首頁sea
搜尋歷史
熱門搜尋
經銷商登入 / 註冊
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嗰陣都會拿 寶騰 X70 同 馬自達 CX-60 去做比較。呢兩款車喺價位同定位上都好接近，我哋今日就從多個方面做一個詳細嘅對比，幫你節省做功課嘅時間。
寶騰 X70 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 106,800 - 122,300，總共有 3 個版本，包括 1.5L Standard 2WD（RM 106,800）、1.5L Executive 2WD（RM 115,800）、1.5L Premium 2WD（RM 122,300） 等。
馬自達 CX-60 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 200,510 - 252,873，總共有 2 個版本，包括 2026 3.3T 4WD High Plus（RM 252,873）、2025 2.5L 2WD High（RM 200,510） 等。
從價錢睇嚟，寶騰 X70 嘅起跳價確實比 馬自達 CX-60 平咗 RM 93,710。如果你預算有限，寶騰嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需要。不過要留意，平嗰幾千蚊，喺配備方面會有取捨，具體要睇你嘅需要。
寶騰 X70 搭載 1.5L Turbo，馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。
馬自達 CX-60 搭載 2.0L 4-cyl，馬力 170 hp。官方油耗 8.0 L/100km。
動力方面，馬自達 CX-60 嘅 2.0L 4-cyl 比 寶騰 X70 嘅 1.5L Turbo 多咗 30 匹馬力。不過日常喺市區行，兩款車嘅動力都夠用，唔會覺得唔夠力。
寶騰 X70 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA)。
馬自達 CX-60 嘅安全評級係 5★ (Euro NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 i-Activsense Pro。
安全配備方面，兩款車都拿到唔錯嘅評級。不過 寶騰 X70 嘅 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA) 同 馬自達 CX-60 嘅 i-Activsense Pro 喺功能上有些差異，如果你比較重視主動安全嘅話，可以仔細對比下兩者嘅功能列表。
寶騰 X70 車身長 4400 mm，行李箱 400 L。
馬自達 CX-60 車身長 4500 mm，行李箱 450 L。
空間方面，馬自達 CX-60 嘅車身比 寶騰 X70 長咗 100 mm，乘坐空間更有優勢。不過 寶騰 X70 喺城市入面停車會靈活啲，各有取捨。
寶騰 X70 保修 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
馬自達 CX-60 保修 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
兩款車嘅保修條件一樣，呢方面唔使糾結。實際保養成本仲要睇品牌嘅服務網絡同零件價格，建議去車友群問問真實車主嘅經驗。
總括嚟講，寶騰 X70 同 馬自達 CX-60 都係馬來西亞市場好唔錯嘅車款。揀邊一輛，關鍵都要睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較下幾間車行嘅報價，再去做試駕先做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拎 Proton X70 同 Mazda CX-30 來比較。這兩款車喺售價同定位上都幾接近，今日我哋就從多個方面做一次詳細嘅比較，幫你節省做功課嘅時間。
Proton X70 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 106,800 - 122,300，一共有 3 個版本，包括 1.5L Standard 2WD（RM 106,800）、1.5L Executive 2WD（RM 115,800）、1.5L Premium 2WD（RM 122,300）等等。
Mazda CX-30 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 122,409 - 146,409，一共有 4 個版本，包括 2025 2.0L High+ Premium（RM 146,409）、2025 2.0L High+（RM 138,409）、2025 2.0L High（RM 130,409）等等。
從價錢睇落去，Proton X70 嘅起跳價確實比 Mazda CX-30 平咗 RM 15,609。如果你預算有限，Proton 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需要。但都要記住，便宜嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備上會有取舍，具體要看你嘅需要。
Proton X70 搭載 1.5L Turbo，馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。
Mazda CX-30 搭載 1.5L Turbo，馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。
兩款車用咗同一套動力系統，日常開出嚟嘅感覺基本冇分別。油耗方面都相若，唔使太糾結這一點。
Proton X70 嘅安全评分係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA)。
Mazda CX-30 嘅安全评分係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 i-Activsense。
兩款車嘅安全评分一樣，喺呢個級別入面安全配備都算好齊全。現在嘅新車安全性都唔差，唔使太擔心這一點。
Proton X70 保修 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Mazda CX-30 保修 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
兩款車嘅保修條件一樣，呢方面唔使糾結。實際保養成本仲要睇品牌嘅服務網絡同零件價錢，建議去車友群問問真實車主嘅經驗。
總括嚟講，Proton X70 同 Mazda CX-30 都係馬來西亞市場好唔錯嘅車型。揀邊輛，關鍵都係睇你嘅個人需要同預算。建議大家做好做功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最後決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers compare Proton X70 and Toyota Fortuner when choosing a car. These two models are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will do a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time doing research.
Proton X70 OTR price in Malaysia is RM 106,800 - 122,300, with 3 versions in total, including 1.5L Standard 2WD (RM 106,800), 1.5L Executive 2WD (RM 115,800), 1.5L Premium 2WD (RM 122,300), etc.
Toyota Fortuner OTR price in Malaysia is RM 195,880 - 241,880, with 3 versions in total, including 2024 2.8T VRZ Diesel (RM 241,880), 2024 2.7L SRZ Petrol (RM 202,880), 2024 2.4L Standard Diesel (RM 195,880), etc.
Looking at the price, Proton X70's starting price is indeed RM 89,080 cheaper than Toyota Fortuner. If your budget is limited, Proton's entry-level version already meets daily needs. But also note, the few thousand dollars cheaper might have trade-offs in features, depending on your needs.
Proton X70 safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
Toyota Fortuner safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include .
Both cars have the same safety rating, safety features are quite complete in this class. New cars nowadays are not lacking in safety, no need to worry too much about this.
Proton X70 body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
Toyota Fortuner body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
Both cars' dimensions are almost identical, interior space difference is not significant. For this class of cars, daily use is more than enough.
Proton X70 adopts FWD drive mode.
Toyota Fortuner adopts FWD drive mode.
Both cars have the same drive mode, both are FWD, daily driving feel won't have much difference.
Overall, Proton X70 and Toyota Fortuner are both quite good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends mainly on your personal needs and budget. It is recommended to do your homework, compare quotes from a few car dealerships, and then test drive to make the final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending time doing research will definitely not be a mistake.
On July 13, 2026, the 70th anniversary commemoration event for the completion of New China's first automobile was grandly held in Changchun, Jilin. This is a major event in the history of the development of China's automotive industry. 70 years ago, that is on July 13, 1956, the first Jiefang CA10 truck manufactured by the First Automobile Works (predecessor of China FAW) officially went off the production line. Over 70 years, China FAW has resonated in frequency with the development of China's automotive industry, witnessed the extraordinary development process of China's automotive industry from nothing to something, from small to large, and from large to strong, and is also the pioneer, participant, and leader of the butterfly transformation of China's automotive industry system.
"The completion of the first Jiefang truck launched the magnificent journey of self-reliance, hard struggle, self-improvement, and dreaming forward for China's automotive industry." Fu Yuwu, Honorary Chairman of the China Society of Automotive Engineers and Vice Director of the China Automotive Industry Consulting Committee, said in an exclusive interview with "Automotive Panorama": "For China's automotive industry, China FAW is the cradle and the flag. China FAW's valuable entrepreneurial and innovative spirit is the wealth of China's automotive industry. This wealth has become an important force supporting the development of China's automotive industry."
Honorary Chairman of the China Society of Automotive Engineers,
Fu Yuwu, Vice Director of the China Automotive Industry Consulting Committee
China FAW adheres to the leadership of technological innovation and has made important progress in technological breakthroughs, brand upward movement, and market development. In the past six years, China FAW has focused on independent innovation, breaking through more than 1,700 key core technologies, while continuously deepening the integration of technological innovation and industrial innovation. In 2025, China FAW's total vehicle sales exceeded 3.3 million units. During the "14th Five-Year Plan" period, China FAW's cumulative sales exceeded 16.5 million units. China FAW and automotive industry enterprises have jointly written a magnificent history of the 70-year evolution of China's automotive industry and have shouldered the historical responsibility of "raising the national brand automobile industry".
According to data released by the China Association of Automobile Manufacturers on July 9, 2026, automobile production and sales from January to June reached 14.993 million and 15.017 million units respectively. In 2025, China's automobile production and sales reached 34.531 million and 34.40 million units respectively, with annual automobile production and sales ranking first in the world for 17 consecutive years. Among them, passenger car production and sales reached 30.27 million and 30.103 million units respectively, with passenger car production and sales scale exceeding 30 million units for the first time, and the market share of passenger cars with independent brands close to 70%; commercial vehicle production and sales reached 4.261 million and 4.296 million units respectively. According to the Ministry of Public Security, as of the end of June 2026, the national automobile holdings reached 371 million units.
This is a great achievement achieved by generations of Chinese automobile people continuing to co-create. As a "Third Generation of Chinese Automobile People", Fu Yuwu was born into a mechanical family in 1945. This generation of automobile people is an important promoter of entrepreneurship and innovation on the new track of new energy. While the first generation of Chinese automobile people are the founders of New China's automotive industry, opening the great journey of China's automotive industry from nothing to something. The second generation of Chinese automobile people is shouldering the historical mission of rewriting the landscape of China's automotive industry. New era Chinese automobile people are continuing to write a new glory of China's automotive industry development. He said in an exclusive interview with "Automotive Panorama": "Because of China FAW, there is China's automotive industry. China FAW has laid the foundation for the development of China's automotive industry. Today, we still view China FAW with such cognition, because the valuable material and spiritual wealth accumulated by China FAW is the common wealth of our automotive industry."
Pioneering Entrepreneurship Era:
From Pioneer to Founder
Before the Reform and Opening Up, China's automotive industry was in the era of "pioneering" entrepreneurship and foundation laying, with China FAW playing a key role in it. In 1956, the first Jiefang CA10 truck went off the production line, ending the history that China could not manufacture automobiles; in 1958, the first sedan under China FAW was born, ending the history that China could not make sedans, of which the "Dongfeng" sedan, New China's first sedan, was successfully developed on May 12, and New China's first high-grade sedan "Hongqi" was tested on August 1. During the "Third Line Construction" period, in 1969, the Second Automobile Works (predecessor of Dongfeng Motor) broke ground in Shiyan, Hubei. From then on, the layout of China's automotive industry gradually evolved from "one branch blooming" by China FAW to the development of multiple "giants". China FAW, founded in 1953, is the veritable "Cradle of New China's Automotive Industry" and has made historical contributions to the "pioneering" and foundation laying of China's automotive industry.
