首頁RX-7 FD3S
搜尋歷史
熱門搜尋
經銷商登入 / 註冊
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嗰陣都會拎 Proton X90 同 Mazda CX-60 嚟做比較。呢兩款車喺價位同定位上都幾接近，今日我哋就從多個方面做一個詳細嘅比較，幫你節省咗做功課嘅時間。
Proton X90 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 106,800 - 122,800，一共有 4 個版本，包括 2026 1.5T Prime X（RM 122,800）、2026 1.5T Prime（RM 116,800）、2026 1.5T Lite（RM 106,800） 等。
Mazda CX-60 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 200,510 - 252,873，一共有 2 個版本，包括 2026 3.3T 4WD High Plus（RM 252,873）、2025 2.5L 2WD High（RM 200,510） 等。
從價錢嚟睇，Proton X90 嘅起步價確實比 Mazda CX-60 平咗 RM 93,710。如果你預算有限，Proton 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需求。不過都注意下，平嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備上會有取舍，具體睇你嘅需求。
Proton X90 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA)。
Mazda CX-60 嘅安全評級係 5★ (Euro NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 i-Activsense Pro。
安全配備方面，兩款車都拿到唔錯嘅評級。不過 Proton X90 嘅 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA) 同 Mazda CX-60 嘅 i-Activsense Pro 喺功能上有些差異，如果你比較著重主動安全嘅話，可以仔細對比吓兩者嘅功能列表。
Proton X90 車身長 4400 mm，後備箱 400 L。
Mazda CX-60 車身長 4500 mm，後備箱 450 L。
空間方面，Mazda CX-60 嘅車身比 Proton X90 長咗 100 mm，乘坐空間更有優勢。不過 Proton X90 喺城市入面停車會靈活少少，各有取舍。
Proton X90 保修 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Mazda CX-60 保修 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
兩款車嘅保修條件一樣，呢方面唔使糾結。實際保養成本仲要睇品牌嘅服務網絡同零件價格，建議去車友群問下真實車主嘅經驗。
總括嚟講，Proton X90 同 Mazda CX-60 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一部，關鍵仲要睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最後決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
In Malaysia's SUV market, many buyers often compare Proton X70 and Kia Sportage when choosing a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will do a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
Proton X70's OTR price in Malaysia is RM 106,800 - 122,300, with 3 versions including 1.5L Standard 2WD (RM 106,800), 1.5L Executive 2WD (RM 115,800), 1.5L Premium 2WD (RM 122,300), etc.
Kia Sportage's OTR price in Malaysia is RM 129,639 - 179,320, with 4 versions including 2025 1.6T DCT 4WD High (RM 179,320), 2025 1.6T DCT 2WD High (RM 159,320), 2025 2.0L AT 2WD High (RM 139,639), etc.
From a price perspective, Proton X70's starting price is indeed RM 22,839 cheaper than Kia Sportage. If your budget is limited, Proton's entry-level version already meets daily needs. However, note that the savings of a few thousand might involve trade-offs in features, depending on your specific needs.
Proton X70 is equipped with 1.5L Turbo, 140 hp. Official fuel consumption 7.0 L/100km.
Kia Sportage is equipped with 1.5L Turbo, 140 hp. Official fuel consumption 7.0 L/100km.
Both cars use the same powertrain, the driving experience is basically the same. Fuel consumption is also similar, no need to worry too much about this point.
Proton X70 body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
Kia Sportage body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
The dimensions of both cars are almost the same, interior space difference is not large. Cars at this level are completely sufficient for daily use.
Proton X70 adopts FWD drivetrain.
Kia Sportage adopts FWD drivetrain.
Both cars have the same drivetrain, both are FWD, daily driving experience will not have much difference.
Overall, Proton X70 and Kia Sportage are both very good models in the Malaysia market. Choosing which one, the key depends on your personal needs and budget. We suggest doing your research, comparing quotes from several dealerships, then going for a test drive to make the final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending some time on research will definitely not be wrong.
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嗰陣都會拿 Proton X70 同 Volkswagen Tiguan 來比較。呢兩款車喺價位同定位上都幾接近，今日我哋就從多個方面做一個詳細比較，幫你節省做功課嘅時間。
Proton X70 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 106,800 - 122,300，一共有 3 個版本，包括 1.5L Standard 2WD（RM 106,800）、1.5L Executive 2WD（RM 115,800）、1.5L Premium 2WD（RM 122,300） 等。
Volkswagen Tiguan 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 206,540 - 260,024，一共有 2 個版本，包括 2025 Allspace 2.0T R-Line（RM 260,024）、2025 Allspace 1.4T Elegance（RM 206,540） 等。
從價錢嚟睇，Proton X70 嘅起價確實比 Volkswagen Tiguan 平咗 RM 99,740。如果你預算有限，Proton 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需要。但都要留意，平嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備上面會有取捨，具體睇你嘅需要。
Proton X70 配備 1.5L Turbo，馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。
Volkswagen Tiguan 配備 2.0L 4-cyl，馬力 170 hp。官方油耗 8.0 L/100km。
動力方面，Volkswagen Tiguan 嘅 2.0L 4-cyl 比 Proton X70 嘅 1.5L Turbo 多咗 30 匹馬力。不過日常喺市區開，兩款車嘅動力都夠用，唔會覺得唔夠力。
Proton X70 車身長 4400 mm，行李箱 400 L。
Volkswagen Tiguan 車身長 4400 mm，行李箱 400 L。
兩款車嘅尺寸幾乎一樣，車內空間分別唔大。呢個級別嘅車，日常使用完全夠用。
Proton X70 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
Volkswagen Tiguan 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
兩款車嘅驅動方式一樣，都係 FWD，日常駕駛感受唔會有太大分別。
總括嚟講，Proton X70 同 Volkswagen Tiguan 都係馬來西亞市場好唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一部，關鍵就係睇你嘅個人需要同預算。建議大家做足功課，多問幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最後決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers compare Proton X70 and MG MG HS when choosing a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
The OTR price of Proton X70 in Malaysia is RM 106,800 - 122,300. There are 3 versions in total, including 1.5L Standard 2WD (RM 106,800), 1.5L Executive 2WD (RM 115,800), 1.5L Premium 2WD (RM 122,300), etc.
The OTR price of MG MG HS in Malaysia is RM 130,450 - 146,450. There are 2 versions in total, including 1.5L Standard (RM 105,000), 1.5L Executive (RM 115,000), etc.
From the price perspective, the starting price of Proton X70 is indeed RM 23,650 cheaper than MG MG HS. If your budget is limited, Proton's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. But be aware that the few thousand difference might involve trade-offs in features, depending on your specific requirements.
Proton X70 is equipped with a 1.5L Turbo, 140 hp. Official fuel consumption 7.0 L/100km.
MG MG HS is equipped with a 1.5L Turbo, 140 hp. Official fuel consumption 7.0 L/100km.
Both cars use the same powertrain system, and the driving feel is basically the same daily. Fuel consumption is also similar, so no need to worry too much about this point.
The safety rating of Proton X70 is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP). Active safety systems include ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
The safety rating of MG MG HS is TBD. Active safety systems include Basic.
