首頁insurance
搜尋歷史
熱門搜尋
經銷商登入 / 註冊
In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers compare Proton X70 and Chery Tiggo 9 when choosing a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning. Today we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
Proton X70's OTR price in Malaysia is RM 106,800 - 122,300, with a total of 3 versions, including 1.5L Standard 2WD (RM 106,800), 1.5L Executive 2WD (RM 115,800), 1.5L Premium 2WD (RM 122,300), etc.
Chery Tiggo 9's OTR price in Malaysia is RM 166,800 - 179,800, with a total of 1 version, including 2026 2.0T Standard (RM 179,750), etc.
In terms of price, the Proton X70's starting price is indeed RM 60,000 cheaper than the Chery Tiggo 9. If your budget is limited, Proton's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. But also note that the price difference of a few thousand might involve trade-offs in features, it depends on your specific needs.
Proton X70 is equipped with 1.5L Turbo, 140 hp. Official fuel consumption 7.0 L/100km.
Chery Tiggo 9 is equipped with 2.0L 4-cyl, 170 hp. Official fuel consumption 8.0 L/100km.
In terms of power, Chery Tiggo 9's 2.0L 4-cyl has 30 more horsepower than Proton X70's 1.5L Turbo. However, for daily city driving, the power of both cars is sufficient and won't feel underpowered.
Proton X70's safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
Chery Tiggo 9's safety rating is TBD, active safety systems include Basic.
Regarding safety features, both cars received good ratings. However, Proton X70's ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA) and Chery Tiggo 9's Basic have some functional differences. If you value active safety highly, you can compare the feature lists of both carefully.
Proton X70 body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
Chery Tiggo 9 body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
The dimensions of both cars are almost the same, and the interior space difference is not significant. For cars in this class, it is more than sufficient for daily use.
Proton X70 and Chery Tiggo 9 are both mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, prioritize the one with better reputation; if you care more about value for money and features, choose the one with more rich equipment. Ultimately, it is recommended to test drive both, as personal experience is the most important.
In summary, Proton X70 and Chery Tiggo 9 are both excellent car models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends mainly on your personal needs and budget. It is recommended to do research, compare quotes from several dealerships, and then test drive to make a final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending some time doing research will definitely not go wrong.
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拿寶騰 X70 同馬自達 CX-3 嚟做比較。呢兩款車喺價位同定位上都幾接近，今日我哋就由多個方面做一個詳細嘅對比，幫你省咗做功課嘅時間。
寶騰 X70 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 106,800 - 122,300，一共有 3 個版本，包括 1.5L Standard 2WD（RM 106,800）、1.5L Executive 2WD（RM 115,800）、1.5L Premium 2WD（RM 122,300）等。
馬自達 CX-3 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 126,159 - 139,159，一共有 2 個版本，包括 2023 2.0L High（RM 139,159）、2023 2.0L Plus（RM 126,159）等。
由價錢睇落，寶騰 X70 嘅起步價真係比馬自達 CX-3 平咗 RM 19,359。如果你預算有限，寶騰嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需求。但要注意，平嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備上面會有取舍，具體要看你嘅需求。
寶騰 X70 搭載 1.5L Turbo，馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。
馬自達 CX-3 搭載 1.5L Turbo，馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。
兩款車用住同一套動力系統，日常開嘅感覺基本冇乜分別。油耗方面都差不多，唔使太糾結這一點。
寶騰 X70 車身長 4400 mm，後備箱 400 L。
馬自達 CX-3 車身長 4500 mm，後備箱 450 L。
空間方面，馬自達 CX-3 嘅車身比寶騰 X70 長咗 100 mm，乘坐空間更有優勢。不過寶騰 X70 喺城市入面泊車會靈活啲，各有取舍。
寶騰 X70 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
馬自達 CX-3 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
兩款車嘅驅動方式一樣，都係 FWD，日常駕駛感受唔會有太大區別。
寶騰 X70 保修 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
馬自達 CX-3 保修 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
兩款車嘅保修條件一樣，呢方面唔使糾結。實際保養成本仲要睇品牌嘅服務網絡同零件價格，建議去車友群問吓真實車主嘅經驗。
總嚟講，寶騰 X70 同馬自達 CX-3 都係馬來西亞市場好唔錯嘅車型。揀邊部，關鍵仲係要睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做足功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去做試駕先做最終決定。買車係件大事，花啲時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
In Malaysia's SUV market, many buyers compare Proton X50 and Hyundai Tucson when choosing a car. These two models are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will do a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
Proton X50 OTR prices in Malaysia range from RM 89,800 to 113,300, with a total of 4 versions, including 1.5T Executive (RM 89,800), 1.5T Premium (RM 101,800), 1.5T Flagship (RM 113,300), etc.