Fu Yuwu and China FAW have a deep connection. After graduating from university in 1970, he was assigned to FAW Harbin Gear Factory, worked in different technical positions, and later became the Deputy Factory Director and Chief Engineer. By 1990, he was transferred to Harbin Automotive Industrial General Corporation as General Manager, etc. At China FAW, he worked for 20 years and can be called an "old FAW person". He said: "I was assigned to work at the Harbin Automotive Gear Factory under the 'FAW Trust' after graduating from university, so my career is bound up with China FAW. The first blueprint I drew was for the process of spare parts for the Jiefang CA10, which left a deep impression on me."
Actually, the process of entrepreneurship and innovation of China FAW was very difficult, but it created a miracle. Fu Yuwu said: "At that time, China's automotive industry 'lacked heavy and lacked light', and the sedan field was a blank. I witnessed the development process of China FAW from small to large, and from large to strong." China FAW's first generation of trucks Jiefang CA10 was upgraded to the second-generation truck Jiefang CA141 in July 1986, thereby ending the history of the Jiefang truck's 30-year continuous system. Over 70 years, Jiefang has undergone seven generations of product iterations, with cumulative production and sales exceeding 9.5 million units. The development of "Jiefang" is a microcosm of the takeoff of China's automotive industry. He said: "I participated in and witnessed the process of lightweight truck upgrades and heavy truck testing. At that time, China FAW established a lightweight truck headquarters, and I was also a member of the headquarters. It was very difficult to change models at that time. When the first lightweight truck really started running, it encountered many problems beyond imagination. Recalling this history, I am very moved by the development of China's automotive industry on a foundation of extreme poverty and emptiness."
Fu Yuwu talked about an experience during an exclusive interview with "Automotive Panorama". In 2016, it was just the 60th anniversary of the completion of FAW Jiefang trucks, and he was invited to participate in the special production work of the CCTV "National Memory" program. During the shooting, the director asked him to restore the process of entrepreneurship and innovation of China FAW at that time. He vividly restored the moving entrepreneurial scenes where the older generation of builders stood against the wind and snow, fought against the severe cold, accompanied steam, broke frozen soil, and rushed the schedule in the extreme cold weather of minus 30 to 40 degrees, day and night without stop, fighting on the front line. At that time, the locomotive transformed into a super "heater". Eight locomotives sprayed steam on the ground to keep heat and warmth. In this way, the workers sprayed steam while laying the ground and built the factory building with hands and shoulders. After recording was completed, the director told him: "We all cried!" He recalled: "I did not expect that, even though 60 years have passed, I was still deeply moved when I restored that difficult entrepreneurial history."
"Although the Soviet Union provided the drawings at that time, we never produced tens of thousands of parts. From factory construction to product production, we China FAW created a miracle of China's automotive industry development in three years, holding up an automotive city with hands and shoulders." Fu Yuwu stated that China FAW also trained a large number of talents for the automotive industry and laid the foundation for later output of more than 10,000 people to support the construction of the Second Automotive Works. "The entrepreneurial and innovative spirit of China FAW is amazing!"
Fu Yuwu used the four words "Earth-shaking Changes" to describe the changes of China FAW. He told an experience during an exclusive interview with "Automotive Panorama": In 1984, for sedan production, he went abroad to the United States for the first time to purchase Gleason equipment. Visiting the production lines of American car companies in Detroit, he was shocked and unimaginable when he saw the mass production line, because the annual capacity in China was only hundreds of thousands of cars that year, while the United States was millions. "I remember that Ford's axle factory had an annual capacity of 5 million at that time, which was an astronomical number for us, absolutely unimaginable. But now the world's best automobile production line is in China, we have the best processing equipment and the best test conditions, isn't this an earth-shaking change?"
New China's automobiles started with commercial vehicles, with the beginning being Jiefang CA10. In 1958, the Dongfeng sedan was produced. In 1959, the Hongqi high-grade sedan was successfully tested. Later, there were both light and heavy vehicles. Fu Yuwu said: "Now our commercial vehicle engine technology has reached a world advanced level. Looking back, in these 70 years, we automobile people have created a world miracle. Not only did commercial vehicles make substantial progress, but passenger cars are also advancing by leaps and bounds, and the development of independent brands is full of vitality. Now our passenger car Hongqi is already a national glory. The modern China FAW is the pride of our Chinese automobile people."
From the completion of the first Jiefang truck to the period before the Reform and Opening Up, for the pioneering and foundation laying path that China FAW led the development of China's automotive industry, Fu Yuwu used the three keywords "Ambitious", "Fearless of Difficulties", and "Innovation" to express.
First is "Ambitious". Fu Yuwu said: "As the cradle of New China's automotive industry, China FAW not only produces products but also cultivates many talents. Now go look at various car factories and units, all have the shadow of China FAW. China FAW held up an automotive city with its hands and held up the foundation of China's automotive industry development."
Second is "Fearless of Difficulties". Fu Yuwu said: "The spirit of fearlessness of difficulties has continued in China FAW. When Comrade Rao Bin talked about entrepreneurship in China FAW that year: 'I am willing to become a bridge, let everyone walk over my body, work together to make the sedan'. We finally solved the 'lack of heavy and light' problem. The spirit of fearlessness of difficulties has become a valuable wealth for the development of China's automotive industry."
Third is "Innovation". Fu Yuwu said: "China FAW started with entrepreneurial and innovative spirit. For example, when making light vehicles, we did not have an R&D system and process, so we gradually explored the R&D system and process through round and round practice. Ambitious to overcome difficulties, with entrepreneurial innovative spirit, this is the portrait of this generation of automobile people. They are really amazing!"
Looking back at the magnificent years of 70 years, Fu Yuwu said: "China FAW has not only solidified the industrial foundation of China's automotive industry, accumulated valuable development experience, and cultivated a large number of industry backbone talents, but also tempered and cast the spirit of striving for self-improvement that leads the industry, illuminates the road ahead, and is passed down from generation to generation, becoming a spiritual totem of Chinese automobile people who have never ceased."
Joint Venture Cooperation Era:
Joint Venture Brands from Breaking Ice to Dominating
From the Reform and Opening Up to the 2000s, China's automotive industry welcomed the era of joint venture cooperation. At that time, the state listed the automotive industry as a pillar industry for developing the national economy and decided to import sedan assembly lines. During this period, China's automotive industry set off a wave of Sino-foreign joint venture cooperation. "Market for Technology" promoted the development of China's automotive industry. In 1984, Beijing Jeep was established, becoming the first joint venture automobile company in the country; in 1985, Shanghai Volkswagen was established, Santana went off the line, becoming the first Sino-foreign joint venture sedan enterprise; in 1991, FAW-Volkswagen was established, the first Jetta A2 sedan went off the line, becoming "National Family Car", opening a new chapter in joint venture cooperation. Other joint venture brands also entered successively.
"What we laid the foundation for heavy vehicles was the comprehensive introduction of the Austrian Steyr 91 project." According to Fu Yuwu's introduction, to change the situation of "lack of heavy and light", in 1983, the China Heavy Vehicle Industrial Enterprise Joint Venture Company was established, and the Austrian Steyr heavy vehicle technology project was introduced. In 1985, the first Steyr heavy vehicle went off the line, and in 1989, the first domestic Steyr went off the line at China National Heavy Vehicle Group manufacturing general factory. He said: "At that time, we introduced heavy vehicles which was necessary. Even looking at it now, doing so was correct. In that era of 'Market for Technology', we quickly established a complete industrial system through introducing foreign capital and joint venture cooperation, but we paid the price of brand speechlessness, core technologies controlled by others, and industrial profits flowing out in large quantities."
During this period, China's automotive industry obtained rapid development. In 1992, China's automobile production broke through 1 million units for the first time, reaching 1.0617 million units. China's automotive industry system was also gradually built. This created a historic strategic opportunity for the development of joint venture brands. Fu Yuwu recalled: "Later there was Beijing Jeep, and later there were 'Three Bigs, Three Smalls, and Two Micros'. This played a major role in the development of China's passenger and commercial vehicles."
In July 1994, China promulgated the first "Automotive Industry Industrial Policy". This marked that China's automotive industry entered a new stage. It encouraged the automotive industry to use foreign capital and relax the restrictions on Sino-foreign joint venture cooperation of automobile parts; it clarified the development direction of sedans and encouraged individuals to purchase cars, etc. In 2000, national automobile production and sales broke through 2 million units for the first time. In 2001, after China joined the WTO, the automotive industry entered a new stage of comprehensive opening up to the outside world. The "Automotive Industry Industrial Policy" was stopped after 10 years of execution, and the "Automotive Industry Development Policy" began to be implemented in 2004. It determined the strategic positioning of a major automotive country, promoted the formation of a complete modern automotive industry system and a major automotive production and consumption country.
In the era of joint venture cooperation, joint venture brands went from breaking ice to gradually dominating the domestic automobile market. Through "Market for Technology", joint venture/foreign enterprises brought advanced technology, management systems, and complete supply chains, although "Market for Technology" later triggered controversy. Fu Yuwu said: "To look at it against the background of the great times, we lacked technology, capital, and experience at that time. Through introduction, digestion, and absorption, joint venture cooperation played an important role for us to understand the world and understand frontier technology, laying a very good foundation for the takeoff of China's automotive industry, so we should not deny the important contribution of joint venture cooperation to the development of China's automotive industry. But when it develops to a certain extent, new momentum is needed to support the development of the automotive industry. This momentum is our innovation and independence, otherwise we will never be strong. In this way, we can gradually step into the new era of independent innovation and overtaking on a new bend."
During this period, China FAW formed a dual-wheel drive pattern of "Joint Venture (FAW-Volkswagen, FAW Toyota) + Independent (Jiefang, Hongqi)". Among them, FAW Toyota was established in 2000, 9 years later than FAW-Volkswagen. In 2025, the sales of joint venture brands under China FAW were 2.3619 million units, maintaining the leading position in joint venture brands, and the sales of independent brands were 0.9401 million units. In particular, FAW-Volkswagen has always played a flag role, maintaining the first sales volume among joint venture car companies and the first sales volume in the domestic fuel vehicle market for a long time. In October 2025, FAW-Volkswagen welcomed the completion of the 300 millionth vehicle, becoming the first domestic passenger car enterprise to achieve this production and sales scale; achieving 1.5871 million units in annual vehicle sales. In recent years, China FAW has continued to deepen cooperation with Volkswagen Group and Toyota Motor, promoting the "Joint Venture Cooperation 2.0 New Era" of co-creation and win-win, jointly creating a new model for joint venture car companies.
