首頁faith
搜尋歷史
熱門搜尋
經銷商登入 / 註冊
August 4, CPCA released the global automaker sales ranking for the first half of 2026, a historic moment was born here.
The list shows Toyota still ranks first with 11% of the global market share, Volkswagen and Hyundai Kia in second and third. Chinese automakers see a collective breakthrough: BYD ranks 6th globally with 4.8% share, Geely 7th with 4.6%, Chery ties with Ford for 9th with 4.1% share. For the first time, three Chinese automakers appear simultaneously on the global top 10 sales list.
This not only means Chinese cars take root in the top global tier for the first time, but also means the global automotive industry's competitive landscape begins to truly change.
For the past few decades, the global auto industry was long dominated by European, American, Japanese, and Korean brands, with Chinese automakers mostly catching up in the local market. Now, with BYD, Geely, and Chery entering the global top 10 simultaneously, it shows Chinese cars are no longer just participants in the new energy vehicle sector, but an important competitive force in the global automotive industry.
But if we observe these three companies closely, we will find their paths to the global top 10 are not the same.
BYD achieved a rapid rise relying on new energy. Relying on Three-Electric technology and scale advantages, BYD not only firmly holds first place in domestic new energy vehicles, but the overseas market has also become a new growth pole. In the first half of this year, BYD's global sales were about 1.8 million units, of which overseas sales reached 789,000 units, accounting for over 43%, a year-on-year increase of 145%. The overseas market is no longer just a supplementary market, but an important support for enterprise growth.
Geely relies on global layout. Brands such as Volvo, Zeekr, Lynk & Co form a brand matrix covering different markets and price points, giving Geely stronger global competitiveness.
Chery represents another path. Although domestic attention is less than BYD, relying on years of persistent exports, Chery has entered over 130 countries and regions, accumulating stable channels and brand foundations overseas, which is also an important reason for its first entry into the global top 10.
However, sales entering the global top 10 does not mean Chinese cars have truly won the global market.
In fact, Chinese cars going global have begun to enter a new stage.
In the first half of this year, China's automotive exports reached 5.096 million units, up 65.3% year-on-year; single-month exports in June broke through 1 million units for the first time, with annual exports potentially aiming for 10 million units. Numbers remain bright, but more and more companies realize that relying solely on selling cars out is no longer enough to support development in the next stage.
The China Association of Automobile Manufacturers divides Chinese automotive going global into three stages: The first stage is "Going Out" of complete vehicle exports, the second stage is "Going In" of capacity exports, and the third stage is brands truly "Going Up". Currently, Chinese automakers are at a critical period transitioning from the first stage to the second stage.
On one hand, trade barriers in various countries are rising. The EU imposed additional anti-subsidy tariffs up to 37.6% on Chinese EVs, Brazil raised complete vehicle tariffs to 35%, Mexico increased to 50%. The cost advantage relying solely on complete vehicle exports is rapidly shrinking.
On the other hand, more and more countries begin to require local production, local R&D, local procurement. If Chinese automakers want to stay in overseas markets long-term, they must truly integrate into local industrial chains.
Therefore, we see more and more enterprises beginning to change tactics.
Geely cooperates with Ford, jointly operating the Valencia plant in Spain, leveraging existing capacity to quickly achieve European local manufacturing.
BYD's Rayong plant in Thailand has achieved localization production of five models, local employee share about 93%, local parts procurement ratio reached 50%, and is building an overseas capacity network covering Europe, Southeast Asia, Latin America.
XPeng completed Turing AI intelligent driving localization testing in Germany, established data centers and R&D capabilities in Europe, rather than simply moving Chinese software overseas.
These changes show that the focus of Chinese automotive going global is shifting from "selling cars" to "building ecosystems". However, precisely at this stage, automakers need to remain clear-headed even more.
At this year's China Auto Forum, multiple industry figures mentioned a warning-worthy issue -- "Involution Spillover".
Geely Automobile Holdings Chief Product Strategy Officer Tang Liming pointed out that the industry currently faces multiple challenges such as tariffs, financing, and technical barriers, and the "Involution Spillover" of domestic price wars spreading overseas is also overdrawing the overall brand image of Chinese cars. He proposed that enterprises should strengthen price self-discipline, channel self-discipline, compliance self-discipline, and brand self-discipline, to achieve benign competition.
Wang Xia, Chairman of the Automotive Industry Committee of China Council for the Promotion of International Trade, also emphasized that the overseas market should become a new height for brand value addition, not a new battlefield for price wars. Enterprises should quickly realize the strategic shift from "selling out" to "integrating in", achieving joint project construction, value sharing, and risk sharing with localities, rather than copying domestic low-price competition overseas.
This reminder is precisely worth serious thought for all Chinese automakers.
Editor's Commentary
The entry of three Chinese automakers into the global top 10 is indeed a memorable step, but this is more like getting a ticket to enter the global top arena, rather than the competition having ended.
What truly determines future rankings is not just sales growth speed, but who can establish overseas R&D systems, local manufacturing capabilities, complete supply chain networks, and gain long-term trust from local consumers.
Global top 10 is a new height for Chinese cars. But true global brands still need time to build.
Only when Chinese automakers can not only sell cars overseas but also truly take root overseas and integrate overseas, can Chinese cars truly move from "Top 10 Global Sales" to "Global Automotive Powerhouse".
In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers compare Proton X70 and Mazda CX-60 when choosing a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning, and today we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time doing research.
The Proton X70 OTR price in Malaysia is RM 106,800 - 122,300, with a total of 3 versions, including 1.5L Standard 2WD (RM 106,800), 1.5L Executive 2WD (RM 115,800), 1.5L Premium 2WD (RM 122,300), etc.
The Mazda CX-60 OTR price in Malaysia is RM 200,510 - 252,873, with a total of 2 versions, including 2026 3.3T 4WD High Plus (RM 252,873), 2025 2.5L 2WD High (RM 200,510), etc.
In terms of price, the starting price of Proton X70 is indeed RM 93,710 cheaper than Mazda CX-60. If your budget is limited, Proton's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. But you also need to note that the few thousand cheaper might involve trade-offs in equipment, specifically depending on your needs.