Hyundai Tucson OTR prices in Malaysia range from RM 143,888 to 197,888, with a total of 5 versions, including 2025 HEV 1.6T AT 2WD Prestige (RM 197,888), 2025 1.6T DCT 4WD Prestige (RM 186,888), 2025 1.6T DCT 2WD Prime (RM 164,888), etc.
From a price perspective, the starting price of Proton X50 is indeed RM 54,088 cheaper than Hyundai Tucson. If your budget is limited, Proton's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. But note, the few thousand ringgit saved might come with trade-offs in features, depending on your specific needs.
Proton X50 uses 4WD drive system.
Hyundai Tucson uses FWD drive system.
Proton's 4WD and Hyundai's FWD will feel different in handling, a test drive comparison is recommended.
Proton X50 warranty is 5 years/150,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Hyundai Tucson warranty is 5 years/300,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Both Proton X50 and Hyundai Tucson are mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, prioritize the one with better reputation; if you care more about value for money and features, choose the one with richer configurations. Ultimately, it is recommended to test drive both, personal experience is the most important.
Overall, Proton X50 and Hyundai Tucson are both quite good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends on your personal needs and budget. We suggest doing your research, comparing quotes from multiple dealers, and then test driving to make a final decision. Buying a car is a big deal, spending time on research will never go wrong.
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多人買車嘅時候都會拿 Perodua Aruz 同 Mitsubishi Xforce 嚟做比較。呢兩款車喺價位同定位上都幾接近，今日我哋就從多個方面做一個詳細嘅對比，幫你省下做功課嘅時間。
Perodua Aruz 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 72,900 - 77,900，一共有 2 個版本，包括 1.5L X（RM 72,900）、1.5L AV（RM 77,900） 等。
Mitsubishi Xforce 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 109,930 - 119,930，一共有 2 個版本，包括 2026 1.5L Ultimate（RM 119,930）、2026 1.5L Urban（RM 109,930） 等。
從價錢嚟睇，Perodua Aruz 嘅起步價確實比 Mitsubishi Xforce 平咗 RM 37,030。如果你預算有限，Perodua 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需求。但都要留意，便宜嗰幾千塊，可能喺配備上會有取捨，具體要看你嘅需求。
Perodua Aruz 搭載 1.5L 4-cyl，馬力 105 hp。官方油耗 6.0 L/100km。
Mitsubishi Xforce 搭載 1.5L Turbo，馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。
動力方面，Mitsubishi Xforce 嘅 1.5L Turbo 比 Perodua Aruz 嘅 1.5L 4-cyl 多咗 35 匹馬力。不過日常喺市區開，兩款車嘅動力都夠用，唔會覺得唔夠力。
