首頁Coaster BB
搜尋歷史
熱門搜尋
經銷商登入 / 註冊
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嗰陣都會拿 Honda CR-V 同 Volkswagen Tiguan 做比較。呢兩部車喺價位同定位上都幾接近，今日我哋就從多個方面做一個詳細嘅比較，幫你節省做功課嘅時間。
Honda CR-V 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 178,200 - 195,900，一共有 4 個版本，包括 2026 e:HEV 2.0L 2WD RS（RM 195,900）、2026 1.5T 4WD V（RM 181,900）、2026 e:HEV 2.0L 2WD E（RM 178,200） 等。
Volkswagen Tiguan 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 206,540 - 260,024，一共有 2 個版本，包括 2025 Allspace 2.0T R-Line（RM 260,024）、2025 Allspace 1.4T Elegance（RM 206,540） 等。
從價錢睇嚟，Honda CR-V 嘅起步價確實比 Volkswagen Tiguan 平咗 RM 28,340。如果你預算唔夠，Honda 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需要。但都要注意，平啲嘅幾千蚊，可能喺配備上會會有取捨，具體要看你嘅需要。
Honda CR-V 車身長 4500 mm，車尾箱 450 L。
Volkswagen Tiguan 車身長 4400 mm，車尾箱 400 L。
空間方面，Honda CR-V 嘅車身比 Volkswagen Tiguan 長咗 100 mm，車內乘坐空間會稍微寬鬆少少，尤其係後排腳部空間。如果你經常載家人或者需要放嬰兒車，大少少嘅車身確實更實用。
Honda CR-V 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
Volkswagen Tiguan 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
兩款車嘅驅動方式一樣，都係 FWD，日常駕駛感受唔會有太大分別。
Honda CR-V 同 Volkswagen Tiguan 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更重視品牌聲譽同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑好嘅嗰一款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，就揀配備更豐富嘅嗰款。最後都係建議兩部都去試駕，親身體驗先係最重要嘅。
總嚟講，Honda CR-V 同 Volkswagen Tiguan 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一部，關鍵都要看你嘅個人需要同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
In Malaysia's SUV market, many buyers compare Honda CR-V and Mitsubishi Xforce when choosing a car. These two models are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
The OTR price of Honda CR-V in Malaysia is RM 178,200 - 195,900, with a total of 4 variants, including 2026 e:HEV 2.0L 2WD RS (RM 195,900), 2026 1.5T 4WD V (RM 181,900), 2026 e:HEV 2.0L 2WD E (RM 178,200) etc.
The OTR price of Mitsubishi Xforce in Malaysia is RM 109,930 - 119,930, with a total of 2 variants, including 2026 1.5L Ultimate (RM 119,930), 2026 1.5L Urban (RM 109,930) etc.
Looking at the price, the starting price of Mitsubishi Xforce is RM 68,270 cheaper than Honda CR-V. To be honest, in this price range, a gap of a few thousand is actually not significant; the key is to look at overall value for money and long-term usage costs.
Honda CR-V is equipped with a 2.0L 4-cyl engine, horsepower 170 hp. Official fuel consumption 8.0 L/100km.
Mitsubishi Xforce is equipped with a 1.5L Turbo, horsepower 140 hp. Official fuel consumption 7.0 L/100km.
In terms of power, Honda CR-V's 2.0L 4-cyl has 30 more horsepower than Mitsubishi Xforce's 1.5L Turbo, with more confidence in mid-range acceleration, especially when overtaking on highways. However, Mitsubishi Xforce's fuel consumption might be more favorable, and the difference in daily urban commuting won't be significant.
Honda CR-V body length 4500 mm, trunk 450 L.
Mitsubishi Xforce body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
In terms of space, Honda CR-V's body is 100 mm longer than Mitsubishi Xforce, making the interior seating space slightly more spacious, especially the rear legroom. If you often carry family members or need to put in a stroller, a larger body is indeed more practical.
Honda CR-V uses FWD drive system.
Mitsubishi Xforce uses FWD drive system.
Both cars have the same drive system, both are FWD, so daily driving feel will not have much difference.
Overall, both Honda CR-V and Mitsubishi Xforce are very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends on your personal needs and budget. We recommend doing your research, comparing quotes from several dealerships, and then test driving to make the final decision. Buying a car is a big deal, spending some time doing homework will never be wrong.
