首頁Civic EK9
搜尋歷史
熱門搜尋
經銷商登入 / 註冊
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家在揀車嘅時候都會拎 寶騰 X50 同 起亞 Sportage 來做比較。呢兩款車喺價位同定位上都好接近，今日我哋就從多個方面做一個詳細嘅對比，幫下你撳走做功課嘅時間。
寶騰 X50 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 89,800 - 113,300，一總有 4 個版本，包括 1.5T Executive（RM 89,800）、1.5T Premium（RM 101,800）、1.5T Flagship（RM 113,300） 等。
起亞 Sportage 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 129,639 - 179,320，一總有 4 個版本，包括 2025 1.6T DCT 4WD High（RM 179,320）、2025 1.6T DCT 2WD High（RM 159,320）、2025 2.0L AT 2WD High（RM 139,639） 等。
從價錢來看，寶騰 X50 嘅起步價確實比 起亞 Sportage 平咗 RM 39,839。如果你預算有限，寶騰嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需要。但都要注意，平咗嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備上會有取舍，具體要睇你嘅需求。
寶騰 X50 配備 1.5L 4-cyl，馬力 105 hp。官方油耗 6.0 L/100km。
起亞 Sportage 配備 1.5L Turbo，馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。
動力方面，起亞 Sportage 嘅 1.5L Turbo 比 寶騰 X50 嘅 1.5L 4-cyl 多咗 35 匹馬力。不過日常喺市區開，兩款車嘅動力都夠用，唔會覺得唔夠力。
寶騰 X50 車身長 4400 mm，後備箱 400 L。
起亞 Sportage 車身長 4400 mm，後備箱 400 L。
兩款車嘅尺寸差唔多一樣，車內空間分別唔大。呢個級別嘅車，日常使用完全夠用。
寶騰 X50 同 起亞 Sportage 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更加重視品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑好啲嗰款；如果你更加在意性價比同配備，嗰就揀配備更豐富嗰款。最後始終建議兩款都去試駕，親身體驗先係最重要嘅。
總括嚟講，寶騰 X50 同 起亞 Sportage 都係馬來西亞市場好唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵都要睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最後決定。買車係件大事，花啲時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
In Malaysia's SUV market, many buyers compare the Proton X50 and Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV when choosing a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
Proton X50 OTR price in Malaysia is RM 89,800 - 113,300, with a total of 4 versions, including 1.5T Executive (RM 89,800), 1.5T Premium (RM 101,800), 1.5T Flagship (RM 113,300), etc.
Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV OTR price in Malaysia is RM 159,750 - 159,750, with a total of 2 versions, including 1.6L Turbo Standard (RM 130,000), 1.6L Turbo Premium (RM 145,000), etc.
In terms of price, the starting price of Proton X50 is indeed RM 69,950 cheaper than Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV. If your budget is limited, Proton's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. But be aware, those few thousand Ringgit cheaper might involve trade-offs in features, which depends on your specific needs.
Proton X50 safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety system includes ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV safety rating is TBD, active safety system includes Basic.
Regarding safety features, both cars have received good ratings. However, the Proton X50's ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA) and Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV's Basic differ slightly in functionality. If you value active safety highly, you can compare the feature lists of both carefully.
Proton X50 body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
The dimensions of both cars are almost the same, and the interior space difference is small. For this class of cars, it is fully sufficient for daily use.
Proton X50 warranty 5 years/150,000km, service interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV warranty 3 years/100,000km, service interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Proton X50 and Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV are both mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, you can prioritize the one with better reputation; if you care more about cost-performance ratio and features, then choose the one with richer configuration. In the end, it is recommended to test drive both, as personal experience is the most important.
Overall, Proton X50 and Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV are both very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose mainly depends on your personal needs and budget. It is recommended that you do your homework, compare quotes from a few more dealerships, and then test drive to make the final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending time doing homework will definitely not be wrong.
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拿 Proton X50 同 Toyota Corolla Cross 嚟做比較。呢兩部車喺價位同定位上都幾接近，而家我就從多個方面做一個詳細嘅比較，幫到你省咗做功課嘅時間。
Proton X50 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 89,800 - 113,300，總共有 4 個版本，包括 1.5T Executive（RM 89,800）、1.5T Premium（RM 101,800）、1.5T Flagship（RM 113,300） 等。
Toyota Corolla Cross 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 133,800 - 148,800，總共有 3 個版本，包括 2026 HEV 1.8L GR Sport（RM 148,800）、2026 HEV 1.8L Standard（RM 140,800）、2026 1.8L Standard（RM 133,800） 等。
由價錢睇，Proton X50 嘅起步價確實比 Toyota Corolla Cross 平咗 RM 44,000。如果你預算有限，Proton 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需要。不過要小心，平嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備上要有揀選，具體要看你嘅需要。
Proton X50 配備 1.5L 4-cyl，馬力 105 hp。官方油耗 6.0 L/100km。
Toyota Corolla Cross 配備 1.5L Turbo，馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。
動力方面，Toyota Corolla Cross 嘅 1.5L Turbo 比 Proton X50 嘅 1.5L 4-cyl 多咗 35 匹馬力。不過日常喺市區開，兩部車嘅動力都夠用，唔會覺得唔夠力。
Proton X50 採用 4WD 驅動方式。
Toyota Corolla Cross 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
Proton 嘅 4WD 同 Toyota 嘅 FWD 喺操控上會有唔同感受，建議試駕比較。
Proton X50 保養 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Toyota Corolla Cross 保養 5 年/無限制里程，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Proton X50 同 Toyota Corolla Cross 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更重視品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，就揀配置更豐富嗰款。最終都建議兩部都去試駕，親身體驗先至最重要。
總而言之，Proton X50 同 Toyota Corolla Cross 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊架，關鍵都係睇你嘅個人需要同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers compare Perodua Aruz and Toyota Yaris Cross when choosing a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
Perodua Aruz OTR price in Malaysia is RM 72,900 - 77,900, there are 2 versions in total, including 1.5L X (RM 72,900), 1.5L AV (RM 77,900), etc.
Toyota Yaris Cross OTR price in Malaysia is RM 99,900 - 109,900, there are 2 versions in total, including 2026 1.5L Standard (RM 99,900), 2026 HEV 1.5L Standard (RM 109,900), etc.
In terms of price, Perodua Aruz starting price is indeed RM 27,000 cheaper than Toyota Yaris Cross. If your budget is limited, the Perodua entry-level version can already meet daily needs. However, keep in mind that the few thousand ringgit cheaper might involve trade-offs in specifications, depending on your specific needs.
Perodua Aruz equipped with 1.5L 4-cyl, horsepower 105 hp. Official fuel consumption 6.0 L/100km.
Toyota Yaris Cross equipped with 1.5L 4-cyl, horsepower 105 hp. Official fuel consumption 6.0 L/100km.
Both cars use the same powertrain, and the driving experience in daily use is basically the same. Fuel consumption is also similar, so there is no need to worry too much about this.
Perodua Aruz body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
Toyota Yaris Cross body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
The dimensions of both cars are almost the same, and the interior space difference is not significant. For cars in this segment, daily use is completely sufficient.