In terms of safety features, both cars received decent ratings. However, there are some differences in function between Proton X70's ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA) and MG MG HS's Basic. If you value active safety more, you can carefully compare the feature lists of both.
Proton X70 adopts FWD drive mode.
MG MG HS adopts FWD drive mode.
The drive mode of both cars is the same, both are FWD, and there won't be a big difference in daily driving feel.
Overall, Proton X70 and MG MG HS are both very good models in the Malaysian market. Choosing which one depends mainly on your personal needs and budget. We suggest doing your research, comparing quotes from several dealerships, and then test driving to make the final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending time doing research will definitely not be wrong.
（2026年8月6日，杭州）8月6日，全新一代smart精灵1号上市发布，限时权益价14.99万元起，5大权益至高价值超2.5万元。
全新一代smart精灵1号上市，限时权益价14.99万元起，5大权益至高价值超2.5万元
全新一代smart精灵1号推出535 Max与535 Ultra两个版型，超200项整车体验升级，63项同级领先、20项同级唯一。新车以“新奢品质、技术智能、灵动驾控”三大引领，重新定义豪华智能小车标杆。
超200项产品体验焕新升级，更新迭代总价值超过3万元
问世四年享誉全球，全球豪华智能小车之王的进化之路
初代smart精灵1号上市至今四年间，已登陆全球41国市场，陪伴超10万密友行驶了十几亿公里，并收获30余家全球权威媒体首肯，揽获德国iF、红点两项国际设计大奖及中欧双五星安全认证，成为电动smart走向世界的名片。
继初代精灵1号上市四年后，全新一代smart精灵1号全面进化，再树标杆
四年后，小车市场早已从蓝海变为红海，各家车企在价值锚定上各有偏好，平台架构、三电技术、智能辅助驾驶、智能座舱等功能与体验层面，很难做到全优表现。面对这样的市场现状，全新一代smart精灵1号围绕“三电两智”全面进化，大不一样，将四年间的引领势能、市场洞察与用户反馈，转化为一次脱胎换骨的进化，持续引领小车市场价值标准。
三电升级两智焕新，精灵1号全面刷新豪华智能小车技术上限
全新一代smart精灵1号，不仅搭载全球首个量子级AI电子电气架构EEA 4.0，更全系标配800V碳化硅高压平台。凭借同级领先的6C超快充技术，电量从10%充至80%仅需12分钟。配合雷霆16合一高效智能电驱，城市通勤一周一充，即便长途出行也不必担忧，高效的补能效率，10分钟便可补能300km以上，远途出行也无需担忧。其搭载的神盾金砖电池，以“军工级”安全标准满足电池新国标要求，为每一程提供可靠保障。
全系标配800V高压平台实现“三电”焕新，6C超快充仅需12分钟即可将电量从10%充至80%
智能驾驶辅助能力，越来越成为用户购车关注的关键点：全新一代smart精灵1号，搭载满血版千里浩瀚H5辅助驾驶系统，采用英伟达Orin Y高算力芯片，基于采用内置千亿参数WAM世界行为模型赋能的G-ASD 4.0解决方案。车辆依托包含激光雷达在内的31个感知硬件，智能辅助驾驶领航能力覆盖城市、高速等多元场景，有导航的地方都能辅助驾驶，全国都能开。在环岛通行，无保护左转，窄巷通行等20多个难点场景下，其决策更类人、更自然，后续还将通过OTA实现车位到车位功能。
同时，新车“天花板级”的智能泊车能力，将彻底打破“泊车难”：无论是窄小的机械车位还是无标线的空地，全新一代smart精灵1号都能轻松泊入。更有离车泊入、指尖泊车等功能，轻松搞定复杂、极端泊车场景，新手秒变“泊学家”。
“两智”全面升级，满血版千里浩瀚H5辅助驾驶系统上车，AI智舱贴心随行
智能座舱方面，新车大幅降低用户的学习与体验成本，实现“上车即上手”。同级唯一4nm制程龙鹰6P芯片提供高算力保障，实现功能操作毫秒级的响应，15.4英寸2.5K中控屏融合新一代smart OS，率先搭载深度定制最新版本Flyme Auto系统，屏幕更加清晰，色彩更加细腻，交互更加便捷，操作凭直觉，学习零成本。面对包含多地址、多顺序的复杂语音指令，“超级精灵”AI助手可以自主完成路线规划。AI空调可自主感知车内外环境，根据车内外的环境温度、湿度、空气良好度自动调节座舱温湿度、风力，舒适氛围随你所愿。算力高、响应快、听得懂、用得上，无论是日常休闲还是关键时刻，都是你的贴心随行好伙伴。
源自smart独特D.N.A. ，全新一代精灵1号新奢大不同
除了三电两智的焕新，全新一代smart精灵1号的全面升级，依然坚守smart无可替代的品牌D.N.A.——奔驰设计、安全至上、悦享驾乘，让新车“大不一样”。
Designed with Love——奔驰设计，每一款smart都由梅赛德斯-奔驰全球设计团队打造，精灵1号也不例外：经典四轮四角风格，让小车也有“大气场”。铂金版专属的日冕金车顶经典回归，与车身搭配出蓝金、白金两款全新配色组合，一眼难忘。同级唯一的D柱璀璨星辰发光Logo与Styled by Mercedes-Benz专属设计徽标，进一步强化了车侧辨识度。搭配19英寸旋翼动感轮毂与高定运动后扰流板，每一面都自带极强的视觉张力。
“紧凑于外，宽适于内”的空间理念，将更多空间留给座舱，2750mm轴距与同级领先的84%超大得房率，让小车身“藏”得下超大空间，配合全车28处分区储物格，从容舒展，气场十足。
日冕金车顶带来全新配色组合，奔驰原创设计让新奢“大有不同”
不只是空间，座舱内的舒适体验同样越级：新奢SPA舒享座椅采用12层舒适叠层结构，主副驾配备24种按摩组合，配合加热通风功能，长途出行也能随时舒缓身体。同级最多的车内软质包覆面积超5㎡，触之所及皆是柔软。门板扶手及杯托盖板等区域采用同级领先的环抱式3D Mesh工艺，承托恰到好处。森海塞尔典范音响系统与256色流光溢彩智能氛围灯，从听觉、触觉到视觉营造沉浸式座舱氛围，让每一次出行都成为感官的放松之旅。
新奢SPA舒享座椅，采用12层舒适叠层结构，配合丰富功能舒缓随行
No Compromise on Safety——安全至上，是smart始终坚持的造车标准：新车依旧按照中欧双五星标准打造，84%钢铝混合笼式车身筑起安全堡垒。新增19项主动安全辅助功能，包含自动紧急制动（AEB）、后方交叉紧急报警与制动（RCTA & RCTB）、爆胎稳定性控制、驾驶员失能辅助等多重能力，为每位乘员构建全域安全体系。
smart与奔驰联合完成新车底盘调教，让城市出行悦享驾乘
Amazing drives——悦享驾乘，是smart始终想要带给密友的出行体验：smart与奔驰联合对新车底盘进行调校，过弯时悬架支撑扎实有力，滤震干净利落，德系底盘兼具厚重感与韧性。穿行城市灵活自如，无论是狭窄掉头还是拥挤街道并线，都游刃有余。154mm离地间隙在保证城市穿梭灵活性的同时，也为周末郊野出行解锁了更多场景可能性，非铺装路面、轻越野路况都能从容应对。同时，新车搭载了CST智能舒适制动系统，能够有效抑制刹车点头，配合智能动态能量回收，兼顾能耗与平顺，起步、过弯、减速皆从容。
不玩套路，smart用灵感打造全新发布会风格
“天生爱不同”的smart，将全新一代smart精灵1号的新车发布，做成一场城市Live Show：全程都市街区里完成新车实测，让超200项升级体验，融入上班通勤、快充补能、周末短途的真实场景，用户看到即得到。
smart品牌全球公司CEO佟湘北
smart将发布会打造成一场都市Live Show，用“天生爱不同”的视角玩转城市出行
本场Live Show，由smart品牌全球公司CEO佟湘北、CMO康毅、明星密友侯佩岑联袂推进，将smart的独特性格与新车特质自然呈现。彩蛋环节，上海、墨尔本、布宜诺斯艾利斯、巴黎、香港、柏林六座城市依次“抢线”催更全新smart精灵2号，传递全球期待呼声。目前，全新smart精灵2号街头艺术涂鸦计划已在全球范围揭开神秘面纱，量产车计划于10月巴黎车展完成全球首秀。
四年前，精灵1号迈出smart全面电动化转型的第一步。正如smart品牌全球公司CEO佟湘北所言：“smart精灵1号始终是豪华小车的品类标杆，过去是，现在是，未来也是。”如今，全新一代smart精灵1号，以“三电两智”全面越级，让每种城市生活都拥有更聪明、更从容的答案。
即日起，打开smart汽车APP或小程序订购全新一代smart精灵1号，锁定首批权益，让出行生活更smart。
-结束-
smart汽车官方小程序
smart汽车官方APP
了解最新信息，请访问
smart全球媒体中心：https://media.smart.com/zh-chs/
smart汽车官方网站：https://www.smart.cn/
媒体垂询
蒋征 vicky.jiang@smart.com
smart品牌全球公司简介
自 20 世纪 90 年代品牌创立以来，smart 始终致力于探索未来都市交通最佳解决方案。2019 年，梅赛德斯-奔驰股份公司与浙江吉利控股集团共同成立 smart 全球合资公司。此后，smart 成功实现品牌、产品和商业模式的全面焕新，发展成为独具特色的新奢个性智能电动汽车品牌。目前，smart 产品矩阵不断扩充，业务版图已覆盖全球超40个国家和地区。