Perodua Aruz 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括。
Mitsubishi Xforce 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 MI-PILOT。
兩款車嘅安全評級一樣，喺呢個級別入面安全配備都算畀得好齊全。而家嘅新車安全性都唔差，唔使太擔心呢一點。
Perodua Aruz 車身長 4400 mm，後尾箱 400 L。
Mitsubishi Xforce 車身長 4400 mm，後尾箱 400 L。
兩款車嘅尺寸幾乎一樣，車內空間差別唔大。呢個級別嘅車，日常使用完全夠用。
Perodua Aruz 同 Mitsubishi Xforce 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更睇重品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰一款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，那就揀配置更豐富嗰款。最終都係建議兩款都去試駕，親身體驗先至最重要。
總體嚟講，Perodua Aruz 同 Mitsubishi Xforce 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵都係要看你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花啲時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嗰陣都會拿 Perodua Aruz 同 Chery Tiggo 8 嚟做比較。呢兩款車喺價位同定位上都幾接近，今日我哋就從多個方面做一個詳細嘅比較，幫你省咗做功課嘅時間。
Perodua Aruz 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 72,900 - 77,900，一共有 2 個版本，包括 1.5L X（RM 72,900）、1.5L AV（RM 77,900）等。
Chery Tiggo 8 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 129,750 - 129,750，一共有 1 個版本，包括 2026 1.6T Standard（RM 129,750）等。
從價錢嚟睇，Perodua Aruz 嘅起步價確實比 Chery Tiggo 8 平咗 RM 56,850。如果你預算有限，Perodua 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需求。但都要留意，平嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備上面要有取舍，具體要看你嘅需求。
Perodua Aruz 搭載 1.5L 4-cyl，馬力 105 hp。官方油耗 6.0 L/100km。
Chery Tiggo 8 搭載 1.5L Turbo，馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。
動力方面，Chery Tiggo 8 嘅 1.5L Turbo 比 Perodua Aruz 嘅 1.5L 4-cyl 多咗 35 匹馬力。不過日常喺市區開，兩款車嘅動力都足夠，唔會覺得唔夠力。
Perodua Aruz 車身長 4400 mm，行李箱 400 L。
Chery Tiggo 8 車身長 4400 mm，行李箱 400 L。
兩款車嘅尺寸幾乎一樣，車內空間分別唔大。呢個級別嘅車，日常使用完全足夠。
Perodua Aruz 保修 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Chery Tiggo 8 保修 3 年/100,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
總體嚟講，Perodua Aruz 同 Chery Tiggo 8 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車款。揀邊一輛，關鍵仲係要睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，先去試駕先做最終決定。買車係件大事情，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
喺馬來西亞嘅汽車市場，好多買家喺揀車嗰陣都會拿現代勝達同富豪 XC60 PHEV 嚟做比較。今日我哋由多個方面做一個詳細嘅對比，幫您省返做功課嘅時間。
現代勝達喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 225,000 - 270,000，一共有 3 個版本，包括 2025 2.5T DCT 4WD Calligraphy 6 座位（RM 270,000）、2025 HEV 1.6T AT 2WD Prestige 7 座位（RM 245,000）、2025 HEV 1.6T AT 2WD Prime 7 座位（RM 225,000）等。
富豪 XC60 PHEV 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 362,888 - 362,888，一共有 2 個版本，包括 2025 2.0T 89km Ultra（RM 362,888）、富豪 XC60 PHEV 有咩安全配備？（RM 296,610）等。