For the parallel development of joint venture brands and independent brands under China FAW, Fu Yuwu said: "It is a process of mutual empowerment. China FAW firmly walks its own path. In the field of passenger cars, it was 'poor and white', China FAW opened joint ventures, but there were no joint ventures in the commercial vehicle field, because China's automobiles started with commercial vehicles, starting with Jiefang. Jiefang has developed its own advantages after decades of development and has confidence. Retain independent technology and hold the bottom line that the brand cannot be lost, maintaining strategic determination. I think this is very rational and has a deep understanding of the China automobile market."
The development logic of commercial vehicles and passenger cars is different, and China has its own commercial vehicle development roadmap. Fu Yuwu said: "It was correct that China FAW and Dongfeng did not have deep joint ventures with foreign countries in heavy vehicles and commercial vehicles. This is based on national conditions. Currently, the level of China FAW commercial vehicles is also at the forefront if placed globally. Now we master electric commercial vehicle technology, overtake on a new bend, and are in a leading position globally."
Fu Yuwu also stated that Volkswagen is an amazing enterprise that actively entered into joint ventures with China FAW at that time. Currently, the production and sales of FAW-Volkswagen and SAIC Volkswagen are still good. "FAW-Volkswagen has delivered and cultivated quite a number of talents for us, and there are still many places worthy of our learning today. So, our independent brands and joint venture enterprises empower each other. For example, in terms of intelligent electrification, FAW-Volkswagen is also learning from independent brands and also using Chinese engineers. Volkswagen did very wisely in this regard."
Fuel Vehicle Era:
Independent Brands from Marginal Force to Important Pole
From the late 1990s to the early 2010s, this was a typical fuel vehicle era, while China's automotive independent brands were born successively, like Great Wall, Geely, Chery, BYD, etc., and independent brands under state-owned automotive enterprises. In 2009, China's automobile production and sales broke through 10 million units for the first time, surpassing the United States and becoming the world's largest automobile production and sales market. The pattern of China's automobile market gradually opened up. With joint venture brands still dominating the market, independent brands broke through the soil with difficulty and gradually grew from a "marginal force" to an important pole of the market.
In the fuel vehicle era, independent brands grew in the cracks between joint venture/foreign brands. Fu Yuwu stated that in 1992, China's total automobile production was only 1 million units. The main problem lay in the sedan market, when private car consumption was not advocated at that time. Later, new car policies were issued, sedans entered household consumption, and at the same time, China joined the WTO, changes in internal and external environments promoted the rapid development of the automobile industry. He said: "From the late 1990s to 2000, we were preparing for flight. Starting from 2000, our automobile production and sales truly grew explosively, surpassing a country in one year. By 2009, our production and sales rank first in the world, increasing from 2 million units in 2000 to over 10 million units in 2009 in 9 years."
Thereafter, the domestic automobile market pattern was completely broken, and the proportion of independent brand sales began to surpass joint venture/foreign brands and occupy market dominance. In 2023, an important node was that the market share of independent brand passenger cars in the domestic market exceeded half for the first time. According to data from the China Association of Automobile Manufacturers, in 2022, China brand passenger cars sold 11.766 million units, accounting for 49.9% of passenger car sales; in 2023, China brand passenger cars sold 14.596 million units, accounting for 56% of passenger car sales.
"The reason why we developed so fast, I think there are three forces: the first is the force of the market, the second is the force of innovation, and the third is the force of joining the WTO." Fu Yuwu said, "The 2009 global financial crisis, China's automotive industry went against the trend. Maybe what we did not expect is, after how many years, our exports also became number one in the world, and the development of electric vehicles can surpass fuel vehicles. But we thought of it, China's automotive industry has its own development logic."
As an important force among independent brands, China FAW firmly developed independent brands, actively planned and broke through, gradually shifting from single production orientation to market orientation and system capability construction, independent brand systems gradually grew, forming a product pattern covering passenger and commercial vehicles. Jiefang brand was born in 1956, Hongqi brand was established in 1958, Bestune brand was created in 2006. Currently, Jiefang has become a leading enterprise in the commercial vehicle field. In 2025, total vehicle sales broke through 280,000 units, among which medium and heavy truck sales were 255,000 units, and terminal share remained first in China; Hongqi actively explored the road to revival and achieved positive results. In 2025, sales broke through 460,000 units, becoming the first Chinese luxury automobile brand to break through 2 million users; Bestune sold 200,017 units in 2025, a year-on-year increase of 33%.
In recent years, China FAW has taken controlling key core technologies as the fundamental path, actively promoted high-quality development of independent brands such as Hongqi, Jiefang, Bestune, Yueyi, etc., and made solid results in brand upward movement, product renewal, and technology breakthroughs. Some innovative technology results broke foreign monopolies. For example, recently China FAW's "A Method for Antiskid Control of Power Distribution" invention patent won the China Patent Excellence Award, using hardcore innovation to run out the "acceleration" of independent four-wheel drive vehicle control technology breakthrough, breaking foreign monopolies and filling the domestic technical gap.
Fu Yuwu said: "In the fields of commercial vehicles and passenger vehicles, China FAW has always been a leader, continuously improving product technology levels, market competitiveness, and market reputation, achieving technology leadership, market leadership, and product leadership. The first Special Prize of China's Automotive Industry Science and Technology Progress Award was won by 'FAW J6', which is the core technology of China FAW heavy truck engines and the integration of vehicle technology." It is also a vivid microcosm of China FAW's continuous innovation.
Electrification Era:
Independent Brands from New Bend to Overtaking
Since the 2010s, China's automotive industry development has ushered in the electrification era, with car companies actively planning the new energy vehicle track and gradually showing an explosive growth trend. Fu Yuwu said: "In 2009, China proposed advanced automotive power and energy issues. In 2010, it was proposed that automotive technology development should achieve energy transformation. So, after 2010, we began to implement automotive energy diversification, and the curtain of electrification was opened." In 2014, the automotive industry practiced the request of "Developing new energy vehicles is the only way for China to move from a major automobile country to a strong automobile country", and electrification development accelerated. New energy vehicles gradually became an important growth point for China's automotive industry.
In 2011, China's new energy vehicle sales were less than 10,000 units. Looking at new energy vehicle production and sales, according to data from the China Association of Automobile Manufacturers, in 2013, it was 17,533 and 17,642 units; in 2024, it was 12.888 million and 12.866 million units, production and sales broke through 10 million units for the first time; in 2025, it was 16.626 million and 16.49 million units; from January to June 2026, it was 7.438 million and 7.446 million units. As of 2025, China's new energy vehicle production and sales have ranked first in the world for 11 consecutive years, market penetration rate increased from 5.34% in 2020 to 47.9% in 2025, domestic new car penetration rate exceeded 50%; January to June 2026 penetration rate was 49.6%, among which domestic penetration rate in June exceeded 60%. According to the Ministry of Public Security, as of the end of June 2026, the national new energy vehicle holdings reached 48.97 million units, accounting for 13.19% of the total automobiles. In the domestic market, new energy vehicle sales have gradually become mainstream.
China's independent brands switched to the new energy track, rose rapidly, and the market offensive and defensive pattern showed a fundamental reversal. Looking at the past two and a half years, in 2024, China brand passenger cars sold 17.97 million units, accounting for 65.2% of passenger car sales; in 2025, China brand passenger cars sold 20.936 million units, accounting for 69.5% of passenger car sales; January to June 2026, China brand passenger cars sold 9.138 million units, accounting for 71.8% of passenger car sales, far exceeding the market share of joint venture/foreign brands. In the electrification era, China's independent brands transformed into leaders. "Market for Technology" has become a thing of the past, and China's car companies have gradually grown into technology exporters.
"The reason why our electrification transformation is so successful, market competitiveness has been improved to unprecedented levels, started with policy drive. Policy orientation played a key role in the first-mover advantage of the new energy vehicle market, and we firmly and confidently entered the new energy track. The automobile electrification transformation has played a major role in the energy structure changes in our country and national energy security, making major contributions." Fu Yuwu said, "At the same time, new forces of car making have played a 'catfish effect' on the new energy track, stirring up our intelligent connected new energy vehicle track with unprecedented activity, reviving vitality. Chinese automobile people are firm actionists, and the spirit of entrepreneurship and innovation was played to the fullest in this special period. In this round of automobile industry reconstruction, we should cheer for Chinese automobile people!"
As an industry leading enterprise, China FAW has taken the initiative in this electrification transformation, writing the history of national automotive industry progress with industry enterprises together, and promoting industry sustainable development. In strategic transformation, China FAW elevated green low-carbon to core strategy, firmly implemented new energy strategy. Hongqi, Jiefang, FAW Bestune, FAW Toyota, Audi FAW, and other new energy vehicle factories and key projects were built and put into production. Underlying independent brands and joint venture brands all actively participated in this electrification revolution practice. In terms of independent brands, FAW Jiefang transformed to new energy, independently mastered "oil, gas, hydrogen, electricity, hybrid" multiple technology routes, and comprehensively built hydrogen internal combustion engine chain industrialization ability; FAW Bestune built an independently controllable "Yueying" new energy technology architecture in terms of technology and products. In terms of joint venture brands, FAW-Volkswagen anchored the "Oil and Electric Co-advancement Full Intelligence" strategy; FAW Toyota promoted the "Oil and Electric Co-advancement" strategy, practicing fuel, hybrid, plug-in hybrid, pure electric, and other multiple drive routes. In terms of capacity layout, during the "14th Five-Year Plan" period, China FAW's added vehicle capacity exceeded 70% for new energy vehicle production.
Promoting electrification transformation, China FAW has achieved positive results. For example, its independent brand new energy vehicle sales in 2025 were 366,417 units, a year-on-year increase of 71.4%. FAW Hongqi new energy product sales in 2025 reached 149,000 units, a year-on-year increase of 29.8%; FAW Jiefang new energy model sales in 2025 were 45,000 units, a year-on-year increase of 184.3%, growing doubled for three consecutive years; FAW Bestune new energy vehicle sales in 2025 were 171,957 units, a year-on-year increase of 107%, new energy penetration rate reached 85%, sales in the first half of 2026 were 87,000 units, among which new energy vehicle sales were 72,000 units, reaching a new high. In May 2026, FAW Yueyi upgraded to an independent new energy brand. This is a key measure for China FAW to layout the mainstream new energy passenger car market.
