首頁NIO ET5
搜尋歷史
熱門搜尋
經銷商登入 / 註冊
8 月 12 日，奇瑞風雲 T7 正式開啟預售。這次發布會的主題是「慢工造好車，久等了」。能看出奇瑞沒有跟風行業快速造車的節奏，反而花足時間打磨一台面向普通家庭、經得起全球路況檢驗的純電 SUV。新車一共推出三款版型，預售區間卡在 10.99 萬 -12.99 萬元，訂車還能疊加七重購車權益，整體定價剛好卡在家用純電 SUV 競爭最激烈的價位段。
說說這台車最核心的底層邏輯，它不是一台只針對國內路況開發的代步車。奇瑞有 23 年全球化造車積累，這台車走的是反向出海驗證再回歸國內的路線。
同源車型 Lepas L6 已經在南非、泰國上市，還登上過米蘭設計週，提前經過海外市場真實用戶檢驗。研發週期足足五年，兩年策劃、三年完整研發，投入 81 台專屬耐久車同步路試，整車累計測試里程突破 600 萬公里，光是耐久專項測試就跑了 145 萬公里。東南亞雨季、中東高溫、北歐極寒、巴西爛路，全球上百種極限環境全部完整試煉一遍，這也是它敢打出「全球品質」標籤的底氣。
現在很多家用電車外觀要么過於浮誇，要么內飾用料廉價，開兩三年就顯舊。風雲 T7 在設計上避開了這個短板。外觀由奇瑞全球十大設計中心、五千多名海內外用戶共創，御風前臉、流線型絲綢車身搭配貫穿式霞光尾燈，線條簡約耐看，不會有過時的風險。車漆一共提供六款東方意境配色，其中熾焰橙採用豪車級三層噴塗工藝，全車漆面同步海外耐候標準，長期暴曬、冷熱交替也不容易褪色失光。
內飾分溫暖黑棕、極夜黑曜兩種風格，整個座艙叫雲翼環抱設計，大面積軟包覆鋪滿車內。鵝卵石造型懸浮揚聲器、菱格縫紉座椅細節提升精緻度，內飾皮革、塑料件都做了抗老化處理，不用擔心用久了發硬發白，兼顧家用溫馨和長期質感。
安全是家庭用戶選電車最看重的一點，風雲 T7 的安全規格放在 10 萬級車裡幾乎沒有對手。
整車按照 2026 版 E-NCAP 五星標準開發，功能安全達到 ASILD 最高等級。車身 80% 高強度鋼、18.84% 熱成型鋼，九橫五縱籠式車身搭配同級獨有的 Shotgun 結構、雙框副車架加電池防撞梁，前後一共 15 條碰撞傳力通道，最大程度分散撞擊力度，守住乘員艙生存空間。
全系標配 9 個安全氣囊，包含 48L 大容積遠端氣囊、後排側氣囊，360 度覆蓋車內每一位乘客。電池方面搭載犀牛 6D 防護電池，31 層鎖子甲防護結構，側邊抗擠壓能力是國標兩倍，IP68 防水等級達到國標 96 倍，城市內澇、雨天涉水不用擔憂電池短路。更有行業少見的兩大兜底保障，首任非營運車主如果電池自身問題引發熱失控，直接賠付同款新車；一年內智駕輔助系統故障引發事故，最高 500 萬賠付，直接打消大家對電車安全的後顧之憂。
目前市面上多數同價位純電 SUV，入門款只會給到四百多公里續航，想要長續航就得加錢上高配。風雲 T7 直接打破這種分級溢價套路，三款車款全部標配 65.05kWh 犀牛電池，CLTC 續航 600 公里，實測續航能跑到 667 公里，屬於行業少見的「反向虛標」。
充電速度也很實用，電量 30% 充到 80% 僅需 20 分鐘，日常逛商場、喝咖啡的空檔就能補能三百公里。
針對南北方不同氣候，標配全域雙源寬溫域熱泵空調加高壓 PTC，工作溫域覆蓋 -30℃到 55℃。北方冬季低溫制熱省電，高溫地區散熱穩定，再配合 AGS 智能進氣格柵和 14 項低風阻優化，不管高速還是市區，能耗表現都很穩定，不會出現冬天續航大幅縮水的情況。電池循環壽命超 2500 次，家用十五年基本不用更換電池，長期用車成本更低。
智能配置是這台車的另一大越級亮點，同級首發 4nm 製程 8775 艙駕一體晶片，72TOPS 高算力，系統響應僅 80 毫秒，開機速度提升三成，車機操作順滑不卡頓。
座艙配備 15.6 英寸 2.5K 防眩光大屏，無線 CarPlay、華為 HiCar 全部支持，適配市面上絕大多數手機。靈犀智艙 2.0 接入豆包大模型，提供六種真人感語音人設，還有小憩、露營、寵物、醒神六大一鍵場景模式，駐車場景不用反覆調節設定。
智駕搭載獵鷹 500 輔助系統，全車 22 顆高精度傳感器，包含 3 顆毫米波雷達、7 顆攝像頭。最實用的跨樓層記憶泊車，三百多種全場景自動泊車全部標配，支持兩公里內跨樓層記憶、斷頭路泊車、一鍵循跡倒車，過去只在二十萬級高端車款上才有的泊車功能，十萬價位就能落地，對新手、女性車主十分友好。
車身尺寸 4570×1852×1694mm，軸距 2700mm，車內得房率高達 84%，後排純平地台，腿部空間達到 911mm，高個子乘客乘坐也不會局促。後排座椅放倒之後，能形成 1955mm 純平大床，常規行李箱 450L，拓展後可達 1550L，露營裝備、大件行李都能輕鬆收納。
座椅採用九層雲感複合結構，軟而不塌陷，同時標配三檔加熱、吸風式通風。零下二十度環境五分鐘就能加熱到 30℃，夏天通風不悶後背。車內設計 38 處儲物空間，行李箱四個承重 300kg 鉚環、兩個掛鉤，戶外裝載、居家收納都很方便。
底盤由瑪莎拉蒂前底盤調校專家帶隊的國際化團隊打磨，50.8:49.2 黃金軸荷比，高速不飄、過彎不推頭甩尾，再加上奇瑞二十六年底盤研發功底，城市通勤、山路自駕、長途高速都能保持平穩舒適。
當下十萬到十三萬純電緊湊型 SUV，是新能源市場競爭最白熱化的賽道。
比亞迪元 PLUS、長安啟源 Q05、零跑 B10、廣汽鉑智 3X 幾款主流車款各有側重，但普遍存在明顯短板。比如元 PLUS 入門續航僅五百多公里，高配車款價格突破 14 萬；零跑 B10 低續航版本配置縮水，高階智駕需要選裝；長安啟源 Q05 在車身鋼材、氣囊數量、底盤調校上存在降級，多數車款只有六氣囊，缺少遠端氣囊；合資鉑智 3X 雖然有品牌加持，但底盤調校、車內空間拓展能力偏弱，也沒有終身質保這類長期保障政策。
大部分競爭對手都在做配置取捨：要么犧牲續航換低價，要么縮減安全配置控制成本，智駕、舒適、安全很難做到全系均衡。風雲 T7 剛好踩中市場空白，打出了「全系無縮水」的產品路線。
短期來看，這台車會直接分流原本考慮元 PLUS、啟源 Q05、零跑 B10 的潛在客戶；長期而言，它樹立了十萬級純電 SUV 全新價值標尺，倒逼同價位競爭對手提升安全、續航、智駕的基礎配置，未來在 10-13 萬細分市場，會成為極具競爭力的黑馬車款。
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拿 Proton X90 同 Mazda CX-8 嚟做比較。這兩款車喺價位同定位上都幾接近，而家我哋就由多個方面做個詳細比較，幫你慳返做功課嘅時間。
Proton X90 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 106,800 - 122,800，一共有 4 個版本，包括 2026 1.5T Prime X（RM 122,800）、2026 1.5T Prime（RM 116,800）、2026 1.5T Lite（RM 106,800） 等。
Mazda CX-8 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 165,360 - 201,360，一共有 5 個版本，包括 2025 2.5T 4WD High Plus Petrol（RM 201,360）、2025 2.2L 2WD High Plus Diesel（RM 193,123）、2025 2.5L 2WD High Plus Petrol（RM 186,360） 等。
睇返價錢，Proton X90 嘅入門價確實比 Mazda CX-8 平咗 RM 58,560。如果你預算有限，Proton 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需要。但都要留意，平嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備上會有取舍，具體要睇你嘅需求。
Proton X90 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA)。
Mazda CX-8 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 Brand ADAS。
兩款車嘅安全評級一樣，喺呢個級數入面安全配備都算好齊全啦。而家嘅新車安全性都唔差，唔使太擔心這一點。
Proton X90 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
Mazda CX-8 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
兩款車嘅驅動方式一樣，都係 FWD，日常駕駛感受唔會有太大分別。
Proton X90 保修 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Mazda CX-8 保修 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
兩款車嘅保修條件一樣，呢方面唔使糾結。實際保養成本仲要睇品牌嘅服務網絡同零件價格，建議去車友群問吓真實車主嘅經驗。
總括嚟講，Proton X90 同 Mazda CX-8 都係馬來西亞市場好唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵仲係要睇你嘅個人需要同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕無問題。
In Malaysia's SUV market, many buyers compare Proton X90 and Toyota Fortuner when selecting a car. These two cars are quite close in terms of price and positioning. Today, we will conduct a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
Proton X90 OTR price in Malaysia is RM 106,800 - 122,800, with a total of 4 versions, including 2026 1.5T Prime X (RM 122,800), 2026 1.5T Prime (RM 116,800), 2026 1.5T Lite (RM 106,800) etc.
Toyota Fortuner OTR price in Malaysia is RM 195,880 - 241,880, with a total of 3 versions, including 2024 2.8T VRZ Diesel (RM 241,880), 2024 2.7L SRZ Petrol (RM 202,880), 2024 2.4L Standard Diesel (RM 195,880) etc.
