首頁NIO ET5
搜尋歷史
熱門搜尋
經銷商登入 / 註冊
In Malaysia's SUV market, many buyers compare Proton X90 and Toyota Fortuner when selecting a car. These two cars are quite close in terms of price and positioning. Today, we will conduct a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
Proton X90 OTR price in Malaysia is RM 106,800 - 122,800, with a total of 4 versions, including 2026 1.5T Prime X (RM 122,800), 2026 1.5T Prime (RM 116,800), 2026 1.5T Lite (RM 106,800) etc.
Toyota Fortuner OTR price in Malaysia is RM 195,880 - 241,880, with a total of 3 versions, including 2024 2.8T VRZ Diesel (RM 241,880), 2024 2.7L SRZ Petrol (RM 202,880), 2024 2.4L Standard Diesel (RM 195,880) etc.
From a price perspective, the starting price of Proton X90 is indeed RM 89,080 cheaper than Toyota Fortuner. If your budget is limited, Proton's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. However, please note that the savings of a few thousand may involve trade-offs in features, depending on your specific needs.
Proton X90 is equipped with 1.5L Turbo, horsepower 140 hp. Official fuel consumption 7.0 L/100km.
Toyota Fortuner is equipped with 2.5L Diesel, horsepower 187 hp. Official fuel consumption 8.5 L/100km.
In terms of power, Toyota Fortuner's 2.5L Diesel has 47 more horsepower than Proton X90's 1.5L Turbo. However, for daily driving in the city, the power of both cars is sufficient, you won't feel lacking power.
Proton X90's safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
Toyota Fortuner's safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include .
Both cars have the same safety rating, in this class safety features are quite complete. New cars nowadays don't have bad safety, no need to worry too much about this.
Proton X90 adopts FWD drive type.
Toyota Fortuner adopts FWD drive type.
Both cars have the same drive type, both are FWD, daily driving experience will not have much difference.
Overall, Proton X90 and Toyota Fortuner are both very good models in the Malaysia market. Which one to choose, it depends on your personal needs and budget. We suggest doing research, comparing quotes from several dealers, and then test driving to make the final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending some time on research will definitely not be wrong.
In the SUV market in Malaysia, many buyers compare Proton X70 and Mitsubishi Xforce when choosing a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning. Today we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time doing research.
The OTR price of Proton X70 in Malaysia is RM 106,800 - 122,300, with a total of 3 versions, including 1.5L Standard 2WD (RM 106,800), 1.5L Executive 2WD (RM 115,800), 1.5L Premium 2WD (RM 122,300), etc.
The OTR price of Mitsubishi Xforce in Malaysia is RM 109,930 - 119,930, with a total of 2 versions, including 2026 1.5L Ultimate (RM 119,930), 2026 1.5L Urban (RM 109,930), etc.
From a price perspective, the starting price of Proton X70 is indeed RM 3,130 cheaper than Mitsubishi Xforce. If your budget is limited, Proton's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. But be aware, the few thousand ringgit cheaper, there might be trade-offs in equipment, depending on your needs.
Proton X70 safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
Mitsubishi Xforce safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety system includes MI-PILOT.
Both cars have the same safety rating, safety features in this class are quite comprehensive. New cars nowadays are not lacking in safety, no need to worry too much about this.
Proton X70 body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
Mitsubishi Xforce body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
The dimensions of both cars are almost the same, interior space difference is not large. Cars in this class are sufficient for daily use.
Proton X70 warranty 5 years/150,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Mitsubishi Xforce warranty 3 years/100,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Overall, Proton X70 and Mitsubishi Xforce are both very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose ultimately depends on your personal needs and budget. It is recommended to do your research, compare quotes from several dealerships, and go for a test drive to make the final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending time doing research will never be wrong.
In the SUV market in Malaysia, many buyers compare the Proton X70 and GWM Haval H6 when choosing a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning. Today we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
The Proton X70 OTR price in Malaysia is RM 106,800 - 122,300, with a total of 3 versions, including 1.5L Standard 2WD (RM 106,800), 1.5L Executive 2WD (RM 115,800), 1.5L Premium 2WD (RM 122,300), etc.
The GWM Haval H6 OTR price in Malaysia is RM 139,750 - 139,750, with a total of 2 versions, including 1.5L Turbo Standard (RM 140,000), 1.5L Turbo Premium (RM 155,000), etc.
In terms of price, the starting price of the Proton X70 is indeed RM 32,950 cheaper than the GWM Haval H6. If your budget is limited, the Proton entry-level version can already meet daily needs. But note that the few thousand cheaper amount might involve trade-offs in features, depending on your specific needs.
The safety rating of the Proton X70 is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), with active safety systems including ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
The safety rating of the GWM Haval H6 is TBD, with active safety systems including Basic.
Regarding safety features, both cars have received good ratings. However, the Proton X70's ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA) and the GWM Haval H6's Basic have some differences in functionality. If you value active safety more, you can compare the feature lists of both in detail.
The Proton X70 uses FWD drive mode.
The GWM Haval H6 uses FWD drive mode.
Both cars have the same drive mode, which is FWD, so there won't be much difference in the daily driving experience.
Both the Proton X70 and GWM Haval H6 are mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, you can prioritize the one with better reputation; if you care more about cost-performance ratio and features, then choose the one with richer configuration. Ultimately, it is recommended to test drive both, personal experience is the most important.
Overall, both the Proton X70 and GWM Haval H6 are very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose mainly depends on your personal needs and budget. We recommend doing your homework, comparing quotes from several dealerships, and then test driving to make the final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending time doing research will definitely not be wrong.
今天在香港启德看曼城对国米，这场比赛还有一个隐藏的主角：比亚迪。
场上是两支欧洲豪门，场外停着比亚迪出海的车型，很有气势！
国内的方程豹豹5，出海时放进了腾势体系，这个细节挺值得琢磨——比亚迪出海已经开始根据不同市场，重新组织自己的品牌表达。
这两年比亚迪对足球的投入也越来越密集：从2024欧洲杯、美洲杯，到国际米兰、曼城，再到刚刚签约的巴黎圣日耳曼。
体育赛事的价值也在这里。它能把汽车带进一个有共同情绪、愿意投入时间和消费的真实人群里。现场几万名球迷的欢呼，比一块孤零零的广告牌更容易留下记忆。
今天打动我的画面还有看台上的足球少年。
他们当中有中国足球小将，也有从新疆伊犁、陕西宁陕、贵州兴仁、普安等地赶来的孩子。
比赛一开始，几个人握着拳头站起来大喊，眼睛完全离不开球场，这感觉比专业解说可有意思多了！
对他们来说，第一次走进五万人的球场、亲眼看世界级球员比赛，可能会把他的梦想一下子放大很多倍。很多年以后，他们也许已经记不清这场比赛的比分，却会一直记得几万人同时欢呼的声音。
中国汽车已经跑向世界。也希望这些足球少年，有一天同样能被世界看见。
In Malaysia's SUV market, many buyers compare Proton X70 and Mazda CX-3 when choosing a car. These two models are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will conduct a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
Proton X70's OTR price in Malaysia is RM 106,800 - 122,300, with a total of 3 versions, including 1.5L Standard 2WD (RM 106,800), 1.5L Executive 2WD (RM 115,800), 1.5L Premium 2WD (RM 122,300), etc.
Mazda CX-3's OTR price in Malaysia is RM 126,159 - 139,159, with a total of 2 versions, including 2023 2.0L High (RM 139,159), 2023 2.0L Plus (RM 126,159), etc.