Perodua Aruz warranty 5 years/150,000km, service interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Toyota Yaris Cross warranty 5 years/unlimited mileage, service interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
In general, both Perodua Aruz and Toyota Yaris Cross are very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose ultimately depends on your personal needs and budget. We suggest doing your research, comparing quotes from several dealerships, and then test driving to make a final decision. Buying a car is a major decision, spending time doing research will never be wrong.
In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers compare the Perodua Ativa and Toyota Yaris Cross when choosing a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning. Today we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
Perodua Ativa's OTR price in Malaysia ranges from RM 62,500 to 73,400, with a total of 3 versions, including 1.0L Turbo X (RM 62,500), 1.0L Turbo H (RM 67,300), 1.0L Turbo AV (RM 73,400), etc.
Toyota Yaris Cross's OTR price in Malaysia ranges from RM 99,900 to 109,900, with a total of 2 versions, including 2026 1.5L Standard (RM 99,900), 2026 HEV 1.5L Standard (RM 109,900), etc.
In terms of price, the starting price of the Perodua Ativa is indeed RM 37,400 cheaper than the Toyota Yaris Cross. If your budget is limited, Perodua's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. However, note that the difference of a few thousand ringgit might involve trade-offs in features, depending on your specific requirements.
Perodua Ativa's safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include ASA 3.0 + ACC + LDA + LKA + BSM + RCTA.
Toyota Yaris Cross's safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include TSS.
Both cars have the same safety rating, and safety features are quite comprehensive in this class. New cars nowadays generally do not have poor safety, so there is no need to worry too much about this.
Perodua Ativa warranty is 5 years/150,000km, servicing interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Toyota Yaris Cross warranty is 5 years/unlimited mileage, servicing interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Both Perodua Ativa and Toyota Yaris Cross are mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale price more, prioritize the one with the better reputation; if you care more about value for money and features, choose the one with richer configuration. Ultimately, it is recommended to test drive both, as personal experience is the most important.
Overall, both Perodua Ativa and Toyota Yaris Cross are excellent models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends mainly on your personal needs and budget. It is suggested to do your research, compare quotes from several dealerships, and then test drive to make the final decision. Buying a car is a major matter, spending some time doing research will never be wrong.
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拿 Perodua Ativa 同 Proton X70 嚟做比較。這兩款車喺價位同定位上都幾接近，今日我哋就從多個方面做一個詳細嘅比較，幫你省下做功課嘅時間。
Perodua Ativa 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 62,500 - 73,400，一共有 3 個版本，包括 1.0L Turbo X（RM 62,500）、1.0L Turbo H（RM 67,300）、1.0L Turbo AV（RM 73,400） 等。
Proton X70 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 106,800 - 122,300，一共有 3 個版本，包括 1.5L Standard 2WD（RM 106,800）、1.5L Executive 2WD（RM 115,800）、1.5L Premium 2WD（RM 122,300） 等。
由價錢睇，Perodua Ativa 嘅起價確實比 Proton X70 平咗 RM 44,300。如果你預算有限，Perodua 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需求。但都要注意，平嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備上會有取舍，具體要看你嘅需求。
Perodua Ativa 搭載 1.5L 4 缸，馬力 105 hp。官方油耗 6.0 L/100km。
Proton X70 搭載 1.5L Turbo，馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。
动力方面，Proton X70 嘅 1.5L Turbo 比 Perodua Ativa 嘅 1.5L 4 缸多咗 35 匹馬力。不過日常喺市區開，兩款車嘅動力都足夠，唔會覺得唔夠力。
Perodua Ativa 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
Proton X70 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
兩款車嘅驅動方式一樣，都係 FWD，日常駕駛感受唔會有太大分別。
Perodua Ativa 保修 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Proton X70 保修 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
兩款車嘅保修條件一樣，呢方面唔使糾結。實際保養成本仲要睇品牌嘅服務網絡同零件價格，建議去車友群問下真實車主嘅經驗。
Perodua Ativa 同 Proton X70 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更睇重品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，就揀配置更豐富嗰款。最終都係建議兩款都去試駕，親身體驗先係最重要嘅。
總體嚟講，Perodua Ativa 同 Proton X70 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車款。揀邊一輛，關鍵都要睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花啲時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好幾多買家喺揀車嗰陣都會拎 Perodua Ativa 同 Proton X70 做比較。呢兩款車喺價位同定位上都相當接近，今日我哋會從多個方面做一個詳細比較，幫你省下做功課嘅時間。
Perodua Ativa 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 62,500 - 73,400，總共有 3 個版本，包括 1.0L Turbo X（RM 62,500）、1.0L Turbo H（RM 67,300）、1.0L Turbo AV（RM 73,400） 等。
Proton X70 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 106,800 - 122,300，總共有 3 個版本，包括 1.5L Standard 2WD（RM 106,800）、1.5L Executive 2WD（RM 115,800）、1.5L Premium 2WD（RM 122,300） 等。
由價錢睇，Perodua Ativa 嘅起步價確實比 Proton X70 平咗 RM 44,300。如果你預算有限，Perodua 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需要。但都係要注意，平嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備上會有取捨，具體要睇你嘅需求。
Perodua Ativa 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 ASA 3.0 + ACC + LDA + LKA + BSM + RCTA。
Proton X70 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA)。
兩款車嘅安全評級一樣，喺呢個級別入面安全配備都算好齊全。而家嘅新車安全性都幾唔錯，唔使太擔心這一點。
Perodua Ativa 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
