首頁Toyota Starlet
搜尋歷史
熱門搜尋
經銷商登入 / 註冊
In Malaysia's SUV market, many buyers compare Proton X70 and Mazda CX-60 when choosing a car. These two models are quite close in price and positioning, today we will do a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
Proton X70 OTR price in Malaysia is RM 106,800 - 122,300, with a total of 3 versions, including 1.5L Standard 2WD (RM 106,800), 1.5L Executive 2WD (RM 115,800), 1.5L Premium 2WD (RM 122,300), etc.
Mazda CX-60 OTR price in Malaysia is RM 200,510 - 252,873, with a total of 2 versions, including 2026 3.3T 4WD High Plus (RM 252,873), 2025 2.5L 2WD High (RM 200,510), etc.
In terms of price, Proton X70's starting price is indeed RM 93,710 cheaper than Mazda CX-60. If your budget is limited, Proton's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. However, also note that the price difference of a few thousand might involve compromises in equipment, it depends on your specific needs.
Proton X70 is equipped with 1.5L Turbo, 140 hp. Official fuel consumption 7.0 L/100km.
Mazda CX-60 is equipped with 2.0L 4-cyl, 170 hp. Official fuel consumption 8.0 L/100km.
In terms of power, Mazda CX-60's 2.0L 4-cyl has 30 more horsepower than Proton X70's 1.5L Turbo. However, for daily city driving, both cars have sufficient power and won't feel underpowered.
Proton X70's safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
Mazda CX-60's safety rating is 5★ (Euro NCAP), active safety systems include i-Activsense Pro.
In terms of safety features, both cars have received good ratings. However, Proton X70's ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA) and Mazda CX-60's i-Activsense Pro have some differences in functionality. If you value active safety, you can compare the function lists of both closely.
Proton X70 warranty 5 years/150,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Mazda CX-60 warranty 5 years/150,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Both cars have the same warranty conditions, no need to worry about this. Actual maintenance costs also depend on the brand's service network and parts prices, it is suggested to ask real owners in car owner groups for experience.
Overall, Proton X70 and Mazda CX-60 are both very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends mainly on your personal needs and budget. We suggest doing your research, compare quotes from several dealerships, and then test drive to make a final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending time on research will never be wrong.
[Lead: The latest Q2 2026 financial report released by General Motors proves a fact: although multinational automakers face challenges in the new energy vehicle era, they still show tenacious vitality.]
Author: Zhang Dachuan
How is the life of multinational auto giants so far this year? Recently, General Motors presented a passable mid-term exam result.
The Q2 2026 financial report of General Motors shows that the company achieved revenue of $48 billion this quarter, up 1.9% year-on-year, higher than the market's prior expectation of $46.67 billion; Adjusted EBIT reached $3.9 billion, with the profit margin rising to 8.2%. Thanks to the positive expectations for annual operating performance and market prospects, the company raised its full-year performance guidance for the second time this year, increasing the Adjusted EBIT target range to $14 billion to $16 billion.
△ General Motors' Q2 financial report performance data was good
However, there is a drag factor in the report. Affected by about $2.3 billion in strategic restructuring expenses for the electric vehicle business, General Motors' net income attributable to shareholders for this quarter was $1.3 billion, a year-on-year decline of 31.1%. However, if this non-recurring factor is excluded, the company's core operating profitability has actually improved significantly compared to the same period last year, and overall performance remains robust.
△ Electric vehicle business strategic restructuring brought about a $2.3 billion expense impact
GM North America business profitability remains strong
The North American market remains the most important profit source for General Motors and the core foundation supporting its overall performance. In Q2 2026, GM's North American business achieved Adjusted EBIT of $3.446 billion, contributing the vast majority of the company's operating profit; the Adjusted EBIT margin further increased to 8.6%, up 2.5 percentage points year-on-year, with profitability continuing to strengthen.
This is mainly due to the continued strong sales of high-profit models under brands such as Chevrolet and GMC in the North American market. General Motors has held the title of best-selling full-size SUV in the US for 52 consecutive years and has ranked first in full-size pickup sales for 7 consecutive years, holding about a 43% market share in this high-profit segment. Even facing strong competitors such as Ford's F-Series and RAM under Stellantis, General Motors maintains its leading position through the synergy of multiple brands such as Chevrolet and GMC. The new generation Chevrolet Silverado and GMC Sierra 1500 scheduled to launch in Q4 this year are expected to further consolidate its competitive advantage in North America's most profitable segment.
△ General Motors holds about a 43% market share in the North American full-size pickup segment
Compared to the electric vehicle business which is still in an adjustment phase, General Motors' intelligent connected business is gradually growing into a new profit growth engine, with the profitability of software subscriptions and digital services continuing to be released. The report shows that by the end of Q2, OnStar deferred revenue reached $6.3 billion, up nearly 50% year-on-year, providing a solid foundation for continued recognition of future software service revenue; Super Cruise confirmed revenue grew by about 70% year-on-year, maintaining a high-speed growth trend. Compared to traditional vehicle business, software and digital services have higher gross margins and stronger sustainable profitability. As related business scales continue to expand, General Motors will not only be able to generate more recurring income throughout the vehicle lifecycle but also optimize the revenue structure and improve overall profit quality and financial performance.
△ General Motors' intelligent connected business is gradually growing into a new profit growth engine
SAIC-GM's strategic status rises
In General Motors' Q2 2026 financial report, the China business remains under close attention. Although General Motors has continued to scale back investments in China in recent years, the equity earnings from the China business still grew by 16.9% year-on-year and have been profitable for seven consecutive quarters, showing strong operational resilience.
As the most important joint venture for General Motors in China, SAIC-GM's performance was also commendable. According to the June production and sales quick report released by SAIC Motor, in the first half of 2026, SAIC-GM's cumulative wholesale sales reached 231,200 units, a year-on-year decline of 5.68%, significantly better than the overall domestic passenger car market decline of 20.2%, and it is one of the mainstream joint venture automakers with the smallest sales decline. This is mainly due to the stable performance of main models such as Buick GL8, Envision family, and new LaCrosse. At the same time, SAIC-GM's new energy business grew rapidly, with sales close to 50,000 units in the first half of the year, up 81.1% year-on-year. Among them, Buick Zhijing E7 launched in April contributed more than 60% of the new energy sales and is becoming a new growth engine.
△ SAIC-GM outperformed the domestic overall car market in the first half of the year
It is worth noting that SAIC-GM may play a more important strategic role in the future. Relying on China's leading advantages in new energy and intelligence, SAIC-GM is gradually transforming from a market and profit contributor in the past to an important output platform for General Motors' global technological innovation. Taking the "Xiao Yao" super integrated architecture equipped with Zhijing E7 as an example, General Motors has already upgraded its battery wireless management system and thermal runaway protection standards to global safety standards for mid-level models. In early 2026, Buick and Chevrolet new energy models built on this architecture have entered the Mexican, Thai, and Brazilian markets in CKD form, with core three-electric systems and intelligent control modules supplied by Chinese factories. In the future, General Motors also plans to apply the "Xiao Yao" architecture's smart cockpit and intelligent driving underlying technology to mid-size pure electric SUVs in the North American market by 2027.
△ SAIC-GM is gradually transforming into an important output platform for General Motors' global technological innovation
Foreign automakers have not lost competitiveness
General Motors' financial report shows that in the new energy vehicle era, although multinational automakers face huge challenges, they have not truly lost competitiveness, and their operating concepts and system capabilities are still worth reference for Chinese automakers.
