首頁RX-7 FD3S
搜尋歷史
熱門搜尋
經銷商登入 / 註冊
In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers compare Proton X70 and Mazda CX-3 when choosing a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning. Today we will do a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time doing research.
Proton X70 OTR price in Malaysia is RM 106,800 - 122,300, totaling 3 versions, including 1.5L Standard 2WD (RM 106,800), 1.5L Executive 2WD (RM 115,800), 1.5L Premium 2WD (RM 122,300), etc.
Mazda CX-3 OTR price in Malaysia is RM 126,159 - 139,159, totaling 2 versions, including 2023 2.0L High (RM 139,159), 2023 2.0L Plus (RM 126,159), etc.
Looking at the price, Proton X70's starting price is indeed RM 19,359 cheaper than Mazda CX-3. If your budget is limited, Proton's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. But be aware, the few thousand dollars cheaper, might mean compromises in equipment, depends on your needs.
Proton X70 is equipped with 1.5L Turbo, power 140 hp. Official fuel consumption 7.0 L/100km.
Mazda CX-3 is equipped with 1.5L Turbo, power 140 hp. Official fuel consumption 7.0 L/100km.
Both cars use the same powertrain, the driving experience is basically the same. Fuel consumption is also similar, no need to worry too much about this point.
Proton X70 body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
Mazda CX-3 body length 4500 mm, trunk 450 L.
In terms of space, Mazda CX-3 body is 100 mm longer than Proton X70, passenger space has more advantage. However, Proton X70 is more flexible for parking in the city, each has trade-offs.
Proton X70 adopts FWD drive type.
Mazda CX-3 adopts FWD drive type.
Both cars have the same drive type, both are FWD, daily driving experience will not have too much difference.
Overall, Proton X70 and Mazda CX-3 are both very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose, key depends on your personal needs and budget. It is recommended to do research, compare quotes from multiple dealers, and then test drive to make the final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending time doing research will definitely not be wrong.
The autonomous driving company Momenta has delivered heavy good news for overseas expansion. The company successfully obtained official approval from the German Federal Motor Transport Authority (KBA) and is authorized to conduct Level 4 autonomous driving road tests on city roads throughout Germany. This marks the first time a domestic autonomous driving enterprise has won Level 4 testing qualification for city roads across the entire German nation, indicating that China's high-level autonomous driving technology has officially obtained the clearance for full-domain implementation in the core European market, writing a milestone chapter for the global layout of the local intelligent driving industry.
After the positive news landed, the capital market quickly gave a positive feedback. Momenta's stock price surged over 10% intraday, fully confirming the market's high recognition of its overseas commercialization prospects. Industry analysts believe that this Germany nationwide testing license is not a single qualification breakthrough, but a key strategic layout for the landing of the enterprise's cooperation with the international giant Uber's European mobility project. As early as 2025, Momenta reached a deep strategic cooperation with the global top mobility platform Uber, confirming that Momenta autonomous driving taxi Robotaxi will be integrated into Uber's global mobility network. Munich was designated as the launch city for both parties' European projects. The landing of this full-Germany road test qualification will directly accelerate the scaled rollout of autonomous driving mobility services in Germany and even across the entire European region.
On the capital level, the binding relationship between the two continued to deepen. During Momenta's Hong Kong Stock IPO phase, SMB Holding Corporation, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Uber, continued to add capital to equity investment, winning 397,600 shares in the current public offering allocation segment. Tracing the previous financing process, SMB had completed the layout as early as September 2025 in the enterprise's Series C financing round, holding 791,055 preferred shares. With the stacking of two rounds of investment, Uber holds approximately 1.1887 million shares of Momenta in total. Business synergy combined with continuous capital injection created a three-dimensional deep cooperation system built by the two, forming a global development synergy integrating technology, funds, and channels.
As the "First Physical AI Stock" hotly discussed in the market, Momenta officially landed on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange on July 8. During the listing stage, it attracted widespread pursuit from global capital, fully displaying the technical attractiveness of domestic autonomous driving enterprises. Prospectus placement data shows that the oversubscription ratio of the enterprise's public offering shares reached 414 times; the international placement segment attracted institutional orders exceeding 100 billion Hong Kong dollars. Investors covered sovereign funds and long-term asset management institutions in 15 countries and regions globally. Top international long-term institutions such as Singapore Government Investment Corporation, Fidelity International, BlackRock, etc., all entered heavily as cornerstone and anchor investors.
Looking at industry development, developed overseas countries have strict access standards for autonomous driving testing, and Germany is even the highland of the global automotive industry, setting extremely high thresholds for autonomous driving safety and technical compliance. Momenta being able to obtain the full-Germany Level 4 testing license proves from the side that the safety, maturity, and compliance of domestic high-order autonomous driving solutions have reached international top standards. Unlike most enterprises limited to single-city pilots, the nationwide road test qualification grants the enterprise greater technology iteration space, allowing it to rely on Germany's complex and diverse urban road conditions to refine autonomous driving solutions adapted for European scenarios.
Currently, the pace of the domestic intelligent driving industry going global accelerates. Relying on its own Physical AI technology foundation, combined with the dual support of international mobility giant channels and capital, Momenta walks a differentiated global expansion path where technology export, capital cooperation, and commercial implementation proceed simultaneously. This landing of the Germany nationwide testing qualification is not only a key node in the enterprise's own global journey but also provides a replicable model for domestic autonomous driving enterprises entering the European high-end market, and is expected to continue to promote Chinese intelligent driving technology to the center of the global stage.
In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers compare the Proton X70 and Honda HR-V when choosing a car. These two models are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will conduct a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
The OTR price of Proton X70 in Malaysia is RM 106,800 - 122,300, with a total of 3 versions, including 1.5L Standard 2WD (RM 106,800), 1.5L Executive 2WD (RM 115,800), 1.5L Premium 2WD (RM 122,300), etc.
The OTR price of Honda HR-V in Malaysia is RM 115,900 - 143,900, with a total of 4 versions, including 2026 e:HEV 1.5L RS (RM 143,900), 2026 1.5T V (RM 137,900), 2026 1.5T E (RM 130,900), etc.
From a price perspective, the starting price of Proton X70 is indeed RM 9,100 cheaper than Honda HR-V. If your budget is limited, Proton's entry-level version is already sufficient for daily needs. However, note that the few thousand cheaper may involve trade-offs in specifications, depending on your needs.
Proton X70 comes with a 1.5L Turbo, horsepower 140 hp. Official fuel consumption 7.0 L/100km.
Honda HR-V comes with a 1.5L Turbo, horsepower 140 hp. Official fuel consumption 7.0 L/100km.
Both cars use the same powertrain system, so the driving experience feels basically the same in daily use. Fuel consumption is also similar, no need to worry too much about this point.
Proton X70 body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
Honda HR-V body length 4500 mm, trunk 450 L.
In terms of space, the Honda HR-V body is 100 mm longer than Proton X70, offering a better advantage in passenger space. However, Proton X70 is more flexible for parking in the city, each has trade-offs.