From a price perspective, Proton X70's starting price is indeed RM 19,359 cheaper than Mazda CX-3. If your budget is limited, Proton's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. But note, the few thousand difference might involve trade-offs in features, depending on your needs.
Proton X70 is equipped with 1.5L Turbo, 140 hp. Official fuel consumption 7.0 L/100km.
Mazda CX-3 is equipped with 1.5L Turbo, 140 hp. Official fuel consumption 7.0 L/100km.
Both cars use the same powertrain, and the driving experience feels basically the same. Fuel economy is also similar, so don't worry too much about this.
Proton X70's safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
Mazda CX-3's safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include i-Activsense.
Both cars have the same safety rating, and safety features are quite comprehensive at this level. New cars nowadays generally have good safety, so don't worry too much about this.
Proton X70 warranty 5 years/150,000km, service interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Mazda CX-3 warranty 5 years/150,000km, service interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Both cars have the same warranty conditions, no need to worry about this. Actual maintenance costs depend on the brand's service network and parts prices, it is recommended to ask real owners in car owner groups for experience.
Proton X70 and Mazda CX-3 are both mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, consider the one with better reputation first; if you care more about cost-performance and features, choose the one with richer configuration. Ultimately, it is recommended to test drive both, as personal experience is most important.
Overall, Proton X70 and Mazda CX-3 are both very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose mainly depends on your personal needs and budget. We suggest doing your research, comparing quotes from multiple dealerships, and then test driving to make the final decision. Buying a car is a major event, spending time on research is never wrong.
In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers compare Proton X70 and Honda WR-V when choosing a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will do a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
Proton X70's OTR price in Malaysia is RM 106,800 - 122,300, with a total of 3 versions, including 1.5L Standard 2WD (RM 106,800), 1.5L Executive 2WD (RM 115,800), 1.5L Premium 2WD (RM 122,300), etc.
Honda WR-V's OTR price in Malaysia is RM 89,900 - 107,900, with a total of 4 versions, including 2023 1.5L V (RM 99,900), 2023 1.5L E (RM 95,900), 2023 1.5L S (RM 89,900), etc.
From a price perspective, the starting price of Honda WR-V is RM 16,900 cheaper than Proton X70. Honestly, in this price range, a difference of a few thousand isn't actually that big; the key is still looking at overall value and long-term usage costs.
Proton X70 is equipped with 1.5L Turbo, 140 hp. Official fuel consumption 7.0 L/100km.
Honda WR-V is equipped with 1.5L 4-cyl, 105 hp. Official fuel consumption 6.0 L/100km.
In terms of power, Proton X70's 1.5L Turbo has 35 more horsepower than Honda WR-V's 1.5L 4-cyl, offering more confidence in mid-range acceleration, especially when overtaking on highways. However, Honda WR-V's fuel consumption might be more friendly; the difference in daily city commuting won't be too significant.
Proton X70 warranty 5 years/150,000km, service interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Honda WR-V warranty 5 years/unlimited mileage, service interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Both Proton X70 and Honda WR-V are mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, you can prioritize the one with a better reputation; if you care more about cost-performance and features, then choose the model with richer configuration. Ultimately, it is recommended to test drive both, as firsthand experience is the most important.
Overall, both Proton X70 and Honda WR-V are very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends on your personal needs and budget. It is recommended to do your homework, compare quotes from a few dealerships, and then test drive to make a final decision. Buying a car is a big matter; spending some time researching will never be wrong.
In Malaysia's SUV market, many buyers compare Proton X50 and Chery Tiggo 9 when choosing a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning. Today we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
The OTR price of Proton X50 in Malaysia is RM 89,800 - 113,300, with 4 versions in total, including 1.5T Executive (RM 89,800), 1.5T Premium (RM 101,800), 1.5T Flagship (RM 113,300), etc.
The OTR price of Chery Tiggo 9 in Malaysia is RM 166,800 - 179,800, with 1 version in total, including 2026 2.0T Standard (RM 179,750), etc.
From a price perspective, the starting price of Proton X50 is indeed RM 77,000 cheaper than Chery Tiggo 9. If your budget is limited, Proton's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. But also note, the few thousand savings might involve trade-offs in features, it depends on your needs.
Proton X50 comes with a 1.5L 4-cyl, 105 hp. Official fuel consumption 6.0 L/100km.
Chery Tiggo 9 comes with a 2.0L 4-cyl, 170 hp. Official fuel consumption 8.0 L/100km.
In terms of power, Chery Tiggo 9's 2.0L 4-cyl has 65 hp more than Proton X50's 1.5L 4-cyl. However, for daily driving in the city, both cars have sufficient power and won't feel underpowered.
Proton X50 Body Length 4400 mm, Trunk 400 L.
Chery Tiggo 9 Body Length 4400 mm, Trunk 400 L.
The dimensions of both cars are almost identical, and the difference in interior space is not significant. For cars at this level, daily use is completely sufficient.
Proton X50 and Chery Tiggo 9 are both mainstream choices in the Malaysia market, suitable for family use and daily commute. If you value brand reputation and resale price more, you can prioritize the one with better reputation; if you care more about value for money and features, then choose the one with richer configurations. Ultimately it is suggested to test drive both, personal experience is the most important.
Overall, Proton X50 and Chery Tiggo 9 are both very good models in the Malaysia market. Which one to choose mainly depends on your personal needs and budget. It is recommended to do your research well, compare quotes from multiple dealerships, and then test drive to make the final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending some time doing research will definitely not be wrong.