2026年，smart全力推进新市场开拓，全面升级smartcare客户服务体系，并重磅推出精灵#2与精灵#6两款战略级全新车型，三大核心举措并举，推动品牌再入新境。
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買車人喺揀車嗰陣都會用寶騰 X70 同 奇瑞 Tiggo 8 PHEV 比較。呢兩款車嘅價錢同定位都幾近，今日我哋就從多個方面做個詳細比較，幫你慳返做功課嘅時間。
寶騰 X70 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 106,800 - 122,300，一共有 3 個版本，包括 1.5L Standard 2WD（RM 106,800）、1.5L Executive 2WD（RM 115,800）、1.5L Premium 2WD（RM 122,300） 等。
奇瑞 Tiggo 8 PHEV 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 159,750 - 159,750，一共有 2 個版本，包括 1.6L Turbo Standard（RM 130,000）、1.6L Turbo Premium（RM 145,000） 等。
從價錢睇落，寶騰 X70 嘅起價真係比 奇瑞 Tiggo 8 PHEV 平咗 RM 52,950。如果你預算有限，寶騰嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需要。但都要注意，平嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備上有取捨，具體要看你嘅需要。
寶騰 X70 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA)。
奇瑞 Tiggo 8 PHEV 嘅安全評級係 TBD，主動安全系統包括 Basic。
安全配備方面，兩款車都攞到唔錯嘅評級。不過寶騰 X70 嘅 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA) 同 奇瑞 Tiggo 8 PHEV 嘅 Basic 喺功能上有啲差異，如果你比較重視主動安全嘅話，可以仔細比較下兩者嘅功能列表。
寶騰 X70 車身長 4400 mm，後備箱 400 L。
奇瑞 Tiggo 8 PHEV 車身長 4400 mm，後備箱 400 L。
兩款車嘅尺寸幾乎一樣，車內空間分別唔大。呢個級別嘅車，日常使用完全夠用。
寶騰 X70 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
奇瑞 Tiggo 8 PHEV 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
兩款車嘅驅動方式一樣，都係 FWD，日常駕駛感受唔會有太大分別。
總嘅嚟講，寶騰 X70 同 奇瑞 Tiggo 8 PHEV 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車款。揀邊一部，關鍵都要睇你個人需要同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試車做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拿 寶騰 X70 同 奇瑞 Tiggo 8 PHEV 做比較。这两款车喺價位同定位上都幾接近嘅，今日我哋就從多個方面做一個詳細嘅對比，幫你攞走做功課嘅時間。
寶騰 X70 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 106,800 至 122,300，合共有 3 個版本，包括 1.5L Standard 2WD（RM 106,800）、1.5L Executive 2WD（RM 115,800）、1.5L Premium 2WD（RM 122,300） 等。
奇瑞 Tiggo 8 PHEV 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 159,750 至 159,750，合共有 2 個版本，包括 1.6L Turbo Standard（RM 130,000）、1.6L Turbo Premium（RM 145,000） 等。
由價錢睇，寶騰 X70 嘅起步價確實比奇瑞 Tiggo 8 PHEV 平咗 RM 52,950。如果你預算有限，寶騰嘅入門版已經滿足到日常需要。但都要留意，平幾千蚊嗰啲錢，可能在配備上會有取捨，具體要看你嘅需要。
寶騰 X70 車身長 4400 mm，後備箱 400 L。
奇瑞 Tiggo 8 PHEV 車身長 4400 mm，後備箱 400 L。
兩款車嘅尺寸幾乎一樣，車廂空間差異唔大。呢個級別嘅車，日常用盡完全夠用。
寶騰 X70 保養 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
奇瑞 Tiggo 8 PHEV 保養 3 年/100,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
寶騰 X70 同 奇瑞 Tiggo 8 PHEV 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭用、日常通勤。如果你更睇重品牌口碑同埋二手價，可以先考慮口碑好嗰款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，那就揀配備多嗰款。最後始終建議兩款都去試駕，親身體驗先係最重要。
總括嚟講，寶騰 X70 同 奇瑞 Tiggo 8 PHEV 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車款。揀邊部，關鍵仲係要看你嘅個人需要同埋預算。建議大家做功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再過去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拿寶騰 X70 同馬自達 CX-8 嚟比較。呢兩部車喺價位同定位上都幾接近嘅，今日我哋就由多個方面做一個詳細嘅比較，幫你省咗做功課嘅時間。
寶騰 X70 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 106,800 - 122,300，一共有 3 個版本，包括 1.5L Standard 2WD（RM 106,800）、1.5L Executive 2WD（RM 115,800）、1.5L Premium 2WD（RM 122,300）等等。
馬自達 CX-8 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 165,360 - 201,360，一共有 5 個版本，包括 2025 2.5T 4WD High Plus Petrol（RM 201,360）、2025 2.2L 2WD High Plus Diesel（RM 193,123）、2025 2.5L 2WD High Plus Petrol（RM 186,360）等等。
由價錢睇落，寶騰 X70 嘅起步價確實比馬自達 CX-8 平咗 RM 58,560。如果你預算有限，寶騰嘅入門版已經可以满足日常需要。不過都要留意，嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備上會有取舍，具體睇下你嘅需要。
寶騰 X70 裝備 1.5L Turbo，馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。
馬自達 CX-8 裝備 2.0L 4-cyl，馬力 170 hp。官方油耗 8.0 L/100km。
動力方面，馬自達 CX-8 嘅 2.0L 4-cyl 比寶騰 X70 嘅 1.5L Turbo 多咗 30 匹馬力。不過日常喺市區行，兩部車嘅動力都夠用，唔會覺得唔夠力。
寶騰 X70 車身長 4400 mm，后备廂 400 L。
馬自達 CX-8 車身長 4500 mm，后备廂 450 L。
空間方面，馬自達 CX-8 嘅車身比寶騰 X70 長咗 100 mm，乘坐空間更有優勢。不過寶騰 X70 喺城市入面泊車會靈活啲，各有取捨。
寶騰 X70 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
馬自達 CX-8 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
兩部車嘅驅動方式一樣，都係 FWD，日常駕駛感覺唔會有太大分別。
總而言之，寶騰 X70 同馬自達 CX-8 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一部，關鍵係要睇你嘅個人需要同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再諗下點算或者去試駕做最後決定。買車係件大事，花啲時間做功課絕對無錯。
In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers compare Proton X70 and Mazda CX-3 when choosing a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning. Today we will do a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time doing research.