Proton X70's safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
Mazda CX-60's safety rating is 5★ (Euro NCAP), active safety systems include i-Activsense Pro.
Regarding safety features, both cars received good ratings. However, there are some differences in functions between Proton X70's ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA) and Mazda CX-60's i-Activsense Pro. If you value active safety, you can compare the function lists of both carefully.
Proton X70 adopts FWD drive mode.
Mazda CX-60 adopts FWD drive mode.
The drive modes of both cars are the same, both are FWD, there won't be a big difference in daily driving experience.
Proton X70 warranty is 5 years/150,000km, maintenance interval is every 10,000km or 6 months.
Mazda CX-60 warranty is 5 years/150,000km, maintenance interval is every 10,000km or 6 months.
Both cars have the same warranty conditions, no need to struggle with this. Actual maintenance costs also depend on the brand's service network and parts prices, suggest asking real owners in car groups for experience.
In general, Proton X70 and Mazda CX-60 are both very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose mainly depends on your personal needs and budget. It is recommended to do your research, compare quotes from several dealerships, and then test drive to make the final decision. Buying a car is a big deal, spending time to prepare will definitely not be wrong.
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嗰陣都會拎 Proton X70 同 Mazda CX-60 嚟做比較。這兩款車喺價位同定位上都幾接近，今日我哋就從多個方面做個詳細比較，幫你省做功課嘅時間。
Proton X70 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 106,800 - 122,300，合共有 3 個版本，包括 1.5L Standard 2WD（RM 106,800）、1.5L Executive 2WD（RM 115,800）、1.5L Premium 2WD（RM 122,300） 等。
Mazda CX-60 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 200,510 - 252,873，合共有 2 個版本，包括 2026 3.3T 4WD High Plus（RM 252,873）、2025 2.5L 2WD High（RM 200,510） 等。
睇落價錢，Proton X70 嘅起步價真係比 Mazda CX-60 平咗 RM 93,710。如果你預算有限，Proton 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需求。但都要注意，平嗰幾千塊，可能喺配備上會有取捨，具體睇你嘅需求。
Proton X70 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA)。
Mazda CX-60 嘅安全評級係 5★ (Euro NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 i-Activsense Pro。
安全配備方面，兩款車都拿咗唔錯嘅評級。不過 Proton X70 嘅 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA) 同 Mazda CX-60 嘅 i-Activsense Pro 喺功能上有啲差異，如果你比較睇重主動安全嘅話，可以詳細比較吓兩者嘅功能列表。
Proton X70 車身長 4400 mm，行李箱 400 L。
Mazda CX-60 車身長 4500 mm，行李箱 450 L。
空間方面，Mazda CX-60 嘅車身比 Proton X70 長咗 100 mm，乘坐空間更有優勢。不過 Proton X70 喺城市入面停車會靈活少少，各有取捨。
Proton X70 同 Mazda CX-60 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更睇重品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，就揀配置更豐富嗰款。最後都建議兩款都去試駕，親身體驗先至係最重要。
總嚟講，Proton X70 同 Mazda CX-60 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊部車，關鍵都要睇返你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花啲時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
In the SUV market in Malaysia, many buyers compare Proton X70 and Toyota Yaris Cross when choosing a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will do a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
Proton X70 OTR price in Malaysia is RM 106,800 - 122,300, with a total of 3 versions, including 1.5L Standard 2WD (RM 106,800), 1.5L Executive 2WD (RM 115,800), 1.5L Premium 2WD (RM 122,300), etc.
Toyota Yaris Cross OTR price in Malaysia is RM 99,900 - 109,900, with a total of 2 versions, including 2026 1.5L Standard (RM 99,900), 2026 HEV 1.5L Standard (RM 109,900), etc.
In terms of price, the starting price of Toyota Yaris Cross is RM 6,900 cheaper than Proton X70. Honestly, in this price range, a difference of a few thousand is actually not big, the key is still to look at the overall value for money and long-term usage cost.
The Proton X70 body length is 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
The Toyota Yaris Cross body length is 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
The dimensions of both cars are almost identical, with little difference in interior space. For cars in this class, they are fully sufficient for daily use.
The Proton X70 uses FWD drive mode.
The Toyota Yaris Cross uses FWD drive mode.
Both cars share the same drive mode, FWD, so the daily driving experience should not differ much.
Proton X70 and Toyota Yaris Cross are both mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, you can prioritize the one with a better reputation; if you care more about cost-effectiveness and features, choose the one with richer configurations. Ultimately, it is recommended to test drive both models, as firsthand experience is the most important.
Overall, Proton X70 and Toyota Yaris Cross are both very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose ultimately depends on your personal needs and budget. It is recommended to do your research, compare quotes from multiple dealers, and then test drive to make a final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending time doing research will never go wrong.
In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers compare the Proton X70 and Honda WR-V when choosing a car. These two models are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
The Proton X70 OTR price in Malaysia is RM 106,800 - 122,300, with a total of 3 versions, including 1.5L Standard 2WD (RM 106,800), 1.5L Executive 2WD (RM 115,800), 1.5L Premium 2WD (RM 122,300), etc.
The Honda WR-V OTR price in Malaysia is RM 89,900 - 107,900, with a total of 4 versions, including 2023 1.5L V (RM 99,900), 2023 1.5L E (RM 95,900), 2023 1.5L S (RM 89,900), etc.
Looking at the price, the starting price of the Honda WR-V is RM 16,900 cheaper than the Proton X70. Honestly, in this price range, a difference of a few thousand is not significant. The key lies in the overall cost-performance ratio and long-term usage costs.
The Proton X70 safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), with active safety systems including ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
The Honda WR-V safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), with active safety systems including Honda SENSING.
Both cars have the same safety rating, and safety features are quite comprehensive for this class. New car safety standards are generally good nowadays, so there is no need to worry too much about this.
Proton X70 warranty is 5 years / 150,000km, service interval is every 10,000km or 6 months.
Honda WR-V warranty is 5 years / unlimited mileage, service interval is every 10,000km or 6 months.
Both the Proton X70 and Honda WR-V are mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, you might consider the one with better reputation; if you care more about cost-performance and features, choose the one with richer configuration. Ultimately, it is recommended to test drive both; personal experience is the most important.
