首頁eat
搜尋歷史
熱門搜尋
經銷商登入 / 註冊
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嗰陣都會拎 Proton X70 同 Subaru Crosstrek 嚟做比較。呢兩款車喺價位同定位上都幾接近，今日我就由多個方面做個詳細比較，幫你節省做功課嘅時間。
Proton X70 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 106,800 - 122,300，總共有 3 個版本，包括 1.5L Standard 2WD（RM 106,800）、1.5L Executive 2WD（RM 115,800）、1.5L Premium 2WD（RM 122,300） 等。
Subaru Crosstrek 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 145,000 - 160,000，總共有 1 個版本，包括 2.0L e-Boxer（RM 150,000） 等。
由價錢睇嚟，Proton X70 嘅起步價的確比 Subaru Crosstrek 平咗 RM 38,200。如果你預算有限，Proton 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需求。不過都唔好忘記，便宜嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備上會有取捨，具體睇你嘅需求。
Proton X70 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA)。
Subaru Crosstrek 嘅安全評級係 5★ (Euro NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 EyeSight。
安全配備方面，兩款車都攞到唔錯嘅評級。不過 Proton X70 嘅 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA) 同 Subaru Crosstrek 嘅 EyeSight 喺功能上有啲差異，如果你比較睇重主動安全嘅話，可以詳細對比下兩者嘅功能列表。
Proton X70 車身長 4400 mm，後廂 400 L。
Subaru Crosstrek 車身長 4400 mm，後廂 400 L。
兩款車嘅尺寸差唔多，車內空間差唔多。呢個級別嘅車，日常使用完全夠用。
Proton X70 保修 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Subaru Crosstrek 保修 3 年/100,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Proton X70 同 Subaru Crosstrek 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更睇重品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，那就揀配置更豐富嗰款。始終都建議兩款都去試駕，親身體驗先係最重要嘅。
總體嚟講，Proton X70 同 Subaru Crosstrek 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊部車，關鍵都要睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再嚟試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拿 寶騰 X70 同 斯巴路 Forester 嚟做比較。呢兩款車喺價位同定位上都好相近，今日我哋就由多個方面做一個詳細嘅對比，幫你節省咗做功課嘅時間。
寶騰 X70 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 106,800 - 122,300，一共有 3 個版本，包括 1.5L 標準 2WD（RM 106,800）、1.5L 行政 2WD（RM 115,800）、1.5L 豪華 2WD（RM 122,300）等。
斯巴路 Forester 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 174,000 - 197,000，一共有 3 個版本，包括 2024 2.0L S EyeSight GT Edition（RM 189,538）、2024 2.0L S EyeSight（RM 177,538）、2024 2.0L L EyeSight（RM 167,538）等。
從價錢嚟睇，寶騰 X70 嘅起步價確實比 斯巴路 Forester 低咗 RM 67,200。如果你預算有限，寶騰嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需求。但亦都要注意，平嗰幾千塊，可能喺配備上會有取捨，具體要睇你嘅需求。
寶騰 X70 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA)。
斯巴路 Forester 嘅安全評級係 5★ (Euro NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 EyeSight。
安全配備方面，兩款車都拿到咗唔錯嘅評級。不過寶騰 X70 嘅 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA) 同 斯巴路 Forester 嘅 EyeSight 喺功能上有些差異，如果你比較看重主動安全嘅話，可以仔細對比下兩者嘅功能列表。
寶騰 X70 採用地 FWD 驅動方式。
斯巴路 Forester 採用地 FWD 驅動方式。
兩款車嘅驅動方式一樣，都係 FWD，日常駕駛感受唔會有太大區別。
寶騰 X70 同 斯巴路 Forester 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更看重品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰一款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，那就揀配備更豐富嗰款。最終都係建議兩款都去試駕，親身體驗先係最重要嘅。
總體嚟講，寶騰 X70 同 斯巴路 Forester 都係馬來西亞市場好唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵都要睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers compare the Proton X70 and the Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV when choosing a car. Both cars are quite similar in price and positioning. Today, we will conduct a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
The OTR price of the Proton X70 in Malaysia is RM 106,800 - 122,300, with a total of 3 versions, including 1.5L Standard 2WD (RM 106,800), 1.5L Executive 2WD (RM 115,800), and 1.5L Premium 2WD (RM 122,300).
The OTR price of the Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV in Malaysia is RM 129,750 - 129,750, with a total of 2 versions, including 2025 1.5T 90km CSH (RM 129,750), What charging methods does the Tiggo 7 PHEV support? Can it be charged using a home power socket? (RM 117,478), and so on.
In terms of price, the starting price of the Proton X70 is indeed RM 22,950 cheaper than the Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV. If your budget is limited, the entry-level version of Proton can already meet daily needs. But keep in mind that the few thousand ringgit difference might involve trade-offs in features, depending on your specific needs.
The Proton X70 is equipped with a 1.5L Turbo, producing 140 hp. Official fuel consumption is 7.0 L/100km.
The Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV is equipped with a Hybrid system, producing 170 hp. Official fuel consumption is 4.5 L/100km.
In terms of power, the Hybrid system in the Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV has 30 more horsepower than the 1.5L Turbo in the Proton X70. However, for daily city driving, the power of both cars is sufficient, and you won't feel underpowered.
The safety rating of the Proton X70 is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP). Active safety systems include ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
The safety rating of the Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV is TBD. Active safety systems include Basic.
Regarding safety features, both cars have achieved good ratings. However, there are some differences in functionality between the Proton X70's ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA) and the Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV's Basic system. If you value active safety, you can compare their feature lists in detail.
The Proton X70 body length is 4400 mm, with a 400 L trunk.
The Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV body length is 4400 mm, with a 400 L trunk.
The dimensions of both cars are almost identical, with little difference in interior space. For this class of vehicle, they are more than sufficient for daily use.
Both the Proton X70 and Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV are mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, you can prioritize the one with the better reputation; if you care more about cost-performance ratio and features, choose the one with richer configurations. Ultimately, it is recommended to test drive both; personal experience is the most important.
In general, both the Proton X70 and Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV are excellent models in the Malaysian market. Choosing which one depends on your personal needs and budget. We recommend doing your homework, comparing quotes from several dealerships, and then test driving to make a final decision. Buying a car is a big decision; spending some time preparing is never a mistake.