First, shifting from scale competition to profit competition. Compared to many domestic automakers that still view sales and market share as the primary goal, General Motors focuses more on profitability and shareholder returns. Relying on high-profit pickups, large SUVs, and Cadillac products, General Motors has built a mature product structure and brand premium system. Even though sales are no longer at the top globally, it can still maintain high per-car profits and ample cash flow. This also shows that for automotive enterprises, true competition is not just about selling more cars, but selling more valuable and more profitable cars.
△ Even though sales are no longer at the top globally, General Motors can still maintain high per-car profits and ample cash flow
Second, building long-term competitiveness, rather than pursuing short-term explosions. General Motors' century-long development history shows that an enterprise's core competitiveness comes not only from the products themselves but also from brand accumulation, global operation systems, and continuous operating capabilities. From R&D, procurement, and manufacturing to quality management and compliance governance, mature system capabilities allow enterprises to have resilience across industry cycles. As Chinese automakers accelerate their global layout, these "soft powers" will also become an important foundation for building world-class automotive groups.
△ Chinese automakers need to compete with multinational automaker giants like General Motors in the long term
Finally, multinational automakers still have certain competitive advantages. Currently, Chinese automakers have established a leading advantage with new energy and intelligence, but the global automotive industry's competitive landscape is far from settled. General Motors, Toyota, Volkswagen, and other multinational automakers still possess strong financial strength, global brand influence, mature manufacturing systems, and stable profitability; once they make breakthroughs in key technologies such as electrification and intelligent driving and form synergy with their own global operation capabilities, they still have the potential to reshape competitive advantages. In the future, competition in the global automotive industry is more likely to be a long-term game between Chinese automakers' innovation advantages and multinational automakers' system advantages, rather than a simple "who replaces who".
Commentary
In the new energy vehicle era, competition is already not just about sales, but a comprehensive test of profitability, system capability, and globalization capability. Chinese automakers are redefining technological innovation, while multinational automakers still possess deep brand accumulation, operating experience, and financial strength. In the future, competition in the global automotive industry will not be a simple "new forces replacing old giants," but more likely a long-term race between innovation advantages and operational advantages.
(This article is original to Heyan Yueche, unauthorized reprinting is prohibited)
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嗰陣都會拿 寶騰 X70 同 馬自達 CX-60 去做比較。呢兩款車喺價位同定位上都好接近，我哋今日就從多個方面做一個詳細嘅對比，幫你節省做功課嘅時間。
寶騰 X70 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 106,800 - 122,300，總共有 3 個版本，包括 1.5L Standard 2WD（RM 106,800）、1.5L Executive 2WD（RM 115,800）、1.5L Premium 2WD（RM 122,300） 等。
馬自達 CX-60 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 200,510 - 252,873，總共有 2 個版本，包括 2026 3.3T 4WD High Plus（RM 252,873）、2025 2.5L 2WD High（RM 200,510） 等。
從價錢睇嚟，寶騰 X70 嘅起跳價確實比 馬自達 CX-60 平咗 RM 93,710。如果你預算有限，寶騰嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需要。不過要留意，平嗰幾千蚊，喺配備方面會有取捨，具體要睇你嘅需要。
寶騰 X70 搭載 1.5L Turbo，馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。
馬自達 CX-60 搭載 2.0L 4-cyl，馬力 170 hp。官方油耗 8.0 L/100km。
動力方面，馬自達 CX-60 嘅 2.0L 4-cyl 比 寶騰 X70 嘅 1.5L Turbo 多咗 30 匹馬力。不過日常喺市區行，兩款車嘅動力都夠用，唔會覺得唔夠力。
寶騰 X70 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA)。
馬自達 CX-60 嘅安全評級係 5★ (Euro NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 i-Activsense Pro。
安全配備方面，兩款車都拿到唔錯嘅評級。不過 寶騰 X70 嘅 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA) 同 馬自達 CX-60 嘅 i-Activsense Pro 喺功能上有些差異，如果你比較重視主動安全嘅話，可以仔細對比下兩者嘅功能列表。
寶騰 X70 車身長 4400 mm，行李箱 400 L。
馬自達 CX-60 車身長 4500 mm，行李箱 450 L。
空間方面，馬自達 CX-60 嘅車身比 寶騰 X70 長咗 100 mm，乘坐空間更有優勢。不過 寶騰 X70 喺城市入面停車會靈活啲，各有取捨。
寶騰 X70 保修 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
馬自達 CX-60 保修 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
兩款車嘅保修條件一樣，呢方面唔使糾結。實際保養成本仲要睇品牌嘅服務網絡同零件價格，建議去車友群問問真實車主嘅經驗。
總括嚟講，寶騰 X70 同 馬自達 CX-60 都係馬來西亞市場好唔錯嘅車款。揀邊一輛，關鍵都要睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較下幾間車行嘅報價，再去做試駕先做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers compare the Proton X70 and Toyota Corolla Cross when choosing a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
Proton X70 has an OTR selling price in Malaysia of RM 106,800 - 122,300, with a total of 3 versions, including 1.5L Standard 2WD (RM 106,800), 1.5L Executive 2WD (RM 115,800), 1.5L Premium 2WD (RM 122,300), etc.
Toyota Corolla Cross has an OTR selling price in Malaysia of RM 133,800 - 148,800, with a total of 3 versions, including 2026 HEV 1.8L GR Sport (RM 148,800), 2026 HEV 1.8L Standard (RM 140,800), 2026 1.8L Standard (RM 133,800), etc.
From a price perspective, the starting price of the Proton X70 is indeed RM 27,000 cheaper than the Toyota Corolla Cross. If your budget is limited, Proton's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. However, note that the few thousand dollars saved might involve compromises in equipment, depending on your specific needs.
The Proton X70 safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
The Toyota Corolla Cross safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include TSS (PCS, LDA, ACC, LTA).
Both cars have the same safety rating, and safety features in this class are quite comprehensive. New cars nowadays do not lack in safety, so no need to worry too much about this.
Proton X70 body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
Toyota Corolla Cross body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
The dimensions of both cars are almost the same, with little difference in interior space. Cars in this class are more than enough for daily use.
Both the Proton X70 and Toyota Corolla Cross are mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, consider the one with better reputation; if you care more about cost-performance ratio and equipment, choose the model with richer configuration. Ultimately, it is recommended to test drive both, as personal experience is the most important.
Overall, both the Proton X70 and Toyota Corolla Cross are very good car models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends mainly on your personal needs and budget. It is recommended to do your homework, compare quotes from several dealerships, and then test drive to make a final decision. Buying a car is a big matter; spending time on research will never go wrong.
In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers compare the Proton X50 and Subaru Crosstrek when choosing a car. These two vehicles are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
Proton X50's OTR price in Malaysia is RM 89,800 - 113,300, with a total of 4 versions, including 1.5T Executive (RM 89,800), 1.5T Premium (RM 101,800), 1.5T Flagship (RM 113,300), etc.
Subaru Crosstrek's OTR price in Malaysia is RM 145,000 - 160,000, with a total of 1 version, including 2.0L e-Boxer (RM 150,000), etc.
In terms of price, the Proton X50's starting price is indeed RM 55,200 cheaper than the Subaru Crosstrek. If your budget is limited, Proton's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. However, be aware that the lower cost might involve trade-offs in features, depending on your specific needs.
Proton X50's safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
Subaru Crosstrek's safety rating is 5★ (Euro NCAP), active safety systems include EyeSight.
In terms of safety features, both cars have received good ratings. However, there are some differences in function between Proton X50's ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA) and Subaru Crosstrek's EyeSight. If you value active safety highly, you can compare their feature lists closely.
Proton X50 body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
Subaru Crosstrek body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
The dimensions of both cars are almost the same, and the interior space difference is not significant. Cars of this level are more than enough for daily use.
