首頁Subaru Forester
搜尋歷史
熱門搜尋
經銷商登入 / 註冊
喺馬來西亞嘅汽車市場，好買家喺揀車嘅時候都會用 Mazda CX-60 同 Subaru Forester 做比較。今日我哋由多個方面做一個詳細嘅比較，幫你省咗做功課嘅時間。
Mazda CX-60 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 200,510 - 252,873，一共有 2 個版本，包括 2026 3.3T 4WD High Plus（RM 252,873）、2025 2.5L 2WD High（RM 200,510） 等。
Subaru Forester 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 174,000 - 197,000，一共有 3 個版本，包括 2024 2.0L S EyeSight GT Edition（RM 189,538）、2024 2.0L S EyeSight（RM 177,538）、2024 2.0L L EyeSight（RM 167,538） 等。
從價錢嚟睇，Subaru Forester 嘅起步價比 Mazda CX-60 平咗 RM 26,510。老實講，喺呢個價位段，幾千蚊嘅差距其實唔算大，關鍵仲係睇整體嘅性價比同埋長期使用成本。
Mazda CX-60 嘅安全評級係 5★ (Euro NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 i-Activsense Pro。
Subaru Forester 嘅安全評級係 5★ (Euro NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 EyeSight。
兩款車嘅安全評級一樣，喺呢個級別裡面安全配備都算畀得好齊全。而家嘅新車安全性都唔差，唔使太擔心呢一點。
Mazda CX-60 車身長 4500 mm，後備箱 450 L。
Subaru Forester 車身長 4400 mm，後備箱 400 L。
空間方面，Mazda CX-60 嘅車身比 Subaru Forester 長咗 100 mm，車內坐位空間會稍微寬鬆少少，尤其係後座腿部空間。如果你經常載家人或者需要放嬰兒車，大少少嘅車身確實更實用。
Mazda CX-60 同 Subaru Forester 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更重視品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，那就揀配置更豐富嗰款。最後仲係建議兩款都去試駕，親身體驗先係最重要。
總嘅嚟講，Mazda CX-60 同 Subaru Forester 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊輛車，關鍵仲係睇你嘅個人需求同埋預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
喺馬來西亞嘅汽車市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拿 Mazda CX-60 同 Subaru Forester 嚟做比較。今日我哋從多個方面做一個詳細嘅比較，幫你省下做功課嘅時間。
Mazda CX-60 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 200,510 - 252,873，總共有 2 個版本，包括 2026 3.3T 4WD High Plus（RM 252,873）、2025 2.5L 2WD High（RM 200,510） 等。
Subaru Forester 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 174,000 - 197,000，總共有 3 個版本，包括 2024 2.0L S EyeSight GT Edition（RM 189,538）、2024 2.0L S EyeSight（RM 177,538）、2024 2.0L L EyeSight（RM 167,538） 等。
睇返價錢，Subaru Forester 嘅起步價比 Mazda CX-60 平咗 RM 26,510。坦白講，喺呢個價位段，幾千蚊嘅差距其實唔算大，關鍵仲係睇整體嘅性價比同長期使用成本。
Mazda CX-60 裝載 2.0L 4-cyl，馬力 170 hp。官方油耗 8.0 L/100km。
Subaru Forester 裝載 2.0L 4-cyl，馬力 170 hp。官方油耗 8.0 L/100km。
兩部車用緊同一套動力系統，所以日常行車嘅感覺基本冇分別。油耗方面都差唔多，唔使太糾結呢一點。
Mazda CX-60 車身長 4500 mm，行李廂 450 L。
Subaru Forester 車身長 4400 mm，行李廂 400 L。
空間方面，Mazda CX-60 嘅車身比 Subaru Forester 長咗 100 mm，車內乘坐空間會稍微寬裕少少，尤其係後座腿部空間。如果你經常載家人或者需要放嬰兒車，大少少嘅車身確實更實用。
Mazda CX-60 同 Subaru Forester 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更重視品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰一款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，那就揀配置更豐富嗰款。最終都建議兩部都去試駕，親身體驗先係最重要嘅。
總體嚟講，Mazda CX-60 同 Subaru Forester 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵仲係睇你嘅個人需求同預算。我哋建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
喺馬來西亞嘅汽車市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拿 Mazda CX-60 同 Subaru Forester 嚟做比較。今日我哋從多個方面做一個詳細嘅比較，幫你省咗做功課嘅時間。
Mazda CX-60 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 200,510 - 252,873，一共有 2 個版本，包括 2026 3.3T 4WD High Plus（RM 252,873）、2025 2.5L 2WD High（RM 200,510） 等。
Subaru Forester 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 174,000 - 197,000，一共有 3 個版本，包括 2024 2.0L S EyeSight GT Edition（RM 189,538）、2024 2.0L S EyeSight（RM 177,538）、2024 2.0L L EyeSight（RM 167,538） 等。
由價錢嚟睇，Subaru Forester 嘅起步價比 Mazda CX-60 平咗 RM 26,510。老實講，喺呢個價位段，幾千塊嘅差距其實唔算大，關鍵仲係睇整體嘅性價比同長期使用成本。
Mazda CX-60 嘅安全評級係 5★ (Euro NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 i-Activsense Pro。
Subaru Forester 嘅安全評級係 5★ (Euro NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 EyeSight。
兩款車嘅安全評級一樣，喺呢個級距入面安全配備都算畀得好齊全。而家嘅新車安全性都唔差，唔使太擔心這一點。
Mazda CX-60 保修 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Subaru Forester 保修 3 年/100,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Mazda CX-60 同 Subaru Forester 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更睇重品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰一款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，那就揀配置更豐富嗰款。最終都係建議兩款都去試駕，親身體驗先係最重要嘅。
總體嚟講，Mazda CX-60 同 Subaru Forester 都係馬來西亞市場好唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵仲係睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕先做最終決定。買車係件大事，花啲時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
喺馬來西亞嘅汽車市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拿 Chery Tiggo 7 Pro 同 Subaru Forester 嚟比較。今日我哋由多個方面做一個詳細比較，幫你省咗做功課嘅時間。
Chery Tiggo 7 Pro 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 123,750 - 123,750，合共有 2 個版本，包括 1.6L Turbo Standard（RM 125,000）、1.6L Turbo Premium（RM 140,000） 等。
Subaru Forester 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 174,000 - 197,000，合共有 3 個版本，包括 2024 2.0L S EyeSight GT Edition（RM 189,538）、2024 2.0L S EyeSight（RM 177,538）、2024 2.0L L EyeSight（RM 167,538） 等。
從價錢嚟睇，Chery Tiggo 7 Pro 嘅起價確實比 Subaru Forester 平咗 RM 50,250。如果你預算有限，Chery 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需求。但都要注意，平嘅嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備方面會有取捨，具體就要睇你嘅需求。
Chery Tiggo 7 Pro 配備 1.5L Turbo，馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。
Subaru Forester 配備 2.0L 4-cyl，馬力 170 hp。官方油耗 8.0 L/100km。
動力方面，Subaru Forester 嘅 2.0L 4-cyl 比 Chery Tiggo 7 Pro 嘅 1.5L Turbo 多出 30 匹馬力。不過日常喺市區開嘅話，兩款車嘅動力都够用，唔會覺得唔夠力。
Chery Tiggo 7 Pro 嘅安全評級係 TBD，主動安全系統包括 Basic。
Subaru Forester 嘅安全評級係 5★ (Euro NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 EyeSight。
安全配備方面，兩款車都拿到唔錯嘅評級。不過 Chery Tiggo 7 Pro 嘅 Basic 同 Subaru Forester 嘅 EyeSight 喺功能上有些分別，如果你比較看重主動安全嘅話，可以仔細對比吓兩者嘅功能列表。
Chery Tiggo 7 Pro 保修 3 年/100,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Subaru Forester 保修 3 年/100,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
兩款車嘅保修條件一樣，呢方面唔使糾結。實際保養成本仲要睇品牌嘅服務網絡同零件價格，建議去車友群問吓真實車主嘅經驗。
總體嚟講，Chery Tiggo 7 Pro 同 Subaru Forester 都係馬來西亞市場幾不錯嘅車款。揀邊一部，關鍵都係睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做足功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去做試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
喺馬來西亞嘅汽車市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拿 Chery Tiggo 7 Pro 同 Subaru Forester 做比較。今日我哋從多個方面做一個詳細嘅對比，幫你省下做足功課嘅時間。
