In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers often compare the Proton X70 and the MG HS when choosing a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning, so today we will compare them in detail from multiple aspects to help you save time doing homework.
The Proton X70 is priced at RM 106,800 - 122,300 OTR in Malaysia, with a total of 3 versions, including 1.5L Standard 2WD (RM 106,800), 1.5L Executive 2WD (RM 115,800), 1.5L Premium 2WD (RM 122,300) and more.
The MG HS is priced at RM 130,450 - 146,450 OTR in Malaysia, with a total of 2 versions, including 1.5L Standard (RM 105,000), 1.5L Executive (RM 115,000) and more.
From a price perspective, the Proton X70's starting price is indeed RM 23,650 cheaper than the MG HS. If your budget is limited, Proton's entry-level version is already sufficient for daily needs. However, keep in mind that the few thousand savings may involve trade-offs in features, so it depends on your specific needs.
The Proton X70 comes with a 1.5L Turbo, with 140 hp. Official fuel consumption is 7.0 L/100km.
The MG HS comes with a 1.5L Turbo, with 140 hp. Official fuel consumption is 7.0 L/100km.
Both cars use the same powertrain, and the driving feel is basically the same. Fuel consumption is also similar, so no need to worry too much about this point.
The Proton X70 has a body length of 4400 mm and a trunk of 400 L.
The MG HS has a body length of 4400 mm and a trunk of 400 L.
The dimensions of both cars are almost the same, and the interior space does not differ much. For this class of cars, daily use is more than sufficient.
Both the Proton X70 and the MG HS are popular choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, you might prioritize the one with better reputation; if you care more about value for money and features, then choose the one with richer configurations. Ultimately, it is recommended to test drive both, as personal experience is the most important.
In general, both the Proton X70 and the MG HS are very good car models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends mainly on your personal needs and budget. We suggest doing your research, comparing quotations from multiple dealerships, and then test driving to make a final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, and spending time doing research will never go wrong.
In Malaysia's SUV market, many buyers compare Proton X70 and Chery Tiggo 8 Pro when choosing a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning. Today we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
Proton X70's OTR price in Malaysia is RM 106,800 - 122,300, with a total of 3 versions, including 1.5L Standard 2WD (RM 106,800), 1.5L Executive 2WD (RM 115,800), 1.5L Premium 2WD (RM 122,300), etc.
Chery Tiggo 8 Pro's OTR price in Malaysia is RM 159,750 - 159,750, with a total of 2 versions, including 1.6L Turbo Standard (RM 130,000), 1.6L Turbo Premium (RM 145,000), etc.
From a price perspective, Proton X70's starting price is indeed RM 52,950 cheaper than Chery Tiggo 8 Pro. If your budget is limited, Proton's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. But also note, the few thousand RM saved might involve trade-offs in features, depending on your specific needs.
Proton X70 is equipped with a 1.5L Turbo, 140 hp. Official fuel consumption 7.0 L/100km.
Chery Tiggo 8 Pro is equipped with a 2.0L 4-cyl, 170 hp. Official fuel consumption 8.0 L/100km.
In terms of performance, Chery Tiggo 8 Pro's 2.0L 4-cyl has 30 more horsepower than Proton X70's 1.5L Turbo. However, for daily city driving, the power of both cars is sufficient, you won't feel it's lacking.
Proton X70 body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
Chery Tiggo 8 Pro body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
The dimensions of both cars are almost the same, with little difference in interior space. For a car of this class, it is completely sufficient for daily use.
Proton X70 warranty 5 years/150,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Chery Tiggo 8 Pro warranty 3 years/100,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Overall, both Proton X70 and Chery Tiggo 8 Pro are quite good car models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends mainly on your personal needs and budget. It is recommended to do your research, compare quotes from several car dealerships, and then go for a test drive to make the final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending time doing research is never wrong.
In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers compare Proton X50 and Mitsubishi Xforce when choosing a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning. Today we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
Proton X50 OTR price in Malaysia is RM 89,800 - 113,300, with a total of 4 versions, including 1.5T Executive (RM 89,800), 1.5T Premium (RM 101,800), 1.5T Flagship (RM 113,300), etc.
Mitsubishi Xforce OTR price in Malaysia is RM 109,930 - 119,930, with a total of 2 versions, including 2026 1.5L Ultimate (RM 119,930), 2026 1.5L Urban (RM 109,930), etc.
In terms of price, Proton X50 starting price is indeed RM 20,130 cheaper than Mitsubishi Xforce. If your budget is limited, Proton's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. But be aware, the difference of a few thousand might involve trade-offs in specifications, depending on your specific needs.

Proton X50 is equipped with 1.5L 4-cyl, 105 hp. Official fuel consumption 6.0 L/100km.
Mitsubishi Xforce is equipped with 1.5L Turbo, 140 hp. Official fuel consumption 7.0 L/100km.
Power wise, Mitsubishi Xforce 1.5L Turbo has 35 more horsepower than Proton X50 1.5L 4-cyl. However, for daily city driving, power of both cars is sufficient, won't feel lacking.