Proton X70 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
兩款車嘅驅動方式一樣，都係 FWD，日常駕駛感受唔會有大分別。
Perodua Ativa 保養保修 5 年/150,000 公里，保養間隔 每 10,000 公里或 6 個月。
Proton X70 保養保修 5 年/150,000 公里，保養間隔 每 10,000 公里或 6 個月。
兩款車嘅保修條件一樣，呢方面唔使糾結。實際保養成本仲要睇品牌嘅服務網絡同零件價格，建議去車友群問下真實車主嘅經驗。
總體嚟講，Perodua Ativa 同 Proton X70 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵都係要睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，先去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大嚿事，花啲時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拿 Proton X90 同 Chery Tiggo Cross 比對。這兩款車喺價位同定位上都幾接近，今日我哋就從多個方面做一個詳細比較，幫你節省做功課嘅時間。
Proton X90 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 106,800 - 122,800，總共有 4 個版本，包括 2026 1.5T Prime X（RM 122,800）、2026 1.5T Prime（RM 116,800）、2026 1.5T Lite（RM 106,800） 等。
Chery Tiggo Cross 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 88,750 - 99,750，總共有 2 個版本，包括 2025 HEV 1.5L CSH（RM 99,750）、2025 1.5T Standard（RM 88,750） 等。
由價錢嚟睇，Chery Tiggo Cross 嘅起步價比 Proton X90 平咗 RM 18,050。實講，喺呢個價位段，幾千蚊嘅差距其實唔算大，關鍵始終睇整體嘅性價比同長期使用成本。
Proton X90 配備 1.5L Turbo，馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。
Chery Tiggo Cross 配備 1.5L 4-cyl，馬力 105 hp。官方油耗 6.0 L/100km。
動力方面，Proton X90 嘅 1.5L Turbo 比 Chery Tiggo Cross 嘅 1.5L 4-cyl 多咗 35 匹馬力，中段加速更有信心，尤其係跑高速公路超車嘅時候。不過 Chery Tiggo Cross 嘅油耗可能更抵，日常市區通勤差別唔會太大。
Proton X90 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA)。
Chery Tiggo Cross 嘅安全評級係 TBD，主動安全系統包括 Basic。
安全配備方面，兩款車都拿到咗唔錯嘅評級。不過 Proton X90 嘅 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA) 同 Chery Tiggo Cross 嘅 Basic 喺功能上有啲差異，如果你比較重視主動安全嘅話，可以仔細對比下兩者嘅功能列表。
Proton X90 保修 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Chery Tiggo Cross 保修 3 年/100,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
總而言之，Proton X90 同 Chery Tiggo Cross 都係馬來西亞市場好唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一部，關鍵仲係睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嗰陣都會拿 Mazda CX-30 同 Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV 嚟比較。這兩款車喺價位同定位上都幾接近，今日我哋就從多個方面做個詳細比較，幫你省卻做功課嘅時間。
Mazda CX-30 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 122,409 - 146,409，一共有 4 個版本，包括 2025 2.0L High+ Premium（RM 146,409）、2025 2.0L High+（RM 138,409）、2025 2.0L High（RM 130,409） 等。
Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 129,750 - 129,750，一共有 2 個版本，包括 2025 1.5T 90km CSH（RM 129,750）、Tiggo 7 PHEV 支援邊種充電方法？可以喺居家電源插座度充電？（RM 117,478）等。
從價錢睇，Mazda CX-30 嘅起價確實比 Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV 平咗 RM 7,341。如果你預算有限，Mazda 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需求。但要記住，平嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備上要有取舍，具體要看你嘅需求。
Mazda CX-30 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 i-Activsense。
Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV 嘅安全評級係 TBD，主動安全系統包括 Basic。
安全配備方面，兩款車都揾到唔錯嘅評級。不過 Mazda CX-30 嘅 i-Activsense 同 Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV 嘅 Basic 喺功能上有啲分別，如果你比較重視主動安全嘅話，可以仔細比較下兩者嘅功能列表。
Mazda CX-30 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
兩款車嘅驅動方式一樣，都係 FWD，日常駕駛感受唔會有太大區別。
Mazda CX-30 同 Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更重視品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，那就揀配置更豐富嗰款。最尾都建議兩款都去試駕，親身體驗先係最重要。
總嚟講，Mazda CX-30 同 Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV 都係馬來西亞市場幾不錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵都係睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花點時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拿 Mazda CX-60 同 Chery Tiggo 8 做比較。這兩款車喺價位同定位上都幾接近，今日我哋就從多個方面做一個詳細嘅比較，幫你節省咗做功課嘅時間。
Mazda CX-60 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 200,510 - 252,873，一共 有 2 個版本，包括 2026 3.3T 4WD High Plus（RM 252,873）、2025 2.5L 2WD High（RM 200,510） 等。
Chery Tiggo 8 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 129,750 - 129,750，一共 有 1 個版本，包括 2026 1.6T Standard（RM 129,750） 等。
由價錢睇，Chery Tiggo 8 嘅起步價比 Mazda CX-60 平咗 RM 70,760。講真係，喺呢個價位段，幾千蚊嘅差距其實唔算大，關鍵始終要睇整體嘅性價比同長期使用成本。
Mazda CX-60 嘅安全評級係 5★ (Euro NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 i-Activsense Pro。
Chery Tiggo 8 嘅安全評級係 TBD，主動安全系統包括 Basic。
安全配備方面，兩款車都拿到唔錯嘅評級。不過 Mazda CX-60 嘅 i-Activsense Pro 同 Chery Tiggo 8 嘅 Basic 喺功能上有啲分別，如果你比較睇重主動安全嘅話，可以仔細比較下兩者嘅功能列表。
Mazda CX-60 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
Chery Tiggo 8 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
兩款車嘅驅動方式一樣，都係 FWD，日常駕駛感受唔會有太大分別。
Mazda CX-60 同 Chery Tiggo 8 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更睇重品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰一款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，就揀配備更豐富嗰款。最終始終建議兩款都去試駕，親身體驗先係最重要嘅。
總嚟講，Mazda CX-60 同 Chery Tiggo 8 都係馬來西亞市場好唔錯嘅車型。揀邊部，關鍵始終都要睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最後決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拎 BMW X7 同 Porsche Cayenne 嚟比較。呢兩款車喺價位同定位上都幾接近，今日我哋就從多個方面做一個詳細嘅對比，幫你省返做功課嘅時間。
BMW X7 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 635,800 - 694,800，一共有 3 個版本，包括 1.5L Standard 2WD（RM 106,800）、1.5L Executive 2WD（RM 115,800）、1.5L Premium 2WD（RM 122,300） 等。
Porsche Cayenne 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 609,000 - 1,200,000，一共有 3 個版本，包括 2025 Sportback 2.0T quattro S line（RM 442,112）、2026 Cayenne 3.0T（RM 609,000）、2026 Cayenne S 4.0T（RM 1,200,000） 等。
由價錢睇落，Porsche Cayenne 嘅起步價比 BMW X7 平咗 RM 26,800。坦白講，喺呢個價位段，幾千蚊嘅差距其實唔算大，重點仲係睇整體嘅性價比同長期使用成本。
BMW X7 配備 3.0L Turbo，馬力 350 hp。官方油耗 12.0 L/100km。
Porsche Cayenne 配備 3.0L Turbo，馬力 350 hp。官方油耗 12.0 L/100km。
兩款車用緊同一套動力系統，日常開落嘅感受基本上無咩分別。油耗方面都差唔多，唔使太糾結這一點。
BMW X7 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA)。