近日，第八屆「中國卓越管理公司」（BMC）榜單在雄安新區揭曉。中國輪胎商務網（Tirechina.net）獲悉，凌龍輪胎成功蟬聯這一被譽為「中國企業管理奧斯卡」的權威獎項，成為輪胎行業唯一連續兩屆獲此殊榮的企業。
「中國卓越管理公司」（BMC）項目是德勤擁有 32 年歷史的全球性權威獎項，也是目前中國唯一針對企業管理體系進行全面評估的國際獎項。本屆評選歷時 6 個月，評審團通過閉門推薦、企業家訪談及專家調研，運用全球統一的「德勤 BMC 卓越管理標準」，對企業進行了全方位、高標準的嚴格評估。
本屆 BMC 評選釋放出清晰信號：中國領先民營企業正從「中國冠軍」邁向「世界冠軍」。玲瓏連續兩年獲獎，不僅體現了國際專業機構對其全球化戰略佈局、數字化轉型成效以及可持續發展理念的高度認可，更是對其作為中國輪胎行業領軍者地位的有力背書。
以卓越管理定義行業標杆
作為蟬聯 BMC 大獎的輪胎企業，玲瓏輪胎在技術研發、全球佈局、智能製造與綠色轉型等關鍵領域持續深耕，構成了此次蟬聯的深層底氣。
技術研發與產品創新：搶佔新能源與綠色材料制高點。 公司持續將研發投入向新能源賽道傾斜，聚焦低滾阻、靜音棉、超耐磨等電動車專用技術攻關，已形成覆蓋全系列新能源車型的產品矩陣。2026 年，玲瓏大師二代產品依托第七代技術平台全面上市，實現了濕地操控、靜謐駕乘、超長里程等「全週期巔峰性能」，高附加值產品佔比穩步提升。今年以來，玲瓏產品在歐洲權威測評中頻傳捷報：《Auto Bild》夏季胎預選奪得第一，德國《Netzwelt》測試總分第二、獲評「最具價值」，ACE 歐洲汽車俱樂部測試中成為唯一入圍並表現優異的中國品牌。
全球化產能與市場協同：從「產品出海」到「體系出海」全面落地。 玲瓏已建成中國、德國、美國「三國八地」全球研發體系，泰國與塞爾維亞兩大海外基地實現穩定量產，其中塞爾維亞工廠作為中國輪胎在歐洲的首個生產基地，已通過大眾、奧迪、寶馬等德系豪華品牌審核，進入歐洲主流供應鏈。公司與全球十大車企中八家建立配套合作，累計配套輪胎超 3 億條。在國內市場，玲瓏構建了近 3 萬家店門渠道網絡及四級配送體系，新零售「智慧門店系統」實現庫存、銷售、服務的全鏈路數據化管理。
智能製造與數字化轉型：以數據驅動「零缺陷」製造。 玲瓏持續推進工廠智能化改造，依托工業互聯網平台實現從原材料採購到生產製造、終端配送的全流程數據貫通與質量可控，人工質檢誤差率顯著降低。供應鏈協同平台打通了跨工廠、跨區域的產能調配鏈路，訂單交付效率持續優化，為全球客戶提供了更具韌性的供應保障。
ESG 與綠色供應鏈建設：將可持續發展刻入企業基因。 玲瓏明確了「2030 年碳達峰、2050 年碳中和」的清晰路線圖，較巴黎協定目標提前十年。公司已在多個生產基地推進屋頂光伏覆蓋，2026 年可再生能源使用比例穩步提升。與此同時，玲瓏聯合下游夥伴共建廢舊輪胎再生循環網絡，推動輪胎全生命週期管理，以實際行動構建循環經濟模式。
作為輪胎行業唯一連續兩屆入選「中國卓越管理公司」的企業，玲瓏輪胎此次蟬聯，既是德勤全球統一評估體系對其綜合管理能力的權威背書，也為國內輪胎行業的高質量發展樹立了管理標杆。
當前中國輪胎產業正處於向全球化、智能化、綠色化轉型關鍵階段，企業間的競爭早已從單一的產品比拼升級為體系化管理能力的較量。玲瓏在技術研發、全球產能協同、智能製造與 ESG 全鏈條管理上的實踐成果，印證了系統化管理對企業長期發展的支撐作用，也為行業提供了從「產品出海」邁向「體系出海」的參考樣本。後續玲瓏在管理升級與品牌向上路徑上的進展，值得全行業持續關注。
In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers compare the Proton X50 and Toyota Yaris Cross when choosing a car. These two models are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will do a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
The OTR price of the Proton X50 in Malaysia is RM 89,800 - 113,300, with a total of 4 versions, including 1.5T Executive (RM 89,800), 1.5T Premium (RM 101,800), 1.5T Flagship (RM 113,300), etc.
The OTR price of the Toyota Yaris Cross in Malaysia is RM 99,900 - 109,900, with a total of 2 versions, including 2026 1.5L Standard (RM 99,900), 2026 HEV 1.5L Standard (RM 109,900), etc.
From a price perspective, the Proton X50's starting price is indeed RM 10,100 cheaper than the Toyota Yaris Cross. If your budget is limited, Proton's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. However, also note that the few thousand ringgit cheaper might involve compromises on features, depending on your specific needs.
The Proton X50 is equipped with a 1.5L 4-cyl engine, 105 hp. Official fuel consumption 6.0 L/100km.
The Toyota Yaris Cross is equipped with a 1.5L 4-cyl engine, 105 hp. Official fuel consumption 6.0 L/100km.
Both cars use the same powertrain, and the driving feel is basically the same in daily use. Fuel consumption is also similar, so there is no need to worry too much about this point.
Proton X50 body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
Toyota Yaris Cross body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
The dimensions of both cars are almost the same, and the interior space is not much different. For a car in this class, it is completely sufficient for daily use.
Proton X50 warranty 5 years/150,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Toyota Yaris Cross warranty 5 years/unlimited mileage, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
In summary, both the Proton X50 and Toyota Yaris Cross are very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose mainly depends on your personal needs and budget. We suggest doing your research, comparing quotes from several dealerships, and then test driving to make the final decision. Buying a car is a major matter, spending some time on research will never be wrong.
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會用 Proton X50 同 Honda HR-V 嚟做比較。兩款車喺價位同定位上都幾接近嘅，今日我哋就從多個方面做一個詳細嘅比較，幫你節省做功課嘅時間。
Proton X50 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 89,800 - 113,300，合共有 4 個版本，包括 1.5T Executive（RM 89,800）、1.5T Premium（RM 101,800）、1.5T Flagship（RM 113,300）等。
Honda HR-V 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 115,900 - 143,900，合共有 4 個版本，包括 2026 e:HEV 1.5L RS（RM 143,900）、2026 1.5T V（RM 137,900）、2026 1.5T E（RM 130,900）等。
由價錢睇落，Proton X50 嘅起步價確實比 Honda HR-V 平咗 RM 26,100。如果你預算有限，Proton 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需求。不過都要注意，平嘅嗰幾千塊，可能喺配備上要有取舍，具體要睇你嘅需求。
Proton X50 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA)。
Honda HR-V 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 Honda SENSING (ACC, CMBS, LKAS, RDM)。
兩款車嘅安全評級一樣，喺呢個級別入面安全配備都算好齊全。而家嘅新車安全性都唔差，唔使太擔心呢一點。
Proton X50 保修 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Honda HR-V 保修 5 年/無限制里程，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Proton X50 同 Honda HR-V 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更重視品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰一款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，就揀配置更豐富嗰款。最後始終建議兩款都去試駕，親身體驗先至最重要。
總括嚟講，Proton X50 同 Honda HR-V 都係馬來西亞市場好唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵始終要睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做足功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拿 Perodua Aruz 同 Mitsubishi Xforce 來比較。這兩款車喺價位同定位上都幾接近嘅，今日我哋會由多個方面做詳細嘅比較，幫你節省做功課嘅時間。
Perodua Aruz 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 72,900 - 77,900，一共有 2 個版本，包括 1.5L X（RM 72,900）、1.5L AV（RM 77,900） 等。
Mitsubishi Xforce 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 109,930 - 119,930，一共有 2 個版本，包括 2026 1.5L Ultimate（RM 119,930）、2026 1.5L Urban（RM 109,930） 等。
由價錢睇，Perodua Aruz 嘅起步價確實比 Mitsubishi Xforce 平咗 RM 37,030。如果你預算有限，Perodua 嘅入門版已經可以满足日常需要。但都要留意，平嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備方面要有取捨，具體要睇你嘅需求。
Perodua Aruz 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
Mitsubishi Xforce 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
兩款車嘅驅動方式一樣，都係 FWD，日常駕駛感覺唔會差幾多。
Perodua Aruz 包修 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Mitsubishi Xforce 包修 3 年/100,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Perodua Aruz 同 Mitsubishi Xforce 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更重視品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，就揀配備更豐富嗰款。最後都建議兩款都去試駕，親身體驗先至最重要。
總括嚟講，Perodua Aruz 同 Mitsubishi Xforce 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵都要睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做足功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，先去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事情，花啲時間做功課絕對無問題。
Surprisingly, this year's World Cup soccer tournament actually had a 'negative impact' on car sales.
The market analysis report for June released by the CPCA mentioned that with the World Cup starting, the time and budget of car buyers were diverted. Implicitly, cars aren't selling well, and even the World Cup is to blame.
This is not just passing the buck. In the first half of this year, the China auto market was indeed very difficult, where any minor factor could affect final transactions.
According to data, national passenger car retail sales were 8.701 million units in the first half, a year-on-year drop of 20.2%. The drop in June alone widened to 23.2%. Statistics from CAAM also show that total vehicle sales including exports were 15.017 million units, a year-on-year decline of 4.1%.
