malaysia's SUV market, many buyers compare the Perodua Aruz and Proton X70 when choosing a car. These two cars are quite similar in price and positioning. Today, we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
The Perodua Aruz OTR price in Malaysia is RM 72,900 - 77,900, with a total of 2 variants, including 1.5L X (RM 72,900), 1.5L AV (RM 77,900) etc.
The Proton X70 OTR price in Malaysia is RM 106,800 - 122,300, with a total of 3 variants, including 1.5L Standard 2WD (RM 106,800), 1.5L Executive 2WD (RM 115,800), 1.5L Premium 2WD (RM 122,300) etc.
From a price perspective, the Perodua Aruz starting price is indeed RM 33,900 cheaper than the Proton X70. If your budget is limited, Perodua's entry-level version is already sufficient for daily needs. However, keep in mind that the few thousand ringgit saved might involve trade-offs in features, which depends on your specific requirements.
The Perodua Aruz safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include.
The Proton X70 safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
Both cars have the same safety rating, and safety features are quite comprehensive in this class. New cars nowadays generally have good safety, so there is no need to worry too much about this.
The Perodua Aruz body length is 4400 mm, boot 400 L.
The Proton X70 body length is 4400 mm, boot 400 L.
The dimensions of both cars are almost the same, and the interior space difference is not significant. For this class of cars, it is completely sufficient for daily use.
Perodua Aruz and Proton X70 are both mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, prioritize the one with better reputation; if you care more about value for money and features, choose the one with richer configuration. Ultimately, it is recommended to test drive both, as personal experience is the most important.
In general, Perodua Aruz and Proton X70 are both very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends mainly on your personal needs and budget. We suggest doing research, comparing quotes from multiple car dealers, and then test driving to make a final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, taking time to do research will never be wrong.
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嗰陣都會揀 Perodua Aruz 同 Honda HR-V 嚟比較。呢兩款車喺價位同定位上都幾接近，而家我哋就從多個方面做一次詳細比較，幫你慳返做功課嘅時間。
Perodua Aruz 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 72,900 - 77,900，合共 2 個版本，包括 1.5L X（RM 72,900）、1.5L AV（RM 77,900）等。
Honda HR-V 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 115,900 - 143,900，合共 4 個版本，包括 2026 e:HEV 1.5L RS（RM 143,900）、2026 1.5T V（RM 137,900）、2026 1.5T E（RM 130,900）等。
由價錢睇落去，Perodua Aruz 嘅起價確實比 Honda HR-V 平咗 RM 43,000。如果你預算有限，Perodua 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需要。但都要留意，平嘅嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備上會有取舍，具體要看你嘅需要。
Perodua Aruz 配 1.5L 4-cyl，馬力 105 hp。官方油耗 6.0 L/100km。
Honda HR-V 配 1.5L Turbo，馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。
動力方面，Honda HR-V 嘅 1.5L Turbo 比 Perodua Aruz 嘅 1.5L 4-cyl 多咗 35 匹馬力。不過日常喺市區開，兩款車嘅動力都夠用，唔會覺得唔夠力。
Perodua Aruz 車身長 4400 mm，行李箱 400 L。
Honda HR-V 車身長 4500 mm，行李箱 450 L。
空間方面，Honda HR-V 嘅車身比 Perodua Aruz 長咗 100 mm，乘坐空間更有優勢。不過 Perodua Aruz 喺城入面停車會靈活啲，各有取舍。
Perodua Aruz 同 Honda HR-V 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更睇重品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，就揀配備更豐富嗰款。最終都建議兩款都去試駕，親身體驗先至最重要。