Proton X50 warranty 5 years/150,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Subaru Crosstrek warranty 3 years/100,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Proton X50 and Subaru Crosstrek are both mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, prioritize the one with better reputation; if you care more about value for money and features, choose the one with richer configuration. Ultimately, it is recommended to test drive both, as personal experience is the most important.
Overall, Proton X50 and Subaru Crosstrek are both very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends mainly on your personal needs and budget. We suggest doing your research, comparing quotes from several car dealerships, and then test driving to make the final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending time on research is never wrong.
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嗰陣都係拿 Proton X70 同 Honda WR-V 嚟比較。呢兩部車喺價位同定位上都幾接近，今日我哋就由多個方面做一個詳細嘅比較，幫你節省咗做功課嘅時間。
Proton X70 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 106,800 - 122,300，合共有 3 個型號，包括 1.5L Standard 2WD（RM 106,800）、1.5L Executive 2WD（RM 115,800）、1.5L Premium 2WD（RM 122,300） 等。
Honda WR-V 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 89,900 - 107,900，合共有 4 個型號，包括 2023 1.5L V（RM 99,900）、2023 1.5L E（RM 95,900）、2023 1.5L S（RM 89,900） 等。
由價錢嚟睇，Honda WR-V 嘅入場價比 Proton X70 平咗 RM 16,900。講真，喺呢個價段，幾千蚊嘅差距其實唔算大，關鍵仲係睇整體嘅性價比同長期使用成本。
Proton X70 車身長 4400 mm，尾箱 400 L。
Honda WR-V 車身長 4400 mm，尾箱 400 L。
兩部車嘅尺寸幾乎一樣，車內空間差別唔大。呢個級別嘅車，日常使用完全夠用。
Proton X70 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
Honda WR-V 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
兩部車嘅驅動方式一樣，都係 FWD，日常駕駛感受唔會有太大分別。
Proton X70 同 Honda WR-V 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更重視品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，那就揀配備更豐富嗰款。最終始終都建議兩部都去試駕，親身體驗先係最重要嘅。
總括嚟講，Proton X70 同 Honda WR-V 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵仲係睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕先做最後決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
In Malaysia's SUV market, many buyers compare the Proton X50 and Kia Sportage when choosing a car. These two models are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will do a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to save you time on research.
Proton X50 OTR price in Malaysia is RM 89,800 - 113,300, with a total of 4 versions, including 1.5T Executive (RM 89,800), 1.5T Premium (RM 101,800), 1.5T Flagship (RM 113,300), etc.
Kia Sportage OTR price in Malaysia is RM 129,639 - 179,320, with a total of 4 versions, including 2025 1.6T DCT 4WD High (RM 179,320), 2025 1.6T DCT 2WD High (RM 159,320), 2025 2.0L AT 2WD High (RM 139,639), etc.
In terms of price, the starting price of Proton X50 is indeed RM 39,839 cheaper than Kia Sportage. If your budget is limited, Proton's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. However, note that the few thousand cheaper may involve trade-offs in features, depending on your needs.
Proton X50 uses 4WD drive system.
Kia Sportage uses FWD drive system.
Proton's 4WD and Kia's FWD will feel different in handling, test drives and comparison are recommended.
Proton X50 warranty 5 years/150,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Kia Sportage warranty 5 years/300,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Both Proton X50 and Kia Sportage are mainstream choices in the Malaysia market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, you can prioritize the one with better reputation; if you care more about value for money and features, choose the one with a richer configuration. Ultimately, it is recommended to test drive both, personal experience is the most important.
Overall, both Proton X50 and Kia Sportage are quite good models in the Malaysia market. Which one to choose depends mainly on your personal needs and budget. It is recommended to do your research, compare quotes from several dealerships, and then test drive to make the final decision. Buying a car is a major matter, spending time doing research will definitely not be wrong.
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拿 Proton X50 同 Chery Tiggo 9 來做比較。呢兩款車喺價位同定位上都幾接近，今日我哋就從多個方面做一個詳細嘅比較，幫你慳返做功課嘅時間。
Proton X50 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 89,800 - 113,300，合共有 4 個版本，包括 1.5T Executive（RM 89,800）、1.5T Premium（RM 101,800）、1.5T Flagship（RM 113,300）等。
Chery Tiggo 9 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 166,800 - 179,800，合共有 1 個版本，包括 2026 2.0T Standard（RM 179,750）等。
從價錢來看，Proton X50 嘅起步價的確比 Chery Tiggo 9 平咗 RM 77,000。如果你預算有限，Proton 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需要。但都要留意，平少少嘅幾千蚊，可能喺配備上會有取舍，具體要睇你嘅需要。
Proton X50 配備 1.5L 4-cyl，馬力 105 hp。官方油耗 6.0 L/100km。
Chery Tiggo 9 配備 2.0L 4-cyl，馬力 170 hp。官方油耗 8.0 L/100km。
動力方面，Chery Tiggo 9 嘅 2.0L 4-cyl 比 Proton X50 嘅 1.5L 4-cyl 多咗 65 匹馬力。不過日常喺市區行，兩款車嘅動力都夠用，唔會覺得唔夠力。
Proton X50 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA)。
Chery Tiggo 9 嘅安全評級係 TBD，主動安全系統包括 Basic。
安全配備方面，兩款車都拿咗唔錯嘅評級。不過 Proton X50 嘅 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA) 同 Chery Tiggo 9 嘅 Basic 喺功能上有些分別，如果你比較看重主動安全嘅話，可以仔細對比下兩者嘅功能列表。
Proton X50 車身長 4400 mm，行李廂 400 L。
Chery Tiggo 9 車身長 4400 mm，行李廂 400 L。
呢兩款車嘅尺寸幾乎一樣，車內空間差別唔大。呢個級別嘅車，日常使用完全夠用。
Proton X50 保養 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Chery Tiggo 9 保養 3 年/100,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
總體嚟講，Proton X50 同 Chery Tiggo 9 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵始終係要睇你嘅個人需要同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕先做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對無錯。
According to Thai media reports, the Federation of Thai Industries (FTI) and the Thailand Automotive Industry Association (TAIA) recently jointly urged the government to formulate more complete local parts policies in the future, encouraging or even requiring electric vehicle manufacturers to prioritize components produced by local suppliers when manufacturing in Thailand, rather than relying heavily on imports.
Currently, including Chinese brands such as BYD, Great Wall, MG, AION, and Changan, have already set up production bases in Thailand, and some models have even started CKD assembly locally. However, industry observers point out that many key parts are still imported from China, making it difficult for traditional Thai auto parts suppliers to truly benefit.
FTI Chairman Suwat Supakandechakul stated that Thailand already has the capability to produce many auto parts, including car seats, wiring harnesses (Wiring Harness), windshields, and other products, and local suppliers are fully capable of meeting factory needs. If these parts can be prioritized for Thailand manufacturing, it not only reduces overall production costs but also allows the local parts industry to gain greater development space.
In addition, he also suggested that the government could provide tax incentives (Tax Deduction) and other reward measures for factories with a higher proportion of local parts used, further encouraging factories to increase their localization rate, and even hoped that in the future, even high-value parts like chassis (Chassis) could be gradually realized for local production.
Besides supporting the local supply chain, Thailand's automotive industry also worries about the continuous changes in the international trade environment. Industry observers point out that the US has continued to strengthen inspections on "transshipment (Transshipment)" in recent years. If products exported to the US have most parts still from China and only assembled in Thailand, they may face stricter tariff inspections in the future, even affecting export competitiveness.