Fortunately, just like a football match, halftime does not mean the end. In the first 100 matches of this World Cup, based on 90-minute results, 40 matches had different halftime win/draw/loss outcomes compared to the final result.
The second half for automakers has just begun. Whether they can rewrite the score depends on what cards each company holds. But one thing is unquestionable: Only leading automotive enterprises that seriously 'prepare' and have a stable 'chassis' have the opportunity to continue leading.
More Difficult Than Sales Decline is Profit Squeezing
A retail drop of 20.2% is already enough to catch the eye, but the more troublesome pressure compared to sales decline is hidden in the automakers' profit statements.
Data from the National Bureau of Statistics shows that in the first five months of this year, industrial enterprise profits above a certain scale nationwide increased by 18.8% year-on-year, while automobile manufacturing industry profits fell by 19.8%.
During the same period, the automobile industry achieved revenue of 420.96 billion yuan, a 1.4% year-on-year increase, but the profit margin was only 3.4%. Back in 2017, this figure was around 8%.
Revenue barely grew while profits plummeted, indicating that insufficient demand is only part of the pressure. Price competition continues, raw material prices like lithium carbonate and aluminum have risen, and R&D, channel, and marketing investments are hard to shrink synchronously with sales. For many automakers, even if cars are sold, the profit remaining on the balance sheet is decreasing.
This pressure is more intuitive when falling on specific enterprises.
In the first half, Li Auto delivered a cumulative 193,500 units, down 5.13% year-on-year, and saw single-month sales decline for two consecutive months; XPeng delivered 165,000 units, down 15.8% year-on-year. New force automakers that used to maintain high-speed growth are also beginning to face growth pressure brought by the expansion of sales volume bases and intensified product competition.
The situation on the profit side is even more severe.
On July 12, Seres released performance forecasts, expecting a net loss of 1.5 billion to 1.8 billion yuan in the first half, while the net profit for the same period last year was 2.941 billion yuan. This means its performance decreased by more than 4.4 billion yuan compared to the same period last year. Price hikes in raw materials such as memory chips and lithium carbonate have pushed up costs, compounded by book adjustments of certain existing assets, significantly impacting its profitability.
The pressure is also transmitting to the channel end. In June, the dealer inventory warning index reached 57.2%, continuing to remain above the prosperity-thriving line; more than 70% of dealer stores did not complete their half-year sales targets. Slower inventory turnover and expanded terminal discounts further compressed the profit space for dealers and automakers.
The new energy market is no exception either. The penetration rate of new energy in June has reached 62.8%, but new energy passenger car retail sales still dropped by 14% in the first half. The substitution of new energy for fuel vehicles continues, but no longer naturally equates to the total growth of the auto market.
Insufficient domestic market growth has also made exports an important direction for automakers to seek new growth and diversify operational pressure.
Exports Contribute Growth, Going Overseas Shifts to Local Operation
Data from CAAM shows that in the first half of the year, China's auto exports reached 5.096 million units, a 65.3% year-on-year increase; June alone exports were 1.037 million units, a 75.1% year-on-year increase, with monthly export volume standing at the million-unit level for the first time.
While domestic demand shrinks, exports have become an important fulcrum for many automakers to maintain scale. However, from exporting whole vehicles to building factories overseas to opening channels with international partners, the paths chosen by each company are not the same.
Chery remains the vanguard of exports. In the first half, Chery Group exported 943,800 units, accounting for nearly 70% of total sales; June alone saw exports of 191,100 units, breaking the record for single-month exports by Chinese automakers.
BYD's overseas focus is shifting from whole vehicle exports to local manufacturing. In the first half, BYD sold 789,400 units overseas, a 68% year-on-year increase; June overseas sales accounted for more than 40% of its total monthly sales. With factories in Brazil and Thailand coming into production successively, BYD is gradually spreading capacity 'beyond tariff barriers'.
Geely and Leapmotor's export growth rates are equally outstanding. Geely exported 474,200 units in the first half, a 158% increase year-on-year; first-half export volume has already exceeded that of the full year of 2025. Leapmotor utilized Stellantis' channels and factory layout to go overseas, exporting nearly 100,000 units in the first half, also exceeding the full previous year. Borrowing from a mature global system allowed Leapmotor to save the time needed to build its own channels and capacity.
SAIC's overseas sales in the first half were 735,000 units, a 48.7% year-on-year increase, accounting for about 36% of the group's total sales. Overseas manufacturing, channel, and brand systems accumulated over the years have become an important buffer in this round of domestic market adjustments.
Changan is also accelerating the transformation from product exports to local operations. The 2.0 version of the 'Sea Accepts Rivers' plan released in April proposed long-term, local, and systematic approaches, promoting global business extension into manufacturing, investment, service, and brand operations. With the landing of multiple results such as Brazilian President witnessing the Brazil factory production start, the 20,000th whole vehicle coming off the line at the Thailand factory, and Qiyuan Q05 launching in Uzbekistan, overseas localization layout is gradually showing results. In the first half, Changan delivered 402,000 units overseas, a 35.1% year-on-year increase, accounting for about one-third of the group's delivery volume.
In May, Changan reached a global official cooperation agreement with the Portuguese National Football Team. Carrying out sports marketing in the World Cup year can also be seen as a step where its overseas investment extends from channel construction to brand operations.
As the proportion of overseas sales in the enterprise's total portfolio continues to increase, export numbers are no longer the only standard for measuring the effectiveness of globalization.Tariff policies, certification standards, and consumption habit differences in different markets are significantly distinct. Channels, after-sales, local production, and brand building all require long-term investment, and may not directly translate into profits in the short term.
Therefore, in the second half of the year when evaluating automakers' overseas performance, sales volume is still the foundation, but local operation efficiency, brand recognition, and profit quality will become more important. Whether exports can truly precipitate into long-term growth depends on whether automakers can move from 'selling cars' to 'operating locally'.
Viewing Sales Proportion: Domestic Market Is Still the Main Battlefield
The rapid growth of overseas markets has not changed the basic proportion of the domestic market.
Data from CAAM shows that domestic car sales in the first half were 9.921 million units. Although down 21.1% year-on-year, the scale is still close to twice that of exports, accounting for about two-thirds of total auto sales. Calculated by half-year alone, one percentage point of market share is close to 100,000 units. No mainstream automaker would give up easily.
Domestic market competition is already fierce, but overseas giants have also not chosen to leave.
Data from the CPCA shows that in June, domestic retail of mainstream joint venture brand new energy passenger cars increased by 45% year-on-year. Volkswagen plans to launch more than 20 electrified models in China this year. The locally developed CEA electronic/electrical architecture has entered mass production with the first model, and subsequent models will also be launched successively within the year. As joint venture brands accelerate local R&D and new energy transformation, competition intensity in the domestic market will continue to increase.
Facing internal demand pressure, domestic independent brands are also looking for breakthrough points from different directions such as products, technology, organization, and capacity.
BYD stabilizes the sales basic disk while supplementing infrastructure. June sales reached 403,500 units, achieving year-on-year positive growth again; Megawatt flash charging is also starting to move from conferences to implementation, and charging networks are gradually spreading nationwide.
Geely is asking internal efficiency.Li Shufu proposed 'stopping, merging, transferring, and transforming' redundant entities, compressing repeated brand and R&D investments, and concentrating resources further on main platforms. In the first half, Geely stabilized overall sales volume with 1.423 million units.
New forces in the growth phase have also not stopped expanding. Leapmotor delivered 356,500 units in the first half, a 60% year-on-year increase, becoming the new force with the highest sales volume. The A10 launched in March entered the top three in SUV sales in three months, and the flagship model D19 cut into the fiercely competitive mid-to-large SUV market, promoting volume sales and brand elevation along two lines simultaneously.
