首頁Tesla Model X
搜尋歷史
熱門搜尋
經銷商登入 / 註冊
In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers compare Proton X70 and Toyota Fortuner when choosing a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning, so today we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
Proton X70's OTR price in Malaysia is RM 106,800 - 122,300, with 3 versions in total, including 1.5L Standard 2WD (RM 106,800), 1.5L Executive 2WD (RM 115,800), 1.5L Premium 2WD (RM 122,300), etc.
Toyota Fortuner's OTR price in Malaysia is RM 195,880 - 241,880, with 3 versions in total, including 2024 2.8T VRZ Diesel (RM 241,880), 2024 2.7L SRZ Petrol (RM 202,880), 2024 2.4L Standard Diesel (RM 195,880), etc.
From a price perspective, Proton X70's starting price is indeed RM 89,080 cheaper than Toyota Fortuner. If your budget is limited, Proton's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. However, also note that the savings of a few thousand may involve trade-offs in features, depending on your specific needs.
Proton X70 comes with a 1.5L Turbo, 140 hp. Official fuel consumption 7.0 L/100km.
Toyota Fortuner comes with a 2.5L Diesel, 187 hp. Official fuel consumption 8.5 L/100km.
In terms of power, Toyota Fortuner's 2.5L Diesel has 47 more horsepower than Proton X70's 1.5L Turbo. However, for daily city driving, both cars have enough power, and you won't feel underpowered.
Proton X70's safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP). Active safety systems include ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
Toyota Fortuner's safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP). Active safety systems include .
Both cars have the same safety rating. Safety features in this class are considered very comprehensive. New cars nowadays generally have good safety, so there is no need to worry too much about this.
Proton X70 warranty 5 years/150,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Toyota Fortuner warranty 5 years/unlimited mileage, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Overall, Proton X70 and Toyota Fortuner are both very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose mainly depends on your personal needs and budget. We recommend doing your research, comparing quotes from several dealerships, and then test-driving to make a final decision. Buying a car is a major decision, so spending some time on research will never be wrong.
In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers compare Proton X70 and Toyota Fortuner when choosing a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning. Today we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time doing research.
The OTR price of Proton X70 in Malaysia is RM 106,800 - 122,300, with a total of 3 variants, including 1.5L Standard 2WD (RM 106,800), 1.5L Executive 2WD (RM 115,800), 1.5L Premium 2WD (RM 122,300), etc.
The OTR price of Toyota Fortuner in Malaysia is RM 195,880 - 241,880, with a total of 3 variants, including 2024 2.8T VRZ Diesel (RM 241,880), 2024 2.7L SRZ Petrol (RM 202,880), 2024 2.4L Standard Diesel (RM 195,880), etc.
From a pricing perspective, the starting price of Proton X70 is indeed RM 89,080 cheaper than Toyota Fortuner. If your budget is limited, Proton's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. However, it is also worth noting that the few thousand cheaper might involve trade-offs in features, depending on your specific needs.
Proton X70 is equipped with 1.5L Turbo, 140 hp. Official fuel consumption 7.0 L/100km.
Toyota Fortuner is equipped with 2.5L Diesel, 187 hp. Official fuel consumption 8.5 L/100km.
In terms of power, Toyota Fortuner's 2.5L Diesel has 47 more horsepower than Proton X70's 1.5L Turbo. However, for daily city driving, both cars have sufficient power, and you won't feel lacking in power.
Proton X70 body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
Toyota Fortuner body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
The dimensions of both cars are almost the same, with little difference in interior space. Cars in this class are more than sufficient for daily use.
Proton X70 adopts FWD drive mode.
Toyota Fortuner adopts FWD drive mode.
Both cars have the same drive mode, both are FWD, and there won't be much difference in daily driving experience.
Overall, Proton X70 and Toyota Fortuner are both very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose mainly depends on your personal needs and budget. It is recommended to do your research thoroughly, compare quotes from several car dealerships, and then go for a test drive to make the final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, taking some time to do research will definitely not be wrong.
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都仲會揸 Proton X70 同 Honda CR-V 嚟做比較。呢兩款車喺價位同定位上都幾接近，今日我哋就從多個方面做一個詳細嘅比較，幫你慳返做功課嘅時間。
Proton X70 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 106,800 - 122,300，一總共有 3 個版本，包括 1.5L Standard 2WD（RM 106,800）、1.5L Executive 2WD（RM 115,800）、1.5L Premium 2WD（RM 122,300） 呢啲。
Honda CR-V 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 178,200 - 195,900，一總共有 4 個版本，包括 2026 e:HEV 2.0L 2WD RS（RM 195,900）、2026 1.5T 4WD V（RM 181,900）、2026 e:HEV 2.0L 2WD E（RM 178,200） 呢啲。
從價錢睇落，Proton X70 嘅起步價確實比 Honda CR-V 平咗 RM 71,400。如果你預算有限，Proton 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需求。但都要留意，平咗嘅嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備上有取舍，具體就要睇你嘅需求啦。
Proton X70 車身長 4400 mm，尾箱 400 L。
Honda CR-V 車身長 4500 mm，尾箱 450 L。
空間方面，Honda CR-V 嘅車身比 Proton X70 長咗 100 mm，乘坐空間更有優勢。不過 Proton X70 喺城市入面泊車會靈活啲，各有取舍。
Proton X70 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
Honda CR-V 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
兩款車嘅驅動方式一樣，都係 FWD，日常駕駛感受唔會太大分別。
Proton X70 同 Honda CR-V 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更睇重品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰一款；如果你更介意性價比同配備，咁就揀配置更豐富嗰款。最後都係建議兩款都去試駕，親身體驗先係最重要嘅。
總括嚟講，Proton X70 同 Honda CR-V 都係馬來西亞市場好唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一部，關鍵仲係要睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，先去試駕先做最後決定。買車係一件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
In Malaysia's SUV market, many buyers compare Proton X70 and Honda HR-V when choosing a car. These two models are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will do a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
Proton X70's OTR price in Malaysia is RM 106,800 - 122,300, with a total of 3 versions, including 1.5L Standard 2WD (RM 106,800), 1.5L Executive 2WD (RM 115,800), 1.5L Premium 2WD (RM 122,300), etc.
Honda HR-V's OTR price in Malaysia is RM 115,900 - 143,900, with a total of 4 versions, including 2026 e:HEV 1.5L RS (RM 143,900), 2026 1.5T V (RM 137,900), 2026 1.5T E (RM 130,900), etc.
From a price perspective, Proton X70's starting price is indeed RM 9,100 cheaper than Honda HR-V. If your budget is limited, Proton's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. However, be aware that the few thousand RM cheaper might involve trade-offs in features, depending on your specific needs.
Proton X70 is equipped with 1.5L Turbo, horsepower 140 hp. Official fuel consumption 7.0 L/100km.
Honda HR-V is equipped with 1.5L Turbo, horsepower 140 hp. Official fuel consumption 7.0 L/100km.
Both cars use the same powertrain, and the driving experience in daily use is basically no different. Fuel consumption is also similar, no need to worry too much about this point.
Proton X70's safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
Honda HR-V's safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include Honda SENSING (ACC, CMBS, LKAS, RDM).
Both cars have the same safety rating, and safety features in this class are considered quite comprehensive. New car safety is generally not lacking these days, no need to worry too much about this.
Proton X70 body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
Honda HR-V body length 4500 mm, trunk 450 L.
In terms of space, Honda HR-V's body is 100 mm longer than Proton X70, offering better passenger space. However, Proton X70 is a bit more flexible for parking in the city, each has trade-offs.
Proton X70 adopts FWD drive system.
Honda HR-V adopts FWD drive system.
Both cars have the same drive system, both are FWD, there will not be a huge difference in daily driving experience.
Overall, Proton X70 and Honda HR-V are both very good models in the Malaysia market. Which one to choose depends mainly on your personal needs and budget. We suggest doing your homework, comparing quotes from several dealerships, and then test driving to make the final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending time on research is definitely not wrong.
Recently, an event where new energy vehicles purchased domestically triggered security protection strategies due to long-term driving overseas, resulting in restrictions on in-vehicle network related functions, has reached a satisfactory conclusion.
Previously, the car owner triggered the vehicle enterprise's backend risk control mechanism due to the vehicle being long-term located in an overseas area, and smart functions such as in-vehicle audio and video entertainment were temporarily restricted. After the owner posted their experience on social media, it sparked widespread discussion.
In response, Zeekr officially clarified and quickly launched optimization measures early in the morning on the 26th. Zeekr acknowledged that although this in-vehicle restriction was intended to protect users' property safety, there is indeed room for improvement in terms of user experience. Combining feedback from users and netizens, optimization was immediately advanced.