Proton X70 warranty 5 years/150,000km, service interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Honda HR-V warranty 5 years/unlimited mileage, service interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Overall, Proton X70 and Honda HR-V are both excellent models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends on your personal needs and budget. We suggest doing your research, comparing quotes from multiple dealerships, and test driving before making a final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending time doing research will never be wrong.
喺马来西亚嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拿住宝腾 X50 同起亚 Sportage 嚟做比較。呢兩款車喺價位同定位上都相當接近，今日我哋就從多個方面做一個詳細嘅比較，幫你節省咗做功課嘅時間。
宝腾 X50 喺马来西亚嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 89,800 - 113,300，一共有 4 個版本，包括 1.5T Executive（RM 89,800）、1.5T Premium（RM 101,800）、1.5T Flagship（RM 113,300）等等。
起亚 Sportage 喺马来西亚嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 129,639 - 179,320，一共有 4 個版本，包括 2025 1.6T DCT 4WD High（RM 179,320）、2025 1.6T DCT 2WD High（RM 159,320）、2025 2.0L AT 2WD High（RM 139,639）等等。
由價錢嚟睇，宝腾 X50 嘅起步價確實比起亚 Sportage 平咗 RM 39,839。如果你預算有限，宝腾嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需要。但要留意，平嗰幾千蚊，喺配備上可能有取捨，具體要睇你嘅需要。
宝腾 X50 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA)。
起亚 Sportage 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 Drive Wise。
呢兩款車嘅安全評級一樣，喺呢個級別入面安全配備都算係給得好齊全。而家嘅新車安全性都唔差，唔使太擔心呢一點。
宝腾 X50 保用 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
起亚 Sportage 保用 5 年/300,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
宝腾 X50 同起亚 Sportage 都係马来西亚市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更重視品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰一款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，就揀配置更豐富嗰款。最終都係建議兩款都去試駕，親身體驗先至係最重要嘅。
總體嚟講，宝腾 X50 同起亚 Sportage 都係马来西亚市場好唔錯嘅車型。揀邊輛，關鍵都係要睇你嘅個人需要同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，先至去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花啲時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
In the SUV market in Malaysia, many buyers compare Proton X50 and Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV when choosing a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save the time of doing research.
Proton X50 has an OTR price in Malaysia of RM 89,800 - 113,300, with a total of 4 versions, including 1.5T Executive (RM 89,800), 1.5T Premium (RM 101,800), 1.5T Flagship (RM 113,300), etc.
Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV has an OTR price in Malaysia of RM 159,750 - 159,750, with a total of 2 versions, including 1.6L Turbo Standard (RM 130,000), 1.6L Turbo Premium (RM 145,000), etc.
From a price perspective, Proton X50's starting price is indeed RM 69,950 cheaper than Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV. If your budget is limited, Proton's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. But be aware, the few thousand cheaper price may involve trade-offs in features, depending on your specific needs.
Proton X50 is equipped with a 1.5L 4-cyl, 105 hp. Official fuel consumption 6.0 L/100km.
Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV is equipped with Hybrid, 170 hp. Official fuel consumption 4.5 L/100km.
In terms of power, Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV's Hybrid has 65 more horsepower than Proton X50's 1.5L 4-cyl. However, for daily city driving, both cars have enough power and you won't feel underpowered.
Proton X50's safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV's safety rating is TBD, active safety systems include Basic.
Regarding safety features, both cars have received good ratings. However, there are some differences in function between Proton X50's ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA) and Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV's Basic. If you value active safety, you can compare their feature lists carefully.
Proton X50 warranty 5 years/150,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV warranty 3 years/100,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Proton X50 and Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV are both mainstream choices in the Malaysia market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, you can prioritize the one with better reputation; if you care more about value for money and features, then choose the one with richer configuration. Ultimately, it is recommended to test drive both, as personal experience is the most important.
In general, Proton X50 and Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV are both very good models in the Malaysia market. Which one to choose, the key still depends on your personal needs and budget. We suggest everyone do their research, compare quotes from several car dealerships, then go test drive to make the final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending some time doing research will definitely not be wrong.
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多人揀車嗰陣都會拿 Proton X50 同 Toyota Yaris Cross 做比較。這兩款車喺價位同定位上都好接近，今日我哋就從多個方面做一个詳細嘅對比，幫你省返做功課嘅時間。
Proton X50 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 89,800 - 113,300，一共有 4 個版本，包括 1.5T Executive（RM 89,800）、1.5T Premium（RM 101,800）、1.5T Flagship（RM 113,300） 等。
Toyota Yaris Cross 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 99,900 - 109,900，一共有 2 個版本，包括 2026 1.5L Standard（RM 99,900）、2026 HEV 1.5L Standard（RM 109,900） 等。
睇價錢嚟講，Proton X50 嘅起步價確實比 Toyota Yaris Cross 平咗 RM 10,100。如果你預算有限，Proton 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需要。但都要留意，平嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備上有取舍，具體要睇你嘅需求。
Proton X50 車身長 4400 mm，尾箱 400 L。
Toyota Yaris Cross 車身長 4400 mm，尾箱 400 L。
兩款車嘅尺寸幾乎一樣，車內空間差別唔大。呢級嘅車，日常使用完全夠用。
Proton X50 採用 4WD 驅動方式。
Toyota Yaris Cross 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
Proton 嘅 4WD 同 Toyota 嘅 FWD 喺操控上有唔同感覺，建議試駕比較。
Proton X50 同 Toyota Yaris Cross 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更睇重品牌口碑同二手價，可以首選口碑更好嗰一款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，那就揀配備更豐富嗰款。最終都係建議兩款都去試駕，親自體驗先係最重要。
總括嚟講，Proton X50 同 Toyota Yaris Cross 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車款。揀邊一輛，關鍵仲係要睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花啲時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
On July 16, engine sounds and applause intertwined inside the GAC Trumpchi plant. When a right-hand drive GAC Trumpchi M8 PHEV slowly rolled off the production line and the spotlight hit the car body, GAC Group officially announced that it had welcomed its 30 millionth user in its development history. This day, leaders from Guangdong Province, Guangzhou City, and Panyu District, Fu Bingfeng, Executive Vice President and Secretary-General of China Association of Automobile Manufacturers, Feng Xingya, Chairman of GAC Group, He Xianqing, General Manager, and other core management personnel, along with global suppliers, dealers, owners from home and abroad, and media representatives were all present to witness this historic snapshot defined as "from scale expansion to value leap".
From GAC's establishment in 1997 to the first whole vehicle rolling off the line, and to today's breakthrough of the 30 million level, GAC took 29 years. If we break down this timeline: from 0 to 10 million vehicles, it took 20 years; from 10 million to 30 million vehicles, it took only 9 years. This acceleration is not just the enterprise's own growth curve, but also a microcosm of the Chinese automobile industry from joint venture introduction, self-owned rise to global breakthrough. But beyond flowers and numbers, through this "30 Million User Gratitude Event", we can see more clearly a veteran automotive group's persistence and shift during the deep reshaping period of the industry.