In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers compare the Proton X70 and Chery Tiggo 7 Pro when choosing a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning, so today we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
The OTR price of Proton X70 in Malaysia is RM 106,800 - 122,300, with a total of 3 versions, including 1.5L Standard 2WD (RM 106,800), 1.5L Executive 2WD (RM 115,800), 1.5L Premium 2WD (RM 122,300), etc.
The OTR price of Chery Tiggo 7 Pro in Malaysia is RM 123,750 - 123,750, with a total of 2 versions, including 1.6L Turbo Standard (RM 125,000), 1.6L Turbo Premium (RM 140,000), etc.
In terms of price, the starting price of the Proton X70 is indeed RM 16,950 cheaper than the Chery Tiggo 7 Pro. If your budget is limited, the entry-level Proton is sufficient for daily needs. However, note that the savings of a few thousand might involve trade-offs in features, depending on your specific needs.
The safety rating of Proton X70 is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), with active safety systems including ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
The safety rating of Chery Tiggo 7 Pro is TBD, with active safety systems including Basic.
Regarding safety features, both cars have received good ratings. However, the ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA) of the Proton X70 and the Basic system of the Chery Tiggo 7 Pro differ in functionality. If you prioritize active safety, you can carefully compare the feature lists of both.
Proton X70 warranty 5 years/150,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Chery Tiggo 7 Pro warranty 3 years/100,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Both the Proton X70 and Chery Tiggo 7 Pro are mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale price more, you can prioritize the one with a better reputation; if you care more about value and features, choose the one with richer configurations. Ultimately, it is recommended to test drive both, as personal experience is the most important.
Overall, both the Proton X70 and Chery Tiggo 7 Pro are very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose mainly depends on your personal needs and budget. We recommend doing thorough research, comparing quotes from several dealerships, and then test driving to make the final decision. Buying a car is a major decision; spending time on research is never a mistake.
In Malaysia's SUV market, many buyers compare Proton X70 and Mazda CX-30 when choosing a car. The price and positioning of these two cars are quite close. Today we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to save you time doing research.
Proton X70's OTR price in Malaysia is RM 106,800 - 122,300, with a total of 3 versions, including 1.5L Standard 2WD (RM 106,800), 1.5L Executive 2WD (RM 115,800), 1.5L Premium 2WD (RM 122,300), etc.
Mazda CX-30's OTR price in Malaysia is RM 122,409 - 146,409, with a total of 4 versions, including 2025 2.0L High+ Premium (RM 146,409), 2025 2.0L High+ (RM 138,409), 2025 2.0L High (RM 130,409), etc.
Looking at the price, Proton X70's starting price is indeed RM 15,609 cheaper than Mazda CX-30. If your budget is limited, Proton's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. However, be aware that the cheaper few thousand might involve trade-offs in features, depending on your specific requirements.
Proton X70 is equipped with 1.5L Turbo, 140 hp. Official fuel consumption 7.0 L/100km.
Mazda CX-30 is equipped with 1.5L Turbo, 140 hp. Official fuel consumption 7.0 L/100km.
Both cars use the same powertrain, and the driving experience feels basically the same daily. Fuel consumption is also similar, no need to worry too much about this.
Proton X70 warranty 5 years/150,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Mazda CX-30 warranty 5 years/150,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
The warranty conditions for both cars are the same, no need to worry about this aspect. Actual maintenance costs also depend on the brand's service network and parts prices. It is recommended to ask real car owners in owner groups for their experience.
Proton X70 and Mazda CX-30 are both mainstream choices in the Malaysia market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale price more, you can prioritize the one with better reputation; if you care more about cost-performance ratio and features, then choose the one with richer configuration. Ultimately, it is suggested to test drive both, personal experience is the most important.
Overall, Proton X70 and Mazda CX-30 are both very good models in the Malaysia market. Which one to choose depends mainly on your personal needs and budget. It is recommended that everyone does their homework well, compares quotes from several dealerships, and then test drives to make a final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending time doing homework will never be wrong.
In Malaysia's SUV market, many buyers compare Proton X70 and Toyota Fortuner when choosing a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning. Today we will do a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
Proton X70's OTR price in Malaysia is RM 106,800 - 122,300, with a total of 3 versions, including 1.5L Standard 2WD (RM 106,800), 1.5L Executive 2WD (RM 115,800), 1.5L Premium 2WD (RM 122,300), etc.
Toyota Fortuner's OTR price in Malaysia is RM 195,880 - 241,880, with a total of 3 versions, including 2024 2.8T VRZ Diesel (RM 241,880), 2024 2.7L SRZ Petrol (RM 202,880), 2024 2.4L Standard Diesel (RM 195,880), etc.
From a price perspective, the starting price of Proton X70 is indeed RM 89,080 cheaper than Toyota Fortuner. If your budget is limited, Proton's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. But be aware that the few thousand ringgit saved might involve trade-offs in features, which depends on your specific needs.
Proton X70's safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
Toyota Fortuner's safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include.
Both cars have the same safety rating, and safety features are quite comprehensive for this class. New cars these days are generally safe, so there is no need to worry too much about this.
Proton X70 body length is 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
Toyota Fortuner body length is 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
Both cars are almost the same size, and the interior space is not much different. For this class of cars, daily use is more than enough.
Proton X70 warranty 5 years/150,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Toyota Fortuner warranty 5 years/unlimited mileage, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Proton X70 and Toyota Fortuner are both mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, you can prioritize the one with better reputation; if you care more about cost-performance ratio and features, choose the one with richer configuration. Ultimately, it is recommended to test drive both, as personal experience is the most important.
Overall, Proton X70 and Toyota Fortuner are both very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose, the key is still to look at your personal needs and budget. We suggest doing your research, comparing quotes from multiple dealerships, and then test driving to make a final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending time on research will never be wrong.