Proton X50 safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
Mitsubishi Xforce safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include MI-PILOT.
Both cars have same safety rating, in this class safety features are quite comprehensive. New cars safety nowadays is not poor, no need to worry too much about this.

Proton X50 adopts 4WD drive mode.
Mitsubishi Xforce adopts FWD drive mode.
Proton 4WD and Mitsubishi FWD will have different feelings in handling, test drive comparison is recommended.

Overall, Proton X50 and Mitsubishi Xforce are both very good models in Malaysia market. Which one to choose, key depends on your personal needs and budget. We suggest doing research, compare quotes from multiple dealerships, then go for test drive for final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending time doing research will definitely not be wrong.

In Malaysia's SUV market, many buyers compare Proton X50 and Mitsubishi Xforce when choosing a car. These two models are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to save you time doing your research.
Proton X50 is priced at RM 89,800 - 113,300 OTR in Malaysia, with a total of 4 versions, including 1.5T Executive (RM 89,800), 1.5T Premium (RM 101,800), 1.5T Flagship (RM 113,300), etc.
Mitsubishi Xforce is priced at RM 109,930 - 119,930 OTR in Malaysia, with a total of 2 versions, including 2026 1.5L Ultimate (RM 119,930), 2026 1.5L Urban (RM 109,930), etc.
From a price perspective, the starting price of Proton X50 is indeed RM 20,130 cheaper than Mitsubishi Xforce. If your budget is limited, Proton's entry-level version is already sufficient for daily needs. However, also note that the few thousand difference might involve trade-offs in features, depending on your specific needs.

Proton X50's safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), with active safety systems including ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
Mitsubishi Xforce's safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), with active safety systems including MI-PILOT.
Both cars have the same safety rating, and safety features are quite comprehensive for this class. Safety in new cars nowadays is generally not an issue, so no need to worry too much about this.

Proton X50 comes with a 5-year/150,000km warranty, with service intervals every 10,000km or 6 months.
Mitsubishi Xforce comes with a 3-year/100,000km warranty, with service intervals every 10,000km or 6 months.

Proton X50 and Mitsubishi Xforce are both mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, you might prioritize the one with the better reputation; if you care more about cost-performance ratio and features, choose the one with richer specifications. Ultimately, we suggest test-driving both, as personal experience is the most important.

In general, Proton X50 and Mitsubishi Xforce are both very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends mainly on your personal needs and budget. We suggest doing your research, comparing quotes from several dealerships, and then test-driving to make a final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, and taking time to research will never be wrong.

In the SUV market in Malaysia, many buyers compare Proton X50 and GWM Haval H6 when choosing a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning, today we will do a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
The OTR price for Proton X50 in Malaysia is RM 89,800 - 113,300, with a total of 4 versions, including 1.5T Executive (RM 89,800), 1.5T Premium (RM 101,800), 1.5T Flagship (RM 113,300), etc.
The OTR price for GWM Haval H6 in Malaysia is RM 139,750 - 139,750, with a total of 2 versions, including 1.5L Turbo Standard (RM 140,000), 1.5L Turbo Premium (RM 155,000), etc.
From a price perspective, the starting price of Proton X50 is indeed RM 49,950 cheaper than GWM Haval H6. If your budget is limited, Proton's entry-level version is already enough for daily needs. But also note, the few thousand difference, there might be trade-offs in features, depends on your specific needs.

Proton X50's safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
GWM Haval H6's safety rating is TBD, active safety systems include Basic.
Regarding safety features, both cars received good ratings. However, the ADAS of Proton X50 and Basic of GWM Haval H6 have some differences in functionality, if you value active safety highly, you can compare their feature lists carefully.

Proton X50 adopts 4WD drive mode.
GWM Haval H6 adopts FWD drive mode.
Proton's 4WD and GWM's FWD will have different handling experiences, test drive comparison is recommended.

Proton X50 and GWM Haval H6 are both mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, you can prioritize the one with better reputation; if you care more about cost-performance and features, then choose the one with richer configurations. In the end, it is recommended to test drive both models, personal experience is the most important.
Overall, Proton X50 and GWM Haval H6 are both very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose mainly depends on your personal needs and budget. We suggest doing your homework, comparing quotes from multiple dealerships, and then test driving to make the final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, taking some time to do homework is never wrong.

喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場,好多買家喺揀車嗰陣都會拿 寶騰 X50 同 奇瑞 Tiggo 7 PHEV 嚟比較。呢兩款車喺價錢同定位上都幾接近,而家我哋就由多個方面做一個詳細比較,幫你攞返做功課嘅時間。
寶騰 X50 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 89,800 - 113,300,一共有 4 個版本,包括 1.5T Executive(RM 89,800)、1.5T Premium(RM 101,800)、1.5T Flagship(RM 113,300) 等。
奇瑞 Tiggo 7 PHEV 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 129,750 - 129,750,一共有 2 個版本,包括 2025 1.5T 90km CSH(RM 129,750)、Tiggo 7 PHEV 支援邊種充電方式?可唔可以用屋企電源插座充電?(RM 117,478) 等。
由價錢睇,寶騰 X50 嘅起步價確實比 奇瑞 Tiggo 7 PHEV 平咗 RM 39,950。如果你預算有限,寶騰嘅入門版已經可以應付日常需要。但都要留意,平嗰幾千蚊,可能喺配備上要有取捨,具體要看你嘅需要。

寶騰 X50 搭載 1.5L 4-cyl,馬力 105 hp。官方油耗 6.0 L/100km。
奇瑞 Tiggo 7 PHEV 搭載 Hybrid,馬力 170 hp。官方油耗 4.5 L/100km。
動力方面,奇瑞 Tiggo 7 PHEV 嘅 Hybrid 比 寶騰 X50 嘅 1.5L 4-cyl 多出 65 匹馬力。不過日常喺市區開,兩款車嘅動力都夠用,唔會覺得唔夠力。

寶騰 X50 嘅安全评分係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP),主動安全系統包括 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA)。
奇瑞 Tiggo 7 PHEV 嘅安全评分係 TBD,主動安全系統包括 Basic。
安全配備方面,兩款車都攞到唔錯嘅評分。不過 寶騰 X50 嘅 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA) 同 奇瑞 Tiggo 7 PHEV 嘅 Basic 喺功能上有啲分別,如果你比較看重主動安全嘅話,可以仔細比較下兩者嘅功能列表。

寶騰 X50 保用 5 年/150,000km,保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
奇瑞 Tiggo 7 PHEV 保用 3 年/100,000km,保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。

總括嚟講,寶騰 X50 同 奇瑞 Tiggo 7 PHEV 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊輛,關鍵仲係要看你嘅個人需要同預算。建議大家做好功課,多比較間車行嘅報價,先去試駕先做最終決定。買車係件大事,花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。

运营商财经网 李广艳/文
在国内重卡领域,中国重汽的知名度很高,备受市场关注,本次运营商财经网便将目光放在中国重汽集团副总经理赵红身上,并试图揭秘她的过往经历。

公开资料显示,赵红毕业于兰州理工大学,拥有学士学位和高级工程师职称,虽然官方并没有披露具体的出生年月,但是在2022年,有资料介绍她为43岁,以此来推算,赵红今年应该在47岁左右。
2020年时,赵红曾以中国重汽轻卡有限公司总经理的身份公开露面,随后在2022年12月,赵红获委任为中国重汽(香港)有限公司执行董事及执行委员会成员,彼时她担任着中国重汽副总经理一职。
2025年5月,中国重汽集团官网更新了领导班子信息,其中,赵红出任中国重汽集团党委委员、副总经理。除了赵红之外,刘正涛出任中国重汽集团党委书记、董事长,刘伟出任党委副书记、董事、总经理,韩峰、赵华、王德春出任中国重汽集团党委委员、副总经理,丁惟云出任中国重汽集团总工程师,核心领导团队发生变化。
天眼查显示,赵红目前还担任着中国重汽集团青岛重工有限公司和中国重汽集团泰安五岳专用汽车有限公司的董事长、法定代表人,以及重汽(济南)轻卡有限公司总经理。
公开数据显示,2025年中国重汽集团累计销售整车45.2万辆,同比增长25.9%,其中,重卡销量30.5万辆,位居全球重卡销量第一;全年营业收入2304亿元,同比增长20.1%,业绩优异。
运营商财经网将持续关注中国重汽和赵红之后的发展情况。

In Malaysia's SUV market, many buyers compare Perodua Aruz and Subaru Crosstrek when choosing a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time doing research.
Perodua Aruz OTR price in Malaysia is RM 72,900 - 77,900, with a total of 2 versions, including 1.5L X (RM 72,900), 1.5L AV (RM 77,900), etc.
Subaru Crosstrek OTR price in Malaysia is RM 145,000 - 160,000, with a total of 1 version, including 2.0L e-Boxer (RM 150,000), etc.
In terms of price, Perodua Aruz's starting price is indeed RM 72,100 cheaper than Subaru Crosstrek. If your budget is limited, Perodua's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. However, note that the few thousand Ringgit difference might involve trade-offs in features, depending on your needs.
Perodua Aruz features a 1.5L 4-cyl, 105 hp. Official fuel consumption 6.0 L/100km.
Subaru Crosstrek features a 1.5L Turbo, 140 hp. Official fuel consumption 7.0 L/100km.
Regarding power, Subaru Crosstrek's 1.5L Turbo has 35 more horsepower than Perodua Aruz's 1.5L 4-cyl. However, for daily city driving, both cars have sufficient power and will not feel underpowered.
Perodua Aruz safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include.
Subaru Crosstrek safety rating is 5★ (Euro NCAP), active safety systems include EyeSight.
Perodua Aruz uses FWD drive configuration.
Subaru Crosstrek uses FWD drive configuration.
Both cars have the same drive configuration, both are FWD, and there will not be much difference in daily driving experience.
Overall, both Perodua Aruz and Subaru Crosstrek are very good models in the Malaysian market. Choosing which one depends mainly on your personal needs and budget. We recommend doing your research, comparing quotes from several dealerships, and test driving before making a final decision. Buying a car is a major matter, and spending time on research will never be wrong.

喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場,好多買家喺揀車嗰陣都會將 Perodua Ativa 同 Proton X90 嚟做比較。呢兩部車喺價位同定位上都好接近,今日我哋就從多個方面做個詳細比較,幫你省咗做功課嘅時間。
Perodua Ativa 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 62,500 - 73,400,合共有 3 個版本,包括 1.0L Turbo X(RM 62,500)、1.0L Turbo H(RM 67,300)、1.0L Turbo AV(RM 73,400) 等等。
Proton X90 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 106,800 - 122,800,合共有 4 個版本,包括 2026 1.5T Prime X(RM 122,800)、2026 1.5T Prime(RM 116,800)、2026 1.5T Lite(RM 106,800) 等等。
從價錢嚟睇,Perodua Ativa 嘅起價確實比 Proton X90 平咗 RM 44,300。如果你預算有限,Perodua 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需要。但都要注意,平嗰啲幾千蚊,可能喺配備上會有取舍,具體睇你嘅需要。

Perodua Ativa 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP),主動安全系統包括 ASA 3.0 + ACC + LDA + LKA + BSM + RCTA。
Proton X90 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP),主動安全系統包括 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA)。
兩部車嘅安全評級一樣,喺呢個級別入面安全配備都算好齊全。而家嘅新車安全性都唔差,唔使太擔心呢一點。

Perodua Ativa 保養保修 5 年/150,000km,保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Proton X90 保養保修 5 年/150,000km,保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
兩部車嘅保修條件一樣,呢方面唔使糾結。實際保養成本仲要睇品牌嘅服務網絡同零件價錢,建議去車友群問下真實車主嘅經驗。

Perodua Ativa 同 Proton X90 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇,適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更睇重品牌口碑同二手價,可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰款;如果你更在意性價比同配備,嗰就揀配置更豐富嗰款。最終都係建議兩款都去試駕,親自體驗先至最重要。

總體嚟講,Perodua Ativa 同 Proton X90 都係馬來西亞市場好唔錯嘅車型。揀邊輛,關鍵仲要睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做足功課,多比較幾間車行之報價,先至去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事,花啲時間做功課絕對唔會錯。

喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場,好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拿 Chery Tiggo 8 Pro 同 Subaru Crosstrek 嚟比較。兩款車喺價錢同定位上都幾近,今日我哋就從多個方面做詳細比較,幫你節省做功課嘅時間。
Chery Tiggo 8 Pro 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 159,750 - 159,750,總共有 2 個版本,包括 1.6L Turbo Standard(RM 130,000)、1.6L Turbo Premium(RM 145,000) 等等。
Subaru Crosstrek 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 145,000 - 160,000,總共有 1 個版本,包括 2.0L e-Boxer(RM 150,000) 等等。
由價錢睇,Subaru Crosstrek 嘅起價比 Chery Tiggo 8 Pro 平咗 RM 14,750。老實講,喺呢個價位區間,幾千蚊嘅差距其實唔算大,關鍵始終係睇整體嘅性價比同長期使用成本。

Chery Tiggo 8 Pro 配備 2.0L 4 缸,馬力 170 hp。廠方油耗 8.0 L/100km。
Subaru Crosstrek 配備 1.5L Turbo,馬力 140 hp。廠方油耗 7.0 L/100km。
動力方面,Chery Tiggo 8 Pro 嘅 2.0L 4 缸比 Subaru Crosstrek 嘅 1.5L Turbo 多咗 30 匹馬力,中段加速更有信心,尤其係行高速公路超車嘅時候。不過 Subaru Crosstrek 嘅油耗可能更抵,日常市區通勤分別唔會太大。

Chery Tiggo 8 Pro 車身長 4400 mm,尾箱 400 L。
Subaru Crosstrek 車身長 4400 mm,尾箱 400 L。
兩款車嘅尺寸幾乎一樣,車內空間分別唔大。呢個級別嘅車,日常使用完全夠用。

Chery Tiggo 8 Pro 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
Subaru Crosstrek 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
兩款車嘅驅動方式一樣,都係 FWD,日常駕駛感受唔會有太大分別。
Chery Tiggo 8 Pro 保養 3 年/100,000km,保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Subaru Crosstrek 保養 3 年/100,000km,保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
兩款車嘅保養條件一樣,呢方面唔使諗。實際保養成本仲要睇品牌嘅服務網絡同零件價格,建議去車友群問吓真實車主嘅經驗。
總括嚟講,Chery Tiggo 8 Pro 同 Subaru Crosstrek 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車款。揀邊部,關鍵始終係睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做足功課,多比較幾間車行嘅報價,然後先去試車先決定。買車係件大事情,花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。