Overall, the Proton X70 and Honda WR-V are both very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends on your personal needs and budget. It is recommended to do your homework, compare quotes from multiple car dealerships, and then test drive to make the final decision. Buying a car is a big matter; spending time on research is never wrong.
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拿 寶騰 X50 同 現代 Tucson 來做比較。這兩款車喺價位同定位上都好接近，今日我就由多個方面做一個詳細比較，幫你省返做功課嘅時間。
寶騰 X50 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 89,800 - 113,300，一共有 4 個版本，包括 1.5T Executive（RM 89,800）、1.5T Premium（RM 101,800）、1.5T Flagship（RM 113,300） 等。
現代 Tucson 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 143,888 - 197,888，一共有 5 個版本，包括 2025 HEV 1.6T AT 2WD Prestige（RM 197,888）、2025 1.6T DCT 4WD Prestige（RM 186,888）、2025 1.6T DCT 2WD Prime（RM 164,888） 等。
從價錢來看，寶騰 X50 嘅起步價確實比 現代 Tucson 平咗 RM 54,088。如果你預算有限，寶騰嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需求。但都要注意，平嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備上會有取舍，具體睇你嘅需求。
寶騰 X50 採用 4WD 驅動方式。
現代 Tucson 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
寶騰嘅 4WD 同 現代嘅 FWD 喺操控上會有唔同感受，建議試駕比較。
寶騰 X50 保用 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
現代 Tucson 保用 5 年/300,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
寶騰 X50 同 現代 Tucson 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更看重品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰一款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，那就揀配備更豐富嗰款。最終都係建議兩款都去試駕，親身體驗先係最重要。
總體嚟講，寶騰 X50 同 現代 Tucson 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車款。揀邊一輛，關鍵都係要睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，先去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拿寶騰 X50 同馬自達 CX-30 嚟做比較。这两款車喺價位同定位上都蠻接近，而家我哋就從多個方面做一个詳細嘅比較，幫你省做功課嘅時間。
寶騰 X50 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 89,800 - 113,300，合共 4 個版本，包括 1.5T Executive（RM 89,800）、1.5T Premium（RM 101,800）、1.5T Flagship（RM 113,300） 等。
馬自達 CX-30 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 122,409 - 146,409，合共 4 個版本，包括 2025 2.0L High+ Premium（RM 146,409）、2025 2.0L High+（RM 138,409）、2025 2.0L High（RM 130,409） 等。
從價錢睇落嚟，寶騰 X50 嘅起步價確實比馬自達 CX-30 平咗 RM 32,609。如果你預算有限，寶騰嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需求。但都要記住，平嗰幾千蚊，喺配備上可能有取舍，具體就要睇你嘅需求。
寶騰 X50 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA)。
馬自達 CX-30 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 i-Activsense。
兩款車嘅安全評級一樣，喺呢個級別入面安全配備都算好齊全。而家嘅新车安全性都唔差，唔使太擔心呢一點。
寶騰 X50 採用 4WD 驅動方式。
馬自達 CX-30 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
寶騰嘅 4WD 同馬自達嘅 FWD 喺操控上有唔同感受，建議試駕比較。
寶騰 X50 保用 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
馬自達 CX-30 保用 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
兩款車嘅保用條件一樣，呢方面唔使糾結。實際保養成本仲要睇品牌嘅服務網絡同零件價格，建議去車友群問下真實車主嘅經驗。
總體嚟講，寶騰 X50 同馬自達 CX-30 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車款。揀邊架，關鍵仲係要睇你個人嘅需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去做試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
【CNMO科技消息】7 月 16 日，@數說新能源 發佈東南亞汽車市場觀察數據：中國品牌在東盟六國（印尼、馬來西亞、泰國、越南、菲律賓、新加坡）新能源市佔率超 60%。其中，印尼高達 91%。
中國新能源汽車
據統計，東盟六國上半年乘用車及皮卡累計銷量為 192.46 萬輛，同比提升 7.2%。具體到 6 月數據，乘用車及皮卡零售 33.27 萬輛，同比上升 9.7%。印尼（乘用車，本段後同）銷量為 74507 輛，同比上升 10.5%；馬來西亞銷量為 72943 輛，同比上升 23.1%；泰國銷量為 68912 輛，同比上升 11.2%；越南和菲律賓分別售出 51366 輛和 38124 輛，同比上升 6.4% 和 4.1%；新加坡是唯一一個銷量同比下降的國家，售出 6948 輛，下降 1.8%。
數據顯示，6 月各國新能源滲透率差異懸殊，新加坡以 66.4% 的滲透率排名第一，同比增長 19.2%；越南和泰國分別以 41%、30.3% 的滲透分列第二、第三，同比增長 94.7% 和 31%。印尼和馬來西亞滲透率雖不足 20%，但同比暴增 78% 和 122%。菲律賓因充電設施匱乏嚴重滯後，滲透率只有 2.1%。這些市場增量主要由中國新能源品牌貢獻。
在新能源領域中，中國品牌市佔率超 60%。其中，馬來西亞達 62%，泰國達 78%，印尼高達 91%。但在整體市場中，日系仍以 68% 領先。不過，中國品牌整體市佔率同比增加 6.2 百分點（達到 13.7%），在泰國已達 17.3%，超越日韓系成為第一大派系。
In Malaysia's SUV market, many buyers compare Perodua Aruz and Chery Tiggo 7 Pro when choosing a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning. Today we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
Perodua Aruz has an OTR price in Malaysia of RM 72,900 - 77,900, with a total of 2 versions, including 1.5L X (RM 72,900), 1.5L AV (RM 77,900), etc.
Chery Tiggo 7 Pro has an OTR price in Malaysia of RM 123,750 - 123,750, with a total of 2 versions, including 1.6L Turbo Standard (RM 125,000), 1.6L Turbo Premium (RM 140,000), etc.
From a price perspective, Perodua Aruz's starting price is indeed RM 50,850 cheaper than Chery Tiggo 7 Pro. If your budget is limited, Perodua's entry-level version is already sufficient for daily needs. But note that the cheaper few thousand might involve trade-offs in features, depending on your needs.
