首頁Honda Vezel
搜尋歷史
熱門搜尋
經銷商登入 / 註冊
On October 1, Geely Automobile Holdings Limited released its September performance report: 292,168 vehicles, setting a new high for the year, with consecutive double growth in YoY and MoM for 7 months. NEV reached 190,868 vehicles, accounting for 65%; Overseas exports 106,685 vehicles, surging 162% YoY. Cumulative Jan–Sept 2,235,481 vehicles, NEV cumulative 1,326,364 vehicles. The numbers aren't noisy, but they are explosive enough. Some ask, why is Geely getting fiercer with more competition? The answer isn't in one hit product, but in three curves rising simultaneously. Today we unpack this report to see which three trump cards "One Geely" actually reveals.
1. 292,168 Vehicles, Seven Consecutive Months Growth is Not Hot Air
September sales 292,168 vehicles, up 7% YoY, up 8% MoM, consecutive 7 months of double growth YoY and MoM. Even more impressive is the Jan–Sept cumulative 2,235,481 vehicles, setting a historical high for the same period, up 3% YoY. This isn't hitting the windfall in a single month, but making growth an inertia. NEV sector September sales including Geely, Lynk & Co, Zeekr totaled 190,868 vehicles, setting a single-month NEV historical high, up 16% YoY, proportion pulled to 65%. For every three cars sold, about two are electric. Breakdown: Geely Brand 236,459 vehicles, Geely Galaxy 130,479 vehicles, China Star 105,980 vehicles, Lynk & Co 18,493 vehicles, Zeekr 37,216 vehicles. Zeekr up 104% YoY, Lynk & Co NEV sales 17,039 vehicles, Galaxy up MoM and YoM. My point is direct: Geely this time isn't relying on low prices for volume, but on structural upward shift. Fuel base stabilized, NEV pushing high, premium brands breaking circles. Sales are the result, structure is the answer. Behind the seven consecutive months of growth, product matrix, price bands, and brand momentum are all working together. Rivals wanting to catch up must first catch up to this rhythm.
2. NEV Accounts for 65%, Three Brands All on the Table
Zeekr submitted first: September delivery 37,216 vehicles, up 104% YoY; Jan–Sept delivery 288,404 vehicles, up 101% YoY. Zeekr 9X in the 500k+ large SUV market pulled sales, reputation, resale value to max. Zeekr 7X broke 10k deliveries for 3 consecutive months, global cumulative delivery over 200,000. Lynk & Co is also capable: September sales 18,493 vehicles, up 9% MoM, NEV product sales 17,039 vehicles; Jan–Sept cumulative 196,117 vehicles, NEV 140,209 vehicles. Lynk & Co 08 EM-P global cumulative delivery near 200,000, Lynk & Co 06 global over 300,000 units, Lynk & Co 07GT delivery broke 10k, becoming the fastest Chinese wagon to reach 10k delivery. New Lynk & Co models launched 1 hour pre-orders broke 14,633 vehicles. Geely Galaxy September sales 130,479 vehicles, setting a new single-month high for the year; Geely Star Wish consecutive 4 months over 50,000, September sold 60,871 vehicles; Galaxy Starship 7 sales 22,059 vehicles, Galaxy E5 sales 12,695 vehicles. Galaxy Warship 700 pre-sale 9 mins orders broke 10,000, 60 mins broke 43,900. China Star September sales 105,980 vehicles, Preface L PLUS, 4th Gen Boyue L continuing to add firepower. Luxury, Premium, Mass Market, Fuel, Geely filled the table. Three brands aren't fighting for rice, but making the cake bigger together.
3. Overseas Surged 162%, System-Based Overseas Expansion is Scary
Overseas exports consecutive 4 months over 100,000 vehicles. September export 106,685 vehicles, up 162% YoY; Jan–Sept export 797,670 vehicles, up 169% YoY. NEV export even more exaggerated: September 73,664 vehicles, surged 403% YoY, proportion 69%; Jan–Sept 484,086 vehicles, surged 531% YoY, proportion 61%. What does this mean? Geely going global isn't just putting cars on ships, it's moving brand, channel, manufacturing, service out together. Zeekr 9X large shipment to UAE, local price approx RMB over 800,000; Zeekr 009 in Thailand, Malaysia consecutive months EV MPV sales champion. Lynk & Co top in Ecuador premium sub-market, solid results in Tunisia, Mexico. Geely Brand Australia monthly sales broke 4,500 vehicles, Panama top Chinese brand sales, Brazil cumulative over 36,000, UK cumulative over 10,000. Even worse is system landing: First locally manufactured in Brazil Geely Galaxy Starship 7 rolled off line; Reached agreement with Volvo, from Jan 2027 Volvo becomes Lynk & Co Europe exclusive distributor; Geely Smart Charge released, single gun peak charging power 2250 kilowatts, max charging temp controlled within 65°C, battery cycle life increased 20%. Qianli Haohan assisted driving reached 1 million installations, activation rate 93.8%. From product going global to system going global, Geely is changing lanes to overtake.
