首頁Toyota Starlet
搜尋歷史
熱門搜尋
經銷商登入 / 註冊
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拎 Proton X90 同 Honda CR-V 做比較。呢兩部車喺價位同定位上都幾接近，今日我哋就從多個方面做個詳細嘅比較，幫你省下做功課嘅時間。
Proton X90 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 106,800 - 122,800，合共有 4 個版本，包括 2026 1.5T Prime X（RM 122,800）、2026 1.5T Prime（RM 116,800）、2026 1.5T Lite（RM 106,800）等等。
Honda CR-V 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 178,200 - 195,900，合共有 4 個版本，包括 2026 e:HEV 2.0L 2WD RS（RM 195,900）、2026 1.5T 4WD V（RM 181,900）、2026 e:HEV 2.0L 2WD E（RM 178,200）等等。
睇返價錢，Proton X90 嘅起步價確實比 Honda CR-V 平咗 RM 71,400。如果你預算有限，Proton 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需要。不過要留意，嗰幾千元，可能喺配備上會有取舍，具體要看你嘅需要。
Proton X90 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA)。
Honda CR-V 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 Honda SENSING (ACC, CMBS, LKAS, RDM)。
兩部車嘅安全評級一樣，喺呢個級距入面安全配備都算好齊全。而家嘅新車安全性都唔差，唔使太擔心呢一點。
Proton X90 車身長 4400 mm，后备厢 400 L。
Honda CR-V 車身長 4500 mm，后备厢 450 L。
空間方面，Honda CR-V 嘅車身比 Proton X90 長咗 100 mm，乘坐空間更有優勢。不過 Proton X90 喺市區停車會靈活啲，各有優缺。
Proton X90 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
Honda CR-V 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
兩部車嘅驅動方式一樣，都係 FWD，日常駕駛感覺唔會有太大分別。
總體嚟講，Proton X90 同 Honda CR-V 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一部，關鍵仲要睇你嘅個人需要同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去做試駕同做最終決定。買車係一件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
From the green belt to the bamboo cicada, the 'hidden war' between Chinese automakers has gone public.
Regarding the 'Bamboo Cicada' incident that has caused a storm in the industry, on August 5, official media 'Zhejiang Propaganda' published an article like this: 'Four Thoughts on the Bamboo Cicada Incident.'
The article states: The stronger the enterprise, the greater its tolerance for discussion. In the 'Bamboo Cicada' incident, many netizens participated in the discussion by releasing videos, etc. This was not to deny Huawei's technical strength, nor was it to question China's technological innovation, but rather grassroots expression centered around certain communication symbols of enterprises. This expression is more about exploring the boundary between commercial rights protection and internet meme culture, reflecting higher scrutiny standards for behavior of top enterprises, and is a soft form of public opinion feedback.
But what netizens worry about is: If various jokes and teasing are considered attacks, and if brand dignity is equated to 'cannot be discussed', then the margin for error for online expression will continue to be compressed, derivative creation and memes will be easily over-interpreted, and making statements will become increasingly restrained.
Zhejiang Propaganda also specifically mentioned: High-profile expression must withstand scrutiny. Zhejiang Propaganda pointed out: For example, Huawei Executive Director and Terminal BG Chairman Richard Yu stated at a press conference that whether within 5 million or 10 million, AITO M9 is the most powerful SUV among currently launched models on Earth, hands down.
'Most Powerful' 'Hands down' such unreserved statements, indeed tend to be amplified in communication. When an enterprise emphasizes its own advantages with absolute language, consumers will naturally ask: Why is it the 'most powerful'? What is the standard? Once a disconnect appears between communication expression and user actual feelings, the rhetoric originally used to build trust may become a target for netizen jokes or even sarcasm.
After Zhejiang Propaganda published this article, it immediately triggered an uproar. Surprisingly, 'Half-Month Talk', a magazine under Xinhua News Agency, reprinted the article verbatim. Does this mean official media collectively stepped in to criticize Harmony Intelligent Mobility's 'dominance'?
