首頁fragrance
搜尋歷史
熱門搜尋
經銷商登入 / 註冊
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會用 Proton X90 同 Chery Tiggo Cross 做比較。這兩款車喺價錢同定位上都幾接近，而家我哋就從多個角度做個詳細嘅比較，幫到你省返做功課嘅時間。
Proton X90 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 106,800 - 122,800，合共有 4 個版本，包括 2026 1.5T Prime X（RM 122,800）、2026 1.5T Prime（RM 116,800）、2026 1.5T Lite（RM 106,800） 等。
Chery Tiggo Cross 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 88,750 - 99,750，合共有 2 個版本，包括 2025 HEV 1.5L CSH（RM 99,750）、2025 1.5T Standard（RM 88,750） 等。
睇返價錢，Chery Tiggo Cross 嘅起步價比 Proton X90 平咗 RM 18,050。講真，喺呢個價位段，幾千蚊嘅分別其實唔算大，關鍵都係睇整體嘅性價比同長期使用成本。
Proton X90 配備 1.5L Turbo，馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。
Chery Tiggo Cross 配備 1.5L 4-cyl，馬力 105 hp。官方油耗 6.0 L/100km。
動力方面，Proton X90 嘅 1.5L Turbo 比 Chery Tiggo Cross 嘅 1.5L 4-cyl 多咗 35 匹馬力，中段加速更有把握，尤其係行高速公路超車嗰陣。不過 Chery Tiggo Cross 嘅油耗可能更抵用，日常市區通勤分別唔會太大。
Proton X90 車身長 4400 mm，尾箱 400 L。
Chery Tiggo Cross 車身長 4400 mm，尾箱 400 L。
兩款車嘅尺寸幾近一樣，車內空間分別唔大。呢個級距嘅車，日常使用完全夠用。
Proton X90 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
Chery Tiggo Cross 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
兩款車嘅驅動方式一樣，都係 FWD，日常駕駛感受唔會有太大分別。
總括嚟講，Proton X90 同 Chery Tiggo Cross 都係馬來西亞市場唔錯嘅車型。揀邊架，關鍵都係睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做足做功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕先做最後決定。買車係件大事，花啲時間做功課絕對無錯。
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嗰陣都會拿 Proton X50 同 Kia Sportage 做比較。呢兩款車喺價位同定位上都蠻接近嘅，今日我就由多個方面做一個詳細嘅對比，幫你省下做功課嘅時間。
Proton X50 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 89,800 - 113,300，一共有 4 個版本，包括 1.5T Executive（RM 89,800）、1.5T Premium（RM 101,800）、1.5T Flagship（RM 113,300） 等。
Kia Sportage 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 129,639 - 179,320，一共有 4 個版本，包括 2025 1.6T DCT 4WD High（RM 179,320）、2025 1.6T DCT 2WD High（RM 159,320）、2025 2.0L AT 2WD High（RM 139,639） 等。
由價錢睇落去，Proton X50 嘅起步價確實比 Kia Sportage 平咗 RM 39,839。如果你預算有限，Proton 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需要。但都要注意，平嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備上會有取舍，具體睇你嘅需要。
Proton X50 配備 1.5L 4-cyl，馬力 105 hp。官方油耗 6.0 L/100km。
Kia Sportage 配備 1.5L Turbo，馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。
動力方面，Kia Sportage 嘅 1.5L Turbo 比 Proton X50 嘅 1.5L 4-cyl 多咗 35 匹馬力。不過日常喺市區開，兩款車嘅動力都夠用，唔會覺得力唔夠。
Proton X50 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA)。
Kia Sportage 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 Drive Wise。
兩款車嘅安全評級一樣，喺呢個級別入面安全配備都算給晒好齊全。而家嘅新車安全性都唔錯，唔使太擔心呢一點。
Proton X50 車身長 4400 mm，行李箱 400 L。
Kia Sportage 車身長 4400 mm，行李箱 400 L。
兩款車嘅尺寸幾乎一樣，車內空間差別唔大。呢個級別嘅車，日常使用完全夠用。
Proton X50 同 Kia Sportage 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更睇重品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰一款；如果你更喺意性價比同配備，那就揀配置更豐富嗰款。最終都係建議兩款都去試駕，親身經歷先係最重要。
總括嚟講，Proton X50 同 Kia Sportage 都係馬來西亞市場好好嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵始終係睇你嘅個人需要同預算。建議大家做好功課，多問間車行嘅報價，再去做試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花啲時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會將 Proton X50 同 Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV 拿嚟做比較。呢兩款車喺價位同定位上都幾接近，今日我哋就從多個方面做一個詳細嘅對比，幫你攞番做功課嘅時間。
Proton X50 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 89,800 - 113,300，一共有 4 個版本，包括 1.5T Executive（RM 89,800）、1.5T Premium（RM 101,800）、1.5T Flagship（RM 113,300）等。
Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 159,750 - 159,750，一共有 2 個版本，包括 1.6L Turbo Standard（RM 130,000）、1.6L Turbo Premium（RM 145,000）等。
從價錢睇落，Proton X50 嘅起價確實比 Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV 平咗 RM 69,950。如果你預算有限，Proton 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需求。不過都係要注意，平嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備上會有取舍，具體要看你嘅需求。