從價錢嚟睇，現代勝達嘅入價確實比富豪 XC60 PHEV 平咗 RM 137,888。如果你預算有限，現代嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需要。但都要留意，平嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備上會有取捨，具體要睇你嘅需要。
現代勝達裝配 2.0L 四氣缸，馬力 170 hp。官方油耗 8.0 L/100km。
富豪 XC60 PHEV 裝配混合動力，馬力 170 hp。官方油耗 4.5 L/100km。
動力方面，富豪 XC60 PHEV 嘅混合動力比現代勝達嘅 2.0L 四氣缸多咗 0 匹馬力。不過日常喺市區開嘅話，兩款車嘅動力都夠用，唔會覺得唔夠力。
現代勝達車身長 4400 mm，尾箱 400 L。
富豪 XC60 PHEV 車身長 4400 mm，尾箱 400 L。
兩款車嘅尺寸幾乎一樣，車內空間分別唔大。呢個級別嘅車，日常使用完全夠用。
現代勝達採用前輪驅動方式。
富豪 XC60 PHEV 採用前輪驅動方式。
兩款車嘅驅動方式一樣，都係前輪驅動，日常駕駛感受唔會有太大分別。
總嚟講，現代勝達同富豪 XC60 PHEV 都係馬來西亞市場幾好嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵係要睇你個人嘅需要同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行之報價，再去試駕做最後決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
車型概覽
哈弗二代大狗 PHEV 值唔值得睇，第一步唔係望牌子或者外形，而係睇佢能唔能夠配合你嘅香港日常。 呢篇會集中講版本取捨，幫你用買家角度篩走唔適合嘅選擇。
售價仍待確認，買家可以先把佢放入候選名單，等價格落實後再同同級車逐項比較。
購車價格指南
哈弗二代大狗 PHEV 目前售價仍未清晰，較理性嘅做法係先睇版本、車身大小同動力形式，等價格落實後再決定值唔值得落訂。
如果有幾個版本可揀，可以先將 2024 1.5T 102km 四驅版（價格待確認） 放喺同一張清單。日常通勤重視舒適同易用，家庭買家就要優先睇後排、尾箱同安全配置。
核心規格重點
睇 哈弗二代大狗 PHEV 嘅規格，重點唔係背數字，而係理解佢喺香港用車場景會帶嚟咩分別。
18.74 kWh 嘅電池容量，真正意義係可以幫你估算一星期通勤同周末出車要唔要中途補電。 167 Ps / 123 kW / 220 kW、243/510 N·m 嘅輸出，令高速併線同短距離超車更有信心。 車長 4705 mm、車闊 1908 mm、車高 1780 mm、軸距 2810 mm 可以幫你預判商場停車場、屋苑車位同後排腿部空間。 混合動力專用(DHT)、前置四駆 會影響起步順滑度、濕地穩定感同長途巡航性格。
優缺點分析
哈弗二代大狗 PHEV 嘅優點唔需要講到天花龍鳳，真正有價值係佢能唔能夠令日常用車更省心：電池同續航資訊有助安排通勤同補電、動力輸出對高速同上斜更有底氣、空間同車身尺寸方便家庭買家預判實用性。
要留意嘅係，要先確認屋苑、公司或常去商場嘅充電條件、香港停車場同窄路使用要留意車身闊度。呢啲唔一定係缺點，但係落訂前應該先諗清楚。
買家常見問題
買 哈弗二代大狗 PHEV 之前，真正要問嘅唔係單一規格，而係佢可唔可以融入你每日嘅生活節奏。
常見疑問係「哈弗 Haval 二代大狗 PHEV 變速箱係邊款？」簡單講，哈弗 Haval 二代大狗 PHEV 配備咗 2 速 DHT 混能專用變速箱。 放到實際用車，就係要睇佢對通勤、泊車、家庭乘坐同長期成本有幾大幫助。
同級對比內容
將 哈弗二代大狗 PHEV 放入同級車清單時，唔建議只用外形或者品牌光環決定。比較順序可以係：先等售價落實，再決定佢應該同邊個級距比較、再睇動力係咪足夠應付高速併線同滿載、再比較能源成本同補能便利、最後睇車身大小、座位同尾箱是否適合家人。
咁樣篩選會貼近香港買家真實生活：平日塞車、商場泊車、周末去新界、甚至一家人出入，先係一部車每日要面對嘅考驗。
用車全周期指南
擁有 哈弗二代大狗 PHEV 最重要係先諗清楚充電節奏。屋苑、公司或者常去商場只要有穩定充電選項，電動化用車就會容易相處好多。
如果你主要喺市區行，視野、低速順滑度同泊車輔助會好影響心情；如果經常行高速或跨區，座椅舒適度、隔音同動力從容感會更重要。
车见万宜讯—2026年6月，香港亚洲国际博览馆，极氪展台成为本届车博会人气最集中的区域。明星到场、企业家驻足、观众排队体验——这些现象本身并不稀奇，但有两个细节值得注意。
一是演员古天乐在展台当场下定极氪9X右舵版，成为全球首位预定该车型的用户。二是搜狐创始人张朝阳专程飞抵香港，在极氪展台停留许久，对极氪009光辉的物理隔断设计和8X的AI智慧能源管理连连称赞。
如果把这些仅仅归结为“明星效应”或“营销活动”，恐怕会错过更重要的信号。在中国香港这个全球最成熟的豪华车市场之一，消费者正在用订单投票，而他们投票的依据正在发生变化。
先看一组数据：2026年1至5月，极氪在中国香港豪华车市场占据40.7%的份额，位居销量榜首。这意味着每卖出两辆豪华车，就有一辆是极氪。其中，极氪009长期蝉联豪华MPV销冠，极氪7X则在豪华SUV细分市场登顶。
这个成绩放在三年前几乎不可想象。彼时，中国香港的豪华MPV市场长期由丰田埃尔法等传统车型主导，中国品牌几乎没有存在感。极氪能打破这一格局，靠的并非价格战——极氪单车均价超过36万元人民币，9X平均成交价达到53万元，009光辉售价更高。