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家在揀車嘅時候都會拿 寶騰 X50 同 速霸陸 Forester 嚟做比較。這兩款車喺價位同定位上都幾接近，今日我就由多個方面做一個詳細嘅比較，幫你省咗做功課嘅時間。
寶騰 X50 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 89,800 - 113,300，一共有 4 個版本，包括 1.5T Executive（RM 89,800）、1.5T Premium（RM 101,800）、1.5T Flagship（RM 113,300） 等。
速霸陸 Forester 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 174,000 - 197,000，一共有 3 個版本，包括 2024 2.0L S EyeSight GT Edition（RM 189,538）、2024 2.0L S EyeSight（RM 177,538）、2024 2.0L L EyeSight（RM 167,538） 等。
由價錢嚟睇，寶騰 X50 嘅起步價確實比 速霸陸 Forester 平咗 RM 84,200。如果你預算有限，寶騰嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需求。但亦都要留意，平嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備上有取舍，具體要睇你嘅需求。
寶騰 X50 搭載 1.5L 4-cyl，馬力 105 hp。官方油耗 6.0 L/100km。
速霸陸 Forester 搭載 2.0L 4-cyl，馬力 170 hp。官方油耗 8.0 L/100km。
動力方面，速霸陸 Forester 嘅 2.0L 4-cyl 比 寶騰 X50 嘅 1.5L 4-cyl 多咗 65 匹馬力。不過日常喺市區開，兩款車嘅動力都夠用，唔會覺得唔夠力。
寶騰 X50 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA)。
速霸陸 Forester 嘅安全評級係 5★ (Euro NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 EyeSight。
安全配備方面，兩款車都拿到唔錯嘅評級。不過 寶騰 X50 嘅 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA) 同 速霸陸 Forester 嘅 EyeSight 喺功能上有啲差異，如果你比較重視主動安全嘅話，可以仔細比較吓兩者嘅功能列表。
寶騰 X50 採用 4WD 驅動方式。
速霸陸 Forester 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
寶騰嘅 4WD 同 速霸陸嘅 FWD 喺操控上會有唔同感受，建議試駕比較。
總體嚟講，寶騰 X50 同 速霸陸 Forester 都係馬來西亞市場好唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一部，關鍵都要睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花點時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
In the Malaysia SUV market, many buyers compare Proton X50 and Mitsubishi Xforce when choosing a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning, so today we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
The OTR price for Proton X50 in Malaysia is RM 89,800 - 113,300, with a total of 4 variants, including 1.5T Executive (RM 89,800), 1.5T Premium (RM 101,800), 1.5T Flagship (RM 113,300), etc.
The OTR price for Mitsubishi Xforce in Malaysia is RM 109,930 - 119,930, with a total of 2 variants, including 2026 1.5L Ultimate (RM 119,930), 2026 1.5L Urban (RM 109,930), etc.
From a price perspective, the starting price of Proton X50 is indeed RM 20,130 cheaper than Mitsubishi Xforce. If your budget is limited, Proton's entry-level version already meets daily needs. However, also note that the few thousand cheaper might involve trade-offs in features, depending on your needs.
Proton X50 is equipped with 1.5L 4-cyl, 105 hp. Official fuel consumption 6.0 L/100km.
Mitsubishi Xforce is equipped with 1.5L Turbo, 140 hp. Official fuel consumption 7.0 L/100km.
In terms of power, Mitsubishi Xforce's 1.5L Turbo has 35 more horsepower than Proton X50's 1.5L 4-cyl. However, for daily city driving, both cars have enough power and won't feel underpowered.
Proton X50 body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
Mitsubishi Xforce body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
The dimensions of both cars are almost the same, with little difference in interior space. For this class of car, daily use is more than enough.
Proton X50 uses 4WD drive system.
Mitsubishi Xforce uses FWD drive system.
Proton's 4WD and Mitsubishi's FWD will offer different handling experiences, a test drive comparison is recommended.
Both Proton X50 and Mitsubishi Xforce are mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, you can prioritize the one with better reputation; if you care more about value for money and features, choose the one with more configurations. Ultimately, it is recommended to test drive both, personal experience is the most important.
In general, both Proton X50 and Mitsubishi Xforce are very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends mainly on your personal needs and budget. We recommend doing your homework, comparing quotes from multiple dealerships, and then test driving to make the final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending time on research will never go wrong.
In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers compare Proton X50 and MG MG HS when choosing a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning. Today we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
The Proton X50 OTR price in Malaysia is RM 89,800 - 113,300, with a total of 4 versions, including 1.5T Executive (RM 89,800), 1.5T Premium (RM 101,800), 1.5T Flagship (RM 113,300), etc.
The MG MG HS OTR price in Malaysia is RM 130,450 - 146,450, with a total of 2 versions, including 1.5L Standard (RM 105,000), 1.5L Executive (RM 115,000), etc.
From a price perspective, the starting price of Proton X50 is indeed RM 40,650 cheaper than MG MG HS. If your budget is limited, Proton's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. But also note, the few thousand difference in price might involve trade-offs in features, it depends on your specific needs.
Proton X50's safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
MG MG HS's safety rating is TBD, active safety systems include Basic.
Regarding safety features, both cars have achieved good ratings. However, Proton X50's ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA) and MG MG HS's Basic have some differences in functionality. If you value active safety, you can compare the feature lists of both carefully.
Proton X50 adopts 4WD drive system.
MG MG HS adopts FWD drive system.
Proton's 4WD and MG's FWD will offer different handling experiences, recommended to test drive and compare.
Proton X50 Warranty 5 years/150,000km, Maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
MG MG HS Warranty 7 years/150,000km, Maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Both Proton X50 and MG MG HS are mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, you can prioritize the one with better reputation; if you value cost-effectiveness and features more, then choose the one with richer specifications. Ultimately, it is recommended to test drive both, personal experience is the most important.
Overall, Proton X50 and MG MG HS are both very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose, the key is to look at your personal needs and budget. It is recommended to do your homework, compare quotes from a few dealerships, and then test drive to make the final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending some time on research will never go wrong.