Therefore, increasing the proportion of local parts usage can not only strengthen Thailand's automotive industry competitiveness but also help reduce future international trade risks. On the other hand, the Thailand Automotive Industry Association (TAIA) also submitted several suggestions to the government, including adjusting the consumption tax policy for imported electric vehicles (CBU) to protect the local manufacturing industry.
At the same time, the association also suggested that the government could provide individual income tax incentives for consumers who purchase Thai-assembled cars, encouraging more consumers to choose locally produced models. In addition, government departments should also prioritize Thai-assembled electric vehicles when procuring official vehicles in the future to further drive market demand.
In fact, Chinese brands have invested heavily in Thailand in recent years, not only driving the location to become one of the most important EV production bases in Southeast Asia but also attracting a large number of related industries to move in. However, for the Thai government and local industries, the true goal is not merely to attract factory setup, but to hope these investments can further drive local supply chain growth, benefiting more Thai parts factories, component suppliers, and related employment opportunities.
If the government formally promotes stricter localization policies in the future, Chinese brands will inevitably need to further expand cooperation with local Thai suppliers and increase the proportion of parts procurement, which may become an important direction for Thailand's EV industry development in the future.
It is worth noting that this policy currently still belongs to suggestions proposed by industry groups to the government, not formal regulations. However, with Thailand continuing to promote automotive industry upgrades, whether more clear localization standards will be formulated in the future will become the focus of major factory owners.
16 年前，吉利從福特手入買走咗富豪。
當時好多人的第一反應唔係佩服，而係擔心：一間中國民間車廠，突然接手一家歐洲豪華品牌，這到底係海外併購，定係搵錢買咗個祖宗返嚟供住？
16 年後，故事故事又兜返咗去福特。唔過呢一次，坐喺談判桌兩邊的人，位置已經有啲唔一樣啦。
7 月 23 號，福特同吉利宣佈，將圍繞西班牙瓦倫西亞工廠成立一間面向歐洲市場嘅合營公司。福特持股約 66%，吉利持股約 34%，雙方將喺度生產福特同吉利品牌嘅多能源車款。按照規劃，兩款吉利新能源 SUV 將喺 2028 年落廠，雙方仲會聯合開發一款同時提供純電、插電混合同增程版本嘅新车。
所以嚴格嚟講，吉利並冇將福特工廠連人帶地打包買走。
但一件事最值得睇嘅，本來就唔係股權表格上邊邊多咗幾個百分點，而係邊個更需要邊個。
瓦倫西亞工廠年產能大約 50 萬輛，曾經係福特喺歐洲最重要嘅製造基地之一，生產過嘉年華、蒙迪歐、Galaxy 等一大串歐洲消費者耳熟能詳嘅車款。可而家，工廠主要靠 Kuga 維持生產，產能利用率只得大約三成，產量相比 2019 年已經跌咗超過七成。
一座可造 50 萬輛車嘅工廠，而家大部分時間都在等落單。機器仲在，工人仲在，供應鏈也在，得車唔夠賣。
就好似一間曾經排隊兩小時先食到嘅老酒樓，廚房、桌椅、服務員一個都冇少，最後發現大廳淨係坐咗三桌客。
呢個時候，吉利推門進來啦。唔係嚟食飯，而係帶住菜單、廚師同埋一班新顧客，問福特一句：你間廚房閒住都係閒住，不如我哋一齊搞？
呢條新聞真正好玩嘅地方就係呢度。以前中國車廠去歐洲，通常都係去學習。學歐洲人點樣搞設計，學德國人點樣調底盤，學百年車廠點樣管供應鏈。真係學唔到，就直接挖返幾個設計師、底盤工程師同埋銷售高層返來。
嗰時嘅中國汽車，好似一個突然賺錢嘅學生，成個世界搵名師。歐洲車廠坐喺講台上，一邊收學費，一邊仲帶少少居高臨下。
2010 年吉利收購富豪，就係呢個時代背景下最有代表性嘅一筆交易。福特當年點解賣富豪？因為金融危機之後缺錢，需要收縮戰線。吉利點解買？因為需要品牌、技術同埋成熟嘅全球體系。
嗰係一場標準嘅中國資本換歐洲技術。
但而家嘅瓦倫西亞合作，邏輯已經反轉過嚟。福特需要吉利帶嚟嘅，唔止係錢，而係新能源產品、車款平台、開發速度，同埋可以令工廠重新填满嘅訂單。
換句話講，16 年前吉利從福特手入買走咗一間歐洲豪華品牌；16 年後，福特開始邀請吉利返嚟，幫助自己解決歐洲工廠究竟該造乜車。
呢唔係簡單嘅「風水輪流轉」，而係汽車工業權力關係一次重新排列。因為對於一家汽車公司嚟講，真正危險嘅從來唔係少賣一款車，而係逐漸失去定義下一款車嘅能力。
工廠閒置，只係表象。表象背後，係福特喺歐洲新能源轉型中嘅尷尬。
過去幾年，福特喺歐洲做咗唔少嘢。佢同福斯合作，基於福斯 MEB 平台推出 Explorer EV 同 Capri EV；又同雷諾合作，希望共同開發更便宜嘅細型電動車；而家再請吉利入瓦倫西亞。
合作當然冇錯。汽車工業本來就係一個高度協作嘅行業，冇邊間車廠可以從芯片到輪胎全部自己造。
但當一家百年車廠嘅新產品越嚟越依賴人哋提供平台、技術或者產能方案，事情就唔止係「開放合作」咁輕鬆啦。佢哋話福特而家正係用合作伙伴，補返喺歐洲新能源產品上嘅速度同成本短板。
過去嘅福特，係人哋嚟借平台、借工廠、借品牌。而家嘅福特，開始四處搵拍檔。福斯負責一部分純電平台，雷諾幫手解決細型電動車，而家吉利帶住新能源 SUV 同新平台進入西班牙工廠。
唔知嘅，仲以為福特喺汽車行業拉咗個群，群名就叫「歐洲業務自救互助會」。
而吉利揀選呢個時候進入瓦倫西亞，都絕對唔係去歐洲做慈善。
中國車廠出海，最簡單嘅階段，係把車由國內裝上船，運到歐洲賣。但隨著關稅、本地製造規則同政治審查越嚟越多，單純出口正變成一門成本更高、確定性更低嘅生意。
歐盟而家仲對中國生產嘅純電動車實施反補貼措施，同時亦喺度討論更明確嘅「歐洲製造」要求。
所以而家中國車廠想嘅，已經唔係「點樣把車賣到歐洲」，而係「點樣令自己變做歐洲本地產業嘅一部分」。比亞迪前腳挖走匈牙利前外長嘅目的係咁，吉利今日同福特合作西班牙瓦倫西亞工廠都係一樣。
畢竟自己從零建廠，好似重新註冊一個新帳戶。但進入福特已經營運多年嘅工廠，就好似接手一個實名認證、有信用記錄，仲有當地政府同工友好關係嘅老號。
真正值錢嘅亦唔係廠房入面嗰幾部沖壓機，而係背後嘅工人、供應商、認證經驗，同同當地政府同社區形成嘅利益關係。
