首頁jelly
搜尋歷史
熱門搜尋
經銷商登入 / 註冊
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拿 Proton X90 同 Honda CR-V 嚟做比較。這兩款車喺價錢同定位上都幾接近，今日我哋就由多個方面做一个詳細嘅比較，幫手節省做功課嘅時間。
Proton X90 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 106,800 - 122,800，一共 4 個版本，包括 2026 1.5T Prime X（RM 122,800）、2026 1.5T Prime（RM 116,800）、2026 1.5T Lite（RM 106,800） 等。
Honda CR-V 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 178,200 - 195,900，一共 4 個版本，包括 2026 e:HEV 2.0L 2WD RS（RM 195,900）、2026 1.5T 4WD V（RM 181,900）、2026 e:HEV 2.0L 2WD E（RM 178,200） 等。
由價錢睇落，Proton X90 嘅起價的確比 Honda CR-V 平咗 RM 71,400。如果你預算有限，Proton 嘅入門版已經可以满足日常需求。但都要留意，平嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備上會有取捨，具體要睇你嘅需求。
Proton X90 車身長 4400 mm，行李廂 400 L。
Honda CR-V 車身長 4500 mm，行李廂 450 L。
空間方面，Honda CR-V 嘅車身比 Proton X90 長咗 100 mm，乘坐空間更有優勢。不過 Proton X90 喺城市入面泊車會靈活啲，各有取捨。
Proton X90 採用 FWD 驅動形式。
Honda CR-V 採用 FWD 驅動形式。
兩款車嘅驅動形式一樣，都係 FWD，日常駕駛感覺唔會大有分別。
Proton X90 同 Honda CR-V 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更加看重品牌聲譽同二手價，可以優先考慮聲譽更好嗰款；如果你更加在意性價比同配備，就揀配備更豐富嗰款。最後都係建議兩部都去試駕，親身體驗先係最重要嘅。
總嚟講，Proton X90 同 Honda CR-V 都係馬來西亞市場幾好嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵都係要睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拿寶騰 X70 同福斯 Tiguan 嚟做比較。這兩款車喺價位同定位上都蠻接近嘅，今日我哋就由多個方面做一個詳細嘅比較，幫你省省做功課嘅時間。
寶騰 X70 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 106,800 - 122,300，一共有 3 個版本，包括 1.5L Standard 2WD（RM 106,800）、1.5L Executive 2WD（RM 115,800）、1.5L Premium 2WD（RM 122,300） 等。
福斯 Tiguan 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 206,540 - 260,024，一共有 2 個版本，包括 2025 Allspace 2.0T R-Line（RM 260,024）、2025 Allspace 1.4T Elegance（RM 206,540） 等。
從價錢嚟睇，寶騰 X70 嘅起步價確實比福斯 Tiguan 平咗 RM 99,740。如果你預算有限，寶騰嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需求。但都要留意，便宜嗰幾千塊，喺配備上可能會有取舍，具體睇返你嘅需求。
寶騰 X70 搭載 1.5L Turbo，馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。
福斯 Tiguan 搭載 2.0L 4 缸，馬力 170 hp。官方油耗 8.0 L/100km。
動力方面，福斯 Tiguan 嘅 2.0L 4 缸比寶騰 X70 嘅 1.5L Turbo 多咗 30 匹馬力。不過日常喺市區開，兩款車嘅動力都夠用，唔會覺得唔夠力。
寶騰 X70 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA)。
福斯 Tiguan 嘅安全評級係 5★ (Euro NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 IQ.Drive。
安全配備方面，兩款車都拿到咗唔錯嘅評級。不過寶騰 X70 嘅 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA) 同福斯 Tiguan 嘅 IQ.Drive 喺功能上有些差異，如果你比較看重主動安全嘅話，可以仔細對比下兩者嘅功能列表。
寶騰 X70 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
福斯 Tiguan 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
兩款車嘅驅動方式一樣，都係 FWD，日常駕駛感受唔會有太大區別。
總體嚟講，寶騰 X70 同福斯 Tiguan 都係馬來西亞市場好唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵仲係睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，先至去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拿 Proton X70 同 Volkswagen Tiguan 嚟做比較。呢兩款車喺價位同定位上都好啱，今日我哋就從多個方面做一個詳細嘅對比，幫你慳返做功課嘅時間。
Proton X70 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 106,800 - 122,300，一共有 3 個版本，包括 1.5L Standard 2WD（RM 106,800）、1.5L Executive 2WD（RM 115,800）、1.5L Premium 2WD（RM 122,300） 等。
Volkswagen Tiguan 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 206,540 - 260,024，一共有 2 個版本，包括 2025 Allspace 2.0T R-Line（RM 260,024）、2025 Allspace 1.4T Elegance（RM 206,540） 等。
從價錢睇嚟，Proton X70 嘅起步價的確比 Volkswagen Tiguan 平咗 RM 99,740。如果你預算有限，Proton 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需求。但都要留意，平嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備上會有取捨，具體要看你嘅需求。
Proton X70 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA)。
Volkswagen Tiguan 嘅安全評級係 5★ (Euro NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 IQ.Drive。
安全配備方面，兩款車都攞到唔錯嘅評級。不過 Proton X70 嘅 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA) 同 Volkswagen Tiguan 嘅 IQ.Drive 喺功能上啲差異，如果你比較著重主動安全嘅話，可以仔細對比下兩者嘅功能列表。
Proton X70 車身長 4400 mm，後備箱 400 L。
Volkswagen Tiguan 車身長 4400 mm，後備箱 400 L。
兩款車嘅尺寸差唔多一樣，車內空間差別唔大。呢個級別嘅車，日常使用完全夠用。
Proton X70 同 Volkswagen Tiguan 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更加著重品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑好嗰一款；如果你更加在意性價比同配備，那就揀配置更豐富嗰款。最後都建議兩款都去試駕，親身體驗先係最重要。
總嘅嚟講，Proton X70 同 Volkswagen Tiguan 都係馬來西亞市場好唔錯嘅車型。揀邊輛，關鍵都係睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再落去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
In Malaysia's SUV market, many buyers compare Proton X70 and GWM Haval H6 when choosing a car. These two models are quite close in price and positioning. Today we make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
Proton X70's OTR price in Malaysia is RM 106,800 - 122,300, with a total of 3 versions, including 1.5L Standard 2WD (RM 106,800), 1.5L Executive 2WD (RM 115,800), 1.5L Premium 2WD (RM 122,300) etc.
GWM Haval H6's OTR price in Malaysia is RM 139,750 - 139,750, with a total of 2 versions, including 1.5L Turbo Standard (RM 140,000), 1.5L Turbo Premium (RM 155,000) etc.