But facing the background of electric technology route selection and independent brand rise accelerating competition, some foreign brands and joint venture brands appeared strategic wavering situations. For this, Fu Yuwu said: "First, a great change unseen in a century, regardless of which type of enterprise all face unprecedented market competition and transformation. Automobile power diversification is global, and the global automobile industry all faces reconstruction. So, to develop better in a fully competitive automobile market, no one can bypass the challenges of industrial reconstruction and transformation, this is an era proposition. Second, today do not doubt the trend of electrification and intelligence and the era challenges brought by it. If we do not go with the trend, we may be eliminated. Third, regardless of wholly-owned enterprises, joint venture enterprises, or Chinese independent enterprises, all need to empower each other on the transformation road, need to learn from each other, promote each other, and jointly build a new ecosystem for healthy automobile industry."
Intelligent Electrification Era:
From Made in China to Smart Made in China
Currently, the automotive industry "first half" electrification is still continuing, while the "second half" intelligence has opened a new situation. Electrification and intelligence are starting to integrate deeply, comprehensively reshaping the automotive industry pattern, and the automotive industry is gradually entering the intelligent electrification new era. In the intelligent electrification era, China's car companies went from scale leadership to technology, standards, brand, etc., comprehensive leadership. At the same time, the "15th Five-Year Plan" period will become a key period for China's automotive brand construction, and also the decisive window period for high-quality development of the automotive industry. Automotive industry enterprises should seize new historic development opportunities. Fu Yuwu said: "In terms of technology, we have built the world's most complete new energy vehicle industry chain, with battery energy density, safety, cost control, and other core indicators leading globally; intelligent connected technology has achieved commercial landing, with on-vehicle chips, vehicle operating system, and other 'chokehold' areas achieving breakthrough progress, completely reversing the passive situation of 'shortage of chips and cores'."
"Now our intelligence development is generally at the leading position globally, there is no country's automotive industry more active than us, actions faster, actions so firm, and consumers very enjoy the new experience brought by intelligence. Government, industry, university, research, and use five aspects effort to support intelligence market operation, in the ecology China is unique. This is the most favorable social background for us to develop intelligence." Fu Yuwu said, "The ultimate goal of intelligence is unmanned driving, to make cars safer, but really walking to full scenario unmanned driving may still need some time, because safety can least be slack, because it relates to life safety. In summary, our intelligence development prospects are all good."
In terms of intelligence, the entire domestic ecology has started to form a closed loop. Fu Yuwu believes that our country's entire ecological chain, innovation chain, and industrial chain have formed. For example, people, cars, roads, networks, clouds, maps, six elements can be combined, and foreigners cannot do it. China has system advantages and can effectively integrate resources. "In this round of change, China's industry collaboration, upstream and downstream innovation linkage is unprecedentedly active. This round of intelligent electrification system track success is closely related to collaborative innovation. Now any niche field has technology supporters, there are companions, and there are ecological partners. So, our success is not a flash in the pan, there are very good industry foundations, social foundations, and the foundation is very heavy, is based on cross-industry, cross-discipline fusion innovation foundation mutual empowerment. We created a historical miracle, this is China's characteristics."
Facing the wave of intelligent electrification development, China FAW is comprehensively building technological innovation systematic ability, and achieving "original technology source" strength together with industry enterprises. For example, during the "14th Five-Year Plan" period, FAW Hongqi broke through more than 1,500 key core technologies, focusing on "Three Electric", "Three Intelligence" implemented a series of major strategic layout, technological innovation and organizational adjustment, comprehensively creating Tiangong pure electric, Honghu hybrid, Jiuzhang smart three major technology platforms, brake-by-wire steering system, all solid-state battery, Hongqi Sinzhi Intelligent Driving reached industry advanced level, created a powerful technical foundation for independent R&D, and formed a full spectrum matrix covering fuel, pure electric, plug-in hybrid, and range-extending. Now, "Hongqi" has entered 2.3 million families. FAW Jiefang transformed into a provider of green intelligent transportation solutions, cracking efficient oil-cooled electric drive bridge technology, new energy vehicle lightweight, and other key core technologies on core technologies. Now, FAW Jiefang cumulative production and sales have exceeded 9 million units. FAW Bestune created a new energy technology cluster such as Yueying platform, Zhuri Power, and Ruyi Cockpit in technology breakthroughs. Joint venture enterprises FAW-Volkswagen and FAW Toyota are also comprehensively promoting intelligence and electrification transformation.
Currently, China FAW uses digital intelligence as a key handle, with AI as the core engine, creating FAW Flexible Intelligent Manufacturing Mode, promoting enterprises to transform from manufacturing type to technology type. It will also list digital intelligence transformation as a "Number One Hand" project, creating a digital intelligence product chain around core business. For example, it initiated the "Digital Intelligence Transformation Open Source Plan", output the self-developed Qixing Cloud platform ability modularly, jointly with relevant enterprises to build an intelligent manufacturing ecology; released the industry's first enterprise operation intelligent agent OpenMind, etc.
Cross-border integration has become an important handle for car companies to "break through". For example, China FAW has begun to layout the low-altitude economy, successfully developed Hongqi "Tianjian No. 1" flying car; promoted AI+ special action, creating humanoid robots, wheel-arm robots, quadruped robots, self-developed embodied intelligent robots will be comprehensively landed in Hongqi Intelligent Factory. Fu Yuwu advocates that the automotive industry should "look at automobiles by jumping out of automobiles", emphasizing cross-border integration. In the intelligent electrification era, he said: "Cross-border integration is the theme of the times, enterprises should treat it as a new value orientation. At the same time, they must embrace the ecology. This is not a matter of willing or not, but a life and death issue. We must embrace the Internet of Vehicles, without ecology, it is impossible to move forward. How to establish a benign ecology adapted to the new era is a required question for enterprises. Embracing the future, they must proactively unite ecological partners. Whose ecology is done well, who may win the future. In these aspects, China FAW has great potential."
Globalization Era:
From Automobile Major Country to Automobile Strong Country
In terms of transformation towards electrification and intelligence, China's automotive industry has achieved significant results, completed new energy track complete layout, formed full-chain advantages, at the same time intelligence advantages also appeared, improving the competitiveness of exported products. China's car companies' globalization development entered a new stage, exports became a new growth pole, and transformed from "Looking Up" to "Looking Straight". Overtaking on a new bend, new energy vehicles became the core engine of exports. Fu Yuwu said: "We Reform and Opening Up, joined WTO, let China's automobiles become part of the global. Today, China's automobile production and sales become number one in the world, from a deeper step, the global automotive industry cannot leave China, we are more confident."
Fu Yuwu stated that for a long time, the global market's cognition of China's automobiles was solidified on "Low Price, OEM, Imitation" labels. This cognition bias, both overseas public opinion long-term formed stereotypes, and with our country's industry early "Heavy Sales, Light R&D, Heavy Scale, Light Brand" development stage closely related. But after nearly ten years of deep transformation, China's automotive industry fundamentals underwent fundamental, subversive changes, we have complete reason and confidence to set up China's automotive technology confidence, industry confidence, and brand confidence. Standing on a new historical starting point, the era background of China's automotive brands has been updated to innovation, quality, intelligence, green, and open.
China's automobile exports first broke through 1 million units in 2012, reaching 1.0561 million units; from 1 vehicle to 1 million units took 55 years; in 2021, automobile exports first broke through 2 million units, reaching 2.015 million units, surpassing South Korea and becoming the world's third; in 2022, automobile exports broke through 3 million units, reaching 3.111 million units, surpassing Germany and becoming the world's second, among which new energy vehicle exports were 679,000 units; in 2023, automobile exports were 4.91 million units, surpassing Japan for the first time, becoming the world's first, among which traditional fuel automobile exports were 3.707 million units, new energy vehicle exports were 1.203 million units; in 2024, automobile exports were 5.859 million units, among which new energy vehicle exports were 1.284 million units; in 2025, automobile exports broke through 7 million units, reaching 7.098 million units, ranking first in the world for 3 consecutive years; from January to June 2026, automobile exports were 5.096 million units, first half-year exports first broke through 5 million units, and whole year expected to break through 10 million units.
China's car companies' globalization development form comprehensively leaped, from "Product Export" to full industry chain ecology going global, especially "Technology Going Global" attracted attention, ushered in from "Scale Expansion" to "Value Going Global" key leap. Fu Yuwu said: "Experienced seventy years of hard conditions, forty years of Reform and Opening Up, China's automotive industry completed the historical leap from 'Importing' to 'Going Out', from 'Following and Imitating' to 'Paralleling and Leading', from 'Product Output' to 'Ecology Leading'. Currently, the evaluation of China's automotive brands in the international market shows a complex pattern of recognition steadily rising, regional differentiation obvious, deep-seated prejudices not yet eliminated."
Fu Yuwu emphasized that globalization development is long and hard, automotive industry reconstruction, internationalization is a major opportunity for China's automotive industry development, and also a great challenge. He said: "We must remain clear, production and sales scale leading does not equal industry discourse power leading, capacity advantage does not equal value advantage, local market success does not equal global market success, China's automobiles fully entering Europe and America high-end markets still face brand barriers, trade barriers, cultural barriers and many other challenges. China's automobiles' product power and technology power have been widely recognized globally, but brand power is still our biggest shortcoming. Filling the brand value shortcoming, building an international brand discourse system matching with China's automotive industry status, is a major problem we must focus on solving in the current and a period of time to come. Globalization is a required question, but I do not agree that everyone goes out to sea, Chinese enterprises going out to sea is a long-term historical proposition, focusing on value resonance, winning in independent innovation."
In the globalization era, China FAW has comprehensively accelerated globalization layout, is building an ecology going global system, systematically transforming towards high value-added direction, achieving from 'Going Out' to 'Going In' 'Going Up', from 'Product Going Global' to 'System Going Global' leap. Currently, China FAW overseas business covers more than 100 countries and regions, its independent brands implement differentiated going global strategies for different market characteristics. For example, Hongqi focuses on European high-end new energy market, accelerating localization strategy; Jiefang deeply cultivates Global South markets, ranking first among Chinese brand holdings in South Africa, Indonesia, etc. markets, in 2025 overseas sales first broke through 60,000 units, achieving 6-year 10-fold sales leap; Bestune established an international company for independent operation, steadily promoting globalization strategy landing. Joint venture enterprise FAW-Volkswagen is also exerting effort, in 2025 the first batch of exported vehicles officially exported to the Middle East, achieving "0 to 1" historic breakthrough in overseas career.
"China FAW export time is earlier, among which commercial vehicle export went earliest, passenger vehicle export later. So, China FAW globalization development, one is having foundation, two is having better layout and experience, three is now facing new export, internationalization steps should be larger. Believe China FAW internationalization development has good prospects." Fu Yuwu advised, to adhere to technology standing as root, with hardcore strength build brand foundation; change narrative perspective, build globalization brand communication system; adhere to value going global, promote from product output to ecology output upgrade; consolidate talent foundation, provide core support for brand globalization.