Regarding the so-called 'Bamboo Cicada' incident, the AI software Doubao gave such an explanation:
In the December 2023 AITO M9 press conference, Richard Yu said the hit line 'Best SUV within 10 million', and the audience on site let out continuous 'Wow' sounds of surprise, becoming a network meme circulated for years in the auto circle.
In July 2026, some netizens accidentally found that the wawa sound emitted by the Bamboo Cicada rotating is highly similar to the collective surprise sound of the audience at the press conference. Many bloggers started making derivative short videos: the screen shows hand-cranking the Bamboo Cicada, the soundtrack is the original press conference audio, and the caption plays on the meme: Best toy within 10 million, leading by shaking.
At that time, it was widely rumored online that Harmony Intelligent Mobility legal department complained and took down videos as soon as they saw Bamboo Cicada videos, even videos that only posted Bamboo Cicada without any follow-up interpretation were also complained and taken down. Public opinion was immediately in an uproar.
How real is the situation? On August 4, a Harmony Intelligent Mobility spokesperson issued a statement:
For a long time, malicious editing, impersonation of relevant executive voices, using AI to defame portraits, false attribution, slander, etc., content infringing on personal legal rights has been continuously existing on the network. We have always conducted daily evidence collection and complaints in accordance with the law. This complaint is part of daily rights protection work, targeting specific infringing content, not targeting the 'Bamboo Cicada' toy. As of the evening of August 4, a total of 56,000+ relevant online information was monitored. We actually initiated complaints against 171 specific infringing content items, and the platform feedback indicated 144 were taken down.
The Harmony Intelligent Mobility spokesperson clearly pointed out in the statement that complaints were initiated against only 171 items, and the platform feedback indicated 144 were taken down. In other words, among these 171 videos, at least 84% of videos were judged as non-compliant by the platform. Then, where did the information spread on the internet that Harmony Intelligent Mobility complains whenever seeing Bamboo Cicada come from?
Even more shocking is, regarding the same event, official media showed divergence, with high tension between them. On the evening of August 5, 'Jiangsu News', also an official media, published an article like this: Those advising Huawei to be generous, are you suitable?
Jiangsu News stated: It is quite rare that when Huawei is maliciously attacked and takes rights protection action voluntarily, someone still jumps out to advise it — large enterprises should be generous, only listening seriously to advice is true confidence, etc., with an air of teaching large enterprises how to do things,
Essentially, it is a posture of justifying black traffic, guiding public opinion with words that seem rational, neutral, and objective on the surface, but actually blur legal boundaries, affect market judgment, and damage the business environment, which is a bit inappropriate.
Since 'Jiangsu News' mentioned in the article 'Someone jumps out to advise it — large enterprises should be generous', which is highly related to what was mentioned in 'Zhejiang Propaganda' article 'The stronger the enterprise, the greater its tolerance for discussion', outsiders widely speculate that Jiangsu News is directly 'retorting' against relevant figures represented by the 'Zhejiang Propaganda' article.
Official media directly stepping in to 'fight', this is a rare thing in the past car circle.
Coincidentally, on July 30, Xiaomi Auto held the Xiaomi Pengcheng Technology Launch Event, when Xiaomi Company founder Lei Jun announced the price of Xiaomi's new car N90 Max, he specially said such a sentence: 'I can assertively say that N90 Max is one of the best models among Range Extender SUVs within 500,000 yuan.' What is interesting is, when Lei Jun mentioned 'models' here, he intentionally made a longer pause, and then added words like 'one of'.
After the Xiaomi Pengcheng Technology Launch Event, on August 3, Xiaomi PR Head Xu Jieyun posted a Weibo like this: 'Encourage real awesome, strike down exaggerating awesome', presumably alluding to the industry 'exaggerated marketing' phenomenon. The two events happened one after the other, since it coincided with the escalation of the Harmony Intelligent Mobility 'Bamboo Cicada' incident, triggering extensive discussion in the industry.