From a price perspective, Proton X70's starting price is indeed RM 32,950 cheaper than GWM Haval H6. If your budget is limited, Proton's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. But also note, the savings of a few thousand may have trade-offs in features, depending on your specific needs.
Proton X70's safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
GWM Haval H6's safety rating is TBD, active safety systems include Basic.
Regarding safety features, both cars received decent ratings. However, there are some functional differences between Proton X70's ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA) and GWM Haval H6's Basic, if you value active safety, you can compare the feature lists of both carefully.
Proton X70 body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
GWM Haval H6 body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
The dimensions of both cars are almost the same, and the interior space difference is not significant. Cars in this class are completely sufficient for daily use.
Proton X70 adopts FWD drive mode.
GWM Haval H6 adopts FWD drive mode.
Both cars have the same drive mode, both are FWD, and the daily driving experience will not differ much.
Overall, Proton X70 and GWM Haval H6 are both very good models in the Malaysia market. Which one to choose depends mainly on your personal needs and budget. We suggest you do your homework, compare quotes from multiple dealerships, and then test drive to make the final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending time on research will definitely not be wrong.
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嗰陣都會拿 Proton X70 同 Hyundai Tucson 嚟做比較。這兩款車喺價位同定位上都好接近，今日我哋就會從多個方面做一個詳細嘅比較，幫你節省做功課嘅時間。
Proton X70 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 106,800 - 122,300，一共有 3 個版本，包括 1.5L Standard 2WD（RM 106,800）、1.5L Executive 2WD（RM 115,800）、1.5L Premium 2WD（RM 122,300） 等。
Hyundai Tucson 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 143,888 - 197,888，一共有 5 個版本，包括 2025 HEV 1.6T AT 2WD Prestige（RM 197,888）、2025 1.6T DCT 4WD Prestige（RM 186,888）、2025 1.6T DCT 2WD Prime（RM 164,888） 等。
從價錢嚟睇，Proton X70 嘅起價確實比 Hyundai Tucson 平咗 RM 37,088。如果你預算有限，Proton 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需要。但要留意，平嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備上會有取舍，具體要睇你嘅需求。
Proton X70 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA)。
Hyundai Tucson 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 SmartSense。
兩款車嘅安全評級一樣，喺呢個級數裡面安全配備都算好齊全。依家嘅新車安全性都好唔錯，唔使太擔心這方面。
Proton X70 保養 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Hyundai Tucson 保養 5 年/300,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Proton X70 同 Hyundai Tucson 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭用、日常通勤。如果你更睇重品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰一款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，那就揀配備更豐富嗰款。最終都係建議兩款都去試駕，親身體驗先係最重要。
總體嚟講，Proton X70 同 Hyundai Tucson 都係馬來西亞市場好唔錯嘅車款。揀邊一部，關鍵都係睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拿 Proton X70 同 MG MG HS 嚟做比較。呢兩部車喺價碼同定位上都幾相近，而家我哋就從多個方面做一個詳細嘅比較，幫你省返做功課嘅時間。
Proton X70 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 106,800 - 122,300，一共有 3 個版本，包括 1.5L Standard 2WD（RM 106,800）、1.5L Executive 2WD（RM 115,800）、1.5L Premium 2WD（RM 122,300） 等。
MG MG HS 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 130,450 - 146,450，一共有 2 個版本，包括 1.5L Standard（RM 105,000）、1.5L Executive（RM 115,000） 等。
由價錢睇，Proton X70 嘅起售價的確比 MG MG HS 平咗 RM 23,650。如果你預算唔多，Proton 嘅入門版已經足以滿足日常需要。不過都要留意，平嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備上有得有失，具體要看你嘅需要。
Proton X70 裝載 1.5L Turbo，馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。
MG MG HS 裝載 1.5L Turbo，馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。
兩部車用同一套動力系統，日常開起嚟嘅感覺基本冇分別。油耗方面都差唔多，唔使太糾結這一點。
Proton X70 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA)。
MG MG HS 嘅安全評級係 TBD，主動安全系統包括 Basic。
安全配備方面，兩部車都拿到唔錯嘅評級。不過 Proton X70 嘅 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA) 同 MG MG HS 嘅 Basic 喺功能上有啲差異，如果你比較重視主動安全嘅話，可以仔細比較下兩者嘅功能列表。
Proton X70 車身長 4400 mm，尾箱 400 L。
MG MG HS 車身長 4400 mm，尾箱 400 L。
兩部車嘅尺寸差唔多，車內空間差別唔大。呢個級別嘅車，日常使用完全夠用。
Proton X70 同 MG MG HS 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭用、日常上落。如果你更重視品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰一款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，那就揀配置更豐富嗰款。最終都係建議兩部都去試駕，親自體驗先係最重要。
總體嚟講，Proton X70 同 MG MG HS 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊輛車，關鍵都係要看你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers compare Proton X70 and Toyota Fortuner when choosing a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
The Proton X70 OTR price in Malaysia is RM 106,800 - 122,300, with a total of 3 versions, including 1.5L Standard 2WD (RM 106,800), 1.5L Executive 2WD (RM 115,800), 1.5L Premium 2WD (RM 122,300), etc.
The Toyota Fortuner OTR price in Malaysia is RM 195,880 - 241,880, with a total of 3 versions, including 2024 2.8T VRZ Diesel (RM 241,880), 2024 2.7L SRZ Petrol (RM 202,880), 2024 2.4L Standard Diesel (RM 195,880), etc.
From a price perspective, the starting price of the Proton X70 is indeed RM 89,080 cheaper than the Toyota Fortuner. If your budget is limited, Proton's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. However, also note that the difference of a few thousand cheaper might involve trade-offs in features, which depends on your specific needs.
The Proton X70 safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
The Toyota Fortuner safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include.
The safety ratings for both cars are the same. In this class, safety features are quite comprehensive. New cars these days don't have poor safety, so there is no need to worry too much about this.
Proton X70 uses FWD drivetrain.
Toyota Fortuner uses FWD drivetrain.
Both cars have the same drivetrain, both are FWD, and the daily driving feel will not differ significantly.
Proton X70 warranty 5 years/150,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Toyota Fortuner warranty 5 years/unlimited mileage, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Overall, Proton X70 and Toyota Fortuner are both very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose mainly depends on your personal needs and budget. It is recommended that everyone does their homework, compares quotes from multiple dealers, and then test drives to make the final decision. Buying a car is a big matter; spending some time on homework will never be wrong.