September 8, two "heavy bombs" landed simultaneously: Brent crude approached $100/barrel intraday, natural rubber main contract closed up 2.75%, quoted at 19,635 Yuan/ton, both hitting new phase highs. Under the surge of raw materials' "dual engines", two tire companies announced price hike letters on the same day. The third round of price hikes in the tire industry this year is now unstoppable.
Rubber Approaches 20,000 Yuan, Rubber Series "Three Brothers" Surge Together
September 8 closing, Shanghai Futures Exchange natural rubber main contract quoted at 19,635 Yuan/ton, up 2.75%, intraday high touched around 19,700 Yuan, one step away from the 20,000 Yuan threshold, single day turnover reached 77.22 billion Yuan.
The day before (September 7), the rubber series had already staged a collective surge: Natural rubber main contract closed at 19,180 Yuan/ton, up 2.18%; No. 20 Rubber main contract set a new record since listing, closed at 16,345 Yuan/ton; Synthetic rubber intraday approached 8%, closed at 15,605 Yuan/ton, up 4.59% for the day. Three varieties surged collectively and broke through the high-level oscillation zone within a day, which is rare in the past two years.
Guotai Junan Futures Analysts Point to Three Drivers:
First, synthetic rubber fundamentals are relatively strong. High oil prices pushed up the core raw material butadiene price, synthetic rubber processing profits continued to decline, some private enterprises operated at reduced capacity, supply side shrank, and market anxiety over spot liquidity intensified.
Second, natural rubber raw material side is firm. Hat Yai main producing areas had excessive rainfall and tapping was hindered, Hat Yai rubber glue prices rose from 75 Baht at the start of the month to 77.7 Baht; El Niño production cut expectations continued to ferment, impact intensity expected to peak in September-November, production cut logic difficult to disprove in the short term.
Third, the price hike atmosphere in the industrial chain is formed. Around September 1, over 25 tire enterprises such as Triangle, Double Star, Aeolus centrally adjusted prices by 2%-3%, strengthening bullish sentiment.
Different from the price hike wave in March-April, this time natural rubber and synthetic rubber resonated synchronously. According to Zhuochuang Information data, comparing September 3 with August 3, Shandong STR20# Blended Rubber rose 8.75%, Styrene Butadiene Rubber 1502 rose 16.67%, Polybutadiene Rubber rose 20.65%, Carbon Black N330 rose 16.89% — the four major core raw materials all surged heavily, none were "gentle".
Oil Price Nears $100, Goldman Sachs Forecasts $120
September 8, Brent crude intraday high touched $99.42/barrel, one step away from the $100 threshold, year-to-date gain nearly 100%; NY crude futures rose over 3%. On the same day, A-share oil and gas sector surged, Huajin Shares, Heshun Petroleum, Zhongman Petroleum hit limit up, Tongyuan Petroleum, Guanghui Energy and other stocks rose over 5%.
The direct trigger is the rapid escalation of the Middle East situation: Saudi energy facilities attacked by Houthis, partial facility operations interrupted, causing 73 injuries; meanwhile, US-Iran standoff over the Strait of Hormuz continued, US military required 94 commercial ships to alter course in blockade actions.
Goldman Sachs warned that if attacks escalate further, oil price may rise to $120/barrel; China Merchants Futures pointed out that if Yanbu Port exports continue to be hindered, supply reduction could expand to 3-4 million barrels/day. Plus OPEC+ announced October production halt — this is the first since production increase started in April this year, oil price upside risk is significant.
Price Hike Letters Land Again, Another "3% Hike"
Under cost pressure, two tire companies announced price hikes simultaneously on September 8:
Fangxing Rubber announced that due to continued rise in raw material prices such as rubber, carbon black, steel cord, starting from September 12, semi-steel, full-steel, and engineering tire series prices were adjusted upward by 3%;
Shandong Weihai Rubber announced that "Hongying", "OPALS", "HIMALAYA" brand full-steel radial tires increased by 3% starting from September 12.
This is the third centralized price hike in the tire industry since late August this year. But the gap between cost and selling price remains glaring: Zhuochuang Information calculates that on September 3, production cost of a single full-steel tire was about 984.97 Yuan, up 9.21% in one month, up 13.87% year-on-year. Cost rose nearly 10 points, selling price only rose 2-3 points, some economic tires already showed real losses like "losing 80 Yuan per tire sold". Some enterprises said frankly: Tire prices need to rise at least another 16% to cover costs, and 20% increase is needed to achieve profitability.