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拿 Proton X50 同 Mitsubishi Xforce 嚟做比較。呢兩部車喺價錢同定位上都好接近，今日我哋就從多方面做一個詳細比較，幫你節省做功課嘅時間。
Proton X50 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 89,800 - 113,300，總共有 4 個版本，包括 1.5T Executive（RM 89,800）、1.5T Premium（RM 101,800）、1.5T Flagship（RM 113,300）等。
Mitsubishi Xforce 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 109,930 - 119,930，總共有 2 個版本，包括 2026 1.5L Ultimate（RM 119,930）、2026 1.5L Urban（RM 109,930）等。
由價錢睇落，Proton X50 嘅起跳價確實比 Mitsubishi Xforce 平咗 RM 20,130。如果你預算有限，Proton 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需要。但都要記得注意，平嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備上會有取捨，具體睇你嘅需要。
Proton X50 配備 1.5L 4-cyl，馬力 105 hp。官方油耗 6.0 L/100km。
Mitsubishi Xforce 配備 1.5L Turbo，馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。
動力方面，Mitsubishi Xforce 嘅 1.5L Turbo 比 Proton X50 嘅 1.5L 4-cyl 多咗 35 匹馬力。不過日常喺市區行，兩部車嘅動力都夠用，唔會覺得唔夠力。
Proton X50 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA)。
Mitsubishi Xforce 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 MI-PILOT。
兩部車嘅安全評級一樣，喺呢個級別入面安全配備都算好齊全。而家嘅新車安全性都幾好，唔使太擔心呢一點。
Proton X50 車身長 4400 mm，尾箱 400 L。
Mitsubishi Xforce 車身長 4400 mm，尾箱 400 L。
兩部車嘅尺寸幾乎一樣，車內空間差別唔大。呢個級別嘅車，日常使用完全夠用。
Proton X50 採用 4WD 驅動方式。
Mitsubishi Xforce 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
Proton 嘅 4WD 同 Mitsubishi 嘅 FWD 喺操控上會有唔同感受，建議試駕比較。
總體嚟講，Proton X50 同 Mitsubishi Xforce 都係馬來西亞市場好唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一部，關鍵都係睇你嘅個人需要同預算。建議大家做足功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再行去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers compare the Proton X50 and Chery Tiggo Cross when choosing a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
The OTR price of the Proton X50 in Malaysia is RM 89,800 - 113,300, with a total of 4 versions, including 1.5T Executive (RM 89,800), 1.5T Premium (RM 101,800), 1.5T Flagship (RM 113,300), etc.
The OTR price of the Chery Tiggo Cross in Malaysia is RM 88,750 - 99,750, with a total of 2 versions, including 2025 HEV 1.5L CSH (RM 99,750), 2025 1.5T Standard (RM 88,750), etc.
In terms of price, the starting price of the Chery Tiggo Cross is RM 1,050 cheaper than the Proton X50. Honestly, in this price range, a difference of a few thousand is not actually that big; the key is still the overall cost-effectiveness and long-term maintenance costs.
The Proton X50 is equipped with a 1.5L 4-cyl engine, 105 hp. Official fuel consumption 6.0 L/100km.
The Chery Tiggo Cross is equipped with a 1.5L 4-cyl engine, 105 hp. Official fuel consumption 6.0 L/100km.
Both cars use the same powertrain, so the driving experience in daily use is basically the same. Fuel consumption is also about the same, so there is no need to worry too much about this point.
Proton X50 Warranty 5 years/150,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Chery Tiggo Cross Warranty 3 years/100,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Both Proton X50 and Chery Tiggo Cross are mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, you can prioritize the one with better reputation; if you care more about cost-performance ratio and features, then choose the one with richer configuration. Ultimately, it is recommended to test drive both models, as hands-on experience is the most important.
Overall, Proton X50 and Chery Tiggo Cross are both quite good car models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose mainly depends on your personal needs and budget. It is recommended to do your homework, compare quotes from several dealerships, and then test drive to make the final decision. Buying a car is a big matter; spending some time researching will definitely not be wrong.
Author | Janson
Editor | Zhi Hao
Half-year revenue of 342.7 billion yuan yet revenue grew without profit growth, Musk bets on Robotaxi to break the deadlock.
Carwest news on July 23, just now, Tesla released its Q2 2026 financial report, and simultaneously held an earnings call to address investors' concerns.
In the second quarter, Tesla's automotive business recovered significantly, delivering 480,100 vehicles, a 25% year-on-year increase, setting a new historical high for the same period.
▲ Overview of Tesla's financial information for the second quarter of the past three years
Tesla's Q2 revenue reached $28.236 billion (approximately 191.2 billion yuan), up 26% year-on-year; Automotive business revenue reached $20.516 billion (approximately 138.9 billion yuan), up 23% year-on-year.
But sales and revenue growth did not bring proportional profit improvement. In the second quarter, Tesla's operating profit was only $398 million (approximately 2.7 billion yuan), a 57% year-on-year decrease; the operating profit margin dropped from 4.1% in the same period last year to 1.4%. Automotive gross margin also dropped from 21.1% in the first quarter of this year to 16.9%.
Looking at the entire first half of the year, Tesla's cumulative revenue reached $50.623 billion (approximately 342.7 billion yuan), of which Automotive business revenue was $36.750 billion (approximately 248.8 billion yuan), still contributing over 70% of revenue.
▲ Overview of Tesla's financial information for the first half of the past three years
On the profit front, Tesla's first-half gross profit totaled $9.471 billion (approximately 64.1 billion yuan), with an overall gross margin of about 18.7%. Regarding deliveries, Tesla produced approximately 860,100 vehicles and delivered approximately 838,100 vehicles in the first half of the year.
Overall, the delivery rebound in Q2 pushed Tesla's first-half revenue to a new high for the same period in the past three years, but the operating profit margin still dropped to 2.65%, and the problem of revenue growing without profit did not get resolved.
Compared to profit performance, Tesla's progress in FSD (Supervised), Robotaxi, and Cybercab was more prominent.
As of the end of the second quarter, Tesla FSD paid user numbers reached 1.48 million, a 56% increase from 950,000 in the same period last year, and up 200,000 from the end of the first quarter this year. Tesla CEO Musk said that as FSD receives regulatory approval in various countries, market demand will further surge.
In addition, Tesla has started pushing FSD v14 lite to vehicles equipped with AI3 (HW3) hardware, distilling the driving behavior of the v14 series on AI4 vehicles to the previous generation hardware platform.
Regarding Robotaxi, Tesla's service scope has expanded to multiple cities in the US. Meanwhile, Cybercab has started production at the Texas Gigafactory and has entered the public road engineering testing phase.
While the profit pressure on Tesla's Model 3/Model Y vehicle sales business continues, FSD subscriptions and Robotaxi are gradually becoming new growth sources outside of Tesla's automotive business.
I. Revenue Grows But Profits Don't, Automotive Gross Margin Declines Quarter-on-QuarterVehicle delivery volume recovered, driving Tesla's Q2 revenue to recover growth.
In the second quarter of this year, Tesla's total revenue reached $28.236 billion (approximately 191.16 billion yuan), up 26% year-on-year; Automotive business revenue reached $20.516 billion (approximately 138.89 billion yuan), up 23% year-on-year.