Conclusion: 292,168 vehicles is not the endpoint, but a new benchmark for "One Geely" high-quality upward development. NEV, Globalization, AI Technology three lines advancing together. Geely made hits into matrix, went global into system, made tech into experience. Consecutive 7 months double growth YoY and MoM, the scariest part isn't the numbers, but growth starting to have methods, rhythm, and stamina. Next quarter, pressure really given to rivals.
August 2026, Australia new car market deliveries reached 108,760 units, up 4.9% year-on-year. Behind the stable figures lies a historic shift in powertrains: 27,078 Battery Electric Vehicles (BEVs) were delivered, surging 169.4% year-on-year. With a market share of 24.9%, BEVs surpassed petrol, diesel, and hybrid for the first time, becoming the top powertrain type in Australia; Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicles (PHEVs) also grew 171.1% to 10,591 units. The Tesla Model Y topped the overall model sales list, while BYD secured second place among brands with 8,231 units (+68.8%), making New Energy brands the biggest winners of the month.
As pickups bear heavy-load tasks such as hauling, towing, and off-roading, their requirements for range and power are far higher than ordinary passenger cars; consequently, their electrification lags significantly behind the overall market — but August data shows they can no longer stay isolated.
Toyota Hilux retained the pickup title with 4,833 units, but saw only a slight increase of 0.2% year-on-year, essentially standing still. Ford Ranger suffered a cliff-like drop, delivering only 2,440 units, plummeting 50.6% year-on-year — primarily due to a temporary delivery halt caused by safety concerns with side air curtains, resulting in a monthly loss of about 2,500 units, which is a supply-side shock rather than a demand collapse.
Isuzu D-Max delivered 1,708 units (-26.2%), Mitsubishi Triton 1,161 units (-23.8%), and Mazda BT-50 recorded 804 units (-29.4%); all three Japanese diesel pickups declined by double digits. Volkswagen Amarok 306 units (-27.7%), Nissan Navara 277 units (-53.2%), and Kia Tasman performed the worst with only 312 units, down 61.1% year-on-year.
Pickups manufactured in China continued to expand their presence. BYD Shark 6 led Chinese brand pickups with 1,385 units, followed closely by Great Wall Cannon with 827 units. Adding Maxus LDV pickups (T60 + Terron 9 totaling 423 units), Foton Tunland V7 (124 units), MG U9 (115 units), JAC T9 (77 units), and others, total Chinese pickups reached approximately 2,951 units, accounting for about 18.5% of the Australian pickup market. In contrast, vehicles manufactured in Thailand delivered 15,658 units in August, down 24.7% year-on-year, driven almost entirely by the contraction of the pickup segment — Thailand is the main production base for Japanese pickups.
Amidst the general decline, BYD Shark 6 grew 9.8% year-on-year, reaching a year-to-date total of 12,094 units, becoming one of the few mainstream pickups with positive growth. Its PHEV positioning balances electric driving experience with pickup utility needs, coupled with BYD's strong brand power and more competitive pricing, opening up new volume outside of traditional diesel pickups. Notably, New Energy itself is not a guarantee of growth; brand momentum, pricing, and supply rhythm are key.
The full-size pickup market showed clear divergence. Ford F-150 delivered 152 units (surged from a low base), Chevrolet Silverado 1500 delivered 148 units (-6.9%), and RAM 1500 fell 32.6% to 149 units. Premium pickups above A$100,000 overall grew 18.1% to 764 units, forming a contrast with mainstream market weakness.
Final thoughts: August data clearly shows that even in the pickup segment where electrification is inevitably lagging, traditional fuel powertrains are also feeling a clear chill. Ranger's delivery halt amplified the decline. BYD Shark 6's growth against the trend validated the viability of PHEVs in the pickup market. Chinese brands like Great Wall Cannon, Maxus LDV, and others became an undeniable force in the Australian pickup market through stable sales volumes and forward-looking new energy layouts. With Ranger resuming deliveries in September and more hybrids and EV pickups entering the market, how the Australian pickup landscape will change again remains to be seen.