Xiaomi delivered more than 180,000 units cumulatively in the first half. Compared to the 550,000 annual target set at the beginning of the year, monthly delivery volume in the second half needs to be increased to above 60,000. Expanding capacity and accelerating deliveries will become the core task of its second half.
Changan Auto achieved deliveries of 1.1956 million units in the first half, with 402,000 units delivered overseas (up 35.1% year-on-year), and new energy deliveries of 456,000 units (up 5.2% year-on-year). In the second half of this year, Changan Auto will concentrate on promoting product launches and technology implementation, continuously promoting the strategic synergy of Avatr and Deepal frontend independence and backend integration, while accelerating the application of self-developed intelligent technology.Currently, the Tiandu intelligent driving assistance function has been successively applied to Qiyuan Q07, A06, and the new Q05. According to the mass production plan announced in May this year, the Qiyuan Q06 launching in the second half will be equipped with Tiandu Pilot on all models, becoming an important node for Changan's self-developed assisted driving solution to further expand its application.
The domestic market still has a semi-annual scale of nearly 10 million units, and replacement demand will not disappear into thin air. The issue is, facing the increasingly dense new car launches and continuously increasing price pressure, automakers not only need to compete for sales but also need to try to repair profits.
In the second half, whether new cars can quickly gain volume, whether technology can be converted into experiences consumers are willing to pay for, and whether scale growth can bring operational efficiency improvements will jointly determine the performance of automakers in the domestic market.
Final Remarks:
In the first half of this year, the pressure on China's auto industry was reflected simultaneously at both sales and profit ends.Exports grew rapidly, providing a new scale fulcrum for automakers; but the domestic market still determines the basic disk of most enterprises and is the most intensely competitive main battlefield in the second half of the year.
The key to follow lies in whether overseas layout can precipitate into continuous orders and local operating capabilities, whether domestic new products can form scale delivery, and whether technology investment can truly be converted into revenue and profit.
For automakers that have completed a certain amount of preliminary layout, subsequent performance depends on whether products, technology, and global reserve can be timely redeemed for sales and income.
For the entire industry, simply pursuing sales volume is no longer enough; delivery speed, cost control, and profit quality will become equally important.
Halftime has passed, but the outcome has not yet been determined.
In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers often compare Perodua Aruz and Honda HR-V when choosing a car. Both cars are quite close in price and positioning. Today we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to save you time doing research.
Perodua Aruz OTR price in Malaysia is RM 72,900 - 77,900, with a total of 2 versions, including 1.5L X (RM 72,900), 1.5L AV (RM 77,900), etc.
Honda HR-V OTR price in Malaysia is RM 115,900 - 143,900, with a total of 4 versions, including 2026 e:HEV 1.5L RS (RM 143,900), 2026 1.5T V (RM 137,900), 2026 1.5T E (RM 130,900), etc.
Looking at the price, Perodua Aruz's starting price is indeed RM 43,000 cheaper than Honda HR-V. If your budget is limited, Perodua's entry-level model can already meet daily needs. But also note, the few thousand difference might have trade-offs in features, it depends on your specific needs.
Perodua Aruz safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include .
Honda HR-V safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include Honda SENSING (ACC, CMBS, LKAS, RDM).
Both cars have the same safety rating, and safety features in this class are considered very comprehensive. New car safety is not poor nowadays, no need to worry too much about this point.
Perodua Aruz vehicle length 4400 mm, Boot 400 L.
Honda HR-V vehicle length 4500 mm, Boot 450 L.
Regarding space, Honda HR-V's body is 100 mm longer than Perodua Aruz, offering better passenger space. However, Perodua Aruz is more flexible for parking in the city, each has trade-offs.
Perodua Aruz and Honda HR-V are both popular choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, prioritize the one with better reputation; if you value value for money and features more, choose the one with richer configuration. Ultimately, we suggest test driving both, personal experience is the most important.
Overall, Perodua Aruz and Honda HR-V are both very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends on your personal needs and budget. We suggest doing your research, compare quotes from a few dealerships, and then test drive to make a final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending some time doing research will never go wrong.
In Malaysia's SUV market, many buyers compare Perodua Aruz and Honda HR-V when choosing a car. The prices and positioning of these two cars are quite similar. Today we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
Perodua Aruz is priced at RM 72,900 - 77,900 OTR in Malaysia, with 2 versions in total, including 1.5L X (RM 72,900), 1.5L AV (RM 77,900), etc.
Honda HR-V is priced at RM 115,900 - 143,900 OTR in Malaysia, with 4 versions in total, including 2026 e:HEV 1.5L RS (RM 143,900), 2026 1.5T V (RM 137,900), 2026 1.5T E (RM 130,900), etc.
Looking at the price, Perodua Aruz's starting price is indeed RM 43,000 cheaper than Honda HR-V. If your budget is limited, Perodua's entry-level version is already sufficient for daily needs. However, note that the few thousand savings might come with trade-offs in features, depending on your specific needs.
Perodua Aruz body length is 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
Honda HR-V body length is 4500 mm, trunk 450 L.
In terms of space, Honda HR-V's body is 100 mm longer than Perodua Aruz, offering an advantage in passenger space. However, Perodua Aruz is slightly more flexible for parking in the city, each has trade-offs.
Perodua Aruz warranty 5 years/150,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Honda HR-V warranty 5 years/unlimited mileage, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Perodua Aruz and Honda HR-V are both mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, you can prioritize the one with better reputation; if you care more about value for money and features, then choose the one with richer configuration. Ultimately, it is recommended to test drive both, personal experience is the most important.
Overall, Perodua Aruz and Honda HR-V are both very good car models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends mainly on your personal needs and budget. It is recommended that everyone do their homework, compare quotes from several car dealerships, and then test drive to make a final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending some time doing homework will never be wrong.
In Malaysia's SUV market, many buyers compare Perodua Aruz and Honda HR-V when choosing a car. These two models are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
Perodua Aruz OTR price in Malaysia is RM 72,900 - 77,900, with a total of 2 versions, including 1.5L X (RM 72,900), 1.5L AV (RM 77,900), etc.
Honda HR-V OTR price in Malaysia is RM 115,900 - 143,900, with a total of 4 versions, including 2026 e:HEV 1.5L RS (RM 143,900), 2026 1.5T V (RM 137,900), 2026 1.5T E (RM 130,900), etc.
From a price perspective, the starting price of Perodua Aruz is indeed RM 43,000 cheaper than Honda HR-V. If your budget is limited, Perodua's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. But note that the few thousand cheaper might mean compromises on equipment, it depends on your specific needs.
Perodua Aruz is equipped with 1.5L 4-cyl, 105 hp. Official fuel consumption 6.0 L/100km.
Honda HR-V is equipped with 1.5L Turbo, 140 hp. Official fuel consumption 7.0 L/100km.
Regarding power, Honda HR-V's 1.5L Turbo has 35 more horsepower than Perodua Aruz's 1.5L 4-cyl. However, for daily city driving, both cars have enough power and won't feel underpowered.
Perodua Aruz body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
Honda HR-V body length 4500 mm, trunk 450 L.
In terms of space, Honda HR-V's body is 100 mm longer than Perodua Aruz, offering an advantage in seating space. However, Perodua Aruz is more flexible for parking in the city, each has its trade-offs.
Perodua Aruz uses FWD drive type.
Honda HR-V uses FWD drive type.
Both cars have the same drive type, both are FWD, daily driving experience won't differ much.