Specifically, Automotive sales revenue was $20.006 billion (approximately 135.4 billion yuan), Car rental revenue was $364 million (approximately 2.5 billion yuan), and Automotive regulatory credit revenue was $146 million (approximately 1 billion yuan).
▲ Detailed quarterly financial information of Tesla
Tesla stated that Q2 revenue growth was mainly driven by increased vehicle deliveries, FSD subscription growth, expansion of services and other businesses, growth in energy business, and a positive exchange rate impact of about $500 million (approximately 3.4 billion yuan).
However, the decline in average selling price of vehicles offset some of the growth.
In the second quarter, Tesla's gross profit was $4.751 billion (approximately 32.2 billion yuan), up 23% year-on-year; the overall gross margin was 16.8%, down 0.4 percentage points from 17.2% in the same period last year, and down 4.3 percentage points from 21.1% in the first quarter this year.
But the decline in average selling price of vehicles, reduction in regulatory credit revenue, and increased investment in AI projects dragged down overall profit performance.
In the second quarter of this year, Tesla's operating profit was $398 million (approximately 2.7 billion yuan), a 57% year-on-year decrease; the operating profit margin dropped from 4.1% in the same period last year to 1.4%, a year-on-year decline of 2.69 percentage points.
However, Tesla's GAAP net profit was also supported by an investment income. In the second quarter, Tesla recognized $1.005 billion (approximately 6.8 billion yuan) in unrealized gains from its SpaceX equity investment, which was included in other income.
Regarding R&D expenses, Tesla's R&D expenses in the second quarter reached $2.371 billion (approximately 16.1 billion yuan), an increase of about 49% year-on-year.
In terms of automotive manufacturing, Tesla stated that battery pack capacity remains the main factor limiting global automotive production growth.
Tesla is increasing 4680 cell production to support Cybercab, Tesla Semi capacity ramp-up, and Model Y production expansion.
▲ Tesla's battery capacity plans for each factory
Currently, Tesla's Texas 4680 cells have installed annual capacity exceeding 40GWh, the Nevada LFP (Lithium Iron Phosphate) battery project is in the early capacity ramp-up phase, with expected annual capacity of 7GWh, while the Berlin 4680 cell project is still under construction.
In addition, the Tesla Semi new factory is in the equipment debugging phase, planning to start production in 2026.
II. Q2 Deliveries Hit Record High, Cybercab Production Starts, FSD Users Reach 1.48 MillionIn the second quarter of this year, Tesla produced 451,800 vehicles, up 10% year-on-year; delivered 480,100 vehicles, up 25% year-on-year, setting a new historical high for the same period.
In the first half of 2026, Tesla cumulatively produced approximately 860,100 vehicles and delivered approximately 838,100 vehicles.
▲ Tesla's quarterly delivery situation
Among them, Model 3/Y remain the core sales driver, producing 442,900 vehicles and delivering 467,800 vehicles in the second quarter, up 12% and 25% respectively year-on-year, contributing approximately 97.4% of the delivery volume.
Other models including Cybertruck produced 8,822 units, down 34% year-on-year; delivered 12,400 units, up 19% year-on-year.
With deliveries exceeding production, Tesla's inventory pressure significantly eased, global vehicle inventory turnover days dropped from 27 days in the first quarter to 15 days, lower than 24 days in the same period last year.
Tesla set delivery records in multiple markets including South Korea, Australia, Japan, Taiwan, Thailand, etc.
Regarding capacity, Shanghai Factory Model 3/Y annual capacity exceeds 950,000 vehicles, still Tesla's largest vehicle production factory; California, Berlin, and Texas factory related model annual capacities exceed 550,000, 375,000, and 250,000 respectively.
Additionally, Cybercab designed specifically for Robotaxi has started production at the Texas Gigafactory, with installed annual capacity exceeding 125,000 vehicles.
▲ Tesla's installed annual capacity and production status for each factory
The mass-produced Cybercab began public road engineering testing in the second quarter, and in July provided ride services for employees at the Texas factory park.
Robotaxi is also accelerating expansion, currently entering 7 major metro areas in the US. Austin continues to expand areas with unsupervised operations, Dallas and Houston are promoting relevant operations, Miami, Orlando, and Tampa launched unsupervised services in July; San Francisco Bay Area still equips safety drivers. Phoenix and Las Vegas are in the pre-launch preparation phase.
▲ Mass-produced Cybercab in testing
FSD has become another growth point. As of the end of the second quarter, Tesla FSD paid users reached 1.48 million, up 56% year-on-year, up 200,000 from the first quarter; increased by approximately 380,000 in the first half of 2026 alone.
In the second quarter, Tesla FSD net new subscription users set a record, over 55% of new vehicles delivered in North America included FSD subscription, and the order rate also reached a historical high. FSD subscription growth has formed a positive contribution to automotive related revenue and operating profit.
Regarding software, Tesla began pushing FSD v14 lite to vehicles equipped with AI3 (previously referred to by Tesla as HW3) hardware in the US, and pushed it to South Korea in July.
This version distills driving behavior of the v14 series on the AI4 platform to the AI3 platform, adds destination options such as parking lots, roadside, lane entrances, and curbs, and improves performance in scenarios such as navigation, merging/diverging, pedestrian interaction, traffic lights, and vehicle cutting in.
FSD's overseas approvals also made new progress, after the Netherlands, Tesla obtained FSD deployment approval in Lithuania, Estonia, Denmark, and Belgium.
As of July, users in the above opened markets cumulatively used FSD to drive over 50 million kilometers. Tesla stated that FSD implementation is driving local consumers' interest in its vehicles.
III. Cybercab Has No Legal Barriers, Old Owners Need Hardware Upgrade AssessmentDuring the earnings call, Musk and Tesla management focused on responding to Robotaxi operations, Cybercab regulations, Starlink access, Semi autonomous driving capabilities, and AI3 model hardware upgrades. Carwest organized the following 8 key Q&As:
1. How is the current operation of Robotaxi? How to scale up next?
Tesla AI Head Ashok Elluswamy: Currently, Tesla Robotaxi has cumulatively completed over 380,000 miles (approximately 610,000 km) of unsupervised driving in two US states and six cities, with no safety accidents worth noting. Existing accident reports were all collisions or impacts by other road users when the vehicle was stationary.