In addition, China's automotive industry and enterprise development "From Large to Strong", needs entrepreneur spirit. "Entrepreneur spirit with entrepreneurship innovation, never giving up, always striving as background is a spiritual totem running through China's automotive industry development, generations continue. The era calls for such enterprises and entrepreneurs." Fu Yuwu said, "China FAW entrepreneurship innovation spirit, Dongfeng struggle background color, are in different eras living practice performance. Ultimately, hard strength determines how fast we can walk, and entrepreneur spirit as the core industry soft strength, determines how far we can walk, how steady, to how big a world stage."
Fu Yuwu said: "In today's industry reconstruction, era change today, I hope China FAW always holds entrepreneurship innovation spirit, be good as industry dragon head, be good as industry 'older brother', not only output products, but also output spirit, output better spiritual food. China FAW entrepreneurship innovation striving spirit never outdated."
In summary, China's automotive industry 70-year evolution history, is a history of starting from scratch, self-reliance, independent innovation, bravely climbing peaks, and from "Following" to "Parallel Running" to "Leading" striving history. China's automotive industry development changes are technology, scale, and status, unchanging is China's automobile people striving for self-improvement, bravely standing in the forefront of the tide pioneer spirit, innovative spirit. Standing on a new starting point, China's automotive industry will continue to write new legends and era chapters belonging to China's automotive brands in openness, cooperation, and win-win.
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嗰陣都會拿 Proton X70 同 Toyota Yaris Cross 嚟比較。呢兩款車喺價位同定位上都幾接近，今日我哋就由多個方面嚟做一个詳細比較，幫你省晒做功課嘅時間。
Proton X70 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 106,800 - 122,300，一共有 3 個版本，包括 1.5L Standard 2WD（RM 106,800）、1.5L Executive 2WD（RM 115,800）、1.5L Premium 2WD（RM 122,300）等等。
Toyota Yaris Cross 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 99,900 - 109,900，一共有 2 個版本，包括 2026 1.5L Standard（RM 99,900）、2026 HEV 1.5L Standard（RM 109,900）等等。
由價錢睇，Toyota Yaris Cross 嘅起步價比 Proton X70 平咗 RM 6,900。講真，喺呢個價位段，幾千塊嘅差距其實唔算大，關鍵都係睇整體嘅性價比同長期使用成本。
Proton X70 搭載 1.5L Turbo，馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。
Toyota Yaris Cross 搭載 1.5L 4-cyl，馬力 105 hp。官方油耗 6.0 L/100km。
動力方面，Proton X70 嘅 1.5L Turbo 比 Toyota Yaris Cross 嘅 1.5L 4-cyl 多咗 35 匹馬力，中段加速更有信心，尤其係跑高速公路超車嘅時候。不過 Toyota Yaris Cross 嘅油耗可能更抵，日常市區通勤分別唔會太大。
Proton X70 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
Toyota Yaris Cross 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
兩款車嘅驅動方式一樣，都係 FWD，日常駕駛感受唔會有太大分別。
Proton X70 保修 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Toyota Yaris Cross 保修 5 年/無限制里程，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Proton X70 同 Toyota Yaris Cross 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更重視品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，那就揀配備更豐富嗰款。始終建議兩款都去試駕，親身體驗先至最重要。
總體嚟講，Proton X70 同 Toyota Yaris Cross 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊輛，關鍵都係要睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去做試駕做最後決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers compare the Proton X70 and Honda HR-V when choosing a car. Both cars are quite close in price and positioning. Today we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to save you time on research.
The Proton X70 is priced at RM 106,800 - 122,300 OTR in Malaysia, with a total of 3 versions, including 1.5L Standard 2WD (RM 106,800), 1.5L Executive 2WD (RM 115,800), 1.5L Premium 2WD (RM 122,300), etc.
The Honda HR-V is priced at RM 115,900 - 143,900 OTR in Malaysia, with a total of 4 versions, including 2026 e:HEV 1.5L RS (RM 143,900), 2026 1.5T V (RM 137,900), 2026 1.5T E (RM 130,900), etc.
In terms of price, the Proton X70's entry price is indeed RM 9,100 cheaper than the Honda HR-V. If your budget is limited, Proton's entry-level version is already sufficient for daily needs. However, keep in mind that the savings of a few thousand might mean compromises on features, depending on your specific needs.
Proton X70's safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
Honda HR-V's safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include Honda SENSING (ACC, CMBS, LKAS, RDM).
Both cars have the same safety rating. In this class, safety features are quite comprehensive. Safety in new cars nowadays is not poor, so there is no need to worry too much about this.
Proton X70 body length is 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
Honda HR-V body length is 4500 mm, trunk 450 L.
In terms of space, the Honda HR-V body is 100 mm longer than the Proton X70, offering more advantage in passenger space. However, the Proton X70 is a bit more flexible for parking in the city, each has its trade-offs.
The Proton X70 uses FWD drive system.
The Honda HR-V uses FWD drive system.
Both cars have the same drive method, both are FWD, daily driving experience will not have a huge difference.
Overall, both the Proton X70 and Honda HR-V are very good car models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends on your personal needs and budget. We suggest doing your research, compare quotes from multiple dealerships, and then take a test drive to make the final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending some time on research will definitely not go wrong.
In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers compare Proton X70 and Honda WR-V when choosing a car. These two models are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will do a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to save you time on research.
Proton X70's OTR price in Malaysia is RM 106,800 - 122,300, with a total of 3 versions, including 1.5L Standard 2WD (RM 106,800), 1.5L Executive 2WD (RM 115,800), 1.5L Premium 2WD (RM 122,300), etc.
Honda WR-V's OTR price in Malaysia is RM 89,900 - 107,900, with a total of 4 versions, including 2023 1.5L V (RM 99,900), 2023 1.5L E (RM 95,900), 2023 1.5L S (RM 89,900), etc.
From a price perspective, the starting price of Honda WR-V is RM 16,900 cheaper than Proton X70. Honestly, in this price segment, a difference of a few thousand is not really big; the key is still looking at overall value for money and long-term usage costs.
Proton X70 comes with a 1.5L Turbo, horsepower 140 hp. Official fuel consumption 7.0 L/100km.
Honda WR-V comes with a 1.5L 4-cyl, horsepower 105 hp. Official fuel consumption 6.0 L/100km.