Is this Xiaomi intentionally targeting Huawei?
It is not an isolated incident. As early as September 16, 2025 at the Harmony Intelligent Mobility Stelato S9T New Product Launch Event, Huawei's Richard Yu publicly said such a paragraph: 'You say our cars are racing for two-second acceleration performance, or three-second acceleration performance, this is meaningless, you know? What is truly important is safety. Drifting directly on the road, drifting to other lanes, drifting to the green belt. Everyone thinks drifting is a very impressive performance, on highways, in city roads, you simply cannot drift easily, drifting will only bring traffic accidents. You think drifting in the city is how cool, I say that is the most stupid behavior, safety is the most important.'
Since Xiaomi SU7 Max version and SU7 ULTRA version both have extremely strong acceleration capabilities, and frequently there are incidents of Xiaomi SU7 running onto green belts in folklore, some netizens called Xiaomi SU7 'Green Belt God of War', and Xiaomi also specifically debunked rumors for this. In such a background, Richard Yu's paragraph is generally interpreted by the industry as alluding to Xiaomi.
Added to that in the early years Lei Jun had publicly called out to 'Defeat Huawei'. No matter what background this sentence was based on, at first glance, this information undoubtedly conveyed the signal to people that Xiaomi and Huawei are 'arch enemies'.
This time Bamboo Cicada incident, Zhejiang Propaganda, Jiangsu News stepped in turn, standing at completely opposite positions to comment on the same thing, which is truly rare.
What felt unexpected was, on August 6, a netizen posted a Lianhe Zaobao article, Lianhe Zaobao stated in the article: 'Facing the huge Chinese public opinion market, using power to pressure netizens is actually the lower strategy, ignoring it is the middle strategy, being able to like Lei Jun turn positive communication through self-mockery or other techniques is the upper strategy'. From Lianhe Zaobao's viewpoint, its stance of praising Xiaomi and mocking Huawei is obvious. This again triggered an uproar in domestic public opinion.
From multiple angles, the hidden struggle between Huawei and Xiaomi seems to be upgrading. Our view is: Two top enterprises hidden struggle, and duration is prolonged, is both a manifestation of the industry competition becoming fierce, and also caused by the objective factors of industry high-speed development. In such a scenario, whether it is Huawei or Xiaomi, remaining restrained in public opinion, maintaining high standards in products, ensuring legal compliance in marketing communication, or perhaps is the way to solve mutual respect.
In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers compare the Proton X70 and Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV when choosing a car. Both cars are quite close in price and positioning. Today we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
The Proton X70 OTR price in Malaysia is RM 106,800 - 122,300, with a total of 3 versions, including 1.5L Standard 2WD (RM 106,800), 1.5L Executive 2WD (RM 115,800), 1.5L Premium 2WD (RM 122,300) etc.
The Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV OTR price in Malaysia is RM 159,750 - 159,750, with a total of 2 versions, including 1.6L Turbo Standard (RM 130,000), 1.6L Turbo Premium (RM 145,000) etc.
From a price perspective, the starting price of the Proton X70 is indeed RM 52,950 cheaper than the Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV. If your budget is limited, Proton's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. But keep in mind, the cheaper few thousand might have trade-offs in features, it depends on your specific needs.
Proton X70 safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV safety rating is TBD, active safety systems include Basic.
Regarding safety features, both cars received good ratings. However, the Proton X70's ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA) and Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV's Basic have some differences in functions. If you value active safety, you can carefully compare the feature lists of both.
Proton X70 adopts FWD drive mode.
Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV adopts FWD drive mode.
Both cars have the same drive mode, both are FWD, daily driving experience will not be much different.
Proton X70 warranty is 5 years/150,000km, maintenance interval is every 10,000km or 6 months.
Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV warranty is 3 years/100,000km, maintenance interval is every 10,000km or 6 months.