Proton X70 OTR price in Malaysia is RM 106,800 - 122,300, totaling 3 versions, including 1.5L Standard 2WD (RM 106,800), 1.5L Executive 2WD (RM 115,800), 1.5L Premium 2WD (RM 122,300), etc.
Mazda CX-3 OTR price in Malaysia is RM 126,159 - 139,159, totaling 2 versions, including 2023 2.0L High (RM 139,159), 2023 2.0L Plus (RM 126,159), etc.
Looking at the price, Proton X70's starting price is indeed RM 19,359 cheaper than Mazda CX-3. If your budget is limited, Proton's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. But be aware, the few thousand dollars cheaper, might mean compromises in equipment, depends on your needs.
Proton X70 is equipped with 1.5L Turbo, power 140 hp. Official fuel consumption 7.0 L/100km.
Mazda CX-3 is equipped with 1.5L Turbo, power 140 hp. Official fuel consumption 7.0 L/100km.
Both cars use the same powertrain, the driving experience is basically the same. Fuel consumption is also similar, no need to worry too much about this point.
Proton X70 body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
Mazda CX-3 body length 4500 mm, trunk 450 L.
In terms of space, Mazda CX-3 body is 100 mm longer than Proton X70, passenger space has more advantage. However, Proton X70 is more flexible for parking in the city, each has trade-offs.
Proton X70 adopts FWD drive type.
Mazda CX-3 adopts FWD drive type.
Both cars have the same drive type, both are FWD, daily driving experience will not have too much difference.
Overall, Proton X70 and Mazda CX-3 are both very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose, key depends on your personal needs and budget. It is recommended to do research, compare quotes from multiple dealers, and then test drive to make the final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending time doing research will definitely not be wrong.
The autonomous driving company Momenta has delivered heavy good news for overseas expansion. The company successfully obtained official approval from the German Federal Motor Transport Authority (KBA) and is authorized to conduct Level 4 autonomous driving road tests on city roads throughout Germany. This marks the first time a domestic autonomous driving enterprise has won Level 4 testing qualification for city roads across the entire German nation, indicating that China's high-level autonomous driving technology has officially obtained the clearance for full-domain implementation in the core European market, writing a milestone chapter for the global layout of the local intelligent driving industry.
After the positive news landed, the capital market quickly gave a positive feedback. Momenta's stock price surged over 10% intraday, fully confirming the market's high recognition of its overseas commercialization prospects. Industry analysts believe that this Germany nationwide testing license is not a single qualification breakthrough, but a key strategic layout for the landing of the enterprise's cooperation with the international giant Uber's European mobility project. As early as 2025, Momenta reached a deep strategic cooperation with the global top mobility platform Uber, confirming that Momenta autonomous driving taxi Robotaxi will be integrated into Uber's global mobility network. Munich was designated as the launch city for both parties' European projects. The landing of this full-Germany road test qualification will directly accelerate the scaled rollout of autonomous driving mobility services in Germany and even across the entire European region.
On the capital level, the binding relationship between the two continued to deepen. During Momenta's Hong Kong Stock IPO phase, SMB Holding Corporation, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Uber, continued to add capital to equity investment, winning 397,600 shares in the current public offering allocation segment. Tracing the previous financing process, SMB had completed the layout as early as September 2025 in the enterprise's Series C financing round, holding 791,055 preferred shares. With the stacking of two rounds of investment, Uber holds approximately 1.1887 million shares of Momenta in total. Business synergy combined with continuous capital injection created a three-dimensional deep cooperation system built by the two, forming a global development synergy integrating technology, funds, and channels.
As the "First Physical AI Stock" hotly discussed in the market, Momenta officially landed on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange on July 8. During the listing stage, it attracted widespread pursuit from global capital, fully displaying the technical attractiveness of domestic autonomous driving enterprises. Prospectus placement data shows that the oversubscription ratio of the enterprise's public offering shares reached 414 times; the international placement segment attracted institutional orders exceeding 100 billion Hong Kong dollars. Investors covered sovereign funds and long-term asset management institutions in 15 countries and regions globally. Top international long-term institutions such as Singapore Government Investment Corporation, Fidelity International, BlackRock, etc., all entered heavily as cornerstone and anchor investors.
Looking at industry development, developed overseas countries have strict access standards for autonomous driving testing, and Germany is even the highland of the global automotive industry, setting extremely high thresholds for autonomous driving safety and technical compliance. Momenta being able to obtain the full-Germany Level 4 testing license proves from the side that the safety, maturity, and compliance of domestic high-order autonomous driving solutions have reached international top standards. Unlike most enterprises limited to single-city pilots, the nationwide road test qualification grants the enterprise greater technology iteration space, allowing it to rely on Germany's complex and diverse urban road conditions to refine autonomous driving solutions adapted for European scenarios.
Currently, the pace of the domestic intelligent driving industry going global accelerates. Relying on its own Physical AI technology foundation, combined with the dual support of international mobility giant channels and capital, Momenta walks a differentiated global expansion path where technology export, capital cooperation, and commercial implementation proceed simultaneously. This landing of the Germany nationwide testing qualification is not only a key node in the enterprise's own global journey but also provides a replicable model for domestic autonomous driving enterprises entering the European high-end market, and is expected to continue to promote Chinese intelligent driving technology to the center of the global stage.