Industry insiders point out that raw materials are unlikely to fall in the short term, but weak demand constrains transmission, price hikes will show a pattern of "multiple batches, small amplitude" rotation, industry reshuffling accelerates. For dealers, the dense period of price hike letters is both opportunity and trap, reasonable stocking, cash flow is king, maintain flexibility to navigate the cycle.
In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers compare Honda HR-V and Volkswagen Tiguan when choosing a car. These two models are quite close in price and positioning. Today we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
Honda HR-V's OTR price in Malaysia is RM 115,900 - 143,900, with a total of 4 versions, including 2026 e:HEV 1.5L RS (RM 143,900), 2026 1.5T V (RM 137,900), 2026 1.5T E (RM 130,900), etc.
Volkswagen Tiguan's OTR price in Malaysia is RM 206,540 - 260,024, with a total of 2 versions, including 2025 Allspace 2.0T R-Line (RM 260,024), 2025 Allspace 1.4T Elegance (RM 206,540), etc.
From the price perspective, Honda HR-V's starting price is indeed RM 90,640 cheaper than Volkswagen Tiguan. If your budget is limited, Honda's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. But be aware, the few thousand difference in price might involve trade-offs in equipment, depending on your specific needs.
Honda HR-V body length 4500 mm, trunk capacity 450 L.
Volkswagen Tiguan body length 4400 mm, trunk capacity 400 L.
In terms of space, Honda HR-V's body is 100 mm longer than Volkswagen Tiguan, making the interior seating space slightly more spacious, especially the rear legroom. If you frequently carry family members or need to fit a stroller, the larger body is indeed more practical.
Honda HR-V uses FWD drive system.
Volkswagen Tiguan uses FWD drive system.
Both cars have the same drive system, both FWD, daily driving experience won't have much difference.
Honda HR-V and Volkswagen Tiguan are both mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, prioritize the one with better reputation; if you care more about cost-performance and equipment, choose the one with richer configuration. Ultimately it is recommended to test drive both, personal experience is the most important.
Overall, Honda HR-V and Volkswagen Tiguan are both quite good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends mainly on your personal needs and budget. It is recommended to do your homework, compare quotes from several dealerships, and test drive before making a final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, taking time to research will never be wrong.