The core measure is to optimize the cross-border security protection experience. The Zeekr App adds an entry point for the "Cross-Border Guardian" function. The owner only needs to trigger it with one click to quickly complete self-unlocking, simplifying the process. The "Cross-Border Guardian Function Switch" currently under development will be pushed via OTA later.
This module has become the industry's first comprehensive cross-border security protection system and is also a typical case of users, netizens, and vehicle manufacturers jointly promoting industry progress.
Official Rapid Response, Step-by-Step Optimization of Security Protection ExperienceIt is understood that this car owner drove a self-drive journey starting from Henan. After entering Kazakhstan, the in-vehicle system popped up a strong prompt interface, and smart functions such as navigation and audio/video were restricted. The reporter verified that the vehicle's power, braking and other core driving systems were always normal, and there was no situation of "unable to drive". Currently, this vehicle has completed verification, and the in-vehicle strong prompt has been lifted.
After the incident occurred, Zeekr listened to user suggestions humbly, responded quickly to public opinion appeals, and implemented an optimization plan step-by-step, balancing vehicle security protection and car owner usage experience.
The specific optimization plan includes: First, the Zeekr APP officially launched the "Cross-Border Guardian" function entry point. The owner only needs to trigger it with one click to quickly obtain the verification code, complete self-unlocking, simplify the process, and improve response efficiency. Second, the "Cross-Border Guardian Function Switch" currently under development will be pushed via OTA later. After the switch function is launched, "Cross-Border Guardian" will be in the closed state by default. Before going overseas, the car owner can manually choose to open or close it on the mobile phone according to their own needs. If the car owner actively opens this function, they can still perform self-unlocking through the APP "Cross-Border Guardian" entry point. Third, for users who have gone overseas or are about to go overseas, Zeekr has opened a 24-hour customer service hotline (400-003-6036) which will provide a priority access channel. If unlocking fails or an emergency occurs, Zeekr will assist remotely at the first time.
Zeekr side stated that the brand adheres to the original intention of extreme full-domain safety, always puts user experience and safety first, and always attaches importance to every real voice. In the future, it will continue to collect and listen to car owner feedback on a normalized basis, iterate and optimize security risk control strategies and cross-border travel service processes, and continue to find a more perfect balance point between building a security and data safety defense line and optimizing user travel experience.
Reporter Investigation: New Energy Industry Universally Uses Risk Control Design, But Experience Needs ImprovementIn fact, new energy vehicle enterprises deploying cross-border risk control systems are not redundant control means, but a necessary guarantee to cope with the current automotive cross-border black and gray industry and protect car owner rights and interests. In recent years, the chaos of cross-border theft and robbery of new energy vehicles, dismantling and smuggling has occurred frequently. Previously, a flagship model of a new force brand was stolen and then transported overseas, the vehicle was transferred quickly, the in-vehicle account and filing information were tampered with remotely, resulting in the car owner having no way to defend their rights. Many places have also cracked down on cases of batch new cars flowing overseas, behind which is the security loopholes left by the lack of security protection mechanisms.
Industry data shows that in-vehicle restrictions are essentially a mature global vehicle security protection strategy of vehicle enterprises. Mercedes-Benz, BMW, Porsche, Tesla and other global head vehicle enterprises have deployed similar mechanisms. During the Russia-Ukraine War, the above brands, lacking backup communication mechanisms and intelligent fault tolerance design, triggered security prevention and control mechanisms due to external signal interruption or interference, thereby forcibly locking the vehicle.
But for a long time, most vehicle enterprises only focus on risk control implementation, neglect user notification and experience adaptation, imperfect processes and non-transparent mechanisms, leading to the general public to produce a misunderstanding that "enterprises overstep their authority and excessively intervene in property rights". Essentially, this kind of risk control logic is the same source as iPhone device positioning anti-theft, electronic fence lock machine mechanisms, the core is to provide a safety net for user property safety, and can be unlocked after user reporting.
Industry and Legal Experts: Security Strategies and User Privacy Protection Are Very NecessaryMany senior figures in the automotive industry interviewed stated that this Zeekr rapid optimization measure has, to a certain extent, promoted the progress of the new energy industry security risk control system.
In the era of smart cars, the core responsibility of vehicle enterprises has long been limited to driving operation safety, but extended to the full-domain security protection system: it includes not only basic driving safety such as steering, braking, and power, but also vehicle property anti-theft safety and car owner personal data privacy safety. Zeekr's optimization of cross-border risk control rules this time is essentially finding the optimal balance point between safety compliance baseline, property protection mechanism and user experience, truly handing back the vehicle control right to users, achieving "safety in place, experience not discounted".
For the viewpoint questioning whether vehicle enterprises have the right to restrict vehicle functions unilaterally. Some lawyers stated: The enterprise's geofencing risk control only restricts in-vehicle entertainment, navigation and other additional functions, and never interferes with core hardware related to driving safety such as steering, braking, and power. After the car owner provides passports,通关 vouchers, car purchase proof and other materials to complete verification, the restriction can be unlocked, which does not constitute an infringement of property rights. On the contrary, if the vehicle enterprise allows vehicles to flow overseas without control, it will face high administrative penalties from customs.
The real feedback of front-line car owners further confirms the necessity of industry optimization. Many Zeekr car owners interviewed stated that they chose Zeekr precisely because they appreciated the brand concept of extreme safety. Relevant industry persons believe that the full-domain electronic fence, cross-border risk control mechanism is a necessary safety configuration for high-end luxury cars, and is consistent with the anti-theft lock machine logic of various digital products. High-end luxury cars have high value and large cross-border arbitrage space, and a perfect risk control mechanism can effectively avoid the risk of vehicles being stolen, robbed, and illegally resold, making daily car use and long-distance cross-border travel safer and more reassuring.
Behind the Controversy: The Inevitable Step for Chinese High-End New Energy GlobalizationFrom the perspective of the long-term trend of the industry, this vehicle enterprise's upgrade measure is the inevitable way for Chinese high-end new energy vehicles to go global. Currently, domestic high-end new energy brand acceleration to go out of the country, the huge difference in price between domestic and foreign markets has formed a huge arbitrage space: Zeekr 009 domestic price is more than 400,000 yuan, Singapore market is more than 2 million yuan; Zeekr 9X overseas terminals generally add 400,000 yuan, Mansory custom modified version overseas price reaches 400,000 US dollars,折合 to more than 2.7 million yuan RMB. The huge price difference dividend makes domestic high-end luxury cars the key coveting target of cross-border black and gray industry and illegal reselling dealers, and various illegal cross-border reselling, whole vehicle smuggling, parts dismantling arbitrage behaviors are emerging.
At the same time, vehicle positioning trajectory, in-vehicle surveying and mapping geographic information belongs to national statutory important data. According to the "Data Security Law", "Provisions on Several Issues Concerning the Safety Management of Automotive Data (Trial)", "Guidelines for Automotive Data Cross-Border Security (2026 Version)", "Surveying and Mapping Law", relevant data are strictly prohibited from non-compliant cross-border transmission, geofencing risk control is the statutory responsibility of vehicle enterprises to implement national data security and surveying and mapping confidentiality. And in 2026, domestic pure electric passenger car export license management system will be implemented, and vehicles without formal licenses are prohibited from flowing out, and vehicle enterprise risk control is also a necessary measure to cooperate with national import and export supervision and avoid compliance risks. In addition, overseas in-vehicle audio and video, traffic services involve copyright and local laws in various places, and disorderly opening of functions will also bring compliance troubles to car owners.
Zeekr brand, known for full-domain safety, is praised by users as "Road Zeekr". Not only does it pursue leading technology configuration in body structure, intelligent obstacle avoidance and other aspects, but it is also at the forefront of the industry in privacy protection, anti-loss and anti-theft. But no matter how good the original intention is, it must avoid excessive protection similar to "there is a kind of cold called mom is afraid you are cold". Cars are essentially users' property, and security strategies should not make users feel disturbed.
This controversy turned from public opinion crisis to industry upgrade opportunity. Zeekr's "listening to advice upgrade" also made a positive demonstration for the whole industry: Security risk control has never been a redundant restraint, but the core confidence and necessary infrastructure for the globalization of Chinese automobile brands. In the future, as domestic high-end new energy vehicles continue to deeply cultivate overseas markets such as Southeast Asia, Middle East, Singapore, the industry will definitely refer to this optimization paradigm, uniformly improve the "risk control bottom-line + user autonomy + convenient unlocking" standardization system.