Chery Tiggo 7 Pro 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 123,750 - 123,750，一共有 2 個版本，包括 1.6L Turbo 標準版（RM 125,000）、1.6L Turbo 豪華版（RM 140,000）等等。
Subaru Forester 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 174,000 - 197,000，一共有 3 個版本，包括 2024 2.0L S EyeSight GT Edition（RM 189,538）、2024 2.0L S EyeSight（RM 177,538）、2024 2.0L L EyeSight（RM 167,538）等等。
從價錢嚟睇，Chery Tiggo 7 Pro 嘅起步價確實比 Subaru Forester 平咗 RM 50,250。如果你預算有限，Chery 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需求。但都要注意，平嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備上會有取舍，具體睇你嘅需求。
Chery Tiggo 7 Pro 嘅安全評級係 TBD，主動安全系統包括 Basic。
Subaru Forester 嘅安全評級係 5★ (Euro NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 EyeSight。
安全配備方面，兩款車都拿到幾唔錯嘅評級。不過 Chery Tiggo 7 Pro 嘅 Basic 同 Subaru Forester 嘅 EyeSight 喺功能上有啲差異，如果你比較睇重主動安全嘅話，可以仔細對比吓兩者嘅功能列表。
Chery Tiggo 7 Pro 車身長 4400 mm，行李箱 400 L。
Subaru Forester 車身長 4400 mm，行李箱 400 L。
兩款車嘅尺寸幾乎一樣，車內空間差別唔大。呢個級別嘅車，日常使用完全夠用。
Chery Tiggo 7 Pro 保養 3 年/100,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Subaru Forester 保養 3 年/100,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
兩款車嘅保養條件一樣，呢方面不用糾結。實際保養成本仲要睇品牌嘅服務網絡同零件價格，建議去車友群問下真實車主嘅經驗。
總嚟嚟講，Chery Tiggo 7 Pro 同 Subaru Forester 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵仲係要看你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做足功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係一件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
喺馬來西亞嘅汽車市場，好多買家揀車嘅時候都會拿 Volvo XC60 同 Subaru Forester 做比較。今日我哋由多個方面做個詳細嘅比較，幫你節省做功課嘅時間。
Volvo XC60 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 328,888 - 328,888，合共 1 個版本，包括 2025 2.0T Core（RM 328,888）等。
Subaru Forester 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 174,000 - 197,000，合共 3 個版本，包括 2024 2.0L S EyeSight GT Edition（RM 189,538）、2024 2.0L S EyeSight（RM 177,538）、2024 2.0L L EyeSight（RM 167,538）等。
從價錢嚟睇，Subaru Forester 嘅起步價比 Volvo XC60 平咗 RM 154,888。老實講，喺呢個價位段，幾千蚊嘅差距其實唔算大，關鍵都係睇整體嘅性價比同長期使用成本。
Volvo XC60 嘅安全評級係 5★ (Euro NCAP)，主動安全系統包括。
Subaru Forester 嘅安全評級係 5★ (Euro NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 EyeSight。
兩款車嘅安全評級一樣，喺呢個級別裡面安全配備都算給得好齊全。而家嘅新車安全性都唔差，唔使太擔心這一點。
Volvo XC60 車身長 4400 mm，車尾箱 400 L。
Subaru Forester 車身長 4400 mm，車尾箱 400 L。
兩款車嘅尺寸幾乎一樣，車廂空間差別唔大。呢個級別嘅車，日常使用完全夠用。
Volvo XC60 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
Subaru Forester 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
兩款車嘅驅動方式一樣，都係 FWD，日常駕駛感受唔會有太大分別。
總體嚟講，Volvo XC60 同 Subaru Forester 都係馬來西亞市場好靚嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵都要睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，先至去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
喺馬來西亞嘅汽車市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拿 Volvo XC60 同 Subaru Forester 嚟做比較。而家我哋由多個方面做一個詳細嘅對比，幫你節省返做功課嘅時間。
Volvo XC60 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 328,888 - 328,888，一共有 1 個版本，包括 2025 2.0T Core（RM 328,888） 等。
Subaru Forester 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 174,000 - 197,000，一共有 3 個版本，包括 2024 2.0L S EyeSight GT Edition（RM 189,538）、2024 2.0L S EyeSight（RM 177,538）、2024 2.0L L EyeSight（RM 167,538） 等。
由價錢睇，Subaru Forester 嘅起價比 Volvo XC60 平咗 RM 154,888。坦白講，喺呢個價位段，幾千蚊嘅差距其實唔算大，關鍵都係睇整體嘅性價比同長期使用成本。
Volvo XC60 車身長 4400 mm，後備箱 400 L。
Subaru Forester 車身長 4400 mm，後備箱 400 L。
兩款車嘅尺寸幾乎一樣，車內空間分別唔大。呢個級別嘅車，日常使用完全夠用。
Volvo XC60 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
Subaru Forester 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
兩款車嘅驅動方式一樣，都係 FWD，日常駕駛感覺唔會有太大分別。
Volvo XC60 同 Subaru Forester 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更重視品牌聲譽同二手價，可以優先考慮聲譽更好嗰款；如果你更在乎性價比同配備，就揀配備更豐富嗰款。最終都係建議兩款都去試駕，親身體驗先係最重要嘅。
總括嚟講，Volvo XC60 同 Subaru Forester 都係馬來西亞市場好唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵都要睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
In Malaysia's SUV market, many buyers compare Honda CR-V and Mazda CX-30 when choosing a car. Both models are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
Honda CR-V OTR price in Malaysia is RM 178,200 - 195,900, with a total of 4 versions, including 2026 e:HEV 2.0L 2WD RS (RM 195,900), 2026 1.5T 4WD V (RM 181,900), 2026 e:HEV 2.0L 2WD E (RM 178,200) etc.
Mazda CX-30 OTR price in Malaysia is RM 122,409 - 146,409, with a total of 4 versions, including 2025 2.0L High+ Premium (RM 146,409), 2025 2.0L High+ (RM 138,409), 2025 2.0L High (RM 130,409) etc.
From a price perspective, Mazda CX-30's starting price is RM 55,791 cheaper than Honda CR-V. To be honest, in this price range, a difference of a few thousand isn't actually that big; the key is looking at overall cost-performance ratio and long-term usage costs.
Honda CR-V is equipped with 2.0L 4-cyl, 170 hp. Official fuel consumption 8.0 L/100km.
Mazda CX-30 is equipped with 1.5L Turbo, 140 hp. Official fuel consumption 7.0 L/100km.
In terms of power, Honda CR-V's 2.0L 4-cyl has 30 more horsepower than Mazda CX-30's 1.5L Turbo, with more confidence in mid-range acceleration, especially when overtaking on highways. However, Mazda CX-30's fuel consumption might be more user-friendly, and the difference in daily city commuting won't be too large.
Honda CR-V body length 4500 mm, trunk 450 L.
Mazda CX-30 body length 4500 mm, trunk 450 L.
The dimensions of both cars are almost the same, with little difference in interior space. Cars at this level are fully sufficient for daily use.
Honda CR-V adopts FWD drive mode.
Mazda CX-30 adopts FWD drive mode.
Both cars have the same drive mode, both are FWD, so there won't be a significant difference in daily driving experience.
Honda CR-V warranty 5 years/unlimited mileage, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Mazda CX-30 warranty 5 years/150,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Overall, Honda CR-V and Mazda CX-30 are both excellent models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends on your personal needs and budget. We recommend doing your research, comparing quotes from multiple dealers, and then test-driving to make a final decision. Buying a car is a major event; spending time doing research will definitely not go wrong.
