In Malaysia's SUV market, many buyers compare Perodua Aruz and Honda WR-V when choosing a car. Both cars are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will conduct a detailed comparison from various aspects to help you save time on research.
Perodua Aruz has an OTR price of RM 72,900 - 77,900 in Malaysia, with a total of 2 versions, including 1.5L X (RM 72,900), 1.5L AV (RM 77,900), etc.
Honda WR-V has an OTR price of RM 89,900 - 107,900 in Malaysia, with a total of 4 versions, including 2023 1.5L V (RM 99,900), 2023 1.5L E (RM 95,900), 2023 1.5L S (RM 89,900), etc.
In terms of price, Perodua Aruz's starting price is indeed RM 17,000 cheaper than Honda WR-V. If your budget is limited, Perodua's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. However, be aware that the lower price might mean trade-offs in features, depending on your specific needs.

Perodua Aruz is equipped with a 1.5L 4-cyl, 105 hp. Official fuel consumption is 6.0 L/100km.
Honda WR-V is equipped with a 1.5L 4-cyl, 105 hp. Official fuel consumption is 6.0 L/100km.
Both cars use the same powertrain, and the driving experience in daily use is basically the same. Fuel consumption is also similar, so there is no need to worry too much about this.

Perodua Aruz body length is 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
Honda WR-V body length is 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
The dimensions of both cars are almost the same, and the interior space difference is not significant. Cars in this class are more than enough for daily use.

Perodua Aruz adopts FWD drive configuration.
Honda WR-V adopts FWD drive configuration.
Both cars have the same drive configuration, both are FWD, and the daily driving experience will not differ much.

Overall, Perodua Aruz and Honda WR-V are both very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose mainly depends on your personal needs and budget. It is recommended to do your homework, compare quotes from multiple dealerships, and then go for a test drive to make the final decision. Buying a car is a big deal, so spending some time on research is never wrong.