In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers compare Proton X70 and Toyota Yaris Cross when choosing a car. These two models are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will conduct a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
The OTR price of Proton X70 in Malaysia is RM 106,800 - 122,300, with a total of 3 versions, including 1.5L Standard 2WD (RM 106,800), 1.5L Executive 2WD (RM 115,800), 1.5L Premium 2WD (RM 122,300), etc.
The OTR price of Toyota Yaris Cross in Malaysia is RM 99,900 - 109,900, with a total of 2 versions, including 2026 1.5L Standard (RM 99,900), 2026 HEV 1.5L Standard (RM 109,900), etc.
From a price perspective, the starting price of Toyota Yaris Cross is RM 6,900 cheaper than Proton X70. To be honest, within this price range, a difference of a few thousand is not really significant; the key is still to look at overall cost-performance ratio and long-term usage costs.
Proton X70's safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
Toyota Yaris Cross's safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include TSS.
Both cars have the same safety rating; safety features are quite comprehensive within this class. New car safety in general is not bad nowadays, so there is no need to worry too much about this point.
Proton X70 warranty is 5 years/150,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Toyota Yaris Cross warranty is 5 years/unlimited mileage, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Both Proton X70 and Toyota Yaris Cross are mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, you can prioritize the one with better reputation; if you care more about cost-performance ratio and features, choose the one with richer configurations. Ultimately, it is recommended to test drive both, as personal experience is the most important.
Overall, both Proton X70 and Toyota Yaris Cross are very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends on your personal needs and budget. It is recommended to do your research, compare quotes from several car dealerships, and then test drive to make the final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending some time researching is never wrong.
In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers compare Proton X50 and Mitsubishi Xforce when choosing a car. These two models are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
The OTR price of Proton X50 in Malaysia is RM 89,800 - 113,300, with a total of 4 versions, including 1.5T Executive (RM 89,800), 1.5T Premium (RM 101,800), 1.5T Flagship (RM 113,300) etc.
The OTR price of Mitsubishi Xforce in Malaysia is RM 109,930 - 119,930, with a total of 2 versions, including 2026 1.5L Ultimate (RM 119,930), 2026 1.5L Urban (RM 109,930) etc.
From the price perspective, Proton X50's starting price is indeed RM 20,130 cheaper than Mitsubishi Xforce. If your budget is limited, Proton's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. However, be aware that the few thousand cheaper might involve trade-offs in features, depending on your specific needs.
Proton X50's safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
Mitsubishi Xforce's safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety system includes MI-PILOT.
Both cars have the same safety rating, safety features are quite comprehensive in this class. New cars nowadays generally have good safety, no need to worry too much about this point.
Proton X50 body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
Mitsubishi Xforce body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
Both cars' dimensions are almost the same, interior space difference is not significant. Cars in this class are fully adequate for daily use.
Proton X50 warranty 5 years/150,000km, service interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Mitsubishi Xforce warranty 3 years/100,000km, service interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Overall, Proton X50 and Mitsubishi Xforce are both very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose ultimately depends on your personal needs and budget. We suggest doing your research, comparing quotes from several dealerships, and then test driving before making a final decision. Buying a car is a big deal, spending time on research will never go wrong.
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嗰陣都會拿 Proton X50 同 MG MG HS 嚟做比較。呢兩部車喺價位同定位上都幾接近嘅，今日我哋就從多個方面做一個詳細比較，幫你節省做功課嘅時間。
Proton X50 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 89,800 - 113,300，合共 4 個版本，包括 1.5T Executive（RM 89,800）、1.5T Premium（RM 101,800）、1.5T Flagship（RM 113,300） 等。
MG MG HS 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 130,450 - 146,450，合共 2 個版本，包括 1.5L Standard（RM 105,000）、1.5L Executive（RM 115,000） 等。
從價錢嚟睇，Proton X50 嘅起步價確實比 MG MG HS 平咗 RM 40,650。如果你預算有限，Proton 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需要。但都要留意，平嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備上會有取捨，具體要睇你嘅需求。
Proton X50 配備 1.5L 4-cyl，馬力 105 hp。官方油耗 6.0 L/100km。
MG MG HS 配備 1.5L Turbo，馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。
動力方面，MG MG HS 嘅 1.5L Turbo 比 Proton X50 嘅 1.5L 4-cyl 多咗 35 匹馬力。不過日常喺市區行，兩部車嘅動力都夠用，唔會覺得唔夠力。
Proton X50 採用 4WD 驅動方式。
MG MG HS 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
Proton 嘅 4WD 同 MG 嘅 FWD 喺操控上會有唔同感受，建議試駕比較。
Proton X50 保修 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
MG MG HS 保修 7 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Proton X50 同 MG MG HS 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更重視品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，那就揀配備更豐富嗰款。最終都建議兩部都去試駕，親身體驗先係最重要嘅。
總體嚟講，Proton X50 同 MG MG HS 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一部，關鍵仲係要睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做足功課，多比較幾間車行之報價，再去試駕先做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers compare Proton X50 and Chery Tiggo 8 Pro when choosing a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
Proton X50's OTR price in Malaysia is RM 89,800 - 113,300, with a total of 4 versions, including 1.5T Executive (RM 89,800), 1.5T Premium (RM 101,800), 1.5T Flagship (RM 113,300), etc.
Chery Tiggo 8 Pro's OTR price in Malaysia is RM 159,750 - 159,750, with a total of 2 versions, including 1.6L Turbo Standard (RM 130,000), 1.6L Turbo Premium (RM 145,000), etc.
From a price perspective, the starting price of Proton X50 is indeed RM 69,950 cheaper than Chery Tiggo 8 Pro. If your budget is limited, Proton's entry-level model can already meet daily needs. But be aware that the few thousand difference might involve trade-offs in features, depending on your specific needs.
Proton X50 is equipped with a 1.5L 4-cyl engine, 105 hp. Official fuel consumption 6.0 L/100km.
Chery Tiggo 8 Pro is equipped with a 2.0L 4-cyl engine, 170 hp. Official fuel consumption 8.0 L/100km.
In terms of power, Chery Tiggo 8 Pro's 2.0L 4-cyl has 65 more horsepower than Proton X50's 1.5L 4-cyl. However, for daily city driving, both cars have enough power and won't feel underpowered.
Proton X50's safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
Chery Tiggo 8 Pro's safety rating is TBD, active safety systems include Basic.
Regarding safety features, both cars have received decent ratings. However, Proton X50's ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA) and Chery Tiggo 8 Pro's Basic have some functional differences. If you value active safety, you can compare the feature lists of both carefully.