喺馬來西亞嘅汽車市場，好多買家揀車嘅時候都會用 Subaru Forester 同 Mercedes-Benz GLB 嚟比較。今日我哋從多個方面做一個詳細嘅比較，幫你節省做功課嘅時間。
Subaru Forester 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 174,000 - 197,000，一共有 3 個版本，包括 2024 2.0L S EyeSight GT Edition（RM 189,538）、2024 2.0L S EyeSight（RM 177,538）、2024 2.0L L EyeSight（RM 167,538） 等。
Mercedes-Benz GLB 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 299,888 - 352,888，一共有 1 個版本，包括 Standard（RM 299,888） 等。
從價錢嚟睇，Subaru Forester 嘅起步價確實比 Mercedes-Benz GLB 平咗 RM 125,888。如果你預算有限，Subaru 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需求。但都係要注意，平嗰幾千塊，可能喺配備上有取捨，具體要看你嘅需求。
Subaru Forester 嘅安全評級係 5★ (Euro NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 EyeSight。
Mercedes-Benz GLB 嘅安全評級係 5★ (Euro NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 Premium ADAS。
兩款車嘅安全評級一樣，喺呢個級別入面安全配備都算好齊全。而家嘅新車安全性都唔差，唔使太擔心呢一點。
Subaru Forester 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
Mercedes-Benz GLB 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
兩款車嘅驅動方式一樣，都係 FWD，日常駕駛感受唔會有太大分別。
Subaru Forester 保修 3 年/100,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Mercedes-Benz GLB 保修 3 年/100,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
兩款車嘅保修條件一樣，呢方面唔使糾結。實際保養成本仲要看品牌嘅服務網絡同零件價格，建議去車友群問下真實車主嘅經驗。
總體嚟講，Subaru Forester 同 Mercedes-Benz GLB 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊架，關鍵都要睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，先至去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花啲時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
喺馬來西亞嘅汽車市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拿 Subaru Forester 同 Mercedes-Benz GLB 嚟做比較。今日我哋從多個方面做一個詳細嘅對比，幫你省返做功課嘅時間。
Subaru Forester 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 174,000 - 197,000，總共 3 個版本，包括 2024 2.0L S EyeSight GT Edition（RM 189,538）、2024 2.0L S EyeSight（RM 177,538）、2024 2.0L L EyeSight（RM 167,538）等。
Mercedes-Benz GLB 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 299,888 - 352,888，總共 1 個版本，包括 Standard（RM 299,888）等。
從價錢睇落去，Subaru Forester 嘅起步價確實比 Mercedes-Benz GLB 平咗 RM 125,888。如果你預算有限，Subaru 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需要。但都要留意，平嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備上會有取捨，具體要睇你嘅需要。
Subaru Forester 搭載 2.0L 4-cyl，馬力 170 hp。官方油耗 8.0 L/100km。
Mercedes-Benz GLB 搭載 2.0L Turbo，馬力 220 hp。官方油耗 9.5 L/100km。
動力方面，Mercedes-Benz GLB 嘅 2.0L Turbo 比 Subaru Forester 嘅 2.0L 4-cyl 多咗 50 匹馬力。不過日常喺市區開嘅話，兩部車嘅動力都夠用，唔會覺得唔夠力。
Subaru Forester 保修 3 年/100,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Mercedes-Benz GLB 保修 3 年/100,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
兩部車嘅保修條件一樣，呢方面唔使糾結。實際保養成本仲要睇品牌嘅服務網絡同零件價格，建議去車友群問吓真實車主嘅經驗。
Subaru Forester 同 Mercedes-Benz GLB 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭用途、日常通勤。如果你更睇重品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑好嗰一款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，就揀配置更豐富嗰款。最終仲係建議兩部都去試駕，親身體驗先係最重要嘅。
總體嚟講，Subaru Forester 同 Mercedes-Benz GLB 都係馬來西亞市場幾好嘅車型。揀邊部車，關鍵仲要睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去做試駕做最後決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對無錯。
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好幾多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拎本田 CR-V 同馬自達 CX-8 來作比較。呢兩部車喺價位同定位上都相當接近，而家我哋就從多個方面做一個詳細比較，幫你省返做功課嘅時間。
本田 CR-V 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 178,200 - 195,900，總共 4 個版本，包括 2026 e:HEV 2.0L 2WD RS（RM 195,900）、2026 1.5T 4WD V（RM 181,900）、2026 e:HEV 2.0L 2WD E（RM 178,200） 等。
馬自達 CX-8 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 165,360 - 201,360，總共 5 個版本，包括 2025 2.5T 4WD High Plus Petrol（RM 201,360）、2025 2.2L 2WD High Plus Diesel（RM 193,123）、2025 2.5L 2WD High Plus Petrol（RM 186,360） 等。
由價錢睇，馬自達 CX-8 嘅起步價比本田 CR-V 平咗 RM 12,840。老實講，喺呢個價位段，幾千塊嘅差距其實唔算大，關鍵係睇整體嘅性價比同埋長期使用成本。
本田 CR-V 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 Honda SENSING (ACC, CMBS, LKAS, RDM)。
馬自達 CX-8 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 Brand ADAS。
兩部車嘅安全評級一樣，喺呢個級別裡面安全配備都算好齊全。而家嘅新車安全性都唔差，唔使太擔心呢一點。
本田 CR-V 車身長 4500 mm，行李箱 450 L。
馬自達 CX-8 車身長 4500 mm，行李箱 450 L。
兩部車嘅尺寸幾乎一樣，車內空間差別唔大。呢個級別嘅車，日常使用完全夠用。
本田 CR-V 保養 5 年/無限制里程，保養間隔 每 10,000 公里或 6 個月。
馬自達 CX-8 保養 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000 公里或 6 個月。
本田 CR-V 同馬自達 CX-8 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更睇重品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰一款；如果你更介意性價比同配備，嗰就揀配置更豐富嗰款。最終始終建議兩部都去試駕，親身體驗先至係最重要。
總體嚟講，本田 CR-V 同馬自達 CX-8 都係馬來西亞市場幾不錯嘅車型。揀邊輛，關鍵仲係睇你嘅個人需求同埋預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers choose to compare Honda CR-V and Toyota Corolla Cross when selecting a car. The price and positioning of these two cars are quite close, so today we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help save you time on research.
Honda CR-V's OTR price in Malaysia is RM 178,200 - 195,900, with a total of 4 versions, including 2026 e:HEV 2.0L 2WD RS (RM 195,900), 2026 1.5T 4WD V (RM 181,900), 2026 e:HEV 2.0L 2WD E (RM 178,200), etc.
Toyota Corolla Cross's OTR price in Malaysia is RM 133,800 - 148,800, with a total of 3 versions, including 2026 HEV 1.8L GR Sport (RM 148,800), 2026 HEV 1.8L Standard (RM 140,800), 2026 1.8L Standard (RM 133,800), etc.
In terms of price, the starting price of Toyota Corolla Cross is RM 44,400 cheaper than Honda CR-V. Honestly, in this price range, a difference of a few thousand is actually not significant; the key is still to look at overall value for money and long-term ownership costs.
Honda CR-V's safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), and active safety systems include Honda SENSING (ACC, CMBS, LKAS, RDM).
Toyota Corolla Cross's safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), and active safety systems include TSS (PCS, LDA, ACC, LTA).
Both cars have the same safety rating; safety features are quite comprehensive in this class. New cars nowadays generally have good safety, so there is no need to worry too much about this point.
Honda CR-V body length is 4500 mm, trunk 450 L.
Toyota Corolla Cross body length is 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
Regarding space, Honda CR-V's body is 100 mm longer than Toyota Corolla Cross, and the passenger space inside is slightly more spacious, especially rear legroom. If you frequently carry family members or need to fit a stroller, a slightly larger body is indeed more practical.
Honda CR-V warranty 5 years/unlimited mileage, service interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Toyota Corolla Cross warranty 5 years/unlimited mileage, service interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Both cars have the same warranty conditions, so there is no need to struggle over this. Actual maintenance costs also depend on the brand's service network and parts prices; it is recommended to ask real owners in car owner groups for experience.
Both Honda CR-V and Toyota Corolla Cross are mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, you can prioritize the one with better reputation; if you care more about value for money and features, choose the better-equipped model. In the end, it is still recommended to test drive both, as personal experience is the most important.
Overall, Honda CR-V and Toyota Corolla Cross are both very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose mainly depends on your personal needs and budget. We suggest doing your research, compare quotes from multiple dealerships, and then test drive to make the final decision. Buying a car is a big matter; spending time on research will never be wrong.
The continuous "price war" intensifies market involution, while also prompting Chinese automakers to expand into overseas markets. However, as the scale of China's automotive exports continues to grow, the competitive order and compliance in overseas markets are becoming the industry's focus.
Recently, the Ministry of Commerce, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, and the State Administration for Market Regulation jointly released a document—"Guidelines for Overseas Competitive Behavior and Compliance Construction in the Automotive Industry". This document directly points to a series of controversies triggered by frequent price cuts by Chinese automakers in overseas markets in recent years, and for the first time at the official level, systematically set clear compliance requirements for automakers' overseas pricing, promotions, and localized operations, among other behaviors.