Proton X50 搭載 1.5L 4-cyl，馬力 105 hp。官方油耗 6.0 L/100km。
Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV 搭載 Hybrid，馬力 170 hp。官方油耗 4.5 L/100km。
動力方面，Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV 嘅 Hybrid 比 Proton X50 嘅 1.5L 4-cyl 多咗 65 匹馬力。不過日常喺市區開，兩款車嘅動力都夠用，唔會覺得唔夠力。
Proton X50 車身長 4400 mm，尾箱 400 L。
Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV 車身長 4400 mm，尾箱 400 L。
兩款車嘅尺寸幾乎一樣，車內空間分別唔大。呢個級別嘅車，日常使用完全夠用。
Proton X50 同 Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更重視品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰一款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，那就揀配置更豐富嗰款。最終都係建議兩款都去試駕，親身體驗先係最重要嘅。
總體嚟講，Proton X50 同 Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一部，關鍵就係睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做足功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係一件大事，花啲時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會揀 Perodua Aruz 同名爵 HS 做比較。呢兩款車喺價位同定位上都好接近，今日我哋就從多個方面做一個詳細嘅對比，幫你省下做功課嘅時間。
Perodua Aruz 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 72,900 - 77,900，一共有 2 個版本，包括 1.5L X（RM 72,900）、1.5L AV（RM 77,900）等。
名爵 HS 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 130,450 - 146,450，一共有 2 個版本，包括 1.5L Standard（RM 105,000）、1.5L Executive（RM 115,000）等。
從價錢嚟睇，Perodua Aruz 嘅起步價真係比名爵 HS 平咗 RM 57,550。如果你預算有限，Perodua 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需求。但要留意，平嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備上會有取舍，具體要看你嘅需求。
Perodua Aruz 配備 1.5L 4-cyl，馬力 105 匹。官方油耗 6.0 升/百公里。
名爵 HS 配備 1.5L Turbo，馬力 140 匹。官方油耗 7.0 升/百公里。
動力方面，名爵 HS 嘅 1.5L Turbo 比 Perodua Aruz 嘅 1.5L 4-cyl 多咗 35 匹馬力。不過日常喺市區開，兩款車嘅動力都够用，唔會覺得唔夠力。
Perodua Aruz 車身長 4400 mm，行李箱 400 升。
名爵 HS 車身長 4400 mm，行李箱 400 升。
兩款車嘅尺寸幾乎一樣，車內空間差別唔大。呢個級別嘅車，日常使用完全够用。
Perodua Aruz 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
名爵 HS 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
兩款車嘅驅動方式一樣，都係 FWD，日常駕駛感受唔會有太大分別。
Perodua Aruz 保養 5 年/150,000 公里，保養間隔 每 10,000 公里或 6 個月。
名爵 HS 保養 7 年/150,000 公里，保養間隔 每 10,000 公里或 6 個月。
總括嚟講，Perodua Aruz 同名爵 HS 都係馬來西亞市場好唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵仲係要看你嘅個人需求同預算。大家建議做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，先去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
In Malaysia's SUV market, many buyers compare Perodua Aruz and Toyota Corolla Cross when choosing a car. These two models are quite close in pricing and positioning. Today we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
The OTR price of Perodua Aruz in Malaysia is RM 72,900 - 77,900, with a total of 2 versions, including 1.5L X (RM 72,900), 1.5L AV (RM 77,900), etc.
The OTR price of Toyota Corolla Cross in Malaysia is RM 133,800 - 148,800, with a total of 3 versions, including 2026 HEV 1.8L GR Sport (RM 148,800), 2026 HEV 1.8L Standard (RM 140,800), 2026 1.8L Standard (RM 133,800), etc.
In terms of price, the starting price of Perodua Aruz is indeed RM 60,900 cheaper than Toyota Corolla Cross. If your budget is limited, the entry-level version of Perodua is already sufficient for daily needs. But also note, for the few thousand cheaper, there may be trade-offs in features, depending on your specific needs.
Perodua Aruz is equipped with a 1.5L 4-cyl, 105 hp. Official fuel consumption 6.0 L/100km.
Toyota Corolla Cross is equipped with a 1.5L Turbo, 140 hp. Official fuel consumption 7.0 L/100km.
In terms of power, Toyota Corolla Cross's 1.5L Turbo has 35 hp more than Perodua Aruz's 1.5L 4-cyl. However, for daily city driving, the power of both cars is sufficient, you won't feel a lack of power.