From a price perspective, the starting price of Proton X90 is indeed RM 89,080 cheaper than Toyota Fortuner. If your budget is limited, Proton's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. However, please note that the savings of a few thousand may involve trade-offs in features, depending on your specific needs.
Proton X90 is equipped with 1.5L Turbo, horsepower 140 hp. Official fuel consumption 7.0 L/100km.
Toyota Fortuner is equipped with 2.5L Diesel, horsepower 187 hp. Official fuel consumption 8.5 L/100km.
In terms of power, Toyota Fortuner's 2.5L Diesel has 47 more horsepower than Proton X90's 1.5L Turbo. However, for daily driving in the city, the power of both cars is sufficient, you won't feel lacking power.
Proton X90's safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
Toyota Fortuner's safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include .
Both cars have the same safety rating, in this class safety features are quite complete. New cars nowadays don't have bad safety, no need to worry too much about this.
Proton X90 adopts FWD drive type.
Toyota Fortuner adopts FWD drive type.
Both cars have the same drive type, both are FWD, daily driving experience will not have much difference.
Overall, Proton X90 and Toyota Fortuner are both very good models in the Malaysia market. Which one to choose, it depends on your personal needs and budget. We suggest doing research, comparing quotes from several dealers, and then test driving to make the final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending some time on research will definitely not be wrong.
In the SUV market in Malaysia, many buyers compare Proton X70 and Mitsubishi Xforce when choosing a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning. Today we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time doing research.
The OTR price of Proton X70 in Malaysia is RM 106,800 - 122,300, with a total of 3 versions, including 1.5L Standard 2WD (RM 106,800), 1.5L Executive 2WD (RM 115,800), 1.5L Premium 2WD (RM 122,300), etc.
The OTR price of Mitsubishi Xforce in Malaysia is RM 109,930 - 119,930, with a total of 2 versions, including 2026 1.5L Ultimate (RM 119,930), 2026 1.5L Urban (RM 109,930), etc.
From a price perspective, the starting price of Proton X70 is indeed RM 3,130 cheaper than Mitsubishi Xforce. If your budget is limited, Proton's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. But be aware, the few thousand ringgit cheaper, there might be trade-offs in equipment, depending on your needs.
Proton X70 safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
Mitsubishi Xforce safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety system includes MI-PILOT.
Both cars have the same safety rating, safety features in this class are quite comprehensive. New cars nowadays are not lacking in safety, no need to worry too much about this.
Proton X70 body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
Mitsubishi Xforce body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
The dimensions of both cars are almost the same, interior space difference is not large. Cars in this class are sufficient for daily use.
Proton X70 warranty 5 years/150,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Mitsubishi Xforce warranty 3 years/100,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Overall, Proton X70 and Mitsubishi Xforce are both very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose ultimately depends on your personal needs and budget. It is recommended to do your research, compare quotes from several dealerships, and go for a test drive to make the final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending time doing research will never be wrong.
In the SUV market in Malaysia, many buyers compare the Proton X70 and GWM Haval H6 when choosing a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning. Today we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
The Proton X70 OTR price in Malaysia is RM 106,800 - 122,300, with a total of 3 versions, including 1.5L Standard 2WD (RM 106,800), 1.5L Executive 2WD (RM 115,800), 1.5L Premium 2WD (RM 122,300), etc.
The GWM Haval H6 OTR price in Malaysia is RM 139,750 - 139,750, with a total of 2 versions, including 1.5L Turbo Standard (RM 140,000), 1.5L Turbo Premium (RM 155,000), etc.
In terms of price, the starting price of the Proton X70 is indeed RM 32,950 cheaper than the GWM Haval H6. If your budget is limited, the Proton entry-level version can already meet daily needs. But note that the few thousand cheaper amount might involve trade-offs in features, depending on your specific needs.