Porsche Cayenne 嘅安全評級係 TBD，主動安全系統包括 Basic。
安全配備方面，兩款車都拿到唔錯嘅評級。不過 BMW X7 嘅 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA) 同 Porsche Cayenne 嘅 Basic 喺功能上有啲差異，如果你比較睇重主動安全嘅話，可以仔細比較吓兩者嘅功能列表。
BMW X7 保用 5 年/無限里程，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Porsche Cayenne 保用 3 年/100,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
總體嚟講，BMW X7 同 Porsche Cayenne 都係馬來西亞市場都幾唔錯嘅車款。揀邊架，關鍵仲係睇你自己嘅個人需求同埋預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，先至去試駕做最後決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拿 Mercedes-Benz GLA 同 Audi Q5 嚟做比較。呢兩款車喺價位同定位上都幾接近，今日我哋就由多個方面做一個詳細比較，幫你省卻研究時間。
Mercedes-Benz GLA 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 258,888 - 295,888，合共有 1 個版本，包括 Standard（RM 258,888）等。
Audi Q5 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 354,174 - 423,174，合共有 2 個版本，包括 40 TDI（RM 320,000）、45 TFSI（RM 350,000）等。
由價錢睇，Mercedes-Benz GLA 嘅起步價的確比 Audi Q5 平咗 RM 95,286。如果你預算有限，Mercedes-Benz 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需要。但亦要留神，平嗰啲幾千蚊，可能喺配備上會有所取捨，具體睇你嘅需要。
Mercedes-Benz GLA 配備 2.0L Turbo，馬力 220 hp。官方油耗 9.5 L/100km。
Audi Q5 配備 2.0L Turbo，馬力 220 hp。官方油耗 9.5 L/100km。
兩款車用嘅係同一套動力系統，日常開落去嘅感覺基本無分別。油耗方面都幾接近，唔使太糾結呢一點。
Mercedes-Benz GLA 嘅安全評級係 5★ (Euro NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 Premium ADAS。
Audi Q5 嘅安全評級係 5★ (Euro NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 Pre Sense + ACC。
兩款車嘅安全評級一樣，喺呢個級別入面安全配備都算好齊全。而家嘅新車安全性都唔錯，唔使太擔心呢點。
Mercedes-Benz GLA 車身長 4400 mm，行李箱 400 L。
Audi Q5 車身長 4400 mm，行李箱 400 L。
兩款車嘅尺寸幾乎一樣，車內空間分別唔大。呢個級別嘅車，日常使用完全夠用。
Mercedes-Benz GLA 保養保修 3 年/100,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Audi Q5 保養保修 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
總體嚟講，Mercedes-Benz GLA 同 Audi Q5 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車款。揀邊一輛，關鍵仲係睇返你嘅個人需要同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較多間車行嘅報價，再去做試駕做最後決定。買車係一件大事，花啲時間做功課絕對無錯。
喺馬來西亞嘅汽車市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拿 Toyota Corolla Cross 同 Subaru Forester 嚟做比較。今日我哋從多個方面做一個詳細嘅比較，幫你省做功課嘅時間。
Toyota Corolla Cross 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 133,800 - 148,800，一共有 3 個版本，包括 2026 HEV 1.8L GR Sport（RM 148,800）、2026 HEV 1.8L Standard（RM 140,800）、2026 1.8L Standard（RM 133,800） 等。
Subaru Forester 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 174,000 - 197,000，一共有 3 個版本，包括 2024 2.0L S EyeSight GT Edition（RM 189,538）、2024 2.0L S EyeSight（RM 177,538）、2024 2.0L L EyeSight（RM 167,538） 等。
由價錢睇，Toyota Corolla Cross 嘅起價確實比 Subaru Forester 平咗 RM 40,200。如果你預算有限，Toyota 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需求。但都要注意，平嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備上會有取捨，具體要看你嘅需求。
Toyota Corolla Cross 搭載 1.5L Turbo，馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。
Subaru Forester 搭載 2.0L 4-cyl，馬力 170 hp。官方油耗 8.0 L/100km。
動力方面，Subaru Forester 嘅 2.0L 4-cyl 比 Toyota Corolla Cross 嘅 1.5L Turbo 多咗 30 匹馬力。不過日常喺市區開嘅話，兩款車嘅動力都夠用，唔會覺得唔夠力。
Toyota Corolla Cross 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 TSS (PCS, LDA, ACC, LTA)。
Subaru Forester 嘅安全評級係 5★ (Euro NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 EyeSight。
安全配備方面，兩款車都拿到唔錯嘅評級。不過 Toyota Corolla Cross 嘅 TSS (PCS, LDA, ACC, LTA) 同 Subaru Forester 嘅 EyeSight 喺功能上有啲差異，如果你比較睇重主動安全嘅話，可以仔細比較吓兩者嘅功能列表。
Toyota Corolla Cross 保修 5 年/無限制里程，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Subaru Forester 保修 3 年/100,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
總括嚟講，Toyota Corolla Cross 同 Subaru Forester 都係馬來西亞市場幾好嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵都係要看你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，先至去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
車型概覽
上汽大通Mifa 氫 值唔值得睇，第一步唔係望牌子或者外形，而係睇佢能唔能夠配合你嘅香港日常。 呢篇會集中講售價未落實前點樣先篩選，幫你用買家角度篩走唔適合嘅選擇。
售價仍待確認，買家可以先把佢放入候選名單，等價格落實後再同同級車逐項比較。
購車價格指南
上汽大通Mifa 氫 目前售價仍未清晰，較理性嘅做法係先睇版本、車身大小同動力形式，等價格落實後再決定值唔值得落訂。
如果有幾個版本可揀，可以先將 2022 605km 後驅版（價格待確認） 放喺同一張清單。日常通勤重視舒適同易用，家庭買家就要優先睇後排、尾箱同安全配置。
核心規格重點
睇 上汽大通Mifa 氫 嘅規格，重點唔係背數字，而係理解佢喺香港用車場景會帶嚟咩分別。
13 kWh 嘅電池容量，真正意義係可以幫你估算一星期通勤同周末出車要唔要中途補電。 150 kW、310 N·m 嘅輸出，令高速併線同短距離超車更有信心。 車長 5225 mm、車闊 1980 mm、車高 1938 mm、軸距 3198 mm 可以幫你預判商場停車場、屋苑車位同後排腿部空間。 固定齒比、後置後駆 會影響起步順滑度、濕地穩定感同長途巡航性格。
優缺點分析
上汽大通Mifa 氫 嘅優點唔需要講到天花龍鳳，真正有價值係佢能唔能夠令日常用車更省心：電池同續航資訊有助安排通勤同補電、動力輸出對高速同上斜更有底氣、空間同車身尺寸方便家庭買家預判實用性。
要留意嘅係，要先確認屋苑、公司或常去商場嘅充電條件、香港停車場同窄路使用要留意車身闊度。呢啲唔一定係缺點，但係落訂前應該先諗清楚。
買家常見問題
買 上汽大通Mifa 氫 之前，真正要問嘅唔係單一規格，而係佢可唔可以融入你每日嘅生活節奏。
常見疑問係「上汽大通 Mifa 氫香港落地價約幾多？」簡單講，上汽大通 Mifa 氫香港落地價約780,000–880,000 港元，視版本而定上汽大通MAXUS。 放到實際用車，就係要睇佢對通勤、泊車、家庭乘坐同長期成本有幾大幫助。
同級對比內容
將 上汽大通Mifa 氫 放入同級車清單時，唔建議只用外形或者品牌光環決定。比較順序可以係：先等售價落實，再決定佢應該同邊個級距比較、再睇動力係咪足夠應付高速併線同滿載、再比較能源成本同補能便利、最後睇車身大小、座位同尾箱是否適合家人。
咁樣篩選會貼近香港買家真實生活：平日塞車、商場泊車、周末去新界、甚至一家人出入，先係一部車每日要面對嘅考驗。
用車全周期指南
擁有 上汽大通Mifa 氫 最重要係先諗清楚充電節奏。屋苑、公司或者常去商場只要有穩定充電選項，電動化用車就會容易相處好多。
如果你主要喺市區行，視野、低速順滑度同泊車輔助會好影響心情；如果經常行高速或跨區，座椅舒適度、隔音同動力從容感會更重要。
BYD officially released the May 2026 production and sales flash report, with new energy vehicles from all brands reaching a monthly sales volume of 383,453 vehicles, a slight increase of 0.26% year-on-year, achieving year-on-year positive growth in monthly sales after ten months; among them, passenger car deliveries reached 376,990 units, surging 19.4% month-on-month, wiping out the pain of previous model iterations, presenting a new pattern where the domestic base is stable, overseas sales are soaring, and high-end brands are scaling up across the board. Amidst the market environment of intensified competition in the domestic new energy sector, Tesla FSD entering China, and an intense launch of independent new products, it has forged a unique structural growth path.