Proton X70 and Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV are both mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, you can prioritize the one with better reputation; if you care more about cost-performance ratio and features, then choose the one with richer configuration. Ultimately, it is recommended to test drive both, experiencing it yourself is the most important.
Overall, Proton X70 and Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV are both very good car models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends on your personal needs and budget. We suggest you do your homework, compare quotes from several car dealers, and then test drive to make a final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending some time doing homework will never be wrong.
In Malaysia's SUV market, many buyers compare the Proton X70 and Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV when choosing a car. These two cars are quite similar in price and positioning. Today we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
The OTR price for Proton X70 in Malaysia is RM 106,800 - 122,300, with a total of 3 variants, including 1.5L Standard 2WD (RM 106,800), 1.5L Executive 2WD (RM 115,800), 1.5L Premium 2WD (RM 122,300), etc.
The OTR price for Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV in Malaysia is RM 159,750 - 159,750, with a total of 2 variants, including 1.6L Turbo Standard (RM 130,000), 1.6L Turbo Premium (RM 145,000), etc.
From a price perspective, Proton X70's starting price is indeed RM 52,950 cheaper than Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV. If your budget is limited, Proton's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. But also note, the few thousand ringgit difference, there might be trade-offs in features, specifically depends on your needs.
Proton X70 uses FWD drive type.
Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV uses FWD drive type.
Both cars have the same drive type, both are FWD, daily driving experience will not differ too much.
Proton X70 warranty 5 years/150,000km, service interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV warranty 3 years/100,000km, service interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Proton X70 and Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV are both mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use, daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, you can prioritize the one with better reputation; if you care more about cost-performance and features, then choose the one with richer configuration. Ultimately, it is recommended to test drive both models, personal experience is the most important.
In general, Proton X70 and Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV are both very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose, key still depends on your personal needs and budget. We recommend everyone do their research, compare quotes from several car dealers, then test drive to make the final decision. Buying a car is a big deal, spending time on research is never wrong.
In the SUV market in Malaysia, many buyers compare the Proton X70 and Chery Tiggo 7 Pro when choosing a car.
The OTR price of Proton X70 in Malaysia is RM 106,800 - 122,300, with a total of 3 versions, including 1.5L Standard 2WD (RM 106,800), 1.5L Executive 2WD (RM 115,800), 1.5L Premium 2WD (RM 122,300), etc.
The OTR price of Chery Tiggo 7 Pro in Malaysia is RM 123,750 - 123,750, with a total of 2 versions, including 1.6L Turbo Standard (RM 125,000), 1.6L Turbo Premium (RM 140,000), etc.
From a price perspective, the starting price of Proton X70 is indeed RM 16,950 cheaper than Chery Tiggo 7 Pro. If your budget is limited, Proton's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. But be aware, the few thousand cheaper may involve compromises on equipment, depending on your needs.
Proton X70 is equipped with 1.5L Turbo, 140 hp. Official fuel consumption 7.0 L/100km.
Chery Tiggo 7 Pro is equipped with 1.5L Turbo, 140 hp. Official fuel consumption 7.0 L/100km.
Both cars use the same powertrain, the driving feel is basically the same in daily use. Fuel economy is also similar, no need to worry too much about this point.
The safety rating of Proton X70 is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
The safety rating of Chery Tiggo 7 Pro is TBD, active safety systems include Basic.
In terms of safety features, both cars have received good ratings. However, there are some differences in functionality between Proton X70's ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA) and Chery Tiggo 7 Pro's Basic. If you value active safety more, you can compare the feature lists of both carefully.
Proton X70 warranty is 5 years/150,000km, service interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Chery Tiggo 7 Pro warranty is 3 years/100,000km, service interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Both Proton X70 and Chery Tiggo 7 Pro are mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, you can prioritize the one with better reputation; if you care more about cost-performance and equipment, choose the one with richer configuration. Ultimately, it is recommended to test drive both, as personal experience is the most important.