Tesla started the Robotaxi project in Austin about a year ago, at that time the passenger seat was still equipped with a safety monitor; at the end of 2025, the first batch of fully unsupervised Robotaxi started operations. Since 2026, the weekly unsupervised driving mileage of the fleet has maintained double-digit quarter-over-quarter growth, expected to continue this pace within the year.
Currently, the Robotaxi fleet has been running early versions of FSD V15. V15 planned about seven major improvement routes, with about 40% of improvement content merged into the version used by the fleet. With subsequent capabilities going live, Tesla hopes the engineering investment and preparation time required to enter new cities will gradually approach zero, finally shifting from city-by-city expansion to state-wide operations.
2. How does Tesla want the US to regulate Robotaxi?
Tesla Automotive Engineering Head Lars Moravy: The US Federal level has made不少 progress, especially Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards (FMVSS) are gradually accepting vehicles designed specifically for autonomous driving.
Tesla believes reasonable regulation should be for regulatory agencies to propose safety goals and problems to be solved, then allow enterprises to choose technical solutions, rather than specifying beforehand that a certain technical route such as LiDAR or millimeter wave radar must be adopted.
Tesla ultimately still needs to win regulatory agency and public recognition with actual vehicle safety performance, which will also become the basis for Robotaxi to continue expanding.
3. What factors limit Robotaxi expansion? Will it integrate with third-party ride-hailing platforms?
Musk: Tesla expects Robotaxi will not face insufficient demand problems, its operational economics will be very attractive, and market demand may exceed Tesla's service capability for a long time. Therefore, Robotaxi business will continue to adopt a highly vertically integrated model, at this stage there is no need to rely on third-party ride-hailing platforms for customer flow.
What truly limits Robotaxi expansion is system reliability, which is increasing the "9" in reliability indicators. Musk stated that ideally, Robotaxi needs to achieve reliability close to 99.999999%. Continuously improving reliability is the main constraint for current fleet scaling.
4. Could Tesla and SpaceX merge?
Musk: Tesla and SpaceX have increasing business overlap and cooperation in many fields, but company merger is not suitable for discussion on earnings call, if future matters involve similar items, formal decision and approval process must be undergone.
Tesla General Counsel Brandon Ehrhart: In early 2026, Tesla deepened its relationship with SpaceX through equity investment and framework agreement, both parties are cooperating on projects such as Digital Optimus.
5. Why not expand the Austin fleet first?
Ashok Elluswamy: Tesla did not concentrate all vehicles in Austin, mainly to verify the generalization capability of the FSD tech stack, proving the system can adapt to multiple cities with different road environments without massive additional development.
Robotaxi is still in the early stage of exponential growth, the absolute number of vehicles seen by outsiders is not large, but the fleet operates basically continuously, single vehicle driving time is far higher than private cars. Therefore, Tesla focuses more on unsupervised driving mileage, rather than simply focusing on vehicle quantity.
Musk: Cybercab is a brand new model, not having millions of vehicles providing road data like Model 3 and Model Y. Tesla needs to use temporarily added steering wheel, acceleration and braking pedals Cybercab to accumulate mileage, complete calibration for chassis and vehicle dynamics. After relevant data meets requirements, Cybercab quantity in each city will increase significantly.
Additionally, ride-hailing and traffic regulatory requirements vary by city and state in the US. City-by-city expansion also helps Tesla solve software, operations, and local regulatory issues one by one, then expand single market fleet size.
6. What federal regulatory barriers remain for removing steering wheels and pedals from Cybercab?
Lars Moravy: Besides regulatory agencies promoting relevant rule adjustments, Cybercab currently has no other major federal regulatory barriers.
In the past few years, Tesla has explained Cybercab's product planning and technical progress to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration and other departments. Although both sides cannot be completely consistent on all issues, communication is smooth, regulatory agencies are pushing to cancel traditional requirements such as vehicles must be equipped with steering wheels and pedals according to autonomous driving technology development.
7. Can Cybercab become a Starlink mobile hotspot? When will Tesla Semi add autonomous driving capabilities?
Musk: Starlink terminal mounted on Cybercab may become ground network relay in the future, providing Wi-Fi service for nearby mobile phones or other devices, but relevant solution has not been officially announced.
Regarding Semi, autonomous driving capabilities can alleviate US truck driver shortage, and improve safety and comfort of long-haul transport. However, Semi currently occupies a low proportion in Tesla fleet, Tesla will prioritize investment of R&D resources in larger models such as Model 3, Model Y, and Cybercab.
It is expected that Semi's autonomous driving capabilities will make substantive progress at the end of 2026 or early 2027, and will be put into use in 2027, catching up with the timing of Semi entering large-scale mass production.
8. Will old cars equipped with AI3 hardware be upgraded to new hardware?
Musk: In the long term, upgrading hardware for vehicles equipped with AI3 or earlier computing platforms, and already adopting camera-based solution, may be economically feasible. But if vehicles need massive structural modifications, upgrading may not be economically viable.
Tesla may not simply upgrade AI3 vehicles to existing AI4, but wait for the next generation computing platform. The company is developing improved AI4, performance has a moderate increase compared to existing AI4, expected to launch production around mid-2027.
AI5 is also expected to enter mass production around mid-2027, and will be applied to Optimus first. Musk also revealed that AI6 chip has entered the design phase, with the goal of becoming a globally leading edge computing chip.
Conclusion: Tesla Aggressively Pursues GrowthOverall, Tesla's first-half automotive sales walked out of the valley, but low pricing and increased R&D investment continue to squeeze profits, delivery growth has not yet translated into stronger profitability.
At the same time, FSD paid users growing rapidly, Cybercab put into production, Robotaxi accelerating city expansion, showing Tesla is shifting growth focus from simply selling cars to software subscriptions and mobility services.
Next, determining the success or failure of this transformation is not only whether FSD capabilities can continue to improve, but more importantly whether Robotaxi can cross the reliability and regulatory thresholds to achieve true large-scale commercial operations.
July16, GAC Trumpchi factory in Panyu, Guangzhou, a brand new right-hand drive Trumpchi M8 PHEV slowly drove off the production line. GAC Group Chairman Feng Xingya handed the car keys to Thai owner Tony Jaa. At this moment, GAC welcomed the milestone production of the 30 millionth vehicle. From the 1st to the 30 millionth vehicle, this Chinese automotive giant took 29 years. Amidst the industry's deep transformation, GAC revealed its confidence in navigating the cycle to the outside world through a performance sheet led by "Stability" and a cross-border delivery ceremony.