The Dynasty and Ocean main brands combined sold 330,215 vehicles in May, accounting for over 80% of the group's total sales, remaining the stabilizer for BYD's sales volume. The full series had 8 models exceeding 20,000 units in monthly sales, covering products from 50,000 entry-level commuter to 200,000 home SUV.
Inside the Dynasty Network, the Yuan family sold 56,691 units, and the Song family 51,370 units. Both crossed the 50,000 threshold, becoming two major sales pillars for the brand, catering to home commuter and urban-rural travel needs; the Qin family followed closely with a stable performance of 28,360 units. The Han and Tang series maintained a volume in the six-thousand range, deeply cultivating the mid-to-large home sedan and SUV niche markets; the brand new model Xia is in the market cultivation phase, delivering 1,810 units monthly, with potential for steady volume growth as channels expand.
The Ocean Network's growth momentum is even more rapid, with 5 models entering the 20,000 club across the series: Sealion 42,615 units, Seal 34,117 units, Seagull 39,919 units, Dolphin 22,260 units, and Song PLUS 27,755 units. Among them, Seagull remains the best-selling entry-level commuter model thanks to its affordable pricing of 60,000-80,000. Sealion, as a new volume model, stands firm at the 40,000 level upon launch, filling the mid-size SUV product gap in the Ocean Network and perfecting the Ocean product tier layout. From commuter small cars to compact SUVs, the two main brands rely on DM-i hybrid and pure electric dual-line technologies to牢牢锁住 the mainstream home market share within 150,000 domestically.
Fang Cheng Bao Year-on-Year Surges 139.7%, Brand Upward Positioning Takes EffectThe high-end matrix of Denza, Fang Cheng Bao, and Yangwang sold a combined 46,489 vehicles in May, officially breaking away from the niche positioning to become a new pivot for BYD's brand premium and profit growth, breaking the industry curse of difficulty in high-end breakthrough for domestic brands.
The off-road brand Fang Cheng Bao sold 30,186 units monthly, surging 139.7% year-on-year, creating a new high in monthly sales since the brand launched. Its Titanium 7 model sold 18,280 units monthly, while Leopard 5 and Leopard 8 output remained stable, continuously squeezing the survival space for joint venture and imported models in the 250,000-400,000 hardcore off-road niche market.
Denza delivered 16,303 units in May, with the MPV benchmark D9 selling 6,721 units, and the Z9 series close to 6,000 units. MPV and mid-to-large sedan dual-line efforts helped them stand firm in the luxury new energy track; the million-level ultra-luxury brand Yangwang continued its steady climb, delivering 286 units that month, a year-on-year increase of 105.8%, completing market verification of the domestic brand ceiling product and forming a full price range product layout from 100,000+ home, 300,000-400,000 off-road, 500,000 luxury MPV to million-level flagship.
In May, BYD's overseas sales of passenger cars and pickup trucks reached 160,177 units, surging 80.7% year-on-year. Exports accounted for over 42% of the full series total sales, setting a new historical high for brand export and becoming the core driving force to stabilize May overall sales and achieve year-on-year positive growth.
Southeast Asia, Europe, and Latin America became the main incremental markets. Seagull, Song PLUS, and Yuan series continued to top new energy best-seller lists in multiple countries; the SHARK pickup truck exceeded 4,000 units in monthly exports for two consecutive months. Relying on the completion of localization production in Thailand, Brazil, Hungary, and Uzbekistan with four overseas vehicle factories, localized production continues to land, avoiding tariffs while rapidly penetrating terminal channels. Against the background of stock market competition in the domestic auto industry and normalized price wars, the rapidly expanding overseas market effectively counteracts sales volatility brought by domestic model iterations, officially upgrading from a supplementary market to BYD's core growth engine. As of now, BYD's global cumulative new energy vehicle sales have exceeded 16.5 million units, with the globalization map continuously broadening.
Intelligent Driving Empowers Product Iteration, H2 New Products Prepare to Surge VolumeMay marked a key node in BYD's intelligent driving landing, with the God's Eye intelligent driving system becoming a core bonus point for models: the number of vehicles with advanced intelligent driving across all brands exceeded 3.15 million, with daily road test data exceeding 200 million kilometers; that month, BYD implemented City Pilot and Smart Parking dual safety backup services, becoming the world's first auto manufacturer to achieve dual intelligent driving backups. Three days after policy implementation, the activation rate of models equipped with the God's Eye system in cities surged 50%. Intelligent driving experience upgrades directly drove in-store order conversion, solidifying product competitiveness for subsequent models to continue volume sales, and facing the intelligent driving market shock brought by FSD entering China.
From data details, BYD's cumulative sales from January to May 2026 were 1,405,039 units, down 20.32% year-on-year. The core reason is that the full series of main models were concentratedly iterated, and the capacity ramp-up of the 2nd Gen Fast Charge Blade Battery was restricted. The new Flash Charge Battery upgraded fast charging and low-temperature performance. Full series iteration models prioritized installing new batteries, but production line retrofitting dragged down capacity release. Order backlogs on popular models and delayed deliveries compressed the May delivery volume to a certain extent.
As the end of the second quarter approaches and the 2nd Gen Blade Battery capacity continues to release, coupled with new models such as Denza N8L, Fang Cheng Bao Titanium 7 Pure Electric Version, Sealion 05, and Xia L landing the market, the industry generally predicts that BYD's full brand sales in June are expected to exceed 400,000 vehicles. Relying on the four-dimension development logic of low-end volume locking share, high-end raising profit, overseas pushing volume, and intelligence improving product power, amidst the intensified new energy elimination round in the domestic market, BYD's full category layout advantage continues to amplify, securing its status as the domestic new energy leader, accelerating steadily towards global top auto manufacturers.