Proton X50 body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
Chery Tiggo 8 Pro body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
The dimensions of both cars are almost the same, with little difference in interior space. For cars in this class, daily use is more than enough.
Proton X50 and Chery Tiggo 8 Pro are both mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, you can prioritize the one with better reputation; if you care more about value for money and features, choose the one with more configurations. Ultimately, we recommend test driving both, as personal experience is the most important.
Overall, Proton X50 and Chery Tiggo 8 Pro are both very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends mainly on your personal needs and budget. We suggest doing your homework, comparing quotes from multiple dealerships, and test driving before making a final decision. Buying a car is a major matter, spending some time on research will never be wrong.
In Malaysia's SUV market, many buyers compare Proton X50 and Honda HR-V when choosing a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
Proton X50's OTR price in Malaysia is RM 89,800 - 113,300. There are 4 versions in total, including 1.5T Executive (RM 89,800), 1.5T Premium (RM 101,800), 1.5T Flagship (RM 113,300), etc.
Honda HR-V's OTR price in Malaysia is RM 115,900 - 143,900. There are 4 versions in total, including 2026 e:HEV 1.5L RS (RM 143,900), 2026 1.5T V (RM 137,900), 2026 1.5T E (RM 130,900), etc.
From a price perspective, the starting price of Proton X50 is indeed RM 26,100 cheaper than Honda HR-V. If your budget is limited, Proton's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. But note, those few thousand cheaper might involve trade-offs in features, depending on your specific needs.
Proton X50 is equipped with 1.5L 4-cyl, 105 hp. Official fuel consumption 6.0 L/100km.
Honda HR-V is equipped with 1.5L Turbo, 140 hp. Official fuel consumption 7.0 L/100km.
In terms of power, Honda HR-V's 1.5L Turbo has 35 more horsepower than Proton X50's 1.5L 4-cyl. However, for daily city driving, both cars have enough power and won't feel underpowered.
Proton X50's safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP). Active safety systems include ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
Honda HR-V's safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP). Active safety systems include Honda SENSING (ACC, CMBS, LKAS, RDM).
Both cars have the same safety rating. Safety features are quite comprehensive in this class. New cars nowadays are generally safe, so no need to worry too much about this.
Proton X50 body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
Honda HR-V body length 4500 mm, trunk 450 L.
In terms of space, Honda HR-V's body is 100 mm longer than Proton X50, offering better passenger space. However, Proton X50 is a bit more flexible for parking in the city. It's a trade-off.
Both Proton X50 and Honda HR-V are mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, prioritize the one with better reputation. If you care more about value for money and features, choose the one with richer configuration. Ultimately, it is suggested to test drive both. Personal experience is the most important.
Overall, Proton X50 and Honda HR-V are both very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose mainly depends on your personal needs and budget. It is suggested to do your research, compare quotes from several dealerships, and then test drive to make the final decision. Buying a car is a big matter. Spending some time doing research will never be wrong.
當全世界仍然喺度討論「中國電動車內捲」嘅時候，一輛平均價過百萬嘅國產豪華 SUV，悄然間令一位諾貝爾物理學獎得主刷咗張卡。2026 年 7 月 9 日，新加坡，石墨烯之父、諾獎得主康斯坦丁・諾沃肖洛夫親自接過一把車匙——佢唔係代言，而係自掏腰包，成為阿維塔 07 第 10 萬位車主。 呢唔僅僅係一次交付，而係中國高端製造喺全球豪華車腹地嘅一次「諾獎級認證」。
交付地點揀喺阿維塔新加坡門市，場面唔大，但分量極重。呢位全球頂尖嘅「硬核科學家」喺現場直言，自己今年 5 月去重慶嗰陣就係被輛車「迷倒」。「佢嘅設計唔似呢個時代嘅產物，車廂充滿科技感嘅環抱式互動，令我覺得喺同一台有情感嘅機器傾計。」諾沃肖洛夫甚至用「過目難忘」嚟形容。佢明確表示，呢係自己車庫入面嘅第一輛中國品牌汽車，揀選阿維塔 07，完全係因為佢啱晒自己嘅品味，而且滿足咗一個物理學家嘅極致理性同日常舒適需求。 能夠令一個見過世界頂尖科技嘅大腦感到驚嘆，呢部車嘅含金量不言而喻。
咁呢部被諾獎得主 Pick 嘅車係咩嚟㗎？阿維塔 07，定位智美都市豪華 SUV。喺新加坡，佢嘅起售價超過 100 萬人民幣，直接殺入咗保時捷、BBA 旗艦車款嘅核心價格區間。邊有邊憑？係靠未來美學嘅原創設計、頭等艙般嘅豪華感，同埋六大硬核技術護城河。 喺智能化、性能、安全同豪華感方面，佢畀到「滿配唔妥協」嘅體驗。上市至今，全球 10 萬車主用真金白銀投票， 阿維塔品牌全球累積銷量更係突破 26 萬台。呢啲數據喺國內或係只係新勢力嘅及格線，但喺海外高端市場，嗰就係中國品牌罕有嘅「高溢價突圍」。
比賣得好仲驚係邊個喺買。除咗呢位諾獎得主，泰國副總理、不丹國王、卡塔爾王室成員……呢一連串政要名流嘅座駕名單上，全部都出現咗阿維塔嘅名。呢種「頂級意見領袖」嘅連鎖效應，比任何廣告投放都管用。 自 2025 年進入新加坡，阿維塔就聯手當地巨頭 DPL Premium Automobiles，行起「高舉高打」嘅直營服務路線。截至今日，阿維塔已殺入 43 個國家同地區，並揚言 2030 年要覆蓋 110 個以上。喺中東土豪嘅停車場、東南亞新貴嘅別墅區，呢部中國造嘅「新豪華」而家正蠶食傳統豪車嘅地盤。
當諾獎得主開始用智商稅投票，當百萬級售價唔再係歐美日韓嘅專利，阿維塔嘅故事告訴我哋：中國新能源車嘅下半場，唔係捲價，而係捲認知。 連物理學家嘅苛刻標準都能夠滿足，呢部國產「百萬神車」到底仲有幾多黑科技？下一個被征服嘅全球頂流會係邊個？我哋拭目以待。
On July 14, Great Wall Motor's semi-annual performance forecast announcement sparked widespread market attention. The announcement indicated that the company expects net profit attributable to parent company shareholders for the first half of 2026 to be between 2.35 billion and 2.6 billion yuan, a year-on-year decline of 58.97% to 62.92%. The net profit excluding non-recurring gains and losses attributable to parent company shareholders for the same period is expected to be between 1.5 billion and 1.75 billion yuan, a year-on-year decrease of 51.14% to 58.12%.