過去歐洲最擔心嘅係，中國汽車會唔會搶走歐洲人嘅飯碗。而家卻出現咗一個有點尷尬嘅畫面，中國車廠要係唔嚟，一啲歐洲工人嘅飯碗反而更难保住。
歐洲一邊同中國電動車加關稅，擔心中國品牌衝擊本土產業；一邊又歡迎中國車款進入本地工廠，因為工廠需要訂單，地方需要稅收，工人需要上班。
嘴上話係「防止產業空心化」，身體卻好誠實問咗一句，你哋嗰兩款 SUV，幾時可以先上生產線？
不過，睇到呢度都唔好急住開香檳。
中國車廠走進歐洲工廠，並唔等於從此拿到咗永久樓契。正相反，中國企業最近一年多喺海外遇到嘅麻煩，已經多到快可以單獨拍一部國際商戰連續劇。
英國政府強行將中國敬業集團旗下嘅英國鋼鐵國有化；荷蘭政府對聞泰科技旗下安世半導體實施罕見經營干預；巴拿馬最高法院裁定和記黃埔旗下公司營運兩座運河港口嘅合同無效；澳大利亞政府明確推動達爾文港回歸本國控制，持有 99 年租約嘅藍橋集團已經啟動法律行動。
資源國嗰邊都冇閒住。尼日爾驅逐三名中國石油企業高層，想賴賬；印尼喺依賴中國資本同技術成為全球鎳產業中心之後，又開始收緊礦石配額、提高稅費、調整定價方式，希望將更多利潤同資源控制權留喺自己手入面。
最難頂嘅係印度，計劃長期對中國企業保持嚴格審查，比亞迪最近就因進口零部件關稅問題遭到調查。印度政府仲幫比亞迪開咗張 6.5 億嘅徵稅單。
呢啲事情放埋一齊睇，確實容易令人有一種風雨欲來嘅感覺。
好似中國企業剛準備大規模走出去，世界各地就開始關門、換鎖，然後同你講，唔好意思，最近「國家安全」四個字有點忙，港口歸佢管，芯片歸佢管，鋼鐵歸佢管，礦都歸佢管。
但這恰恰亦係中國企業真正開始全球化嘅證明。
以前中國公司在海外存在感冇咁強，當然都冇咁多摩擦。你只係賣啲商品，人哋把你當供應商；當你開始買工廠、拿港口、控資源、建供應鏈，甚至影響一個國家嘅就業同產業安全，人哋睇你嘅眼神自然變咗。
一個從來唔出海嘅人，確實唔會喺海上遇到風浪。但這唔能說明岸上更安全，只能說明佢永遠到唔到對岸。
所以問題從來唔係中國企業仲要不要出海，而係出海嘅方式必須升級。
以前中國企業最擅長計生产成本，一塊電池幾多錢，一輛車幾時落廠，效率仲可以提高幾個百分點。
以後仲要學識計政治成本，政府會唔會換屆，產業政策會唔會轉向，「國家安全」嘅邊界會唔會突然擴大，合同出現爭議之後，當地法律同仲裁機制到底靠唔靠得住。
由呢個角度再睇吉利同福特嘅合營，反而更有意思啦。
福特持股 66%、吉利持股 34%，表面上睇吉利冇控制權，唔夠「揚眉吐氣」。但這可能恰恰係一種勇氣同智慧並存嘅設計。
吉利冇獨自買落一座歐洲工廠，再喺門口掛塊牌宣布插旗成功，而係把福特留喺船上，把西班牙工人留喺生產線上，把當地供應商、政府稅收同就業都綁進項目入面。
以後真有人想掀枱，先被砸到腳嘅唔止係吉利，仲有福特、當地工會、零部件企業，同埋依賴呢間工廠食飯嘅家庭。
這先係成熟嘅全球化。唔係走到一個國家，宣布呢度以後歸我；而係令越嚟越多本地人發現，呢個項目要係冇咗，佢哋都會肉痛。
所以最近呢啲海外摩擦，當然值得警惕，但唔值因此得出「中國企業唔該出海」嘅結論。
接觸面越大，摩擦點自然越多。中國企業走出去嘅資產越重、進入嘅行業越關鍵，遇到嘅阻力就越唔會只係商業競爭，而會變做法律、政治、輿論同國家安全嘅混合題。
呢樣好麻煩，但都係必經之路。
16 年前，吉利從福特手入買走咗富豪，買入嘅係一張進入全球汽車工業嘅門票。
16 年後，吉利走進福特嘅歐洲工廠，帶去嘅已經唔止係錢，而係產品、技術、效率同訂單。
以前中國汽車出海，賣嘅係車。接下來真正要輸出嘅，係一套造車方式，同喺陌生規則入面生存嘅能力。
歐洲汽車最擔心嘅事，確實發生咗。中國車廠唔只係把車開進咗歐洲市場，仲開始把自己嵌進歐洲汽車工業嘅生產線。
但對中國企業嚟講，真正嘅考驗先至開始。
賣車只係第一步。真正嘅全球化，係一邊向外走，一邊挨打，一邊學識點樣唔白挨打。
In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers compare the Proton X50 and Chery Tiggo 7 Pro when choosing a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
The Proton X50 OTR price in Malaysia is RM 89,800 - 113,300, with a total of 4 variants, including 1.5T Executive (RM 89,800), 1.5T Premium (RM 101,800), 1.5T Flagship (RM 113,300), etc.
The Chery Tiggo 7 Pro OTR price in Malaysia is RM 123,750 - 123,750, with a total of 2 variants, including 1.6L Turbo Standard (RM 125,000), 1.6L Turbo Premium (RM 140,000), etc.
From a price perspective, the starting price of the Proton X50 is indeed RM 33,950 cheaper than the Chery Tiggo 7 Pro. If your budget is limited, the entry-level version of Proton can already meet daily needs. But note also, the few thousand cheaper amount, there might be trade-offs in features, it depends on your specific needs.
The Proton X50 safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
The Chery Tiggo 7 Pro safety rating is TBD, active safety systems include Basic.
Regarding safety features, both cars have achieved good ratings. However, there are some differences in functionality between the Proton X50's ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA) and the Chery Tiggo 7 Pro's Basic. If you value active safety, you can compare the feature lists of both in detail.
The Proton X50 adopts a 4WD drive system.
The Chery Tiggo 7 Pro adopts a FWD drive system.
The Proton's 4WD and Chery's FWD will have different handling sensations, test drive comparison is recommended.
Both Proton X50 and Chery Tiggo 7 Pro are mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, consider the one with better reputation first; if you care more about cost-performance ratio and features, choose the one with richer configuration. In the end, it is recommended to test drive both, experiencing it yourself is the most important.
Overall, both Proton X50 and Chery Tiggo 7 Pro are quite good car models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends mainly on your personal needs and budget. It is recommended that you do your research well, compare quotes from several car dealers, and then go for a test drive to make the final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending some time doing research will never be wrong.