In terms of power, Proton X70's 1.5L Turbo has 35 more horsepower than Honda WR-V's 1.5L 4-cyl, providing more confidence in mid-range acceleration, especially when overtaking on highways. However, Honda WR-V's fuel consumption might be friendlier, and the difference in daily city commuting won't be too big.
Proton X70's safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
Honda WR-V's safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include Honda SENSING.
Both cars have the same safety rating. In this segment, safety features are quite comprehensive. New cars nowadays don't have bad safety, so there is no need to worry too much about this.
Proton X70 warranty 5 years/150,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Honda WR-V warranty 5 years/unlimited mileage, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Overall, Proton X70 and Honda WR-V are both very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends on your personal needs and budget. We recommend doing your research, comparing quotes from multiple dealers, and test driving before making a final decision. Buying a car is a big matter; spending some time researching is never wrong.
Robotaxi 的全球化竞赛，正进入真正意义上的「深水区」。
全球化能力，本质取决于 Robotaxi 是否具备跨交通体系的迁移能力。
尤其是左舵市场打磨成熟的技术栈，能否在右舵市场完成规则重构与场景适配？这是所有玩家的一道必答题。
这一次，中国无人驾驶玩家先迈出了关键一步。
在香港，萝卜快跑完成全球首个右舵左行环境下的「全无人」Robotaxi 测试，首次实现右舵市场去安全员化，这是「0 到 1」的破冰。
另一项里程碑式突破，在伦敦。
全球前两大的出行巨头 Lyft 与 Uber，同时宣布与萝卜快跑合作，在伦敦启动公开道路测试。
伦敦以极端天气、狭窄巷道和复杂环岛著称，代表右舵市场的最高难度关卡，同样，它也代表着右舵市场的「兵家必争之地」。
如今，伦敦街头同时出现两个名字：萝卜快跑与 Waymo。
在自动驾驶最严苛的实战考场，中美头部 Robotaxi 玩家第一次真正站在同一把标尺下正面对决。
与此同时，右舵「无人化」的突破，叠加伦敦战场的同台对垒，也意味着，中国无人驾驶正在把「技术验证」的全球化竞争，拉入「跨体系实战」的全新维度。
01、右舵市场，注定是一场硬仗
过去十年，自动驾驶经历了从技术路线之争到量产落地竞赛的演进，跑在最前面的始终是中美两国的 Robotaxi 玩家。
全球最大的两个左舵市场，天然构成了无人驾驶最肥沃的实验场。
美国提供了开阔的郊区道路、相对统一的交通规则，以及率先松绑的监管环境。
中国则贡献了全球最复杂的城市混合交通流，如密集的人口、大量的两轮车、随机性极强的行人行为。
所以，左舵市场形成了一个先发优势的正循环，高质量路测数据带来更快的算法迭代，以及更成熟的商业化落地。
而右舵市场，如英国、日本、澳大利亚等国家，以及中国香港等地区，在过去很长一段时间里，并没有足够体量的本土自动驾驶企业出现，自然缺乏左舵市场这般产业密度和推进节奏。
直到全球化成为头部玩家的核心命题后，右舵市场就从被忽略的角落，转变成了必须拿下的战略要地。
然而，从左舵市场向右舵市场的延伸，远非简单的镜像复制。
核心难题在于，打破左舵技术栈的「思维惯性」，使之与右舵交通规则完成系统级对齐。
主流自动驾驶系统的感知模型、高精地图坐标系、定位系统，都是以左舵驾驶习惯为底层假设进行开发的，右舵市场本质上可以通用，但是一旦到预测、决策与规划逻辑环节，就不是一个「开关切换」就能解决的问题了。
最直观的例子就是环岛。
左舵市场的环岛是逆时针绕行，车辆需要让行左侧来车；右舵市场则是顺时针绕行，让行方向完全相反，右侧来车拥有优先权。
这就使得，让行逻辑必须要重写，系统需要重新学习右舵环境下车辆驶入环岛的让行时间窗口，这不仅涉及对向车流的轨迹预测，还要考虑驾驶习惯的地域差异。
比如香港的螺旋式环岛，就要求车辆在进入前就选对车道，入口处就决定了出口方向，没有中途调整的空间。
这也意味着，从左舵向右舵的跨越，必然伴随一段技术脱敏期。
而萝卜快跑选择香港为右舵市场第一站，目的就是先在这把技术验证跑透，再向更难的市场发起冲击。
严格意义上，右舵市场的真正战场是伦敦。
这座城市作为近代左行交通规则的策源地，催生了成熟的右舵汽车体系，也成为全球右舵交通范式的起点。
伦敦辐射右舵市场，代表着整个右舵 Robotaxi 的战略起点。
战略价值高的背面是攻克难度大，这座城市恰恰是右舵市场中最难啃的「硬骨头」。
伦敦本身的城市交通环境对于无人驾驶并不友好，受中世纪路网规划制约，道路空间局促、街巷纵横交错，机动车、非机动车、行人混行交织；叠加持续较高的交通流量，车道宽度起伏多变，大量不规则合流、分岔路段，形成高密度复杂动态场景。
但另一种意义上，右舵市场的技术复杂性与城市环境严苛度，也让伦敦天然构筑起极高的准入壁垒，这是高手才能进入的战场。
2、伦敦擂台：萝卜快跑与 Waymo 的「高手局」
伦敦这场高手局，真正意义上同台对垒的，只有萝卜快跑和 Waymo。
尽管本地玩家 Wayve 在此扎根已久，商业化落地始终步履蹒跚，量产经验依然是零。
Waymo 去年底进场，推进节奏还算稳定。目前仍处于部署测试车阶段，并配备人类安全驾驶员，仅限员工乘坐。运营计划统一等待交通部最终批准。
而萝卜快跑虽然稍晚入场，但出场方式并不低调。它是全球头部出行平台押注的「技术合伙人」。
没错，全球排名前二的主流出行平台，Uber 与 Lyft，都选择与中国 Robotaxi 玩家合作，这在行业里并不多见。
两大平台同时锚定一家中国玩家，背后是对其技术栈成熟度与商业化落地能力的双重认可。
但带来的收益显而易见，对比 Waymo 需要依靠自有 APP 重新推广，萝卜快跑可以借助 Uber 和 Lyft 成熟的运营网络与用户基础，大幅缩短市场导入周期，越过出行平台最烧钱的「冷启动」阶段，将精力集中在运营优化和体验打磨上。
实际上，除了运营体系的构建，萝卜快跑在伦敦的落子路径，与 Waymo 本就有着截然不同的逻辑。
如果说 Waymo 进入伦敦的路径是典型的「常规打法」。先做数据采集，了解路况；再派安全员上车进行小规模测试，验证系统在陌生环境中的表现；确认安全基线后，才有可能逐步推进到全无人。
萝卜快跑则是高阶打法，没有选择在伦敦从零开始「补课」，而是先在香港这座同样右舵、同样高难度的城市，先完成「模拟考」，再开始伦敦这场「大考」。
香港与伦敦之间不只是「都靠左行驶」的浅层共性，两座城市同样道路狭窄、人口密集、拥有特殊环岛，同样是国际化的高监管门槛市场。在香港取得的运营许可和实际路测数据，天然具备向伦敦迁移的可信度与合规说服力。
而过去一年多时间，萝卜快跑的「模拟考」成绩不错，在香港完成了五次扩区，并实现了有安全员到全无人的进阶突破。
重点是，这是全球范围内首次在右舵市场实现公开道路全无人落地，比 Waymo 更早。
由此，技术验证的提前完成、右舵全无人的先发优势，再加上两大出行平台的流量入口，这些筹码叠加在一起，已经让萝卜快跑在这场擂台赛中占据了不容忽视的起跑位置。
03、进击「右舵市场」，抢滩高价值版图
萝卜快跑、Waymo 对垒伦敦的根本目的，都是借伦敦这一「桥头堡」辐射整个右舵市场。
右舵市场不仅代表着左舵市场的空缺面，更大价值在于其结构性版图。
一方面，70 余个国家和地区采用右舵驾驶，覆盖约 20 亿人口，全球右舵车年销量维持在 1700 万至 1800 万辆区间，占全球汽车市场约四分之一的份额。
另一方面，右舵市场囊括英国、日本、澳大利亚、新加坡等发达经济体，这些出行市场城市密度高、出行距离短、打车客单价高，形成了优于左舵市场的 Robotaxi 商业模型基础。
以伦敦为例，算一笔账。
德意志银行报告数据显示，全球各城市 5 公里出租车行程平均费用排行中，伦敦以约合人民币 160 元位列全球第五，旧金山排名第 24。
折算到单公里价格，伦敦是旧金山的 1.6 倍；
对比中国网约车市场 1.5 至 2.5 元/公里的费用区间，伦敦的单公里出行成本与中国存在十余倍的差距。
客单价的量级差异，直接决定了盈亏平衡周期的长短。
右舵发达市场所具备的高客单价、高密度、高需求与成熟监管，恰恰是 Robotaxi 从「技术可行」走向「商业可持续」的关键拼图。
与左舵市场以规模换利润的逻辑不同，这里天然拥有更短的盈亏周期和更厚的利润缓冲带。
这也解释了为什么萝卜快跑在完成左舵市场的规模化验证后，必须要向右舵市场这一高价值版图进击。
从中可以窥见三层意义：
第一，萝卜快跑树立了一个中国无人驾驶打开全球化局面的范本。
先在香港完成右舵体系的「制度磨合」与「技术验证」，再以伦敦为跳板进入欧洲核心出行市场。
这条渐进式路线绕开了直接进入英国市场的高墙，用分步验证的方式降低了全球化扩张的成本与风险。
第二，左右舵市场组合的全球化版图逐步完整。
左舵市场基于「一城一策」策略稳步推进的同时，右舵市场同步打开。
一旦在香港和伦敦跑通商业闭环，这套模型即可向澳大利亚、新加坡、日本等右舵市场批量复制。
第三，中国无人驾驶正在改写全球 Robotaxi 竞赛格局。
过去全球 Robotaxi 的竞赛，本质上是左舵市场内部的排位赛。中国玩家、美国玩家在各跑各的赛道，各讲各的故事。
而当萝卜快跑带着香港全无人经验驶入伦敦，与 Waymo 站在同一条街道上时，这场竞赛从此不再有「主场」与「客场」之分，只有同一套标准下的真实运营表现。
中国无人驾驶的全球化，不再是「走出去」的叙事，而是直接进入全球最难考场、与最强对手同台竞技的能力证明。
现在，左舵的技术积累与右舵的商业价值在伦敦交汇后，这场关于未来出行主导权的较量，才算正式开始。
In Malaysia's SUV market, many buyers compare Proton X50 and GWM Haval H6 when choosing a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning, so today we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
Proton X50 OTR price in Malaysia is RM 89,800 - 113,300, with a total of 4 versions, including 1.5T Executive (RM 89,800), 1.5T Premium (RM 101,800), 1.5T Flagship (RM 113,300), etc.
GWM Haval H6 OTR price in Malaysia is RM 139,750 - 139,750, with a total of 2 versions, including 1.5L Turbo Standard (RM 140,000), 1.5L Turbo Premium (RM 155,000), etc.
From a price perspective, the starting price of Proton X50 is indeed RM 49,950 cheaper than GWM Haval H6. If your budget is limited, Proton's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. But also note, the few thousand cheaper might have trade-offs in features, it depends on your specific needs.
Proton X50 safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety system includes ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
GWM Haval H6 safety rating is TBD, active safety system includes Basic.
In terms of safety features, both cars received good ratings. However, there are some differences in functionality between Proton X50's ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA) and GWM Haval H6's Basic. If you value active safety, you can compare their feature lists carefully.
Proton X50 adopts 4WD drive system.
GWM Haval H6 adopts FWD drive system.
Proton's 4WD and GWM's FWD will feel different in handling, a test drive comparison is recommended.
Proton X50 warranty 5 years/150,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
GWM Haval H6 warranty 7 years/150,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Overall, Proton X50 and GWM Haval H6 are both very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends mainly on your personal needs and budget. It is recommended to do your homework, compare quotes from several car dealerships, and then test drive to make the final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending some time doing research will never be wrong.