那靠的是什么？张朝阳的参观提供了一条线索。他在体验009光辉后，专门指出了后排与前排的物理隔断设计——在物理学博士眼中，这不是简单的“私密性”配置，而是一套利用吸声材料、多层隔音玻璃和主动降噪技术构建的声学系统。他对8X“越跑电越多”的评价同样指向工程逻辑：通过AI大模型实时调度能量分配，在下坡、滑行等工况下高效回收能量，让电量在特定条件下不降反升。
简而言之，打动这位物理学博士的，不是品牌光环，而是可验证的工程能力。这或许也解释了香港消费者的选择——在一个地狭人稠、用车场景复杂的城市，用户对产品的审视往往更务实。他们关心技术能否真正解决实际问题，而非营销话术。极氪能在香港站稳脚跟，核心在于浩瀚架构、900V高压系统、一体化压铸等底层技术得到了实际路况的检验。
本届车博会上，极氪正式发布9系双旗舰全球化战略——极氪9X与极氪009光辉将走向海外市场。极氪9X已在中东开启预售，后续计划拓展至拉美、中亚、欧洲；009光辉右舵版则将于2026年第四季度登陆中国香港。
选择香港作为战略发布地，本身就是一个务实决策。作为右舵市场的“桥头堡”，香港市场的认可意味着品牌具备了向澳大利亚、东南亚、英国等右舵地区输出的基础。而9系双旗舰的定位也很有针对性——9X主打超豪华SUV，009光辉主打四座超豪华MPV，分别瞄准两个细分领域的顶端。
这种打法不再是“把车卖出去”的初级阶段，而是试图用旗舰产品重新定义细分市场的竞争标准。极氪9X在中国内地市场连续七个月位居50万元级大型SUV销冠，80%的用户来自BBA、路虎、保时捷等传统豪华品牌，这说明产品力在高端用户群体中已获得初步验证。009光辉则以“MPV中的劳斯莱斯”为定位，通过一体式压铸C环结构、专属SPA理疗座椅等差异化配置，在四座超豪华MPV细分市场建立了认知优势。
对普通消费者而言，极氪在香港的表现传递出一个信号：中国豪华品牌的产品力已经具备与国际传统豪华品牌正面竞争的技术基础。
极氪9X主打超长续航（综合续航超1000公里）和快速补能（20%-80%充电仅需9分钟），适合有长途出行需求且对性能要求较高的用户。但其车身尺寸较大，在停车位紧张的城市中心区域可能不够便利。极氪009光辉则定位极致私密与舒适，二排独立座椅、物理隔断、殿堂级影音系统均为商务接待或高端私人出行设计，但四座布局牺牲了载人灵活性，更适合特定场景而非家庭日常使用。
极氪7X和8X则覆盖了更大众化的细分市场。7X作为纯电SUV，在中国香港市场已击败特斯拉Model Y，适合注重空间和舒适性的家庭用户；8X作为插混车型，综合续航达1416公里，解决了里程焦虑问题，同时零百加速2.96秒的性能表现也兼顾了驾驶乐趣。
总体而言，极氪的产品矩阵已初步形成了从30万到近百万的价格覆盖，消费者可以根据自身需求、用车场景和预算进行选择。但需注意，电动车和插混车型的使用体验高度依赖当地充电网络和售后服务，购买前应充分考察品牌在当地的网点布局和维修保障能力。
古天乐的定车、张朝阳的点赞、香港市场的份额跃升——这些现象共同指向一个事实：中国汽车品牌出海的竞争逻辑正在从“产品输出”转向“技术输出”。极氪能在香港这个“试金石”市场站稳脚跟，说明其工程体系得到了严苛用户的认可。
但挑战同样真实：海外市场的消费习惯、法规标准、品牌忠诚度都与中国内地和香港不同，旗舰车型的定价策略和服务体系也需要因地制宜。极氪的全球化之路刚刚开始，未来的考验还在后面。
对于消费者而言，极氪的出现增加了豪华车市场的选择多样性，但购车决策仍需基于自身实际需求，而非品牌热度。理性的选择，永远建立在充分了解产品特性与自身使用场景的匹配度之上。
In May, China's automotive market overall presented a gentle recovery trend, with domestic brands still being the sales backbone of the market. Recently, BYD, Geely, Chery, Changan, and Great Wall, the top 5 domestic automakers, successively released their monthly performance reports. From the data, these five companies show a general characteristic of "stable total growth, divergence between domestic and international markets, and accelerated new energy penetration". Overseas exports and new energy vehicles have become the most core growth engines; export business has evolved from a "bonus item" to the "core foundation" for some companies. BYD's "dominant leader" status is further consolidated, Chery achieved high growth via exports, Geely's new energy penetration rate broke 56%, Changan focused steadily on balanced development, while Great Wall appeared slightly under pressure during structural transformation.