Looking back at the past year, Zeekr has transformed user voices into the driving force for brand evolution step by step. From clarifying that "model changes need to be announced in advance and no more than once a year" in response to the problem of too fast model change rhythm, to launching the "Zeekr Zero Distance" communication mechanism and publishing the "Sunshine Service Convention" - every measure behind it is the sincerity of giving the right to speak back to users. It is this frank communication that does not avoid and does not shirk that made Zeekr brand NPS (Net Promoter Score) soar greatly, and formed a strong word-of-mouth effect in the market. In the first half of this year, Zeekr cumulative delivery 178,370 vehicles, year-on-year growth of 97%, becoming the only enterprise among new force brands that completed more than half of the annual sales target. Market recognition is the best reward.
In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers compare Proton X50 and Chery Tiggo 9 when choosing a car. The pricing and positioning of these two models are quite close. Today, we will conduct a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
Proton X50 OTR price in Malaysia is RM 89,800 - 113,300, with a total of 4 versions, including 1.5T Executive (RM 89,800), 1.5T Premium (RM 101,800), 1.5T Flagship (RM 113,300) etc.
Chery Tiggo 9 OTR price in Malaysia is RM 166,800 - 179,800, with a total of 1 version, including 2026 2.0T Standard (RM 179,750) etc.
Looking at the price, Proton X50's starting price is indeed RM 77,000 cheaper than Chery Tiggo 9. If your budget is limited, Proton's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. But also note, the few thousand difference might have trade-offs in features, it depends on your specific needs.
Proton X50 body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
Chery Tiggo 9 body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
The dimensions of both cars are almost the same, with little difference in interior space. Cars in this class are fully sufficient for daily use.
Proton X50 warranty 5 years/150,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Chery Tiggo 9 warranty 3 years/100,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Proton X50 and Chery Tiggo 9 are both mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, you can prioritize the one with better reputation; if you care more about value for money and features, choose the one with more configurations. Ultimately, it is recommended to test drive both, personal experience is the most important.
Overall, Proton X50 and Chery Tiggo 9 are both very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends mainly on your personal needs and budget. It is recommended to do your research, compare quotes from several car dealerships, and then test drive to make a final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending some time on research will never be wrong.
In Malaysia's SUV market, many buyers compare Proton X50 and Mazda CX-8 when choosing a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
The OTR price of Proton X50 in Malaysia is RM 89,800 - 113,300. There are 4 versions in total, including 1.5T Executive (RM 89,800), 1.5T Premium (RM 101,800), 1.5T Flagship (RM 113,300), etc.
The OTR price of Mazda CX-8 in Malaysia is RM 165,360 - 201,360. There are 5 versions in total, including 2025 2.5T 4WD High Plus Petrol (RM 201,360), 2025 2.2L 2WD High Plus Diesel (RM 193,123), 2025 2.5L 2WD High Plus Petrol (RM 186,360), etc.
From a price perspective, the starting price of Proton X50 is indeed RM 75,560 cheaper than Mazda CX-8. If your budget is limited, Proton's entry-level version is already sufficient for daily needs. However, note that the few thousand difference in price might involve compromises in features, which depends on your specific needs.
Proton X50 is equipped with a 1.5L 4-cyl, 105 hp. Official fuel consumption is 6.0 L/100km.
Mazda CX-8 is equipped with a 2.0L 4-cyl, 170 hp. Official fuel consumption is 8.0 L/100km.
In terms of power, the Mazda CX-8's 2.0L 4-cyl has 65 more horsepower than the Proton X50's 1.5L 4-cyl. However, for daily city driving, the power of both cars is sufficient and will not feel lacking.
The safety rating of Proton X50 is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP). Active safety systems include ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
The safety rating of Mazda CX-8 is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP). Active safety systems include Brand ADAS.
Both cars have the same safety rating. In this class, safety features are quite comprehensive. New car safety is generally good nowadays, so there is no need to worry too much about this.
Proton X50 uses a 4WD drive system.
Mazda CX-8 uses a FWD drive system.
Proton's 4WD and Mazda's FWD will have different driving experiences, a test drive comparison is recommended.
Overall, Proton X50 and Mazda CX-8 are both very good models in the Malaysian market. Choosing which one depends on your personal needs and budget. It is recommended to do your homework, compare quotes from several dealerships, and then test drive to make the final decision. Buying a car is a big deal, spending some time doing homework will never be wrong.
In Malaysia's SUV market, many buyers compare Perodua Aruz and Hyundai Tucson when choosing a car.
Perodua Aruz OTR price in Malaysia is RM 72,900 - 77,900, with a total of 2 versions, including 1.5L X (RM 72,900), 1.5L AV (RM 77,900), etc.
Hyundai Tucson OTR price in Malaysia is RM 143,888 - 197,888, with a total of 5 versions, including 2025 HEV 1.6T AT 2WD Prestige (RM 197,888), 2025 1.6T DCT 4WD Prestige (RM 186,888), 2025 1.6T DCT 2WD Prime (RM 164,888), etc.
From the price perspective, Perodua Aruz's starting price is indeed RM 70,988 cheaper than Hyundai Tucson. If your budget is limited, Perodua's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. But also note, those few thousand cheaper might mean compromises on features, it depends on your specific needs.
Perodua Aruz safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include .
Hyundai Tucson safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include SmartSense.
Both cars have the same safety rating, safety features are quite comprehensive for this class. New cars these days have decent safety, no need to worry too much about this point.
Perodua Aruz body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
Hyundai Tucson body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
Dimensions of both cars are almost the same, interior space difference is not large. Cars in this class are completely sufficient for daily use.
Perodua Aruz warranty 5 years/150,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Hyundai Tucson warranty 5 years/300,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Both Perodua Aruz and Hyundai Tucson are mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use, daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale price more, prioritize the one with better reputation; if you care more about cost-performance ratio and features, choose the one with richer configuration. Ultimately, it is recommended to test drive both, personal experience is the most important.
Overall, Perodua Aruz and Hyundai Tucson are both very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends mainly on your personal needs and budget. We suggest doing your homework, compare quotes from several car dealerships, and then test drive to make the final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending some time doing homework will definitely not be a mistake.
In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers compare Perodua Aruz and Proton X90 when choosing a car. These two models are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to save you the time of doing research.
The OTR price of Perodua Aruz in Malaysia is RM 72,900 - 77,900, with a total of 2 versions, including 1.5L X (RM 72,900), 1.5L AV (RM 77,900), etc.
The OTR price of Proton X90 in Malaysia is RM 106,800 - 122,800, with a total of 4 versions, including 2026 1.5T Prime X (RM 122,800), 2026 1.5T Prime (RM 116,800), 2026 1.5T Lite (RM 106,800), etc.
In terms of price, the starting price of Perodua Aruz is indeed RM 33,900 cheaper than Proton X90. If your budget is limited, Perodua's entry version can already meet daily needs. But also note, the few thousand cheaper might have trade-offs in equipment, specifically depending on your needs.
Perodua Aruz is equipped with a 1.5L 4-cyl, horsepower 105 hp. Official fuel consumption 6.0 L/100km.
Proton X90 is equipped with a 1.5L Turbo, horsepower 140 hp. Official fuel consumption 7.0 L/100km.
In terms of power, the 1.5L Turbo of Proton X90 has 35 more horsepower than the 1.5L 4-cyl of Perodua Aruz. However, for daily city driving, the power of both cars is sufficient, you won't feel underpowered.
Perodua Aruz body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
Proton X90 body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
The dimensions of both cars are almost the same, with little difference in interior space. For this class of car, it is fully sufficient for daily use.
Perodua Aruz warranty 5 years/150,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Proton X90 warranty 5 years/150,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
The warranty conditions for both cars are the same, no need to worry about this. Actual maintenance costs depend on the brand's service network and parts prices. Suggestion to ask real owners in car owner groups for experience.
Overall, both Perodua Aruz and Proton X90 are very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends on your personal needs and budget. It is recommended to do your research, compare quotes from several car dealerships, and test drive before making a final decision. Buying a car is a big deal, spending time on research will definitely not be wrong.