總體嚟講，Perodua Aruz 同 Honda HR-V 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車款。揀邊一輛，關鍵仲係睇你個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花啲時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
喺馬來西亞嘅汽車市場，好多買家喺揀車嗰陣都會揀 奇瑞 Tiggo 8 同 起亞 Sportage 嚟比較。今日我哋從多個方面做個詳細比較，幫你省返做功課嘅時間。
奇瑞 Tiggo 8 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 129,750 - 129,750，一總共有 1 個版本，包括 2026 1.6T Standard（RM 129,750） 等。
起亞 Sportage 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 129,639 - 179,320，一總共有 4 個版本，包括 2025 1.6T DCT 4WD High（RM 179,320）、2025 1.6T DCT 2WD High（RM 159,320）、2025 2.0L AT 2WD High（RM 139,639） 等。
由價錢睇，起亞 Sportage 嘅起步價比 奇瑞 Tiggo 8 平咗 RM 111。實講，喺呢個價位段，幾千蚊嘅差距其實唔算大，關鍵仲睇整體嘅性價比同長期使用成本。
奇瑞 Tiggo 8 車身長 4400 mm，尾箱 400 L。
起亞 Sportage 車身長 4400 mm，尾箱 400 L。
兩部車嘅尺寸幾乎一樣，車廂空間分別唔大。呢個級別嘅車，日常使用完全夠用。
奇瑞 Tiggo 8 採用了 FWD 驅動方式。
起亞 Sportage 採用了 FWD 驅動方式。
兩部車嘅驅動方式一樣，都係 FWD，日常駕駛感覺唔會有太大分別。
奇瑞 Tiggo 8 同 起亞 Sportage 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你好看重品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，就揀配備更豐富嗰款。始終建議兩部都去試駕，親身體驗先至最重要。
總括嚟講，奇瑞 Tiggo 8 同 起亞 Sportage 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊部，關鍵仲要睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
喺馬來西亞嘅汽車市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拿 Volvo XC90 PHEV 同 Mercedes-Benz GLA 做比較。今日我哋從多個方面做一個詳細嘅比較，幫你節省做功課嘅時間。
Volvo XC90 PHEV 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 434,888 - 434,888，一共有 2 個版本，包括 2025 2.0T 77km Ultra（RM 434,888）、Volvo XC90 PHEV 邊啲安全配備？（RM 362,888）等。
Mercedes-Benz GLA 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 258,888 - 295,888，一共有 1 個版本，包括 Standard（RM 258,888）等。
睇返價錢，Mercedes-Benz GLA 嘅起價比 Volvo XC90 PHEV 平咗 RM 176,000。老實講，喺呢個價位段，幾千塊嘅差距其實唔算大，關鍵仲係睇整體嘅性價比同長期使用成本。
Volvo XC90 PHEV 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
Mercedes-Benz GLA 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
兩款車嘅驅動方式一樣，都係 FWD，日常駕駛感受唔會有太大區別。
Volvo XC90 PHEV 保修 5 年/無限里程，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Mercedes-Benz GLA 保修 3 年/100,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Volvo XC90 PHEV 同 Mercedes-Benz GLA 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更重視品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰一款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，就揀配備更豐富嗰款。最終都係建議兩款都去試駕，親身體驗先係最重要。
總體嚟講，Volvo XC90 PHEV 同 Mercedes-Benz GLA 都係馬來西亞市場好唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一部，關鍵仲係睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做足功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對無錯。
Vehicle Overview
Whether the Audi RS 3 is worth buying depends not on how attractive it looks, but on whether it can meet your actual usage needs. This article will focus on insurance, road tax, tires, and daily energy costs.
The price is set at RM 673,600. Buyers can first use this to assess budget pressure and positioning within the same class.
Vehicle Purchase Price Guide
The purchase budget for the Audi RS 3 can be measured starting from RM 673,600. This number truly affects monthly installments, insurance, and cash flow, not just the displayed price in the showroom.
If you are hesitating between a few versions, you can put the 2025 Sedan 2.5 TFSI quattro (RM 673,600) on the same list for comparison. Daily commuters should prioritize comfort and safety, while frequent highway drivers should place more emphasis on power, driver assistance, and cabin convenience.