喺馬來西亞嘅汽車市場,好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拿 Mazda CX-30 同 Chery Tiggo 7 Pro 做比較。今日我哋從多個方面做一個詳細嘅對比,幫你省返做功課嘅時間。

Mazda CX-30 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 122,409 - 146,409,一共有 4 個版本,包括 2025 2.0L High+ Premium(RM 146,409)、2025 2.0L High+(RM 138,409)、2025 2.0L High(RM 130,409) 等。
Chery Tiggo 7 Pro 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 123,750 - 123,750,一共有 2 個版本,包括 1.6L Turbo Standard(RM 125,000)、1.6L Turbo Premium(RM 140,000) 等。
從價錢嚟睇,Mazda CX-30 嘅起步價確實比 Chery Tiggo 7 Pro 平咗 RM 1,341。如果你預算有限,Mazda 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需要。但都要注意,平嗰幾千蚊,可能喺配備上有取捨,具體要看你嘅需要。

Mazda CX-30 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP),主動安全系統包括 i-Activsense。
Chery Tiggo 7 Pro 嘅安全評級係 TBD,主動安全系統包括 Basic。
安全配備方面,兩款車都拿到唔錯嘅評級。不過 Mazda CX-30 嘅 i-Activsense 同 Chery Tiggo 7 Pro 嘅 Basic 喺功能上有少少分別,如果你比較睇重主動安全嘅話,可以仔細對比一下兩者嘅功能列表。

Mazda CX-30 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
Chery Tiggo 7 Pro 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
兩款車嘅驅動方式一樣,都係 FWD,日常駕駛感受唔會有太大分別。
Mazda CX-30 保修 5 年/150,000km,保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Chery Tiggo 7 Pro 保修 3 年/100,000km,保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
總括嚟講,Mazda CX-30 同 Chery Tiggo 7 Pro 都係馬來西亞市場好唔錯嘅車型。揀邊輛車,關鍵都係睇你嘅個人需要同預算。建議大家做足功課,多比較幾間車行嘅報價,再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事,花啲時間做功課絕對唔會錯。

車型概覽

東風風神AX7 值唔值得睇,第一步唔係望牌子或者外形,而係睇佢能唔能夠配合你嘅香港日常。 呢篇會集中講每日相處是否輕鬆,幫你用買家角度篩走唔適合嘅選擇。
售價仍待確認,買家可以先把佢放入候選名單,等價格落實後再同同級車逐項比較。
購車價格指南
東風風神AX7 目前售價仍未清晰,較理性嘅做法係先睇版本、車身大小同動力形式,等價格落實後再決定值唔值得落訂。
如果有幾個版本可揀,可以先將 2023 1.5T 雙離合版(價格待確認) 放喺同一張清單。日常通勤重視舒適同易用,家庭買家就要優先睇後排、尾箱同安全配置。
核心規格重點

睇 東風風神AX7 嘅規格,重點唔係背數字,而係理解佢喺香港用車場景會帶嚟咩分別。
渦輪增壓、4 個 汽缸、1476 mL 排量 嘅動力底子,重點係市區跟車夠唔夠順、高速巡航會唔會吃力。 190 Ps / 140 kW、300 N·m 嘅輸出,對滿載、上斜同超車都比單睇馬力數字更有意思。 車長 4660 mm、車闊 1880 mm、車高 1690 mm、軸距 2715 mm 可以幫你預判商場停車場、屋苑車位同後排腿部空間。 濕式雙離合(DCT)、前置前駆 會影響起步順滑度、濕地穩定感同長途巡航性格。
優缺點分析
東風風神AX7 嘅優點唔需要講到天花龍鳳,真正有價值係佢能唔能夠令日常用車更省心:動力輸出對高速同上斜更有底氣、空間同車身尺寸方便家庭買家預判實用性。
要留意嘅係,香港停車場同窄路使用要留意車身闊度、售價未清晰前唔應該太早用性價比落結論。呢啲唔一定係缺點,但係落訂前應該先諗清楚。
買家常見問題
買 東風風神AX7 之前,真正要問嘅唔係單一規格,而係佢可唔可以融入你每日嘅生活節奏。
常見疑問係「東風風神 Aeolus AX7 適合長途駕駛嗎?」簡單講,適合,東風風神 Aeolus AX7 座椅舒適且支撐力足。 放到實際用車,就係要睇佢對通勤、泊車、家庭乘坐同長期成本有幾大幫助。
同級對比內容
將 東風風神AX7 放入同級車清單時,唔建議只用外形或者品牌光環決定。比較順序可以係:先等售價落實,再決定佢應該同邊個級距比較、再睇動力係咪足夠應付高速併線同滿載、最後睇車身大小、座位同尾箱是否適合家人。
咁樣篩選會貼近香港買家真實生活:平日塞車、商場泊車、周末去新界、甚至一家人出入,先係一部車每日要面對嘅考驗。
用車全周期指南
擁有 東風風神AX7 唔係買車一刻就完結,之後仲有保險、輪胎、保養、泊車同日常能源成本要處理。
如果你主要喺市區行,視野、低速順滑度同泊車輔助會好影響心情;如果經常行高速或跨區,座椅舒適度、隔音同動力從容感會更重要。