The Significance of 30 Million: Not a Single Myth, but Matrix Synergy
There was a highly symbolic detail at the event site: GAC's multiple global production bases connected synchronously, GAC Honda P7, GAC Toyota BZ7, Qijing GT7, GAC Aion N60, GAC Hyper S600, respectively rolled off the line as vehicles numbered from 29,999,995 to 29,999,999, subsequently the 30 millionth whole vehicle — right-hand drive Trumpchi M8 PHEV appeared at the center of the stage. The full line of new energy vehicle matrix appeared collectively, which is not common in past milestone celebrations.
This arrangement reveals two signals: Firstly, GAC's 30 million volume does not rely on any "god car" or single sector to pull, but the result of joint ventures (GAC Honda, GAC Toyota), self-owned (Trumpchi, Aion, Hyper), new sequences (Qijing), and new energy transformation parallel lines; Secondly, the 30 millionth vehicle chose a right-hand drive plug-in hybrid MPV and was delivered to Thai owner Tony Jaa (famous movie star "Ong Bak" leading actor), clearly tying together the two main threads of "new energy transformation" and "globalization and going overseas". This is not only for domestic users to see, but also to convey confidence to the global market: GAC's product structure has thoroughly crossed the boundaries of the pure fuel era.
Data supports this shift. In the first half of 2026, GAC Group cumulative sales reached 773,100 vehicles, a year-on-year growth of 2.35%; among them, new energy vehicle sales reached 260,200 vehicles, a significant year-on-year increase of 68.8%, the proportion of energy-saving and new energy vehicle models has been raised to 62.82%; overseas exports also broke through 120,000 vehicles, a year-on-year growth of 132%, simultaneous high growth in five major regions: Americas, Asia-Pacific, Middle East, Africa, and Europe. Against the background of pressure on the industry overall market, new energy and going overseas have become GAC's dual engines to cross the cycle.
"Old-school Stubbornness" on the Quality Bottom Line: Slowing Down in a Fast Era
In the speech, one sentence by Feng Xingya was repeatedly quoted: "Quality is the bottom line GAC will never cede." "Some things can seek speed and newness, some things absolutely cannot seek quantity or strength." Today when intelligentization, price wars, and iteration speed are infinitely amplified, this statement seems somewhat "old-fashioned", but precisely it is the foundation behind the 30 million sales.
GAC's quality philosophy has its historical origins. As one of the earliest car enterprises in China to systematically introduce joint venture experience, GAC absorbed Honda's Total Quality Management (TQM) and Toyota's Lean Production Method (TPS) early on, then integrating Lingnan pragmatist culture, built an "Integration and Innovation" quality management model. This gene has been continued to independent R&D and manufacturing links: before each new car hits the market, it must undergo extreme environment tests such as "high cold, high heat, high altitude, high humidity, high corrosion, mountainous areas, sand and dust" known as "Five Highs, One Mountain, One Dust", complete "Two Winters, One Summer" field road tests; whole vehicle verification covers 12 major items and over 1,500 sub-items; GAC Aion Smart Ecological Factory as the world's first new energy vehicle "Lighthouse Factory", ensuring mass production consistency with digital intelligent manufacturing.
In safety technology, GAC proposed "Safety must be defined by automakers". Xingling Safety Protection System builds four major protection dimensions, eight key systems adopt dual redundancy design, has protected nearly 2 million users, avoided 6.28 million potential travel risks; Magazine Battery cumulative installation of 1.5 million vehicles, safe driving over 160 billion kilometers. Targeting user anxiety, GAC took the lead in the industry to launch the self-owned brand "Three Commitments" policy, actively underwriting for battery and intelligent driving assistance issues. These invisible investments constitute the implicit costs for the 30 million users to "drive with peace of mind".
From Engineer Thinking to User Thinking: The Turn of Organizational Mechanism
"In the past, we always stood from the engineer's perspective to polish technology, today we must completely stand from the user's perspective to examine experience." Feng Xingya summarized the 30 million moment with four words: "Gratitude, Persistence, Sincerity, Co-journey", among which "Sincerity" points directly to the reconstruction of user relationships.
This reconstruction is not a slogan. GAC regularly holds "User All Open Mic" events, inviting users to headquarters to "nitpick" face-to-face, and establish a full-process closed-loop management mechanism, ensuring every suggestion is traceable, common issues fully optimized; organizationally established a dedicated User Insight Department, promoting the full-process transformation from problem discovery to solution. Service network is also sinking: planned to add 1,000 county-level authorized stores this year, currently 600 recognized; online and offline "Super Butler" service, committed to 5-second response, 2-hour request handling; recharging end built "9 Verticals, 10 Horizontals" network, covering 31 provinces, 213 cities, self-operated charging piles over 27,000, in core urban areas a station must be within 1 km straight line. From the frontline where guns can be heard to backend mechanisms, GAC attempts to bring "people-oriented" down to executable details.
Long Slope and Thick Snow: From Commuting Tool to Ecosystem Tech
30 million is a milestone, and also a new starting point. On the electrification and intelligence tracks, GAC presents a systematic technology matrix rather than point breakthroughs:
Power Field: "National Excellent Engineer Team" developed Xingyuan Power covers Xingyuan Range Extender, Xingyuan Plug-in Hybrid, Xingyuan Super Twin three technologies, every product passed 100,000 hours bench and equivalent over 10 million kilometers verification;
Three Electrics Field: Completed all-solid-state battery pilot production line, Quark Electric Drive Motor maximum efficiency broke through 99%, tackling ultra-fast charging and low-range endurance pain points;
Intelligent Connectivity: Super Brain Xingling Architecture 4.0 connects intelligent driving, cockpit, powertrain, chassis, body, and vehicle networking six domains, comprehensive performance improved by 40%; Galaxy Smart Cockpit Terminal-Cloud Integrated, integrating Qianwen Large Model, letting cars evolve from commuting tools to "thinking partners";
Open Ecosystem: Co-building AI Intelligent Ecosystem with Huawei, CATL, Didi, Tencent, Alibaba, etc., cumulative R&D investment over 62 billion yuan, global R&D team over 6,800 people.
The direction of these technology investments is very clear: GAC aims to advance from traditional manufacturing enterprise to "Ecosystem Tech GAC", products will extend from mobile space to green energy ecosystem.
When Feng Xingya handed the 30 millionth vehicle key to Thai owner Tony Jaa, what the lens froze was not just a number, but the crossing-the-sea moment of Made in China from "sold out" to "trusted". 30 million users are a mirror, revealing GAC's 29 years of persistence and transformation, also revealing the exam question of the next stage: in the future of global competition, tech iteration, and user needs fragmentation, how to use the same quality determination and user sincerity to run the next 30 million well?
The answer might be written in the "GAC Group 30 Million Vehicle Rollout · Renewal Gratitude Season" launched that day — six major brands simultaneously launched new purchase, trade-in, and additional purchase feedback policies, responding to companionship with tangible benefits. But a longer-term answer than short-term feedback is hidden in those extreme environment test mileages, in Xingling Architecture's redundancy design, in county store signboards, and in every suggestion seriously handled after every "User All Open Mic".