Core Specifications Summary
When looking at the Audi RS 3's core specifications, the most important thing is to translate the numbers into real-life feelings.
Turbocharging, a 5-cylinder power base, is suitable for judging whether city driving and highway cruising will be easy. An output of 400 Ps and 500 N·m truly matters in terms of not being too strenuous when fully loaded, climbing hills, and overtaking. The settings of the DCT dual-clutch transmission and all-wheel drive layout will affect startup smoothness, wet road stability, and long-distance cruising feel.
Pros and Cons Analysis
The pros of the Audi RS 3 do not need exaggeration; the truly valuable part is whether it makes daily use more worry-free: clear budget positioning, easy direct comparison with same-class cars, power output supporting highway and overtaking needs, and space/body dimensions facilitating family buyers to predict practicality.
It should be noted that the final trade-offs will fall on version configuration, insurance, and long-term maintenance costs. These are not negative points, but life details that should be clarified before placing an order.
Common Car Buying Questions
Before buying an Audi RS 3, the most common question from buyers is not a single specification, but whether it can fit into their lives.
Who is this car suitable for? Buyers who prioritize insurance, road tax, tires, and daily energy costs. What should family users look at? Prioritize rear seat riding, child seats, luggage, and whether getting in and out of the car for daily use is convenient. Will driving it every day be troublesome? If energy costs, parking convenience, and version configuration all match your life rhythm, it will be easier to get along with.