Among them, Chery Automotive's response was swift and steady, clearly stating it will establish a scientific pricing system in overseas markets and regulate terminal prices and promotional behaviors. GAC Group was not left behind, with its statement stating, "Integrating compliance concepts throughout the entire R&D, production, supply, sales, and service chain". Moreover, BYD, Great Wall Motor, and Geely Holding Group also issued statements in response in succession.
From the industry's top-level call to standardize benign competition and eliminate spillover involution, to automakers generally recognizing the ineffective competition of low-price killing, the whole industry has formed a unified consensus on breaking the deadlock. However, reaching a consensus does not mean risks automatically dissipate; the warning bell against "involution" spillover must still ring long.
1
Export Acceleration, Compliance Faces Challenges
The background for the release of the "Guidelines" is the explosive growth in the scale of Chinese automotive "going global". Data shows that in the first 7 months of this year, China exported 6.14 million automobiles, a year-on-year increase of 66.8%. The monthly export volume first broke through the 1 million mark in June of this year, and July continued this trend, achieving consecutive two months of over 1 million automobiles exported. Industry predictions suggest the full year may hit 10 million.
Against the background of intensified competition in the domestic market, overseas exports have become the core growth engine for numerous Chinese automakers. Taking August sales as an example, BYD's single-month overseas sales exceeded 180,000, setting a new historical high; Chery exported 197,000, a year-on-year increase of 52.1%, with cumulative exports exceeding 7.18 million; Geely's overseas exports in August reached 110,100, a significant increase of 205% year-on-year. Great Wall Motor's overseas sales of 289,000 in the first half of this year have surpassed its domestic sales of 286,700; this is the first time in Great Wall's history that overseas sales have exceeded domestic sales.
Behind rapid expansion, the hazards of extensive overseas expansion are gradually emerging. Some enterprises expanding overseas continue to use the domestic "trade price for volume" strategy, with frequent price cuts, channel channeling, and failure to fulfill promises to dealers occurring from time to time. This not only harms consumer interests but also impacts the overall brand image of Chinese automobiles.
2
Overseas Markets Can No Longer "Price Arbitrarily"
Pricing is the core focus of this guideline. It is reported that the document urges vehicle and component manufacturers to avoid fierce price wars and significant price-cut promotions in overseas markets. It requires enterprises to base pricing on costs and local market supply and demand, avoiding frequent and large price cuts. Different configurations must have clear price gradients and cannot rely on low prices to disrupt local market order. At the same time, dealer channels must be regulated, and a complete compliance system for overseas after-sales, quality, and data security must be improved.
The intent of "admonishing" in this section is obvious, referring precisely to the "involution" spillover that everyone has been very familiar with in recent years. Many automakers, after expanding overseas, adopted aggressive methods such as price cuts to quickly grab market share. Although this was due to market behavior, it did exert certain impacts on the stability of the local market. There are already some negative cases, for example, in the Thai market, some automakers made successive price cuts in Thailand, raising the dissatisfaction of users who had already purchased cars. Thai public institutions also launched investigations into this matter.
This scene inevitably recalls the past lessons of Chinese motorcycle exports to Southeast Asia. If Chinese auto enterprises continue to blindly "involute" and replicate the domestic price war tactics, it will only undermine the value of Chinese brands, and even trigger anti-dumping and trade protection investigations by local regulators. This is a very dangerous signal for Chinese automakers who are just beginning to emerge in overseas markets.
The purpose of the state issuing relevant guidelines this time is clear: no longer solely encouraging the expansion of export scale, but beginning to standardize and manage the increasingly complex global business layout. In other words, previously Chinese automobiles competed on "whether they could go out", but now they are competing on "whether they can stay".
Overseas markets are full of gold mines, automakers must not mess this up. Chinese automakers going overseas cannot just think about selling cars; they must also learn to do business long-term and in a compliant manner. After all, the outcome of long-term competition no longer depends on who has the lower price or faster shipment, but on the comprehensive ability of localized operations, global compliance governance, supply chain collaboration, and brand building.
Currently, China's automotive export faces dual pressures of intensifying trade barriers and the spillover of internal price wars. The joint release of compliance guidelines by the Ministry of Commerce and two other ministries is precisely to curb malicious competition. Of course, the guidelines are essentially guiding, non-mandatory regulations. To be implemented, it ultimately depends on whether enterprises can reach a true industry consensus and take concrete actions.
In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers compare the Honda CR-V and Toyota Yaris Cross when choosing a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning. Today we will do a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
Honda CR-V OTR price in Malaysia is RM 178,200 - 195,900, with a total of 4 variants, including 2026 e:HEV 2.0L 2WD RS (RM 195,900), 2026 1.5T 4WD V (RM 181,900), 2026 e:HEV 2.0L 2WD E (RM 178,200), etc.
Toyota Yaris Cross OTR price in Malaysia is RM 99,900 - 109,900, with a total of 2 variants, including 2026 1.5L Standard (RM 99,900), 2026 HEV 1.5L Standard (RM 109,900), etc.
From a price perspective, the starting price of the Toyota Yaris Cross is RM 78,300 cheaper than the Honda CR-V. Honestly, in this price range, a difference of a few thousand is not really big. The key is to look at overall value for money and long-term ownership costs.
Honda CR-V comes with a 2.0L 4-cyl, 170 hp. Official fuel consumption 8.0 L/100km.
Toyota Yaris Cross comes with a 1.5L 4-cyl, 105 hp. Official fuel consumption 6.0 L/100km.
Regarding performance, Honda CR-V's 2.0L 4-cyl has 65 more horsepower than Toyota Yaris Cross's 1.5L 4-cyl, providing more confidence in mid-range acceleration, especially when overtaking on highways. However, Toyota Yaris Cross's fuel consumption might be more friendly, and the difference in daily city commuting won't be too large.
Honda CR-V safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include Honda SENSING (ACC, CMBS, LKAS, RDM).
Toyota Yaris Cross safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include TSS.
Both cars have the same safety rating, and safety features are quite comprehensive in this class. New cars nowadays don't lack safety, so no need to worry too much about this.
Honda CR-V warranty 5 years/unlimited mileage, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Toyota Yaris Cross warranty 5 years/unlimited mileage, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Both cars have the same warranty conditions, no need to fuss about this. Actual maintenance costs depend on the brand's service network and parts prices. Suggest asking real owners in car communities for experience.
Overall, Honda CR-V and Toyota Yaris Cross are both very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends mainly on your personal needs and budget. Suggest doing your research, compare quotes from several dealerships, and then test drive to make the final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending some time doing research will never be wrong.
Xinhua AUTO: In 2026, the Chinese new energy vehicle market is undergoing an unprecedented restructuring. As the industry shifts from widespread incremental expansion to fierce stock competition, an August sales report not only announces a complete reshuffle of the ranking among new car manufacturers, but also demonstrates the strong momentum of Chinese new energy automakers on the global track.
Leapmotor delivered 103,129 vehicles globally, with a year-on-year increase of 80.7%, solidly standing at the 100,000 monthly sales mark for the second consecutive month, unhesitatingly retaining the sales champion among new forces. What is more shocking is the gap of over 60,000 vehicles opened between it and the second-place Harmony Intelligence (42,101 vehicles) — Leapmotor's single monthly sales exceeded the sum of the second to fourth places. According to the comparable terminal registration data for the first 5 months of this year, Leapmotor ranks fourth globally among new energy passenger car brands, behind BYD, Tesla, and Geely, ranking third among Chinese new energy passenger car brands.
From 879 units sold per month in 2019 to 100,000 units today, Leapmotor took six years. This is not luck, but a manufacturing logic that has been repeatedly verified.
Sales Gap Leading, New Force Structure Faces Reshaping
First, let's look at how drastic the tier differentiation is in August's chess game.
Above Leapmotor, no one; below Leapmotor, crowded. Harmony Intelligence ranks second with 42,101 units, while Xpeng, Li Auto, Zeekr, and Nio are densely packed in the 35,000 to 40,000 unit range — the gap between them is less than 4,000 units. A production fluctuation in a key model or the launch of a new car is enough to rewrite monthly rankings. This is a typical "close-quarters combat" zone.