Perodua Aruz body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
Toyota Corolla Cross body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
The dimensions of the two cars are almost the same, interior space difference is not significant. Cars of this class are completely sufficient for daily use.
Perodua Aruz uses FWD drive mode.
Toyota Corolla Cross uses FWD drive mode.
Both cars have the same drive mode, both are FWD, daily driving experience will not be too different.
Perodua Aruz and Toyota Corolla Cross are both mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use, daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, you can prioritize the one with better reputation; If you care more about value for money and features, then choose the one with richer configurations. Ultimately it is recommended to test drive both, personal experience is the most important.
Overall, Perodua Aruz and Toyota Corolla Cross are both very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends on your personal needs and budget. It is recommended to do research, compare quotes from several car dealerships, then test drive to make the final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending some time doing research will definitely not be wrong.
現下，內地新能源車市場嘅激烈競爭態勢早已不須多言，眾多品牌長期以減價策略換取銷量，硬係將競爭賽道越卷越窄。與此形成鮮明對比嘅係，阿維塔近期迎來關鍵里程碑：阿維塔 07 第 10 萬台整車順利下線，頗具深意嘅係，呢台極具紀念意義嘅車係右軚版本，完工後即刻發往海外，足見佢由起步階段起便從未將目光局限於內地市場。
自上市以來，07 始終穩坐品牌銷量擔當嘅寶座，助力品牌整體銷量一路攀升，成功突破 26 萬台大關。佢之所以能長期保持熱銷態勢，關鍵在於拒絕盲目跟風，摒棄同質化外觀，憑藉獨樹一幟嘅設計風格，榮膺國際設計獎項，無論係東南亞，定係中東市場，均贏得當地民眾嘅高度認可。日常駕駛體驗主打舒適與均衡，無論係城市通勤，定係全家短途出遊，都能完美契合，完全冇明顯短板，精準覆蓋海内外普通家庭多元化嘅用車需求。
10 萬台穩定交付，離唔開工廠數字化生產模式。整套線上管控流程簡化咗唔少製造環節，既能批量生產，亦支持唔同內飾、配色嘅個性化揀選，統一嘅品控標準，保證發往唔同國家嘅車輛體驗差距唔大，呢都係佢能批量出口嘅基礎。
出海絕非一時興起嘅營銷策略，而係品牌着眼長遠嘅戰略佈局。現下，旗下車款已成功進駐新加坡、泰國、阿聯酋等市場，線下銷售網絡已拓展至 43 個國家。依據既定嘅品牌規劃，今年將進軍歐洲市場，至 2030 年，計劃實現對超 110 個國家嘅全面覆蓋。與眾多以低價策略開拓海外市場嘅車款唔同，阿維塔堅定聚焦高端智能電動車賽道，致力於喺海外塑造國產高端電車嘅卓越形象。不過，海外高端市場對呢個定位嘅認可程度，仍有待後續長期嘅市場實踐嚟檢驗。
適逢 10 萬台里程碑達成之際，阿維塔 07L 亦同步啟動預售。現款 07 精準聚焦都市日常通勤場景，而新款經加長設計後，更契合多成員家庭嘅出行需求。兩款車協同佈局，全方位覆蓋多元預算與差異化用車訴求嘅消費群體，進而深度拓展用戶群體，有效化解僅依賴單一車款所帶來嘅銷量風險。
纵观新能源產業全局，只靠減價策略搶佔本土市場，已經步入難以維繫嘅困局。阿維塔 07 嘅進階軌跡，為行業帶來嶄新啟示：憑藉契合日常所需、精準對接需求嘅產品筑牢國內根基，憑藉完備且成熟嘅智能製造體系，成功打通海外版圖，進而以多元車款佈局，全方位拓展受眾群體。10 萬台嘅達成，唔過係品牌前行途中嘅一個里程碑，既全力深耕國內家庭出行領域，又穩步佈局全球市場，呢種雙軌並行嘅戰略佈局，正正係品牌實現持續進階嘅核心支撐。
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嗰陣都會用 Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV 同 Hyundai Tucson 嚟做比較。這兩款車喺價位同定位上都幾接近，今日我哋就從多個方面做一次詳細嘅比較，幫你省下做功課嘅時間。
Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 159,750 - 159,750，合共 2 個版本，包括 1.6L Turbo Standard（RM 130,000）、1.6L Turbo Premium（RM 145,000） 等。
Hyundai Tucson 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 143,888 - 197,888，合共 5 個版本，包括 2025 HEV 1.6T AT 2WD Prestige（RM 197,888）、2025 1.6T DCT 4WD Prestige（RM 186,888）、2025 1.6T DCT 2WD Prime（RM 164,888） 等。
由價錢睇落，Hyundai Tucson 嘅起步價比 Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV 平咗 RM 15,862。老實講，喺呢個價位範圍，幾千蚊嘅差距其實唔算大，關鍵仲係睇整體嘅性價比同埋長期使用成本。
Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV 搭載 Hybrid，馬力 170 hp。官方油耗 4.5 L/100km。
Hyundai Tucson 搭載 1.5L Turbo，馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。