In Malaysia's SUV market, many buyers compare Honda WR-V and MG MG HS when choosing a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
Honda WR-V's OTR price in Malaysia is RM 89,900 - 107,900, with a total of 4 versions, including 2023 1.5L V (RM 99,900), 2023 1.5L E (RM 95,900), 2023 1.5L S (RM 89,900), etc.
MG MG HS's OTR price in Malaysia is RM 130,450 - 146,450, with a total of 2 versions, including 1.5L Standard (RM 105,000), 1.5L Executive (RM 115,000), etc.
From a price perspective, Honda WR-V's starting price is indeed RM 40,550 cheaper than MG MG HS. If your budget is limited, Honda's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. But note, the few thousand cheaper might have trade-offs in features, depending on your specific needs.
Honda WR-V's safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include Honda SENSING.
MG MG HS's safety rating is TBD, active safety systems include Basic.
In terms of safety features, both cars received good ratings. However, there are some differences in function between Honda WR-V's Honda SENSING and MG MG HS's Basic. If you value active safety highly, you can compare the function lists of both carefully.
Honda WR-V body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
MG MG HS body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
The dimensions of both cars are almost the same, with little difference in interior space. Cars in this class are more than enough for daily use.
Honda WR-V adopts FWD drive mode.
MG MG HS adopts FWD drive mode.
Both cars have the same drive mode, both are FWD, so daily driving feel won't differ much.
Overall, Honda WR-V and MG MG HS are both very good models in the Malaysia market. Which one to choose depends on your personal needs and budget. We suggest doing your research well, comparing quotes from several dealerships, and then test driving to make the final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending time doing research will definitely not be wrong.
In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers compare Honda WR-V and Chery Tiggo 8 when choosing a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning, so today we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to save you time on research.
Honda WR-V's OTR price in Malaysia is RM 89,900 - 107,900, totaling 4 versions, including 2023 1.5L V (RM 99,900), 2023 1.5L E (RM 95,900), 2023 1.5L S (RM 89,900), etc.
Chery Tiggo 8's OTR price in Malaysia is RM 129,750 - 129,750, totaling 1 version, including 2026 1.6T Standard (RM 129,750), etc.
From a pricing perspective, the Honda WR-V's starting price is indeed RM 39,850 cheaper than the Chery Tiggo 8. If your budget is limited, Honda's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. However, keep in mind that the savings of a few thousand might involve trade-offs in features, depending on your specific requirements.
Honda WR-V body length is 4400 mm, trunk space 400 L.
Chery Tiggo 8 body length is 4400 mm, trunk space 400 L.
The dimensions of the two cars are almost identical, with little difference in interior space. For this class of vehicles, they are more than sufficient for daily use.
Honda WR-V warranty 5 years/unlimited mileage, maintenance interval every 10,000 km or 6 months.
Chery Tiggo 8 warranty 3 years/100,000 km, maintenance interval every 10,000 km or 6 months.
Both Honda WR-V and Chery Tiggo 8 are mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, prioritize the one with better reputation; if you care more about value for money and features, choose the one with richer configuration. Ultimately, we recommend test driving both models, as personal experience is most important.
Overall, both Honda WR-V and Chery Tiggo 8 are very good models in the Malaysian market. The choice depends on your personal needs and budget. We suggest doing your research, comparing quotes from multiple dealerships, and test driving before making a final decision. Buying a car is a major decision, spending time on research will definitely not be a mistake.
In the SUV market in Malaysia, many buyers compare Proton X90 and Mazda CX-5 when choosing a car. Both cars are quite close in price and positioning. Today we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save the time spent on research.
The OTR price of Proton X90 in Malaysia is RM 106,800 - 122,800, with a total of 4 versions, including 2026 1.5T Prime X (RM 122,800), 2026 1.5T Prime (RM 116,800), 2026 1.5T Lite (RM 106,800), etc.
The OTR price of Mazda CX-5 in Malaysia is RM 135,469 - 166,760, with a total of 3 versions, including 2025 2.0L AT 35th Anniversary (RM 316,154), 2025 2.0L AT (RM 296,154), 2025 2.0L MT (RM 294,154), etc.
From a price perspective, the starting price of Proton X90 is indeed RM 28,669 cheaper than Mazda CX-5. If your budget is limited, Proton's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. However, note that the few thousand difference might involve trade-offs in features, it depends on your specific needs.
Proton X90 is equipped with 1.5L Turbo, 140 hp. Official fuel consumption is 7.0 L/100km.
Mazda CX-5 is equipped with 1.5L Turbo, 140 hp. Official fuel consumption is 7.0 L/100km.
Both cars use the same powertrain system, the driving experience feels basically the same in daily use. Fuel consumption is also similar, no need to worry too much about this point.