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嗰陣都會拿 Perodua Aruz 同 Proton X90 嚟做比較。呢兩款車喺價錢同定位上都幾近嘅，今日我哋就從多個方面做一次詳細嘅對比，幫你節省咗做功課嘅時間。
Perodua Aruz 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 72,900 - 77,900，總共有 2 個版本，包括 1.5L X（RM 72,900）、1.5L AV（RM 77,900） 等。
Proton X90 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 106,800 - 122,800，總共有 4 個版本，包括 2026 1.5T Prime X（RM 122,800）、2026 1.5T Prime（RM 116,800）、2026 1.5T Lite（RM 106,800） 等。
從價錢睇，Perodua Aruz 嘅起步價確實比 Proton X90 平咗 RM 33,900。如果你預算有限，Perodua 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需要。但都要留意，平嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備上會有取捨，具體要看你嘅需要。
Perodua Aruz 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 。
Proton X90 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA)。
兩款車嘅安全評級一樣，喺呢個級別入面安全配備都算給得好齊全。而家嘅新車安全性都唔差，唔使太擔心這一點。
Perodua Aruz 車身長 4400 mm，車廂 400 L。
Proton X90 車身長 4400 mm，車廂 400 L。
兩款車嘅尺寸差唔多一樣，車內空間分別唔大。呢個級別嘅車，日常使用完全够用。
Perodua Aruz 同 Proton X90 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更重視品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，就揀配置更豐富嗰款。最終都係建議兩款都去試駕，親身體驗先係最重要。
總體嚟講，Perodua Aruz 同 Proton X90 都係馬來西亞市場好唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵都要睇你嘅個人需要同預算。建议大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
In Malaysia's SUV market, many buyers compare Perodua Ativa and Proton X70 when choosing a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
Perodua Ativa's OTR price in Malaysia is RM 62,500 - 73,400, with a total of 3 versions, including 1.0L Turbo X (RM 62,500), 1.0L Turbo H (RM 67,300), 1.0L Turbo AV (RM 73,400), etc.
Proton X70's OTR price in Malaysia is RM 106,800 - 122,300, with a total of 3 versions, including 1.5L Standard 2WD (RM 106,800), 1.5L Executive 2WD (RM 115,800), 1.5L Premium 2WD (RM 122,300), etc.
From a price perspective, Perodua Ativa's starting price is indeed RM 44,300 cheaper than Proton X70. If your budget is limited, Perodua's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. But note, the few thousand dollars cheaper might involve trade-offs in features, it depends on your specific requirements.
Perodua Ativa body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
Proton X70 body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
The dimensions of both cars are almost the same, with little difference in interior space. Cars in this class are more than enough for daily use.
Perodua Ativa uses FWD drive method.
Proton X70 uses FWD drive method.
Both cars have the same drive method, both are FWD, there won't be a big difference in daily driving feel.
Perodua Ativa and Proton X70 are both mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, prioritize the one with better reputation; if you care more about cost-performance ratio and features, choose the one with richer configuration. Ultimately, it is suggested to test drive both, personal experience is the most important.
Overall, Perodua Ativa and Proton X70 are both very good car models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends mainly on your personal needs and budget. We suggest doing research, comparing quotes from several dealerships, and then test driving to make the final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending time doing research will never be wrong.
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拿 Mazda CX-30 同 Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV 來作比較。呢兩款車喺價位同定位上都幾接近嘅，今日我哋就由多個方面做一個詳細比較，幫你節省咗做功課嘅時間。
Mazda CX-30 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 122,409 - 146,409，一共有 4 個版本，包括 2025 2.0L High+ Premium（RM 146,409）、2025 2.0L High+（RM 138,409）、2025 2.0L High（RM 130,409） 等。
Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 129,750 - 129,750，一共有 2 個版本，包括 2025 1.5T 90km CSH（RM 129,750）、Tiggo 7 PHEV 支援咩充電方法？可以用家用電源插座充電嗎？（RM 117,478） 等。
由價錢嚟睇，Mazda CX-30 嘅起步價確實比 Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV 平咗 RM 7,341。如果你預算有限，Mazda 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需要。但都要留意，平嗰啲幾千蚊，可能喺配備上會有取捨，具體要看你嘅需要。
Mazda CX-30 搭載 1.5L Turbo，馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。
Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV 搭載 Hybrid，馬力 170 hp。官方油耗 4.5 L/100km。
動力方面，Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV 嘅 Hybrid 比 Mazda CX-30 嘅 1.5L Turbo 多咗 30 匹馬力。不過日常喺市區開，兩款車嘅動力都夠用，唔會覺得唔夠力。
Mazda CX-30 保養 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV 保養 3 年/100,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Mazda CX-30 同 Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更重視品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰一款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，就揀配置更豐富嗰款。最後都建議兩款都去試駕，親身體驗先至最重要嘅。
總括嚟講，Mazda CX-30 同 Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一部，關鍵都係睇你嘅個人需要同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較間車行嘅報價，先至去試駕做最後決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課肯定唔會錯。
喺馬來西亞嘅汽車市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會攞馬自達 CX-80 同 Mercedes-Benz GLC 來做比較。今日我哋從多個方面做一個詳細嘅比較，幫你省做功課嘅時間。
馬自達 CX-80 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 296,610 - 296,610，一共有 1 個版本，包括 2025 2.5L 65km High Plus（RM 296,610）等。
梅賽德斯 - 奔馳 GLC 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 336,888 - 336,888，一共有 2 個版本，包括 GLC 200（RM 290,000）、GLC 300（RM 340,000）等。
由價錢睇，馬自達 CX-80 嘅起步價確實比 Mercedes-Benz GLC 平咗 RM 40,278。如果你預算有限，馬自達嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需要。不過都要注意，平嗰幾千塊，可能喺配備上會有取舍，具體就要睇你嘅需要。