Perodua Aruz safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include.
Chery Tiggo 7 Pro safety rating is TBD, active safety systems include Basic.
Perodua Aruz body length is 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
Chery Tiggo 7 Pro body length is 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
The dimensions of both cars are almost the same, and the interior space difference is not significant. For cars in this class, daily use is completely sufficient.
Perodua Aruz and Chery Tiggo 7 Pro are both mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and second-hand value more, prioritize the one with better reputation; if you care more about cost-performance and features, choose the one with richer configuration. Ultimately, it is recommended to test drive both cars, personal experience is the most important.
All in all, Perodua Aruz and Chery Tiggo 7 Pro are both very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends mainly on your personal needs and budget. We suggest doing research, comparing quotes from multiple dealerships, and test driving before making the final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, taking time to do research will definitely not be wrong.
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拿 馬自達 CX-60 同 福特 Everest 嚟做比較。這兩款車喺價位同定位上都幾接近，而家我哋就從多個方面做一個詳細嘅比較，幫你省咗做功課嘅時間。
馬自達 CX-60 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 200,510 - 252,873，一共有 2 個版本，包括 2026 3.3T 4WD High Plus（RM 252,873）、2025 2.5L 2WD High（RM 200,510） 等等。
福特 Everest 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 266,338 - 430,838，一共有 6 個版本，包括 2026 3.0T 4WD Platinum（RM 430,838）、2026 2.0T 4WD Platinum（RM 348,838）、2026 2.0T 4WD Sport（RM 316,838） 等等。
由價錢嚟睇，馬自達 CX-60 嘅起步價確實比福特 Everest 平咗 RM 65,828。如果你預算有限，馬自達嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需求。但都要注意，平嘅嗰啲錢，可能喺配備上會有取舍，具體要看你嘅需求。
馬自達 CX-60 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
福特 Everest 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
兩款車嘅驅動方式一樣，都係 FWD，日常駕駛感受唔會有太大區別。
馬自達 CX-60 保修 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
福特 Everest 保修 3 年/100,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
馬自達 CX-60 同福特 Everest 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更重視品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰一款；如果你更介意性價比同配備，就揀配備更豐富嗰款。最終都係建議兩款都去試駕，親身體驗先係最重要。
總體嚟講，馬自達 CX-60 同福特 Everest 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵都要睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，先去試駕先做最終決定。買車係件大事，花啲時間做功課絕唔會錯。
喺馬來西亞嘅轎車市場，好多人喺揀車嗰陣都拎 Honda Civic 同 Toyota Corolla 嚟做比較。這兩款車喺價位同定位上都幾接近，而家我哋就从多個方面做一个詳細對比，幫你省咗做功課嘅時間。
Honda Civic 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 133,900 - 167,900，一共有 5 個版本，包括 2025 e:HEV 2.0L RS（RM 167,900）、2025 1.5T RS（RM 149,900）、2025 1.5T V（RM 144,900） 等。
Toyota Corolla 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 144,800 - 149,800，一共有 2 個版本，包括 2026 1.8L GR Sport（RM 149,800）、2026 1.8L G（RM 144,800） 等。
從價錢嚟睇，Honda Civic 嘅起步價確實比 Toyota Corolla 平咗 RM 10,900。如果你預算有限，Honda 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需求。但都要留意，平嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備上會有取捨，具體要看你嘅需求。
Honda Civic 搭載 1.5L Turbo，馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。
Toyota Corolla 搭載 1.5L Turbo，馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。
兩款車用嘅係同一套動力系統，日常開起嚟嘅感受基本冇分別。油耗方面都差唔多，唔使太糾結這一點。
Honda Civic 車身長 4450 mm，車尾箱 470 L。
Toyota Corolla 車身長 4400 mm，車尾箱 400 L。
空間方面，Honda Civic 嘅車身比 Toyota Corolla 長咗 50 mm，車內乘坐空間會稍微寬鬆啲，尤其係後座腿部空間。如果你經常載家人或者需要放嬰兒車，大少少嘅車身確實更實用。
Honda Civic 同 Toyota Corolla 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更睇重品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰一款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，就揀配置更豐富嗰款。最終都係建議兩款都去試駕，親身體驗先最重要。
總嘅嚟講，Honda Civic 同 Toyota Corolla 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵都要睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