Competitor Comparison Content
When putting the Audi RS 3 into the same-class car list, it is not recommended to look only at the brand or appearance. The truly useful comparison order is: first use RM 673,600 to lock the budget range, then see if the power is enough to handle highway and full load, and finally see if the space is suitable for family and luggage.
The results screened out this way are closer to daily life. You will be clearer whether it is suitable for city commuting, family transportation, long-distance cruising, or more suitable as a choice that seeks individuality.
Full Cycle Usage Guide
The key to owning an Audi RS 3 is confirming that insurance, road tax, maintenance, and tire costs are all within acceptable ranges. Buying a car is not ending with a one-time payment, but interacting every day.
If you often run the North-South Expressway, power and cabin comfort are more important than simply low price; if mostly in the city, parking flexibility, visibility, and low-speed smoothness will affect your mood more.
車型概覽
捷途旅行者 值唔值得睇，第一步唔係望牌子或者外形，而係睇佢能唔能夠配合你嘅香港日常。 呢篇會集中講家庭乘坐、行李同舒適度，幫你用買家角度篩走唔適合嘅選擇。
售價仍待確認，買家可以先把佢放入候選名單，等價格落實後再同同級車逐項比較。
購車價格指南
捷途旅行者 目前售價仍未清晰，較理性嘅做法係先睇版本、車身大小同動力形式，等價格落實後再決定值唔值得落訂。
如果有幾個版本可揀，可以先將 2025 1.5T 双离合两驅版（價格待確認）、2025 2.0T 雙離合四驅版（價格待確認）、2025 2.0T 自動四驅版（價格待確認） 放喺同一張清單。日常通勤重視舒適同易用，家庭買家就要優先睇後排、尾箱同安全配置。
核心規格重點
睇 捷途旅行者 嘅規格，重點唔係背數字，而係理解佢喺香港用車場景會帶嚟咩分別。
渦輪增壓、4 個 汽缸、1498/1998 mL 排量 嘅動力底子，重點係市區跟車夠唔夠順、高速巡航會唔會吃力。 184 Ps / 135 kW / 254 Ps / 187 kW、290/390 N·m 嘅輸出，對滿載、上斜同超車都比單睇馬力數字更有意思。 車長 4785/4782 mm、車闊 2006/2036 mm、車高 1880 mm、軸距 2800 mm 可以幫你預判商場停車場、屋苑車位同後排腿部空間。 濕式雙離合(DCT) / 手自一體(AT)、前置前駆 / 前置四駆 會影響起步順滑度、濕地穩定感同長途巡航性格。
優缺點分析