Looking at the profit figures alone, it is indeed staggering — from 6.337 billion yuan year-on-year to less than 2.6 billion yuan suddenly. However, if we look away from the income statement to examine the full picture of the entire performance report, we will find another completely different story: Cumulative sales volume in the first half of the year reached 583,900 units, a year-on-year increase of 2.48%; operating revenue increased year-on-year; overseas sales reached 291,400 units, a year-on-year surge of 47.44%; high-value vehicle models above 200,000 yuan sold 270,200 units, an increase of 55,700 units year-on-year, with a sales volume share of 44%, a year-on-year increase of 7 percentage points.
Sales volume and revenue both increased, yet profits nearly halved. Behind this seemingly contradictory phenomenon lies a profound structural transformation that Great Wall Motor is currently undergoing.
I. The "Real Reason" for the Sharp Drop in Profits: One-off Rather Than Trend-Based
Great Wall Motor Chairman Wei Jianjun openly responded to the public via Weibo on the same day the performance forecast was released. The reasons for the profit decline are clear and transparent: first, the recovery of overseas tax policy subsidy income was delayed — the company received 2.274 billion yuan in tax subsidies last year at this time, but this income has not yet arrived this year; second, the impact of exchange rate fluctuations — after hedging foreign exchange lock-in value protection products, the comprehensive exchange loss for this period was approximately 266 million yuan, with a year-on-year decrease in exchange gains of approximately 1.759 billion yuan (1.493 billion yuan in gains for the same period last year).
The changes in non-recurring gains and losses totaling nearly 4 billion yuan explain the year-on-year decrease in net profit attributable to the parent company of 3.737 billion to 3.987 billion yuan. In other words, Great Wall Motor's core operating capability in the first half of the year did not deteriorate in a trend. The data itself of 1.5 billion to 1.75 billion yuan for net profit excluding non-recurring gains and losses, conversely, reflects the actual profitability of the company's main business more accurately.
This is not the first time Great Wall Motor has encountered short-term profit fluctuations. In the first half of 2025, the company also saw a situation of "revenue grew but profits didn't" — revenue increased slightly by 0.99% to 92.335 billion yuan, and net profit attributable to parent company shareholders of 6.337 billion yuan decreased by 10.21% year-on-year. At that time, the profit decline was attributed to channel model transformation and increased investment in new vehicle models. By the second quarter of 2025, net profit attributable to parent company shareholders increased significantly by 161.91% quarter-on-quarter to 4.586 billion yuan.
Historical experience shows that Great Wall Motor's profit fluctuations often have obvious phased characteristics.
II. Overseas Growth of 47%: From 'Going Global' to 'Going Upward'
What is truly worthy of attention is the data that Great Wall Motor's overseas sales in the first half of the year reached 291,400 units, a year-on-year increase of 47.44%. Looking at the entire Chinese automotive industry, passenger car exports in the first half of 2026 reached 4.432 million units, a year-on-year increase of 71.7%; total car exports reached 5.096 million units, a year-on-year increase of 65.3%. China's automotive industry going global is at a historic window of opportunity, and Great Wall Motor has occupied an important position in this tide.
More importantly, the quality of growth. At the beginning of 2026, Great Wall Motor set a goal of 600,000 units in annual overseas sales, while the company CTO Wu Huixiao stated during the Beijing Auto Show that overseas order growth exceeded expectations, "The goal might be adjusted upward, even higher than last year's 30% growth rate". Great Wall Motor's logic of going global is not simply "trading volume for price" — its overseas sales are mainly fuel vehicles (accounting for 94% from January to April 2026), with 3 full-process complete vehicle production bases built in places like Brazil and Thailand, overseas sales channels exceeding 1,500, and cumulative global users exceeding 16 million.
This "ecosystem going global" approach is completely different from simply moving domestic products to overseas markets. Great Wall Motor CTO Wu Huixiao once stated bluntly that globalization cannot be simply understood as moving products verified in the Chinese market to overseas. This persistence in long-termism means that profit release in overseas business will not be achieved overnight, but the deeper the foundation is laid, the broader the future growth space will be.
III. Share of High-Value Models at 44%: A Signal of Brand Upward Trend
Another key indicator easily overlooked is: Cumulative sales of vehicle models above 200,000 yuan in the first half of the year reached 270,200 units, with a sales volume share of 44%, an increase of 7 percentage points year-on-year. Against the background of overall pressure in the current domestic passenger car market — domestic passenger car sales in the first half of the year were 8.288 million units, a year-on-year decrease of 24.3% — this achievement is particularly rare.
The increase in the share of high-value models means that Great Wall Motor is breaking free from the path dependency of winning on price-performance ratio in the past, seeking profits through brand premium. Continuous efforts in mid-to-high-end product lines such as Tank brand and Wey brand are reshaping the company's product structure and profit model. A brokerage research report pointed out that 2026 is the "peak year for mid-to-high-end products" for Great Wall Motor. The launch of all-new Tank 700, Tank 300 and other models will further promote the upward improvement of global brand influence.
At the channel operation level, Great Wall Motor also showed restraint and rationality. Wei Jianjun specifically mentioned in the response: "At the channel operation level, we sell more and ship less. The domestic inventory-to-sales ratio is better than the industry average, ensuring healthy operation of enterprises and dealers." In the 2026 auto market where price wars rise and fall, being able to maintain channel health rather than blindly forcing inventory buildup is itself a kind of strategic determination.
IV. Buyback and Confidence: A Footnote of Long-Termism
While releasing the performance forecast, Great Wall Motor announced that it will proceed with share buyback according to the H-share buyback plan. This move sent a clear signal: The management believes the current stock price fails to reflect the company's true value.
Credit Suisse downgraded Great Wall Motor's target price after the performance forecast but maintained the "Outperform the market" rating, citing the reason that "Great Wall is expected to maintain resilience amidst industry volatility". The underlying logic of this "resilience" is exactly the three keywords that Great Wall Motor has continuously emphasized over the past few years: bottom-line thinking, long-termism, and pursuing quality market share -.
Wei Jianjun has a pragmatic interpretation of long-termism: "Long-termism is not about looking at the short-term effectiveness of specific moves, but about creating high-quality, high-technology products to provide users with a durable and worry-free driving experience." Short-term fluctuations in net profit are just a data point in the framework of long-termism.
V. Conclusion: Beyond the Numbers
Returning to the question at the beginning of the article: Why did the profit of a company with dual growth in sales volume and revenue drop sharply by 60%?