In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers compare the Proton X70 and Honda HR-V when choosing a car. These two models are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will conduct a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
The OTR price of Proton X70 in Malaysia is RM 106,800 - 122,300, with a total of 3 versions, including 1.5L Standard 2WD (RM 106,800), 1.5L Executive 2WD (RM 115,800), 1.5L Premium 2WD (RM 122,300), etc.
The OTR price of Honda HR-V in Malaysia is RM 115,900 - 143,900, with a total of 4 versions, including 2026 e:HEV 1.5L RS (RM 143,900), 2026 1.5T V (RM 137,900), 2026 1.5T E (RM 130,900), etc.
From a price perspective, the starting price of Proton X70 is indeed RM 9,100 cheaper than Honda HR-V. If your budget is limited, Proton's entry-level version is already sufficient for daily needs. However, note that the few thousand cheaper may involve trade-offs in specifications, depending on your needs.
Proton X70 comes with a 1.5L Turbo, horsepower 140 hp. Official fuel consumption 7.0 L/100km.
Honda HR-V comes with a 1.5L Turbo, horsepower 140 hp. Official fuel consumption 7.0 L/100km.
Both cars use the same powertrain system, so the driving experience feels basically the same in daily use. Fuel consumption is also similar, no need to worry too much about this point.
Proton X70 body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
Honda HR-V body length 4500 mm, trunk 450 L.
In terms of space, the Honda HR-V body is 100 mm longer than Proton X70, offering a better advantage in passenger space. However, Proton X70 is more flexible for parking in the city, each has trade-offs.
Proton X70 warranty 5 years/150,000km, service interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Honda HR-V warranty 5 years/unlimited mileage, service interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Overall, Proton X70 and Honda HR-V are both excellent models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends on your personal needs and budget. We suggest doing your research, comparing quotes from multiple dealerships, and test driving before making a final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending time doing research will never be wrong.
喺马来西亚嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拿住宝腾 X50 同起亚 Sportage 嚟做比較。呢兩款車喺價位同定位上都相當接近，今日我哋就從多個方面做一個詳細嘅比較，幫你節省咗做功課嘅時間。
宝腾 X50 喺马来西亚嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 89,800 - 113,300，一共有 4 個版本，包括 1.5T Executive（RM 89,800）、1.5T Premium（RM 101,800）、1.5T Flagship（RM 113,300）等等。
起亚 Sportage 喺马来西亚嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 129,639 - 179,320，一共有 4 個版本，包括 2025 1.6T DCT 4WD High（RM 179,320）、2025 1.6T DCT 2WD High（RM 159,320）、2025 2.0L AT 2WD High（RM 139,639）等等。
由價錢嚟睇，宝腾 X50 嘅起步價確實比起亚 Sportage 平咗 RM 39,839。如果你預算有限，宝腾嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需要。但要留意，平嗰幾千蚊，喺配備上可能有取捨，具體要睇你嘅需要。
宝腾 X50 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA)。
起亚 Sportage 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 Drive Wise。
呢兩款車嘅安全評級一樣，喺呢個級別入面安全配備都算係給得好齊全。而家嘅新車安全性都唔差，唔使太擔心呢一點。
宝腾 X50 保用 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
起亚 Sportage 保用 5 年/300,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
宝腾 X50 同起亚 Sportage 都係马来西亚市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更重視品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰一款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，就揀配置更豐富嗰款。最終都係建議兩款都去試駕，親身體驗先至係最重要嘅。
總體嚟講，宝腾 X50 同起亚 Sportage 都係马来西亚市場好唔錯嘅車型。揀邊輛，關鍵都係要睇你嘅個人需要同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，先至去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花啲時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
In the SUV market in Malaysia, many buyers compare Proton X50 and Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV when choosing a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save the time of doing research.
Proton X50 has an OTR price in Malaysia of RM 89,800 - 113,300, with a total of 4 versions, including 1.5T Executive (RM 89,800), 1.5T Premium (RM 101,800), 1.5T Flagship (RM 113,300), etc.
Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV has an OTR price in Malaysia of RM 159,750 - 159,750, with a total of 2 versions, including 1.6L Turbo Standard (RM 130,000), 1.6L Turbo Premium (RM 145,000), etc.
From a price perspective, Proton X50's starting price is indeed RM 69,950 cheaper than Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV. If your budget is limited, Proton's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. But be aware, the few thousand cheaper price may involve trade-offs in features, depending on your specific needs.
Proton X50 is equipped with a 1.5L 4-cyl, 105 hp. Official fuel consumption 6.0 L/100km.
Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV is equipped with Hybrid, 170 hp. Official fuel consumption 4.5 L/100km.
In terms of power, Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV's Hybrid has 65 more horsepower than Proton X50's 1.5L 4-cyl. However, for daily city driving, both cars have enough power and you won't feel underpowered.
Proton X50's safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV's safety rating is TBD, active safety systems include Basic.
Regarding safety features, both cars have received good ratings. However, there are some differences in function between Proton X50's ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA) and Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV's Basic. If you value active safety, you can compare their feature lists carefully.
Proton X50 warranty 5 years/150,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV warranty 3 years/100,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Proton X50 and Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV are both mainstream choices in the Malaysia market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, you can prioritize the one with better reputation; if you care more about value for money and features, then choose the one with richer configuration. Ultimately, it is recommended to test drive both, as personal experience is the most important.
In general, Proton X50 and Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV are both very good models in the Malaysia market. Which one to choose, the key still depends on your personal needs and budget. We suggest everyone do their research, compare quotes from several car dealerships, then go test drive to make the final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending some time doing research will definitely not be wrong.
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多人揀車嗰陣都會拿 Proton X50 同 Toyota Yaris Cross 做比較。這兩款車喺價位同定位上都好接近，今日我哋就從多個方面做一个詳細嘅對比，幫你省返做功課嘅時間。
Proton X50 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 89,800 - 113,300，一共有 4 個版本，包括 1.5T Executive（RM 89,800）、1.5T Premium（RM 101,800）、1.5T Flagship（RM 113,300） 等。
Toyota Yaris Cross 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 99,900 - 109,900，一共有 2 個版本，包括 2026 1.5L Standard（RM 99,900）、2026 HEV 1.5L Standard（RM 109,900） 等。
睇價錢嚟講，Proton X50 嘅起步價確實比 Toyota Yaris Cross 平咗 RM 10,100。如果你預算有限，Proton 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需要。但都要留意，平嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備上有取舍，具體要睇你嘅需求。
Proton X50 車身長 4400 mm，尾箱 400 L。
Toyota Yaris Cross 車身長 4400 mm，尾箱 400 L。
兩款車嘅尺寸幾乎一樣，車內空間差別唔大。呢級嘅車，日常使用完全夠用。
Proton X50 採用 4WD 驅動方式。
Toyota Yaris Cross 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
Proton 嘅 4WD 同 Toyota 嘅 FWD 喺操控上有唔同感覺，建議試駕比較。
Proton X50 同 Toyota Yaris Cross 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更睇重品牌口碑同二手價，可以首選口碑更好嗰一款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，那就揀配備更豐富嗰款。最終都係建議兩款都去試駕，親自體驗先係最重要。
總括嚟講，Proton X50 同 Toyota Yaris Cross 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車款。揀邊一輛，關鍵仲係要睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花啲時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
On July 16, engine sounds and applause intertwined inside the GAC Trumpchi plant. When a right-hand drive GAC Trumpchi M8 PHEV slowly rolled off the production line and the spotlight hit the car body, GAC Group officially announced that it had welcomed its 30 millionth user in its development history. This day, leaders from Guangdong Province, Guangzhou City, and Panyu District, Fu Bingfeng, Executive Vice President and Secretary-General of China Association of Automobile Manufacturers, Feng Xingya, Chairman of GAC Group, He Xianqing, General Manager, and other core management personnel, along with global suppliers, dealers, owners from home and abroad, and media representatives were all present to witness this historic snapshot defined as "from scale expansion to value leap".