BYD: Export Hits New High Becomes Biggest HighlightIn May, BYD stood firmly at the top of domestic brands with a monthly sales volume of 383,500 vehicles, maintaining positive growth both year-on-year and month-over-month under a large base. Its two main brands, Dynasty and Ocean, sold a combined 330,200 vehicles, contributing 86.1% of total sales; Fangchengbao's monthly sales broke 30,000 units to reach 30,200, a year-on-year increase of 139.7%, setting a new high for the year; Denza sold 16,300 vehicles, and Yangwang delivered 286 vehicles. From a model perspective, BYD had eight models in May with monthly sales exceeding 20,000 vehicles. The Song Family and Yuan Family both broke 50,000 units, selling 51,370 and 56,691 vehicles respectively. The Sea Lion Family followed closely with 42,615 vehicles, and Seagull sales were also close to 40,000 vehicles.
BYD's biggest highlight in May was exports. Overseas new energy vehicle sales reached 160,600 units, an 80.4% year-on-year increase, accounting for about 42%. The sharp expansion of export scale effectively countered the phased weakness in domestic demand. Cumulative exports from January to May exceeded 620,000 vehicles. High export growth mainly benefited from continued ramping up of overseas factory capacity, improved ocean shipping capacity, and accelerated channel network expansion. In the domestic market, BYD promoted Megawatt Super Charging and intelligent strategies simultaneously—Megawatt charging achieved about 90% charge in 9 minutes; 20,000 super charging stations are planned to be built by 2026; all series models are available with Sky Eye B intelligent driving solutions and city navigation safety fallback plans, accelerating the popularization of high-level intelligent driving. As Gen 2 Blade Battery capacity gradually releases, the company's orders are expected to continue rising.
Chery: Sales Growth Leads the Top 5Chery Group's total sales volume in May was 247,800 vehicles, a significant year-on-year increase of 20.5%, ranking first in growth speed among the top 5. Exports remained its most core growth engine—May exports reached 181,900 vehicles, an 80.5% year-on-year increase, accounting for 73.4% of total sales that month, continuously breaking the single-month export record for Chinese brands for three months. In terms of new energy, Chery New Energy sold 100,300 vehicles, a 58.8% year-on-year increase. April and May consecutively saw monthly new energy sales breaking 100,000 vehicles.
The strong performance in exports benefited from Chery's long-term deep cultivation of overseas channel advantages and localized operation capabilities. While overseas orders continued to rise, high export growth formed a sharp contrast with domestic sales—Chery's domestic sales in May were only 60,000 vehicles, accounting for one-quarter of total sales. From cumulative data, Chery Group accumulated 1.101 million sales from January to May, but against the annual goal of 3.2 million vehicles, monthly averages need to reach about 420,000 vehicles later, and pressure remains significant.