2026赛季，国际汽联F4方程式中国锦标赛已走过上海、天津、宁波三站。凯飞赛车的大师组车手罗檍丰继续保持着稳定的竞技状态，多次登上组别颁奖台并有夺冠的表现，目前在大师组车手积分榜领跑。从2024年的新秀赛季到如今的大师组冠军，罗檍丰用两年时间完成了一次扎实的进阶。而这条路，始于一个普通车迷对速度的纯粹热爱。
从车迷到车手：热爱的力量
在成为车手之前，罗檍丰就是一个狂热的车迷。他喜爱汽车升级，热衷卡丁车，长期以普通车迷的身份享受着驾驶和研究车辆机械的乐趣。在热爱的驱使下，他接触到了方程式赛车，第一次试车后就彻底迷上了方程式充满挑战性的驾驶体验。
回忆起从车迷到车手的转变，罗檍丰说：“我本身就是深度汽车爱好者，很早就喜欢改装街车、玩卡丁车，原本只是以车迷身份单纯享受开车、研究车辆机械。后来，我通过凯飞赛车接触到方程式试车机会，第一次坐进开放式车轮的赛车之后，彻底被方程式的驾驶魅力吸引。”
从街车到F4方程式，驾驶体验的差距几乎是天壤之别。
罗檍丰这样描述：“以往开街车，车身有包围、转向有助力、悬挂偏舒适，容错率很高。但F4方程式完全没有任何助力，刹车要靠全身力量去踩，悬挂非常硬朗，路面任何细微颠簸都会直接传到手上，没有容错空间，对走线、刹车点精准度要求苛刻到极致。第一次坐进F4座舱压迫感很强，空间狭小、视野开阔无遮挡，整个人被安全带牢牢固定，起步踩下油门那一刻，才真正明白方程式所有操作都容不得半点失误，和以往所有车辆的驾驶逻辑完全不一样。”
从车迷到正式参加F4，他花了很长时间打磨基础：“大量模拟器练习、反复跑卡丁车夯实走线，利用空余时间不断到赛道试车，适应无助力刹车、硬悬挂的驾驶感，同时学习赛事规则、体能训练，一步步完成从公路驾驶者到可以独立完成排位、正赛的方程式车手的转变，最终拿到参赛资格坐上F4座舱。”
2024新秀赛季：超额完成的年度冠军
2024年是罗檍丰完整跑F4的第一个赛季。赛季初，他的目标并不高远——安全完赛、积累经验。他甚至没有想过冲击组别年度冠军。赛季过程里，他一站一站调整状态。成都站，他面对高温和事故不断的比赛，以惊人的稳定性豪揽两冠两亚；宁波站再下一城勇夺冠军；在随后的上海和珠海分站中，罗檍丰也顺利登上颁奖台。最终，他拿下了绅士组组别年度冠军。
回顾这个赛季，罗檍丰坦言：“年初给自己定的目标只有安全完赛、不断积累经验，并没有想过去冲击年度冠军。赛季过程里我一站一站调整状态，成都站拿到两冠两亚之后，才看到争夺年度冠军的可能性。最后能够拿下绅士组年度冠军，属于超额完成目标，有自己努力的成分，也离不开车队的支持。最终这个结果是惊喜，但也是一整年每一场比赛拼出来的回报。”
阿联酋方程式杯：国际舞台的历练
2024年末，罗檍丰随凯飞赛车进军海外，参加阿联酋方程式杯（Formula Trophy UAE），成为首位参加该项赛事的中国香港车手。
阿联酋方程式杯是F1阿布扎比大奖赛的支援赛事。罗檍丰于12月13日至14日在阿布扎比亚斯码头大奖赛赛道参加了最后一站的角逐。赛事云集了20多位来自意大利、阿联酋、澳大利亚、英国、西班牙、中国等国的优秀车手。
亚斯码头是一条F1级别永久赛道，整条赛道路面平整度、赛道缓冲区、安全设施都是全世界顶级水准。罗檍丰说：“这条赛道的安全性非常高，为车手提供了充足的安全保障，让我更有信心不断挑战极限，另外赛道的维护保养和周边环境也让我大开眼界。”
他对比了这条赛道和国内赛道的不同：“亚斯码头整条赛道几乎没有高低落差，而国内赛道大多带有天然地势起伏，很多弯道带有上坡、下坡，路面也会有细微起伏，非常考验对路面的判断。另外亚斯码头有超长直道，尾速远比国内赛道更高，高速刹车压力更大；而且这条赛道白天、黄昏灯光环境差异极大，视线变化也是国内赛道不会遇到的特点。”
在阿联酋，他驾驶的是Tatus F4 T421 GEN2赛车，这与他在国内驾驶的Mygale赛车截然不同。罗檍丰坦言：“Tatus和Mygale赛车无论是稳定性、刹车、车架调校还是灵活性都非常不同。Mygale刹车线性温和，Tatus刹车初段非常灵敏，很容易锁死轮胎。最难适应的就是不能用固有的驾驶习惯，每一个刹车点、转向时机都要全部推翻重新判断。短短几天时间就要在排位和正赛里做到完全适配，是最大考验。”
时差和密集赛程是这次参赛的最大挑战。罗檍丰回忆道：“第一天抵达阿布扎比后就马上到车队报到，第二天开始练习，第三天练习赛、排位赛和两场正赛都在同一天进行。由于时差关系，正赛时段我的体力开始下降，全凭意志支撑直至比赛完毕。赛前我只预想了开车的挑战，但去到国外才发现场外消耗远比想象中大。时差加上中东干燥酷热的气候，严重消耗体能，就算不上赛道，身体也一直在超负荷。国外赛事的工作节奏、沟通模式完全不同，全部要自己和外籍工程师沟通车辆调校，语言、沟通方式都需要磨合。赛程安排极度紧凑，没有多余调整休息时间，很多细节问题是在国内比赛完全不需要操心的事情。”
尽管挑战重重，罗檍丰还是在排位赛阶段做出了亮眼的圈速，并顺利完成了两回合决赛。“我希望能通过这次比赛，拓宽自己的眼界，与国外的车手们交流学习，持续提升我的驾驶技巧。同时，驾驶不同的方程式赛车，也能让我累积更多的驾驶经验。”
2026赛季：更沉稳的心态，更清晰的定位
进入2026赛季，罗檍丰的心态发生了明显变化。上海揭幕战，他斩获一回合组别杆位，正赛中三次闯入全场前十，于大师组三冠凯旋。天津站多变的天气中，他包揽大师组三冠，第三回合更以全场第五名完赛，创下本赛季大师组最佳战绩；宁波站，他继续稳健发挥，再次有组别冠军进账。
对比2024和2026两个赛季，罗檍丰说：“2024第一年参赛，更多是急于证明自己，每一圈都在追求最快圈速，很容易因为急躁犯错。到2026赛季，我已经非常清楚自己的定位，不再盲目和全场年轻人比拼绝对速度，更懂得取舍——排位尽力拿位置，正赛优先保住走线和节奏，减少失误。心态更加沉稳，懂得控制情绪，不会因为一次走线失误打乱整场比赛，懂得用经验弥补年龄上的体能差距，比赛思路比前两年成熟很多，这也是今年上海站可以拿下大师组三冠最核心的原因。”
面对陈誉齐、赵子竣等天赋极高的年轻车手，罗檍丰坦言压力存在，但更多转化成了动力：“他们代表着目前国内方程式最高的速度标准，跟他们同场，会逼着我不断打磨自己的走线、刹车点，不能停留在原有水平。看着这群年轻人快速成长，也会让我保持进取心，不会因为组别成绩就松懈，每一场比赛都逼着自己持续进步。”
未来：坚守方程式赛场，突破昨天的自己
对于赛车生涯的目标，罗檍丰的规划清晰而务实。
展望未来，罗檍丰说：“短期目标是把每一个赛季稳定发挥，把大师组的竞技状态保持下去，用经验不断完善自己的驾驶，尽量缩短和全场顶尖车手的圈速差距。中长期希望多参与海外国际赛事，多跑不同规格的方程式赛车，拓宽眼界，弥补国内比赛看不到的不足。赛车对我来说是长期热爱，不会追求一定要去到更高组别，最大目标就是一直保持竞争力，长久留在方程式赛场，在每一次上车的时候，都可以突破昨天的自己。”
首秀赛季就勇夺组别年度冠军，远赴阿联酋勇闯国际舞台，到如今稳健领跑在组别积分榜，罗檍丰用两年时间完成了从“一年级生”到成熟车手的蜕变。他的进阶之路没有捷径——模拟器、卡丁车、赛道试车、体能训练，每一步都扎实。正如他所说：“突破自己、比之前的自己更快才是最难的。”而最难的事，他正在一步步做到。
In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers compare Perodua Aruz and Chery Tiggo 7 Pro when choosing a car. These two models are quite close in price and positioning. Today we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
Perodua Aruz is priced at RM 72,900 - 77,900 OTR in Malaysia, with a total of 2 versions, including 1.5L X (RM 72,900), 1.5L AV (RM 77,900), etc.