A Special Delivery, Witnessing "Mutual Effort"
Unlike the dazzling spotlights at previous delivery ceremonies, GAC Group reserved the "C-position" for the owner of the 30 millionth vehicle -- Thai action star Tony Jaa. When Feng Xingya handed him the keys, this was not just a simple delivery, but a vivid microcosm of GAC's globalization strategy from "Going Out" to "Going In".
At the event site, this "Global Sync" atmosphere was fully displayed: GAC Honda P7, GAC Toyota Intelliz 7, Qijing GT7, GAC Aion N60, GAC Hyper S600, as the 29,999,995th to 29,999,999th vehicles, sequentially rolled off the line in sync with GAC's multiple global production bases. This wave of new energy models clearly outlines GAC's determined figure in fully advancing electrification and intelligence transformation.
The Dialectic of "Fast" and "Steady": Resilience Behind the Data
If 30 million vehicles is the result, then supporting this result is GAC's resilience in "not rushing forward, only deepening cultivation" amidst change.
Data shows, in the first half of this year, GAC Group sales reached 773,100 vehicles, up 2.35% year-on-year, among which new energy vehicle sales surged 68.8% year-on-year; overseas exports exceeded 120,000, up 132% year-on-year. Against the backdrop of surging price wars and generally pressured industry profitability, GAC's "Stability" stood out especially.
Feng Xingya gave the answer in his speech: "Quality is the bottom line GAC will never yield." Behind this seemingly simple promise lies a system of strictness bordering on obsession. Before each new car is launched, it must undergo extreme environment tempering of "Five Highs, One Mountain, One Dust", and complete "Two Winters, One Summer" of on-site road testing. It is precisely this relentless pursuit of quality that made the GAC Aion Smart Eco-Factory become the "World's First New Energy Vehicle Lighthouse Factory", and also won users' trust of the Slate Battery cumulative installation of 1.5 million units, safe driving over 160 billion kilometers.
From "Product Delivery" to "Emotional Delivery"
Under the grand narrative of 30 million vehicles, GAC wants to tell more specific and micro user stories. At the event site, Feng Xingya announced the launch of "GAC Group 30 Million Vehicle Production Launch · Renewal Gratitude Season", six passenger car brands will launch special policies around new purchase, trade-in, etc.
But what is more worth attention is GAC's layout on service soft power. Facing user anxiety about battery degradation and intelligent driving safety, GAC took the lead in launching the brand's "Three Responsibilities" policy, actively taking the bottom line; facing charging pain points, GAC has already built a "9 Vertical 10 Horizontal" charging network covering 31 provinces and 213 cities nationwide, core urban areas achieving "Station Every 1 Kilometer in a Straight Line".
In addition, GAC is using activities like "User Open Mic", inviting users to "Home" to give opinions, and establishing a full-process closed-loop management mechanism. This transformation from "I Build Cars You Pay" to "You Use Cars I Accompany" is reshaping the relationship between GAC and 30 million users.
User Logic Behind Technology "Arms Race"
Standing at the new starting point of 30 million vehicles, GAC's gaze is cast towards a farther future. In Feng Xingya's view, technology should not be showing off skills, but should be converted into peace of mind and convenience that users can perceive.
In the power field, Xingyuan Power developed by the "National Distinguished Engineer Team" will be mass-produced on more models; in the "Three Electrics" field, the all-solid-state battery pilot production line has been built, and the Quark electric drive motor efficiency has broken through 99%; in the intelligent connected field, the Xingling architecture has connected six major systems, making cars become partners that "Think and Understand People". As of now, GAC cumulative R&D investment exceeded 62 billion Yuan, global R&D team exceeds 6,800 people.
As one on-site owner said: "Buying GAC, the point is "Peace of Mind"." This might be the simplest annotation for GAC's 30 million vehicle milestone, and also its strongest power to continue moving forward in the next 30 years.
July 16, GAC Group welcomed the roll-off of its 30 millionth vehicle, entering a new milestone moment.
Different from the single vehicle roll-off of other brands in the past, the roll-off of GAC Group's 30 millionth vehicles included GAC Honda P7, GAC Toyota BZ7, Qijing GT7, GAC AION N60, GAC Hyper S600, and the finale right-hand drive version GAC Trumpchi M8 PHEV.
The roll-off of star models from all brands under GAC Group simultaneously also indicates its anchoring on electrification, intelligence, and internationalization strategic routes, entering a deeper level of strategic transformation in electrification, intelligence, and internationalization.
Subsequently, Feng Xingya handed the key of the 30 millionth vehicle to Thai owner Mr. Tony Jaa. This moment froze not just a number, but a warm witness of the "two-way rush" between GAC and global users.
This trust spanning mountains and seas is the confidence with which GAC broke through amidst industry changes. In the first half of this year, GAC Group sales reached 773,100 vehicles, a 2.35% year-on-year increase. Among them, new energy vehicle sales increased by 68.8% year-on-year; overseas exports broke through 120,000 vehicles, a 132% surge year-on-year, running a steady rhythm during the industry's deep restructuring period.
Quality as the Foundation, Building the Confidence of 10 Million Users' Travel
"Quality is the bottom line that GAC will never cede," Feng Xingya said in the closing remarks. In GAC's development, scale growth has always been based on quality. For years, GAC Group has adhered to the "Quality First" concept, integrating Honda Total Quality Management (TQM), Toyota Production System (TPS), and Lingnan culture, constructing a quality management model centered on "Integrated Innovation". The bottom line of everything is to build good cars that allow users to drive with peace of mind, use with peace of mind, and sit with comfort.
From the R&D end to the manufacturing end, GAC has established a strict quality control system for the whole chain: Before every new car launch, it must undergo extreme environment tests of "Five Highs, One Mountain, One Dust" such as high cold, high heat, high altitude, high humidity, high corrosion, mountain areas, and sand and dust, completing "Two Winters and One Summer" field road tests; aided by test fields and laboratories covering 12 major categories and over 1,500 verification sub-items of the whole vehicle, achieving systematic quality verification; GAC AION Smart Ecological Factory, as the "World's First New Energy Vehicle Lighthouse Factory", guarantees mass product quality stability with a digital intelligent manufacturing system.