The answer is already clear: Almost all of the nearly 4 billion yuan profit gap comes from tax subsidy delays and exchange rate fluctuations, these two non-recurring factors. Excluding these factors, Great Wall Motor's core operating fundamentals did not deteriorate, but actually made substantial progress in multiple dimensions such as overseas expansion, brand upward trend, and channel health.
Of course, this does not mean Great Wall Motor can sleep soundly. Fierce competition in the domestic market, continuous pressure from new energy vehicle transformation, and geopolitical risks in overseas markets are all realistic challenges placed before them. At least, what this semi-annual report reveals is not a signal of an enterprise heading towards decline, but the growing pains of a traditional automaker actively undergoing structural adjustment amid major industry changes.
As Wei Jianjun said: "Surface numbers are important, but we care more about the healthy development of the enterprise." In the automobile industry filled with short-term gaming and price wars, an enterprise philosophy that adheres to "not sacrificing long-term health for short-term profits" is itself a scarce competitiveness.
Numbers will fluctuate, but direction is more important than speed. Great Wall Motor is proving with actions: It has chosen a harder but more sustainable path.
广州2026年7月12日 /美通社/ -- 从第一辆车驶下生产线，到即将迎来第3000万辆整车下线，广汽的每一步向前，都源于全球用户的选择与陪伴。7月16日，广汽集团将举行3000万用户感恩活动，与全球用户共庆第3000万辆整车下线的历史性时刻。
自第一辆整车交付用户以来，广汽的发展始终与全球用户的出行生活同频向前。今年以来，源源不断的新用户加入广汽大家庭，共同汇聚成3000万份沉甸甸的信赖。
2026年上半年，广汽自主品牌出口量达12.15万辆，同比大增132%。美洲、亚太、中东、非洲、欧洲五大区域同步实现高增，充分印证全球市场对广汽产品品质的认可与青睐。
目前，广汽国际化业务已覆盖亚太、中东、美洲、欧洲等五大板块110个国家和地区，建成746家销售服务网点、6座海外生产工厂与9个海外零部件仓库，形成覆盖研发、生产、供应、销售的全价值链本地化运营能力。在美洲，多款主力车型跻身当地细分市场前列，巴西、哥伦比亚等国单月销量实现数倍增长；在亚太，中国香港1-5月电动市占率突破11%，泰国市场6月销量环比劲增207%；在欧洲，搭建起从本地化生产到市场终端销售的全链路运营体系，新能源产品稳步进入核心国家市场。每一份市场增长的背后，都是当地用户的认可与选择，共同汇聚成全球3000万用户的信赖版图。
广汽集团3000万辆的里程碑，凝聚着全球用户的信赖与托付。站在新起点，广汽集团将纵深推进"番禺行动"改革，始终坚持"以用户为中心"发展理念，把全球用户的信赖转化为前行动力，以更优质的产品、更先进的技术、更完善的服务回馈每一份支持，与全球3000万用户携手，共启全新发展征程。
欲了解更多关于广汽的信息，请访问：https://www.gacgroup.com/en 或在社交媒体上关注我们。
As 2026 passes the halfway mark, China's car market has produced a "heaven and hell" half-year report. New energy penetration rate historically broke through 60%, but the completion rate of annual targets for most car companies is generally in the 30% to 40% range. Under pressure on the industry as a whole, SAIC Group became the only Chinese car company to break the 2 million vehicle milestone with a half-year cumulative sales of 2.045 million vehicles, taking the halfway sales crown.
This is not an isolated number. On May 28, SAIC completed the delivery of the 100 millionth vehicle, becoming the first automotive group in the history of China's automobile industry to break 100 million cumulative production and sales, making China officially a country with "100 million-level car companies," and taking the development of China's automobile industry to a new level.
The "speed" of 2.045 million vehicles in half a year and the "accumulation" of 100 million vehicles interweave, letting this 71-year-old car company stand at two unprecedented heights in 2026. But more worthy of inquiry than the numbers is: How was this 100 million accumulated? How was this 2.045 million in half a year driven out?
The Only One Breaking 2 Million in Half a Year
First, look at the "skeleton" of the half-year scorecard. In June, SAIC Group's complete vehicle sales were 395,000 units, up 8.1% year-on-year and 13.1% quarter-on-quarter; cumulative from January to June was 2.045 million vehicles. In terms of total volume, it is the only car company to break 2 million vehicles in the first half of the year, and compared to the second-place car company's 1.8085 million vehicles, the leading advantage is very obvious.
But what is truly worth noting is the internal structural changes in these 2.045 million vehicles.
Independent brand cumulative sales from January to June reached 1.469 million vehicles, up 12.6% year-on-year, accounting for 71.8% of the group's total sales, up 8.3 percentage points compared to the same period last year. In other words, for every 10 vehicles SAIC sells, more than 7 are independent brands. This number was almost unimaginable five years ago.
Looking at segments, SAIC Motor had 549,000 units in half a year, surging 49.4% year-on-year; SAIC Maxus 138,000 units, up 29.1% year-on-year; SAIC-GM-Wuling 681,000 units. IM Motors cumulative sales in the first half were 40,000 units, up 107% year-on-year. The launch of the range-extender large SUV LS8 drove the brand into a new stage of scaled growth.
The new energy sector also accelerated significantly. Cumulative new energy vehicle sales in the first half were 796,000 units, up 23.1% year-on-year. Among them, SAIC Motor new energy vehicles surged 218.1% year-on-year. The MG4 family delivered over 18,000 units in June, breaking 10,000 for 9 consecutive months; Shangjie Z7/Z7T single monthly delivery broke 10,000; Wuling Bingo Pro sales broke 30,000 units 38 days after launch.
Joint venture new energy also entered a growth channel. SAIC-GM new energy reached nearly 50,000 units in half a year, up 81.1% year-on-year; Volkswagen ID. ERA 9X delivered over 10,000 units cumulatively in two months after launch; Audi E7X delivered over 4,000 units in the first month.
The overseas market also contributed strong incremental growth. Cumulative overseas sales in the first half were 735,000 units, up 48.7% year-on-year. The MG brand's cumulative sales in Europe in the first half were nearly 190,000 units, up over 20% year-on-year, ranking as the top selling Chinese brand in Europe for 11 consecutive years.
It should be known that the total volume of China's passenger car market in the first half of this year was under pressure, down nearly 20% year-on-year, with car companies generally "shrinking". Behind SAIC's rising trend against the counter is a clear clue: SAIC's growth engine is switching from joint venture "single-core" to independent, new energy, and overseas "multi-core" drive. This is not a simple sales recovery, but a structural transformation lasting several years is entering the harvest period.