30 million is not the end, but the next starting line of "mutual journey" between GAC and global users.
In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers compare Perodua Aruz and MG MG HS when choosing a car. These two models are quite close in price and positioning. Today we will do a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
Perodua Aruz OTR price in Malaysia is RM 72,900 - 77,900, there are 2 versions in total, including 1.5L X (RM 72,900), 1.5L AV (RM 77,900), etc.
MG MG HS OTR price in Malaysia is RM 130,450 - 146,450, there are 2 versions in total, including 1.5L Standard (RM 105,000), 1.5L Executive (RM 115,000), etc.
In terms of price, Perodua Aruz's starting price is indeed RM 57,550 cheaper than MG MG HS. If your budget is limited, Perodua's entry-level version is already sufficient for daily needs. But also note, the price difference of a few thousand might involve trade-offs in features, depending on your specific needs.
Perodua Aruz comes with 1.5L 4-cyl, 105 hp. Official fuel consumption 6.0 L/100km.
MG MG HS comes with 1.5L Turbo, 140 hp. Official fuel consumption 7.0 L/100km.
Regarding power, MG MG HS's 1.5L Turbo has 35 more horsepower than Perodua Aruz's 1.5L 4-cyl. However, for daily city driving, both cars have sufficient power, you won't feel underpowered.
Perodua Aruz safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include .
MG MG HS safety rating is TBD, active safety systems include Basic.
Perodua Aruz warranty 5 years/150,000km, service interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
MG MG HS warranty 7 years/150,000km, service interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Overall, Perodua Aruz and MG MG HS are both very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose mainly depends on your personal needs and budget. We recommend doing your research, comparing quotes from several car dealers, and then test driving to make the final decision. Buying a car is a major purchase, spending some time researching will never be a mistake.
7 月 16 日，廣汽集團正式迎來累計交付 3000 萬台嘅重要里程碑，同步啟動全品牌 3000 萬用戶感恩回饋活動。29 年深耕汽車賽道，從零起步到收穫三千萬用戶信賴，呢份亮眼成績，即係廣汽堅持長期品質主義嘅成果，亦係中國汽車產業高質量發展嘅真實縮影。
能收穫 3000 萬車主長久選擇，核心根基在於廣汽一以貫之嘅嚴苛品控體系。所有新車上市前必須完成「兩冬一夏」長週期極限測試，還要奔赴高溫、極寒、高海拔、沙塵等「五高一山一塵」全域場景驗證；依托全球一體化整車風洞、國內高標準綜合試驗場與埃安全球新能源燈塔工廠，廣汽實現設計、測試、生產全鏈路數字化管控，焊裝車間數百台工業機器人搭配 AI 視覺檢測，數千個車身緊固點數據終身可追溯，從源頭守住製造精度。
安全層面，廣汽打造完善全域防護體系。彈匣電池累計裝車 150 萬輛，累計行駛里程突破 1600 億公里；星靈安全守護系統上線以來，累計規避 628 萬次潛在行車風險。行業首創「三擔責」服務承諾，針對三電自燃、電池過度衰減、智能泊車事故三大用戶核心顧慮給出兜底保障，搭配高標準籠式車身、高佔比高強度鋼材，把安全貫穿車輛全生命週期。長期嚴苛品控也收獲權威認可，廣汽斬獲中國質量獎提名獎，旗下多品牌常年佔據細分保值率、質量榜單前列。
持續鉅額研發投入，係廣汽品質不斷進階嘅底氣。截至 2025 年底，廣汽自主研發累計投入超 620 億元，專利申請總量突破 2.49 萬件，發明專利超 1.12 萬件。星靈架構 4.0、星河智艙、星源動力、星艦車身四大自研核心技術全面落地，同時攜手華為乾崑打造啟境 GT 等高端智能車型，實現智駕、座艙、動力技術協同突破，兼顧家用舒適與前沿科技，讓不同預算用戶都能享受到高標準產品。
如果說硬核品質係廣汽嘅內生根基，那麼體系化全球化戰略就係企業第二增長曲線。唔同於簡單整車出口，廣汽依托「One GAC 2.0」戰略，實現研發、生產、供應鏈、銷售服務全價值鏈海外扎根，徹底擺脫單純賣車嘅傳統出海模式。目前廣汽業務覆蓋亞太、中東、美洲、歐洲五大板塊共計 110 個國家，落地 7 座海外生產基地、9 個零部件倉庫、746 家海外銷售服務網點，完整本地化運營體系助力產品適應各國法規與用戶需求。
海外市場增長勢頭迅猛，2026 上半年廣汽自主品牌出口量達 12.15 萬輛，同比大漲 132%，半年銷量已接近 2025 全年水平。區域市場多點開花，泰國市場 6 月銷量環比增幅達 207%，歐洲市場新能源車型穩步落地，巴西、哥倫比亞等美洲國家車型銷量倍數增長。面向長遠，廣汽定下清晰全球化目標：2030 年業務覆蓋 120 個國家，海外線下網點突破 2000 家，年海外銷量衝擊 100 萬輛，讓「廣汽智造」持續擴大全球市場份額。
為回饋 3000 萬全球車主，7 月 16 日至 8 月 31 日，廣汽旗下廣汽本田、廣汽豐田、廣汽傳祺、埃安、昊鉑、啟境六大品牌同步推出購車福利，新購直降、低息金融、高額置換、家庭增購多重禮遇疊加，覆蓋燃油、混動、純電、增程全品類車型，多款主力車型同步在海外內工廠下線，啟境 GT7、傳祺 M8 PHEV、埃安 N60 等重磅產品集中亮相，直觀展現廣汽全矩陣產品實力。
回望 29 年發展，廣汽歷經合資起步、自主崛起、電動智能轉型、全球生態拓展四次跨越式升級，3000 萬台交付里程碑唔係終點，而是全新起點。未來廣汽將繼續堅守精工品質長期主義，持續加碼核心技術自研，同步深化全價值鏈全球化佈局，以可靠產品、完善服務走向世界，持續擦亮中國汽車工業智造名片。
In Malaysia's SUV market, many buyers compare Perodua Aruz and Mazda CX-3 when choosing a car. The pricing and positioning of these two models are quite close. Today, we will conduct a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to save you time doing research.
Perodua Aruz OTR price in Malaysia is RM 72,900 - 77,900, with a total of 2 versions, including 1.5L X (RM 72,900), 1.5L AV (RM 77,900), etc.
Mazda CX-3 OTR price in Malaysia is RM 126,159 - 139,159, with a total of 2 versions, including 2023 2.0L High (RM 139,159), 2023 2.0L Plus (RM 126,159), etc.
From a price perspective, Perodua Aruz's starting price is indeed RM 53,259 cheaper than Mazda CX-3. If your budget is limited, Perodua's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. However, note that the few thousand dollars saved might involve compromises in features, which depends on your specific needs.
Perodua Aruz is equipped with a 1.5L 4-cyl, 105 hp. Official fuel consumption 6.0 L/100km.