The safety rating of the Proton X70 is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), with active safety systems including ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
The safety rating of the GWM Haval H6 is TBD, with active safety systems including Basic.
Regarding safety features, both cars have received good ratings. However, the Proton X70's ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA) and the GWM Haval H6's Basic have some differences in functionality. If you value active safety more, you can compare the feature lists of both in detail.
The Proton X70 uses FWD drive mode.
The GWM Haval H6 uses FWD drive mode.
Both cars have the same drive mode, which is FWD, so there won't be much difference in the daily driving experience.
Both the Proton X70 and GWM Haval H6 are mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, you can prioritize the one with better reputation; if you care more about cost-performance ratio and features, then choose the one with richer configuration. Ultimately, it is recommended to test drive both, personal experience is the most important.
Overall, both the Proton X70 and GWM Haval H6 are very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose mainly depends on your personal needs and budget. We recommend doing your homework, comparing quotes from several dealerships, and then test driving to make the final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending time doing research will definitely not be wrong.
今天在香港启德看曼城对国米，这场比赛还有一个隐藏的主角：比亚迪。
场上是两支欧洲豪门，场外停着比亚迪出海的车型，很有气势！
国内的方程豹豹5，出海时放进了腾势体系，这个细节挺值得琢磨——比亚迪出海已经开始根据不同市场，重新组织自己的品牌表达。
这两年比亚迪对足球的投入也越来越密集：从2024欧洲杯、美洲杯，到国际米兰、曼城，再到刚刚签约的巴黎圣日耳曼。
体育赛事的价值也在这里。它能把汽车带进一个有共同情绪、愿意投入时间和消费的真实人群里。现场几万名球迷的欢呼，比一块孤零零的广告牌更容易留下记忆。
今天打动我的画面还有看台上的足球少年。
他们当中有中国足球小将，也有从新疆伊犁、陕西宁陕、贵州兴仁、普安等地赶来的孩子。
比赛一开始，几个人握着拳头站起来大喊，眼睛完全离不开球场，这感觉比专业解说可有意思多了！
对他们来说，第一次走进五万人的球场、亲眼看世界级球员比赛，可能会把他的梦想一下子放大很多倍。很多年以后，他们也许已经记不清这场比赛的比分，却会一直记得几万人同时欢呼的声音。
中国汽车已经跑向世界。也希望这些足球少年，有一天同样能被世界看见。
In Malaysia's SUV market, many buyers compare Proton X70 and Mazda CX-3 when choosing a car. These two models are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will conduct a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
Proton X70's OTR price in Malaysia is RM 106,800 - 122,300, with a total of 3 versions, including 1.5L Standard 2WD (RM 106,800), 1.5L Executive 2WD (RM 115,800), 1.5L Premium 2WD (RM 122,300), etc.
Mazda CX-3's OTR price in Malaysia is RM 126,159 - 139,159, with a total of 2 versions, including 2023 2.0L High (RM 139,159), 2023 2.0L Plus (RM 126,159), etc.
From a price perspective, Proton X70's starting price is indeed RM 19,359 cheaper than Mazda CX-3. If your budget is limited, Proton's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. But note, the few thousand difference might involve trade-offs in features, depending on your needs.
Proton X70 is equipped with 1.5L Turbo, 140 hp. Official fuel consumption 7.0 L/100km.
Mazda CX-3 is equipped with 1.5L Turbo, 140 hp. Official fuel consumption 7.0 L/100km.
Both cars use the same powertrain, and the driving experience feels basically the same. Fuel economy is also similar, so don't worry too much about this.
Proton X70's safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
Mazda CX-3's safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include i-Activsense.
Both cars have the same safety rating, and safety features are quite comprehensive at this level. New cars nowadays generally have good safety, so don't worry too much about this.
Proton X70 warranty 5 years/150,000km, service interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Mazda CX-3 warranty 5 years/150,000km, service interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Both cars have the same warranty conditions, no need to worry about this. Actual maintenance costs depend on the brand's service network and parts prices, it is recommended to ask real owners in car owner groups for experience.
Proton X70 and Mazda CX-3 are both mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, consider the one with better reputation first; if you care more about cost-performance and features, choose the one with richer configuration. Ultimately, it is recommended to test drive both, as personal experience is most important.
Overall, Proton X70 and Mazda CX-3 are both very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose mainly depends on your personal needs and budget. We suggest doing your research, comparing quotes from multiple dealerships, and then test driving to make the final decision. Buying a car is a major event, spending time on research is never wrong.
In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers compare Proton X70 and Honda WR-V when choosing a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will do a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
Proton X70's OTR price in Malaysia is RM 106,800 - 122,300, with a total of 3 versions, including 1.5L Standard 2WD (RM 106,800), 1.5L Executive 2WD (RM 115,800), 1.5L Premium 2WD (RM 122,300), etc.
Honda WR-V's OTR price in Malaysia is RM 89,900 - 107,900, with a total of 4 versions, including 2023 1.5L V (RM 99,900), 2023 1.5L E (RM 95,900), 2023 1.5L S (RM 89,900), etc.
From a price perspective, the starting price of Honda WR-V is RM 16,900 cheaper than Proton X70. Honestly, in this price range, a difference of a few thousand isn't actually that big; the key is still looking at overall value and long-term usage costs.
Proton X70 is equipped with 1.5L Turbo, 140 hp. Official fuel consumption 7.0 L/100km.
Honda WR-V is equipped with 1.5L 4-cyl, 105 hp. Official fuel consumption 6.0 L/100km.
In terms of power, Proton X70's 1.5L Turbo has 35 more horsepower than Honda WR-V's 1.5L 4-cyl, offering more confidence in mid-range acceleration, especially when overtaking on highways. However, Honda WR-V's fuel consumption might be more friendly; the difference in daily city commuting won't be too significant.
Proton X70 warranty 5 years/150,000km, service interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Honda WR-V warranty 5 years/unlimited mileage, service interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Both Proton X70 and Honda WR-V are mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, you can prioritize the one with a better reputation; if you care more about cost-performance and features, then choose the model with richer configuration. Ultimately, it is recommended to test drive both, as firsthand experience is the most important.
Overall, both Proton X70 and Honda WR-V are very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends on your personal needs and budget. It is recommended to do your homework, compare quotes from a few dealerships, and then test drive to make a final decision. Buying a car is a big matter; spending some time researching will never be wrong.
In Malaysia's SUV market, many buyers compare Proton X50 and Chery Tiggo 9 when choosing a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning. Today we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
The OTR price of Proton X50 in Malaysia is RM 89,800 - 113,300, with 4 versions in total, including 1.5T Executive (RM 89,800), 1.5T Premium (RM 101,800), 1.5T Flagship (RM 113,300), etc.
The OTR price of Chery Tiggo 9 in Malaysia is RM 166,800 - 179,800, with 1 version in total, including 2026 2.0T Standard (RM 179,750), etc.