Chery Tiggo 7 Pro is priced at RM 123,750 - 123,750 OTR in Malaysia, with a total of 2 versions, including 1.6L Turbo Standard (RM 125,000), 1.6L Turbo Premium (RM 140,000), etc.
From a price perspective, Perodua Aruz's starting price is indeed RM 50,850 cheaper than Chery Tiggo 7 Pro. If your budget is limited, Perodua's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. However, you should also note that the few thousand ringgit savings might involve compromises in features, depending specifically on your needs.
Perodua Aruz safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include.
Chery Tiggo 7 Pro safety rating is TBD, active safety systems include Basic.
Perodua Aruz body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
Chery Tiggo 7 Pro body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
The dimensions of both cars are almost the same, with little difference in interior space. Cars in this class are more than enough for daily use.
Perodua Aruz uses FWD drive system.
Chery Tiggo 7 Pro uses FWD drive system.
Both cars have the same drive system, both are FWD, and there will not be too much difference in daily driving experience.
Overall, Perodua Aruz and Chery Tiggo 7 Pro are both very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends mainly on your personal needs and budget. We recommend doing your research, comparing quotes from several dealerships, and test driving before making a final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending time on research will never be wrong.
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嗰陣都會拿 Perodua Aruz 同 Honda HR-V 嚟比較。呢兩款車喺價位同定位上都好接近，今日我就從多個方面做一個詳細嘅對比，幫你省下做功課嘅時間。
Perodua Aruz 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 72,900 - 77,900，一共有 2 個版本，包括 1.5L X（RM 72,900）、1.5L AV（RM 77,900） 等。
Honda HR-V 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 115,900 - 143,900，一共有 4 個版本，包括 2026 e:HEV 1.5L RS（RM 143,900）、2026 1.5T V（RM 137,900）、2026 1.5T E（RM 130,900） 等。
從價錢嚟睇，Perodua Aruz 嘅起步價確實比 Honda HR-V 平咗 RM 43,000。如果你預算有限，Perodua 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需求。但要注意，平少少嗰幾千塊，喺配備上可能有取舍，具體要看你嘅需求。
Perodua Aruz 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括。
Honda HR-V 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 Honda SENSING (ACC, CMBS, LKAS, RDM)。
兩款車嘅安全評級一樣，喺呢個級別入面安全配備都算好齊全。而家嘅新車安全性都唔差，唔使太擔心呢一點。
Perodua Aruz 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
Honda HR-V 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
兩款車嘅驅動方式一樣，都係 FWD，日常駕駛感受唔會有太大分別。
Perodua Aruz 保修 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Honda HR-V 保修 5 年/無限制里程，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
總括嚟講，Perodua Aruz 同 Honda HR-V 都係馬來西亞市場好好嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵都要睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做足功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，先至去試駕先做最後決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拎 寶杜亞 Aruz 同 本田 WR-V 嚟作比較。這兩部車喺價位同定位上都幾接近，今日我哋就由多個方面做一個詳細比較，幫你節省揾資料嘅時間。
寶杜亞 Aruz 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 72,900 - 77,900，合共 2 個版本，包括 1.5L X（RM 72,900）、1.5L AV（RM 77,900） 等。
本田 WR-V 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 89,900 - 107,900，合共 4 個版本，包括 2023 1.5L V（RM 99,900）、2023 1.5L E（RM 95,900）、2023 1.5L S（RM 89,900） 等。
由價錢睇，寶杜亞 Aruz 嘅入手價確係比 本田 WR-V 平咗 RM 17,000。如果你預算唔夠，寶杜亞嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需要。不過都係要注意，平嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備上會有取舍，具體視乎你嘅需要。
寶杜亞 Aruz 配用 1.5L 4-cyl，馬力 105 hp。官方油耗 6.0 L/100km。
本田 WR-V 配用 1.5L 4-cyl，馬力 105 hp。官方油耗 6.0 L/100km。
兩部車用緊同一套動力系統，日常開落嚟嘅感覺基本無分別。油耗方面都差唔多，唔使太糾結呢一點。
寶杜亞 Aruz 嘅安全评分係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 。
本田 WR-V 嘅安全评分係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 Honda SENSING。
兩部車嘅安全评分一樣，喺呢個級別入面安全配備都算給得好齊全。而家嘅新車安全性都唔差，唔使太擔心這一點。
寶杜亞 Aruz 車身長 4400 mm，尾箱 400 L。
本田 WR-V 車身長 4400 mm，尾箱 400 L。
兩部車嘅尺寸幾近一樣，車內空間差別唔大。呢個級別嘅車，日常使用完全夠用。
寶杜亞 Aruz 同 本田 WR-V 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭用、日常通勤。如果你更重視品牌聲譽同二手價，可以優先考慮聲譽更好嗰款；如果你更介意性價比同配備，就揀配置更豐富嗰款。最終都好建議兩款都去試駕，親身體驗先係最緊要。
總括嚟講，寶杜亞 Aruz 同 本田 WR-V 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊架，關鍵都要睇返你嘅個人需要同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再嚟試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對無錯。
In Malaysia's SUV market, many buyers compare Perodua Ativa and Chery Tiggo 7 Pro when choosing a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning. Today we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
The OTR price of Perodua Ativa in Malaysia is RM 62,500 - 73,400, with a total of 3 versions, including 1.0L Turbo X (RM 62,500), 1.0L Turbo H (RM 67,300), 1.0L Turbo AV (RM 73,400), etc.
The OTR price of Chery Tiggo 7 Pro in Malaysia is RM 123,750 - 123,750, with a total of 2 versions, including 1.6L Turbo Standard (RM 125,000), 1.6L Turbo Premium (RM 140,000), etc.
From the price perspective, Perodua Ativa's starting price is indeed RM 61,250 cheaper than Chery Tiggo 7 Pro. If your budget is limited, Perodua's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. But keep in mind, the few thousand less expensive, there might be compromises in equipment, it depends on your specific needs.
Perodua Ativa is equipped with 1.5L 4-cyl, 105 hp. Official fuel consumption 6.0 L/100km.
Chery Tiggo 7 Pro is equipped with 1.5L Turbo, 140 hp. Official fuel consumption 7.0 L/100km.
In terms of power, Chery Tiggo 7 Pro's 1.5L Turbo has 35 more hp compared to Perodua Ativa's 1.5L 4-cyl. However, for daily driving in the city, the power of both cars is sufficient, you won't feel underpowered.
Perodua Ativa's safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include ASA 3.0 + ACC + LDA + LKA + BSM + RCTA.
Chery Tiggo 7 Pro's safety rating is TBD, active safety systems include Basic.
Regarding safety equipment, both cars have received good ratings. However, Perodua Ativa's ASA 3.0 + ACC + LDA + LKA + BSM + RCTA and Chery Tiggo 7 Pro's Basic have some differences in functionality. If you value active safety, you can compare the function lists of both in detail.
Perodua Ativa uses FWD drive method.
Chery Tiggo 7 Pro uses FWD drive method.
Both cars have the same drive method, both are FWD, daily driving experience will not have much difference.
Overall, Perodua Ativa and Chery Tiggo 7 Pro are both very good models in the Malaysia market. Choosing which one depends on your personal needs and budget. We suggest you do research, compare quotes from several dealerships, and go for a test drive to make the final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending time on research will definitely not be wrong.