喺馬來西亞嘅汽車市場，好多買家揀車嗰陣都會拿 MG MG HS 同 Hyundai Santa Fe 嚟做比較。今日我哋由多個角度做一個詳細比較，幫你省咗做功課嘅時間。
MG MG HS 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 130,450 - 146,450，一共有 2 個版本，包括 1.5L Standard（RM 105,000）、1.5L Executive（RM 115,000） 等。
Hyundai Santa Fe 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 225,000 - 270,000，一共有 3 個版本，包括 2025 2.5T DCT 4WD Calligraphy 6 Seats（RM 270,000）、2025 HEV 1.6T AT 2WD Prestige 7 Seats（RM 245,000）、2025 HEV 1.6T AT 2WD Prime 7 Seats（RM 225,000） 等。
由價錢睇落嚟，MG MG HS 嘅起步價確實比 Hyundai Santa Fe 平咗 RM 94,550。如果你預算有限，MG 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需要。但都要留意，平嗰幾千蚊，喺配備上可能會有所取捨，具體就要睇你嘅需要。
MG MG HS 搭載 1.5L Turbo，馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。
Hyundai Santa Fe 搭載 2.0L 4-cyl，馬力 170 hp。官方油耗 8.0 L/100km。
動力方面，Hyundai Santa Fe 嘅 2.0L 4-cyl 比 MG MG HS 嘅 1.5L Turbo 多咗 30 匹馬力。不過日常喺市區開嘅話，兩部車嘅動力都夠用，唔會覺得唔夠力。
MG MG HS 保修 7 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Hyundai Santa Fe 保修 5 年/300,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
MG MG HS 同 Hyundai Santa Fe 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更加看重品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰款；如果你更加在意性價比同配備，那就揀配置更豐富嗰款。最後都建議兩部車都去試駕，親身體驗先至係最重要嘅。
總嚟講，MG MG HS 同 Hyundai Santa Fe 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一部，關鍵仲係要睇你個人需要同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕先至做最後決定。買車係件大事，花啲時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
喺馬來西亞嘅汽車市場，好多買家喺揀車嗰陣都會拿 Hyundai Tucson 同 Mercedes-Benz GLA 做比較。今日我哋由多個方面做一個詳細嘅對比，幫你省返做功課嘅時間。
Hyundai Tucson 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 143,888 - 197,888，一共有 5 個版本，包括 2025 HEV 1.6T AT 2WD Prestige（RM 197,888）、2025 1.6T DCT 4WD Prestige（RM 186,888）、2025 1.6T DCT 2WD Prime（RM 164,888） 等。
Mercedes-Benz GLA 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 258,888 - 295,888，一共有 1 個版本，包括 Standard（RM 258,888） 等。
從價錢嚟睇，Hyundai Tucson 嘅起步價的確比 Mercedes-Benz GLA 平咗 RM 115,000。如果你預算有限，Hyundai 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需要。但都要注意，平嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備上會有取捨，具體要睇你嘅需要。
Hyundai Tucson 車身長 4400 mm，尾箱 400 L。
Mercedes-Benz GLA 車身長 4400 mm，尾箱 400 L。
兩款車嘅尺寸幾乎一樣，車內空間差別唔大。呢個級別嘅車，日常使用完全夠用。
Hyundai Tucson 保養 5 年/300,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Mercedes-Benz GLA 保養 3 年/100,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Hyundai Tucson 同 Mercedes-Benz GLA 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更重視品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰一款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，就揀配置更豐富嗰款。最終仲係建議兩款都去試駕，親自體驗先係最重要嘅。
總括嚟講，Hyundai Tucson 同 Mercedes-Benz GLA 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一部，關鍵仲係睇你嘅個人需要同預算。我哋建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
車型概覽
奇瑞瑞虎8 值唔值得睇，第一步唔係望牌子或者外形，而係睇佢能唔能夠配合你嘅香港日常。 呢篇會集中講家庭乘坐、行李同舒適度，幫你用買家角度篩走唔適合嘅選擇。
售價仍待確認，買家可以先把佢放入候選名單，等價格落實後再同同級車逐項比較。
購車價格指南
奇瑞瑞虎8 目前售價仍未清晰，較理性嘅做法係先睇版本、車身大小同動力形式，等價格落實後再決定值唔值得落訂。
如果有幾個版本可揀，可以先將 2025 1.5T 手動版（價格待確認）、2025 1.5T 雙離合版（價格待確認） 放喺同一張清單。日常通勤重視舒適同易用，家庭買家就要優先睇後排、尾箱同安全配置。
核心規格重點
睇 奇瑞瑞虎8 嘅規格，重點唔係背數字，而係理解佢喺香港用車場景會帶嚟咩分別。
渦輪增壓、4 個 汽缸、1498 mL 排量 嘅動力底子，重點係市區跟車夠唔夠順、高速巡航會唔會吃力。 156 Ps / 115 kW、230 N·m 嘅輸出，對滿載、上斜同超車都比單睇馬力數字更有意思。 車長 4722 mm、車闊 1860 mm、車高 1745 mm、軸距 2710 mm 可以幫你預判商場停車場、屋苑車位同後排腿部空間。 手動(MT) / 濕式雙離合(DCT)、前置前駆 會影響起步順滑度、濕地穩定感同長途巡航性格。
優缺點分析
奇瑞瑞虎8 嘅優點唔需要講到天花龍鳳，真正有價值係佢能唔能夠令日常用車更省心：動力輸出對高速同上斜更有底氣、空間同車身尺寸方便家庭買家預判實用性。
要留意嘅係，香港停車場同窄路使用要留意車身闊度、售價未清晰前唔應該太早用性價比落結論。呢啲唔一定係缺點，但係落訂前應該先諗清楚。
買家常見問題
買 奇瑞瑞虎8 之前，真正要問嘅唔係單一規格，而係佢可唔可以融入你每日嘅生活節奏。
常見疑問係「奇瑞瑞虎 8 的座椅布局同空間表現係點樣？」簡單講，奇瑞瑞虎 8 為 7 座中型 SUV，三排空間實用，載人載物都舒適。 放到實際用車，就係要睇佢對通勤、泊車、家庭乘坐同長期成本有幾大幫助。
同級對比內容
將 奇瑞瑞虎8 放入同級車清單時，唔建議只用外形或者品牌光環決定。比較順序可以係：先等售價落實，再決定佢應該同邊個級距比較、再睇動力係咪足夠應付高速併線同滿載、最後睇車身大小、座位同尾箱是否適合家人。
咁樣篩選會貼近香港買家真實生活：平日塞車、商場泊車、周末去新界、甚至一家人出入，先係一部車每日要面對嘅考驗。
用車全周期指南
擁有 奇瑞瑞虎8 唔係買車一刻就完結，之後仲有保險、輪胎、保養、泊車同日常能源成本要處理。