動力方面，Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV 嘅 Hybrid 比 Hyundai Tucson 嘅 1.5L Turbo 多咗 30 匹馬力，中段加速更有信心，尤其係行高速公路超車嗰陣。不過 Hyundai Tucson 嘅油耗可能更親切，日常市區通勤差別唔會太大。
Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV 嘅安全評級係 TBD，主動安全系統包括 Basic。
Hyundai Tucson 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 SmartSense。
安全配備方面，兩款車都拿到唔錯嘅評級。不過 Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV 嘅 Basic 同 Hyundai Tucson 嘅 SmartSense 喺功能上有啲差異，如果你比較看重主動安全嘅話，可以仔細對比一下兩者嘅功能列表。
Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
Hyundai Tucson 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
兩款車嘅驅動方式一樣，都係 FWD，日常駕駛感受唔會有太大分別。
Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV 同 Hyundai Tucson 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更看重品牌口碑同埋二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰一款；如果你更在意性價比同埋配備，那就揀配置更豐富嗰款。最後始終建議兩款都去試駕，親身體驗先至係最重要。
總體嚟講，Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV 同 Hyundai Tucson 都係馬來西亞市場好唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵仲係睇你嘅個人需求同埋預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再嚟試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拿 Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV 同 Subaru Crosstrek 嚟做比較。這兩款車喺價位同定位上都幾接近，今日我哋就從多個方面做個詳細對比，幫你省返做功課嘅時間。
Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 129,750 - 129,750，一共有 2 個版本，包括 2025 1.5T 90km CSH（RM 129,750）、Tiggo 7 PHEV 支持邊種充電方法？可以用家用電源插座充電嗎？（RM 117,478）等。
Subaru Crosstrek 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 145,000 - 160,000，一共有 1 個版本，包括 2.0L e-Boxer（RM 150,000）等。
從價錢嚟睇，Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV 嘅入門價真係比 Subaru Crosstrek 平咗 RM 15,250。如果你預算有限，Chery 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需要。但都要注意，平嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備上會有取捨，具體要睇你嘅需要。
Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV 配 Hybrid，170 匹馬力。官方油耗 4.5 L/100km。
Subaru Crosstrek 配 1.5L Turbo，140 匹馬力。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。
動力方面，Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV 嘅 Hybrid 比 Subaru Crosstrek 嘅 1.5L Turbo 多咗 30 匹馬力，中段加速更有信心，尤其係跑高速超車嘅時候。不過 Subaru Crosstrek 嘅油耗表現可能更抵，日常市區通勤差別唔會太大。
Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV 嘅安全評級係 TBD，主動安全系統包括 Basic。
Subaru Crosstrek 嘅安全評級係 5★ (Euro NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 EyeSight。
安全配備方面，兩款車都拿到唔錯嘅評級。不過 Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV 嘅 Basic 同 Subaru Crosstrek 嘅 EyeSight 喺功能上有些差異，如果你比較看重主動安全嘅話，可以仔細對比下兩者嘅功能列表。
Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
Subaru Crosstrek 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
兩款車嘅驅動方式一樣，都係 FWD，日常駕駛感受唔會有太大分別。
Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV 同 Subaru Crosstrek 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更看重品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰款；如果你更在意性價同配備，就揀配置更豐富嗰款。最後都建議兩款都去試駕，親身體驗先至最重要。
總體嚟講，Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV 同 Subaru Crosstrek 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊台，關鍵係睇你個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
車型概覽