Geely: New Energy Penetration Rate Breaks 56%Geely Auto's total sales volume in May was 237,600 vehicles, a 1% year-on-year increase, achieving month-over-month double growth for three consecutive months. In terms of structure, Geely's "New Four Transformations" transformation showed significant results: new energy vehicle sales reached 133,400 units, accounting for 56% of total sales, with new energy share exceeding 50% for four consecutive months.
From sub-brands, performance was significantly divergent. Zeekr brand sales in May reached 34,400 vehicles, a 82% year-on-year increase; Zeekr 9 Series and 8 Series models combined sales approached 50% of total sales, showing bright performance in the high-end market; Galaxy brand sales were 81,700 vehicles; Geely brand sales were 182,500 vehicles, among which China Star Series sales reached 100,800 vehicles; Lynk & Co brand sales were 20,700 vehicles, with new energy vehicle sales share rising to 71%.
In terms of exports, Geely's overseas vehicle exports in May reached 85,100 vehicles, a explosive 184% year-on-year increase, setting a brand single-month export record high. Among exported products, new energy vehicles reached 40,800 units, accounting for nearly half; hybrid and pure electric products have successively landed in Southeast Asia, Middle East, Latin America, and other markets, highlighting the results of global strategy implementation.
Changan: Multi-brand Matrix Balanced EffortChangan Auto's delivery volume in May was 209,100 vehicles, among which new energy deliveries were 92,400 vehicles, a 5.8% year-on-year increase, with new energy share about 44%. In terms of exports, overseas deliveries reached 70,700 vehicles, a 38% year-on-year increase, becoming another major growth highlight for Changan in May.
In the sub-brand matrix, Changan Qiyuan delivered 34,500 vehicles in May; All-New Q05 delivered 15,800 units, with orders breaking 3,000 units within three days of listing in Thailand; Deepal sales in May were 33,200 vehicles, a 30% year-on-year increase; January to May overseas cumulative sales were 28,700 vehicles, a significant 167% year-on-year increase; Avatr delivered 7,336 vehicles in May; Changan Auto (Gravity) delivered nearly 49,000 vehicles in May.
Changan Auto's balanced layout was fully reflected in May: the fuel car base remained stable, new energy brands Deepal and Qiyuan accelerated volume growth, high-end brand Avatr continued to break through in technical cooperation, and overseas markets simultaneously achieved breakthrough growth. The pattern of five brands working together, driven by both new energy and exports, is initially taking shape.
Great Wall: Overseas Sales Growth Year-on-Year 46.75%Great Wall Motor's sales in May were 100,400 vehicles, slightly down compared to last May's 102,200 vehicles, making it the only company among the top 5 to show a year-on-year negative growth. From sub-brands, Haval brand sales in May were 55,500 vehicles, remaining Great Wall's most important sales pillar; Tank brand sales were 17,100 vehicles; both Haval and Tank brand sales showed year-on-year declines; Wey brand sold 8,119 vehicles, a 31.78% year-on-year increase, achieving growth against the trend; Ora brand performance was most stunning, with sales of 6,018 vehicles, a significant 206.88% year-on-year increase. In terms of new energy, Great Wall sold 30,400 new energy vehicles in May, with new energy vehicle transformation gradually accelerating.
The overseas market became Great Wall's biggest highlight in May, with overseas sales growing 46.75% year-on-year. Against the background of pressure on the domestic market, strong growth in overseas business effectively made up for the decline in the domestic market. Great Wall Motor's current core contradiction lies in: Haval and Tank, the two traditional main-selling brands, face weak growth, while Wey and Ora brands, although growing notably, have relatively small volume and are not yet enough to support overall growth. How to complete the "relay" between old and new brands is the key issue Great Wall must solve subsequently.
Final ThoughtsFrom May data, the growth pattern of the top 5 domestic brands has clearly diverged, but there are three common trends worth noting: First, exports have become a key engine for domestic brands to seek stability and growth. Second, new energy transformation is still accelerating, but paths differ among enterprises. Third, technological innovation continues to deepen brand moats. Looking ahead to the second half of the year, competition in the automotive industry will continue to upgrade around these three trends. Although everyone has a common direction, these three trends are all competing for the entire enterprise's industrial chain strength, and the strong will remain strong, which has almost become an inevitable outcome.