From GAC's establishment in 1997 to the first whole vehicle rolling off the line, and to today's breakthrough of the 30 million level, GAC took 29 years. If we break down this timeline: from 0 to 10 million vehicles, it took 20 years; from 10 million to 30 million vehicles, it took only 9 years. This acceleration is not just the enterprise's own growth curve, but also a microcosm of the Chinese automobile industry from joint venture introduction, self-owned rise to global breakthrough. But beyond flowers and numbers, through this "30 Million User Gratitude Event", we can see more clearly a veteran automotive group's persistence and shift during the deep reshaping period of the industry.
The Significance of 30 Million: Not a Single Myth, but Matrix Synergy
There was a highly symbolic detail at the event site: GAC's multiple global production bases connected synchronously, GAC Honda P7, GAC Toyota BZ7, Qijing GT7, GAC Aion N60, GAC Hyper S600, respectively rolled off the line as vehicles numbered from 29,999,995 to 29,999,999, subsequently the 30 millionth whole vehicle — right-hand drive Trumpchi M8 PHEV appeared at the center of the stage. The full line of new energy vehicle matrix appeared collectively, which is not common in past milestone celebrations.
This arrangement reveals two signals: Firstly, GAC's 30 million volume does not rely on any "god car" or single sector to pull, but the result of joint ventures (GAC Honda, GAC Toyota), self-owned (Trumpchi, Aion, Hyper), new sequences (Qijing), and new energy transformation parallel lines; Secondly, the 30 millionth vehicle chose a right-hand drive plug-in hybrid MPV and was delivered to Thai owner Tony Jaa (famous movie star "Ong Bak" leading actor), clearly tying together the two main threads of "new energy transformation" and "globalization and going overseas". This is not only for domestic users to see, but also to convey confidence to the global market: GAC's product structure has thoroughly crossed the boundaries of the pure fuel era.
Data supports this shift. In the first half of 2026, GAC Group cumulative sales reached 773,100 vehicles, a year-on-year growth of 2.35%; among them, new energy vehicle sales reached 260,200 vehicles, a significant year-on-year increase of 68.8%, the proportion of energy-saving and new energy vehicle models has been raised to 62.82%; overseas exports also broke through 120,000 vehicles, a year-on-year growth of 132%, simultaneous high growth in five major regions: Americas, Asia-Pacific, Middle East, Africa, and Europe. Against the background of pressure on the industry overall market, new energy and going overseas have become GAC's dual engines to cross the cycle.
"Old-school Stubbornness" on the Quality Bottom Line: Slowing Down in a Fast Era
In the speech, one sentence by Feng Xingya was repeatedly quoted: "Quality is the bottom line GAC will never cede." "Some things can seek speed and newness, some things absolutely cannot seek quantity or strength." Today when intelligentization, price wars, and iteration speed are infinitely amplified, this statement seems somewhat "old-fashioned", but precisely it is the foundation behind the 30 million sales.
GAC's quality philosophy has its historical origins. As one of the earliest car enterprises in China to systematically introduce joint venture experience, GAC absorbed Honda's Total Quality Management (TQM) and Toyota's Lean Production Method (TPS) early on, then integrating Lingnan pragmatist culture, built an "Integration and Innovation" quality management model. This gene has been continued to independent R&D and manufacturing links: before each new car hits the market, it must undergo extreme environment tests such as "high cold, high heat, high altitude, high humidity, high corrosion, mountainous areas, sand and dust" known as "Five Highs, One Mountain, One Dust", complete "Two Winters, One Summer" field road tests; whole vehicle verification covers 12 major items and over 1,500 sub-items; GAC Aion Smart Ecological Factory as the world's first new energy vehicle "Lighthouse Factory", ensuring mass production consistency with digital intelligent manufacturing.
In safety technology, GAC proposed "Safety must be defined by automakers". Xingling Safety Protection System builds four major protection dimensions, eight key systems adopt dual redundancy design, has protected nearly 2 million users, avoided 6.28 million potential travel risks; Magazine Battery cumulative installation of 1.5 million vehicles, safe driving over 160 billion kilometers. Targeting user anxiety, GAC took the lead in the industry to launch the self-owned brand "Three Commitments" policy, actively underwriting for battery and intelligent driving assistance issues. These invisible investments constitute the implicit costs for the 30 million users to "drive with peace of mind".
From Engineer Thinking to User Thinking: The Turn of Organizational Mechanism
"In the past, we always stood from the engineer's perspective to polish technology, today we must completely stand from the user's perspective to examine experience." Feng Xingya summarized the 30 million moment with four words: "Gratitude, Persistence, Sincerity, Co-journey", among which "Sincerity" points directly to the reconstruction of user relationships.
This reconstruction is not a slogan. GAC regularly holds "User All Open Mic" events, inviting users to headquarters to "nitpick" face-to-face, and establish a full-process closed-loop management mechanism, ensuring every suggestion is traceable, common issues fully optimized; organizationally established a dedicated User Insight Department, promoting the full-process transformation from problem discovery to solution. Service network is also sinking: planned to add 1,000 county-level authorized stores this year, currently 600 recognized; online and offline "Super Butler" service, committed to 5-second response, 2-hour request handling; recharging end built "9 Verticals, 10 Horizontals" network, covering 31 provinces, 213 cities, self-operated charging piles over 27,000, in core urban areas a station must be within 1 km straight line. From the frontline where guns can be heard to backend mechanisms, GAC attempts to bring "people-oriented" down to executable details.
Long Slope and Thick Snow: From Commuting Tool to Ecosystem Tech
30 million is a milestone, and also a new starting point. On the electrification and intelligence tracks, GAC presents a systematic technology matrix rather than point breakthroughs:
Power Field: "National Excellent Engineer Team" developed Xingyuan Power covers Xingyuan Range Extender, Xingyuan Plug-in Hybrid, Xingyuan Super Twin three technologies, every product passed 100,000 hours bench and equivalent over 10 million kilometers verification;
Three Electrics Field: Completed all-solid-state battery pilot production line, Quark Electric Drive Motor maximum efficiency broke through 99%, tackling ultra-fast charging and low-range endurance pain points;
Intelligent Connectivity: Super Brain Xingling Architecture 4.0 connects intelligent driving, cockpit, powertrain, chassis, body, and vehicle networking six domains, comprehensive performance improved by 40%; Galaxy Smart Cockpit Terminal-Cloud Integrated, integrating Qianwen Large Model, letting cars evolve from commuting tools to "thinking partners";
Open Ecosystem: Co-building AI Intelligent Ecosystem with Huawei, CATL, Didi, Tencent, Alibaba, etc., cumulative R&D investment over 62 billion yuan, global R&D team over 6,800 people.