From a price perspective, the starting price of Proton X50 is indeed RM 77,000 cheaper than Chery Tiggo 9. If your budget is limited, Proton's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. But also note, the few thousand savings might involve trade-offs in features, it depends on your needs.
Proton X50 comes with a 1.5L 4-cyl, 105 hp. Official fuel consumption 6.0 L/100km.
Chery Tiggo 9 comes with a 2.0L 4-cyl, 170 hp. Official fuel consumption 8.0 L/100km.
In terms of power, Chery Tiggo 9's 2.0L 4-cyl has 65 hp more than Proton X50's 1.5L 4-cyl. However, for daily driving in the city, both cars have sufficient power and won't feel underpowered.
Proton X50 Body Length 4400 mm, Trunk 400 L.
Chery Tiggo 9 Body Length 4400 mm, Trunk 400 L.
The dimensions of both cars are almost identical, and the difference in interior space is not significant. For cars at this level, daily use is completely sufficient.
Proton X50 and Chery Tiggo 9 are both mainstream choices in the Malaysia market, suitable for family use and daily commute. If you value brand reputation and resale price more, you can prioritize the one with better reputation; if you care more about value for money and features, then choose the one with richer configurations. Ultimately it is suggested to test drive both, personal experience is the most important.
Overall, Proton X50 and Chery Tiggo 9 are both very good models in the Malaysia market. Which one to choose mainly depends on your personal needs and budget. It is recommended to do your research well, compare quotes from multiple dealerships, and then test drive to make the final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending some time doing research will definitely not be wrong.
近日，第八屆「中國卓越管理公司」（BMC）榜單在雄安新區揭曉。中國輪胎商務網（Tirechina.net）獲悉，凌龍輪胎成功蟬聯這一被譽為「中國企業管理奧斯卡」的權威獎項，成為輪胎行業唯一連續兩屆獲此殊榮的企業。
「中國卓越管理公司」（BMC）項目是德勤擁有 32 年歷史的全球性權威獎項，也是目前中國唯一針對企業管理體系進行全面評估的國際獎項。本屆評選歷時 6 個月，評審團通過閉門推薦、企業家訪談及專家調研，運用全球統一的「德勤 BMC 卓越管理標準」，對企業進行了全方位、高標準的嚴格評估。
本屆 BMC 評選釋放出清晰信號：中國領先民營企業正從「中國冠軍」邁向「世界冠軍」。玲瓏連續兩年獲獎，不僅體現了國際專業機構對其全球化戰略佈局、數字化轉型成效以及可持續發展理念的高度認可，更是對其作為中國輪胎行業領軍者地位的有力背書。
以卓越管理定義行業標杆
作為蟬聯 BMC 大獎的輪胎企業，玲瓏輪胎在技術研發、全球佈局、智能製造與綠色轉型等關鍵領域持續深耕，構成了此次蟬聯的深層底氣。
技術研發與產品創新：搶佔新能源與綠色材料制高點。 公司持續將研發投入向新能源賽道傾斜，聚焦低滾阻、靜音棉、超耐磨等電動車專用技術攻關，已形成覆蓋全系列新能源車型的產品矩陣。2026 年，玲瓏大師二代產品依托第七代技術平台全面上市，實現了濕地操控、靜謐駕乘、超長里程等「全週期巔峰性能」，高附加值產品佔比穩步提升。今年以來，玲瓏產品在歐洲權威測評中頻傳捷報：《Auto Bild》夏季胎預選奪得第一，德國《Netzwelt》測試總分第二、獲評「最具價值」，ACE 歐洲汽車俱樂部測試中成為唯一入圍並表現優異的中國品牌。
全球化產能與市場協同：從「產品出海」到「體系出海」全面落地。 玲瓏已建成中國、德國、美國「三國八地」全球研發體系，泰國與塞爾維亞兩大海外基地實現穩定量產，其中塞爾維亞工廠作為中國輪胎在歐洲的首個生產基地，已通過大眾、奧迪、寶馬等德系豪華品牌審核，進入歐洲主流供應鏈。公司與全球十大車企中八家建立配套合作，累計配套輪胎超 3 億條。在國內市場，玲瓏構建了近 3 萬家店門渠道網絡及四級配送體系，新零售「智慧門店系統」實現庫存、銷售、服務的全鏈路數據化管理。
智能製造與數字化轉型：以數據驅動「零缺陷」製造。 玲瓏持續推進工廠智能化改造，依托工業互聯網平台實現從原材料採購到生產製造、終端配送的全流程數據貫通與質量可控，人工質檢誤差率顯著降低。供應鏈協同平台打通了跨工廠、跨區域的產能調配鏈路，訂單交付效率持續優化，為全球客戶提供了更具韌性的供應保障。
ESG 與綠色供應鏈建設：將可持續發展刻入企業基因。 玲瓏明確了「2030 年碳達峰、2050 年碳中和」的清晰路線圖，較巴黎協定目標提前十年。公司已在多個生產基地推進屋頂光伏覆蓋，2026 年可再生能源使用比例穩步提升。與此同時，玲瓏聯合下游夥伴共建廢舊輪胎再生循環網絡，推動輪胎全生命週期管理，以實際行動構建循環經濟模式。
作為輪胎行業唯一連續兩屆入選「中國卓越管理公司」的企業，玲瓏輪胎此次蟬聯，既是德勤全球統一評估體系對其綜合管理能力的權威背書，也為國內輪胎行業的高質量發展樹立了管理標杆。
當前中國輪胎產業正處於向全球化、智能化、綠色化轉型關鍵階段，企業間的競爭早已從單一的產品比拼升級為體系化管理能力的較量。玲瓏在技術研發、全球產能協同、智能製造與 ESG 全鏈條管理上的實踐成果，印證了系統化管理對企業長期發展的支撐作用，也為行業提供了從「產品出海」邁向「體系出海」的參考樣本。後續玲瓏在管理升級與品牌向上路徑上的進展，值得全行業持續關注。
In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers compare the Proton X50 and Toyota Yaris Cross when choosing a car. These two models are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will do a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
The OTR price of the Proton X50 in Malaysia is RM 89,800 - 113,300, with a total of 4 versions, including 1.5T Executive (RM 89,800), 1.5T Premium (RM 101,800), 1.5T Flagship (RM 113,300), etc.
The OTR price of the Toyota Yaris Cross in Malaysia is RM 99,900 - 109,900, with a total of 2 versions, including 2026 1.5L Standard (RM 99,900), 2026 HEV 1.5L Standard (RM 109,900), etc.
From a price perspective, the Proton X50's starting price is indeed RM 10,100 cheaper than the Toyota Yaris Cross. If your budget is limited, Proton's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. However, also note that the few thousand ringgit cheaper might involve compromises on features, depending on your specific needs.