The safety rating of Proton X90 is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
The safety rating of Mazda CX-5 is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include .
Both cars have the same safety rating, safety features in this class are quite comprehensive. New car safety is not bad nowadays, no need to worry too much about this.
Proton X90 body length is 4400 mm, trunk is 400 L.
Mazda CX-5 body length is 4500 mm, trunk is 450 L.
In terms of space, Mazda CX-5's body is 100 mm longer than Proton X90, offering an advantage in passenger space. However, Proton X90 is slightly more flexible for parking in the city, each has its trade-offs.
Proton X90 adopts the FWD drive system.
Mazda CX-5 adopts the FWD drive system.
Both cars have the same drive system, both are FWD, daily driving experience will not differ much.
Overall, Proton X90 and Mazda CX-5 are both very good car models in the Malaysia market. Choosing which one depends on your personal needs and budget. We suggest doing your research, comparing quotes from multiple dealerships, and test driving before making a final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending some time doing research will definitely not be wrong.
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拿 Proton X90 同 Mazda CX-5 嚟做比較。這兩款車喺價位同定位上都幾接近，今日我哋就從多個方面做一個詳細嘅比較，幫你節省做功課嘅時間。
Proton X90 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 106,800 - 122,800，一共有 4 個版本，包括 2026 1.5T Prime X（RM 122,800）、2026 1.5T Prime（RM 116,800）、2026 1.5T Lite（RM 106,800） 等。
Mazda CX-5 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 135,469 - 166,760，一共有 3 個版本，包括 2025 2.0L AT 35th Anniversary（RM 316,154）、2025 2.0L AT（RM 296,154）、2025 2.0L MT（RM 294,154） 等。
從價錢嚟睇，Proton X90 嘅起步價確實比 Mazda CX-5 平咗 RM 28,669。如果你預算有限，Proton 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需求。但都要注意，平嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備上會有取捨，具體要睇你嘅需求。
Proton X90 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
Mazda CX-5 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
兩款車嘅驅動方式一樣，都係 FWD，日常駕駛感受唔會有太大區別。
Proton X90 保修 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Mazda CX-5 保修 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
兩款車嘅保修條件一樣，呢方面唔使糾結。實際保養成本仲要睇品牌嘅服務網絡同零件價格，建議去車友群問下真實車主嘅經驗。
Proton X90 同 Mazda CX-5 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更重視品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰一款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，就揀配備更豐富嗰款。最終都係建議兩款都去試駕，親身體驗先係最重要。
總體嚟講，Proton X90 同 Mazda CX-5 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵都係要睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，先去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
In the SUV market in Malaysia, many buyers compare Proton X90 and Toyota Yaris Cross when choosing a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning. Today we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
The OTR price of Proton X90 in Malaysia is RM 106,800 - 122,800, with a total of 4 variants, including 2026 1.5T Prime X (RM 122,800), 2026 1.5T Prime (RM 116,800), 2026 1.5T Lite (RM 106,800), etc.
The OTR price of Toyota Yaris Cross in Malaysia is RM 99,900 - 109,900, with a total of 2 variants, including 2026 1.5L Standard (RM 99,900), 2026 HEV 1.5L Standard (RM 109,900), etc.
From a price perspective, the starting price of Toyota Yaris Cross is RM 6,900 cheaper than Proton X90. To be honest, in this price segment, the gap of a few thousand is actually not significant; the key is to look at overall cost-performance ratio and long-term usage costs.
The safety rating of Proton X90 is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), with active safety systems including ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
The safety rating of Toyota Yaris Cross is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), with active safety systems including TSS.
Both cars have the same safety rating, and safety features in this class are quite comprehensive. New cars nowadays are not lacking in safety, so there is no need to worry too much about this point.
Proton X90 body length is 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
Toyota Yaris Cross body length is 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
The dimensions of both cars are almost the same, with little difference in interior space. Cars in this class are more than enough for daily use.
Proton X90 adopts FWD drive mode.
Toyota Yaris Cross adopts FWD drive mode.
Both cars have the same drive mode, both are FWD, so there will not be much difference in daily driving feel.
Overall, both Proton X90 and Toyota Yaris Cross are quite good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose mainly depends on your personal needs and budget. It is recommended to do your homework, compare quotes from several car dealerships, and then take a test drive to make the final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending time on research will never be wrong.
In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers often compare Proton X70 and Hyundai Tucson when choosing a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning. Today we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
The OTR price of Proton X70 in Malaysia is RM 106,800 - 122,300, with a total of 3 versions, including 1.5L Standard 2WD (RM 106,800), 1.5L Executive 2WD (RM 115,800), 1.5L Premium 2WD (RM 122,300), etc.