如果你主要喺市區行，視野、低速順滑度同泊車輔助會好影響心情；如果經常行高速或跨區，座椅舒適度、隔音同動力從容感會更重要。
車型概覽
奧迪 RS 6 值唔值幾錢買，關鍵唔係佢睇落幾吸引，而係佢啱唔啱解決你嘅真實用車需要。呢篇文章會把重點放喺佢同同級車相比嘅生活適用度。
版本方面，奧迪 RS 6 目前可圍繞二零二五 Avant quattro 嚟比較。
購車價格指南
評估奧迪 RS 6 嘅購車預算時，建議先由版本定位同後續擁車成本下手。價格唔係唯一重點，真正決定係唔係抵嘅係每日會唔會用到嗰些配備。
如果你在幾個版本之間猶豫，可以把二零二五 Avant quattro 放喺同一張清單入面比較。日常通勤買家優先睇舒適同安全，經常跑高速嘅買家則更應重視動力、輔助駕駛同車廂便利。
核心參數總匯
睇奧迪 RS 6 嘅核心規格，最重要係把數字翻譯成生活入面嘅感受。
奧迪 RS 6 嘅核心價值應回到日常場景判斷：你要佢負責通勤、家庭出行、長途，定係作為更有個性嘅選擇。
優缺點分析
奧迪 RS 6 嘅優點唔使誇張，真正有價值嘅係佢啱唔啱令日常使用更省心：車型定位清晰，適合先作為同級比較對象。
需要留意嘅係，最終取舍會落喺版本配備、保險同長期保養成本。呢啲唔係扣分項，而係落訂之前應該先諗清楚嘅生活細節。
購車常見問題解答
購買奧迪 RS 6 前，買家最常問嘅唔係單一規格，而係佢啱唔啱融入你嘅生活。
呢輛車適合邊個？適合把佢同同級車相比嘅生活適用度放喺首位嘅買家。 家庭用戶要看咩？優先睇後排乘坐、兒童座椅、行李同日常上落車係唔係順手。 每日開會不會麻煩？如果能源成本、泊車便利同版本配備都啱你嘅生活節奏，佢會比較容易相處。
競爭對手對比內容
把奧迪 RS 6 放進同級車名單時，唔建議只看品牌或外形。真正有用嘅比較順序係：先由版本定位、品牌售後同日常用途開始比較。
這樣篩選出嚟嘅結果更貼近日常生活。你會更清楚佢係適合城市通勤、家庭代步、長途巡航，定係更適合作為一輛講求個性嘅選擇。
用車全週期指南
擁有奧迪 RS 6 嘅重點，係確認保險、路稅、保養同輪胎成本都喺可接受範圍內。買車唔係一次過付款結束，而係每日都要相處。
如果你常跑南北大道，動力同車廂舒適度會比純粹平嘅價更重要；如果主要喺市區，泊車靈活性、視野同低速順滑度會更影響心情。
車型概覽
比亞迪e9 值唔值得睇，第一步唔係望牌子或者外形，而係睇佢能唔能夠配合你嘅香港日常。 呢篇會集中講高速巡航、併線同超車信心，幫你用買家角度篩走唔適合嘅選擇。
售價仍待確認，買家可以先把佢放入候選名單，等價格落實後再同同級車逐項比較。
購車價格指南
比亞迪e9 目前售價仍未清晰，較理性嘅做法係先睇版本、車身大小同動力形式，等價格落實後再決定值唔值得落訂。
如果有幾個版本可揀，可以先將 2022 506km 前驅版（價格待確認） 放喺同一張清單。日常通勤重視舒適同易用，家庭買家就要優先睇後排、尾箱同安全配置。
核心規格重點
睇 比亞迪e9 嘅規格，重點唔係背數字，而係理解佢喺香港用車場景會帶嚟咩分別。
63.36 kWh 嘅電池容量，真正意義係可以幫你估算一星期通勤同周末出車要唔要中途補電。 120 kW、330 N·m 嘅輸出，令高速併線同短距離超車更有信心。 車長 4980 mm、車闊 1940 mm、車高 1495 mm、軸距 2920 mm 可以幫你預判商場停車場、屋苑車位同後排腿部空間。 固定齒比、前置前駆 會影響起步順滑度、濕地穩定感同長途巡航性格。
優缺點分析
比亞迪e9 嘅優點唔需要講到天花龍鳳，真正有價值係佢能唔能夠令日常用車更省心：電池同續航資訊有助安排通勤同補電、動力輸出對高速同上斜更有底氣、空間同車身尺寸方便家庭買家預判實用性。
要留意嘅係，要先確認屋苑、公司或常去商場嘅充電條件、香港停車場同窄路使用要留意車身闊度。呢啲唔一定係缺點，但係落訂前應該先諗清楚。
買家常見問題
買 比亞迪e9 之前，真正要問嘅唔係單一規格，而係佢可唔可以融入你每日嘅生活節奏。
常見疑問係「比亞迪 e9 係唔係純電動車？」簡單講，係呀，比亞迪 e9 係一款專為網約車同商務市場設計嘅純電動轎車。 放到實際用車，就係要睇佢對通勤、泊車、家庭乘坐同長期成本有幾大幫助。
同級對比內容
將 比亞迪e9 放入同級車清單時，唔建議只用外形或者品牌光環決定。比較順序可以係：先等售價落實，再決定佢應該同邊個級距比較、再睇動力係咪足夠應付高速併線同滿載、再比較能源成本同補能便利、最後睇車身大小、座位同尾箱是否適合家人。
咁樣篩選會貼近香港買家真實生活：平日塞車、商場泊車、周末去新界、甚至一家人出入，先係一部車每日要面對嘅考驗。
用車全周期指南
擁有 比亞迪e9 最重要係先諗清楚充電節奏。屋苑、公司或者常去商場只要有穩定充電選項，電動化用車就會容易相處好多。
如果你主要喺市區行，視野、低速順滑度同泊車輔助會好影響心情；如果經常行高速或跨區，座椅舒適度、隔音同動力從容感會更重要。
In May, China's automotive market overall presented a gentle recovery trend, with domestic brands still being the sales backbone of the market. Recently, BYD, Geely, Chery, Changan, and Great Wall, the top 5 domestic automakers, successively released their monthly performance reports. From the data, these five companies show a general characteristic of "stable total growth, divergence between domestic and international markets, and accelerated new energy penetration". Overseas exports and new energy vehicles have become the most core growth engines; export business has evolved from a "bonus item" to the "core foundation" for some companies. BYD's "dominant leader" status is further consolidated, Chery achieved high growth via exports, Geely's new energy penetration rate broke 56%, Changan focused steadily on balanced development, while Great Wall appeared slightly under pressure during structural transformation.
BYD: Export Hits New High Becomes Biggest HighlightIn May, BYD stood firmly at the top of domestic brands with a monthly sales volume of 383,500 vehicles, maintaining positive growth both year-on-year and month-over-month under a large base. Its two main brands, Dynasty and Ocean, sold a combined 330,200 vehicles, contributing 86.1% of total sales; Fangchengbao's monthly sales broke 30,000 units to reach 30,200, a year-on-year increase of 139.7%, setting a new high for the year; Denza sold 16,300 vehicles, and Yangwang delivered 286 vehicles. From a model perspective, BYD had eight models in May with monthly sales exceeding 20,000 vehicles. The Song Family and Yuan Family both broke 50,000 units, selling 51,370 and 56,691 vehicles respectively. The Sea Lion Family followed closely with 42,615 vehicles, and Seagull sales were also close to 40,000 vehicles.