近日風雲 T7 正式展開預售，新車共推出 3 款車型，預售指導價格為 10.99 萬至 12.99 萬，並享有 7 重購車優惠。風雲 T7 作為一款緊湊型 SUV，以“慢功造好車”為目標，秉持長期主義嘅造車理念，主打一個高標準高品質。
依托奇瑞 10 大全球設計中心，風雲 T7 造型上採用御風前臉、風塑綢緞車身、天際霞光尾門，平衡國際簡約美學同東方雅緻氣韻。全車漆面標準同步海外嚴苛耐候要求，提供熾焰橙、山煙紫、雲粉米、流光銀、青竹灰、墨石黑 6 種配色。
內飾設計採用雲翼環抱座艙搭配大面積軟包覆，細節上擁有鵝卵石懸浮揚聲器、菱格縫紉等。配色則有溫暖黑棕、極夜黑曜兩種風格。整車尺寸 4570×1852×1694mm，軸距 2700mm，車內實用率 84%。
動力系統方面，風雲 T7 全系標配大容量犀牛電池 65.05kWh，CLTC 600km 續航，實測續航 667+km。電池由 30% 充至 80% 只需 20 分鐘。且搭載全域一體化熱管理雙源寬溫热泵空調 + 高壓 PTC，北方車主冬季亦能安心開。-30°C-55°C 超寬溫域穩定運作，低溫環境製暖更省電、高溫環境散熱更高效。配合全系標配嘅 AGS 智能進氣格柵同 14 項低風阻優化，高速低速能耗更穩定。
在底盤懸掛系統方面，風雲 T7 採由由瑪莎拉蒂前底盤調校專家領銜嘅國際化底盤團隊進行測試調校，50.8:49.2 黃金軸荷比能有效抑制轉向推頭、甩尾現象，提升過彎穩定性同直線行駛循跡性。
在智能化方面，風雲 T7 搭載座艙駕駛一體 8775 晶片，做到座艙駕駛雙優，兩大域無縫協同。72TOPS 嘅高算力，響應僅需 80ms，提升整體體驗速度。中控台使用 15.6 英寸 2.5K 高清大屏畫面細膩真實，防眩光、抗反射、抗指紋，CarPlay、HUAWEI HiCar、CarLink 無線連接。
智能駕駛採用獵鷹 500 駕駛輔助系統，集成 3 顆毫米波雷達、7 個高性能攝像頭、12 個超聲波雷達，總計 22 顆高精度傳感器，除咗常規輔助功能外仲可以实现全場景自動泊車。
最後再提下安全同耐用，首先全車身採用 80% 高強度鋼、18.84% 熱成型鋼打造九橫五縱籠式車身，採用 shotgun 結構、雙框副車架 +Pack 防撞梁。安全配置搭載咗 9 個安全氣囊，包含 48L 雙腔遠端氣囊同後排側氣囊。全系搭載嘅犀牛電池亦構建咗抵禦擠壓、穿刺、衝擊等情況嘅多種安全保護機制。此外風雲 T7 經過 2 年策劃，3 年研發，合共投入 81 台專屬耐久車同步路試，車身累計測試里程超過 600 萬公里，耐久專項實測 145 萬公里，同時針對東南亞雨季、中東高溫暴曬、印尼高濕等多種全球多地域進行極限實車試煉。
從風雲 T7 嘅產品力同佢嘅設計工藝可以睇出，佢確實係一台高標準、重品質，針對家用车市場痛點推出嘅車型。目前預售價已出，仲有唔少購車優惠，可以繼續關注佢嘅正式發布。
8 月 12 日，奇瑞旗下純電 SUV 風雲 T7 開啟預售。10.99 萬元至 12.99 萬元嘅價格區間，三個版本，七重購車優惠——呢啲數字喺而家嘅新能源車市入面並唔算震撼。真正令人停落嚟嘅，係發佈會主題嗰句「慢工出好車，等咗好耐」。
喺「上市即交車」「一年三改型」成為行業常態嘅今日，講「慢」需要勇氣，聽「慢」需要耐心。而風雲 T7 嘅敘事，恰恰係從呢種唔合時宜嘅節奏開始。
一場反向嘅「出海」
中國汽車正以前所未有嘅速度湧向全球，但多數品牌走嘅係「內地先火，再圖外銷」嘅捷徑。風雲 T7 反其道而行——佢嘅同源車款 Lepas L6 曾經喺米蘭設計週亮相，整車研發倚賴奇瑞全球十大設計中心，5000 多名海内外用戶全程參與共同創作。而後，呢台車冇急住喺內地上市，而係先駛向東南亞嘅雨季、中東嘅烈日、印尼嘅潮濕，喺極端路況入面反覆調校，累計測試里程超過 600 萬公里。
呢好似係一場刻意嘅「延遲滿足」。當同行搶住「首發即爆款」嘅時間窗口，風雲 T7 揀用三年研發、兩年策劃、81 台耐久性車輛同步路試，嚟回答一個樸素嘅問題：一輛面向全球嘅純電 SUV，到底應該憑咩站穩腳跟？
答案藏喺細節入面。對標 2026 版 E-NCAP 五星安全標準，車身 80% 高強度鋼，18.84% 熱成型鋼，9 個安全氣囊——呢啲參數背後，係對「全球路況」而唔係「實驗室工況」嘅敬畏。甚至連漆面標準都同步海外耐侯要求，為係令到一輛車喺常年日曬雨淋之後，依然保有「顏面嘅尊嚴」。
六大「核心需求」同埋一種生活邏輯
新能源時代，造車者熱衷於製造「偽需求」：冰櫃電視大軟墊，語音喚醒表情符號。風雲 T7 卻將產品力拆解為「六大核心需求」——外貌、安全、出行、智能、舒適享受、安心。看似平淡嘅分類，其實暗含對消費主義嘅抵抗。
譬如續航。全係標配 65.05kWh 電池、CLTC 600km，實測達到 667km 以上，官方稱之為「反向虛標」。呢個詞值得玩味——當行業普遍用「樂觀續航」討好用戶時，佢揀用保守數字換取真實信任。再如冬季用車，-30°C 至 55°C 寬溫域熱泵空調，北方車主唔再被「電動祖宗」困擾；30% 充到 80% 只需 20 分鐘，一杯咖啡嘅時間，剛剛係城市生活入面最奢侈嘅喘息。
智能配備同樣克制。8775 晶片、15.6 英寸 2.5K 大屏幕、六大真人感陪伴語音角色——呢啲並唔係賣弄技術，而係試圖回答「機器點同人相處」。獵鷹 500 輔助駕駛系統涵蓋 300+ 泊車場景，包括斷頭路、跨樓層、循跡倒車，解決嘅恰恰係城市駕駛入面最真實嘅焦慮：唔係自動駕駛嘅遙遠幻想，而係「泊唔入車」嘅眼前尷尬。
空間設計則透露出對家庭用戶嘅體察。84% 實用率，後排純平地台，後排放倒即變 1.95 米「純平大床」，38 處儲物空間——呢唔係參數競賽，而係對「出行即生活」嘅重新定義。瑪莎拉蒂前底盤調校專家領銜嘅團隊，賦予呢台車 50.8:49.2 嘅黃金軸荷比，過彎唔推頭，直線唔飄移——呢種唔見嘅功夫，恰恰係「慢功」最誠實嘅註腳。