兄弟姐妹們,今日講一個出海嘅大新聞——唔係賣車,係賣「司機」。6 月 2 號,文遠知行同 Uber 聯合宣佈咗一件事:計劃喺西班牙馬德里推出該國首個商業化 Robotaxi 試點服務。意思就係:西班牙人好快就可以用 Uber 叫到一台冇司機嘅出租車。呢次係文遠知行同 Uber 第一次一齊進入歐洲市場。馬德里亦成為文遠知行 Robotaxi 駛入嘅全球第十二個城市。
官方消息話,喺馬德里自治區政府嘅支持下,呢項服務今年內就會正式啟動。到嗰陣,馬德里嘅朋友哋打開 Uber App,就有一鍵呼叫文遠知行嘅 Robotaxi。同叫普通網約車一樣,分別係嚟嘅車冇駕駛員——至少喺初期,仲係有分別嘅。運營初期,車入面會配備經過專業培訓嘅安全員,終究係剛上線,穩妥第一。
文遠知行呢間公司,你可能聽過,也可能冇聽過。簡單介紹下:2017 年成立,一直埋頭搞 Robotaxi 技術研發同商業化。而家佢嘅 Robotaxi 已經覆蓋咗廣州、北京、新加坡、阿布達比、迪拜、利雅得、蘇黎世……加埋而家嘅馬德里,一共 12 個城市。西班牙亦係文遠知行進入嘅第五個歐洲市場——之前已經入咗瑞士、法國、比利時、斯洛伐克。按照文遠知行同 Uber 喺 2025 年 5 月達成嘅規劃,佢哋要喺五年內新增 15 個國際城市部署 Robotaxi 服務,全球部署數萬輛 Robotaxi。隨著馬德里落地,目前已經完成咗 4 個城市嘅佈局,仲有 11 個會喺 2030 年前陸續覆蓋。
講真嘅,中國自動駕駛公司出海唔係頭一回,但中國技術 + 全球出行平台 + 歐洲市場呢個組合,定係好有意思。馬德里係歐洲最具商業潛力嘅 Robotaxi 市場之一,人口多、出行需求大,當地政策都好友善。喺呢個市場站穩腳根,對文遠知行嚟講係個唔小嘅里程碑。對 Uber 嚟講,引進 Robotaxi 都係為咗降低成本——終究司機唔使發人工。對馬德里市民嚟講,以後打車可能更平。


港交所網站掛出一咗一份熟悉嘅招股書。
5 月 28 日,繼去年 10 月首次遞表失效後,智能駕駛解決方案提供商蘇州天瞳威視電子科技股份有限公司(天瞳威視)再次向港股主板發起重衝,由匯豐及華泰國際聯席保薦。

喺智能駕駛賽道從「講故事」轉向「拼量產」嘅 2026 年,天瞳威視嘅二次遞表唔單止係一次資本試探,更係一場關於中國智駕供應商生存現狀嘅集中檢閱。
呢間被認為係「算力效率派」代表嘅公司,一邊連住從采埃孚到上汽、北汽嘅豪華產業資本陣營,一邊卻面臨住現金流緊繃、海外明顯回落嘅現實困境。喺呢場 IPO 嘅博弈中,光鮮同陣痛並存。
01
邊個係「天瞳威視」?
天瞳威視嘅創辦人王曦係一位典型嘅「回國」技術派。佢畢業於北京航空航天大學,後喺英國雷丁大學攻讀計算機科學博士學位。
喺決定創業之前,王曦曾經喺汽車零部件供應商天合汽車(TRW)及采埃孚擔任算法工程師同技術負責人,深度參與咗早期 ADAS 系統嘅開發。
2016 年,王曦捕捉到國內汽車智能化嘅風口,回國喺蘇州創立咗天瞳威視,定位係「以軟件算法驅動智能駕駛」嘅本土解決方案提供商。
公司嘅名字「天瞳」寓意「天之眼」,意在打造車輛感知萬物嘅視覺中樞。佢從最初嘅視覺感知算法起步,逐步擴展至行泊一體域控制器、L4 級自動駕駛系統等軟硬件結合嘅整體方案。