The Global Relay of 100 Million Vehicles
If the 2.045 million vehicles in half a year shows "current speed," then the cumulative 100 million vehicles tells of "the weight of time."
In 1955, Shanghai Internal Combustion Engine Parts Manufacturing Company was established. In 1958, workers hammered out the first "Phoenix" sedan in a small alley factory. In 1983, Santana went off the line, starting joint venture cooperation; Shanghai General was established in 1997; Independent brand Roewe was born in 2006; In 2016, the world's first internet car Roewe RX5 was launched; In 2020, the high-end smart electric brand IM Motors was established.
In 71 years, from "breaking zero" to "100 million vehicles," SAIC's growth trajectory almost overlaps with the evolutionary history of China's automobile industry.
The delivery ceremony on May 28 itself also carried symbolic significance. SAIC did not choose the traditional press conference format, but connected Shanghai's main venue and multiple cities such as the UK, Indonesia, and Singapore with "Global Relay Delivery", with over a dozen brands and 19 models spanning the Eurasian continent completing delivery.
The first 100 millionth delivery model was IM LS9 Hyper, equipped with full-steer-by-wire four-wheel steering, 520-line LiDAR, NVIDIA Thor chip, and all-domain 800V high-voltage platform. The car owner is Momenta CEO Cao Xudong, and Momenta is also SAIC's core strategic partner in the intelligent driving field. "Partner becoming car owner" itself is a very persuasive footnote.
Triple Genes: Breakthrough, Cooperation, Quality
Behind 100 million vehicles and 2.045 million vehicles, if only one main thread can be extracted, it might be the triple cultural genes accumulated by SAIC over 71 years: breakthrough, cooperation, quality, finally settling on SAIC's refined "Understand cars better, understand you better."
Breakthrough is carved into SAIC's bones. Hammering out the Phoenix brand by hand in 1958 was a breakthrough; launching the world's first internet car in 2016 was a breakthrough; today, mass production of semi-solid-state batteries, steer-by-wire, and AI large model landing are still breakthroughs. SAIC has cumulatively invested over 150 billion yuan in R&D over the past decade, possessing nearly 26,000 valid patents. From January to April 2026, SAIC accumulated sales of 1.302 million vehicles, ranking as the top selling Chinese car company for four consecutive months.
Cooperation is the methodology underlying SAIC. From the Santana localization community in the 1980s, to moving from "market for technology" to "technology co-creation" in the JV 2.0 era with Volkswagen, GM, and Audi; from jointly launching the Shangjie brand with Huawei, to deeply co-creating intelligent driving solutions empowering IM, Volkswagen, Audi, Buick, Cadillac and other brands; from joining hands with tech companies like Alibaba, OPPO, ByteDance, SAIC always upholds the open concept of "no technical walls, no ecological islands".
Quality is the most fundamental trust cornerstone. From the "never allow quality substitution" quality commitment during the Santana localization period, to the Magic Cube Battery's "zero spontaneous combustion" safety record, to the European E-NCAP five-star safety certification, quality is the foundation upon which 100 million vehicles were accumulated.
These three genes eventually converge into a core concept: "Understand cars better, understand you better." "Understanding cars" is the extreme pursuit of core technology, "Understanding you" is landing cutting-edge technology into beautiful mobility experiences perceivable by users.
The "Downward Shift" from 60,000 Level to 500,000 Level
The 2.045 million vehicles in the first half of the year is not "resting on past laurels", but more from "innovation". Just from the April Beijing Auto Show to now, SAIC has densely launched over 20 major new cars with a "Independent + Joint Venture + Luxury" full matrix, covering A0 level to full size, 50,000 level to 500,000 level, all technical routes of pure electric/range extender/plug-in hybrid.
In April, IM LS8 launched, full series standard with Star Super Range Extender, steer-by-wire + rear wheel steering, orders broke 8,000 units 1 hour after launch. Shangjie Z7/Z7T dual cars launched together, full series standard with Huawei Qiankun Intelligent Driving ADS 4.1 and 896-line LiDAR, June delivery broke 10,000. Buick Zhijing E7 industry first with Doubao Large Model and Qualcomm 8775 chip, orders broke 10,000 in 90 minutes after launch, first month delivery broke 10,000. 2026 MG4 launched semi-solid battery in 100,000 level market. Roewe i6 full series standard with 8155 chip and Doubao Large Model.
In May, Huajing S launched, full series standard with Huawei Qiankun Intelligent Driving ADS Pro Enhanced Version and HarmonyOS Cockpit, bringing high-level intelligent driving into 150,000 level family market. Audi E7X launched, full series standard with 900V high-voltage platform, quattro 4WD and rear wheel steering. Tiguan L ePro and Passat ePro launched simultaneously, limited-time fixed prices starting at 191,900 yuan and 169,900 yuan respectively, further improving cost-effectiveness.
In June, new Shangjie H5 launched, selling price 159,800 to 199,800 yuan, annual model change completed seven key upgrades. Wuling Star Light L Black Warrior version official images released.
In addition, ID. ERA 5S, Zhijing L7 Pure Electric Version, MG 07 completed declaration; in June, Roewe Jiayue 07, IM LS8 Pure Electric Version, ID. ERA 8X appeared successively. These models will enter the market in the second half of the year, reserving ammunition for subsequent growth.
SAIC's new cars in the first half of the year launched one "hot" after another, one of the most core reasons is the speed of technology "sinking".
In the past, words like "High-level Intelligent Driving", "AI Large Models", "Semi-solid-state Batteries" were often bound with models over 300,000. But in the first half of this year, SAIC broke this line: Roewe i6 at 60,000 level full series standard with 8155 chip and Doubao Large Model; MG4X at 90,000 level full series standard with semi-solid battery and rear drive five-link independent suspension; Buick Zhijing E7 at 150,000 level industry first with Doubao Large Model and Qualcomm 8775 chip; Shangjie at 200,000 level full series standard with Huawei ADS 4.1 and 896-line LiDAR.
Technology is no longer exclusive to high-spec models, but is becoming the "standard configuration" for the entire price band. Market orders are the most direct vote for technology value. When semi-solid batteries, AI large models, and high-level intelligent driving move from the laboratory to mass production, from high-end to universal access, SAIC is verifying a proposition: the value of technology lies not in "whether it has", but in "how many people can use it".
Standing on Two "Firsts"
Half-year 2.045 million vehicles and cumulative 100 million vehicles, the former is speed, the latter is thickness. Speed comes from the accumulation of thickness, thickness expands continuously due to speed.