BYD's biggest highlight in May was exports. Overseas new energy vehicle sales reached 160,600 units, an 80.4% year-on-year increase, accounting for about 42%. The sharp expansion of export scale effectively countered the phased weakness in domestic demand. Cumulative exports from January to May exceeded 620,000 vehicles. High export growth mainly benefited from continued ramping up of overseas factory capacity, improved ocean shipping capacity, and accelerated channel network expansion. In the domestic market, BYD promoted Megawatt Super Charging and intelligent strategies simultaneously—Megawatt charging achieved about 90% charge in 9 minutes; 20,000 super charging stations are planned to be built by 2026; all series models are available with Sky Eye B intelligent driving solutions and city navigation safety fallback plans, accelerating the popularization of high-level intelligent driving. As Gen 2 Blade Battery capacity gradually releases, the company's orders are expected to continue rising.
Chery: Sales Growth Leads the Top 5Chery Group's total sales volume in May was 247,800 vehicles, a significant year-on-year increase of 20.5%, ranking first in growth speed among the top 5. Exports remained its most core growth engine—May exports reached 181,900 vehicles, an 80.5% year-on-year increase, accounting for 73.4% of total sales that month, continuously breaking the single-month export record for Chinese brands for three months. In terms of new energy, Chery New Energy sold 100,300 vehicles, a 58.8% year-on-year increase. April and May consecutively saw monthly new energy sales breaking 100,000 vehicles.
The strong performance in exports benefited from Chery's long-term deep cultivation of overseas channel advantages and localized operation capabilities. While overseas orders continued to rise, high export growth formed a sharp contrast with domestic sales—Chery's domestic sales in May were only 60,000 vehicles, accounting for one-quarter of total sales. From cumulative data, Chery Group accumulated 1.101 million sales from January to May, but against the annual goal of 3.2 million vehicles, monthly averages need to reach about 420,000 vehicles later, and pressure remains significant.
Geely: New Energy Penetration Rate Breaks 56%Geely Auto's total sales volume in May was 237,600 vehicles, a 1% year-on-year increase, achieving month-over-month double growth for three consecutive months. In terms of structure, Geely's "New Four Transformations" transformation showed significant results: new energy vehicle sales reached 133,400 units, accounting for 56% of total sales, with new energy share exceeding 50% for four consecutive months.
From sub-brands, performance was significantly divergent. Zeekr brand sales in May reached 34,400 vehicles, a 82% year-on-year increase; Zeekr 9 Series and 8 Series models combined sales approached 50% of total sales, showing bright performance in the high-end market; Galaxy brand sales were 81,700 vehicles; Geely brand sales were 182,500 vehicles, among which China Star Series sales reached 100,800 vehicles; Lynk & Co brand sales were 20,700 vehicles, with new energy vehicle sales share rising to 71%.
In terms of exports, Geely's overseas vehicle exports in May reached 85,100 vehicles, a explosive 184% year-on-year increase, setting a brand single-month export record high. Among exported products, new energy vehicles reached 40,800 units, accounting for nearly half; hybrid and pure electric products have successively landed in Southeast Asia, Middle East, Latin America, and other markets, highlighting the results of global strategy implementation.
Changan: Multi-brand Matrix Balanced EffortChangan Auto's delivery volume in May was 209,100 vehicles, among which new energy deliveries were 92,400 vehicles, a 5.8% year-on-year increase, with new energy share about 44%. In terms of exports, overseas deliveries reached 70,700 vehicles, a 38% year-on-year increase, becoming another major growth highlight for Changan in May.
In the sub-brand matrix, Changan Qiyuan delivered 34,500 vehicles in May; All-New Q05 delivered 15,800 units, with orders breaking 3,000 units within three days of listing in Thailand; Deepal sales in May were 33,200 vehicles, a 30% year-on-year increase; January to May overseas cumulative sales were 28,700 vehicles, a significant 167% year-on-year increase; Avatr delivered 7,336 vehicles in May; Changan Auto (Gravity) delivered nearly 49,000 vehicles in May.
Changan Auto's balanced layout was fully reflected in May: the fuel car base remained stable, new energy brands Deepal and Qiyuan accelerated volume growth, high-end brand Avatr continued to break through in technical cooperation, and overseas markets simultaneously achieved breakthrough growth. The pattern of five brands working together, driven by both new energy and exports, is initially taking shape.
Great Wall: Overseas Sales Growth Year-on-Year 46.75%Great Wall Motor's sales in May were 100,400 vehicles, slightly down compared to last May's 102,200 vehicles, making it the only company among the top 5 to show a year-on-year negative growth. From sub-brands, Haval brand sales in May were 55,500 vehicles, remaining Great Wall's most important sales pillar; Tank brand sales were 17,100 vehicles; both Haval and Tank brand sales showed year-on-year declines; Wey brand sold 8,119 vehicles, a 31.78% year-on-year increase, achieving growth against the trend; Ora brand performance was most stunning, with sales of 6,018 vehicles, a significant 206.88% year-on-year increase. In terms of new energy, Great Wall sold 30,400 new energy vehicles in May, with new energy vehicle transformation gradually accelerating.
The overseas market became Great Wall's biggest highlight in May, with overseas sales growing 46.75% year-on-year. Against the background of pressure on the domestic market, strong growth in overseas business effectively made up for the decline in the domestic market. Great Wall Motor's current core contradiction lies in: Haval and Tank, the two traditional main-selling brands, face weak growth, while Wey and Ora brands, although growing notably, have relatively small volume and are not yet enough to support overall growth. How to complete the "relay" between old and new brands is the key issue Great Wall must solve subsequently.