The OTR price of Hyundai Tucson in Malaysia is RM 143,888 - 197,888, with a total of 5 versions, including 2025 HEV 1.6T AT 2WD Prestige (RM 197,888), 2025 1.6T DCT 4WD Prestige (RM 186,888), 2025 1.6T DCT 2WD Prime (RM 164,888), etc.
From a pricing perspective, the starting price of Proton X70 is indeed RM 37,088 cheaper than Hyundai Tucson. If you are on a budget, Proton's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. But keep in mind, the savings of a few thousand RM might involve trade-offs in features, depending on your needs.
Proton X70 body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
Hyundai Tucson body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
The dimensions of both cars are almost the same, with little difference in interior space. For cars of this class, it is completely sufficient for daily use.
Proton X70 warranty 5 years/150,000km, service interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Hyundai Tucson warranty 5 years/300,000km, service interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Both Proton X70 and Hyundai Tucson are mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, consider the one with better reputation first; if you care more about value for money and features, choose the one with richer configurations. In the end, we suggest test-driving both, as personal experience is the most important.
Overall, both Proton X70 and Hyundai Tucson are quite good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose mainly depends on your personal needs and budget. We suggest doing your homework, comparing quotes from several dealerships, and then test-driving to make the final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending some time doing research will definitely not be wrong.
In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers compare the Proton X70 and Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV when selecting a car. Both vehicles are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will do a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to save you time on research.
The Proton X70 has an OTR price in Malaysia of RM 106,800 - 122,300, with a total of 3 versions, including 1.5L Standard 2WD (RM 106,800), 1.5L Executive 2WD (RM 115,800), 1.5L Premium 2WD (RM 122,300), etc.
The Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV has an OTR price in Malaysia of RM 159,750 - 159,750, with a total of 2 versions, including 1.6L Turbo Standard (RM 130,000), 1.6L Turbo Premium (RM 145,000), etc.
From a price perspective, the Proton X70's starting price is indeed RM 52,950 cheaper than the Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV. If your budget is limited, Proton's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. But be aware, the few thousand dollars saved might involve trade-offs in features, depending on your specific needs.
The Proton X70 is equipped with a 1.5L Turbo engine, 140 hp. Official fuel consumption is 7.0 L/100 km.
The Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV is equipped with a Hybrid system, 170 hp. Official fuel consumption is 4.5 L/100 km.
In terms of power, the Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV's Hybrid has 30 more horsepower than the Proton X70's 1.5L Turbo. However, for daily city driving, both vehicles have sufficient power and won't feel underpowered.
The Proton X70 adopts FWD drive configuration.
The Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV adopts FWD drive configuration.
Both vehicles use the same drive configuration, both are FWD, so there won't be much difference in daily driving feel.
The Proton X70 warranty is 5 years/150,000 km, maintenance interval every 10,000 km or 6 months.
The Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV warranty is 3 years/100,000 km, maintenance interval every 10,000 km or 6 months.
Both the Proton X70 and Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV are mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale price more, you can prioritize the one with better reputation; if you care more about value for money and features, then choose the model with richer configurations. Ultimately, it is recommended to test drive both, as experiencing it personally is the most important.
Overall, both the Proton X70 and Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV are excellent models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends on your personal needs and budget. We suggest doing your research, comparing quotes from multiple dealerships, and then test driving to make a final decision. Buying a car is a major matter, spending time on research is never a wrong move.
8月1日香港足球文化节迎来曼城与国米的重磅季前赛，而比亚迪作为两队共同的官方合作伙伴全程护航，这场新能源龙头企业与两大足坛豪门的相遇，更是充分彰显中国品牌的全球格局。最终国米点球4-2拿下比赛，无论赛场输赢，比亚迪都是本场比赛最大的赢家！
曼城、国米均拿下上赛季本土双冠，都曾创造足坛五冠王佳绩。而比亚迪更是稳居全球新能源销量榜首，2025年还跻身全球车企前五，在香港市场更是每五台新车就有一台出自比亚迪。赛事期间比亚迪全系车型负责球队通勤与后勤保障，场馆内品牌展示随处可见，排面直接拉满。
看台一众足球少年格外亮眼，比亚迪邀请了新疆、贵州、陕西山区小球员现场观赛。多年来也持续带青少年奔赴世界杯、欧洲杯观赛，还安排他们与海外青训梯队切磋。
目前比亚迪手握曼城、国米、大巴黎等顶级足球IP，用足球和硬核新能源技术开拓海外市场，同时深耕青少年足球公益，兼顾品牌实力与品牌温度！