From the Phoenix brand hammered out in the alley in 1958 to the 2026 IM LS9 Hyper equipped with full steer-by-wire chassis and semi-solid-state batteries; from the "Quality for Survival" of the Santana localization era to the "Tech Equity" of AI large models and high-level intelligent driving today. SAIC's 71-year trajectory is essentially a gradual progress following the times and industry development from "Making Cars" to "Making Good Cars" to "Making Cars That Understand You".
For SAIC, the 2.045 million half-year scorecard and the 100 million historical milestone together constitute two "Firsts" of 2026. But more important than the "Firsts" itself is a fact they point to: This 71-year-old car company is completing the leap from "Scale Leading" to "Quality Leading" and "Tech Equity Leading", to "User Care Leading".
So independent brand share breaking 70%, dual-wheel drive of new energy and overseas, technology moving from reserve to mass production and continuously sinking, these structural changes are the root foundation of sales figures constantly rising, and SAIC is also driving towards a faster lane for grander goals.
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會將寶達 Ativa 同寶騰 X50 作比較。這兩款車喺價位同定位上都幾接近，今日我就從多個方面做一個詳細嘅對比，幫你節省做功課嘅時間。
寶達 Ativa 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 62,500 - 73,400，一共有 3 個版本，包括 1.0L Turbo X（RM 62,500）、1.0L Turbo H（RM 67,300）、1.0L Turbo AV（RM 73,400）等。
寶騰 X50 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 89,800 - 113,300，一共有 4 個版本，包括 1.5T Executive（RM 89,800）、1.5T Premium（RM 101,800）、1.5T Flagship（RM 113,300）等。
從價錢嚟睇，寶達 Ativa 嘅起步價確實比寶騰 X50 平咗 RM 27,300。如果你預算有限，寶達嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需要。但都要注意，平嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備上會有取舍，具體要睇你嘅需求。
寶達 Ativa 搭載 1.5L 4-cyl，馬力 105 hp。官方油耗 6.0 L/100km。
寶騰 X50 搭載 1.5L 4-cyl，馬力 105 hp。官方油耗 6.0 L/100km。
兩款車用緊同一套動力系統，日常開起嚟嘅感覺基本冇分別。油耗方面也差唔多，唔使太糾結這一點。
寶達 Ativa 車身長 4400 mm，行李箱 400 L。
寶騰 X50 車身長 4400 mm，行李箱 400 L。
兩款車嘅尺寸幾乎一樣，車內空間差異唔大。呢個級別嘅車，日常使用完全夠用。
寶達 Ativa 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
寶騰 X50 採用 4WD 驅動方式。
寶達嘅 FWD 同寶騰嘅 4WD 喺操控上會有唔同感覺，建議試駕對比。
寶達 Ativa 保修 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
寶騰 X50 保修 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
兩款車嘅保修條件一樣，呢方面唔使糾結。實際保養成本仲要睇品牌嘅服務網絡同零件價格，建議去車友群問下真實車主嘅經驗。
總嘅嚟講，寶達 Ativa 同寶騰 X50 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一個，關鍵仲係睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做足功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對無錯。
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好幾多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拿 Chery Tiggo 8 同 Mitsubishi Xforce 嚟做比較。呢兩款車喺價位同定位上都相當接近嘅，今日我哋就從多個方面做一個詳細嘅對比，幫你節省做功課嘅時間。
Chery Tiggo 8 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 129,750 - 129,750，總共有 1 個版本，包括 2026 1.6T Standard（RM 129,750） 等。
Mitsubishi Xforce 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 109,930 - 119,930，總共有 2 個版本，包括 2026 1.5L Ultimate（RM 119,930）、2026 1.5L Urban（RM 109,930） 等。
由價錢睇落，Mitsubishi Xforce 嘅起步價比 Chery Tiggo 8 平咗 RM 19,820。講真，喺呢個價位段，幾千蚊嘅差距其實都算細，重點始終係睇整體嘅性價比同長期使用成本。
Chery Tiggo 8 配備 1.5L Turbo，馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。
Mitsubishi Xforce 配備 1.5L Turbo，馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。
兩款車用緊同一套動力系統，日常行起嚟嘅感覺基本無分別。油耗方面亦都相若，唔使太糾結這一點。
Chery Tiggo 8 車身長 4400 mm，行李廂 400 L。
Mitsubishi Xforce 車身長 4400 mm，行李廂 400 L。
兩款車嘅尺寸幾乎一模一樣，車內空間分別唔大。呢個級別嘅車，日常使用完全夠用。
Chery Tiggo 8 保養保修 3 年/100,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Mitsubishi Xforce 保養保修 3 年/100,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
兩款車嘅保修條件相同，呢方面唔使糾結。實際保養成本仲要睇品牌嘅服務網絡同零件價格，建議去車友群問問真實車主嘅經驗。
總括嚟講，Chery Tiggo 8 同 Mitsubishi Xforce 都係馬來西亞市場好唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛，重點始終係睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，先去做試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拿 Chery Tiggo 8 Pro 同 Hyundai Tucson 嚟做比較。呢兩款車喺價位同定位上都幾接近，今日我哋就從多個方面做一次詳細嘅比較，幫你省下做功課嘅時間。
Chery Tiggo 8 Pro 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 159,750 - 159,750，合共有 2 個版本，包括 1.6L Turbo Standard（RM 130,000）、1.6L Turbo Premium（RM 145,000）等等。
Hyundai Tucson 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 143,888 - 197,888，合共有 5 個版本，包括 2025 HEV 1.6T AT 2WD Prestige（RM 197,888）、2025 1.6T DCT 4WD Prestige（RM 186,888）、2025 1.6T DCT 2WD Prime（RM 164,888）等等。
由價錢睇落，Hyundai Tucson 嘅起步價比 Chery Tiggo 8 Pro 平咗 RM 15,862。講真，喺呢個價位段，千幾蚊嘅差距其實唔算大，關鍵都係睇整體嘅性價比同埋長期使用成本。
Chery Tiggo 8 Pro 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
Hyundai Tucson 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
兩款車嘅驅動方式一樣，都係 FWD，日常駕駛感受唔會有太大分別。
Chery Tiggo 8 Pro 保修 3 年/100,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Hyundai Tucson 保修 5 年/300,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Chery Tiggo 8 Pro 同 Hyundai Tucson 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭用、日常通勤。如果你更睇重品牌口碑同埋二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，嗰就揀配置更豐富嗰款。最後仲係建議兩款都去試駕，親自體驗先至最重要。
總括嚟講，Chery Tiggo 8 Pro 同 Hyundai Tucson 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵仲係要睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