And Leapmotor has completely left this quagmire, pushing the new force competition threshold directly to the 100,000 units monthly scale.
Supporting this gap is the A, B, C, D four major product series covering the entire price band from 60,000 to 300,000 yuan. A series sold nearly 30,000 units in October, taking the sales champion of Chinese brand SUVs, and is the absolute main force in the entry market; B series monthly sales broke through 20,000 units, catering to the mid-range needs of young families; C series is a global model, C10 monthly sales continued to break 10,000, with the series global cumulative sales exceeding 850,000 units, among which C11 cumulative sales reached about 350,000 since its launch in 2021; the flagship sequence also achieved significant breakthroughs — D19 delivered 10,043 units in July, retaining the sales champion of large SUVs within 400,000 yuan for three consecutive months, the first MPV D99 first batch order average price broke through 300,000 yuan.
Four vehicles selling in volume simultaneously, without relying on a single hit, anti-risk ability is far stronger than opponents who "support the whole situation with one car". This is the product-end foundation for Leapmotor to stand out in the battlefield.
Stretching the time axis is more astonishing: 596,600 units delivered in full year 2025, up 103.1% year-on-year; 560,900 units reached in the first 8 months of 2026, up about 70% year-on-year; as of the end of July, Leapmotor's global cumulative delivery broke through 1.6 million units.
Jumping to Fourth Globally, Going Overseas Builds Second Growth Curve
If it's only price-performance ratio in the domestic market, Leapmotor can at most be a "China Sales Champion". What truly pushes it to fourth globally is the steep growth curve overseas.
In the first half of 2026, Leapmotor exported 96,294 units, a violent increase of 372.6% year-on-year — this number has already exceeded its total export volume for all of 2025, accounting for 27% of total sales in the first half. Equivalent to about one out of every four Leapmotor sold is sent overseas. Cumulative exports in January to July reached 113,863 units, the annual target has been adjusted from 100,000 to 150,000 units to 200,000 units, 2027 challenges 350,000 to 400,000 units.
The key lies in path selection: ride the boat to go out to sea, instead of building boats themselves.
In 2023, Stellantis obtained about 20% equity of Leapmotor for about 1.5 billion euros; in 2024, the two parties established a joint company "Leapmotor International" (Stellantis holding 51%, Leapmotor 49%), responsible for sales and production outside Greater China. Leapmotor's sales outlets are directly embedded into the dealer system of brands under Stellantis, channel costs are close to zero.
What does this mean? As of the end of June, Leapmotor International has entered more than 45 international markets, establishing more than 1,000 sales and after-sales outlets, among which Europe exceeds 900 — the same channel volume level, BYD spent nearly three years, Leapmotor only used one and a half years.
The battle results are very real: Italy pure electric registration 23,000 units in the first half, market share over 25%, ranking first in local pure electric sales for consecutive periods; June became the Chinese brand with the highest new pure electric vehicle registration volume in the German market; ranked third in Chinese brand pure electric retail in the UK. Revenue from markets outside mainland China in the first half reached 9.099 billion yuan, accounting for about 23.9% of total revenue, among which Europe contributed 8.875 billion yuan.
Another deeper step is local production: Malaysia Kedah factory C10 has completed mass production, Spain Zaragoza factory B10 starts production in the third quarter, Brazil Goiania factory is selected as the South American assembly base (mass production in the second half of 2027). This is both a passive choice to cope with EU tariff barriers, and an active layout rooted in the overseas market — CFO Li Tengfei said very clearly: "The improvement of local net profit is not in the present, but in the near future."
The Trump Card: Turn "Cost Structure" into a Moat
The majority of people's impression of Leapmotor stays at "cheap". But cheap is just the result, the real reason is that it re-disassembled the whole vehicle cost structure.
Leapmotor insists on "Full Domain R&D + Deep Self-Manufacturing": grasping more than 65% of the core components of the whole vehicle BOM cost, building 18 parts factories, whole vehicle architecture generalization rate exceeds 88% — more than a dozen cars only used 3 types of battery cells, 2 intelligent driving solutions.
The "Super Five-Electric Factory" in Huzhou, Zhejiang is the entity of this logic: total construction area about 500,000 square meters, concentrating Battery, Drive, Domain Control, Headlights, Electronic Power five key components in one park, is the largest area and highest integration pure core component R&D and self-manufacturing cluster in the global new energy field.
Traditional automobile industry has evolved over decades, forming a pyramid supplier system — whole vehicle factories mainly responsible for design and assembly, about 60% to 80% of the total vehicle cost comes from outsourcing and purchasing, suppliers on average take about 15% gross margin. Leapmotor internalized these links, whole vehicle cost is about 10% lower than pure purchasing schemes.
Specific to details, every cent has an origin:
Drive: Stator manufacturing, rotor manufacturing, controller manufacturing and drive assembly four processes concentrated in one factory, full process "zero transfer", saving 3 times packaging, 3 times cross-factory transport and 3 times entry and exit, single set manufacturing cost saves about 50 yuan — calculated at annual production of 1 million sets, one year is 50 million yuan. It is precisely because of this that Leapmotor dares to promise lifetime warranty for electric drive.
Domain Control: A circuit board the size of A4 paper integrates about 8,000 electronic components, any one sticking crooked 10 microns may affect driving safety. Leapmotor moved the chip manufacturing environment into the car factory, ultra-high speed precision pick and place accuracy reaches ±15 microns, better than industry mainstream ±25—30 microns, nitrogen vacuum reflow soldering yield exceeds 99.995%.
Battery: Follow "self-developed battery pack + purchased cells" route, annual production capacity over 380,000 sets production line has been put into production, module line automation rate as high as 90%, from cell to CTC battery pack through 56 processes, 100% full inspection and data traceability.
This 10% cost advantage is finally converted into pricing power. Zhu Jiangming said this very plainly: "We do not pursue high gross margin, this is not a result, but a choice." He set the target gross margin at 15%, "among which 10% is saved by self-research and self-manufacturing, users actually only pay 5%."
He compared Uniqlo to Zegna — Zegna gross margin is high, but must be placed in the best malls in top tier cities, operating costs high, sales low; Uniqlo gross margin low but turnover fast, scale large. "Zegna and Uniqlo who makes money? Answer is Uniqlo."
This is not "losing money to make noise", but by full domain self-research to reassign the money originally to be earned by others on the supply chain to users and itself.
Breaking Profit Curse, but Only Earn 589 Yuan Per Car
In the automobile industry, enterprises with 100,000 monthly sales often face huge profit tests. Leapmotor broke the new forces "sell more, lose more" curse.
In the first half of 2026, Leapmotor achieved operating revenue 38.11 billion yuan, up 57.2% year-on-year, creating a historical high for the same period; net profit 210 million yuan, up about 600%, maintaining profitability for three consecutive half-years. Second quarter gross margin increased 3.2 percentage points quarter-on-quarter to 12.6%, showing scale effect is being released.
Expense end data can illustrate the problem better: first half sales expense increased 41.1%, management expense increased 27.8%, R&D expense increased 22.8%, three expense growth rates were all lower than revenue 57.2% growth — R&D, production line depreciation, management these fixed costs were diluted by the rapidly expanded production and sales volume, full domain self-research heavy investment started entering return cycle.
But taking the financial report apart, under the halo there are three cracks.
First, profit making ability is far worse than selling cars ability. Calculating by net profit divided by sales, first half car net profit only about 589 yuan. More noteworthy structure: first half other revenue reached 1.08 billion yuan, financial income net 131 million yuan, while operating profit only 128 million yuan — deducting other revenue, main business operating level actually in loss state.
Gross margin decreased from 14.1% of the same period last year to 11.7%, company attributed to raw material cost increase and whole vehicle product combination changes (low price A series volume release). Management team has lowered annual net profit target from 5 billion yuan to 3 billion yuan, Li Tengfei said frankly, even if second half gross margin repair, only "basically back to last year same period level", "this cannot be called a particularly excellent performance".
Second, quality and after-sales arrears are catching up. 2025 Leapmotor complaint index grew 37% year-on-year, ranked third in new forces complaint list, C11, C10, C16 three cars accounted for 64% of total complaints. Chezhiwang data shows, 2026 C11, B10, C16 manufacturer reply rate respectively 72%, 81.7%, 86.9%, while same list many brands reached 100%; C11 and C16 user satisfaction only 2.0 points and 1.9 points.