The Proton X50 is equipped with a 1.5L 4-cyl engine, 105 hp. Official fuel consumption 6.0 L/100km.
The Toyota Yaris Cross is equipped with a 1.5L 4-cyl engine, 105 hp. Official fuel consumption 6.0 L/100km.
Both cars use the same powertrain, and the driving feel is basically the same in daily use. Fuel consumption is also similar, so there is no need to worry too much about this point.
Proton X50 body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
Toyota Yaris Cross body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
The dimensions of both cars are almost the same, and the interior space is not much different. For a car in this class, it is completely sufficient for daily use.
Proton X50 warranty 5 years/150,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Toyota Yaris Cross warranty 5 years/unlimited mileage, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
In summary, both the Proton X50 and Toyota Yaris Cross are very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose mainly depends on your personal needs and budget. We suggest doing your research, comparing quotes from several dealerships, and then test driving to make the final decision. Buying a car is a major matter, spending some time on research will never be wrong.
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會用 Proton X50 同 Honda HR-V 嚟做比較。兩款車喺價位同定位上都幾接近嘅，今日我哋就從多個方面做一個詳細嘅比較，幫你節省做功課嘅時間。
Proton X50 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 89,800 - 113,300，合共有 4 個版本，包括 1.5T Executive（RM 89,800）、1.5T Premium（RM 101,800）、1.5T Flagship（RM 113,300）等。
Honda HR-V 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 115,900 - 143,900，合共有 4 個版本，包括 2026 e:HEV 1.5L RS（RM 143,900）、2026 1.5T V（RM 137,900）、2026 1.5T E（RM 130,900）等。
由價錢睇落，Proton X50 嘅起步價確實比 Honda HR-V 平咗 RM 26,100。如果你預算有限，Proton 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需求。不過都要注意，平嘅嗰幾千塊，可能喺配備上要有取舍，具體要睇你嘅需求。
Proton X50 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA)。
Honda HR-V 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 Honda SENSING (ACC, CMBS, LKAS, RDM)。
兩款車嘅安全評級一樣，喺呢個級別入面安全配備都算好齊全。而家嘅新車安全性都唔差，唔使太擔心呢一點。
Proton X50 保修 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Honda HR-V 保修 5 年/無限制里程，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Proton X50 同 Honda HR-V 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更重視品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰一款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，就揀配置更豐富嗰款。最後始終建議兩款都去試駕，親身體驗先至最重要。
總括嚟講，Proton X50 同 Honda HR-V 都係馬來西亞市場好唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵始終要睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做足功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拿 Perodua Aruz 同 Mitsubishi Xforce 來比較。這兩款車喺價位同定位上都幾接近嘅，今日我哋會由多個方面做詳細嘅比較，幫你節省做功課嘅時間。
Perodua Aruz 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 72,900 - 77,900，一共有 2 個版本，包括 1.5L X（RM 72,900）、1.5L AV（RM 77,900） 等。
Mitsubishi Xforce 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 109,930 - 119,930，一共有 2 個版本，包括 2026 1.5L Ultimate（RM 119,930）、2026 1.5L Urban（RM 109,930） 等。
由價錢睇，Perodua Aruz 嘅起步價確實比 Mitsubishi Xforce 平咗 RM 37,030。如果你預算有限，Perodua 嘅入門版已經可以满足日常需要。但都要留意，平嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備方面要有取捨，具體要睇你嘅需求。
Perodua Aruz 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
Mitsubishi Xforce 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
兩款車嘅驅動方式一樣，都係 FWD，日常駕駛感覺唔會差幾多。
Perodua Aruz 包修 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Mitsubishi Xforce 包修 3 年/100,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Perodua Aruz 同 Mitsubishi Xforce 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更重視品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，就揀配備更豐富嗰款。最後都建議兩款都去試駕，親身體驗先至最重要。
總括嚟講，Perodua Aruz 同 Mitsubishi Xforce 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵都要睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做足功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，先去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事情，花啲時間做功課絕對無問題。
Surprisingly, this year's World Cup soccer tournament actually had a 'negative impact' on car sales.
The market analysis report for June released by the CPCA mentioned that with the World Cup starting, the time and budget of car buyers were diverted. Implicitly, cars aren't selling well, and even the World Cup is to blame.
This is not just passing the buck. In the first half of this year, the China auto market was indeed very difficult, where any minor factor could affect final transactions.
According to data, national passenger car retail sales were 8.701 million units in the first half, a year-on-year drop of 20.2%. The drop in June alone widened to 23.2%. Statistics from CAAM also show that total vehicle sales including exports were 15.017 million units, a year-on-year decline of 4.1%.
Fortunately, just like a football match, halftime does not mean the end. In the first 100 matches of this World Cup, based on 90-minute results, 40 matches had different halftime win/draw/loss outcomes compared to the final result.
The second half for automakers has just begun. Whether they can rewrite the score depends on what cards each company holds. But one thing is unquestionable: Only leading automotive enterprises that seriously 'prepare' and have a stable 'chassis' have the opportunity to continue leading.
More Difficult Than Sales Decline is Profit Squeezing
A retail drop of 20.2% is already enough to catch the eye, but the more troublesome pressure compared to sales decline is hidden in the automakers' profit statements.
Data from the National Bureau of Statistics shows that in the first five months of this year, industrial enterprise profits above a certain scale nationwide increased by 18.8% year-on-year, while automobile manufacturing industry profits fell by 19.8%.
During the same period, the automobile industry achieved revenue of 420.96 billion yuan, a 1.4% year-on-year increase, but the profit margin was only 3.4%. Back in 2017, this figure was around 8%.
Revenue barely grew while profits plummeted, indicating that insufficient demand is only part of the pressure. Price competition continues, raw material prices like lithium carbonate and aluminum have risen, and R&D, channel, and marketing investments are hard to shrink synchronously with sales. For many automakers, even if cars are sold, the profit remaining on the balance sheet is decreasing.
This pressure is more intuitive when falling on specific enterprises.
In the first half, Li Auto delivered a cumulative 193,500 units, down 5.13% year-on-year, and saw single-month sales decline for two consecutive months; XPeng delivered 165,000 units, down 15.8% year-on-year. New force automakers that used to maintain high-speed growth are also beginning to face growth pressure brought by the expansion of sales volume bases and intensified product competition.
The situation on the profit side is even more severe.
On July 12, Seres released performance forecasts, expecting a net loss of 1.5 billion to 1.8 billion yuan in the first half, while the net profit for the same period last year was 2.941 billion yuan. This means its performance decreased by more than 4.4 billion yuan compared to the same period last year. Price hikes in raw materials such as memory chips and lithium carbonate have pushed up costs, compounded by book adjustments of certain existing assets, significantly impacting its profitability.
The pressure is also transmitting to the channel end. In June, the dealer inventory warning index reached 57.2%, continuing to remain above the prosperity-thriving line; more than 70% of dealer stores did not complete their half-year sales targets. Slower inventory turnover and expanded terminal discounts further compressed the profit space for dealers and automakers.