馬自達 CX-80 搭載 2.0L Turbo，馬力 220 hp。官方油耗 9.5 L/100km。
梅賽德斯 - 奔馳 GLC 搭載 2.0L Turbo，馬力 220 hp。官方油耗 9.5 L/100km。
兩款車用緊同一套動力系統，所以日常開起嚟嘅感受基本冇分別。油耗方面都差唔多，唔使太糾結這一點。
馬自達 CX-80 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 Brand ADAS。
梅賽德斯 - 奔馳 GLC 嘅安全評級係 5★ (Euro NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 Premium ADAS。
安全配備方面，兩款車都拿到唔錯嘅評級。不過馬自達 CX-80 嘅 Brand ADAS 同 Mercedes-Benz GLC 嘅 Premium ADAS 喺功能上有些差異，如果你比較重視主動安全嘅話，可以仔細比較下兩者嘅功能列表。
馬自達 CX-80 保修 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
梅賽德斯 - 奔馳 GLC 保修 3 年/100,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
總嘅嚟講，馬自達 CX-80 同 Mercedes-Benz GLC 都係馬來西亞市場好唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵都要睇你嘅個人需要同預算。我哋建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去做試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
你睇過印度嘅馬路嗎？
我喺網上見過。
畫面通常係咁，一輛轎車俾牛尾擋住，旁邊仲有亂竄嘅摩托，甚至周圍仲有賣奶茶嘅小夥，嗰叫一個“乾淨又衛生”。
然而，喺呢啲睇完好多人覺得生理不適嘅地方，豐田、鈴木、本田等日本車廠，卻決定將籌碼押落印度。
據印度“品牌質量基金會”網站顯示，三家車廠將喺印度投資近110 億美元建廠、提產能、搞出口。
對此有网友表示，三家日本車廠係咪錢多到無處花？
事實上，佢哋唔係錢多到花唔完，亦唔係被印度嘅咖哩蒙蔽咗心竅，呢啲日本車廠高層遠比我哋清醒。
而家嘅日系車，營業額、市場份額都喺下滑，原材料成本仲係升得飛起，打開世界地圖，搵一個能夠容納產能、拓充份額、競爭溫和嘅市場，唔係咁容易嘅事。
所以，唔係日本車廠選擇咗印度，而係因為冇得揀。
日本車廠之痛
曾經嘅日系車，嗰時妥妥係人哋個仔。
你問下十幾年前開過日系車嘅老司機，一提起日系車，幾乎就冇唔豎大拇指嘅，價錢平、省油、耐用又抵撞……
甚至好多日系車，仲要加價購買，但邊個諗到，呢個鐵打嘅江山，短短幾年時間就俾佢哋打得找唔著北。
隨著新能源汽車浪潮嚟到，電動化、智能化變成好多自主車廠“彎道超車”嘅目標，依托於中國強大嘅新能源汽車產業鏈優勢同車廠自身對研發、技術嘅堅持，中國自主品牌迅速實現咗“彎道超車”。
曾經被人吐槽嘅國產車，而家喺馬路越來越多人，甚至份額超越咗合資。
根據乘聯會嘅數據，喺2026 年4 月，自主品牌嘅份額已經高達62.5%，遠超日系嘅13.1%。
要知道，中國汽車市場係全球最大嘅汽車市場，喺中國市場失速，就相當於丟咗一塊巨大嘅蛋糕。
同時，中國市場近年嚟嘅主旋律依舊係價格戰，捲配置、捲價格、捲服務已經成為一種常態，亦對日系車嘅利潤產生咗巨大嘅影響。
除咗中國，日系車喺美國過得亦唔太好。
2025 年 1 月 20 日，特朗普宣誓就職第 47 任美國總統，自此開啟咗一連串搞搞震，其中就包括以國家安全為理由徵收額外嘅汽車關稅，導致進口日本汽車嘅關稅稅率一度高達 27.5%，雖然後嚟有所降低，但亦遠高於最初嘅稅率。
呢個操作，直接導致七大日本車廠喺2025 財政年度嘅關稅損失超2 萬億日元。
再睇日本本土，其實亦唔容易。
中東地緣衝突導致霍爾木茲海峽航運受阻，運輸成本、原材料成本暴漲，日本車廠都有苦難言。
高管們看著報表，背後發涼，只能尋找全新嘅增長曲線。
所以，日本車廠唔係愛上印度，係冇地方去。
揀選印度嘅深思熟慮
咁，印度點解咁有魔力，先至令日本車廠重資投入呢？
第一個優勢就係大。喺2025 年，印度汽車市場取得咗551.7 萬輛嘅新車銷量，同比增長 6%，刷新咗歷史紀錄，位居全球第三大汽車市場，已经连续四年超越日本，僅次於中國同美國。
呢個含金量唔使多講啦，而印度取得呢一成績，主要係因為印度一直喺推動減稅政策，促進消費，這導致國內消費意願出現咗明顯增強。
第二個優點係近，就係離日系車賣得動嘅地方近，如非洲等其他地區。
所以，印度對於日本車廠，更似一個建喺十字路口中央嘅便利店，你唔使將車分別運去八個國家，只需要喺印度呢站造好，然後一船一船甩去，就能削減唔少成本。
《日本經濟新聞》亦認為，印度有望轉變為佢哋全球嘅汽車供應中心。
第三個優點係穩。要知道，日系車嘅優勢就係燃油車，畢竟引擎、變速箱、底盤三大件，佢哋已經玩咗好多年，技術積累喺全球都係數一數二。
但係中國汽車市場已經全力推動電動化、智能化發展，導致日系車嘅優勢越來越弱，根本無法發揮出嚟，但印度唔一樣，佢擁有充電樁少、電動化進程緩慢嘅特點，印度老百姓買車，都仲係盯住平、省油、易修，而呢三點正係日系車嘅老本行。
尤其係鈴木，一直係印度汽車市場嘅常青樹，幾乎年年穩坐暢銷車型寶座，口碑好，勝過任何廣告。
所以，日本車廠大力佈局印度市場，顯然是經過深思熟慮嘅。
但，印度市場真係咁好混咩？
難啃嘅印度市場
當然，印度亦唔係完美得似個香口格，佢嘅缺點同佢嘅優點一樣明顯，而且每一個都夠日本車廠喝一壺。
先講電動化，冇錯，眼睇下印度充電樁少、電動車賣唔動，確實係日系燃油車嘅避風港。但你得諗諗，呢個“避風港”能避幾耐？
印度此前可係喊出咗 2030 年電動車佔新車 30% 嘅口號，雖然聽落似吹水，但抵唔住人哋真補錢、真建充電站。
試諗下，萬一有日印度突然開竅，開始大力推動電動化、搞基建，充電樁似雨後春筍咁冒出來，嗰日系車唔就傻眼？
呢唔係泰國市場嘅翻版咩？
當年日系車喺泰國都係躺贏，整個東南亞市場，都被稱為日系車嘅後花園，結果泰國率先推動電動化，中國電動車一嚟，直接就成咗香口格，再睇日系車，喺泰國嘅市場份額嘩嘩嚟咗落。
如果印度係電動化一加速，歷史大概率會重演，而而家呢次，日系車連逃嘅地方都快冇咗，點樣預防，將成為日本車廠嘅首要問題。
再講政策，印度嘅政策就似一鍋咖哩，你永遠唔知下一口食到係雞肉定係馬鈴薯。
呢個魔幻嘅國家，今日係低關稅鼓勵建廠，明日就可能罰你一筆巨款，更令人頭痛嘅係強制合資，外國車廠想喺印度賣車，要搵本地夥伴搭檔，等你工廠建好咗、供應鏈搭完咗，印度直接背刺你，到嗰陣無論係加錢定撤資，換嚟嘅都係心痛。
所以你看，印度呢個市場，就好似一個睇落好甜嘅芒果，咬落去第一口仲行，再啃幾口就摸著硬核。
日系車而家嘅算盤係，趁住核都未硌牙，趕緊多啃幾口，但核遲早會硌到，只係唔知係邊一日。
尾聲
日系車呢趟印度之旅，唔係去旅遊，係去搵食。
中國同東南亞嘅飯桌更擁擠，生產、運輸嘅成本又提高咗，放眼全球，就印度呢口鍋仲冒住熱氣，哪怕入面煮嘅係咖哩味嘅石頭，都要硬著頭皮啃落去。
日本車廠想擴大市場，印度想嘅係拉動經濟、解決就業，雙方都有各自嘅心思。
至於結局係日系車喺印度重新封神，定係好似當年嘅部分友商一樣灰溜溜走人，那就唔知啦。
但無論點樣，呢場戲先至開始，我哋慢慢睇就得啦。
反正印度嘅故事，從來唔會悶。
車型概覽
吉利EX5 值唔值得睇，第一步唔係望牌子或者外形，而係睇佢能唔能夠配合你嘅香港日常。 呢篇會集中講同級車比較，幫你用買家角度篩走唔適合嘅選擇。 近期市場討論到「自動駕駛全新突破 吉利Eva Cab亮相香港汽車博覽會」，代表呢類車型仍然有一定關注度。
零售價 HK$ 160,216、完稅價 HK$ 238,000 - 299,900 令預算位置更清楚，買家可以先估算月供、保險、泊車同日常開支。
購車價格指南
吉利EX5 嘅購車預算可以先由 零售價 HK$ 160,216、完稅價 HK$ 238,000 - 299,900 開始計。香港買車唔只係睇車價，月供、保險、牌費、泊車同能源成本都會影響每月壓力。
如果有幾個版本可揀，可以先將 2026 550km Max Plus（HK$ 299,900）、2025 430km Pro（HK$ 238,000）、2025 425km Max（HK$ 257,389） 放喺同一張清單。日常通勤重視舒適同易用，家庭買家就要優先睇後排、尾箱同安全配置。
核心規格重點
睇 吉利EX5 嘅規格，重點唔係背數字，而係理解佢喺香港用車場景會帶嚟咩分別。
68.39/60.22 kWh 嘅電池容量，真正意義係可以幫你估算一星期通勤同周末出車要唔要中途補電。 14.3/15.8/16 kWh/100km 嘅耗電表現，會影響你去快充站或者屋苑充電位嘅頻率。 160 kW、320 N·m 嘅輸出，令高速併線同短距離超車更有信心。 車長 4615 mm、車闊 1901 mm、車高 1670 mm、軸距 2750 mm 可以幫你預判商場停車場、屋苑車位同後排腿部空間。
優缺點分析
吉利EX5 嘅優點唔需要講到天花龍鳳，真正有價值係佢能唔能夠令日常用車更省心：預算位置清楚，方便同同級車直接比較、日常能源成本有基本參考、電池同續航資訊有助安排通勤同補電。
要留意嘅係，要先確認屋苑、公司或常去商場嘅充電條件、香港停車場同窄路使用要留意車身闊度。呢啲唔一定係缺點，但係落訂前應該先諗清楚。
買家常見問題
買 吉利EX5 之前，真正要問嘅唔係單一規格，而係佢可唔可以融入你每日嘅生活節奏。
常見疑問係「吉利 EX5 的車廂空間同實用性係點樣？」簡單講，吉利 EX5 為緊湊型純電 SUV，車廆空間實用，後排與尾箱適合家庭使用。 放到實際用車，就係要睇佢對通勤、泊車、家庭乘坐同長期成本有幾大幫助。
同級對比內容
將 吉利EX5 放入同級車清單時，唔建議只用外形或者品牌光環決定。比較順序可以係：先用 零售價 HK$ 160,216、完稅價 HK$ 238,000 - 299,900 鎖定預算圈、再睇動力係咪足夠應付高速併線同滿載、再比較能源成本同補能便利、最後睇車身大小、座位同尾箱是否適合家人。
咁樣篩選會貼近香港買家真實生活：平日塞車、商場泊車、周末去新界、甚至一家人出入，先係一部車每日要面對嘅考驗。
用車全周期指南
擁有 吉利EX5 最重要係先諗清楚充電節奏。屋苑、公司或者常去商場只要有穩定充電選項，電動化用車就會容易相處好多。
如果你主要喺市區行，視野、低速順滑度同泊車輔助會好影響心情；如果經常行高速或跨區，座椅舒適度、隔音同動力從容感會更重要。
In May, China's automotive market overall presented a gentle recovery trend, with domestic brands still being the sales backbone of the market. Recently, BYD, Geely, Chery, Changan, and Great Wall, the top 5 domestic automakers, successively released their monthly performance reports. From the data, these five companies show a general characteristic of "stable total growth, divergence between domestic and international markets, and accelerated new energy penetration". Overseas exports and new energy vehicles have become the most core growth engines; export business has evolved from a "bonus item" to the "core foundation" for some companies. BYD's "dominant leader" status is further consolidated, Chery achieved high growth via exports, Geely's new energy penetration rate broke 56%, Changan focused steadily on balanced development, while Great Wall appeared slightly under pressure during structural transformation.