Mazda CX-3 is equipped with a 1.5L Turbo, 140 hp. Official fuel consumption 7.0 L/100km.
In terms of power, Mazda CX-3's 1.5L Turbo has 35 hp more than Perodua Aruz's 1.5L 4-cyl. However, for daily city driving, both cars have sufficient power, you won't feel underpowered.
Perodua Aruz body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
Mazda CX-3 body length 4500 mm, trunk 450 L.
Regarding space, Mazda CX-3's body is 100 mm longer than Perodua Aruz, offering better passenger space. However, Perodua Aruz is more flexible for parking in the city, each has trade-offs.
Perodua Aruz adopts FWD drive system.
Mazda CX-3 adopts FWD drive system.
Both cars have the same drive system, both are FWD, daily driving experience won't differ much.
Perodua Aruz warranty 5 years/150,000km, service interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Mazda CX-3 warranty 5 years/150,000km, service interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Warranty conditions for both cars are the same, no need to worry about this. Actual maintenance costs depend on the brand's service network and parts prices. Suggest asking real owners in car groups about their experience.
Overall, Perodua Aruz and Mazda CX-3 are both very good models in the Malaysian market. Choosing which one depends mainly on your personal needs and budget. We suggest doing your research, comparing quotes from multiple dealerships, and then test driving to make the final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending time researching will never be wrong.
In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers compare Perodua Ativa and Chery Tiggo Cross when choosing a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
Perodua Ativa's OTR price in Malaysia is RM 62,500 - 73,400, with a total of 3 versions, including 1.0L Turbo X (RM 62,500), 1.0L Turbo H (RM 67,300), 1.0L Turbo AV (RM 73,400), etc.
Chery Tiggo Cross's OTR price in Malaysia is RM 88,750 - 99,750, with a total of 2 versions, including 2025 HEV 1.5L CSH (RM 99,750), 2025 1.5T Standard (RM 88,750), etc.
From the price perspective, Perodua Ativa's starting price is indeed RM 26,250 cheaper than Chery Tiggo Cross. If your budget is limited, Perodua's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. But be aware that the few thousand cheaper may involve trade-offs in features, depending on your specific requirements.
Perodua Ativa is equipped with 1.5L 4-cyl, horsepower 105 hp. Official fuel consumption 6.0 L/100km.
Chery Tiggo Cross is equipped with 1.5L 4-cyl, horsepower 105 hp. Official fuel consumption 6.0 L/100km.
Both cars use the same powertrain system, and the driving feel is basically the same in daily use. Fuel consumption is also similar, so no need to worry too much about this point.
Perodua Ativa's safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include ASA 3.0 + ACC + LDA + LKA + BSM + RCTA.
Chery Tiggo Cross's safety rating is TBD, active safety systems include Basic.
Regarding safety features, both cars have received good ratings. However, Perodua Ativa's ASA 3.0 + ACC + LDA + LKA + BSM + RCTA and Chery Tiggo Cross's Basic have some differences in functions. If you value active safety, you can compare their feature lists in detail.
Perodua Ativa warranty 5 years/150,000km, service interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Chery Tiggo Cross warranty 3 years/100,000km, service interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Overall, Perodua Ativa and Chery Tiggo Cross are both excellent models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends on your personal needs and budget. It is recommended to do your homework, compare quotes from several car dealers, and go for a test drive to make the final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending time on research will never be wrong.
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拿 Perodua Ativa 同 Chery Tiggo 7 Pro 嚟作比較。這兩款車喺價位同定位上都幾接近，今日我哋就從多個角度做一個詳細嘅比較，幫你節省做功課嘅時間。