100,000 monthly sales is a sales milestone, also after-sales system pressure test. Repair workstations, parts reserve and service response, run faster than orders? This bill, Leapmotor must make up as soon as possible.
Third, overseas structural dependence. Europe one place accounted for most of Leapmotor overseas volume, market highly single. While DAT data shows, April 2026 Chinese brand pure electric and plug-in hybrid models in Germany three-year second-hand car residual value only original price 47%, down 14 percentage points from 61% at beginning of 2024 — Chinese brand depreciation speed is twice industry average. In European market with loan car purchase, long-term lease, second-hand exchange mainly, residual value every drop is real cost.
In addition, carbon points are an undeniable "policy dividend": 2025 Leapmotor transferred EU carbon points to Stellantis, annual revenue reached 1.11 billion yuan, equivalent to Leapmotor annual profit two times; 2026 transaction amount limit has been raised to 2.8 billion yuan. This is cooperation dividend, not sustainable profit — once cooperation relationship changes, this profit source can be cut off at any time.
Next Challenge: From "Price-Performance" to "Technology Accessibility"
Facing new challenges in industry transformation period — extended range dividend gradually fading, low price product proportion expanding, raw material cost rising, overseas expansion high investment, Leapmotor is not satisfied with "price-performance" single label.
September 16, Leapmotor will hold 2026 annual technology conference in Huzhou, Zhejiang, release official preview as "entire industry first tier level" intelligent assisted driving world model, and new battery, new motor results in three electric field.
Leapmotor has always been a "late arrival" in intelligence. Zhu Jiangming judgment is: route not stable do not rashly heavy investment — from high precision map to map-less, to embodied model, large model, direction changed several times, Leapmotor choose to wait for direction clear, 2025 second half just increased investment.
It bets on self-developed VLA world model route: multi-modal input, not just relying on text, also through vision, sound and other perception understand world; code does not have if-else rules, but also different from fully unexplainable end-to-end "black box".
Its product goal is not to do strongest intelligent driving, but to make sufficient intelligent driving cheapest — put four or five ten thousand luxury car world model solution, down to 100,000 yuan entry model. This road needs to run smoothly, rely on cumulative 1.6 million delivery accumulated data loop.
Further back, Leapmotor has confirmed planning positioning 300,000 yuan above second brand, plan 2027 launch, adopt independent sales channel, role similar to Lexus to Toyota, Denza to BYD; brand warm-up expected 2026 year end launch. Zhu Jiangming long term goal is 10 years inside annual sales 4 million units.
Conclusion: Scale is Ticket, Not Endgame
Leapmotor story, essentially is a manufacturing logic defeating internet narrative sample. In a financing scale, founder halo dominant discourse industry, Leapmotor chose the most stupid path: make parts themselves, build factory themselves, press gross margin to lowest, use scale exchange survival. Its success proves one thing: in fully competitive manufacturing, cost structure difference is more reliable than brand premium.
But must also see clearly, global fourth this position, currently is sat on by "sales", not yet by "profit" or "brand" sit stable. 589 yuan car profit, run lose peer after-sales satisfaction, highly concentrated overseas market, not yet verified intelligent driving ability — these four questions, any one do wrong, will let "Unleashed" narrative suddenly stop.
True watershed may be in September 16, when saved costs start to convert into visible technology, not just visible configuration, Leapmotor just from "Price-Performance King" to "Technical Player". At that time, global fourth is not finish line, but new starting line.
头图来源：权力的游戏剧照
作者 | 陈丹
编辑 | 苏鹏
2026年上半年，“蔚小理零”交出了一份耐人寻味的成绩单。
四家把车卖出了规模，却没把利润卖出来。
蔚来半年营收576.7亿、零跑交付35.6万台登顶新势力，各自守住了不同的冠军头衔。但如果把四家经营利润加在一起似乎是另一种景象，表现最好的蔚来与零跑，其利润合计不过4.5亿元。
4.5亿元，在2026年的资产市场上，约等于上海陆家嘴滨江一套顶复，或者北京壹号院两层楼王，再或者香港半山一套中等尺度的公寓。
但这笔钱，是蔚来和零跑两家加起来、上半年经营利润的全部。
如果换一种算法，4.5亿元还不够买一辆布加迪La Voiture Noire的拍卖价。要知道，去年同期，理想一家就净赚11亿元。
这不是一份难看的财报。但它揭示了新势力进入第二阶段后面临的集体命题：从“卖得动”到“赚得到”，中间还隔着一条供应链涨价的鸿沟。
上半年，供应链迎来全域性涨价潮。碳酸锂从7.5万元/吨反弹至近20万元，车规存储芯片涨幅最高冲到180%，铜铝等大宗商品全线走高。
一台高阶智驾车型，仅存储芯片就多掏7000到10000元。成本像水一样渗透进每一辆车的BOM表。
同样的涨价，打在四家身上的痛感完全不同。蔚来靠ES8、ES9两款40万以上车型守住了18.5%的整车毛利率；理想因为智能化配置高、用量大，被供应链涨价咬得最狠；零跑用35.6万台的规模摊薄了固定成本；小鹏用自研芯片和给大众的技术授权费，用技术给自己回血。
2026年下半年的剧本已经展开。蔚来继续靠高端结构穿越周期，小鹏把筹码压在Q4的新品与技术释放，零跑主动下调盈利预期换取规模扩张，理想押注全新产品矩阵修复毛利率。
四家的路径越走越远，但面对的是同一个问题：当供应链涨价的潮水不退，谁能真正靠自己的泳姿游到对岸？
殊途不同归当2025年出现集体盈利反转之后，“蔚小理零”来到新一轮验证周期。
汽车销售是“蔚小理零”四家新势力的主业，但各家业绩底色的差异也意味着四者各自的商业模式短板、增长天花板、经营韧性的不同。
2026年过半，四家核心财务轮廓清晰可见：
营收维度：蔚来576.7亿＞理想486.5亿＞零跑381.1亿＞小鹏327.7亿；
交付维度：零跑35.64万＞理想19.35万＞蔚来19.1万＞小鹏16.59万；
毛利率维度：小鹏综合20.7%＞蔚来18.7%＞零跑11.7%＞理想9.5%；
现金储备：理想875亿元＞蔚来 567亿元＞小鹏 404.8 亿元＞零跑 385.9亿元。
作为率先跑通高端盈利模型的车企，蔚来在二季度完成盈利固化，正式进入常态化盈利周期。