The direction of these technology investments is very clear: GAC aims to advance from traditional manufacturing enterprise to "Ecosystem Tech GAC", products will extend from mobile space to green energy ecosystem.
When Feng Xingya handed the 30 millionth vehicle key to Thai owner Tony Jaa, what the lens froze was not just a number, but the crossing-the-sea moment of Made in China from "sold out" to "trusted". 30 million users are a mirror, revealing GAC's 29 years of persistence and transformation, also revealing the exam question of the next stage: in the future of global competition, tech iteration, and user needs fragmentation, how to use the same quality determination and user sincerity to run the next 30 million well?
The answer might be written in the "GAC Group 30 Million Vehicle Rollout · Renewal Gratitude Season" launched that day — six major brands simultaneously launched new purchase, trade-in, and additional purchase feedback policies, responding to companionship with tangible benefits. But a longer-term answer than short-term feedback is hidden in those extreme environment test mileages, in Xingling Architecture's redundancy design, in county store signboards, and in every suggestion seriously handled after every "User All Open Mic".
30 million is not the end, but the next starting line of "mutual journey" between GAC and global users.
In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers compare Perodua Aruz and MG MG HS when choosing a car. These two models are quite close in price and positioning. Today we will do a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
Perodua Aruz OTR price in Malaysia is RM 72,900 - 77,900, there are 2 versions in total, including 1.5L X (RM 72,900), 1.5L AV (RM 77,900), etc.
MG MG HS OTR price in Malaysia is RM 130,450 - 146,450, there are 2 versions in total, including 1.5L Standard (RM 105,000), 1.5L Executive (RM 115,000), etc.
In terms of price, Perodua Aruz's starting price is indeed RM 57,550 cheaper than MG MG HS. If your budget is limited, Perodua's entry-level version is already sufficient for daily needs. But also note, the price difference of a few thousand might involve trade-offs in features, depending on your specific needs.
Perodua Aruz comes with 1.5L 4-cyl, 105 hp. Official fuel consumption 6.0 L/100km.
MG MG HS comes with 1.5L Turbo, 140 hp. Official fuel consumption 7.0 L/100km.
Regarding power, MG MG HS's 1.5L Turbo has 35 more horsepower than Perodua Aruz's 1.5L 4-cyl. However, for daily city driving, both cars have sufficient power, you won't feel underpowered.
Perodua Aruz safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include .
MG MG HS safety rating is TBD, active safety systems include Basic.
Perodua Aruz warranty 5 years/150,000km, service interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
MG MG HS warranty 7 years/150,000km, service interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Overall, Perodua Aruz and MG MG HS are both very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose mainly depends on your personal needs and budget. We recommend doing your research, comparing quotes from several car dealers, and then test driving to make the final decision. Buying a car is a major purchase, spending some time researching will never be a mistake.
7 月 16 日，廣汽集團正式迎來累計交付 3000 萬台嘅重要里程碑，同步啟動全品牌 3000 萬用戶感恩回饋活動。29 年深耕汽車賽道，從零起步到收穫三千萬用戶信賴，呢份亮眼成績，即係廣汽堅持長期品質主義嘅成果，亦係中國汽車產業高質量發展嘅真實縮影。
能收穫 3000 萬車主長久選擇，核心根基在於廣汽一以貫之嘅嚴苛品控體系。所有新車上市前必須完成「兩冬一夏」長週期極限測試，還要奔赴高溫、極寒、高海拔、沙塵等「五高一山一塵」全域場景驗證；依托全球一體化整車風洞、國內高標準綜合試驗場與埃安全球新能源燈塔工廠，廣汽實現設計、測試、生產全鏈路數字化管控，焊裝車間數百台工業機器人搭配 AI 視覺檢測，數千個車身緊固點數據終身可追溯，從源頭守住製造精度。
安全層面，廣汽打造完善全域防護體系。彈匣電池累計裝車 150 萬輛，累計行駛里程突破 1600 億公里；星靈安全守護系統上線以來，累計規避 628 萬次潛在行車風險。行業首創「三擔責」服務承諾，針對三電自燃、電池過度衰減、智能泊車事故三大用戶核心顧慮給出兜底保障，搭配高標準籠式車身、高佔比高強度鋼材，把安全貫穿車輛全生命週期。長期嚴苛品控也收獲權威認可，廣汽斬獲中國質量獎提名獎，旗下多品牌常年佔據細分保值率、質量榜單前列。
持續鉅額研發投入，係廣汽品質不斷進階嘅底氣。截至 2025 年底，廣汽自主研發累計投入超 620 億元，專利申請總量突破 2.49 萬件，發明專利超 1.12 萬件。星靈架構 4.0、星河智艙、星源動力、星艦車身四大自研核心技術全面落地，同時攜手華為乾崑打造啟境 GT 等高端智能車型，實現智駕、座艙、動力技術協同突破，兼顧家用舒適與前沿科技，讓不同預算用戶都能享受到高標準產品。
如果說硬核品質係廣汽嘅內生根基，那麼體系化全球化戰略就係企業第二增長曲線。唔同於簡單整車出口，廣汽依托「One GAC 2.0」戰略，實現研發、生產、供應鏈、銷售服務全價值鏈海外扎根，徹底擺脫單純賣車嘅傳統出海模式。目前廣汽業務覆蓋亞太、中東、美洲、歐洲五大板塊共計 110 個國家，落地 7 座海外生產基地、9 個零部件倉庫、746 家海外銷售服務網點，完整本地化運營體系助力產品適應各國法規與用戶需求。
海外市場增長勢頭迅猛，2026 上半年廣汽自主品牌出口量達 12.15 萬輛，同比大漲 132%，半年銷量已接近 2025 全年水平。區域市場多點開花，泰國市場 6 月銷量環比增幅達 207%，歐洲市場新能源車型穩步落地，巴西、哥倫比亞等美洲國家車型銷量倍數增長。面向長遠，廣汽定下清晰全球化目標：2030 年業務覆蓋 120 個國家，海外線下網點突破 2000 家，年海外銷量衝擊 100 萬輛，讓「廣汽智造」持續擴大全球市場份額。
為回饋 3000 萬全球車主，7 月 16 日至 8 月 31 日，廣汽旗下廣汽本田、廣汽豐田、廣汽傳祺、埃安、昊鉑、啟境六大品牌同步推出購車福利，新購直降、低息金融、高額置換、家庭增購多重禮遇疊加，覆蓋燃油、混動、純電、增程全品類車型，多款主力車型同步在海外內工廠下線，啟境 GT7、傳祺 M8 PHEV、埃安 N60 等重磅產品集中亮相，直觀展現廣汽全矩陣產品實力。
回望 29 年發展，廣汽歷經合資起步、自主崛起、電動智能轉型、全球生態拓展四次跨越式升級，3000 萬台交付里程碑唔係終點，而是全新起點。未來廣汽將繼續堅守精工品質長期主義，持續加碼核心技術自研，同步深化全價值鏈全球化佈局，以可靠產品、完善服務走向世界，持續擦亮中國汽車工業智造名片。
In Malaysia's SUV market, many buyers compare Perodua Aruz and Mazda CX-3 when choosing a car. The pricing and positioning of these two models are quite close. Today, we will conduct a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to save you time doing research.