天瞳威視融資情況。資料來源:企查查
成立後不久,天瞳威視就獲得德聯資本、盛世投資嘅天使輪融資。此後十年時間,天瞳威視累計完成咗超過 10 輪融資,融資總額近 10 億元。
從招股書披露嘅股權結構嚟睇,天瞳威視構建咗深度綁定嘅「產業 + 資本」生態圈。
一方面,產業夥伴站台,全球汽車零部件巨頭采埃孚唔單止係其 C 輪領投方,亦係其戰略合作夥伴,持有天瞳威視 6.93% 嘅股份,位列第四大股東;國內方面,上汽集團通過上汽北美產投持股,北汽集團通過北汽產投佈局其中,地平線同商湯科技亦係戰略投資者。
另一方面,地方國資護航,唐山機器人基金、吳中金控等國資背景基金喺 D 輪及 D+ 輪入場,提供咗約 5.23 億元嘅資金支持。

截至最後實際可行日期股權架構
截至目前,王曦透過直接持股同員工持股平台合共控制公司約 40.84% 嘅權益,依然保持住對公司嘅控制權。
02
「兩條腿」行路
天瞳威視喺業務佈局上採取咗「雙軌並行」嘅策略。

喺 L2-L2+ 級輔助駕駛領域,天瞳威視嘅選擇非常務實。佢並冇盲目追逐算力堆疊嘅「軍備競賽」,而係走咗一條高性價比路線。
作為典型嘅視覺派智駕供應商,佢喺 L2 量產方案上以視覺感知為主,融合毫米波雷達同超聲波雷達,能夠喺較低算力平台上實現高級功能。例如,基於地平線 J6B 芯片(約 20TOPS)嘅方案即可支持行泊一體、高速 NOA。
呢種打法擊中咗 10 萬 -20 萬級主流車款對成本敏感嘅痛點。根據灼識諮詢嘅數據,按 2024 年裝機量計,天瞳威視係中國第二大同時提供行車同泊車解決方案嘅以軟件為核心嘅 L2-L2+ 級方案提供商,市場份額為 14.3%。

2024 年中國具備行泊一體能力嘅以軟件為核心供應商格局
截至最後實際可行日期,天瞳威視獲得 23 個汽車品牌嘅 198 款車款嘅 L2-L2+ 級解決方案定點函,並實現 6 個汽車品牌嘅 105 款車款嘅量產;獲得定點函嘅 198 款車款中有 87 款覆蓋海外市場,其中 59 款已實現量產。
但值得注意嘅係,L2-L2+ 市場正在經歷劇烈嘅「紅海化」。
一方面,經緯恆潤、福瑞泰克等本土 Tier1 正在加速追趕;另一方面,部分頭部車廠開始將低階智駕方案從外購轉為內部集成。
天瞳威視能否維持佢喺「性價比方案」領域嘅領先地位,取決於佢能否持續保持算法對低算力平台嘅優化能力,而這需要喺研發投入上持續加碼。

喺高級 L4 級自動駕駛領域,天瞳威視更多扮演「先鋒」角色。這亦係佢近兩年增長最快嘅板塊。
早在 2019 年,佢就參與咗上海洋山港嘅 5G 智能重卡項目。目前佢嘅 L4 方案覆蓋 Robobus、Robotaxi 同 Robotruck。其中,Robobus 係佢最具代表性嘅產品線,已喺蘇州、天津等城市嘅公開道路投入常態化試營運。
2025 年,天瞳威視從 L4 級解決方案產生收入 3.75 億元,佔公司總收入嘅 68% 以上,大部分收入來自 L4 級軟件解決方案。
然而,硬幣嘅另一面係商業化嘅曲折。雖然 L4 業務營收暴增,但佢嘅交付形態目前以「軟硬件一體解決方案」為主,呢種模式本質上接近「項目制交付」或「小規模車隊部署」,與 L2 業務中「純軟件授權 + 白盒交付」嘅高毛利、大規模複製邏輯存在顯著差異。
呢就直接導致 L4 業務毛利率嘅大幅波動:喺部分自研硬件佔比较高嘅項目中,毛利率一度低至 15%。

截至遞表日,公司雖手握超 10 億元嘅 L4 意向訂單,涵蓋 2500 架車,但呢啲訂單預計要喺未來三至五年內先會陸續交付,短期內對現金流嘅改善作用有限。
此外,天瞳威視仲有部分應收來自工程服務,主要涉及道路測試、數據收集支援及數據標註服務以及公司嘅專有工具鏈。
03
財務嘅雙面鏡
招股書嘅財務部分,展現咗智駕行業最真實嘅「B 面」:規模同虧損嘅極限拉扯,同埋賬面現金同營運消耗之間嘅緊張博弈。