BYD: Export Hits New High Becomes Biggest HighlightIn May, BYD stood firmly at the top of domestic brands with a monthly sales volume of 383,500 vehicles, maintaining positive growth both year-on-year and month-over-month under a large base. Its two main brands, Dynasty and Ocean, sold a combined 330,200 vehicles, contributing 86.1% of total sales; Fangchengbao's monthly sales broke 30,000 units to reach 30,200, a year-on-year increase of 139.7%, setting a new high for the year; Denza sold 16,300 vehicles, and Yangwang delivered 286 vehicles. From a model perspective, BYD had eight models in May with monthly sales exceeding 20,000 vehicles. The Song Family and Yuan Family both broke 50,000 units, selling 51,370 and 56,691 vehicles respectively. The Sea Lion Family followed closely with 42,615 vehicles, and Seagull sales were also close to 40,000 vehicles.
BYD's biggest highlight in May was exports. Overseas new energy vehicle sales reached 160,600 units, an 80.4% year-on-year increase, accounting for about 42%. The sharp expansion of export scale effectively countered the phased weakness in domestic demand. Cumulative exports from January to May exceeded 620,000 vehicles. High export growth mainly benefited from continued ramping up of overseas factory capacity, improved ocean shipping capacity, and accelerated channel network expansion. In the domestic market, BYD promoted Megawatt Super Charging and intelligent strategies simultaneously—Megawatt charging achieved about 90% charge in 9 minutes; 20,000 super charging stations are planned to be built by 2026; all series models are available with Sky Eye B intelligent driving solutions and city navigation safety fallback plans, accelerating the popularization of high-level intelligent driving. As Gen 2 Blade Battery capacity gradually releases, the company's orders are expected to continue rising.
Chery: Sales Growth Leads the Top 5Chery Group's total sales volume in May was 247,800 vehicles, a significant year-on-year increase of 20.5%, ranking first in growth speed among the top 5. Exports remained its most core growth engine—May exports reached 181,900 vehicles, an 80.5% year-on-year increase, accounting for 73.4% of total sales that month, continuously breaking the single-month export record for Chinese brands for three months. In terms of new energy, Chery New Energy sold 100,300 vehicles, a 58.8% year-on-year increase. April and May consecutively saw monthly new energy sales breaking 100,000 vehicles.
The strong performance in exports benefited from Chery's long-term deep cultivation of overseas channel advantages and localized operation capabilities. While overseas orders continued to rise, high export growth formed a sharp contrast with domestic sales—Chery's domestic sales in May were only 60,000 vehicles, accounting for one-quarter of total sales. From cumulative data, Chery Group accumulated 1.101 million sales from January to May, but against the annual goal of 3.2 million vehicles, monthly averages need to reach about 420,000 vehicles later, and pressure remains significant.
Geely: New Energy Penetration Rate Breaks 56%Geely Auto's total sales volume in May was 237,600 vehicles, a 1% year-on-year increase, achieving month-over-month double growth for three consecutive months. In terms of structure, Geely's "New Four Transformations" transformation showed significant results: new energy vehicle sales reached 133,400 units, accounting for 56% of total sales, with new energy share exceeding 50% for four consecutive months.
From sub-brands, performance was significantly divergent. Zeekr brand sales in May reached 34,400 vehicles, a 82% year-on-year increase; Zeekr 9 Series and 8 Series models combined sales approached 50% of total sales, showing bright performance in the high-end market; Galaxy brand sales were 81,700 vehicles; Geely brand sales were 182,500 vehicles, among which China Star Series sales reached 100,800 vehicles; Lynk & Co brand sales were 20,700 vehicles, with new energy vehicle sales share rising to 71%.
In terms of exports, Geely's overseas vehicle exports in May reached 85,100 vehicles, a explosive 184% year-on-year increase, setting a brand single-month export record high. Among exported products, new energy vehicles reached 40,800 units, accounting for nearly half; hybrid and pure electric products have successively landed in Southeast Asia, Middle East, Latin America, and other markets, highlighting the results of global strategy implementation.
Changan: Multi-brand Matrix Balanced EffortChangan Auto's delivery volume in May was 209,100 vehicles, among which new energy deliveries were 92,400 vehicles, a 5.8% year-on-year increase, with new energy share about 44%. In terms of exports, overseas deliveries reached 70,700 vehicles, a 38% year-on-year increase, becoming another major growth highlight for Changan in May.
In the sub-brand matrix, Changan Qiyuan delivered 34,500 vehicles in May; All-New Q05 delivered 15,800 units, with orders breaking 3,000 units within three days of listing in Thailand; Deepal sales in May were 33,200 vehicles, a 30% year-on-year increase; January to May overseas cumulative sales were 28,700 vehicles, a significant 167% year-on-year increase; Avatr delivered 7,336 vehicles in May; Changan Auto (Gravity) delivered nearly 49,000 vehicles in May.
Changan Auto's balanced layout was fully reflected in May: the fuel car base remained stable, new energy brands Deepal and Qiyuan accelerated volume growth, high-end brand Avatr continued to break through in technical cooperation, and overseas markets simultaneously achieved breakthrough growth. The pattern of five brands working together, driven by both new energy and exports, is initially taking shape.
Great Wall: Overseas Sales Growth Year-on-Year 46.75%Great Wall Motor's sales in May were 100,400 vehicles, slightly down compared to last May's 102,200 vehicles, making it the only company among the top 5 to show a year-on-year negative growth. From sub-brands, Haval brand sales in May were 55,500 vehicles, remaining Great Wall's most important sales pillar; Tank brand sales were 17,100 vehicles; both Haval and Tank brand sales showed year-on-year declines; Wey brand sold 8,119 vehicles, a 31.78% year-on-year increase, achieving growth against the trend; Ora brand performance was most stunning, with sales of 6,018 vehicles, a significant 206.88% year-on-year increase. In terms of new energy, Great Wall sold 30,400 new energy vehicles in May, with new energy vehicle transformation gradually accelerating.
The overseas market became Great Wall's biggest highlight in May, with overseas sales growing 46.75% year-on-year. Against the background of pressure on the domestic market, strong growth in overseas business effectively made up for the decline in the domestic market. Great Wall Motor's current core contradiction lies in: Haval and Tank, the two traditional main-selling brands, face weak growth, while Wey and Ora brands, although growing notably, have relatively small volume and are not yet enough to support overall growth. How to complete the "relay" between old and new brands is the key issue Great Wall must solve subsequently.
Final ThoughtsFrom May data, the growth pattern of the top 5 domestic brands has clearly diverged, but there are three common trends worth noting: First, exports have become a key engine for domestic brands to seek stability and growth. Second, new energy transformation is still accelerating, but paths differ among enterprises. Third, technological innovation continues to deepen brand moats. Looking ahead to the second half of the year, competition in the automotive industry will continue to upgrade around these three trends. Although everyone has a common direction, these three trends are all competing for the entire enterprise's industrial chain strength, and the strong will remain strong, which has almost become an inevitable outcome.