七百五十年前，马可波罗跨越山海、穿行欧亚，以步履打通东西方文明互通的壁垒，让古老丝路成为文明交融、商贸互通的纽带；七百五十年后，一场跨越大陆的绿色科创之旅续写丝路传奇。历时43天、驰骋15000公里的欧亚征程，比亚迪纯电车队顺利驶入深圳湾畔，标志着备受关注的马可波罗新丝路之旅圆满落幕。依托新能源核心技术与全域补能体系，这场新时代丝路之行，万里丝路绿色同行，以绿色科技为笔墨，为中西文明交融、全球可持续发展书写了全新答卷。
北京时间7月25日，本次马可波罗新丝路收官盛典于比亚迪全球总部隆重举行。活动由哥伦比亚大学教授、知名经济学家杰弗里·萨克斯与M31资本创始管理合伙人仲雷联合发起，以“绿色出行、科技互通、文明共生”为核心，完成了一场横跨欧亚、链接古今的科创实践与文明对话。不同于古丝路的车马跋涉，本次征程以新能源汽车为载体、以智能闪充网络为支撑，穿越多国复杂地貌与多元气候，用实打实的超长里程实测，验证了中国新能源技术的硬核实力，也让千年丝路的开放包容精神，在绿色低碳的新时代语境中焕发全新活力。
收官系列活动中，南方科技大学主办的“科技引领 共创未来”青年论坛成为亮点。论坛汇聚全球顶尖学者、科创领军者、行业精英与青年学子，搭建起中西科技文化深度交融的高端对话平台，聚焦科技创新、人才培育、全球协作、可持续发展等核心议题，激荡思想、启迪新知，为青年科创成长赋能，为跨国产业合作聚力。深圳市委宣传部相关领导在致辞中指出，本次马可波罗新丝路行动，深度契合“一带一路”共商共建共享的核心理念与APEC互联互通、共生共赢的发展主旨。以比亚迪为代表的深圳本土科创企业，扎根深圳创新创业沃土，以开放姿态拥抱全球市场，持续输出中国科创力量，成为新时代丝路对外开放的重要标杆。
主旨演讲环节，杰弗里·萨克斯教授全程回顾了本次欧亚丝路征程的实践成果。他表示，这场跨越15000公里的出行实测，绝非简单的技术展演，更是一场跨越国界、贯通古今的文明交流实践。他高度肯定比亚迪以绿色科技赋能全球交通变革、推动世界互联互通的深耕实践，认可其在全球碳中和进程中作出的积极贡献。同时，他高度赞扬“深圳-香港-广州”创新集群登顶2025年全球创新指数百强集群的亮眼成就，并对中国一带一路倡议的前瞻性布局与务实落地成果给予高度评价，认为区域科创合力与全球化开放格局，是新时代国际协作的核心优势。
立足生命科学前沿与时代发展大势，华大集团首席执行官尹烨带来前沿观点分享。他聚焦AI技术革新与生命医学突破带来的时代变革，解读新时代可持续发展的多元内涵，提出随着科研技术的不断突破，人类健康长寿的新时代已然到来。他寄语广大青年学子，要紧跟科技发展浪潮，敢于突破认知边界、勇于深耕科研探索，抢抓时代机遇、扛起科创担当，在跨界融合的新时代赛道中实现个人价值、助力社会发展。
圆桌对话环节，行业大咖齐聚、思维碰撞频发，深度解码深圳科创生态与中国企业全球化发展路径。比亚迪集团董事会秘书、首席投资官李黔结合企业全球化布局经验分享道，比亚迪深耕全球百余个国家和地区的实践印证，顶尖科技的全球化输出，绝非单向度的技术赋能与产品输出，而是构建共生共荣的科技生态、培育可持续发展的人才体系，以生态合力推动全球产业协同进阶。
速腾聚创CEO邱纯潮以企业成长历程为切入点，讲述了团队从校园科研探索到扎根新能源产业赛道的成长蜕变，结合AI技术迭代趋势，分享了企业深耕物理智能技术底座、赋能全产业智能化升级的前瞻布局，展现了中国科创企业的创新活力与深耕定力。
南方科技大学孟庆虎院士从深圳独特的科创基因出发，深度剖析深圳科创领跑全国、走向全球的核心逻辑。他表示，深圳的核心科创优势，并非单一产业的单点突破，而是构建了“高校基础研究—科研人才培育—技术成果转化—产业落地孵化”的全链条创新闭环。完善的科创生态、高效的产学研融合机制，成为深圳科创企业逐鹿全球、持续领跑的底层支撑。
活动现场，多位嘉宾达成共识，诠释了新时代丝路的全新内涵。杰弗里·萨克斯教授强调，全球化时代，合作共赢始终是科技创新、经济发展、可持续发展的核心共识，唯有打破地域壁垒、深化跨国协作，才能应对全球发展共性难题。仲雷则提出，新时代的丝绸之路，早已突破传统地理通道的局限，升级为以科技创新为内核、文明对话为纽带的全球化协作网络，而深圳凭借顶尖的科创实力、开放的发展格局，成为这一网络中不可或缺的东方核心枢纽。
千年丝路薪火相传，绿色科创续写新章。此次马可波罗新丝路之旅的圆满收官，是古今丝路精神的隔空对话，也是中国绿色科技走向世界的生动实践。未来，比亚迪将持续扎根深圳科创沃土，坚守技术创新初心，持续深耕新能源与绿色科技领域，以硬核技术搭建中西文明对话、跨国产业协作的桥梁，传承丝路互通共生的精神内核，持续输出中国绿色方案，为全球碳中和事业与可持续发展进程注入源源不断的中国动能。
In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers compare Proton X50 and Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV when choosing a car. The two cars are quite close in price and positioning. Today we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to save you time on research.
Proton X50 OTR price in Malaysia is RM 89,800 - 113,300, with 4 versions in total, including 1.5T Executive (RM 89,800), 1.5T Premium (RM 101,800), 1.5T Flagship (RM 113,300), etc.
Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV OTR price in Malaysia is RM 129,750 - 129,750, with 2 versions in total, including 2025 1.5T 90km CSH (RM 129,750), What charging methods does the Tiggo 7 PHEV support? Can it be charged using a home power socket? (RM 117,478), etc.
From a price perspective, Proton X50 starting price is indeed RM 39,950 cheaper than Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV. If your budget is limited, Proton's entry level can already meet daily needs. But note that the fewer thousand cheaper may have trade-offs in features, it depends on your needs.
Proton X50 safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV safety rating is TBD, active safety systems include Basic.
In terms of safety features, both cars have achieved decent ratings. However, Proton X50's ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA) and Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV's Basic have some functional differences. If you value active safety, you can compare the feature lists of both.
Proton X50 adopts 4WD drive type.
Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV adopts FWD drive type.
Proton's 4WD and Chery's FWD will have different handling experiences. A test drive comparison is recommended.
Proton X50 warranty 5 years / 150,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV warranty 3 years / 100,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Proton X50 and Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV are both mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, you can prioritize the one with a better reputation; if you value cost-effectiveness and features more, then choose the one with richer configuration. In the end, it is recommended to test drive both, personal experience is the most important.
In general, Proton X50 and Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV are both very good car models in the Malaysian market. Choosing which one mainly depends on your personal needs and budget. It is recommended that everyone do their homework, compare quotes from several dealerships, and then test drive to make the final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending time on research will definitely not be wrong.
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好買車喺揀車嗰陣都會拿 Proton X50 同 Chery Tiggo 9 嚟做比較。呢兩款車喺價位同定位上都好接近，今日我哋就從多個方面做個詳細比較，幫你節省做功課嘅時間。
Proton X50 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 89,800 - 113,300，合共 4 個版本，包括 1.5T Executive（RM 89,800）、1.5T Premium（RM 101,800）、1.5T Flagship（RM 113,300）等。
Chery Tiggo 9 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 166,800 - 179,800，合共 1 個版本，包括 2026 2.0T Standard（RM 179,750）等。
睇返價錢，Proton X50 嘅起步價確實比 Chery Tiggo 9 平咗 RM 77,000。如果你預算有限，Proton 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需求。但都要注意，平嗰幾千蚊，可能會喺配備上有取舍，具體睇你嘅需求。
Proton X50 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA)。
Chery Tiggo 9 嘅安全評級係 TBD，主動安全系統包括 Basic。
安全配備方面，兩款車都拿到唔錯嘅評級。不過 Proton X50 嘅 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA) 同 Chery Tiggo 9 嘅 Basic 喺功能上有啲差異，如果你比較重視主動安全嘅話，可以仔細對比下兩者嘅功能列表。
Proton X50 採用 4WD 驅動方式。
Chery Tiggo 9 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
Proton 嘅 4WD 同 Chery 嘅 FWD 喺操控上會有唔同感受，建議試駕比較。
Proton X50 同 Chery Tiggo 9 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭用、日常通勤。如果你更重視品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰一款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，那就揀配置更豐富嗰款。最終仲係建議兩款都去試駕，親身體驗先最重要。
總體嚟講，Proton X50 同 Chery Tiggo 9 都係馬來西亞市場好唔錯嘅車型。揀邊架車，關鍵仲係要睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行之報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers compare the Proton X50 and Chery Tiggo 8 Pro when choosing a car. Both cars are quite close in price and positioning. Today we will do a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to save you time doing research.
Proton X50 has an OTR price in Malaysia of RM 89,800 - 113,300, totaling 4 variants, including 1.5T Executive (RM 89,800), 1.5T Premium (RM 101,800), 1.5T Flagship (RM 113,300), etc.
Chery Tiggo 8 Pro has an OTR price in Malaysia of RM 159,750 - 159,750, totaling 2 variants, including 1.6L Turbo Standard (RM 130,000), 1.6L Turbo Premium (RM 145,000), etc.
In terms of price, the starting price of the Proton X50 is indeed RM 69,950 cheaper than the Chery Tiggo 8 Pro. If your budget is limited, the entry-level Proton can already meet daily needs. But be aware, that few thousand difference may involve trade-offs in features, depending on your specific needs.
Proton X50 has a safety rating of 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
Chery Tiggo 8 Pro safety rating is TBD, active safety system includes Basic.
Regarding safety features, both cars received good ratings. However, there are some differences in functionality between the Proton X50's ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA) and the Chery Tiggo 8 Pro's Basic. If you value active safety more, you can compare their feature lists carefully.
Proton X50 body length is 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
Chery Tiggo 8 Pro body length is 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
The dimensions of both cars are almost the same, with little difference in interior space. For cars in this class, it is more than enough for daily use.
Both Proton X50 and Chery Tiggo 8 Pro are mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale price more, consider the one with better reputation first; If you care more about value for money and features, then choose the one with more features. Ultimately, it is recommended to test drive both as the personal experience is most important.
Overall, both Proton X50 and Chery Tiggo 8 Pro are very good car models in the Malaysian market. Choosing which one depends mainly on your personal needs and budget. We suggest you research thoroughly, compare quotes from several dealerships, and then test drive to make the final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending some time on research will never be wrong.