The new energy market is no exception either. The penetration rate of new energy in June has reached 62.8%, but new energy passenger car retail sales still dropped by 14% in the first half. The substitution of new energy for fuel vehicles continues, but no longer naturally equates to the total growth of the auto market.
Insufficient domestic market growth has also made exports an important direction for automakers to seek new growth and diversify operational pressure.
Exports Contribute Growth, Going Overseas Shifts to Local Operation
Data from CAAM shows that in the first half of the year, China's auto exports reached 5.096 million units, a 65.3% year-on-year increase; June alone exports were 1.037 million units, a 75.1% year-on-year increase, with monthly export volume standing at the million-unit level for the first time.
While domestic demand shrinks, exports have become an important fulcrum for many automakers to maintain scale. However, from exporting whole vehicles to building factories overseas to opening channels with international partners, the paths chosen by each company are not the same.
Chery remains the vanguard of exports. In the first half, Chery Group exported 943,800 units, accounting for nearly 70% of total sales; June alone saw exports of 191,100 units, breaking the record for single-month exports by Chinese automakers.
BYD's overseas focus is shifting from whole vehicle exports to local manufacturing. In the first half, BYD sold 789,400 units overseas, a 68% year-on-year increase; June overseas sales accounted for more than 40% of its total monthly sales. With factories in Brazil and Thailand coming into production successively, BYD is gradually spreading capacity 'beyond tariff barriers'.
Geely and Leapmotor's export growth rates are equally outstanding. Geely exported 474,200 units in the first half, a 158% increase year-on-year; first-half export volume has already exceeded that of the full year of 2025. Leapmotor utilized Stellantis' channels and factory layout to go overseas, exporting nearly 100,000 units in the first half, also exceeding the full previous year. Borrowing from a mature global system allowed Leapmotor to save the time needed to build its own channels and capacity.
SAIC's overseas sales in the first half were 735,000 units, a 48.7% year-on-year increase, accounting for about 36% of the group's total sales. Overseas manufacturing, channel, and brand systems accumulated over the years have become an important buffer in this round of domestic market adjustments.
Changan is also accelerating the transformation from product exports to local operations. The 2.0 version of the 'Sea Accepts Rivers' plan released in April proposed long-term, local, and systematic approaches, promoting global business extension into manufacturing, investment, service, and brand operations. With the landing of multiple results such as Brazilian President witnessing the Brazil factory production start, the 20,000th whole vehicle coming off the line at the Thailand factory, and Qiyuan Q05 launching in Uzbekistan, overseas localization layout is gradually showing results. In the first half, Changan delivered 402,000 units overseas, a 35.1% year-on-year increase, accounting for about one-third of the group's delivery volume.
In May, Changan reached a global official cooperation agreement with the Portuguese National Football Team. Carrying out sports marketing in the World Cup year can also be seen as a step where its overseas investment extends from channel construction to brand operations.
As the proportion of overseas sales in the enterprise's total portfolio continues to increase, export numbers are no longer the only standard for measuring the effectiveness of globalization.Tariff policies, certification standards, and consumption habit differences in different markets are significantly distinct. Channels, after-sales, local production, and brand building all require long-term investment, and may not directly translate into profits in the short term.
Therefore, in the second half of the year when evaluating automakers' overseas performance, sales volume is still the foundation, but local operation efficiency, brand recognition, and profit quality will become more important. Whether exports can truly precipitate into long-term growth depends on whether automakers can move from 'selling cars' to 'operating locally'.
Viewing Sales Proportion: Domestic Market Is Still the Main Battlefield
The rapid growth of overseas markets has not changed the basic proportion of the domestic market.
Data from CAAM shows that domestic car sales in the first half were 9.921 million units. Although down 21.1% year-on-year, the scale is still close to twice that of exports, accounting for about two-thirds of total auto sales. Calculated by half-year alone, one percentage point of market share is close to 100,000 units. No mainstream automaker would give up easily.
Domestic market competition is already fierce, but overseas giants have also not chosen to leave.
Data from the CPCA shows that in June, domestic retail of mainstream joint venture brand new energy passenger cars increased by 45% year-on-year. Volkswagen plans to launch more than 20 electrified models in China this year. The locally developed CEA electronic/electrical architecture has entered mass production with the first model, and subsequent models will also be launched successively within the year. As joint venture brands accelerate local R&D and new energy transformation, competition intensity in the domestic market will continue to increase.
Facing internal demand pressure, domestic independent brands are also looking for breakthrough points from different directions such as products, technology, organization, and capacity.
BYD stabilizes the sales basic disk while supplementing infrastructure. June sales reached 403,500 units, achieving year-on-year positive growth again; Megawatt flash charging is also starting to move from conferences to implementation, and charging networks are gradually spreading nationwide.
Geely is asking internal efficiency.Li Shufu proposed 'stopping, merging, transferring, and transforming' redundant entities, compressing repeated brand and R&D investments, and concentrating resources further on main platforms. In the first half, Geely stabilized overall sales volume with 1.423 million units.
New forces in the growth phase have also not stopped expanding. Leapmotor delivered 356,500 units in the first half, a 60% year-on-year increase, becoming the new force with the highest sales volume. The A10 launched in March entered the top three in SUV sales in three months, and the flagship model D19 cut into the fiercely competitive mid-to-large SUV market, promoting volume sales and brand elevation along two lines simultaneously.
Xiaomi delivered more than 180,000 units cumulatively in the first half. Compared to the 550,000 annual target set at the beginning of the year, monthly delivery volume in the second half needs to be increased to above 60,000. Expanding capacity and accelerating deliveries will become the core task of its second half.
Changan Auto achieved deliveries of 1.1956 million units in the first half, with 402,000 units delivered overseas (up 35.1% year-on-year), and new energy deliveries of 456,000 units (up 5.2% year-on-year). In the second half of this year, Changan Auto will concentrate on promoting product launches and technology implementation, continuously promoting the strategic synergy of Avatr and Deepal frontend independence and backend integration, while accelerating the application of self-developed intelligent technology.Currently, the Tiandu intelligent driving assistance function has been successively applied to Qiyuan Q07, A06, and the new Q05. According to the mass production plan announced in May this year, the Qiyuan Q06 launching in the second half will be equipped with Tiandu Pilot on all models, becoming an important node for Changan's self-developed assisted driving solution to further expand its application.
The domestic market still has a semi-annual scale of nearly 10 million units, and replacement demand will not disappear into thin air. The issue is, facing the increasingly dense new car launches and continuously increasing price pressure, automakers not only need to compete for sales but also need to try to repair profits.
In the second half, whether new cars can quickly gain volume, whether technology can be converted into experiences consumers are willing to pay for, and whether scale growth can bring operational efficiency improvements will jointly determine the performance of automakers in the domestic market.