Perodua Aruz OTR price in Malaysia is RM 72,900 - 77,900, with a total of 2 versions, including 1.5L X (RM 72,900), 1.5L AV (RM 77,900), etc.
Mazda CX-3 OTR price in Malaysia is RM 126,159 - 139,159, with a total of 2 versions, including 2023 2.0L High (RM 139,159), 2023 2.0L Plus (RM 126,159), etc.
From a price perspective, Perodua Aruz's starting price is indeed RM 53,259 cheaper than Mazda CX-3. If your budget is limited, Perodua's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. However, note that the few thousand dollars saved might involve compromises in features, which depends on your specific needs.
Perodua Aruz is equipped with a 1.5L 4-cyl, 105 hp. Official fuel consumption 6.0 L/100km.
Mazda CX-3 is equipped with a 1.5L Turbo, 140 hp. Official fuel consumption 7.0 L/100km.
In terms of power, Mazda CX-3's 1.5L Turbo has 35 hp more than Perodua Aruz's 1.5L 4-cyl. However, for daily city driving, both cars have sufficient power, you won't feel underpowered.
Perodua Aruz body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
Mazda CX-3 body length 4500 mm, trunk 450 L.
Regarding space, Mazda CX-3's body is 100 mm longer than Perodua Aruz, offering better passenger space. However, Perodua Aruz is more flexible for parking in the city, each has trade-offs.
Perodua Aruz adopts FWD drive system.
Mazda CX-3 adopts FWD drive system.
Both cars have the same drive system, both are FWD, daily driving experience won't differ much.
Perodua Aruz warranty 5 years/150,000km, service interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Mazda CX-3 warranty 5 years/150,000km, service interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Warranty conditions for both cars are the same, no need to worry about this. Actual maintenance costs depend on the brand's service network and parts prices. Suggest asking real owners in car groups about their experience.
Overall, Perodua Aruz and Mazda CX-3 are both very good models in the Malaysian market. Choosing which one depends mainly on your personal needs and budget. We suggest doing your research, comparing quotes from multiple dealerships, and then test driving to make the final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending time researching will never be wrong.
In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers compare Perodua Ativa and Chery Tiggo Cross when choosing a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
Perodua Ativa's OTR price in Malaysia is RM 62,500 - 73,400, with a total of 3 versions, including 1.0L Turbo X (RM 62,500), 1.0L Turbo H (RM 67,300), 1.0L Turbo AV (RM 73,400), etc.
Chery Tiggo Cross's OTR price in Malaysia is RM 88,750 - 99,750, with a total of 2 versions, including 2025 HEV 1.5L CSH (RM 99,750), 2025 1.5T Standard (RM 88,750), etc.
From the price perspective, Perodua Ativa's starting price is indeed RM 26,250 cheaper than Chery Tiggo Cross. If your budget is limited, Perodua's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. But be aware that the few thousand cheaper may involve trade-offs in features, depending on your specific requirements.
Perodua Ativa is equipped with 1.5L 4-cyl, horsepower 105 hp. Official fuel consumption 6.0 L/100km.
Chery Tiggo Cross is equipped with 1.5L 4-cyl, horsepower 105 hp. Official fuel consumption 6.0 L/100km.
Both cars use the same powertrain system, and the driving feel is basically the same in daily use. Fuel consumption is also similar, so no need to worry too much about this point.
Perodua Ativa's safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include ASA 3.0 + ACC + LDA + LKA + BSM + RCTA.
Chery Tiggo Cross's safety rating is TBD, active safety systems include Basic.
Regarding safety features, both cars have received good ratings. However, Perodua Ativa's ASA 3.0 + ACC + LDA + LKA + BSM + RCTA and Chery Tiggo Cross's Basic have some differences in functions. If you value active safety, you can compare their feature lists in detail.
Perodua Ativa warranty 5 years/150,000km, service interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Chery Tiggo Cross warranty 3 years/100,000km, service interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Overall, Perodua Ativa and Chery Tiggo Cross are both excellent models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends on your personal needs and budget. It is recommended to do your homework, compare quotes from several car dealers, and go for a test drive to make the final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending time on research will never be wrong.
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拿 Perodua Ativa 同 Chery Tiggo 7 Pro 嚟作比較。這兩款車喺價位同定位上都幾接近，今日我哋就從多個角度做一個詳細嘅比較，幫你節省做功課嘅時間。
Perodua Ativa 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 62,500 - 73,400，一共有 3 個版本，包括 1.0L Turbo X（RM 62,500）、1.0L Turbo H（RM 67,300）、1.0L Turbo AV（RM 73,400） 等。
Chery Tiggo 7 Pro 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 123,750 - 123,750，一共有 2 個版本，包括 1.6L Turbo Standard（RM 125,000）、1.6L Turbo Premium（RM 140,000） 等。
從價格來看，Perodua Ativa 嘅起步價確實比 Chery Tiggo 7 Pro 便宜咗 RM 61,250。如果你預算有限，Perodua 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需求。但都要注意，便宜嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備上會有取捨，具體要看你嘅需求。
Perodua Ativa 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 ASA 3.0 + ACC + LDA + LKA + BSM + RCTA。
Chery Tiggo 7 Pro 嘅安全評級係 TBD，主動安全系統包括 Basic。
安全配備方面，兩款車都拿到唔錯嘅評級。不過 Perodua Ativa 嘅 ASA 3.0 + ACC + LDA + LKA + BSM + RCTA 同 Chery Tiggo 7 Pro 嘅 Basic 喺功能上有少少分別，如果你比較睇重主動安全嘅話，可以仔細比較下兩者嘅功能列表。
Perodua Ativa 車身長 4400 mm，尾箱 400 L。
Chery Tiggo 7 Pro 車身長 4400 mm，尾箱 400 L。
兩款車嘅尺寸幾乎一樣，車內空間分別唔大。呢個級別嘅車，日常使用完全夠用。
Perodua Ativa 保修 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Chery Tiggo 7 Pro 保修 3 年/100,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Perodua Ativa 同 Chery Tiggo 7 Pro 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更睇重品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰一款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，就選配備更豐富嗰款。最終都係建議兩款都去試駕，親身體驗先係最重要嘅。
總嘅嚟講，Perodua Ativa 同 Chery Tiggo 7 Pro 都係馬來西亞市場好唔錯嘅車款。揀邊一輛，關鍵係睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