你睇過印度嘅馬路嗎？
我喺網上見過。
畫面通常係咁，一輛轎車俾牛尾擋住，旁邊仲有亂竄嘅摩托，甚至周圍仲有賣奶茶嘅小夥，嗰叫一個“乾淨又衛生”。
然而，喺呢啲睇完好多人覺得生理不適嘅地方，豐田、鈴木、本田等日本車廠，卻決定將籌碼押落印度。
據印度“品牌質量基金會”網站顯示，三家車廠將喺印度投資近110 億美元建廠、提產能、搞出口。
對此有网友表示，三家日本車廠係咪錢多到無處花？
事實上，佢哋唔係錢多到花唔完，亦唔係被印度嘅咖哩蒙蔽咗心竅，呢啲日本車廠高層遠比我哋清醒。
而家嘅日系車，營業額、市場份額都喺下滑，原材料成本仲係升得飛起，打開世界地圖，搵一個能夠容納產能、拓充份額、競爭溫和嘅市場，唔係咁容易嘅事。
所以，唔係日本車廠選擇咗印度，而係因為冇得揀。
日本車廠之痛
曾經嘅日系車，嗰時妥妥係人哋個仔。
你問下十幾年前開過日系車嘅老司機，一提起日系車，幾乎就冇唔豎大拇指嘅，價錢平、省油、耐用又抵撞……
甚至好多日系車，仲要加價購買，但邊個諗到，呢個鐵打嘅江山，短短幾年時間就俾佢哋打得找唔著北。
隨著新能源汽車浪潮嚟到，電動化、智能化變成好多自主車廠“彎道超車”嘅目標，依托於中國強大嘅新能源汽車產業鏈優勢同車廠自身對研發、技術嘅堅持，中國自主品牌迅速實現咗“彎道超車”。
曾經被人吐槽嘅國產車，而家喺馬路越來越多人，甚至份額超越咗合資。
根據乘聯會嘅數據，喺2026 年4 月，自主品牌嘅份額已經高達62.5%，遠超日系嘅13.1%。
要知道，中國汽車市場係全球最大嘅汽車市場，喺中國市場失速，就相當於丟咗一塊巨大嘅蛋糕。
同時，中國市場近年嚟嘅主旋律依舊係價格戰，捲配置、捲價格、捲服務已經成為一種常態，亦對日系車嘅利潤產生咗巨大嘅影響。
除咗中國，日系車喺美國過得亦唔太好。
2025 年 1 月 20 日，特朗普宣誓就職第 47 任美國總統，自此開啟咗一連串搞搞震，其中就包括以國家安全為理由徵收額外嘅汽車關稅，導致進口日本汽車嘅關稅稅率一度高達 27.5%，雖然後嚟有所降低，但亦遠高於最初嘅稅率。
呢個操作，直接導致七大日本車廠喺2025 財政年度嘅關稅損失超2 萬億日元。
再睇日本本土，其實亦唔容易。
中東地緣衝突導致霍爾木茲海峽航運受阻，運輸成本、原材料成本暴漲，日本車廠都有苦難言。
高管們看著報表，背後發涼，只能尋找全新嘅增長曲線。
所以，日本車廠唔係愛上印度，係冇地方去。
揀選印度嘅深思熟慮
咁，印度點解咁有魔力，先至令日本車廠重資投入呢？
第一個優勢就係大。喺2025 年，印度汽車市場取得咗551.7 萬輛嘅新車銷量，同比增長 6%，刷新咗歷史紀錄，位居全球第三大汽車市場，已经连续四年超越日本，僅次於中國同美國。
呢個含金量唔使多講啦，而印度取得呢一成績，主要係因為印度一直喺推動減稅政策，促進消費，這導致國內消費意願出現咗明顯增強。
第二個優點係近，就係離日系車賣得動嘅地方近，如非洲等其他地區。
所以，印度對於日本車廠，更似一個建喺十字路口中央嘅便利店，你唔使將車分別運去八個國家，只需要喺印度呢站造好，然後一船一船甩去，就能削減唔少成本。
《日本經濟新聞》亦認為，印度有望轉變為佢哋全球嘅汽車供應中心。
第三個優點係穩。要知道，日系車嘅優勢就係燃油車，畢竟引擎、變速箱、底盤三大件，佢哋已經玩咗好多年，技術積累喺全球都係數一數二。
但係中國汽車市場已經全力推動電動化、智能化發展，導致日系車嘅優勢越來越弱，根本無法發揮出嚟，但印度唔一樣，佢擁有充電樁少、電動化進程緩慢嘅特點，印度老百姓買車，都仲係盯住平、省油、易修，而呢三點正係日系車嘅老本行。
尤其係鈴木，一直係印度汽車市場嘅常青樹，幾乎年年穩坐暢銷車型寶座，口碑好，勝過任何廣告。
所以，日本車廠大力佈局印度市場，顯然是經過深思熟慮嘅。
但，印度市場真係咁好混咩？
難啃嘅印度市場
當然，印度亦唔係完美得似個香口格，佢嘅缺點同佢嘅優點一樣明顯，而且每一個都夠日本車廠喝一壺。
先講電動化，冇錯，眼睇下印度充電樁少、電動車賣唔動，確實係日系燃油車嘅避風港。但你得諗諗，呢個“避風港”能避幾耐？
印度此前可係喊出咗 2030 年電動車佔新車 30% 嘅口號，雖然聽落似吹水，但抵唔住人哋真補錢、真建充電站。
試諗下，萬一有日印度突然開竅，開始大力推動電動化、搞基建，充電樁似雨後春筍咁冒出來，嗰日系車唔就傻眼？
呢唔係泰國市場嘅翻版咩？
當年日系車喺泰國都係躺贏，整個東南亞市場，都被稱為日系車嘅後花園，結果泰國率先推動電動化，中國電動車一嚟，直接就成咗香口格，再睇日系車，喺泰國嘅市場份額嘩嘩嚟咗落。
如果印度係電動化一加速，歷史大概率會重演，而而家呢次，日系車連逃嘅地方都快冇咗，點樣預防，將成為日本車廠嘅首要問題。
再講政策，印度嘅政策就似一鍋咖哩，你永遠唔知下一口食到係雞肉定係馬鈴薯。
呢個魔幻嘅國家，今日係低關稅鼓勵建廠，明日就可能罰你一筆巨款，更令人頭痛嘅係強制合資，外國車廠想喺印度賣車，要搵本地夥伴搭檔，等你工廠建好咗、供應鏈搭完咗，印度直接背刺你，到嗰陣無論係加錢定撤資，換嚟嘅都係心痛。
所以你看，印度呢個市場，就好似一個睇落好甜嘅芒果，咬落去第一口仲行，再啃幾口就摸著硬核。
日系車而家嘅算盤係，趁住核都未硌牙，趕緊多啃幾口，但核遲早會硌到，只係唔知係邊一日。
尾聲
日系車呢趟印度之旅，唔係去旅遊，係去搵食。
中國同東南亞嘅飯桌更擁擠，生產、運輸嘅成本又提高咗，放眼全球，就印度呢口鍋仲冒住熱氣，哪怕入面煮嘅係咖哩味嘅石頭，都要硬著頭皮啃落去。
日本車廠想擴大市場，印度想嘅係拉動經濟、解決就業，雙方都有各自嘅心思。
至於結局係日系車喺印度重新封神，定係好似當年嘅部分友商一樣灰溜溜走人，那就唔知啦。
但無論點樣，呢場戲先至開始，我哋慢慢睇就得啦。
反正印度嘅故事，從來唔會悶。
兄弟姐妹們，今日講一個出海嘅大新聞——唔係賣車，係賣「司機」。6 月 2 號，文遠知行同 Uber 聯合宣佈咗一件事：計劃喺西班牙馬德里推出該國首個商業化 Robotaxi 試點服務。意思就係：西班牙人好快就可以用 Uber 叫到一台冇司機嘅出租車。呢次係文遠知行同 Uber 第一次一齊進入歐洲市場。馬德里亦成為文遠知行 Robotaxi 駛入嘅全球第十二個城市。
官方消息話，喺馬德里自治區政府嘅支持下，呢項服務今年內就會正式啟動。到嗰陣，馬德里嘅朋友哋打開 Uber App，就有一鍵呼叫文遠知行嘅 Robotaxi。同叫普通網約車一樣，分別係嚟嘅車冇駕駛員——至少喺初期，仲係有分別嘅。運營初期，車入面會配備經過專業培訓嘅安全員，終究係剛上線，穩妥第一。