Subaru Solterra 值唔值得睇，第一步唔係望牌子或者外形，而係睇佢能唔能夠配合你嘅香港日常。 呢篇會集中講預算、月供同同級定位，幫你用買家角度篩走唔適合嘅選擇。
零售價 HK$ 289,900 - 302,047、完稅價 HK$ 479,214 - 502,400 令預算位置更清楚，買家可以先估算月供、保險、泊車同日常開支。
購車價格指南
Subaru Solterra 嘅購車預算可以先由 零售價 HK$ 289,900 - 302,047、完稅價 HK$ 479,214 - 502,400 開始計。香港買車唔只係睇車價，月供、保險、牌費、泊車同能源成本都會影響每月壓力。
如果有幾個版本可揀，可以先將 2026 436km XT（HK$ 502,400）、2025 465km Standard（HK$ 479,214） 放喺同一張清單。日常通勤重視舒適同易用，家庭買家就要優先睇後排、尾箱同安全配置。
核心規格重點
睇 Subaru Solterra 嘅規格，重點唔係背數字，而係理解佢喺香港用車場景會帶嚟咩分別。
73.1/71.4 kWh 嘅電池容量，真正意義係可以幫你估算一星期通勤同周末出車要唔要中途補電。 255/160 kW、437/336 N·m 嘅輸出，令高速併線同短距離超車更有信心。 車長 4690 mm、車闊 1860 mm、車高 1650 mm、軸距 2850 mm 可以幫你預判商場停車場、屋苑車位同後排腿部空間。 固定齒比、雙電機四駆 會影響起步順滑度、濕地穩定感同長途巡航性格。
優缺點分析
Subaru Solterra 嘅優點唔需要講到天花龍鳳，真正有價值係佢能唔能夠令日常用車更省心：預算位置清楚，方便同同級車直接比較、電池同續航資訊有助安排通勤同補電、動力輸出對高速同上斜更有底氣。
要留意嘅係，要先確認屋苑、公司或常去商場嘅充電條件、香港停車場同窄路使用要留意車身闊度。呢啲唔一定係缺點，但係落訂前應該先諗清楚。
買家常見問題
買 Subaru Solterra 之前，真正要問嘅唔係單一規格，而係佢可唔可以融入你每日嘅生活節奏。
常見疑問係「Subaru Solterra 喺香港有咩動力配置？」簡單講，Subaru Solterra 喺香港提供雙馬達四驅版本，搭載 71.4kWh 鋰電池，前後軸各有一個 eAxle 永磁同步摩打，輸出 215 匹馬力及 34.2kgm 扭力，0-100km/h 加速只需 6.9 秒。 放到實際用車，就係要睇佢對通勤、泊車、家庭乘坐同長期成本有幾大幫助。
同級對比內容
將 Subaru Solterra 放入同級車清單時，唔建議只用外形或者品牌光環決定。比較順序可以係：先用 零售價 HK$ 289,900 - 302,047、完稅價 HK$ 479,214 - 502,400 鎖定預算圈、再睇動力係咪足夠應付高速併線同滿載、再比較能源成本同補能便利、最後睇車身大小、座位同尾箱是否適合家人。
咁樣篩選會貼近香港買家真實生活：平日塞車、商場泊車、周末去新界、甚至一家人出入，先係一部車每日要面對嘅考驗。
用車全周期指南
擁有 Subaru Solterra 最重要係先諗清楚充電節奏。屋苑、公司或者常去商場只要有穩定充電選項，電動化用車就會容易相處好多。
如果你主要喺市區行，視野、低速順滑度同泊車輔助會好影響心情；如果經常行高速或跨區，座椅舒適度、隔音同動力從容感會更重要。
車型概覽
鴻蒙智行智界V9 值唔值得睇，第一步唔係望牌子或者外形，而係睇佢能唔能夠配合你嘅香港日常。 呢篇會集中講長途乘坐舒適度，幫你用買家角度篩走唔適合嘅選擇。
售價仍待確認，買家可以先把佢放入候選名單，等價格落實後再同同級車逐項比較。
購車價格指南
鴻蒙智行智界V9 目前售價仍未清晰，較理性嘅做法係先睇版本、車身大小同動力形式，等價格落實後再決定值唔值得落訂。
如果有幾個版本可揀，可以先將 2026 Standard（價格待確認） 放喺同一張清單。日常通勤重視舒適同易用，家庭買家就要優先睇後排、尾箱同安全配置。
核心規格重點
睇 鴻蒙智行智界V9 嘅規格，重點唔係背數字，而係理解佢喺香港用車場景會帶嚟咩分別。
鴻蒙智行智界V9 現階段最值得留意係車型定位同版本方向，詳細取捨應該等價格同規格更清楚再作決定。
優缺點分析
鴻蒙智行智界V9 嘅優點唔需要講到天花龍鳳，真正有價值係佢能唔能夠令日常用車更省心：車型定位清楚，適合作為同級比較起點。
要留意嘅係，售價未清晰前唔應該太早用性價比落結論。呢啲唔一定係缺點，但係落訂前應該先諗清楚。
買家常見問題
買 鴻蒙智行智界V9 之前，真正要問嘅唔係單一規格，而係佢可唔可以融入你每日嘅生活節奏。
如果你重視長途乘坐舒適度，可以先問三件事：每日泊車會唔會麻煩、家人坐得舒唔舒服、長期開支係咪喺預算內。
同級對比內容
將 鴻蒙智行智界V9 放入同級車清單時，唔建議只用外形或者品牌光環決定。比較順序可以係：先等售價落實，再決定佢應該同邊個級距比較。
咁樣篩選會貼近香港買家真實生活：平日塞車、商場泊車、周末去新界、甚至一家人出入，先係一部車每日要面對嘅考驗。
用車全周期指南
擁有 鴻蒙智行智界V9 唔係買車一刻就完結，之後仲有保險、輪胎、保養、泊車同日常能源成本要處理。
如果你主要喺市區行，視野、低速順滑度同泊車輔助會好影響心情；如果經常行高速或跨區，座椅舒適度、隔音同動力從容感會更重要。
In May, China's automotive market overall presented a gentle recovery trend, with domestic brands still being the sales backbone of the market. Recently, BYD, Geely, Chery, Changan, and Great Wall, the top 5 domestic automakers, successively released their monthly performance reports. From the data, these five companies show a general characteristic of "stable total growth, divergence between domestic and international markets, and accelerated new energy penetration". Overseas exports and new energy vehicles have become the most core growth engines; export business has evolved from a "bonus item" to the "core foundation" for some companies. BYD's "dominant leader" status is further consolidated, Chery achieved high growth via exports, Geely's new energy penetration rate broke 56%, Changan focused steadily on balanced development, while Great Wall appeared slightly under pressure during structural transformation.