捷途旅行者 嘅優點唔需要講到天花龍鳳，真正有價值係佢能唔能夠令日常用車更省心：動力輸出對高速同上斜更有底氣、空間同車身尺寸方便家庭買家預判實用性。
要留意嘅係，香港停車場同窄路使用要留意車身闊度、售價未清晰前唔應該太早用性價比落結論。呢啲唔一定係缺點，但係落訂前應該先諗清楚。
買家常見問題
買 捷途旅行者 之前，真正要問嘅唔係單一規格，而係佢可唔可以融入你每日嘅生活節奏。
常見疑問係「捷途 Jetour 旅行者 嘅座艙智能嗎？」簡單講，捷途 Jetour 旅行者 採用咗高通驍龍 8155 芯片，反應好流暢。 放到實際用車，就係要睇佢對通勤、泊車、家庭乘坐同長期成本有幾大幫助。
同級對比內容
將 捷途旅行者 放入同級車清單時，唔建議只用外形或者品牌光環決定。比較順序可以係：先等售價落實，再決定佢應該同邊個級距比較、再睇動力係咪足夠應付高速併線同滿載、最後睇車身大小、座位同尾箱是否適合家人。
咁樣篩選會貼近香港買家真實生活：平日塞車、商場泊車、周末去新界、甚至一家人出入，先係一部車每日要面對嘅考驗。
用車全周期指南
擁有 捷途旅行者 唔係買車一刻就完結，之後仲有保險、輪胎、保養、泊車同日常能源成本要處理。
如果你主要喺市區行，視野、低速順滑度同泊車輔助會好影響心情；如果經常行高速或跨區，座椅舒適度、隔音同動力從容感會更重要。
車型概覽
寶馬iX2 值唔值得睇，第一步唔係望牌子或者外形，而係睇佢能唔能夠配合你嘅香港日常。 呢篇會集中講家庭乘坐、行李同舒適度，幫你用買家角度篩走唔適合嘅選擇。
完稅價 HK$ 599,899 - 799,900 令預算位置更清楚，買家可以先估算月供、保險、泊車同日常開支。
購車價格指南
寶馬iX2 嘅購車預算可以先由 完稅價 HK$ 599,899 - 799,900 開始計。香港買車唔只係睇車價，月供、保險、牌費、泊車同能源成本都會影響每月壓力。
如果有幾個版本可揀，可以先將 2025 eDrive20（HK$ 599,899）、2025 eDrive20 M Sport Edition（HK$ 669,900）、2025 xDrive30 M Sport Edition（HK$ 799,900）、2025 xDrive30（價格待確認） 放喺同一張清單。日常通勤重視舒適同易用，家庭買家就要優先睇後排、尾箱同安全配置。
核心規格重點
睇 寶馬iX2 嘅規格，重點唔係背數字，而係理解佢喺香港用車場景會帶嚟咩分別。
64.8 kWh 嘅電池容量，真正意義係可以幫你估算一星期通勤同周末出車要唔要中途補電。 150/230 kW、250/494 N·m 嘅輸出，令高速併線同短距離超車更有信心。 車長 4554 mm、車闊 1845 mm、車高 1560 mm、軸距 2692 mm 可以幫你預判商場停車場、屋苑車位同後排腿部空間。 固定齒比、前置前駆 / 雙電機四駆 會影響起步順滑度、濕地穩定感同長途巡航性格。
優缺點分析
寶馬iX2 嘅優點唔需要講到天花龍鳳，真正有價值係佢能唔能夠令日常用車更省心：預算位置清楚，方便同同級車直接比較、電池同續航資訊有助安排通勤同補電、動力輸出對高速同上斜更有底氣。
要留意嘅係，要先確認屋苑、公司或常去商場嘅充電條件、香港停車場同窄路使用要留意車身闊度。呢啲唔一定係缺點，但係落訂前應該先諗清楚。
買家常見問題
買 寶馬iX2 之前，真正要問嘅唔係單一規格，而係佢可唔可以融入你每日嘅生活節奏。
常見疑問係「BMW iX2 嘅行李箱空間實用嗎？」簡單講，BMW iX2 嘅行李箱標準容量為 525 公升，由於採用咗大斜背設計，開口非常寬闊方便拎取大型物件。若摺低後排座椅，BMW iX2 嘅載物空間更可擴展至 1,400 公升，無論係擺放戶外運動裝備定係超市購物袋都非常方便。 放到實際用車，就係要睇佢對通勤、泊車、家庭乘坐同長期成本有幾大幫助。
同級對比內容
將 寶馬iX2 放入同級車清單時，唔建議只用外形或者品牌光環決定。比較順序可以係：先用 完稅價 HK$ 599,899 - 799,900 鎖定預算圈、再睇動力係咪足夠應付高速併線同滿載、再比較能源成本同補能便利、最後睇車身大小、座位同尾箱是否適合家人。