Perodua Ativa 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 62,500 - 73,400，一共有 3 個版本，包括 1.0L Turbo X（RM 62,500）、1.0L Turbo H（RM 67,300）、1.0L Turbo AV（RM 73,400） 等。
Chery Tiggo 7 Pro 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 123,750 - 123,750，一共有 2 個版本，包括 1.6L Turbo Standard（RM 125,000）、1.6L Turbo Premium（RM 140,000） 等。
從價格來看，Perodua Ativa 嘅起步價確實比 Chery Tiggo 7 Pro 便宜咗 RM 61,250。如果你預算有限，Perodua 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需求。但都要注意，便宜嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備上會有取捨，具體要看你嘅需求。
Perodua Ativa 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 ASA 3.0 + ACC + LDA + LKA + BSM + RCTA。
Chery Tiggo 7 Pro 嘅安全評級係 TBD，主動安全系統包括 Basic。
安全配備方面，兩款車都拿到唔錯嘅評級。不過 Perodua Ativa 嘅 ASA 3.0 + ACC + LDA + LKA + BSM + RCTA 同 Chery Tiggo 7 Pro 嘅 Basic 喺功能上有少少分別，如果你比較睇重主動安全嘅話，可以仔細比較下兩者嘅功能列表。
Perodua Ativa 車身長 4400 mm，尾箱 400 L。
Chery Tiggo 7 Pro 車身長 4400 mm，尾箱 400 L。
兩款車嘅尺寸幾乎一樣，車內空間分別唔大。呢個級別嘅車，日常使用完全夠用。
Perodua Ativa 保修 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Chery Tiggo 7 Pro 保修 3 年/100,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Perodua Ativa 同 Chery Tiggo 7 Pro 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更睇重品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰一款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，就選配備更豐富嗰款。最終都係建議兩款都去試駕，親身體驗先係最重要嘅。
總嘅嚟講，Perodua Ativa 同 Chery Tiggo 7 Pro 都係馬來西亞市場好唔錯嘅車款。揀邊一輛，關鍵係睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拿 Perodua Ativa 同 Chery Tiggo Cross 做比較。呢兩部車喺價位同定位上都幾接近，今日我哋就由多個方面做一個詳細嘅對比，幫你省返做功課嘅時間。
Perodua Ativa 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 62,500 - 73,400，一共有 3 個版本，包括 1.0L Turbo X（RM 62,500）、1.0L Turbo H（RM 67,300）、1.0L Turbo AV（RM 73,400） 等。
Chery Tiggo Cross 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 88,750 - 99,750，一共有 2 個版本，包括 2025 HEV 1.5L CSH（RM 99,750）、2025 1.5T Standard（RM 88,750） 等。
由價錢睇，Perodua Ativa 嘅起步價確實比 Chery Tiggo Cross 平咗 RM 26,250。如果你預算有限，Perodua 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需要。不過要留意，平嗰幾千塊，可能喺配備上會有取捨，具體要睇你嘅需要。
Perodua Ativa 嘅安全評級係 5 星 (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 ASA 3.0 + ACC + LDA + LKA + BSM + RCTA。
Chery Tiggo Cross 嘅安全評級係 TBD，主動安全系統包括 Basic。
安全配備方面，兩款車都拿到幾唔錯嘅評級。不過 Perodua Ativa 嘅 ASA 3.0 + ACC + LDA + LKA + BSM + RCTA 同 Chery Tiggo Cross 嘅 Basic 喺功能上有少少差異，如果你比較睇重主動安全嘅話，可以詳細對比吓兩者嘅功能列表。
Perodua Ativa 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
Chery Tiggo Cross 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
兩款車嘅驅動方式一樣，都係 FWD，日常駕駛感受唔會有太大分別。
Perodua Ativa 保養 5 年/150,000 公里，保養間隔 每 10,000 公里或 6 個月。
Chery Tiggo Cross 保養 3 年/100,000 公里，保養間隔 每 10,000 公里或 6 個月。
總體嚟講，Perodua Ativa 同 Chery Tiggo Cross 都係馬來西亞市場好唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一部，關鍵始終要睇你嘅個人需要同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕先做最終決定。買車係件大事，花啲時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嗰陣，都會拿馬自達 CX-60 同 現代 途勝嚟做比較。呢兩款車喺價位同定位上都幾接近，今日我哋就由多個方面做詳細比較，幫你省返做功課嘅時間。
馬自達 CX-60 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 200,510 至 252,873，一共有 2 個版本，包括 2026 3.3T 4WD High Plus（RM 252,873）、2025 2.5L 2WD High（RM 200,510）等等。
現代 途勝喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 143,888 至 197,888，一共有 5 個版本，包括 2025 HEV 1.6T AT 2WD Prestige（RM 197,888）、2025 1.6T DCT 4WD Prestige（RM 186,888）、2025 1.6T DCT 2WD Prime（RM 164,888）等等。
從價錢睇，現代 途勝嘅起步價比馬自達 CX-60 平咗 RM 56,622。講真，喺呢個價位段，幾千蚊嘅差距其實唔算大，關鍵仲係睇整體嘅性價比同長期使用成本。
馬自達 CX-60 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
現代 途勝採用 FWD 驅動方式。
兩款車嘅驅動方式一樣，都係 FWD，日常駕駛感受唔會有太大分別。
馬自達 CX-60 保修 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
現代 途勝保修 5 年/300,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
馬自達 CX-60 同 現代 途勝都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更睇重品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰一款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，那就揀配置更豐富嗰款。最後仲建議兩款都去試駕，親身體驗先至最重要。
總嚟講，馬自達 CX-60 同 現代 途勝都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵仲係睇你個人需求同埋預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行之報價，再去做試駕做最後決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