兄弟姐妹們，今日講一個出海嘅大新聞——唔係賣車，係賣「司機」。6 月 2 號，文遠知行同 Uber 聯合宣佈咗一件事：計劃喺西班牙馬德里推出該國首個商業化 Robotaxi 試點服務。意思就係：西班牙人好快就可以用 Uber 叫到一台冇司機嘅出租車。呢次係文遠知行同 Uber 第一次一齊進入歐洲市場。馬德里亦成為文遠知行 Robotaxi 駛入嘅全球第十二個城市。
官方消息話，喺馬德里自治區政府嘅支持下，呢項服務今年內就會正式啟動。到嗰陣，馬德里嘅朋友哋打開 Uber App，就有一鍵呼叫文遠知行嘅 Robotaxi。同叫普通網約車一樣，分別係嚟嘅車冇駕駛員——至少喺初期，仲係有分別嘅。運營初期，車入面會配備經過專業培訓嘅安全員，終究係剛上線，穩妥第一。
文遠知行呢間公司，你可能聽過，也可能冇聽過。簡單介紹下：2017 年成立，一直埋頭搞 Robotaxi 技術研發同商業化。而家佢嘅 Robotaxi 已經覆蓋咗廣州、北京、新加坡、阿布達比、迪拜、利雅得、蘇黎世……加埋而家嘅馬德里，一共 12 個城市。西班牙亦係文遠知行進入嘅第五個歐洲市場——之前已經入咗瑞士、法國、比利時、斯洛伐克。按照文遠知行同 Uber 喺 2025 年 5 月達成嘅規劃，佢哋要喺五年內新增 15 個國際城市部署 Robotaxi 服務，全球部署數萬輛 Robotaxi。隨著馬德里落地，目前已經完成咗 4 個城市嘅佈局，仲有 11 個會喺 2030 年前陸續覆蓋。
講真嘅，中國自動駕駛公司出海唔係頭一回，但中國技術 + 全球出行平台 + 歐洲市場呢個組合，定係好有意思。馬德里係歐洲最具商業潛力嘅 Robotaxi 市場之一，人口多、出行需求大，當地政策都好友善。喺呢個市場站穩腳根，對文遠知行嚟講係個唔小嘅里程碑。對 Uber 嚟講，引進 Robotaxi 都係為咗降低成本——終究司機唔使發人工。對馬德里市民嚟講，以後打車可能更平。
In May, China's automotive market overall presented a gentle recovery trend, with domestic brands still being the sales backbone of the market. Recently, BYD, Geely, Chery, Changan, and Great Wall, the top 5 domestic automakers, successively released their monthly performance reports. From the data, these five companies show a general characteristic of "stable total growth, divergence between domestic and international markets, and accelerated new energy penetration". Overseas exports and new energy vehicles have become the most core growth engines; export business has evolved from a "bonus item" to the "core foundation" for some companies. BYD's "dominant leader" status is further consolidated, Chery achieved high growth via exports, Geely's new energy penetration rate broke 56%, Changan focused steadily on balanced development, while Great Wall appeared slightly under pressure during structural transformation.
BYD: Export Hits New High Becomes Biggest HighlightIn May, BYD stood firmly at the top of domestic brands with a monthly sales volume of 383,500 vehicles, maintaining positive growth both year-on-year and month-over-month under a large base. Its two main brands, Dynasty and Ocean, sold a combined 330,200 vehicles, contributing 86.1% of total sales; Fangchengbao's monthly sales broke 30,000 units to reach 30,200, a year-on-year increase of 139.7%, setting a new high for the year; Denza sold 16,300 vehicles, and Yangwang delivered 286 vehicles. From a model perspective, BYD had eight models in May with monthly sales exceeding 20,000 vehicles. The Song Family and Yuan Family both broke 50,000 units, selling 51,370 and 56,691 vehicles respectively. The Sea Lion Family followed closely with 42,615 vehicles, and Seagull sales were also close to 40,000 vehicles.
BYD's biggest highlight in May was exports. Overseas new energy vehicle sales reached 160,600 units, an 80.4% year-on-year increase, accounting for about 42%. The sharp expansion of export scale effectively countered the phased weakness in domestic demand. Cumulative exports from January to May exceeded 620,000 vehicles. High export growth mainly benefited from continued ramping up of overseas factory capacity, improved ocean shipping capacity, and accelerated channel network expansion. In the domestic market, BYD promoted Megawatt Super Charging and intelligent strategies simultaneously—Megawatt charging achieved about 90% charge in 9 minutes; 20,000 super charging stations are planned to be built by 2026; all series models are available with Sky Eye B intelligent driving solutions and city navigation safety fallback plans, accelerating the popularization of high-level intelligent driving. As Gen 2 Blade Battery capacity gradually releases, the company's orders are expected to continue rising.
Chery: Sales Growth Leads the Top 5Chery Group's total sales volume in May was 247,800 vehicles, a significant year-on-year increase of 20.5%, ranking first in growth speed among the top 5. Exports remained its most core growth engine—May exports reached 181,900 vehicles, an 80.5% year-on-year increase, accounting for 73.4% of total sales that month, continuously breaking the single-month export record for Chinese brands for three months. In terms of new energy, Chery New Energy sold 100,300 vehicles, a 58.8% year-on-year increase. April and May consecutively saw monthly new energy sales breaking 100,000 vehicles.
The strong performance in exports benefited from Chery's long-term deep cultivation of overseas channel advantages and localized operation capabilities. While overseas orders continued to rise, high export growth formed a sharp contrast with domestic sales—Chery's domestic sales in May were only 60,000 vehicles, accounting for one-quarter of total sales. From cumulative data, Chery Group accumulated 1.101 million sales from January to May, but against the annual goal of 3.2 million vehicles, monthly averages need to reach about 420,000 vehicles later, and pressure remains significant.
Geely: New Energy Penetration Rate Breaks 56%Geely Auto's total sales volume in May was 237,600 vehicles, a 1% year-on-year increase, achieving month-over-month double growth for three consecutive months. In terms of structure, Geely's "New Four Transformations" transformation showed significant results: new energy vehicle sales reached 133,400 units, accounting for 56% of total sales, with new energy share exceeding 50% for four consecutive months.
From sub-brands, performance was significantly divergent. Zeekr brand sales in May reached 34,400 vehicles, a 82% year-on-year increase; Zeekr 9 Series and 8 Series models combined sales approached 50% of total sales, showing bright performance in the high-end market; Galaxy brand sales were 81,700 vehicles; Geely brand sales were 182,500 vehicles, among which China Star Series sales reached 100,800 vehicles; Lynk & Co brand sales were 20,700 vehicles, with new energy vehicle sales share rising to 71%.
In terms of exports, Geely's overseas vehicle exports in May reached 85,100 vehicles, a explosive 184% year-on-year increase, setting a brand single-month export record high. Among exported products, new energy vehicles reached 40,800 units, accounting for nearly half; hybrid and pure electric products have successively landed in Southeast Asia, Middle East, Latin America, and other markets, highlighting the results of global strategy implementation.
Changan: Multi-brand Matrix Balanced EffortChangan Auto's delivery volume in May was 209,100 vehicles, among which new energy deliveries were 92,400 vehicles, a 5.8% year-on-year increase, with new energy share about 44%. In terms of exports, overseas deliveries reached 70,700 vehicles, a 38% year-on-year increase, becoming another major growth highlight for Changan in May.
In the sub-brand matrix, Changan Qiyuan delivered 34,500 vehicles in May; All-New Q05 delivered 15,800 units, with orders breaking 3,000 units within three days of listing in Thailand; Deepal sales in May were 33,200 vehicles, a 30% year-on-year increase; January to May overseas cumulative sales were 28,700 vehicles, a significant 167% year-on-year increase; Avatr delivered 7,336 vehicles in May; Changan Auto (Gravity) delivered nearly 49,000 vehicles in May.
Changan Auto's balanced layout was fully reflected in May: the fuel car base remained stable, new energy brands Deepal and Qiyuan accelerated volume growth, high-end brand Avatr continued to break through in technical cooperation, and overseas markets simultaneously achieved breakthrough growth. The pattern of five brands working together, driven by both new energy and exports, is initially taking shape.
Great Wall: Overseas Sales Growth Year-on-Year 46.75%Great Wall Motor's sales in May were 100,400 vehicles, slightly down compared to last May's 102,200 vehicles, making it the only company among the top 5 to show a year-on-year negative growth. From sub-brands, Haval brand sales in May were 55,500 vehicles, remaining Great Wall's most important sales pillar; Tank brand sales were 17,100 vehicles; both Haval and Tank brand sales showed year-on-year declines; Wey brand sold 8,119 vehicles, a 31.78% year-on-year increase, achieving growth against the trend; Ora brand performance was most stunning, with sales of 6,018 vehicles, a significant 206.88% year-on-year increase. In terms of new energy, Great Wall sold 30,400 new energy vehicles in May, with new energy vehicle transformation gradually accelerating.
The overseas market became Great Wall's biggest highlight in May, with overseas sales growing 46.75% year-on-year. Against the background of pressure on the domestic market, strong growth in overseas business effectively made up for the decline in the domestic market. Great Wall Motor's current core contradiction lies in: Haval and Tank, the two traditional main-selling brands, face weak growth, while Wey and Ora brands, although growing notably, have relatively small volume and are not yet enough to support overall growth. How to complete the "relay" between old and new brands is the key issue Great Wall must solve subsequently.