At the core safety technology level, the Xingling Safety Protection System constructs four protection dimensions, with eight key systems adopting dual redundancy design. It has protected nearly 2 million users and avoided 6.28 million potential travel risks; the Dart Battery has cumulatively installed 1.5 million vehicles, with a safe driving mileage of over 160 billion kilometers; the service side synchronously adds guarantees. GAC took the lead in the industry to launch the independent brand "Three Responsibilities" policy, taking the initiative to cover battery and intelligent driving assistance issues of user concern, eliminating user concerns about vehicle use. It is precisely these lines of security defense and service commitments that support the brand confidence behind GAC's 30 million sales.
User-Oriented, Building a Full-Cycle Warm Service System
"What users care about, we keep in our hearts; what users expect, we go all out." Feng Xingya stated that this user-centric concept has long been deeply integrated into the development gene of GAC Group. For many years, GAC Group has always adhered to the corporate concept of "People as the Basis, Integrity as the Way, Innovation as the Priority". The core essence of "People as the Basis" is people-oriented.
On one hand, to face problems directly and listen to user voices, GAC regularly holds user open mic events, inviting users to the "home" for face-to-face communication. At the same time, establish a full-process closed-loop management mechanism to ensure that every suggestion can be properly handled, and common problems are optimized for all users at the first time.
In addition, GAC has also established exclusive user insight departments and promoted full-process changes from problem discovery to resolution, ensuring user requests have responses and matters have results from an organizational mechanism perspective.
On the other hand, the service network accelerates penetration simultaneously. At the channel end, promote service network sinking into counties, planning to add 1,000 county authorized stores this year; at the response end, launch "Super Butler" service, achieving 5-second response and 2-hour request completion, ensuring user requests are handled quickly and directly. At the energy replenishment end, build a "9 Vertical and 10 Horizontal" energy replenishment network, already covering 31 provinces and 213 cities nationwide, achieving "a station every 1km straight line" in core urban areas. Self-operated charging piles exceed 27,000, among which super charging piles break through 20,000, providing convenient energy replenishment services for new energy car owners.
The core theme of this gratitude activity is to express sincere return and thanks to the long-term support of 30 million users. At the event scene, Feng Xingya announced that from now on, GAC officially launches the "GAC Group 30 Millionth Vehicle Roll-off · Renewal Gratitude Season". GAC Honda, GAC Toyota, GAC Trumpchi, GAC AION, GAC Hyper, and Qijing Automobile six passenger car brands will launch characteristic policies around new purchase, trade-in to additional purchase respectively, to return every bit of companionship and support.
Tech-Centric, Empowering Real Travel with Frontier Technology
With 30 million as a new starting point, GAC will drive innovation, move towards a new journey of electrification and intelligence, and let frontier technology truly transform into user-perceivable peace of mind and convenience.
In the power field, Xingyuan Power developed by the "National Excellent Engineer Team" covers Xingyuan Extended Range, Xingyuan PHEV, and Xingyuan Super Dual Engine three technologies, which will be mass-produced with more models. Every product needs to pass 100,000 hours bench and whole vehicle validation, equivalent mileage exceeds 10 million kilometers, ensuring that performance remains steady as a rock under all scenarios and all regions.
In the "Three-Electricity" field, GAC continues to attack battery super-fast charging, low-temperature range and other industry pain points. It has built an all-solid-state battery pilot production line, launched ultimate energy consumption technology. The mass-produced Quark Electric Drive Motor's maximum efficiency breaks through 99%, the highest level in the industry.
In the intelligent connectivity field, the Super Brain Xingling Architecture continues to evolve, connecting intelligent driving assistance, intelligent cockpit, power, chassis, body, and vehicle networking six systems, achieving "One Brain Unified Command", comprehensive performance improvement by 40%; Galaxy Smart Cockpit achieves terminal-cloud integration, making the car become a real "thinking, understanding human heart" partner. GAC will also fight shoulder-to-shoulder with top partners such as Huawei, CATL, Didi, Tencent, Alibaba to build a more powerful AI intelligent ecosystem.
As of now, GAC Group's cumulative R&D investment exceeds 62 billion yuan, and the global R&D team exceeds 6,800 people. Continuous technical investment is driving GAC's products to evolve from commuting tools to intelligent travel partners, mobile smart spaces, and green energy ecosystems.
Looking to the future, GAC will continue to use user needs as anchors, quality as the foundation, technological innovation as the core driver, and global layout as the development path, accelerating to advance towards an ecological tech GAC, walking side by side with more users, achieving each other, and rushing towards a smarter, greener, and broader future together.
In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers compare Perodua Aruz and MG MG HS when choosing a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning, so today we will do a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
The Perodua Aruz OTR price in Malaysia is RM 72,900 - 77,900, with a total of 2 versions, including 1.5L X (RM 72,900), 1.5L AV (RM 77,900) etc.
The MG MG HS OTR price in Malaysia is RM 130,450 - 146,450, with a total of 2 versions, including 1.5L Standard (RM 105,000), 1.5L Executive (RM 115,000) etc.
In terms of price, Perodua Aruz's starting price is indeed RM 57,550 cheaper than MG MG HS. If your budget is limited, Perodua's entry-level version is already sufficient for daily needs. But be aware that the cheaper few thousand might involve trade-offs in features, depending on your needs.
Perodua Aruz is equipped with a 1.5L 4-cyl, 105 hp. Official fuel consumption is 6.0 L/100km.
MG MG HS is equipped with a 1.5L Turbo, 140 hp. Official fuel consumption is 7.0 L/100km.
In terms of power, MG MG HS's 1.5L Turbo has 35 more horsepower than Perodua Aruz's 1.5L 4-cyl. However, for daily city driving, both cars have sufficient power and won't feel lacking.
Perodua Aruz adopts FWD drive type.
MG MG HS adopts FWD drive type.
Both cars have the same drive type, which is FWD, so there won't be much difference in daily driving experience.
Perodua Aruz warranty is 5 years/150,000km, service interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
MG MG HS warranty is 7 years/150,000km, service interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Perodua Aruz and MG MG HS are both mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, prioritize the one with the better reputation; if you care more about cost-performance and features, choose the one with richer features. In the end, it is recommended to test drive both; personal experience is the most important.
Overall, Perodua Aruz and MG MG HS are both very good car models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose mainly depends on your personal needs and budget. We recommend doing research, comparing quotes from several dealerships, and then test driving to make a final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending time on research will never be wrong.