来源：蔚来官方
财报数据显示，蔚来二季度实现经营利润2.1亿元，达成连续三个季度盈利。单季营收突破321.4亿元，同比大涨69.1%；毛利总额59.1亿元，同比上涨211.3%。
盈利质量的核心突破，体现在毛利率的持续抬升。二季度蔚来综合毛利率为18.4%，同比提升8.4个百分点，其中核心的整车毛利率18.5%，同比增长8.2个百分点。
这意味着蔚来ES8、ES9的高溢价能力以及公司成本管控成效实现了持续兑现。拉长周期来看，蔚来上半年总营收576.7亿元，同比增幅85.8%，毛利总额107.7亿元
与蔚来的稳健盈利不同，理想汽车正处于产品大换代的周期阵痛与修复窗口期。经历2025年首次年度亏损后，理想并未在2026年二季度实现净利润转正。
理想二季度营收257亿元，环比增长11.7%；整体毛利率环比提升3.1个百分点至11.0%，经营活动现金流实现单季转正。二季度交付新车9.8万辆，环比小幅上涨3.4%
不过理想二季度亏损额达17.1亿元，去年同期是净利润11亿元。但这个数字其实比一季度好一些，但相比于一季度22.9亿元的亏损，环比收窄了25%左右。
但也不用以悲观的视角看待理想。
在完成超过6.3亿美元股份回购的前提下，理想二季度末现金储备依旧高达 875 亿元，四家之中现金储备遥遥领先，充裕资金可以支撑产品迭代、具身智能研发、超充网络以及中东全球化布局。
零跑汽车则延续了自身独有的“规模薄利”模型，成为新势力中连续三个半年度稳定盈利的选手。2026年上半年，零跑营收创下同期新高，达到381.1亿元，实现净利润2.1亿元。
全域自研带来的成本优势与极致规模化策略，零跑销量持续狂飙。上半年全球销量超35.6万台，同比增长60.8%，7月和8月更是成为首个单月交付突破10万台的中国新势力。
海量规模持续摊薄单车成本，推动二季度综合毛利率环比稳步上行至12.6%，经营质量逐季改善。
来源：小鹏官方
小鹏汽车呈现出最特殊的结构性分化：销量、营收大幅回暖，综合毛利率逆势走高，盈利逻辑形成“传统卖车+技术增收”的格局。
小鹏汽车上半年的产品周期红利全面释放，二季度小鹏交付10.3万辆，环比上涨64.8%；单季营收197.4亿元，环比增长51.5%、同比增长8.0%。
盈利层面，小鹏综合毛利率攀升至20.7%，同比提升3.4个百分点，处于四家新势力首位。
高毛利的核心来源，是高速增长的技术服务业务。二季度小鹏服务及其他收入达27.0亿元，同比暴涨93.9%，对外技术授权、零部件配套、生态服务的盈利贡献持续放大，成为利润核心支柱。
都是供应链惹的祸？2026年上半年，蔚来、理想、零跑、小鹏四家新势力把车卖出了规模，却没把利润卖出来。
即便业绩最稳健的蔚来和销量最高的零跑，上半年也没赚到太多钱。财报电话会上，各家高管把原因指向了同一个方向：供应链。
2026年上半年，供应链迎来全域性涨价潮。
AI算力需求挤占车规产能，带动车规级存储、PCB、功率器件价格全线上行。车规DDR4/DDR5现货涨幅最高冲到180%。
碳酸锂从2025年7月的7.5万元/吨反弹至2026年5月逼近20万元/吨，一台50度电的车，电池成本上涨了2500到3000元。
铜突破10万、铝突破2.5万，稀土价格外溢到电机线束和底盘件，未来汽车Daily估算得知，造一辆中型电动车，光是铜铝就多1800元。
但同样的涨价，打在四家身上的痛感完全不同。
“芯片、PCB、存储芯片等半导体价格走高，理想智能化程度高、用量大，受冲击更明显。”李想这句话点出了理想被咬得最狠的命门。
来源：理想官方
Q2车辆毛利率从19.4%掉到9.4%，半年净亏39.8亿。纯电换挡期，i6一款车吃下近七成交付，均价低于旧L系列——供应链涨价只是放大器，产品组合切换才是那把真正的刀。
蔚来CFO曲玉给了最精确的数字：自3月起，Q2单车成本较2025年底已上涨约1.4万元，下半年预计再涨2000到3000元。但蔚来靠ES8、ES9两款40万以上车型持续放量，把整车毛利率守在了18.5%。高端结构把伤疤遮在了领口下面。
零跑交付35.65万辆，登顶新势力，净利润却只有2.1亿，单车净利约590元。
朱江明把毛利下滑归因于原材料涨价加上低价车占比提升，年初50亿的净利目标已经下调到30亿。规模摊薄了固定成本，却摊不动涨价的绝对值。
小鹏对供应链涨价似乎不那么敏感。
小鹏集团副总裁顾宏地说，“面对行业性的成本上升压力，公司经营保持稳健，得益于高端化和国际化的突破，公司毛利率继续超过20%”。
这句话背后是三组数字：图灵芯片自研替代外采，单车成本环比压了约9000元；Q2海外交付破2万，同比增长81%；服务及其他收入27亿，毛利率75.1%，给大众的技术授权以13.7%的收入占比贡献了近半毛利。
天气是共同的，伤口位置是各家自己选的。理想伤在纯电换挡加上智能化堆料，零跑伤在薄利规模，蔚来用高端结构把伤疤藏在领口下，小鹏用自研和授权费换了块新布。
顶着压力前行供应链涨价是2026年上半年全行业共性难题，但真正拉开新势力差距的，是各家面对成本冲击时截然不同的应对能力与周期节奏。
四家之中，蔚来是唯一实现“成本周期逆向穿越”的选手。财报指引显示，蔚来Q3交付10.8万–11.1万辆、营收332.9亿元–340.5亿元，同比分别增长24%–27.5%、52.7%–56.2%。
交付稳健增长、营收翻倍拉升的错配数据，直观印证其高端结构溢价逻辑彻底跑通。
面对行业最难解的成本压力，李斌在电话会上直言，下半年单车成本较去年底增加1.6万元–1.7万元，全年累计成本上行压力极大。
但不同于同行被动承压、靠规模摊薄成本，蔚来依托ES8、全新ES9两款40万+旗舰车型持续放量，叠加长期自研降本体系，完全内部消化了本轮供应链涨价冲击。
对蔚来而言，2026年下半年的核心命题早已不是“冲销量”，而是“卖更贵、利润更高的车”，以高端产品结构锚定稳态盈利，也是其能在行业成本上行周期中，维持盈利质量持续优化的核心壁垒。
与蔚来的周期穿越形成鲜明反差，小鹏Q3成为全年的蓄力过渡窗口。小鹏Q3交付、营收指引双双低于市场预期，交付11.5万–12.1万辆、营收217亿–234亿元，同比增速近乎持平。
如何看待本轮短期走弱？何小鹏将其定义为车企规模化迭代的必经阶段：存量车型生命周期见底、新品尚未集中交付，行业性产品空窗导致短期增长乏力。
但基本面需求并未透支，三季度新增锁单环比大涨50%、创下历史新高，终端热度充分储备增量。
小鹏的全年博弈重心完全后置至Q4，9月G9L上市、四季度MONA L05落地，叠加第二代VLA大模型端侧参数扩容3.5倍，智能化能力迎来跨越式升级。
对小鹏来说，Q3的低增长是主动战略取舍，牺牲短期季度数据，换取年末产品、技术双爆发的确定性。
如果说蔚来靠结构抗周期、小鹏靠新品渡周期，零跑则是典型的“规模换利润、务实控预期”。
面对持续发酵的供应链涨价压力，零跑主动收敛全年盈利目标，将年初50亿元净利润预期下调至30亿元左右，成为四家唯一公开下调盈利指引的车企，彻底摒弃粗放式增长预期，直面低价带车型的盈利短板。
来源：零跑官方
零跑破局路径高度依赖规模效应与全球化落地。
管理层判断，随着下半年销量爬坡、百万级年度目标冲刺，叠加西班牙工厂B10车型三季度本地化投产、海外渠道持续扩容，规模化量产与海外增量将逐步对冲上游成本压力。零跑的周期解法简单且务实：不赌单品高毛利，只靠体量与海外增量，稳住薄利基本盘。
相较三家的明确路径，理想的下半年周期修复最具不确定性，核心押注产品迭代的结构性救赎。
本轮供应链涨价对智能化配置更高的理想车型冲击尤为显著，直接延缓了其毛利率修复节奏，也是其二季度未能净利润转正的核心外因。基于此，理想下半年的核心破局逻辑，是用全新产品矩阵对冲成本压力。
随着新一代L9、纯电i9、全新MEGA等重磅车型集中上新，全线控底盘、自研马赫芯片、具身智能技术全面落地，理想将通过产品升级拉高单车价值与技术溢价，摆脱低端价格内卷，用结构性升级抵消供应链涨价的负面影响。
短期来看，Q3交付更多用于填补老款车型下滑缺口、保障基本盘稳定，难有大幅净增量；长期看点在于，纯电矩阵能否顺利接棒、毛利率能否持续爬坡，决定理想能否彻底走出换代阵痛、重回盈利上行通道。
—完—
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拿本田 HR-V 同馬自達 CX-5 嚟做比較。呢兩款車喺價錢同定位上都幾接近，今日我哋就從多個方面做一個詳細嘅比較，幫你省返做功課嘅時間。
本田 HR-V 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 115,900 - 143,900，一共有 4 個版本，包括 2026 e:HEV 1.5L RS（RM 143,900）、2026 1.5T V（RM 137,900）、2026 1.5T E（RM 130,900） 等。
馬自達 CX-5 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 135,469 - 166,760，一共有 3 個版本，包括 2025 2.0L AT 35th Anniversary（RM 316,154）、2025 2.0L AT（RM 296,154）、2025 2.0L MT（RM 294,154） 等。
從價錢嚟睇，本田 HR-V 嘅起步價的確比馬自達 CX-5 平咗 RM 19,569。如果你預算有限，本田嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需求。但都要注意，平嗰幾千塊，可能喺配備上會有取捨，具體要看你嘅需求。
本田 HR-V 配備 1.5L Turbo，馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。
馬自達 CX-5 配備 1.5L Turbo，馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。
兩款車用住同一套動力系統，日常行落嚟嘅感覺基本冇差別。油耗方面都差唔多，唔使太糾結呢一點。
本田 HR-V 嘅安全评分係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括本田 SENSING (ACC, CMBS, LKAS, RDM)。
馬自達 CX-5 嘅安全评分係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 。
兩款車嘅安全评分一樣，喺呢個級別入面安全配備都算好齊全。而家嘅新車安全性都唔差，唔使太擔心呢一點。
本田 HR-V 車身長 4500 mm，尾箱 450 L。
馬自達 CX-5 車身長 4500 mm，尾箱 450 L。
兩款車嘅尺寸幾乎一樣，車內空間差別唔大。呢個級別嘅車，日常使用完全夠用。
本田 HR-V 同馬自達 CX-5 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更睇重品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰一款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，那就揀配置更豐富嗰款。最終都係建議兩款都去試車，親身體驗先最重要。
總體嚟講，本田 HR-V 同馬自達 CX-5 都係馬來西亞市場好唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一部，關鍵都要睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試車做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
On August 25, BYD's full-protection '2026 Silk Road Ten-Thousand Li Journey · Enlightenment Road' concluded officially in Singapore.