營收高增長,但結構劇烈波動。
財務數據顯示,公司嘅營收呈現爆發式增長,從 2022 年嘅 1.72 億元增長至 2024 年嘅 4.83 億元,複合年增長率高達 67.7%。2025 年全年營收進一步增長至 5.5 億元。
但收入結構嘅變化明顯。2023 年,公司依賴 L2-L2+ 業務,佔比 90.2%;去到 2024 年,L4 業務佔比升至 50.2%;2025 年,L4 業務佔比進一步拉高至 68%。呢種「斷崖式」嘅結構切換,雖然證明佢 L4 技術搵到咗落地場景,但亦令市場質疑佢 L2 業務係咪已觸及天花板。
毛利率同純利潤嘅背離,呢係天瞳威視面臨嘅最大挑戰。
從毛利睇,整體毛利率喺 30% 左右徘徊,喺呢個技術密集型嘅智駕行業屬於中等水平。但細拆睇嚟,L2-L2+ 業務嘅毛利率通常能維持喺 40% 以上,純軟件授權模式,而 L4 業務嘅毛利率則因「軟硬件一體」交付中硬件佔比提高而被顯著拉低。
從純利潤睇,雖然表面虧損額較大,2024 年虧損 4.63 億、2025 年虧損約 2 億,呢度包含大量因優先股公平值變動帶來嘅「紙面虧損」。剔除呢個因素後嘅經調整純利潤更能反映公司嘅真實經營狀況:2024 年已收窄至 -438 萬元,但 2025 年並未如市場預期實現轉正,而係錄得約 -1086 萬元,虧損較 2024 年有所擴大。
呢個背後有一個不可回避嘅關鍵前提:調整後嘅「減虧」乃至「接近盈虧平衡」,係喺公司持續壓縮研發投入嘅基礎上實現嘅,研發費用從 2024 年嘅 1.17 億元降至 2025 年嘅 9231 萬元,研發費用率從 2024 年嘅 24.3% 進一步降至 16.8%,而 2022 年呢個數字曾高達 108.7%。對於一家科技公司嚟講,研發強度嘅「退坡」是否會影響未來嘅技術護城河,係一個潛在風險點。
現金流持續告急,最令人擔憂嘅信號。
根據最新招股書,截至 2025 年 12 月 31 日,公司賬上嘅現金及現金等价物為 2.35 億元,較 2025 年 6 月 30 日嘅 3.74 億元淨減少 1.39 億元,現金消耗速度較快。

更值得警惕嘅係經營現金流由正轉負且缺口持續擴大嘅趨勢。2023 年,公司經營活動現金流淨額為正向流入 1.15 億元,但 2024 年迅速轉為淨流出 1.89 億元,2025 年進一步惡化至淨流出 2.93 億元。
與此同時,應收賬款周轉急劇惡化。公司嘅貿易應收款項從 2023 年嘅 0.89 億元升至 2025 年嘅 5.48 億元,三年增長超過五倍,而同期營收增幅僅約 2.7 倍。
更令人擔憂嘅係應收款項周轉天數從 2023 年嘅 191 天同 2024 年嘅 166 天,到 2025 年驟升至 300 天,意味著公司從完成交付到收回款項平均需要接近一年時間。呢相當於變相為客戶提供長期無息墊資,喺資金本就緊張嘅情況下進一步加劇咗流動性壓力。

此外,雖然天瞳威視係首家出海嘅中國智駕軟件供應商,但 2025 年佢嘅海外業務遭遇咗明顯回落。2023 年天瞳威視海外收入為 1.27 億元,佔總營收比重達到 62.2%;到 2025 年海外收入降至 1100 萬元,佔比僅 2.0%。
喺而家全球地緣政治複雜、部分國家對智能汽車數據監管趨嚴嘅背景下,為佢嘅全球化故事增添咗一絲不確定性。
04
結語
天瞳威視嘅二次闖關,係智能駕駛行業進入「淘汰賽」階段嘅一個縮影。
從好嘅方面睇,佢踩準咗 L2 性價比同 L4 場景化落地嘅雙重節奏,且經調整純利潤喺特定口徑下已接近盈虧平衡,呢啲都畀投資者提供咗「有亮點可講」嘅故事線。
但從風險嘅角度睇,情況遠比首次遞表時更為嚴峻。業務重心嘅急速漂移、L4 業務商業化初期嘅盈利磨難、研發投入嘅被動收縮,呢啲此前就已存在嘅問題並未緩解。

天瞳威視 L4 級智能巴士
而真正令此次 IPO 帶「求生」色彩嘅,係現金流數據嘅實質性惡化:2.35 億元嘅賬面現金,面對每年近 3 億元嘅经营性現金淨流出,安全邊際已不足一年。疊加 300 天嘅應收賬款周轉天數,意味著公司每交付一筆訂單,都要墊付近一年嘅資金成本。
換言之,天瞳威視正處喺一個危險嘅財務窗口期:賬上嘅錢僅夠維持唔足一年嘅正常運作,而 L4 業務嘅大規模交付同回款卻需要更長時間。喺呢個智駕資本熱潮退去、一級市場融資邊際收緊嘅時刻,公司已冇太多等待嘅餘地。
首次遞表失效後僅隔半年便再次衝擊港股,對天瞳威視而言,與其話係戰略選擇,唔如話係現金倒逼下嘅必然之舉。