文遠知行呢間公司，你可能聽過，也可能冇聽過。簡單介紹下：2017 年成立，一直埋頭搞 Robotaxi 技術研發同商業化。而家佢嘅 Robotaxi 已經覆蓋咗廣州、北京、新加坡、阿布達比、迪拜、利雅得、蘇黎世……加埋而家嘅馬德里，一共 12 個城市。西班牙亦係文遠知行進入嘅第五個歐洲市場——之前已經入咗瑞士、法國、比利時、斯洛伐克。按照文遠知行同 Uber 喺 2025 年 5 月達成嘅規劃，佢哋要喺五年內新增 15 個國際城市部署 Robotaxi 服務，全球部署數萬輛 Robotaxi。隨著馬德里落地，目前已經完成咗 4 個城市嘅佈局，仲有 11 個會喺 2030 年前陸續覆蓋。
講真嘅，中國自動駕駛公司出海唔係頭一回，但中國技術 + 全球出行平台 + 歐洲市場呢個組合，定係好有意思。馬德里係歐洲最具商業潛力嘅 Robotaxi 市場之一，人口多、出行需求大，當地政策都好友善。喺呢個市場站穩腳根，對文遠知行嚟講係個唔小嘅里程碑。對 Uber 嚟講，引進 Robotaxi 都係為咗降低成本——終究司機唔使發人工。對馬德里市民嚟講，以後打車可能更平。
車型概覽
凌志RZ 值唔值得睇，第一步唔係望牌子或者外形，而係睇佢能唔能夠配合你嘅香港日常。 呢篇會集中講高速巡航、併線同超車信心，幫你用買家角度篩走唔適合嘅選擇。 近期市場討論到「因應市場需求轉變 豐田終止凌志LF-ZC純電房車量產開發計劃」，代表呢類車型仍然有一定關注度。
零售價 HK$ 441,500 - 478,800、完稅價 HK$ 802,225 - 882,420 令預算位置更清楚，買家可以先估算月供、保險、泊車同日常開支。
購車價格指南
凌志RZ 嘅購車預算可以先由 零售價 HK$ 441,500 - 478,800、完稅價 HK$ 802,225 - 882,420 開始計。香港買車唔只係睇車價，月供、保險、牌費、泊車同能源成本都會影響每月壓力。
如果有幾個版本可揀，可以先將 2026 500e Luxury（HK$ 802,225）、2026 550e F Sport（HK$ 882,420）、2025 300e Luxury（價格待確認）、2025 450e Luxury（價格待確認） 放喺同一張清單。日常通勤重視舒適同易用，家庭買家就要優先睇後排、尾箱同安全配置。
核心規格重點
睇 凌志RZ 嘅規格，重點唔係背數字，而係理解佢喺香港用車場景會帶嚟咩分別。
74.68/76.96 kWh 嘅電池容量，真正意義係可以幫你估算一星期通勤同周末出車要唔要中途補電。 334 kW、537 N·m 嘅輸出，令高速併線同短距離超車更有信心。 車長 4805 mm、車闊 1895 mm、車高 1635 mm、軸距 2850 mm 可以幫你預判商場停車場、屋苑車位同後排腿部空間。 固定齒比、雙電機四駆 會影響起步順滑度、濕地穩定感同長途巡航性格。
優缺點分析
凌志RZ 嘅優點唔需要講到天花龍鳳，真正有價值係佢能唔能夠令日常用車更省心：預算位置清楚，方便同同級車直接比較、電池同續航資訊有助安排通勤同補電、動力輸出對高速同上斜更有底氣。
要留意嘅係，要先確認屋苑、公司或常去商場嘅充電條件、香港停車場同窄路使用要留意車身闊度。呢啲唔一定係缺點，但係落訂前應該先諗清楚。
買家常見問題
買 凌志RZ 之前，真正要問嘅唔係單一規格，而係佢可唔可以融入你每日嘅生活節奏。
常見疑問係「Lexus RZ500e 同 RZ550e F SPORT 嘅馬力有幾大？」簡單講，Lexus RZ500e 嘅前後摩打各自輸出 227 匹馬力，系統綜合總馬力 380 匹，0-100 km/h 加速只需 4.6 秒。Lexus RZ550e F SPORT 採用相同摩打但調校更進取，綜合馬力達到 407 匹，0-100 km/h 只需 4.4 秒。 放到實際用車，就係要睇佢對通勤、泊車、家庭乘坐同長期成本有幾大幫助。
同級對比內容
將 凌志RZ 放入同級車清單時，唔建議只用外形或者品牌光環決定。比較順序可以係：先用 零售價 HK$ 441,500 - 478,800、完稅價 HK$ 802,225 - 882,420 鎖定預算圈、再睇動力係咪足夠應付高速併線同滿載、再比較能源成本同補能便利、最後睇車身大小、座位同尾箱是否適合家人。
咁樣篩選會貼近香港買家真實生活：平日塞車、商場泊車、周末去新界、甚至一家人出入，先係一部車每日要面對嘅考驗。
用車全周期指南
擁有 凌志RZ 最重要係先諗清楚充電節奏。屋苑、公司或者常去商場只要有穩定充電選項，電動化用車就會容易相處好多。
如果你主要喺市區行，視野、低速順滑度同泊車輔助會好影響心情；如果經常行高速或跨區，座椅舒適度、隔音同動力從容感會更重要。
Folks, today let's talk about big news on going global—not selling cars, but selling "drivers". On June 2, WeRide and Uber jointly announced a plan: to launch the country's first commercial Robotaxi pilot service in Madrid, Spain. In other words: Spanish residents will soon be able to hail a driverless taxi via Uber. This is the first time WeRide and Uber are partnering to enter the European market. Madrid also becomes the 12th city globally where WeRide's Robotaxi arrives.
According to official news, with the support of the Madrid regional government, this service will officially launch within this year. At that time, friends in Madrid can open the Uber App and call WeRide's Robotaxi with one click. It's just like calling an ordinary ride-hailing service, the difference is the arriving car has no driver—at least initially, there is still a difference. In the initial operation phase, a professionally trained safety monitor will be on board, as it's just launched, safety comes first.