兩份「保底」同埋長期主義嘅代價
預售優惠入面最引人注目嘅，唔係價格，而係兩項「保底保障」：動力電池熱失控導致整車损毁，奇瑞賠償同款新車；輔助駕駛系統原因導致意外，最高賠償 500 萬。加埋整車終身質保同埋終身保養套餐，呢家老牌車廠正喺用一種近乎笨拙嘅方式，回應消費者對新能源車最深嘅隱憂——唔係續航唔夠，唔係智能唔足，而係「出事之後邊個負責」。
呢或許先係「慢功」真正嘅底色。佢意味著企業對產品有足夠嘅自信，亦意味著對用戶有足夠嘅誠意。當新勢力用「用戶企業」嘅口號贏得掌聲時，奇瑞揀用一份合約條款嚟兌現承諾——唔煽情，但沉甸甸。
全球標準，中國答案
風雲 T7 嘅預售海報上寫住一句說話：「生而全球，淬煉而歸。」呢八個字，既係對產品路徑嘅概括，亦係對中國汽車產業處境嘅隱喻。當全球汽車工業進入「中國時間」，中國品牌唔再只係輸出產能同價格，而係輸出標準同品質。風雲 T7 所錨定嘅，並非某一國市場嘅偏好，而係全球路況、全球氣候、全球安全法規嘅公約數。
佢冇驚人之嘅零百加速，冇誇張嘅屏幕數量，亦冇炫目嘅「顛覆性創新」。但佢有一台車最本質嘅嘢：紮實嘅底盤、可靠嘅電池、耐睇嘅內飾、誠懇嘅續航，以及一份願意為失誤買單嘅契約。
喺呢個以「快」為信仰嘅時代，風雲 T7 用一次「慢功」嘅預售，向行業提出一個溫和嘅詰問：當用戶終於被鋪天蓋地嘅參數教育得疲憊不堪嗰陣，佢哋真正需要嘅，會不會只係一臺「久等唔失望」嘅車？
答案，或許就藏喺佢駛向全球又回到中國嘅 600 萬公里路上。嗰啲里程唔會說話，但佢哋知——風沙、暴雨、極寒、擁堵、長途、泊車——每一個場景，都係對「品質」最真實嘅拷問。而風雲 T7，揀用六年嘅沉默，嚟回答呢聲拷問。
而家，佢返咗嚟。靜候每一個唔願就嚟嘅生活家。
In the current hyper-competitive new energy vehicle market, car companies seem to be playing a "double-speed playback" survival game. Finishing the entire process from R&D to launch in 12 to 18 months has become the industry's default passing line. However, when "crash-course cars" become the norm, we can't help but ask: what exactly was cut from the extremely compressed time? Was it invisible structural redundancy, or a safety baseline unnoticed by users?
On August 12, Chery Fengyun T7 officially opened pre-sales at a pre-sale price of 109,900 to 129,900 yuan. At this launch event, Chery brought up a highly counter-consensus topic — "Slow work builds good cars." In this traffic-first era, Fengyun T7 chose a path that seemed clumsy. But when we peel back this layer of "slowness", we find that it is not inefficiency, but a persistence in long-termism.
Investing time in the "invisible" baseline
Fengyun T7's "slowness" is first reflected in its 3-year R&D cycle. In today's industry where "short, flat, fast" is universally pursued, spending three years polishing a car sounds like a "clumsy method". But during these three years, Chery did not spend time on marketing gimmicks or piling up surface parameters, but poured it into the deep polishing of the global 1+7+N R&D system.
For this car, Chery invested 963 test vehicles, completing up to 1.45 million kilometers of extreme verification. From -40°C high cold to 60°C high heat, from Indonesia's high humidity to Saudi Arabia's high-temperature sun exposure, Fengyun T7's footprints cover more than 10 countries including the EU, South Africa, and Australia/New Zealand. This "slowness" is essentially respect for physical laws. Spending time on places users can't see but which can save lives and withstand extreme conditions is true responsibility to family users.