BYD: Export Hits New High Becomes Biggest HighlightIn May, BYD stood firmly at the top of domestic brands with a monthly sales volume of 383,500 vehicles, maintaining positive growth both year-on-year and month-over-month under a large base. Its two main brands, Dynasty and Ocean, sold a combined 330,200 vehicles, contributing 86.1% of total sales; Fangchengbao's monthly sales broke 30,000 units to reach 30,200, a year-on-year increase of 139.7%, setting a new high for the year; Denza sold 16,300 vehicles, and Yangwang delivered 286 vehicles. From a model perspective, BYD had eight models in May with monthly sales exceeding 20,000 vehicles. The Song Family and Yuan Family both broke 50,000 units, selling 51,370 and 56,691 vehicles respectively. The Sea Lion Family followed closely with 42,615 vehicles, and Seagull sales were also close to 40,000 vehicles.
BYD's biggest highlight in May was exports. Overseas new energy vehicle sales reached 160,600 units, an 80.4% year-on-year increase, accounting for about 42%. The sharp expansion of export scale effectively countered the phased weakness in domestic demand. Cumulative exports from January to May exceeded 620,000 vehicles. High export growth mainly benefited from continued ramping up of overseas factory capacity, improved ocean shipping capacity, and accelerated channel network expansion. In the domestic market, BYD promoted Megawatt Super Charging and intelligent strategies simultaneously—Megawatt charging achieved about 90% charge in 9 minutes; 20,000 super charging stations are planned to be built by 2026; all series models are available with Sky Eye B intelligent driving solutions and city navigation safety fallback plans, accelerating the popularization of high-level intelligent driving. As Gen 2 Blade Battery capacity gradually releases, the company's orders are expected to continue rising.
Chery: Sales Growth Leads the Top 5Chery Group's total sales volume in May was 247,800 vehicles, a significant year-on-year increase of 20.5%, ranking first in growth speed among the top 5. Exports remained its most core growth engine—May exports reached 181,900 vehicles, an 80.5% year-on-year increase, accounting for 73.4% of total sales that month, continuously breaking the single-month export record for Chinese brands for three months. In terms of new energy, Chery New Energy sold 100,300 vehicles, a 58.8% year-on-year increase. April and May consecutively saw monthly new energy sales breaking 100,000 vehicles.
The strong performance in exports benefited from Chery's long-term deep cultivation of overseas channel advantages and localized operation capabilities. While overseas orders continued to rise, high export growth formed a sharp contrast with domestic sales—Chery's domestic sales in May were only 60,000 vehicles, accounting for one-quarter of total sales. From cumulative data, Chery Group accumulated 1.101 million sales from January to May, but against the annual goal of 3.2 million vehicles, monthly averages need to reach about 420,000 vehicles later, and pressure remains significant.
Geely: New Energy Penetration Rate Breaks 56%Geely Auto's total sales volume in May was 237,600 vehicles, a 1% year-on-year increase, achieving month-over-month double growth for three consecutive months. In terms of structure, Geely's "New Four Transformations" transformation showed significant results: new energy vehicle sales reached 133,400 units, accounting for 56% of total sales, with new energy share exceeding 50% for four consecutive months.
From sub-brands, performance was significantly divergent. Zeekr brand sales in May reached 34,400 vehicles, a 82% year-on-year increase; Zeekr 9 Series and 8 Series models combined sales approached 50% of total sales, showing bright performance in the high-end market; Galaxy brand sales were 81,700 vehicles; Geely brand sales were 182,500 vehicles, among which China Star Series sales reached 100,800 vehicles; Lynk & Co brand sales were 20,700 vehicles, with new energy vehicle sales share rising to 71%.
In terms of exports, Geely's overseas vehicle exports in May reached 85,100 vehicles, a explosive 184% year-on-year increase, setting a brand single-month export record high. Among exported products, new energy vehicles reached 40,800 units, accounting for nearly half; hybrid and pure electric products have successively landed in Southeast Asia, Middle East, Latin America, and other markets, highlighting the results of global strategy implementation.