Final Remarks:
In the first half of this year, the pressure on China's auto industry was reflected simultaneously at both sales and profit ends.Exports grew rapidly, providing a new scale fulcrum for automakers; but the domestic market still determines the basic disk of most enterprises and is the most intensely competitive main battlefield in the second half of the year.
The key to follow lies in whether overseas layout can precipitate into continuous orders and local operating capabilities, whether domestic new products can form scale delivery, and whether technology investment can truly be converted into revenue and profit.
For automakers that have completed a certain amount of preliminary layout, subsequent performance depends on whether products, technology, and global reserve can be timely redeemed for sales and income.
For the entire industry, simply pursuing sales volume is no longer enough; delivery speed, cost control, and profit quality will become equally important.
Halftime has passed, but the outcome has not yet been determined.
In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers often compare Perodua Aruz and Honda HR-V when choosing a car. Both cars are quite close in price and positioning. Today we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to save you time doing research.
Perodua Aruz OTR price in Malaysia is RM 72,900 - 77,900, with a total of 2 versions, including 1.5L X (RM 72,900), 1.5L AV (RM 77,900), etc.
Honda HR-V OTR price in Malaysia is RM 115,900 - 143,900, with a total of 4 versions, including 2026 e:HEV 1.5L RS (RM 143,900), 2026 1.5T V (RM 137,900), 2026 1.5T E (RM 130,900), etc.
Looking at the price, Perodua Aruz's starting price is indeed RM 43,000 cheaper than Honda HR-V. If your budget is limited, Perodua's entry-level model can already meet daily needs. But also note, the few thousand difference might have trade-offs in features, it depends on your specific needs.
Perodua Aruz safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include .
Honda HR-V safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include Honda SENSING (ACC, CMBS, LKAS, RDM).
Both cars have the same safety rating, and safety features in this class are considered very comprehensive. New car safety is not poor nowadays, no need to worry too much about this point.
Perodua Aruz vehicle length 4400 mm, Boot 400 L.
Honda HR-V vehicle length 4500 mm, Boot 450 L.
Regarding space, Honda HR-V's body is 100 mm longer than Perodua Aruz, offering better passenger space. However, Perodua Aruz is more flexible for parking in the city, each has trade-offs.
Perodua Aruz and Honda HR-V are both popular choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, prioritize the one with better reputation; if you value value for money and features more, choose the one with richer configuration. Ultimately, we suggest test driving both, personal experience is the most important.
Overall, Perodua Aruz and Honda HR-V are both very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends on your personal needs and budget. We suggest doing your research, compare quotes from a few dealerships, and then test drive to make a final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending some time doing research will never go wrong.
In Malaysia's SUV market, many buyers compare Perodua Aruz and Honda HR-V when choosing a car. The prices and positioning of these two cars are quite similar. Today we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
Perodua Aruz is priced at RM 72,900 - 77,900 OTR in Malaysia, with 2 versions in total, including 1.5L X (RM 72,900), 1.5L AV (RM 77,900), etc.
Honda HR-V is priced at RM 115,900 - 143,900 OTR in Malaysia, with 4 versions in total, including 2026 e:HEV 1.5L RS (RM 143,900), 2026 1.5T V (RM 137,900), 2026 1.5T E (RM 130,900), etc.
Looking at the price, Perodua Aruz's starting price is indeed RM 43,000 cheaper than Honda HR-V. If your budget is limited, Perodua's entry-level version is already sufficient for daily needs. However, note that the few thousand savings might come with trade-offs in features, depending on your specific needs.
Perodua Aruz body length is 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
Honda HR-V body length is 4500 mm, trunk 450 L.
In terms of space, Honda HR-V's body is 100 mm longer than Perodua Aruz, offering an advantage in passenger space. However, Perodua Aruz is slightly more flexible for parking in the city, each has trade-offs.
Perodua Aruz warranty 5 years/150,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Honda HR-V warranty 5 years/unlimited mileage, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Perodua Aruz and Honda HR-V are both mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, you can prioritize the one with better reputation; if you care more about value for money and features, then choose the one with richer configuration. Ultimately, it is recommended to test drive both, personal experience is the most important.
Overall, Perodua Aruz and Honda HR-V are both very good car models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends mainly on your personal needs and budget. It is recommended that everyone do their homework, compare quotes from several car dealerships, and then test drive to make a final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending some time doing homework will never be wrong.
In Malaysia's SUV market, many buyers compare Perodua Aruz and Honda HR-V when choosing a car. These two models are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
Perodua Aruz OTR price in Malaysia is RM 72,900 - 77,900, with a total of 2 versions, including 1.5L X (RM 72,900), 1.5L AV (RM 77,900), etc.
Honda HR-V OTR price in Malaysia is RM 115,900 - 143,900, with a total of 4 versions, including 2026 e:HEV 1.5L RS (RM 143,900), 2026 1.5T V (RM 137,900), 2026 1.5T E (RM 130,900), etc.
From a price perspective, the starting price of Perodua Aruz is indeed RM 43,000 cheaper than Honda HR-V. If your budget is limited, Perodua's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. But note that the few thousand cheaper might mean compromises on equipment, it depends on your specific needs.
Perodua Aruz is equipped with 1.5L 4-cyl, 105 hp. Official fuel consumption 6.0 L/100km.
Honda HR-V is equipped with 1.5L Turbo, 140 hp. Official fuel consumption 7.0 L/100km.
Regarding power, Honda HR-V's 1.5L Turbo has 35 more horsepower than Perodua Aruz's 1.5L 4-cyl. However, for daily city driving, both cars have enough power and won't feel underpowered.
Perodua Aruz body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
Honda HR-V body length 4500 mm, trunk 450 L.
In terms of space, Honda HR-V's body is 100 mm longer than Perodua Aruz, offering an advantage in seating space. However, Perodua Aruz is more flexible for parking in the city, each has its trade-offs.
Perodua Aruz uses FWD drive type.
Honda HR-V uses FWD drive type.
Both cars have the same drive type, both are FWD, daily driving experience won't differ much.
Overall, Perodua Aruz and Honda HR-V are both very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends mainly on your personal needs and budget. We suggest doing research, comparing quotes from several dealerships, and test driving before making a final decision. Buying a car is a big deal, spending time on research will never be wrong.