33 days, over 10,000 kilometers, driving all the way from Xi'an to the Lion City. The four major Silk Road artifacts—aromatic herbs, porcelain, silk, and tea—also appeared overseas together for the first time.
Why choose Singapore for the finale? Because BYD has won the top sales spot for passenger car brands there for 19 consecutive months, with a market share of 24.7% and an EV share exceeding 40%. One of the markets with the highest car ownership costs in the world, relying not on low prices but on solid products to compete.
And this 10,000-li expedition itself was a rigorous field test. The fleet composed of five networks and four brands—Dynasty, Ocean, Denza, Fang Cheng Bao, Yangwang—underwent multiple tests including highways, mountainous areas, and urban congestion. Flash charging '5 minutes to charge well, 9 minutes to fully charge', Sky's Eye Intelligent Driving stayed online throughout.
Green energy accompanies the long Silk Road journey. A thousand years ago, camel caravans carried silk and porcelain to finish this route; today, wheels carry new energy technology and Chinese smart manufacturing to walk it again.
From the circulation of goods to the co-construction of technology, this is probably the most vivid footnote to the 'Belt and Road'.
In Malaysia's SUV market, many buyers compare the Honda HR-V and Toyota Yaris Cross when choosing a car. Both cars are quite close in price and positioning, today we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time doing research.
Honda HR-V's OTR price in Malaysia is RM 115,900 - 143,900, with a total of 4 versions, including 2026 e:HEV 1.5L RS (RM 143,900), 2026 1.5T V (RM 137,900), 2026 1.5T E (RM 130,900), etc.
Toyota Yaris Cross's OTR price in Malaysia is RM 99,900 - 109,900, with a total of 2 versions, including 2026 1.5L Standard (RM 99,900), 2026 HEV 1.5L Standard (RM 109,900), etc.
From a price perspective, the starting price of Toyota Yaris Cross is RM 16,000 cheaper than Honda HR-V. Honestly, in this price range, a difference of a few thousand is actually not significant, the key is still looking at overall value for money and long-term usage cost.
Honda HR-V's safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include Honda SENSING (ACC, CMBS, LKAS, RDM).
Toyota Yaris Cross's safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include TSS.
Both cars have the same safety rating, safety features in this class are considered quite comprehensive. New car safety nowadays is not poor, no need to worry too much about this point.
Honda HR-V body length is 4500 mm, trunk is 450 L.
Toyota Yaris Cross body length is 4400 mm, trunk is 400 L.
Regarding space, Honda HR-V's body is 100 mm longer than Toyota Yaris Cross, the interior passenger space will be slightly more spacious, especially rear legroom. If you often carry family or need to fit a stroller, a larger body is indeed more practical.
Honda HR-V and Toyota Yaris Cross are both mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use, daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale price more, you can prioritize the one with better reputation; if you care more about value for money and features, then choose the one with richer configurations. In the end, it is recommended to test drive both models, personal experience is the most important.
In general, Honda HR-V and Toyota Yaris Cross are both very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends mainly on your personal needs and budget. We suggest everyone do their homework, compare quotes from a few car dealerships, then test drive to make the final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending some time doing research is absolutely the right thing.
On August 26, Chery Fengyun "Steady Happiness" launch event was held as scheduled, global quality pure electric SUV Fengyun T7 officially debuted, the new car offers 3 trims, official guide price 97,900–118,900 CNY, priority trade-in price 94,900–115,900 CNY, with native global car strength, restructuring the new standard for the 100,000-level quality pure electric SUV market.
As a positively developed native global car, Fengyun T7 rejects the "domestic modifications for overseas release" model, adhering to the long-term manufacturing philosophy, practicing the "global cars cannot be rushed" R&D concept. Relying on the global 1+7+N R&D system, undergoing 3 years of R&D cycle, gathering 100+ global designers for collaborative creation, completing 5,000+ global user co-creation. Whole vehicle benchmarked against 2026 version E‑NCAP 5-star safety standard, invested 81 durability test vehicles, completed 1.45 million km real-vehicle durability verification, traversing 7 major extreme environments including high heat, high cold, high humidity, high salinity, etc., covering -40°C to -55°C extreme temperature range, adapting to vehicle usage needs in 210 countries and regions worldwide. At the launch event, overseas chassis, design, R&D engineers collectively endorsed, all test data comes from global real road conditions, not laboratory simulated environments.
Same-source global model Lepas L6 has entered South Africa, Thailand markets, will subsequently enter Indonesia, EU, Australia-New Zealand, UK, etc., and appeared at Milan Design Week receiving international praise. Relying on solid strength, Fengyun T7 received enthusiastic market feedback during pre-sale phase, 72-hour firm order booking 10,937 units, 9-day pre-sale broke 16,787 units.
This launch event held a car handover ceremony simultaneously, achieving delivery upon launch, foreign users in China became the first owners; adding Associated Press authoritative reports, Chengdu Auto Show foreign car tour group on-site orders, multiple third-party testimonies confirm Fengyun T7's global quality is by no means a marketing slogan, but a solid capability verified by global users and real road conditions.
This launch event, Hacken Lee appeared as a surprise "Happiness Experience Officer", and Chery Auto Executive Vice President Li Xueyong had a dialogue around "Steady Happiness", interpreting Fengyun T7's product value combining daily travel scenarios, both parties jointly launched "Happiness Co-creation Plan", digging out small bits of happiness in travel life. Fengyun T7 revolves around High Performance, Global Beauty, Safer, Smart 4 core values, matching collision safety, battery safety, range equality, full domain energy saving, handling performance, whole vehicle verification 6 redundant strengths, bringing cross-level configurations down to the 100,000-level market.
Regarding range, Fengyun T7 standardizes 65.05kWh Rhino battery across all trims, CLTC range 600km, actual test range reaches 681.6km, achieving actual range exceeds claims; 30%-80% fast charging takes only 20 minutes; all trims standard dual-source wide temperature range heat pump AC, -10°C environment range increases 30%, solving the pain point of new energy vehicle winter range degradation. Safety aspect, body high-strength steel ratio reaches 80%, equipped with most 9 airbags in class, 6D lock mail armor 31-layer battery protection, IP68 water resistance capability is 96 times national standard, from body structure to battery protection layers fortified travel fortress. In smart configuration, equipped with class-first 4nm process 8775 Cockpit-Drive Integrated Chip, equipped with Lingxi Smart Cockpit 2.0x Doubao Large Model, having 300+ all-scenario automatic parking, highway pilot assist and other functions, greatly reducing travel burden. Exterior blends Eastern wind control aesthetics, providing 6 exclusive car colors, 2700mm wheelbase brings 84% interior space utilization, largest pure flat large bed mode in class, 9-layer cloud feel comfort seats, accommodating family commuting, camping travel and other diverse scenarios.
Relying on Chery's continuous 23 years as No. 1 in Chinese brand passenger car exports accumulation, global users exceeded 20 million, Fengyun T7 brings products that underwent global strict trials back to domestic market, allowing domestic consumers with 100,000-level budget, own a true global quality pure electric SUV, guarding the "Steady Happiness" of countless families on the road.