Overall, Perodua Aruz and Honda HR-V are both very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends mainly on your personal needs and budget. We suggest doing research, comparing quotes from several dealerships, and test driving before making a final decision. Buying a car is a big deal, spending time on research will never be wrong.
喺馬來西亞嘅皮卡市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會揀 Nissan Navara 同 Mazda BT-50 嚟做比較。呢兩部車喺價位同定位上都幾接近，今日我哋就從多個方面做一個詳細嘅對比，幫你省咗做功課嘅時間。
Nissan Navara 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 98,600 - 154,800，一共有 5 個版本，包括 2025 Single Cab 2.5T MT（RM 98,600）、2025 Double Cab 2.5T AT Pro-4X（RM 154,800）、2025 Double Cab 2.5T AT VL（RM 146,900） 等。
Mazda BT-50 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 140,418 - 140,418，一共有 1 個版本，包括 2025 3.0T High Plus（RM 140,418） 等。
從價錢嚟講，Nissan Navara 嘅起步價確實比 Mazda BT-50 平咗 RM 41,818。如果你預算有限，Nissan 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需求。但要留意，平嗰幾千幾萬，喺配備上可能有取捨，視乎你嘅需求。
Nissan Navara 搭載 2.5L 柴油，馬力 187 hp。官方油耗 8.5 L/100km。
Mazda BT-50 搭載 2.5L 柴油，馬力 187 hp。官方油耗 8.5 L/100km。
兩款車用咗同一套動力系統，日常開落嚟嘅感覺基本冇差別。油耗方面都差不多，唔使太糾結呢一點。
Nissan Navara 車身長 4400 mm，後備箱 400 L。
Mazda BT-50 車身長 4400 mm，後備箱 400 L。
兩款車嘅尺寸幾乎一樣，車內空間差別唔大。呢個級別嘅車，日常使用完全夠用。
Nissan Navara 採用前輪驅動方式。
Mazda BT-50 採用前輪驅動方式。
兩款車嘅驅動方式一樣，都係前輪驅動，日常駕駛感覺唔會有太大分別。
Nissan Navara 同 Mazda BT-50 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更睇重品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更佳嗰一款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，就揀配備更豐富嗰款。最後始終建議兩部都去試駕，親身體驗先係最緊要。
總括嚟講，Nissan Navara 同 Mazda BT-50 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一部，關鍵仲係要睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做足功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最後決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
兄弟姐妹們，今日講一個出海嘅大新聞——唔係賣車，係賣「司機」。6 月 2 號，文遠知行同 Uber 聯合宣佈咗一件事：計劃喺西班牙馬德里推出該國首個商業化 Robotaxi 試點服務。意思就係：西班牙人好快就可以用 Uber 叫到一台冇司機嘅出租車。呢次係文遠知行同 Uber 第一次一齊進入歐洲市場。馬德里亦成為文遠知行 Robotaxi 駛入嘅全球第十二個城市。
官方消息話，喺馬德里自治區政府嘅支持下，呢項服務今年內就會正式啟動。到嗰陣，馬德里嘅朋友哋打開 Uber App，就有一鍵呼叫文遠知行嘅 Robotaxi。同叫普通網約車一樣，分別係嚟嘅車冇駕駛員——至少喺初期，仲係有分別嘅。運營初期，車入面會配備經過專業培訓嘅安全員，終究係剛上線，穩妥第一。
文遠知行呢間公司，你可能聽過，也可能冇聽過。簡單介紹下：2017 年成立，一直埋頭搞 Robotaxi 技術研發同商業化。而家佢嘅 Robotaxi 已經覆蓋咗廣州、北京、新加坡、阿布達比、迪拜、利雅得、蘇黎世……加埋而家嘅馬德里，一共 12 個城市。西班牙亦係文遠知行進入嘅第五個歐洲市場——之前已經入咗瑞士、法國、比利時、斯洛伐克。按照文遠知行同 Uber 喺 2025 年 5 月達成嘅規劃，佢哋要喺五年內新增 15 個國際城市部署 Robotaxi 服務，全球部署數萬輛 Robotaxi。隨著馬德里落地，目前已經完成咗 4 個城市嘅佈局，仲有 11 個會喺 2030 年前陸續覆蓋。
講真嘅，中國自動駕駛公司出海唔係頭一回，但中國技術 + 全球出行平台 + 歐洲市場呢個組合，定係好有意思。馬德里係歐洲最具商業潛力嘅 Robotaxi 市場之一，人口多、出行需求大，當地政策都好友善。喺呢個市場站穩腳根，對文遠知行嚟講係個唔小嘅里程碑。對 Uber 嚟講，引進 Robotaxi 都係為咗降低成本——終究司機唔使發人工。對馬德里市民嚟講，以後打車可能更平。
車型概覽
Tesla Cybertruck 值唔值得睇，第一步唔係望牌子或者外形，而係睇佢能唔能夠配合你嘅香港日常。 呢篇會集中講版本取捨，幫你用買家角度篩走唔適合嘅選擇。
售價仍待確認，買家可以先把佢放入候選名單，等價格落實後再同同級車逐項比較。
購車價格指南
Tesla Cybertruck 目前售價仍未清晰，較理性嘅做法係先睇版本、車身大小同動力形式，等價格落實後再決定值唔值得落訂。
如果有幾個版本可揀，可以先將 2025 523km 四驅版（價格待確認）、2025 515km 四驅Cyberbeast版（價格待確認） 放喺同一張清單。日常通勤重視舒適同易用，家庭買家就要優先睇後排、尾箱同安全配置。
核心規格重點
睇 Tesla Cybertruck 嘅規格，重點唔係背數字，而係理解佢喺香港用車場景會帶嚟咩分別。