In general, Proton X70 and Chery Tiggo 7 Pro are both quite good car models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends mainly on your personal needs and budget. It is recommended that everyone do their research, compare quotes from several car dealers, and then test drive to make a final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, taking some time to do research will never be wrong.
In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers compare the Proton X70 and Chery Tiggo 7 Pro when choosing a car. The prices and positioning of these two cars are quite similar. Today, we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
The OTR price of the Proton X70 in Malaysia is RM 106,800 - 122,300, with a total of 3 versions, including 1.5L Standard 2WD (RM 106,800), 1.5L Executive 2WD (RM 115,800), 1.5L Premium 2WD (RM 122,300), etc.
The OTR price of the Chery Tiggo 7 Pro in Malaysia is RM 123,750 - 123,750, with a total of 2 versions, including 1.6L Turbo Standard (RM 125,000), 1.6L Turbo Premium (RM 140,000), etc.
From the price perspective, the starting price of the Proton X70 is indeed RM 16,950 cheaper than the Chery Tiggo 7 Pro. If your budget is limited, the Proton entry-level model can already meet daily needs. But you should also note that the few thousand cheaper may involve trade-offs in specifications, it depends on your specific needs.
The Proton X70 is equipped with 1.5L Turbo, 140 hp. Official fuel consumption is 7.0 L/100km.
The Chery Tiggo 7 Pro is equipped with 1.5L Turbo, 140 hp. Official fuel consumption is 7.0 L/100km.
Both cars use the same powertrain, the driving experience in daily use is basically the same. Fuel consumption is also similar, no need to worry too much about this point.
The Proton X70 body length is 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
The Chery Tiggo 7 Pro body length is 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
The dimensions of the two cars are almost the same, the interior space difference is not large. For this class of cars, it is completely sufficient for daily use.
Proton X70 warranty 5 years/150,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Chery Tiggo 7 Pro warranty 3 years/100,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
In general, Proton X70 and Chery Tiggo 7 Pro are both very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose, the key is to look at your personal needs and budget. We suggest everyone do research, compare quotes from multiple dealerships, and then go for a test drive to make the final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending time on research will never be wrong.
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多人揀車嘅時候都拿 Proton X70 同 Chery Tiggo Cross 做比較。呢兩款車喺價錢同定位上都幾接近，今日我哋就由多個方面做詳細比較，幫你省返做功課嘅時間。
Proton X70 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 106,800 - 122,300，一共有 3 個版本，包括 1.5L Standard 2WD（RM 106,800）、1.5L Executive 2WD（RM 115,800）、1.5L Premium 2WD（RM 122,300） 等。
Chery Tiggo Cross 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 88,750 - 99,750，一共有 2 個版本，包括 2025 HEV 1.5L CSH（RM 99,750）、2025 1.5T Standard（RM 88,750） 等。
由價錢睇，Chery Tiggo Cross 嘅起步價比 Proton X70 平咗 RM 18,050。坦白講，喺呢個價錢段，幾千蚊嘅差距其實唔算大，關鍵仲係睇整體嘅性價比同長期使用成本。
Proton X70 車身長 4400 mm，行李廂 400 L。
Chery Tiggo Cross 車身長 4400 mm，行李廂 400 L。
兩部車嘅尺寸幾乎一樣，車內空間差別唔大。呢個級別嘅車，日常使用完全夠用。
Proton X70 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
Chery Tiggo Cross 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
兩部車嘅驅動方式一樣，都係 FWD，日常駕駛感受唔會有太大分別。
Proton X70 同 Chery Tiggo Cross 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更睇重品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，就揀配置更豐富嗰款。最終仲係建議兩部車都去試駕，親身體驗先係最重要嘅。
總括嚟講，Proton X70 同 Chery Tiggo Cross 都係馬來西亞市場好唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一部，關鍵仲係睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕先做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