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都係拿 Proton X50 同 Chery Tiggo Cross 做比較。呢兩款車喺價位同定位上都幾接近，今日我哋就從多個方面做一個詳細嘅比較，幫你節省咗做功課嘅時間。
Proton X50 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 89,800 - 113,300，一總共有 4 個版本，包括 1.5T Executive（RM 89,800）、1.5T Premium（RM 101,800）、1.5T Flagship（RM 113,300） 等。
Chery Tiggo Cross 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 88,750 - 99,750，一總共有 2 個版本，包括 2025 HEV 1.5L CSH（RM 99,750）、2025 1.5T Standard（RM 88,750） 等。
由價錢睇嚟，Chery Tiggo Cross 嘅起步價比 Proton X50 平咗 RM 1,050。老實講，喺呢個價位段，幾千蚊嘅差距其實唔算大，關鍵仲係睇整體嘅性價比同長期使用成本。
Proton X50 配備 1.5L 4-cyl，馬力 105 hp。官方油耗 6.0 L/100km。
Chery Tiggo Cross 配備 1.5L 4-cyl，馬力 105 hp。官方油耗 6.0 L/100km。
兩款車用嘅係同一套動力系統，日常開起嚟嘅感覺基本無分別。油耗方面都幾接近，唔使太糾結呢一點。
Proton X50 車身長 4400 mm，後行李廂 400 L。
Chery Tiggo Cross 車身長 4400 mm，後行李廂 400 L。
兩款車嘅尺寸幾乎一樣，車內空間唔係好大分別。呢個級別嘅車，日常使用完全夠用。
Proton X50 採用 4WD 驅動方式。
Chery Tiggo Cross 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
Proton 嘅 4WD 同 Chery 嘅 FWD 喺操控上會有唔同感覺，建議試駕比較。
總體嚟講，Proton X50 同 Chery Tiggo Cross 都係馬來西亞市場好唔錯嘅車型。揀邊輛，關鍵仲係要睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，先至試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花啲時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
7 月 21 日，2026 年《財富》中國 500 強排行榜重磅發布。作為國內輪胎龍頭企業，中策橡膠集團首次強勢登榜，以 6254.6 百萬美元營業收入位列第 343 位。
登陸資本市場首年交出亮眼「成績單」
作為今年榜單中耀眼「新面孔」，中策橡膠喺登陸 A 股資本市場後交出首份年度成績單頗為亮眼。2025 年，公司各項核心指標全面躍昇：實現營業收入 449.56 億元，同比增長 14.52%；淨利潤達 41.47 億元，同比增長 9.51%；扣非淨利潤更係大幅飆漲 22.15% 至 40.58 億元，彰顯卓越市場競爭力同盈利質量。喺業績大增同時，公司拋出超 12 億元慷慨分紅方案，分紅比例高達 30.15%，回饋投資者誠意滿滿。
新能源配套「質變」，產銷兩旺勢頭強勁
業績嘅穩健增長源於核心業務嘅全面開花。作為全球最大嘅全鋼胎製造企業，中策橡膠全鋼胎全球市佔率約 12%，海外銷量增速超 20%，全年產銷率高達 102%，產能利用率幾近滿負荷；半鋼胎業務亦呈現量價齊升態勢，預計 2026 年國內半鋼胎銷量將達到約 4500 萬條。
最大亮點在於新能源配套市場歷史性「質變」。2025 年，公司新能源乘用車配套輪胎超 1070 萬條，不僅率先成為全球首家推出新能源商用車專用輪胎系列嘅企業，更成為比亞迪、小鵬、吉利等頭部新能源車企嘅核心原配輪胎供應商。同時，公司成功實現尊界 S800 典藏版、問界 M6 等中高端標杆車型嘅原配定點，穩步推進鴻蒙智行旗下車型配套進程，打破外資壟斷，實現中國輪胎品牌喺中高端整車配套領域嘅歷史性突破。
研發重倉同 AI 賦能，技術突破引領行業
喺科技創新端，中策橡膠憑藉喺高性能輪胎及綠色智慧製造領域嘅系統性突破，榮獲國家科學技術進步獎二等獎。2025 年，公司研發投入高達 15.43 億元，依托自主研發嘅「天工」同「天璣」兩大核心技術系統，加速前沿科技成果向產業優勢轉化。同時，公司全面加速「未來工廠」建設，大力發展 AI 技術全鏈條應用，以新質生產力為高質量發展注入強勁動能。
全球化產能矩陣，有效對沖貿易風險
喺全球化佈局端，中策橡膠依托泰國、印尼生產基地嘅全面投產，以及越南新基地嘅穩步推進，構建起穩健嘅全球化產能矩陣，境外收入佔比已達 48%，有效對沖咗國際貿易風險。
首次登榜《財富》中國 500 強，係里程碑，更係新起點。未來，中策橡膠將繼續深耕主業，以硬核科技賦能智造，以全球化視野謀發展，為中國輪胎產業嘅全面躍昇貢獻中策力量，堅定不移向住世界一流輪胎企業嘅目標穩步邁進。
In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers compare Proton X50 and Mazda CX-30 when choosing a car. The price and positioning of these two cars are quite close. Today, we will conduct a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
The OTR price for Proton X50 in Malaysia is RM 89,800 - 113,300, with a total of 4 versions, including 1.5T Executive (RM 89,800), 1.5T Premium (RM 101,800), 1.5T Flagship (RM 113,300), etc.
The OTR price for Mazda CX-30 in Malaysia is RM 122,409 - 146,409, with a total of 4 versions, including 2025 2.0L High+ Premium (RM 146,409), 2025 2.0L High+ (RM 138,409), 2025 2.0L High (RM 130,409), etc.
From a price perspective, the Proton X50's starting price is indeed RM 32,609 cheaper than the Mazda CX-30. If your budget is limited, Proton's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. However, be aware that the thousands saved might involve trade-offs in features, depending on your specific needs.
Proton X50 safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
Mazda CX-30 safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include i-Activsense.
Both cars have the same safety rating, and safety features are quite comprehensive in this class. Safety in new cars nowadays is not poor, no need to worry too much about this.
Proton X50 body length 4400 mm, boot capacity 400 L.
Mazda CX-30 body length 4500 mm, boot capacity 450 L.
Regarding space, the Mazda CX-30 body is 100 mm longer than the Proton X50, offering an advantage in passenger space. However, the Proton X50 is more flexible for parking in the city, each has its trade-offs.
Proton X50 warranty 5 years/150,000km, service interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Mazda CX-30 warranty 5 years/150,000km, service interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Both cars have the same warranty conditions, no need to dwell on this aspect. Actual maintenance costs also depend on the brand's service network and parts prices, it is recommended to ask real owners in car owner groups for experience.
Overall, both Proton X50 and Mazda CX-30 are very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose ultimately depends on your personal needs and budget. We suggest doing your research, comparing quotes from several dealerships, and then test driving to make the final decision. Buying a car is a major matter, spending some time on research will never go wrong.
June 2026
Model Y becomes the best-selling imported electric brand in Malaysia
Model 3 becomes the best-selling all-electric sedan in Malaysia
Chinese smart manufacturing from the Shanghai Superfactory
Safe, Smart, Easy to Drive, Durable 🦾
In the SUV market in Malaysia, many buyers compare the Proton X50 and Toyota Yaris Cross when choosing a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time doing research.
The Proton X50 OTR price in Malaysia is RM 89,800 - 113,300, with 4 variants in total, including 1.5T Executive (RM 89,800), 1.5T Premium (RM 101,800), 1.5T Flagship (RM 113,300), etc.
The Toyota Yaris Cross OTR price in Malaysia is RM 99,900 - 109,900, with 2 variants in total, including 2026 1.5L Standard (RM 99,900), 2026 HEV 1.5L Standard (RM 109,900), etc.
From a price perspective, the Proton X50's starting price is indeed RM 10,100 cheaper than the Toyota Yaris Cross. If your budget is limited, Proton's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. But note, the few thousand dollars difference might involve trade-offs in features, depending on your specific needs.
The Proton X50 safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
The Toyota Yaris Cross safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include TSS.
Both cars have the same safety rating; safety features are quite comprehensive for this class. New cars nowadays are not lacking in safety, so no need to worry too much about this point.
Proton X50 body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
Toyota Yaris Cross body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
The dimensions of both cars are almost identical, with little difference in interior space. For this class of car, it is more than enough for daily use.
Proton X50 uses 4WD drive method.
Toyota Yaris Cross uses FWD drive method.
Proton's 4WD and Toyota's FWD will feel different in handling; test drive comparison is recommended.
Overall, the Proton X50 and Toyota Yaris Cross are both very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends mainly on your personal needs and budget. We suggest doing your research, comparing quotes from several car dealerships, and then test driving to make a final decision. Buying a car is a big matter; spending some time doing research will never be wrong.
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多次買家喺揀車嘅時候都會將 寶騰 X50 同 本田 CR-V 嚟比較。呢兩款車喺價位同定位上都好接近，今日我哋就從多個方面做一個詳細嘅比較，幫你節省咗做功課嘅時間。
寶騰 X50 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 89,800 - 113,300，合共 4 個版本，包括 1.5T Executive（RM 89,800）、1.5T Premium（RM 101,800）、1.5T Flagship（RM 113,300） 等。
本田 CR-V 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 178,200 - 195,900，合共 4 個版本，包括 2026 e:HEV 2.0L 2WD RS（RM 195,900）、2026 1.5T 4WD V（RM 181,900）、2026 e:HEV 2.0L 2WD E（RM 178,200） 等。
由價錢睇，寶騰 X50 嘅入門口價確實比 本田 CR-V 平咗 RM 88,400。如果你預算有限，寶騰嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需求。但亦要注意，平嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備上會有所取捨，具體要睇你嘅需求。
寶騰 X50 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA)。
本田 CR-V 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 Honda SENSING (ACC, CMBS, LKAS, RDM)。
兩款車嘅安全評級一樣，喺呢個級距入面安全配備都算好齊全。而家嘅新車安全性都唔差，唔使太擔心這一點。
寶騰 X50 採用 4WD 驅動方式。
本田 CR-V 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
寶騰嘅 4WD 同本田嘅 FWD 喺操控上會有唔同感受，建議試駕比較。
寶騰 X50 同本田 CR-V 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭用、日常通勤。如果你更睇重品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰一款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，就揀配備更豐富嗰款。最後都建議兩款都去試駕，親身體驗先至係最重要。
總括嚟講，寶騰 X50 同本田 CR-V 都係馬來西亞市場好唔錯嘅車款。揀邊一輛，關鍵係要睇你嘅個人需求同預算。希望大家做足功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers will compare the Perodua Aruz and Kia Sportage when choosing a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning. Today we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to save you time on research.
Perodua Aruz has an OTR price in Malaysia of RM 72,900 - 77,900, with a total of 2 versions, including 1.5L X (RM 72,900), 1.5L AV (RM 77,900), etc.
Kia Sportage has an OTR price in Malaysia of RM 129,639 - 179,320, with a total of 4 versions, including 2025 1.6T DCT 4WD High (RM 179,320), 2025 1.6T DCT 2WD High (RM 159,320), 2025 2.0L AT 2WD High (RM 139,639), etc.
In terms of price, the starting price of Perodua Aruz is indeed RM 56,739 cheaper than Kia Sportage. If your budget is limited, the entry-level version of Perodua can already meet daily needs. However, note that that few thousand price difference might involve trade-offs in features, depending on your specific needs.
Perodua Aruz comes with 1.5L 4-cyl, 105 hp. Official fuel consumption is 6.0 L/100km.
Kia Sportage comes with 1.5L Turbo, 140 hp. Official fuel consumption is 7.0 L/100km.
In terms of power, Kia Sportage's 1.5L Turbo has 35 more horsepower than Perodua Aruz's 1.5L 4-cyl. However, when driving daily in the city, both cars have sufficient power and will not feel underpowered.
Perodua Aruz body length is 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
Kia Sportage body length is 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
The dimensions of both cars are almost the same, with little difference in interior space. Cars of this level are more than enough for daily use.
Perodua Aruz uses FWD drive type.
Kia Sportage uses FWD drive type.
Both cars have the same drive type, both are FWD, and there will not be much difference in daily driving experience.
Overall, Perodua Aruz and Kia Sportage are both very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one you choose ultimately depends on your personal needs and budget. We suggest doing your homework, comparing quotes from several dealerships, and then going for a test drive to make a final decision. Buying a car is a big matter; spending time doing homework will definitely not be wrong.