車長 5283 mm、車闊 2201 mm、車高 1791 mm 可以幫你預判商場停車場、屋苑車位同後排腿部空間。 固定齒比、雙電機四駆 / 三電機四駆 會影響起步順滑度、濕地穩定感同長途巡航性格。
優缺點分析
Tesla Cybertruck 嘅優點唔需要講到天花龍鳳，真正有價值係佢能唔能夠令日常用車更省心：空間同車身尺寸方便家庭買家預判實用性。
要留意嘅係，香港停車場同窄路使用要留意車身闊度、售價未清晰前唔應該太早用性價比落結論。呢啲唔一定係缺點，但係落訂前應該先諗清楚。
買家常見問題
買 Tesla Cybertruck 之前，真正要問嘅唔係單一規格，而係佢可唔可以融入你每日嘅生活節奏。
常見疑問係「Tesla Cybertruck 最頂級嘅「Cyberbeast」版有幾癲？」簡單講，癲。Tesla Cybertruck 最勁嘅「Cyberbeast」三摩打版本，馬力達到驚人嘅 845 匹，0 至 96 km/h 加速最快只需 2.6 秒。佢嘅續航力（EPA 標準）大約係 515 公里。呢個版本主要以性能為先，係一部超跑級嘅電動貨車。 放到實際用車，就係要睇佢對通勤、泊車、家庭乘坐同長期成本有幾大幫助。
同級對比內容
將 Tesla Cybertruck 放入同級車清單時，唔建議只用外形或者品牌光環決定。比較順序可以係：先等售價落實，再決定佢應該同邊個級距比較、最後睇車身大小、座位同尾箱是否適合家人。
咁樣篩選會貼近香港買家真實生活：平日塞車、商場泊車、周末去新界、甚至一家人出入，先係一部車每日要面對嘅考驗。
用車全周期指南
擁有 Tesla Cybertruck 唔係買車一刻就完結，之後仲有保險、輪胎、保養、泊車同日常能源成本要處理。
如果你主要喺市區行，視野、低速順滑度同泊車輔助會好影響心情；如果經常行高速或跨區，座椅舒適度、隔音同動力從容感會更重要。
港交所網站掛出一咗一份熟悉嘅招股書。
5 月 28 日，繼去年 10 月首次遞表失效後，智能駕駛解決方案提供商蘇州天瞳威視電子科技股份有限公司（天瞳威視）再次向港股主板發起重衝，由匯豐及華泰國際聯席保薦。
喺智能駕駛賽道從「講故事」轉向「拼量產」嘅 2026 年，天瞳威視嘅二次遞表唔單止係一次資本試探，更係一場關於中國智駕供應商生存現狀嘅集中檢閱。
呢間被認為係「算力效率派」代表嘅公司，一邊連住從采埃孚到上汽、北汽嘅豪華產業資本陣營，一邊卻面臨住現金流緊繃、海外明顯回落嘅現實困境。喺呢場 IPO 嘅博弈中，光鮮同陣痛並存。
01
邊個係「天瞳威視」？
天瞳威視嘅創辦人王曦係一位典型嘅「回國」技術派。佢畢業於北京航空航天大學，後喺英國雷丁大學攻讀計算機科學博士學位。
喺決定創業之前，王曦曾經喺汽車零部件供應商天合汽車（TRW）及采埃孚擔任算法工程師同技術負責人，深度參與咗早期 ADAS 系統嘅開發。
2016 年，王曦捕捉到國內汽車智能化嘅風口，回國喺蘇州創立咗天瞳威視，定位係「以軟件算法驅動智能駕駛」嘅本土解決方案提供商。
公司嘅名字「天瞳」寓意「天之眼」，意在打造車輛感知萬物嘅視覺中樞。佢從最初嘅視覺感知算法起步，逐步擴展至行泊一體域控制器、L4 級自動駕駛系統等軟硬件結合嘅整體方案。
天瞳威視融資情況。資料來源：企查查
成立後不久，天瞳威視就獲得德聯資本、盛世投資嘅天使輪融資。此後十年時間，天瞳威視累計完成咗超過 10 輪融資，融資總額近 10 億元。
從招股書披露嘅股權結構嚟睇，天瞳威視構建咗深度綁定嘅「產業 + 資本」生態圈。
一方面，產業夥伴站台，全球汽車零部件巨頭采埃孚唔單止係其 C 輪領投方，亦係其戰略合作夥伴，持有天瞳威視 6.93% 嘅股份，位列第四大股東；國內方面，上汽集團通過上汽北美產投持股，北汽集團通過北汽產投佈局其中，地平線同商湯科技亦係戰略投資者。
另一方面，地方國資護航，唐山機器人基金、吳中金控等國資背景基金喺 D 輪及 D+ 輪入場，提供咗約 5.23 億元嘅資金支持。
截至最後實際可行日期股權架構
截至目前，王曦透過直接持股同員工持股平台合共控制公司約 40.84% 嘅權益，依然保持住對公司嘅控制權。
02
「兩條腿」行路
天瞳威視喺業務佈局上採取咗「雙軌並行」嘅策略。
喺 L2-L2+ 級輔助駕駛領域，天瞳威視嘅選擇非常務實。佢並冇盲目追逐算力堆疊嘅「軍備競賽」，而係走咗一條高性價比路線。
作為典型嘅視覺派智駕供應商，佢喺 L2 量產方案上以視覺感知為主，融合毫米波雷達同超聲波雷達，能夠喺較低算力平台上實現高級功能。例如，基於地平線 J6B 芯片（約 20TOPS）嘅方案即可支持行泊一體、高速 NOA。
呢種打法擊中咗 10 萬 -20 萬級主流車款對成本敏感嘅痛點。根據灼識諮詢嘅數據，按 2024 年裝機量計，天瞳威視係中國第二大同時提供行車同泊車解決方案嘅以軟件為核心嘅 L2-L2+ 級方案提供商，市場份額為 14.3%。
2024 年中國具備行泊一體能力嘅以軟件為核心供應商格局
截至最後實際可行日期，天瞳威視獲得 23 個汽車品牌嘅 198 款車款嘅 L2-L2+ 級解決方案定點函，並實現 6 個汽車品牌嘅 105 款車款嘅量產；獲得定點函嘅 198 款車款中有 87 款覆蓋海外市場，其中 59 款已實現量產。
但值得注意嘅係，L2-L2+ 市場正在經歷劇烈嘅「紅海化」。
一方面，經緯恆潤、福瑞泰克等本土 Tier1 正在加速追趕；另一方面，部分頭部車廠開始將低階智駕方案從外購轉為內部集成。
天瞳威視能否維持佢喺「性價比方案」領域嘅領先地位，取決於佢能否持續保持算法對低算力平台嘅優化能力，而這需要喺研發投入上持續加碼。
喺高級 L4 級自動駕駛領域，天瞳威視更多扮演「先鋒」角色。這亦係佢近兩年增長最快嘅板塊。
早在 2019 年，佢就參與咗上海洋山港嘅 5G 智能重卡項目。目前佢嘅 L4 方案覆蓋 Robobus、Robotaxi 同 Robotruck。其中，Robobus 係佢最具代表性嘅產品線，已喺蘇州、天津等城市嘅公開道路投入常態化試營運。
2025 年，天瞳威視從 L4 級解決方案產生收入 3.75 億元，佔公司總收入嘅 68% 以上，大部分收入來自 L4 級軟件解決方案。
然而，硬幣嘅另一面係商業化嘅曲折。雖然 L4 業務營收暴增，但佢嘅交付形態目前以「軟硬件一體解決方案」為主，呢種模式本質上接近「項目制交付」或「小規模車隊部署」，與 L2 業務中「純軟件授權 + 白盒交付」嘅高毛利、大規模複製邏輯存在顯著差異。
呢就直接導致 L4 業務毛利率嘅大幅波動：喺部分自研硬件佔比较高嘅項目中，毛利率一度低至 15%。
截至遞表日，公司雖手握超 10 億元嘅 L4 意向訂單，涵蓋 2500 架車，但呢啲訂單預計要喺未來三至五年內先會陸續交付，短期內對現金流嘅改善作用有限。
此外，天瞳威視仲有部分應收來自工程服務，主要涉及道路測試、數據收集支援及數據標註服務以及公司嘅專有工具鏈。
03
財務嘅雙面鏡
招股書嘅財務部分，展現咗智駕行業最真實嘅「B 面」：規模同虧損嘅極限拉扯，同埋賬面現金同營運消耗之間嘅緊張博弈。
營收高增長，但結構劇烈波動。
財務數據顯示，公司嘅營收呈現爆發式增長，從 2022 年嘅 1.72 億元增長至 2024 年嘅 4.83 億元，複合年增長率高達 67.7%。2025 年全年營收進一步增長至 5.5 億元。