【CNMO科技消息】7月7日，据行业消息，现代汽车集团已放弃向加拿大政府提议的“海狸计划”（Project Beaver），撤回在加拿大构建氢能生态系统的项目。此举是因为加拿大政府于7月6日（当地时间）选定德国蒂森克虏伯海洋系统公司（TKMS）作为加拿大巡逻潜艇项目（CPSP）的优先投标方，韩国联合团队的提议失去推动意义。
现代氢能项目
“海狸计划”由韩国政府与现代汽车集团共同提出，核心内容为投资31亿加元（约合23亿美元）在加拿大建设氢能生态系统。具体包括在不列颠哥伦比亚省建设液态氢工厂、在阿尔伯塔省建立加氢站，以及在安大略省建设氢能卡车制造工厂。加拿大政府曾要求与CPSP项目捆绑建设汽车生产设施，但现代汽车集团因过去有撤出当地工厂的经历，且考虑到业务可行性较低，转而以氢能项目作为替代方案。
撤回加拿大项目后，现代汽车集团预计不会立即寻找新的海外投资目的地，而是集中资源加速推进已有氢能业务。这包括：在韩国国内，全力完成2028年投产的蔚山氢燃料电池工厂，总投资9300亿韩元（约合6.2亿美元），未来年产能将达3万套燃料电池；同时加快新万金项目，总投资9万亿韩元（约合60亿美元），计划建设AI氢能城市、电解水工厂、AI数据中心、机器人制造及零部件集群和太阳能发电设施。
海外方面，现代汽车集团将加大对中国的HTWO广州氢燃料电池系统生产企业的投资。该企业近期被广州市认定为“产业链领先企业”，可获得地方业务执行与政策支持。此外，现代汽车集团还决定参与香港的氢能生态系统创建与活化项目。
喺馬來西亞嘅汽車市場，好多買家喺揀車嗰陣都會拿 Ford Everest 同 Mercedes-Benz GLB 做比較。今日我哋從多個方面做一個詳細嘅對比，幫你省下做功課嘅時間。
Ford Everest 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 266,338 到 430,838，一共有 6 個版本，包括 2026 3.0T 4WD Platinum（RM 430,838）、2026 2.0T 4WD Platinum（RM 348,838）、2026 2.0T 4WD Sport（RM 316,838） 等。
Mercedes-Benz GLB 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 299,888 到 352,888，一共有 1 個版本，包括 Standard（RM 299,888） 等。
從價錢睇落去，Ford Everest 嘅起步價確實比 Mercedes-Benz GLB 平咗 RM 33,550。如果你預算有限，Ford 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需求。不過都要注意，平嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備上會有取捨，具體要看你嘅需求。
Ford Everest 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 Co-Pilot360。
Mercedes-Benz GLB 嘅安全評級係 5★ (Euro NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 Premium ADAS。
安全配備方面，兩款車都拿到唔錯嘅評級。不過 Ford Everest 嘅 Co-Pilot360 同 Mercedes-Benz GLB 嘅 Premium ADAS 喺功能上有些差異，如果你比較看重主動安全嘅話，可以仔細對比吓兩者嘅功能列表。
Ford Everest 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
Mercedes-Benz GLB 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
兩款車嘅驅動方式一樣，都係 FWD，日常駕駛感受唔會有太大區別。
Ford Everest 保修 3 年/100,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Mercedes-Benz GLB 保修 3 年/100,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
兩款車嘅保修條件一樣，呢方面唔使糾結。實際保養成本仲要看品牌嘅服務網絡同零件價格，建議去車友群問吓真實車主嘅經驗。
總嘅嚟講，Ford Everest 同 Mercedes-Benz GLB 都係馬來西亞市場好唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一部，關鍵仲係要看你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
車型概覽
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque PHEV 值唔值得睇，第一步唔係望牌子或者外形，而係睇佢能唔能夠配合你嘅香港日常。 呢篇會集中講高速巡航、併線同超車信心，幫你用買家角度篩走唔適合嘅選擇。
售價仍待確認，買家可以先把佢放入候選名單，等價格落實後再同同級車逐項比較。
購車價格指南
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque PHEV 目前售價仍未清晰，較理性嘅做法係先睇版本、車身大小同動力形式，等價格落實後再決定值唔值得落訂。
如果有幾個版本可揀，可以先將 2026 Dynamic SE（價格待確認）、2026 Hoxton Edition（價格待確認）、2026 Autobiography（價格待確認） 放喺同一張清單。日常通勤重視舒適同易用，家庭買家就要優先睇後排、尾箱同安全配置。
核心規格重點
睇 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque PHEV 嘅規格，重點唔係背數字，而係理解佢喺香港用車場景會帶嚟咩分別。
11.98 kWh 嘅電池容量，真正意義係可以幫你估算一星期通勤同周末出車要唔要中途補電。 269 Ps / 198 kW、540 N·m 嘅輸出，令高速併線同短距離超車更有信心。 車長 4371 mm、車闊 1996 mm、車高 1649 mm、軸距 2681 mm 可以幫你預判商場停車場、屋苑車位同後排腿部空間。 手自一體(AT)、前置四駆 會影響起步順滑度、濕地穩定感同長途巡航性格。
優缺點分析
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque PHEV 嘅優點唔需要講到天花龍鳳，真正有價值係佢能唔能夠令日常用車更省心：電池同續航資訊有助安排通勤同補電、動力輸出對高速同上斜更有底氣、空間同車身尺寸方便家庭買家預判實用性。
要留意嘅係，要先確認屋苑、公司或常去商場嘅充電條件、香港停車場同窄路使用要留意車身闊度。呢啲唔一定係缺點，但係落訂前應該先諗清楚。
買家常見問題
買 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque PHEV 之前，真正要問嘅唔係單一規格，而係佢可唔可以融入你每日嘅生活節奏。
常見疑問係「Land Rover Range Rover Evoque PHEV 嘅動力同性能表現係點？」簡單講，Land Rover Range Rover Evoque PHEV 採用 P270e 插電式混能系統，結合 1.5 公升三缸引擎同電動摩打，綜合輸出 249 匹馬力，0-100 km/h 加速只需 7.6 秒，極速可達 230 km/h。綜合油耗為 3.7 至 4.0 L/100km，二氧化碳排放量低至 85-90 g/km。純電。 放到實際用車，就係要睇佢對通勤、泊車、家庭乘坐同長期成本有幾大幫助。
同級對比內容
將 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque PHEV 放入同級車清單時，唔建議只用外形或者品牌光環決定。比較順序可以係：先等售價落實，再決定佢應該同邊個級距比較、再睇動力係咪足夠應付高速併線同滿載、再比較能源成本同補能便利、最後睇車身大小、座位同尾箱是否適合家人。
咁樣篩選會貼近香港買家真實生活：平日塞車、商場泊車、周末去新界、甚至一家人出入，先係一部車每日要面對嘅考驗。
用車全周期指南
擁有 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque PHEV 最重要係先諗清楚充電節奏。屋苑、公司或者常去商場只要有穩定充電選項，電動化用車就會容易相處好多。
如果你主要喺市區行，視野、低速順滑度同泊車輔助會好影響心情；如果經常行高速或跨區，座椅舒適度、隔音同動力從容感會更重要。
車型概覽