Final ThoughtsFrom May data, the growth pattern of the top 5 domestic brands has clearly diverged, but there are three common trends worth noting: First, exports have become a key engine for domestic brands to seek stability and growth. Second, new energy transformation is still accelerating, but paths differ among enterprises. Third, technological innovation continues to deepen brand moats. Looking ahead to the second half of the year, competition in the automotive industry will continue to upgrade around these three trends. Although everyone has a common direction, these three trends are all competing for the entire enterprise's industrial chain strength, and the strong will remain strong, which has almost become an inevitable outcome.
On May 28, 2026, SAIC held a "Global 100 Millionth User Vehicle Handover Ceremony" at the North Bund in Shanghai. Over a dozen brands under its umbrella and 19 car models handed over vehicles in relay from domestic to overseas markets. SAIC has become the first automotive group in China to exceed 100 million cumulative production and sales, making history in China's automotive industry.
From "Phoenix" to "IM", the history of Chinese automotive struggle behind 100 million vehicles
The story of SAIC begins in 1955, when it was called Shanghai Internal Combustion Engine Parts Manufacturing Company. In 1958, workers hammered out the first "Phoenix" sedan, and Shanghai finally could make sedans on its own. For more than 70 years, SAIC has witnessed China's automotive industry starting from zero and becoming increasingly strong: The Santana rolled off the assembly line in 1983, opening the joint venture era; Shanghai GM was established in 1997 and completed construction and production in just 23 months, known as the "Shanghai Speed"; The independent brand Roewe was launched in 2006; In 2016, the world's first Internet car Roewe RX5 was made; In 2020, the high-end smart electric brand IM was established.
Throughout this journey, SAIC has always adhered to a concept: "Knows cars better, understands you even better". Simply put, technology must be solid, but more importantly, users must enjoy driving and using it comfortably. From Santana localization to Joint Venture 2.0 technology cooperation, from Internet cars to full-by-wire chassis, solid-state batteries, and AI large models on board, every progress is to turn high technology into tangible driving experiences. 100 million vehicles are also 100 million units of user trust.
The 100 Millionth Vehicle is IM LS9 Hyper, combining over 70 years of SAIC technology
This IM LS9 Hyper is considered the culmination of SAIC technology, representing the arrival of the "New Three Major Components" era for new energy vehicles. It is equipped with next-generation chassis technology; full-by-wire four-wheel steering is the first in its class; in terms of intelligent driving, it features a 520-line LiDAR + NVIDIA Thor chip; the three-electric system uses a full-domain 800V high-voltage platform and Stellar Super Range Extender. It also reserves upgrade capability for L3+ advanced intelligent driving in advance. In addition, it debuts the "SAIC Gold Label Hurricane Three-Motor", easily entering the 3-second club for 0-100 km/h acceleration. Even better, in cooperation with Purple Mountain Laboratories, it globally debuted "Intrinsic Security" technology, extending safety from the physical level to information and system security, which is an essential guarantee for driving in the AI era.
The 100 Millionth user is Cao Xudong, CEO of Momenta, and Momenta happens to be SAIC's core partner in the intelligent driving field. The intelligent driving technology developed by both sides has been used in multiple brands of both independent and joint ventures. "Partners become car owners", this is not just about selling cars, but also deep resonance in the intelligent automotive ecosystem.
Behind 100 million vehicles is SAIC's full-brand, global hard power
SAIC has six major sectors: whole vehicles, parts, mobility services, finance, international operations, and innovation technology, forming a complete industrial chain. In the first four months of 2026, SAIC sold a cumulative 1.302 million units, ranking first among Chinese automakers for four consecutive months. Among them, independent brands sold 910,000 units, accounting for nearly 70%; new energy vehicles sold 412,000 units; overseas sales reached 459,000 units, a year-on-year surge of 50.2%.
At the vehicle handover ceremony, SAIC's independent and joint venture brands all participated. On the independent brand side: Shangjie Z7, Huajing S, Roewe M7, MG4 Semi-Solid State Battery Edition, Wuling Xingguang 560, Maxus eDeliver5, Hongyan Heavy Truck, Yuejin Dan T1, Sunwin Pure Electric Bus, Iveco Juxing EV, etc., covering scenarios such as personal mobility, home use, commercial use, logistics, etc. Joint venture brands also showcased the achievements of "Joint Venture 2.0": Volkswagen ID. ERA 9X globally debuted the Momenta R7 Reinforced Learning World Model, delivering over 7,000 units one month after launch; AUDI E7X plans to become the first model for L3-level autonomous driving landing globally for Audi; Buick Zhijing E7 is based on the "Xiao Yao" Super Fusion Architecture, delivering over 10,000 units one month after launch.
The ceremony held Shanghai as the main venue, with the relay extending to Nanjing, Liuzhou, Taiyuan, and places like the UK, Indonesia, Singapore, etc., creating a new way for Chinese automotive brands. Behind this is SAIC's foundation of multi-year global layout: Overseas have more than 100 parts production bases, more than 3,000 dealer networks, built 3 major R&D centers such as London, and 4 manufacturing bases in Thailand, Indonesia, India, and Pakistan; Anji Logistics has 42 Ro-Ro ships, 8 international routes covering Southeast Asia, Europe, and the Americas. Currently, SAIC's products and services are distributed in over 170 countries and regions, and cumulative overseas sales have exceeded 7 million units. MG has been the European sales champion of Chinese brands for 11 consecutive years; in 2025, it sold more than 300,000 units in Europe, becoming the first Chinese brand to exceed 1 million cumulative sales in Europe and the UK. In March this year, MG held a technology day in Frankfurt, Germany, globally debuting semi-solid-state batteries and Hybrid+ hybrid technology, and the Hybrid+ family's overseas monthly sales have exceeded 20,000. In 2025, SAIC released the overseas "Glocal Strategy" (Global + Local), shifting from "Product Going Overseas" to "Value Chain Going Overseas", letting "Made in China Intelligence" go further.
100 million vehicles is the answer sheet of the past, and even more so a new starting line
100 million vehicles is a stage achievement of SAIC's 70+ years of development, and also a new starting point for the "second entrepreneurship" towards the future of intelligent electrification. In 2014, SAIC actively responded to "Developing new energy vehicles is the only way for car countries to move towards powerful countries", taking the lead in comprehensive transformation. 12 years later today, from the "leading in the pack" in intelligent electric transformation, to "ten thousand horses galloping" in independent vs joint venture, passenger vs commercial, domestic vs overseas, SAIC will continue to adhere to the concept of "Knows cars better, understands you even better", letting technological innovation truly benefit every user.
From 1955 to 2026, from the first user to the 100 millionth user, from grope start to industry leadership — SAIC will continue to accompany global users and partners on this "billion-mile journey", creating a better future for mobility together.
Folks, today let's talk about big news on going global—not selling cars, but selling "drivers". On June 2, WeRide and Uber jointly announced a plan: to launch the country's first commercial Robotaxi pilot service in Madrid, Spain. In other words: Spanish residents will soon be able to hail a driverless taxi via Uber. This is the first time WeRide and Uber are partnering to enter the European market. Madrid also becomes the 12th city globally where WeRide's Robotaxi arrives.
According to official news, with the support of the Madrid regional government, this service will officially launch within this year. At that time, friends in Madrid can open the Uber App and call WeRide's Robotaxi with one click. It's just like calling an ordinary ride-hailing service, the difference is the arriving car has no driver—at least initially, there is still a difference. In the initial operation phase, a professionally trained safety monitor will be on board, as it's just launched, safety comes first.
This company, WeRide, you might have heard of it, or you might not. A brief introduction: Established in 2017, it has been dedicated to Robotaxi technology R&D and commercialization. Currently, its Robotaxis cover Guangzhou, Beijing, Singapore, Abu Dhabi, Dubai, Riyadh, Zurich... plus Madrid now, totaling 12 cities. Spain is also the 5th European market WeRide has entered—previously entered Switzerland, France, Belgium, Slovakia. According to the plan agreed by WeRide and Uber in May 2025, they plan to deploy Robotaxi services in 15 new international cities within five years, deploying tens of thousands of Robotaxis globally. With the Madrid launch, the deployment in 4 cities has been completed, and 11 more will be covered successively before 2030.
To be honest, it's not the first time Chinese autonomous driving companies are going global, but the combination of Chinese technology + global mobility platform + European market is quite interesting. Madrid is one of the European Robotaxi markets with the most commercial potential, with a large population, high travel demand, and friendly local policies. Being able to take root in this market is a significant milestone for WeRide. For Uber, introducing Robotaxis is also a way to reduce costs—after all, drivers don't need salaries. For Madrid residents, hailing a taxi might be cheaper in the future.