喺馬來西亞嘅皮卡市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會揀 Nissan Navara 同 Mazda BT-50 嚟做比較。呢兩部車喺價位同定位上都幾接近，今日我哋就從多個方面做一個詳細嘅對比，幫你省咗做功課嘅時間。
Nissan Navara 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 98,600 - 154,800，一共有 5 個版本，包括 2025 Single Cab 2.5T MT（RM 98,600）、2025 Double Cab 2.5T AT Pro-4X（RM 154,800）、2025 Double Cab 2.5T AT VL（RM 146,900） 等。
Mazda BT-50 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 140,418 - 140,418，一共有 1 個版本，包括 2025 3.0T High Plus（RM 140,418） 等。
從價錢嚟講，Nissan Navara 嘅起步價確實比 Mazda BT-50 平咗 RM 41,818。如果你預算有限，Nissan 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需求。但要留意，平嗰幾千幾萬，喺配備上可能有取捨，視乎你嘅需求。
Nissan Navara 搭載 2.5L 柴油，馬力 187 hp。官方油耗 8.5 L/100km。
Mazda BT-50 搭載 2.5L 柴油，馬力 187 hp。官方油耗 8.5 L/100km。
兩款車用咗同一套動力系統，日常開落嚟嘅感覺基本冇差別。油耗方面都差不多，唔使太糾結呢一點。
Nissan Navara 車身長 4400 mm，後備箱 400 L。
Mazda BT-50 車身長 4400 mm，後備箱 400 L。
兩款車嘅尺寸幾乎一樣，車內空間差別唔大。呢個級別嘅車，日常使用完全夠用。
Nissan Navara 採用前輪驅動方式。
Mazda BT-50 採用前輪驅動方式。
兩款車嘅驅動方式一樣，都係前輪驅動，日常駕駛感覺唔會有太大分別。
Nissan Navara 同 Mazda BT-50 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更睇重品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更佳嗰一款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，就揀配備更豐富嗰款。最後始終建議兩部都去試駕，親身體驗先係最緊要。
總括嚟講，Nissan Navara 同 Mazda BT-50 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一部，關鍵仲係要睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做足功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最後決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
兄弟姐妹們，今日講一個出海嘅大新聞——唔係賣車，係賣「司機」。6 月 2 號，文遠知行同 Uber 聯合宣佈咗一件事：計劃喺西班牙馬德里推出該國首個商業化 Robotaxi 試點服務。意思就係：西班牙人好快就可以用 Uber 叫到一台冇司機嘅出租車。呢次係文遠知行同 Uber 第一次一齊進入歐洲市場。馬德里亦成為文遠知行 Robotaxi 駛入嘅全球第十二個城市。
官方消息話，喺馬德里自治區政府嘅支持下，呢項服務今年內就會正式啟動。到嗰陣，馬德里嘅朋友哋打開 Uber App，就有一鍵呼叫文遠知行嘅 Robotaxi。同叫普通網約車一樣，分別係嚟嘅車冇駕駛員——至少喺初期，仲係有分別嘅。運營初期，車入面會配備經過專業培訓嘅安全員，終究係剛上線，穩妥第一。
文遠知行呢間公司，你可能聽過，也可能冇聽過。簡單介紹下：2017 年成立，一直埋頭搞 Robotaxi 技術研發同商業化。而家佢嘅 Robotaxi 已經覆蓋咗廣州、北京、新加坡、阿布達比、迪拜、利雅得、蘇黎世……加埋而家嘅馬德里，一共 12 個城市。西班牙亦係文遠知行進入嘅第五個歐洲市場——之前已經入咗瑞士、法國、比利時、斯洛伐克。按照文遠知行同 Uber 喺 2025 年 5 月達成嘅規劃，佢哋要喺五年內新增 15 個國際城市部署 Robotaxi 服務，全球部署數萬輛 Robotaxi。隨著馬德里落地，目前已經完成咗 4 個城市嘅佈局，仲有 11 個會喺 2030 年前陸續覆蓋。
講真嘅，中國自動駕駛公司出海唔係頭一回，但中國技術 + 全球出行平台 + 歐洲市場呢個組合，定係好有意思。馬德里係歐洲最具商業潛力嘅 Robotaxi 市場之一，人口多、出行需求大，當地政策都好友善。喺呢個市場站穩腳根，對文遠知行嚟講係個唔小嘅里程碑。對 Uber 嚟講，引進 Robotaxi 都係為咗降低成本——終究司機唔使發人工。對馬德里市民嚟講，以後打車可能更平。
車型概覽
Tesla Cybertruck 值唔值得睇，第一步唔係望牌子或者外形，而係睇佢能唔能夠配合你嘅香港日常。 呢篇會集中講版本取捨，幫你用買家角度篩走唔適合嘅選擇。
售價仍待確認，買家可以先把佢放入候選名單，等價格落實後再同同級車逐項比較。
購車價格指南
Tesla Cybertruck 目前售價仍未清晰，較理性嘅做法係先睇版本、車身大小同動力形式，等價格落實後再決定值唔值得落訂。
如果有幾個版本可揀，可以先將 2025 523km 四驅版（價格待確認）、2025 515km 四驅Cyberbeast版（價格待確認） 放喺同一張清單。日常通勤重視舒適同易用，家庭買家就要優先睇後排、尾箱同安全配置。
核心規格重點
睇 Tesla Cybertruck 嘅規格，重點唔係背數字，而係理解佢喺香港用車場景會帶嚟咩分別。
車長 5283 mm、車闊 2201 mm、車高 1791 mm 可以幫你預判商場停車場、屋苑車位同後排腿部空間。 固定齒比、雙電機四駆 / 三電機四駆 會影響起步順滑度、濕地穩定感同長途巡航性格。
優缺點分析
Tesla Cybertruck 嘅優點唔需要講到天花龍鳳，真正有價值係佢能唔能夠令日常用車更省心：空間同車身尺寸方便家庭買家預判實用性。
要留意嘅係，香港停車場同窄路使用要留意車身闊度、售價未清晰前唔應該太早用性價比落結論。呢啲唔一定係缺點，但係落訂前應該先諗清楚。
買家常見問題
買 Tesla Cybertruck 之前，真正要問嘅唔係單一規格，而係佢可唔可以融入你每日嘅生活節奏。
常見疑問係「Tesla Cybertruck 最頂級嘅「Cyberbeast」版有幾癲？」簡單講，癲。Tesla Cybertruck 最勁嘅「Cyberbeast」三摩打版本，馬力達到驚人嘅 845 匹，0 至 96 km/h 加速最快只需 2.6 秒。佢嘅續航力（EPA 標準）大約係 515 公里。呢個版本主要以性能為先，係一部超跑級嘅電動貨車。 放到實際用車，就係要睇佢對通勤、泊車、家庭乘坐同長期成本有幾大幫助。
同級對比內容
將 Tesla Cybertruck 放入同級車清單時，唔建議只用外形或者品牌光環決定。比較順序可以係：先等售價落實，再決定佢應該同邊個級距比較、最後睇車身大小、座位同尾箱是否適合家人。
咁樣篩選會貼近香港買家真實生活：平日塞車、商場泊車、周末去新界、甚至一家人出入，先係一部車每日要面對嘅考驗。
用車全周期指南
擁有 Tesla Cybertruck 唔係買車一刻就完結，之後仲有保險、輪胎、保養、泊車同日常能源成本要處理。
如果你主要喺市區行，視野、低速順滑度同泊車輔助會好影響心情；如果經常行高速或跨區，座椅舒適度、隔音同動力從容感會更重要。