Changan: Multi-brand Matrix Balanced EffortChangan Auto's delivery volume in May was 209,100 vehicles, among which new energy deliveries were 92,400 vehicles, a 5.8% year-on-year increase, with new energy share about 44%. In terms of exports, overseas deliveries reached 70,700 vehicles, a 38% year-on-year increase, becoming another major growth highlight for Changan in May.
In the sub-brand matrix, Changan Qiyuan delivered 34,500 vehicles in May; All-New Q05 delivered 15,800 units, with orders breaking 3,000 units within three days of listing in Thailand; Deepal sales in May were 33,200 vehicles, a 30% year-on-year increase; January to May overseas cumulative sales were 28,700 vehicles, a significant 167% year-on-year increase; Avatr delivered 7,336 vehicles in May; Changan Auto (Gravity) delivered nearly 49,000 vehicles in May.
Changan Auto's balanced layout was fully reflected in May: the fuel car base remained stable, new energy brands Deepal and Qiyuan accelerated volume growth, high-end brand Avatr continued to break through in technical cooperation, and overseas markets simultaneously achieved breakthrough growth. The pattern of five brands working together, driven by both new energy and exports, is initially taking shape.
Great Wall: Overseas Sales Growth Year-on-Year 46.75%Great Wall Motor's sales in May were 100,400 vehicles, slightly down compared to last May's 102,200 vehicles, making it the only company among the top 5 to show a year-on-year negative growth. From sub-brands, Haval brand sales in May were 55,500 vehicles, remaining Great Wall's most important sales pillar; Tank brand sales were 17,100 vehicles; both Haval and Tank brand sales showed year-on-year declines; Wey brand sold 8,119 vehicles, a 31.78% year-on-year increase, achieving growth against the trend; Ora brand performance was most stunning, with sales of 6,018 vehicles, a significant 206.88% year-on-year increase. In terms of new energy, Great Wall sold 30,400 new energy vehicles in May, with new energy vehicle transformation gradually accelerating.
The overseas market became Great Wall's biggest highlight in May, with overseas sales growing 46.75% year-on-year. Against the background of pressure on the domestic market, strong growth in overseas business effectively made up for the decline in the domestic market. Great Wall Motor's current core contradiction lies in: Haval and Tank, the two traditional main-selling brands, face weak growth, while Wey and Ora brands, although growing notably, have relatively small volume and are not yet enough to support overall growth. How to complete the "relay" between old and new brands is the key issue Great Wall must solve subsequently.
Final ThoughtsFrom May data, the growth pattern of the top 5 domestic brands has clearly diverged, but there are three common trends worth noting: First, exports have become a key engine for domestic brands to seek stability and growth. Second, new energy transformation is still accelerating, but paths differ among enterprises. Third, technological innovation continues to deepen brand moats. Looking ahead to the second half of the year, competition in the automotive industry will continue to upgrade around these three trends. Although everyone has a common direction, these three trends are all competing for the entire enterprise's industrial chain strength, and the strong will remain strong, which has almost become an inevitable outcome.
Have you ever seen the roads in India?
I've seen them online.
The scene is usually like this: a sedan blocked behind a cow, motorcycles running wild nearby, even milk tea vendors nearby, so "clean and hygienic".
However, in a place where many feel physically uncomfortable after watching, Toyota, Suzuki, Honda and other Japanese car companies decided to bet on India.
According to the Indian "Brand Quality Foundation" website, the three car companies will invest nearly $11 billion to build factories, increase capacity, and develop exports in India.
Some netizens commented: Did the three Japanese car companies have too much money?
In fact, they didn't have endless money to spend, nor were they bewildered by Indian curry. These Japanese car executives are much clearer than us.
Current Japanese car revenue and market share are declining. Raw material costs are soaring. Looking at the world map, finding a market that can accommodate capacity, expand share, and has gentle competition is not easy.
So, it wasn't that Japanese car companies chose India, but because they had no choice.
The Pain of Japanese Car Companies
Past Japanese cars were truly the envy of others.
Ask old drivers who drove Japanese cars over ten years ago, talking about Japanese cars, almost no one doesn't give a thumbs up, cheap price, fuel saving, durable...
Even many Japanese cars needed to be bought at a markup, but who would think this iron fortress would be beaten out of sight in a few short years.
With the wave of new energy vehicles coming, electrification and intelligence became the goal for many domestic car companies to "leapfrog". Relying on China's strong new energy vehicle industry chain advantages and car companies' own persistence on R&D and technology, Chinese independent brands quickly achieved "leapfrogging".
Domestic cars once criticized are now becoming more and more common on the roads, even surpassing joint ventures in share.
According to CPCA data, in April 2026, the share of independent brands reached as high as 62.5%, far exceeding Japan's 13.1%.
You need to know, the Chinese car market is the largest car market in the world. Losing speed in the Chinese market is like losing a huge piece of cake.
Meanwhile, the main theme of the Chinese market in recent years is still price wars. Racing on configuration, price, and service has become a normal state, which also had a huge impact on Japanese cars' profits.