咁樣篩選會貼近香港買家真實生活：平日塞車、商場泊車、周末去新界、甚至一家人出入，先係一部車每日要面對嘅考驗。
用車全周期指南
擁有 寶馬iX2 最重要係先諗清楚充電節奏。屋苑、公司或者常去商場只要有穩定充電選項，電動化用車就會容易相處好多。
如果你主要喺市區行，視野、低速順滑度同泊車輔助會好影響心情；如果經常行高速或跨區，座椅舒適度、隔音同動力從容感會更重要。
兄弟姐妹們，今日講一個出海嘅大新聞——唔係賣車，係賣「司機」。6 月 2 號，文遠知行同 Uber 聯合宣佈咗一件事：計劃喺西班牙馬德里推出該國首個商業化 Robotaxi 試點服務。意思就係：西班牙人好快就可以用 Uber 叫到一台冇司機嘅出租車。呢次係文遠知行同 Uber 第一次一齊進入歐洲市場。馬德里亦成為文遠知行 Robotaxi 駛入嘅全球第十二個城市。
官方消息話，喺馬德里自治區政府嘅支持下，呢項服務今年內就會正式啟動。到嗰陣，馬德里嘅朋友哋打開 Uber App，就有一鍵呼叫文遠知行嘅 Robotaxi。同叫普通網約車一樣，分別係嚟嘅車冇駕駛員——至少喺初期，仲係有分別嘅。運營初期，車入面會配備經過專業培訓嘅安全員，終究係剛上線，穩妥第一。
文遠知行呢間公司，你可能聽過，也可能冇聽過。簡單介紹下：2017 年成立，一直埋頭搞 Robotaxi 技術研發同商業化。而家佢嘅 Robotaxi 已經覆蓋咗廣州、北京、新加坡、阿布達比、迪拜、利雅得、蘇黎世……加埋而家嘅馬德里，一共 12 個城市。西班牙亦係文遠知行進入嘅第五個歐洲市場——之前已經入咗瑞士、法國、比利時、斯洛伐克。按照文遠知行同 Uber 喺 2025 年 5 月達成嘅規劃，佢哋要喺五年內新增 15 個國際城市部署 Robotaxi 服務，全球部署數萬輛 Robotaxi。隨著馬德里落地，目前已經完成咗 4 個城市嘅佈局，仲有 11 個會喺 2030 年前陸續覆蓋。
講真嘅，中國自動駕駛公司出海唔係頭一回，但中國技術 + 全球出行平台 + 歐洲市場呢個組合，定係好有意思。馬德里係歐洲最具商業潛力嘅 Robotaxi 市場之一，人口多、出行需求大，當地政策都好友善。喺呢個市場站穩腳根，對文遠知行嚟講係個唔小嘅里程碑。對 Uber 嚟講，引進 Robotaxi 都係為咗降低成本——終究司機唔使發人工。對馬德里市民嚟講，以後打車可能更平。
你睇過印度嘅馬路嗎？
我喺網上見過。
畫面通常係咁，一輛轎車俾牛尾擋住，旁邊仲有亂竄嘅摩托，甚至周圍仲有賣奶茶嘅小夥，嗰叫一個“乾淨又衛生”。
然而，喺呢啲睇完好多人覺得生理不適嘅地方，豐田、鈴木、本田等日本車廠，卻決定將籌碼押落印度。
據印度“品牌質量基金會”網站顯示，三家車廠將喺印度投資近110 億美元建廠、提產能、搞出口。
對此有网友表示，三家日本車廠係咪錢多到無處花？
事實上，佢哋唔係錢多到花唔完，亦唔係被印度嘅咖哩蒙蔽咗心竅，呢啲日本車廠高層遠比我哋清醒。
而家嘅日系車，營業額、市場份額都喺下滑，原材料成本仲係升得飛起，打開世界地圖，搵一個能夠容納產能、拓充份額、競爭溫和嘅市場，唔係咁容易嘅事。
所以，唔係日本車廠選擇咗印度，而係因為冇得揀。
日本車廠之痛
曾經嘅日系車，嗰時妥妥係人哋個仔。
你問下十幾年前開過日系車嘅老司機，一提起日系車，幾乎就冇唔豎大拇指嘅，價錢平、省油、耐用又抵撞……
甚至好多日系車，仲要加價購買，但邊個諗到，呢個鐵打嘅江山，短短幾年時間就俾佢哋打得找唔著北。
隨著新能源汽車浪潮嚟到，電動化、智能化變成好多自主車廠“彎道超車”嘅目標，依托於中國強大嘅新能源汽車產業鏈優勢同車廠自身對研發、技術嘅堅持，中國自主品牌迅速實現咗“彎道超車”。
曾經被人吐槽嘅國產車，而家喺馬路越來越多人，甚至份額超越咗合資。
根據乘聯會嘅數據，喺2026 年4 月，自主品牌嘅份額已經高達62.5%，遠超日系嘅13.1%。
要知道，中國汽車市場係全球最大嘅汽車市場，喺中國市場失速，就相當於丟咗一塊巨大嘅蛋糕。