Final ThoughtsFrom May data, the growth pattern of the top 5 domestic brands has clearly diverged, but there are three common trends worth noting: First, exports have become a key engine for domestic brands to seek stability and growth. Second, new energy transformation is still accelerating, but paths differ among enterprises. Third, technological innovation continues to deepen brand moats. Looking ahead to the second half of the year, competition in the automotive industry will continue to upgrade around these three trends. Although everyone has a common direction, these three trends are all competing for the entire enterprise's industrial chain strength, and the strong will remain strong, which has almost become an inevitable outcome.
唔知有幾多朋友最近期關注 10 萬內純電 SUV 市場？近段時間睇嚟，呢個細分市場好熱鬧。就講長安啟源全新 Q05 同零跑 A10，上個月銷量分別達 15814 輛同 14372 輛，全部挺進 2026 年 4 月銷量排行全品類前 10，長安啟源全新 Q05 甚至奪得緊緊湊型純電 SUV 市場嘅銷冠。
（長安啟源全新 Q05）
值得留意係，兩款大熱門產品亮點亦唔少，9 萬級可以得到 500km+嘅續航，零跑 A10 甚至配備激光雷達，有高級智駕輔助需求嘅朋友嚟講，呢架車吸引力的確唔低。但係喺價格上，同為高配嘅長安啟源全新 Q05 506Max+ 同零跑 A10 505 激光雷達版，終端價格分別係 9.59 萬同 8.68 萬，手握 9 萬左右預算嘅朋友都可以考慮。明顯係，又去到決賽圈二揀一環節。
（零跑 A10）
如果對預算比較敏感，咁喺長安啟源全新 Q05 同零跑 A10 之間，後者可能更受歡迎，畢竟終端價格實打實平咗幾千元。而且，高配 A10 配有激光雷達，市區/高速情況均能啟動領航輔助駕駛，呢個就係佢嘅優勢所在。當然，如果預算允許，揀長安啟源全新 Q05 高配，都有帶激光雷達嘅高級輔助駕駛。
（長安啟源全新 Q05）
但既然係買車前嘅橫評，唔少全方位對比。首先從尺寸睇，作為緊湊型 SUV，長安啟源全新 Q05 長寬高分別係 4435*1855*1595mm，軸距為 2735mm。而零跑 A10 車型級別就係小型 SUV，長寬高分別係 4270*1810*1635mm，軸距為 2605mm。
（零跑 A10）
如果只係考慮代步、通勤，零跑 A10 嘅細個嘅略有優勢，方便行街串巷。但實際上，好多人買車都要兼顧家用，10 萬內預算也多以剛需用車群體為主。既然係剛需，且有家用需求，嗰空間自然唔好掉鏈子。
（長安啟源全新 Q05）
（零跑 A10）
講返日常家庭出行嚟講，兩車之間 130mm 軸距差異，直接反映喺後排體驗。坐入長安啟源全新 Q05 後排，腿部空間平整兼寬敞，一齊坐 3 位成年人都唔會太擠；但係坐入零跑 A10 後排，無論坐寬定係腿部空間都會細少少。媽咪喺後排照顧孩子，長安啟源全新 Q05 後排更加寬敞嘅空間會更加方便佢操作，孩子都能有更大嘅活動空間。
（長安啟源全新 Q05）
（零跑 A10）
除咗空間，通勤黨同家庭用戶對舒適配置都比較關注。睇嚟對比，兩車都有配電動尾門、無匙進入、自適應遠近光等外部配置。但係從車廂內睇，零跑 A10 副駕無法電動調節，後排靠背都唔支援角度調節，同埋缺少後排空調出風口、車內 PM2.5 過濾裝置等。
（長安啟源全新 Q05）
（零跑 A10）
反觀長安啟源全新 Q05，除咗副駕支持電動調節，前排仲集成咗加熱/通風/按摩/副駕腿托功能，對比零跑 A10 只提供前排座椅加熱，佢嘅品質無疑更上一層樓。包括後排乘員都有少少照顧，例如靠背角度可調、配有後排空調出風口、後排中央扶手/杯架等，更加適合家人同行呢類場景。
（長安啟源全新 Q05）
（零跑 A10）
除咗舒享體驗，行駛系統嘅對比我哋都唔好忽略。首先從大家關注嘅續航睇，長安啟源全新 Q05 同零跑 A10 分別搭載 51.9kWh、53kWh 電池，CLTC 純電續航做到 506km、505km，差異大可忽略。但從電芯供應鏈睇，前者出自寧德時代，後者就係國軒高科/江蘇正力，若論品牌含金量，“寧王”順位自然靠前，更值得信賴。另外，兩車都有全球品質，按照全球嚴苛嘅標準打造，零跑 A10 符合國內、歐盟雙標準，長安啟源全新 Q05 已經喺泰國上市，未來仲會相繼落地多個國家地區，最終開拓歐洲區域，此外仲有央企背書，質量品質都好可靠。
因為本文討論嘅係 A10 嘅 505 版本，採用電池液冷技術，溫控較好，而如果係 403 版本，採用成本低嘅風冷技術，散熱效果較差。呢點上，全新 Q05 做得更好，入門就採用電池直冷技術，高配用嘅係液冷技術，能更好地實現熱管理，保證電池安全。
（長安啟源全新 Q05）
（零跑 A10）
動力方面，長安啟源全新 Q05 同零跑 A10 都係前置單電機佈局，電機最大動力輸出分別係 120kW/190N·m、90kW/150N·m，0-100km/h 加速時間分別做到 8.9 秒同 10.6 秒。坦率嚟講，兩款車喺純電陣營加速性能都中規中矩；但係相對嚟講，長安啟源全新 Q05 嘅 8 秒級零百加速，喺山路行駛、高速超車等情況下會比零跑 A10 更加分。
（長安啟源全新 Q05）
（零跑 A10）
總結嚟講，零跑 A10 505 激光雷達版優勢突出：價格更低、智駕輔助覆蓋範圍更廣，適合預算優先 + 科技嘗鮮嘅消費者。而長安啟源全新 Q05 更強調“全面”二字：加少少預算同樣可以獲得高級輔助駕駛，而且尺寸更大、舒適配置更高、採用頭部電芯供應鏈，動力亦更強，綜合表現更全能。總括嚟講，預算 9 萬級追求面面俱到嘅家用體驗，長安啟源全新 Q05 506Max+ 更加值得考慮。