寶駿雲海 值唔值得睇，第一步唔係望牌子或者外形，而係睇佢能唔能夠配合你嘅香港日常。 呢篇會集中講同級車比較，幫你用買家角度篩走唔適合嘅選擇。
售價仍待確認，買家可以先把佢放入候選名單，等價格落實後再同同級車逐項比較。
購車價格指南
寶駿雲海 目前售價仍未清晰，較理性嘅做法係先睇版本、車身大小同動力形式，等價格落實後再決定值唔值得落訂。
如果有幾個版本可揀，可以先將 2026 PHEV 1.5L 140km 前驅版（價格待確認）、2026 BEV 500km 前驅版（價格待確認）、2026 BEV 600km 前驅版（價格待確認）、2025 BEV 500km 前驅版（價格待確認） 放喺同一張清單。日常通勤重視舒適同易用，家庭買家就要優先睇後排、尾箱同安全配置。
核心規格重點
睇 寶駿雲海 嘅規格，重點唔係背數字，而係理解佢喺香港用車場景會帶嚟咩分別。
20.5/56.7/69.2/9.5 kWh 嘅電池容量，真正意義係可以幫你估算一星期通勤同周末出車要唔要中途補電。 140/500/600/60 km 嘅續航參考，對住喺新界、九龍同港島之間跨區行車嘅用家會更實際。 15.7/13.3/13.5 kWh/100km 嘅耗電表現，會影響你去快充站或者屋苑充電位嘅頻率。 106 Ps / 78 kW / 150 kW、130/310 N·m 嘅輸出，令高速併線同短距離超車更有信心。
優缺點分析
寶駿雲海 嘅優點唔需要講到天花龍鳳，真正有價值係佢能唔能夠令日常用車更省心：日常能源成本有基本參考、電池同續航資訊有助安排通勤同補電、動力輸出對高速同上斜更有底氣。
要留意嘅係，要先確認屋苑、公司或常去商場嘅充電條件、香港停車場同窄路使用要留意車身闊度。呢啲唔一定係缺點，但係落訂前應該先諗清楚。
買家常見問題
買 寶駿雲海 之前，真正要問嘅唔係單一規格，而係佢可唔可以融入你每日嘅生活節奏。
常見疑問係「寶駿雲海適合家庭代步嗎？」簡單講，寶駿雲海空間大、舒適靜謐、續航長，適合香港多人口家庭。 放到實際用車，就係要睇佢對通勤、泊車、家庭乘坐同長期成本有幾大幫助。
同級對比內容
將 寶駿雲海 放入同級車清單時，唔建議只用外形或者品牌光環決定。比較順序可以係：先等售價落實，再決定佢應該同邊個級距比較、再睇動力係咪足夠應付高速併線同滿載、再比較能源成本同補能便利、最後睇車身大小、座位同尾箱是否適合家人。
咁樣篩選會貼近香港買家真實生活：平日塞車、商場泊車、周末去新界、甚至一家人出入，先係一部車每日要面對嘅考驗。
用車全周期指南
擁有 寶駿雲海 最重要係先諗清楚充電節奏。屋苑、公司或者常去商場只要有穩定充電選項，電動化用車就會容易相處好多。
如果你主要喺市區行，視野、低速順滑度同泊車輔助會好影響心情；如果經常行高速或跨區，座椅舒適度、隔音同動力從容感會更重要。
車型概覽
Acura ADX 值唔值得睇，第一步唔係望牌子或者外形，而係睇佢能唔能夠配合你嘅香港日常。 呢篇會集中講版本取捨，幫你用買家角度篩走唔適合嘅選擇。
售價仍待確認，買家可以先把佢放入候選名單，等價格落實後再同同級車逐項比較。
購車價格指南
Acura ADX 目前售價仍未清晰，較理性嘅做法係先睇版本、車身大小同動力形式，等價格落實後再決定值唔值得落訂。
如果有幾個版本可揀，可以先將 2026 1.5T 兩驅標準版（價格待確認）、2026 1.5T 兩驅A-Spec組合版（價格待確認）、2026 1.5T 兩驅A-Spec先進版（價格待確認）、2026 1.5T 四驅標準版（價格待確認） 放喺同一張清單。日常通勤重視舒適同易用，家庭買家就要優先睇後排、尾箱同安全配置。
核心規格重點
睇 Acura ADX 嘅規格，重點唔係背數字，而係理解佢喺香港用車場景會帶嚟咩分別。
渦輪增壓、4 個 汽缸 嘅動力底子，重點係市區跟車夠唔夠順、高速巡航會唔會吃力。 190 Ps、179 N·m 嘅輸出，對滿載、上斜同超車都比單睇馬力數字更有意思。 車長 4719 mm、車闊 1842 mm、車高 1621 mm、軸距 2654 mm 可以幫你預判商場停車場、屋苑車位同後排腿部空間。 無級變速(CVT)、前置前駆 會影響起步順滑度、濕地穩定感同長途巡航性格。
優缺點分析
Acura ADX 嘅優點唔需要講到天花龍鳳，真正有價值係佢能唔能夠令日常用車更省心：動力輸出對高速同上斜更有底氣、空間同車身尺寸方便家庭買家預判實用性。
要留意嘅係，香港停車場同窄路使用要留意車身闊度、售價未清晰前唔應該太早用性價比落結論。呢啲唔一定係缺點，但係落訂前應該先諗清楚。
買家常見問題
買 Acura ADX 之前，真正要問嘅唔係單一規格，而係佢可唔可以融入你每日嘅生活節奏。
常見疑問係「Acura ADX 有冇提供四驅？」簡單講，係呀，Acura ADX 提供前驅同四驅版本供海外買家選擇。 放到實際用車，就係要睇佢對通勤、泊車、家庭乘坐同長期成本有幾大幫助。
同級對比內容
將 Acura ADX 放入同級車清單時，唔建議只用外形或者品牌光環決定。比較順序可以係：先等售價落實，再決定佢應該同邊個級距比較、再睇動力係咪足夠應付高速併線同滿載、最後睇車身大小、座位同尾箱是否適合家人。
咁樣篩選會貼近香港買家真實生活：平日塞車、商場泊車、周末去新界、甚至一家人出入，先係一部車每日要面對嘅考驗。
用車全周期指南
擁有 Acura ADX 唔係買車一刻就完結，之後仲有保險、輪胎、保養、泊車同日常能源成本要處理。
如果你主要喺市區行，視野、低速順滑度同泊車輔助會好影響心情；如果經常行高速或跨區，座椅舒適度、隔音同動力從容感會更重要。
2026 年 5 月 28 日，中國汽車工業歷史上一個值得被反覆提起嘅日子。
上汽集團喺上海北外灘世界會客廳，向全球第一億位用戶——Momenta CEO 曹旭東，交付咗一輛智己 LS9 Hyper。呢次唔係一次普通交車。與此同時，上汽旗下十餘個品牌、十九款車型，喺全球多地接力交付。從上海到南京、柳州、太原，從英國到印尼、新加坡，一場橫跨洲際嘅「交付接力賽」，宣告咗一個事實：中國第一家累計產銷量突破一億輛嘅汽車集團，誕生咗。
一億輛。呢個數字過去只屬於豐田、大眾、通用。今日，佢屬於一家中國企業。
好多人可能會話：一億輛又點樣？不過係「量大」。但我恰恰覺得，呢一億輛最值得細品嘅，唔係「多」，而係「變」。
第一層變：從「敲車」到「造車」，從「市場換技術」到「技術定義市場」
1958 年，上海工人用榔頭敲出第一輛「鳳凰牌」轎車。嗰時中國汽車工業處於嬰兒期，笨拙、原始，但充滿渴望。
1983 年桑塔納落線，中國汽車進入合資時代。嗰個階段嘅邏輯係：用市場換技術。我哋出市場，外方出技術。上汽喺呢個過程最大嘅收穫，唔止學識咗造車，而係構建咗一套從零部件到整車、從研發到製造嘅全產業鏈能力。好多人唔知，桑塔納國產化共同體曾經係中國汽車工業最扎實嘅「黃埔軍校」。
2016 年，榮威 RX5 上市，號稱「全球首款互聯網汽車」。嗰陣好多人覺得係噱頭。回頭睇，嗰其實係上汽第一次發出信號：智能化嘅主導權，該我哋啦。
2020 年智己汽車成立，再到今日第一億輛車——智己 LS9 Hyper，搭載全线控四輪轉向、全域 800V 高壓平台、恆星超級增程、L3 級智駕冗餘能力，甚至聯合紫金山實驗室首發咗「內生安全」技術，將安全從物理世界拉咗入信息世界。
呢一億輛嘅進化軌跡好清晰：從「我能造車」，到「我能造好車」，再到「我能定義下一代車嘅標準」。
第二層變：從「產品出海」到「價值鏈出海」
上汽呢一億輛入面，海外累計銷量已突破 700 萬輛。MG 連續 11 年奪得中國品牌歐洲銷冠，2025 年歐洲年銷突破 30 萬輛，成為首個喺歐洲同英國累計銷量破百萬嘅中國品牌。
更值得關注嘅係上汽去年發布嘅「Glocal 戰略」（全球 + 本土）。乜意思？唔再係簡單咁將國內嘅車運到國外賣，而係喺當地建研發中心、生產基地，甚至針對當地市場反向開發技術。半固態電池、Hybrid+ 混動技術，都係喺海外技術日率先首發，再反哺全球。
呢先至係真正嘅「價值鏈出海」。品牌、技術、標準、生態，一齊走出去。
第三層變：從「我懂車」到「我懂你」
上汽呢場交付儀式最令我感動嘅細節，唔係啲炫酷嘅技術參數，而係佢哋邀請咗各種各樣嘅真實用戶：羅振宇、楊晨、曹開亮、公益理髮師劉佳……每一個用戶背後，都有一個「呢輛車點解適合我」嘅故事。
上汽提出咗一個理念叫做「懂車更懂你」。以前車企話「懂車」，係炫耀工程能力；而家話「懂你」，係將技術翻譯成人話，變成你每日開車時感受到嘅安心、便利、樂趣。
一億輛，唔係一個冷冰冰嘅工廠累計數字。佢係一億個具體嘅人，一億種唔同嘅出行生活。能做到呢個量級嘅企業，一定唔止係將車造好咗，而係將「人」照顧好咗。
最後同大家講少少我嘅獨家觀察
好多人將「一億輛」當做中國汽車工業嘅成人禮。我唔係咁睇。我認為呢係中國汽車從「規模競爭」進入「生態競爭」嘅分水嶺。
過去我哋比嘅係邊個產能大、邊個平、邊個賣得多。未來比嘅係邊個能喺全球範圍構建一個包含能源網絡、智駕系統、數據閉環、用戶社區嘅完整生態。上汽呢一億輛，恰恰證明咗它有足夠嘅用戶基數、產品寬度同技術縱深，去支撐呢個生態嘅建立。
第一億輛交付畀 Momenta 嘅 CEO，呢個細節好有象徵意義——主機廠同智駕供應商嘅關係，從「採購」變成咗「共創」。呢唔係一次交付，而係一次聯盟嘅確認。
1955 到 2026，七十一年，一億輛車。下一個一億輛，唔再需要七十一年。但下一個一億輛嘅關鍵，唔係速度，而係高度。
中國汽車工業，終於有咗一張真正意義上嘅「億級名片」。呢張名片寫嘅唔係「世界工廠」，而係「全球共創」。