同時，中國市場近年嚟嘅主旋律依舊係價格戰，捲配置、捲價格、捲服務已經成為一種常態，亦對日系車嘅利潤產生咗巨大嘅影響。
除咗中國，日系車喺美國過得亦唔太好。
2025 年 1 月 20 日，特朗普宣誓就職第 47 任美國總統，自此開啟咗一連串搞搞震，其中就包括以國家安全為理由徵收額外嘅汽車關稅，導致進口日本汽車嘅關稅稅率一度高達 27.5%，雖然後嚟有所降低，但亦遠高於最初嘅稅率。
呢個操作，直接導致七大日本車廠喺2025 財政年度嘅關稅損失超2 萬億日元。
再睇日本本土，其實亦唔容易。
中東地緣衝突導致霍爾木茲海峽航運受阻，運輸成本、原材料成本暴漲，日本車廠都有苦難言。
高管們看著報表，背後發涼，只能尋找全新嘅增長曲線。
所以，日本車廠唔係愛上印度，係冇地方去。
揀選印度嘅深思熟慮
咁，印度點解咁有魔力，先至令日本車廠重資投入呢？
第一個優勢就係大。喺2025 年，印度汽車市場取得咗551.7 萬輛嘅新車銷量，同比增長 6%，刷新咗歷史紀錄，位居全球第三大汽車市場，已经连续四年超越日本，僅次於中國同美國。
呢個含金量唔使多講啦，而印度取得呢一成績，主要係因為印度一直喺推動減稅政策，促進消費，這導致國內消費意願出現咗明顯增強。
第二個優點係近，就係離日系車賣得動嘅地方近，如非洲等其他地區。
所以，印度對於日本車廠，更似一個建喺十字路口中央嘅便利店，你唔使將車分別運去八個國家，只需要喺印度呢站造好，然後一船一船甩去，就能削減唔少成本。
《日本經濟新聞》亦認為，印度有望轉變為佢哋全球嘅汽車供應中心。
第三個優點係穩。要知道，日系車嘅優勢就係燃油車，畢竟引擎、變速箱、底盤三大件，佢哋已經玩咗好多年，技術積累喺全球都係數一數二。
但係中國汽車市場已經全力推動電動化、智能化發展，導致日系車嘅優勢越來越弱，根本無法發揮出嚟，但印度唔一樣，佢擁有充電樁少、電動化進程緩慢嘅特點，印度老百姓買車，都仲係盯住平、省油、易修，而呢三點正係日系車嘅老本行。
尤其係鈴木，一直係印度汽車市場嘅常青樹，幾乎年年穩坐暢銷車型寶座，口碑好，勝過任何廣告。
所以，日本車廠大力佈局印度市場，顯然是經過深思熟慮嘅。
但，印度市場真係咁好混咩？
難啃嘅印度市場
當然，印度亦唔係完美得似個香口格，佢嘅缺點同佢嘅優點一樣明顯，而且每一個都夠日本車廠喝一壺。
先講電動化，冇錯，眼睇下印度充電樁少、電動車賣唔動，確實係日系燃油車嘅避風港。但你得諗諗，呢個“避風港”能避幾耐？
印度此前可係喊出咗 2030 年電動車佔新車 30% 嘅口號，雖然聽落似吹水，但抵唔住人哋真補錢、真建充電站。
試諗下，萬一有日印度突然開竅，開始大力推動電動化、搞基建，充電樁似雨後春筍咁冒出來，嗰日系車唔就傻眼？
呢唔係泰國市場嘅翻版咩？
當年日系車喺泰國都係躺贏，整個東南亞市場，都被稱為日系車嘅後花園，結果泰國率先推動電動化，中國電動車一嚟，直接就成咗香口格，再睇日系車，喺泰國嘅市場份額嘩嘩嚟咗落。
如果印度係電動化一加速，歷史大概率會重演，而而家呢次，日系車連逃嘅地方都快冇咗，點樣預防，將成為日本車廠嘅首要問題。
再講政策，印度嘅政策就似一鍋咖哩，你永遠唔知下一口食到係雞肉定係馬鈴薯。
呢個魔幻嘅國家，今日係低關稅鼓勵建廠，明日就可能罰你一筆巨款，更令人頭痛嘅係強制合資，外國車廠想喺印度賣車，要搵本地夥伴搭檔，等你工廠建好咗、供應鏈搭完咗，印度直接背刺你，到嗰陣無論係加錢定撤資，換嚟嘅都係心痛。
所以你看，印度呢個市場，就好似一個睇落好甜嘅芒果，咬落去第一口仲行，再啃幾口就摸著硬核。
日系車而家嘅算盤係，趁住核都未硌牙，趕緊多啃幾口，但核遲早會硌到，只係唔知係邊一日。
尾聲
日系車呢趟印度之旅，唔係去旅遊，係去搵食。
中國同東南亞嘅飯桌更擁擠，生產、運輸嘅成本又提高咗，放眼全球，就印度呢口鍋仲冒住熱氣，哪怕入面煮嘅係咖哩味嘅石頭，都要硬著頭皮啃落去。
日本車廠想擴大市場，印度想嘅係拉動經濟、解決就業，雙方都有各自嘅心思。
至於結局係日系車喺印度重新封神，定係好似當年嘅部分友商一樣灰溜溜走人，那就唔知啦。
但無論點樣，呢場戲先至開始，我哋慢慢睇就得啦。
反正印度嘅故事，從來唔會悶。