First accepting the world's most severe "interrogation"
Fengyun T7's "slowness" is also reflected in its unique rhythm of "reverse global expansion". As a global car, its homologous model Lepas L6 launched first in overseas markets such as South Africa and Thailand, then moved into high-regulation markets like the EU in September, and finally returned to the domestic market.
This "Global First, Domestic Later" path means it must be developed against the 2026 E-NCAP 5-star safety standard. 80% high-strength steel, 18.84% hot-formed steel, the class-exclusive shotgun structure, and up to 9 airbags make up its safety baseline. Chery has ranked first in passenger car exports among Chinese brands for 23 consecutive years, with global users breaking 20 million. This confidence allows it to dare to bring products verified by the world's most severe markets back to the domestic market, original and true. This "slowness" is great respect for Chinese consumers.
The "sincerity" of investing costs where it matters
In the second half of the new energy era, many car companies, in order to lower the starting price, often "cut" range or core configurations to implement tiered premiums. But Fengyun T7 also showed the "slowness" determination in its pricing logic: pre-sale guide price 109,900 - 129,900 yuan, not only standardizing the 65.05kWh Rhino battery across the series, achieving CLTC 600km range (actual test can reach 667+km), but also launching the 8775 chip (72TOPS computing power) with 4nm process.
The pricing starting at 109,900 is precisely because "slow work yields fine work" puts costs where they count, not in endless marketing wars. This "range parity" and "intelligence parity" breaks the industry's prevailing premium logic. Coupled with whole vehicle lifetime warranty, battery thermal runaway damage compensation with a new car, autonomous driving coverage up to 5 million, etc., Chery proves with practical actions: true cost-performance is not a low price obtained by reducing specifications, but a top-tier value polished by global standards.
In the wave of new energy, "fast" might be the shortcut to traffic, but "slow" is the only path to accumulate product power. Fengyun T7 interprets the profound meaning of "Global cars can't be rushed" with hard data of 3 years R&D, 1.45 million km verification, and benchmarking the 2026 E-NCAP. This pure electric SUV with slow work and fine craft is not only a powerful rebuttal to the involution era, but also Chery's sincere work of feeding back its global car-making system to the domestic market.
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家在揀車嘅時候都會拎 Proton X90 同 Chery Tiggo 7 Pro 嚟比較。這兩款車喺價位同定位上都幾接近，今日我哋就從多個方面做一個詳細嘅比較，幫你慳做功課嘅時間。
Proton X90 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 106,800 - 122,800，一共有 4 個版本，包括 2026 1.5T Prime X（RM 122,800）、2026 1.5T Prime（RM 116,800）、2026 1.5T Lite（RM 106,800）等。
Chery Tiggo 7 Pro 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 123,750 - 123,750，一共有 2 個版本，包括 1.6L Turbo Standard（RM 125,000）、1.6L Turbo Premium（RM 140,000）等。
從價錢來看，Proton X90 嘅起步價確實比 Chery Tiggo 7 Pro 平咗 RM 16,950。如果你預算有限，Proton 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需求。但要留意，平嗰幾千蚊，喺配備上可能有取捨，具體要看你嘅需求。
Proton X90 搭載 1.5L Turbo，馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。
Chery Tiggo 7 Pro 搭載 1.5L Turbo，馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。
兩款車用咗同一套動力系統，日常開嚟嘅感覺基本冇分別。油耗方面都差不多，唔使太糾結呢一點。
Proton X90 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA)。
Chery Tiggo 7 Pro 嘅安全評級係 TBD，主動安全系統包括 Basic。
安全配備方面，兩款車都拿到唔錯嘅評級。不過 Proton X90 嘅 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA) 同 Chery Tiggo 7 Pro 嘅 Basic 喺功能上有些差異，如果你比較重視主動安全嘅話，可以仔細比較一下兩者嘅功能列表。
Proton X90 保修 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Chery Tiggo 7 Pro 保修 3 年/100,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Proton X90 同 Chery Tiggo 7 Pro 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更重視品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰一款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，就揀配置更豐富嗰款。最終都建議兩款都去試駕，親身體驗先係最重要嘅。
總嚟講，Proton X90 同 Chery Tiggo 7 Pro 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊輛，關鍵都要睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