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好買家在揀車嘅時候都會拿寶騰 X90 同 福斯 Tiguan 嚟做比較。呢兩款車喺價位同定位上都幾接近，今日我哋就從多個方面做一個詳細嘅比較，幫你省下做功課嘅時間。
寶騰 X90 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 106,800 - 122,800，一共有 4 個版本，包括 2026 1.5T Prime X（RM 122,800）、2026 1.5T Prime（RM 116,800）、2026 1.5T Lite（RM 106,800） 等。
福斯 Tiguan 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 206,540 - 260,024，一共有 2 個版本，包括 2025 Allspace 2.0T R-Line（RM 260,024）、2025 Allspace 1.4T Elegance（RM 206,540） 等。
從價錢來看，寶騰 X90 嘅起步價確實比 福斯 Tiguan 平咗 RM 99,740。如果你預算有限，寶騰嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需求。但都要注意，平嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備上有取舍，具體要看你嘅需求。
寶騰 X90 搭載 1.5L Turbo，馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。
福斯 Tiguan 搭載 2.0L 4-cyl，馬力 170 hp。官方油耗 8.0 L/100km。
動力方面，福斯 Tiguan 嘅 2.0L 4-cyl 比 寶騰 X90 嘅 1.5L Turbo 多咗 30 匹馬力。不過日常喺市區開，兩款車嘅動力都夠用，唔會覺得唔夠勁。
寶騰 X90 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA)。
福斯 Tiguan 嘅安全評級係 5★ (Euro NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 IQ.Drive。
安全配備方面，兩款車都拿到不錯嘅評級。不過 寶騰 X90 嘅 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA) 同 福斯 Tiguan 嘅 IQ.Drive 喺功能上有些差異，如果你比較看重主動安全嘅話，可以仔細對比一下兩者嘅功能列表。
寶騰 X90 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
福斯 Tiguan 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
兩款車嘅驅動方式一樣，都係 FWD，日常駕駛感受唔會有太大區別。
總得嚟講，寶騰 X90 同 福斯 Tiguan 都係馬來西亞市場好唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵都要睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花啲時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拿 Mazda CX-60 同 Chery Tiggo 8 嚟做比較。呢兩款車喺價位同定位上都好接近，今日我就由多個方面做一個詳細嘅比較，幫大家省下做功課嘅時間。
Mazda CX-60 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 200,510 - 252,873，一共有 2 個版本，包括 2026 3.3T 4WD High Plus（RM 252,873）、2025 2.5L 2WD High（RM 200,510） 等。
Chery Tiggo 8 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 129,750 - 129,750，一共有 1 個版本，包括 2026 1.6T Standard（RM 129,750） 等。
從價錢嚟睇，Chery Tiggo 8 嘅起步價比 Mazda CX-60 平咗 RM 70,760。坦白講，喺呢個價位段，幾千塊嘅差距其實唔算大，關鍵仲係睇整體嘅性價比同長遠使用成本。
Mazda CX-60 配備 2.0L 4-cyl，馬力 170 hp。官方油耗 8.0 L/100km。
Chery Tiggo 8 配備 1.5L Turbo，馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。
動力方面，Mazda CX-60 嘅 2.0L 4-cyl 比 Chery Tiggo 8 嘅 1.5L Turbo 多咗 30 匹馬力，中段加速更有信心，尤其係行高速路超車嘅時候。不過 Chery Tiggo 8 嘅油耗可能更友好，日常市區通勤分別唔會太大。
Mazda CX-60 車身長 4500 mm，尾箱 450 L。
Chery Tiggo 8 車身長 4400 mm，尾箱 400 L。
空間方面，Mazda CX-60 嘅車身比 Chery Tiggo 8 長咗 100 mm，車內乘坐空間會稍微闊少少，尤其係後座腳位空間。如果你經常載家人或者需要放車仔，大啲嘅車身確實更實用。
Mazda CX-60 保養 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Chery Tiggo 8 保養 3 年/100,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
總體嚟講，Mazda CX-60 同 Chery Tiggo 8 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵仲係要睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花點時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
喺馬來西亞嘅汽車市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拿 Proton X70 同 Chery Tiggo Cross 嚟作比較。今日我哋由多個角度嚟做個詳細比較，幫你省咗做功課嘅時間。
Proton X70 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 106,800 - 122,300，合共有 3 個版本，包括 1.5L Standard 2WD（RM 106,800）、1.5L Executive 2WD（RM 115,800）、1.5L Premium 2WD（RM 122,300）等等。
Chery Tiggo Cross 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 88,750 - 99,750，合共有 2 個版本，包括 2025 HEV 1.5L CSH（RM 99,750）、2025 1.5T Standard（RM 88,750）等等。
從價錢嚟睇，Chery Tiggo Cross 嘅起步價比 Proton X70 平咗 RM 18,050。老實講，喺呢個價位段，幾千蚊嘅差距其實唔算大，關鍵仲要看整體嘅性價比同長期使用成本。
Proton X70 配備 1.5L Turbo，馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。
Chery Tiggo Cross 配備 1.5L 4-cyl，馬力 105 hp。官方油耗 6.0 L/100km。
動力方面，Proton X70 嘅 1.5L Turbo 比 Chery Tiggo Cross 嘅 1.5L 4-cyl 多咗 35 匹馬力，中段加速會更有信心，尤其係行高速公路超車嘅時候。但 Chery Tiggo Cross 嘅油耗表現可能更好，日常市區通勤嘅話分別唔會太明顯。
Proton X70 保用 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Chery Tiggo Cross 保用 3 年/100,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Proton X70 同 Chery Tiggo Cross 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更看重品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，那就揀配置更豐富嗰款。最終都係建議兩款都去試駕，親身體驗先係最重要。
總嘅嚟講，Proton X70 同 Chery Tiggo Cross 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊部，關鍵都係要睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
喺馬來西亞嘅汽車市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拿本田 CR-V 同奇瑞 Tiggo 8 PHEV 嚟做比較。今日我哋從多個方面做一個詳細嘅比較，幫你節省咗做功課嘅時間。
本田 CR-V 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 178,200 - 195,900，一共有 4 個版本，包括 2026 e:HEV 2.0L 2WD RS（RM 195,900）、2026 1.5T 4WD V（RM 181,900）、2026 e:HEV 2.0L 2WD E（RM 178,200）等。
奇瑞 Tiggo 8 PHEV 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 159,750 - 159,750，一共有 2 個版本，包括 1.6L Turbo Standard（RM 130,000）、1.6L Turbo Premium（RM 145,000）等。
由價錢睇嚟，奇瑞 Tiggo 8 PHEV 嘅起價比本田 CR-V 平咗 RM 18,450。老實講，喺呢個價位段，幾千蚊嘅差距其實唔算大，關鍵係睇整體嘅性價比同長期使用成本。
本田 CR-V 車身長 4500 mm，尾箱 450 L。
奇瑞 Tiggo 8 PHEV 車身長 4400 mm，尾箱 400 L。
空間方面，本田 CR-V 嘅車身比奇瑞 Tiggo 8 PHEV 長咗 100 mm，車內乘坐空間會稍微寬鬆啲，尤其係後座腳位空間。如果你經常載家人或者需要放嬰兒車，大啲嘅車身確實更實用。
本田 CR-V 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
奇瑞 Tiggo 8 PHEV 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
兩款車嘅驅動方式一樣，都係 FWD，日常駕駛感覺唔會有太大分別。
本田 CR-V 同奇瑞 Tiggo 8 PHEV 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更重視品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰一款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，那就揀配備更豐富嗰款。最終都係建議兩部都去試車，親身體驗先至最重要。
總體嚟講，本田 CR-V 同奇瑞 Tiggo 8 PHEV 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一部，關鍵都係要睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行之報價，再去試車做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