Apart from China, Japanese cars are also not doing well in the US.
On January 20, 2025, Trump swore in as the 47th US President, starting a series of chaotic operations, including imposing additional car tariffs in the name of national security, causing the tariff rate for imported Japanese cars to reach as high as 27.5% at one point. Although it decreased later, it was still far higher than the initial tax rate.
This operation directly led to a tariff loss of over 2 trillion yen for seven Japanese car companies in fiscal year 2025.
Looking at Japan itself, it is actually not easy either.
Middle East geopolitical conflicts blocked shipping in the Strait of Hormuz, transportation costs and raw material costs soared, Japanese car companies also had to suffer in silence.
Executives looking at the reports, their backs went cold, only to find a new growth curve.
So, Japanese car companies didn't fall in love with India, there was nowhere else to go.
Deep Thought on Choosing India
So, what magic does India have, to make Japanese car companies invest heavily?
The first advantage is big. In 2025, the Indian car market achieved 5.517 million new car sales, up 6% year-on-year, breaking the historical record, ranking as the third largest car market in the world, exceeding Japan for four consecutive years, second only to China and the United States.
The value of this doesn't need me to say much. India achieved this result mainly because India has been promoting tax reduction policies to promote consumption, which led to a significant increase in domestic consumption willingness.
The second advantage is close, meaning it is close to places where Japanese cars sell well, such as Africa.
So, India for Japanese car companies is more like a convenience store built in the center of a crossroad. You don't need to ship cars to eight countries separately, just build well at this stop in India, then unload ship by ship, and you can save a lot of costs.
The Nikkei also believes that India is expected to become its global car supply center.
The third advantage is stability. You know, Japanese cars' advantage is fuel cars, after all, the three major components of engines, gearboxes, and chassis, they have played for many years, technology accumulation is number one in the world.
But the Chinese car market has fully promoted electrification and intelligence development, leading to Japanese cars' advantage becoming weaker and weaker, impossible to play out. But India is different, it has the characteristics of few charging piles and slow electrification process. Indian old people buying cars still look for cheap, fuel saving, easy to fix, and these three points are exactly Japanese cars' old trade.
Especially Suzuki, always been India's car market evergreen, almost always sitting on the best-selling model throne, reputation of being worry-free, better than any advertisement.
So, Japanese car companies' vigorous layout of the Indian market is obviously carefully considered.
But, is the Indian market really that easy to mix?
The Hard-to-Bite Indian Market
Of course, India is not perfect like a hot commodity, its disadvantages are as obvious as its advantages, and every one is enough for Japanese car companies to face a hard time.
First talk about electrification. Yes, right now India has few charging piles and electric cars don't sell well, it is indeed a shelter for Japanese fuel cars. But you have to think, how long can this "shelter" avoid?
India previously shouted the slogan of 30% of new cars being electric vehicles by 2030. Although it sounds like bragging, but can't help but they really give subsidies, really build charging stations.
Imagine, what if one day India suddenly wakes up, starts vigorously promoting electrification, doing infrastructure, charging piles popping out like mushrooms after rain, then Japanese cars will be dumbfounded?
Isn't this a version of the Thai market?
Back then Japanese cars in Thailand won easily. The entire Southeast Asian market was called Japanese cars' backyard. Result Thailand took the lead in promoting electrification. Chinese electric vehicles came in, directly became a hot commodity. Look at Japanese cars again, share in Thailand falling down rapidly.
If India accelerates electrification, history will likely repeat, and this time, Japanese cars don't even have a place to flee, how to prevent will become the first problem for Japanese car companies.
Next talk about policy. India's policy is like a pot of curry, you never know if you will eat chicken or potato next time.
This magical country, today low tariff encourages building factories, tomorrow may fine you a huge amount. What's more annoying is mandatory joint venture. Foreign car companies want to sell cars in India, have to find local partners to partner up. When your factory is built, supply chain is done, India directly backstabs you. At that time whether adding money or withdrawing capital, what you get is heartache.
So you see, this market like India is like a mango that looks very sweet, bite the first mouth it's okay, chew two more mouths hit the hard core.
Japanese cars now is calculating, while the core hasn't bit the tooth, hurry up to nibble a few more mouths, but the core will bite sooner or later, just don't know which day.
Epilogue
Japanese cars this trip to India, not go for tourism, is go to make a living.
Chinese and Southeast Asian dining tables are more crowded, production and transportation costs have risen. Looking around the world, only this pot in India is still steaming, even if what is boiling inside is curry-flavored stones, have to bite hard and chew down.
Japanese car companies want to expand market, India wants to pull economy, solve employment, both sides have their own thoughts.
As for the ending is Japanese cars in India regain their glory, or like past competitors shamefully walk away, then is not known.
But no matter how, this play just started, we slowly watch is okay.
Anyway India's story, never bored.