This company, WeRide, you might have heard of it, or you might not. A brief introduction: Established in 2017, it has been dedicated to Robotaxi technology R&D and commercialization. Currently, its Robotaxis cover Guangzhou, Beijing, Singapore, Abu Dhabi, Dubai, Riyadh, Zurich... plus Madrid now, totaling 12 cities. Spain is also the 5th European market WeRide has entered—previously entered Switzerland, France, Belgium, Slovakia. According to the plan agreed by WeRide and Uber in May 2025, they plan to deploy Robotaxi services in 15 new international cities within five years, deploying tens of thousands of Robotaxis globally. With the Madrid launch, the deployment in 4 cities has been completed, and 11 more will be covered successively before 2030.
To be honest, it's not the first time Chinese autonomous driving companies are going global, but the combination of Chinese technology + global mobility platform + European market is quite interesting. Madrid is one of the European Robotaxi markets with the most commercial potential, with a large population, high travel demand, and friendly local policies. Being able to take root in this market is a significant milestone for WeRide. For Uber, introducing Robotaxis is also a way to reduce costs—after all, drivers don't need salaries. For Madrid residents, hailing a taxi might be cheaper in the future.
As the 2026 USA, Canada, and Mexico World Cup approaches, Chinese football achieves a highlight moment on the distant European stage. The team that won the championship is the Chinese "Boy Football" Football Juniors 2014 (U12) team.
On June 2 Beijing Time, the Italy SIGISMONDI International Youth Cup concluded. Led by Dong Lu, the Chinese Football Juniors 2014 (U12) team went through seven grueling matches, defeating the Premier League powerhouse Everton youth squad 5-4 in a penalty shootout. With a dominant performance of seven wins from seven games, 21 goals scored and only 2 conceded, they lifted the championship trophy, becoming the first Asian team to reach the summit since the event was founded, with the Five-Star Red Flag flying high on the European U12 "Little World Cup" stage.
This tournament brought together 48 top youth training teams from around the world. Youth squads from multiple long-established European clubs such as Everton, Fiorentina, Copenhagen, and Braga all participated, making the tournament highly competitive. In the group stage, the Chinese Juniors surged forward, defeating Italy TTT 2-0, sweeping Denmark Copenhagen 5-0, and crushing GGR 7-0. They kept a clean sheet in three matches, scoring 14 goals, and advanced strongly to the knockout stage as group winners.
Entering the knockout stage, the team continued to play steadily, displaying maturity and resilience beyond their years.
They defeated the Italy Serie A Fiorentina squad 3-1 in the Round of 16 and secured a 1-0 win against Braga in the Portuguese Super League in the Quarter-finals. They defeated Copenhagen 2-0 again in the Semi-finals. With 6 matches played and only 1 goal conceded, they strongly entered the final. The final was a showdown of champions. Everton scored first in regular time. Just as everyone thought victory was slipping away, the Chinese Juniors quickly leveled the score within 6 minutes, dragging the match into a grueling penalty shootout.
Finally defeating the Everton U12 squad, they won the tournament championship with seven wins in seven matches, using their impressive record to validate the growth potential of grassroots youth training.
About the Chinese Football Juniors 2014 Team
The Chinese Football Juniors 2014 Team is composed of a group of young players born in 2014 (currently 12 years old). The English alias is Chinese Football Boy 2014. It is a grassroots youth training boys' football team founded by Dong Lu in 2017.
Unlike the selection mode of various sports schools and football association squads, the members of the Football Juniors 2014 Team are recruited through open nationwide auditions. Selection has no restrictions on household registration or region. Children of appropriate age from all over the country can sign up for trials.
Players selected for the team do not need to pay training fees. The club will not sign restrictive long-term bundled contracts that limit player development, reserving the children's right to choose themselves to the maximum extent.
In terms of daily training mode, the team adopts a characteristic mode of dispersed schooling and phased concentration. Young players stay in their registered residence to attend school normally, and daily basic training relies on local venues and coaches. The whole team organizes a centralized training camp every three to four months. After the training ends, they move to domestic and foreign events in a batch, adhering to the training philosophy of using matches as training.
BYD Makes a Great Contribution
Behind the Chinese Football Juniors winning the championship is a new energy vehicle brand providing silent support, using green transportation to escort the dream.
Team operating funds do not rely on government allocation, mainly supported by revenue sharing from event streaming platforms and corporate commercial sponsorships. BYD, as a core partner sponsor, has long-term supported and guaranteed the team's expenses for away competitions and training camps.
Since officially sponsoring the Chinese Football Juniors in 2025, BYD has supported grassroots youth training with solid actions. Every time the Football Juniors go abroad to play matches, besides regular transportation vehicles which are all handled by BYD, BYD also connects with high-quality overseas football resources like the Italian Serie A to help children broaden their horizons and accumulate international match experience.
Earlier this month, BYD escorted another batch of Chinese Football Juniors to depart for Brazil and Mexico, continuing their overseas study and training journey. This attitude of "doing practical work" is exactly BYD's consistent approach.
Football and cars, seemingly two unrelated fields, have surprising similarities—both require technical accumulation and long-term persistence and long-term investment, neither has a shortcut.
BYD's support for football, like R&D, is a long-term strategic layout, definitely not a short-term game, investing in the future of Chinese football.
Nowadays, BYD has become the world's largest electric vehicle manufacturer. Products have entered 119 countries and regions globally. The overseas dealer network has exceeded 2,000 stores. The European market achieves a dual-line layout for mass and high-end consumers.
May 2026 new energy vehicle exports 160,644 units, accounting for 41.9% of the total sales of 383,453 units in the month, an 80.7% year-on-year increase, creating a historical high for monthly exports. January to May BYD overseas cumulative sales reached 614,470 units. At the same time, established production bases in Thailand, Brazil, Hungary, etc. 2026 export target adjusted from 1.3 million units to 1.5 million units.
Regarding overseas production bases, BYD has already formed four core manufacturing bases:
① Thailand Rayong Factory (Production started July 2024, annual capacity 150,000 units) focuses on right-hand drive models radiating ASEAN, localization rate reaches 70%, employee localization exceeds 90%;
② Brazil Camaçari Factory (Production started July 2025) covers 4 million square meters, initial capacity 150,000 units. By the end of 2026, it will expand to 300,000 units, becoming the largest EV manufacturing center in Latin America;
③ Hungary Szeged Factory (Production started Q1 2026) serving as the European headquarters, annual capacity 150,000 units, can avoid EU 38.1% anti-subsidy tariff, delivery cycle shortened from 45 days to 15 days; Uzbekistan Factory Phase 1 capacity 50,000 units, Phase 3 plan reaches 300,000 units, covering Central Asia and Eastern Europe markets.
In terms of logistics, BYD has formed a self-operated RoRo fleet, having invested 8 large RoRo ships (including 3 with 9,200 vehicle slots, the largest in the world). Annual capacity exceeds 1 million units. It has already shed reliance on third-party logistics, significantly reducing sea freight costs (by approximately 50%) and improving delivery efficiency.
As the 2026 USA-Canada-Mexico World Cup approaches, the Chinese Football Juniors' championship victory has shown us a spark of hope. And BYD's staunch support is adding fuel to this spark, so that one day it can ignite into a vast fire, illuminating the future path of Chinese football.