但收入結構嘅變化明顯。2023 年，公司依賴 L2-L2+ 業務，佔比 90.2%；去到 2024 年，L4 業務佔比升至 50.2%；2025 年，L4 業務佔比進一步拉高至 68%。呢種「斷崖式」嘅結構切換，雖然證明佢 L4 技術搵到咗落地場景，但亦令市場質疑佢 L2 業務係咪已觸及天花板。
毛利率同純利潤嘅背離，呢係天瞳威視面臨嘅最大挑戰。
從毛利睇，整體毛利率喺 30% 左右徘徊，喺呢個技術密集型嘅智駕行業屬於中等水平。但細拆睇嚟，L2-L2+ 業務嘅毛利率通常能維持喺 40% 以上，純軟件授權模式，而 L4 業務嘅毛利率則因「軟硬件一體」交付中硬件佔比提高而被顯著拉低。
從純利潤睇，雖然表面虧損額較大，2024 年虧損 4.63 億、2025 年虧損約 2 億，呢度包含大量因優先股公平值變動帶來嘅「紙面虧損」。剔除呢個因素後嘅經調整純利潤更能反映公司嘅真實經營狀況：2024 年已收窄至 -438 萬元，但 2025 年並未如市場預期實現轉正，而係錄得約 -1086 萬元，虧損較 2024 年有所擴大。
呢個背後有一個不可回避嘅關鍵前提：調整後嘅「減虧」乃至「接近盈虧平衡」，係喺公司持續壓縮研發投入嘅基礎上實現嘅，研發費用從 2024 年嘅 1.17 億元降至 2025 年嘅 9231 萬元，研發費用率從 2024 年嘅 24.3% 進一步降至 16.8%，而 2022 年呢個數字曾高達 108.7%。對於一家科技公司嚟講，研發強度嘅「退坡」是否會影響未來嘅技術護城河，係一個潛在風險點。
現金流持續告急，最令人擔憂嘅信號。
根據最新招股書，截至 2025 年 12 月 31 日，公司賬上嘅現金及現金等价物為 2.35 億元，較 2025 年 6 月 30 日嘅 3.74 億元淨減少 1.39 億元，現金消耗速度較快。
更值得警惕嘅係經營現金流由正轉負且缺口持續擴大嘅趨勢。2023 年，公司經營活動現金流淨額為正向流入 1.15 億元，但 2024 年迅速轉為淨流出 1.89 億元，2025 年進一步惡化至淨流出 2.93 億元。
與此同時，應收賬款周轉急劇惡化。公司嘅貿易應收款項從 2023 年嘅 0.89 億元升至 2025 年嘅 5.48 億元，三年增長超過五倍，而同期營收增幅僅約 2.7 倍。
更令人擔憂嘅係應收款項周轉天數從 2023 年嘅 191 天同 2024 年嘅 166 天，到 2025 年驟升至 300 天，意味著公司從完成交付到收回款項平均需要接近一年時間。呢相當於變相為客戶提供長期無息墊資，喺資金本就緊張嘅情況下進一步加劇咗流動性壓力。
此外，雖然天瞳威視係首家出海嘅中國智駕軟件供應商，但 2025 年佢嘅海外業務遭遇咗明顯回落。2023 年天瞳威視海外收入為 1.27 億元，佔總營收比重達到 62.2%；到 2025 年海外收入降至 1100 萬元，佔比僅 2.0%。
喺而家全球地緣政治複雜、部分國家對智能汽車數據監管趨嚴嘅背景下，為佢嘅全球化故事增添咗一絲不確定性。
04
結語
天瞳威視嘅二次闖關，係智能駕駛行業進入「淘汰賽」階段嘅一個縮影。
從好嘅方面睇，佢踩準咗 L2 性價比同 L4 場景化落地嘅雙重節奏，且經調整純利潤喺特定口徑下已接近盈虧平衡，呢啲都畀投資者提供咗「有亮點可講」嘅故事線。
但從風險嘅角度睇，情況遠比首次遞表時更為嚴峻。業務重心嘅急速漂移、L4 業務商業化初期嘅盈利磨難、研發投入嘅被動收縮，呢啲此前就已存在嘅問題並未緩解。
天瞳威視 L4 級智能巴士
而真正令此次 IPO 帶「求生」色彩嘅，係現金流數據嘅實質性惡化：2.35 億元嘅賬面現金，面對每年近 3 億元嘅经营性現金淨流出，安全邊際已不足一年。疊加 300 天嘅應收賬款周轉天數，意味著公司每交付一筆訂單，都要墊付近一年嘅資金成本。
換言之，天瞳威視正處喺一個危險嘅財務窗口期：賬上嘅錢僅夠維持唔足一年嘅正常運作，而 L4 業務嘅大規模交付同回款卻需要更長時間。喺呢個智駕資本熱潮退去、一級市場融資邊際收緊嘅時刻，公司已冇太多等待嘅餘地。
首次遞表失效後僅隔半年便再次衝擊港股，對天瞳威視而言，與其話係戰略選擇，唔如話係現金倒逼下嘅必然之舉。
車型概覽
東風小康風光500 值唔值得睇，第一步唔係望牌子或者外形，而係睇佢能唔能夠配合你嘅香港日常。 呢篇會集中講同級車比較，幫你用買家角度篩走唔適合嘅選擇。
售價仍待確認，買家可以先把佢放入候選名單，等價格落實後再同同級車逐項比較。
購車價格指南
東風小康風光500 目前售價仍未清晰，較理性嘅做法係先睇版本、車身大小同動力形式，等價格落實後再決定值唔值得落訂。
如果有幾個版本可揀，可以先將 2022 1.5L 手動版（價格待確認）、2022 1.5T 手動版（價格待確認）、2022 1.5L CVT版（價格待確認）、2022 1.5T CVT版（價格待確認） 放喺同一張清單。日常通勤重視舒適同易用，家庭買家就要優先睇後排、尾箱同安全配置。
核心規格重點
睇 東風小康風光500 嘅規格，重點唔係背數字，而係理解佢喺香港用車場景會帶嚟咩分別。
自然進氣 / 渦輪增壓、4 個 汽缸、1498 mL 排量 嘅動力底子，重點係市區跟車夠唔夠順、高速巡航會唔會吃力。 116 Ps / 85 kW / 150 Ps / 110 kW、148/220 N·m 嘅輸出，對滿載、上斜同超車都比單睇馬力數字更有意思。 車長 4385 mm、車闊 1850 mm、車高 1645 mm、軸距 2655 mm 可以幫你預判商場停車場、屋苑車位同後排腿部空間。 手動(MT) / 無級變速(CVT)、前置前駆 會影響起步順滑度、濕地穩定感同長途巡航性格。
優缺點分析
東風小康風光500 嘅優點唔需要講到天花龍鳳，真正有價值係佢能唔能夠令日常用車更省心：動力輸出對高速同上斜更有底氣、空間同車身尺寸方便家庭買家預判實用性。
要留意嘅係，香港停車場同窄路使用要留意車身闊度、售價未清晰前唔應該太早用性價比落結論。呢啲唔一定係缺點，但係落訂前應該先諗清楚。
買家常見問題
買 東風小康風光500 之前，真正要問嘅唔係單一規格，而係佢可唔可以融入你每日嘅生活節奏。
常見疑問係「東風小康 DFSK Fengon 500 嘅油耗表現點？」簡單講，東風小康 DFSK Fengon 500 引擎調校偏向省油，適合市區通勤。 放到實際用車，就係要睇佢對通勤、泊車、家庭乘坐同長期成本有幾大幫助。
同級對比內容
將 東風小康風光500 放入同級車清單時，唔建議只用外形或者品牌光環決定。比較順序可以係：先等售價落實，再決定佢應該同邊個級距比較、再睇動力係咪足夠應付高速併線同滿載、最後睇車身大小、座位同尾箱是否適合家人。
咁樣篩選會貼近香港買家真實生活：平日塞車、商場泊車、周末去新界、甚至一家人出入，先係一部車每日要面對嘅考驗。
用車全周期指南
擁有 東風小康風光500 唔係買車一刻就完結，之後仲有保險、輪胎、保養、泊車同日常能源成本要處理。
如果你主要喺市區行，視野、低速順滑度同泊車輔助會好影響心情；如果經常行高速或跨區，座椅舒適度、隔音同動力從容感會更重要。
